DAVID STANLEY TRANTER Appellant. THE QUEEN Respondent JUDGMENT OF THE COURT. The appeal against conviction and sentence is dismissed.

Size: px
Start display at page:

Download "DAVID STANLEY TRANTER Appellant. THE QUEEN Respondent JUDGMENT OF THE COURT. The appeal against conviction and sentence is dismissed."

Transcription

1 NOTE: PUBLICATION OF NAMES, ADDRESSES, OCCUPATIONS OR IDENTIFYING PARTICULARS, OF COMPLAINANTS PROHIBITED BY S 139 OF THE CRIMINAL JUSTICE ACT 1985 AND S 203 OF THE CRIMINAL PROCEDURE ACT IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF NEW ZEALAND CA671/2015 [2017] NZCA 45 BETWEEN AND DAVID STANLEY TRANTER Appellant THE QUEEN Respondent Hearing: Court: Counsel: Judgment: 16 November 2016 (further submissions received 20 December 2016) Kós P, French and Venning JJ A J McKenzie for the Appellant M J Lillico for the Respondent 7 March 2017 at 10.00am JUDGMENT OF THE COURT The appeal against conviction and sentence is dismissed. REASONS OF THE COURT (Given by Kós P) [1] The appellant was convicted in the High Court at Christchurch on five counts of historical sexual offending against three minors. The convictions include two of sexual violation by rape and, as against complainant A, sodomy and performance of TRANTER v R [2017] NZCA 45 [7 March 2017]

2 an indecent act. He was sentenced by Gendall J to preventive detention. 1 appeals conviction and sentence. He Conviction appeal [2] The sole ground of conviction appeal is that a miscarriage of justice has arisen because fresh evidence is now available that has a material effect on the safety of the convictions in respect of complainant A. [3] Complainant A was asked in cross-examination whether he had made physical or sexual abuse allegations against the appellant. He said that he had made complaints of physical abuse, and had gone to the police. This was in the early 1980s. He was asked whether charges against the appellant had been dismissed. He could not recall. [4] The appellant then gave evidence in his own defence that physical and sexual abuse charges relating to complainant A had been brought against him. But he asserted they had been dismissed by a Judge without trial. His then-solicitor gave evidence. She no longer had her file but she had a record of a file in the appellant s name: Children s Court Police Charge. She could not recall what it was about. She accepted it might have been about a child charged with an offence. But she said that would just be speculation. [5] In closing the prosecutor made some mention of this aspect of the appellant s evidence. The prosecutor suggested his credibility was impaired because the appellant could never have faced sexual abuse charges in a Children and Young Persons Court (as the Youth Court then was called). Therefore such charges could never have been dismissed, as he claimed. The Judge referred to it also, simply noting the prosecutor s submission. [6] The fresh evidence is a file note from August 1983 obtained from the Ministry of Social Development. The note was redacted in part. It appeared to 1 R v Tranter [2016] NZHC 111.

3 relate to a complaint of physical abuse that complainant A had made against the appellant. [7] The appellant submitted this evidence was important and relevant to the contest at trial. In particular it was relevant to assist the jury assess the veracity of complainant A. It also supported the appellant s evidence that he had been charged with physical abuse at least, but that those charges were withdrawn because the underlying complaint was false. [8] Following the hearing we directed the Ministry to produce the full file note, unredacted. The Ministry did so on 28 November. We called for further submissions, which we received from both counsel. [9] Having considered those submissions we consider the fresh evidence does not materially assist. It does not have a material effect on the safety of the convictions entered. [10] The unredacted document provides no support for the suggestion that complainant A had made a prior complaint of sexual abuse against the appellant. Indeed, quite the contrary. It undermines the evidence given by the appellant that he had been charged in the District Court with both physical and sexual abuse of complainant A in the early 1980s. It was the latter aspect he was emphasising in his evidence to the jury: that similar charges had been tested and found wanting because complainant A was unreliable. An attachment to the document produced by the Ministry instead makes clear that a charge of ill-treatment against a child had been laid against the appellant. And that it had been withdrawn by consent by the prosecution. That charge had been laid under s 27(2) of the Children & Young Persons Act That required determination in the Children and Young Persons Court, not the District Court. [11] The most relevant aspects of the document are two. First, that a social worker in 1983 assessed that complainant A, then a young boy, had a propensity to lie. Secondly, that there had indeed been a charge brought against the appellant. As to the former, we do not consider evidence of that antiquity is substantially helpful to

4 assess complainant A s veracity at the time of the trial some 30 years later. The document would be inadmissible under s 37(1) of the Evidence Act As to the latter, while the Ministry documents support the proposition that the appellant had indeed faced a charge in 1983, the gravamen of the submission made by the prosecutor (and repeated by the Judge) remains correct: that (contrary to his own evidence) he had not been charged with sexual abuse in 1983, and that such a charge had not been dismissed. [12] Taken as a whole, the fresh evidence is adverse to the appellant s position. It does not call into question the safety of the convictions. It does not therefore meet the threshold for admission and the conviction appeal must be dismissed. Sentence appeal [13] Gendall J first considered the appropriate finite sentence. He took a starting point of 10 years imprisonment, and allowed a 10 per cent discount for the appellant s age (65 years): a finite sentence of 9 years. The Judge then considered preventive detention, the sentence sought by the Crown. That is governed by s 87 of the Sentencing Act The appellant qualified for that sentence in terms of s 87(2)(a) and (b). The other pre-condition in s 87(2)(c) is that the Court be satisfied that the person was likely to commit another qualifying sexual or violent offence if released at the sentence expiry date. In considering that pre-condition, and the mandatory considerations in s 87(4), the Judge found that there was a discernible pattern of sexual offending (with the appellant having eight previous offences for sexual offending against children in 1986, 2000, 2002 and 2004). That offending had caused serious harm to the community given where it had occurred and that it involved breaches of trust and threatened violence. Evidence from a psychologist and psychiatrist indicated the appellant had at least a moderate to high chance of reoffending against young children. He failed to complete treatment for sexual offending in the Kia Marama Special Unit on two occasions. He consistently denied his offending. The Judge concluded a lengthy determinate sentence would not adequately protect the community because of his denials of the offending and his high risk of reoffending. On that basis the Judge imposed a sentence of preventive detention, with a minimum period of five years.

5 [14] Mr McKenzie, Mr Tranter s counsel, submitted that the Judge was wrong to do so. A finite sentence with an extended supervision order (ESO) at its conclusion would have provided adequate protection. Mr Tranter had no sexual offending since 2003, and had not reoffended in a manner requiring the protection of society. The present offending for which he was sentenced pre-dated that offending, all occurring in the 1980s. The later offending was less serious. The Judge misdirected himself by referring to a pattern of sexual offending when the criterion is serious offending. [15] We are not convinced that the sentence of preventive detention is manifestly excessive. It is correct that Mr Tranter has not been convicted of sexual offences since Likewise that the later offences were less serious than those for which he was sentenced by Gendall J. However, both report writers considered that fact in their risk assessments. There was no basis on which to infer that the Judge misunderstood that consideration. Given the experts adverse propensity assessments, the Judge was right to find the appellant likely to commit another qualifying sexual offence if released at the substitute finite prison term. The appellant himself accepts that at least an ESO would need to be imposed. [16] We are not satisfied that the protection of the community would be adequately met by the imposition of an ESO. In 2007 the appellant was released subject to an ESO for his last sexual offending committed in Shortly after his release he fraudulently obtained a passport and absconded to the Philippines. That was in breach of the ESO and release conditions. He was convicted of those breaches and passport offences in 2007, and was sentenced to three years imprisonment. The appellant has compiled a lamentable list of sexual offences against children, continues to deny that offending despite all evidence to the contrary, has twice failed to complete treatment for sexual offending in the Kia Marama Special Unit and breached immediately the ESO imposed in [17] Given those considerations and the likelihood of reoffending, we are satisfied that the appropriate sentence imposed was one of preventive detention. The minimum period of imprisonment, set at five years, was appropriate and offered the

