Sector: 10% 5% 0% -5% -10% -15% -20% -25% -30% -35% -40% 3.0% 2.5% 2.0% 15% 10% 5% 0% -5% -10% -15% -20% 30% 25% 20% 15% 10% 5% 0% $2,000 $1,500
|
|
- Laurence Johnston
- 5 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 Applied Portfolio Management ESV Analysts: Jordan Crowell & Kevin Parhomek Ensco plc BUY Energy Sector: Report Date: Market Cap (mm) Return on Capital EPS (ttm) Current Price 12-mo. Target Price $13, % $6.08 $57.18 $55.00 Annual Dividend Dividend Yield Price/Earnings (ttm) Economic Value-Added (ttm) Free Cash Flow Margin $ % 9.4 $ % Business Description Ensco plc provides offshore contract drilling services to the oil and gas industry worldwide. The company operates through three segments: Floaters, Jackups, and Other. The company owns and operates an offshore drilling rig fleet of approximately 74 rigs, including 10 drill ships, 13 dynamically positioned semisubmersible rigs, 6 moored semisubmersible rigs, and 45 jackup rigs. Its drilling rigs are located in the North and South America, the Middle East and Africa, the Asia Pacific rim, and Europe and Mediterranean regions. The company also offers management services on rigs owned by third-parties. It serves Investment Thesis Ensco has positioned itself as a market leader in the offshore drilling industry. The company has been able to expand its rig fleet and enter into the highly profitable ultra deepwater market. Due to our optimism about the macro economy in the coming 6-9 months, we have chosen to overweight the energy sector of the Student Investment Fund. Ensco gives the fund some diversity within the sector, and provides the benefit of increased dividend yield and low P/E. The company has been able to grow its total revenue, EBIT and NOPAT in each of the past 3 years. Using conservative forecasts, we view the company as a longterm (3-5) year investment because of its high dividend yield and potential capital gains if the market corrects its current 18.83% undervaluation. 2-Yr Beta (S&P 500 Index) Annualized Alpha Institutional Ownership Short Interest (% of Shares) Days to Cover Short % 11.2% 4.9% 4.0 ESV 10% 5% 0% -5% -10% -15% -20% -25% -30% -35% -40% Compared With: Transocean Ltd. Diamond Offshore Drilling, Inc. and the S&P 500 Index RIG NYSE:DO ESV 30% 25% 20% 15% 10% 5% 0% -5% -10% -15% -20% 5/11/2014 ^SPX ROA ROE ROIC 30% 25% ANNUALIZED 3-YEAR CAGR 20% Total Revenue EBIT NOPAT Earnings Per Share Dividends Per Share 43.2% 40.4% 41.1% 14.4% 27.9% Margins and Yields 2009 Operating Margin Free Cash Flow Margin Earnings Yield Dividend Yield 49.0% 19.5% 13.7% 0.3% Free Cash Flow Total Invested Capital Total Assets Economic Value-Added Market Value-Added % -3.4% 7.6% 2.0% % 0.1% 6.6% 3.0% 46.9% 34.4% 40.3% 121.7% -36.0% % 10% 5% 0% % 8.9% 8.5% 2.5% 35.7% 4.1% 10.6% 3.9% 2010 EBIT Net Operating Profit After Tax $2,000 $1,500 $1, Per Share Metrics (0.69) Earnings Dividends NOPAT Free Cash Flow Economic Value-Added (32.40) $2,000 $1,500 $1,000 $500 -$500 -$1,000 -$1,500 -$2,000 -$2,500 $600 $400 $200 -$200 -$400 -$600 Datasource: Capital IQ Market Valued-Added $ $ Price/Earnings Price/Free Cash Flow 3,000 2,500 2,000 1,500 1,
2 Analysts: Jordan Crowell & Kevin Parhomek Student Investment Fund Portfolio Recommendation: BUY Market Cap: $13.2 billion Current Price: $57.18 Sector: Energy Dividend Yield: 3.9% 12-month target price: $55 Sub-Sector: Oil, Gas & Coal P/E Ratio: 9.4 Beta: 1.33 Highlights Ensco plc. is the world s second largest offshore drilling company, and operates in a multitude of worldwide markets. ESV has focused on expanding its fleet in order to better compete in the ultra deepwater (UDW) market. ESV has been rated #1 in overall customer satisfaction for four consecutive years by EnergyPoint Research. Ensco has continued to grow revenues, EBIT, NOPAT, and Dividends over the past three years, while simultaneously expanding and modernizing its fleet. Business Summary Ensco plc provides offshore contract drilling services to the oil and gas industry worldwide. The company operates through three segments: Floaters, Jackups, and Other. The company owns and operates an offshore drilling rig fleet of approximately 74 rigs, including 10 drill ships, 13 dynamically positioned semisubmersible rigs, 6 moored semisubmersible rigs, and 45 jackup rigs. Its drilling rigs are located in the North and South America, the Middle East and Africa, the Asia Pacific rim, and Europe and Mediterranean regions. The company also offers management services on rigs owned by third-parties. It serves government-owned and independent oil and gas companies.
3 Ensco Plc. Investment Thesis With the modern world s heavy dependence on oil as a source of energy, ESV has positioned itself to benefit greatly from this demand in the future. With projected future economic growth, it is advantageous to include stocks with higher betas into the portfolio in order to capitalize on better overall market performance. ESV meets many of the criteria displayed in the SIF Investment Policy Statement; including paying above average dividends, having a modest ROIC-WACC spread, and is currently trading at a price significantly below its intrinsic value based on conservative but realistic forecasts. ESV has made competitive moves to better compete in the offshore drilling industry, which include increasing dividends even with declining EPS in 2010 &2011, purchasing Pride International in 2011 in order to increase the company s drilling fleet and access to human capital, and aggressively pursuing newer rigs while dispatching older ones in order to modernize the fleet for future market supremacy. Macroeconomic Thesis After analyzing the Conference Board s Economic Indicators, our team has projected a period of economic growth in the coming six to nine months. This period of increases economic activity means that companies will likely want to expand their business operations, and the demand for energy will be farther heightened. With the world s energy needs growing by the day, crude oil has continued to rise in price over the past five years after the recession. The combination of increased economic activity and therefore demand for oil makes Ensco Plc. an attractive investment option.
4 Historical Analysis Ensco Plc. has proven to be a financially sound company throughout the past five years. The company has been able to grow revenues and net income substantially for three consecutive years, and has also been committed to paying and growing their dividend. Even with declining EPS in 2010 & 2011, ESV was determined to return capital to its investors by growing dividends 975% in 2010 and 30% in In addition, the company has made significant competitive moves in recent years, including a $7.3 billion purchase of Pride International that allowed the company to increase its fleet size by 26 rigs. While Ensco s CEO Dan Rabun explained the move by saying It s easy to order rigs; it s little tougher to contract them and operate them this is clearly about access to assets, access to people and access to markets and customers, which just ordering and new-building does not necessarily give you. While the acquisition did allow Ensco to approach Transocean as far as number of rigs, the company sees this move as one that will provide long-term gains. ESV has also begun modernizing its fleet by selling off older jackup rigs and ordering new ultra deepwater (UDW) rigs. These rigs are able to drill at over 7,500 feet below sea level. Because of this ability, the UDW rigs are able to demand a much larger dayrate than other rigs.
5 For investors attempting to accurately project a company s future trajectory and value it accordingly, NOPAT and free cash flow play a major role in their valuation. As shown above, ESV has been able to increase its NOPAT for the past three years, but this success is not always mirrored in their free cash flow. As noted earlier, Ensco made a $7.3 billion acquisition in 2011, which caused free cash flow to be negative for that year. While some investors may see this large, negative free cash flow value as a red flag, our research shows that it has actually helped the company tremendously. It is worth noting that this sharp decline does not have an effect on the company s steadily rising NOPAT or free cash flow growth in the following years. In addition to a large, negative 2011 free cash flow value, the acquisition of Pride provided a large increase in ESV s total invested capital and net fixed assets. While Ensco was able to double its total invested capital in one year, the company also experienced a significant decline in its return on invested capital in This metric, along with ESV s return on assets and return on equity, has rebounded nicely since the acquisition, and ROE & ROIC have surpassed their pre-acquisition levels.
