IRS Practice and Procedure as to the Collection of Payroll Taxes. Penalties and Interest

Size: px
Start display at page:

Download "IRS Practice and Procedure as to the Collection of Payroll Taxes. Penalties and Interest"

Transcription

1 IRS Practice and Procedure as to the Collection of Payroll Taxes By: Kenneth B. Schwartz, Esq., CPA 500 North Broadway, Ste 124 Jericho, N.Y Tel: December 2, 2013 Penalties and Interest a) Failure to Make Deposits IRC 6656 imposes the following penalties when payroll taxes are not being deposited timely: 1. Two percent, if five days late or less; 2. Five percent, if six to fifteen days late; 3. Ten percent, if more than fifteen days late; and 4. Fifteen percent, if not paid within ten days after the earlier of (i) the date of the first delinquency notice, or (ii) the date on which notice and demand for payment is given. You can abate the penalties under IRC 6656 upon a showing of reasonable cause rather than willful neglect. b) Other Civil Penalties 1. Failure to File Return (IRC 6651(a)(1)) If failure due to willful neglect, 5 percent of the tax being due for each month the return not filed, to a maximum of 25 percent. To the extent that a failure to pay penalty may apply at the same time, the penalty for 1

2 failure to pay tax as shown on the return (see para. 2 ) will reduce the failure to file penalty dollar for dollar so the two will not apply at the same time. 2. Failure to Pay Tax Shown on Return (IRC 6651(a)(2)) If failure to pay tax is due to willful neglect, then penalty will equal.5 percent per month for each month unpaid, to a maximum of 25 percent. 3. Failure to Pay Tax Not Shown on Return (IRC 6651(a)(3)) If due to willful neglect,.5 percent per month of the unpaid tax, to a maximum of 25 percent. This penalty may apply in addition to the penalties for failure to file (para. 1, above) and failure to pay tax shown on return (para. 2, above). 4. Accuracy Related Penalty as to Underpayment of Tax (IRC 6662) 20 percent of the underpayment if attributable to (a) negligency or disregard of rules or regulations, or (b) a substantial understatement of tax. Substantial Understatement means the greater of $5,000 or 10 percent of the correct tax that s required on the return. The penalty will not apply if substantial authority exists for the position that was taken, or if adequate disclosure was made in a statement attached to the return. 5. Fraud Penalty (IRC 6663) 75 percent of any understatement of tax if any portion due to fraud. IRS would have the burden to establish fraud by showing (a) an understatement of tax, and (b) the taxpayer intended to evade his taxes (Park v. Comm. 94 TC 654 (1990)). 2

3 c) The Trust Fund Recovery Penalty (IRC 6672) An amount equal to the entire withholding for income, social security and medicare taxes inclusive of interest and penalties as to those who willfully fail to collect, account for or pay over the tax or who willfully acted to evade or defeat the tax. The IRS will look to all Responsible Persons for payment, severally, inclusive of anyone having the right to sign checks or to make decisions as to how the taxpayer can disburse funds, like for instance, officers and other employees having a meaningful financial involvement. Payments received under the Trust Fund Recovery Penalty will reduce the overall liability for trust fund withholdings, dollar for dollar (see eg., Ltr Rul ). The following procedures will apply to appeals and collections for the Trust Fund Recovery Penalty under IRC 6672: 1. Limitations Period IRS must serve a notice of proposed assessment prior to assessing any penalty under IRC 6672 within the limitations period in IRC 6501 (ie. generally, 3 years from the filing date of the return. The limitations period is then extended until the later of (i) 90 days after the service of the notice of proposed assessment, or (ii) 30 days after a final administrative determination if issued on a protest. IRC 6672(b)(3)) Day Notice IRS must serve its notice of proposed assessment, commonly known as Form 1153, at least 60 days prior to serving notice of a demand for payment. IRC 6672(b)(2). 3

4 3. Protest Upon receiving a notice of proposed assessment (ie. Form 1153), the taxpayer can file a protest with the Appeals Office of the IRS. This will generally stay any enforcement activity until a final determination is rendered by IRS (see Ltr Rul , citing IRM ; also see IRM (2)). The withdrawal of a timely protest will constitute a final administrative determination. id. 4. No Tax Court Jurisdiction The US Tax Court would lack jurisdiction over a dispute relating to IRC 6672, except in the context of a Collection Due Process Hearing under IRC Lawsuits in the Federal District Court Allowed as Exception to the Anti Injunction Act under IRC 7421 No levy allowed if a refund claim was filed as to any portion of the tax and a lawsuit for the claim was brought in the Federal District Court and the results of that case would settle the issues. IRC 6331(i). 6. Collection Due Process Applies to Levies under IRC Sec s and 6331 After an assessment is issued, but prior to levy, IRC 6331 requires both a Notice and Demand (ie. 10 day notice) and Final Notice and Demand (ie. 30 day notice) prior to the time that a levy can occur, or in other words, prior to an actual seizure of the taxpayer s property. After the Final Notice and Demand is issued, taxpayers have the right to demand a hearing and if so demanded, the IRS Office of Appeals will hold a hearing and 4

5 consider all issues that were not previously considered or waived. This would exclude all issues already addressed in a protest (see para. 4, above). After the Office of Appeals issues a final determination, the taxpayer may file a petition in the US Tax Court and the Court will consider de novo, all issues having been determined by the Office of Appeals, or those not waived by the taxpayer either on consent or by operation of law. 7. Collection Due Process Applies to Notices of Lien under IRC Sec s 6320, 6321 and 6323 The IRS may file a notice of lien as to unpaid taxes after assessing the tax and serving a notice and demand for payment. If not paid after the notice and demand is given, IRS may then file a notice of lien. Within 5 business days after a notice of lien is filed, the IRS must notify the taxpayer and afford him 30 days to demand a hearing as to the unpaid tax or the propriety of the lien. The Office of Appeals will then address any issues that were not addressed in any other administrative hearing, like for instance, a pre-levy hearing. The taxpayer may then file a petition in the US Tax Court within 30 days of a final determination. d) Abatement of Penalties Upon a showing of reasonable cause you can abate the penalties for failure to file a return or pay the tax under IRC 6651, and the penalties for failure to make deposits of payroll taxes under IRC Reasonable cause will generally involve a somewhat factual determination based upon actions which the taxpayer did or did not take to show circumstances either beyond his control, like for 5

