TECHNIQUES FOR DECISION MAKING IN RISKY CONDITIONS
|
|
- Eric Dalton
- 6 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 RISK AND UNCERTAINTY THREE ALTERNATIVE STATES OF INFORMATION CERTAINTY - where the decision maker is perfectly informed in advance about the outcome of their decisions. For each decision there is only one possible outcome which is known to the decision maker. RISK in this situation a decision may have more than one possible outcome, so that certainty no longer exists. However, the decision maker is aware of all possible outcomes and knows the probability of each occurring. UNCERTAINTY In this situation a decision may have more than one outcome and the decision maker does not know the precise nature of these outcomes, nor can they objectively assign a probability to the outcome. TECHNIQUES FOR DECISION MAKING IN RISKY CONDITIONS If the decision maker knows the possible outcomes that may result from a decision and can assign probabilities to each of those outcomes, then the expected monetary values may be substituted for certain values in choosing between alternative courses of action. The expected monetary value (EMV) of a particular course of action may be defined as: EMV P i V i Where P i = the probability of the i th outcome V i = the value of the i th outcome P i = 1 EMV is the weighted sum of the possible outcomes, when each outcome is weighted by its probability, and all possible outcomes are taken into account.
2 Example: An ice cream shop may know that its takings vary with the weather, which may be sunny [with a probability (p) of 0.2] or cloudy (p = 0.4) or raining (p = 0.4). In this case the EMV is calculated as shown below: EMV = $500 (0.2) + $300 (0.4) + $100 (0.4) = $260 In the example given here there are only three possible weather conditions and three probabilities, which sum to one (1). A discrete probability distribution If the distribution of ice cream takings is characterized by a normal distribution (continuous), then the EMV of the takings is given by the mean of the distribution.
3 A continuous probability distribution LIMITATIONS OF THE EXPECTED VALUES a) If the expected monetary values are used as the decision criterion, then the rational decision-maker deciding between two alternatives will always choose the course of action that yields the highest EMV. However while this may appear an intuitively sensible way in which to take decisions, a number of examples show that its application can lead to a number of quite nonsensical conclusions. Imagine that a rational person is asked to take part in a game with another player which consists of tossing a coin for a stake of $1. If the coin lands head up there is a gain of $1. If the coin lands tails up there is a loss of $1. Provided that the coin is a fair one, so that heads and tails are equally likely, the expected value of this game is equal to: 0.5 ($1) 0.5 ($1) = 0. A person using the EMV criterion would be absolutely indifferent to whether they played the game or not. The slightest inducement to play (a bribe of one cent, for instance) would be sufficient to encourage them to take part. When the stakes are small this analysis seems intuitively acceptable. However, the expected monetary value of the game remains exactly the same as the stakes rise. If the stakes were $ the expected value would still be zero and a bribe of one penny would be sufficient to encourage a rational person using EMV as the basis for the decision to take part. This seems intuitively much less plausible, as it seems highly unlikely that a rational person would be prepared to risk losing $ , even if that possibility were offset by the equally likely prospect of winning $ In everyday language it seems sensible to
4 suppose that most people would care more about the prospective loss than the prospective gain. b) St Pertersburg Paradox makes the same point clear in an even more dramatic way. Consider the situation where a coin is tossed and a payment is made to the player depending upon which toss of the coin first comes up heads. If it comes up heads first time the payment is $2. If it does not come up heads until the second toss, the payment is $2 2 = $4, and if it does not come up until the n th toss, the payment is $2n. How much would a rational person be willing to pay to take part in this game? The expected monetary value of the game is given by: EMV = 0.5 (2) + (0.5 2 ) (2 2 ) + (0.5 3 )(2 3 ) (0.5 n )(2 n ) EMV = EMV = INFINITY In other words the EMV is infinity, and a person using the EMV as a means of decision-making would be willing to pay everything they have to take part in the game. These examples illustrate a major problem with EMVs as a means of taking decisions. Individuals will not accept fair bets involving large amounts of money because they CARE more about the possibility of a loss than they do about the possibility of an equal gain. In the language of economists the UTILITY lost as a result of losing $100 may be more than the utility gained by winning $100. UTILITY AND ATTITUDES TOWARDS RISK The analysis above suggests that EMV has serious limitations as a criterion on which to base decisions. It seems intuitively likely that the value or utility placed on a loss of $100 by a rational individual may well exceed the utility arising from a gain of $100. That suggests that a explicit examination of the links between utility and income may help to provide an alternative means of assessing decisions in situations of risk. Figure below shows three different possible relationships between an individual s level of income and the utility they experience as a result of having that income. Each can be seen to illustrate different attitudes to risk on the part of the individual concerned. In figure (a) the curve linking utility and income becomes less and less steep at higher levels of income indicating decreasing marginal utility of income. If such an individual is at level of income A, which
5 gives them utility X, and is considering whether or not to accept a fair bet with a 50/50 probability of either increasing their income to C or reducing it by an equal amount to B, they will consider the impact on their utility. If their income is increased to C their utility rises to Z. On the other hand, if their income is reduced to B, their utility falls to Y. However, as figure (a) clearly shows the decrease from X to Y is substantially larger than the increase from X to Z. If these are equally likely as in the example given, the individual in question will not accept the bet offered. The type of behaviour shown above is known as RISK AVERSE behaviour, and it is frequently assumed that most individuals and companies behave in this way. In figure below the link between utility and income is drawn as a straight line. In this case, the individual places exactly the same value on a loss as on a gain of the same monetary value, and is described as RISK NEUTRAL.
