REGIONAL PUBLIC TRANSPORT PLAN
|
|
- Alan Simmons
- 5 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 Gisborne REGIONAL PUBLIC TRANSPORT PLAN
2
3 CONTENTS 1. IntrodUCTION 4 Our Vision Introduction Time Frame 4 2. Background Legislative Requirements Current Services The Current status of Public Transport in Tairawhiti Patronage Why GDC subsidises Public Transport? Involvement of Other Parties Funding What we plan to do in the next three years Strategic Network Review Electronic ticketing Renewals and improvements Ride Sharing Accessibility and the Transport Disadvantaged Who are the transport disadvantaged? What does this plan do to support the transport disadvantaged? Objectives and POLICIES Objectives and policies Monitoring, Reporting and RevIEW Monitoring and Reporting Review AppendICES 16 Appendix A - Legislative Context for the RPTP 16 Appendix B - Services to Be Provided 17 Appendix C - Fare Box Recovery Policy 20 Appendix D - Significance Policy 22
4 1. Introduction Our Vision To provide an efficient, accessible and financially sustainable public transport network that supports the needs and wellbeing of our communities. 1.1 Introduction The Gisborne District council (GDC) provides the public transport service to the Gisborne urban area. This includes the urban bus service known as Gizzy Bus, Waka Kura (school buses) and the Total Mobility Scheme for people with disabilities. These services are provided under contract and are subsidised by GDC. Funding for these services has three sources: passenger ticket sales, GDC rate payers and the New Zealand Transport Agency. This plan provides Council with the strategic framework for making decisions around public transport services. Its preparation is a requirement under the Land Transport Management Act 2003 (LTMA). The LTMA sets out the requirements regarding the Plan s content and the consultation process required in preparing the Plan. Principles of the Public Transport Operating Model (PTOM) have been incorporated into the LTMA. PTOM changes the way Council plans and procures its public transport service. It provides an opportunity for regions to work in partnership with operators to achieve improved competition and value for money while improving the effectiveness of services delivered to communities. Over time all regions are expected to review their procurement strategies to incorporate PTOM requirements. 1.2 Time Frame The Land Transport Management Amendment Act 2013 requires councils to produce Regional Public Transport Plans with a 10 year horizon, to be reviewed every 3 years and aligned with the Regional Land Transport Plan. The Plan may also be reviewed at any stage to respond to changes in strategic or funding conditions. 4
5 2. Background 2.1 Legislative Requirements In 2013 the Government amended the Land Transport Management Act (LTMA), repealing the Public Transport Management Act while also legislating a new Public transport Operating Model (PTOM). The new purpose of the LTMA is to contribute to an effective, efficient and safe land transport system in the public interest. The PTOM provides direction for the planning, procurement and delivery of public transport services. It is the LTMA that requires council to adopt a regional public transport plan (RPTP). The RPTP describes the councils plan for its public transport network. Feeding directly into this plan is the Long Term Plan, council s core document for its 10 year strategy, and the Regional Land Transport Plan, which sets out the council s strategy for roading and transport. Figure 1 illustrates the strategic relationships between this plan, its parent documents and other relevant legislation, government policies and plans. Figure 1: Strategic policy framework for Regional Public Transport Plans. 5
6 2.2 Current Services Gizzy Bus The Gisborne metropolitan area is serviced by the GizzyBus unit. There are two buses, operated by our contract provider Go Bus. The service utilises 2 modern, sign written, wheelchair accessible buses that operate across 6 routes. Bus Routes There are 6 bus routes servicing the Gisborne area. Route 1A - City - Hospital - Te Hapara City Route 1B - City - Elgin - City Route 2A - City - Kaiti - Tamarau - City Route 2B - City - Elgin - Hospital - City Route 3A - City - Elgin - Hospital - City Route 3B - City - Kaiti - Tamarau City Fares Fare Prices for the GizzyBus Adult - $2 one-way Child - $1.50 one-way SuperGold - free between 9am - 3pm. Just show your card to the driver when boarding. Under 5 free Same day continuous transfer is free A child fare is ages 5-15 inclusive, or still at school. A high school student not in school uniform just needs to show their student ID. Regular bus users can purchase a ticket for 10 rides. There is no discount on the fare. Waka Kura Bus The council subsidises the bus network which operate services to Gisborne Girls High, Gisborne Boys High, Lytton High, Nga Uri A Maui, Gisborne Intermediate, Campion College and St Mary s, alongside fully funding the Kaiti bus initiative. This is done to reduce congestion on the urban bus service as well as aiding educational accessibility and addressing truancy in Gisborne s high schools. This service is managed by GoBus under contract to Gisborne District Council. There are 8, 57 seater, low-floor easy access buses, all sign written with our school bus brand, Waka Kura. Kaiti Bus Initiative Students living in Kaiti experience unique geographical and socio-economic challenges in traveling to and from school. The initiative, originating from the governments social sector trials, aimed to improve school attendance for Kaiti high school students through fully funded bus concession tickets. Students identified by their school as at risk firstly qualify for the initiative by meeting a minimum attendance requirement, and then remain eligible as long as attendance continues. In 2016 the council decided to continue the programme for a further 2 year trial. This trial will finish with the 2018 school year and council will review the initiative during the Strategic Network Review in the second half of An annual budget of $40,000 for the next three years ( ) has been included in the LTP to continue the trial, subsidised under applicable FAR. Total Mobility The Total Mobility Scheme is a nationwide program that provides discounted transport for people with disabilities which prevent them from easily accessing public transport. Once assessed as eligible for the scheme, individuals can access discounted taxi fares for travel in the Gisborne area. 6
7 2.3 The Current status of Public Transport in Tairawhiti User Satisfaction Survey In July and August 2017 we conducted in person interviews with Gizzy Bus patrons, provided an online survey and had questionnaires filled in by each of the schools bus controllers. The overall report card was positive, with customer satisfaction high across 90% of measures. The stand out performers were the helpfulness of our drivers and the perceived value for money of the fare. On the other hand, significant concerns were raised around the frequency of departures leading to long travel times. These concerns will be carefully explored in the 2018 Strategic Network Review. Figure 2 shows responses to key questions from the survey alongside the 2015 results. 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% 120% Frequency of Services 2015 Rate the helpfulness of the Driver 2015 Are there Enough Seats 2015 Communication of Delays/Disruptions 2015 Access to Timetable Information 2015 Is the Fair Value for Money? 2015 Poor Average Excellent Figure 2: User satisfaction survey responses 30 Request for Service Another key tool for measuring community satisfaction with the public transport network is the number and type of requests for service (RFS) received by council. Figure 3 shows the number of transport related RFS s received in the last years, grouped by type. Number of RFS Recived Figure 3: Public transport related Requests for Service (RFS) 7
8 2.4 Patronage Urban Bus Patronage Figure 4 displays the urban bus patronage for the last eight years, separated into the three main user groups. The data show that urban bus usage has been steadily declining since 2012/ / / / / / / / /17 Figure 4: Urban bus patronage 2009/ /17 Child Adult Pension Bus Patronage Figure 5 shows school bus patronage for the last 3 years with monthly volumes. Despite a small decrease in user numbers in 2016, school bus patronage has been steadily climbing, justifying the provision of additional services as well as the extension of some existing routes Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Figure 5: bus patronage
