Gary Bell QC Crime. Silk: 2012 Year of Call: 1989
|
|
- Melvyn Lamb
- 5 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 Gary Bell QC Crime Silk: 2012 Year of Call: 1989 Clerks Senior Practice Manager Andrew Trotter Chief Executive & Director of Clerking Tony McDaid Contact a Clerk Tel: +44 (0) Fax: +44 (0) crime@no5.com Gary Bell is a natural jury advocate. Whilst at University he was the English Universities debating champion and won many national and international debating competitions. As a result of this success he was selected for the prestigious English Speaking Union debating tour of the USA and spent three months visiting 35 universities in 30 different states. Whilst in Los Angeles he was head hunted by a leading commercial law firm and spent a year with them between 1988 and 1989 in the business litigation department. He then returned to England and was called to the bar. Anxious to be a trial advocate he chose a career as a criminal barrister but with his commercial background he soon carved out a niche as a specialist fraud practitioner. He became a QC in 2012 and is instructed by solicitors from all over the country in the most complex and serious fraud cases. He also acts for defendants in major drugs conspiracies and other multi-handed crimes, particularly with a financial element. His practice is 100% defence. Many of his cases involve over 100,000 pages of evidence, millions of pounds of losses and are listed to last several months. They require exhaustive preparation, attention to detail, working as part of a team and courtroom advocacy. In view of their size and complexity Gary Bell generally only does three to four cases a year. He is acknowledged as an expert in financial crime and the Proceeds of Crime Act and regularly gives training seminars on the law relating to all aspects of fraud to other barristers, solicitors and judges. He recently lectured Chinese government officials on the implications of the Bribery Act. He is consulted on aspects of criminal law facing their clients by commercial silks and magic circle commercial firms. Clients of magic circle firms facing criminal fraud charges are often referred to Gary Bell by them. He also appears in contested matters before the tax tribunal. He is often consulted by major financial institutions on the implications of the Bribery Act and Deferred Prosecution Agreements. He is currently advising a Nigerian Company involved in the Oil and Gas Industry and their proposed partner, a Korean Manufacturer, on international contract law and compliance with bribery and corruption legislation which will satisfy the 82 major international companies they are seeking to do business with in Nigeria.
2 He accepts direct access instructions. In the light of recent proposed changes in relation to legally aided cases Gary Bell regrets that he will, as a general rule, no longer accept legally aided instructions. However, he will still accept legally aided cases in exceptional circumstances on a case by case basis. He will always give honest and robust advice to the lay client about the strength of the case against them, and if a client wants to explore a potential guilty plea he will negotiate with the prosecution to secure the most favourable basis of plea possible. He is happiest, however, in the trial arena. If the client wants a trial Gary Bell will give the client a trial. RECENT CASES R v N (2013) N was tried along with six other defendants on a conspiracy to launder ten million pounds and send it to China. She had opened up two bank accounts and a foreign exchange account through which over two million pounds was laundered. After a six week trial she was found not guilty by the jury. Five of the other six defendants were convicted. R v K (2013) Acted for the first defendant of 6 who had pleaded guilty in the face of overwhelming evidence to masterminding a tax fraud running to over seven million pounds. The prosecution claimed as part of the confiscation proceedings that he had hidden the money and it should be confiscated as a hidden asset. The confiscation proceedings were extremely complicated and took over three years to litigate. The sticking point between prosecution and defence was the whereabouts of three quarters of a million pounds which had been withdrawn from banks in cash and disappeared thus becoming a hidden asset of K. At the confiscation proceedings it was shown that K had accounted for his income and expenditure and the court concluded that K had no hidden assets. The prosecution attempted to confiscate seven million pounds. The final order was 300,000. R v F (2012) F, the first defendant, had pleaded guilty to a conspiracy to defraud financial institutions of a huge amount of money through his company. He had made full admissions in interview. His personal benefit was found to be a hundred and thirty million pounds. The confiscation proceedings were fully contested and included issues as to the status of his wife s inheritance and preferential shares to the value of millions of pounds redeemed by his brothers on F s authority after he knew that his company was trading insolvent. On both contested issues in the confiscation proceedings F was successful and the result was an order against the defendant of only a hundred and fifty thousand pounds. R v W (2012) W was alleged to have been involved in a conspiracy to commit mortgage fraud with eighteen co-defendants and a total value of several million pounds. She was also charged with perverting the course of justice. There was overwhelming evidence that she was guilty of perverting the course of justice and a guilty plea to that count was negotiated on a very limited basis and on condition that the mortgage fraud conspiracy would be dropped against her and there would be no confiscation proceedings against her and no application for costs. For the perverting the course of justice count she received a non-custodial sentence. R v Y (2012) Acted for a defendant charged with being involved in a large scale conspiracy to defraud investors in internet companies with five other defendants. It was submitted that there was no evidence of dishonesty against Y. These submissions were successful and not guilty verdicts were entered.
