STATE OF MINNESOTA Office of the State Auditor

Transcription

1 STATE OF MINNESOTA Office of the State Auditor Rebecca Otto State Auditor Criminal Forfeitures in Minnesota For the Year Ended December 31, 2013

2 Description of the Office of the State Auditor The mission of the Office of the State Auditor is to oversee local government finances for Minnesota taxpayers by helping to ensure financial integrity and accountability in local governmental financial activities. Through financial, compliance, and special audits, the State Auditor oversees and ensures that local government funds are used for the purposes intended by law and that local governments hold themselves to the highest standards of financial accountability. The State Auditor performs approximately 150 financial and compliance audits per year and has oversight responsibilities for over 3,300 local units of government throughout the state. The office currently maintains five divisions: Audit Practice - conducts financial and legal compliance audits of local governments; Government Information - collects and analyzes financial information for cities, towns, counties, and special districts; Legal/Special Investigations - provides legal analysis and counsel to the Office and responds to outside inquiries about Minnesota local government law; as well as investigates allegations of misfeasance, malfeasance, and nonfeasance in local government; Pension - monitors investment, financial, and actuarial reporting for approximately 730 public pension funds; and Tax Increment Financing - promotes compliance and accountability in local governments use of tax increment financing through financial and compliance audits. The State Auditor serves on the State Executive Council, State Board of Investment, Land Exchange Board, Public Employees Retirement Association Board, Minnesota Housing Finance Agency, and the Rural Finance Authority Board. Office of the State Auditor 525 Park Street, Suite 500 Saint Paul, Minnesota (651) state.auditor@osa.state.mn.us This document can be made available in alternative formats upon request. Call [voice] or [relay service] for assistance; or visit the Office of the State Auditor s web site:

3 Criminal Forfeitures in Minnesota For the Year Ended December 31, 2013 June 4, 2014 Government Information Division Office of the State Auditor State of Minnesota Deputy State Auditor Greg Hierlinger Staff Kathy Docter, Director of Government Information Division John Jernberg, Research Analysis Specialist Christy John, Research Analyst Mark Albarado, Accounting Officer Tiffany O Neil, Accounting Officer Erin Schutta, Accounting Officer Trang Pham (Intern) MaryEllen Wies (Intern)

4 This page left blank intentionally

5 TABLE OF CONTENTS Executive Summary...1 Scope and Methodology...3 Background Forfeiture Activity...7 Range in Net Proceeds Level...7 Criminal Forfeiture Activity by Law Enforcement Agency...8 Type of Property...8 Table 1 - Type of Forfeited Property and Type of Crime...10 Controlled Substance and DUI-Related Forfeitures...10 Forfeited Property Destroyed, Retained, or Forwarded to Other Agency...12 Final Disposition of Property...12 Property or Proceeds Shared With Other Agency...12 Agencies Reporting No Forfeitures in Data Tables Table 2 - Property Seized Subject to Forfeiture - Final Disposition Sorted by Agency and Net Proceeds...16 Table 3 - Summary of Forfeiture Activity by Agency Sorted by Agency Appendices Appendix 1 - Law Enforcement Agencies Reporting No Forfeitures in Appendix 2 - Law Enforcement Agencies That Did Not File a Forfeiture Report Appendix Drug and Violent Crime Enforcement Teams...247

6 This page left blank intentionally

7 Executive Summary In 2013, 314 Minnesota law enforcement agencies reported a total of 6,955 incidents of property seized subject to forfeiture. This compares to 310 agencies reporting 6,851 incidents of property seized subject to forfeiture in 2012 (pg. 7). Of the 6,955 forfeiture incidents reported, 4,919 involved seized cash, property that was sold, or an agreement that required monetary compensation to the agency. 1 The total value of net proceeds from these forfeitures was $6,925,472. Net proceeds derived from forfeitures ranged from $1 to $68,740. Net proceeds per forfeiture incident averaged $1,408 in (pg. 7). In 2013, gross sales of forfeited property or seized cash totaled $8,777,183; administrative expenses and lien holder obligations totaled $1,987,573; 3,4 and net proceeds totaled $6,925,472 (pg. 7). The agencies with 100 or more forfeiture incidents completed in 2013 were: the Minnesota State Patrol (1,007); the Minneapolis Police Department (311); Department of Natural Resources (DNR) Enforcement Division (271); the Dakota County Drug Task Force (210); the Saint Paul Police Department (192); the Southeast Minnesota Drug Task Force (169); the Hennepin County Violent Offenders Task Force (163); the Mille Lacs County Sheriff s Office (137); the Rochester Police Department (126); and the Bloomington Police Department (108) (pg. 8). In 2013, vehicles accounted for 58 percent (54 percent in 2012) of property seized, 5 followed by cash at 28 percent (33 percent in 2012), firearms at 13 percent (11 percent in 2012), and other property at 2 percent (same as 2012) 6 (pg. 8). The most common criminal activities leading to seizure, forfeiture, and final disposition of property in 2013 were controlled substance and DUI-related, accounting for 91 percent of the forfeitures. Forfeitures involving a controlled substance accounted for 3,189, or 46 percent, of reported incidents, while DUI-related forfeitures accounted for 3,128, or 45 percent, of reported incidents. The remaining incidents involved game and fish violations (264), fleeing (161), other crimes (68), weapons (63), burglary (37), robbery/theft (28), and assault (17) (pg. 10). In addition to the 110 agencies that indicated they had no forfeitures to report in 2013 (compared to 107 in 2012), 53 (compared to 66 in 2012) agencies did not provide any information to the Office of the State Auditor regarding their forfeiture activity in 2013 (pg. 13). 1 The remaining 2,036 forfeiture incidents involved property returned, property destroyed, and other types of dispositions that did not result in proceeds. 2 This analysis examines the 4,919 incidents in which the seizure involved cash, property that was sold, or an agreement that required monetary compensation to the agency. 3 Net proceeds do not equal the gross proceeds minus administrative expenses/lienholder obligations because when expenses exceed the gross proceeds, the net proceeds available for distribution are shown as zero. 4 These costs represent the payment of seizure, storage, forfeiture, and sale expenses; satisfaction of valid liens against the property; and court-ordered restitution (Minn. Stat , subd. 4). 5 Vehicles include ATVs, boats, motorcycles, motorhomes, personal watercraft, and snowmobiles. 6 Due to rounding, the sum of the percentages is greater than 100 percent. 1

8 This page left blank intentionally

9 Scope and Methodology Under Minnesota law, property associated with designated criminal offenses may be forfeited. Minn. Stat , subd. 6, directs law enforcement agencies to report to the Office of the State Auditor property seized subject to forfeiture under these laws. In 2010, the Legislature revised a number of statutes that authorize the seizure and forfeiture of property. The statutory changes, among other things, expanded the scope of information that must be reported to the Office of the State Auditor. Additionally, the reporting requirements are now linked to a broader range of forfeitures including those involving driving under the influence (DUI), game and fish violations, off-road vehicle violations, gambling, and racketeering. The forfeitures presented in this report only reflect property forfeited under state statutes. Property forfeited under federal statutes is reported to the U.S. Department of Justice and is not required to be reported to the Office of the State Auditor. Information reported to the Office of the State Auditor includes the amount forfeited, the statutory authority for the forfeiture, the disposition date, a brief description of the circumstances involved, whether the forfeiture was contested, and the final disposition of the property. For controlled substance and driving while impaired forfeitures, the report must indicate whether the forfeiture was initiated as an administrative or a judicial forfeiture. For firearms, the make, model, and serial number of each firearm forfeited must be reported. This report provides information on the cash and property seized subject to forfeiture in which the final disposition was completed in Forfeitures are considered complete in the year in which there is a final disposition of the seized property regardless of the date the property is initially seized. At final disposition, items are sold, retained for law enforcement purposes, destroyed, forwarded to other law enforcement agencies, or returned to the owner. This report does not reflect all property seizure and forfeiture activity in 2013, but rather the number of forfeitures that went through final disposition in In addition to the 314 law enforcement agencies that completed forfeitures in 2013, 110 agencies reported that they had no forfeitures, and 53 did not file reports with the Office of the State Auditor. Forfeitures that were completed in 2013 are detailed in the three data tables in this report. Table 1 provides a summary and comparison of the type and value of property forfeited that had a final disposition date in 2012 or 2013 (pg. 9). Table 2 lists, by agency, all property seized subject to forfeiture for which the final disposition was completed in 2013 (pg. 16). Table 3 summarizes forfeiture activity by agency for which the final disposition was completed in 2013 (pg. 230). 7 In Minn. Stat , the subject of this report is described as property seized which is subject to forfeiture. Other terminology used in this report, such as forfeiture incidents and forfeitures, are intended to convey the same meaning. 8 All forfeiture information in this report is self-reported by individual law enforcement agencies. The Office of the State Auditor does not audit this data. 3