6 SWOT Analysis Strengths One of the main strengths of Ensco is their high commitment to customer service. Ensco has been rated #1 overall in customer satisfaction in the offshore drilling industry for four straight years. The acquisition of rival company Pride International in 2011 was due in large part to the expansion of customer service possibilities the acquisition would provide to Ensco. In addition to the #1 overall rating in customer satisfaction, Ensco was rated #1 in eight out of fourteen categories in their independent customer survey. The eight categories they were rated #1 in were total satisfaction, performance and reliability, deepwater drilling, shelf drilling, technology, horizontal and directional wells, special applications, and North Sea. In addition to their strength in customer satisfaction, Ensco also shows strength in the size of their oil rig fleet. Ensco has the second largest fleet collection among oil drillers with a total of 74 rigs, including 46 jackup rigs and 19 ultra deepwater rigs. The large fleet Ensco possesses also provides them with additional strength in the form of allowing their fleet to be dispersed globally. Having their fleet dispersed globally means that Ensco won t be affected as much as other competitors if production slows in any particular geographic region since they can make up for the slow in production in other locations. Weaknesses The main weakness of Ensco is the bargaining power of customers. There are only a handful of large customers that Ensco and other oil drilling companies must rely on for their revenue incomes. Ensco s top five customers accounted for 45% of their total revenue in 2013, and their top customer accounted for 17% alone. This inequality between buyers and sellers gives a large amount of power to the buyers which the buyers can use to their advantage. Another weakness of Ensco is the high cost of stacking when demand weakens. Stacking can be equated to putting an oil rig into storage, with warm stacking (when the crew remains on the rig and are standing by to start working) being similar to a short-term storage and cold stacking (when the rig is shut down completely and the entire crew is removed) being similar to long-term storage. Due to the high costs involved with reactivating a cold stacked unit, most rigs will normally be held in the warm stacking state unless the company does not expect to obtain a contract anytime in the near future.
7 Finally, Ensco also shows a weakness in the fact that the personnel required to operate ultra deepwater rigs is in very short demand during both poor and favorable economic conditions. The short supply of personnel with the knowledge needed to operate these rigs was one of the main factors in the buyout of rival company Pride International. Even with this acquisition though, Ensco still has a limited number of personnel that are capable of running ultra deepwater rigs, and must manage those personnel accordingly to gain the maximum amount of revenue possible. Opportunities All of the opportunities for Ensco are intertwined between each other. For starters, the continued expansion of their fleet size (especially ultra deepwater rigs) in the coming years allows them opportunity to grow and continue to increase profits. This growth and increase in profits from the increased fleet size is partially due to an increase in demand for oil from customers as the price of oil continues to rise. As long as oil prices are rising it will give Ensco the reason and opportunity it needs to continue increasing its fleet size while simultaneously increasing profits as well. This of course is all reliant on Ensco being able to predict where to place their new rigs as they become operational to match the areas where new drilling will take place in the coming years. The portion of growth they can capture in the industry is directly correlated to how well they can predict where to place their new rigs as they become operational. Threats The biggest threat to Ensco is the threat of alternative fuel sources becoming more viable. Fortunately for Ensco and others, this threat is a very long term threat and not something that has any real possibility of impacting Ensco in the near future. Although it is also an opportunity, the possibility of having an oversupply of new drilling rigs. If economic conditions take a downturn the new rigs being produced by Ensco could end up being stacked, due to the decreased demand for oil worldwide. This would end up costing Ensco money since they wouldn t be able to put their new rigs into use immediately, and would have to stack even more rigs than they have been stacking thanks to the new rigs being completed. This should not be a threat that Ensco has to worry about as long as conditions are continuing like they are now though.
8 Finally, the possibility of new regulations within the oil and natural gas industry is a threat that can never be overlooked. The Macondo oil spill in 2010 caused many new regulations to be created for the oil and natural gas industry; including separating the duties of the Bureau of Ocean Energy, Management, Regulation and Enforcement into two new separate organizations. The operating expenses of Ensco increased as a result of these new regulations so that they would be able to adhere to the new regulations effectively. Additional new regulations being added to the industry could happen at any time, and with these regulations would come even higher operating expenses for Ensco. The Deepwater Horizon disaster caused the largest oil spill in U.S. history, forever changing the public s view of the offshore drilling industry.
9 Porter s Five Forces Ensco Plc. has positioned itself within a very competitive industry that is comprised of many different suppliers of oil. By evaluating this market using Porter s five forces, we can determine the level of competitive rivalry within the offshore drilling industry. Bargaining Power of Suppliers: Low Ensco relies on suppliers for oilfield services & rig construction. Ensco is able to maintain bargaining power over its suppliers because there are so many oilfield service companies who bid on jobs. The company also has the ability to maintain bargaining power over its suppliers of new rigs because these companies rely heavily on a few large firms for their revenue. The capital intensive and specialized industry does not allow rig manufacturers to gain bargaining power over their customers. It is for these reasons that we give this force a rating of low. Bargaining Power of Customers: High Ensco, along with many other offshore drillers, relies on contracts from only a select few large customers for their revenue. This imbalance between the low number of customers and high number of suppliers gives customers in this market a great deal of bargaining power over offshore drillers. For these reasons, we give this force a rating of high. Threat of New Entrants: Low The offshore drilling industry is one that is very difficult to move in to. The drilling rigs require millions of dollars of capital to acquire and maintain, and the expertise that is required to operate and be successful in the industry is in very short demand. Given the pedigree of large players in the market, it would also be very difficult to establish a clientele for a small, developing company in an already populated industry. For these reasons, we give this force a rating of low. Threat of Substitute Products: Low Alternative fuel sources are the way of the future, but are any of them viable options right now? Our research shows that alternative fuel sources are not a legitimate threat to the oil industry at this point because each source has its own drawbacks. However, the rising price of oil does create an opportunity for substitute goods in the future. While alternative fuel sources will eventually cut into the production of offshore drilling companies, we do not see this as a threat in our 3-5 year investment horizon, and therefore give this force a rating of low.
10 Competitive Rivalry: High Ensco operates in an industry that is not involved in differentiated products, and therefore has a much more daunting task when competing with other companies. Ensco is just one of many companies that a customer could choose to do business with, and price is the main determinant of which companies are contracted for jobs. Because of these factors, we give this force a rating of high. Porter s Five Forces Summary After evaluating the offshore drilling industry, we can conclude that offshore drilling is a very alluring industry. For well established companies like Ensco, the high barriers to entry and current lack of viable substitutes make the industry attractive. High barriers to entry and a lack of substitutes allow companies like Ensco to focus more on increasing operating efficiency and developing a sustainable competitive advantage for the long term, rather than focusing on new competitors or rapid changes in the market. Comparative Analysis A comparative analysis between Ensco and Transocean (the world s largest offshore driller) shows that the two companies are on much different paths heading into the future, and Ensco looks to have a much brighter future than its main competitor. Fleet Size and Makeup Ensco Transocean 74 Total (+7 under construction) 79 total (+7 under construction) 46 jackups (+3 under 11 jackups construction) 19 UDW (+3 under construction) 27 UDW (+7 under construction) While Ensco and Transocean both compete in the same industry, it is easy to see where the companies differ. Ensco has continued to expand its fleet of jackups that are used for more shallow water drilling, and has the largest jackup fleet in the world. As for Transocean, the bulk of their fleet is concentrated on ultra deepwater drilling rigs that can drill at depths of more than 7,500 feet below sea level. Not only can these rigs drill deeper, they also bring in a much more lucrative dayrate than jackups. During 2013, the average dayrate for jackup rigs was $106,000, while the average dayrate for UDW rigs was a staggering $465,000. With UDW drilling becoming a more popular option in recent years, Ensco was late to position itself in the UDW market and allowed Transocean and other competitors to dominate the market for UDW drilling. Ensco has since been working to strengthen its UDW fleet, and has also focused on modernizing its other fleet segments. These strategic moves should allow the company to gain
11 market share in the developing UDW market, while maintaining its advantage in shallow drilling markets with its modernized jackup segment. Market share Ensco had been working to gain market share from Transocean with little success until In 2010, Transocean saw significant losses in both profits and worldwide popularity when its Deepwater Horizon exploded in the Gulf of Mexico and caused the largest oil spill in U.S. history. The company s reputation was forever tarnished, and the escalation of Ensco as a market leader was exacerbated by its competitor s faux pas. Ensco gained an 8% market share increase on Transocean the following year, and has been gaining ground at a rapid rate ever since. This upward trend for Ensco can be explained by their four consecutive years receiving awards for being #1 in Total Satisfaction among offshore drillers by EnergyPoint Research from years During that time span, Transocean ranked near the bottom in each year after winning the award in each year from Income Statement Forecast The valuation of ESV was performed using modeling assumptions that were conservative, yet realistic. The overall intrinsic value of the offshore drilling company is estimated using a variety of approaches. A discounted free cash flow model based on a 5-year forecast generated a current intrinsic value of $67.56, which indicates ESV is currently under-valued by 30%. The company was also valued using a more conservative dividend discount model, which valued the company based only on its expected future dividend payments. The modeling assumptions and intrinsic value estimates are further explained below.
