Sheltered Homeless Persons. Nebraska Balance of State 10/1/2016-9/30/2017

Transcription

1 Sheltered Homeless Persons Nebraska Balance of State 10/1/2016-9/30/2017 Families Emergency Shelter Families Transitional Families Permanent Supportive Emergency Shelter Transitional Permanent Supportive Data from the Homeless Management Information System Submitted for the Department of and Urban Development s 2017 Annual Homeless Assessment Report to Congress

2 Introduction This report on sheltered homeless persons is based on local data submitted to the 2017 Annual Homeless Assessment Report (AHAR). The AHAR is a report to the U.S. Congress on the extent and nature of homelessness America, prepared by the Department of and Urban Development (HUD). It provides nationwide estimates of homelessness, cludg formation about the demographic characteristics of homeless persons, service use patterns, and the capacity to house homeless persons. Once published, the 2017 AHAR will be found on HUD s Homeless Resource Exchange ( The AHAR Local Report is meant to be a resource for stakeholders each community to view their data a variety of user friendly tables and charts. The report is based primarily on Homeless Management Information Systems (HMIS) data about homeless persons who used emergency shelter, transitional housg or permanent supportive housg programs durg the 12-month period between Saturday, October 1, 2016 to Saturday, September 30, The data are collected six categories: Persons Families Emergency Shelter, Emergency Shelter, Persons Families Transitional, Transitional, Persons Families Permanent Supportive and Permanent Supportive All data are based on unduplicated counts, such that each person is counted only once, regardless of how many different programs the person used. Data on length of stay represent the cumulative length of stay for each person with a particular category. For communities that have all emergency shelter, transitional housg and permanent supportive housg providers usg HMIS, the total counts reflect the numbers that those providers reported for the 12 month reportg period. For communities where not all emergency shelter, transitional housg and permanent supportive housg providers are usg HMIS, this report provides estimates of the homeless dividuals and persons families emergency shelter, transitional housg and permanent supportive housg programs. The estimate is an extrapolated count and is based on the assumption that beds located programs that do not participate HMIS are occupied at the same rate and with the same amount of overlap as beds located HMIS-participatg programs. Data were only cluded the national AHAR if HMIS participation rates for a particular category exceeded 50 percent of total beds. The extent to which extrapolated data are representative of the entire community depends on the validity of the assumption that non-participatg programs are similar to participatg programs. Some programs may target specific sub-populations (such as veterans or women), and their clusion or exclusion may skew the overall values particular questions. This report does not clude or purport to extrapolate about persons that are served by victim service providers cludg rape crisis centers, battered women s shelters, domestic violence transitional housg programs, and other programs whose primary mission is to provide services to victims of domestic violence, datg violence, sexual assault, or stalkg. This report also does not clude those who were livg places not meant for human habitation, such as on the street, hotels or motels, or doubled-up livg situations, unless these persons also used emergency shelter or transitional housg. The report cludes the followg sections: The Estimated Homeless Counts durg a One-Year Period table shows the total estimated yearly count for each reportg period, extrapolated pot--time counts, estimated utilization and turnover rates, and estimated counts by household type. Further explanation of the extrapolated counts can be found the Detailed Derivation of Estimated Homeless Counts table. This table explas the steps used to derive the extrapolated counts and cludes both a description and source for where the data comes from. The Year (2017) to Year (2016) Estimated Homeless Counts durg a One-Year Period table shows the percentage change of the 2017 community data compared to 2016 community data. Further explanation of the extrapolated counts can be found the Year (2017) to Year (2016) Detailed Derivation of Estimated Homeless Counts table. The Demographic Characteristics of Sheltered Homeless Persons table provides the percentage of persons reported category by gender of adults, gender of children, ethnicity, race, age, persons by household size, veteran status (adults only) and disability status (adults only). Graphs for each category are below the table. The Prior Livg Situation of Persons Usg Homeless Residential Services table shows the percentage breakdowns of the prior livg situation data each category. The data is categorized by livg arrangement from the night before program entry. Livg arrangements are categorized by homeless situations, housg situations, stitutional settgs, and other settgs. This table also shows the percentage of the stability of the previous night s livg arrangements and the zip code of last permanent address. Graphs for each category are below the table. Data Submitted for HUD's 2017 Annual Homeless Assessment Report Page: 2