10 This page left blank intentionally

11 Background State laws governing property that is subject to criminal forfeiture proceedings, and the actual disposition of the forfeited property, have changed considerably since their inception in In 1971, the Legislature authorized law enforcement agencies making an arrest involving a controlled substance to seize property associated with the use or transportation of the controlled substance. Upon conviction of the offense, the individual forfeited the seized property to the local law enforcement agency. Legislation authorized local law enforcement agencies to use forfeited property for law enforcement purposes or sell the property and use the proceeds of the sale for authorized agency activities and to destroy forfeited contraband. In 1973, the Legislature authorized the seizure and subsequent forfeiture of money that was deemed to be related to the commission of an offense involving a controlled substance. The 1973 law prescribed a more detailed process for criminal forfeitures. It also directed that half of all proceeds from the sale of forfeited property, and half of all of the forfeited cash, be forwarded to the state drug abuse authority. The state drug abuse authority was directed to use its share of the proceeds for the care and treatment of individuals with drug-related disorders. The remaining half of the proceeds from the sale of forfeited property would continue to be used by the local law enforcement agency. In 1984, the Legislature expanded the items that are subject to criminal forfeiture to include all money, precious metals, gems, negotiable instruments, securities, and property or things of value. The 1984 law further stipulated that all moneys, precious metals, and gems found in proximity to controlled substances or in proximity to any equipment or records pertaining to a controlled substance, are subject to forfeiture. It also revised the formula for distributing forfeited cash and the net proceeds from the sale of forfeited property. Under the 1984 revision, the state retained one-third of the cash and net proceeds for the care and treatment of individuals with drug-related disorders. The remaining two-thirds of the net proceeds were to be shared equally between the law enforcement agency making the initial arrest and the prosecuting agency. In 1988, the Legislature significantly expanded the list of criminal offenses that could result in the forfeiture of cash and personal property. In addition to controlled substance-related forfeitures, the Legislature authorized forfeitures of cash and property related to the commission of a variety of other criminal offenses including: murder, aggravated assault, criminal sexual conduct, criminal vehicular homicide, robbery, kidnapping, prostitution, bribery, fraud, and theft. The 1988 law also amended the formula used to distribute forfeited cash and the proceeds from the sale of forfeited property. The new formula directed that 70 percent of the cash and net proceeds be used by the law enforcement agency initiating the forfeiture action, 20 percent of the cash and net proceeds be distributed to the prosecuting agency, and the remaining 10 percent of the cash and net proceeds be forwarded to the state for deposit in the state s General Fund. 5

12 In 1992, legislative interest in the nature and extent of criminal forfeitures increased throughout the state. This increased interest resulted in a legislatively-imposed requirement that law enforcement agencies report all criminal forfeitures to the Office of the State Auditor. The new reporting requirement mandated that the reports be filed monthly and include the amount forfeited, date, and a brief description of the circumstances involved. In 1993, the Legislature passed legislation that prohibited law enforcement agencies from selling forfeited firearms. The provision required that all forfeited weapons, ammunition, and firearm accessories be destroyed unless retained for law enforcement purposes. In 1994, the Legislature amended the forfeiture statutes to require law enforcement agencies to report to the Office of the State Auditor the number of firearms forfeited, and the make, model, and serial number of each firearm forfeited. In 1995, the Legislature expanded DUI-related forfeiture statutes to include offenses involving snowmobiles, all-terrain vehicles, boats, and automobiles. A vehicle used in an incident that results in a third impaired driving conviction in 5 years or a fourth conviction within 15 years is subject to forfeiture. The legislation also required law enforcement agencies to report these forfeitures to the Office of the State Auditor on an annual basis. Due to the 1997 legislative repeal of Minn. Stat , subd. 10, and 86B.337, subd. 10, the requirement to report information on DUI-related forfeitures to the Office of the State Auditor was eliminated. In 1999, the Legislature amended Minn. Stat , subd. 1, to allow law enforcement agencies to sell forfeited firearms to federally-licensed firearms dealers. The Hennepin and Ramsey County Boards were given authorization to ban the sale of forfeited firearms by their respective sheriff s departments. The Boards subsequently voted to continue the ban. In 2010, the Legislature made numerous changes to the forfeiture laws, including the expansion of the reporting requirements related to forfeiture; requiring model policies on forfeiture; requiring officers to give forfeiture receipts upon seizure of property; implementing timelines for forfeiture notice and hearings; placing a cap on the value of property that may be forfeited administratively; authorizing petitions for remission and mitigation of seized property; requiring certification by the prosecutor before property may be forfeited administratively; and prohibiting the sale of forfeited property to law enforcement officers, employees, and family members. 6

13 2013 Forfeiture Activity In 2013, 314 Minnesota law enforcement agencies reported a total of 6,955 incidents of property seized subject to forfeiture. This compares to 310 agencies reporting 6,851 incidents of property seized subject to forfeiture in Although the number of forfeiture incidents reported by the Department of Natural Resources (DNR) Enforcement Division, decreased by 170 and the Saint Paul Police Department decreased by 498, several of the other law enforcement agencies reported slightly higher forfeiture incidents in The number of law enforcement agencies reporting 100 or more forfeiture incidents also increased from 8 in 2012 to 10 in Of the 6,955 forfeiture incidents reported, 4,919 involved seized cash, property that was sold, or an agreement that required monetary compensation to the agency. 9 The total value of net proceeds from these forfeitures was $6,925,472. Net proceeds derived from forfeitures ranged from $1 to $68,740. Net proceeds per forfeiture incident averaged $1,408 in In 2013, the gross sales, expenses, and net proceeds of all forfeited property totaled the following amounts: Gross sales of forfeited property or seized cash totaled $8,777,183. Administrative expenses and lien holder obligations totaled $1,987, ,12 Net proceeds totaled $6,925,472. Range in Net Proceeds Level Law enforcement agencies receive funds derived from forfeitures in three primary ways: the forfeited item was cash, the forfeited item was sold, or an agreement required monetary compensation to the agency. An analysis of the net proceeds of these 4,919 incidents showed the following: 456 (9 percent) forfeitures were less than $100. 1,922 (39 percent) forfeitures ranged from $100 to $ (19 percent) forfeitures ranged from $500 to $999. 1,284 (26 percent) forfeitures ranged from $1,000 to $4, (6 percent) forfeitures were greater than $5, The remaining 2,036 forfeiture incidents involved property returned, property destroyed, and other types of dispositions that did not result in proceeds. 10 This analysis examines the 4,919 incidents in which the seizure involved cash, property that was sold, or an agreement that required monetary compensation to the agency. 11 Net proceeds do not equal the gross proceeds minus administrative expenses/lienholder obligations because when expenses exceed the gross proceeds, the net proceeds available for distribution are shown as zero. 12 These costs represent the payment of seizure, storage, forfeiture, and sale expenses; satisfaction of valid liens against the property; and court-ordered restitution (Minn. Stat , subd. 4). 7

