Dynamic Portfolio Choice with Frictions
|
|
- Martha Anthony
- 5 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 Dynamic Portfolio Choice with Frictions Nicolae Gârleanu UC Berkeley, CEPR, and NBER Lasse H. Pedersen NYU, Copenhagen Business School, AQR, CEPR, and NBER December 2014 Gârleanu and Pedersen Dynamic Portfolio Choice with Frictions, p.1
2 Dynamic Trading with Predictable Returns and TC Central issue in finance: optimal portfolio choice Dynamic problem: Expected returns vary over time e.g. driven by factors Expected returns mean revert with different alpha decay Transaction costs imply that positions are sticky Investors can continually re-adjust their portfolio Questions: What is the optimal trading strategy? Understand limiting behavior as trading becomes frequent What are the implications for equilibrium excess returns? Gârleanu and Pedersen Dynamic Portfolio Choice with Frictions, p.2
3 Dynamic Trading with Predictable Returns and TC Central issue in finance: optimal portfolio choice Dynamic problem: Expected returns vary over time e.g. driven by factors Expected returns mean revert with different alpha decay Transaction costs imply that positions are sticky Investors can continually re-adjust their portfolio Questions: What is the optimal trading strategy? Understand limiting behavior as trading becomes frequent What are the implications for equilibrium excess returns? Broadly applicable technology Macro models (e.g., of investment) Monetary economics Micro economics (e.g., firm decisions) Political economy Gârleanu and Pedersen Dynamic Portfolio Choice with Frictions, p.2
4 Main Results Closed-form solution in general model Gârleanu and Pedersen Dynamic Portfolio Choice with Frictions, p.3
5 Main Results Closed-form solution in general model Price impact understood as compensation for intermediary risk Gârleanu and Pedersen Dynamic Portfolio Choice with Frictions, p.3
6 Main Results Closed-form solution in general model Price impact understood as compensation for intermediary risk If intermediary lays off inventory Over one model period: no transaction cost in the limit Over fixed calendar-time period: positive transitory cost in the limit Gradually over (calendar) time: persistent price impact Gârleanu and Pedersen Dynamic Portfolio Choice with Frictions, p.3
7 Main Results Closed-form solution in general model Price impact understood as compensation for intermediary risk If intermediary lays off inventory Over one model period: no transaction cost in the limit Over fixed calendar-time period: positive transitory cost in the limit Gradually over (calendar) time: persistent price impact Properties of the optimal portfolio path: With transitory transaction cost: smooth With only persistent price impact: Brownian (with jumps) Gârleanu and Pedersen Dynamic Portfolio Choice with Frictions, p.3
8 Main Results Closed-form solution in general model Price impact understood as compensation for intermediary risk If intermediary lays off inventory Over one model period: no transaction cost in the limit Over fixed calendar-time period: positive transitory cost in the limit Gradually over (calendar) time: persistent price impact Properties of the optimal portfolio path: With transitory transaction cost: smooth With only persistent price impact: Brownian (with jumps) Stochastic volatility: Risk cost: mean-reverting Trading cost: incurred instantaneously Trade less aggressively in high-volatility environments Gârleanu and Pedersen Dynamic Portfolio Choice with Frictions, p.3
9 Main Results Closed-form solution in general model Price impact understood as compensation for intermediary risk If intermediary lays off inventory Over one model period: no transaction cost in the limit Over fixed calendar-time period: positive transitory cost in the limit Gradually over (calendar) time: persistent price impact Properties of the optimal portfolio path: With transitory transaction cost: smooth With only persistent price impact: Brownian (with jumps) Stochastic volatility: Risk cost: mean-reverting Trading cost: incurred instantaneously Trade less aggressively in high-volatility environments Equilibrium: Faster decaying alphas are larger Gârleanu and Pedersen Dynamic Portfolio Choice with Frictions, p.3
10 Aim in Front of the Target Closed-form optimal dynamic trading strategy Gârleanu and Pedersen Dynamic Portfolio Choice with Frictions, p.4
11 Aim in Front of the Target Closed-form optimal dynamic trading strategy Two portfolio principles 1. Aim in the front of the target 2. Trade partially towards the (current) aim Panel A: Construction of Current Optimal Trade Markowitz t Position in asset 2 old position x t 1 new position x t E t (aim t+1 ) aim t Position in asset 1 Gârleanu and Pedersen Dynamic Portfolio Choice with Frictions, p.4
12 Aim in Front of the Target Closed-form optimal dynamic trading strategy Two portfolio principles 1. Aim in the front of the target 2. Trade partially towards the (current) aim Aim portfolio : Weighted average of current and future Markowitz portfolios Predictors with Panel slower A: Construction mean reversion of receiver Current higher Optimal weight Trade Markowitz t Position in asset 2 old position x t 1 new position x t E t (aim t+1 ) aim t Position in asset 1 Gârleanu and Pedersen Dynamic Portfolio Choice with Frictions, p.4
13 Aim in Front of the Target: Illustration Panel A: Construction of Current Optimal Trade Markowitz t Position in asset 2 old position x t 1 new position aim t x t E t (aim t+1 ) Position in asset 1 Gârleanu and Pedersen Dynamic Portfolio Choice with Frictions, p.5
14 Aim in Front of the Target: Illustration Panel A: Construction of Current Optimal Trade Markowitz t Position in asset 2 old position x t 1 new position aim t x t E t (aim t+1 ) Position in asset 1 Panel B: Expected Next Optimal Portfolio Position in asset 2 x t 1 x t Et (x t+1 ) E t (Markowitz t+1 ) Position in asset 1 Gârleanu and Pedersen Dynamic Portfolio Choice with Frictions, p.5