9 Total Mobility Trips Figure 6 shows the total boarding s (or trips) subsidised under the Total Mobility Scheme. In line with the national trend, boardings have, with the exception of , been steadily declining for over 10 years. Causes for this decline have not been conclusively identified but have been generally attributed to increased availability of alternatives including wheel chair accessible buses, mobility scooters and private transport options like the Sunshine Bus. Additionally, the subsidy rate has remained fixed for some time leading taxi fare rises to diminish the scheme s affordability. Total mobility will also feature in the strategic network review. 30,000 25,000 20,000 15,000 10,000 5,000 0 Figure 6: Total mobility trips 2.5 Why GDC subsidises Public Transport? The Council, on behalf of its rate payers, makes a considerable investment in public transport. It is therefore important to understand why we make that investment and what our objectives are. There s five key factors that drive our public transport investment. Eases Network Pressure Public transport eases pressure on our roading network in a variety of ways. Some are obvious like lowering traffic congestion and demand for parking, but some are more subtle such as reduced wear and tear on the roading network decreasing the need for maintenance and renewals. Safety Public transport users are 30 times less likely to be involved in traffic accident fatalities compared with other modes of transport. Accessibility A key objective of GDC s public transport plan is increased accessibility to employment, healthcare community facilities and social activities for all users. Of particular importance is expanding accessibility for those with sensory and mobility impairments and those who have limited access to their own transport. By subsidising public transport we provide opportunity and inclusion for all members of our community. Environmental Using public transport reduces the number of vehicles on the road thereby lowering emissions and noise pollution. Modern technology takes this even further by making buses more energy efficient, increasing fuel economy and further lowering CO2 emissions. 2.6 Involvement of Other Parties The public transport operating model requires strong collaborative approach between council, service providers, community groups and the transport agency. During this plans drafting GDC undertook pre-consultation with each stake holder group, holding meetings with Go Bus, conducting user surveys, interviewing bus drivers and school bus controllers before moving into formal a consultation process with the wider community. 9
10 2.7 Funding Where our Funding comes from. Public transport in Gisborne is funded from 3 sources: 1. Passenger ticket sales, referred to as fare revenue or farebox recovery. 2. GDC, local ratepayers funding, and 3. NZTA, which contributes between 30% and 40% of the cost of services. Actual FBRR GDC subsidy NZTA subsidy Fare Box Recovery Figure 7 shows the share of funding between the three sources. Figure 8 shows the decline in fare box recovery rate for the last 7 years. Figure 9 sets out the likely funding available for bus services and Total Mobility services over the life of this Plan. The fare portion includes fares paid by school and city bus passengers including Total Mobility payments and SuperGold allocations. Cost of Service Service 600,000 Number of Users 2016/17 Total Cost to operate services (as of June 2016/17) Gizzy Bus 50,027 $259,086 Waka Kura 94,557 $197,907 Bus Total Mobility trips 8,794 $67, % 32.30% 30% 25% 500, ,000 20% 15% $ Budget 300,000 10% 200, % 5% 0% 2010/ / / / / / /17 FRR GizzyBus FRR Bus 100, / / / / / / / / / /28 Rates Fares NZTA Subsidy Figure 7: Share of public transport funding for public transport in Gisborne Figure 8: Fare Box Recovery Rate by service Figure 9: Financial Forecast
11 4. What we plan to do in the next three years Council has already committed to undertaking improvements to its public transport services over the next three years. They include: 4.1 Strategic Network Review This will be a comprehensive review of the Gizzy Bus Service, routes and fares, the Waka Kura Bus Service, the Total mobility scheme and a holistic review of the networks sustainability, efficacy and community value. This review has been timed to align with the urban bus contract tender process commencing early Electronic ticketing Smartcards have now been widely adopted throughout New Zealand Cities. There are many advantages to these systems such as enabling variable pricing, simplifying boarding, reducing opportunities for fraud and providing richer patronage data. All of which can be utilised to drive patronage growth. The current ticketing system is reaching the end of its life cycle presenting council with the opportunity to invest in up to date technology that will increase simplicity and drive affordability for the network. 4.3 Renewals and improvements Council has already identified, designed and will soon build new bus shelters in several high use areas. Bus shelters improve user experience whilst expanding accessibility to the service in a range of weather types. Council will continue identify suitable locations for further shelters to improve current levels of service and help drive patronage. An annual budget of $18,000 for the next three years ( ) has been included in the LTP for provision of new bus shelters and improvements to bus shelters subsidised under applicable FAR. 4.4 Ride Sharing Modern app based ride sharing services have radically changed public transport around the world. By bringing new service models that are simple, reliable and above all affordable companies like Uber and Lyft have had a strong and often controversial impact on the sector. What these changes mean for smaller urban centres like Gisborne is not well understood. The council will as part of its strategic network investigation, explore the implications and opportunities presented by ride sharing to the Gisborne community. 11
12 5. Accessibility and the Transport Disadvantaged The LTMA requires regional authorities to consider and assist people who are transport disadvantaged. GDC considers this highly appropriate and seeks to place a strong value on the accessibility of our public transport network. 5.1 Who are the transport disadvantaged? The LTMA defines the transport disadvantaged as any group who GDC has identified as least able to access transport to basic activities such as work, education, health care and shopping. Accordingly, GDC has identified the following groups as being transport disadvantaged. Children The elderly People with disabilities Tertiary students People on low incomes People who are unable to drive or have no access to a vehicle. 5.2 What does this plan do to support the transport disadvantaged? GDC through this plan, recognises four mechanisms available to support the transport disadvantaged. Fare pricing: While acknowledging the need to balance costs between users, rate payers and central government, GDC seeks to keep Public Transport as low cost as possible. Route coverage: Enhanced route design to ensure wide accessibility throughout residential areas, linking them to commercial hubs and community facilities. Wheelchair accessible: All GDC and Urban services are and will continue to be wheel chair and mobility frame accessible. Total Mobility Scheme: provides an alternative for those unable to use public transport due to disability. Furthermore, GDC recognises that the above does not represent a complete solution and commits to continued engagement in this space to seek better outcomes for the transport disadvantaged. 12