3 R v T (2011) - Acted for a solicitor charged with a five million pound intellectual property fraud. T was alleged to have fraudulently set up shadow companies to transfer millions of pounds worth of assets belonging to an Australian businessman who was ignorant of the transfers. The Australian businessman was the prosecution s main witness. Served alongside the case papers were disks served as unused material and which contained tens of thousands of pages of material. After a thorough analysis of the unused material none of which had been read by the prosecution, Gary Bell drafted a skeleton argument which, with attached exhibits, ran to over a hundred pages. In the skeleton it was alleged that the exhibits proved the Australian businessman knew full well about the transfers and had sanctioned them. It was therefore submitted that it would be an abuse of process to rely on his evidence. The prosecution agreed with the submission shortly after they received it and offered no evidence against T. Not guilty verdicts were then returned. R v D (2011) D was a financial broker charged with masterminding and financing a conspiracy to commit mortgage fraud to the value of several million pounds. The case included a large number of buyers and sellers of property, but none of the large number of solicitors who had sanctioned and used the scheme had been charged. A legal submission was made that it would be an abuse of process to try D without also charging and putting on trial a large number of solicitors. The prosecution were ordered by the judge to draft a response justifying their approach and setting out in detail what their case was against D. They failed to lodge a response and not guilty verdicts were entered for D. R v T (2011) T was charged with conspiracy to launder a large amount of money which was alleged to have been the proceeds of drug trafficking. An extremely limited basis of plea was negotiated in relation to only a small amount of money which resulted in her not going to prison and facing no confiscation proceedings nor any application for costs. R v M (2011) - M was convicted after a trial, along with all of the other defendants, of being involved in a multi-million pound mortgage fraud. At the confiscation proceedings the benefit figure for M was over 3 million and M had precious few assets other than the mortgage free family home. It was submitted that it would be unjust to confiscate the home as it was a mortgage free asset his wife had brought to the marriage. This submission was accepted by the prosecution and M and his wife were able to keep their home. R v B (2010) - B was caught with 14 kilograms of heroin and pleaded guilty on the basis he was a courier, being paid a few hundred pounds for delivering it. He pleaded guilty on that basis and received a sentence of four years imprisonment. The prosecution appealed this as unduly lenient but lost the appeal. At the confiscation proceedings the prosecution alleged the benefit figure was over a million pounds (ie: the value of the heroin) and that as the defendant owned a large property portfolio that should be confiscated as realisable assets. Gary Bell argued that the benefit figure should be limited to the few hundred pounds B had been paid as a courier and not the full, one million pound plus, value of the heroin. This was accepted by the judge after full argument and an order for confiscation in relation to the 14 kilograms of heroin was made in the sum of 200. The prosecution appealed this decision but the Court of Appeal rejected their appeal. R v P (2010) - A multi-million pound boiler room fraud involving over 100,000 pages of evidence and five defendants. Shortly before the trial the defendant absconded and was tried in his absence. P was alleged to have run a boiler room in Spain selling worthless shares to hapless investors for millions of pounds. Two other defendants in the trial were also alleged to have run boiler rooms in Spain. After a three month trial the other two defendants were convicted by the jury but P was found not guilty.
4 R v H (2010) A client charged as part of a large scale conspiracy to defraud the revenue. He was acquitted after a legal submission. He also stood trial with four other defendants for a related attempted murder. The other four defendants were found guilty by the jury but H was acquitted after an 8 week trial. R v B (2009) B was charged with being involved a large multi-handed mortgage fraud. After submissions made to the prosecution they offered no evidence and a not guilty verdict was returned. R v W (2009) W was charged as being involved as part of a conspiracy to commit a Ponzi fraud, defrauding investors of a total of twenty six million pounds by marketing a scheme to turn rock into gold. There was compelling evidence of his guilt and he was advised to plead guilty. An extremely limited basis of plea was negotiated with the prosecution based upon W only knowing that the investment scheme was fraudulent very late in the day. Other defendants had a trial and were convicted by the jury. W was the only defendant of eight to receive a non-custodial sentence. His confiscation proceedings were limited to thirty thousand pounds. R v K (2009) - Acted for the first defendant of two in an 11 million MTIC fraud at the Southwark Crown Court. The case was prepared for trial but the co-defendant then pleaded guilty and gave a statement in preparation for giving Queen's evidence against K. A guilty plea by K was then negotiated on an extremely limited basis which included no costs and no confiscation proceedings, in spite of the fact he had the stolen 11 million sitting in his bank account and a mortgage free house worth 3 million. R v C (2008) A large scale drugs conspiracy where C was the first defendant of 11 alleged to have been involved in the wholesale supply of heroin across the country. C was the main focus of the six month investigation where two undercover police officers lived as a pretend man and wife in C s community. The operation resulted in twenty eight arrests. Most of the defendants pleaded guilty in the face of overwhelming evidence but six of them stood trial. After a three month trial the jury convicted all of the defendants but couldn t agree on a verdict for C. He was tried again on his own and, after a two month trial, acquitted unanimously by the jury. R v A (2008) - A major long firm fraud involving seven defendants accused of receiving millions of pounds from hapless suppliers. The case was listed for trial but on the day of trial six defendants pleaded guilty, leaving A to stand trial alone. A submission of no case to answer was made and acceded to by the prosecution and A was found not guilty. R v T (2008) An accountant alleged to be part of a conspiracy with six other defendants to commit tax fraud. T s role was the alleged preparation and submission of fraudulent accounts for a firm of solicitors. T was acquitted after legal submission that not to charge a seventh co-defendant amounted to an abuse of process. R v G (2008) A car trader accused of being involved in an importation tax fraud conspiracy with ten other defendants by importing cars for pretended supply to disabled customers (which are VAT free) and thus defrauding the revenue of millions of pounds. Amongst the large amount of unused material served were documents which showed that other parties to the conspiracy had been granted immunity from prosecution in return for COP 9 admissions and repayment of the tax owed. It was submitted that, in the circumstances, it was an abuse of process to try G. This submission was accepted by the prosecution and no evidence was offered against G.
