AN EVALUATION STUDY ON VIKAS MEIN JAN SAHYOG PROGRAMME IN HIMACHAL PRADESH

Transcription

1 AN EVALUATION STUDY ON VIKAS MEIN JAN SAHYOG PROGRAMME IN HIMACHAL PRADESH ISSUED BY : Planning Department Himachal Pradesh

2 PREFACE The programme Gaon Bhi Apna, Kam Bhi Apna was introduced in 99-9 to elicit effective people s participation through decentralized planning. In 994 the programme was restructured and renamed as Vikas Main Jan Sahyog. Under this participatory programme people come forward for meeting their most intensively felt needs with a public participation supplemented with Government budgetary support. After the feed back from the public, different slabs have been introduced for the public and Government participation of the programme. The public and government contribution ratio for Tribal Areas, Backward Declared Areas of the pradesh and villages having 50% and more than 50% population of SC/ST/OBC (or all the three categories) is 5:85. This contribution ratio for other rural areas and urban areas is 5:75 and 50:50 respectively. But the contribution ratio in urban areas for the construction of government Educational, Health, Veterinary institution buildings, Water Supply & Sewerage and Hand Pumps is 5:75. The contribution ratio for the to be constructed in the memory of some one is 50:50 in both the rural as well as urban areas. The State Government has decided to make a comprehensive review of this programme by conducting an evaluation study to assess the efficacy of this scheme. Accordingly, present study was conducted to assess the various aspects such as people s participation, utilization of funds for infrastructural development, completion and maintenance of assets, utility of assets created for the people and employment generation under this programme. The scope of the study was whole of Himachal Pradesh. A detailed schedule was designed to collect wide range of information on all aspects of the scheme covered under Vikas Main Jan Sahyog Programme. Out of total 667, 66 covering Community Assets, Drinking Water, Irrigation, Roads and Schools were selected for the study. The main findings of the study are : i) Out of 66, the estimated cost of 96% of the were below Rs. 5 lakh. % each of the were between Rs. 5 to 0 lakh and above Rs. 0 lakh. Concluding thereby that people prefer smaller. ii) Out of 66, sharing pattern of 47% was 5:85, 5% 5:75 and % were in the sharing pattern of 50:50 which depicts that this scheme is more popular in the rural areas. This fact is also substantiated with the finding that in sharing pattern of 50:50 category only % of the total sample fall. iii) Out of 66 works of 60 i.e. 97.5% were completed. iv) Out of total investment of lakh the public contributin was Rs lakh and rest was Govt. share.

3 v) The study has revealed that 99% of the were functional due to the people s participation input in the programme. vi) 99% of labour force were employed for construction of works under VMJS from with in the village resulting in a very high employment generation of this programme in rural economy. The study has come out with the findings indicating the successful implementation of the programme. This study shows that any programme having public participation not only lead to the additional mobilisation of resources but also create sense of belongingness among the public which ensures the sustainability of the programme. I hope that the planners, policy formulator and the researcher will find this publication very useful. Dated : (Arvind Mehta) I.A.S. Secretary (Planning) to the Govt. of H.P., Shimla-

4 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY The State Government decided to undertake a comprehensive review of VMJS programme and accordingly, this study was conducted to assess the various aspects of the scheme such as people's participation, utilization of funds for infrastructural development, completion and maintenance of assets, utility of assets created for the rural population, social acceptability of programme, employment generation under this programme and to know the quality of work. The study has been conducted in all the districts of the State. The systematic stratified random sampling with multi-stage sampling technique for the selection of sample was adopted. 0% sample was drawn from each strata after stratifying the works on the basis of activity and estimated cost within the district. Out of 667 total number of, a sample size of 644 was selected for this study. But the analysis of the report is based on 66 as were not reported and 6 schedules were rejected during scrutiny. The completed.from the year to were covered under this study. The results of the present study show that this programme is usefu to a greater extent for creation of assets in the rural areas as well as in the urban areas on a need felt basis. In 97.5yo cases, the works taken under this programme were completed in a stipulated period. The average Government and public participation ratio in financial terms was 80:0. About 99% of the completed were functional. However, on the maintenance part, results of the study indicate that only in % cases the maintenance funds were utilized. In 73% cases Development Committees have been constituted to oversee the work under VMJS programme. This programme has also helped in employment generation at the local level as 99% of the labour force employed was from within the village. The detailed findings of the study are as under : Under VMJS Programme, first preference of the people is to build road (3%) followed by Community Assets(6%), Schools (4%) Irrigation % and Drinking Water(8%). Out of 66, estimated cost of 96% of the total was below Rs. 5 lakh and % each of the between Rs 5 to 0 lakh and above 0 lakh. In 99.6% cases the estimated cost of the was equal to actual amount sanctioned and there was no cost escalation observed under this scheme. In terms of investment 5% of the total amount was invested in the below Rs 5 lakh and 48% investment was utilized in the of Rs 5 to 0 lakh and above Rs 0 lakh. In terms of investment 48% of the share of investment goes to Schools followed by Community Assets (9%), Roads (5%), Irrigation (6%) and Drinking Water (%). 3

5 Out of 66, sharing pattern of 47% of the was 5:85, 5% 5:75 and % scheme was in the sharing pattern of 50:50. The scheme is more popular in rural areas. Only % cases of the bearing the name of the particular person fall in the category of sharing pattern of 50:50 and in 99% cases community are preferred. In total investment of Rs lakh, Rs lakh i.e. 80% comprises Govt. share and Rs lakh i.e. 0% is public share under the sample. Out of 66, 60 i.e. 97.5% were completed. Out of total completed, 73% of the were completed within one year, 9% took years for completion and 8% took more than years 99% of the were found functional Only 3% UCs/CCs were submitted In % cases beneficiaries have utilized the maintenance fund. In case of 79% of the need for the use of maintenance fund was not felt and 8% were not aware of the maintenance fund. In 73% of the cases Development Committees have been constituted. 99% of the labour force employed under this programme was from within the village. Out of total investment,.5% was observed as labour cost. The average wage paid to the labour was Rs 56/- per day. 4

6 CONTENTS CHAPTERS Chapter Subject Page I II III IV V VI VII VIII Introduction Objectives of the study Methodology and sampling Design Overall results and discussions District-wise results and discussions Summary of findings Recommendation Schedules TABLES Table Title Page Composition of assets created Category and size-wise surveyed Amount sanctioned Asset-wise investment Activity-wise sharing pattern Activity-wise Govt. and Public share Status of surveyed Time taken for completion of scheme Completed and functional Activity-wise submission of UCs/CCs Maintenance Fund Agency maintaining the created assets Status of utilization of maintenance fund Constitution of Development Committees Status of the and families benefited Activity-wise labour force used Activity-wise mandays generated District-wise tables : Table- to Table-4 Table- to Table