6 necessary incentive to the appellant to complete the treatment which might mitigate the perceived risk of reoffending. Result [18] The appeal is dismissed. Solicitors: Crown Law Office, Wellington for Respondent

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF NEW ZEALAND THE QUEEN PETER CHARLES HALLMOND. Fisher J Potter J. W N Dollimore for appellant K Raftery for Crown

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF NEW ZEALAND THE QUEEN PETER CHARLES HALLMOND. Fisher J Potter J. W N Dollimore for appellant K Raftery for Crown IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF NEW ZEALAND CA42/01 THE QUEEN V PETER CHARLES HALLMOND Hearing: 21 June 2001 Coram: Appearances: Blanchard J Fisher J Potter J W N Dollimore for appellant K Raftery for Crown

More information

NOTE: PUBLICATION OF NAME OR IDENTIFYING PARTICULARS OF COMPLAINANT PROHIBITED BY S 139 OF THE CRIMINAL JUSTICE ACT 1985.

NOTE: PUBLICATION OF NAME OR IDENTIFYING PARTICULARS OF COMPLAINANT PROHIBITED BY S 139 OF THE CRIMINAL JUSTICE ACT 1985. NOTE: PUBLICATION OF NAME OR IDENTIFYING PARTICULARS OF COMPLAINANT PROHIBITED BY S 139 OF THE CRIMINAL JUSTICE ACT 1985. IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF NEW ZEALAND CA82/2014 [2014] NZCA 304 BETWEEN AND TOESE

More information

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF NEW ZEALAND CA 196/97

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF NEW ZEALAND CA 196/97 IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF NEW ZEALAND CA 196/97 THE QUEEN v IAN CHARLES PHIPPS Coram: Hearing: Counsel: Gault J Anderson J Robertson J 19 August 1997 (at Auckland) R. Asher QC and J.H. Wiles for Appellant

More information

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF NEW ZEALAND CA 385/97 THE QUEEN

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF NEW ZEALAND CA 385/97 THE QUEEN IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF NEW ZEALAND CA 385/97 THE QUEEN v CLIFFORD ANDREW RODGER CoramEichelbaum CJ Tipping J Goddard J Hearing 30 April 1998 Counsel H Croft for Appellant S P France for Crown Judgment

More information

Appellant. THE QUEEN Respondent. N M Dutch for Appellant I R Murray and R K Thomson for Respondent JUDGMENT OF THE COURT

Appellant. THE QUEEN Respondent. N M Dutch for Appellant I R Murray and R K Thomson for Respondent JUDGMENT OF THE COURT ORDER PROHIBITING PUBLICATION OF NAME, ADDRESS, OCCUPATION OR IDENTIFYING PARTICULARS OF APPELLANT PURSUANT TO S 200 OF THE CRIMINAL PROCEDURE ACT 2011. NOTE: PUBLICATION OF NAMES, ADDRESSES, OCCUPATIONS

More information

THE HUMAN RIGHTS REVIEW TRIBUNAL & ORS Respondents

THE HUMAN RIGHTS REVIEW TRIBUNAL & ORS Respondents NOTE: ORDER OF THE HUMAN RIGHTS REVIEW TRIBUNAL AND OF THE HIGH COURT PROHIBITING PUBLICATION OF NAMES, ADDRESSES OR IDENTIFYING PARTICULARS OF THE SECOND, THIRD AND FOURTH RESPONDENTS AND THE SECOND RESPONDENT'S

More information

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF NEW ZEALAND CA 165/99 THE QUEEN HARRY MICHAEL JAMES MURPHY. 28 July 1999 (at Auckland) Anderson J Robertson J

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF NEW ZEALAND CA 165/99 THE QUEEN HARRY MICHAEL JAMES MURPHY. 28 July 1999 (at Auckland) Anderson J Robertson J IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF NEW ZEALAND CA 165/99 THE QUEEN V HARRY MICHAEL JAMES MURPHY Hearing: Coram: Appearances: 28 July 1999 (at Auckland) Henry J Anderson J Robertson J B R Northwood for Appellant

More information

Respondent. Counsel: Paul Heaslip for the Appellant Sarah Mandeno for the Respondent

Respondent. Counsel: Paul Heaslip for the Appellant Sarah Mandeno for the Respondent IN THE HIGH COURT OF NEW ZEALAND AUCKLAND REGISTRY A193/00 BETWEEN R LYON Appellant AND THE NEW ZEALAND POLICE Respondent Date of hearin g : 14 November 2000 Counsel: Paul Heaslip for the Appellant Sarah

More information

CARL KIATIKA NGAWHIKA Appellant. THE QUEEN Respondent. J U Mooney for Appellant JEL Carruthers for Respondent JUDGMENT OF THE COURT

CARL KIATIKA NGAWHIKA Appellant. THE QUEEN Respondent. J U Mooney for Appellant JEL Carruthers for Respondent JUDGMENT OF THE COURT IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF NEW ZEALAND CA297/2017 [2017] NZCA 535 BETWEEN AND CARL KIATIKA NGAWHIKA Appellant THE QUEEN Respondent Hearing: 15 November 2017 Court: Counsel: Judgment: Harrison, Lang and

More information

SUPREME COURT OF QUEENSLAND

SUPREME COURT OF QUEENSLAND SUPREME COURT OF QUEENSLAND CITATION: R v M [2003] QCA 380 PARTIES: R v M (applicant/appellant) FILE NO/S: CA No 92 of 2003 DC No 334 of 2003 DIVISION: PROCEEDING: ORIGINATING COURT: Court of Appeal Appeal

More information

Appellant. THE QUEEN Respondent. Winkelmann, Peters and Collins JJ JUDGMENT OF THE COURT. The appeal against conviction and sentence is dismissed.

Appellant. THE QUEEN Respondent. Winkelmann, Peters and Collins JJ JUDGMENT OF THE COURT. The appeal against conviction and sentence is dismissed. IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF NEW ZEALAND CA508/2015 [2016] NZCA 138 BETWEEN AND MRINAL SARDANA Appellant THE QUEEN Respondent Hearing: 8 March 2016 Court: Counsel: Judgment: Winkelmann, Peters and Collins

More information

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF BELIZE, A.D. 2006

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF BELIZE, A.D. 2006 IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF BELIZE, A.D. 2006 CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 5 OF 2006 BETWEEN: LAURIANO RAMIREZ Appellant AND THE QUEEN Respondent BEFORE: The Hon. Mr. Justice Mottley President The Hon. Mr. Justice

More information

JOHN ARCHIBALD BANKS Appellant. THE QUEEN Respondent

JOHN ARCHIBALD BANKS Appellant. THE QUEEN Respondent IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF NEW ZEALAND CA361/2016 [2017] NZCA 69 BETWEEN AND JOHN ARCHIBALD BANKS Appellant THE QUEEN Respondent Hearing: Court: Counsel: Judgment: 15 February 2017 (with an application

More information

IN THE HIGH COURT OF NEW ZEALAND WHANGAREI REGISTRY CRI [2016] NZHC 162. DAVID KEITH SILBY Appellant. NEW ZEALAND POLICE Respondent