5 R v K (2007) K was charged with a conspiracy to defraud the revenue of over a million pounds through a VAT carousel fraud via Poland. Disclosure requests were made asking for material the prosecution were unwilling to disclose. An application for the material was listed before the court and, rather than disclose the material, the prosecution offered no evidence against K. R v N (2007) N was the first of eleven defendants facing a conspiracy to dump millions of items of mail, having been paid to deliver them. She was also charged with bribing a co-defendant to take the blame. She was advised to plead guilty on ma limited basis, involving no admission that she dumped mail or bribed the co-defendant, and received a short prison sentence. As part of the plea bargain it was agreed that there would be no confiscation proceedings and no costs would be applied for. R v M (2007) M was found to have benefitted from fraud to the tune of six million three hundred thousand pounds. He faced confiscation proceedings where the prosecution alleged he had hidden the entire amount. Gary Bell was brought in at that stage to deal with the confiscation proceedings. After a complicated audit which took two years to complete every penny was accounted for and no order was made against the defendant for any of the aforementioned sum of money. R v S (2006) S had pleaded guilty to an international conspiracy to defraud suppliers of sham companies he had set up. The losses ran into millions of pounds. The evidence of his involvement was unanswerable but a very limited basis of plea was negotiated with the prosecution. In the confiscation proceedings the prosecution claimed a benefit figure and realisable asset figure of millions of pounds. After a contested confiscation hearing his realisable assets were found to be one hundred pounds. Of the 24 cases listed above 14 were contested by the defendants. Thirteen of these defendants were found not guilty, one was found guilty. Of the remaining ten cases nine of the sentences were dealt with by Gary Bell. Three defendants received non-custodial sentences and the rest received prison sentences with credit given by the judge for the guilty pleas and favourable bases negotiated on their behalves by Gary Bell. In all nine of those cases either all of the defendants pleaded guilty or some others had a trial and were found guilty by the jury. Eleven defendants faced confiscation proceedings. No order was made against five of those defendants and in relation to the other six all confiscation issues which were disputed were won by the defendants. One of these six received an order of a hundred pounds; two were allowed to keep their family homes; one was found to have no hidden assets and the remaining two won their confiscation proceedings where new law was made. Gary Bell is happy to have a preliminary conversation with any prospective client with a view to seeing if they would be happy working together.
He also acts in murder and other cases of serious crime and is instructed in regulatory matters, for example on behalf of the Football Association.
Andrew Radcliffe QC "A Rolls Royce performer whose judgment is excellent" Chambers UK 2017 Year of Call: 1975 QC: 2000 020 7353 5324 Andrew Radcliffe QC is a white collar crime fraud specialist, who continues
More informationSERIOUS FRAUD, CONFISCATION FINANCIAL OFFENCES. A Guide to Our Services & REGULATORY INVESTIGATIONS
FINANCIAL OFFENCES & REGULATORY SERIOUS FRAUD, CONFISCATION & REGULATORY A Guide to Our Services Page 1 Serious Fraud: Our Experience Birds Solicitors has a wealth of experience in representing individuals
More informationCalled Contact Senior Clerk - John Pyne Telephone Fax
Called 2005 Email jamiesharma@187fleetstreet.com Contact Senior Clerk - John Pyne Telephone 0207 430 7423 Fax 0207 430 7431 Jamie Sharma Profile Jamie is a specialist lawyer in business crime and civil
More informationJames Nicholls Consultant Solicitor
James Nicholls Consultant Solicitor j.nicholls@birds.eu.com +44 (0)20 8874 7433 Practice & Background James qualified as a solicitor in 1996. He qualified at Edward Fail, Bradshaw & Waterson in East London
More informationMember of the Fraud Lawyers Association, ALBA, the Criminal Bar Association and POCLA.
John Carl Townsend Year of Call: 2006 John Carl provides advice and representation to clients in respect of financial misconduct and business disputes across the civil and criminal courts. His experience
More informationClare is widely valued as a pre litigation adviser, providing strategic guidance and advice to companies and individuals caught up in regulatory and
Clare is widely valued as a pre litigation adviser, providing strategic guidance and advice to companies and individuals caught up in regulatory and criminal investigations, particularly those with an
More informationServices of the International Criminal and Regulatory Bar
Services of the International Criminal and Regulatory Bar The Bar Council Integrity Excellence Justice How barristers can help Why England and Wales? Specialist areas of criminal barristers List of barristers
More informationCrime and Courts Act 2013: Deferred Prosecution Agreements Code of Practice
UK CLIENT MEMORANDUM ENGLISH LAW UPDATES Crime and Courts Act 2013: Deferred Prosecution August 8, 2013 AUTHORS Peter Burrell Paul Feldberg Introduction On 27 June 2013, the Director of the Serious Fraud
More informationCARL KIATIKA NGAWHIKA Appellant. THE QUEEN Respondent. J U Mooney for Appellant JEL Carruthers for Respondent JUDGMENT OF THE COURT
IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF NEW ZEALAND CA297/2017 [2017] NZCA 535 BETWEEN AND CARL KIATIKA NGAWHIKA Appellant THE QUEEN Respondent Hearing: 15 November 2017 Court: Counsel: Judgment: Harrison, Lang and
More informationJeremy Rosenberg 2009
Crime/Regulatory Financial crime Jeremy covers all aspects of criminal practice whilst focusing on dishonesty and fraud. Having defended in a wide variety of matters including conspiracy, money laundering,
More informationDISCIPLINARY COMMITTEE OF THE ASSOCIATION OF CHARTERED CERTIFIED ACCOUNTANTS
DISCIPLINARY COMMITTEE OF THE ASSOCIATION OF CHARTERED CERTIFIED ACCOUNTANTS REASONS FOR DECISION In the matter of: Mr Lee Martin Holberton Heard on: Wednesday, 13 April 2016 Location: ACCA Offices, The
More informationIan Unsworth QC. clear compelling approachable. Year of Call 1992, Year of Silk 2010
Year of Call 1992, Year of Silk 2010 has vast experience in dealing with cases of the utmost complexity, seriousness and sensitivity. His practice embraces serious and complex crime, serious fraud, regulatory,
More informationCRIME DEPARTMENT FACT SHEET Criminal legal aid
CRIME DEPARTMENT FACT SHEET - 4.24 - Criminal legal aid Making an Application In order to obtain criminal Legal Aid (a Legal Aid), you must complete the legal aid forms CRM14 (and often CRM15 as well)
More informationSamantha Hatt Essex Street London WC2R 3AA Fraud & Financial Crime
Fraud & Financial Crime Samantha has particular expertise in fraud and financial crime. She regularly appears alone and as junior counsel in multi-handed and complex cases of fraud, money laundering and
More informationCameron Scott Essex Street London WC2R 3AA Profile
Profile Cameron brings over 20 years' of experience as a solicitor and 9 years as a solicitor-advocate to the Bar. His range and depth of experience enables him to advise and represent professional services
More informationMark Trafford QC 1992
Profile Mark is instructed for the prosecution and defence in criminal matters and has appeared at all levels of court in the criminal justice system. He is a Grade 4 Prosecutor who prosecutes for CPS
More informationRichard Milne Essex Street London WC2R 3AA Fraud & Financial Crime
Fraud & Financial Crime Richard s methodical but creative intellect ensures him a steady flow of significant cases involving money laundering and banking, tax, VAT and NHS frauds. He is regularly instructed
More informationDISCIPLINARY COMMITTEE OF THE ASSOCIATION OF CHARTERED CERTIFIED ACCOUNTANTS
DISCIPLINARY COMMITTEE OF THE ASSOCIATION OF CHARTERED CERTIFIED ACCOUNTANTS REASONS FOR DECISION In the matter of: Mr Alan Goddard Heard on: 30 August 2016 Location: The Adelphi, 1-11 John Adam Street,
More informationB e f o r e: MR JUSTICE JEREMY BAKER MR JUSTICE GOSS R E G I N A ISAAC OLARINOYE
Neutral Citation Number: [2015] EWCA Crim 1503 No: 2015/2745/A3 IN THE COURT OF APPEAL CRIMINAL DIVISION Royal Courts of Justice Strand London, WC2A 2LL Friday, 7 August 2015 B e f o r e: MR JUSTICE JEREMY
More informationAlex Rooke. Overview +44 (0)
+44 (0) 207 332 5400 Alex Rooke YEAR OF CALL: 2001 Solicitors and judges have commented favourably on Alex's ability to pick up complex cases, to master large amounts of information, and to cut to the
More informationAn appeal from an order of the Department of Management Services.