3 The Length of Stay Emergency Shelter, Transitional and Permanent Supportive for Families and table shows the percentage breakdown of length of stay for dividuals and families emergency shelter, transitional housg and permanent supportive housg. In each category an dividual percentage is given for a specific length of stay as well as a cumulative percentage that show the dividual percentages accrug. A graph comparg the categories is below the table. 1 Families are defed as any household that cludes at least one adult over 18 years old and one child who is younger than 18 years old. All other persons, cludg those multi-person households consistg of only adults or only children, are reported as sgle dividuals. 2 Other factors, such as nightly counts that far exceeded the reported number of beds the community, may also have caused data to have been excluded from the AHAR. Data Submitted for HUD's 2017 Annual Homeless Assessment Report Page: 3

4 Table of Contents Overall Counts Exhibit 1.1 Estimated Homeless Counts durg a One-Year Period (Table) Exhibit 1.2 Detailed Derivation of Estimated Homeless Count (Table) Exhibit 1.3 Estimated Homeless Counts: Pot Time Counts (Graph) Exhibit 1.4 Estimated Homeless Counts: Number of Families (Graph) Exhibit 1.5 Estimated Homeless Counts: Estimated Average Utilization Rate (Graph) Exhibit 1.6 Estimated Homeless Counts: Turnover Rate (Graph) Exhibit 1.7 Estimated Homeless Counts: Persons Families Emergency Shelter (Graph) Exhibit 1.8 Estimated Homeless Counts: Persons Families Transitional (Graph) Exhibit 1.9 Estimated Homeless Counts: Persons Families Permanent Supportive (Graph) Exhibit 1.10 Estimated Homeless Counts: Emergency Shelter (Graph) Exhibit 1.11 Estimated Homeless Counts: Transitional (Graph) Exhibit 1.12 Estimated Homeless Counts: Permanent Supportive (Graph) Demographics Exhibit 3.1 Demographic Characteristics of Sheltered Homeless Persons (Table) Exhibit 3.2 Demographic Characteristics: Gender of Adults (Graph) Exhibit 3.3 Demographic Characteristics: Gender of Children (Graph) Exhibit 3.4 Demographic Characteristics: Race of Persons Families Emergency Shelter (Graph) Exhibit 3.5 Demographic Characteristics: Race of Persons Families Transitional (Graph) Exhibit 3.6 Demographic Characteristics: Race of Persons Families Permanent Supportive (Graph) Exhibit 3.7 Demographic Characteristics: Race of Emergency Shelter (Graph) Exhibit 3.8 Demographic Characteristics: Race of Transitional (Graph) Exhibit 3.9 Demographic Characteristics: Race of Permanent Supportive (Graph) Exhibit 3.10 Demographic Characteristics: Race (Graph) Exhibit 3.11 Demographic Characteristics: Age of Persons Families Emergency Shelter (Graph) Exhibit 3.12 Demographic Characteristics: Age of Persons Families Transitional (Graph) Exhibit 3.13 Demographic Characteristics: Age of Persons Families Permanent Supportive (Graph) Exhibit 3.14 Demographic Characteristics: Age of Emergency Shelter (Graph) Exhibit 3.15 Demographic Characteristics: Age of Transitional (Graph) Exhibit 3.16 Demographic Characteristics: Age of Permanent Supportive (Graph) Exhibit 3.17 Demographic Characteristics: Persons by Household Size: Persons Families Emergency Shelter (Graph) Exhibit 3.18 Demographic Characteristics: Persons by Household Size: Persons Families Transitional (Graph) Exhibit 3.19 Demographic Characteristics: Persons by Household Size: Persons Families Permanent Supportive (Graph) Exhibit 3.20 Demographic Characteristics: Persons by Household Size: Emergency Shelter (Graph) Exhibit 3.21 Demographic Characteristics: Persons by Household Size: Transitional (Graph) Exhibit 3.22 Demographic Characteristics: Persons by Household Size: Permanent Supportive (Graph) Exhibit 3.23 Demographic Characteristics: Persons by Household Size (Graph) '> Exhibit 3.24 Demographic Characteristics: Veteran Status (Adults Only) (Graph) Exhibit 3.25 Demographic Characteristics: Disabled (Adults Only) (Graph) Prior Livg Situation Exhibit 4.1 Prior Livg Situation of Persons Usg Homeless Residential Services (Table) Exhibit 4.2 Livg Arrangement the Night before Program Entry: Persons Families Emergency Shelter (Graph) Exhibit 4.3 Livg Arrangement the Night before Program Entry: Persons Families Transitional (Graph) Exhibit 4.4 Livg Arrangement the Night before Program Entry: Persons Families Permanent Supportive (Graph) Exhibit 4.5 Livg Arrangement the Night before Program Entry: Emergency Shelter (Graph) Exhibit 4.6 Livg Arrangement the Night before Program Entry: Transitional (Graph) Exhibit 4.7 Livg Arrangement the Night before Program Entry: Permanent Supportive (Graph) Exhibit 4.8 Prior Livg Situation: Livg Arrangement the Night before Program Entry (Graph) Exhibit 4.9 Stability of Previous Night s Livg Arrangement (Graph) Exhibit 4.10 Zip Code of Last Permanent Address (Graph) Length of Stay Exhibit 5.1 Length of Stay Emergency Shelter and Transitional for Families and (Table) Exhibit 5.2 Length of Stay (Graph) Data Submitted for HUD's 2017 Annual Homeless Assessment Report Page: 4