7 DIAGRAMS Figure Title Page Composition of selected under sample frame Size of investment-wise percentage of Schemes and investment pattern Asset-wise investment percentage Sharing pattern of Sharing pattern and activity-wise percentage of Govt. and Public share Completed Agencies maintaining created assets Families benefited DISTRICT-WISE DIAGRAMS District-wise percentage of District-wise investment percentage of Estimated Cost - wise of scheme Average size of as per estimated cost

8 I. INTRODUCTION CHAPTER- I.. The State Government has started a programme named "Gaon Bhi Apna or Kam Bhi Apna" in the year 99-9 as a step in the area of decentralised planning and Public participation. A detailed review of this scheme was carried out after two years of its implementation which led to the restructuring and renaming of the Programme as "Vikas Main Jan Sahyog". Over the years certain changes/amendments have been carried out in its implementation but by and large basic frame work and objectives of the scheme remained the same as was envisaged at the very outset of the Programme. Basic approach behind this programme was to ensure people's participation at the grass root level with an objective of supplementing the Government efforts in the area of infrastructural development and ensure the sustainability of assets in future... There is people's participation from the stage of identification of the scheme based on local priorities up to the level of its execution as is clear from the very nomenclature of the Scheme. According to the guidelines of the scheme a community or an individual can approach the DC/ADC/ADM/SDM/DPO/BDO for taking up a particular work under this scheme and thereafter the community or an individual can submit the approved plan alongwith the requisite contribution and other necessary documents required as per the guidelines of the scheme. People's contribution varies according to the nature/type of scheme and location of the scheme i.e. whether in the urban area, rural area, backward area, or SCI ST population predominant area...3 VMJS Programme is in operation in the entire State both tribal areas as well as non-tribal areas. As per the norms, funds are apportioned among the districts, 60% on the basis of population and 40% on the basis of area. Schemes sanctioned above Rs. five lakh are over and above the normal financial allocations made to the Districts...4 The designated sanctioning authorities of according to their financial powers are as under: Initial Revised. Dy Commissioner Rs..00 lakh Rs lakh. Pr. Adviser (Planning) Rs lakh Rs lakh 3. Pr. Secretary (Planning) Rs lakh Rs lakh 4. Finance Department Above Rs lakh..5 The sharing pattern for urban area is 50:50 except Government Educational, Health, and Veterinary institution buildings, Water Supply, Sewerage and Hand Pumps where public and government contribution is 5 :75 in urban areas also, for the rural areas 5:75 and for SCs / STs populated area and backward area it is 5:85. An amount i.e. 0% of public and Government share is kept for maintenance of asset created. The public share is collected in advance by the D.C. and the funds are released keeping in view the availability of budget under VMJS programme. 7

9 ..6 Under this programme Government share is not provided to such works where the financial assistance is already provided by Central Government, State Government or any other source. In addition, such cases are not considered where there is already a budget provision in the State Budget. The financial support for the religious institutions is provided only for the community assets...7 The priority of works given under this programme is as under:. C/O school buildings. C/O multipurpose community assets 3. C/O motorable roads and rope-ways 4. C/O Irrigation /drinking water /installation of hand pumps 5. C/O buildings for public health services 6. Provision of important missing links such as three phase transmission lines, transformers, X-Rays plant and Ambulance etc...8 In addition, thee is provision up to Rs. 0 lakh investment by the Government for providing special facilities on pilot basis at places of tourist interest under Vikas Main Jan Shayog, on matching share basis by local communities or Hotel Association...9 The local committee of the public sharers is given first priority for the execution of work. If the sanctioned work is to be executed by the private agencies /Committees including PT As, such agencies should be registered. The sanctioned work is required to be completed within a period of one year form the date of sanction...0 There is very strong in built mechanism for monitoring of works in progress. For this purpose, local committees based on the size of the have been constituted For up to Rs. fifty Thousand, members of the committee comprise Chairman of Panchayat Samitti, Block Development Officer and Junior Engineer. For works up to one lakh, Members of the Zila Parishad of the concerned Division and Sub- Oivisional Officer are additional members and for works above Rs. One lakh, Chairman of Zila Parishad, Deputy Commissioner, XEN, Chairman of concerned Panchayat Samitti and BOO are the members of the monitoring committee. About 68% of the sanctioned are monitored by the various designated authorities.. Need of the Study.. In a State Level Technical Advisory Committee meeting held on 30th act. 00, it was decided that to conduct evaluation studies including the VMJS. In this meeting it was also decided that evaluation study on VMJS Programme may be conducted by the Planning Department. The field work of the study was done by the District Planning Cells. 8

10 ... Since the VMJS Programme has been under implementation since 99 and significant amount of Plan funds have been invested on this programme, it was decided to take stock of the extent of usefulness and social acceptability of this programme in various districts including tribal districts. 3. Scope of the Study.3. This study has been conducted in districts of the State. Under this study the following have been selected:. Community Assets. Drinking Water Supply 3. Irrigation 4. Roads 5. Schools 4. Time period of study.4. The completed from to were covered under this evaluation study. 9

11 CHAPTER-II OBJECTIVE OF THE STUDY.. The main objectives of the study are : i) To assess level of public participation / contribution made and funds utilised for the in fulfilling local developmental needs in terms of infrastructural development at the Panchayat / Village level. ii) iii) iv) To study the time taken for the sanction of completed and maintenance of. To evaluate the importance / utility of the assets created for the benefit of the local people. To study the views of the local representatives regarding the social acceptability of the programme. v) To estimate the direct employment generation in rural areas under this programme. vi) To evaluate the Quality of the work undertaken under this programme and the extent of usefulness of the prioritised by the people in rural areas. 0

12 CHAPTER-III METHODOLOGY AND SAMPLING DESIGN: 3.. It was decided to adopt stratified random sampling with multi-stage sampling technique for the selection of sample under the study. While selecting from the districts, the entire universe was divided into two stratums. i) Strata-I Tribal Areas ii) Strata-II Non-Tribal Areas. 3.. It was further decided that proportion of sample from Non- Tribal and Tribal districts would be in the ratio of 90%: 0%.. Sampling Size 3.. In this study, systematic stratified sampling design was adopted to workout the 0% sample and the following sample was selected:- Name of Category No of Schemes Sample size i) Community Assets ii) Drinking Water iii) Irrigation iv) Roads v) Schools The sample was further stratified into the following three categories based on the estimated cost. i) Estimated cost < than as five lakh. ii) iii) Estimated cost Rs. five lakh one to Rs. ten lakhs. Estimated cost Rs. ten lakh one and above After stratifying the works on the basis of activity and estimated cost within the district, 0% sample was drawn from each strata.out of the total sample of 644, 65 fall in the range of the estimated cost of less than Rs. 5 lakh, 4 were in the range of Rs to 0.00 lakh and the rest 5 were above 0 lakh.

