2014 CDS Benchmarking Report
|
|
- Jane Hall
- 5 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 2014 CDS Benchmarking Report
2 Table of Contents Section Slide(s) Introduction 3 10 About CDS 3 About the 2014 CDS Benchmarking Report 4 Customizing 2014 CDS Benchmarking Report Graphs, in Five Steps 5 6 Introduction to Benchmarking 7 Steps for a Successful Benchmarking Assessment 8 Identify Your Goals 9 Summary of the Landscape 10 IT Financials IT Staffing IT Services Methodology
3 About CDS Since 2002, the EDUCAUSE Core Data Service (CDS) has been providing higher education CIOs and senior IT leaders with the benchmarks they need to make strategic decisions about IT at their institutions. On average, more than 800 institutions (both within and outside the United States) participate in a survey about IT financials, staffing, and services. Survey participants are rewarded for their time and effort with access to CDS Reporting, a self-service tool that enables institutions to benchmark their IT organizations against those of their peers. In addition to gaining access to CDS Reporting, institutions also participate in CDS for the following reasons: To study their IT organization To benchmark against past performance To look at trends over time* To start gathering and using metrics To have data available just in case 3 * The number of years available for trend data varies throughout the CDS dataset. For example, CDS data on funding can be tracked from 2002 to present, whereas CDS data on expenditures can be tracked for FY2012/13 and FY2013/14.
4 About the 2014 CDS Benchmarking Report Traditionally, the CDS annual report has summarized the state of higher education IT; however, the strength of CDS data are shown through their benchmarking capability. To serve both purposes, the 2014 CDS annual report has been refactored as a Benchmarking Report to summarize key findings from the CDS 2014 survey, provide a glimpse into the breadth of CDS data, and ultimately provide you with an opportunity to conduct your own benchmarking assessment. The customizable graphs contained within this report are meant to be used to assess your IT operation compared to that at peer institutions of similar size, control, or Carnegie Classification. As you consider the metrics and benchmarks contained within this report in relation to your institution, findings that differ from your experience should inspire questions, not answers. When questions do arise, CDS Reporting can facilitate further investigation (if your institution participated in CDS 2014). If your institution did not participate, consider adding your data to the next CDS survey, launching in July The CDS 2014 survey concluded with 828 participants. The metrics discussed in this report focus primarily on FY2013/14 central IT financials, staffing, and services from 720 nonspecialized U.S. institutions. Metrics are calculated for each of six Carnegie Classification groupings using the 2010 classification system (,,,,, and DR public). These groupings provide the most granular breakdown by institutional type possible (given available sample sizes) and should provide suitable comparison groups for most institution types and sizes within the United States. Fifty-nine specialized U.S. institutions and 49 non-u.s. institutions from 17 countries participated in this year s survey; however, small sample sizes from each of these groups preclude meaningful aggregate analysis. If your institution is a specialized U.S. institution or a non-u.s. institution, this report may be used to compare your institution to institutions in a similar Carnegie Classification or to the metric calculated for All (non-specialized) U.S. institutions. A list of CDS 2014 participants can be found on the CDS website. 4 The metrics in this report evaluate central IT only. Central IT funding, expenditure, and staffing data are only one component of the full IT resource picture at institutions with significant distributed IT resources. Data on distributed resources, however, remain elusive. A year-over-year analysis of the CDS data collected about distributed IT resources revealed low data reliability, an indication that current methods for gathering these data are ineffective. For this reason data on distributed IT resources have been excluded from this report but can be found in CDS Reporting. Efforts are under way to improve the quality of these data for future years.
5 Customizing 2014 CDS Benchmarking Report Graphs, in Five Steps 1. Review the slide notes for background on why each metric is important and to identify the origin of each metric. 2. Use the CDS 2014 survey and IPEDS* data to calculate values for your institution. 3. Right-click on the slide graph and select Edit Data in the pop-up menu. 5 * IPEDS data are used to normalize metrics in CDS based on institutional size and budget. More information about IPEDS data is available online.
6 Customizing 2014 CDS Benchmarking Report Graphs, in Five Steps (cont d) 4. Enter data for your institution where indicated in the Excel spreadsheet. 5. Check to make sure data for My Institution is now visible. 6
7 Introduction to Benchmarking Today s institution must run efficiently and effectively. Having a clear understanding of your organization s financial, staffing, and operational status is critical to making informed decisions and optimizing the impact of IT; having the same information about your peers and aspirant peers is even better. You can: Make the case for additional resources by comparing resource allocations to those of peers or estimating the level of investment required to achieve a certain output or service level. With CDS benchmarking data on: Central IT FTEs per 1,000 institutional FTEs Total central IT spending per institutional FTE (students, faculty, and staff) Make the case for organizational structure or governance by uncovering best practices for IT leader reporting structures, IT governance structures, or distributed IT service delivery models. Calibrate your performance against best practices and best in class institutions that have set the bar for your institution. Communicate the value of IT by comparing service portfolios and service performance to financial investment. Assess the relative maturity of strategic initiatives such as e- learning, student success technologies, and analytics. CIO reporting line IT governance maturity Organizational units responsible for more than 100 IT functions CDS participants have the ability to customize benchmarking assessments by selecting specific peer institutions with which to compare. Services provided by central IT compared to total IT expenditures and IT expenditures by IT domain area. IT maturity for seven IT capabilities, including e-learning, student success technologies, and analytics. 7
8 Steps for a Successful Benchmarking Assessment 2. Identify your audience. Are you gathering data for leadership, users, or services owners? 6. Consider possible outcomes. Will any action take place upon reporting the results? 1. Identify your goals. What are your benchmarking needs? What is the goal of this exercise? 3. Identify data sources. Do you have the data you need? Which groups will you compare against? 5. Develop a plan for reporting. Are you reporting the data at the right frequency, in the right formats, and to the right people? 4. Evaluate data quality.* Determine whether data contain errors. Do the data need to be reformatted or cleaned? 8 * Evaluating data quality is important even when using CDS data. As you analyze CDS data be sure to evaluate whether the budget and staffing numbers reported are in line with what is expected and please report suspicious data to coredata@educause.edu.
