IRS Errors Get Taxpayer Partial Abatement of Late Payment Interest
|
|
- Luke Brooks
- 5 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 IRS Errors Get Taxpayer Partial Abatement of Late Payment Interest King, TC Memo Where a taxpayer was unable to pay his employment tax liabilities on time and asked for an installment payment agreement, and IRS made procedural errors and bad judgments, the Tax Court has held that some of the interest that accrued on his late payments were excessive. As a result, the Court abated that interest but not the rest of the late payment interest. Code Sec. 6404(a) provides: "IRS is authorized to abate the unpaid portion of the assessment of any tax or any liability in respect thereof, which-(1) is excessive in amount, or (2) is assessed after the expiration of the period of limitation properly applicable thereto, or (3) is erroneously or illegally assessed." Code Sec. 6404(e) authorizes IRS to abate the assessment of interest on (1) any deficiency attributable to IRS' unreasonable error or delay in performing a ministerial or managerial act, or (2) any payment of tax described in Code Sec. 6212(a) to the extent that unreasonable error or delay in such payment is attributable to IRS' being erroneous or dilatory in performing a ministerial or managerial act. IRS's power to abate an assessment of interest involves the exercise of discretion, and the Tax Court gives due deference to IRS's discretion. In order to prevail, a taxpayer must prove that IRS exercised this discretion arbitrarily, capriciously, or without sound basis in fact or law. (Woodral, (1999) 112 TC 19 ) IRS has the authority to prescribe the procedures, form, and manner of proposing installment agreements. ( Reg (b)(1) ) The Internal Revenue Manual (IRM) pt outlines the ways in which a taxpayer may request an installment agreement. According to the IRM, "proposals to enter into installment agreements may result from letters, phone contacts, voic , , or other communications between taxpayers and Service personnel." (IRM pt (1)) The IRM further provides that an installment agreement request must do the following 1
2 four things before an IRS employee may identify a taxpayer's account as having a pending installment agreement: (1) provide sufficient information to identify the taxpayer, (2) identify the tax liability that the request addresses, (3) propose a periodic payment of a specific amount, and (4) be in compliance with filing requirements. If the taxpayer does not satisfy these four requirements, the IRS employee is instructed to ask the taxpayer for the missing information. The IRM provides an example: If no payment amount is specified, the employee should ask how much can be paid per month. Once IRS receives a perfected installment agreement request, it must enter a computer input code within 24 hours of the request for pending agreements; that code prevents levy actions. (IRM pt ) Mr. King, the taxpayer, agreed that he was liable for unpaid employment taxes and penalties of $50,000 but he didn't have the cash to pay that amount in a lump sum. He owned several items of real property in which he had significant equity. On Mar. 5, 2009, he sent the examining IRS agent from the IRS Cincinnati office a letter that requested an installment agreement; the request indicated that he pay an undisclosed amount per month for a period of five years and that, thereafter, he would have funds to pay off the remaining balance. Mr. Oliver in the Cincinnati IRS office responded that it would be happy to honor his request, but first King would have to sign Form 2504, an agreement to assessment and collection. On Mar. 12, 2009, King returned the signed Form 2504, together with another letter that contained the same request as the Mar. 5 letter. IRS did not send King Form 9456, Installment Agreement Request, nor did IRS give him specific instructions that he would need to complete that form. It did not respond to either of King's letters. Instead, on Apr. 13, 2009, IRS assessed the $50,000 plus interest, and, on May 18, 2009, it sent several notices that stated that it intended to levy and implored King to respond immediately. King then contacted the IRS Cincinnati office, was told that Mr. Oliver was out on medical leave and that he might be entitled to some relief if he contacted the Taxpayer 2
3 Advocate Service (TAS). King contacted the TAS and spoke with Taxpayer Advocate (TA) Morrell on June 10, After significant correspondence between King and Morrell in which King complied with all of Morrell's requests, on Aug. 5, 2009, Morrell told King that he needed to pay more than the $1,000 per month that he had proposed to her, that he should mortgage his real estate in order to raise money, that she didn't have the authority to process an installment request, that a revenue officer (RO) had to process such a request, and that he needed to send additional financial information before she could forward the matter to a RO. On Aug. 18, 2009, IRS, acting on King's Mar. 5 letter, put a code into King's file that indicated that there was a pending installment agreement. On Sept. 4, 2009, Morrell indicated that she had all of the financial information. On Jan. 13, 2010, Morrell recommended that a RO be assigned