6 For individuals whose preferences conform to this relationship, EMVs are an appropriate reflection of their decision-making. It can be seen, then, that EMVs represent a special case within the general framework of varying attitudes to risk. Figure c) illustrates the relationship between income and utility for a RISK LOVER. For this individual the utility attaching to the gain in income from A to C is clearly larger than that arising from the loss from A to B. Such an individual will accept fair bets, even for large amounts. In each of the examples given above the criterion of EMV has been replaced by that of expected utility (EU). Instead of choosing whichever course of action offers the highest EMV, the decision-maker chooses that which gives the highest EU, where:
7 EU = P i U i where P i = probability of the i th outcome U i = utility of the i th outcome and P i = 1. The adoption of the expected utility criterion provides a means by which different attitudes to risk can be taken into account when modeling decisions. However it can be difficult to use it in a normative way, as a prescription and a practical tool, rather than as a means of predicting the firms behaviour in a general way. That is because it involves estimating the relationship between utility and income for a particular decision-maker (or for the shareholders on whose behalf they are taking decisions, which adds to the difficulties). Examples. Standard gambling comparisons---find your own examples. This method of estimating utilities suffers from the fact that it relies upon the decision-makers ability to answer hypothetical questions in the same way in which they would answer real ones. DIFFERING DEGREES OF RISK AVERSION Different people have different degrees of risk aversion. Graphically this is reflected in steeper or flatter Indifference curves in the risk return space. In figure below, we show a person with a relatively high degree of risk aversion contrasted with a person whose preferences indicate a relatively low degree of risk aversion. Points A and D are the same on both graphs. Project D is inferior to project A, since for the same expected return, E 0, it has the larger risk, R 1. In both cases the person would accept the risk level R 1 only if this is accompanied by an expected profit larger than that of project A. The more risk averse person in the left hand graph requires DB dollars in order to remain at the same level of utility and thus has a relatively high MRS of return for risk, measured by the ratio BD/AD. The less risk averse person on the right hand side requires only the considerably smaller amount of extra expected profit, DC dollars, for extra risk, R 1 R 2, and thus exhibits a relatively low MRS of return for risk measured by the ratio CD/AD.
8 RISK PREFERENCE AND RISK NEUTRALITY Risk preference and risk neutrality are not common among business decision makers. Consumers, on the other hand, may show risk preference or neutrality in such situations as gambling, sporting, and recreational activities. Risk preference means that risk is viewed as a utility producing good, and so the individual s indifference curves are negatively sloping as in the graph below. Such an individual is prepared to give up expected profits for a larger amount of risk. For example, a gambler might prefer a game in which the risk is greater and the expected value of gains is lower, over a safer bet on another game in which the expected value is somewhat higher.
9 RISK NEUTRALITY means that the individual is indifferent to risk, receiving neither utility nor disutility from risk regardless of the amount of risk involved. Such an individual s indifference curves would be horizontal. The arrow shows the direction of preference more expected profit is preferred to less, regardless of the risk. Consider an athlete who desperately wants to win the final game of the season. This individual will do whatever is necessary to help his team win or prevent the opposition from winning. Thus, hockey players block shots on goal with their faces and bodies, football players make suicidal plays that could easily result in broken bones, and racing drivers attempt that final pass on the last turn before the checkered flag.
10
11 TECHNIQUES OF COPING WITH UNCERTAINTY The problems considered above all related to situations of risk, where the probabilities of different outcomes are known. If the probabilities are not known, the situation is one of uncertainty, rather than risk, and the techniques outlined above cannot be applied. Nevertheless, there are a number of different strategies that may be adopted in order to make decisions on rational criteria. THE MINIMAX CRITERION A firm making a decision may be characterized as choosing between alternative courses of action, whose outcomes depend upon which state of nature happens to be in force at the time of the action. In a situation of uncertainty the probabilities of the different states of nature are not known. In order to begin analyzing the problem a PAY-OFF MATRIX may be constructed as shown below. Each cell in the matrix shows the pay-off, which could be in terms of monetary values or utilities, for a given course of action, given the state of nature indicated. If the minimax criterion is adopted, the decision maker examines the worst pay-off for each action and then chooses the action for which the worst pay-off is highest. In the example given above the worst payoffs are as follows: In this example action 3 is selected, guaranteeing that the lowest payoff that will be received is 60. The minimax rule ensures that the worst possible outcomes are avoided and may be described as a pessimistic, conservative or high risk averse strategy. The obvious problem is
12 that it ignores the higher value pay-offs which may imply foregoing some possibly very large gains. The minimax regret criterion In the case of the minimax regret criterion the decision-maker considers the extent of the sacrifice made if a particular state of nature occurred but the best action for that state of nature was not chosen. In the example above, for state of nature A, action 1 involves a regret of 40, action 2 a regret of 100 and action 3 a regret of zero (0). Table below shows a complete regret matrix for all actions and states of nature.