9 Identify Your Goals The first step to a successful benchmarking study is to identify your goals. CDS data can support general benchmarking studies with goals such as identify best practices or communicate the value of IT, as well as more targeted efforts such as make the case for additional resources. For example, the table below provides a view into how certain CDS metrics (all of which are contained in this report) can be used to address the 2015 Top 10 IT Issues Top 10 IT Issue Supporting metrics Slide(s) Hiring and Retaining Qualified Staff, and Updating the Knowledge and Skills of Existing Technology Staff Optimizing the Use of Technology in Teaching and Learning in Collaboration with Academic Leadership, Including Understanding the Appropriate Level of Technology to Use Developing IT Funding Models That Sustain Core Service, Support Innovation, and Facilitate Growth Improving Student Outcomes through an Institutional Approach That Strategically Leverages Technology Demonstrating the Business Value of Information Technology and How Technology and the IT Organization Can Help the Institution Achieve Its Goals Increasing the IT Organization s Capacity for Managing Change, Despite Differing Community Needs, Priorities, and Abilities Providing User Support in the New Normal Mobile, Online Education, Cloud, and BYOD Environments Developing Mobile, Cloud, and Digital Security Policies That Work for Most of the Institutional Community Developing an Enterprise IT Architecture That Can Respond to Changing Conditions and New Opportunities 10 Balancing Agility, Openness, and Security Central IT training spending per central IT staff FTE Central IT FTEs per 1,000 institutional FTEs 23 24; Most common teaching and learning support services for faculty 36 Percentage of central IT spending on running, growing, and transforming the institution Central IT compensation, noncompensation, and capital spending as a percentage of total central IT spending Central IT outsourcing spending as a percentage of total central IT spending Systems most commonly mobile friendly 48 Total central IT spending per institutional FTE (students, faculty, and staff) Total central IT spending as a percentage of institutional expenses Systems most likely to be replaced in the next three years 47 Institutions offering tier 2/level 2 service or higher Institutions offering self-service help options 34 Access points that are n or ac 41 Systems most commonly mobile friendly 48 Institutions with mandatory information security training 42 Systems most likely to be replaced in the next three years 47 Institutions that have conducted any sort of IT security risk assessment
10 Summary of the Landscape To provide a brief, high-level view of the data contained within this report, below are the nonspecialized U.S. metrics for some of the most commonly used CDS benchmarks: IT Financials $906 Total central IT spending per institutional FTE (students, faculty, and staff) 4.2% Total central IT spending as a percentage of institutional expenses 54% Central IT compensation spending as a percentage of total central IT spending 34% Central IT noncompensation operating spending as a percentage of total central IT spending 9% Central IT capital spending as a percentage of total central IT spending IT Staffing 7.7 Central IT FTEs per 1,000 institutional FTEs 17% Student workers as a percentage of total central IT FTE $1,076 Central IT training spending per central IT staff FTE IT Services 75% Institutions offering tier 2/level 2 service or higher for central IT help desk 18 Student FTEs per lab/cluster workstations provided by central IT 5 Institutions hosting or participating in cross-institutional data center services 23% Access points that are n 57% Institutions with mandatory information security training for faculty or staff 27% Institutions planning to replace customer relationship management (CRM) systems in the next three years. 10
11 IT Financials The first step to strategically funding IT is to identify budget parameters based on type of institution, institutional population, and institutional budget. Then, based on institutional priorities and your current IT environment, determine a spending portfolio that will get you to where you want to be. Breaking the budget down by dollars spent running, growing, and transforming the institution; by each IT domain area; and by capital versus operating work will help you determine the right blend of innovation spending to operating spending for all areas of IT. The metrics contained in this section can help you address the following questions: What is a practical range for total budget based on my institution type, institutional population, and institutional budget? (metrics 1 3) Are changes in my budget from the previous fiscal year in line with changes in peer budgets? (metric 4) What is an appropriate distribution of spending for my institution? (metrics 5 8) Metric 1 Total central IT spending per institutional FTE (students, faculty, and staff) vs. Total central IT spending as a percentage of institutional expenses Slide(s) Total central IT spending per institutional FTE (students, faculty, and staff) Five-year trend Total central IT spending as a percentage of institutional expenses Five-year trend Total central IT FY2013/14 spending as a percentage change from FY2012/ Central IT compensation, noncompensation, and capital spending as a percentage of total central IT spending 16 6 Percentage of central IT spending on running, growing, and transforming the institution 17 7 IT domain area spending as a percentage of central IT spending Central IT outsourcing spending as a percentage of total central IT spending 21 11
12 Median total central IT spending as a percentage of institutional expenses (all nonspecialized U.S. median = 4.2%) Total central IT spending per institutional FTE (students, faculty, and staff) vs. total central IT spending as a percentage of institutional expenses 8.4% $ % 4.2% $ % $ % $ % $1, % $1, % 12 $ $0 $906 $1,812 Median total central IT spending per institutional FTE (students, faculty, and staff) (all nonspecialized U.S. median = $906)
13 Median total central IT spending per institutional FTE (students, faculty, and staff) Total central IT spending per institutional FTE (students, faculty, and staff), five-year trend 1,800 1,600 1,400 1,200 1, RY2009/10 FY2010/11 FY2012/13 FY2013/14 Fiscal year* 13 * FY2011/12 data were not collected in CDS on either expenditures or funding.
14 Median total central IT spending as a percentage of institutional expenses Total central IT spending as a percentage of institutional expenses, five-year trend RY2009/10 FY2010/11 FY2012/13 FY2013/14 Fiscal year* 14 * FY2011/12 data were not collected in CDS on either expenditures or funding.
15 Total central IT FY2013/14 spending as a percentage change from FY2012/13 0.3% % 1.6% % 3.4% % % % % % 5. Median total central IT spending as a percentage change from previous year 15
16 MA private All nonspecial ized U.S. My institution Central IT compensation, noncompensation, and capital spending as a percentage of total central IT spending Compensation Noncompensation Capital Compensation Noncompensation Capital Compensation Noncompensation Capital Compensation Noncompensation Capital Compensation Noncompensation Capital Compensation Noncompensation Capital Compensation Noncompensation Capital Compensation Noncompensation Capital 7% 6% 9% 1 11% 1 12% 25% 34% 35% 32% 32% 35% 35% 54% 5 54% 56% 51% 56% 59% Median central IT compensation, noncompensation, and capital spending as a percentage of total central IT spending
17 All nonspecial ized U.S. My institution Percentage of central IT spending on running, growing, and transforming the institution Run Grow Transform Run Grow Transform Run Grow Transform Run Grow Transform Run Grow Transform Run Grow Transform Run Grow Transform Run Grow Transform 6% 5% 5% 11% 7% 6% 7% 9% 13% 12% 13% 13% 15% 16% 79% 79% 8 79% 77% Median percentage of central IT spending on running, growing, and transforming the institution
18 IT support services Information systems IT domain area spending as a percentage of central IT spending 18% 9% 18% 18% 19% 17% 2 15% 18% 19% 14% 17% 13% 13% 18 5% 1 15% 2 25% Median IT domain area spending as a percentage of central IT spending
19 Educational technology services Communications infrastructure IT domain area spending as a percentage of central IT spending 13% 7% 13% 11% 12% 23% 13% 1 11% 11% 11% 1 1 9% 19 5% 1 15% 2 25% Median IT domain area spending as a percentage of central IT spending
20 Information security Data center IT domain area spending as a percentage of central IT spending 4% 5% 2% 4% 4% 4% 5% 2% 1% 1% 2% 1% 3% 2% 20 5% 1 15% 2 25% Median IT domain area spending as a percentage of central IT spending