15 Aim in Front of the Target: Illustration Panel A: Construction of Current Optimal Trade Panel D: Skate to where the puck is going to be Markowitz t Position in asset 2 old position x t 1 new position aim t x t E t (aim t+1 ) Position in asset 1 Panel B: Expected Next Optimal Portfolio Position in asset 2 x t 1 x t Et (x t+1 ) E t (Markowitz t+1 ) Position in asset 1 Gârleanu and Pedersen Dynamic Portfolio Choice with Frictions, p.5
16 Aim in Front of the Target: Illustration Panel A: Construction of Current Optimal Trade Panel D: Skate to where the puck is going to be Markowitz t Position in asset 2 old position x t 1 new position aim t x t E t (aim t+1 ) Position in asset 1 Panel B: Expected Next Optimal Portfolio Panel E: Shooting: lead the duck Position in asset 2 x t 1 x t Et (x t+1 ) E t (Markowitz t+1 ) Position in asset 1 Gârleanu and Pedersen Dynamic Portfolio Choice with Frictions, p.5
17 Aim in Front of the Target: Illustration Panel A: Construction of Current Optimal Trade Panel D: Skate to where the puck is going to be Markowitz t Position in asset 2 old position x t 1 new position aim t x t E t (aim t+1 ) Position in asset 1 Panel B: Expected Next Optimal Portfolio Panel E: Shooting: lead the duck Position in asset 2 x t 1 x t Et (x t+1 ) E t (Markowitz t+1 ) Position in asset 1 Panel C: Expected Optimal Future Path Position in asset 2 E t (x t+h ) E t (Markowitz t+h ) Position in asset 1 Gârleanu and Pedersen Dynamic Portfolio Choice with Frictions, p.5
18 Aim in Front of the Target: Illustration Panel A: Construction of Current Optimal Trade Panel D: Skate to where the puck is going to be Markowitz t Position in asset 2 old position x t 1 new position aim t x t E t (aim t+1 ) Position in asset 1 Panel B: Expected Next Optimal Portfolio Panel E: Shooting: lead the duck Position in asset 2 x t 1 x t Et (x t+1 ) E t (Markowitz t+1 ) Position in asset 1 Panel C: Expected Optimal Future Path Panel F: Missile systems: lead homing guidance Position in asset 2 E t (x t+h ) E t (Markowitz t+h ) Position in asset 1 Gârleanu and Pedersen Dynamic Portfolio Choice with Frictions, p.5
19 Related Literature Optimal trading with transactions costs, no predictability Constantinides (86), Amihud and Mendelson (86), Vayanos (98), Liu (04) Predictability, no transactions costs Merton (73), Campbell and Viceira (02) Optimal trade execution with exogenous trade: Perold (88), Almgren and Chriss (00) Numerical results with time-varying investment opportunity set Jang, Koo, Liu, and Loewenstein (07), Lynch and Tan (08) Quadratic programming Used in macroeconomics (Ljungqvist and Sargent (04)) and other fields: solve up to Ricatti equations Grinold (06), Collin-Dufresne et al. (2014) Continuous-time TC based on trading intensity Carlin et al. (2008), Oehmke (2009) Gârleanu and Pedersen Dynamic Portfolio Choice with Frictions, p.6
20 Pure Transitory Transaction Costs: Model Returns: dp t rp t dt = Bf t dt + du t Risk: var t (du t ) = Σ dt Factor decay: df t = µ f (f t )dt + dε t T-cost with dx t = τ t dt : whatever T C(τ t ) = 1 2 τ t Λτ t Maximand: E t [ t e ρ(s t) ( x s Bf s γ 2 x s Σx s 1 2 τ s Λτ s ) ds ] Gârleanu and Pedersen Dynamic Portfolio Choice with Frictions, p.7
21 Continuous-Time Solution Method Conjecture and verify quadratic value function: V (x, f) = 1 2 x A xx x + x A x (f) A(f) Value function V solves Hamilton-Jacoby-Bellman equation: ρv = sup τ { x Bf γ 2 x Σx 1 2 τ Λτ + V x τ + x DA x (f) + DA(f) Maximizing with respect to the trading intensity results in 1 V τ = Λ. x } Gârleanu and Pedersen Dynamic Portfolio Choice with Frictions, p.8
22 Optimal Continuous-Time Strategy: General Case Proposition The optimal trading intensity τ = dxt dt where and τ t = Λ 1 A xx [aim t x t ], aim t = (γa 1 xx Σ) A xx = ρ 2 Λ + Λ 1 2 Markowitz s = (γσ) 1 Bf s. t is e (γa 1 xx Σ)(s t) E t [Markowitz s ] ds ( γλ 1 2 ΣΛ 1 ρ ) I 2 Λ 1 2 Gârleanu and Pedersen Dynamic Portfolio Choice with Frictions, p.9
23 Illustration: Optimal Portfolio with One Asset Markowitz Aim Optimal Position Time Gârleanu and Pedersen Dynamic Portfolio Choice with Frictions, p.10
24 Optimal Continuous-Time Strategy Proposition If Λ = λσ and µ f (f) = Φf, then the optimal trading intensity is τ t = a λ [aim t x t ], where aim t = (γσ) 1 B (I + aφ/γ) 1 f t a = ρλ + ρ 2 λ 2 + 4γλ. 2 If each factor s decay only depends on itself (i.e., Φ is diagonal), then: ( aim t = (γσ) 1 ft 1 B 1 + aφ 1 /γ,..., ft K ) 1 + aφ K. /γ The rate of trade a λ increases with γ λ. Gârleanu and Pedersen Dynamic Portfolio Choice with Frictions, p.11
25 Illustration: Expected Optimal Portfolio with Two Assets Markowitz Aim Optimal Markowitz 0 Position in asset 2 aim 0 x 0 Position in asset 1 Gârleanu and Pedersen Dynamic Portfolio Choice with Frictions, p.12
26 Transitory and Persistent Price Impact: Model Transaction price: p t = p t + D t Price distortion: dd t = RD t dt + Cτ t dt Returns: d p t rp t dt = Bf t dt + dd t rd t dt + du t Risk: var t (du t ) = Σ dt Factor decay: df t = µ f (f t )dt + dε t Temporary t-cost:wh T C(τ t ) = 1 2 τ t Λτ t Maximand: [ E t t e ρ(s t) ( x s Bf s γ 2 x s Σx s 1 2 τ s ) Λτ s ds + ] t e ρ(s t) x s ( (r + R)D s + Cτ s ) ds Gârleanu and Pedersen Dynamic Portfolio Choice with Frictions, p.13
27 Transitory and Persistent Price Impact: Solution Proposition The value function is quadratic in (x t, D t ). The optimal trading strategy is given by with τ t = M rate ( aim M f (f t ) + M aim f t M aim D D t x t ) (f) = N 2 e N1(s t) N 3 E t [Markowitz s ] dt. t Gârleanu and Pedersen Dynamic Portfolio Choice with Frictions, p.14
28 Pure Persistent Price Impact: Model Transaction price: p t = p t + D t Price distortion: dd t = RD t dt + Cτ t dt Returns: d p t rp t dt = Bf t dt + dd t rd t dt + du t Risk: var t (du t ) = Σ dt Factor decay: df t = µ f (f t )dt + dε t Temporary t-cost:wh zero (x no longer bounded variation) Maximand: [ E t t e ρ(s t) ( x s (Bf s (r + R)D s ) γ ) 2 x s Σx s ds + t e ρ(s t) x s Cdx s + 1 ] 2 t e ρ(s t) d [x, Cx] s Gârleanu and Pedersen Dynamic Portfolio Choice with Frictions, p.15