5 Data Submitted for HUD's 2017 Annual Homeless Assessment Report Page: 5

6 Exhibit 1.1 Estimated Homeless Counts durg a One-Year Period 1 Reportg Year: 10/1/2016-9/30/2017 Site: Nebraska Balance of State Persons Families Emergency Shelters Persons Families Transitional Total Estimated Yearly Count 2 Persons Families Permanent Supportive Emergency Shelters Transitional Permanent Supportive Estimated Total Number of Homeless Persons Across Reportg Categories * Estimated Total Count for Period , ,317 Estimated Total on an Average Night On a sgle night... Pot--Time Counts October January April July year count (October 1- September 30) Pot--Time Counts 5 Number of Families October 29, January 28, April 29, July 29, Estimated Utilization and Turnover Rates Estimated Average Utilization Rate 6 76% 76% 84% 68% 63% 97% Turnover Rate Estimated Counts by Household Type 8 Individual adult male 1, Individual adult female Adult family, with child(ren) Children families, with adults Households with only adults Households with only children Unaccompanied child Missg this formation Data Submitted for HUD's 2017 Annual Homeless Assessment Report Page: 6

7 Exhibit 1.2 Detailed Derivation of Estimated Homeless Count 1 Reportg Year: 10/1/2016-9/30/2017 Site: Nebraska Balance of State Step Description Source Unduplicated number of persons participatg HMIS Number of emergency, year-round equivalent beds HMIS (i.e., bed capacity for participatg providers) Average number of clients served per bed Number of year-round equivalent beds for not participatg HMIS (i.e., bed capacity for nonparticipatg providers) Estimated unduplicated number of persons served by providers that do not participate HMIS Estimated number of persons served by participatg and nonparticipatg Providers. Note that this estimate double HMIS data from providers that participate HMIS SuperNOFA Inventory Chart Step 1 Step 2 SuperNOFA Inventory Chart Step 3 x Step 4 Persons Families Emergency Shelters Persons Families Transitional Persons Families Permanent Supportive Emergency Shelters Transitional Permanent Supportive , Persons Beds Persons per Bed Beds Persons Data Submitted for HUD's 2017 Annual Homeless Assessment Report Page: 7

8 counts people who use participatg and nonparticipatg providers. This double count will be elimated by the overlap adjustment below. Overlap factor is the square of [(Bed capacity for HMIS nonparticipatg providers)/ (Bed capacity for HMIS participatg providers)] Number of persons who used more than one HMIS participatg provider the category Estimated number of persons families that used both participatg and nonparticipatg providers Total estimate of number persons that used either HMIS participatg or nonparticipatg Emergency Shelter Step 1 + Step 5 (Step 4 Step 2) x (Step 4 Step 2) HMIS data from providers that participate HMIS Step 7 x Step 8 Step 6 Step , Persons is overlap factor Persons is overlap (cross-over) adjustment , Persons Data Submitted for HUD's 2017 Annual Homeless Assessment Report Page: 8