21 Central IT outsourcing spending as a percentage of total central IT spending 2% 1% 1% 1% 3% 2% 2% 21 1% 2% 3% 4% Median central IT outsourcing spending as a percentage of total central IT spending
22 IT Staffing Staffing models are evolving. Hiring and retaining qualified staff, and updating the knowledge and skills of existing technology staff, is the #1 Top 10 IT Issues in Services are being outsourced, but institutions need staff to manage outsourcing and need more services and bandwidth to support BYOD. Does this mean fewer staff or the same number of staff with different skills? Through this evolution, you ll want to keep an eye on several benchmarks: ratio of central IT staff to institutional FTE, student workers as a percentage of total central IT FTE, percentage of IT staff across IT domain areas, and training spending per IT staff member. Paying attention to how others are staffed and knowing how your peers balance their staff portfolio can help you find the right fit. Knowing what your peers are spending on staff training can help you budget for updating skill sets of existing staff. The metrics contained in this section can help you address the following questions: What is a practical range for staff size based on my institution type and size? (metrics 1 2) What is the right blend of staff? (metrics 3 5) Do I have the appropriate budget to retrain current staff? (metrics 6 7) Metric Slide(s) 1 Central IT FTEs per 1,000 institutional FTEs 23 2 Central IT FTEs per 1,000 institutional FTEs Four-year trend 24 3 Student workers as a percentage of total central IT FTE 25 4 Student workers as a percentage of total central IT FTE Four-year trend 26 5 Central IT domain area FTEs per 1,000 institutional FTEs Central IT training spending per central IT staff FTE 30 7 Central IT training spending per central IT staff FTE Five-year trend 31 22
23 Central IT FTEs per 1,000 institutional FTEs Median central IT FTEs per 1,000 institutional FTEs
24 Median central IT FTEs per 1,000 institutional FTEs Central IT FTEs per 1,000 institutional FTEs, four-year trend FY2010/11 FY2011/12 FY2012/13 FY2013/14 Fiscal year
25 Student workers as a percentage of total central IT FTE My onstitution 17% 7% 2 24% 22% 17% 12% 25 5% 1 15% 2 25% 3 Median student workers as a percentage of total central IT FTE
26 Median student workers as a percentage of total central IT FTE Student workers as a percentage of total central IT FTE, four-year trend FY2010/11 FY2011/12 FY2012/13 FY2013/14 Fiscal year
27 Information systems IT support services Central IT domain area FTEs per 1,000 institutional FTEs Median central IT domain area FTEs per 1,000 institutional FTEs
28 Communications infrastructure Educational technology services Central IT domain area FTEs per 1,000 institutional FTEs Median central IT domain area FTEs per 1,000 institutional FTEs
29 Information security Data center Central IT domain area FTEs per 1,000 institutional FTEs Median central IT domain area FTEs per 1,000 institutional FTEs
30 Central IT training spending per central IT staff FTE $- $1,076 $620 $1,190 $1,168 $1,091 $1,095 $1, $0 $200 $400 $600 $800 $1,000 $1,200 $1,400 Median central IT training spending per central IT staff FTE
31 Median central IT training spending per central IT staff FTE Central IT training spending per central IT staff FTE, five-year trend $1,600 $1,400 $1,200 $1,000 $800 $600 $400 $200 $0 RY2009/10 FY2010/11 FY2012/13 FY2013/14 Fiscal year* 31 * FY2011/12 data were not collected in CDS on either expenditures or funding.
32 IT Services In a changing environment, it is important to know which services are in demand and which are fading in importance; which should stay local and which can be outsourced; and which must have mobile deployment or be accessible via the cloud. It s important to provide the right services in the most efficient manner. CDS has data that can help you understand how your peers are supporting users in mobile computing, online education, cloud, and BYOD environments. CDS data on faculty support services can help you determine how to help your faculty optimize the use of technology in teaching and learning, and data (including vendor/product, deployment, and management strategy) on 50 different information systems can help you strategize for an enterprise architecture that is right for you. The metrics contained in this section can help you address the following questions: What services should I provide? How should I provide those services? How can I evaluate service efficiency or effectiveness? 32
33 IT Services: Benchmarks IT Domain Area Metric Slide Institutions offering tier 2/level 2 service or higher for central IT help desk 34 IT Support Services Educational Technology Services Institutions offering self-service options for central IT help desk services 34 Annual number of tickets per institutional FTE among institutions with a central IT help desk that offers each mode (phone, , walk-in) Most common teaching and learning support services 36 Student FTE per shared workstation provided by central IT Institutions using commercial data center services 38 Data Center Institutions hosting or participating in cross-institutional data center services 38 Institutions using SaaS, PaaS, or IaaS to provide data center services 39 Communications Infrastructure Information Security Communications infrastructure technologies most likely to be deployed soon 40 Access points that are n or ac 41 Institutions with mandatory information security training for faculty, staff, or students 42 Institutions that have conducted any sort of IT security risk assessment 43 Systems most commonly vendor hosted (IaaS) 44 Systems most commonly vendor managed (PaaS) 45 Information Systems and Applications Systems most commonly vendor managed (SaaS) 46 Systems most likely to be replaced in the next three years 47 Systems most commonly mobile friendly 48 33
34 Institutions offering self-service options for central IT help desk services Institutions offering tier 2/level 2 service or higher for central IT help desk IT Support Services: Service delivery 75% % 72% 78% 82% 89% 78% 86% 98% 8 97% 98% Median percentage
35 Walk-in Phone IT Support Services: Annual number of tickets per institutional FTE, among institutions with a central IT help desk that offers each mode Median annual number of tickets per institutional FTE among institutions with a central IT help desk that offers each mode
36 Educational Technology Services: Most common teaching and learning support services for faculty My institution All nonspecialized U.S. Classroom technology support for faculty % Faculty individual training in use of educational technology 99% 99% 99% 99% 99% 99% 10 Learning (course) management training and support for faculty 99% 98% 99% Faculty group training in use of educational technology 98% 97% 96% 99% 99% 99% 98% Online learning technology support for faculty 97% 10 86% 10 97% 99% has this service does not have this service
37 Student FTE per laptop/tablet provided by central IT for checkout or loan Student FTE per virtual lab/cluster workstation provided by central IT Student FTE per lab/cluster workstations provided by central IT Educational Technology Services: Student FTE per shared workstation provided by central IT * * Median student FTEs per shared workstation provided by central IT * Sample sizes for lab/cluster workstations and virtual lab/cluster workstations provided by central IT at institutions were too small to calculate an appropriate benchmark.
38 Institutions hosting or participating in cross-institutional data center services Institutions using commercial data center services Data Center: Outsourcing and shared services* 27% 16% 3 31% 3 23% 4 47% 5 26% 73% 17% 77% 48% Median percentage * For the purpose of this analysis, outsourcing refers to the use of commercial data center services; shared services refers to institutions using hosted services provided by system or state/consortia facility OR providing services to other institutions or consortia.
39 Institutions using IaaS to provide data center services Institutions using PaaS to provide data center services Institutions using SaaS to provide data center services Data Center: Use of SaaS, PaaS, and IaaS 68% 6 59% 68% 74% 74% 78% 2 13% 25% 16% 14% 26% 24% 28% 11% 28% 31% 3 31% 45% Median percentage
40 Communications Infrastructure: Communications infrastructure technologies most likely to be deployed soon* All nonspecialized U.S. Unified communications and collaboration 34% 21% 34% 35% 31% 45% 3 IPv6 31% 25% 32% 41% 14% 37% 4 Session initiation protocol (SIP) 28% 25% 25% 33% 17% 37% 3 Network capacity planning and management tools 19% 26% 15% 2 17% 2 16% has this technology does not have this technology 40 * For the purpose of this analysis, technologies to be deployed soon are those with expected or initial deployment status.