13 6. Objectives and Policies 6.1 Objectives and policies Strategic Priority Objective What we aim to do Service Delivery Our public transport service maintains levels Consider variations to existing routes where demand and funding permit. Such variations would be of service that promote customer loyalty and subject to a minimum trial period of six months before council considers permanency drive passenger growth Ensure the Gizzy Bus brand and colour scheme are applied to all vehicles providing urban services under contract to Council Ensure the Gizzy Bus brand and colour scheme are featured on all publications and marketing materials for the service Ensure service information is readily available and easy to understand Develop and implement bus-stop service level standards, requiring high use stops to have correct signage, shelters and timetable information; and medium/low use stops to have a minimum of road markings and signage Ensure fare payment systems are easy to use and accurately record passenger trip Regularly review all routes, stops and departures to ensure they meet the travel needs of the population Access and Mobility Our people have access to public transport Maintain the total mobility scheme as an alternative for those unable to use public transport due to services that connect them to where they disability want to go Continue to provide wheelchair accessible vehicles to ensure easy access for wheelchair users, parents with young children and passengers with mobility difficulties Provide readily available and easy to understand information on the Total Mobility Scheme Ensure all parties to the total mobility scheme are appropriately trained and equipped to meet the needs of all customers Review the Kaiti Bus initiative and consider viable ways of reducing barriers to secondary school access for the transport disadvantaged Route coverage: Enhanced route design to ensure wide accessibility throughout residential areas, linking them to commercial hubs and community facilities. 13
14 Strategic Priority Objective What we aim to do Fares and ticketing Our funding system for public passenger Improve the fare recovery rate for the service to: services is fair to ratepayers and users, 42% by end 2021/22 ( baseline 32% in 2016/17) while covering a reasonable proportion of operating costs Review fare levels annually to support the achievement of higher fare box recovery rates Set fares on bus routes at levels that incentivise patronage and frequent use, while balancing user contributions against public funding Ensure fare payment systems are easy to use and accurately record passenger trip information. Investigate, develop and implement public transport service enhancements, including electronic ticketing and new technology that supports user convenience and more flexibility for fare price setting Contracting Council s procurement process continues to Implement a procurement process that is consistent with the Public Transport Operating Model requirement deliver an efficient and effective network of Ensure vehicles operated under contract to GDC meet the environmental standards as set out in the public transport services New Zealand Transport Agency Requirements for Urban Buses Enforce strict adherence to all health and safety standards required by law and to the requisite standards for quality set out in the New Zealand Transport Agency Requirements for Urban Buses, and Complete monitoring and reporting of safety through the New Zealand Transport Agency s Operator Rating System 14
15 7. Monitoring, Reporting and Review 7.1 Monitoring and Reporting In order to measure the success of the plan and its implementation the council undertakes to monitor both the achievement of the plans objectives and the quality of services provided. In accordance with the Public Transport Operating Model (PTOM), GDG will closely manage, monitor and evaluate the performance of its urban and school bus units. This requires a cooperative approach between the council and its contractors. Annual operating targets will be set by GDC and our contractors. Regular reporting will be done and regular meetings will be held to evaluate progress against the goals set out in the annual operating targets and against the key performance indicators for the service. The Key Performance Indicators set out the quantitative measures contractors will report on and against which contractor performance will be assessed: Patronage Farebox revenue Service reliability and punctuality Customer satisfaction Complaints number received and quality of resolution Incidents the number and type of incidents occurring on the services Fleet quality compliance with national Requirements for Urban Buses standards, age of fleet. Operator safety ratings provided by the NZ Transport Agency Procurement will be conducted in accordance with the Public Transport Operating Model (PTOM) as outlined in the Land Transport Management Act and will be reported on as a measure of the success of the PTOM in our region. Monitoring criteria include: The number of bids received per tender The final agreed price for service units 7.2 Review The LTMA requires the RPTP be reviewed every three years. At this time GDC will assess the plans operational success and decide whether to leave, amend or formally review the plan. Variations to the existing plan may trigger the Significance policy, which will inform GDC how widely it must consult with the effected parties and the community. In addition, GDC will consult with persons who will or may be affected by or have an interest in the proposed variation in accordance with sections 126(4) and 125(2) (a) of the LTMA and Section 82 of the LGA. Reviews of this plan will be aligned with those of the RLTP. As the parent document to the public transport plan, the RLTP feeds high level objectives and budgetary forward planning into the RPTP and any review of the RLTP will likely trigger a review of both plans. 15
16 8. Appendices Appendix A - Legislative Context for the RPTP The Land Transport Management Act 2003 The Land Transport Management Act 2003 (LTMA) requires a council to consider certain matters when preparing its plan. Section 124 requires councils to: a. Be satisfied that the plan i. Contributes to the purpose of the LTMA ii. iii. Has been prepared in accordance with any relevant guidelines that the Agency has issued. Is, if it includes a matter that is not within the scope of the RLTP, otherwise consistent with that plan. b. Be satisfied that it has applied the principles specified within Section 115(1). c. Take into account i. Any national energy efficiency and conservation strategy ii. iii. Any relevant regional policy statement, regional plan, district plan or proposed regional plan or district plan prepared under the RMA The public transport funding likely to be available within the region iv. The need to obtain the best value for money, having regard to the desirability of encouraging a competitive and efficient market for public transport services; and v. The views of public transport operators in the region. d. Consider the needs of persons who are transport disadvantaged. Council has complied with all the above requirements when preparing this Plan. 16
17 Appendix B - Services to Be Provided Nga Uri A Maui POTAE AVE Lytton High R R VALLEY RD ORMOND RD HOSPITAL RD MASSEY RD SCHOOL BUS TIMETABLE Campion College/ St Marys CHALMERS RD NELSON RD GLADSTONE RD LYTTON RD R R CHILDERS RD GGHS STANLEY RD GBHS ABERDEEN RD ROEBUCK RD GLADSTONE RD WI PERE ST R R R R R R R R BALLANCE ST ORMOND RD STOUT ST FOX ST STAFFORD ST HARRIS ST DE LAUTOUR RD R R R R R OWEN RD TYNDALL RD LAWRENCE ST DALTON ST PICKERING ST Gisborne Intermediate RUTENE RD R R R Route 1: GGHS Times AM PM Monday Tuesday Wednesday Thursday Friday Route 2: GBHS Times AM PM Monday Tuesday Wednesday Thursday Friday Route 3: Lytton Times AM PM Monday Tuesday Wednesday Thursday Friday Route 4: GGHS Times AM PM Monday Tuesday Wednesday Thursday Friday Route 5: GBHS Times AM PM Monday Tuesday Wednesday Thursday Friday Route 6: Lytton Times AM PM Monday Tuesday Wednesday Thursday Friday Route 7: Gis Int Times AM PM Monday Tuesday Wednesday Thursday Friday Route 8: Campion Times AM PM Monday Tuesday Wednesday Thursday Friday Route 9: Campion/Lytton Times AM PM Monday Tuesday Wednesday Thursday Friday Bus Stops R1 Gisborne Girls High R2 Gisborne Boys High R3 Lytton High /Nga Uri A Maui R4 Gisborne Girls High R5 Gisborne Boys High R6 Lytton High /Nga Uri A Maui R7 Gisborne Intermediate (via Mangapapa) R8 Campion College/St Mary s R9 Campion College/Lytton High R FARE Route and estimated arrival time One way $ ticket pass available HIRINI ST CRAWFORD RD RANFURLY ST QR Code Scan to read LONDON ST WAINUI RD CAMBRIDGE TCE TYNDALL RD HUXLEY RD IDA RD ALICE ST MATTHEWS RD NEWTON ST PARAONE RD WAINUI RD For timetable enquiries and lost property contact GoBus ph: Gisborne District Council Freephone: service@gdc.govt.nz R R R R R R R R MURDOCH RD R R R