29 Pure Persistent Price Impact: Solution Proposition The value function satisfies V (x, D, f) = V (0, D Cx, f) 1 2 x Cx ˆV (D 0, f) 1 2 x Cx. The function ˆV is quadratic in D 0. The optimal portfolio is given by x t = ˆN 0,f Markowitz t + M 1,f (f t ) M D (D Cx ), with M 1,f (f t ) = ˆN 2 e ˆN 1 (s t) ˆN3 E t [Markowitz s ] ds. 0 Gârleanu and Pedersen Dynamic Portfolio Choice with Frictions, p.16
30 Illustration: Pure Persistent Impact Markowitz Optimal Position 0 Time Gârleanu and Pedersen Dynamic Portfolio Choice with Frictions, p.17
31 General Discrete-Time Model Transaction price: p t = p t + D t Returns: p t+1 rp t t = Bf t t + u t Price distortion: D t+1 = R( t )D t + C( t ) x t+1 Risk: var t ( u t+1 ) = Σ t Factor decay: f t+1 = Φf t t + ε t+1 T-cost:whate T C( x t ) = 1 2 x t Λ( t ) x t [ Maximand: E t t e (x ρs t s (Bf s γ 2 x s Σx s ) t 1 2 x s Λ x s + x s ( (r t + R)D s + C x s ) + )] x s C x s x s+1 C x s+1 Gârleanu and Pedersen Dynamic Portfolio Choice with Frictions, p.18
32 Quadratic TC in Continuous Time: Is It Reasonable? Quadratic transaction cost: T C (1) ( x) = x Λ x Consider splitting the cost over two equal sub-periods: ( ) x ( ) x T C (2) ( x) = 2 Λ 2 2 = 1 2 T C(1) ( x) It follows that T C (n) 0 as n Gârleanu and Pedersen Dynamic Portfolio Choice with Frictions, p.19
33 Quadratic TC in Continuous Time: Is It Reasonable? Quadratic transaction cost: T C (1) ( x) = x Λ x Consider splitting the cost over two equal sub-periods: ( ) x ( ) x T C (2) ( x) = 2 Λ 2 2 = 1 2 T C(1) ( x) It follows that T C (n) 0 as n But why should the parameter Λ be independent of the frequency of trade? Gârleanu and Pedersen Dynamic Portfolio Choice with Frictions, p.19
34 Micro Foundation: Transitory Cost Agent trades with specialized, risk-averse intermediaries One unit of intermediaries, risk aversion equal to one Intermediaries require duration of time h( t ) to place inventory with end users, off the market during this period Gârleanu and Pedersen Dynamic Portfolio Choice with Frictions, p.20
35 Micro Foundation: Transitory Cost Agent trades with specialized, risk-averse intermediaries One unit of intermediaries, risk aversion equal to one Intermediaries require duration of time h( t ) to place inventory with end users, off the market during this period At every trading date: t /h( t ) intermediaries h( t )/ t aggregate risk aversion x units of risky asset Holding period h( t ) Gârleanu and Pedersen Dynamic Portfolio Choice with Frictions, p.20
36 Micro Foundation: Transitory Cost Agent trades with specialized, risk-averse intermediaries One unit of intermediaries, risk aversion equal to one Intermediaries require duration of time h( t ) to place inventory with end users, off the market during this period At every trading date: t /h( t ) intermediaries h( t )/ t aggregate risk aversion x units of risky asset Holding period h( t ) Implied transaction cost is proportional to x t (Σh( t )) x t 1 t h( t ) t Gârleanu and Pedersen Dynamic Portfolio Choice with Frictions, p.20
37 Micro Foundation: Transitory Cost Agent trades with specialized, risk-averse intermediaries One unit of intermediaries, risk aversion equal to one Intermediaries require duration of time h( t ) to place inventory with end users, off the market during this period At every trading date: t /h( t ) intermediaries h( t )/ t aggregate risk aversion x units of risky asset Holding period h( t ) Implied transaction cost is proportional to x t (Σh( t )) x t 1 t h( t ) t Implication: Λ( t ) 1 t h( t ) 2 Σ Gârleanu and Pedersen Dynamic Portfolio Choice with Frictions, p.20
38 Micro Foundation: Transitory Cost Agent trades with specialized, risk-averse intermediaries One unit of intermediaries, risk aversion equal to one Intermediaries require duration of time h( t ) to place inventory with end users, off the market during this period At every trading date: t /h( t ) intermediaries h( t )/ t aggregate risk aversion x units of risky asset Holding period h( t ) Implied transaction cost is proportional to x t (Σh( t )) x t 1 t h( t ) t Implication: Λ( t ) 1 t h( t ) 2 Σ Constant h( t ) : Λ( t ) 1 t If h( t ) t : Λ( t ) t Gârleanu and Pedersen Dynamic Portfolio Choice with Frictions, p.20
39 Reduced-Form Transaction-Cost Model The number of trades is of order 1 t Transaction cost is of order ( t ) 2 Λ( t ) 1 t Gârleanu and Pedersen Dynamic Portfolio Choice with Frictions, p.21
40 Reduced-Form Transaction-Cost Model The number of trades is of order 1 t Transaction cost is of order ( t ) 2 Λ( t ) 1 t A transitory cost obtains in continuous time if Λ( t ) 1 t, i.e., h( t ) is constant Corresponds to constant time to liquidate inventory, independent of trading frequency (or modeled, or observed, frequency) Gârleanu and Pedersen Dynamic Portfolio Choice with Frictions, p.21
41 Reduced-Form Transaction-Cost Model The number of trades is of order 1 t Transaction cost is of order ( t ) 2 Λ( t ) 1 t A transitory cost obtains in continuous time if Λ( t ) 1 t, i.e., h( t ) is constant Corresponds to constant time to liquidate inventory, independent of trading frequency (or modeled, or observed, frequency) If Λ( t ) increases more slowly than 1 t, then TC vanishes in limit Corresponds to time to liquidate that decreases with the trading frequency perhaps due to technological change, other secular trends Gârleanu and Pedersen Dynamic Portfolio Choice with Frictions, p.21
42 Micro Foundation: Persistent Price Impact If intermediaries sell inventory and return to market gradually persistent impact. Parameter behaviour: R( t ) t C( t ) 0 t Both types of costs obtain if two kinds of intermediaries handle each trade (serially) Gârleanu and Pedersen Dynamic Portfolio Choice with Frictions, p.22
43 Connection Discrete-Continuous Time Proposition (i) If intermediaries need a fixed amount of calendar time to liquidate inventory, so that Λ( t ) = Λ/ t, then M rate ( t ) lim t 0 t = rate M lim ( t ) t 0 = M aim. Discrete time continuous time with transitory and persistent costs Gârleanu and Pedersen Dynamic Portfolio Choice with Frictions, p.23