IN THE HIGH COURT OF NEW ZEALAND WHANGAREI REGISTRY CRI [2016] NZHC 162. DAVID KEITH SILBY Appellant. NEW ZEALAND POLICE Respondent IN THE HIGH COURT OF NEW ZEALAND WHANGAREI REGISTRY CRI-2015-488-000048 [2016] NZHC 162 BETWEEN AND DAVID KEITH SILBY Appellant NEW ZEALAND POLICE Respondent Hearing: Appearances: 11 February 2016 (By

More information

Appellant. NEW ZEALAND POLICE Respondent. Miller, Cooper and Winkelmann JJ. A Shaw for Appellant A M Powell and E J Devine for Respondent

Appellant. NEW ZEALAND POLICE Respondent. Miller, Cooper and Winkelmann JJ. A Shaw for Appellant A M Powell and E J Devine for Respondent IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF NEW ZEALAND CA600/2015 [2016] NZCA 420 BETWEEN AND DINH TU DO Appellant NEW ZEALAND POLICE Respondent Hearing: 24 August 2016 Court: Counsel: Judgment: Miller, Cooper and Winkelmann

More information

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF NEW ZEALAND CA305/2008 [2008] NZCA 415 THE QUEEN ALISTAIR MARK STUART LYON. Robertson, Cooper and Winkelmann JJ

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF NEW ZEALAND CA305/2008 [2008] NZCA 415 THE QUEEN ALISTAIR MARK STUART LYON. Robertson, Cooper and Winkelmann JJ IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF NEW ZEALAND CA305/2008 [2008] NZCA 415 THE QUEEN v ALISTAIR MARK STUART LYON Hearing: 20 August 2008 Court: Counsel: Judgment: Robertson, Cooper and Winkelmann JJ Appellant in

More information

SUPREME COURT OF QUEENSLAND

SUPREME COURT OF QUEENSLAND SUPREME COURT OF QUEENSLAND CITATION: R v MCE [2015] QCA 4 PARTIES: R v MCE (appellant) FILE NO: CA No 186 of 2014 DC No 198 of 2012 DIVISION: PROCEEDING: ORIGINATING COURT: Court of Appeal Appeal against

More information

BEFORE THE REAL ESTATE AGENTS DISCIPLINARY TRIBUNAL

BEFORE THE REAL ESTATE AGENTS DISCIPLINARY TRIBUNAL BEFORE THE REAL ESTATE AGENTS DISCIPLINARY TRIBUNAL [2016] NZREADT 78 READT 042/16 IN THE MATTER OF BETWEEN AND An application to review a decision of the Registrar pursuant to section 112 of the Real

More information

THE IMMIGRATION ACTS. Promulgated On 5 January 2016 On 19 January Before DEPUTY UPPER TRIBUNAL JUDGE HUTCHINSON. Between BN (ANONYMITY ORDER)

THE IMMIGRATION ACTS. Promulgated On 5 January 2016 On 19 January Before DEPUTY UPPER TRIBUNAL JUDGE HUTCHINSON. Between BN (ANONYMITY ORDER) Upper Tribunal (Immigration and Asylum Chamber) Appeal Number: AA/06347/2015 THE IMMIGRATION ACTS Heard at Field House Decision and Reasons Promulgated On 5 January 2016 On 19 January 2016 Before DEPUTY

More information

PUBLICATION OF NAMES OR IDENTIFYING PARTICULARS OF COMPLAINANTS PROHIBITED BY S 139 CRIMINAL JUSTICE ACT 1985.

PUBLICATION OF NAMES OR IDENTIFYING PARTICULARS OF COMPLAINANTS PROHIBITED BY S 139 CRIMINAL JUSTICE ACT 1985. PUBLICATION OF NAMES OR IDENTIFYING PARTICULARS OF COMPLAINANTS PROHIBITED BY S 139 CRIMINAL JUSTICE ACT 1985. IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF NEW ZEALAND CA563/2008 [2009] NZCA 145 THE QUEEN v WAYNE ALEXANDER

More information

IN THE HIGH COURT OF NEW ZEALAND CHRISTCHURCH REGISTRY CRI GEORGE MICHAEL SUNNEX Appellant. POLICE Respondent

IN THE HIGH COURT OF NEW ZEALAND CHRISTCHURCH REGISTRY CRI GEORGE MICHAEL SUNNEX Appellant. POLICE Respondent IN THE HIGH COURT OF NEW ZEALAND CHRISTCHURCH REGISTRY CRI-2010-409-000043 GEORGE MICHAEL SUNNEX Appellant v POLICE Respondent Hearing: 22 April 2010 Appearances: A Bailey for Appellant K Basire for Respondent

More information

IN THE HIGH COURT OF NEW ZEALAND DUNEDIN REGISTRY CRI [2016] NZHC CALEB MAX OʼCONNELL Appellant. NEW ZEALAND POLICE Respondent

IN THE HIGH COURT OF NEW ZEALAND DUNEDIN REGISTRY CRI [2016] NZHC CALEB MAX OʼCONNELL Appellant. NEW ZEALAND POLICE Respondent IN THE HIGH COURT OF NEW ZEALAND DUNEDIN REGISTRY CRI-2016-412-000014 [2016] NZHC 1692 BETWEEN AND CALEB MAX OʼCONNELL Appellant NEW ZEALAND POLICE Respondent Hearing: 25 July 2016 Appearances: C C Lynch

More information

THE IMMIGRATION ACTS. Before UPPER TRIBUNAL JUDGE HANSON. Between ALDIS KRUMINS. and. THE SECRETARY OF STATE FOR THE HOME DEPARTMENT Respondent

THE IMMIGRATION ACTS. Before UPPER TRIBUNAL JUDGE HANSON. Between ALDIS KRUMINS. and. THE SECRETARY OF STATE FOR THE HOME DEPARTMENT Respondent Upper Tribunal (Immigration and Asylum Chamber) THE IMMIGRATION ACTS Heard at Nottingham Determination Promulgated on 18 th June 2013 on 19 th June 2013 Before UPPER TRIBUNAL JUDGE HANSON Between ALDIS

More information

kenyalawreports.or.ke

kenyalawreports.or.ke REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA AT MACHAKOS APPELLATE SIDE HIGH COURT CRIMINAL APPEAL 184 OF 2002 (From Original Conviction(s) and Sentence(s) in Criminal Case No 1320 of 2001 of the Principal

More information

COUNSEL FOR THE APPELLANT : Mr M.E SETUMU COUNSEL FOR RESPONDENT : ADV. NONTENJWA

COUNSEL FOR THE APPELLANT : Mr M.E SETUMU COUNSEL FOR RESPONDENT : ADV. NONTENJWA . Reportable: Circulate to Judges: Circulate to Magistrates: Circulate to Regional Magistrates: YES / NO YES / NO YES / NO YES / NO SAFLII Note: Certain personal/private details of parties or witnesses

More information

IN THE HIGH COURT OF NEW ZEALAND CHRISTCHURCH REGISTRY CRI [2013] NZHC Appellant. CHRISTCHURCH CITY COUNCIL Respondent

IN THE HIGH COURT OF NEW ZEALAND CHRISTCHURCH REGISTRY CRI [2013] NZHC Appellant. CHRISTCHURCH CITY COUNCIL Respondent IN THE HIGH COURT OF NEW ZEALAND CHRISTCHURCH REGISTRY CRI-2013-409-000006 [2013] NZHC 2388 BETWEEN AND CIRCLE K LIMITED Appellant CHRISTCHURCH CITY COUNCIL Respondent Hearing: 11 September 2013 Appearances:

More information

OLO and Others (para foreign criminal ) [2016] UKUT (IAC) THE IMMIGRATION ACTS

OLO and Others (para foreign criminal ) [2016] UKUT (IAC) THE IMMIGRATION ACTS Upper Tribunal (Immigration and Asylum Chamber) OLO and Others (para 398 - foreign criminal ) [2016] UKUT 00056 (IAC) THE IMMIGRATION ACTS Heard at Field House Decision & Reasons Promulgated On 23 November