18 Lytton West Lytton High Medical centres EMILY ST CHARLES ST DALRYMPLE RD Mangapapa RUA ST MANGAPAPA RD Gisborne Airport HAIG ST BULWER RD BIRRELL ST Lytton West Lytton High Elgin CHILDERS RD KENT ST TON RD EMILY ST MILL RD Te Hapara CHARLES ST Te Wananga o Aotearoa AYTON ST FERGUSSON DR TOTARA ST ALBERT ST DALRYMPLE RD Girls High STANLEY RD Pools HERBERT RD Mangapapa RUA ST Gisborne Intermediate MANGAPAPA RD Gisborne Airport GLADSTONE RD DISRAELI ST Countdown Botanical Gardens CARNARVON ST AWAPUNI RD SALISBURY RD Bus stop HAIG ST BULWER RD BIRRELL ST Bus stop - route point Direction of travel Elgin Medical centres CHILDERS RD KENT ST COBDEN ST Pak n Save LYTTON RD DERBY ST MILL RD Te Hapara CITY HOSPITAL TE HAPARA CITY 1A CITY ELGIN HOSPITAL CITY Te Wananga o Aotearoa BRIGHT ST KAHUTIA ST PEEL ST FERGUSSON DR TOTARA ST SHEEHAN ST Bright St Balance Hospital Te Wiremu Awapuni Rd Bright St Terminal Street Rest Home - Library Terminal AM AM AM/PM PM PM A Bright St Hospital Elgin Rugby Park Bright St Terminal Shops Terminal AM PM LOWE ST ALBERT ST CUSTOMHOUSE ST Court House Girls High STANLEY RD CITY HOSPITAL TE HAPARA CITY 1A Bright St Balance Hospital Te Wiremu Awapuni Rd Bright St Terminal Street Rest Home - Library Terminal AM AM AM/PM PM PM CITY ELGIN HOSPITAL CITY 3A Bright St Hospital Elgin Rugby Park Bright St Terminal Shops Terminal AM PM Anzac Park Bright St YMCA Elgin Hospital Bright St Terminal Shops Terminal AM AM Court House PM PM AWAPUNI RD HERBERT RD SALISBURY RD Gisborne Intermediate CITY ELGIN CITY 1B GLADSTONE RD DISRAELI ST Countdown CARNARVON ST Botanical Gardens AWAPUNI RD SALISBURY RD CITY ELGIN HOSPITAL CITY COBDEN ST Pak n Save CHILDERS RD DERBY ST BRIGHT ST KAHUTIA ST PEEL ST SHEEHAN ST LOWE ST CUSTOMHOUSE ST Court House Bright St Desmond Rugby Elgin Awapuni Rd Bright St Terminal Road Park Shops - Library Terminal AM AM BRIGHT ST PM TERMINAL PM B 18
19 DICKSON ST Titirangi LEWI Te Poho o Rawiri OXFORD ST Kaiti CITY KAITI TAMARAU CITY 2A DONNA ST COLDSTREAM RD MATTHEWS RD STEELE RD Bright St Kaiti Heath De Lautour Awapuni Rd Bright St Terminal Mall Johnston Park Shops - Library Terminal AM AM AM/PM PM PM CITY KAITI TAMARAU CITY 3B Bright St Kaiti Heath De Lautour Bright St Terminal Mall Johnston Park Shops Terminal AM PM lowered. Put your bike on the bus All GizzyBuses are fitted with bike racks. There s no extra cost to put your bike on a GizzyBus. You re responsible for loading and unloading your own bike. SuperGold card The SuperGold card is available to all eligible New Zealanders aged 65 years or over and those who receive the New Zealand Superannuation or the Veterans Pension. You just need to show the driver your SuperGold card to receive the fare concession. Child fares students may be asked to show the driver a valid student ID to receive a fare concession. Contact us if you have any questions or comments about GizzyBus services 24hr Freephone: service@gdc.govt.nz on Facebook and Twitter QR CODE - SCAN TO READ Anzac Park Bus stop - route point TYNDALL RD MAPS LAWRENCE ST PALMERSTON RD ORMOND RD Illminster Intermediate DAPHNE ST Waikirikiri Reserve GLADSTONE RD COBDEN ST AWAPUNI RD SALISBURY RD Pak n Save DERBY ST BRIGHT ST PEEL ST LOWE ST CHILDERS RD BRIGHT ST TERMINAL CUSTOMHOUSE ST Court House THE ESPLANADE HIRINI ST PARAU ST MAKI ST DICKSON ST HINAKI ST RUTENE RD LEWIS ST Te Poho o Rawiri GRAHAM RD OXFORD ST KARA ST Kaiti CAVENDISH CR DONNA ST COLDSTREAM RD MATTHEWS RD ALICE ST STEELE RD Waikirikiri Titirangi 19
20 Appendix C - Fare Box Recovery Policy Introduction Fare box recovery measures the percentage of public transport operating costs that is covered by the passenger fares (the remaining balance of which is shared in equal measures by GDC and Central Government. The New Zealand Transport Agency requires GDC to adopt a Farebox recovery policy. The fare box recovery policy also establishes the target rate at which GDC forecasts passengers to cover the cost of the public transport service over the 3 year review cycle of this plan. NZ Transport Agency Requirements In order to access transport agency funding for public transport GDC is required to prepare, as part of the Regional Public Transport Plan, a farebox recovery policy. NZ Transport Agency prescribes the formula for establishing the farebox recovery rate. Gisborne Bus Service In 2012/13, after review and significant community consultation, GDC embarked on a major restructuring of its bus service. The Gizzy Bus brand was created, new buses were purchased and a complete realignment of routes and time tables was implemented. The review took into account fare levels but the decision was made to leave them at current levels. No reviews have been undertaken since that time. Services included The public transport services to be included in the calculation of the fare recovery are all GDC contracted services operating in the region. Long-distance (e.g. inter-city services) services, privately funded school services, Ministry of Education funded school services; tourist and charter services are not included Year Fare-box recovery rate 2010/11 46% 2011/12 43% 2012/13 44% 2013/14 41% 2014/15 39% 2015/16 25% % The actual 2016/17 farebox recovery rate was 32%, no target had been set for that financial year. The transport agency expects a national farebox recovery rate of 50% (Achieved 48% in 2016/17). Large metropolitan centres contribute strongly to this target whereas smaller regional centres struggle. The transport agency is sensitive to this imbalance and the challenges regional centres face in providing a value service at a reasonable subsidy, however it is expected that GDC will take steps increase the recovery rate by raising fares and/or driving patronage growth. In accordance with the transport agency s farebox recovery policy guidelines GDC has set a year on year growth target of 1% for the review cycle of this plan. In doing so GDC has considered the deteriorating trend over the last 5 years alongside the set of tools council has to influence farebox recovery, and decided that stabilising the current trend is both reasonable and achievable. Actual Farebox Recovery (2016/17 Target (2018/19) Target (2019/20) 32% 40% 41% 42% Target (2020/21) 20
21 GDC proposes 3 mechanisms to realise this target. 1. Early 2018 adoption of a Smart Card electronic ticketing system 2. Late 2018 Comprehensive Strategic Network Review Contract tender application process As with many other regional centres, Gisborne s urban bus service is primarily a social service, as opposed to the more commuter orientated services found in New Zealand s metropolitan centres. The reality for our users is they often have few transport options and limited capacity to wear significant fare increases. It is therefore considered appropriate to set a conservative farebox recovery rate that is achievable for council and affordable for our customers. The strategic network review, aligned with our bus contract tender process is expected to uncover more efficiencies for the service, means for driving patronage and a new electronic ticketing system will enable more agile fare pricing structures and more regular fare reviews. 21
22 Appendix D - Significance Policy As conditions and requirements change over time, so to the contents of this plan can be altered accordingly. When those circumstances arise, council will first determine the significance of those changes, in accordance with section 120(4) of the Land Transport Management Act, and if required, undertake an appropriate level of consultation. This significance policy outlines the specific factors contained in the GDC draft Significance and Engagement policy which are pertinent to public transport planning and implementation. General Determination of Significance Proposed variations to the plan, which necessitate a council decision, will be considered against the following criteria set out by the councils Significance and Engagement Policy: The effects on all or a large part of the Gisborne district The effects on individuals or specific communities including the impact on Maori. The level or history of public interest in the matter or issue Consistency with Council s current strategy and policy including the Strategic priorities. Impacts on Council s financial strategy, Long Term Plan and Annual Plan and levels of service (also including the Regional land Transport Plan, if applicable). Whether the decision is reversible? Significant and Non-Significant Matters Determining the significance of most variations to this plan will be decided upon by the council on a case by case basis, unless they fall into one of the following categories: Variations that will always be considered significant are: Any variation that amends this policy on significance; and Any variation that introduces a new public transport unit Any variation that alters the cost of the provision of public transport services by more than 10% in one financial year. Variations that will always be considered not significant are: Minor editorial and typographical amendments to this Plan Minor changes to fare levels in accordance with current policy and funding levels 22