9 Step Description Source Extrapolation Factor for nonparticipatg providers: This is the factor applied to calculations that are based only on Step 10 participatg Step 1 providers. It is used to estimate total number of persons served by participatg and nonparticipatg providers. HMIS bed coverage rate Step 2 (Step 2 + Step 4) Pot-In-Time Extrapolation Factor. This is the factor applied to calculations that are based only on participatg providers. It is used to estimate total number of persons served by participatg and nonparticipatg Step 6 Step 1 providers for values that report Pot-time numbers. In contrast to the standard Extrapolation Factor, the pot--time Extrapolation fact does not clude an adjustment for Persons Families Emergency Shelters Persons Families Transitional Persons Families Permanent Supportive Emergency Shelters Transitional Permanent Supportive % 87% 100% 54% 76% 100% is the extrapolation factor for nonparticipatg providers. % of beds participatg the HMIS is the extrapolation factor for pot-time counts. Data Submitted for HUD's 2017 Annual Homeless Assessment Report Page: 9

10 persons usg multiple providers. 1 This reports provides estimates of the homeless dividuals and persons families Emergency Shelter and transitional housg programs that participate HMIS, as well as those that do not participate HMIS. The estimate is an extrapolated count and is based on the assumption that beds located programs that do not participate HMIS are occupied at the same rate as beds located HMIS-participatg programs. The complete derivation of the total extrapolation factors is detailed the next table. Addg values across categories will double count persons who appeared multiple types of programs. The estimates do not clude persons that are served by "victim service providers," cludg rape crisis centers, battered women's shelters, domestic violence transitional housg programs, and other programs whose primary mission is to provide services to victims of domestic violence, datg violence, sexual assault, or stalkg. 2 These results are generated by multiplyg the HMIS data by the Extrapolation Factor (Step 11, table 2.) 3 These values are generated by multiplyg the HMIS data by the Pot-In-Time Extrapolation Factor (Step 13, table 2.) 4 These results are generated by multiplyg the HMIS data by the Extrapolation Factor (Step 11, table 2.) 5 These values are generated by multiplyg the HMIS data by the Pot-In-Time Extrapolation Factor (Step 13, table 2.) 6 These results are generated by dividg the HMIS data on persons on an average night by the total beds HMIS. 7 These results represent the average number of people who use each bed. It is generated by dividg the unduplicated count of persons recorded HMIS, by the total number of beds HMIS 8 These results are generated by multiplyg the HMIS data by the Extrapolation Factor (Step 11, table 2). * This value is generated by multiplyg the sum of the extrpolated number of persons each category by an overlap factor, which accounts for persons who use multiple categories. This value is based on the overlap rates among participatg programs and adjusted to account for possible overlap non-participatg providers. In this site the adjustment factor is: For the PIT. These values are generated by addg the pot time counts across categories. It is assumed that persons do not appear multiple programs on the same night. Data Submitted for HUD's 2017 Annual Homeless Assessment Report Page: 10