13 Having set out the regret matrix, the action is chosen for which the largest regret is a minimum, leading to the choice of action 1. Such a strategy ensures that the maximum regret is not experienced, and is also a relatively pessimistic basis on which to make a decision. As in the case of the minimax criterion, the major criticism of this technique is that it only makes use of a very limited amount of information that is available, ignoring everything else. Actions that are rejected may have much smaller regrets than the one that is chosen, apart from their largest regrets. It is also possible that use of this approach could lead to inconsistent decisions in that if an action is chosen from a group of alternatives and then one of the rejected actions is deleted from the options, a different action may now be chosen, despite the fact that the original BEST option is still available. The maximax criterion This criterion is the opposite of the MINIMAX CRITERION in that the best outcomes of each action are identified, and then the action is selected for which the best outcome is largest. In the case set out in the first table this would lead to the choice of action 2. This is clearly an optimistic criterion to use in that it selects the action that provides a possibility of making the highest possible return. As in the case of the other criteria considered, its main failing is that it only takes a limited amount of the available information into account. The action that offers a prospect of the highest possible return may also be the one that offers the prospect of the highest possible loss (as in the example), but this is ignored. The Hurwicz alpha criterion The Hurwicz approach is an attempt to use more of the information available by constructing an index (the alpha index) for each action, which takes into account both the best and the worst outcomes and the extent to which the decision maker wishes to adopt a pessimistic or optimistic posture. The index is defined in the following way for each action:
14 I i = al i + (1-a) L i where: I i = the index for action I a= an optimism/pessimism index li = the lowest pay-off for action I L i = the highest pay-off for action I The action that has the largest alpha index is the one selected. The optimism/pessimism index may vary between 0 and 1 and may be estimated by increasing the value of x within the range for the situation shown in the table below until the decision maker is indifferent between the two actions. A very pessimistic decision-maker will be indifferent between the two actions at a very low value of x (they will be quite happy with a small certain gain compared with the prospect of either 0 or 1, because their pessimism leads them to suspect that the outcome of action 1 would be zero). On the other hand a very optimistic decision-maker who suspects that the outcome of action 1 is likely to be 1 will only be equally content with a certain amount that is almost as large as 1. Once the value of x has been estimated, through direct questioning of the decision maker, it is assumed that, as the decision-maker is indifferent between action 1 and action 2 they both have the same alpha index. From the formula given, action 1 has an index of (1-a) and action 2 has an index of x. It follows therefore that: (1 a) = x and the value of a can be calculated from the known value of x arrived at by experiment.
15 It should be noted that if x has a value of 1, so that a takes the value of zero, this indicates that the decision maker is very optimistic and the alpha criterion is exactly the same as the maximax criterion. Similarly, if the decision maker is highly pessimistic, so that a takes the value 1 the alpha criterion is equivalent to using the minimax approach. The Hurwicz technique therefore has the rather elegant property of encompassing minimax and maximin as special cases, each at a different end of the spectrum that may vary from highly optimistic to highly pessimistic. As the technique also makes use of more information than either maximax or minimax it may be said to be more superior to either of them in that respect. Nevertheless, like those other techniques it also wastes some of the available information concerning the possible outcomes of actions, using only the information for the best and the worst outcomes. Combinations of different strategies There is no reason to suppose, of course that firms do or must adopt any singe criterion in taking decisions under uncertainty. They may adopt different strategies on different occasions, or may consciously combine different strategies in order to spread the risk associated with any single approach.
DECISION MAKING. Decision making under conditions of uncertainty
DECISION MAKING Decision making under conditions of uncertainty Set of States of nature: S 1,..., S j,..., S n Set of decision alternatives: d 1,...,d i,...,d m The outcome of the decision C ij depends
More informationDecision Theory Using Probabilities, MV, EMV, EVPI and Other Techniques
1 Decision Theory Using Probabilities, MV, EMV, EVPI and Other Techniques Thompson Lumber is looking at marketing a new product storage sheds. Mr. Thompson has identified three decision options (alternatives)
More informationThe Course So Far. Atomic agent: uninformed, informed, local Specific KR languages
The Course So Far Traditional AI: Deterministic single agent domains Atomic agent: uninformed, informed, local Specific KR languages Constraint Satisfaction Logic and Satisfiability STRIPS for Classical
More informationThe Course So Far. Decision Making in Deterministic Domains. Decision Making in Uncertain Domains. Next: Decision Making in Uncertain Domains
The Course So Far Decision Making in Deterministic Domains search planning Decision Making in Uncertain Domains Uncertainty: adversarial Minimax Next: Decision Making in Uncertain Domains Uncertainty:
More informationLearning Objectives = = where X i is the i t h outcome of a decision, p i is the probability of the i t h
Learning Objectives After reading Chapter 15 and working the problems for Chapter 15 in the textbook and in this Workbook, you should be able to: Distinguish between decision making under uncertainty and
More informationDecision Analysis under Uncertainty. Christopher Grigoriou Executive MBA/HEC Lausanne
Decision Analysis under Uncertainty Christopher Grigoriou Executive MBA/HEC Lausanne 2007-2008 2008 Introduction Examples of decision making under uncertainty in the business world; => Trade-off between