to assist King with establishing an installment agreement. IRS told TAS that its ROs had a full inventory of cases and couldn't get to King's request then. On Mar. 15, 2010, IRS assigned a RO. The RO recommended that King file Form 9456, which King did on Apr. 30, On June 16, 2010, the RO called King to tell him that she was recommending his installment agreement request be denied and suggested that he sell or mortgage an interest in real estate to pay the tax liabilities. On Aug. 5, 2010, the RO called King to tell him that his installment agreement request had been denied because King had significant property that he could sell or mortgage. In July 2010, IRS Appeals held a collection due process (CDP) hearing and subsequently issued a notice of determination upholding the denial of the installment request. King sought to have IRS abate his late payment interest, and, when it refused, he petitioned the Tax Court to have the late payment interest abated. The Tax Court abated the late payment interest that accrued for the period from Mar. 5, 2009 to June 10, 2009 but did not abate any of the other interest. 3
4 The Court began its analysis by stating that it is well established that IRS does not have authority to abate assessed interest pursuant to Code Sec. 6404(e) with respect to employment taxes. (Woodral; Scanlon White, Inc., TC Memo ; see also Reg (a) ) Therefore, IRS did not commit an abuse of discretion by denying King's claim for abatement under Code Sec. 6404(e) because IRS does not have the authority under Code Sec. 6404(e) to abate interest on employment taxes. The Court then looked to Code Sec. 6404(a) and noted, citing H & H Trim & Upholstery Co., TC Memo , that Code Sec. 6404(a) 's "any liability in respect thereof" language includes interest that has accrued on the underlying tax. And, it said that it interpreted the word "excessive" in Code Sec. 6404(a), as it relates to interest, to include a concept of unfairness under all of the facts and circumstances. The Court then noted that King's Mar. 5, 2009 letter identified him and the employment tax liabilities. It did not propose a specific amount per month, however. Because neither King's Mar. 5, 2009, letter nor the Mar. 12, 2009, letter provided information sufficient to satisfy the four requirements of IRM pt , King did not submit a perfected installment agreement. IRS was therefore not required to enter an input code within 24 hours of receipt of either letter. At that point, an IRS employee should have asked King how much he could afford to pay each month and whether he was in filing compliance. See IRM pt Instead of communicating this to King, however, IRS next corresponded with King over two months later when it sent notices threatening collection action by levy. King followed the instructions in IRS's Mar. 5, 2009, letter by mailing the Forms He did not receive any indication from IRS that his installment agreement request was deficient. IRS did not adhere to the instructions in IRM pt by asking for the information missing from King's proposal. It was reasonable for King to believe, absent communication from IRS, that his installment agreement would be processed once IRS received the Forms IRS assessed the tax on Apr. 13, Therefore, IRS had received and processed the Forms 2504 by that date but did not communicate to King 4
5 about his proposed installment agreement at that time. The delay from IRS's failure to communicate to King the deficiencies of his proposed installment agreement was unfair to King under all the facts and circumstances. The fact that King may not have qualified for an installment agreement at that time was not dispositive, as IRS failed to take even preliminary steps toward determining King's eligibility. It was not until June 10, 2009, when King spoke with TAS, that he was informed of the additional steps necessary to arrange an installment agreement, putting him back in the place he would have been in had IRS's Cincinnati office timely communicated with him. The Court was satisfied that, had IRS timely communicated with King about the proposal, King would have perfected his proposal within a reasonable time. The Court said that it was further satisfied that, but for IRS's delay in communicating with King, he would have paid his employment tax liabilities earlier. IRS contends that King is not entitled to abatement because he could have made voluntary payments but did not. However, unlike Code Sec. 6404(e), Code Sec. 6404(a) does not bar abatement when a significant aspect of the error or delay can be attributed to the taxpayer involved. Therefore, the interest that accrued from Apr. 13, 2009 until June 10, 2009, was excessive, and IRS's denial of King's request to abate this interest was an abuse of discretion. In concluding that no additional interest should be abated, the Court noted the following:... After June 10, 2009, King knew or should have known the requirements for submitting an installment agreement, such as providing financial information. On Aug. 5, 2009, after receiving the requested financial information, Morrell told King that TAS did not have authority to accept collection alternatives. Although IRS may have shuffled King to TAS to resolve its own mistakes, TAS is an independent body, and was not under obligation to assist King with his case. And 5