More information

JOSEPH MWAMBA KALENGA. SAKALA, CJ, MUYOVWE and MUSONDA, JJS On the 6 th December, 2011 and 8 th May, 2012

JOSEPH MWAMBA KALENGA. SAKALA, CJ, MUYOVWE and MUSONDA, JJS On the 6 th December, 2011 and 8 th May, 2012 IN THE SUPREME COURT FOR ZAMBIA HOLDEN AT NDOLA (Criminal Jurisdiction) SCZ/103/2011 BETWEEN: JOSEPH MWAMBA KALENGA APPELLANT VS THE PEOPLE RESPONDENT Coram: SAKALA, CJ, MUYOVWE and MUSONDA, JJS On the

More information

IN THE HIGH COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA (NORTH WEST DIVISION, MAHIKENG)

IN THE HIGH COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA (NORTH WEST DIVISION, MAHIKENG) SAFLII Note: Certain personal/private details of parties or witnesses have been redacted from this document in compliance with the law and SAFLII Policy IN THE HIGH COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA (NORTH WEST DIVISION,

More information

DISCIPLINARY COMMITTEE OF THE ASSOCIATION OF CHARTERED CERTIFIED ACCOUNTANTS

DISCIPLINARY COMMITTEE OF THE ASSOCIATION OF CHARTERED CERTIFIED ACCOUNTANTS DISCIPLINARY COMMITTEE OF THE ASSOCIATION OF CHARTERED CERTIFIED ACCOUNTANTS REASONS FOR DECISION In the matter of: Stephen Jeremy Bache Heard on: 27 July 2015 Location: Committee: Legal Adviser: Persons

More information

DISCIPLINARY COMMITTEE OF THE ASSOCIATION OF CHARTERED CERTIFIED ACCOUNTANTS

DISCIPLINARY COMMITTEE OF THE ASSOCIATION OF CHARTERED CERTIFIED ACCOUNTANTS DISCIPLINARY COMMITTEE OF THE ASSOCIATION OF CHARTERED CERTIFIED ACCOUNTANTS REASONS FOR DECISION In the matter of: Mr Ibttsam Hamid Heard on: Thursday 18 August 2016 Location: The Chartered Institute

More information

NON-PRECEDENTIAL DECISION - SEE SUPERIOR COURT I.O.P : : : : : : : : :

NON-PRECEDENTIAL DECISION - SEE SUPERIOR COURT I.O.P : : : : : : : : : NON-PRECEDENTIAL DECISION - SEE SUPERIOR COURT I.O.P. 65.37 COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA v. AKEEM JOHNSON Appellant IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA No. 2880 EDA 2016 Appeal from the Judgment of Sentence

More information

THE IMMIGRATION ACTS. Before UPPER TRIBUNAL JUDGE CRAIG. Between MR ABDUL KADIR SAID. and. THE SECRETARY OF STATE FOR THE HOME DEPARTMENT Respondent

THE IMMIGRATION ACTS. Before UPPER TRIBUNAL JUDGE CRAIG. Between MR ABDUL KADIR SAID. and. THE SECRETARY OF STATE FOR THE HOME DEPARTMENT Respondent IAC-FH-NL-V1 Upper Tribunal (Immigration and Asylum Chamber) Appeal Number: DA/00950/2014 THE IMMIGRATION ACTS Heard at Royal Courts of Justice Oral determination given immediately following the hearing

More information

THE IMMIGRATION ACTS. Before UPPER TRIBUNAL JUDGE KOPIECZEK. Between. THE SECRETARY OF STATE FOR THE HOME DEPARTMENT Appellant and

THE IMMIGRATION ACTS. Before UPPER TRIBUNAL JUDGE KOPIECZEK. Between. THE SECRETARY OF STATE FOR THE HOME DEPARTMENT Appellant and Upper Tribunal (Immigration and Asylum Chamber) Appeal Number: DA/01787/2013 THE IMMIGRATION ACTS Heard at Royal Courts of Justice Determination Promulgated On 7 July 2014 On 15 th Aug 2014 Judgment given

More information

SUPREME COURT OF QUEENSLAND

SUPREME COURT OF QUEENSLAND SUPREME COURT OF QUEENSLAND CITATION: R v S [2000] QCA 256 PARTIES: R v S (appellant) FILE NO/S: CA No 80 of 2000 DC No 80 of 1999 DIVISION: PROCEEDING: ORIGINATING COURT: Court of Appeal Appeal against

More information

Alexander Blackman. In the Court Martial Appeal Court. Judgment. 21 st December 2016

Alexander Blackman. In the Court Martial Appeal Court. Judgment. 21 st December 2016 JU Alexander Blackman In the Court Martial Appeal Court Judgment 21 st December 2016 Lord Thomas of Cwmgiedd CJ and Sweeney J : 1. The court has before it this afternoon three applications. First an application

More information

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF TANZANIA AT ARUSHA

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF TANZANIA AT ARUSHA CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 103 OF 2006- COURT OF APPEAL OF TANZANIA AT ARUSHA- RAMADHANI, C.J., MROSO, J.A. And, KAJI J.A. NYEKA KOU Vs. REPUBLIC (Appeal from the Decision of the High Court of Tanzania at Arusha)-

More information

FREE STATE HIGH COURT, BLOEMFONTEIN REPUBLIC OF SOUTH AFRICA. LEKALE, J et DA ROCHA-BOLTNEY, AJ JUDGMENT

FREE STATE HIGH COURT, BLOEMFONTEIN REPUBLIC OF SOUTH AFRICA. LEKALE, J et DA ROCHA-BOLTNEY, AJ JUDGMENT FREE STATE HIGH COURT, BLOEMFONTEIN REPUBLIC OF SOUTH AFRICA In the appeal between:- Appeal No. : A297/11 BUSANI JOHANNES LOUW Appellant and THE STATE Respondent CORAM: LEKALE, J et DA ROCHA-BOLTNEY, AJ

More information

Ezekiel Wafula v Republic [2005] eklr REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA AT BUNGOMA

Ezekiel Wafula v Republic [2005] eklr REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA AT BUNGOMA REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA AT BUNGOMA Criminal Appeal 36 of 2004 (1) Arising from Webuye SRM Cr. Case no. 155 of 2003 EZEKIEL WAFULA..APPELLANT VS REPUBLIC..RESPONDENT J U D G M E N T

More information

IN THE HIGH COURT OF NEW ZEALAND AUCKLAND REGISTRY CIV [2015] NZHC KIWIBANK LIMITED Defendant

IN THE HIGH COURT OF NEW ZEALAND AUCKLAND REGISTRY CIV [2015] NZHC KIWIBANK LIMITED Defendant IN THE HIGH COURT OF NEW ZEALAND AUCKLAND REGISTRY CIV-2015-404-694 [2015] NZHC 1417 BETWEEN AND E-TRANS INTERNATIONAL FINANCE LIMITED Plaintiff KIWIBANK LIMITED Defendant Hearing: 23 April 2015 Appearances:

More information

THE IMMIGRATION ACTS. Heard at : Birmingham Magistrates Court Determination Promulgated On : 5 November 2014 On : 11 November 2014.

THE IMMIGRATION ACTS. Heard at : Birmingham Magistrates Court Determination Promulgated On : 5 November 2014 On : 11 November 2014. Upper Tribunal (Immigration and Asylum Chamber) Appeal Number: DA/00581/2014 THE IMMIGRATION ACTS Heard at : Birmingham Magistrates Court Determination Promulgated On : 5 November 2014 On : 11 November

More information

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF TANZANIA AT MWANZA. (CORAM: LUBUVA, J.A., MROSO, J.A., And RUTAKANGWA, J.A.) CRIMINAL APPEAL NO.