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL FIRST DISTRICT, STATE OF FLORIDA KENNETH C. JENNE, v. Appellant, NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED CASE NO. 1D09-2959
More informationStephen Baker. Barrister at Law. Senior Legal Adviser
Stephen Baker Barrister at Law Senior Legal Adviser Money Laundering Local Risks Internal Threats Reputational Damage How to Protect Your Business. Major Local Risk Handling the proceeds of serious financial
More informationDISCIPLINARY COMMITTEE OF THE ASSOCIATION OF CHARTERED CERTIFIED ACCOUNTANTS
DISCIPLINARY COMMITTEE OF THE ASSOCIATION OF CHARTERED CERTIFIED ACCOUNTANTS REASONS FOR DECISION In the matter of: Stephen Jeremy Bache Heard on: 27 July 2015 Location: Committee: Legal Adviser: Persons
More informationDISCIPLINARY COMMITTEE OF THE ASSOCIATION OF CHARTERED CERTIFIED ACCOUNTANTS
DISCIPLINARY COMMITTEE OF THE ASSOCIATION OF CHARTERED CERTIFIED ACCOUNTANTS REASONS FOR DECISION In the matter of: Mr Ibttsam Hamid Heard on: Thursday 18 August 2016 Location: The Chartered Institute
More informationExecutive summary...v. About the authors...ix
Contents Executive summary...v About the authors...ix Two tier is too dangerous... 1 By Bill Waddington, director and head of Defence Advocacy at Williamsons Solicitors and chair of CLSA Criminal legislation
More informationAndrew Evans. Overview +44 (0)
+44 (0) 207 332 5400 Andrew Evans YEAR OF CALL: 1985 Andrew Evans is an experienced criminal practitioner, specialising in the prosecution of serious and complex fraud. Andrew has acquired a reputation
More informationBENZILE McDONALD ZWANE B A I L A P P E A L J U D G M E N T. 1]The appellant applied for bail before the Magistrate, Port Elizabeth and his
IN THE HIGH COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA (EASTERN CAPE PORT ELIZABETH) In the matter between: Case No.: CA&R08/2011 Date heard: 12 May 2011 Date delivered: 17 May 2011 BENZILE McDONALD ZWANE Appellant and THE
More informationDavid Walbank QC. Call: 1987 Silk:2018 Phone:
David Walbank QC Call: 1987 Silk:2018 Phone:0207 520 6000 Email:chambers@18rlc.co.uk According to the Legal 500, David Walbank is outstanding in fraud matters. Having historically had conduct of many of
More informationAlexander Blackman. In the Court Martial Appeal Court. Judgment. 21 st December 2016
JU Alexander Blackman In the Court Martial Appeal Court Judgment 21 st December 2016 Lord Thomas of Cwmgiedd CJ and Sweeney J : 1. The court has before it this afternoon three applications. First an application
More informationJohn Warrington. Overview +44 (0)
+44 (0) 207 332 5400 Connect on LinkedIn John Warrington YEAR OF CALL: 2000 John is a barrister specialising in professional disciplinary proceedings, regulatory and criminal law. John has particular expertise
More informationYou are aged 65 and of positive previous good character.