6 instance a serious illness as to he or members of his immediate family, the erroneous advice of an IRS Office or employee (McMahan v. Comm. (2 nd Cir., 1997) 114 F.3d 366, or reliance on a mistaken legal opinion of a competent tax adviser that it was unnecessary to file a tax return. id. Relying upon an expert s advice as to substantive questions of tax law may constitute reasonable cause. U.S. v. Boyle (1985), 469 US 241. Similarly, IRC 6664(c) provides that penalties will not apply under IRC 6662 (ie., accuracy related penalty) and IRC 6663 (ie. fraud) if the taxpayer exercised reasonable cause and good faith. IRC 6404(f) requires the IRS to abate penalties or additions to tax which are due to the erroneous advice of an officer or employee of IRS in their official capacity, which (i) was given in response to the taxpayer s written request and was reasonably relied upon, and (ii) did not result from the taxpayer s failure to provide adequate information. e) Interest Interest on an underpayment of tax will apply from the date that a payment was due and it will continue to run until payment is received except that a notice and demand for payment, once served, will stop the running of interest as long as full payment is received within 21 days after the notice date. IRC 6601(e). Interest applies not only to underpaid taxes it call also apply to certain kinds of penalties like the failure to file penalty in IRC 6651(a)(1) if payment isn t made within 21 days after notice and demand. IRC 6601(e)(2). 6

7 The amount of interest will fluctuate according to the federal short term rates that are designated by Treasury at the beginning of each calendar quarter under IRC 1274(d), plus 3 percent in most cases, 5 percent for corporations if the underpayment exceeds $100,000. IRC Interest charges are compounded daily. IRC As to abating interest, IRC 6404(e) provides that you can potentially abate interest where IRS has acted in a fashion to cause unreasonable error or delay and the US Tax Court might even have jurisdiction to review a determination by IRS, however the better view holds that IRC 6404(e) does not apply to employment taxes. see eg., Woodral v. Comm., 112 TC 19 (1999). 7

ABA TAX SECTION WASHINGTON, DC

ABA TAX SECTION WASHINGTON, DC ABA TAX SECTION WASHINGTON, DC MAY 11, 2012 CLOSELY HELD BUSINESSES AND CIVIL AND CRIMINAL TAX PENALTIES COMMITTEES Presented by: Renesha N. Fountain Chamberlain, Hrdlicka, White, Williams & Aughtry Houston,

More information

Trust Fund Recovery. A Tax Resolution Institute Publication 2016

Trust Fund Recovery. A Tax Resolution Institute Publication 2016 A Tax Resolution Institute Publication 2016 Trust Fund Recovery Facing possible retributions such as civil liability for unpaid employment taxes, including penalties and interest, and possible criminal

More information

Bankruptcy Liquidating Trust Was Not Grantor Trust; Taxpayer Not Entitled to Associated NOLs

Bankruptcy Liquidating Trust Was Not Grantor Trust; Taxpayer Not Entitled to Associated NOLs Bankruptcy Liquidating Trust Was Not Grantor Trust; Taxpayer Not Entitled to Associated NOLs Gould, (2012) 139 TC No. 17 The Tax Court has held that a taxpayer was not the grantor of the liquidating trust

More information

Topical Index to Chapter 11 Penalties and Interest

Topical Index to Chapter 11 Penalties and Interest Topical Index to Chapter 11 Penalties and Interest 11.01 Accuracy-related penalty 6662 Penalties grouped Negligence Substantial understatement of income tax Substantial valuation misstatement Substantial

More information

11 - Court Rejects Taxpayer's Objections to IRS Collection Actions

11 - Court Rejects Taxpayer's Objections to IRS Collection Actions 11 - Court Rejects Taxpayer's Objections to IRS Collection Actions McAvey, TC Memo 2018-142 The Tax Court has held that IRS did not abuse its discretion with respect to various of its collection actions

More information

Kevin Murphy, Esq. Andreozzi Bluestein LLP 9145 Main Street Clarence, NY PH# (716) , Fax# (716)

Kevin Murphy, Esq. Andreozzi Bluestein LLP 9145 Main Street Clarence, NY PH# (716) , Fax# (716) Kevin Murphy, Esq. Andreozzi Bluestein LLP 9145 Main Street Clarence, NY 14031 PH# (716) 633-3200, Fax# (716) 633-0301 kmm@andreozzibluestein.com PART 1 BASIC TAX ISSUES IN BANKRUPTCY Tax Collection Defense

More information

DEALING WITH THE IRS

DEALING WITH THE IRS 2 STARTING A BUSINES RETIREMENT STRATEGIE OPERATING A BUSINES MARRIAG INVESTING TAX SMAR ESTATE PLANNIN 3 DEALING WITH THE IRS More individuals deal with the IRS than any other federal government agency.

More information

BOARD OF EQUALIZATION STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

BOARD OF EQUALIZATION STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) STATE BOARD OF EQUALIZATION In the Matter of the Appeal of: PEDRO V. DATING AND SIMONA V. DATING Representing the Parties: For Appellants: For Franchise Tax Board: Counsel for the Board of Equalization:

More information

IRS PENALTIES. Avoidance and abatement. June 2017

IRS PENALTIES. Avoidance and abatement. June 2017 IRS PENALTIES Avoidance and abatement June 2017 Today s presenters Patti Burquest Principal Washington National Tax Patti leads the firm s tax controversy team, with a focus on IRS examination and appeals.

More information

RETURN PREPARER PENALTIES UNDER TITLE 26

RETURN PREPARER PENALTIES UNDER TITLE 26 RETURN PREPARER PENALTIES UNDER TITLE 26 Bio Garrett Gregory Received JD from South Texas College of Law in 1999 Member of the Texas State Bar as of 1999 Received Master of Laws (Taxation) from Boston

More information

Why do penalties exist? NIB

Why do penalties exist? NIB Pg 369 397 Merrill J Fromer Why do penalties exist? NIB Encourage compliance with tax laws and regulations Punish taxpayers when they fail to adhere to tax laws and regulations Punish preparers when they

More information

Case 1:06-cv DLC Document 19 Filed 02/13/2008 Page 1 of 9

Case 1:06-cv DLC Document 19 Filed 02/13/2008 Page 1 of 9 Case 106-cv-13248-DLC Document 19 Filed 02/13/2008 Page 1 of 9 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK ----------------------------------------X FALLU PRODUCTIONS, INC., Plaintiff, -v-