More informationDr. Abdallah Abdallah Fall Term 2014
Quantitative Analysis Dr. Abdallah Abdallah Fall Term 2014 1 Decision analysis Fundamentals of decision theory models Ch. 3 2 Decision theory Decision theory is an analytic and systemic way to tackle problems
More informationSCHOOL OF BUSINESS, ECONOMICS AND MANAGEMENT. BF360 Operations Research
SCHOOL OF BUSINESS, ECONOMICS AND MANAGEMENT BF360 Operations Research Unit 5 Moses Mwale e-mail: moses.mwale@ictar.ac.zm BF360 Operations Research Contents Unit 5: Decision Analysis 3 5.1 Components
More informationModule 15 July 28, 2014
Module 15 July 28, 2014 General Approach to Decision Making Many Uses: Capacity Planning Product/Service Design Equipment Selection Location Planning Others Typically Used for Decisions Characterized by
More informationDecision Making. D.K.Sharma
Decision Making D.K.Sharma 1 Decision making Learning Objectives: To make the students understand the concepts of Decision making Decision making environment; Decision making under certainty; Decision
More informationMaking Hard Decision. ENCE 627 Decision Analysis for Engineering. Identify the decision situation and understand objectives. Identify alternatives
CHAPTER Duxbury Thomson Learning Making Hard Decision Third Edition RISK ATTITUDES A. J. Clark School of Engineering Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering 13 FALL 2003 By Dr. Ibrahim. Assakkaf
More informationFull file at CHAPTER 3 Decision Analysis
CHAPTER 3 Decision Analysis TRUE/FALSE 3.1 Expected Monetary Value (EMV) is the average or expected monetary outcome of a decision if it can be repeated a large number of times. 3.2 Expected Monetary Value
More informationDecision Theory. Refail N. Kasimbeyli
Decision Theory Refail N. Kasimbeyli Chapter 3 3 Utility Theory 3.1 Single-attribute utility 3.2 Interpreting utility functions 3.3 Utility functions for non-monetary attributes 3.4 The axioms of utility
More informationDecision Making. DKSharma
Decision Making DKSharma Decision making Learning Objectives: To make the students understand the concepts of Decision making Decision making environment; Decision making under certainty; Decision making
More informationRational theories of finance tell us how people should behave and often do not reflect reality.
FINC3023 Behavioral Finance TOPIC 1: Expected Utility Rational theories of finance tell us how people should behave and often do not reflect reality. A normative theory based on rational utility maximizers
More informationChapter 23: Choice under Risk
Chapter 23: Choice under Risk 23.1: Introduction We consider in this chapter optimal behaviour in conditions of risk. By this we mean that, when the individual takes a decision, he or she does not know
More informationChoice under risk and uncertainty
Choice under risk and uncertainty Introduction Up until now, we have thought of the objects that our decision makers are choosing as being physical items However, we can also think of cases where the outcomes
More informationCONVENTIONAL FINANCE, PROSPECT THEORY, AND MARKET EFFICIENCY
CONVENTIONAL FINANCE, PROSPECT THEORY, AND MARKET EFFICIENCY PART ± I CHAPTER 1 CHAPTER 2 CHAPTER 3 Foundations of Finance I: Expected Utility Theory Foundations of Finance II: Asset Pricing, Market Efficiency,
More informationTextbook: pp Chapter 3: Decision Analysis
1 Textbook: pp. 81-128 Chapter 3: Decision Analysis 2 Learning Objectives After completing this chapter, students will be able to: List the steps of the decision-making process. Describe the types of decision-making
More information1. A is a decision support tool that uses a tree-like graph or model of decisions and their possible consequences, including chance event outcomes,
1. A is a decision support tool that uses a tree-like graph or model of decisions and their possible consequences, including chance event outcomes, resource costs, and utility. A) Decision tree B) Graphs
More informationBEEM109 Experimental Economics and Finance
University of Exeter Recap Last class we looked at the axioms of expected utility, which defined a rational agent as proposed by von Neumann and Morgenstern. We then proceeded to look at empirical evidence
More informationAnswers to chapter 3 review questions
Answers to chapter 3 review questions 3.1 Explain why the indifference curves in a probability triangle diagram are straight lines if preferences satisfy expected utility theory. The expected utility of
More informationChapter 12. Decision Analysis
Page 1 of 80 Chapter 12. Decision Analysis [Page 514] [Page 515] In the previous chapters dealing with linear programming, models were formulated and solved in order to aid the manager in making a decision.
More informationNotes 10: Risk and Uncertainty
Economics 335 April 19, 1999 A. Introduction Notes 10: Risk and Uncertainty 1. Basic Types of Uncertainty in Agriculture a. production b. prices 2. Examples of Uncertainty in Agriculture a. crop yields
More informationLearning Objectives 6/2/18. Some keys from yesterday
Valuation and pricing (November 5, 2013) Lecture 12 Decisions Risk & Uncertainty Olivier J. de Jong, LL.M., MM., MBA, CFD, CFFA, AA www.centime.biz Some keys from yesterday Learning Objectives v Explain
More informationDecision making under uncertainty
Decision making under uncertainty 1 Outline 1. Components of decision making 2. Criteria for decision making 3. Utility theory 4. Decision trees 5. Posterior probabilities using Bayes rule 6. The Monty
More informationConcave utility functions
Meeting 9: Addendum Concave utility functions This functional form of the utility function characterizes a risk avoider. Why is it so? Consider the following bet (better numbers than those used at Meeting
More informationNext Year s Demand -Alternatives- Low High Do nothing Expand Subcontract 40 70
Lesson 04 Decision Making Solutions Solved Problem #1: see text book Solved Problem #2: see textbook Solved Problem #3: see textbook Solved Problem #6: (costs) see textbook #1: A small building contractor
More informationPAULI MURTO, ANDREY ZHUKOV
GAME THEORY SOLUTION SET 1 WINTER 018 PAULI MURTO, ANDREY ZHUKOV Introduction For suggested solution to problem 4, last year s suggested solutions by Tsz-Ning Wong were used who I think used suggested
More informationHandling Uncertainty. Ender Ozcan given by Peter Blanchfield
Handling Uncertainty Ender Ozcan given by Peter Blanchfield Objectives Be able to construct a payoff table to represent a decision problem. Be able to apply the maximin and maximax criteria to the table.