44 Connection Discrete-Continuous Time Proposition (i) If intermediaries need a fixed amount of calendar time to liquidate inventory, so that Λ( t ) = Λ/ t, then M rate ( t ) lim t 0 t = rate M lim ( t ) t 0 = M aim. Discrete time continuous time with transitory and persistent costs (ii) If intermediaries can liquidate inventory during one trading period, so that Λ( t ) = Λ t, then the optimal portfolio tends to that obtaining in continuous-time model with Λ = 0: Discrete time continuous time with purely persistent costs Gârleanu and Pedersen Dynamic Portfolio Choice with Frictions, p.23
45 Illustration: Fixed Liquidating Time t=1 Position Time Gârleanu and Pedersen Dynamic Portfolio Choice with Frictions, p.24
46 Illustration: Fixed Liquidating Time t=1 t=0.25 Position Time Gârleanu and Pedersen Dynamic Portfolio Choice with Frictions, p.24
47 Illustration: Fixed Liquidating Time t=1 t=0.25 Continuous Position Time Gârleanu and Pedersen Dynamic Portfolio Choice with Frictions, p.24
48 Stochastic Volatility: Model Suppose that Σt = v t Σ Λt = λσ t dv t = µ v (v t ) dt + σ v (v t ) dw t Gârleanu and Pedersen Dynamic Portfolio Choice with Frictions, p.25
49 Stochastic Volatility: Model Suppose that Σt = v t Σ Λt = λσ t dv t = µ v (v t ) dt + σ v (v t ) dw t Value function takes the form V (x, f, v) = 1 2 x A xx (v)x + x A xf (v)f f A ff (v)f + A 0 (v) Gârleanu and Pedersen Dynamic Portfolio Choice with Frictions, p.25
50 Stochastic Volatility: Model Suppose that Σt = v t Σ Λt = λσ t dv t = µ v (v t ) dt + σ v (v t ) dw t Value function takes the form V (x, f, v) = 1 2 x A xx (v)x + x A xf (v)f f A ff (v)f + A 0 (v) Proposition If µ v is decreasing and crosses 0, then trading is more intense for low v t than for high v t : there exists ˆv such that M rate (v t ) > M rate (ˆv) iff v t < ˆv. Gârleanu and Pedersen Dynamic Portfolio Choice with Frictions, p.25
51 Equilibrium Model Noise trader positions: ( ) dzt l = κ ft l zt l dt df l t = ψ l f l tdt + dw l t. State variables: f (f 1,..., f L, z) where z t = l zl t. It follows E t [df t ] = Φf t dt, with mean-reversion matrix ψ ψ 2 0 Φ = κ κ κ Market clearing: x t = z t dx t = dz t Gârleanu and Pedersen Dynamic Portfolio Choice with Frictions, p.26
52 Equilibrium Expected Returns Proposition The market is in equilibrium iff Bf t = L λσ 2 κ(ψ l + ρ + κ)( ft) l + σ 2 (ρλκ + λκ 2 γ)z t l=1 The coefficients λσ 2 κ(ψ k + ρ + κ) increase in the mean-reversion parameters ψ k and κ and in the trading costs λσ 2. I.e., noise trader selling (ft k < 0) increases the alpha, and especially if its mean reversion is faster and if the trading cost is larger. Gârleanu and Pedersen Dynamic Portfolio Choice with Frictions, p.27
53 Conclusion Tractable model with frictions Discrete and continuous time General dynamics of investment opportunity Intuitive closed form solution embodying two principles Trade partially towards aim Aim overweights persistent signals Clarifies model dependence on frequency; quadratic costs can be modeled in discrete or continuous time Applications: equilibrium, stochastic volatility Tractable framework has many potential applications, beyond TC: Monetary policy Firm reaction to various consumer-preference signals Political party acting on signals from different constituents Gârleanu and Pedersen Dynamic Portfolio Choice with Frictions, p.28
Dynamic Trading with Predictable Returns and Transaction Costs. Dynamic Portfolio Choice with Frictions. Nicolae Gârleanu
Dynamic Trading with Predictable Returns and Transaction Costs Dynamic Portfolio Choice with Frictions Nicolae Gârleanu UC Berkeley, CEPR, and NBER Lasse H. Pedersen New York University, Copenhagen Business
More informationDynamic Trading with Predictable Returns and Transaction Costs
Dynamic Trading with Predictable Returns and Transaction Costs Nicolae Gârleanu and Lasse Heje Pedersen Current Version: July 21, 2009 Abstract This paper derives in closed form the optimal dynamic portfolio
More informationDynamic Trading with Predictable Returns and Transaction Costs
Dynamic Trading with Predictable Returns and Transaction Costs Nicolae Gârleanu and Lasse Heje Pedersen Current Version: March 27, 2009 Abstract This paper derives in closed form the optimal dynamic portfolio
More informationDynamic Portfolio Choice with Frictions
Dynamic Portfolio Choice with Frictions Nicolae Gârleanu and Lasse Heje Pedersen October, 2013 PRELIMINARY AND INCOMPLETE Abstract We show that the optimal portfolio can be derived explicitly in a large
More informationDynamic Portfolio Choice with Frictions
Dynamic Portfolio Choice with Frictions Nicolae Gârleanu and Lasse Heje Pedersen March, 2016 Abstract We show how portfolio choice can be modeled in continuous time with transitory and persistent transaction
More informationDynamic Trading with Predictable Returns and Transaction Costs
Dynamic Trading with Predictable Returns and Transaction Costs Nicolae Gârleanu and Lasse Heje Pedersen Current Version: March 5, 2009 Preliminary and Incomplete Abstract This paper derives in closed form
More informationInsider trading, stochastic liquidity, and equilibrium prices
Insider trading, stochastic liquidity, and equilibrium prices Pierre Collin-Dufresne EPFL, Columbia University and NBER Vyacheslav (Slava) Fos University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign April 24, 2013
More informationLiquidity Regimes and Optimal Dynamic Asset Allocation
Liquidity Regimes and Dynamic Asset Allocation Pierre Collin-Dufresne SFI@EPFL email: pierre.collin-dufresne@epfl.ch Mehmet Sağlam University of Cincinnati email: mehmet.saglam@uc.edu Kent Daniel Columbia
More informationInsider trading, stochastic liquidity, and equilibrium prices
Insider trading, stochastic liquidity, and equilibrium prices Pierre Collin-Dufresne SFI@EPFL and CEPR Vyacheslav (Slava) Fos University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign June 2, 2015 pcd Insider trading,
More informationOptimal Trade Execution: Mean Variance or Mean Quadratic Variation?