12 Revenue Growth Revenue Growth Avg. 2014E 2015E 2016E 2017E 2018E -15.8% -11.4% 67.1% 53.7% 14.4% 17.0% 5.0% 10.0% 5.0% 5.0% 2.5% ESV has experienced volatile revenue growth in recent years, but is expected to return to normal levels of revenue growth in the coming years. The entire market struggled in 2009 & 2010 when the U.S. economy was recovering from recession, but Ensco seems to have pulled out of its tailspin. The company saw unprecedented revenue growth in years 2011 & 2012, but we do not foresee this as being a normal occurrence for the company in the future. We have forecasted revenue growth well below the company s 5-year average of 17.0%, and see these projections as being both conservative and realistic. The 10.0% revenue growth projected for year 2015 is based on the completion of Ensco s new rigs that will become available in early This mirrors the drastic revenue increase that the company last saw a substantial increase in its fleet size, (2011) although we do not expect revenue growth in 2015 to rival that of The 2.5% perpetual growth gives the company a conservative, but attainable bump for free cash flow valuation. Gross Margin Gross Margin Avg. 2014E 2015E 2016E 2017E 2018E 62.5% 55.7% 48.2% 52.8% 51.2% 54.1% 51.0% 51.0% 51.0% 51.0% 51.0% Ensco s 2009 & 2010 gross margins are unstable and unrealistic to use in our conservative forecast, but ESV s gross margin has remained stable around a 3-year average of 51.0%. Operating Margin Ensco s ability to achieve and maintain an operating margin above 35% for four of the past five years proves that the company has the ability to maintain a steady operating margin over time. In order to be conservative, an operating margin of 35% is used in all forecasted years. Net Margin Ensco s ability to achieve and maintain a net margin above 27% for four of the past five years proves that the company has the ability to maintain a steady net margin over time. In order to be conservative, a net margin of 27% is used in all forecasted years.
13 Common Shares Growth C.S. Growth Avg. 2014E 2015E 2016E 2017E 2018E -0.8% 0.4% 36.3% 19.4% 0.7% 10.3% 1.0% 1.0% 1.0% 1.0% 1.0% ESV has actively used equity in order to raise capital in the past, but its use of equity has been sporadic. The large increases in 2011 & 2012 were used to fund the acquisition of Pride International. Because the company does not seem to follow a specified trend or stay within a stable range of common shares growth, we have projected a 1.0% increase in common shares for all forecasted years. This increase will somewhat dilute our intrinsic value calculation and create a larger margin of safety in our valuation. Dividend Growth Dividend Growth Avg. 2014E 2015E 2016E 2017E 2018E 0.0% 975.0% 30.2% 7.1% 50.0% 86.4% 12.0% 10.0% 10.0% 5.0% 3.5% Ensco is obviously committed to paying and growing its dividend moving into the future. While the company has grown its dividend in large increments in the past four years, we have implemented much more realistic and conservative growth rates in our forecasts. Our forecasted dividend growth culminates in a 3.5% perpetual growth rate.
14 Balance Sheet Forecast The balance sheet forecast for Ensco was rather interesting to piece together due to the acquisition of Pride International happening in 2011, which is right in the middle of the previous years we had to use to model our future expectations of the company. Due to this, we used a large number of two and three year averages and worked from there for our predictions. For cash and equivalents a three year average of 10% was used. The first two years of our data (2009 and 2010) had much higher percentages, and we felt it would throw off the results in our forecast if they were included. Total receivables has been in a decline over the past three years so we bumped down the results a bit from the five year average of 19.3% to 17% to reflect this decline. For inventory we went stuck with the five year average. The previous two years reflect the five year average closely, and we wanted to be conservative in our metrics. As a result, we simply stuck with the five year average for this metric instead of using a two or three year average that would have bumped the percentage up slightly.
15 For current assets we used a three year average, similar to cash and equivalents, due to the much higher percentages in 2009 and 2010 and also as a way to be more conservative in our future estimates. For net PP&E and total assets we used a two year average. This is because the large jump in the percentage in 2011 from the acquisition of Pride International causes the average to be higher than it should be, and because the percent hanged around the same level in the years preceding and following For payables and accruals we simply toned down the percent from last year slightly. Not including 2011, the average has been right around 13% historically; and not the average presented or what you get from a two or three year average. Similarly for current liabilities, we simply toned down the number from last year. This was done in an attempt to be conservative in our forecasting and because the average in the other years was slightly above 20%. Finally, for total debt and total equity we used two year averages. The high fluctuation in the percentages over the years in these two metrics caused us to be more cautious and base our averages off a shorter period of time as opposed to a longer time period. In 2015 we gave Ensco a boost in net PP&E, total assets, payables and accruals, total current liabilities, total debt, and total equity. This is to reflect the seven new rigs that will become operational and start drilling in this year. We attempted to model the boost Ensco had in 2011 when acquiring Pride International, but we made the boost smaller since they aren t getting as many rigs in We thought about tapering the boost off over two years but decided not to since Ensco nearly returned to previous levels the year after acquiring Pride International, and the boost we gave them in 2015 wasn t nearly as large as the one they had in 2011.
16 WACC-ROIC Spread The weighted average cost of capital in our model is 8.415%. In comparison, the return on invested capital is 9.5%; which means that although it isn t a very large spread between the two, there still is a spread between the weighted average cost of capital and the return on invested capital. This means that Ensco makes.01 for every dollar invested in the company. Although this may seem like an insignificant amount of money, this is actually a very large sum when you look at how much money is invested into a company like Ensco. The amount made from the 1% spread between the weighted average cost of capital and the return on invested capital can be in the tens, or even hundreds of millions of dollars with the level of investments made into the company.
17 Intrinsic Value of FCFs Valuation Model Based on our forecasts for ESV s income statement, balance sheet, and WACC calculation we arrived at a 2014 per share intrinsic value of $ This value, when compared to the projected 2014 year-end stock price, has Ensco being $15.74 (30%) undervalued in This significant undervaluation allows the opportunity to purchase the shares before the value is recognized and corrected by the market in the future. Even with Ensco being stressed in our forecasts, our projections still have the stock increasing per share intrinsic value each year. These conservative forecasts project a future in which the intrinsic value of ESV will not significantly change, positively or negatively, in a short period of time. Due to the moderately bright future under stressed circumstances paired with a solid dividend stream, we conclude that Ensco has a great deal of upside risk in the future.
18 Dividend Discount Model For the dividend discount model we used our expected dividend growth rates along with our alternative beta of 1.20 that came from smoothing the two year beta of We smoothed the beta to 1.20 because of the steep decline seen between the five and two year beta, which leads us to believe the beta will continue to taper down towards the average beta level of The results of the dividend discount model show that the dividend alone has an intrinsic value of $44.73, which is over 70% of the current price of Ensco s stock. This is a good sign for Ensco because it means a lot of the current value for the stock comes from the dividend instead of having it come from economic value-added.
19 Conclusion After conducting our analysis of Ensco Plc. our research shows that the company has positioned itself to thrive in the offshore drilling market in the coming years. We recommend a buy of Ensco for the Student Investment Fund since it meets many of the criteria listed in the SIF s Policy Statement including: paying above average dividends, having a modest ROIC-WACC spread, and is currently trading at a price significantly below its intrinsic value based on conservative but realistic forecasts. We view this stock as a long-term (3-5 year) investment with dependable dividend payments and potential capital gains. This equity will help to overweight the SIF in the Energy sector (as we have optimism about the macroeconomic future), and will diversify us within the sector as well. For all of these reasons, we recommend a BUY for ESV.