More informationUNIT 5 DECISION MAKING
UNIT 5 DECISION MAKING This unit: UNDER UNCERTAINTY Discusses the techniques to deal with uncertainties 1 INTRODUCTION Few decisions in construction industry are made with certainty. Need to look at: The
More informationChapter 2 supplement. Decision Analysis
Chapter 2 supplement At the operational level hundreds of decisions are made in order to achieve local outcomes that contribute to the achievement of the company's overall strategic goal. These local outcomes
More informationPrice Theory Lecture 9: Choice Under Uncertainty
I. Probability and Expected Value Price Theory Lecture 9: Choice Under Uncertainty In all that we have done so far, we've assumed that choices are being made under conditions of certainty -- prices are
More informationDecision-making under conditions of risk and uncertainty
Decision-making under conditions of risk and uncertainty Solutions to Chapter 12 questions (a) Profit and Loss Statement for Period Ending 31 May 2000 Revenue (14 400 000 journeys): 0 3 miles (7 200 000
More informationPAPER NO.1 : MICROECONOMICS ANALYSIS MODULE NO.6 : INDIFFERENCE CURVES
Subject Paper No and Title Module No and Title Module Tag 1: Microeconomics Analysis 6: Indifference Curves BSE_P1_M6 PAPER NO.1 : MICRO ANALYSIS TABLE OF CONTENTS 1. Learning Outcomes 2. Introduction
More informationnot to be republished NCERT Chapter 2 Consumer Behaviour 2.1 THE CONSUMER S BUDGET
Chapter 2 Theory y of Consumer Behaviour In this chapter, we will study the behaviour of an individual consumer in a market for final goods. The consumer has to decide on how much of each of the different
More informationModels and Decision with Financial Applications UNIT 1: Elements of Decision under Uncertainty
Models and Decision with Financial Applications UNIT 1: Elements of Decision under Uncertainty We always need to make a decision (or select from among actions, options or moves) even when there exists
More informationP1 Performance Operations
Operational Level Paper P1 Performance Operations Examiner s Answers SECTION A Answer to Question One 1.1 The correct answer is D. 1.2 $40,000 x 3.791 = $151,640 $50,000 / $151,640 = 0.3297 = 33.0% The
More informationKey concepts: Certainty Equivalent and Risk Premium
Certainty equivalents Risk premiums 19 Key concepts: Certainty Equivalent and Risk Premium Which is the amount of money that is equivalent in your mind to a given situation that involves uncertainty? Ex:
More informationExpected value is basically the average payoff from some sort of lottery, gamble or other situation with a randomly determined outcome.
Economics 352: Intermediate Microeconomics Notes and Sample Questions Chapter 18: Uncertainty and Risk Aversion Expected Value The chapter starts out by explaining what expected value is and how to calculate
More informationUsing the Maximin Principle
Using the Maximin Principle Under the maximin principle, it is easy to see that Rose should choose a, making her worst-case payoff 0. Colin s similar rationality as a player induces him to play (under
More informationUnit 4.3: Uncertainty
Unit 4.: Uncertainty Michael Malcolm June 8, 20 Up until now, we have been considering consumer choice problems where the consumer chooses over outcomes that are known. However, many choices in economics
More informationANASH EQUILIBRIUM of a strategic game is an action profile in which every. Strategy Equilibrium
Draft chapter from An introduction to game theory by Martin J. Osborne. Version: 2002/7/23. Martin.Osborne@utoronto.ca http://www.economics.utoronto.ca/osborne Copyright 1995 2002 by Martin J. Osborne.