Optimal Trade Execution: Mean Variance or Mean Quadratic Variation? Peter Forsyth 1 S. Tse 2 H. Windcliff 2 S. Kennedy 2 1 Cheriton School of Computer Science University of Waterloo 2 Morgan Stanley New
More informationLiquidity Regimes and Optimal Dynamic Asset Allocation
Liquidity Regimes and Dynamic Asset Allocation Pierre Collin-Dufresne SFI@EPFL email: pierre.collin-dufresne@epfl.ch Mehmet Sağlam University of Cincinnati email: mehmet.saglam@uc.edu Kent Daniel Columbia
More informationWhat Can Rational Investors Do About Excessive Volatility and Sentiment Fluctuations?
What Can Rational Investors Do About Excessive Volatility and Sentiment Fluctuations? Bernard Dumas INSEAD, Wharton, CEPR, NBER Alexander Kurshev London Business School Raman Uppal London Business School,
More informationOptimal Execution: II. Trade Optimal Execution
Optimal Execution: II. Trade Optimal Execution René Carmona Bendheim Center for Finance Department of Operations Research & Financial Engineering Princeton University Purdue June 21, 212 Optimal Execution
More informationArbitrageurs, bubbles and credit conditions
Arbitrageurs, bubbles and credit conditions Julien Hugonnier (SFI @ EPFL) and Rodolfo Prieto (BU) 8th Cowles Conference on General Equilibrium and its Applications April 28, 212 Motivation Loewenstein
More informationInformation and Inventories in High-Frequency Trading
Information and Inventories in High-Frequency Trading Johannes Muhle-Karbe ETH Zürich and Swiss Finance Institute Joint work with Kevin Webster AMaMeF and Swissquote Conference, September 7, 2015 Introduction
More informationOPTIMAL PORTFOLIO SELECTION WITH TRANSACTION COSTS WHEN AN ILLIQUID ASSET PAYS CASH DIVIDENDS
J. Korean Math. Soc. 44 (2007, No. 1, pp. 139 150 OPTIMAL PORTFOLIO SELECTION WITH TRANSACTION COSTS WHEN AN ILLIQUID ASSET PAYS CASH DIVIDENDS Bong-Gyu Jang Reprinted from the Journal of the Korean Mathematical
More informationAdvanced Topics in Derivative Pricing Models. Topic 4 - Variance products and volatility derivatives
Advanced Topics in Derivative Pricing Models Topic 4 - Variance products and volatility derivatives 4.1 Volatility trading and replication of variance swaps 4.2 Volatility swaps 4.3 Pricing of discrete
More informationIEOR E4703: Monte-Carlo Simulation
IEOR E4703: Monte-Carlo Simulation Simulating Stochastic Differential Equations Martin Haugh Department of Industrial Engineering and Operations Research Columbia University Email: martin.b.haugh@gmail.com
More informationNon-Time-Separable Utility: Habit Formation
Finance 400 A. Penati - G. Pennacchi Non-Time-Separable Utility: Habit Formation I. Introduction Thus far, we have considered time-separable lifetime utility specifications such as E t Z T t U[C(s), s]
More informationShould Norway Change the 60% Equity portion of the GPFG fund?
Should Norway Change the 60% Equity portion of the GPFG fund? Pierre Collin-Dufresne EPFL & SFI, and CEPR April 2016 Outline Endowment Consumption Commitments Return Predictability and Trading Costs General
More informationStructural Models of Credit Risk and Some Applications
Structural Models of Credit Risk and Some Applications Albert Cohen Actuarial Science Program Department of Mathematics Department of Statistics and Probability albert@math.msu.edu August 29, 2018 Outline
More informationTrading in Crowded Markets
Trading in Crowded Markets Stepan Gorban, Anna A. Obizhaeva, and Yajun Wang First Draft: November, 2017 This Draft: March 2, 2018 We study crowded markets using a symmetric continuous-time model with strategic
More informationSmooth Trading with Overconfidence and Market Power
Smooth Trading with Overconfidence and Market Power Albert S. Kyle Anna A. Obizhaeva Yajun Wang University of Maryland New Economic School University of Maryland College Park, MD Moscow College Park, MD
More informationThe Self-financing Condition: Remembering the Limit Order Book
The Self-financing Condition: Remembering the Limit Order Book R. Carmona, K. Webster Bendheim Center for Finance ORFE, Princeton University November 6, 2013 Structural relationships? From LOB Models to
More informationStochastic modelling of electricity markets Pricing Forwards and Swaps
Stochastic modelling of electricity markets Pricing Forwards and Swaps Jhonny Gonzalez School of Mathematics The University of Manchester Magical books project August 23, 2012 Clip for this slide Pricing
More informationGrowth Opportunities, Investment-Specific Technology Shocks and the Cross-Section of Stock Returns
Growth Opportunities, Investment-Specific Technology Shocks and the Cross-Section of Stock Returns Leonid Kogan 1 Dimitris Papanikolaou 2 1 MIT and NBER 2 Northwestern University Boston, June 5, 2009 Kogan,
More informationNBER WORKING PAPER SERIES STRATEGIC ASSET ALLOCATION IN A CONTINUOUS-TIME VAR MODEL. John Y. Campbell George Chacko Jorge Rodriguez Luis M.
NBER WORKING PAPER SERIES STRATEGIC ASSET ALLOCATION IN A CONTINUOUS-TIME VAR MODEL John Y. Campbell George Chacko Jorge Rodriguez Luis M. Viciera Working Paper 9547 http://www.nber.org/papers/w9547 NATIONAL
More informationINTERTEMPORAL ASSET ALLOCATION: THEORY
INTERTEMPORAL ASSET ALLOCATION: THEORY Multi-Period Model The agent acts as a price-taker in asset markets and then chooses today s consumption and asset shares to maximise lifetime utility. This multi-period
More informationWhy Surplus Consumption in the Habit Model May be Less Pe. May be Less Persistent than You Think
Why Surplus Consumption in the Habit Model May be Less Persistent than You Think October 19th, 2009 Introduction: Habit Preferences Habit preferences: can generate a higher equity premium for a given curvature
More informationLecture 4. Finite difference and finite element methods
Finite difference and finite element methods Lecture 4 Outline Black-Scholes equation From expectation to PDE Goal: compute the value of European option with payoff g which is the conditional expectation
More informationGeneralized Multi-Factor Commodity Spot Price Modeling through Dynamic Cournot Resource Extraction Models
Generalized Multi-Factor Commodity Spot Price Modeling through Dynamic Cournot Resource Extraction Models Bilkan Erkmen (joint work with Michael Coulon) Workshop on Stochastic Games, Equilibrium, and Applications
More informationAdvanced topics in continuous time finance
Based on readings of Prof. Kerry E. Back on the IAS in Vienna, October 21. Advanced topics in continuous time finance Mag. Martin Vonwald (martin@voni.at) November 21 Contents 1 Introduction 4 1.1 Martingale.....................................
