GATEWA Y SERVICES COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT

Transcription

1 GATEWA Y SERVICES COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT Minutes of Meeting The regular meeting of the Board of Supervisors of the Gateway Services Community Development District was held on Thursday, at 4:00 p.m. at the Gateway Services COD Offices Meeting Room, located at Griffin Dr., Ft. Myers, Florida CALL TO ORDER/ROLL CALL Mr. Lamb called the regular meeting of the Board of Supervisors of the Gateway Services Community Development District to order on Thursday, October 2,2008 at 4:20 p.m. Board Members Present and Constituting a Quorum: Peter Doragh Chairman Bob Nielson Vice Chairman (joined meeting in progress) Patty Gedra Supervisor Carol Stanley Supervisor Staff Members Present: Brian Lamb Steve Connolly Tony Pires Bill Knight Steve Morrison Erik Howard Audience Members Present: Ed Tinkle Ed Sichel Gene Heiwig Jan Grier Various Residents District Manager, District Management Services, LLC District Treasurer, District Management Services, LLC (joined meeting in progress via speakerphone) District Counsel, Woodward, Pires & Lombardo, P.A. District Operations Manager, GSCDD District Engineer, Johnson Engineering, Inc. Representative, Johnson Engineering, Inc. President, Gateway Country Club, Park Committee Traffic Committee Chairman, Pelican Preserve Committee Vice Chairman, Pelican Preserve Committee Mr. Doragh briefly reviewed the rules and procedures for public participation during the Board of Supervisors meeting. 2. APPROVAL OF CONSENT AGENDA ITEMS CONSENT AGENDA ITEMS A. Approval of August 21, 2008 and September 4, 2008 Meeting Minutes (Tab I) B. Approval of Operations and Maintenance Expenditures, October 2008 (Tab 2) C. Approval of Enterprise Fund Expenditures, October 2008 (Tab 3)

2 GATEWAY SERVICES COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT Page 2 Approve the Consent Agenda Items: Meeting Minutes from August 21, 2008 and September 4,2008 (as revised); Operations and Maintenance Expenditures for October 2008 ($299, ); Enterprise Fund Expenditures, October 2008 ($141,292.66). Supervisor Stanley None further 3/0 - Motion passed unanimously 3. ITEMS FOR DISCUSSION A. Consideration of Employee Vacation Time Carry Over (Tab 4) Mr. Knight stated that on May I", 2008 the Board passed a motion to not allow District employees to CatTY over accrued unused vacation hours for more than one fiscal year. He stated that at the time of the motion there was discussion regarding how to deal with the transition of this new policy and no final decisions were made. Mr. Knight reviewed the options available to the Board with regards to the accumulated vacation time. He recommended that because the new vacation hour policy only affects three employees they provide a grandfather clause for the three employees. Mr. Doragh stated that if they follow the policy adopted by the Board there is a limitation at which pace people can utilize the vacation time. He stated that there isn't anything that causes the time to be consumed. Mr. Doragh stated that the time shouldn't be allowed to continue to increase. He stated that the accumulation should be capped at a specific amount. Mr. Doragh stated that if the employees do not use the extra time over the next four or five years, they will lose the time. Ms. Gedra stated that if they had a policy that they had to utilize their vacation time during the year in place years ago there would not be such an accumulation of time built up. She stated that now the rules are changing and they don't want to make them unfair but if they are going to address it so that at some point in time everybody will start with the same amount then they should figure out a policy where they have to use the time within a cettain time period or they will lose the time. Ms. Gedra asked if the affected employees will be given the choice of which option they would like to go with individually or will the Board be adopting the option as a policy. Mr. Lamb stated that the Operations Manager is providing a recommendation however the decision is at the Board's discretion. Ms. Gedra suggested that they payout half of the vacation time now and require that they utilize the remainder in the next two to five years. Mr. Doragh asked what they are going to limit the carryover of hours to be each year. Mr. Knight stated that they can not carryover more than what they can accrue in anyone year. Mr. Doragh asked if an employee who is not subject to the new policy accumulated an entire year of vacation time, could they take two years of vacation the next year or are they going to be subject to the one year plus 80 hours rule. Mr. Knight stated that they would still be subject to the one year plus 80 hours rule.