14 Figure 1 below shows the distribution of forfeitures by net proceeds range. Figure 1: Number of Forfeiture Incidents by Net Proceeds Range ,000 Number of Forfeitures 1,500 1, Less than $100 $100 to $499 $500 to $999 $1,000 to $4,999 Over $5,000 Net Proceeds Range Criminal Forfeiture Activity by Law Enforcement Agency The 314 law enforcement agencies reporting criminal forfeiture incidents in 2013 included county sheriff s departments, city police departments, drug and gang task forces, airport police departments, the University of Minnesota police department, and state law enforcement agencies. The number of law enforcement agencies reporting 100 or more forfeiture incidents has increased from 8 in 2012 to 10 in The agencies with 100 or more forfeiture incidents completed in 2013 were: the Minnesota State Patrol (1,007); the Minneapolis Police Department (311); DNR, Enforcement Division (271); the Dakota County Drug Task Force (210); the Saint Paul Police Department (192); the Southeast Minnesota Drug Task Force (169); the Hennepin County Violent Offenders Task Force (163); the Mille Lacs County Sheriff s Office (137); the Rochester Police Department (126); and the Bloomington Police Department (108). Type of Property Figure 2 on the following page shows the type of property seized subject to forfeiture in In 2013, vehicles accounted for 58 percent (54 percent in 2012) of property seized, 13 followed by cash at 28 percent (33 percent in 2012), firearms at 13 percent (11 percent in 2012), and other property at 2 percent (same as 2012) Vehicles include ATVs, boats, motorcycles, motorhomes, personal watercraft, and snowmobiles. 14 Due to rounding, the sum of the percentages is greater than 100 percent. 8

15 Figure 2: Types of Property Seized Cash 28% Vehicles 58% Other 2% Firearms 13% The table below shows the three most common types of forfeited property (cash, vehicles, and firearms) and all other property for 2012 and It also shows the change between the two years. Table 1: Type of Forfeited Property and 2013 Administrative Number of Type of Gross Expenses/ Net Forfeiture Years Property Sales Liens Proceeds* Incidents 2012 Cash $3,115,749 $229,344 $2,886,743 2, Cash 3,302, ,841 2,831,166 1,922 Difference $187,058 $244,497 ($55,577) (347) 2012 Vehicle $4,787,646 $1,328,656 $3,566,839 3, Vehicle 5,238,094 1,491,462 3,880,213 4,030 Difference $450,448 $162,806 $313, Firearm $173,907 $22,457 $151, Firearm 169,536 18, , Difference ($4,371) ($4,387) $ All Other $315,862 $240,373 $76, All Other 66,746 4,200 62, Difference ($249,116) ($236,173) ($13,696) (14) 2012 Totals $8,393,164 $1,820,830 $6,681,319 6, Totals 8,777,183 1,987,573 6,925,472 6,955 Difference $384,019 $166,743 $244, *Net proceeds do not equal the gross proceeds minus administrative expenses/lien obligations because when expenses exceed the gross proceeds, the net proceeds available for distribution are shown as zero. 9

16 Type of Crime The most common criminal activities leading to seizure, forfeiture, and final disposition of property in 2013 were controlled substance and DUI-related, accounting for 91 percent of the forfeitures. Forfeitures involving a controlled substance accounted for 3,189, or 46 percent, of reported incidents, while DUI-related forfeitures accounted for 3,128, or 45 percent, of reported incidents. The remaining incidents involved game and fish violations (264), fleeing (161), other crimes (68), weapons (63), burglary (37), robbery/theft (28), and assault (17). Figure 3 below shows forfeiture incidents by type of crime. Figure 3: Forfeiture Incidents by Type of Crime ,500 Number of Incidents 3,000 2,500 2,000 1,500 1, Controlled Substance DUI Game and Fish Fleeing Other Weapons Burglary Robbery/Theft Assault Controlled Substance and DUI-Related Forfeitures Property seized subject to forfeiture for which the associated crime is controlled substance- or DUI-related must also include whether the forfeiture was initiated as an administrative or judicial forfeiture and whether the forfeiture was contested. For 2013: There were 3,128 DUI-related forfeitures reported, compared to 2,851 reported in Of these 3,128 DUI-related forfeitures, 3,034, or 97 percent, were initiated as administrative forfeitures; 71, or 2 percent, were initiated as judicial forfeitures; and, 23, or 1 percent, were initiated as other. Figure 4 on the following page shows this breakdown. Among the DUI forfeitures, 943, or 31 percent, of those initiated as administrative forfeitures were contested; 48, or 68 percent, initiated as judicial forfeitures were contested; and 6, or 26 percent, of those listed as other were contested. 10

17 Figure 4: 2013 DUI-Related Forfeiture Initiation Type - Administrative, Judicial, or Other 3,128 DUI-Related Forfeitures Administrative 97% Other 1% Judicial 2% There were 3,189 controlled substance-related forfeitures reported, compared to 3,253 reported in Of the 3,189 controlled substance forfeitures in 2013, 3,032, or 95 percent, were initiated as administrative forfeitures; 102, or 3 percent, were initiated as judicial forfeitures; and 55, or 2 percent, were initiated as other. Figure 5 below illustrates this distribution. Among the controlled substance-related forfeitures, 683, or 23 percent, of those initiated as administrative forfeitures were contested; 53, or 52 percent, initiated as judicial forfeitures were contested; and 37, or 67 percent, of those initiated as other were contested. Figure 5: 2013 Controlled Substance-Related Forfeitures Initiation Type - Administrative, Judicial, or Other 3,189 Controlled Substance-Related Forfeitures Administrative 95% Judicial 3% Other 2% 11

18 Forfeited Property Destroyed, Retained, or Forwarded to Other Agency In addition to selling forfeited property, law enforcement agencies have the authority to destroy property that is harmful to the public, retain property for official use by the agency, return the seized property upon court order or agreement, or forward property to a state or federal agency (usually the Drug Enforcement Administration). When the final disposition of seized property is one of those listed above, there are no net proceeds subject to the various distribution formulas. If property retained for official use is later sold, the net proceeds are apportioned according to Minn. Stat , subd. 5. In 2013, 1,453 forfeitures resulted in the seized property being returned to the owner upon agreement or court order, 504 forfeitures resulted in property being destroyed or sent to a salvage yard, 378 forfeitures were used to resolve liens against the property, and 82 forfeitures resulted in property being retained by the agency or forwarded to another agency. Final Disposition of Property Law enforcement agencies reported final disposition for 6,955 incidences of seized property in Figure 6 below shows the final disposition for the 6,955 forfeitures. 15 Figure 6: Final Dispostion of Property Seized Subject to Forfeiture Cash 25% Owner 21% Lien 5% Sold 40% Retained/Forwarded 1% Salvage Yard/ Destroyed 7% Property or Proceeds Shared With Other Agency Law enforcement agencies frequently work together, especially on drug-related offenses, and often share the cash proceeds from drug-related criminal forfeitures. Sharing of property or proceeds occurs most frequently in narcotics task forces, where proceeds are split amongst the contributing agencies in accordance with Minn. Stat , subd Due to rounding, the sum of the percentages is less than 100 percent. 12