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF TANZANIA AT MWANZA. (CORAM: LUBUVA, J.A., MROSO, J.A., And RUTAKANGWA, J.A.) CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. THE COURT OF APPEAL OF TANZANIA AT MWANZA [CORAM: LUBUVA, J.A MROSSO, JA; RUTAKANGWA, J.A] CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 151 OF 2005 NGASA MADINA APPELLANT VERSUS THE REPUBLIC.. RESPONDENT (Appeal from the High

More information

FREE STATE HIGH COURT, BLOEMFONTEIN REPUBLIC OF SOUTH AFRICA

FREE STATE HIGH COURT, BLOEMFONTEIN REPUBLIC OF SOUTH AFRICA FREE STATE HIGH COURT, BLOEMFONTEIN REPUBLIC OF SOUTH AFRICA In the appeal of: DAVID LEPHUTHING Appeal No.:A137/2012 Appellant and THE STATE Respondent CORAM: MOLEMELA, J et THAMAGE, AJ DELIVERED ON: 14

More information

THE IMMIGRATION ACTS. Before. Upper Tribunal Judge Gleeson Deputy Upper Tribunal Judge Rimington. (Immigration and Asylum Chamber) Between

THE IMMIGRATION ACTS. Before. Upper Tribunal Judge Gleeson Deputy Upper Tribunal Judge Rimington. (Immigration and Asylum Chamber) Between Upper Tribunal (Immigration and Asylum Chamber) Appeal Number: DA/00112/2015 THE IMMIGRATION ACTS Heard at Field House Decision & Reasons Promulgated On 7 th December 2015 On 7 th January 2016 Before Upper

More information

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF NEW ZEALAND SC 78/2014 [2014] NZSC 197. Appellant. Elias CJ, McGrath, William Young, Glazebrook and Arnold JJ

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF NEW ZEALAND SC 78/2014 [2014] NZSC 197. Appellant. Elias CJ, McGrath, William Young, Glazebrook and Arnold JJ NOTE: THE ORDER MADE BY THE HIGH COURT ON 28 MAY 2012 PROHIBITING PUBLICATION OF THE PARTIES' NAMES AND ANY PARTICULARS THAT WOULD IDENTIFY THE RESPONDENT (INCLUDING HER NAME, OCCUPATION, EMPLOYMENT HISTORY

More information

Upper Tribunal (Immigration and Asylum Chamber) DA/00257/2014 THE IMMIGRATION ACTS

Upper Tribunal (Immigration and Asylum Chamber) DA/00257/2014 THE IMMIGRATION ACTS Upper Tribunal (Immigration and Asylum Chamber) DA/00257/2014 THE IMMIGRATION ACTS Heard at: Field House Decision and Reasons Promulgated On 24 th November 2015 On 11 th December 2015 Before Upper Tribunal

More information

IN THE HIGH COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA (BOPHUTHATSWANA PROVINCIAL DIVISION)

IN THE HIGH COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA (BOPHUTHATSWANA PROVINCIAL DIVISION) A NO: 18/2002 C IN THE HIGH COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA (BOPHUTHATSWANA PROVINCIAL DIVISION) In the matter between:- ALEX DHIKUSOOKA and THE STATE APPELLANT RESPONDENT APPLICATION MMABATHO LEEUW J COUNSEL FOR

More information

THE SUPREME COURT OF APPEAL OF SOUTH AFRICA JUDGMENT NOMFUSI NOMPUMZA SEYISI

THE SUPREME COURT OF APPEAL OF SOUTH AFRICA JUDGMENT NOMFUSI NOMPUMZA SEYISI THE SUPREME COURT OF APPEAL OF SOUTH AFRICA JUDGMENT Case no: 117/12 Non Reportable In the matter between: NOMFUSI NOMPUMZA SEYISI APPELLANT and THE STATE RESPONDENT Neutral citation: Seyisi v The State

More information

THE IMMIGRATION ACTS. Heard at Bradford Decision & Reasons Promulgated On 6 th February 2018 On 1 March Before

THE IMMIGRATION ACTS. Heard at Bradford Decision & Reasons Promulgated On 6 th February 2018 On 1 March Before Upper Tribunal (Immigration and Asylum Chamber) Appeal Number: HU/13377/2016 THE IMMIGRATION ACTS Heard at Bradford Decision & Reasons Promulgated On 6 th February 2018 On 1 March 2018 Before DEPUTY UPPER

More information

IN THE HIGH COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA (EASTERN CAPE DIVISION, GRAHAMSTOWN)

IN THE HIGH COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA (EASTERN CAPE DIVISION, GRAHAMSTOWN) 1 SAFLII Note: Certain personal/private details of parties or witnesses have been redacted from this document in compliance with the law and SAFLII Policy IN THE HIGH COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA (EASTERN CAPE

More information

ADDIE NKOSINGIPHILE SHABANGU

ADDIE NKOSINGIPHILE SHABANGU SAFLII Note: Certain personal/private details of parties or witnesses have been redacted from this document in compliance with the law and SAFLII Policy IN THE HIGH COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA (GAUTENG DIVISION,

More information

THE IMMIGRATION ACTS. On 17 December 2015 On 5 January Before DEPUTY UPPER TRIBUNAL JUDGE DOYLE. Between

THE IMMIGRATION ACTS. On 17 December 2015 On 5 January Before DEPUTY UPPER TRIBUNAL JUDGE DOYLE. Between Upper Tribunal (Immigration and Asylum Chamber) THE IMMIGRATION ACTS Heard at Field House Decision & Reasons Promulgated On 17 December 2015 On 5 January 2016 Before DEPUTY UPPER TRIBUNAL JUDGE DOYLE Between

More information

IN THE HIGH COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA GAUTENG DIVISION, PRETORIA

IN THE HIGH COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA GAUTENG DIVISION, PRETORIA SAFLII Note: Certain personal/private details of parties or witnesses have been redacted from this document in compliance with the law and SAFLII Policy IN THE HIGH COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA GAUTENG DIVISION,

More information

No. 1D On appeal from the Circuit Court for Hamilton County. Andrew J. Decker, III, Judge. August 24, 2018

No. 1D On appeal from the Circuit Court for Hamilton County. Andrew J. Decker, III, Judge. August 24, 2018 FIRST DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL STATE OF FLORIDA No. 1D17-836 TYRONE D. WALLACE, Appellant, v. STATE OF FLORIDA, Appellee. On appeal from the Circuit Court for Hamilton County. Andrew J. Decker, III, Judge.