3 GATEWA Y SERVICES COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT Page 3 Mr. Doragh asked what the point of letting anyone carryover more than 80 hours was. Mr. Knight stated that it is not uncommon for government agencies to allow employees to carry over more than 80 hours. Ms. Gedra stated that most big corporations have a use it or lose it policy for vacation hours. Mr. Knight stated that he based his recommendation on the Board's motion. He stated that if an employee accrued two weeks of vacation during the year, they could only carryover that amount into the next year. Mr. Knight stated that if the employee only used a week of vacation time during the year, they could carry the other week over to the next year. He stated that the maximum amount of vacation time an employee could have on the books is four weeks. Mr. Doragh stated that there are at least three employees if not more that accrue vacation time at greater than 80 hours per year. Mr. Knight stated that he was providing an example. Mr. Doragh stated that if they allow people to accrue 160 hours and carry them over they are going to only allow them to use 240 hours in the next year. He stated that they basically would be requiring them to utilize the time over the next two years. It was stated that there should be an 80 hour cap to the amount of hours allowed to be carried over by all employees. Mr. Knight stated that since the motion was made, the whole team other than the three employees made sure to stay within the parameters. Ms. Gedra asked if they are going to tell the employees who have over 100 hours rolled over that they have to use the time within a certain time period or they will lose the hours. Mr. Lamb suggested providing an option to the indi vidual to either use the time by a certain date or being compensated for the time. Mr. Doragh stated that up until now they haven't allowed employees to opt out of vacation time unless they have quit so he didn't think they'd want to allow that. He stated that they could take the existing excess and require that it be brought into compliance with this plan over a period of years. Mr. Doragh stated that these individuals wouldn't have the ability to accrue additional hours beyond their current accrual and they would have to start using their vacation time. He clarified that at the end of the year the individual can not carryover more than what they current have. Mr. Doragh recommended that they cap the amount of hours an employee can carryover each year to 80 hours except for the three employees. He stated that the three individuals would have a schedule of how many hours they need to take per year to bring down their accumulation. Approve a policy to cap the amount of hours an employee can carry over each year to 80 hours with the exception of Terry Handlin, Dennis Burgener, and Dan Carrube. Supervisor Stanley None further 3/0 - Motion passed unanimously B. Review of Fiscal Year 2007 Financial Audit Report (Tab 5) Mr. Lamb stated that the audit was prepared for the period ending September 30, 2007 and was a clean report. He stated that a motion would be in order to accept the report as prepared. Mr. Lamb stated that he could have Steve Connolly join the meeting via conference call to answer any questions the Board may have. Mr. Pires stated that the report reflects that the Board members are elected by the landowners as opposed to requiring the Board members to be qualified electors/registered voters and needs to be revised. He stated that there were several other comments he provided to the auditor.

4 GATE\VA Y SERVICES COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT Page 4 (Mr. Connolly joined the meeting ill progress via speakerphone.) Mr. Doragh asked if there were any material changes from the internal year end accounting that the Board saw previously and the report being presented. Mr. Connolly stated that there were no material changes. Mr. Doragh stated that they should now be to the point that their financial reports for the fiscal year beginning October I, 2007 were built within DMS's office. Mr. Connolly stated that is correct. Mr. Doragh asked if going forward they should be able to avoid the lengthy process that they have been engaged in to get an audit completed. He stated that they should be able to get an audit completed for the fiscal year ending September 30, 2008 more expeditiously this year. Mr. Connolly stated that is correct. Mr. Nielson asked what Mr. Connolly what he considers timely. Mr. Connolly stated that he is aiming for a completion date in April Mr. Nielson asked if there were any changes at all to the audit. Mr. Connolly stated that there were no changes. He stated that the only thing that the auditor does that DMS does not is the depreciation on the fixed assets. Mr. Connolly stated that thcre were no adjustments to the figures that he provided the auditor. Mr. Connolly reviewed the report for the Board. Ms. Gedra asked if Mr. Pires changes were incorporated into the final report. Mr. Connolly stated that Mr. Pires changes were not incorporated but he reviewed the report and had some of the verbiage changed. He stated that because of the time restraints he had the report finalized without Mr. Pires comments. Mr. Connolly stated that there were references to WCI Communities being the major landowner and he had the report amended. Ms. Gedra asked if the reference to the Board being elected by the landowners was changed as well as the reference to 5,300 acres. Mr. Connolly stated that those changes were not made. Mr. Pires stated that those changes needed to be made prior to the Board accepting the report. He stated that on page 26 under the authorized investments it needs to track the specific statutes. Mr. Pires reviewed Section of the Florida Statutes in relation to the Districts investments. Mr. Doragh stated that he is accustomed in other organizations to getting a side letter of observations of potential weaknesses andlor opportunities for improvement in the accounting process. He asked if they received anything like that. Mr. Connolly stated that they did not but that they could request one. Mr. Doragh stated that they requested it when they hired the auditing firm. He stated that if the auditor has not seen the comments provided by Mr. Pires he does not feel they can approve the repolt subject to those comments because they do not know for sure that the auditor will accept the comments. Discussion ensued regarding Mr. Pires comments and whether they were factual or opinions. Mr. Connolly recommended that they accept the repolt subject to Mr. Pires changes and the addition of the letter as requested by Mr. Doragh. He stated that the report has been sent to the Auditor General but he can send the revised pages once they have been completed. Table the acceptance of the Fiscal Year 2007 Financial Audit Report until the next meeting. Supervisor Stanley None further 3/0 - Motion passed unanimously