More information

A. Circular 230 Proposed Regulations - September 2010

A. Circular 230 Proposed Regulations - September 2010 OUTLINE LEGAL ISSUES RELATED TO PAID PREPARER REQUIREMENTS FORMS 8038 By Nancy M. Lashnits Phoenix, Arizona A. Circular 230 Proposed Regulations - September 2010 1. The IRS published another round of Circular

More information

T.C. Memo UNITED STATES TAX COURT. CUSTOM STAIRS & TRIM, LTD., INC., Petitioner v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, Respondent

T.C. Memo UNITED STATES TAX COURT. CUSTOM STAIRS & TRIM, LTD., INC., Petitioner v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, Respondent T.C. Memo. 2011-155 UNITED STATES TAX COURT CUSTOM STAIRS & TRIM, LTD., INC., Petitioner v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, Respondent Docket No. 9204-09L. Filed July 5, 2011. P filed a petition for

More information

LIST OF SUBSTANTIVE CHANGES AND ADDITIONS Route To: Partners PPC's Guide to Dealing with the IRS Managers. Twenty second Edition (June 2014)

LIST OF SUBSTANTIVE CHANGES AND ADDITIONS Route To: Partners PPC's Guide to Dealing with the IRS Managers. Twenty second Edition (June 2014) LIST OF SUBSTANTIVE CHANGES AND ADDITIONS Route To: Partners PPC's Guide to Dealing with the IRS Managers Staff File Twenty second Edition (June 2014) The following are some of the features of this year

More information

IRS Errors Get Taxpayer Partial Abatement of Late Payment Interest

IRS Errors Get Taxpayer Partial Abatement of Late Payment Interest IRS Errors Get Taxpayer Partial Abatement of Late Payment Interest King, TC Memo 2015-36 Where a taxpayer was unable to pay his employment tax liabilities on time and asked for an installment payment agreement,

More information

Chapter 12 Tax Administration & Tax Planning

Chapter 12 Tax Administration & Tax Planning Chapter 12 Tax Administration & Tax Planning Income Tax Fundamentals 2011 Gerald E. Whittenburg & Martha Altus-Buller Learning Objectives Identify organizational structure of the IRS Understand IRS audit

More information

HOUSE BILL No As Amended by House Committee

HOUSE BILL No As Amended by House Committee Session of 0 As Amended by House Committee HOUSE BILL No. 0 By Committee on Taxation - 0 0 0 AN ACT concerning taxation; relating to the use of a debt collection agency to collect delinquent taxes; time

More information

Collection Due Process Hearing

Collection Due Process Hearing 263 Collection Due Process (CDP) Statutory Right A gift from the IRS Restructuring and Reform Act of 1998 1. Lien IRC 6320 2. Levy IRC 6330 263 264 Critical Issues of CDP Use it or lose it 30 days to REQUEST

More information

IRS COLLECTION PROCEDURES AND TAXPAYER REMEDIES

IRS COLLECTION PROCEDURES AND TAXPAYER REMEDIES IRS COLLECTION PROCEDURES AND TAXPAYER REMEDIES By: Daniel J. Cramer Cramer, Minock & Sweeney, PLC The IRS has broad powers to enforce tax laws and collect outstanding taxes. The most common IRS collection

More information

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT Peter McLauchlan v. Case: CIR 12-60657 Document: 00512551524 Page: 1 Date Filed: 03/06/2014Doc. 502551524 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT PETER A. MCLAUCHLAN, United States

More information

REPRESENTING NON-FILERS. Journal of the National Association of Enrolled Agents

REPRESENTING NON-FILERS. Journal of the National Association of Enrolled Agents REPRESENTING NON-FILERS Journal of the National Association of Enrolled Agents Published September/October 2007 By Howard S. Levy Non-filers are often overwhelmed by their predicament. Many times they

More information

LIST OF SUBSTANTIVE CHANGES AND ADDITIONS. PPC s Guide to Dealing with the IRS. Twenty-fourth Edition (June 2016)

LIST OF SUBSTANTIVE CHANGES AND ADDITIONS. PPC s Guide to Dealing with the IRS. Twenty-fourth Edition (June 2016) LIST OF SUBSTANTIVE CHANGES AND ADDITIONS PPC s Guide to Dealing with the IRS Twenty-fourth Edition (June 2016) The following are some of the features of this year s update of PPC s Guide to dealing with

More information

Representing the Innocent Spouse in Pre- and Post-Filing Tax Controversies

Representing the Innocent Spouse in Pre- and Post-Filing Tax Controversies Representing the Innocent Spouse in Pre- and Post-Filing Tax Controversies Presented to CPA Academy Lawrence A. Sannicandro, Esq. 1 Overview I. Introduction II. Conflicts of Interest III. Overview of Innocent

More information

The Audit is Over Now What?

The Audit is Over Now What? Where Do We Go From Here: A Comparison of Alternatives When You and the IRS Agree to Disagree JENNY LOUISE JOHNSON, Holland & Knight LLP Co-Chair of Tax Controversy Practice CHARLES E. HODGES, Kilpatrick

More information

DON T LEAVE MONEY ON THE TABLE! IRS [MIS]COMPUTATION OF INTEREST By: Bob Probasco The Probasco Law Firm

DON T LEAVE MONEY ON THE TABLE! IRS [MIS]COMPUTATION OF INTEREST By: Bob Probasco The Probasco Law Firm DON T LEAVE MONEY ON THE TABLE! IRS [MIS]COMPUTATION OF INTEREST By: Bob Probasco The Probasco Law Firm Robert.probasco@probascotaxlaw.com After resolving federal tax deficiencies or refunds, taxpayers

More information

STATUTE OF LIMITATIONS Analyze This. By LG Brooks Enrolled Agent

STATUTE OF LIMITATIONS Analyze This. By LG Brooks Enrolled Agent The capital of Texas enrolled agents Austin, Texas November 2008 STATUTE OF LIMITATIONS Analyze This By LG Brooks Enrolled Agent I. BIOGRAPHY LG Brooks, BA, EA LG Brooks is an Enrolled Agent and is the

More information

T.C. Memo UNITED STATES TAX COURT. KENNETH L. MALLORY AND LARITA K. MALLORY, Petitioners v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, Respondent