More information

IN THE HIGH COURT OF NEW ZEALAND WELLINGTON REGISTRY AP 290/02 BETWEEN PAUL KHAN WHATUIRA A N D NEW ZEALAND POLICE ORAL JUDGMENT OF HAMMOND J

IN THE HIGH COURT OF NEW ZEALAND WELLINGTON REGISTRY AP 290/02 BETWEEN PAUL KHAN WHATUIRA A N D NEW ZEALAND POLICE ORAL JUDGMENT OF HAMMOND J cs6 IN THE HIGH COURT OF NEW ZEALAND WELLINGTON REGISTRY AP 290/02 BETWEEN PAUL KHAN WHATUIRA Appellant A N D NEW ZEALAND POLICE Respondent Hearing: 10 December 2002 Counsel: C Nicholls for Appellant M

More information

IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT NASHVILLE Assigned on Briefs April 24, 2007

IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT NASHVILLE Assigned on Briefs April 24, 2007 IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT NASHVILLE Assigned on Briefs April 24, 2007 STATE OF TENNESSEE v. EDWARD BUCK FRANKLIN Appeal from the Circuit Court for Bedford County No. 15,981 15,986

More information

DISCIPLINE CASE DIGEST

DISCIPLINE CASE DIGEST DISCIPLINE CASE DIGEST Case 16-10 Member: Jurisdiction: James Graeme Earle Young Winnipeg, Manitoba Called to the Bar: June 16, 2005 Particulars of Charges: Professional Misconduct (11 Counts): Breach

More information

IN THE HIGH COURT OF NEW ZEALAND AUCKLAND REGISTRY CRI [2015] NZHC Appellant. NEW ZEALAND POLICE Respondent

IN THE HIGH COURT OF NEW ZEALAND AUCKLAND REGISTRY CRI [2015] NZHC Appellant. NEW ZEALAND POLICE Respondent IN THE HIGH COURT OF NEW ZEALAND AUCKLAND REGISTRY CRI-2015-404-176 [2015] NZHC 2009 BETWEEN AND HORACE TOHU Appellant NEW ZEALAND POLICE Respondent Hearing: 24 August 2015 Counsel: M English for the Appellant

More information

2. Your conduct in relation to charge 1a took place at Grosvenor Dental Practice where you worked as a dentist.

2. Your conduct in relation to charge 1a took place at Grosvenor Dental Practice where you worked as a dentist. HEARING HEARD IN PUBLIC AGHAEI, Khosrow Registration No: 75287 PROFESSIONAL CONDUCT COMMITTEE DECEMBER 2014 Outcome: Fitness to Practise is impaired; erasure with an immediate suspension order Khosrow

More information

TRIBUNAL D APPEL EN MATIÈRE DE PERMIS

TRIBUNAL D APPEL EN MATIÈRE DE PERMIS LICENCE APPEAL TRIBUNAL Safety, Licensing Appeals and Standards Tribunals Ontario TRIBUNAL D APPEL EN MATIÈRE DE PERMIS Tribunaux de la sécurité, des appels en matière de permis et des normes Ontario Tribunal

More information

Upper Tribunal (Immigration and Asylum Chamber) HU/08884/2017 THE IMMIGRATION ACTS

Upper Tribunal (Immigration and Asylum Chamber) HU/08884/2017 THE IMMIGRATION ACTS Upper Tribunal (Immigration and Asylum Chamber) HU/08884/2017 Appeal Number: THE IMMIGRATION ACTS Heard at Royal Courts of Justice Decision & Reasons Promulgated On 18 December 2017 On 11 January 2018

More information

SUPREME COURT NGULUBE, D.C.J., GARDNER AND MUWO, J.J.S. 14TH SEPTEMBER AND 5TH OCTOBER,1982 (S.C.Z. JUDGMENT NO.28 OF 1982) APPEAL NO.

SUPREME COURT NGULUBE, D.C.J., GARDNER AND MUWO, J.J.S. 14TH SEPTEMBER AND 5TH OCTOBER,1982 (S.C.Z. JUDGMENT NO.28 OF 1982) APPEAL NO. THE PEOPLE (1982) Z.R. 115 (S.C.) SUPREME COURT NGULUBE, D.C.J., GARDNER AND MUWO, J.J.S. 14TH SEPTEMBER AND 5TH OCTOBER,1982 (S.C.Z. JUDGMENT NO.28 OF 1982) APPEAL NO.72 OF 1982 Flynote Criminal law and

More information

THE IMMIGRATION ACTS. Before UPPER TRIBUNAL JUDGE KEKIĆ. Between GLEZIER PALMER-LUIS (ANONYMITY ORDER NOT MADE) and

THE IMMIGRATION ACTS. Before UPPER TRIBUNAL JUDGE KEKIĆ. Between GLEZIER PALMER-LUIS (ANONYMITY ORDER NOT MADE) and Upper Tribunal (Immigration and Asylum Chamber) Appeal Number: DA/00604/2016 THE IMMIGRATION ACTS Heard at Field House Determination Promulgated On 20 July 2017 On 25 July 2017 Before UPPER TRIBUNAL JUDGE

More information

Mutua Mulundi v Republic [2005] eklr REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA AT MACHAKOS

Mutua Mulundi v Republic [2005] eklr REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA AT MACHAKOS REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA AT MACHAKOS Criminal Appeal 23 of 2003 (From Original conviction (s) and Sentence (s) in Criminal Case No. 720 of 2001 of the Resident Magistrate s Court at

More information

NON-PRECEDENTIAL DECISION - SEE SUPERIOR COURT I.O.P

NON-PRECEDENTIAL DECISION - SEE SUPERIOR COURT I.O.P NON-PRECEDENTIAL DECISION - SEE SUPERIOR COURT I.O.P. 65.37 COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA, Appellee IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA v. RALPH E. SMITH, Appellant No. 1229 MDA 2014 Appeal from the Judgment

More information

DECISION AND REASONS

DECISION AND REASONS Upper Tribunal (Immigration and Asylum Chamber) Appeal Number: IA/17105/2012 THE IMMIGRATION ACTS Heard at Field House Determination Promulgated On 21 April 2015 On 10 June 2015 Before UPPER TRIBUNAL JUDGE

More information

ASYLUM AND IMMIGRATION TRIBUNAL

ASYLUM AND IMMIGRATION TRIBUNAL RS and SS (Exclusion of appellant from hearing) Pakistan [2008] UKAIT 00012 ASYLUM AND IMMIGRATION TRIBUNAL THE IMMIGRATION ACTS Heard at: Field House Date of Hearing: 18 December 2007 Before: Mr C M G

More information

THE IMMIGRATION ACTS. Promulgated On 21 January 2015 On 11 February Before UPPER TRIBUNAL JUDGE DEANS. Between MR AQIB HUSSAIN.

THE IMMIGRATION ACTS. Promulgated On 21 January 2015 On 11 February Before UPPER TRIBUNAL JUDGE DEANS. Between MR AQIB HUSSAIN. Upper Tribunal (Immigration and Asylum Chamber) Appeal Number: DA/01309/2014 THE IMMIGRATION ACTS Heard at Glasgow Determination Promulgated On 21 January 2015 On 11 February 2015 Before UPPER TRIBUNAL

More information

HIGH COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA (GAUTENG DIVISION, PRETORIA)

HIGH COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA (GAUTENG DIVISION, PRETORIA) - - ------------------- HIGH COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA (GAUTENG DIVISION, PRETORIA) CASE NO: A200/2016 DELETE WHICHEVER IS NOT APPLICABLE (1) REPORTABLE: ~ / NO. (2) OF INTEREST TO OTHER JUDGES:,$ I NO. (3)

More information

JUDGMENT. [1] This is an appeal in terms of section 65 of Act 51 of 1977 ( the Act ) against a

JUDGMENT. [1] This is an appeal in terms of section 65 of Act 51 of 1977 ( the Act ) against a IN THE HIGH COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA EASTERN CAPE, PORT ELIZABETH CASE NO.: CA&R14/10 In the matter between: BASHARAD ALI Appellant and THE STATE Respondent JUDGMENT GROGAN AJ: [1] This is an appeal in terms

More information

THE IMMIGRATION ACTS. Promulgated On 22 December 2014 On 8 January Before DEPUTY UPPER TRIBUNAL JUDGE HANBURY. Between

THE IMMIGRATION ACTS. Promulgated On 22 December 2014 On 8 January Before DEPUTY UPPER TRIBUNAL JUDGE HANBURY. Between Upper Tribunal (Immigration and Asylum Chamber) Appeal Number: AA/03806/2014 THE IMMIGRATION ACTS Heard at Field House Determination Promulgated On 22 December 2014 On 8 January 2015 Before DEPUTY UPPER

More information

JUDGMENT OF THE COURT

JUDGMENT OF THE COURT IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF TANZANIA ATTANGA {CORAM: MBAROUK, J.A., MWARIJA, J.A. And MWANGESI. J.A.) CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 391 of 2016 CHARLES JUMA............ APPELLANT VERSUS THE REPUBLIC.......................