5 GATEW A Y SERVICES COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT Page 5 Mr. Connolly reviewed the statement of net assets for the Enterprise Funds. He stated that the future projects of the fund were supposed to be paid out of new connection fees that in the last six months have dried up. Mr. Connolly stated that when the street light fund was terminated it had a net cash service of $900,000 which the Board directed to be transferred to the General Fund. He recommended that the Board redirect those funds back to the water and sewer fund. Mr. Connolly stated that his basis for that recommendation is that the street light fund was an Enterprise Fund to start with and the General Fund has net assets of just over $4,000,000 including the $900,000 that came from the street light fund. Mr. Doragh stated that they transfelted the money to the General Fund based on the recommendation of DMS. He stated that he is not aware that they will be making any capital improvements unless they have new roof tops. Mr. Doragh stated that there should still be some linkage in time between connection fees and capital improvements. He stated that the fact that they do not have capital improvements may also mean they don't have the need to make expenditures. Mr. Doragh stated that he believes they have already reserved a substantial amount of money for those improvements which they think will be required based on the existing system. He stated that they would need to look at whether there are improvements that need to be made that are not reserved for and have to be made whether or not there is any new development. Mr. Doragh stated that they do not need to create an operating reserve unless there are some. He stated that there should be an analysis they can do based upon the needs of the utility fund, enterprise fund, or equity to figure out what operating reserve they need to carry forward, if any, in addition to what they already have. (Mr. Connelly left the meeting in progress.) C. Discussion Regarding NovemberlDecember Newsletter Mr. Knight distributed a first draft of the November/December newsletter and asked for any suggestions for articles. Ms. Stanley stated that she provided Ms. Hamlin with an article regarding a new hazardous waste disposal center. Discussion ensued regarding possibly holding a food drive for the holidays. Mr. Doragh stated that they should have an article with an update on the Pelican Preserve matter as well as the bankruptcy matter. Ms. Gedra suggested that Mr. Knight include an article about the resurfacing project. Ms. Stanley suggested that they provide Thanksgiving tips in the newsletter. Mr. Doragh stated that they should include the elections results. 4, STAFF REPORTS A. District Counsel I. AC Schultes Contract - Pelican Preserve Mr. Pires stated that AC Schultes CAC") is well drilling contractor for the well field. He stated that he had a meeting with Mr. Knight and representatives of Johnson Engineering, Inc. to prepare, draft, and send a letter to AC in response to the request for final payment made by AC to the District. Mr. Pires stated that the letter stated that they calculate and are setting off against their request for final payment of $69,000 an amount of approximately $84,000 plus over $2,000 for additional engineering services that needed to be provided by Johnson Engineering, Inc. He stated that the District's position in the letter is that the contractor owes the District money. Mr. Pires stated that as soon as a response is received they will update the Board accordingly. He stated that at the previous meeting the Board stated that if there is no oppottunity or legal basis for recovery of the money he was not to expend funds working on the issue. Mr. Pires stated that in researching the matter he feels that there is a sufficient basis to claim a set off based upon the value of the contract to be completed and the final completion to be achieved within the required time frame.