20 ESV 2008 Total Revenue Gross Profit Operating Income Net Income Retained Earnings Total Common Shares Total Diluted Shares Earnings Per Share Dividends Per Share Sector Historical Income Statement Highlights ,243 1,506 1,280 1,151 4, $ Cash and Equivalents Total Receivables Inventory Total Current Assets Net PPE Total Assets Payables and Accruals Total Current Liabilities Total Debt Total Equity Ensco plc 1,889 1, , $ , , $4.11 $1.08 2,798 1, , $3.12 $1.40 4,301 2,273 1,565 1,170 6, $5.10 $1.50 Historical Balance Sheet Highlights ,401 3,871 5, ,684 1, ,653 4,477 6, ,507 1, ,437 5,050 7, , ,681 12,422 17, ,333 5,003 10, ,724 13,146 18, ,798 11,852 Total Revenue $2,000 $7,000 $6, E 4,920 2,517 1,759 1,418 7, $6.14 $ ,166 2,635 1,808 1,395 8, $5.98 $ E ,535 14,311 19, ,047 4,719 12, ,263 15,497 21, ,033 5,321 13,839 Report Date Forecasted Income Statement Highlights 2015E 2016E 2017E 5,682 2,898 1,989 1,534 9, $6.51 $2.77 5,966 3,043 2,088 1,611 9, $6.77 $3.05 $4, ,489 19,888 29,264 1,421 2,273 8,239 17, , ,613 17,899 24, ,193 6,145 15,984 $2,000 Total Current Assets Cash and Equivalents Total Assets $30,000 $2,000 $25,000 $1,500 $20,000 $1,000 $500 THE REAL FINAL EXCEL FOR ENSCO. Datasource: CapitalIQ Net PPE $35,000 $2, E 626 1, ,744 18,794 25, ,253 6,453 16, , ,813 19,264 26, ,284 6,614 17,203 Earnings Per Share E Dividends Per Share $9.00 $8.00 $7.00 $6.00 $5.00 $4.00 $3.00 $2.00 $ $500 $1,000 5/11/2014 6,421 3,275 2,248 1,734 11, $7.14 $3.31 Net Income $1,000 $3,000 6,265 3,195 2,193 1,691 10, $7.04 $3.20 Forecasted Balance Sheet Highlights 2015E 2016E 2017E $1,500 $5,000 $3, Energy 20,000 15,000 10,000 $15,000 $10,000 5,000 $5,000 0 Financial Analysis & Valuation, Page 1 of 5 Total Equity Total Debt 9,000 8,000 7,000 6,000 5,000 4,000 3,000 2,000 1,000 0 Copyright Robert A. Weigand, Ph.D., 2013
21 Margins E 2015E 2016E 2017E 2018E Gross Profit Margin 67.2% 62.5% 55.7% 48.2% 52.8% 51.2% 51.0% 51.0% 51.0% 51.0% 51.0% Operating Profit Margin 57.1% 49.0% 38.0% 27.9% 36.4% 35.7% 35.0% 35.0% 35.0% 35.0% 35.0% Net Profit Margin 51.3% 41.3% 34.6% 21.5% 27.2% 28.8% 27.0% 27.0% 27.0% 27.0% 27.0% Free Cash Flow Margin 17.4% 0.0% 10.9% 0.0% 7.9% 11.7% 0.7% 0.0% 51.3% 15.1% 22.5% 80% 70% 60% 50% 40% 30% 20% 10% 0% Gross Profit Margin Operating Profit Margin 60% 50% 40% 30% 20% 10% 0% Net Profit Margin Free Cash Flow Margin Liquidity and Debt E 2015E 2016E 2017E 2018E Days Sales Outstanding Inventory Turnover Total Debt to Equity 5.9% 4.7% 4.0% 46.0% 40.5% 36.9% 38.4% 46.8% 38.4% 38.4% 38.4% Total Debt to Assets 4.7% 3.8% 3.4% 27.9% 25.8% 24.2% 24.9% 28.2% 24.9% 24.9% 24.9% 120 Days Sales Outstanding Inventory Turnover 60 50% Total Debt to Equity Total Debt to Assets % 30% 20% 10% 0 0 0% Profitability E 2015E 2016E 2017E 2018E Total Asset Turnover Equity Multiplier Return on Assets 19.7% 11.6% 8.2% 3.4% 6.3% 7.3% 6.5% 5.2% 6.5% 6.5% 6.5% Return on Equity 24.6% 14.2% 9.7% 5.5% 9.9% 11.1% 10.1% 8.7% 10.1% 10.1% 10.1% Return on Capital 21.4% 12.9% 8.8% 5.0% 9.3% 10.2% 9.5% 8.5% 9.5% 9.5% 9.5% Total Asset Turnover Equity Multiplier % 25% 20% 15% 10% 5% 0% Return on Equity Return on Assets 30% 25% 20% 15% 10% 5% 0% Return on Equity Return on Capital THE REAL FINAL EXCEL FOR ENSCO. Datasource: CapitalIQ Financial Analysis & Valuation, Page 2 of 5 Copyright Robert A. Weigand, Ph.D., 2013
22 Capital, NOPAT & FCF E 2015E 2016E 2017E 2018E NOWC 1,073 1,311 1, ,115 1,171 1,200 Net Fixed Assets 3,871 4,477 5,050 12,422 13,146 14,311 15,497 19,888 17,899 18,794 19,264 Total Invested Capital 4,944 5,789 6,148 13,032 13,995 14,938 16,463 20,268 19,014 19,965 20,464 Effective Tax Rate 17.4% 19.2% 14.9% 16.0% 16.7% 13.6% (Tax rate from last historical year used in forecasts) NOPAT 1, ,304 1,519 1,562 1,718 1,804 1,894 1,942 Free Cash Flow N/A , ,087 3, ,443 NOPAT Per Share FCF/Share N/A Return on Capital 21.4% 12.9% 8.8% 5.0% 9.3% 10.2% 9.5% 8.5% 9.5% 9.5% 9.5% $25,000 $20,000 $15,000 $10,000 $5,000 Total Invested Capital Net Fixed Assets $4,000 $2,000 ($2,000) ($4,000) ($6,000) ($8,000) NOPAT Free Cash Flow $800 $600 $400 $200 -$200 -$400 -$600 Economic Value-Added Market Valued-Added $2,500 $2,000 $1,500 $1,000 $500 -$500 -$1,000 -$1,500 -$2,000 -$2,500 Intrinsic Value of FCFs Valuation Model Value Creation E 2015E 2016E 2017E 2018E Economic Value-Added Market Valued-Added ,562-1,866 1, , ,836 1,782 1,827 PV of Future FCFs 8,495 9,306 9,907 16,969 18,055 18,997 20,559 24,376 23,369 24,392 25,002 Value of Non-Oper. Assets 790 1,141 1, Total Intrinsic Firm Value 9,285 10,448 10,958 17,399 18,542 19,163 21,075 24,944 23,966 25,018 25,644 Intrinsic Value of Equity 9,011 10,191 10,718 12,397 13,744 14,444 15,755 16,705 17,820 18,566 19,030 Per Share Intrinsic Value $63.63 $72.58 $76.01 $64.50 $59.91 $62.56 $67.56 $70.92 $74.91 $77.27 $ Year-End Stock Price $28.39 $39.94 $53.38 $46.92 $59.28 $57.18 $50.43 Over (Under) Valuation/Sh ($35.24) ($32.64) ($22.63) ($17.58) (.63) ($5.38) % Over (Under) Valued % -81.7% -42.4% -37.5% -1.1% -9.4% Cost of Capital 2013 Weight % Cost Wgt Cost Equity Capitalization 13, % 9.9% 7.3% Total Debt 4, % 5.0% 1.1% Preferred Stock 0 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% Value of All Securities 17, % Effective Tax Rate 13.6% Long-Term Growth Rate: Risk-Free Rate 2.678% 2.5% 5-Yr Beta Alternative Beta: Market Risk Premium 6.0% 1.20 CAPM Cost of Equity 9.878% Weighted Average Cost of Capital: 8.415% $90 $80 $70 $60 $50 $40 $30 $20 $10 Year-End Stock Price Per Share Intrinsic Value ($5) ($10) ($15) ($20) ($25) ($30) ($35) ($40) Over (Under) Valuation/Sh % Over (Under) Valued 0% -20% -40% -60% -80% -100% -120% -140% THE REAL FINAL EXCEL FOR ENSCO. Datasource: CapitalIQ Financial Analysis & Valuation, Page 3 of 5 Copyright Robert A. Weigand, Ph.D., 2013