13 : Following table gives the activity-wise/ cost-wise breakup of the sampled Category Less than Rs. Five Lakh Rs. Five lakh to Rs. Ten lakh Above Rs. Ten lakh Community Assets Drinking Water Irrigation Roads Schools : District-wise details of the selected are as under: Sr. Districts No of Comm unity Assets Drinking Water Activity-wise detail Irrigation Roads School s Bilaspur Chamba Hamirpur Kangra Kinnaur Kullu L & S Mandi Shimla Sirmour Solan Una The analysis of the report is based on 66 as out of the sample of 644 were non reported cases and 6 schedules were rejected during survey The coverage of this study was from the year to

14 CHAPTER-IV OVERALL RESULTS AND DISCUSSIONS 4.. A sample of 644 was drawn out of total 667 consisting of various categories of assets created under Vikas Main Jan Sahyog Programme. The results of the study are based on 66 as were non reported and 6 schedules were rejected. The assets created have been classified under five broad activities i.e. Community Assets (include Crematoria, Sarai, Community centre, Rain shelter, Mela Ground, Mahila Mandal Bhawan, Janj Ghar, etc.); Drinking Water (Baulies, Water Supply Schemes, Hand Pumps, Drinking Water Tanks, etc.); Irrigation (Irrigation tanks, Irrigation Schemes, Irrigation Wells, Kuhals and Field Channels); Roads ( Paths, Foot paths, link roads, Mule roads, Street pavements, culverts, pully, Bridges and Tractor roads) and Schools (Additional rooms, Toilets, Boundary wall, retaining wall, play ground and Stadium). A table showing the details of total of under sample frame, number of sampled and actual number of on which analysis is based are given below: TABLE- COMPOSITION OF ASSETS CREATED Sr. Schemes of Sample %age of Schemes composition Community Assets Drinking Water Irrigation Roads Schools From the table above it is seen that under Vikas Main Jan Sahyog Programme, first preference of the people is to build Roads (3% ) followed by Community Assets (6%), Schools (4%), Irrigation (%) and Drinking Water (8%). 3

15 4..3 The graphic representation of the above table is given in Figure-I: COMPOSITION OF SELECTED SCHEMES UNDER SAMPLE FRAME Schools-50 (4%) Community Assets-6 (6%) Drinking Water-5 (8%) Roads-9 (3%) Irrigation-7 (%) FIGURE-l 4..4 Out of total 66. the estimated cost of 603 was below Rs lakh and of was Rs to 0.00 lakh and for the estimated cost was above Rs lakh. Under Vikas Main Jan Sahyog Programme, the highest priority has been given by the people to the costing below Rs lakh as 96% of the total fall in this category and % each fall in the category of Rs to 0.00 lakh a~d above Rs lakh Activity-wise details of sample, with percentage, are given in the following table -. : Sr. TABLE- CATEGORY AND SIZE OF INVESTMENT WISE SURVEYED SCHEMES Category of scheme of Schemes Below Rs Lakh Rs-5.00 Rs 0.00 Lakh Above Rs Lakh Community Assets Drinking Water Irrigation Roads Schools (00%) 603 (96%) (%) (%) 4

16 4..6. Graphic presentation of table- is given in Figure- SIZE OF INVESTMENT-WISE PERCENTAGE OF SCHEMES 96% % % Below Rs. 5 lakh Rs. 5 to 0 Lakh SIZE FIGURE- Above Rs. 0 lakh The information on estimated cost and actual amount sanctioned was also collected. It is found that out of lakh of estimated cost Rs lakh was sanctioned i.e.99.6%. Therefore, it is concluded that proposals submitted by the public were mostly in order The aggregate sanctioned amount of the sampled is Rs lakh including Govt. and private share. The analysis is based on the 9.38% of the total and the time period covered under the study is five years. The average annual investment under the programme in respect of sampled comes to Rs lakh. The average annual releases by the Government under these during the period under study are Rs lakh. For further analysis sanctioned amount has been taken as investment.. Investment Pattern: Table 3 below gives the comparative position of of and percentage viz a viz their share in total investment. TABLE-3 AMOUNT SANCTIONED (Rs. in Lakh) Sr. Category of scheme of Schemes (%age) Amount sanctioned / Investment (%age) Below Rs Lakh 603 (96) (5) Lakh () (7) 3. Above 0.00 Lakh () (3) 66 (00) (00) Note : Amount sanctioned has been taken as investment 5

17 SCHEMES AND INVESTMENT PATTERN 96% 5% % 7% % 3% %age of Schemes %age Investment FIGURE Out of total investment 5 percent are invested in the costing below Rs. 5 lakhs, 7 percent in the costing Rs. 5 to 0 lakh and 3% in the costing above Rs. 0 lakh While analyzing the investment pattern in the different assets created, it is seen that 48% of the share of total investment goes to schools followed by Community Assets (9%), Roads (5%), Irrigation (6%) and Drinking Water (% ). Table 4 given below shows the share of investment in different assets created. Sr. Category of scheme TABLE-4 ASSET-WISE INVESTMENT of sample Schemes Amount sanctioned /investment (Rs. in lakh) % age sanctioned amount Community Assets Drinking Water Irrigation Roads Schools

18 4..3. The following diagram depicts the activity-wise details of investment: ASSET -WISE INVESTMENT PERCENTAGE 48% 9% 5% 6% % Schools Community Roads Irrigation Drinking Assets ACTIVITIES Water 3. Sharing Pattern: FIGURE As per the guidelines of VMJS Programme, sharing pattern for the urban areas is 50:50 except Government Educational, Health, Veterinary institution buildings, Water Supply, Sewerage and Hand Pumps whefe public and government contribution is 5:75 in urban areas also, for Rural area 5:75 and for the SCs/STs populated area and Backward area 5: The analysis of the results shows that out of 66 47% falls under 5:85 sharing category, 5% under 5:75 and % under 50:50 sharing pattern. It is revealed from this analysis that higher the Govt. contribution higher is the public demand for the scheme under the VMJS as 99% are falling in the Govt. contribution of 85% and 75%. It is also revealed that this scheme is benefiting the rural areas. It is also concluded that the scheme is more popular in rural areas. The only % were sanctioned in the sharing pattern of 50:50. Among different activities sharing pattern has no specific trend. Table 5 depicts the sharing pattern among different activities. TABLE-5 ACTIVITY-WISE SHARING PATTERN Sr Activity No Sharing Pattern-wise No of of sample 5:85 5:75 50: Community Assets 6 (00) 6 (39) 97 (59) 3 (). Drinking Water (00) (59) (4) 3. Irrigation (00) (38) (6) 4. Roads 9 (00) 3 (57) 68 (4) () 5. Schools 50 (00) 5 (45) 94 (53) 4 () %age to total 66 (00) 93 (47) 35 (5) 8 () 7