More information

REPUBLIC OF SOUTH AFRICA IN THE HIGH COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA GAUTENG DIVISION, PRETORIA NELSON GEORGE MASUNGA JUDGMENT

REPUBLIC OF SOUTH AFRICA IN THE HIGH COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA GAUTENG DIVISION, PRETORIA NELSON GEORGE MASUNGA JUDGMENT SAFLII Note: Certain personal/private details of parties or witnesses have been redacted from this document in compliance with the law and SAFLII Policy REPUBLIC OF SOUTH AFRICA IN THE HIGH COURT OF SOUTH

More information

DISCIPLINARY COMMITTEE OF THE ASSOCIATION OF CHARTERED CERTIFIED ACCOUNTANTS

DISCIPLINARY COMMITTEE OF THE ASSOCIATION OF CHARTERED CERTIFIED ACCOUNTANTS DISCIPLINARY COMMITTEE OF THE ASSOCIATION OF CHARTERED CERTIFIED ACCOUNTANTS REASONS FOR DECISION In the matter of: Mr Alan Goddard Heard on: 30 August 2016 Location: The Adelphi, 1-11 John Adam Street,

More information

THE SUPREME COURT OF APPEAL OF SOUTH AFRICA JUDGMENT. Appellant. Neutral citation: S v The State (423/11) [2011] ZASCA 214 (29 November 2011)

THE SUPREME COURT OF APPEAL OF SOUTH AFRICA JUDGMENT. Appellant. Neutral citation: S v The State (423/11) [2011] ZASCA 214 (29 November 2011) THE SUPREME COURT OF APPEAL OF SOUTH AFRICA JUDGMENT Case No: 423/11 In the matter between: S Appellant and THE STATE Respondent Neutral citation: S v The State (423/11) [2011] ZASCA 214 (29 November 2011)

More information

ALFRED HAROLD KEATING Appellant. THE NEW ZEALAND POLICE Respondent. G J Newell for the Appellant B D Tantrum and S T Teppett for the Respondent

ALFRED HAROLD KEATING Appellant. THE NEW ZEALAND POLICE Respondent. G J Newell for the Appellant B D Tantrum and S T Teppett for the Respondent IN THE HIGH COURT OF NEW ZEALAND AUCKLAND REGISTRY I TE KOTI MATUA O AOTEAROA TAMAKI MAKAURAU ROHE BETWEEN AND ALFRED HAROLD KEATING Appellant THE NEW ZEALAND POLICE Respondent CRI-2018-404-116 [2018]

More information

Taxi licensing Roy Light, St John s Chambers 10 December 2013

Taxi licensing Roy Light, St John s Chambers 10 December 2013 Taxi licensing Roy Light, St John s Chambers roy.light@stjohnschambers.co.uk 10 December 2013 Utilitarianism Recent cases R (application of Singh) v Cardiff City Council [2012] EWCH 1852 (Admin) taxi drivers

More information

Upper Tribunal (Immigration and Asylum Chamber) PA/05279/2016 THE IMMIGRATION ACTS

Upper Tribunal (Immigration and Asylum Chamber) PA/05279/2016 THE IMMIGRATION ACTS Upper Tribunal (Immigration and Asylum Chamber) PA/05279/2016 Appeal Number: THE IMMIGRATION ACTS Heard at Bradford Decision & Reasons Promulgated On 6 April 2017 On 9 May 2017 Before UPPER TRIBUNAL JUDGE

More information

Cotton, T. (2010) 'Court of appeal: Confession evidence and the circumstances requiring a voir dire', Journal of Criminal Law, 74 (5), pp

Cotton, T. (2010) 'Court of appeal: Confession evidence and the circumstances requiring a voir dire', Journal of Criminal Law, 74 (5), pp TeesRep - Teesside's Research Repository Court of appeal: Confession evidence and the circumstances requiring a voir dire Item type Authors Citation DOI Publisher Journal Additional Link Rights Article

More information

ORDER MO Appeal MA Brantford Police Services Board. September 6, 2018

ORDER MO Appeal MA Brantford Police Services Board. September 6, 2018 ORDER MO-3655 Appeal MA15-246 Brantford Police Services Board September 6, 2018 Summary: The appellant made an access request under the Act to the police for records relating to a homicide investigation

More information

Upper Tribunal (Immigration and Asylum Chamber) IA/35017/2015 THE IMMIGRATION ACTS. On 10 January 2018 On 11 January Before

Upper Tribunal (Immigration and Asylum Chamber) IA/35017/2015 THE IMMIGRATION ACTS. On 10 January 2018 On 11 January Before Upper Tribunal (Immigration and Asylum Chamber) IA/35017/2015 Appeal Number: THE IMMIGRATION ACTS Heard at Field House Decision Promulgated On 10 January 2018 On 11 January 2018 Before UPPER TRIBUNAL JUDGE

More information

THE IMMIGRATION ACTS. On 3 February 2015 On 6 February Before UPPER TRIBUNAL JUDGE PITT. Between MR SAULIUS VITAS. and

THE IMMIGRATION ACTS. On 3 February 2015 On 6 February Before UPPER TRIBUNAL JUDGE PITT. Between MR SAULIUS VITAS. and Upper Tribunal (Immigration and Asylum Chamber) THE IMMIGRATION ACTS Heard at Field House Decision & Reasons Promulgated On 3 February 2015 On 6 February 2015 Before UPPER TRIBUNAL JUDGE PITT Between MR

More information

COURT OF APPEALS SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS FORT WORTH

COURT OF APPEALS SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS FORT WORTH COURT OF APPEALS SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS FORT WORTH NO. 02-09-00360-CR JOHNNIE THEDDEUS GARDNER APPELLANT V. THE STATE OF TEXAS STATE ------------ FROM CRIMINAL DISTRICT COURT NO. 2 OF TARRANT COUNTY

More information

HIGH COURT OF AUSTRALIA

HIGH COURT OF AUSTRALIA HIGH COURT OF AUSTRALIA FRENCH C, KIEFEL, BELL, GAGELER AND KEANE DANG KHOA NGUYEN APPELLANT AND THE QUEEN RESPONDENT Nguyen v The Queen [2013] HCA 32 27 une 2013 M30/2013 ORDER 1. Appeal allowed. 2. Set

More information

Lakshmi Bhargavi Koppula. Na (Fiona) Zhou

Lakshmi Bhargavi Koppula. Na (Fiona) Zhou BEFORE THE IMMIGRATION ADVISERS COMPLAINTS AND DISCIPLINARY TRIBUNAL Decision No: [2015] NZIACDT 85 Reference No: IACDT 023/12 IN THE MATTER of a referral under s 48 of the Immigration Advisers Licensing

More information

IN THE HIGH COURT OF NEW ZEALAND CHRISTCHURCH REGISTRY CRI [2013] NZHC ANTHONY RAHIRI MARSH Appellant

IN THE HIGH COURT OF NEW ZEALAND CHRISTCHURCH REGISTRY CRI [2013] NZHC ANTHONY RAHIRI MARSH Appellant IN THE HIGH COURT OF NEW ZEALAND CHRISTCHURCH REGISTRY CRI-2013-409-000048 [2013] NZHC 2234 BETWEEN AND ANTHONY RAHIRI MARSH Appellant NEW ZEALAND POLICE Respondent Hearing: 28 August 2013 Appearances:

More information

CONCERNING CONCERNING BETWEEN. DECISION The names and identifying details of the parties in this decision have been changed.