41 Access points that are ac Access points that are n Communications Infrastructure: Wireless network configuration 23% 17% 26% 24% 42% 12% 14% 1% 4% 2% 2% 41 5% 1 15% 2 25% 3 35% 4 45% Median percentage
42 Institutions with mandatory information security training for students Institutions with mandatory information security training for faculty or staff Information Security: Training for faculty, staff, and students 57% 72% 45% 65% 42% 6 61% 29% 38% 23% 28% 29% 23% 37% Median percentage
43 Institutions that have conducted any sort of IT security risk assessment Information Security: Risk assessments 78% 83% 73% 81% 64% 86% 78% Median percentage
44 Information Systems and Applications: Systems most commonly vendor-managed (SaaS) All nonspecialized U.S. student 55% 42% 53% 52% 56% 62% 69% Customer relationship management 36% 34% 39% 31% 31% 36% 5 Learning (course) management 31% 35% 21% 27% 41% 33% 33% faculty/staff 3 15% 38% 18% 34% 35% 38% Library 23% 34% 23% 15% 32% 14% 24% Facilities management 2 26% 21% 16% 34% 15% 13% 44 uses SaaS for this system does not use SaaS for this system
45 Information Systems and Applications: Systems most commonly vendor-managed (PaaS) All nonspecialized U.S. student 5% 6% 4% 3% 1% 8% 8% Web content management 4% 4% 4% 1% 4% 5% 4% Learning (course) management 4% 4% 3% 3% 1% 6% 8% Library 4% 3% 6% 4% 3% 3% 2% Customer relationship management 3% 2% 4% 6% 5% faculty/staff 3% 4% 3% 1% 1% 6% Facilities management 2% 1% 2% 4% 2% 1% 2% Grants management: preaward 2% 2% 2% 6% 3% 3% Grants management: postaward 2% 2% 2% 6% 1% 2% Human resources information 2% 2% 1% 4% 3% 2% 2% Procurement 2% 2% 1% 4% 1% 2% 45 uses PaaS for this system does not use PaaS for this system
46 Information Systems and Applications: Systems most commonly vendor-hosted (IaaS) All nonspecialized U.S. student 13% 2 9% 16% 14% 11% 8% Learning (course) management 8% 13% 5% 1 1 6% 8% Customer relationship management 7% 12% 4% 13% 5% 6% faculty/staff 7% 8% 4% 9% 8% 6% 4% Web content management 7% 11% 7% 4% 14% 3% Library 6% 12% 8% 1% 12% 2% 4% Facilities management 5% 8% 4% 9% 3% 4% IT service desk management 4% 6% 3% 3% 5% 4% 4% Procurement 4% 8% 3% 5% 6% Advancement/fundraising 3% 5% 3% 1% 4% 3% 4% 46 uses IaaS for this system does not use IaaS for this system
47 Information Systems and Applications: Systems most likely to be replaced in the next three years All nonspecialized U.S. Customer relationship management 27% 22% 22% 32% 24% 29% 3 IT service desk management 25% 26% 17% 28% 23% 27% 33% faculty/staff 22% 24% 15% 35% 19% 25% 12% Web content management 21% 22% 23% 18% 28% 18% 18% Business intelligence reporting 17% 1 12% 13% 16% 25% 23% Facilities management 15% 8% 11% 17% 12% 16% 28% Admissions: undergraduate 13% 8% 17% 8% 16% 12% 2 47 has recently replaced this system or plans to replace in the next three years has not recently replaced this system and has no plans to replace in the next three years
48 Information Systems and Applications: Systems most commonly mobile friendly* All nonspecialized U.S. student 63% 62% 68% 59% 58% 61% 73% Learning (course) management 6 66% 54% 62% 56% faculty/staff 59% 58% 66% 56% 51% 59% 67% Web content management 58% 54% 66% 64% 61% 54% 48% 48 This system is mobile friendly at my institution This system is not mobile friendly at my institution * For the purpose of this analysis, mobile-friendly systems are those using any of the following deployment strategies: mobile app, mobile specific website, or responsive web design.
49 49 Methodology
50 Methodology, 1 of 3 EDUCAUSE invites more than 3,500 institutions to contribute their data to the Core Data Service each year. Invitees include EDUCAUSE member institutions plus nonmember institutions with a record of interaction with EDUCAUSE. Any nonmember institution may request to be added to the CDS sample. Response by Year The CDS 2014 survey collected data about FY2013/14 and was conducted from July 2014 to December This was the 12th CDS survey. Since 2002, survey participation has ranged from 641 to 1,023 institutions. Number of Participating CDS Survey Year of Data Collection Fiscal Year Data Institutions CDS FY2001/02 FY2002/ CDS FY2002/03 FY2003/ CDS FY2003/04 FY2004/ CDS FY2004/05 FY2005/ CDS FY2005/06 FY2006/ CDS FY2006/07 FY2007/08 1,023 CDS FY2007/08 FY2008/ CDS FY2008/09 FY2009/ CDS FY2009/10 FY2010/ CDS FY2010/11 FY2011/ CDS FY2012/ CDS FY2013/
51 Methodology, 2 of 3 Response by Carnegie Classification As in prior years, survey response across Carnegie Classification was highly variable in CDS Due to differences in population sizes across institutional types, the number of participating institutions for a particular type of institution may be deceiving. For example, only 62 private doctoral institutions participated in CDS 2014; however, this accounts for 57% of private doctoral institutions that were invited to complete CDS In contrast, 131 community colleges participated in CDS 2014, but this accounts for only 12% of community colleges that were invited to participate in CDS International participation spanned 17 countries. Carnegie Classification Participating Institutions Response Rate % % % % 62 57% % Other U.S % International 49 13% 51
52 Methodology, 3 of 3 Response by Module The CDS survey is divided into eight modules. CDS survey participation status is based on the completion of the required Module 1: IT Organization, Staffing, and Financing. The remaining seven modules in the survey are optional and cover details about service delivery in the IT domain areas. Some of the optional modules ask about services run at most institutions (e.g., communications infrastructure), while others ask about services run at some institutions (e.g., research computing); thus, response to optional modules varies. CDS 2014 Module Participating Institutions M1: IT Organization, Staffing, and Financing 828 M2: IT Support Services 643 M3: Educational Technology Services 574 M4: Research Computing Services 403 M5: Data Centers 552 M6: Communications Infrastructure Services 550 M7: Information Security 545 M8: Information Systems and Applications
EY India GIC Benchmarking Study
EY India GIC Benchmarking Study 8 th Edition 1 We are pleased to launch the 8 th edition of the EY GIC Benchmarking study Over the last decade, GICs in India have emerged as a powerful value creator, pushing
More informationRFI Background Webinar
Bringing Technology to the States Sponsored by the U.S. Department of Labor State of Maryland NASWA/CESER Understanding the Federal-State Unemployment Insurance System and IT Infrastructure RFI Background
More informationMAKER S GUIDE E X E C U T I V E S U M M A R Y 221 U K C O N T A C T C E N T R E S S U R V E Y E D V E R T I C A L S :
THE UK CONTACT CENTRE DECISION - MAKER S GUIDE E X E C U T I V E S U M M A R Y 221 U K C O N T A C T C E N T R E S S U R V E Y E D V E R T I C A L S : F I N A N C E ( 2 1 ) H O U S I N G ( 2 0 ) I N S
More informationAccenture PLC Undergraduate Analyst Report. Alexander Anisimov Robert Bailey
Accenture PLC 2014 Undergraduate Analyst Report Alexander Anisimov Robert Bailey Analyst Report Ticker: ACN 03/31/2014 UG Student Managed Fund Accenture Plc Key Financial Metrics Market Cap: $50.88B ROE:
More informationLeadership Steering Committee Report
Leadership Steering Committee Report Response to Administrative Review of Texas A&M University conducted by PwC The starting point The PwC report recognizes that Texas A&M University is already highly
More informationFinancial Performance Management Training Catalog. Management Planning and Control Vantage Risk and Budgeting
Financial Performance Management Training Catalog Management Planning and Control Vantage Risk and Budgeting January 2018 June 2018 Table of Contents Performance Management Solutions Training from Fiserv...