T.C. Memo UNITED STATES TAX COURT. KENNETH L. MALLORY AND LARITA K. MALLORY, Petitioners v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, Respondent T.C. Memo. 2016-110 UNITED STATES TAX COURT KENNETH L. MALLORY AND LARITA K. MALLORY, Petitioners v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, Respondent Docket No. 14873-14. Filed June 6, 2016. Joseph A. Flores,

More information

SUMMARY OF THE 2014 MISSISSIPPI TAXPAYER FAIRNESS ACT

SUMMARY OF THE 2014 MISSISSIPPI TAXPAYER FAIRNESS ACT SUMMARY OF THE 2014 MISSISSIPPI TAXPAYER FAIRNESS ACT This omnibus tax legislation, House Bill No. 799, was signed into law by Governor Phil Bryant on April 11, 2014, after passing the House of Representatives

More information

UILC: , , , , , ,

UILC: , , , , , , Office of Chief Counsel Internal Revenue Service Memorandum Number: 200503031 Release Date: 01/21/2005 CC:PA:APJP:B02 ------------ SCAF-119247-04 UILC: 6702.00-00, 6702.01-00, 6611.09-00, 6501.05-00, 6501.05-07,

More information

Responding to Adverse IRS Audit Assessments: Audit Reconsideration Requests, IRS Appeals, and Settlement Strategies

Responding to Adverse IRS Audit Assessments: Audit Reconsideration Requests, IRS Appeals, and Settlement Strategies Responding to Adverse IRS Audit Assessments: Audit Reconsideration Requests, IRS Appeals, and Settlement Strategies TUESDAY, MARCH 1, 2016, 1:00-2:50 pm Eastern IMPORTANT INFORMATION This program is approved

More information

Sec Imposition of Accuracy-Related Penalty on Underpayments.

Sec Imposition of Accuracy-Related Penalty on Underpayments. Sec. 6662. Imposition of Accuracy-Related Penalty on Underpayments. (a) Imposition of Penalty. If this section applies to any portion of an underpayment of tax required to be shown on a return, there shall

More information

ACCOUNTAX SCHOOL OF BUSINESS, INCORPORATED A Profile in Continuing Professional Education. Representing Clients During the Collections Process

ACCOUNTAX SCHOOL OF BUSINESS, INCORPORATED A Profile in Continuing Professional Education. Representing Clients During the Collections Process ACCOUNTAX SCHOOL OF BUSINESS, INCORPORATED A Profile in Continuing Professional Education Representing Clients During the Collections Process A. Extension of time to pay (e.g., Form 1127-A) If a taxpayer

More information

T.C. Memo UNITED STATES TAX COURT. ALEX AND TONJA ORIA, Petitioners v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, Respondent

T.C. Memo UNITED STATES TAX COURT. ALEX AND TONJA ORIA, Petitioners v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, Respondent T.C. Memo. 2007-226 UNITED STATES TAX COURT ALEX AND TONJA ORIA, Petitioners v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, Respondent Docket No. 246-05. Filed August 14, 2007. Steve M. Williard, for petitioners.

More information

Payment. You have unpaid taxes for 2017 Amount due: $1, Billing Summary. What you need to do immediately $1,075.21

Payment. You have unpaid taxes for 2017 Amount due: $1, Billing Summary. What you need to do immediately $1,075.21 Department of the Treasury Internal Revenue Service P.O. Box 9019 Holtsville, NY 11742-9019 date January 30, 2018 To contact us Phone 1-xxx-xxx-xxxx Your caller ID nnnn Page 1 of 5 JOHN AND MARY SMITH

More information

ALI-ABA Course of Study How To Handle a Tax Controversy at the IRS and in Court: From Administrative Audit Through Litigation

ALI-ABA Course of Study How To Handle a Tax Controversy at the IRS and in Court: From Administrative Audit Through Litigation 157 ALI-ABA Course of Study How To Handle a Tax Controversy at the IRS and in Court: From Administrative Audit Through Litigation Sponsored with the cooperation of the ABA Section of Taxation June 24-25,

More information

THE IRS NEW 2014 OFFSHORE VOLUNTARY DISCLOSURE PROCEDURES ANALYZED IN THE NEW OFFSHORE ENFORCEMENT ENVIRONMENT

THE IRS NEW 2014 OFFSHORE VOLUNTARY DISCLOSURE PROCEDURES ANALYZED IN THE NEW OFFSHORE ENFORCEMENT ENVIRONMENT THE IRS NEW 2014 OFFSHORE VOLUNTARY DISCLOSURE PROCEDURES ANALYZED IN THE NEW OFFSHORE ENFORCEMENT ENVIRONMENT Part II: THE STREAMLINED FILLING COMPLIANCE PROCEDURES On June 18, 2014, the Internal Revenue

More information

Kuznitsky v U.S. 17 F.3d 1029

Kuznitsky v U.S. 17 F.3d 1029 Kuznitsky v U.S. 17 F.3d 1029 CLICK HERE to return to the home page Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Illinois, Eastern Division. Before EASTERBROOK and RIPPLE,

More information

RIGHTS AND RESPONSIBILITIES AGREEMENT BETWEEN CHAPTER 13 DEBTORS AND THEIR ATTORNEYS (Model Retention Agreement)

RIGHTS AND RESPONSIBILITIES AGREEMENT BETWEEN CHAPTER 13 DEBTORS AND THEIR ATTORNEYS (Model Retention Agreement) 02/03/04 rev. UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS In re: Case No. Judge: RIGHTS AND RESPONSIBILITIES AGREEMENT BETWEEN CHAPTER 13 DEBTORS AND THEIR ATTORNEYS (Model Retention Agreement)

More information

AIRA 28 th Annual Bankruptcy & Restructuring Conference. Wednesday, June 6, 2012 San Francisco, CA

AIRA 28 th Annual Bankruptcy & Restructuring Conference. Wednesday, June 6, 2012 San Francisco, CA AIRA 28 th Annual Bankruptcy & Restructuring Conference Wednesday, June 6, 2012 San Francisco, CA TAX DISCHARGE Dennis Bean, CPA, CIRA Bean Hunt Harris & Company Certified Public Accountants Fresno, Ca.

More information

T.C. Memo UNITED STATES TAX COURT. EDWARD S. FLUME, Petitioner v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE, Respondent

T.C. Memo UNITED STATES TAX COURT. EDWARD S. FLUME, Petitioner v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE, Respondent T.C. Memo. 2017-21 UNITED STATES TAX COURT EDWARD S. FLUME, Petitioner v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE, Respondent Docket No. 15772-14L. Filed January 30, 2017. David Rodriguez, for petitioner.