23 Variations that will usually be considered not significant are: A variation that has already been consulted on Minor changes to the description of services following a service review, e.g. changes to the route, frequency and hours of a service that may include a reduction in service levels on a route or routes, but which result in the same, or better, overall level of service across the network Changes to the description of services or grouping of services as a result of an area wide service review, provided that there is no significant increase in cost Any variation that alters the cost of the provision of public transport services in one financial year by less than 10% This policy also recognises certain potential variations can be considered routine or time critical and therefore council will generally not consult upon these. Organisational decisions (eg. staff changes and operational matters) that do not materially reduce a level of service. Emergency management activities during a state of emergency Civil Defence Emergency Management Act Decisions taken to manage an urgent issue, or save or protect life, health or amenity prevent serious damage to property» avoid, remedy or mitigate an adverse effect on» protect the integrity of existing and future» Decisions that are commercially sensitive (eg awarding» Any decisions that are made by delegation/ sub-» Entry or exit from a development agreement (private contract) under section 207A Local Government Act 2002 (LGA) Decisions in relation to regulatory and enforcement Decisions to act where it is necessary to:» comply with the law» the environment» infrastructure and amenity» contracts)» delegation to officers» activities. 23
24
National Farebox Recovery Policy
National Farebox Recovery Policy Introduction The NZTA has adopted a National Farebox Recovery Policy following consultation with approved organisations and other stakeholders. The main features of this
More informationVocational Qualifications (QCF, NVQ, NQF) CPC (Certificate of Professional Competence)
Vocational Qualifications (QCF, NVQ, NQF) CPC (Certificate of Professional Competence) Level 3 CPC (Certificate of Professional Competence) for Transport Managers (International Passenger Transport) -
More informationHOUSE OF COMMONS TRANSPORT SELECT COMMITTEE INQUIRY INTO PUBLIC TRANSPORT TICKETING
HOUSE OF COMMONS TRANSPORT SELECT COMMITTEE INQUIRY INTO PUBLIC TRANSPORT TICKETING March 2007 Passenger Transport Executive Group Wellington House 40-50 Wellington Street Leeds LS1 2DE 0113 251 7204 info@pteg.net
More informationWEST MIDLANDS COMBINED AUTHORITY
WEST MIDLANDS COMBINED AUTHORITY TRANSPORT ACT 2000 Travel Concession Reimbursement Arrangements To be valid From 1 st April 2018 Page 1 of 20 WEST MIDLANDS COMBINED AUTHORITY TRANSPORT ACT 2000 TRAVEL
More informationWOKING COMMUNITY TRANSPORT LTD THE TOWN CENTRE BUGGY SERVICE - APPLICATION FOR SUPPORT
Agenda Item No. 37 EXECUTIVE 15 DECEMBER 2016 WOKING COMMUNITY TRANSPORT LTD THE TOWN CENTRE BUGGY SERVICE - APPLICATION FOR SUPPORT Executive Summary Woking Community Transport has applied for annual
More informationPolicy Title: Vehicles University and Private Vehicles Used for University Business
Edith Cowan University POLICY Policy Title: Vehicles University and Private Vehicles Used for University Business Policy Owner: Keywords: Policy Code: Manager, Campus Operations and Resources 1) Vehicle
More informationMarsh Barton Rail Station Draft Benefits Realisation Plan and Monitoring and Evaluation Plan
Draft Benefits Realisation Plan and Monitoring and Evaluation Plan May 2014 Devon County Council County Hall Topsham Road Exeter Devon EX2 4QD Contents 1 Scheme Background and Context... 3 1.1 Description
More informationPeer Agency: King County Metro
Peer Agency: King County Metro City: Seattle, WA Fare Policy: Service Type Full Fare Reduced Fare Peak: - 1 Zone $2.75 $1.00* or $1.50** - 2 Zones $3.25 $1.00* or $1.50** Off Peak $2.50 $1.00* or $1.50**
More informationNATIONAL LAND TRANSPORT PROGRAMME / INformation sheet / october 2012
NATIONAL LAND TRANSPORT PROGRAMME 2012 15 / INformation sheet / october 2012 Creating transport solutions for a thriving New Zealand The NZ Transport Agency Board has adopted the 2012 15 National Land
More informationCash & Liquidity The chart below highlights CTA s cash position at August 2018 compared to August 2017.
To: Chicago Transit Authority Board From: Jeremy Fine, Chief Financial Officer Re: Financial Results for August 2018 Date: October 10, 2018 I. Summary CTA s financial results are favorable to budget for
More informationCash & Liquidity The chart below highlights CTA s cash position at June 2018 compared to June 2017.
To: Chicago Transit Authority Board From: Jeremy Fine, Chief Financial Officer Re: Financial Results for June 2018 Date: August 15, 2018 I. Summary CTA s financial results are unfavorable to budget for
More informationStrategic Plan Progress Report Goal 2 Focus. July 2015 San Francisco, California
Strategic Plan Progress Report Goal 2 Focus July 2015 San Francisco, California 1 Goal 2 focus Make transit, walking, bicycling, taxi, ridesharing and carsharing the preferred means of travel Objective
More informationStrategic Plan Performance Metrics & Targets
San Francisco Municipal Transportation Agency Strategic Plan Performance Metrics & Targets Fiscal Year 2019 Fiscal Year 2020 March 2018 SAFETY Goal 1: Create a safer transportation experience for everyone.
More informationMETRO. Monthly Board Report. June 2006
METRO Monthly Board Report Operating Capital Service Performance June 26 7/17/26 June 26 MONTHLY BOARD REPORT INDEX Section A Section B Section C Section D Section E Section F Section G Operating Budget
More informationCash & Liquidity The chart below highlights CTA s cash position at March 2017 compared to March 2016.
To: Chicago Transit Authority Board From: Jeremy Fine, Chief Financial Officer Re: Financial Results for March 2017 Date: May 10, 2017 I. Summary CTA s financial results are $0.6 million favorable to budget
More informationSuper Gold Card - Free public Transport Initiative
Super Gold Card - Free public Transport Initiative Survey of people aged 65 plus November 2009 Prepared by Deborah Burns Research & Consultants Ltd for the NZTA 2 Background and introduction Since the
More informationIPART. More efficient, more integrated Opal Fares Transport Draft Report December February 2016
IPART More efficient, more integrated Opal Fares Transport Draft Report December 2015 February 2016 Phone: 02 9211 2599 Email: info@ncoss.org.au Suite 301, Level 3, 52-58 William St, Woolloomooloo NSW
More informationConsideration of applications to increase cash, Leap and pre-paid fares from Bus Éireann for 2014
Consideration of applications to increase cash, Leap and pre-paid fares from Bus Éireann for 2014 Determination No. 4 for period Nov/Dec 2013 to Nov/Dec 2014 October 2013 1 Table of contents Executive
More informationMiWay Business Plan and 2015 Budget
MiWay 2015-2018 Business Plan and 2015 Budget Agenda Existing Core Services Vision and Mission Service Delivery Model Service Level Issues and Trends Service Area Information Accomplishments Benchmarks
More informationGuam Visitors Bureau. Japan Visitor Tracker Exit Profile & Market Segmentation Report FY2018 JANUARY 2018
Guam Visitors Bureau Japan Visitor Tracker Exit Profile & Market Segmentation Report FY20 JANUARY 20 Prepared by: Anthology Research Information contained herein is the property of the Guam Visitors Bureau.
More informationCash & Liquidity The chart below highlights CTA s cash position at January 2018 compared to January 2017.