23 Relative Valuation 2008 Stock Price/Intr. Value Price to Earnings Price to Free Cash Flow Price to Sales Price to Book Earnings Yield Dividend Yield Free Cash Flow Yield 2009 $ N/A % 0.4% N/A Price to Earnings $ N/A % 0.3% -1.7% 2010 $ % 2.0% 2.4% $ N/A % 3.0% -69.1% $ % 2.5% 2.5% Price to Free Cash Flow E $ % 3.9% 4.4% $ % 3.7% 0.2% Price to Sales E 2016E $ N/A % 3.9% -12.5% 2017E $ % 4.1% 17.2% Earnings Yield E Metric $ $22.15 $91.65 Estimated Target Prices vs. Current Price PV of Free Cash Flows Dividend Discount Model Price to Earnings Price to Free Cash Flow Price to Sales Price to Book Target Price $67.56 $67.56 $67.56 $ E $50.43 $67.56 $44.73 $67.56 $67.56 $67.56 $67.56 Dividend Yield 16% 14% 12% 10% 8% 6% 4% 2% 0% 4.0 Adjust Ratio $ % 4.2% 7.6% Price to Book 5.0 Relative Valuation Pricing Model 2014E Ratio Ratio Price to Earnings 11.3 Price to Free Cash Flow Price to Sales 3.0 Price to Book E $ % 4.1% 5.1% Dividend Discount Valuation Model ESV Ensco plc Annual Dividend $1.08 $ Yr Div Growth 3-Yr Div Growth 5-Yr Div Growth Risk-Free Rate 5-Yr Beta Market Premium Required Return Alternative Beta Estimated Target Prices vs. Current Price 50.0% 27.9% 86.4% 2.68% % 9.9% 1.20 May 11, $1.50 PV Dividends 1-4 PV Perpetual Div. Intrinsic Value Current Price 2013 $2.25 $9.08 $35.64 $44.73 $50.43 ($50.43) 12.0% 2014E $2.52 Expected Dividend Growth Rates 10.0% 10.0% 5.0% 2015E 2016E 2017E $2.77 $3.05 $ % 2018E $ % Dividend Yield If Purchased For: Expected Return = $2.52 $2.77 $ % $3.05 $ % $51.96 Analyst Notes: Based on a current dividend of $2.25, expected growth as shown above and an equity required return of 9.9%, ESV is worth $44.73 per share, vs. a current price of $ Compared With: Compared With: Transocean Ltd. S&P 500 Index Diamond Offshore Drilling, Inc. $80 $70 $60 $50 $40 $30 $20 $10 Current Price PV of Free Cash Flows Dividend Discount Model Price to Earnings THE REAL FINAL EXCEL FOR ENSCO. Datasource: CapitalIQ Price to Free Price to SalesPrice to Book Cash Flow 10% 5% 0% -5% -10% -15% -20% -25% -30% -35% -40% ESV RIG Financial Analysis & Valuation, Page 4 of 5 NYSE:DO 30% 25% 20% 15% 10% 5% 0% -5% -10% -15% -20% ESV ^SPX Copyright Robert A. Weigand, Ph.D., 2013
24 Piotroski Financial Fitness Scorecard (10-point scale) E 2015E 2016E 2017E 2018E Positive Net Income Positive Free Cash Flow Growing ROA (% change NI > % change TA) Earnings Quality (Operating Income > Net Income) Total Assets Growing Faster Than Total Liabilities Increasing Liquidity (Current Ratio) % Change Shares Outstanding (Diluted) < +2.0% Expanding Gross Margin Asset Turnover (% change sales > % change assets) Total Liabilities to Operating Cash Flow (EBIT) < Piotroski Score Altman Probability of Bankruptcy Z-Score Weight E 2015E 2016E 2017E 2018E (Current Assets-Current Liabilities)/Total Assets Retained Earnings/Total Assets Earnings Before Interest & Tax/Total Assets Market Value Equity/Total Liabilities Sales/Total Assets Altman Score The interpretation for the Altman Score is: Safe Zone = Z > 2.9, Grey Zone = 1.23 < Z < 2.9, Distress Zone = Z < Piotroski Financial Fitness Scorecard (10-pt scale) Altman Probability of Bankruptcy Z-Score THE REAL FINAL EXCEL FOR ENSCO. Datasource: CapitalIQ Financial Analysis & Valuation, Page 5 of 5 Copyright Robert A. Weigand, Ph.D., 2013
ESV Ensco plc Sector: Energy SELL
Analysts: Spencer Elkinton, Jake Gregg and Adam Smith Washburn University Applied Portfolio Management ESV Sector: Energy SELL Report Date: 4/18/2016 Market Cap (mm) $2,013 Annual Dividend.60 2 Yr Beta
More informationAAPL. Apple Inc. Sector: Information Technology HOLD. Analysts: Alexander Anguiano, Applied Portfolio Management. Bryan Lunzmann and Sam Olberding
AAPL Analysts: Alexander Anguiano, Applied Portfolio Management Bryan Lunzmann and Sam Olberding Apple Inc. Sector: Information Technology HOLD Report Date: 4/4/215 Market Cap (mm) $671,725 Annual Dividend
More informationVerizon Communications Inc. Sector: Telecommunication Services Hold
Applied Portfolio Management Analysts: Travis Hirt, Brandon Holle and Mark Latimer VZ Verizon Communications Inc. Sector: Telecommunication Services Hold Report Date: 4/4/25 Market Cap (mm) $85,94 Annual
More informationEXC Exelon Corporation Sector: Utilities HOLD
Analysts: Alexa Bowen, Blake Porter and Kennedy White Washburn University Applied Portfolio Management EXC Sector: Utilities HOLD Report Date: 4/18/2016 Market Cap (mm) $31,337 Annual Dividend $1.24 2
More informationCVX Chevron Corporation Sector: Energy SELL
Analysts: Zachary Haller, Andrew Paley Brown and Sean Miller Washburn University Applied Portfolio Management CVX Sector: Energy SELL Report Date: 4/18/2016 Market Cap (mm) $157,566 Annual Dividend $4.28
More informationKMI Kinder Morgan, Inc. Sector: Energy HOLD
Analysts: Aleck Boyd, Dario Munoz Poletti, Bernadette Smith and Sara Specht Washburn University Applied Portfolio Management KMI Sector: Energy HOLD Report Date: 4/18/2016 Market Cap (mm) $39,563 Annual
More informationUNP Union Pacific Corporation Sector: Industrials SELL
Analysts: Zachary Haller, Andrew Paley Brown and Sean Miller Washburn University Applied Portfolio Management UNP Sector: Industrials SELL Report Date: 4/18/2016 Market Cap (mm) $66,871 Annual Dividend
More informationGILD Gilead Sciences Inc. Sector: Healthcare HOLD
Analysts: Zachary Haller, Andrew Paley Brown and Sean Miller Washburn University Applied Portfolio Management GILD Sector: Healthcare HOLD Report Date: 4/18/2016 Market Cap (mm) $137,792 Annual Dividend
More informationKO Financial Analysis, Page 1 of 10
KO Financial Analysis, Page 1 of 10 Enter Firm Ticker KO values in millions Historical Income Statements Income Statement Forecasting Percentages Enter first year in cell B5 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2005
More informationInvestor Presentation. March 2015
Investor Presentation March 2015 1 Forward-Looking Statements Statements contained in this presentation that are not historical facts are forward-looking statements within the meaning of Section 27A of
More informationRigLogix upstream intelligence system
RigLogix upstream intelligence system November 15, 2010 Highlighting ENSCO A Comparison of Operational and Financial Metrics Since the Deepwater Horizon explosion and subsequent oil spill, regulatory concerns
More informationStrengthening the Offshore Driller of Choice May 30, 2017
Strengthening the Offshore Driller of Choice May 30, 2017 1 Forward-Looking Statements Statements included in this presentation regarding the proposed transaction, benefits, expected synergies and other
More informationCIF Stock Recommendation Report (Spring 2013)
Date: February 6, 2013 Analyst Name: Matt Leid CIF Stock Recommendation Report (Spring 2013) Section (A) Summary Company Name and Ticker: Noble Corporation (NE) Recommendation Buy: Yes No Target Price:
More informationInvestor Presentation December 2015
Investor Presentation December 2015 1 Forward-Looking Statements Statements herein that are not historical facts are forward looking statements within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform
More informationBank of America Merrill Lynch 2017 Leveraged Finance Conference. 29 November 2017
Bank of America Merrill Lynch 2017 Leveraged Finance Conference 29 November 2017 1 Forward-Looking Statements Statements contained in this investor presentation that are not historical facts are forward-looking
More informationConference. May 21, President and CEO
UBS Global Oil and Gas Conference May 21, 2013 Rob Saltiel l President and CEO 1 Forward Looking Statements Statements contained in this report with respect to the future are forward-looking statements.