More information

The Federal Payroll Tax Case (Focus on Trust-Fund Recovery Penalty)

The Federal Payroll Tax Case (Focus on Trust-Fund Recovery Penalty) The Federal Payroll Tax Case (Focus on Trust-Fund Recovery Penalty) STEPHEN P. KAUFFMAN ESQ. SKEEN & KAUFFMAN 911 N. CHARLES ST. BALTIMORE, MD 21201 SKAUFFMAN@SKAUFFLAW.COM 443.478.3720 Payroll Tax Compliance

More information

"It's Not My Fault": Scope of Reasonable Cause And Good Faith Exception to Tax Penalties

It's Not My Fault: Scope of Reasonable Cause And Good Faith Exception to Tax Penalties THE UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS SCHOOL OF LAW Presented: 61st Annual Taxation Conference December 4-5, 2013 Austin, Texas "It's Not My Fault": Scope of Reasonable Cause And Good Faith Exception to Tax Penalties

More information

Officers' Reasonable Belief That Taxes Were Paid Precluded Trust Fund Penalty

Officers' Reasonable Belief That Taxes Were Paid Precluded Trust Fund Penalty Officers' Reasonable Belief That Taxes Were Paid Precluded Trust Fund Penalty Byrne, (CA 6 5/15/2017) 119 AFTR 2d 2017-762 The Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit, vacating and remanding a district

More information

Gleim EA Review Updates to Part Edition, 1st Printing April 2016

Gleim EA Review Updates to Part Edition, 1st Printing April 2016 Page 1 of 6 Gleim EA Review Updates to Part 3 2016 Edition, 1st Printing April 2016 NOTE: Text that should be deleted is displayed with a line through it. New text is shown with a blue background. This

More information

Van Camp & Bennion v. United States 251 F.3d 862 (9th Cir. Wash. 2001).

Van Camp & Bennion v. United States 251 F.3d 862 (9th Cir. Wash. 2001). Van Camp & Bennion v. United States 251 F.3d 862 (9th Cir. Wash. 2001). CLICK HERE to return to the home page No. 96-36068. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Argued and Submitted September

More information

Payment. What you need to do immediately. You still have unpaid taxes Amount due: $4, Amount due $4,823.12

Payment. What you need to do immediately. You still have unpaid taxes Amount due: $4, Amount due $4,823.12 Department of the Tr easu r y Internal Revenue Service Au st in, TX 73301-0023 Date February 27, 2017 Page 1 of 5 s018999546711s JAMES & KAREN Q. HINDS 22 BOULDER STREET HANSON, CT 00000-7523 You still

More information

Intro to Collections

Intro to Collections Intro to Collections The Basics of the IRS Collection Process David F. Miles, E.A. August 6, 2013 Lecture Introduction This is an introductory course of IRS collections. The course will cover the fundamentals

More information

15 - First Circuit Determines When IRS Willfully Violates Bankruptcy Discharge Order

15 - First Circuit Determines When IRS Willfully Violates Bankruptcy Discharge Order 15 - First Circuit Determines When IRS Willfully Violates Bankruptcy Discharge Order IRS v. Murphy, (CA 1, 6/7/2018) 121 AFTR 2d 2018-834 The Court of Appeals for the First Circuit, affirming the district

More information

Amendments That Encourage Compliance with the Tax Law and Enhance the Tax Department's Enforcement Ability

Amendments That Encourage Compliance with the Tax Law and Enhance the Tax Department's Enforcement Ability New York State Department of Taxation and Finance Office of Tax Policy Analysis Taxpayer Guidance Division Amendments That Encourage Compliance with the Tax Law and Enhance the Tax Department's Enforcement

More information

Ch. 35 TAX EXAMINATIONS AND ASSESSMENTS CHAPTER 35. TAX EXAMINATIONS AND ASSESSMENTS

Ch. 35 TAX EXAMINATIONS AND ASSESSMENTS CHAPTER 35. TAX EXAMINATIONS AND ASSESSMENTS Ch. 35 TAX EXAMINATIONS AND ASSESSMENTS 61 35.1 CHAPTER 35. TAX EXAMINATIONS AND ASSESSMENTS Sec. 35.1. Tax examinations and assessments. 35.2. Interest, additions, penalties, crimes, and offenses. 35.3.

More information

136 T.C. No. 29 UNITED STATES TAX COURT. STEPHEN G. WOODSUM AND ANNE R. LOVETT, Petitioners v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, Respondent

136 T.C. No. 29 UNITED STATES TAX COURT. STEPHEN G. WOODSUM AND ANNE R. LOVETT, Petitioners v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, Respondent 136 T.C. No. 29 UNITED STATES TAX COURT STEPHEN G. WOODSUM AND ANNE R. LOVETT, Petitioners v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, Respondent Docket No. 18934-09. Filed June 13, 2011. In 2006 Ps received

More information

GAW v. COMMISSIONER 70 T.C.M. 336 (1995) T.C. Memo Docket No United States Tax Court. Filed August 8, MEMORANDUM OPINION

GAW v. COMMISSIONER 70 T.C.M. 336 (1995) T.C. Memo Docket No United States Tax Court. Filed August 8, MEMORANDUM OPINION 1 of 6 06-Oct-2012 18:01 GAW v. COMMISSIONER 70 T.C.M. 336 (1995) T.C. Memo. 1995-373 Anthony Teong-Chan Gaw and Rosanna W. Gaw v. Commissioner. Docket No. 8015-92. United States Tax Court. Filed August

More information

IRS Appeals New Faces, New Challenges

IRS Appeals New Faces, New Challenges TEI s 68 th Midyear Conference IRS Appeals New Faces, New Challenges Brian Kaufman, Capital One Financial Corporation (moderator) Patti Burquest, RSM US LLP Alex Sadler, Morgan, Lewis & Bockius LLP Susan

More information

Intermediate Sanctions (IRC 4958) Update. By Lawrence M. Brauer and Leonard J. Henzke

Intermediate Sanctions (IRC 4958) Update. By Lawrence M. Brauer and Leonard J. Henzke Intermediate Sanctions (IRC 4958) Update By Lawrence M. Brauer and Leonard J. Henzke Intermediate Sanctions (IRC 4958) Update By Lawrence M. Brauer and Leonard J. Henzke Overview Purpose This article