6 King did not show, but for a particular action that TAS took, his employment tax obligations would have been paid sooner.... IRS had stated that it did not have a qualified RO available until Mar. 15, The RO first met with King shortly thereafter. The Court accepted IRS's testimony that the only qualified RO in the area had a full inventory and could not accept more cases. This delay was not unreasonable under the circumstances. Accordingly, King did not show that the interest that accrued during this time was excessive or that IRS abused his discretion by failing to abate it.... The record did not show that the RO did not follow IRS procedures or otherwise cause unnecessary and unfair delay while processing the Form King's case was promptly and effectively transferred to Appeals, which promptly and effectively conducted the CDP hearing and issued a notice of determination. 6
11 - Court Rejects Taxpayer's Objections to IRS Collection Actions
11 - Court Rejects Taxpayer's Objections to IRS Collection Actions McAvey, TC Memo 2018-142 The Tax Court has held that IRS did not abuse its discretion with respect to various of its collection actions
More informationTax Court Sheds Light on Calculations IRS Should Use in Considering Offers in Compromise
Tax Court Sheds Light on Calculations IRS Should Use in Considering Offers in Compromise Alphson, TC Memo 2016-84 In concluding that IRS did not abuse its discretion in rejecting a taxpayer's offer in
More informationTenth Circuit Finds IRS Followed Procedures and Could Proceed with Levy Action. Cropper v. Comm., (CA 10 6/22/2016) 117 AFTR 2d
Tenth Circuit Finds IRS Followed Procedures and Could Proceed with Levy Action Cropper v. Comm., (CA 10 6/22/2016) 117 AFTR 2d 2016-794 The Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit concluded that because
More information09 - Individual Wasn t Excused From Tax Liability Despite Prescription Drug-induced Gambling Addiction
09 - Individual Wasn t Excused From Tax Liability Despite Prescription Drug-induced Gambling Addiction Gillette, TC Memo 2018-195 The Tax Court has rejected a taxpayer's contention that she was not liable
More informationT.C. Memo UNITED STATES TAX COURT. KENNETH L. MALLORY AND LARITA K. MALLORY, Petitioners v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, Respondent
T.C. Memo. 2016-110 UNITED STATES TAX COURT KENNETH L. MALLORY AND LARITA K. MALLORY, Petitioners v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, Respondent Docket No. 14873-14. Filed June 6, 2016. Joseph A. Flores,
More informationIRS Wasn't Wrong to Reject Taxpayer Payment Plan that Didn't Pay Off Liability in Ten Years
IRS Wasn't Wrong to Reject Taxpayer Payment Plan that Didn't Pay Off Liability in Ten Years Brown, TC Memo 2016-82 The Tax Court has held that IRS was not wrong to reject, based on several failings by
More informationInnocent Spouse Relief from Interest & Penalty Granted to Sole Earner Despite Contrary Rev Proc
Innocent Spouse Relief from Interest & Penalty Granted to Sole Earner Despite Contrary Rev Proc Joseph Patrick Boyle, TC Memo 2016-87 The Tax Court, rejecting IRS's contention that Code Sec. 6015 innocent
More information137 T.C. No. 4 UNITED STATES TAX COURT. KENNETH WILLIAM KASPER, Petitioner v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, Respondent
137 T.C. No. 4 UNITED STATES TAX COURT KENNETH WILLIAM KASPER, Petitioner v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, Respondent Docket No. 13399-10W. Filed July 12, 2011. On Jan. 29, 2009, P filed with R a claim
More informationACCOUNTAX SCHOOL OF BUSINESS, INCORPORATED A Profile in Continuing Professional Education. Representing Clients During the Collections Process
ACCOUNTAX SCHOOL OF BUSINESS, INCORPORATED A Profile in Continuing Professional Education Representing Clients During the Collections Process A. Extension of time to pay (e.g., Form 1127-A) If a taxpayer
More information10 - No Abuse of Discretion by Settlement Officer in Rejecting Offer-in- Compromise
10 - No Abuse of Discretion by Settlement Officer in Rejecting Offer-in- Compromise Gustashaw,TC Memo 2018-215 The Tax Court has concluded that a settlement officer did not abuse his discretion in denying
More information19 - Taxpayer Had Basis in Solar Panels for Purposes of Bonus Depreciation and Energy Credit
19 - Taxpayer Had Basis in Solar Panels for Purposes of Bonus Depreciation and Energy Credit Golan, TC Memo 2018-76 The Tax Court has concluded that a taxpayer established a basis in solar panels and related
More information21 - CA 10 Clarifies TEFRA Partnership Audit SOL and Trial Court Jurisdiction. Omega Forex Group LC et al., (CA 10 10/22/2018) 122 AFTR 2d
21 - CA 10 Clarifies TEFRA Partnership Audit SOL and Trial Court Jurisdiction Omega Forex Group LC et al., (CA 10 10/22/2018) 122 AFTR 2d 2018-5350 The Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit, affirming
More informationBankruptcy Liquidating Trust Was Not Grantor Trust; Taxpayer Not Entitled to Associated NOLs
Bankruptcy Liquidating Trust Was Not Grantor Trust; Taxpayer Not Entitled to Associated NOLs Gould, (2012) 139 TC No. 17 The Tax Court has held that a taxpayer was not the grantor of the liquidating trust