6 GATEWA Y SERVICES COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT Page 6 Mr. Doragh asked what the original engineering costs were for the project. Mr. Pires stated that they were $127,000. He stated that there was a $2,900 ovenun of costs from the original contract. Mr. Pires provided an update on the turn lane for Pelican Preserve. He stated that he had a conference call with Mr. Lamb, Mr. Knight, and representatives of Johnson Engineering and the RW A. Mr. Pires stated that RW A is a surveying, planning, and engineering firm that was utilized by WCI. He stated that the design plans are fully completed for the turn lane. Mr. Pires stated that the development order was ready and may need to be modified but is ready to be picked up. He stated that they now need to finalize the tenns of the contract between RW A and Johnson Engineering, Inc. Mr. Pires stated that reviewed the services that RW A will be providing and reviewed the contract. He stated that the standard general telms and conditions are more geared towards a private entity and are not typical of what he has seen and he would not advise anyone to sign. Mr. Pires noted that RW A stated that they would look at the terms and conditions they use for governmental entities and amend the tenns. He stated that he revised the terms and conditions based on other governmental contracts he has seen and sent them to RW A for review. B. District Engineer Mr. MOlTison gave a presentation with an update on the irrigation system and the modeling they have been doing. Mr. Morrison stated that the Board approved Johnson Engineering, Inc. receivlllg $25,000 to do the modeling. Mr. Morrison stated that they have not expended those funds yet but to finish what they need to do including the testing he is requesting that they increase the amount to $35,000 so they finish the project and give the Board results at the November 20 th meeting. Mr. Morrison stated based upon the modeling that they have done it is evident that no matter what operating scenario the District operates under there are two sections of pipe that need to be upgraded. He stated that a second pipe needs to be installed parallel to the existing pipe in the ground. Mr. Morrison stated that would be consistent with the plan that they created 20 years ago when the system was originally designed. He stated that at that time the pipes were minimized to keep the costs down knowing that someday they would have to go back and parallel the pipes. Mr. Morrison stated that the two sections of pipe he is referring to is from the pump station out to Griffin Road and from Griffin Road over to Gateway Boulevard. He stated that there is a bottleneck in the system that needs to be improved. Mr. Morrison stated that he will not know what the final line sizes are until they finish the modeling but he knows they are going to need lines in those two locations. He stated that most of the design is the upfront work of the survey, the base maps, choosing a location, and figure out what size lines to put on the plans. Mr. Morrison recommended that they start designing and permitting those two line segments. He stated that if they can get the jump on the piece from the pump station to Griffin Road there is a chance they can work with the County and the County's contractor to possibly drop the piece in earlier using the County's contractor which will relieve the bottleneck from the pump station to Griffin Road. Mr. Morrison stated that they have a pump station that can pump 10,000 gallons a minute but is being limited to about 5,000. He stated that there was money in the original capital improvement plan (CIP) and the new CIP to do improvements to the irrigation system. Mr. Morrison stated that if they build the project as they design it, it will be an approximate $1.3 million project. Mr. Mon'ison stated that there is a Board meeting on November 20 th and he anticipates that they will come back to present the final results of the modeling. Mr. Morrison stated that they will assume that the County will pass the rule as is that allows them to do certain things and they will build it into the model. He stated that they will have finished all the onsite testing so they can determine the rate they are going to provide to each house.

7 GATEWA Y SERVICES COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT Page 7 Mr. Nielson stated that when Johnson Engineering, Inc. first came to the Board and stated that $25,000 will get the District a model he was under the impression that it was usable information. He stated that now they are saying it will be $35,000. Mr. Morrison stated that Johnson Engineering, Inc. came to the Board with a proposal for approximately $60,000 to do a model and everything else associated with it. He stated that the Board did not want to spend that amount and they quoted $25,000 to get the model up and running. Mr. Morrison explained the services that would be provided for the additional $10,000. Discussion ensued regarding whether the District has the ability to adopt schedules to manage water restrictions. Mr. Nielson stated that he feels they should let the new Board that will be in place in a month make the decision. Increase the authorization to a not -to-exceed amount of $35,000 for the irrigation system model. Supervisor Stanley Discussion ensued regarding whether utilizing a subcontractor is necessary for this matter or if Mr. Knight's team could've handled it. Mr. Tinkle asked Mr. Monison if the $1.3 million construction cost for the two additional pipes and the missing pipe. Mr. Monison stated that it is for the two pipes only. Mr. Tinkle asked if the $60,000 original quoted to the District include all engineering services, design through construction. Mr. Morrison stated that it was only for design, permitting, and bidding. He stated that it would get the District to the point where the District bid the project out and bring bids before the Board to award the contract. Mr. Monison stated that the $60,000 did not include any construction services. Mr. Tinkle stated that he looked at the as-builds for the neighborhood, the map shows it as eight inch lines looped in their neighborhood, and he thinks there are four and six inch lines in his neighborhood. He questioned whether in Old Mahogany North and Old Mahogany South if they are in fact eight inch lines. Mr. Tinkle stated that if it is an error then the model is a waste of time. Mr. Morrison stated that they checked and double checked and will ensure that the as builds are correct. Mr. Knight stated that they dug up a small portion to ensure that it was COlTect Motion passed (Supervisor Nielson opposed)