19 Agencies Reporting No Forfeitures in 2013 Not all law enforcement agencies in the state process property for forfeiture. The Office of the State Auditor requires all law enforcement agencies that did not process any forfeitures in a given year to inform the Office by January 31 of the following year of this information. For 2013, 110 agencies reported that they did not process any property under the forfeiture statutes (see Appendix 1). This does not mean that forfeitable offenses did not occur in these jurisdictions, but rather it is often cost-prohibitive for these agencies to take advantage of the forfeiture statutes due to their limited size. Many agencies forward their forfeitures to the task force in their jurisdiction. Appendix 3 contains a map of the gang and drug task forces throughout the state. In addition to the 110 agencies that indicated they had no forfeitures to report in 2013 (compared to 107 in 2012), 53 (compared to 66 in 2012) agencies did not provide any information to the Office of the State Auditor regarding their forfeiture activity in These agencies are listed in Appendix 2. 13

20 This page left blank intentionally

21 DATA TABLES

22 16 *

23 17 *

24 18 *

25 19 *

26 20 *

27 21 *

28 22 *

29 23 *

30 24 *

31 25 *

32 26 *

33 27 *

34 28 *

35 29 *

36 30 *

37 31 *

38 32 *

39 33 *

40 34 *

41 35 *

42 36 *

43 37 *

44 38 *

45 39 *

46 40 *

47 41 *

48 42 *

49 43 *

50 44 *

51 45 *

52 46 *

53 47 *

54 48 *

55 49 *

56 50 *

57 51 *

58 52 *

59 53 *

60 54 *

61 55 *

62 56 *

63 57 *

64 58 *

65 59 *

66 60 *

67 61 *

68 62 *

69 63 *

70 64 *

71 65 *

72 66 *

73 67 *

74 68 *

75 69 *

76 70 *

77 71 *

78 72 *

79 73 *

80 74 *

81 75 *

82 76 *

83 77 Entity and Crime Disposition Date Edina Police Department (Continued) Type of Property Table 2 Property Seized Subject to Forfeiture - Final Disposition Sorted by Agency and Net Proceeds Property Detail Disposition of Property Basis of Disposition Estimated Value Gross Sales Expenses and/or Amount Returned to Lien Holder or Owner Net Proceeds* DUI-Related 06/11/2013 Vehicle 2000 Chevrolet Silverado 1500 Returned to Owner Agreement 4, DUI-Related 02/21/2013 Vehicle 2007 Saturn Ion Returned to Owner Agreement 5, DUI-Related 08/21/2013 Vehicle 2008 Ford Focus Returned to Owner Agreement 6, DUI-Related 10/20/2013 Vehicle 2008 Ford Fusion Returned to Owner Agreement 8, DUI-Related 01/22/2013 Vehicle 1994 Cadillac Fleetwood Property Sold Administrative Forfeiture DUI-Related 08/22/2013 Vehicle 2004 Pontiac Sunfire Returned to Lien Holder Administrative Forfeiture 3, DUI-Related 12/11/2013 Vehicle 2007 Ford Focus Returned to Lien Holder Agreement 4, DUI-Related 05/22/2013 Vehicle 2004 Infinity G35 Returned to Lien Holder Agreement 15, DUI-Related 04/05/2013 Vehicle 1979 Mercedes-Benz SL-Class Returned to Owner Agreement 9, DUI-Related 03/26/2013 Vehicle 2001 BMW 325 Property Sold Administrative Forfeiture --- 2, ,516 DUI-Related 08/13/2013 Vehicle 2002 Mercedes-Benz C-Class Property Sold Administrative Forfeiture --- 4, ,040 DUI-Related 04/30/2013 Vehicle 2002 Lexus ES 300 Property Sold Administrative Forfeiture --- 5, ,490 DUI-Related 04/30/2013 Vehicle 2006 Chrysler Sebring Property Sold Administrative Forfeiture --- 6, ,990 Agency Total $76,800 $26,656 $2,725 $23,931 Elk River Police Department DUI-Related 06/20/2013 Vehicle 1995 Mercury Villager Property Sold Administrative Forfeiture DUI-Related 06/10/2013 Vehicle 1994 Oldsmobile Cutlass Supreme Property Sold Administrative Forfeiture DUI-Related 02/15/2013 Vehicle 1993 Mercury Villager Returned to Owner Administrative Forfeiture DUI-Related 03/05/2013 Vehicle 2006 Ford F350 Returned to Owner Administrative Forfeiture 16, Burglary 03/21/2013 Vehicle 1999 Chevrolet Tahoe Returned to Owner Judicial Forfeiture 1, DUI-Related 12/04/2013 Vehicle 2002 Chevrolet Malibu Property Sold Administrative Forfeiture Fleeing Peace Officer 04/17/2013 Vehicle 1993 Cadillac DeVille Salvage Yard Judicial Forfeiture Theft 10/30/2013 Vehicle 2003 Dodge Grand Caravan Returned to Lien Holder Judicial Forfeiture 1, Controlled Substance 10/30/2013 Cash Cash Forfeiture Administrative Forfeiture Controlled Substance 01/17/2013 Cash Cash Forfeiture Administrative Forfeiture DUI-Related 06/10/2013 Vehicle 1999 Chevrolet Lumina Property Sold Administrative Forfeiture Controlled Substance 01/17/2013 Cash Cash Forfeiture Administrative Forfeiture Controlled Substance 02/06/2013 Vehicle 1999 Ford Explorer Property Sold Administrative Forfeiture DUI-Related 01/04/2013 Vehicle 2009 Chevrolet Silverado 1500 Returned to Lien Holder Administrative Forfeiture 20, Controlled Substance 06/10/2013 Cash Cash Forfeiture Administrative Forfeiture DUI-Related 06/10/2013 Vehicle 2001 Chevrolet S-10 Property Sold Administrative Forfeiture Controlled Substance 05/24/2013 Cash Cash Forfeiture Administrative Forfeiture Controlled Substance 01/16/2013 Cash Cash Forfeiture Administrative Forfeiture DUI-Related 01/04/2013 Vehicle 1989 Pontiac Firebird Property Sold Administrative Forfeiture DUI-Related 03/29/2013 Vehicle 2001 Dodge Ram 1500 Property Sold Administrative Forfeiture --- 1, ,009 Controlled Substance 01/25/2013 Cash Cash Forfeiture Agreement --- 1, ,013 *When expenses exceed the gross amount received, the net proceeds available for distribution are shown as zero.