More informationT.C. Memo UNITED STATES TAX COURT. EDWARD S. FLUME, Petitioner v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE, Respondent
T.C. Memo. 2017-21 UNITED STATES TAX COURT EDWARD S. FLUME, Petitioner v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE, Respondent Docket No. 15772-14L. Filed January 30, 2017. David Rodriguez, for petitioner.
More informationStatute of Limitations on Collection Extended by Taxpayer Bankruptcy, Offer in Compromise. Fields, (DC NM 3/17/2016) 117 AFTR 2d
Statute of Limitations on Collection Extended by Taxpayer Bankruptcy, Offer in Compromise Fields, (DC NM 3/17/2016) 117 AFTR 2d 2016-528 A district court has approved IRS's calculation of an extension
More informationINTERNAL MANUAL -- PASSPORT CERTIFICATION PROCEDURES
INTERNAL MANUAL -- PASSPORT CERTIFICATION PROCEDURES (Excerpted from IRS Internal Manual. https://www.irs.gov/irm. Both sections below are substantially the same. The first applies to field collection
More informationDebtor Owes Self-employment Tax on Earnings from Post-petition Services
Debtor Owes Self-employment Tax on Earnings from Post-petition Services Sisson, TC Memo 2016-143 The Tax Court has concluded that a Chapter 11 debtor was liable for selfemployment tax on self-employment
More informationT.C. Memo UNITED STATES TAX COURT. CUSTOM STAIRS & TRIM, LTD., INC., Petitioner v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, Respondent
T.C. Memo. 2011-155 UNITED STATES TAX COURT CUSTOM STAIRS & TRIM, LTD., INC., Petitioner v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, Respondent Docket No. 9204-09L. Filed July 5, 2011. P filed a petition for
More informationIRS Practice and Procedure as to the Collection of Payroll Taxes. Penalties and Interest
IRS Practice and Procedure as to the Collection of Payroll Taxes By: Kenneth B. Schwartz, Esq., CPA 500 North Broadway, Ste 124 Jericho, N.Y. 11754 Tel: 516-333-7020 www.schwartzattorney.com December 2,
More information15 - First Circuit Determines When IRS Willfully Violates Bankruptcy Discharge Order
15 - First Circuit Determines When IRS Willfully Violates Bankruptcy Discharge Order IRS v. Murphy, (CA 1, 6/7/2018) 121 AFTR 2d 2018-834 The Court of Appeals for the First Circuit, affirming the district
More information135 T.C. No. 4 UNITED STATES TAX COURT. WILLIAM PRENTICE COOPER, III, Petitioner v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, Respondent
135 T.C. No. 4 UNITED STATES TAX COURT WILLIAM PRENTICE COOPER, III, Petitioner v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, Respondent Docket Nos. 24178-09W, 24179-09W. Filed July 8, 2010. P filed two claims
More informationPart 5. Collecting Process. Chapter 14. Installment Agreements. Section 1. Securing Installment Agreements Securing Installment Agreements
Part 5. Collecting Process Chapter 14. Installment Agreements Section 1. Securing Installment Agreements 5.14.1 Securing Installment Agreements 5.14.1.1 Overview 5.14.1.2 Installment Agreements and Taxpayer
More information133 T.C. No. 16 UNITED STATES TAX COURT. KATHLEEN A. VINATIERI, Petitioner v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, Respondent
133 T.C. No. 16 UNITED STATES TAX COURT KATHLEEN A. VINATIERI, Petitioner v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, Respondent Docket No. 15895-08L. Filed December 21, 2009. R issued P a notice of intent to
More information14 - IRS Didn't Prove That Taxpayer Convicted of Filing False Returns Intended to Evade Tax
14 - IRS Didn't Prove That Taxpayer Convicted of Filing False Returns Intended to Evade Tax Mathews, TC Memo 2018-212 The Tax Court has held that, although the taxpayer was convicted of filing false income
More information2017 Loscalzo Institute, a Kaplan Company
June 5, 2017 Section: Exam IRS Warns Agents Against Using IRS Website FAQs to Sustain Positions in Exam... 2 Citation: SBSE-04-0517-0030, 5/30/17... 2 Section: Payments User Fees For Certain Rulings, Including
More informationCh. 119 LIABILITIES AND ASSESSMENT CHAPTER 119. LIABILITIES AND ASSESSMENT PROCEDURE AND ADMINISTRATION
Ch. 119 LIABILITIES AND ASSESSMENT 61 119.1 CHAPTER 119. LIABILITIES AND ASSESSMENT PROCEDURE AND ADMINISTRATION Sec. 119.1. Payment on notice and demand. 119.2. Assessment. 119.3. Bankruptcy or receivership.
More informationIRS COLLECTION PROCEDURES AND TAXPAYER REMEDIES
IRS COLLECTION PROCEDURES AND TAXPAYER REMEDIES By: Daniel J. Cramer Cramer, Minock & Sweeney, PLC The IRS has broad powers to enforce tax laws and collect outstanding taxes. The most common IRS collection
More informationMemorandum. Office of Chief Counsel Internal Revenue Service. Number: Release Date: 7/7/2006 CC:PA:APJP:B2:AMIELKE POSTN
Office of Chief Counsel Internal Revenue Service Memorandum Number: 200627023 Release Date: 7/7/2006 CC:PA:APJP:B2:AMIELKE POSTN-112965-06 UILC: 6166.00-00, 6501.00-00, 6213.02-00, 7479.00-00, 7479.01-02
More informationTAX PRACTICE FINAL COPYRIGHT 2017 LGUTEF. Learning Objectives. Introduction
TAX PRACTICE 14 Issue 1: Substitute for Returns and Superseding Returns.. 506 Issue 2: Nonfilers........... 509 Issue 3: Collection Statute of Limitations.............. 513 Issue 4: Transferees, Nominees,
More informationThe Audit is Over Now What?