More informationLost in the Cloud? Top Challenges Facing CIOs in a Cloud-Native World. The 2018 Global CIO Report
Lost in the Cloud? Top Challenges Facing CIOs in a Cloud-Native World The 2018 Global CIO Report Based on a global survey of 800 CIOs, this report takes a closer look at the challenges that organizations
More informationInvestor Presentation. November 2018
Investor Presentation November 2018 Disclaimer Forward-Looking Statements: This presentation contains forward-looking statements which are made pursuant to the safe harbor provisions of Section 27A of
More informationEnterprise Performance Management. Performance Management Solutions Training Catalog
Enterprise Performance Management Performance Management Solutions Training Catalog January 2016 March 2016 Table of Contents Performance Management Solutions Training from Fiserv... 3 Online Learning...
More informationTrends in Chamber Operations 2016 ACCE s 13 th Annual Edition. Produced in part through generous support from
Trends in Chamber Operations 2016 ACCE s 13 th Annual Edition Produced in part through generous support from Chamber Operations Survey Report FY 2016 Thirteenth Annual Chamber Operations Survey ACCE Chamber
More informationGuidewire ClaimCenter. Adapt and succeed
Guidewire ClaimCenter Adapt and succeed Today s Challenge It s a fact that claims handling accounts for your highest cost. It also presents your greatest opportunity for satisfying customers and securing
More informationIndustry Analysts: Kevin Mitchell Acme Packet
Investor Relations: Brian Norris Acme Packet +1 781-328-4790 bnorris@acmepacket.com Industry Analysts: Kevin Mitchell Acme Packet +1 781-328-4436 kmitchell@acmepacket.com Trade and Business Press: Rich
More informationComprehensive plan services with an eye toward tomorrow
Comprehensive plan services with an eye toward tomorrow Schwab Retirement Plan Services, Inc. Always put the client first. No matter what. Charles Schwab Our culture of service At Schwab Retirement Plan
More informationInvestor Presentation. March 2017
Investor Presentation March 2017 Safe Harbor Statement Safe Harbor statement under Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995: This presentation contains forward-looking statements, including statements
More informationAn Overview: Responsibility Center Management (RCM) Treasurer s Town Hall January 15, 2015
An Overview: Responsibility Center Management (RCM) Treasurer s Town Hall January 15, 2015 Common University Budget Models EVERY TUB ON ITS OWN BOTTOM INCREMENTAL FORMULA-BASED RESPONSIBILITY CENTER MANAGEMENT
More informationBudget Town Hall Meeting
Budget Town Hall Meeting FY 2018-19 Operating Budget Proposal Chancellor Steven Angle & EVC Richard Brown Factors Impacting the FY 2019 Budget UTC #1 University in CCTA Metrics for Fourth Year in a Row!
More informationHow to Scale Innovation?
How to Scale Innovation? Dr. Wolfram Jost CTO Darmstadt February 11th, 2014 1 Safe harbor This presentation contains forward-looking statements based on beliefs of Software AG management. Such statements
More informationFINANCE DEPARTMENT PERFORMANCE BENCHMARKS 2019
FINANCE DEPARTMENT PERFORMANCE BENCHMARKS 2019 Benchmark your finance function on key metrics: Budgets, activities, functional costs, workforce measures and more A STUDY OF KEY PERFORMANCE PARAMETERS IN
More informationAnalysis of Costs and Benefits Associated with Implementing SIF
Analysis of Costs and Benefits Associated with Implementing SIF Study For additional information about the SIF Association and for a copy of the entire Analysis of Costs and Benefits Associated with Implementing
More informationBudget Forum. October 18, :30am Noon Hughes Hall Lounge
Budget Forum October 18, 2017 9:30am Noon Hughes Hall Lounge Agenda Topic Presenter(s) Welcome Nana An FY2017 Luella Russo FY2018-19 Operating Budget Status Luella/Bill Brown Business Intelligence (BI)
More informationConnected Vehicle Professional. CVP III Data, Markets, Policy and Regulations
Connected Vehicle Professional CVP III Data, Markets, Policy and Regulations Connected Vehicle Professional Connected Vehicle Professional III Data, Markets, Policy and Regulations (CVP III) focuses on
More informationFROM 12 TO 21: OUR WAY FORWARD
FROM 12 TO 21: OUR WAY FORWARD MESSAGE FROM THE BOARD Weldon Cowan, chair of the board of directors The board of directors shares the corporation s excitement about the next phase of the From 12 to 21
More informationEnhancing business through flexible integration solutions
Enhancing business through flexible integration solutions Vas Giatilis, Chief Software Architect and Web Applications Manager @UNIFY Twitter: @vgiatilis Agenda OpenScape Business Deployment & Maintanance
More informationHow Can Global In-house Centers in the Manufacturing Vertical Partner with Service Providers to Create More Value for their Enterprises?