84 78 Entity and Crime Disposition Date Elk River Police Department (Continued) Type of Property Table 2 Property Seized Subject to Forfeiture - Final Disposition Sorted by Agency and Net Proceeds Property Detail Disposition of Property Basis of Disposition Estimated Value Gross Sales Expenses and/or Amount Returned to Lien Holder or Owner Net Proceeds* DUI-Related 06/10/2013 Vehicle 2001 Dodge Ram 1500 Property Sold Administrative Forfeiture --- 1, ,403 DUI-Related 02/15/2013 Vehicle 2006 Chevrolet Cobalt Property Sold Administrative Forfeiture --- 2, ,332 DUI-Related 08/09/2013 Vehicle 2006 Pontiac Torrent Property Sold Administrative Forfeiture --- 5, ,590 DUI-Related 06/20/2013 Vehicle 2006 Hummer H3 Property Sold Administrative Forfeiture , ,290 DUI-Related 07/18/2013 Vehicle 2010 Dodge Challenger Property Sold Administrative Forfeiture , ,000 Agency Total $39,175 $53,983 $5,829 $48,764 Ely Police Department Fleeing Peace Officer 11/04/2013 Snowmobile 2009 Ski-Doo Renegade Returned to Owner Agreement 5,500 5, ,893 Agency Total Eveleth Police Department $5,500 $5,000 $107 $4,893 DUI-Related 12/19/2013 ATV 1982 Honda 185S Three Wheeler Property Sold Administrative Forfeiture DUI-Related 08/07/2013 Vehicle 1998 Plymouth Neon Property Sold Administrative Forfeiture Controlled Substance 07/24/2013 Cash Cash Forfeiture Administrative Forfeiture Fleeing Peace Officer 09/04/2013 Motorcycle 2001 Suzuki Dirt Bikes RM125 Property Sold Agreement Controlled Substance 07/24/2013 Cash Cash Forfeiture Administrative Forfeiture DUI-Related 08/12/2013 ATV 2012 Polaris Sportsman 550 Returned to Owner Agreement 7,000 1, Controlled Substance 11/06/2013 Vehicle 2002 Chevrolet Monte Carlo Property Sold Administrative Forfeiture --- 2, ,758 DUI-Related 11/06/2013 Motorcycle 2011 KTM Dirt Bikes 350 SX-F Property Sold Administrative Forfeiture --- 2, ,168 Agency Total $7,000 $7,755 $1,165 $6,590 Fairmont Police Department DUI-Related 12/20/2013 Vehicle 2000 Pontiac Bonneville Returned to Owner Agreement Damage to Property 12/04/2013 Vehicle 1999 Ford F150 Property Sold Agreement Controlled Substance 12/02/2013 Cash Cash Forfeiture Administrative Forfeiture Drivers License Violations 12/04/2013 Vehicle 2001 Cadillac DeVille Property Sold Agreement Drivers License Violations 12/20/2013 Vehicle 2004 Pontiac Grand Prix Property Sold Agreement --- 1, ,210 Agency Total $1 $3,155 $510 $2,645 Faribault County Sheriff's Office Controlled Substance 12/06/2013 Firearm Colt Caliber - Unknown Property Sold Agreement Controlled Substance 12/06/2013 Firearm Colt Caliber - Unknown Property Sold Agreement Controlled Substance 12/06/2013 Firearm Walther Millimeter - Unknown Property Sold Agreement Controlled Substance 12/06/2013 Firearm Colt Caliber - Unknown Property Sold Agreement Controlled Substance 12/06/2013 Firearm Colt - 10 Millimeter - Pistol Property Sold Agreement Controlled Substance 12/06/2013 Firearm Colt Caliber - Pistol Property Sold Agreement Controlled Substance 12/06/2013 Firearm Ed Brown Caliber - Unknown Property Sold Agreement Controlled Substance 12/06/2013 Firearm Colt Caliber - Unknown Property Sold Agreement *When expenses exceed the gross amount received, the net proceeds available for distribution are shown as zero.

85 79 *

86 80 *

87 81 *

88 82 *

89 83 *

90 84 *

91 85 *

92 86 *

93 87 *

94 88 *

95 89 *

96 90 *

97 91 *

98 92 *

99 93 *

100 94 *

101 95 *

102 96 *

103 97 *

104 98 *

105 99 *

106 100 *

107 101 *

108 102 *

109 103 *

110 104 *

111 105 *

112 106 *

113 107 *

114 108 *

115 109 *

116 110 *

117 111 *

118 112 *

119 113 *

120 114 *

121 115 *

122 116 *

123 117 *

124 118 *

125 119 *

126 120 *

127 121 *

128 122 *

129 123 *

130 124 *

131 125 *

132 126 *

133 127 *

134 128 *

135 129 *

136 130 *

137 131 *

138 132 *

139 133 *

140 134 *

141 135 *

142 136 *

143 137 *

144 138 *

145 139 *

146 140 *

147 141 *

148 142 *

149 143 *

150 144 *

151 145 *

152 146 *

153 147 *

154 148 *

155 149 *

156 150 *

157 151 *

158 152 *

159 153 *

160 154 *

161 155 *

162 156 *

163 157 *

164 158 *

165 159 *

166 160 *

167 161 *

168 162 *

169 163 *

170 164 *

171 165 *

172 166 *

173 167 *

174 168 *

175 169 *

176 170 *

177 171 *

178 172 *

179 173 *

180 174 *

181 175 *

182 176 *

183 177 *

184 178 *

185 179 *

186 180 *

187 181 *

188 182 *

189 183 *

190 184 *

191 185 *

192 186 *

193 187 *

194 188 *

195 189 *

196 190 *

197 191 *

198 192 *

199 193 *

200 194 *

201 195 *

202 196 *

203 197 *

204 198 *

205 199 *

206 200 *

207 201 *

208 202 *

209 203 *

210 204 *

211 205 *

212 206 *

213 207 *

214 208 *

215 209 *

216 210 *

217 211 *

218 212 *

219 213 *

220 214 *

221 215 *

222 216 *

223 217 *

224 218 *

225 219 *

226 220 *

227 221 *

228 222 *

229 223 *

230 224 *

231 225 *

232 226 *

233 227 *

234 228 *

235 229 Entity and Crime Disposition Date Wright County Sheriff's Office (Continued) Type of Property Table 2 Property Seized Subject to Forfeiture - Final Disposition Sorted by Agency and Net Proceeds Property Detail Disposition of Property Basis of Disposition Estimated Value Gross Sales Expenses and/or Amount Returned to Lien Holder or Owner Net Proceeds* DUI-Related 06/15/2013 Vehicle 2004 Dodge Ram 1500 Property Sold Administrative Forfeiture --- 6, ,512 DUI-Related 06/15/2013 Vehicle 2001 Ford F250 Property Sold Administrative Forfeiture --- 8, ,298 Agency Total $112,285 $97,307 $14,248 $83,059 Wyoming Police Department DUI-Related 10/21/2013 Vehicle 1998 Chevrolet 150 Returned to Owner Agreement 1, DUI-Related 07/17/2013 Vehicle 1997 Ford Mustang Returned to Owner Court-Ordered Return 3, DUI-Related 02/26/2013 Vehicle 2000 Chevrolet Silverado 1500 Property Retained Administrative Forfeiture 6, DUI-Related 05/23/2013 Vehicle 2005 Ford F150 Returned to Owner Agreement 11, DUI-Related 06/19/2013 Vehicle 2001 Chevrolet Cavalier Property Sold Administrative Forfeiture DUI-Related 02/21/2013 Vehicle 1998 Volvo S70 Property Sold Administrative Forfeiture --- 1, DUI-Related 04/08/2013 Vehicle 2001 Ford Ranger Returned to Owner Agreement 6,400 2,998 1,116 1,882 DUI-Related 03/22/2013 Vehicle 2003 Dodge Ram 3500 Returned to Owner Agreement 12,375 8,267 2,667 5,600 Agency Total $41,346 $13,064 $4,610 $8,454 Yellow Medicine County Sheriff's Office DUI-Related 05/22/2013 Vehicle 2004 Chevrolet 1500 Returned to Lien Holder Administrative Forfeiture 10, DUI-Related 05/10/2013 Vehicle 1998 Buick LeSabre Property Sold Administrative Forfeiture --- 3, ,059 Agency Total Zumbrota Police Department $10,700 $4,324 $1,265 $3,059 DUI-Related 09/24/2013 Vehicle 1993 Chevrolet Pickup Salvage Yard Administrative Forfeiture Fleeing Peace Officer 04/26/2013 Vehicle 2010 Ford Fusion Returned to Owner Agreement 13, Controlled Substance 04/17/2013 Cash Returned to Owner Agreement nd Degree Assault 10/21/2013 Firearm Llama Caliber - Pistol Property Sold Summary Forfeiture Controlled Substance 12/12/2013 Cash Cash Forfeiture Administrative Forfeiture DUI-Related 05/08/2013 Vehicle 2007 Pontiac Grand Prix Property Sold Administrative Forfeiture ,055 5,719 5,336 Agency Total Total for All Jurisdictions $13,316 $11,342,557 $11,675 $6,082 $5,909 $8,777,183 $1,987,573 $6,925,472 *When expenses exceed the gross amount received, the net proceeds available for distribution are shown as zero.