8 GATEWAY SERVICES COMMUNrry DEVEWPMENT DISTRICT Page 8 Mr. Tinkle asked Mr. Morrison if the $1.3 million construction cost for the two additional pipes and the missing pipe. Mr. Morrison stated that it is for the two pipes only. Mr. Tinkle asked if the $60,000 original quoted to the District include all engineering services, design through construction. Mr. MOtTison stated that it was only for design, permitting, and bidding. He stated that it would get the District to the point where the District bid the project out and bring bids before the Board to award the contract. Mr. MOlTison stated that the $60,000 did not include any construction services. Mr. Tinkle stated that he looked at the as-builds for the neighborhood, the map shows it as eight inch lines looped in their neighborhood, and he thinks there are four and six inch lines in his neighborhood. He questioned whether in Old Mahogany North and Old Mahogany South if they are in fact eight inch lines. Mr. Tinkle stated that if it is an error then the model is a waste of time. Mr. Morrison stated that they checked and double checked and will ensure that the as builds are correct. Mr. Knight stated that they dug up a small portion to ensure that it was COlTect. Mr. MOtTison stated that in anticipation of the missing pipe not being installed any time in the near future they looked at alternate alignments and presented them to Mr. Knight. Mr. Knight gave an update on his discussions with WCl's bankruptcy attorney in regards to receiving funds to install the missing pipe. Mr. Nielson stated that a meeting two months ago Mr. Howard made a presentation and stated that their distribution system is only as strong as its weakest link. He stated that it was identified that the loop that doesn't go through WCI property is their weakest link. Mr. Nielson stated that if their weakest link is not fixed what the two enhancements are going to do. Mr. Howard stated that he could run the model scenario and tell them exactly what it will do. Mr. Nielson asked if the loop is still the weakest link. Mr. MOlTison replied affirmatively. Mr. Nielson asked how it can be adding value to the District. Mr. Howard stated that he ran a few modeling scenarios of the system at 5,000 gallons per minute upwards of 50,000 gallons per minute. He stated that 50,000 gallons is unrealistic but it gave them a feel for the hydraulics of the system and the nature of the head loss and identified the other weak links within the distribution system. Mr. Howard stated that through the modeling and the balance of the operation and the management of the system they are going to finalize the line size so that it will be the right size to optimize the system. Mr. Morrison stated that all of the water in the community has to run through the pipe from the pump station to Griffin Road. He stated that it is cuttently a 20 inch line and if you try to put all of the water through the line they are going to lose a certain amount of pressure. Mr. MOtTison stated that a good poltion of the water for the community then has to run through the pipe from Griffin Road to Gateway Boulevard. He stated that the only other way the water can go is up Griffin Road through Hampton Park then come back from the North. Mr. MOlTison stated that can not happen though because of the missing link pieces. He stated that all of the water is trying to go down Griffin Road to Gateway Boulevard through a twelve inch pipe. Mr. MOlTison stated that there is a tremendous amount of head loss in that. He stated that if they can parallel that with a larger pipe it will increase the pressure at the intersection of Gateway Boulevard and Griffin Road tremendously. Mr. MOlTison stated that the Board would not be committing to spending the $1.3 million in construction costs. He stated that they would just be committing to the engineering and permitting costs. General discussion ensued. Mr. Howard stated that the application for wetland preserve 47 has been submitted and is being reviewed. Vincent Sardo, a resident, asked several questions regarding the irrigation system.