2015 AN EVEREST GROUP REPORT How Can Global In-house Centers in the Manufacturing Vertical Partner with Service Providers to Create More Value for their Enterprises? H. Karthik, Partner - Global Sourcing
More informationAll 2 and 4 Year Not For Profit Institutions: Comparison Report. Response Rates
Response Rates Response Rate (all institutions listed in the 2013 14 IPEDS Data Collection) Response Rate (all institutions listed in the 2013 14 IPEDS Data Collection with contact information) All 2 and
More informationWelcome to Service Strategy To Support Digital Transformation
Welcome to Service Strategy To Support Digital Transformation Outline of the day First Half of the Day (Tactical) 09:00 Registration 10:00 Introduction & Welcome 10:05 Set the scene 10:30 Audience participation
More informationMoney Management Curriculum Overview
Teaching Notes: The money management curriculum will help students understand their financial standing and create a plan that will help them succeed in improving their financial future. There are eight
More information2018 Institutional Program Review. stockton.edu
2018 Institutional Program Review 2018 Institutional Program Review Broad, comprehensive overview Institutional perspective Collaborative planning process 2018 Institutional Program Review Mr. Michael
More informationConference Summary Report: CIO
Conference Summary Report: CIO The theme of this year s Gartner Symposium/ITxpo was Focus. Connect. Lead. A nexus of four disruptive technologies social, mobile, cloud and information is revolutionizing
More informationComprehensive Compensation, Classification, and Organizational Design and Structure Study for Portland Public Schools, ME FINAL REPORT
Comprehensive Compensation, Classification, and Organizational Design and Structure Study for Portland Public Schools, ME FINAL REPORT August 13, 2013 EVERGREEN SOLUTIONS, LLC Chapter 1- Introduction In
More informationINFORMATION AND WEB TECHNOLOGY PLAN to
INFORMATION AND WEB TECHNOLOGY PLAN 2017-18 to 2020-21 Information and Web Technology Committee Educational Technology Committee Administrative Technology Committee Spring 2017 Introduction The efforts
More informationInternap Reports Third Quarter 2016 Financial Results
Internap Reports Third Quarter 2016 Financial Results Revenue of $74 million, churn down year-over-year and sequentially Including a $78.2 goodwill impairment, GAAP net loss was $(91.3) million, or $(1.75)
More informationBUDGET REPORT GUIDANCE FOR FY19: ACTIVITY-BASED UNITS
Office of the Provost University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign BUDGET REPORT GUIDANCE FOR FY19: ACTIVITY-BASED UNITS 3 November 2017 The State of Illinois recent budget impasse ended in July 2017. Allocations
More informationImpact of Digital Documents in Insurance
Impact of Digital Documents in Insurance Andrew Hellard Product Marketing Manager April 2016 1 Agenda 1 Introductions 2 What is digital insurance? 3 4 Customer communications in a digital world Questions
More informationPlanning and Budgeting Forum Mission Achievement Planning
Planning and Budgeting Forum Mission Achievement Planning September 22, 2014 Denver, Colorado Gordon Jensen Introduction Metropolitan Community College (MCC): One of six community colleges in Nebraska
More informationDisruption or Disrupted. How Digital Transformation is changing IT?
Disruption or Disrupted How Digital Transformation is changing IT? Is there a Digital Transformation Leader in the house? DISRUPTION DIGITAL ECONOMY where IT IS THE BUSINESS Change is Inevitable The ability
More informationAR SOLUTION. User Guide. Version 1.1 9/24/2015
AR SOLUTION User Guide Version 1.1 9/24/2015 TABLE OF CONTENTS ABOUT THIS DOCUMENT... 2 REPORT CODE DEFINITIONS...3 AR SOLUTION OVERVIEW... 3 ROCK-POND REPORTS DIVE IN... 3 HOW OLD IS MY A/R BY KEY CATEGORY?...3
More informationUsing the Principia Suite
Using the Principia Suite Overview - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -1 Generating Research Mode Reports........................................... 2 Overview -
More informationFinancial Report to the Board of Governors
2007 2008 Financial Report to the Board of Governors McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada H3A 2T5 D 08-09 www.mcgill.ca GD 08-05 The Mission of McGill University is the advancement of learning through
More informationMeasureIT Benchmarking Report IT Budgeting Metrics
MeasureIT Benchmarking Report IT Budgeting Metrics Respondent Name: Sample Health Care Company Name: Info-Tech Email: healthcare@infotech.com Date Completed: Jun 12, 2012 Executive Summary The following
More informationINVESTOR BRIEFING SESSION (hosted by Avior Capital)
INVESTOR BRIEFING SESSION (hosted by Avior Capital) 22 March 2018 Andrew A. Darfoor Group Chief Executive RETIREMENTS WEALTH INVESTMENTS INSURANCE Disclaimer 2 The views expressed here may contain information
More informationUIC s Budget Calendar & Budget Development Process
UIC s Budget Calendar & Budget Development Process April 5, 2018, 3p 4p Conference Sponsors: The Office of the Chancellor, Budget & Financial Administration / Human Resources, the Office of the Provost
More informationReacfin s.a./n.v. Place de l Université 25 B-1348 Louvain-la-Neuve Belgium. Phone : +32 (0)
Reacfin s.a./n.v. Place de l Université 25 B-1348 Louvain-la-Neuve Belgium Phone : +32 (0)10 68 86 07 info@reacfin.com www.reacfin.com Leveraging on a unique combination of academic excellence and practitioners
More informationAdjusted EBITDA $ 19,752 $ 19,714 $ 19,109 0% 3% Adjusted EBITDA Margin 25.2% 23.3% 23.8% 190 BPS 140 BPS
Internap Reports Continued Adjusted EBITDA Margin Expansion and Positive Levered Free Cash Flow Revenue of $78.3 million, down 7% versus the third quarter of 2014 Data center services revenue of $58.6
More informationOBAA OBJECTIVES-BASED ASSET ALLOCATION TRULY EFFECTIVE ASSET ALLOCATION FOR INSURANCE COMPANIES DOES YOUR PORTFOLIO SUPPORT YOUR BUSINESS OBJECTIVES?
OBAA OBJECTIVES-BASED ASSET ALLOCATION TRULY EFFECTIVE ASSET ALLOCATION FOR INSURANCE COMPANIES DOES YOUR PORTFOLIO SUPPORT YOUR BUSINESS OBJECTIVES? 02 INTRODUCTION The importance of asset allocation
More informationQuestions and Answers Automated Budgeting Tool RFP
1 11/18/15 2 11/18/15 3 11/18/15 4 11/18/15 5 11/18/15 6 11/18/15 7 11/18/15 Questions and Answers Automated Budgeting Tool RFP Date: November 12-20 Date Question OPERS Response We understand that OPERS
More informationDriving Profitable Growth
Driving Profitable Growth Frank Calderoni EVP and Chief Financial Officer December 7, 2012 Forward-Looking Statements This presentation contains projections and other forward-looking statements regarding
More informationAll Funds Revenue Budget Provides revenue budget information for all budgeted funds on campus, including the University
Page 1 Dashboards There are currently five dashboards reflecting original revenue and expenditure budget data for the University Operating Fund and all budgeted funds (more detail on specific content,
More informationMember Discount Directory. FPA Business Support
Member Discount Directory FPA 1 Partner List Advicent Advizr Asset-Map Black Diamond Bloomberg Tax Clearnomics College for Financial Planning Everplans FP Transitions Golden Gate University IncomeConductor
More informationGAAP Results. Non-GAAP Results. A reconciliation between net income on a GAAP basis and non-gaap net income is provided in the table on page 7.