19 Following graphs show the of under different proportion of sharing and sharing trend among different categories. SHARING PATTERN OF SCHEMES 66 (00) & %age of Schemes 93 (47.0) 35 (5.0) 8 (.0) 5: 85 5:75 50:50 SHARING PATTERN FIGURE-5 SHARING PATTERN AND ACTIVITY -WISE %AGE OF SCHEMES 50:50 % % 59% 57% 5:85 5:75 6% 59% 53% 45% 39% 38% % 4% 4% Community Assets Schools Roads Drinking Water Roads Schools Community Assets Irrigation Irrigation Community Assets Schools Roads Drinking Water FIGURE In total investment of Rs lakh under the sample, Rs lakh is public share and Rs lakh is Government share. This includes provision for repair and maintenance. Taking into account all the categories of the, the average sharing pattern of Government and Public is 80:0. Activity-wise difference in the percentage of Government and public share is due to the of different sharing pattern falling in similar activity. The schematic detail is given in the following table: 8

20 Sr Activity TABLE-6 ACTIVITY-WISE GOVT. AND PUBLIC SHARE of sample Amount of Government and Public share (Rs. In Lakh) Govt. Public Share Share Community Assets 6 (00) (78) 5.68 ( ) 40.6 (00). Drinking Water 5 (00) 3.7 (79) 3.39 () 6.56 (00) 3. Irrigation 7 (00) 4.04 (78).58 () 53.6 (00) 4. Roads 9 (00) (80) 4.7 (0) 3.64 (00) 5. Schools 50 (00) (8) 73.7 (8) (00) %age to 66 (00) (80) (0) (00) Graphic representation of the Govt. and public share is given in figure-7: GOVT. AND PUBLIC SHARE % Amount (Rs. In lakh) & %age % % % Schools Community Assets 5.68 % % Roads SCHEMES 4.7 0% % Irrigation.58 % Drinking Water % % 3.39 % Public Share Govt. Share FIGURE-7 9

21 4. Status of the Scheme: 4.4. The works of 60 i.e. 97.5% were complete; six were in progress and the five,were incomplete out of the total 66. However, the works of two were cancelled and status of 3 was not recorded. The percentage of completed is quite encouraging which can be seen from the following table: TABLE-7 Sr No. Activity STATUS OF THE SAMPLED SCHEMES No of Work Cancelled 0 Status of the Work In progress Schemes Incomplet e No Record Complete d Community Assets Drinking Water Irrigation Roads Schools % age to total Schemes 66 (00) 5. Time Taken for Completion of Scheme: (0.3) 6 (0.9) 5 (0.8) 3 (0.5) 60 (97.5) 4.5. Out of 60, 55 (4%) were completed within 6 months, 3% within the period of 6 to months, 0% between to 8 months, 9% took 8 to 4 months and 8% took above two years for completion. Concluding thereby that out of total completed, 73% were completed within the period of one year, 9% within the period of years and 8% took more than years. The following table depicts the scheme-wise time taken for completion of the : TABLE-8 Sr No Activity TIME TAKEN FOR COMPLETION OF SCHEMES Schemes completed No of No of comple-ted Within 6 months 6- months -8 months 8-4 months Above years Community Assets 6 5 (00) 45 (30) 45 (30) 0 (3) 3 (5) 9 (). Drinking Water 5 50 (00) 8 (56) 5 (30) (4) 3. Irrigation 7 7 (00) 3 (44) () 7 (0) 7 (9) 4 (5) 4. Roads 9 9 (00) 0 (58) 46 (4) 8 (9) 8 (4) 9 (5) 5. Schools (00) 40 (8) 60 (4) 6 () 5 (0) 4 (0) % age to total 66 (00) 60 (00) 55 (4) 88 (3) 6 (0) 53 (9) 53 (8)

22 4.5. Graphic representation of above table is in Figure below: COMPLETED SCHEMES 60 (00% ) 443 (73%) 4 (9%) 53 (8%) and %age Within Within Above year years years FIGURE Out of total 60 completed, 60 were found functional which constitutes about 99% of the completed. The detailed position of completed and functional is depicted in the table below : Sr Activity TABLE-9 COMPLETED AND FUNCTIONAL SCHEMES No of No of completed Functional Nonfunctional Community Assets Drinking Water Irrigation Roads Schools % age to total (00) 60 (99%) 8 (%) 6. Submission of Utilisation Certificate/Completion Certificates: 4.6. The analysis of the results shows that the implementing agencies are not serious about the submission of UCs/CCs. The UCs/CCs of only 96 (3%) were submitted by the beneficiaries out of 60 completed. There are clear instruction in the sanction letter about the submission of Ucs / CCs after completion of the. The detail of submission of UCs/CCs is shown in the following table :

23 Sr Activity TABLE-0 ACTIVITY-WISE SUBMISSION OF UCs/CCs of No of completed UCs/CCs received UCs/CCs Not sent Community Assets Drinking Water Irrigation Roads Schools % age to total Schemes (00%) 96 (3%) 44 (68) 7. MAINTENANCE : i) Maintenance Fund 4.7. As per the guideline of Vikas Main Jan Sahyog programme, maintenance funds equivalent to the 0% of the total cost of the are mandatory. The analysis of the data reveals that the 8.5% of the total cost of the is kept as maintenance fund The Position of sanctioned amount and the maintenance fund is depicted in the following table : TABLE- Sr. Activity of Schemes MAINTENANCE FUND Sanctioned amount/inve stment (Rs.in lakh) Amount kept for %age maintenance Community Assets. Drinking Water Irrigation Roads Schools %age to 66 (00%)