11 Data Submitted for HUD's 2017 Annual Homeless Assessment Report Page: 11

12 Data Submitted for HUD's 2017 Annual Homeless Assessment Report Page: 12

13 Data Submitted for HUD's 2017 Annual Homeless Assessment Report Page: 13

14 Data Submitted for HUD's 2017 Annual Homeless Assessment Report Page: 14

15 Data Submitted for HUD's 2017 Annual Homeless Assessment Report Page: 15

16 Exhibit 3.1 Demographic Characteristics of Sheltered Homeless Persons Reportg Year: 10/1/2016-9/30/2017 Site: Nebraska Balance of State Characteristics Number of Sheltered Homeless Persons Families Emergency Shelters Persons Families Transitional Persons Families Permanent Supportive Emergency Shelters Transitional Permanent Supportive Persons , Number of Sheltered Adults , Number of Sheltered Children Gender of Adults Female 93% 72% 61% 33% 28% 50% Male 7% 28% 39% 67% 72% 50% Unknown 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% Gender of Children Female 53% 50% 49% 0% 100% Male 47% 50% 51% 100% 0% Unknown 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% Ethnicity Race Non-Hispanic/non-Lato 83% 78% 81% 84% 89% 87% Hispanic/Lato 17% 22% 19% 13% 13% 13% Unknown 0% 0% 0% 3% 0% 0% White, non-hispanic/non-lato 32% 63% 63% 71% 73% 78% White, Hispanic/Lato 13% 20% 16% 12% 10% 9% Black or African American 34% 9% 10% 10% 6% 0% Asian 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% American Indian or Alaska Native 7% 4% 2% 3% 5% 11% Native Hawaiian or other Pacific Islander Age 0% 0% 0% 0% 1% 0% Several races 13% 5% 8% 4% 4% 2% Unknown 0% 0% 0% 0% 1% 0% Under 1 6% 8% 9% 0% 0% 0% 1 to 5 25% 24% 19% 0% 0% 0% 6 to 12 23% 22% 22% 0% 0% 0% 13 to 17 11% 4% 7% 0% 2% 0% 18 to 24 7% 12% 14% 15% 27% 33% 25 to 30 10% 13% 10% 16% 13% 2% 31 to 50 17% 15% 15% 46% 39% 35% 51 to 61 0% 1% 2% 18% 14% 26% 62 and older 0% 0% 0% 5% 4% 4% Unknown 2% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% Data Submitted for HUD's 2017 Annual Homeless Assessment Report Page: 16

17 Characteristics Persons by Household Size Persons Families Emergency Shelters Persons Families Transitional Persons Families Permanent Supportive Emergency Shelters Transitional Permanent Supportive 1 person 0% 0% 0% 92% 99% 89% 2 persons 28% 17% 16% 8% 1% 11% 3 persons 28% 29% 24% 0% 0% 0% 4 persons 22% 30% 21% 0% 0% 0% 5 or more persons 21% 23% 38% 0% 0% 0% Unknown 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% Veteran (adults only) Yes 1% 1% 2% 8% 8% 2% No 99% 99% 98% 83% 92% 98% Unknown 0% 0% 0% 9% 0% 0% Disabled (adults only) Yes 21% 19% 80% 44% 64% 98% No 78% 81% 20% 48% 35% 2% Unknown 1% 0% 0% 8% 1% 0% 1 This is the number of sheltered homeless persons from your community's raw data. These numbers do not clude persons that are served by "victim service providers," cludg rape crisis centers, battered women's shelters, domestic violence transitional housg programs, and other programs whose primary mission is to provide services to victims of domestic violence, datg violence, sexual assault, or stalkg. 2 This is the number of sheltered homeless adults from your community's raw data. These numbers do not clude persons that are served by "victim service providers," cludg rape crisis centers, battered women's shelters, domestic violence transitional housg programs, and other programs whose primary mission is to provide services to victims of domestic violence, datg violence, sexual assault, or stalkg. Data Submitted for HUD's 2017 Annual Homeless Assessment Report Page: 17