PRESS RELEASE Cisco Reports First Quarter Earnings SAN JOSE, CA - November 9, 2011 - Cisco (NASDAQ: CSCO) Q1 Net Sales: $11.3 billion Q1 Net Income: $1.8 billion GAAP; $2.3 billion non-gaap Q1 Earnings
More informationChapter 33 Coordinating the Use of Lean Across Ministries and Certain Other Agencies
Chapter 33 Coordinating the Use of Lean Across Ministries and Certain Other Agencies 1.0 MAIN POINTS The Government is seeking to use Lean as a systematic way to improve service delivery and create a culture
More informationBudget Planning and Development Workshop
Budget Planning and Development Workshop Presented By: Administration and Finance Student Life Information Technology Services Workshop Agenda Resource Allocation Overview All Funds Budget Model Budget
More informationInvested in Our Clients
Invested in Our Clients Annual Meeting of Shareholders April 11, 2017 Cautionary Statement A number of statements in our presentations, the accompanying slides and the responses to your questions are forward-looking
More informationChief Tax Officer Program Helping you lead with confidence
Chief Tax Officer Program Helping you lead with confidence Expectations of tax executives are rapidly evolving, both in type and intensity. Whether you are directing a large corporate tax department or
More informationBlackbaud Q1 Investor Presentation. Ticker: BLKB April 30, 2018
Blackbaud Q1 Investor Presentation Ticker: BLKB April 30, 2018 Forward-Looking Statements Forward-Looking Statements: This presentation contains forward-looking statements within the meaning of Section
More informationKnowledge Management Survey
Knowledge Management Survey Analysis by Firm Size ILTA Survey December 2010 ILTA s KM Peer Group Steering Committee KM Survey Analysis: Executive Summary T his is the second survey conducted by ILTA s
More informationBudget Reform Update. Paul Ellinger, Associate Chancellor & Vice Provost Budget and Resource Planning
Budget Reform Update Paul Ellinger, Associate Chancellor & Vice Provost Budget and Resource Planning February 2018 Outline Brief budget model overview Communication plan Principles Major components Timeline
More informationTax operations evolution Drivers, barriers, and building blocks
Tax operations evolution Drivers, barriers, and building blocks Continued globalization, growing demand for the effective use of resources, and an increasing emphasis on performance measurement are compelling
More informationWKU Budget Restructuring Plan: Recommendations to President Caboni. WKU Budget Council. February 20, 2018
WKU Budget Restructuring Plan: Recommendations to President Caboni WKU Budget Council February 20, 2018 Executive Summary In the fall of 2017, WKU President Timothy Caboni redefined the responsibilities
More informationFinancial Performance Management Training Catalog. Management Planning and Control Vantage Risk and Budgeting
Financial Performance Management Training Catalog Management Planning and Control Vantage Risk and Budgeting January 2019 June 2019 Table of Contents Performance Management Solutions Training from Fiserv...
More informationAnalyzing the Elements of Real GDP in FRED Using Stacking
Tools for Teaching with Analyzing the Elements of Real GDP in FRED Using Stacking Author Mark Bayles, Senior Economic Education Specialist Introduction This online activity shows how to use FRED, the Federal
More informationMinnesota State Colleges and Universities Office of Internal Auditing Annual Audit Plan Fiscal Year 2008
Minnesota State Colleges and Universities Office of Internal Auditing Annual Audit Plan Fiscal Year 2008 According to Board Policy 1D.1, Part 6, the Office of Internal Auditing must submit an annual audit
More informationYou can't optimize what you can't automate and audit. JJ Garcia Public Sector ITOM Solution Architect March 8, 2018
You can't optimize what you can't automate and audit JJ Garcia Public Sector ITOM Solution Architect March 8, 2018 2 Dr. Brown now understands IT compliance Automation IT Operations Management Products
More informationTax operations evolution Drivers, barriers, and building blocks
Tax operations evolution Drivers, barriers, and building blocks Continued globalization, growing demand for the effective use of resources, and an increasing emphasis on performance measurement are compelling
More informationTRANSFORM PURDUE GENERAL LEDGER GO-LIVE (7/9/2018)
TRANSFORM PURDUE GENERAL LEDGER GO-LIVE (7/9/2018) Department Heads and Deans Presented - July 30, 2018 AGENDA Post Go-Live Assessment Finance Structure and Metrics Financial Transparency Faculty Allocations
More informationStreamline and integrate your claims processing
Increase flexibility Reduce costs Expedite claims Streamline and integrate your claims processing DXC Insurance RISKMASTERTM For corporate claims and self-insured organizations DXC Insurance RISKMASTER
More informationInstitutional Presentation. February/March 2011
Institutional Presentation February/March 2011 Marketing Campaign SHARE THE NEW WORLD Technology, Software (SaaS), Social Network and Consulting 2 Gross Revenue (R$ Million) and EBITDA Margin (%) ¹ 3 Success
More informationwmi & microsoft partnership
wmi services. company overview WHO: WMI was founded on the premise that collaboration is the key to success. Over the past 15 years, we have built a global operations and technology consulting firm that
More informationCOURSE DESCRIPTION LTE RADIO PLANNING AND OPTIMISATION. Format: Classroom. Duration: 5 Day
COURSE DESCRIPTION LTE RADIO PLANNING AND OPTIMISATION Format: Classroom Duration: 5 Day COURSE SUMMARY HIGHLIGHTS Squarely focused on the effective planning and optimisation of LTE networks Hand-on certification
More informationEverest Group PEAK Matrix for Guidewire Services
Everest Group PEAK Matrix for Guidewire Services Focus on Hexaware July 2018 Copyright 2018 Everest Global, Inc. This document has been licensed for exclusive use and distribution by Hexaware Introduction
More informationBuilding the Healthcare System of the Future O R A C L E W H I T E P A P E R F E B R U A R Y
Building the Healthcare System of the Future O R A C L E W H I T E P A P E R F E B R U A R Y 2 0 1 7 Introduction Healthcare in the United States is changing rapidly. An aging population has increased
More informationAccenture Business Journal for India Digital Insurance: How new technologies are changing the rules of the game for a traditional industry
Accenture Business Journal for India Digital Insurance: How new technologies are changing the rules of the game for a traditional industry The traditional business model for insurance, though still a reliable
More informationfocus The Cloud migration of all applications paves the way for the launch of the Digital Factory Contents italgas.it
Year 2 Information as of 14 September CLARITY AND VALUE TO INVESTOR RELATIONS focus Contents 01 Cloud migration and Digital Factory launch 02 The steps of the digitization process 03 First-half financials
More informationThe global tax disputes environment
The global tax disputes environment How the tax disputes teams of multinational corporations are managing, responding and evolving Global Tax Disputes benchmarking survey 2016 KPMG International kpmg.com/tax
More informationDoes Your Budgeting Process Lack Accountability?
Does Your Budgeting Process Lack Accountability? How effectively you monitor variances will tell you by Jeff Goldstein and Jay Spence Nearly every healthcare provider today is working to reduce or in some
More informationBoston University Undergraduate Finance & Investment Club Investment Policy Statement
Boston University Undergraduate Finance & Investment Club Investment Policy Statement [Adapted from Scott D. Stewart s Training Student Equity Analysts and Utilizing their Recommendations in Active Portfolio
More informationBoard of Visitors Finance Subcommittee Meeting September 10, 2014
Board of Visitors Finance Subcommittee Meeting September 10, 2014 1 Agenda I. Introduction and Comments from Chair II. Reports A. Research B. Philanthropy C. Observations from Completion of Recent Admissions
More informationMINUTES UNIVERSITY ADVISORY COUNCIL ON STRATEGIC BUDGETING AND PLANNING December 5, 2013
MINUTES UNIVERSITY ADVISORY COUNCIL ON STRATEGIC BUDGETING AND PLANNING December 5, 2013 PRESENT: ABSENT: Amy Brunner, Martin Daniel, Wendy Herdman, Tim Hodge, William Knocke, Mark McNamee, Joe Merola,
More informationIt is therefore pleasing to report that this evolution of BOQ has continued throughout this financial year.