Where Do We Go From Here: A Comparison of Alternatives When You and the IRS Agree to Disagree JENNY LOUISE JOHNSON, Holland & Knight LLP Co-Chair of Tax Controversy Practice CHARLES E. HODGES, Kilpatrick
More informationT.C. Memo UNITED STATES TAX COURT. MURRAY S. FRIEDLAND, Petitioner v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, Respondent
T.C. Memo. 2011-90 UNITED STATES TAX COURT MURRAY S. FRIEDLAND, Petitioner v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, Respondent Docket No. 13926-10W. Filed April 25, 2011. Murray S. Friedland, pro se. John
More informationAlter Ego of Law Firm was Liable for Its Unpaid Employment Taxes
Alter Ego of Law Firm was Liable for Its Unpaid Employment Taxes Western Management, Inc. v. U.S., (CA FC 12/12/2012) 110 ATR 2d 2012-5528 Over one dissent, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
More informationNotice of Deficiency Proposed increase in tax and notice of your right to challenge
AUR Notice Department of the Treasury Internal Revenue Service Notice AUR control number To contact us Last date to petition Tax Court Page 1 of 9 Notice of Deficiency Proposed increase in tax and notice
More informationYou must file your 2012 tax return
ADR Department of the Treasury Internal Revenue Service PO BOX 149338 Austin TX 78714-9338 Notice 2566 Tax Year 2012 Social Security number 999-99-9999 To contact us Phone 1-866-681-4271 Hours of operation
More informationSUMMARY OF THE 2014 MISSISSIPPI TAXPAYER FAIRNESS ACT
SUMMARY OF THE 2014 MISSISSIPPI TAXPAYER FAIRNESS ACT This omnibus tax legislation, House Bill No. 799, was signed into law by Governor Phil Bryant on April 11, 2014, after passing the House of Representatives
More informationUNITED STATES TAX COURT WASHINGTON, DC ORDER AND ORDER OF DISMISSAL FOR LACK OF JURISDICTION
24 RS UNITED STATES TAX COURT WASHINGTON, DC 20217 JOHN M. CRIM, Petitioner(s, v. Docket No. 1638-15 COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, Respondent. ORDER AND ORDER OF DISMISSAL FOR LACK OF JURISDICTION
More informationMost Litigated Issues
Appendices Most Serious LR #3 Allow Taxpayers to Request Equitable Relief Under Internal Revenue Code Section 6015(f) or 66(c) at Any Time Before Expiration of the Period of Limitations on Collection and
More informationCA 7: Tax Court Erred When It Required Taxpayer To Accept Settlement Terms
CA 7: Tax Court Erred When It Required Taxpayer To Accept Settlement Terms Shah, (CA 7 6/24/2015) 115 AFTR 2d 2015-856 The Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit has vacated a Tax Court order that required
More informationRepresenting the Innocent Spouse in Pre- and Post-Filing Tax Controversies
Representing the Innocent Spouse in Pre- and Post-Filing Tax Controversies Presented to CPA Academy Lawrence A. Sannicandro, Esq. 1 Overview I. Introduction II. Conflicts of Interest III. Overview of Innocent
More informationUNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
RECOMMENDED FOR FULL-TEXT PUBLICATION Pursuant to Sixth Circuit I.O.P. 32.1(b) File Name: 17a0038p.06 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT AGILITY NETWORK SERVICES, INC., an Illinois Corporation;
More information) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Petitioner Z Financial, LLC, appeals both the trial court s granting of equitable
FOURTH DIVISION April 30, 2009 No. 1-08-1445 In re THE APPLICATION OF THE COUNTY TREASURER AND Ex Officio COUNTY COLLECTOR OF COOK COUNTY ILLINOIS, FOR JUDGMENT AND ORDER OF SALE AGAINST REAL ESTATE RETURNED
More informationIRS Abuse of Discretion
IRS Abuse of Discretion IRS Notice of Tax Lien Abuses After a tax has been assessed by the IRS and a demand for payment has been made upon the taxpayer, a lien arises in favor of the United States upon
More informationPayment. Billing Summary $9,999.99
Department of the Treasury Internal Revenue Service P.O. Box 480 Holtsville, NY 11742-0480 s018999546711s JOHN AND MARY SMITH 123 N HARRIS ST HARVARD, TX 12345 To contact us Phone 1-800-829-0922 Your caller
More informationSenate Bill No. 818 CHAPTER 404
Senate Bill No. 818 CHAPTER 404 An act to amend Section 2924 of, to amend and repeal Sections 2923.4, 2923.5, 2923.6, 2923.7, 2924.12, 2924.15, and 2924.17 of, to add Sections 2923.55, 2924.9, 2924.10,
More informationRequest for Innocent Spouse Relief
Form 8857 (Rev. September 2010) Department of the Treasury Internal Revenue Service (99) Request for Innocent Spouse Relief See separate instructions. OMB 1545-1596 Important things you should know Do
More informationSTATUTE OF LIMITATIONS Analyze This. By LG Brooks Enrolled Agent
The capital of Texas enrolled agents Austin, Texas November 2008 STATUTE OF LIMITATIONS Analyze This By LG Brooks Enrolled Agent I. BIOGRAPHY LG Brooks, BA, EA LG Brooks is an Enrolled Agent and is the
More informationCollection Due Process Hearing
263 Collection Due Process (CDP) Statutory Right A gift from the IRS Restructuring and Reform Act of 1998 1. Lien IRC 6320 2. Levy IRC 6330 263 264 Critical Issues of CDP Use it or lose it 30 days to REQUEST
More informationOffer-in-Compromise Why or Why Not
Why or Why Not The Capital of Texas Enrolled Agents November 2010 by: lg brooks, ea Why or Why Not Table of Contents Introduction 3 The Offer Process 4 The Offer in Compromise: Offers in General 4 Grounds
More informationUILC: , , , , , ,
Office of Chief Counsel Internal Revenue Service Memorandum Number: 200503031 Release Date: 01/21/2005 CC:PA:APJP:B02 ------------ SCAF-119247-04 UILC: 6702.00-00, 6702.01-00, 6611.09-00, 6501.05-00, 6501.05-07,
More informationNotice of intent to levy Intent to terminate your installment agreement
Department of the Treasury Internal Revenue Service Austin, TX 73301-0030 JAMES & KAREN Q. HINDS 22 BOULDER STREET HANSON, CT 00000-7253 Tax period 2016 To contact us 800-xxx-xxxx Your caller ID NNNN Page
More informationSTATEMENT OF JENNIFER E. BREEN ON BEHALF OF THE AMERICAN BAR ASSOCIATION SECTION OF TAXATION BEFORE THE COMMITTEE ON SMALL BUSINESS OF THE
STATEMENT OF JENNIFER E. BREEN ON BEHALF OF THE AMERICAN BAR ASSOCIATION SECTION OF TAXATION BEFORE THE COMMITTEE ON SMALL BUSINESS OF THE UNITED STATES HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES FOR THE HEARING ON IRS
More informationIRM TAS Taxpayer Assistance Order (TAO) Process Reason for Change Key:
Reason for 13.1.7.8(1) is 13.1.20.1(1) 13.1.7.8.1(1) is 13.1.20.1 Internal Revenue Code section 7811 authorizes the National Taxpayer Advocate to issue a Taxpayer Assistance Order (TAO) on cases meeting
More informationT.C. Memo UNITED STATES TAX COURT. YULIA FEDER, Petitioner v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, Respondent
T.C. Memo. 2012-10 UNITED STATES TAX COURT YULIA FEDER, Petitioner v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, Respondent Docket No. 1628-10. Filed January 10, 2012. Frank Agostino, Lawrence M. Brody, and Jeffrey
More informationCh. 35 TAX EXAMINATIONS AND ASSESSMENTS CHAPTER 35. TAX EXAMINATIONS AND ASSESSMENTS
Ch. 35 TAX EXAMINATIONS AND ASSESSMENTS 61 35.1 CHAPTER 35. TAX EXAMINATIONS AND ASSESSMENTS Sec. 35.1. Tax examinations and assessments. 35.2. Interest, additions, penalties, crimes, and offenses. 35.3.