IN THE CENTRAL CRIMINAL COURT THE QUEEN -V- DENIS MACSHANE 23 DECEMBER 2013 SENTENCING REMARKS OF MR JUSTICE SWEENEY You are aged 65 and of positive previous good character. You have pleaded guilty to
More information2017 PA Super 417 : : : : : : : : :
2017 PA Super 417 COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA v. PATRICK CLINE Appellant IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA No. 641 EDA 2017 Appeal from the Judgment of Sentence August 22, 2016 In the Court of Common
More informationRajen Hanumunthadu v The state and the independent commission against corruption SCJ 288 Judgment delivered on 01 September 2010 This was an
Rajen Hanumunthadu v The state and the independent commission against corruption. 2010 SCJ 288 Judgment delivered on 01 September 2010 This was an appeal from the Intermediate Court where the Appellant
More informationSTATE OF OHIO LAVELLE COLEMAN
[Cite as State v. Coleman, 2008-Ohio-2806.] Court of Appeals of Ohio EIGHTH APPELLATE DISTRICT COUNTY OF CUYAHOGA JOURNAL ENTRY AND OPINION No. 89358 STATE OF OHIO PLAINTIFF-APPELLEE vs. LAVELLE COLEMAN
More informationJustice Committee evidence session: The Work of the Serious Fraud Office (SFO) Pre-hearing memorandum from the Serious Fraud Office
Justice Committee evidence session: The Work of the Serious Fraud Office (SFO) Pre-hearing memorandum from the Serious Fraud Office 1 Summary 1.1 This memorandum provides high-level and summary information
More informationIN THE KWAZULU-NATAL HIGH COURT, PIETERMARITZBURG REPUBLIC OF SOUTH AFRICA
IN THE KWAZULU-NATAL HIGH COURT, PIETERMARITZBURG REPUBLIC OF SOUTH AFRICA Case no: AR: 264/11 In the matter between: DONALD DAVID VETTER versus THE STATE MBATHA J APPEAL JUDGMENT Delivered: 13 March 2012
More informationHIGH COURT OF AUSTRALIA
HIGH COURT OF AUSTRALIA FRENCH C, KIEFEL, BELL, GAGELER AND KEANE DANG KHOA NGUYEN APPELLANT AND THE QUEEN RESPONDENT Nguyen v The Queen [2013] HCA 32 27 une 2013 M30/2013 ORDER 1. Appeal allowed. 2. Set
More informationInformation about our service for bringing and defending claims in the employment tribunal
T 01235 861919 E jkelly@employmentlawplus.com W www.employmentlawplus.com Stepstone House Old Moor Milton, Abingdon Oxon OX14 4ED Information about our service for bringing and defending claims in the
More informationDISCIPLINARY COMMITTEE OF THE ASSOCIATION OF CHARTERED CERTIFIED ACCOUNTANTS. Heard on: Wednesday, 28 June 2017
DISCIPLINARY COMMITTEE OF THE ASSOCIATION OF CHARTERED CERTIFIED ACCOUNTANTS REASONS FOR DECISION In the matter of: Mr Abu Talib Ghadiri Heard on: Wednesday, 28 June 2017 Location: HMP The Mount, Molyneaux
More information... N.C. Office of Indigent Defense Services. PAC and Expert Spending in Potentially Capital Cases at the Trial Level.
N.C. Office of Indigent Defense Services. FY07.. Capital. Trial.. Case. Study... PAC and Expert Spending in Potentially Capital Cases at the Trial Level December 2008 Office of Indigent Defense Services
More informationTHE IMMIGRATION ACTS. Before DEPUTY UPPER TRIBUNAL JUDGE MONSON. Between SILVESTER AKSAMIT (ANONYMITY DIRECTION NOT MADE) and
Upper Tribunal (Immigration and Asylum Chamber) Appeal Number: EA/13121/2016 THE IMMIGRATION ACTS Heard at Field House Decision & Reasons Promulgated On 1 March 2018 On 09 March 2018 Before DEPUTY UPPER
More informationBlake Morgan. Employment Tribunal Fees Guide. For Individuals
Blake Morgan Employment Tribunal Fees Guide For Individuals For members of the public: Blake Morgan is a large, nationally recognised law firm with Top Tier legal directory rankings for its Employment
More informationSOLICITORS DISCIPLINARY TRIBUNAL SOLICITORS ACT IN THE MATTER OF ANGELA JANE BUTLER, solicitor (The Respondent)
No. 10609-2010 SOLICITORS DISCIPLINARY TRIBUNAL SOLICITORS ACT 1974 IN THE MATTER OF ANGELA JANE BUTLER, solicitor (The Respondent) Upon the application of Lorraine Trench on behalf of the Solicitors Regulation
More informationDISCIPLINARY COMMITTEE OF THE ASSOCIATION OF CHARTERED CERTIFIED ACCOUNTANTS
DISCIPLINARY COMMITTEE OF THE ASSOCIATION OF CHARTERED CERTIFIED ACCOUNTANTS REASONS FOR DECISION In the matter of: Mr Mikiel Aurokium Heard on: Friday 16 February 2018 Location: The Adelphi, 1-11 John
More informationCURRICULUM VITAE. SHARON L. McCARTHY (212)
CURRICULUM VITAE SHARON L. McCARTHY (212) 808-8100 smccarthy@kflaw.com PROFESSIONAL POSITIONS: Partner, Kostelanetz & Fink, LLP New York, New York (October 2006 April 2008; April 2009 Present) Special
More informationDAVID STANLEY TRANTER Appellant. THE QUEEN Respondent JUDGMENT OF THE COURT. The appeal against conviction and sentence is dismissed.
NOTE: PUBLICATION OF NAMES, ADDRESSES, OCCUPATIONS OR IDENTIFYING PARTICULARS, OF COMPLAINANTS PROHIBITED BY S 139 OF THE CRIMINAL JUSTICE ACT 1985 AND S 203 OF THE CRIMINAL PROCEDURE ACT 2011. IN THE
More informationFINANCIAL ELIGIBILITY FOR SOLEMN CRIMINAL LEGAL AID. Consultation on applying the undue hardship test
FINANCIAL ELIGIBILITY FOR SOLEMN CRIMINAL LEGAL AID Consultation on applying the undue hardship test February 2010 CONTENTS 1. Introduction... 3 Providing access to justice... 3 What does the Board seek
More informationMr S complains about Bar Mutual Indemnity Fund Limited s decision to withdraw funding for his claim.