24 ii) Maintenance of Assets: 4.7. Table depicts that different agencies are maintaining the assets created under VMJS. These agencies are Constituted Committees, Mahila Mandals, NGOs, BDO /SDM, School/PTA, Panchayats and Villagers/eneficiaries. Out of 60 functional, status of maintenance was reported in respect of 98%. Maximum number of assets (50%) are being maintained by the constituted committees. The detailed position is depicted in table. Sr TABLE- AGENCIES MAINTAINING THE CREATED ASSETS Activity Maintenance of Assets by : No of functional Constituted Committee Mahila mandal N.G.O BDO/SDM School/PTA Panchayats Villagers / beneficiaries Not Reported Community 49 0 Assets Drinking 49 0 Water Irrigation Roads Schools Percentage (00) (50.3) (4.0) (0.) (.0) (3.9) (7.8) (0.8) (.0) The graphic representation of the above table is given in figure-9 AGENCIES MAINTAINING CREATED ASSETS Constituted Committee Panchayat 07 (7.8%) School/PTA 84 (3.9) Villagers/Beneficiarie 65 (0.8%) Mahila Mandal 4 (4.0%) Not Reported (.0%) BDO/SDM 6 (.0%) NGO (0.%) 303 (50.3%) 60 (00) FIGURE-9 3

25 iii) Utilisation of Maintenance of Fund: The information on Maintenance Fund was also collected During the survey. It has been revealed after the analysis of data that the Maintenance Funds has been utilized in respect of % only. There was no immediate requirement of Maintenance Fund in case of 79% and 8% could not utilized due to lack of awareness. The following table gives the overall complete position of the utilisation of Maintenance Fund : TABLE-3 STATUS OF UTILISATION OF MAINTENANCE FUND Sr Activity Requirement of Maintenance fund of Schemes No of completed Schemes Received Not Released by the agency No requireme nt received Lack of awareness Community Assets Drinking Water Irrigation Roads Schools % age to total (00) 3 () 6 () 473 (79) 0 (8) As per guidelines, Maintenance Fund is to be provided after years from the completion of the scheme. On the basis of the analysis, it is observed that the utilization of Maintenance Fund is very low i.e. % only. It is suggested that an awareness campaign is required to educate the public for the utilization of Maintenance Fund. 8. Constitution of Development Committee for the execution of works : 4.8. Out of total 60 completed under VMJS, the Development Committees of 73% were found constituted. The average number of the members in the committee comes to seven. The detail of the constitution of Development Committee is shown in the following table : Sr Activity TABLE-4 CONSTITUTION OF DEVELOPMENT COMMITTEES of Schemes No of completed Schemes of Development Committee constituted Members in the Committee Community Assets Drinking Water Irrigation Roads Schools % age to total (00) 448 ( Average Member of Committee 7 4

26 9. Families Benefitted : 4.9. On the basis of the analysis, out of the total 60 functional maximum of families benefitted from construction of school buildings followed by Community Assets, Roads, Irrigation and Drinking Water. On an average, 07 families have been benefitted per scheme. The number of families benefitted under different are depicted in table 5. Sr TABLE-5 STATUS OF THE SCHEMES AND FAMILIES BENEFITTED Activity of Schemes No of Completed Schemes No of Functional No of families benefited Community Assets Drinking Water Irrigation Roads Schools Average families benefitted per scheme (00%) FAMILIES BENEFITTED No of families benefitted (in 000) 33.5 (5%) 6.3 (5%).5 (9%). (%) (%) 0. Employment Generation: Schools Community Roads Irrigation Drinking Assets Water SCHEMES FIGURE On the basis of the analysis, it is found that 99% of the labour force was employed from within the village in respect of sampled and only % was from outside the village. This programme has helped in the employment generation at the village level and uplifting the economic condition of the local people. In further analysis, 5

27 it is seen that maximum of employment was generated by activities of roads being the labour intensive activity. The table below depicts the activity wise labour force used under the VMJS programme Sr Activity TABLE-6 ACTIVITY-WISE LABOUR FORCE USED of Labour farce used of completed Within the Out side Schemes Village the village Community Assets (98) 5 () 30 (00). Drinking Water (00) 0 40 (00) 3. Irrigation (98) () 538 (00) 4. Roads (99) 6 () 6830 (00) 5. Schools (98) 3 ( ) 63 (00) % age to total (99) 0 () 4 (00) The labour component in the total cost is Rs lakh which is % of the total cost of the completed. Capital cost is 79%. The highest labour component is in roads (50%) followed by Drinking water (33.9%) and Irrigation (5.9 %). The maximum of mandays have been generated in roads (35%) followed by schools (9%), Community assets (6%), Irrigation (7%) and drinking water (3%). Table 7 depicts the detailed position of labour cost component and man days generated. Sr Activity TABLE-7 ACTIVITY-WISE MANDAYS GENERATED of Cost Mandays of completed (Rs.in lakh) generated Schemes Amount Paid to the labour % age of labour cost Community Assets (6) (5). Drinking Water (3) (30 3. Irrigation (7) (8) 4. Roads (35) (34) 5. Schools (9) (30) % age to total (00) (00) (00) Average wage per labour 56 6

28 CHAPTER-V DISTRICT-WISE RESULTS AND DISCUSSIONS 5.. While drawing sample, identity of the Districts was also maintained so as to see the District-wise priorities in various activities and investment pattern alongwith the other parameters like sharing pattern of the scheme, status of the, their maintenance, employment pattern, etc. 5.. In all, 66 were surveyed. Tables and give the District-wise and activity-wise distribution of in all the districts of the Pradesh. These Tables have been arranged in the descending order so as to have clear view of the district-wise priorities of the people for the sanctioned under VMJS. District Mandi is leading in terms of total of scheme followed by Hamirpur, Kangra, Kullu and Chamba. Whereas in terms of investment, District Shimla has got the Ist place followed by Solan, Una, Kullu, Mandi and Hamirpur. Graphic representations of Table-I and II give the clear view of the situation Table- and also depict the inter district and intra activity position in terms of of and investment. The roads are at Ist place in term of the maximum number of sanctioned/completed followed by Community Assets, Schools, Irrigation and Drinking Water (Table 6 at page ). District-wise preference of the people for the creation of assets varies from district to district. The table- shows the share of each of district in percentage term as well as in absolute Nos for total no. of as well as each activity separately. This table has been arranged in a descending order to have an instant view of the factual position Table- shows the position of the inter district and intra activity wise investment of the entire twelve districts. The Community Assets, Drinking Water, Roads and School Buildings are at number one place in term of investment in district Sirmour, Mandi, Kullu, and Shimla respectively. As already stated above, Shimla district is at the st place in term of the total investment in all activities. 7