More informationIntro to Collections
Intro to Collections The Basics of the IRS Collection Process David F. Miles, E.A. August 6, 2013 Lecture Introduction This is an introductory course of IRS collections. The course will cover the fundamentals
More informationFi s c a l Ye a r 2011
National Taxpayer Advocate Report to Congress Fi s c a l Ye a r 2011 Objectives June 30, 2010 Introduction Statutory Mission Assisting Taxpayers Infrastructure that taxpayer service is less important perhaps
More information2002 PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE (60 Minutes)
2002 PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE (60 Minutes) Question P-1 (2 minute/s) Taxpayer has received an Internal Revenue Service ( IRS ) notice of deficiency with respect to income tax for 2001. Taxpayer timely files
More informationFive (5) forms are used for notifying an applicant of the status of his application. They are the DFA-6, OFS-6A, DFA-NL-6, ES-NL-A, and DFA-20.
NOTIFICATION OF ACTION TAKEN ON AN APPLICATION Five (5) forms are used for notifying an applicant of the status of his application. They are the DFA-6, OFS-6A, DFA-NL-6, ES-NL-A, and DFA-20. The final
More informationAlphabet Soup for Offers In Compromise (OIC)
HIGH- STAKES TAX DEFENSE & COMPLEX CRIMINAL DEFENSE 1012 Broad Street, 2nd Fl Bloomfield, NJ 07003 Tel (973) 783-7000 Fax (973) 338-3955 www.deblislaw.com 001612007 Alphabet Soup for Offers In Compromise
More informationSTATE OF WISCONSIN TAX APPEALS COMMISSION 06-S-200, 06-S-201, 06-S-202 AND 07-S-45 DAVID C. SWANSON, COMMISSIONER:
STATE OF WISCONSIN TAX APPEALS COMMISSION BADGER STATE ETHANOL, LLC, DOCKET NOS. 06-S-199, 06-S-200, 06-S-201, 06-S-202 AND 07-S-45 Petitioner, vs. RULING AND ORDER WISCONSIN DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE, Respondent.
More informationExtension Time The IRS Gets Extra Time to Assess Tax Based on Preparer Fraud
Extension Time The IRS Gets Extra Time to Assess Tax Based on Preparer Fraud Podcast of March 10, 2007 Feed address for Podcast subscription: http://feeds.feedburner.com/edzollarstaxupdate Home page for
More informationSenate Bill No. 63 Committee on Commerce, Labor and Energy
Senate Bill No. 63 Committee on Commerce, Labor and Energy CHAPTER... AN ACT relating to industrial insurance; establishing provisions for the collection of certain amounts owed to the Division of Industrial
More informationT.C. Memo UNITED STATES TAX COURT. CHARLES D. SHAFFRAN, SR., Petitioner v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, Respondent
T.C. Memo. 2017-35 UNITED STATES TAX COURT CHARLES D. SHAFFRAN, SR., Petitioner v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, Respondent Docket No. 12611-12L. February 16, 2017. Charles D. Shaffran, Sr., pro se.