More informationInvestor Presentation June 24, 2016
Investor Presentation June 24, 2016 1 Forward-Looking Statements Statements herein that are not historical facts are forward looking statements within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform
More informationInvestor Presentation. April 2015
Investor Presentation April 2015 1 Forward-Looking Statements Statements contained in this presentation that are not historical facts are forward-looking statements within the meaning of Section 27A of
More informationInvestor Presentation September 2015
Investor Presentation September 2015 1 Forward-Looking Statements Statements herein that are not historical facts are forward looking statements within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation
More informationHoward Weil Conference Presentation. March 2015
Howard Weil Conference Presentation March 2015 1 Forward-Looking Statements Statements contained in this presentation that are not historical facts are forward-looking statements within the meaning of
More informationInvestment Thesis Highlights Macroeconomic Thesis
Investment Thesis Concerns regarding the Home Improvement Industry have led us to evaluate LOW which is a current stock in the Washburn University Student Investment Fund. Even though LOW has maintained
More informationENERGY SECTOR. Mike Essig
ENERGY SECTOR Chris Gagnon Brian Geiser Mike Essig TABLE OF CONTENTS SECTOR OVERVIEW BUSINESS ANALYSIS ECONOMIC ANALYSIS FINANCIAL ANALYSIS VALUATIONS RECOMMENDATION SECTOR OVERVIEW 5.61% S&P 500 SECTOR
More informationVantage Drilling Company
Vantage Drilling Company Jefferies 2014 Global Energy Conference Houston, Texas November 12, 2014 Forward-Looking Statements Some of the statements in this presentation constitute forward-looking statements.
More information50% 40% 30% 20% 10% 0% -10% 50% 40% 30% 20% 10% 0% -10% -20% 80% 70% 60% 50% 40% 30% 20% 10% 0%
Applied Portfolio Management Analysts: Elisa Gayle, Raul Guevara, Justin Pippitt and Jonathan Ramirez Bristol-Myers Squibb Company Sector: Healthcare HOLD Report Date: 3/27/212 Market Cap (mm) $55,1 Annual
More informationTransocean Ltd. NEUTRAL ZACKS CONSENSUS ESTIMATES (RIG-NYSE)
January 14, 2015 Transocean Ltd. (RIG-NYSE) Current Recommendation Prior Recommendation Underperform Date of Last Change 02/14/2012 Current Price (01/13/15) $15.52 Target Price $16.00 NEUTRAL SUMMARY We
More informationRig Market Regional Challenges from a Risk Managers perspective. Svein Bergstad Director of Risk & Insurance 24 October 2013
Rig Market Regional Challenges from a Risk Managers perspective Svein Bergstad Director of Risk & Insurance 24 October 2013 Content Who is Seadrill? Rig market Insurance challenges and compliance 2 Seadrill
More informationDisney is a household and worldwide name that loyal customers trust. The company is known for the
Executive Summary Disney is a household and worldwide name that loyal customers trust. The company is known for the grand theme parks countrywide and their timeless movies across generations. Disney is
More informationEnergy Summit. February 5-6, Rob Saltiel
2013 Credit Suisse Energy Summit February 5-6, 2013 Rob Saltiel President and CEO 1 Forward Looking Statements Statements contained in this report with respect to the future are forward-looking statements.
More informationONEOK Partners, L.P. ONEOK Partners, L.P. (NYSE:OKS) Applied Portfolio Management. Investment Thesis. Segments Breakdown 5/5/2015
ONEOK Partners, L.P. (NYSE:OKS) ONEOK Partners, L.P. Applied Portfolio Management Publicly traded partnership formed in 1993 o Headquarters: Tulsa, Oklahoma A leading transporter of natural gas and natural
More informationCanadian Natural Resources Ltd.
March 12, 2015 Canadian Natural Resources Ltd. (CNQ-NYSE) Current Recommendation Prior Recommendation Underperform Date of Last Change 06/30/2013 Current Price (03/11/15) $28.82 Target Price $30.00 NEUTRAL
More informationIndustry Analysis. Transocean LTD. (RIG) Applied Portfolio Management
Recommendation: Buy Price $84.83 as of Apr 28, 2010 Sector Global Energy Equipment and Services Sub Industry Oil & Gas Drilling 1 Year Target Price $118.37 Transocean LTD. (RIG) Summary: This leading provider
More informationVALUEx Vail Matthew Griffith, June 26, 2015
VALUEx Vail 2015 Matthew Griffith, CFA @MattGGriffith June 26, 2015 Disclaimer The data in this presentation has been obtained from sources believed to be reliable, but accuracy and completeness are not
More informationEnsco plc to Acquire Atwood Oceanics, Inc.
Ensco plc to Acquire Atwood Oceanics, Inc. Strengthens Position as Leading Offshore Driller Adds High-Quality Portfolio of Floater and Jackup Assets $65 Million of Annual Expense Synergies Anticipated
More informationSelected Financial Metrics:
M I I L ONG FU N D E LECTION ME MO TR A N SOC E A N TO: FROM: MII Managers Hunter Armistead, Sector Head and Senior Analyst, MII Third Year, Majors: Commerce and Economics SUBJECT: Transocean (NYSE: RIG)
More informationAccenture PLC Undergraduate Analyst Report. Alexander Anisimov Robert Bailey
Accenture PLC 2014 Undergraduate Analyst Report Alexander Anisimov Robert Bailey Analyst Report Ticker: ACN 03/31/2014 UG Student Managed Fund Accenture Plc Key Financial Metrics Market Cap: $50.88B ROE:
More informationNasdaq Chaikin Power US Small Cap Index
Nasdaq Chaikin Power US Small Cap Index A Multi-Factor Approach to Small Cap Introduction Multi-factor investing has become very popular in recent years. The term smart beta has been coined to categorize
More informationSEACOR MARINE ANNOUNCES RESULTS FOR ITS FOURTH QUARTER AND YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2017
PRESS RELEASE SEACOR MARINE ANNOUNCES RESULTS FOR ITS FOURTH QUARTER AND YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, Houma, Louisiana March 22, 2018 FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE - SEACOR Marine Holdings Inc. (NYSE:SMHI) (the Company
More informationRevenue (TTM) 79.74M Revenue (Qtrly YoY Growth) EPS Diluted (Quarterly) EPS Diluted (Qtrly YoY Growth) N/A. Profitability. Revenue (Quarterly)
Attractive VNR.TO is probably worth a deeper look. Price is low compared to sales, earnings or assets, and historical fundamentals look strong. Value Score Good (9/10) Fundamental Score Strong (8/10) Valuation
More informationNational Oilwell Varco. Ticker: NOV
National Oilwell Varco Ticker: NOV Business Description National Oilwell Varco, Inc. is a provider in the design, manufacture and sale of equipment and components used in oil and gas drilling, completion
More informationJeffrey L. Chastain Vice President Investor Relations and Corporate Communications. Johnson Rice Energy Conference September 26, 2017
Jeffrey L. Chastain Vice President Investor Relations and Corporate Communications Johnson Rice Energy Conference September 26, 2017 2 Forward Looking Statement This presentation contains forward-looking
More informationJeffrey L. Chastain Vice President Investor Relations and Corporate Communications
Jeffrey L. Chastain Vice President Investor Relations and Corporate Communications Jefferies 2016 Energy Conference November 30, 2016 Forward Looking Statement This presentation contains forward-looking
More informationBasic Materials. Tim Stephenson Matthew Stewart November 8, 2016
Basic Materials Tim Stephenson Matthew Stewart November 8, 2016 - The sector consists of companies engaged in the discovery, development, and processing of raw materials MATERIALS INDUSTRY - AGENDA Agenda
More informationCIF Stock Recommendation Report (Fall 2012)
Date: 10/13/2012 Analyst Name: Ryan Ellingsen CIF Stock Recommendation Report (Fall 2012) Company Name and Ticker: Colgate-Palmolive Company (CL) Section (A) Summary Recommendation Buy: Hold Target Price:
More informationJefferies 2016 Energy Conference
Jefferies 2016 Energy Conference Mark A. Keller, EVP Business Development November 30, 2016 1 Forward-Looking Statements Statements herein that are not historical facts are forward looking statements within
More informationSEACOR Marine Announces Second Quarter 2018 Results
August 9, 2018 SEACOR Marine Announces Second Quarter 2018 Results Continued Improvement in Operating Performance Strengthened Balance Sheet HOUMA, La.--(BUSINESS WIRE)-- SEACOR Marine Holdings Inc. (NYSE:SMHI)
More informationAnalyst Report Ticker: NVR 3/31/2014 UG Student Managed Fund NVR, Inc. Recommendation Closing Price as of 3/31/2014 BUY $1,147.00
1 Analyst Report Ticker: NVR 3/31/2014 UG Student Managed Fund NVR, Inc. Key Financial Metrics As of March 31, 2014 Current Stock Price: $1,147.00 Current Market Cap: $5.15bn 52 Week Range: $830-$1,220.95
More informationSEB Nordic Seminar CFO - Rune Magnus Lundetrae Copenhagen, January 2014
SEB Nordic Seminar CFO - Rune Magnus Lundetrae Copenhagen, January 2014 Forward Looking Statements The statements described in this presentation that are not historical facts are forward-looking statements
More informationInvestor Presentation. September 2017
Investor Presentation September 2017 Forward-Looking Statements Statements herein that are not historical facts are forward looking statements within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform
More informationLockheed Martin. Sector Manager: Daniel Curran. Senior Analyst: Kevin McDonnell. Team Analysts: Jason Flynn. Mike Havris. TJ O Sullivan.