More informationMulti-period Portfolio Choice and Bayesian Dynamic Models
Multi-period Portfolio Choice and Bayesian Dynamic Models Petter Kolm and Gordon Ritter Courant Institute, NYU Paper appeared in Risk Magazine, Feb. 25 (2015) issue Working paper version: papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2472768
More informationThe Macroeconomics of Shadow Banking. January, 2016
The Macroeconomics of Shadow Banking Alan Moreira Yale SOM Alexi Savov NYU Stern & NBER January, 21 Shadow banking, what is it good for? Three views: 1. Regulatory arbitrage - avoid capital requirements,
More informationContinuous Time Finance. Tomas Björk
Continuous Time Finance Tomas Björk 1 II Stochastic Calculus Tomas Björk 2 Typical Setup Take as given the market price process, S(t), of some underlying asset. S(t) = price, at t, per unit of underlying
More informationLiquidity and Risk Management
Liquidity and Risk Management By Nicolae Gârleanu and Lasse Heje Pedersen Risk management plays a central role in institutional investors allocation of capital to trading. For instance, a risk manager
More informationON MAXIMIZING DIVIDENDS WITH INVESTMENT AND REINSURANCE
ON MAXIMIZING DIVIDENDS WITH INVESTMENT AND REINSURANCE George S. Ongkeko, Jr. a, Ricardo C.H. Del Rosario b, Maritina T. Castillo c a Insular Life of the Philippines, Makati City 0725, Philippines b Department
More informationAMH4 - ADVANCED OPTION PRICING. Contents
AMH4 - ADVANCED OPTION PRICING ANDREW TULLOCH Contents 1. Theory of Option Pricing 2 2. Black-Scholes PDE Method 4 3. Martingale method 4 4. Monte Carlo methods 5 4.1. Method of antithetic variances 5
More informationSample Path Large Deviations and Optimal Importance Sampling for Stochastic Volatility Models
Sample Path Large Deviations and Optimal Importance Sampling for Stochastic Volatility Models Scott Robertson Carnegie Mellon University scottrob@andrew.cmu.edu http://www.math.cmu.edu/users/scottrob June
More informationReturn Decomposition over the Business Cycle
Return Decomposition over the Business Cycle Tolga Cenesizoglu March 1, 2016 Cenesizoglu Return Decomposition & the Business Cycle March 1, 2016 1 / 54 Introduction Stock prices depend on investors expectations
More informationHedging with Life and General Insurance Products
Hedging with Life and General Insurance Products June 2016 2 Hedging with Life and General Insurance Products Jungmin Choi Department of Mathematics East Carolina University Abstract In this study, a hybrid
More informationPricing Dynamic Solvency Insurance and Investment Fund Protection
Pricing Dynamic Solvency Insurance and Investment Fund Protection Hans U. Gerber and Gérard Pafumi Switzerland Abstract In the first part of the paper the surplus of a company is modelled by a Wiener process.
More informationAn Information-Based Theory of Time-Varying Liquidity
An Information-Based Theory of Time-Varying Liquidity Brett Green UC Berkeley, Haas School of Business joint with Brendan Daley Duke University, Fuqua School of Business Csef-Igier Symposium on Economics
More informationLeverage Effect, Volatility Feedback, and Self-Exciting MarketAFA, Disruptions 1/7/ / 14
Leverage Effect, Volatility Feedback, and Self-Exciting Market Disruptions Liuren Wu, Baruch College Joint work with Peter Carr, New York University The American Finance Association meetings January 7,
More informationNBER WORKING PAPER SERIES LIQUIDITY AND RISK MANAGEMENT. Nicolae B. Garleanu Lasse H. Pedersen. Working Paper
NBER WORKING PAPER SERIES LIQUIDITY AND RISK MANAGEMENT Nicolae B. Garleanu Lasse H. Pedersen Working Paper 12887 http://www.nber.org/papers/w12887 NATIONAL BUREAU OF ECONOMIC RESEARCH 1050 Massachusetts
More informationBACHELIER FINANCE SOCIETY. 4 th World Congress Tokyo, Investments and forward utilities. Thaleia Zariphopoulou The University of Texas at Austin
BACHELIER FINANCE SOCIETY 4 th World Congress Tokyo, 26 Investments and forward utilities Thaleia Zariphopoulou The University of Texas at Austin 1 Topics Utility-based measurement of performance Utilities
More informationEquilibrium Models with Transaction Costs I
Equilibrium Models with Transaction Costs I Johannes Muhle-Karbe University of Michigan Carnegie Mellon University Dresden, August 28, 217 Introduction Outline Introduction Partial Equilibrium General
More informationNews Trading and Speed
News Trading and Speed Ioanid Roşu (HEC Paris) with Johan Hombert and Thierry Foucault 8th Annual Central Bank Workshop on the Microstructure of Financial Markets October 25-26, 2012 Ioanid Roşu (HEC Paris)
More informationScheinkman, J. A. and Xiong, W. (2003): Overcon dence and Speculative Bubbles, JPE, vol. 111, no.6
Scheinkman, J. A. and Xiong, W. (2003): Overcon dence and Speculative Bubbles, JPE, vol. 111, no.6 Presented by: Ildikó Magyari March 26, 2010 March 26, 2010 1 / 16 The main motivation of the paper (1):
More informationHedging Credit Derivatives in Intensity Based Models
Hedging Credit Derivatives in Intensity Based Models PETER CARR Head of Quantitative Financial Research, Bloomberg LP, New York Director of the Masters Program in Math Finance, Courant Institute, NYU Stanford
More informationOptimal Execution: IV. Heterogeneous Beliefs and Market Making
Optimal Execution: IV. Heterogeneous Beliefs and Market Making René Carmona Bendheim Center for Finance Department of Operations Research & Financial Engineering Princeton University Purdue June 21, 2012
More information13.3 A Stochastic Production Planning Model
13.3. A Stochastic Production Planning Model 347 From (13.9), we can formally write (dx t ) = f (dt) + G (dz t ) + fgdz t dt, (13.3) dx t dt = f(dt) + Gdz t dt. (13.33) The exact meaning of these expressions
More informationDynamic Asset Pricing Models: Recent Developments
Dynamic Asset Pricing Models: Recent Developments Day 1: Asset Pricing Puzzles and Learning Pietro Veronesi Graduate School of Business, University of Chicago CEPR, NBER Bank of Italy: June 2006 Pietro
More informationAsset Pricing Models with Underlying Time-varying Lévy Processes