More informationProblem Set 2. Theory of Banking - Academic Year Maria Bachelet March 2, 2017
Problem Set Theory of Banking - Academic Year 06-7 Maria Bachelet maria.jua.bachelet@gmai.com March, 07 Exercise Consider an agency relationship in which the principal contracts the agent, whose effort
More informationAgenda. Lecture 2. Decision Analysis. Key Characteristics. Terminology. Structuring Decision Problems
Agenda Lecture 2 Theory >Introduction to Making > Making Without Probabilities > Making With Probabilities >Expected Value of Perfect Information >Next Class 1 2 Analysis >Techniques used to make decisions
More informationstake and attain maximum profitability. Therefore, it s judicious to employ the best practices in
1 2 Success or failure of any undertaking mainly lies with the decisions made in every step of the undertaking. When it comes to business the main goal would be to maximize shareholders stake and attain
More informationMICROECONOMIC THEROY CONSUMER THEORY
LECTURE 5 MICROECONOMIC THEROY CONSUMER THEORY Choice under Uncertainty (MWG chapter 6, sections A-C, and Cowell chapter 8) Lecturer: Andreas Papandreou 1 Introduction p Contents n Expected utility theory
More informationFood, stormy 300 D. Constant Expected Consumption Line
FINAL (CHAPTERS 11 13) ECO 61 FALL 2008 UDAYAN ROY Each correct answer is worth 1 point, unless otherwise indicated. The maximum score is 30 points. Do not look at anyone else s answers and do not let
More informationManagerial Economics Uncertainty
Managerial Economics Uncertainty Aalto University School of Science Department of Industrial Engineering and Management January 10 26, 2017 Dr. Arto Kovanen, Ph.D. Visiting Lecturer Uncertainty general
More informationDecision Analysis CHAPTER LEARNING OBJECTIVES CHAPTER OUTLINE. After completing this chapter, students will be able to:
CHAPTER 3 Decision Analysis LEARNING OBJECTIVES After completing this chapter, students will be able to: 1. List the steps of the decision-making process. 2. Describe the types of decision-making environments.
More informationChapter 3. Decision Analysis. Learning Objectives
Chapter 3 Decision Analysis To accompany Quantitative Analysis for Management, Eleventh Edition, by Render, Stair, and Hanna Power Point slides created by Brian Peterson Learning Objectives After completing
More informationDecision Making. BUS 735: Business Decision Making and Research. Learn how to conduct regression analysis with a dummy independent variable.
Making BUS 735: Business Making and Research 1 Goals of this section Specific goals: Learn how to conduct regression analysis with a dummy independent variable. Learning objectives: LO5: Be able to use
More informationLecture 3: Prospect Theory, Framing, and Mental Accounting. Expected Utility Theory. The key features are as follows:
Topics Lecture 3: Prospect Theory, Framing, and Mental Accounting Expected Utility Theory Violations of EUT Prospect Theory Framing Mental Accounting Application of Prospect Theory, Framing, and Mental
More informationProject Risk Analysis and Management Exercises (Part II, Chapters 6, 7)
Project Risk Analysis and Management Exercises (Part II, Chapters 6, 7) Chapter II.6 Exercise 1 For the decision tree in Figure 1, assume Chance Events E and F are independent. a) Draw the appropriate
More informationChapter 15 Trade-offs Involving Time and Risk. Outline. Modeling Time and Risk. The Time Value of Money. Time Preferences. Probability and Risk
Involving Modeling The Value Part VII: Equilibrium in the Macroeconomy 23. Employment and Unemployment 15. Involving Web 1. Financial Decision Making 24. Credit Markets 25. The Monetary System 1 / 36 Involving
More informationECO 203: Worksheet 4. Question 1. Question 2. (6 marks)
ECO 203: Worksheet 4 Question 1 (6 marks) Russel and Ahmed decide to play a simple game. Russel has to flip a fair coin: if he gets a head Ahmed will pay him Tk. 10, if he gets a tail he will have to pay
More informationEconomics Homework 5 Fall 2006 Dickert-Conlin / Conlin
Economics 31 - Homework 5 Fall 26 Dickert-Conlin / Conlin Answer Key 1. Suppose Cush Bring-it-Home Cash has a utility function of U = M 2, where M is her income. Suppose Cush s income is $8 and she is
More information19 Decision Making. Expected Monetary Value Expected Opportunity Loss Return-to-Risk Ratio Decision Making with Sample Information
19 Decision Making USING STATISTICS @ The Reliable Fund 19.1 Payoff Tables and Decision Trees 19.2 Criteria for Decision Making Maximax Payoff Maximin Payoff Expected Monetary Value Expected Opportunity
More informationCHAPTER 6. Risk Aversion and Capital Allocation to Risky Assets INVESTMENTS BODIE, KANE, MARCUS
CHAPTER 6 Risk Aversion and Capital Allocation to Risky Assets INVESTMENTS BODIE, KANE, MARCUS McGraw-Hill/Irwin Copyright 011 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved. 6- Allocation to Risky
More informationECONOMICS SOLUTION BOOK 2ND PUC. Unit 2
ECONOMICS SOLUTION BOOK N PUC Unit I. Choose the correct answer (each question carries mark). Utility is a) Objective b) Subjective c) Both a & b d) None of the above. The shape of an indifference curve
More informationObtaining a fair arbitration outcome
Law, Probability and Risk Advance Access published March 16, 2011 Law, Probability and Risk Page 1 of 9 doi:10.1093/lpr/mgr003 Obtaining a fair arbitration outcome TRISTAN BARNETT School of Mathematics
More informationWhen one firm considers changing its price or output level, it must make assumptions about the reactions of its rivals.
Chapter 3 Oligopoly Oligopoly is an industry where there are relatively few sellers. The product may be standardized (steel) or differentiated (automobiles). The firms have a high degree of interdependence.
More informationDecision Analysis. Introduction. Job Counseling
Decision Analysis Max, min, minimax, maximin, maximax, minimin All good cat names! 1 Introduction Models provide insight and understanding We make decisions Decision making is difficult because: future
More informationTheory of Consumer Behavior First, we need to define the agents' goals and limitations (if any) in their ability to achieve those goals.