More information

Memorandum. Office of Chief Counsel Internal Revenue Service. Number: Release Date: 7/7/2006 CC:PA:APJP:B2:AMIELKE POSTN

Memorandum. Office of Chief Counsel Internal Revenue Service. Number: Release Date: 7/7/2006 CC:PA:APJP:B2:AMIELKE POSTN Office of Chief Counsel Internal Revenue Service Memorandum Number: 200627023 Release Date: 7/7/2006 CC:PA:APJP:B2:AMIELKE POSTN-112965-06 UILC: 6166.00-00, 6501.00-00, 6213.02-00, 7479.00-00, 7479.01-02

More information

Payment. Billing Summary $9,999.99

Payment. Billing Summary $9,999.99 Department of the Treasury Internal Revenue Service P.O. Box 480 Holtsville, NY 11742-0480 s018999546711s JOHN AND MARY SMITH 123 N HARRIS ST HARVARD, TX 12345 To contact us Phone 1-800-829-0922 Your caller

More information

Taxation of Corporations and their Shareholders. Chapter 17. Tax Penalties. UNC Charlotte Master of Accountancy Program

Taxation of Corporations and their Shareholders. Chapter 17. Tax Penalties. UNC Charlotte Master of Accountancy Program Taxation of Corporations and their Shareholders Chapter 17 Tax Penalties UNC Charlotte Master of Accountancy Program April 27, 2015 UNC Charlotte MACC Program Chapter 17. Some Important Tax Penalties Page

More information

T.C. Memo UNITED STATES TAX COURT. CHARLES D. SHAFFRAN, SR., Petitioner v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, Respondent

T.C. Memo UNITED STATES TAX COURT. CHARLES D. SHAFFRAN, SR., Petitioner v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, Respondent T.C. Memo. 2017-35 UNITED STATES TAX COURT CHARLES D. SHAFFRAN, SR., Petitioner v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, Respondent Docket No. 12611-12L. February 16, 2017. Charles D. Shaffran, Sr., pro se.

More information

SMU Law Review. Sarah S. Brieden. Volume 56 Issue 1 Article 26. Follow this and additional works at:

SMU Law Review. Sarah S. Brieden. Volume 56 Issue 1 Article 26. Follow this and additional works at: SMU Law Review Volume 56 Issue 1 Article 26 2003 The Ninth Circuit Holds That an Employer's Financial Difficulties Can Constitute Reasonable Cause for Failure to Pay Employment Taxes - Van Camp & (and)

More information

Introduction to Collections: 9/6/2012. The Basics of the IRS Collections Process

Introduction to Collections: 9/6/2012. The Basics of the IRS Collections Process David F. Miles, E.A. is a consultant with 20/20 Tax Resolution, Inc. with 15 years of tax resolution experience. David works nationally as a taxpayer representative focusing on state and IRS collections.

More information

Ethical Issues in Tax Practice

Ethical Issues in Tax Practice College of William & Mary Law School William & Mary Law School Scholarship Repository William & Mary Annual Tax Conference Conferences, Events, and Lectures 1995 Ethical Issues in Tax Practice Robert I.

More information

SHELF PROJECT. tax notes. Amended Returns Imposing a Duty to Correct Material Mistakes. By T. Keith Fogg and Calvin H. Johnson

SHELF PROJECT. tax notes. Amended Returns Imposing a Duty to Correct Material Mistakes. By T. Keith Fogg and Calvin H. Johnson Amended Returns Imposing a Duty to Correct Material Mistakes By T. Keith Fogg and Calvin H. Johnson T. Keith Fogg is a visiting associate professor and director of the tax clinic at Villanova Law School.

More information

Table of Contents. About This Book How To Use This Book Foreword Acknowledgments Preface

Table of Contents. About This Book How To Use This Book Foreword Acknowledgments Preface Table of Contents About This Book How To Use This Book Foreword Acknowledgments Preface vii ix xi xiii xv Chapter 1 Initial Client Engagement 1 Topical Index 1 1.01 Nature of Federal Tax Law 5 1.02 Role

More information

Case 1:16-cv WGY Document 14 Filed 09/06/16 Page 1 of 12 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS

Case 1:16-cv WGY Document 14 Filed 09/06/16 Page 1 of 12 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS Case 1:16-cv-10148-WGY Document 14 Filed 09/06/16 Page 1 of 12 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS IN RE: JOHAN K. NILSEN, Plaintiff/Appellant, v. CIVIL ACTION NO. 16-10148-WGY MASSACHUSETTS

More information

138 T.C. No. 18 UNITED STATES TAX COURT. HERSHAL WEBER, Petitioner v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, Respondent

138 T.C. No. 18 UNITED STATES TAX COURT. HERSHAL WEBER, Petitioner v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, Respondent 138 T.C. No. 18 UNITED STATES TAX COURT HERSHAL WEBER, Petitioner v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, Respondent Docket No. 27369-10L. Filed May 7, 2012. In 2007 P filed a Federal income tax return for

More information

The Internal Revenue Service is aware that certain promoters are advising

The Internal Revenue Service is aware that certain promoters are advising Part I Income Taxes Meritless Filing Position Based on Sections 932(c) and 934(b) Notice 2004-45 The Internal Revenue Service is aware that certain promoters are advising taxpayers to take highly questionable,

More information

Federal and State Employment Tax Issues

Federal and State Employment Tax Issues Federal and State Employment Tax Issues Seminar prepared for the Virginia Society of Enrolled Agents (September 2014) by The three most common problems 1. Not filing; 2. Not making timely deposits; and

More information

FORGIVE AND FORGET - - THE CALIFORNIA EMPLOYMENT TAX AMNESTY. By Steven Toscher, Esq. March, 1995

FORGIVE AND FORGET - - THE CALIFORNIA EMPLOYMENT TAX AMNESTY. By Steven Toscher, Esq. March, 1995 FORGIVE AND FORGET - - THE CALIFORNIA EMPLOYMENT TAX AMNESTY By Steven Toscher, Esq. March, 1995 INTRODUCTION Should a taxing authority be able to forgive and forget - - that is, grant amnesty to taxpayers

More information

GUIDANCE TO PRACTITIONERS REGARDING PROFESSIONAL OBLIGATIONS UNDER TREASURY CIRCULAR NO. 230 Who is Subject to Treasury Circular No.