To: Chicago Transit Authority Board From: Jeremy Fine, Chief Financial Officer Re: Financial Results for January 2018 Date: March 14, 2018 I. Summary CTA s financial results are $1.7 million unfavorable
More informationChairman of the Policy and Resources Committee. Appendix 1 - Draft Local Implementation Plan Enclosures. Summary
Policy & Resources Committee 23 October 2018 Title Report of Wards Status Urgent Key Local Implementation Plan submission of draft to TfL and public consultation Chairman of the Policy and Resources Committee
More informationAugust 31, 2016 Financial Report
August 31, 2016 Financial Report Capital Metropolitan Transportation Authority 10/14/2016 Table of Contents SUMMARY REPORTS Budgetary Performance - Revenue 2 - Sales Tax Revenue 6 - Operating Expenses
More informationMEETING DATE: November 17, SUBJECT: 2005 Wheel-Trans Operating Budget
MEETING DATE: November 17, 2004 SUBJECT: 2005 Wheel-Trans Operating Budget RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that the Commission approve: 1/ The 2005 Wheel-Trans Operating Budget of $53.1 million provided
More informationTitle VI Fare Equity Analysis
Pioneer Valley Transit Authority Title VI Fare Equity Analysis Prepared by the Pioneer Valley Planning Commission April 12, 2012 PVTA TITLE VI FARE EQUITY ANALYSIS APRIL 12, 2012 1. CONFORMANCE WITH REGULATORY
More informationAppendix J Western Corridor Regeneration Scheme. Benefits Realisation Plan & Monitoring and Evaluation Plan
Appendix J Western Corridor Regeneration Scheme Benefits Realisation Plan & Monitoring and Evaluation Plan April 2014 [Final Report] Strategic Transportation Planning Torbay Council 2nd Floor Electric
More informationDRAFT TRANSPORT ACT The Tyne and Wear Quality Contracts Scheme for Buses [date] ARRANGEMENT OF THE SCHEME ARTICLE
DRAFT TRANSPORT ACT 2000 The Tyne and Wear Quality Contracts Scheme for Buses [date] Made [date] ARRANGEMENT OF THE SCHEME ARTICLE 1. CITATION AND COMMENCEMENT 2. INTERPRETATION 3. THE QCS AREA 4. DESIGNATION
More informationPublic Transit Services Summary of Submitted 2015 Budget From Rates
Public Transit Services Summary of Submitted 2015 From Rates Service Expense 2014 2015 Revised Draft Non Tax Revenue Net Tax Supported Expense Non Tax Revenue Net Tax Supported Increase / (Decrease) Over
More informationCash & Liquidity The chart below highlights CTA s cash position at March 2018 compared to March 2017.
To: Chicago Transit Authority Board From: Jeremy Fine, Chief Financial Officer Re: Financial Results for March 2018 Date: May 9, 2018 I. Summary CTA s financial results are $0.9 million favorable to budget
More informationCOTA SA: DRAFT SUBMISSION ON THE SA TRANSPORT PLAN
28 November 2013 COTA SA: DRAFT SUBMISSION ON THE SA TRANSPORT PLAN The Council on the Ageing SA (COTA SA) is pleased to have the opportunity to provide this brief submission to the State Government s
More informationOperating Budget. Third Quarter Financial Report (July 2005 March 2006)
Third Quarter Financial Report (July 2005 March 2006) INDEX A. Executive Summary...page 2 B. Revenue and Expense Analysis...page 3 C. Budget Variance Reports...page 14 D. Ridership and Performance Measures...page
More informationPre-Budget Submission To Government. From. The Coach Tourism & Transport Council of Ireland
Pre-Budget Submission 2019 To Government From The Coach Tourism & Transport Council of Ireland August 2018 Introduction The Coach Tourism & Transport Council (CTTC) make this submission to Government in
More informationHART Financial Snapshot. HART Finance and Audit Committee January 23, 2017
HART Financial Snapshot HART Finance and Audit Committee January 23, 2017 1 Requested January 3, 2017 Cash flow management overview Fund balance update including year end fund balance reported in the past
More informationGO-AHEAD FULL YEAR RESULTS for the year ended 30 June September 2012
GO-AHEAD FULL YEAR RESULTS for the year ended 30 June 2012 6 September 2012 FULL YEAR RESULTS OVERVIEW A strong performance; results in line with management expectations Record passenger levels across
More informationPOLICY AND PROCEDURES MANUAL
NUMBER EFF. DATE POLICY AND PROCEDURES MANUAL RESPONSIBLE DEPARTMENT Finance/Service Planning TITLE Fare Policy (DRAFT as of 11-13-13) APPLIES TO Development of Fare Structure, General Public SUPERSEDED
More information2016 Q4 CUSTOMER SATISFACTION SURVEY
2016 Q4 CUSTOMER SATISFACTION SURVEY Quarterly Report PREPARED IN PARTNERSHIP WITH: TABLE OF CONTENTS Methodology 3 Executive Summary 4 Summary of Findings 6 Key Drivers by Mode 27 Individual Measures
More information~ NOTICE OF MEETING ~ CAPITAL METROPOLITAN TRANSPORTATION AUTHORITY BOARD OF DIRECTORS MEETING
~ NOTICE OF MEETING ~ CAPITAL METROPOLITAN TRANSPORTATION AUTHORITY BOARD OF DIRECTORS MEETING 2910 East Fifth Street Austin, TX 78702 ~ AGENDA ~ Executive Assistant/Board Liaison Gina Estrada 512-389-7458
More informationRural Transportation Forum, Walkerton, ON
Rural Transportation Forum, Walkerton, ON Dennis Kar, Dillon Consulting Limited June 16 th, 2014 R u r a l Tr a n s p o r t a t i o n Fo r u m 2 Illustrate different types of coordinated transportation
More informationBalancing the Transportation Needs of a Growing City
Balancing the Transportation Needs of a Growing City FY 2019 and FY 2020 Operating Budget SFMTA Board Meeting Ed Reiskin, Director of Transportation March 20, 2018 1 Revises Baselines: FY 2019-2020 ($
More informationFunding Local Public Transportation
Funding Local Public Transportation I. Metro A. SORTA, early history In 1969 the Southwest Ohio Regional Transit Authority was established by Hamilton County with Hamilton County as its jurisdiction. In
More informationReport on. Direct Award of Public Services Contract to Bus Éireann in 2014
Report on Direct Award of Public Services Contract to Bus Éireann in 2014 December 2013 National Transport Authority Dun Scéine Iveagh Court Dublin 2 Contents 1. Background... 3 2. Operation of the Direct
More informationSUBMISSION TO THE GOVERNMENT OF SOUTH AUSTRALIA ON THE STATE TRANSPORT PLAN
COUNCIL ON THE AGEING, SOUTH AUSTRALIA SUBMISSION TO THE GOVERNMENT OF SOUTH AUSTRALIA ON THE STATE TRANSPORT PLAN Prepared by COTA SA 16 Hutt Street Adelaide SA 5000 (08) 8232 0422 www.cotasa.org.au Prepared
More informationPre-seen analysis. T Railways. Note: The enclosed document in no way indicates what is likely to be examined in the un-seen information on exam day.
Pre-seen analysis T Railways Note: The enclosed document in no way indicates what is likely to be examined in the un-seen information on exam day. Contents Pre-seen analysis of T Railways E3 Tips and Guidance
More informationGovernment Policy Statement on land transport 2018 release for public engagement
In Confidence Office of the Minister of Transport Chair, Cabinet Economic Development Committee Government Policy Statement on land transport 2018 release for public engagement Proposal 1. This paper seeks
More informationThe year to date is less than budget and prior year by 15.4 million and 11.6 million, respectively.
To: Chicago Transit Authority Board From: Jeremy Fine, Chief Financial Officer Re: Financial Results for September 2016 Date: November 16, 2016 I. Summary CTA s financial results are $0.3 million unfavorable
More informationThe responsibility for this policy and adherence to the procedures rests with the Chief Operating Officer.
STAFF TRAVEL AND EXPENSES POLICY AND PROCEDURES 1. PURPOSE This document sets out London & Partners policy and procedures on staff travel and expenses. The policy has been designed to ensure that staff
More informationApril 30, 2016 Financial Report
2016 April 30, 2016 Financial Report Capital Metropolitan Transportation Authority 6/15/2016 Table of Contents SUMMARY REPORT Budgetary Performance - Revenue 2 - Sales Tax Revenue 6 - Operating Expenses
More informationSummarised Expenses & Benefits Policy
Summarised Expenses & Benefits Policy Introduction 1. This summarised policy applies to all staff of the University of Aberdeen claiming expenses and benefits incurred in connection with University business.