Theory of Consumer Behavior First, we need to define the agents' goals and limitations (if any) in their ability to achieve those goals. We will deal with a particular set of assumptions, but we can modify
More informationIntroduction LEARNING OBJECTIVES. The Six Steps in Decision Making. Thompson Lumber Company. Thompson Lumber Company
Valua%on and pricing (November 5, 2013) Lecture 4 Decision making (part 1) Olivier J. de Jong, LL.M., MM., MBA, CFD, CFFA, AA www.olivierdejong.com LEARNING OBJECTIVES 1. List the steps of the decision-making
More informationUNCERTAINTY AND INFORMATION
UNCERTAINTY AND INFORMATION M. En C. Eduardo Bustos Farías 1 Objectives After studying this chapter, you will be able to: Explain how people make decisions when they are uncertain about the consequences
More informationModels & Decision with Financial Applications Unit 3: Utility Function and Risk Attitude
Models & Decision with Financial Applications Unit 3: Utility Function and Risk Attitude Duan LI Department of Systems Engineering & Engineering Management The Chinese University of Hong Kong http://www.se.cuhk.edu.hk/
More informationDecision Analysis CHAPTER 19 LEARNING OBJECTIVES
CHAPTER 19 Decision Analysis LEARNING OBJECTIVES This chapter describes how to use decision analysis to improve management decisions, thereby enabling you to: 1. Make decisions under certainty by constructing
More informationOPTIONS & GREEKS. Study notes. An option results in the right (but not the obligation) to buy or sell an asset, at a predetermined
OPTIONS & GREEKS Study notes 1 Options 1.1 Basic information An option results in the right (but not the obligation) to buy or sell an asset, at a predetermined price, and on or before a predetermined
More informationECON 312: MICROECONOMICS II Lecture 11: W/C 25 th April 2016 Uncertainty and Risk Dr Ebo Turkson
ECON 312: MICROECONOMICS II Lecture 11: W/C 25 th April 2016 Uncertainty and Risk Dr Ebo Turkson Chapter 17 Uncertainty Topics Degree of Risk. Decision Making Under Uncertainty. Avoiding Risk. Investing
More informationIntroduction to Economics I: Consumer Theory
Introduction to Economics I: Consumer Theory Leslie Reinhorn Durham University Business School October 2014 What is Economics? Typical De nitions: "Economics is the social science that deals with the production,
More informationDecision Making Under Risk Probability Historical Data (relative frequency) (e.g Insurance) Cause and Effect Models (e.g.
Decision Making Under Risk Probability Historical Data (relative frequency) (e.g Insurance) Cause and Effect Models (e.g. casinos, weather forecasting) Subjective Probability Often, the decision maker
More informationChapter 1 Microeconomics of Consumer Theory
Chapter Microeconomics of Consumer Theory The two broad categories of decision-makers in an economy are consumers and firms. Each individual in each of these groups makes its decisions in order to achieve
More informationPhil 321: Week 2. Decisions under ignorance
Phil 321: Week 2 Decisions under ignorance Decisions under Ignorance 1) Decision under risk: The agent can assign probabilities (conditional or unconditional) to each state. 2) Decision under ignorance:
More informationDecision Making. BUS 735: Business Decision Making and Research. exercises. Assess what we have learned. 2 Decision Making Without Probabilities
Making BUS 735: Business Making and Research 1 1.1 Goals and Agenda Goals and Agenda Learning Objective Learn how to make decisions with uncertainty, without using probabilities. Practice what we learn.
More informationMaximizing Winnings on Final Jeopardy!
Maximizing Winnings on Final Jeopardy! Jessica Abramson, Natalie Collina, and William Gasarch August 2017 1 Introduction Consider a final round of Jeopardy! with players Alice and Betty 1. We assume that
More informationP2 Performance Management May 2013 examination
Management Level Paper P2 Performance Management May 2013 examination Examiner s Answers Note: Some of the answers that follow are fuller and more comprehensive than would be expected from a well-prepared
More informationP1: PBU/OVY P2: PBU/OVY QC: PBU/OVY T1: PBU GTBL GTBL032-Black-v13 January 22, :43
CHAPTER19 Decision Analysis LEARNING OBJECTIVES This chapter describes how to use decision analysis to improve management decisions, thereby enabling you to: 1. Learn about decision making under certainty,
More informationPOSSIBILITIES, PREFERENCES, AND CHOICES
Chapt er 9 POSSIBILITIES, PREFERENCES, AND CHOICES Key Concepts Consumption Possibilities The budget line shows the limits to a household s consumption. Figure 9.1 graphs a budget line. Consumption points
More informationAnswers To Chapter 6. Review Questions
Answers To Chapter 6 Review Questions 1 Answer d Individuals can also affect their hours through working more than one job, vacations, and leaves of absence 2 Answer d Typically when one observes indifference
More informationChoose between the four lotteries with unknown probabilities on the branches: uncertainty
R.E.Marks 2000 Lecture 8-1 2.11 Utility Choose between the four lotteries with unknown probabilities on the branches: uncertainty A B C D $25 $150 $600 $80 $90 $98 $ 20 $0 $100$1000 $105$ 100 R.E.Marks
More informationDecision Analysis CHAPTER 19