29 TABLE- ACTIVITY-WISE AND DISTRICT-WISE SCHEMES SURVEYED Sr. Districts No of Schemes District Comm. Assets District Drinking Water Districts Irrigation Districts Roads Districts Schools Mandi (9.49) Mandi 4 (4.9) Chamba 5 (9.4) Kullu 6 (.) Mandi 54 (8.3) Hamirpur 44 (9.33) Hamirpur 84 (3.4) Hamirpur 3 (4.9) Mandi 3 (5.49) Shimla 4 (9.44) Kullu 33 (7.9) Kangra 3 (5.33) 3 Kangra 76 (.4) Kangra (3.66) Hamirpur 6 (.76) Solan (6.67) Chamba 30 (5.63) Mandi (4.67) 4 Kullu 70 (.8) Solan 9 (.80) Kangra 4 (7.84) Mandi 9 (.50) Kangra 4 (.50) Una (4.00) 5 Chamba 6 (9.74) Una 7 (0.56) Una 4 (7.84) Hamirpur 4 (5.56) Shimla 4 (7.9) Solan (7.33) 6 Solan 54 (8.63) Kullu 4 (8.70) Shimla 4 (7.84) Sirmour 4 (5.56) Solan 9 (4.69) Kullu 7 (4.67) 7 Una 49 (7.83) Kinnaur 9 (5.59) Solan 3 (5.88) Bilaspur 3 (4.7) Bilaspur 8 (4.7) Shimla 6 (4.00) 8 Shimla 46 (7.35) Chamba 9 (5.59) Bilaspur (3.9) Chamba 3 (4.7) Hamirpur 7 (3.65) Chamba 4 (.67) 9 Bilaspur (3.5) Shimla 8 (4.97) Kullu 0 Kangra 3 (4.7) Una 6 (3.3) Bilaspur 4 (.67) 0 Sirmour 7 (.7) Sirmour 6 (3.73) Sirmour 0 Lahaul & Spiti (.78) Sirmour 4 (.08) Sirmour 3 (.00) Kinnaur 5 (.40) Bilaspur 5 (3.) Kinnaur 0 Una (.39) Kinnaur (.04) Kinnaur 3 (.00) Lahaul & Spiti 0 (.60) Lahaul & Spiti 5 (3.) Lahaul & Spiti 0 Kinnaur (.39) Lahaul & Spiti (0.5) Lahaul & Spiti (.33) %age to (00) (5.7) (8.) (.5) (30.7) (4.0) 8

30 TABLE- DISTRICT-WISE & ACTIVITY-WISE INVESTMENT (Rs. In lakh) Sr. Districts Comm. Assets District Drinking Water Districts Irrigation Districts Roads Districts Schools Districts Investment Sirmour (8.8) Mandi 4.4 (5.0) Kullu.58 (40.3) Mandi 4.69 (0.0) Shimla 0.36 (30.) Shimla (9.0) Una 8.4 (.7) Kangra 3. (8.8) Shimla 7.37 (3.8) Kullu 0.9 (6.3) Solan (6.8) Solan 7.9 (4.) 3 Solan 4.58 (0.) Shimla.9 (7.5) Solan 5.9 (.0) Solan 9.35 (5.7) Una (4.5) Una 89.8 (0.6) 4 Lahaul & Spiti 4.0 (0.0) Chamba.5 (3.0) Mandi 3.53 (6.6) Shimla 4.66 (.9) Hamirpur (.4) Kullu (9.7) 5 Mandi 3.06 (9.6) Hamirpur.5 (3.0) Lahaul & Spiti 3.4 (6.) Kangra.69 (0.3) Kangra 3.40 (5.9) Mandi (9.4) 6 Hamirpur.37 (9.3) Solan 0.74 (4.5) Kangra 3.7 (5.9) Chamba 0.57 (8.6) Mandi 3.03 (5.8) Hamirpur (9.) 7 Kullu 9.68 (8.) Una 0.7 (4.3) Bilaspur.8 (4.) Lahaul & Spiti 6.35 (5.) Lahaul & Spiti 0.3 (5.) Kangra (7.) 8 Kangra 7.56 (7.3) Bilaspur 0.65 (3.9) Hamirpur.7 (4.0) Bilaspur 4.79 (3.9) Kullu 9.38 (4.8) Lahaul & Spiti 53.9 (6.5) 9 Kinnaur 6.6 (6.7) Kullu 0 Sirmour.6 (3.0) Hamirpur 4.3 (3.5) Kinnaur 3.77 (3.4) Sirmour 5.40 (6.3) 0 Shimla 3.9 (5.5) Sirmour 0 Chamba.04 (.9) Kinnaur.8 (.8) Sirmour 3.44 (0.8) Kinnaur 33.4 (4.0) Bilaspur 3.5 (.5) Kinnaur 0 Kinnaur 0.93 (.7) Sirmour.8 (.7) Chamba.76 (0.7) Chamba 9.34 (.3) Chamba.8 (.) Lahaul & Spiti 0 Una 0.88 (.6) Una.48 (.) Bilaspur.8 (0.7) Bilaspur 3.95 (.7) %age to (8.8) (.0) (6.4) (4.8) (48.0) (00) 9

31 DISTRICT-WISE %AGE OF SCHEMES 9.49 DISTRICT-WISE INVESTMENT %AGE OF SCHEMES 9 %age of Investment %age of Mandi Hamirpur Kangra Kullu Chamba Solan Una Shimla Bikaspur Sirmour Kinnaur L & S Shimla Solan Una Kullu Mandi Hamirpur Kangra.3.7 L & S Sirmour Kinnaur Chamba Bikaspur FIGURE- FIGURE- 30

32 An attempt has also been made to see the composition of scheme according to their size in various Districts. Table-3 below gives the district-wise position of the scheme classified on the basis of estimated cost. It is seen that District Mandi, Kangra, Bilaspur, Chamba and Sirmour have no scheme in the category of Rs. 5 to 0 lakh and above 0 lakh.. Sr. Activity TABLE-3 ESTIMATED COST-WISE DETAIL OF SCHEMES No of of Scheme having estimated cost (Rs.in lakh) Below Rs lakh Rs to Rs lakh Above Rs 0.00 lakh Mandi 0 0 (8.) Hamirpur (3.9) (8.3) (9.) 3 Kangra (.6) 4 Kullu (.) (5.0) 5 Solan 54 5 (8.5) (8.3) (8.) 6 Una (7.6) (8.3) (8.) 7 Shimla 46 4 (6.7) 3 (5.0) (8.) 8 Bilaspur 0 0 (3.6) 9 Chamba (0.) 0 Sirmour 7 6 (.6) 0 (9.) Kinnaur 5 3 (.) (8.3) (9.) Lahaul & Spiti 0 6 (.0) (6.8) (8.) %age to total ( 00) (00) (00) 3