236 Table 3 Summary of Forfeiture Activity by Agency Sorted by Agency Estimated Gross Administrative Number of Value if Not Sales Expenses/ Net Forfeiture Agency Name Sold Value Liens Proceeds Incidents Ada Police Department $400 $--- $--- $--- 1 Airport Police Department 57,000 9,809 1,245 8,564 9 Aitkin County Sheriff's Office 8 64,837 31,989 33, Aitkin Police Department 100 5,206 1,784 3,422 5 Albany Police Department 14, Albert Lea Police Department 6,982 9,341 1,211 8, Alexandria Police Department ,151 1,290 13, Anoka-Hennepin Drug Task Force 251, ,557 37, , Anoka County Sheriff's Office --- 7, ,313 8 Anoka Police Department 11,050 15, , Apple Valley Police Department 21,240 47,147 3,378 43,769 5 Austin Police Department 80,243 23,556 2,622 20, Avon Police Department --- 3, ,598 1 Babbitt Police Department --- 1,476 1, Bagley Police Department --- 6, ,152 1 Baudette Police Department --- 2, ,394 1 Baxter Police Department 51,000 22,683 7,287 15, Bayport Police Department 78,900 10,193 1,251 8, Becker County Sheriff's Office Becker Police Department --- 3,997 1,349 2,648 2 Belle Plaine Police Department 34,700 12, , Beltrami County Sheriff's Office 51,700 18,223 21,330 4, Bemidji Police Department 84,180 26,535 16,260 12, Benson Police Department 18,200 4, ,900 6 Benton County Sheriff's Office 7,000 10,440 2,652 7,948 8 Big Lake Police Department --- 8,650 2,538 6,402 4 Big Stone County Sheriff's Office 28,450 3, ,814 5 Blaine Police Department 28,000 73,710 19,403 55, Bloomington Police Department 394, ,030 35,674 89, Blue Earth County Sheriff's Office 1,500 38,496 4,542 33, Blue Earth Police Department 20,500 5, ,820 3 Boundary Waters Drug Task Force ,467 3,083 29, Brainerd Police Department 38,250 19, , Breckenridge Police Department ,794 6,119 16,014 3 Breezy Point Police Department 19,900 6, , Brooklyn Center Police Department 10,000 26,813 4,755 22,058 8 Brooklyn Park Police Department 160,600 81,038 13,180 68, Brown Lyon Redwood Gang & Drug Task Force 5,000 26,097 5,011 21, Buffalo Lake Police Department 2, Buffalo Police Department 10, , Buffalo Ridge Gang and Drug Task Force 5,500 9, , Burnsville Police Department 39,656 59,658 20,289 39, Caledonia Police Department 6,000 1,700 1, Cambridge Police Department 5,000 1, ,779 6 Canby Police Department Cannon Falls Police Department 3,925 4,450 2,698 2, Carlton County Sheriff's Office 40,700 17,677 5,602 12, Carver County Sheriff's Office 25,150 15,550 1,997 13, Cass County Sheriff's Office 14,545 1, ,000 3 CEE-VI Gang & Narcotics Task Force 10,200 33,056 5,265 27, Centennial Lakes Police Department 38,000 19,958 6,475 13, Central Minnesota Violent Offenders Task Force ,757 2,197 62,

237 Table 3 Summary of Forfeiture Activity by Agency Sorted by Agency Estimated Gross Administrative Number of Value if Not Sales Expenses/ Net Forfeiture Agency Name Sold Value Liens Proceeds Incidents Champlin Police Department 99,958 5, , Chaska Police Department --- 3,300 1,298 2,002 2 Chatfield Police Department Chippewa County Sheriff's Office Chisago County Sheriff's Office 741 9, ,435 8 Chisholm Police Department 11,000 4, ,937 6 Clay County Sheriff's Office 2,950 31,829 5,380 26, Clearwater County Sheriff's Office 3,000 7,386 2,068 5, Cloquet Police Department 4,500 39,342 8,022 31, Cold Spring Police Department --- 6, ,392 8 Comfrey Police Department Cook County Sheriff's Office --- 3, ,078 3 Coon Rapids Police Department 202,902 71,577 11,960 60, Corcoran Police Department Cottage Grove Police Department 109,922 22,207 4,471 17, Cottonwood County Sheriff's Office Crookston Police Department , , Crosby Police Department 4,643 6,143 1,555 4,588 9 Crosslake Police Department 12,500 13, ,109 7 Crow Wing County Sheriff's Office 32,878 12,756 4,410 8, Crystal Police Department 18, Dakota County Drug Task Force 30, ,163 50, , Dakota County Sheriff's Office 9,000 10,498 4,712 5,786 9 Dawson Police Department 38, Dayton Police Department 4,500 4, ,700 2 Deephaven Police Department 900 2,700 2, Deer River Police Department Detroit Lakes Police Department --- 8, ,469 9 Dilworth Police Department --- 5,925 2,521 3,404 4 DNR, Enforcement Division 2, ,982 20, , Dodge County Sheriff's Office --- 8, ,390 5 Douglas County Sheriff's Office 59,411 13,539 3,298 10, Duluth Police Department 39, ,029 32,291 71, Eagan Police Department 69,780 9,420 4,406 5, Eagle Lake Police Department East Central Drug Task Force 1,950 31, , East Grand Forks Police Department ,300 8,129 8, Eden Prairie Police Department 299,200 62,525 31,830 42, Edina Police Department 76,800 26,656 2,725 23, Elk River Police Department 39,175 53,983 5,829 48, Ely Police Department 5,500 5, ,893 1 Eveleth Police Department 7,000 7,755 1,165 6,590 8 Fairmont Police Department 1 3, ,645 5 Faribault County Sheriff's Office , , Faribault Police Department 8,250 3,810 1,884 1,990 8 Farmington Police Department 32,034 8,028 1,048 6,980 9 Fergus Falls Police Department 229 7,058 2,169 4,889 4 Fillmore County Sheriff's Office 13,983 7,163 3,033 4,130 6 Fisher Police Department 69, Foley Police Department --- 1, Fond du Lac Tribal Police Department 1,500 15,828 4,866 10, Forest Lake Police Department 15,450 25,162 5,163 20,

238 Table 3 Summary of Forfeiture Activity by Agency Sorted by Agency Estimated Gross Administrative Number of Value if Not Sales Expenses/ Net Forfeiture Agency Name Sold Value Liens Proceeds Incidents Freeborn County Sheriff's Office 69,900 24,048 4,641 19, Fridley Police Department 119,000 23,960 11,221 13, Gibbon Police Department 1, Gilbert Police Department 28,500 4, , Glencoe Police Department --- 6, ,390 2 Glenwood Police Department --- 1, ,063 2 Golden Valley Police Department 122,400 76,551 7,729 69, Goodhue County Sheriff's Office 1,300 5,830 1,524 4,306 3 Grand Meadow Police Department 40,000 15, ,251 2 Grand Rapids Police Department 49,000 23, , Granite Falls Police Department Hastings Police Department 39,850 24,839 9,293 15, Hector Police Department --- 9,550 8,524 1,026 1 Henderson Police Department Hennepin County Sheriff's Office 10,000 10,768 2,164 8,604 7 Hennepin County Violent Offenders Task Force 80, ,584 39, , Hermantown Police Department 17,000 3,513 1,680 2,102 8 Hibbing Police Department ,484 2,125 13, Hopkins Police Department 10,300 20,796 5,502 16, Houston County Sheriff's Office 4,800 10,932 1,839 9,128 9 Howard Lake Police Department Hoyt Lakes Police Department --- 3, ,554 2 Hubbard County Sheriff's Office 22,190 14,814 3,097 11, Hutchinson Police Department --- 6,210 2,034 4,176 9 International Falls Police Department Inver Grove Heights Public Safety Department 96,985 41,652 5,341 36, Isanti County Sheriff's Office 11,000 12,278 3,679 8, Isanti Police Department 2,800 3,950 3, Itasca County Sheriff's Office , , Jackson County Sheriff's Office 5,900 1, ,127 2 Jordan Police Department 20,700 13,185 1,742 12,168 9 Kanabec County Sheriff's Office 59,200 22,243 18,760 7, Kandiyohi County Sheriff's Office 36,300 21,208 6,192 15, Keewatin Police Department --- 3, ,992 3 Kittson County Sheriff's Office 93 3, ,917 4 La Crescent Police Department 1,000 6, ,960 5 Lac qui Parle County Sheriff's Office Lake County Sheriff's Office 9,300 5,072 1,184 3,888 7 Lake Crystal Police Department --- 1, ,654 2 Lake Superior Drug & Gang Task Force 1, ,320 2, , Lakefield Police Department 10,000 4, ,000 1 Lakes Area Drug Investigative Division 1,000 43,900 7,831 36, Lakes Area Police District 6,000 18,881 6,519 12,362 9 Lakeville Police Department 207,300 15,537 2,541 13, Le Sueur County Sheriff's Office 50,850 17,102 1,500 15, Le Sueur Police Department 10,800 3, ,880 4 Lewiston Police Department 1, Lino Lakes Police Department 36,574 8,097 7,731 7, Litchfield Police Department --- 1, Long Prairie Police Department --- 1, Lonsdale Police Department ,699 17,746 15,953 2 Lyon County Sheriff's Office 29,667 7,501 4,812 3,