Asset Pricing Models with Underlying Time-varying Lévy Processes Stochastics & Computational Finance 2015 Xuecan CUI Jang SCHILTZ University of Luxembourg July 9, 2015 Xuecan CUI, Jang SCHILTZ University
More informationDynamic Portfolio Choice with Transaction Costs and Return Predictability: Linear Rebalancing Rules
Dynamic Portfolio Choice with Transaction Costs and Return Predictability: Linear Rebalancing Rules Ciamac C. Moallemi Graduate School of Business Columbia University email: ciamac@gsb.columbia.edu Mehmet
More information1 Dynamic programming
1 Dynamic programming A country has just discovered a natural resource which yields an income per period R measured in terms of traded goods. The cost of exploitation is negligible. The government wants
More informationThe Term Structure of Interest Rates under Regime Shifts and Jumps
The Term Structure of Interest Rates under Regime Shifts and Jumps Shu Wu and Yong Zeng September 2005 Abstract This paper develops a tractable dynamic term structure models under jump-diffusion and regime
More information2.1 Mean-variance Analysis: Single-period Model
Chapter Portfolio Selection The theory of option pricing is a theory of deterministic returns: we hedge our option with the underlying to eliminate risk, and our resulting risk-free portfolio then earns
More informationOptimal Trading Strategy With Optimal Horizon
Optimal Trading Strategy With Optimal Horizon Financial Math Festival Florida State University March 1, 2008 Edward Qian PanAgora Asset Management Trading An Integral Part of Investment Process Return
More informationPortfolio Management and Optimal Execution via Convex Optimization
Portfolio Management and Optimal Execution via Convex Optimization Enzo Busseti Stanford University April 9th, 2018 Problems portfolio management choose trades with optimization minimize risk, maximize
More informationSmooth Trading with Overconfidence and Market Power
Smooth Trading with Overconfidence and Market Power Albert S. Kyle Anna A. Obizhaeva Yajun Wang March 24, 2013 Abstract This paper presents a continuous time model of oligopolistic trading among symmetric
More informationPortfolio optimization for an exponential Ornstein-Uhlenbeck model with proportional transaction costs
Portfolio optimization for an exponential Ornstein-Uhlenbeck model with proportional transaction costs Martin Forde King s College London, May 2014 (joint work with Christoph Czichowsky, Philipp Deutsch
More informationSlides 4. Matthieu Gomez Fall 2017
Slides 4 Matthieu Gomez Fall 2017 How to Compute Stationary Distribution of a Diffusion? Kolmogorov Forward Take a diffusion process dx t = µ(x t )dt + σ(x t )dz t How does the density of x t evolves?
More informationOptimal Credit Limit Management
Optimal Credit Limit Management presented by Markus Leippold joint work with Paolo Vanini and Silvan Ebnoether Collegium Budapest - Institute for Advanced Study September 11-13, 2003 Introduction A. Background
More informationSupply Contracts with Financial Hedging
Supply Contracts with Financial Hedging René Caldentey Martin Haugh Stern School of Business NYU Integrated Risk Management in Operations and Global Supply Chain Management: Risk, Contracts and Insurance
More informationOpen Economy Macroeconomics: Theory, methods and applications
Open Economy Macroeconomics: Theory, methods and applications Econ PhD, UC3M Lecture 9: Data and facts Hernán D. Seoane UC3M Spring, 2016 Today s lecture A look at the data Study what data says about open
More informationSentiments and Aggregate Fluctuations
Sentiments and Aggregate Fluctuations Jess Benhabib Pengfei Wang Yi Wen June 15, 2012 Jess Benhabib Pengfei Wang Yi Wen () Sentiments and Aggregate Fluctuations June 15, 2012 1 / 59 Introduction We construct
More informationIlliquidity, Credit risk and Merton s model
Illiquidity, Credit risk and Merton s model (joint work with J. Dong and L. Korobenko) A. Deniz Sezer University of Calgary April 28, 2016 Merton s model of corporate debt A corporate bond is a contingent
More informationIntroduction. The Model Setup F.O.Cs Firms Decision. Constant Money Growth. Impulse Response Functions
F.O.Cs s and Phillips Curves Mikhail Golosov and Robert Lucas, JPE 2007 Sharif University of Technology September 20, 2017 A model of monetary economy in which firms are subject to idiosyncratic productivity
More informationDynamic Asset Allocation with Predictable Returns and Transaction Costs
Dynamic Asset Allocation with Predictable Returns and Transaction Costs Pierre Collin-Dufresne École Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne email: pierre.collin-dufresne@epfl.ch Ciamac C. Moallemi Columbia
More informationOnline Appendix for The Macroeconomics of Shadow Banking
Online Appendix for The Macroeconomics of Shadow Banking Alan Moreira Alexi Savov April 29, 2 Abstract This document contains additional results for the paper The Macroeconomics of Shadow Banking. These
More informationMenu Costs and Phillips Curve by Mikhail Golosov and Robert Lucas. JPE (2007)
Menu Costs and Phillips Curve by Mikhail Golosov and Robert Lucas. JPE (2007) Virginia Olivella and Jose Ignacio Lopez October 2008 Motivation Menu costs and repricing decisions Micro foundation of sticky
More informationOptimal Securitization via Impulse Control
Optimal Securitization via Impulse Control Rüdiger Frey (joint work with Roland C. Seydel) Mathematisches Institut Universität Leipzig and MPI MIS Leipzig Bachelier Finance Society, June 21 (1) Optimal
More informationFINANCIAL OPTIMIZATION. Lecture 5: Dynamic Programming and a Visit to the Soft Side
FINANCIAL OPTIMIZATION Lecture 5: Dynamic Programming and a Visit to the Soft Side Copyright c Philip H. Dybvig 2008 Dynamic Programming All situations in practice are more complex than the simple examples
More informationSupplementary online material to Information tradeoffs in dynamic financial markets
Supplementary online material to Information tradeoffs in dynamic financial markets Efstathios Avdis University of Alberta, Canada 1. The value of information in continuous time In this document I address
More informationCan Information Costs Explain the Equity Premium and Stock Market Participation Puzzles?