18 Data Submitted for HUD's 2017 Annual Homeless Assessment Report Page: 18

19 Data Submitted for HUD's 2017 Annual Homeless Assessment Report Page: 19

20 Data Submitted for HUD's 2017 Annual Homeless Assessment Report Page: 20

21 Data Submitted for HUD's 2017 Annual Homeless Assessment Report Page: 21

22 Data Submitted for HUD's 2017 Annual Homeless Assessment Report Page: 22

23 Data Submitted for HUD's 2017 Annual Homeless Assessment Report Page: 23

24 Data Submitted for HUD's 2017 Annual Homeless Assessment Report Page: 24

25 Data Submitted for HUD's 2017 Annual Homeless Assessment Report Page: 25

26 Data Submitted for HUD's 2017 Annual Homeless Assessment Report Page: 26

27 Data Submitted for HUD's 2017 Annual Homeless Assessment Report Page: 27

28 Data Submitted for HUD's 2017 Annual Homeless Assessment Report Page: 28

29 Data Submitted for HUD's 2017 Annual Homeless Assessment Report Page: 29

30 Exhibit 4.1 Prior Livg Situation of Persons Usg Homeless Residential Services Reportg Year: 10/1/2016-9/30/2017 Site: Nebraska Balance of State Prior Livg Situation Persons Families Emergency Shelters Persons Families Transitional Persons Families Permanent Supportive Emergency Shelters Transitional Permanent Supportive Number of Sheltered Homeless Persons , Livg Arrangement the Night before Program Entry Total from Homeless Situation Place not meant for human habitation 6% 9% 20% 36% 22% 19% Emergency shelter 14% 39% 68% 10% 8% 72% Transitional housg 1% 2% 0% 1% 1% 6% Total from Situation Permanent supportive housg 1% 0% 5% 0% 0% 0% Rented housg unit 25% 14% 0% 11% 9% 0% Owned housg unit 1% 0% 0% 1% 2% 0% Stayg with family or friends 45% 28% 0% 13% 29% 2% Total from Institutional Settgs Psychiatric facility 0% 0% 0% 0% 1% 0% Substance abuse treatment center or detox 0% 0% 2% 3% 3% 0% Hospital (non-psychiatric) 0% 0% 0% 0% 2% 0% Jail, prison, or juvenile detention 0% 3% 0% 7% 11% 2% Total from Other Situations Hotel or motel (no voucher) 6% 5% 5% 3% 8% 0% Foster care home 0% 0% 0% 0% 1% 0% Other livg situation 1% 0% 0% 1% 1% 0% Unknown 0% 0% 0% 10% 0% 0% Stability of Previous Night's Livg Arrangements Stayed 1 week or less 16% 31% 22% 28% 20% 13% Stayed more than 1 week, but less than a month 19% 17% 20% 18% 19% 24% Stayed 1 to 3 months 22% 21% 34% 15% 17% 31% Stayed more than 3 months, but less than a year 25% 16% 15% 14% 26% 22% Stayed 1 year or longer 18% 15% 10% 11% 18% 9% Unknown 1% 0% 0% 15% 1% 0% Zip Code of Last Permanent Address Same jurisdiction as program locator 0% 0% 0% 0% Different jurisdiction than program locator 0% 0% 0% 0% Unknown 100% 100% 100% 100% Data Submitted for HUD's 2017 Annual Homeless Assessment Report Page: 30

31 Data Submitted for HUD's 2017 Annual Homeless Assessment Report Page: 31

32 Data Submitted for HUD's 2017 Annual Homeless Assessment Report Page: 32

33 Data Submitted for HUD's 2017 Annual Homeless Assessment Report Page: 33

34 Other Situations: Hotel or motel (no voucher), Foster care home, Other livg situation, Unknown Institutional Settgs: Psychiatric facility, Substance abuse treatment center or detox, hospital (non-psychiatric), Jail, prison or juvenile detention Situation: Permanent supportive housg, Rented housg unit, Owned housg unit, Stayg with family or friends Homeless Situation: Place not meant for human habitation, Emergency shelter, Transitional housg Data Submitted for HUD's 2017 Annual Homeless Assessment Report Page: 34

35 Data Submitted for HUD's 2017 Annual Homeless Assessment Report Page: 35

36 Exhibit 4.1 Length of Stay Emergency Shelter and Transitional for Persons Reportg Year: 10/1/2016-9/30/2017 Site: Nebraska Balance of State Persons Families Emergency Shelters Persons Families Transitional Persons Families Permanent Supportive Emergency Shelters Transitional Permanent Supportive Length of Stay % Cum. % % Cum. % % Cum. % % Cum. % % Cum. % % Cum. % A week or less 29% 29% 2% 2% 0% 0% 42% 42% 23% 23% 4% 4% 1 wk. to 1 month 21% 50% 13% 15% 0% 0% 30% 72% 31% 54% 6% 9% 1-3 months 26% 76% 23% 38% 23% 23% 23% 95% 28% 83% 11% 20% 3-6 months 17% 93% 23% 61% 7% 31% 4% 99% 11% 94% 22% 43% 6-9 months 7% 100% 12% 73% 18% 49% 1% 100% 4% 98% 9% 52% 9-12 months 0% 100% 27% 100% 51% 100% 0% 100% 2% 100% 48% 100% Unknown 0% 100% 0% 100% 0% 100% 0% 100% 0% 100% 0% 100% Data Submitted for HUD's 2017 Annual Homeless Assessment Report Page: 36