Lockheed Martin T r i n i t y S M F Lockheed Martin Sector Manager: Daniel Curran Senior Analyst: Kevin McDonnell Team Analysts: Jason Flynn Mike Havris TJ O Sullivan Mark Perham T R I N I T Y S M F Investment
More informationBorr Drilling Limited (BDRILL) Announces First Quarter 2018 Results
Borr Drilling Limited (BDRILL) Announces First Quarter 2018 Results Hamilton, Bermuda, May 31, 2018: Borr Drilling Limited ( Borr, Borr Drilling or the Company ) announces results for the first quarter
More informationTransocean Announces ransocean Acquisition of Ocean Rig Announces September 4, 2018
Transocean Announces Acquisition of Ocean Rig September 4, 208 LEGAL DISCLAIMER Forward-Looking Statements The statements described in this presentation that are not historical facts are forward-looking
More informationMarket vs Intrinsic Value
Market vs Intrinsic Value Market Value Determined by the consensus of market participants Observed in the market Intrinsic value Present value of expected future cash flows Not observed Estimated using
More informationInvestor Presentation. September 2016
Investor Presentation September 2016 1 Forward-Looking Statements Statements contained in this press release that are not historical facts are forward-looking statements within the meaning of Section 27A
More informationHoward Weil Energy Conference Per Wullf, CEO
Howard Weil Energy Conference Per Wullf, CEO March 2015 Forward Looking Statements The statements described in this presentation that are not historical facts are forward-looking statements within the
More informationFundamentals of Credit. Arnold Ziegel Mountain Mentors Associates. II. Fundamentals of Financial Analysis
Fundamentals of Credit Arnold Ziegel Mountain Mentors Associates II. Fundamentals of Financial Analysis Financial Analysis is the basis for Credit Analysis January, 2008 Financial analysis is the starting
More informationInvestor Presentation. September 6, 2016
Investor Presentation September 6, 2016 Forward Looking Statements Certain statements and information contained in this presentation constitute forward-looking statements within the meaning of the safe
More informationCIF Stock Recommendation Report (Fall 2012)
Date: 10/11/12 Analyst Name: Joseph Brendel CIF Stock Recommendation Report (Fall 2012) Section (A) Summary Company Name and Ticker: Prudential (PRU) Recommendation Buy: No Target Price: 35 Sector: Financials
More informationCIF Stock Recommendation Report (Fall 2012)
Date: December 3, 2012 Analyst Name: Chris Letcher CIF Stock Recommendation Report (Fall 2012) Company Name and Ticker: Northern Trust Corporation (NTRS) Section (A) Summary Recommendation Buy: No Target
More informationFPA Crescent Fund Q3 Winners & Losers
FPA Crescent Fund Quarterly Commentary 3rd Quarter September 30, 2012 Dear Shareholders: Overview Crescent returned 4.55% in the third quarter, and 8.25% in the year-to-date period. The stock market (S&P
More informationCIF Stock Recommendation Report (Fall 2012) Summary
Date: 11/6/2012 Analyst Name: Kyle Temple CIF Stock Recommendation Report (Fall 2012) Company Name and Ticker: Dover Corp Summary DOV Recommendation Buy: Yes No Target Price: $65.00 Sector: Industrials
More informationSuggested Answer_Syl2012_Jun2014_Paper_20 FINAL EXAMINATION
FINAL EXAMINATION GROUP IV (SYLLABUS 2012) SUGGESTED ANSWERS TO QUESTIONS JUNE 2014 Paper- 20 : FINANCIAL ANALYSIS & BUSINESS VALUATION Time Allowed : 3 Hours Full Marks : 100 The figures in the margin
More informationBarnes & Noble. Sell Price Target: $9.86 Key Statistics as of 04/30/2016. Thesis Points: Company Description: NASDAQ:BKS
Barnes & Noble NASDAQ:BKS Analyst: Sector: Pierre Gouesclou Retail Sell Price Target: $9.86 Key Statistics as of 04/30/2016 Thesis Points: Market Price: Industry: Market Cap: 52-Week Range: Beta: $11.75
More informationTransocean s Acquisition of Transocean Partners August 1, 2016
Transocean s Acquisition of Transocean Partners August 1, 2016 Legal Disclaimer Forward-Looking Statements This presentation includes forward-looking statements within the meaning of Section 27A of the
More informationPareto Securities Oil & Offshore Conference
Pareto Securities Oil & Offshore Conference September 2-3, 2015 Oslo, Norway www.paragonoffshore.com Safe Harbor Statement This material contains statements that are forward looking statements about Paragon
More informationUSF SMIF Price Intrinsic Value Target Price
USF SMIF Price Intrinsic Value Target Price Recommendation BUY 656.75 754.42 840.70 Analysts: A. Nader, J. Ortiz, L. Arruda GICS Sector Healthcare Sub-Industry Health Care Equipment Summary This company
More informationIndustry: CABLE TV August 7, 2013 Recommendation: BUY. Company Overview
Price Target $74.09 Price (08/07/2013) $61.11 52-WK ($) 47.71-67.85 Market Cap ($M) $34,000 Outstanding Shares 556 Insider % 7.0 Revenue $30,750 Valuation TEV ($M) $50,590 EBITDA ($M) $7,480 EV/EBITDA
More informationTransocean s Presentation: Agreement to Acquire Songa Offshore August 15, 2017
Transocean s Presentation: Agreement to Acquire Songa Offshore August 15, 2017 Legal Disclaimer The statements described in this presentation that are not historical facts are forward-looking statements
More informationBlue Power Group Limited Analysis
Blue Power Group Limited Analysis The following analysis takes an in-depth look at the historical performance of Blue Power Group Limited and utilizes various valuation methodologies to determine the fair
More informationPPG Industries, Inc. (PPG) Analyst: Dung Nguyen. Recommendation: HOLD Estimated Fair Value: $95 - $120 * 1. Reasons for the Recommendation
Recommendation: HOLD Estimated Fair Value: $95 - $120 * 1. Reasons for the Recommendation As the global economy starts to recover, it is estimated that the demand for diversified chemicals will be stronger.