More informationRule 006 Refunds & Credits
Rule 006 Refunds & Credits Refunds or credits are granted according to R.S. 47:337.77 through 47:337.81 and 47:337.86. When requesting a refund or credit, the taxpayer must first submit a formal written
More informationRestaurant Owner's Cash Skimming, Other Misdeeds, Were Civil Tax Fraud
Restaurant Owner's Cash Skimming, Other Misdeeds, Were Civil Tax Fraud Musa, TC Memo 2015-58 The Tax Court has held that a restaurant owner who did not report significant amounts of cash that he skimmed
More informationTEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN NO. 03-15-00527-CV In re Farmers Texas County Mutual Insurance Company ORIGINAL PROCEEDING FROM TRAVIS COUNTY O P I N I O N Real party in interest Guy
More informationBOARD OF EQUALIZATION STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )
STATE BOARD OF EQUALIZATION In the Matter of the Appeal of: PEDRO V. DATING AND SIMONA V. DATING Representing the Parties: For Appellants: For Franchise Tax Board: Counsel for the Board of Equalization:
More informationCHAPTER 56. SETOFF DEBT COLLECTION ACT
Disclaimer This statutory database is current through the 2003 Regular Session of the South Carolina General Assembly. Changes to the statutes enacted by the 2004 General Assembly, which will convene in
More informationAn Overview of Offers in Compromise. Course #6800/QAS6800 Course Material
An Overview of Offers in Compromise Course #6800/QAS6800 Course Material An Overview of Offers in Compromise (Course #6800/QAS6800) Table of Contents Page Chapter 1: Introduction to Settling with the IRS
More informationDistrict court concludes that taxpayer s refund suit, relating to the carryback of a deduction for foreign taxes, was untimely
IRS Insights A closer look. In this issue: District court concludes that taxpayer s refund suit, relating to the carryback of a deduction for foreign taxes, was untimely... 1 IRS issues Chief Counsel Advice
More informationRev. Proc I.R.B. 678 April 1, 2002
26 CFR 601.105: Examination of returns and claims for refund, credit, or abatement; determination of correct tax liability. (Also Part 1, 446, 481; 1.446 1, 1.481 1) Rev. Proc. 2002 18 SECTION 1. PURPOSE...680.01
More informationChange in Accounting Methods and the Mitigation Sections
Marquette Law Review Volume 47 Issue 4 Spring 1964 Article 3 Change in Accounting Methods and the Mitigation Sections Bernard D. Kubale Follow this and additional works at: http://scholarship.law.marquette.edu/mulr
More informationIntroduction to Collections: 9/6/2012. The Basics of the IRS Collections Process
David F. Miles, E.A. is a consultant with 20/20 Tax Resolution, Inc. with 15 years of tax resolution experience. David works nationally as a taxpayer representative focusing on state and IRS collections.
More informationAPPENDIX H BLOOMINGTON FIRE DEPARTMENT RELIEF ASSOCIATION DEFINED BENEFIT MONTHLY RETIREMENT PLAN. As Amended and Restated effective January 1, 2009
APPENDIX H BLOOMINGTON FIRE DEPARTMENT RELIEF ASSOCIATION DEFINED BENEFIT MONTHLY RETIREMENT PLAN As Amended and Restated effective January 1, 2009 2007 Appendix H Bloomington V3.0 TABLE OF CONTENTS ARTICLE
More informationYulia Feder v. Commissioner, TC Memo , Code Sec(s) 61; 72; 6201; 7491.
Checkpoint Contents Federal Library Federal Source Materials Federal Tax Decisions Tax Court Memorandum Decisions Tax Court Memorandum Decisions (Current Year) Advance Tax Court Memorandums Yulia Feder,
More informationPRACTICE DIRECTION A APPEALS. This practice direction supplements Part 20 of the Court of Protection Rules 2007
PRACTICE DIRECTION APPEALS This practice direction supplements Part 20 of the Court of Protection Rules 2007 PRACTICE DIRECTION A APPEALS 1. This practice direction applies to appeal proceedings within
More informationfj) IRS Department of the Treasury Internal Revenue Service 1111 Constitution Ave., NW Washington, DC Dear
fj) IRS Department of the Treasury Internal Revenue Service 1111 Constitution Ave., NW Washington, DC 20224 Date: October 2, 2015 Number: 201552032 Release Date: 12/24/2015 Employer ID number: Contact
More informationINNOCENT SPOUSE RELIEF
INNOCENT SPOUSE RELIEF by Carey J. Messina Kean Miller Hawthorne D Armond McCowan & Jarman, L.L.P. P.O. Box 3513 Baton Rouge, LA 70821-3513 (225) 387-0999 www.keanmiller.com The IRS has issued interim
More informationHow does DTA calculate the amount of the overpayment?
Part 7 Overpayments and Fraud 113 What if I was overpaid SNAP benefits? If you get more SNAP benefits than you are eligible for, DTA can recover the overpayment. 106 C.M.R. 367.490. An overpayment can
More informationAMERICAN INSTITUTE OF CERTIFIED PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS COMMENTS ON MODIFICATIONS TO REVENUE PROCEDURES AND
AMERICAN INSTITUTE OF CERTIFIED PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS COMMENTS ON MODIFICATIONS TO REVENUE PROCEDURES 97-27 AND 2002-9 Developed by the Accounting Methods Change Task Force Paul K. Gibbs, Task Force Chair
More informationUNEMPLOYMENT COMPENSATION
UNEMPLOYMENT COMPENSATION Unemployment compensation is a state program to help workers who are unemployed through no fault of their own. It is run by the Virginia Employment Commission (VEC). How do I
More informationNotice of Deficiency Proposed increase in tax and notice of your right to challenge
Department of the Treasury Internal Revenue Service 1973 N RULON WHITE BLVD OGDEN UT 84201-0021 Notice 2D Bar Code 2016 Notice date Social security number Nnn-nn-nnnn AUR control number xxxxx-xxxx To contact