CHAPTER 19 Decision Analysis LEARNING OBJECTIVES This chapter describes how to use decision analysis to improve management decisions, thereby enabling you to: 1. Learn about decision making under certainty,
More information12.2 Utility Functions and Probabilities
220 UNCERTAINTY (Ch. 12) only a small part of the risk. The money backing up the insurance is paid in advance, so there is no default risk to the insured. From the economist's point of view, "cat bonds"
More informationDECISION ANALYSIS: INTRODUCTION. Métodos Cuantitativos M. En C. Eduardo Bustos Farias 1
DECISION ANALYSIS: INTRODUCTION Cuantitativos M. En C. Eduardo Bustos Farias 1 Agenda Decision analysis in general Structuring decision problems Decision making under uncertainty - without probability
More informationRisk, uncertainty and irreversibility
Risk, uncertainty and irreversibility Kine Josefine Aurland-Bredesen Guest lecture ECN275, 19.03.2018 0 Motivation Do we live in a certain world where all choices are reversible? Incorporating risk, uncertainty
More information8 POSSIBILITIES, PREFERENCES, AND CHOICES. Chapter. Key Concepts. The Budget Line
Chapter 8 POSSIBILITIES, PREFERENCES, AND CHOICES Key Concepts FIGURE 8. The Budget Line Consumption Possibilities The budget shows the limits to a household s consumption. Figure 8. graphs a budget ;
More informationCASE FAIR OSTER PRINCIPLES OF MICROECONOMICS E L E V E N T H E D I T I O N. PEARSON 2012 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall
PART II The Market System: Choices Made by Households and Firms PRINCIPLES OF MICROECONOMICS E L E V E N T H E D I T I O N CASE FAIR OSTER PEARSON 2012 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall
More information05/05/2011. Degree of Risk. Degree of Risk. BUSA 4800/4810 May 5, Uncertainty
BUSA 4800/4810 May 5, 2011 Uncertainty We must believe in luck. For how else can we explain the success of those we don t like? Jean Cocteau Degree of Risk We incorporate risk and uncertainty into our
More informationChapter 02 Economist's View of Behavior
Chapter 02 Economist's View of Behavior Essay Questions 1. It is commonly believed that the best ways to motivate an employee are (1) to improve the quality of the workplace and (2) to make the employee
More informationOutline. Simple, Compound, and Reduced Lotteries Independence Axiom Expected Utility Theory Money Lotteries Risk Aversion
Uncertainty Outline Simple, Compound, and Reduced Lotteries Independence Axiom Expected Utility Theory Money Lotteries Risk Aversion 2 Simple Lotteries 3 Simple Lotteries Advanced Microeconomic Theory
More informationDECISION ANALYSIS. Decision often must be made in uncertain environments. Examples:
DECISION ANALYSIS Introduction Decision often must be made in uncertain environments. Examples: Manufacturer introducing a new product in the marketplace. Government contractor bidding on a new contract.
More informationSensitivity = NPV / PV of key input
SECTION A 20 MARKS Question One 1.1 The answer is D 1.2 The answer is C Sensitivity measures the percentage change in a key input (for example initial outlay, direct material, direct labour, residual value)
More informationResource Allocation and Decision Analysis (ECON 8010) Spring 2014 Fundamentals of Managerial and Strategic Decision-Making
Resource Allocation and Decision Analysis ECON 800) Spring 0 Fundamentals of Managerial and Strategic Decision-Making Reading: Relevant Costs and Revenues ECON 800 Coursepak, Page ) Definitions and Concepts:
More informationIX. Decision Theory. A. Basic Definitions
IX. Decision Theory Techniques used to find optimal solutions in situations where a decision maker is faced with several alternatives (Actions) and an uncertain or risk-filled future (Events or States
More informationDecision Making Models
Decision Making Models Prof. Yongwon Seo (seoyw@cau.ac.kr) College of Business Administration, CAU Decision Theory Decision theory problems are characterized by the following: A list of alternatives. A
More informationHow do we cope with uncertainty?
Topic 3: Choice under uncertainty (K&R Ch. 6) In 1965, a Frenchman named Raffray thought that he had found a great deal: He would pay a 90-year-old woman $500 a month until she died, then move into her
More informationEcon 323 Microeconomic Theory. Practice Exam 2 with Solutions
Econ 323 Microeconomic Theory Practice Exam 2 with Solutions Chapter 10, Question 1 Which of the following is not a condition for perfect competition? Firms a. take prices as given b. sell a standardized
More informationChapter 05 Understanding Risk
Chapter 05 Understanding Risk Multiple Choice Questions 1. (p. 93) Which of the following would not be included in a definition of risk? a. Risk is a measure of uncertainty B. Risk can always be avoided
More informationChapter 18: Risky Choice and Risk
Chapter 18: Risky Choice and Risk Risky Choice Probability States of Nature Expected Utility Function Interval Measure Violations Risk Preference State Dependent Utility Risk-Aversion Coefficient Actuarially
More informationModern Portfolio Theory
66 Trusts & Trustees, Vol. 15, No. 2, April 2009 Modern Portfolio Theory Ian Shipway* Abstract All investors, be they private individuals, trustees or professionals are faced with an extraordinary range
More information