239 Table 3 Summary of Forfeiture Activity by Agency Sorted by Agency Estimated Gross Administrative Number of Value if Not Sales Expenses/ Net Forfeiture Agency Name Sold Value Liens Proceeds Incidents Madelia Police Department 2,500 1, ,500 1 Madison Lake Police Department Mahnomen County Sheriff's Office --- 1, ,418 2 Mankato Department of Public Safety 76,075 35,848 5,217 30, Maple Grove Police Department 90,500 47,998 9,480 38, Maplewood Police Department 152,600 24,025 2,412 21, Marshall County Sheriff's Office , ,171 4 Marshall Police Department 500 7, ,933 2 Martin County Sheriff's Office 3,000 2, ,489 3 McLeod County Sheriff's Office 27,700 6, ,102 8 Medina Police Department 21,895 2,656 3,120 1, Meeker County Sheriff's Office 20,000 3, ,800 3 Melrose Police Department --- 1, ,722 2 Mendota Heights Police Department 13,000 7,700 2,591 5,109 2 Metropolitan Transit Police 5, Mille Lacs County Sheriff's Office ,628 3,557 40, Mille Lacs Tribal Police Department Minneapolis Park Police Department --- 2, ,196 3 Minneapolis Police Department 2, ,615 39, , Minnesota River Valley Drug Task Force 7, ,225 5, , Minnesota State Patrol 3,387,082 1,435, ,639 1,009,387 1,007 Minnetonka Police Department 86,418 87,977 21,655 70, Minnetrista Public Safety Department 77,500 8,729 1,795 6,941 7 Montevideo Police Department 41,000 3,625 2,399 1,226 6 Moorhead Police Department ,076 6,245 50, Moose Lake Police Department 25,000 2,765 1,581 1,184 5 Morris Police Department --- 1, ,067 2 Morrison County Sheriff's Office 7,750 18,305 4,027 14, Mounds View Police Department 30,260 26,449 5,966 20, Mower County Sheriff's Office 14,500 2,484 2, Nashwauk Police Department --- 4, ,170 1 New Brighton Department of Public Safety 3,700 50,162 10,495 39, New Hope Police Department 45,700 15, ,300 7 New Prague Police Department 300 4, , New Ulm Police Department 35,200 3, , Nicollet County Sheriff's Office ,898 8,136 14,762 4 Nisswa Police Department 6,000 1, ,630 3 Nobles County Sheriff's Office --- 3, ,312 6 North Branch Police Department 14,655 1, North Central Drug Task Force 2,500 28, , North Saint Paul Police Department Northfield Police Department 20,250 2,440 1,197 1,243 8 Northwest Metro Drug Task Force 57,500 89,829 14,297 75, Oak Park Heights Police Department 500 1,117 1, Oakdale Police Department 1,850 10, ,086 5 Olmsted County Sheriff's Office 22,345 30,074 1,642 28, Orono Police Department 142,800 56,503 7,293 49, Ortonville Police Department 1, Osseo Police Department --- 1, ,609 1 Otter Tail County Sheriff's Office 35,925 21,446 2,931 18, Owatonna Police Department 42,950 28,811 17,738 12, Park Rapids Police Department , ,

240 Table 3 Summary of Forfeiture Activity by Agency Sorted by Agency Estimated Gross Administrative Number of Value if Not Sales Expenses/ Net Forfeiture Agency Name Sold Value Liens Proceeds Incidents Paul Bunyan Drug Task Force 5,050 29,037 4,407 24, Paynesville Police Department 2, Pennington County Sheriff's Office Pike Bay Police Department Pine County Sheriff's Office 2,700 3, ,024 5 Pine to Prairie Drug Task Force 23,500 30,001 2,043 27, Plainview Police Department Plymouth Police Department 89,100 27,106 5,192 21, Polk County Sheriff's Office 170 4, ,281 8 Pope County Sheriff's Office 4,800 4, ,555 2 Prairie Island Indian Community Police --- 3, ,080 1 Preston Police Department 5, Princeton Police Department ,429 5,017 9, Prior Lake Police Department 16,000 36,926 15,138 21, Proctor Police Department Ramsey County Sheriff's Office 155,170 75,751 29,975 45, Ramsey County Violent Crime Enforcement Team 51, ,721 13, , Ramsey Police Department 12,500 13,141 4,556 8, Red River Valley Gang & Drug Task Force , , Red Wing Police Department 53,675 10,311 6,021 4, Redwood County Sheriff's Office --- 4, ,004 2 Redwood Falls Police Department 19,776 18,312 3,083 15, Renville County Sheriff's Office 1,150 13,448 2,326 11, Rice County Drug Task Force 15,195 35,309 5,707 29, Rice County Sheriff's Office 40,750 24,899 8,171 16, Rice Police Department Richfield Police Department 45, ,140 13,940 98, Robbinsdale Police Department 17,500 14,312 1,363 12, Rochester Police Department 183,993 71,728 16,695 55, Rock County Sheriff's Office 24,000 6, ,720 3 Rogers Police Department 1,200 1, ,359 2 Roseau Police Department 4, Rosemount Police Department 58,100 9,642 3,321 6, Roseville Police Department 6,600 43,001 8,146 35, Saint Anthony Police Department 26,250 12,908 2,813 10, Saint Charles Police Department 5,000 5, ,000 1 Saint Cloud Metro Gang Strike Force 3,500 5, ,645 3 Saint Cloud Police Department 71,887 19,144 4,050 15, Saint James Police Department Saint Joseph Police Department 4, Saint Louis County Sheriff's Office 13,391 53,544 9,184 44, Saint Louis Park Police Department 35,000 1, Saint Paul Park Police Department Saint Paul Police Department 57, ,145 26, , Saint Peter Police Department 5,000 6,925 1,102 5,823 3 Sartell Police Department 12,655 2,621 1, Sauk Centre Police Department ,368 1,248 31,120 8 Sauk Rapids Police Department 3,100 8,670 2,357 7, Savage Police Department 77,645 25,406 18,632 6, Scott County Sheriff's Office 103,950 56,751 10,652 46, Shakopee Police Department 44,300 42,585 13,613 28, Sherburne County Sheriff's Office 22,500 92,541 7,945 84,