9 GATEWAY SERVICES COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT Page 9 C. Operations Manager 1. Dashboard Review Mr. Knight reviewed the project list for the Board. Mr. Doragh asked for a status update on the CSA agreement. Mr. Knight stated that the agreement is in draft fonn and ready to be put on the agenda. He stated that the Board directed him to negotiate with the CSA. Mr. Knight stated that he has met with the Director of Operations of the CSA and they reviewed the operational standpoints of the CSA agreements versus the changes that he requested from an operational standpoint. He stated that the CSA has agreed to most of it and Mr. Sherman would like to speak to the Board when the agreement is presented in regards to several areas. D. Committees 1. Park Committee Mr. Tinkle stated that the next meeting wil! be held on October ls'h 2. Traffic Committee Mr. Sichel stated that they wil! be holding a Safety Fair on October 18 th from 10:00 a.m. to I :00 p.m. at the Gateway Commons Pool. Ms. Sendewicz reviewed the activities that wil! take place at the fair. Mr. Sichel stated that the next meeting wil! be held on October 30'h at 5:00 p.m. and representatives from Lee County Department of Transportation wil! be in attendance to discuss and help the committee as they develop requirements for the turnover of the road. 3. Pelican Preserve Committee Mr. Heiwig stated that the committee was requested to recommend to modify or terminate the agreement with the Pelican Preserve. He stated that the committee is made up of six residents - Lynn Mil!er, Bob Geppert, Ned Haile, Jan Grier and Rob Werschky and himself. Mr. Heiwig stated that they have met six times as a committee since September 8 th to September 24th. He reviewed the information that they the committee needs from the Board and Staff. Ms. Gedra asked if they could have minutes from the committee meeting in the meeting packet. Mr. Knight stated that the minutes are done by Cindy Hamlin and are posted on the District website. Ms. Grier stated that they identified several items in comparing both sets of budgeting that were not as moved forward as they should have been. She stated that there were pieces along the way that will need to be studied in depth. Ms. Grier stated that their assumption is that the role of the committee would be limited to the point at which WCI comes out of bankruptcy and would renegotiate a contract with the CDD. She stated that the recommendation is to revise the contract so that the CDD col!ects the money but the Association delivers the service. Mr. Doragh asked if WCI indicated that they were open to that idea. Mr. Heiwig stated that WCI has not objected to anything. Mr. Knight stated that during this process, it was discovered that the boardwalk in Pelican Preserve is owned by the District. General discussion ensued. Mr. Lamb asked for clarification on whether the committee is recommending to the District to collect the funds, find a mechanism to transmit the funds to the HOA to utilize the funds to operate those facilities owned by the District. Ms. Grier stated that the golf course and the town center never contributed towards the guard house and privacy services or the maintenance of the boulevard coming into the comillunity.

10 GATEWA Y SERVICES COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT Page 10 Mr. Doragh thanked the committee for their hard work. He requested that the committee stay in place to be involved with the process to modify the agreement with WCI over the next 30 to 60 days. Mr. Doragh stated that they will look at extending the life of the committee if necessary. Accept the recommendation from the Pelican Preserve Advisory Committee to renegotiate the agreement with WCI Communities regarding the Pelican Preserve Master Community Association. Supervisor Stanley None further 4/0 - Motion passed unanimously E. District Manager I. Financial Statements Ending August 31, 2008 and Summary Analysis (Tab 6) and Summary Financial Ending August 31, 2008 (Tab 7) Approve Financial Statements Ending August 31, 2008 and Summary Analysis and Summary Financial Ending August 31, Supervisor Nielson None further 4/0 - Motion passed unanimously 5. SUPERVISOR REQUESTS AND AUDIENCE COMMENTS Mr. Doragh asked if there were any audience comments. There were none. Mr. Doragh asked if there were any Supervisor requests. Ms. Stanley requested the committee meeting minutes be put in the meeting book if possible. Mr. Knight stated that as Ms. Hamlin uploads them onto the document manager on the website she can them to Ms. Stanley. Ms. Gedra requested that an update from the committee be included in the upcoming newsletter. Mr. Lamb stated that a memo from the committee could be included in the meeting book with the minutes attached. Mr. Nielson asked Mr. Knight questions regarding the plant replacement program. He also asked about the impact fee credits to be reimbursed for the soccer park restroom project that is completed. Mr. Doragh thanked Mr. Knight for fixing the front entrance way and congratulated him for getting it done.

11 GATEWA Y SER VICES COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT Minules of lhe Regular Mccling Page II 6. TASK REVIEW Mr. Lamb briefly reviewed the items for follow-up. General discussion ensued. 7. ADJOURNMENT Chairman Doragh, with unanimous consensus of the Board, adjourned the meeting. *771ese minutes 'were done in summary format. *Each person who decides to appeal ally decision made by the Board with respect to ally mailer considered at the meeting is advised that persall 1110), need to ensure that a verbatim record of the proceedings is made, including the testimony alld evidence upon which such appeal is to be based. Meeting minutes Nre approved at a meeting by vote of the Board of Supervisors at a publicly noticed m~';"'a:~tu <b'= -M ~ Signature?: Printed Name Title:..<1'thairman o Vice Chairman Signature &.bed Me (san..jr = "hf'lw\ lr=\, I c!, /ld Printed Name Title: ~ecretary o Assistant Secretary Recorded by Records Administrat0QQp )2blnl-OJ1 ~J J nq IglOture 0 11 CLo/rl\ Date