CONCERNING CONCERNING BETWEEN. DECISION The names and identifying details of the parties in this decision have been changed. LCRO 279/2014 CONCERNING an application for review pursuant to section 193 of the Lawyers and Conveyancers Act 2006 AND CONCERNING a determination of the [City] Standards Committee [X] BETWEEN VJ Applicant

More information

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO SIXTH APPELLATE DISTRICT WILLIAMS COUNTY. Court of Appeals No. WM Appellee Trial Court No.

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO SIXTH APPELLATE DISTRICT WILLIAMS COUNTY. Court of Appeals No. WM Appellee Trial Court No. [Cite as State v. Treesh, 2008-Ohio-5630.] IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO SIXTH APPELLATE DISTRICT WILLIAMS COUNTY State of Ohio Court of Appeals No. WM-08-006 Appellee Trial Court No. 06 CR 141 v. James

More information

Appellant. THE QUEEN Respondent JUDGMENT OF THE COURT. The application for an extension of time within which to appeal is granted.

Appellant. THE QUEEN Respondent JUDGMENT OF THE COURT. The application for an extension of time within which to appeal is granted. IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF NEW ZEALAND CA542/2016 [2017] NZCA 212 BETWEEN AND JOHN SIONA MOALA Appellant THE QUEEN Respondent Hearing: 10 May 2017 Court: Counsel: Judgment: Harrison, Gilbert and Katz JJ

More information

COURT OF APPEAL FOR ONTARIO. APPELLANT S / RESPONDENT S FACTUM (Select One)

COURT OF APPEAL FOR ONTARIO. APPELLANT S / RESPONDENT S FACTUM (Select One) C.A. N o A-123-11 COURT OF APPEAL FOR ONTARIO BETWEEN: HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN (Appellant) - and - RAHEEM KHAN (Respondent) APPELLANT S / RESPONDENT S FACTUM (Select One) NAME OF LAW FIRM Address of law

More information

OPINION SUR PA.R.AP.P. 1925(a)

OPINION SUR PA.R.AP.P. 1925(a) Commonwealth v. Sellard No. 4518-2013 Ashworth, J. January 16, 2015 Criminal Sexual Abuse of Children Pa. R.A.P. 1925(a) Opinion Suppression IP Subscriber Name and Address Pennsylvania Stored Communications

More information

Court of Criminal Appeals April 22, 2015

Court of Criminal Appeals April 22, 2015 Court of Criminal Appeals April 22, 2015 Ehrke v. State No. PD-0071-14 Case Summary written by Kylie Rahl, Staff Member. JUDGE JOHNSON delivered the opinion of the court in which JUDGE MEYERS, JUDGE KEASLER,

More information

THE IMMIGRATION ACTS. Before UPPER TRIBUNAL JUDGE CRAIG PROFESSOR N M HILL QC DEPUTY JUDGE OF THE UPPER TRIBUNAL. Between

THE IMMIGRATION ACTS. Before UPPER TRIBUNAL JUDGE CRAIG PROFESSOR N M HILL QC DEPUTY JUDGE OF THE UPPER TRIBUNAL. Between IAC-FH-NL-V1 Upper Tribunal (Immigration and Asylum Chamber) Appeal Number: DA/01503/2014 THE IMMIGRATION ACTS Heard at Field House Oral determination given following hearing on 7 July 2015 Decision &

More information

THE IMMIGRATION ACTS. Before UPPER TRIBUNAL JUDGE MARTIN. Between. MR S A (Anonymity Direction Made) and

THE IMMIGRATION ACTS. Before UPPER TRIBUNAL JUDGE MARTIN. Between. MR S A (Anonymity Direction Made) and Upper Tribunal (Immigration and Asylum Chamber) THE IMMIGRATION ACTS Heard at Bennett House, Stoke-on-Trent Determination Promulgated On 23 rd January 2015 On 30 th January 2015 Before UPPER TRIBUNAL JUDGE

More information

COURT OF APPEALS THIRD APPELLATE DISTRICT DEFIANCE COUNTY STATE OF OHIO CASE NUMBER v. O P I N I O N

COURT OF APPEALS THIRD APPELLATE DISTRICT DEFIANCE COUNTY STATE OF OHIO CASE NUMBER v. O P I N I O N [Cite as State v. Reeder, 2003-Ohio-1371.] COURT OF APPEALS THIRD APPELLATE DISTRICT DEFIANCE COUNTY STATE OF OHIO CASE NUMBER 4-02-32 PLAINTIFF-APPELLEE v. O P I N I O N HEATHER J. REEDER DEFENDANT-APPELLANT

More information

Upper Tribunal (Immigration and Asylum Chamber) DC/00014/2016 THE IMMIGRATION ACTS

Upper Tribunal (Immigration and Asylum Chamber) DC/00014/2016 THE IMMIGRATION ACTS Upper Tribunal (Immigration and Asylum Chamber) DC/00014/2016 Appeal Number: THE IMMIGRATION ACTS Heard at Bradford Decision & Reasons Promulgated On 12 March 2018 On 27 April 2018 Before UPPER TRIBUNAL

More information

THE IMMIGRATION ACTS. Before UPPER TRIBUNAL JUDGE DAWSON. Between MR PAUL WAYNE STEPHENSON. and THE SECRETARY OF STATE FOR THE HOME DEPARTMENT

THE IMMIGRATION ACTS. Before UPPER TRIBUNAL JUDGE DAWSON. Between MR PAUL WAYNE STEPHENSON. and THE SECRETARY OF STATE FOR THE HOME DEPARTMENT Upper Tribunal (Immigration and Asylum Chamber) Appeal Number: DA/02333/2013 THE IMMIGRATION ACTS Heard at Manchester Crown Court Determination Promulgated On 10 May 2014 On 15 th May 2014 Before UPPER

More information

CONCERNING CONCERNING BETWEEN. HH and II. The names and identifying details of the parties in this decision have been changed.

CONCERNING CONCERNING BETWEEN. HH and II. The names and identifying details of the parties in this decision have been changed. LCRO 247/2014 CONCERNING an application for review pursuant to section 193 of the Lawyers and Conveyancers Act 2006 AND CONCERNING BETWEEN a determination of the [Area] Standards Committee [X] GG Applicants

More information

THE IMMIGRATION ACTS. On 14 August 2015 On 19 August Before DEPUTY UPPER TRIBUNAL JUDGE FROOM. Between S E Y (ANONYMITY DIRECTION MADE) and

THE IMMIGRATION ACTS. On 14 August 2015 On 19 August Before DEPUTY UPPER TRIBUNAL JUDGE FROOM. Between S E Y (ANONYMITY DIRECTION MADE) and Upper Tribunal (Immigration and Asylum Chamber) THE IMMIGRATION ACTS Heard at Field House Decision Promulgated On 14 August 2015 On 19 August 2015 Before DEPUTY UPPER TRIBUNAL JUDGE FROOM Between S E Y

More information

SUPREME COURT OF QUEENSLAND

SUPREME COURT OF QUEENSLAND SUPREME COURT OF QUEENSLAND CITATION: R v Hoet [2016] QCA 230 PARTIES: R v HOET, Reece Karaitana (appellant) FILE NO/S: CA No 64 of 2016 DC No 548 of 2016 DIVISION: PROCEEDING: Court of Appeal Appeal against

More information