Models & Decision with Financial Applications Unit 3: Utility Function and Risk Attitude
|
|
- Samuel Peters
- 5 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 Models & Decision with Financial Applications Unit 3: Utility Function and Risk Attitude Duan LI Department of Systems Engineering & Engineering Management The Chinese University of Hong Kong seem5820
2 2 Model Decision Maker s Preference: How to model preferences: Utility function approach. Every decision involves some kind of trade-off. In decision making under uncertainty, the fundamental trade-off question often is: How much risk is a decision maker willing to assume? Basing decisions on expected monetary values is convenient, but it can lead to decisions that may not seem intuitively appealing, since the EMV does not capture different risk attitudes of different decisionmaker(s). Consider two lotteries, {0.5, 100; 0.5, 1} and {0.5, 200; 0.5, 100}. Although the second lottery has a higher expected value, most people prefer the first one. The phenomenon that people act differently indicates that the expected value does not capture the essence in modeling decision makers risk attitudes.
3 3 Probability-equivalent Assessment Technique for Assessing Utilities: Let x 1, x 2..., x n be possible consequences from an uncertain event. Let x and x be the most preferred consequence and the least preferred consequence, respectively. An individual s preference on a lottery- that gives a chance p at x and a complementary chance at x is increasing with respect to p (Monotonicity). For any consequence x, there exists some number p(x) such that the decision maker would be indifferent between (1) x for certain and (2) a lottery giving a chance p(x) at x and a complementary chance at x. = p(x) is termed utility of the consequence x. Clearly, we have p(x ) = 0 and p(x ) = 1.
4 Non uniqueness: If u 1 is a utility function, then for any constant a and any positive constant b, the function u 2 = a + bu 1 is also a utility function. The utility function provides (i) a ranking of the consequences or uncertain events and (ii) the degree of preference of one against the other. Let A and B be consequence or uncertainty event. 1. A B (DM prefers A to B) if and only if u(a) > u(b). 2. A B (DM prefers B to A) if and only if u(a) < u(b). 3. A B (DM is indifferent between A to B) if and only if u(a) = u(b). x and x are not necessary in the candidate list. The consequences may not be in dollar unit, or even be evaluated with respect to multiple attributes. 4
5 5 Utility Axioms: The behavioral assumptions that form the basis of expected utility are called axioms. These axioms relate to the consistency with which an individual expresses preferences from among a series of risky prospects. 1. Ordering and transitivity. A decision maker can order (establish preference or indifference) any two alternatives. Further the ordering is transitive: A 1 A 2 and A 2 A 3 A 1 A 3 ( Money Pump argument). 2. Reduction of compound uncertain events. A decision maker is indifferent between a compound uncertain event and a simple uncertain event as determined by reduction using standard probability manipulations. 3. Continuity. A decision maker is indifferent between a consequence A and some uncertain event involving only two basic consequences A 1 and A 2, where A 1 A A 2 (We can construct a reference
6 gamble with some probability p, 0 < p < 1, for which the DM will be indifferent between the reference gamble and A.) 4. Substitutability. A decision maker is indifferent between any original uncertain event that includes A and one formed by substituting for A an uncertain event that is judged to be its equivalent. 5. Monotonicity. Given two reference gambles with the same possible outcomes, a decision maker prefers the one with the higher probability of winning the preferred outcome. 6. Invariance. All that is needed to determine a DM s preferences among uncertain events are the payoffs (or consequences) and the associated probabilities. 7. Finiteness. No consequences are considered infinitely bad or infinitely good. Most of us agree that the above assumptions are reasonable under most circumstances. 6
7 7 Utility of Uncertain Event: If a DM accepts the axioms, (i) it is possible for him/her to find a utility function to evaluate the consequences, and(ii) he/she should be making decisions in a way that is consistent with maximizing expected utility. Consider a selection between two lotteries, A : {0.5,20;0.5,15} and B : {0.3,40;0.7,10}. Applying the above axioms, we can conclude that For a decision maker A B if and only if his/her utility satisfies 0.5u(20) + 0.5u(15) > 0.3u(40) + 0.7u(10).
8 Assume that there is an uncertain event which pays off x i with probability p i, i = 1,2,..., n. The expected utility of this uncertain event is n i=1 p iu(x i ). Expected monetary value (EMV): Assume that there is an uncertain event which pays off x i with probability p i, i = 1,2,..., n. The EMV of this uncertain event is equal to n i=1 p ix i. Certainty Equivalent: Assume that there is an uncertain event which pays off x i with probability p i, i = 1,2,..., n. q is said to be the Certainty Equivalent of this uncertainty event if 8 u(q) = n p i u(x i ) i=1 In other words, the decision maker is indifferent between obtaining q for certain and entering the uncertain event: Expected Utility of the Uncertain Event = Utility of the Certainty Equivalent
9 9 Utility assessment using certainty equivalent Utility function is, in general, applied to the whole wealth. = The preference could change when the DM s current wealth is different. Example: A bettor with utility U(x) = lnx, where x is total wealth, has a choice between two alternatives: A: Win $10,000 with probability 0.2 and win $1,000 with probability 0.8. B: Win $3,000 with probability 0.9 and lose $2,000 with probability If the bettor currently has $2,500, he should prefer A to B, since u(a) = 0.2u(12,500)+0.8u(3,500) = > u(b) = 0.9u(5,500)+0.1u(500) = The CE of A: u 1 (8.415) = The CE of B: u 1 (8.373) =
10 2. If the bettor currently has $5,000, he should prefer B to A, since u(a) = 0.2u(15,000)+0.8u(6,000) = < u(b) = 0.9u(8,000)+0.1u(3,000) = The CE of A: u 1 (8.883) = The CE of B: u 1 (8.889) = If the bettor currently has $10,000, he should prefer A to B, since u(a) = 0.2u(20,000)+0.8u(11,000) = > u(b) = 0.9u(13,000)+0.1u(8,000) = The CE of A: u 1 (9.4254) - 10,000 = The CE of B: u 1 (9.4244) - 10,000 = What is the reason behind this pattern of choices between A and B? 10
11 11 Risk Attitudes A decision maker is risk averse if the decision maker considers no uncertain event more desirable than its EMV, i.e., the decision maker s Certainty Equivalent is less than the EMV. A decision maker is risk averse if his/her utility function is concave (the curve opens downward). If the utility function is second-order differentiable, the utility function is concave if its second order derivative is always nonpositive. Example: u(x) = lnx, where x 0.