More informationFederal Circuit Affirms FPAA Tolled Statute for Partnership when Losses were Attributable To Another Partnership
IRS Insights A closer look. In this issue: Federal Circuit Affirms FPAA Tolled Statute for Partnership when Losses were Attributable To Another Partnership... 1 IRS Grants Relief for Partnerships Filing
More informationTABLE OF CONTENTS. .03 Farmers cooperatives. .01 A request made during the course of an examination
Rev. Proc. 2000 2 TABLE OF CONTENTS SECTION 1. WHAT IS THE p. 77 PURPOSE OF THIS REVENUE PROCEDURE? SECTION 2. WHAT IS p. 78 TECHNICAL ADVICE? SECTION 3. ON WHAT ISSUES p. 78 MAY TECHNICAL ADVICE BE REQUESTED
More informationWhat s News in Tax Analysis That Matters from Washington National Tax
What s News in Tax Analysis That Matters from Washington National Tax LB&I Updates Publication 5125 and the Internal Revenue Manual In February 2016, the IRS revised Publication 5125, which provides guidance
More informationNo. 95-TX Appeal from the Superior Court of the District of Columbia. (Hon. Wendell Gardner, Trial Judge)
Notice: This opinion is subject to formal revision before publication in the Atlantic and Maryland Reporters. Users are requested to notify the Clerk of the Court of any formal errors so that corrections
More informationT.C. Memo UNITED STATES TAX COURT. RAYMOND S. MCGAUGH, Petitioner v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, Respondent
T.C. Memo. 2016-28 UNITED STATES TAX COURT RAYMOND S. MCGAUGH, Petitioner v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, Respondent Docket No. 13665-14. Filed February 24, 2016. P had a self-directed IRA of which
More informationIN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA ) Z STREET, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) Civil No. 1:12-cv-401-KBJ ) DAVID KAUTTER, ) IN HIS OFFICIAL CAPACITY AS ) ACTING COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL
More informationINNOCENT SPOUSE DEFENSE
INNOCENT SPOUSE DEFENSE First Run Broadcast: August 21, 2012 Live Replay: August 16, 2013 1:00 p.m. E.T./12:00 p.m. C.T./11:00 a.m. M.T./10:00 a.m. P.T. (60 minutes) When a married couple files its tax
More information04 - Fourth and Eleventh Circuits Find CARDs Transaction Lacked Economic Substance
04 - Fourth and Eleventh Circuits Find CARDs Transaction Lacked Economic Substance Curtis Investment Company, LLC, v. Comm., (CA11 12/6/2018) 122 AFTR 2d 2018-5485; Baxter, et ux v. Comm., (CA4, 12/7/2018)
More informationNew Jersey Division of Taxation
New Jersey Division of Taxation Protest and Conference Guidebook Office of Counsel Services Conference and Appeals Branch October 2017 CAB-300 Protest and Conference Guidebook Page 2 Submitting a Protest
More informationALI-ABA Course of Study How To Handle a Tax Controversy at the IRS and in Court: From Administrative Audit Through Litigation
157 ALI-ABA Course of Study How To Handle a Tax Controversy at the IRS and in Court: From Administrative Audit Through Litigation Sponsored with the cooperation of the ABA Section of Taxation June 24-25,
More informationTHOMAS P. DORE, ET AL., SUBSTITUTE TRUSTEES. Wright, Arthur, Salmon, James P. (Retired, Specially Assigned),
UNREPORTED IN THE COURT OF SPECIAL APPEALS OF MARYLAND No. 0230 September Term, 2015 MARVIN A. VAN DEN HEUVEL, ET AL. v. THOMAS P. DORE, ET AL., SUBSTITUTE TRUSTEES Wright, Arthur, Salmon, James P. (Retired,
More informationCenter for Clinical Standards and Quality/Survey & Certification Group. Revision of Civil Money Penalty (CMP) Policies and CMP Analytic Tool
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH & HUMAN SERVICES Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services 7500 Security Boulevard, Mail Stop C2-21-16 Baltimore, Maryland 21244-1850 Center for Clinical Standards and Quality/Survey
More informationCalifornia's "Tax Amnesty": What Every California Taxpayer Should Know
California's "Tax Amnesty": What Every California Taxpayer Should Know 2/17/2005 State + Local Tax Client Alert On August 16, 2004, California enacted a tax amnesty ("Amnesty Program") covering both sales
More informationIN THE COMMONWEALTH COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA
IN THE COMMONWEALTH COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA MICHAEL LEMANSKY, : Petitioner : : v. : No. 140 C.D. 1999 : ARGUED: June 14, 1999 WORKERS COMPENSATION : APPEAL BOARD (HAGAN ICE : CREAM COMPANY), : Respondent
More informationKuznitsky v U.S. 17 F.3d 1029
Kuznitsky v U.S. 17 F.3d 1029 CLICK HERE to return to the home page Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Illinois, Eastern Division. Before EASTERBROOK and RIPPLE,
More informationv. Docket 'No S
UNITED STATES TAX COURT Washington, D.C. 20217 GERNOT AND HELGA RUTH MUELLER, Petitioners, v. Docket 'No. 532-89S COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, Respondent. DECISION Pursuant to the determination of
More informationIN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT
Peter McLauchlan v. Case: CIR 12-60657 Document: 00512551524 Page: 1 Date Filed: 03/06/2014Doc. 502551524 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT PETER A. MCLAUCHLAN, United States
More informationPUBLIC ACT 123 OF 1999 (as amended 2001, 2003)
THE GENERAL PROPERTY TAX ACT (EXCERPT) 1893 PA 206 PUBLIC ACT 123 OF 1999 (as amended 2001, 2003) 211.57 Statement of unpaid taxes; return of delinquent taxes; extension of time; rules; notices. Sec. 57.
More information