1 2 Good morning everyone. I will start with the highlights of the results. The strategy we have been implementing in the past few years has transformed BOQ into a resilient, multi-channel business that
More informationFinancial System Report Descriptions
Fund Balances by Department, Fund, PI, and User Fund Balances reports provide a list of funds along with the titles and balances of each of those funds. This report can be selected to display listings
More informationWe help build companies of the future
June 2017 Investor Presentation We help build companies of the future By Pat Goepel SAFE HARBOR STATEMENT (Under the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995) Statements made in this presentation
More information" # $ % &%' %*, &-(.% ' / 0 1 * )) Copyright 2008 Deloitte Development LLC. All rights reserved.
! " # $ % &%' % ())* (+ %*, &(.% ' / 0 1 * )) 1 " # $ % &%' % ())* (+ %*, &(.% ' / 0 1 * )) 2 " $ % 2./01!" #$%& ' ()*%!+ %!'!,! %',," %!'2! # 3! "! # 6,, %'! "! $! ' 4 ', 37,!!! 3 " # $ % &%' % ())* (+
More informationFY17 General Fund Budget Update
FY17 General Fund Budget Update Committee of the Board May 3, 2016 Marie Schrul Chief Financial Officer 1 Purpose To provide an update on the FY 2016-2017 General Fund budget to the Committee of the Board
More information2016 CIO Agenda: A China Perspective
G00297509 2016 CIO Agenda: A China Perspective Published: 19 February 2016 Analyst(s): Owen Chen Gartner's 2016 CIO survey results show that we are now knee-deep in the era of digital business, with many
More informationRobots join the team. Automation, transformation and the future of actuarial work for insurers
v2 Robots join the team Automation, transformation and the future of actuarial work for insurers istock watermarks on images will be removed once images are purchased. Images are $24 each for a total of
More informationAssociation for Communication Excellence (ACE) In Agriculture, Natural Resources, and Life and Human Sciences RFP FOR ASSOCIATION MANAGEMENT SERVICES
Association for Communication Excellence (ACE) In Agriculture, Natural Resources, and Life and Human Sciences RFP FOR ASSOCIATION MANAGEMENT SERVICES HISTORY OF ACE Since 1913, ACE has been providing professional
More informationPCC BUDGET FORUMS: FISCAL YEAR BUDGET OUTLOOK JANUARY 2018 PRESENTED BY: DR. DAVID BEA
PCC BUDGET FORUMS: FISCAL YEAR 2018-2019 BUDGET OUTLOOK JANUARY 2018 PRESENTED BY: DR. DAVID BEA BOARD APPROVED STRATEGIC PRIORITIES 2017-2021 College Strategic Plan Educational Master Plan (EMP) Facilities
More informationFINANCIAL OVERVIEW. Jim Groch. Chief Financial Officer
FINANCIAL OVERVIEW Jim Groch Chief Financial Officer FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS This presentation contains statements that are forward looking within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform
More informationVersion 2.0- Project. Q: What is the current status of your project? A: Completed
Baker College, MI Project: Develop an institutional quality assurance framework to measure institutional effectiveness and drive continuous quality improvement efforts Version 2.0- Project What is the
More informationProgram: Library Services Program Based Budget Page 199
Program: Library Services Program Based Budget 2015 2017 Page 199 Program: Oakville Public Library Vision Statement: Love the experience. Mission Statement: Building community by connecting people and
More informationSURVEY OF GOVERNMENT CONTRACTOR SALES EXPECTATIONS
SURVEY OF GOVERNMENT CONTRACTOR SALES EXPECTATIONS 2017-18 Executive Summary... 03 Introduction... 05 Profile of Government Contractors Surveyed... 06 TABLE OF CONTENTS Onvia Government Contractor Confidence
More informationScientific Council Forty-sixth Session 07/12/2009. KEY PERFORMANCE INDICATORS (KPIs) FOR THE AGENCY
Forty-sixth Session 07/12/2009 Lyon, 27 29 January 2010 Princess Takamatsu Hall KEY PERFORMANCE INDICATORS (KPIs) FOR THE AGENCY What are Key Performance Indicators (KPIs)? 1. KPIs represent a set of measures
More informationTOMORROW'S PROMISE THE COMPREHENSIVE CAPITAL CAMPAIGN FOR FLORIDA A&M UNIVERSITY
F A M U D I V I S I O N O F U N I V E R S I T Y A D V A N C E M E N T TOMORROW'S PROMISE THE COMPREHENSIVE CAPITAL CAMPAIGN FOR FLORIDA A&M UNIVERSITY 1 C O M P R E H E N S I V E C A P I T A L C A M P
More informationInnovation & Technology Budget Unit Program 2019 Proposed Budget Innovation & Technology $ 405, Innovation & Technology Administration
Innovation & Technology Budget Unit Program 2019 Proposed Budget Innovation & Technology $ 405,034 100-30-300 Innovation & Technology Administration - 610-30-300 Innovation & Technology Administration
More informationBoard of Trustees Update
Board of Trustees Update 1) Academic and Student affairs (11 March 2016) 2) Finance and Technology (11 March 2016) 3) Investment Committee (14 March 2016) patti.miles@maine.edu 4) Chancellor Page Update
More informationGeorgia Chapter. Chapter Scores for CBSC: FY18 Overall High Satisfaction*: 91%
Chapter Scores for CBSC: FY18 Overall High Satisfaction*: 91% FY17 Overall High Satisfaction: 69% Favorable/Unfavorable FY17 to FY18: 22% *FY18 High Satisfaction calculated by summing the total of respondents
More informationDEPARTMENT OF CANADIAN HERITAGE FINAL REPORT AUDIT OF THE CANADIAN HERITAGE INFORMATION NETWORK (CHIN)
DEPARTMENT OF CANADIAN HERITAGE FINAL REPORT AUDIT OF THE CANADIAN HERITAGE INFORMATION NETWORK (CHIN) October 19, 2005 TABLE OF CONTENTS Executive Summary 1.0 Background 2.0 Audit Objectives and Scope
More informationAcme Packet Reports Record Results for Fourth Quarter of Fiscal Year 2007
Investor Relations: Brian Norris Acme Packet +1 781-328-4790 bnorris@acmepacket.com Industry Analysts / Trade and Business Press: Rich Williams Connect2 Communications +1 919-554-3532 rmwilliams@connect2comm.com
More informationGlobal In-house Center (GIC) Landscape Annual Report 2017 Will President Trump s Job Protection Initiatives be a Wake Up Call for the GIC Model?
Global In-house Center (GIC) Landscape Annual Report 2017 Will President Trump s Job Protection Initiatives be a Wake Up Call for the GIC Model? Catalyst Annual Report March 2017 Preview Deck Our research
More informationGlobal IT-BPO outsourcing deals analysis
Global IT-BPO outsourcing deals analysis 3Q16 analysis KPMG.com 2016 KPMG International Cooperative ( KPMG International ). KPMG International provides no client services and is a Swiss entity with which
More information