Can Information Costs Explain the Equity Premium and Stock Market Participation Puzzles? Hui Chen University of Chicago GSB November 26 Abstract Unlikely. Rational delay models argue that costs of acquiring
More informationLimited Attention and News Arrival in Limit Order Markets
Limited Attention and News Arrival in Limit Order Markets Jérôme Dugast Banque de France Market Microstructure: Confronting many Viewpoints #3 December 10, 2014 This paper reflects the opinions of the
More informationarxiv: v1 [q-fin.pm] 13 Mar 2014
MERTON PORTFOLIO PROBLEM WITH ONE INDIVISIBLE ASSET JAKUB TRYBU LA arxiv:143.3223v1 [q-fin.pm] 13 Mar 214 Abstract. In this paper we consider a modification of the classical Merton portfolio optimization
More informationRobust Portfolio Choice with External Habit Formation and Equilibrium Asset Prices
Robust Portfolio Choice with External Habit Formation and Equilibrium Asset Prices Tong Suk Kim, Hyo Seob Lee This version: 1 Nov, 2009. Graduate School of Finance, KAIST, 87 Hoegiro, Dongdaemoon-gu, Seoul,
More informationThe stochastic calculus
Gdansk A schedule of the lecture Stochastic differential equations Ito calculus, Ito process Ornstein - Uhlenbeck (OU) process Heston model Stopping time for OU process Stochastic differential equations
More informationIrreversible Investment in General Equilibrium
Irreversible Investment in General Equilibrium Julien Hugonnier Erwan Morellec Suresh Sundaresan June 25 Abstract Theories of investment suggest that the option value of waiting to invest is significant
More informationMultiname and Multiscale Default Modeling
Multiname and Multiscale Default Modeling Jean-Pierre Fouque University of California Santa Barbara Joint work with R. Sircar (Princeton) and K. Sølna (UC Irvine) Special Semester on Stochastics with Emphasis
More informationSupplemental Materials for What is the Optimal Trading Frequency in Financial Markets? Not for Publication. October 21, 2016
Supplemental Materials for What is the Optimal Trading Frequency in Financial Markets? Not for Publication Songzi Du Haoxiang Zhu October, 06 A Model with Multiple Dividend Payment In the model of Du and
More informationStrategic Asset Allocation with Predictable Returns and Transaction Costs
Strategic Asset Allocation with Predictable Returns and Transaction Costs Pierre Collin-Dufresne École Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne email: pierre.collin-dufresne@epfl.ch Ciamac C. Moallemi Columbia
More informationM.I.T Fall Practice Problems
M.I.T. 15.450-Fall 2010 Sloan School of Management Professor Leonid Kogan Practice Problems 1. Consider a 3-period model with t = 0, 1, 2, 3. There are a stock and a risk-free asset. The initial stock
More informationDynamic Relative Valuation
Dynamic Relative Valuation Liuren Wu, Baruch College Joint work with Peter Carr from Morgan Stanley October 15, 2013 Liuren Wu (Baruch) Dynamic Relative Valuation 10/15/2013 1 / 20 The standard approach
More informationSimulating Stochastic Differential Equations
IEOR E4603: Monte-Carlo Simulation c 2017 by Martin Haugh Columbia University Simulating Stochastic Differential Equations In these lecture notes we discuss the simulation of stochastic differential equations
More informationGrowth Options in General Equilibrium: Some Asset Pricing Implications
Growth Options in General Equilibrium: Some Asset Pricing Implications Julien Hugonnier Erwan Morellec Suresh Sundaresan March 25 Abstract We develop a general equilibrium model of a production economy
More informationAsset Prices in General Equilibrium with Transactions Costs and Recursive Utility
Asset Prices in General Equilibrium with Transactions Costs and Recursive Utility Adrian Buss Raman Uppal Grigory Vilkov February 28, 2011 Preliminary Abstract In this paper, we study the effect of proportional
More informationPortfolio Choice with Illiquid Assets
Portfolio Choice with Illiquid Assets Andrew Ang Columbia University and NBER Dimitris Papanikolaou Northwestern University Mark M. Westerfield University of Southern California May 13, 2011 Abstract We
More informationMulti-Period Trading via Convex Optimization
Multi-Period Trading via Convex Optimization Stephen Boyd Enzo Busseti Steven Diamond Ronald Kahn Kwangmoo Koh Peter Nystrup Jan Speth Stanford University & Blackrock City University of Hong Kong September
More informationMULTIPERIOD PORTFOLIO SELECTION WITH TRANSACTION AND MARKET-IMPACT COSTS
Working Paper 13-16 Statistics and Econometrics Series (15) May 2013 Departamento de Estadística Universidad Carlos III de Madrid Calle Madrid, 126 28903 Getafe (Spain) Fax (34) 91 624-98-48 MULTIPERIOD
More informationThe science of monetary policy
Macroeconomic dynamics PhD School of Economics, Lectures 2018/19 The science of monetary policy Giovanni Di Bartolomeo giovanni.dibartolomeo@uniroma1.it Doctoral School of Economics Sapienza University
More informationSentiments and Aggregate Fluctuations
Sentiments and Aggregate Fluctuations Jess Benhabib Pengfei Wang Yi Wen March 15, 2013 Jess Benhabib Pengfei Wang Yi Wen () Sentiments and Aggregate Fluctuations March 15, 2013 1 / 60 Introduction The
More informationNBER WORKING PAPER SERIES INSIDER TRADING, STOCHASTIC LIQUIDITY AND EQUILIBRIUM PRICES. Pierre Collin-Dufresne Vyacheslav Fos
NBER WORKING PAPER SERIES INSIDER TRADING, STOCHASTIC LIQUIDITY AND EQUILIBRIUM PRICES Pierre Collin-Dufresne Vyacheslav Fos Working Paper 18451 http://www.nber.org/papers/w18451 NATIONAL BUREAU OF ECONOMIC
More informationEconomathematics. Problem Sheet 1. Zbigniew Palmowski. Ws 2 dw s = 1 t
Economathematics Problem Sheet 1 Zbigniew Palmowski 1. Calculate Ee X where X is a gaussian random variable with mean µ and volatility σ >.. Verify that where W is a Wiener process. Ws dw s = 1 3 W t 3
More informationLabor income and the Demand for Long-Term Bonds
Labor income and the Demand for Long-Term Bonds Ralph Koijen, Theo Nijman, and Bas Werker Tilburg University and Netspar January 2006 Labor income and the Demand for Long-Term Bonds - p. 1/33 : Life-cycle
More informationM5MF6. Advanced Methods in Derivatives Pricing
Course: Setter: M5MF6 Dr Antoine Jacquier MSc EXAMINATIONS IN MATHEMATICS AND FINANCE DEPARTMENT OF MATHEMATICS April 2016 M5MF6 Advanced Methods in Derivatives Pricing Setter s signature...........................................
More informationContinuous Time Bewley Models
1 / 18 Continuous Time Bewley Models DEEQA Quantitative Macro Sang Yoon (Tim) Lee Toulouse School of Economics October 24, 2016 2 / 18 Today Aiyagari with Poisson wage process : Based on http://www.princeton.edu/~moll/hact.pdf,
More informationRobust Pricing and Hedging of Options on Variance
Robust Pricing and Hedging of Options on Variance Alexander Cox Jiajie Wang University of Bath Bachelier 21, Toronto Financial Setting Option priced on an underlying asset S t Dynamics of S t unspecified,
More information