33 ESTIMATED COST-WISE NO OF SCHEMES Mandi Hamirpur Kangra Kullu Solan Una 46 5 of Schemes Shimla Bilaspur Chamba Sirmour 0 6 Kinnaur L & S 6 3 Above 0 lakh 5 to 0 Lakh Below Rs 5 lakh FIGURE-3 3

34 In table-4 and Graph at Fig-4, District-wise average size of the scheme has been given. It is seen that District Lahaul and Spiti has the highest average size of the scheme in terms of Rupees based on estimated cost followed by Shimla, Sirmour, Kinnaur, Solan and Una. Sr. Districts TABLE-4 AMOUNT SANCTIONED AND AVERAGE SIZE of Scheme Sanctioned amount %age No of Schemes (Rs. In Lakh) Average size of Mandi (9.4) Hamirpur (9.) 3 Kangra (7.) 4 Kullu (9.7) 5 Chamba (.3) 6 Solan (4.) 7 Una (0.6) 8 Shimla (9.0) 9 Bilaspur (.7) 0 Sirmour (6.3) Kinnaur (4.0) Lahaul & Spiti (6.5) %age to (00) 33

35 AVERAGE SIZE OF SCHEMES AS PER ESTIMATED COST 5.39 Avg. Size (Rs.in lakh) L & S Shimla Sirmour Kinnaur Solan Una Kullu Hamirpur Kangra Mandi Bilaspur Chamba DISTRICTS FIGURE-4 Other parameters relating to sharing pattern of the scheme, status of the, maintenance of assets, families benefited and employment generation are given in the subsequent tables. TABLE- SCHEMES SURVEYED AND % THEREOF Sr. Districts of % among districts surveyed Schemes Mandi 9 Hamirpur Kangra 76 4 Kullu 70 5 Chamba Solan Una Shimla Bilaspur 4 0 Sirmour 7 3 Kinnaur 5 Lahaul & Spiti %age to 34

36 TABLE- ACTIVITY-WISE AND DISTRICT-WISE SCHEMES SURVEYED Sr. Districts Activity-wise detail No of Comm. Drinking Irrigation Roads Schools Assets Water Mandi (9.49) Hamirpur 84 (3.4) 3 Kangra 76 (.4) 4 Kullu 70 (.8) 5 Chamba 6 (9.74) 6 Solan 54 (8.63) 7 Una 49 (7.83) 8 Shimla 46 (7.35) 9 Bilaspur (3.5) 0 Sirmour 7 (.7) Kinnaur 5 Lahaul & Spiti %age to (.40) 0 (.60) 66 (00) (4.9) 3 (4.9) (3.66) 4 (8.70) 9 (5.59) 9 (.80) 7 (0.56) 8 (4.97) 5 (3.) 6 (3.73) 9 (5.59) 5 (3.) 6 (00) (5.49) 6 (.76) 4 (7.84) (.50) 4 (5.56) 3 (4.7) (9.4) 3 (5.88) 4 (7.84) 4 (7.84) (3.9) (.) 3 (4.7) (6.67) (.39) 4 (9.44) 3 (4.7) 0 4 (5.56) 0 (.39) 0 5 (00) (.78) 7 (00) (8.3) 7 (3.65) 4 (.50) 33 (7.9) 30 (5.63) 9 (4.69) 6 (3.3) 4 (7.9) 8 (4.7) 4 (.08) (.04) (0.5) 9 (00) (4.67) 44 (9.33) 3 (5.33) 7 (4.67) 4 (.67) (7.33) (4.00) 6 (4.00) 4 (.67) 3 (.00) 3 (.00) (.33) 50 (00) 35

37 Sr. Activity TABLE-3 ESTIMATED COST -WISE SCHEMES SURVEYED No of of Scheme having estimated cost Below Rs. 5.00lakh Rs to Rs lakh (Rs.in lakh) Above Rs 0.00 lakh Mandi (8.) Hamirpur (3.9) 3 Kangra (.6) 4 Kullu (.) 5 Solan 54 5 (8.5) 6 Una (7.6) 7 Shimla 46 4 (6.7) 8 Bilaspur (3.6) 9 Chamba 6 6 (0.) 0 Sirmour 7 6 (.6) Kinnaur 5 3 (.) Lahaul & Spiti 0 6 %age to total (.0) ( 00) 0 0 (8.3) (9.) (5.0) (8.3) (8.3) 3 (5.0) 0 (8.) (8.) (8.) (8.3) (6.8) (00) (9.) (9.) (8.) (00) 36

38 TABLE-4 AMOUNT SANCTIONED (Rs. In Lakh) Sr. Districts of Scheme Sanctioned amount Mandi (9.4) Hamirpur (9.) 3 Kangra (7.) 4 Kullu (9.7) 5 Chamba (.3) 6 Solan (4.) 7 Una (0.6) 8 Shimla (9.0) 9 Bilaspur 3.95 (.7) 0 Sirmour (6.3) Kinnaur (4.0) Lahaul & Spiti (6.5) (00) %age to TABLE-5 DISTRICT-WISE & ACTIVITY-WISE INVESTMENT (Rs. In Lakh) Sr. Districts Activity-wise detail Comm. Assets Drinking Water Irrigation Roads Schools Mandi 3.06 (9.6) 4.4 (5.0) 3.53 (6.6) 4.69 (0.0) 3.03 (5.8) (9.4) Hamirpur.37 (9.3).5 (3.0).7 (4.0) 4.3 (3.5) (.4) (9.) 3 Kangra 7.56 (7.3) 3. (8.8) 3.7 (5.9).69 (0.3) 3.40 (5.9) (7.) 4 Kullu 9.68 (8.) 0.58 (40.3) 0.9 (6.3) 9.38 (4.8) (9.7) 5 Chamba.8 (.).5 (3.0).04 (.9) 0.57 (8.6).76 (0.7) 9.34 (.3) 6 Solan 4.58 (0.) 0.74 (4.5) 5.9 (.0) 9.35 (5.7) (6.8) 7.9 (4.) 7 Una 8.4 (.7) 0.7 (4.3) 0.88 (.6).48 (.) (4.5) 89.7 (0.6) 8 Shimla 3.9 (5.5).9 (7.5) 7.37 (3.8) 4.66 (.9) 0.36 (30.) (9.0) 9 Bilaspur 3.5 (.5) 0.65 (3.9).8 (4.) 4.79 (3.9).8 (0.7) 3.95 (.7) 0 Sirmour (8.8) 0.6 (3.0).8 (.7) 3.44 (0.8) 5.40 (6.3) Kinnaur 6.6 (6.7) (.7).8 (.8) 3.77 (3.4) 33.4 (4.0) Lahaul & Spiti 4.0 (0.0) (6.) 6.35 (5.) 0.3 (5.) 53.9 (6.5) %age to (00.00) (00.00) (00.00) (00.00) (00.00) (00.00) 37