GUIDANCE TO PRACTITIONERS REGARDING PROFESSIONAL OBLIGATIONS UNDER TREASURY CIRCULAR NO. 230 Who is Subject to Treasury Circular No. GUIDANCE TO PRACTITIONERS REGARDING PROFESSIONAL OBLIGATIONS UNDER TREASURY CIRCULAR NO. 230 Who is Subject to Treasury Circular No. 230 1 The provisions of Treasury Circular No. 230 apply to: Attorneys

More information

2017 Updates on Tax Ethics

2017 Updates on Tax Ethics 2017 Updates on Tax Ethics Frank J. Rooney, Esquire Rooney Law Firm Offices in CO, MD and VA 303-534-1690 Colorado 703-527-2660 Virginia 301-984-7505 Maryland 703-636-4445 Fax www.irsequalizer.com Course

More information

Overview of Tax Controversy and Procedure

Overview of Tax Controversy and Procedure Overview of Tax Controversy and Procedure Presented by: Deborah S. Kearns Assistant Clinical Professor of Law Albany Law School December 9, 2014 Getting Started Determine stage of tax controversy. Determine

More information

I. OVERVIEW: RIGHT TO HOLD FUNDS

I. OVERVIEW: RIGHT TO HOLD FUNDS 1 I. OVERVIEW: RIGHT TO HOLD FUNDS U.S. taxpayers can hold offshore accounts for a number of non tax reasons, including access to funds while living or working overseas, asset protection, investment portfolio

More information

Tax Workers Dealing with the IRS as a Creditor

Tax Workers Dealing with the IRS as a Creditor College of William & Mary Law School William & Mary Law School Scholarship Repository William & Mary Annual Tax Conference Conferences, Events, and Lectures 1991 Tax Workers Dealing with the IRS as a Creditor

More information

State Tax Return PENALTIES FOR GEORGIA TAX RETURN PREPARERS

State Tax Return PENALTIES FOR GEORGIA TAX RETURN PREPARERS June 2009 State Tax Return Volume 16 Number 2 PENALTIES FOR GEORGIA TAX RETURN PREPARERS E. Kendrick Smith Shane A. Lord Atlanta Atlanta (404) 581-8343 (404) 581-8055 On March 30, 2009, the Georgia General

More information

City Wide Transit, Inc. v. Comm'r 111 AFTR 2d (03/01/2013)

City Wide Transit, Inc. v. Comm'r 111 AFTR 2d (03/01/2013) City Wide Transit, Inc. v. Comm'r 111 AFTR 2d 2013-1012 (03/01/2013) CLICK HERE to return to the home page WESLEY, Circuit Judge: Some have suggested that the Commissioner of Internal Revenue ("Commissioner")

More information

A Guide to Tax Resolution: Solving IRS Problems

A Guide to Tax Resolution: Solving IRS Problems A Guide to Tax Resolution: Solving IRS Problems 0 A Guide to Tax Resolution: Solving IRS Problems Copyright 2014 by DELTACPE LLC All rights reserved. No part of this course may be reproduced in any form

More information

Alphabet Soup for Offers In Compromise (OIC)

Alphabet Soup for Offers In Compromise (OIC) HIGH- STAKES TAX DEFENSE & COMPLEX CRIMINAL DEFENSE 1012 Broad Street, 2nd Fl Bloomfield, NJ 07003 Tel (973) 783-7000 Fax (973) 338-3955 www.deblislaw.com 001612007 Alphabet Soup for Offers In Compromise

More information

President IRS Solutions Author Loves Taxes Loves Teaching Former Revenue Officer.

President IRS Solutions Author Loves Taxes Loves Teaching Former Revenue Officer. DAVID STONE, E.A. President IRS Solutions Author Loves Taxes Loves Teaching Former Revenue Officer 2 In this Session We Will Learn: 1. What tools the IRS has to use 2. What tools are available to the accountant

More information

2002 PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE (60 Minutes)

2002 PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE (60 Minutes) 2002 PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE (60 Minutes) Question P-1 (2 minute/s) Taxpayer has received an Internal Revenue Service ( IRS ) notice of deficiency with respect to income tax for 2001. Taxpayer timely files

More information

Ch. 119 LIABILITIES AND ASSESSMENT CHAPTER 119. LIABILITIES AND ASSESSMENT PROCEDURE AND ADMINISTRATION

Ch. 119 LIABILITIES AND ASSESSMENT CHAPTER 119. LIABILITIES AND ASSESSMENT PROCEDURE AND ADMINISTRATION Ch. 119 LIABILITIES AND ASSESSMENT 61 119.1 CHAPTER 119. LIABILITIES AND ASSESSMENT PROCEDURE AND ADMINISTRATION Sec. 119.1. Payment on notice and demand. 119.2. Assessment. 119.3. Bankruptcy or receivership.

More information

KANSAS LIQUOR DRINK TAX ACT AND REGULATIONS

KANSAS LIQUOR DRINK TAX ACT AND REGULATIONS KANSAS LIQUOR DRINK TAX ACT AND REGULATIONS K.S.A. Chapter 79, Article 41a Last amended in 2013 K.A.R. Agency 92, Article 24 Last amended in March 2010 Without Annotations - For Public Distribution Division

More information

IRS Wasn't Wrong to Reject Taxpayer Payment Plan that Didn't Pay Off Liability in Ten Years

IRS Wasn't Wrong to Reject Taxpayer Payment Plan that Didn't Pay Off Liability in Ten Years IRS Wasn't Wrong to Reject Taxpayer Payment Plan that Didn't Pay Off Liability in Ten Years Brown, TC Memo 2016-82 The Tax Court has held that IRS was not wrong to reject, based on several failings by

More information

2017 Loscalzo Institute, a Kaplan Company

2017 Loscalzo Institute, a Kaplan Company June 5, 2017 Section: Exam IRS Warns Agents Against Using IRS Website FAQs to Sustain Positions in Exam... 2 Citation: SBSE-04-0517-0030, 5/30/17... 2 Section: Payments User Fees For Certain Rulings, Including

More information

UNITED STATES TAX COURT WASHINGTON, DC ORDER AND ORDER OF DISMISSAL FOR LACK OF JURISDICTION

UNITED STATES TAX COURT WASHINGTON, DC ORDER AND ORDER OF DISMISSAL FOR LACK OF JURISDICTION 24 RS UNITED STATES TAX COURT WASHINGTON, DC 20217 JOHN M. CRIM, Petitioner(s, v. Docket No. 1638-15 COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, Respondent. ORDER AND ORDER OF DISMISSAL FOR LACK OF JURISDICTION