complaint Mr S complains about Bar Mutual Indemnity Fund Limited s decision to withdraw funding for his claim. background I issued a provisional decision on this complaint in December 2015. An extract
More informationIN APPEAL BY NAT GORDON FRASER. against HER MAJESTY S ADVOCATE SUMMARY
IN APPEAL BY NAT GORDON FRASER against HER MAJESTY S ADVOCATE SUMMARY 6 May 2008 Today at the Criminal Appeal Court in Edinburgh the appeal by Nat Gordon Fraser against his conviction for the murder of
More informationNeed to make a claim? Motor Legal Protection Cover
Need to make a claim? 03300 240 242 Motor Legal Protection Cover. About your cover This is your Motor Legal Protection policy. This cover will run alongside your car insurance policy, provided by Provident
More informationManagement liability choice summary of cover
Management liability choice summary of cover January 2018 Why choose AXA s Management liability choice for companies insurance Management Liability Choice insurance is available to any UK registered private
More informationConduct and Competence Committee Substantive Meeting 18 January 2013
Conduct and Competence Committee Substantive Meeting 18 January 2013 Nursing and Midwifery Council, 61 Aldwych, London, WC2B 4AE Name of registrant: NMC Pin: Mr Ezio Branca 05B0165E Part(s) of the register:
More informationPress Release (Exclusively for the use of the media. Not an official document)
Press Release (Exclusively for the use of the media. Not an official document) United Nations Nations Unies APPEALS CHAMBER CHAMBRE D APPEL The Hague, 18 July 2005 JP/MOW/989e International Criminal Tribunal
More informationHamish Common Essex Street London WC2R 3AA
Profile Hamish Common practises in all areas of crime, though principally in fraud and in cases with a numerical, technical or scientific element. He also undertakes regulatory and disciplinary proceedings.
More informationOKALOOSA SHERIFF PRAISES WORK OF NEW MORTGAGE FRAUD TASK FORCE
September 30, 2011 OKALOOSA SHERIFF PRAISES WORK OF NEW MORTGAGE FRAUD TASK FORCE Okaloosa County Sheriff Larry Ashley today praised the work of the newly formed Northwest Florida Mortgage Fraud Task Force,
More informationLESSONS FROM A RECENT DISCIPLINARY CASE. J. Nick Badgerow Rex Sharp
LESSONS FROM A RECENT DISCIPLINARY CASE J. Nick Badgerow Rex Sharp OVERVIEW FIVE DAY DISCIPLINARY HEARING RESPONDENT SELF-REPRESENTED SEVERAL CLIENTS CLAIMS EXPERT WITNESSES PANEL: UNANIMOUSLY RECOMMENDED
More informationAnti-Fraud Policy. Version: 8.0 Approval Status: Approved. Document Owner: Graham Feek. Review Date: 07/12/2018
Anti-Fraud Policy Version: 8.0 Approval Status: Approved Document Owner: Graham Feek Classification: External Review Date: 07/12/2018 Last Reviewed: 09/12/2016 Table of Contents 1. Policy Statement...
More informationDafydd Enoch QC 1985 (QC 2008)
General Crime A stand out Silk (Legal 500), Dafydd Enoch has appeared for the defence and Crown in many very serious criminal cases. He has particular experience in the field of organised crime involving
More informationOverview on anti-corruption rules and regulations in the UNITED KINGDOM
Overview on anti-corruption rules and regulations in the UNITED KINGDOM Author: Chris Whalley I. What is the anti-corruption legal framework in your country (including brief overview on active / passive
More informationTHE IMMIGRATION ACTS. Before UPPER TRIBUNAL JUDGE HANSON. Between ALDIS KRUMINS. and. THE SECRETARY OF STATE FOR THE HOME DEPARTMENT Respondent
Upper Tribunal (Immigration and Asylum Chamber) THE IMMIGRATION ACTS Heard at Nottingham Determination Promulgated on 18 th June 2013 on 19 th June 2013 Before UPPER TRIBUNAL JUDGE HANSON Between ALDIS
More informationCase Studies. COURSE X: MASTERING THE LOAN APPLICATION II Lesson 1: Mortgage Fraud. Case Study 1
Case Studies Case Study 1 TWO MORE CHARGED IN MASSIVE MORTGAGE FRAUD March 22, 2002 CONSPIRACY Susan W. Brooks, United States Attorney for the Southern District of Indiana, announced that RANDALL J. BOOKNIS,
More informationIMMIGRATION APPEAL TRIBUNAL
ar Appeal No. HX08203-2002 SA (Fair Trial-Prison Conditions) Pakistan CG [2002] UKIAT 0563 IMMIGRATION APPEAL TRIBUNAL Before: Mr M W Rapinet (Chairman) Mr C A N Edinboro Date of Hearing : 4 October 2002
More informationSUPREME COURT OF QUEENSLAND
SUPREME COURT OF QUEENSLAND CITATION: R v MCE [2015] QCA 4 PARTIES: R v MCE (appellant) FILE NO: CA No 186 of 2014 DC No 198 of 2012 DIVISION: PROCEEDING: ORIGINATING COURT: Court of Appeal Appeal against
More informationSUPREME COURT OF NEW JERSEY Disciplinary Review Board Docket No. DRB IN THE MATTER OF MICHAEL J. NEDICK, AN ATTORNEY AT LAW
SUPREME COURT OF NEW JERSEY Disciplinary Review Board Docket No. DRB 90-149 IN THE MATTER OF MICHAEL J. NEDICK, AN ATTORNEY AT LAW Argued: Decided: Richard J. Ethics. July 25, 1990 October 1, 1990 Decision
More informationThe A - Z of Advocacy: One Bar - Many Careers
The A - Z of Advocacy: One Bar - Many Careers Karen Squibb-Williams, Barrister International Advocacy Teaching Conference Nottingham Law School, 2014 The Bar Barometer, 2012 15,585 barristers held practising
More informationNO CR. RAFAELA DAVILA, Appellant. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee
Opinion issued February 11, 2010 In The Court of Appeals For The First District of Texas NO. 01-08-00176-CR RAFAELA DAVILA, Appellant v. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee On Appeal from the 400th District Court
More informationFINANCIAL INTELLIGENCE UNIT (UKFIU)
FINANCIAL INTELLIGENCE UNIT (UKFIU) Suspicious Activity Reports (SARs) Case Studies for Training Purposes This is a United Kingdom Financial Intelligence Unit (UKFIU) communications product, produced in
More informationSTATE OF LOUISIANA NO KA-0689 VERSUS COURT OF APPEAL LAWRENCE JOSEPH FOURTH CIRCUIT STATE OF LOUISIANA * * * * * * *
STATE OF LOUISIANA VERSUS LAWRENCE JOSEPH * * * * * * * * * * * NO. 2011-KA-0689 COURT OF APPEAL FOURTH CIRCUIT STATE OF LOUISIANA APPEAL FROM CRIMINAL DISTRICT COURT ORLEANS PARISH NO. 498-015, SECTION
More informationCOMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES INTERIM REPORT FROM THE COMMISSION TO THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT AND THE COUNCIL
EN EN EN COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES Brussels, 12.2.2009 COM(2009) 69 final INTERIM REPORT FROM THE COMMISSION TO THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT AND THE COUNCIL On Progress in Bulgaria under the Co-operation
More informationJoint Advocacy Group. Fourth consultation paper on the Quality Assurance Scheme for Advocates (Crime)
Joint Advocacy Group Fourth consultation paper on the Quality Assurance Scheme for Advocates (Crime) July 2012 Contents Part 1: Background Part 2: The third consultation Part 3: The Revised Scheme Part
More informationNatasha Draycott. Overview +44 (0)
+44 (0) 207 332 5400 Natasha Draycott YEAR OF CALL: 2005 A "brilliant" and "tenacious" advocate who attracts praise for her thorough preparation of cases and her ability to "make judges relax when she
More informationCONCERNING CONCERNING DECISION. The names and indentifying details of the parties in this decision have been changed.