39 Sr. Districts TABLE-6 SHARING PATTERNOF THE SCHEMES of Scheme Sharing Pattern 5:85 5:75 50: Mandi 8 (8.0) Hamirpur 84 (0.3) 3 Kangra 76 4 (4.0) 4 Kullu 70 (7.) 5 Chamba 6 6 (0.8) 6 Solan 54 (3.8) 7 Una 49 4 (4.8) 8 Shimla 46 3 (7.8) 9 Bilaspur 0 (3.4) 0 Sirmour 7 4 (.4) Kinnaur 5 5 (5.) Lahaul & Spiti 0 0 (3.4) %age to (00) 39 (.0) (.5) 8 (4.8) (5.0) 35 0 (0.8) 49 0 (5.) (.6) (5.0) 35 0 (0.8) 3 0 (7.) 0 (3.7) 0 3 (3. ) (37.5) (00) 8 (00) TABLE-7 GOVT. AND PUBLIC SHARE Sr. District No of Govt. and Public share No Govt. Share Public Share Mandi 630 (80.6) 5.5 (9.4) (00.00) Hamirpur (74.7) 9.36 (5.3) (00.00) 3 Kangra (8.0).4 (9.0) (00.00) 4 Kullu (78.0) 7.79 (.0) (00.00) 5 Chamba (84.9).9 (5.) 9.34 (00.00) 6 Solan (8.).7 (9.9) 7.9 (00.00) 7 Una ( 79.9) 7.96 (.) 89.6 (00.00) 8 Shimla ( 8.4) 9.57 (8..6) (00.00) 9 Bilaspur.33 ( 8.).6 (8.8) 3.95 (00.00) 0 Sirmour (74.4) 3.43 (5.6) 5.40 (00.00) Kinnaur (85.0) 4.97 (5.0) 33.4 (00.00) Lahaul & Spiti ( 85.0) 8.09 (5.0) 53.9 (00.00) %age to total (00.00) (00.00) (00.00) 38

40 TABLE-8 STATUS OF SURVEYED SCHEMES Sr. District No of Status of No Work Cancelled Work in Progress incomplete Schemes No Record Completed Mandi 0 (50.0) (9.7) Hamirpur 84 (50.0) (50.0) 79 (.9) 3 Kangra (.4) 4 Kullu (.3) 5 Chamba (0.0) 6 Solan (8.9) 7 Una 49 (50.0) (50.0) 0 46 (7.5) 8 Shimla (7.5) 9 Bilaspur (3.6) 0 Sirmour (.6) Kinnaur 5 0 (50.0) (.3) Lahaul & Spiti (.3) %age to total (00.00) (00.00) (00.00) (00.00) (00.00) Sr. No District TABLE-9 TIME TAKEN FOR COMPLETION OF SCHEMES No No of Time taken for completion of of Comple-ted Within months months months months Above years Mandi 0 (9.7) 43 (6.9) 4 (.3) (8.0) 3 (4.5) (0.7) Hamirpur (.9) 3 (.) 3 (7.) 8 (3.) 5 (9.4) 3 (5.7) 3 Kangra (.4) 30 (.8) 33 (7.5) 7 (.5) 4 (7.5) (.9) 4 Kullu (.3) 40 (5.7) 7 (9.0) 6 (9.8) (3.4) 4 (7.5) 5 Chamba 6 6 (0.0) 5 (0.0) 6 (3.) (3.3) (.9) (.9) 6 Solan (8.9) (4.7) 8 (4.) (8.0) 5 (8.3) 8 (5.) 7 Una (7.5) 0 (3.9) (.) 6 (9.9) 3 (5.7) 6 (.3) 8 Shimla (7.5) 5 (5.9) 8 (4.) 6 (9.9) 4 (7.5) 3 (4.5) 9 Bilaspur (3.6) 7 (.7) (6.4) (.6) (.9) (.9) 0 Sirmour 7 6 (.6) (4.3) 3 (.6) (.6) 0 (.9) Kinnaur 5 4 (.3) 3 (.) 5 (.7) 0 3 (5.7) 3 (5.7) Lahaul & Spiti 0 8 (.3) (0.8) (0.5) (3.3) (3.4) (.9) %age to total 00 (00 ) (00) (00) (00) (00 ) 39

41 Sr. No District TABLE-0 COMPLETED AND FUNCTIONAL SCHEMES No of No of Functional Completed Schemes Non functional Mandi 0 (00) Hamirpur (00) 3 Kangra (00) 4 Kullu (00) 5 Chamba 6 6 (00) 6 Solan (00) 7 Una (00) 8 Shimla (00) 9 Bilaspur (00) 0 Sirmour 7 6 (00) Kinnaur 5 4 (00) Lahaul & Spiti 0 8 %age to total (00) (00) 0 (00) 76 (96) 75 (00) 67 (97) 59 (97) 53 (98) 46 (00) 46 (00) (00) 6 (00) 4 (00) 8 (00) 60 (99 ) 0 3 (4) 0 (3) (3) () ( ) 40

42 Sr. Districts TABLE- SUBMISSION OF UCs/CCs Sr. Districts No of No of completed UCs/CCs received UCs/CCs not received Mandi 0 (00) 0 (8) 0 (9) Hamirpur (00) 6 (77) 8 (3) 3 Kangra (00) 0 75 (00) 4 Kullu (00) 5 (7) 64 (93) 5 Chamba (00) (00) 6 Solan (00) () 53 (98) 7 Una (00) 36 (78) 0 () 8 Shimla (00) 0 46 (00) 9 Bilaspur -- (00) (00) 0 Sirmour 7 6 (00) 0 6 (00) Kinnaur 5 4 (00) 0 4 (00) Lahaul & Spiti 0 8 (00) 0 8 (00) %age to total ( 00) 96 (3%) 44 (68%) TABLE- MAINTENANCE FUND No of Sanctioned amount Amount kept for maintenance %age to sanctioned amount Mandi Hamirpur Kangra Kullu Chamba Solan Una Shimla Bilaspur Sirmour Kinnaur Lahaul & Spiti