More information2014 MBA SMF ANALYST REPORT
2014 MBA SMF ANALYST REPORT Pornpong Lueang-A-Papong Jonathan Coombes Xin Wang March, 2014 Pornpong Lueang-A-Papong, Jonathan Coombes, Xin Wang Page 1 of 11 JPMorgan Chase & Co (JPM) Sector: Financial
More informationPride International, Inc. Howard Weil Energy Conference Louis A. Raspino President & CEO
Pride International, Inc. Howard Weil Energy Conference Louis A. Raspino President & CEO March 25, 2009 New Orleans, LA Forward Looking Statements Certain statements in the following presentation regarding
More informationENSCO PLC FORM 8-K. (Current report filing) Filed 05/27/10 for the Period Ending 05/26/10
ENSCO PLC FORM 8-K (Current report filing) Filed 05/27/10 for the Period Ending 05/26/10 Telephone 4402076594660 CIK 0000314808 Symbol ESV SIC Code 1381 - Drilling Oil and Gas Wells Industry Oil Well Services
More informationHouston - May 9, 2017
Morgan Stanley Energy Conference Morgan Stanley Energy Conference Houston - May 9, 2017 Legal Disclaimer The statements described in this presentation that are not historical facts are forward-looking
More informationSeadrill Limited. Per Wullf, Chief Executive Officer
Seadrill Limited Per Wullf, Chief Executive Officer Disclaimer We have prepared this document solely for informational purposes. You should not definitively rely upon it or use it to form the definitive
More informationEQUITY RESEARCH HOLD Medserv p.l.c. Stock Rating Price target (1Yr) 18 th January 2018
Medserv p.l.c. Stock Rating Price target (1Yr) HOLD 1.21 Executive Summary: We are initiating our coverage with a hold recommendation on Medserv plc ( MDS ). Despite the negative financial performance
More informationSpring Overseas Shipholding Group Inc. Equity Analysis and Valuation. Analysis Team
Spring 2009 Overseas Shipholding Group Inc. Equity Analysis and Valuation Analysis Team William Newland william.newland@ttu.edu Kamil Bachleda kamil.bachleda@ttu.edu Jonathan Farrell jondavidfarrell@yahoo.com
More informationInvestor Goals. Index. Investor Education. Goals, Time Horizon and Risk Level Page 2. Types of Risk Page 3. Risk Tolerance Level Page 4
Index Goals, Time Horizon and Risk Level Page 2 Types of Risk Page 3 Risk Tolerance Level Page 4 Risk Analysis Page 5 Investor Goals Risk Measurement Page 6 January 2019 Investor Education Investor Education
More informationTHE CAQ S SEVENTH ANNUAL. Main Street Investor Survey
THE CAQ S SEVENTH ANNUAL Main Street Investor Survey DEAR FRIEND OF THE CAQ, Since 2007, the Center for Audit Quality (CAQ) has commissioned an annual survey of U.S. individual investors as a part of its
More informationCHAPTER 2. Capital Structure and Debt Capacity. Balancing Operating / Business Risk and Financial Risk
CHAPTER 2 Capital Structure and Debt Capacity Balancing Operating / Business Risk and Financial Risk A company s capital structure is comprised of a combination of debt and equity that is used to fund
More informationFOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE For more information, contact: Richard L. Bergmark, Fax:
FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE For more information, contact: Richard L. Bergmark, + 1 713 328 2101 Fax: +1 713 328 2151 CORE LAB REPORTS EPS OF $0.84 FOR Q4 2010, EX NON-CASH ITEM; ANNUAL RECORDS SET FOR REVENUE,
More informationCIF Stock Recommendation Report (Fall 2012)
CIF Stock Recommendation Report (Fall 2012) Date: Nov 27 th 2012 Analyst Name: Tung Linh Company Name and Ticker: W.W. Grainger, Inc. (GWW) Section (A) Summary Recommendation Buy: No Target Price: Stop-Loss
More informationGOLDMAN SACHS GLOBAL ENERGY CONFERENCE. Mark Mey, Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer January 8, 2019
GOLDMAN SACHS GLOBAL ENERGY CONFERENCE Mark Mey, Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer January 8, 209 LEGAL DISCLAIMER Forward Looking Statements The statements described in this presentation
More informationOutsourced Investment Management
Outsourced Investment Management Quarterly Commentary Second Quarter 2017 The first half of 2017 was a goldilocks environment for investments. United States GDP growth was steady in the first quarter,
More informationIncreasing Shareholder Value Through Transaction Preparation
Increasing Shareholder Value Through Transaction Preparation PRESENTED BY: CHRIS DALTON, NATIONAL TRANSACTION SERVICES LEADER & KEN HIRSCH, MANAGING DIRECTOR, BKD CORPORATE FINANCE TO RECEIVE CPE CREDIT
More informationSUMMARY. Risk Level *
February 26, 2015 The Home Depot, Inc. Current Recommendation Earnings Update: Home Depot Tops Q4 Earnings & Revenues, Guides FY15 SUMMARY DATA NEUTRAL Prior Recommendation Underperform Date of Last Change
More informationGulfstream Quarterly Market Update
Gulfstream Q1 216 Market Update Gulfstream Quarterly Market Update IN THIS REPORT G6 Market... 3 G Market... G Market... GV Market... 6 GIVSP Market... 7 G28 Market... 8 G2 Market...9 G Market...1 Recent
More informationEnsco plc 6 Chesterfield Gardens London W1J 5BQ Ensco plc Reports First Quarter 2011 Results
Ensco plc 6 Chesterfield Gardens London W1J 5BQ www.enscoplc.com Press Release Ensco plc Reports First Quarter 2011 Results Pride Acquisition Announced Ensco Ranked #1 in Total Customer Satisfaction ENSCO
More informationBlack Gold: 5 Oil Stocks To Watch For a Massive Rally When Oil Prices Recover
Disclaimer: This report is to be considered as entertainment value alone. No recommendations to buy any stock are being made. Your investment and trading decisions are solely your responsibility. All research
More informationChapter 7. Analyzing Common Stocks. Security Analysis. Top-Down Approach Kaplan Financial
Chapter 7 Analyzing Common Stocks Security Analysis Process of gathering, organizing, and using information to determine the intrinsic value of a common stock. Intrinsic value is the underlying or inherent
More informationUSER S GUIDE EVA METHODOLOGY EVA SCORECARD EVA IS A REGISTERED TRADEMARK OF STERN & STEWART & CO. NY, NY STOCKPOINTER, INC.
USER S GUIDE EVA METHODOLOGY EVA SCORECARD EVA IS A REGISTERED TRADEMARK OF STERN & STEWART & CO. NY, NY. 2001 STOCKPOINTER, INC. Revised July 2018 Introduction to Inovestor The Economic Value Added (EVA)
More information52-Week High Trailing PE Week Low Forward PE -- Buy 2 Analysts. 1-Year Return: -52.8% 5-Year Return: -79.1%
Last Close 3.42 (CAD) Avg Daily Vol 7,683 52-Week High 7.50 Trailing PE -- Annual Div 0.34 ROE -7.1% LTG Forecast -- 1-Mo -12.8% 2019 March 28 TORONTO Exchange Market Cap (Consol) 145M 52-Week Low 3.07
More informationGulfMark Offshore, Inc. Pritchard Capital Partners: Energize 2006
GulfMark Offshore, Inc. Pritchard Capital Partners: Energize 2006 January, 2005 Cautionary Statement Regarding Forward-Looking Statements This presentation includes forward-looking statements and projections,
More informationTHE GEORGE WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY. CROCS, INC. Case Study Report
THE GEORGE WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY CROCS, INC. Case Study Report ¹ SUBMITTED TO PROF. NEIL COHEN School of Business and Public Management The George Washington University BY Anil Kumar Cheerla FINA 6224
More informationUConn Student Managed Fund Team Gilson
2017 2018 UConn Student Managed Fund Team Gilson Shawn McAuley & Ana Walas Table of Contents Table of Contents Investment Highlights. 3 Basis for Recommendation Business Description 3 Business Overview
More informationCanadian Natural Resources Ltd.
September 11, 2009 Canadian Natural Resources Ltd. SUMMARY DATA NEUTRAL Current Recommendation Prior Recommendation OUTPERFORM Date of Last Change 08/18/2009 Current Price (09/10/09) $62.91 Target Price
More informationTrailing PE Forward PE Hold 6 Analysts. 1-Year Return: 8.9% 5-Year Return: -8.1%
PASON SYSTEMS INC (-T) Last Close 20.14 (CAD) Avg Daily Vol 171,050 52-Week High 22.10 Trailing PE 54.4 Annual Div 0.72 ROE 8.0% LTG Forecast -- 1-Mo 1.5% October 18 TORONTO Exchange Market Cap 1.7B 52-Week
More informationBDRILL - Borr Drilling Limited Announces Fourth Quarter and Full Year 2017 Results
BDRILL - Borr Drilling Limited Announces Fourth Quarter and Full Year 2017 Results Hamilton, Bermuda, February 21, 2018: Borr Drilling Limited ( Borr, Borr Drilling or the Company ) announces its fourth
More informationOverview. Largest Firms Size of Sector Industries Performance
ENERGY SECTOR Overview Largest Firms Size of Sector Industries Performance Worldwide Largest Firms Depends on Market Capital Sector Weightings Third Largest Sector by weighting Sector Makeup Main Industries
More informationKey takeaways. What it may mean for investors FIRST A NALYSIS NEWS OR EVENTS T HAT MAY AFFECT Y OUR INVESTMENTS. Global Investment Strategy Team
FIRST A NALYSIS NEWS OR EVENTS T HAT MAY AFFECT Y OUR INVESTMENTS Global Investment Strategy Team February 5, 2018 Market Sell-off What Investors Need to Know Now Key takeaways» A swift climb in the 10-year
More informationM&A, Private Equity and Capital Markets Update
M&A, Private Equity and Capital Markets Update April 211 DRAFT M&A Market Drivers DRAFT Macroeconomic Conditions Favorable For M&A GDP growth expected to continue The second half of 29 exhibited the first
More information