LCRO 323/2012 CONCERNING an application for review pursuant to section 193 of the Lawyers and Conveyancers Act 2006 AND CONCERNING a determination of Canterbury Westland Standards Committee BETWEEN Mr
More informationSUPREME COURT OF QUEENSLAND
SUPREME COURT OF QUEENSLAND CITATION: R v M [2003] QCA 380 PARTIES: R v M (applicant/appellant) FILE NO/S: CA No 92 of 2003 DC No 334 of 2003 DIVISION: PROCEEDING: ORIGINATING COURT: Court of Appeal Appeal
More informationR v Mavji. Page 1. All England Law Reports/1987/Volume 2 /R v Mavji - [1987] 2 All ER 758. [1987] 2 All ER 758 COURT OF APPEAL, CRIMINAL DIVISION
Page 1 All England Law Reports/1987/Volume 2 /R v Mavji - [1987] 2 All ER 758 [1987] 2 All ER 758 R v Mavji COURT OF APPEAL, CRIMINAL DIVISION MAY LJ, MICHAEL DAVIES AND HIRST JJ 19, 24 JUNE 1986 Criminal
More informationJOHN ARCHIBALD BANKS Appellant. THE QUEEN Respondent
IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF NEW ZEALAND CA361/2016 [2017] NZCA 69 BETWEEN AND JOHN ARCHIBALD BANKS Appellant THE QUEEN Respondent Hearing: Court: Counsel: Judgment: 15 February 2017 (with an application
More informationBut behind the gossip and tabloid articles, the real facts of the case are no less shocking.
The Wolf of HBOS Jeffrey Davidson Managing Director, Honeycomb Recently hitting the headlines was the prosecution of an ex-hbos (Halifax Bank of Scotland) manager and five others, all but one of whom were
More informationIN THE MATTER OF ROBERT JH WARD, A NOTARY AND IN THE MATTER OF THE NOTARIES (CONDUCT AND DISCIPLINE) RULES 2011 DECISION OF THE COURT
IN THE COURT OF FACULTIES IN THE MATTER OF ROBERT JH WARD, A NOTARY AND IN THE MATTER OF THE NOTARIES (CONDUCT AND DISCIPLINE) RULES 2011 DECISION OF THE COURT INTRODUCTION AND PRELIMINARY POINT 1. A complaint
More informationCASE NO. 1D Nancy A. Daniels, Public Defender, and Kathleen Stover, Assistant Public Defender, Tallahassee, for Appellant.
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL FIRST DISTRICT, STATE OF FLORIDA MARKEL LATRAE BASS, v. Appellant, NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED CASE NO. 1D12-3284
More informationAppellant. THE QUEEN Respondent. Winkelmann, Peters and Collins JJ JUDGMENT OF THE COURT. The appeal against conviction and sentence is dismissed.
IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF NEW ZEALAND CA508/2015 [2016] NZCA 138 BETWEEN AND MRINAL SARDANA Appellant THE QUEEN Respondent Hearing: 8 March 2016 Court: Counsel: Judgment: Winkelmann, Peters and Collins
More informationBlake Morgan. Employment Tribunal Fees Guide. For Businesses
Blake Morgan Employment Tribunal Fees Guide For Businesses For businesses Blake Morgan is a large, nationally recognised law firm with Top Tier legal directory rankings for its Employment law teams across
More informationCotton, T. (2010) 'Court of appeal: Confession evidence and the circumstances requiring a voir dire', Journal of Criminal Law, 74 (5), pp
TeesRep - Teesside's Research Repository Court of appeal: Confession evidence and the circumstances requiring a voir dire Item type Authors Citation DOI Publisher Journal Additional Link Rights Article
More informationShilpa Shah. Tel: +44 (0) Fax: +44 (0) , The Ropewalk, Nottingham NG1 5EF
4, The Ropewalk, Tel: +44 (0) 115 947 581 Fax: +44 (0) 115 947 653 Contents Costs & Litigation Funding... Personal Injury... Inquests... Motor... Clinical Negligence... 1 ii 4, The Ropewalk, Tel: +44 (0)
More informationTHE SUPREME COURT OF APPEAL OF SOUTH AFRICA JUDGMENT. Vincent Olebogang Magano and
THE SUPREME COURT OF APPEAL OF SOUTH AFRICA JUDGMENT In the matter between: Case no: 849/12 Not reportable Vincent Olebogang Magano and The State Appellant Respondent Neutral citation: Magano v S (849/12)[2013]
More informationReport of the Finance Director to the meeting of the Governance & Audit Committee to be held on 29 th
Report of the Finance Director to the meeting of the Governance & Audit Committee to be held on 29 th September 2016 Subject: H Corporate Fraud Unit annual performance information. Summary statement: The
More informationTHE IMMIGRATION ACTS. Before UPPER TRIBUNAL JUDGE KEKIĆ. Between MOHAMMED KHURAM SHEZAD (ANONYMITY ORDER NOT MADE) and
Upper Tribunal (Immigration and Asylum Chamber) THE IMMIGRATION ACTS Heard at Field House Decision & Reasons Promulgated On 20 July 2017 On 31 July 2017 Before UPPER TRIBUNAL JUDGE KEKIĆ Between MOHAMMED
More informationFINAL NOTICE. i. imposes on Peter Thomas Carron ( Mr Carron ) a financial penalty of 300,000; and