More informationAffordable Fares Task Force Recommendations. March 26, 2015
Affordable Fares Task Force Recommendations March 26, 2015 Low income individuals make up a disproportionate amount of RTD users. Percent of RTD riders Percent of individuals in the district Less than
More informationSPAIN Zaragoza Tramway SUMMARY OVERVIEW ZARAGOZA TRAMWAY. Location Zaragoza, Aragón, Spain
SPAIN Zaragoza Tramway Image: Tramway through Plaza Lanuza in Zaragoza by Thierry Llansades / CC BY-NC-ND 2.0 OVERVIEW Location Zaragoza, Aragón, Spain Sector Transport Rail Procuring Authority Municipality
More informationDebt Statistics. A consumer focus. January 2017
Debt Statistics A consumer focus January 2017 Contents 3. Message from the Chair 4. About Debt Advice Foundation 5. At-a-glance 6. Overview 7. Age group 8. Gender 9. Region 10. Residential status 11. Employment
More informationBusiness Travel Policy
Business Travel Policy Publication code: HR-0413-058 Publication date 2 April 2013 Version number FINAL Author s initials CC Job title Responsibility for this document Human Resources Adviser Human Resources
More informationDebt Statistics. A consumer focus. October 2016
Debt Statistics A consumer focus October 2016 Contents 3. Message from the Chair 4. About Debt Advice Foundation 5. At-a-glance 6. Overview 7. Age group 8. Gender 9. Region 10. Residential status 11. Employment
More informationDebt Statistics. A consumer focus. November 2016
Debt Statistics A consumer focus November 2016 Contents 3. Message from the Chair 4. About Debt Advice Foundation 5. At-a-glance 6. Overview 7. Age group 8. Gender 9. Region 10. Residential status 11.
More informationDebt Statistics. A consumer focus. December 2016
Debt Statistics A consumer focus December 2016 Contents 3. Message from the Chair 4. About Debt Advice Foundation 5. At-a-glance 6. Overview 7. Age group 8. Gender 9. Region 10. Residential status 11.
More informationDebt Statistics. A consumer focus. June 2016
Debt Statistics A consumer focus June 2016 Contents 3. Message from the Chair 4. About Debt Advice Foundation 5. At-a-glance 6. Overview 7. Age group 8. Gender 9. Region 10. Residential status 11. Employment
More informationMETRO. Fiscal Year 2012 Monthly Board Report. December 2011 (First Quarter Fiscal Year-to-Date)
METRO Fiscal Year 2012 Monthly Board Report Revenue Expense Ridership Performance (First Quarter Fiscal Year-to-Date) 1/27/2012 Table of Contents Section A Section B Section C Section D Section E Section
More informationCoordinating Urban Land Use, Transportation Pricing & Public Policy
Coordinating Urban Land Use, Transportation Pricing & Public Policy The 2007 CalACT Transportation Summit Transportation at the Speed of Life Martin Wachs, Director Transportation, Space, & Technology
More informationCash & Liquidity The chart below highlights CTA s cash position at February 2017 compared to February 2016.
To: Chicago Transit Authority Board From: Jeremy Fine, Chief Financial Officer Re: Financial Results for February 2017 Date: April 5, 2017 I. Summary CTA s financial results are $0.3 million favorable
More informationPASSENGER HANDBOOK. Cody Roggatz Transportation Director City of Aberdeen
1 P u b l i c T r a n s p o r t a t i o n A B E R D E E N R I D E L I N E PASSENGER HANDBOOK Effective: May 1999 R e v i s e d : M a r c h 2 0 1 6 T r a n s i t S y s t e m S p o n s o r e d b y t h e
More informationCash & Liquidity The chart below highlights CTA s cash position at December 2017 compared to December 2016.
To: Chicago Transit Authority Board From: Jeremy Fine, Chief Financial Officer Re: Financial Results for December 2017 Date: February 14, 2018 I. Summary CTA s financial results are $4.7 million favorable
More informationFinancial Management. Adoption: CEO Date: May 2017 (Adoption/most recent revision) Review period: Executive Manager Business Performance
Category: Financial Management Adoption: CEO Date: May 2017 (Adoption/most recent revision) Review period: Three years Responsible Manager: Executive Manager Business Performance CEO Signature Date 20
More informationDevelopment Contributions Policy 2018: Springvale Urban Expansion Area and Otamatea West
Development Contributions Policy 2018: Urban Expansion Area and West 1 P a g e Development Contributions Policy 2018: Urban Expansion Area and West Originator: Damien Wood, Development Engineer Contact
More informationMETRO MONTHLY BOARD REPORT
METRO Revenue Expenses Service Performance Fiscal Year FY2011 Table of Contents Section A Section B Section C Section D Section E Section F Section G Section H Summary Sales Tax Revenue Fare Revenue Operating
More informationTransit Development Plan And 2013 Annual Report. Asotin County PTBA
Transit Development Plan 2014-2019 And 2013 Annual Report Asotin County PTBA Date of Public Hearing: September 10, 2014 Table of Contents Section I: Organization... 3 Section II: Physical Plant... 4 Section
More informationMETRO. Fiscal Year 2014 Monthly Board Report. May 2014
METRO Fiscal Year 2014 Monthly Board Report Revenue Expense Ridership Performance 7/11/2014 Table of Contents Section A Section B Section C Section D Section E Section F Section G Section H Section I Section
More informationCash & Liquidity The chart below highlights CTA s cash position at September 2017 compared to September 2016.