241 Table 3 Summary of Forfeiture Activity by Agency Sorted by Agency Estimated Gross Administrative Number of Value if Not Sales Expenses/ Net Forfeiture Agency Name Sold Value Liens Proceeds Incidents Sibley County Sheriff's Office 8,500 5,800 2,564 3,236 6 Sleepy Eye Police Department 1, South Central Drug Task Force 23,600 11,554 1,898 10, South Lake Minnetonka Police Department 80,752 63,355 8,477 56, South Saint Paul Police Department 5,000 5,428 2,905 2,523 8 Southeast Minnesota Drug Task Force 49, ,826 13, , Southwest Hennepin Drug Task Force 64, ,712 21, , Southwest Metro Drug Task Force , , Spring Grove Police Department --- 2, ,000 1 Spring Lake Park Police Department 46,145 3,486 3, Springfield Police Department Stearns County Sheriff's Office 29,500 21,363 6,704 14, Steele County Sheriff's Office 22,700 13,716 5,039 8, Stevens County Sheriff's Office 32,000 1, Stillwater Police Department 2,000 1, Swift County Sheriff's Office 7,800 7, ,398 3 Thief River Falls Police Department --- 3, ,634 7 Three Rivers Park District Police Department 11,875 3, ,738 3 Todd County Sheriff's Office 40,450 21,973 2,734 19, Tracy Police Department --- 1, ,341 1 Truman Police Department Two Harbors Police Department 46, U/M Duluth Police Department , ,073 5 U/M Twin Cities Police Department Virginia Police Department 19,362 40,361 3,855 37, Wabasha County Sheriff's Office 10,500 10,911 2,002 9,465 8 Wabasha Police Department 5,450 2, ,184 7 Wadena County Sheriff's Office 1,100 1,337 1, Wadena Police Department 15,770 2, ,290 6 Waite Park Police Department ,517 1,325 9,192 7 Waseca County Sheriff's Office 1,500 1, Waseca Police Department 32,460 16,541 2,249 14, Washington County Narcotics Task Force 4,500 47,250 3,191 44, Washington County Sheriff's Office 95,100 63,909 27,538 48, Waterville Police Department Watonwan County Sheriff's Office 3,000 1, ,062 3 West Central Drug Task Force ,789 1,477 81, West Hennepin Public Safety Department 1,000 9,590 14,199 3,041 8 West Metro Drug Task Force 27, , ,979 45, West Saint Paul Police Department 14, White Bear Lake Police Department 124,100 41,467 14,723 27, White Earth Tribal Office 700 7, ,409 5 Wilkin County Sheriff's Office ,306 11,558 6,402 6 Willmar Police Department 47,114 30,346 2,255 28, Windom Police Department 30, Winona County Sheriff's Office 43,350 7, ,460 9 Winona Police Department 24,750 12,217 2,042 10, Winsted Police Department Woodbury Police Department 103,700 34,634 7,179 28, Worthington Police Department 15,000 15,068 1,186 13, Wright County Sheriff's Office 112,285 97,307 14,248 83, Wyoming Police Department 41,346 13,064 4,610 8,

242 Table 3 Summary of Forfeiture Activity by Agency Sorted by Agency Estimated Gross Administrative Number of Value if Not Sales Expenses/ Net Forfeiture Agency Name Sold Value Liens Proceeds Incidents Yellow Medicine County Sheriff's Office 10,700 4,324 1,265 3,059 2 Zumbrota Police Department 13,316 11,675 6,082 5,909 6 Total for All Jurisdictions $11,342,557 $8,777,183 $1,987,573 $6,925,472 6,

243 Appendix 1

244 This page left blank intentionally

245 Law Enforcement Agencies Reporting No Forfeitures in 2013 Adams Police Department Adrian Police Department Akeley Police Department Alcohol & Gambling Enforcement Division Alden Police Department Amboy/Vernon Center Police Department Annandale Police Department Appleton Police Department Ashby Police Department Atwater Police Department Audubon Police Department Barnesville Police Department Battle Lake Police Department Belgrade Police Department Bigfork Police Department Blooming Prairie Police Department Bovey Police Department Braham Police Department Brandon Police Department Breitung Police Department Brown County Sheriff's Office Brownsdale Police Department Brownton Police Department Bureau of Criminal Apprehension Callaway/Ogema Police Department Carlos Police Department Clara City Police Department Clearbrook Police Department Cleveland Police Department Climax Police Department Coleraine Police Department Columbia Heights Police Department Cosmos Police Department Cuyuna Police Department Cyrus Police Department Deerwood Police Department Department of Corrections Duluth Township Police Department Dunnell Police Department Eagle Bend Police Department Eden Valley Police Department Elbow Lake Police Department Elko New Market Police Department Elmore Police Department Fayal Township Floodwood Police Department Fountain Police Department Franklin Police Department Frazee Police Department Fulda Police Department Good Thunder Police Department Goodhue Police Department Goodview Police Department Grant County Sheriff's Office Hennepin County Attorney's Office Henning Police Department Heron Lake-Okabena Police Department Hokah Police Department Ivanhoe Police Department Janesville Police Department Kasson Police Department Lake Benton Police Department Lake City Police Department Lake of the Woods County Sheriff's Office Lake Park Police Department Lake Shore Police Department Lamberton Police Department Le Center Police Department Lester Prairie Police Department Lincoln County Sheriff's Office Longville Police Department Mapleton Police Department Minneota Police Department Montgomery Police Department Morristown Police Department New York Mills Police Department Newport Police Department Norman County Sheriff's Office North Mankato Police Department Ostrander Police Department Parkers Prairie Police Department Pequot Lakes Police Department Pipestone County Sheriff's Office Red Lake County Sheriff's Office Renville Police Department Roseau County Sheriff's Office Royalton Police Department Rushford Police Department Sebeka Police Department Sherburn-Welcome Police Department 239

246 Silver Bay Police Department Slayton Police Department Staples Police Department Starbuck Police Department State Fair Police Department Stillwater Township Thomson Township Traverse County Sheriff's Office U/M Morris Police Department Walker Police Department Walnut Grove Police Department Warroad Police Department Waubun Police Department Wayzata Police Department West Concord Police Department Wells Police Department Westbrook Police Department Wheaton Police Department Winnebago Public Safety Wright County Drug Task Force 240

247 Appendix 2

248 This page left blank intentionally

249 Law Enforcement Agencies That Did Not File a Forfeiture Report Arlington Police Department Blackduck Police Department Clarkfield/Boyd Police Department Danube Police Department Dundas Police Department Echo Police Department Emily Police Department Fairfax Police Department Gaylord Police Department Glyndon Police Department Hallock Police Department Hancock Police Department Hawley Police Department Hendrum Police Department Hill City Police Department Houston Police Department Isle Police Department Kenyon Police Department Kimball Police Department Koochiching County Sheriff's Office Leech Lake Tribal Police Department Little Falls Police Department Lower Sioux Tribal Police Department Lowry Police Department Mapleview/Lyle Public Safety McGregor Police Department Menahga Police Department Milaca Police Department Minnesota Financial Crimes Task Force Morgan Police Department Motley Police Department Mound Police Department Mountain Lake Police Department Murray County Sheriff's Office New Richland Police Department Olivia Police Department Onamia Police Department Osakis Police Department Pelican Rapids Police Department Perham Police Department Pierz Police Department Pillager Police Department Pine River Police Department Randall Police Department Sacred Heart Police Department Saint Francis Police Department Silver Lake Police Department Trimont Police Department Twin Valley Police Department Tyler Police Department Upper Sioux Tribal Community Police Verndale Police Department Winthrop Police Department 243

250 This page left blank intentionally

251 Appendix 3

252 This page left blank intentionally

253 2013 Drug and Violent Crime Enforcement Teams Department of Public Safety Office of Justice Programs 247