FINAL NOTICE To: Peter Thomas Carron Date of 15 September 1968 Birth: IRN: PTC00001 (inactive) Date: 16 September 2014 ACTION 1. For the reasons given in this Notice, the Authority hereby: i. imposes on
More informationHEARING DISCIPLINARY COMMITTEE OF THE ASSOCIATION OF CHARTERED CERTIFIED ACCOUNTANTS
DISCIPLINARY COMMITTEE OF THE ASSOCIATION OF CHARTERED CERTIFIED ACCOUNTANTS REASONS FOR DECISION In the matter of: Mr Jawad Raza Heard on: Thursday 7 and Friday 8 June 2018 Location: ACCA Head Offices,
More informationTHE IMMIGRATION ACTS. Before UPPER TRIBUNAL JUDGE CRAIG. Between MR ABDUL KADIR SAID. and. THE SECRETARY OF STATE FOR THE HOME DEPARTMENT Respondent
IAC-FH-NL-V1 Upper Tribunal (Immigration and Asylum Chamber) Appeal Number: DA/00950/2014 THE IMMIGRATION ACTS Heard at Royal Courts of Justice Oral determination given immediately following the hearing
More informationIN THE HIGH COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA (EASTERN CAPE, GRAHAMSTOWN) Case no: CA&R 206/2015 Date heard: 18 August 2015 Date delivered: 20 August 2015
1 SAFLII Note: Certain personal/private details of parties or witnesses have been redacted from this document in compliance with the law and SAFLII Policy IN THE HIGH COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA (EASTERN CAPE,
More informationStephen Butler. Barrister Profiles. New York. London. Abu Dhabi. Manchester. Dubai. Outer Temple Chambers The Outer Temple 222 Strand London WC2R 1BA
Barrister Profiles Stephen Butler Contents Stephen Butler... 1 Commercial & Chancery... 2 Alternative Dispute Resolution... 3 Employment & Discrimination... 4 Financial Services... 5 Pensions & Trusts...
More informationStatutory Liability Policy
LIABILITY Statutory Liability Policy Costs In Addition (Claims Made Wording) Lumley, a business division of IAG New Zealand Limited, Lumley Centre, 88 Shortland Street, PO Box 2426, Auckland 1140, New
More informationDennis E. Boyle. Senior Counsel. Experience
2018 Whiteford, Taylor & Preston LLP Dennis E. Boyle Senior Counsel 1800 M Street, NW Suite 450N Washington, DC 20036 Phone: 202.659.6808 Fax: 202.327.6175 Email: dboyle@wtplaw.com Experience Dennis is
More informationSUMMARY OF APPEALS CHAMBER SENTENCING JUDGEMENT. The Prosecutor v. Dusko Tadic 26 January 2000
SUMMARY OF APPEALS CHAMBER SENTENCING JUDGEMENT The Prosecutor v. Dusko Tadic 26 January 2000 The Appeals Chamber of this International Tribunal is now delivering judgement in this matter. Copies of the
More informationMORTGAGE FRAUD UPDATE
MORTGAGE FRAUD UPDATE In the past, we have provided several articles discussing the then latest form of mortgage fraud and the ways to spot it and avoid it. Also, in the past we have commented on the lack
More informationDISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FOURTH DISTRICT
DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FOURTH DISTRICT RISTO JOVAN WYATT, Appellant, v. STATE OF FLORIDA, Appellee. No. 4D12-4377 [ May 20, 2015 ] Appeal from the Circuit Court for the Nineteenth
More informationIN THE HIGH COURT OF NEW ZEALAND CHRISTCHURCH REGISTRY CRI [2013] NZHC Appellant. CHRISTCHURCH CITY COUNCIL Respondent
IN THE HIGH COURT OF NEW ZEALAND CHRISTCHURCH REGISTRY CRI-2013-409-000006 [2013] NZHC 2388 BETWEEN AND CIRCLE K LIMITED Appellant CHRISTCHURCH CITY COUNCIL Respondent Hearing: 11 September 2013 Appearances:
More informationAngela Wrottesley Robert Sandford Matthew Parkinson Kevin Jones Richard Veni
Our specialist motoring law team have a reputation for their vast knowledge and their exceptional advocacy skills which has developed when representing multiple clients charged with a Road Traffic Act
More informationH.C.Cr. Appeal No. 621 of 2001) ****************************** JUDGMENT OF THE COURT
REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE COURT OF APPEAL AT NAIROBI (CORAM: OMOLO, GITHINJI & DEVERELL, JJ.A.) CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 120 OF 2004 BETWEEN ALBANUS MWASIA MUTUA APPELLANT AND REPUBLIC... RESPONDENT (Appeal
More informationAnwar Nashashibi. Overview. Areas of expertise. Financial Crime. Year of call: 1995
Anwar Nashashibi Year of call: 1995 A robust advocate but combines that with sensitive cross-examination skills. Overview Anwar Nashashibi is an accomplished advocate with several complementary areas of
More informationPotential Construction Defect Claim Site: 100 Eton Road, Lindfield "Dunstan Grove"
3 April 2017 Partner: David Andrews Direct Line: 9233 9023 Direct Facsimile: 9233 9123 Email: dandrews@makdap.com.au Our Ref: DA: BEL: 170658 BY EMAIL: raymond.reg@stratplus.com.au The Secretary The Owners
More information