More information

Primer on Third Party Liability and the Foreclosure of the Federal Tax Lien

Primer on Third Party Liability and the Foreclosure of the Federal Tax Lien Primer on Third Party Liability and the Foreclosure of the Federal Tax Lien Michael A. Lampert, Michael A. Lampert, P.A., West Palm Beach, Florida Michelle M. Robles, Senior Attorney, Office of Chief Counsel

More information

Circular 230 Changes Affecting Employee Benefits

Circular 230 Changes Affecting Employee Benefits Circular 230 Changes Affecting Employee Benefits Charles F. Plenge Haynes and Boone, LLP October 22, 2011 Who May Practice Attorneys Certified Public Accountants (CPAs) Enrolled Agents (EAs) Enrolled Actuaries

More information

IRS OFFSHORE VOLUNTARY COMPLIANCE INITIATIVE. Hal J. Webb, Esq. Partner, Steven L. Cantor, P.A. April 3, 2003 STEVEN L. CANTOR, P.A.

IRS OFFSHORE VOLUNTARY COMPLIANCE INITIATIVE. Hal J. Webb, Esq. Partner, Steven L. Cantor, P.A. April 3, 2003 STEVEN L. CANTOR, P.A. IRS OFFSHORE VOLUNTARY COMPLIANCE INITIATIVE STEVEN L. CANTOR, P.A. April 3, 2003 Hal J. Webb, Esq. Partner, Steven L. Cantor, P.A. Copyright 2003 Steven L. Cantor, P.A. All rights reserved. What is the

More information

CHAPTER 25 TAX ADMINISTRATION AND PRACTICE SOLUTIONS TO PROBLEM MATERIALS. Status: Q/P Question/ Present in Prior Problem Topic Edition Edition

CHAPTER 25 TAX ADMINISTRATION AND PRACTICE SOLUTIONS TO PROBLEM MATERIALS. Status: Q/P Question/ Present in Prior Problem Topic Edition Edition CHAPTER 25 TAX ADMINISTRATION AND PRACTICE SOLUTIONS TO PROBLEM MATERIALS Status: Q/P Question/ Present in Prior Problem Topic Edition Edition 1 Rates of audit Unchanged 1 2 Document matching and preparer

More information

Payment. Billing Summary. What you need to do immediately $ Changes to your 2016 Form 1040A Amount due: $425.73

Payment. Billing Summary. What you need to do immediately $ Changes to your 2016 Form 1040A Amount due: $425.73 Department of the Treasury Internal Revenue Service Stop 6525 (SP CIS) Kansas City, MO 64999-0025 s018999546711s JOHN AND MARY SMITH 123 N HARRIS ST HARVARD, TX 12345 Notice To contact us Phone 1-800-829-0922

More information

Rule 006 Refunds & Credits

Rule 006 Refunds & Credits Rule 006 Refunds & Credits Refunds or credits are granted according to R.S. 47:337.77 through 47:337.81 and 47:337.86. When requesting a refund or credit, the taxpayer must first submit a formal written

More information

The IRS Collection Process

The IRS Collection Process IRS Mission: Provide America s taxpayers top quality service by helping them understand and meet their tax responsibilities and by applying the tax law with integrity and fairness to all. What You Should

More information

137 T.C. No. 4 UNITED STATES TAX COURT. KENNETH WILLIAM KASPER, Petitioner v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, Respondent

137 T.C. No. 4 UNITED STATES TAX COURT. KENNETH WILLIAM KASPER, Petitioner v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, Respondent 137 T.C. No. 4 UNITED STATES TAX COURT KENNETH WILLIAM KASPER, Petitioner v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, Respondent Docket No. 13399-10W. Filed July 12, 2011. On Jan. 29, 2009, P filed with R a claim

More information

Your client calls frantic one

Your client calls frantic one The IRS Disqualified Employment Tax Levy Just When the Client Thought It Was Safe to Owe Money Again By Lauren M. McNair, Esq. and Eric L. Green, Esq., Green & Sklarz LLC Your client calls frantic one

More information

Circular 230 Diligence and Competence

Circular 230 Diligence and Competence Circular 230 Diligence and Competence Thomas V. Curtin October 24, 2016 Statutory Authority 31 U.S.C. 330 (1884) Regulate the practice of representatives of persons before the Department of the Treasury

More information

Offer-in-Compromise Why or Why Not

Offer-in-Compromise Why or Why Not Why or Why Not The Capital of Texas Enrolled Agents November 2010 by: lg brooks, ea Why or Why Not Table of Contents Introduction 3 The Offer Process 4 The Offer in Compromise: Offers in General 4 Grounds

More information

Managing Tax Audits and Appeals September 22, 2016 Marina del Rey

Managing Tax Audits and Appeals September 22, 2016 Marina del Rey Managing Tax Audits and Appeals 2016 September 22, 2016 Marina del Rey Privilege and Work Product Developments David J. Fischer - 3 - Privilege 101 Attorney-client privilege: Communications between an

More information

Busy Season. all year long. TRI Tax Resolution Institute. where your tax debt is your power!

Busy Season. all year long. TRI Tax Resolution Institute. where your tax debt is your power! 1 TRI Tax Resolution Institute where your tax debt is your power! Busy Season all year long www.taxresolutioninstitute.org info@taxresolutioninstitute.org (877) 829-8370 2 Appeals www.taxresolutioninstitute.org

More information

Effectively Representing the Taxpayer in a Substantiation and Penalty Case. US Tax Court Judicial Conference Tuesday March 27, 2018

Effectively Representing the Taxpayer in a Substantiation and Penalty Case. US Tax Court Judicial Conference Tuesday March 27, 2018 Effectively Representing the Taxpayer in a Substantiation and Penalty Case US Tax Court Judicial Conference Tuesday March 27, 2018 Substantiation of Income/gross receipts and Expenses- generally Self-employed

More information

Petitioners, Respondent.

Petitioners, Respondent. No. IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES JOHN A. BARRETT, JR. and SHERYL S. BARRETT, v. Petitioners, UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Respondent. On Petition For A Writ Of f Certiorari To The United States

More information