To: Chicago Transit Authority Board From: Jeremy Fine, Chief Financial Officer Re: Financial Results for September 2017 Date: November 15, 2017 I. Summary CTA s financial results are $7.7 million favorable
More informationBirmingham-Jefferson County Transit Authority P.O. Box Birmingham, AL Phone: (205) Fax: (205)
Birmingham-Jefferson County Transit Authority P.O. Box 10212 Birmingham, AL 35202-0212 Phone: (205) 521-0161 - Fax: (205) 521-0154 Program of Projects For Federal Fiscal Year 2018 (Utilizing FFY 2017 Apportionments)
More informationDocument Ref QP035 Document Title Travel & Expenses Policy Owning Department Finance Effective Date 05-Nov-18 Review Date 05-Nov-21
Document Ref QP035 Document Title Travel & Expenses Policy Owning Department Finance Effective Date 05-Nov-18 Review Date 05-Nov-21 1. Purpose This document sets out London & Partners policy and procedures
More informationTravel Costs Reimbursement Policy (Replacing 078 and 096 Workforce) THIS POLICY IS CURRENTLY UNDER REVIEW WITH THE POLICY AUTHOR
(Replacing 078 and 096 Workforce) THIS POLICY IS CURRENTLY UNDER REVIEW WITH THE POLICY AUTHOR POLICY NUMBER TPWF/217 POLICY VERSION V.2 RATIFYING COMMITTEE HR Executive Group DATE RATIFIED 21 July 2015
More informationReport to COUNCIL for decision
13/345 Subject: Statement of Proposal Remission of selected rates 2013/2014 Prepared by: Fiona Scragg (Senior Rates Officer) Meeting Date: 5 September 2013 Report to COUNCIL for decision SUMMARY The rates
More informationAnnex 8. Project Assurance Recommendations
Annex 8 Project Assurance Recommendations Contents 1. Project Review Report 2. Recommendations and actions Taken 3. Project Board Roles and Responsibilities This page is intentionally blank BRT North -
More informationMETRO. Fiscal Year 2013 Monthly Board Report. December 2012 (First Quarter Fiscal Year-to-Date)
METRO Fiscal Year 2013 Monthly Board Report Revenue Expense Ridership Performance (First Quarter Fiscal Year-to-Date) 1/14/2013 Table of Contents Section A Section B Section C Section D Section E Section
More informationMETRO. Fiscal Year 2013 Monthly Board Report. November 2012
METRO Fiscal Year 2013 Monthly Board Report Revenue Expense Ridership Performance 12/13/2012 Table of Contents Section A Section B Section C Section D Section E Section F Section G Section H Section I
More informationMETRO. Fiscal Year Monthly Performance Report. Revenue Expense Ridership Performance. November 2018 (Third Quarter Fiscal Year-to Date)
METRO Fiscal Year 2019 Monthly Performance Report Revenue Expense Ridership Performance (Third Quarter Fiscal Year-to Date) 12/12/2018 Table of Contents Section A Section B Section C Section D Section
More informationMETRO. Fiscal Year 2013 Monthly Board Report. January 2013
METRO Fiscal Year 2013 Monthly Board Report Revenue Expense Ridership Performance 2/14/2013 Table of Contents Section A Section B Section C Section D Section E Section F Section G Section H Section I Section
More information20. FUNDING SOURCES AND FINANCIAL FORECASTS
20. FUNDING SOURCES AND FINANCIAL FORECASTS 20.1 FUNDING SOURCES This section provides forecasts of anticipated revenue and expenditure for the next 10 years. The main sources of funds for land transport
More informationMETRO. Fiscal Year 2012 Monthly Board Report. September 2012 (Fourth Quarter Fiscal Year-to-Date)
METRO Fiscal Year 2012 Monthly Board Report Revenue Expense Ridership Performance (Fourth Quarter Fiscal Year-to-Date) This report is based on a preliminary closing of the year-end financials for FY2012
More information2018 Long Term Plan Financial forecasting assumptions
2018 Long Term Plan Financial forecasting assumptions Forecasting assumption Risk Likelihood of occurrence Projected price change factors Forecast financial information That actual price changes vary Medium
More informationCity of Kingston Information Report to Environment, Infrastructure & Transportation Policies Committee Report Number EITP
City of Kingston Information Report to Environment, Infrastructure & Transportation Policies Committee Report Number EITP-16-003 To: From: Resource Staff: Date of Meeting: Subject: Chair and Members of
More informationPublic Transportation
Municipal Manager Marketing & Customer Service Program Planning Transit Operations & Maintenance Transit Planning Transit Operations Para Transit Services Vehicle Maintenance Non-Vehicle Maintenance PT
More informationReport to COUNCIL for noting
15/362 Subject: Chief Executive s Activity Report: September 2015 Prepared by: Judy Campbell (Chief Executive) Meeting Date: 8 October 2015 Report to COUNCIL for noting SUMMARY Attached is my report for
More informationTravel and related costs for NGA Guideline Committees
Travel and related costs for NGA Guideline Committees Published: Oct 2017 v2017-04 1 v2017-04 Contents Contents... 2 1. Policy introduction... 3 2. Travelling expenses... 4 2.2 Travel by car or motor cycle...
More informationA report to Greener Journeys June 2017
The true value of local bus services A report to Greener Journeys June 2017 Important notice This Report, 'The true value of local bus services' ( Report ) has been prepared by KPMG LLP solely for Greener
More informationHALF YEAR RESULTS for the six months ended 2 January 2010
HALF YEAR RESULTS for the six months ended 2 January 2010 Legal disclaimer Certain statements included in this presentation contain forward-looking information concerning the Group s strategy, operations,
More informationOPERATIONAL PARKING POLICY. Guideline
OPERATIONAL PARKING POLICY Solent NHS Trust policies can only be considered to be valid and up-to-date if viewed on the intranet. Please visit the intranet for the latest version. Purpose of Agreement
More informationFinancial Report - FY 2017 Year to Date May 31, 2017
Financial Report - FY 2017 Year to Date July 19, 2017 1 Major Highlights Revenue Sales tax remittances received through YTD April 2017 are 4.2% higher than YTD April 2016 Plaza Saltillo lease income budgeted
More informationPerformance Management Accountability Meeting Data as of October, 2012
Performance Management Accountability Meeting Data as of October, 2012 Richard A. Davey, Secretary & CEO Office of Performance Management and Innovation Celia J. Blue, Assistant Secretary November 27,
More information2017 TRANSIT DEVELOPMENT PLAN PROGRESS REPORT
LAKE COUNTY TRANSIT DIVISION P.O. Box 7800, Tavares, Florida 32778 2440 U.S. Highway 441/27, Fruitland Park, Florida 34731 Telephone: 352.323.5733; Facsimile: 352.323.5755 www.ridelakexpress.com 2017 TRANSIT
More informationHoward Court Staff Car Parking Policy
Howard Court Staff Car Parking Policy (Reference No. HS17 0116) Version: Version 2, January 2016 Version Superseded: Version 1, November 2013 Ratified/ Signed off by: Executive Team Date ratified/ Signed
More informationDebt Statistics. A consumer focus. May 2017
Debt Statistics A consumer focus May 2017 Contents 3. Message from the Chair 4. About Debt Advice Foundation 5. At-a-glance 6. Overview 8. Age group 9. Gender 10. Region 11. Residential status 12. Employment
More informationFebruary 2016 Financial Report
2016 February 2016 Financial Report Capital Metropolitan Transportation Authority 4/13/2016 Table of Contents SUMMARY REPORT Budgetary Performance - Revenue 2 - Sales Tax Revenue 5 - Operating Expenses
More informationCapital Metropolitan Transportation Authority Monthly Financial Report For Period Ending November 30, 2013
Capital Metropolitan Transportation Authority Monthly Financial Report For Period Ending November 30, 2013 Table of Contents SUMMARY REPORT Financial Performance -Sales Tax Revenue 3 -Other Revenue 4 -Operating
More informationDublin City University Ollscoil Chathair Bhaile Átha Cliath. Travelling and Subsistence Regulations. Revision October 2016
Dublin City University Ollscoil Chathair Bhaile Átha Cliath Travelling and Subsistence Regulations Revision October 2016 Document Name Version Reference 4.0 Document Owner Approved by Travel & Subsistence
More informationMETRO. Fiscal Year 2017 Monthly Performance Report. Revenue Expense Ridership Performance. October 2016
METRO Fiscal Year 2017 Monthly Performance Report Revenue Expense Ridership Performance 11/18/2016 Table of Contents Section A Section B Section C Section D Section E Section F Section G Section H Section
More informationInterCity East Coast franchise award
1 InterCity East Coast franchise award Analyst and investor presentation Stagecoach Group plc 27 November 2014 Cautionary statement 2 This document is solely for use in connection with a briefing on the
More informationStrategic Policy Transport Levy
Strategic Policy Transport Levy Corporate Plan reference: An outstanding organisation A high performing customer-focussed organisation marked by great people, good governance and regional leadership 5.3
More informationFINANCE AND EXPENDITURE COMMITTEE. 2018/19 Estimates Examination Vote Oranga Tamariki Standard Estimates Questionnaire Questions 1-22
FINANCE AND EXPENDITURE COMMITTEE 2018/19 Estimates Examination Vote Oranga Tamariki Standard Estimates Questionnaire Questions 1-22 1 Standard Estimates Questionnaire 2018/19 The outcomes that the Vote
More informationThe costs and benefits of concessionary bus travel for older and disabled people in Britain
The costs and benefits of concessionary bus travel for older and disabled people in Britain June 2017 This report, originally published in March 2014, has been updated to account for a wider range of benefits
More informationSpecial City Council Meeting Agenda Consolidated as of February 1, 2019
Special City Council Meeting Agenda Consolidated as of February 1, 2019 Thursday, February 7, 2019 4:00 p.m. Council Chambers, Guelph City Hall, 1 Carden Street Please turn off or place on non-audible
More information