12 A decision maker is risk prone if the decision maker considers every uncertain event more desirable than its EMV, i.e., the decision maker s Certainty Equivalent is always larger than the EMV. A decision maker is risk prone if his/her utility function is convex (the curve opens upward). If the utility function is second-order differentiable, the utility function is convex if its second order derivative is always nonnegative. Example: u(x) = expx. A decision maker is risk neutral if the decision maker evaluates every uncertain event by its EMV, i.e., the decision maker s Certainty Equivalent is always equal to the EMV. A decision maker is risk neutral if his/her utility function is linear. When the variation of the consequence of different options is small with respect to the current wealth, a nonlinear utility can be well approximated by a linear utility function. 12
13 13 Application in Insurance Example: Assume that the utility function of an individual is given by u = w 1/2. His total wealth is $250,000 of which $160,000 is the worth of his house. There is 10% probability that his house may be destroyed by fire. What is the maximum premium (also called insurance premium) he should be willing to pay for insurance against fire? Define Risk Premium = EMV - Certainty Equivalent. What is the risk premium of the above example problem?
14 14 Decision Making Theory in the Insurance Market Consider two possible states of the nature, s 1 and s 2, which mayoccur at any time t, where s 1 is the normal state while s 2 is the state of accident. Let w i denote the wealth of the DM in state s i, i = 1,2. The utility function of the DM is denoted by u(w) which is state independent. The utility function is an increasing function of the wealth. u > 0. Assume that the DM is risk averse. u < 0. The probability that state s 1 will occur is p 1.
15 15 The expected utility function which the DM wants to maximize is Eu = p 1 u(w 1 )+(1 p 1 )u(w 2 ) Indifference curves on the w 1 w 2 plane: Eu = p 1 u(w 1 )+(1 p 1 )u(w 2 ) = constant The DM is indifferent between any two points on an indifference curve. The indifference curves have a negative slope: dw 2 dw 1 = p 1 1 p 1 u (w 1 ) u (w 2 ) < 0 The indifference curves are convex when the DM is risk averse, d(w 2 ) 2 d 2 w 1 = p 1 1 p 1 [ u (w 1 ) u (w 2 ) + u (w 1 ) [u (w 2 )] 2u (w 2 ) dw 2 dw 1 ] > 0
16 The 45 degree line on the w 1 w 2 plane is called the certainty line (No uncertainty in wealth associated with the states of the world). Along the certainty line the indifference curves have the same slope, p 1 1 p 1. Insurance premium: The maximum premium the DM is willing to get himself/herself fully covered against the risk = The money which the DM pays to move from the current (ŵ 1,ŵ 2 ) to the point on the certainty line that has the same utility value. Insurance policy: If the accident occurs, the insured claims the benefit. If the accident does not occur, the insured loses the money paid in premium. Suppose an insurance firm offers $a worth of benefit for each $1 paid in premium. 16
17 The insurance deal is said to be fair if the expected profit from such a contract is zero, 17 (1 p 1 )a p 1 = 0 i.e., a = p 1 1 p 1 TheDM sbudgetlinepassesthroughhis/hercurrentposition(ŵ 1,ŵ 2 )) with slope p 1 1 p 1, w 2 = ŵ 2 p 1 1 p 1 (w 1 ŵ 1 ) The fair premium is less than the insurance premium which is the maximum premium that the DM is willing to pay.
18 18 Fitting of Utility Function The degree of risk aversion of any decision maker changes when his/her status changes! The degree of risk aversion can be measured by the following normalized curvature -like measure: r(x) = u (x) u (x) We may classify decision makers by the classes of their degree of risk aversion, thus fitting the right utility functions for them.
19 19 Constant risk aversion and the exponential utility function An individual displays constant risk aversion if the risk premium for a gamble does not depend on the initial amount of wealth held by the decision maker. For example, if we observe the following behavior, Gamble Expected Certainty Risk Between Value Equivalent Premium 10, , , , we can conclude that the decision maker is of a constant risk aversion. In other words, a constantly risk aversion person would be just anxious about taking a bet regardless of the amount of money available.
20 Mathematically, if a decision maker is of a constant risk aversion, his/her degree of risk aversion r(x) is a constant with respect to x. For decision makers with a constant risk aversion, their utility can be expressed as the following exponential form: u(x) = 1 e x/r, where parameter R is called the risk tolerance that determines how risk averse the utility function is. Note r(x) = 1 R for such a utility function. Essentiallythe abovetable is generatedby settingr=35in theabove exponential utility function. This kind of experiments can be designed to test whether a decision maker is of a constant risk aversion. 20
21 21 How to determine parameter R? The risk tolerance parameter R in the exponential utility function u(x) = 1 e x/r determines how risk averse the utility function is. Larger values of R make the exponential utility function flatter, while smaller values make it more concave or more risk averse. How to determine R? Consider the gamble: Win $Y with probability 0.5 and lose $Y/2 with probability 0.5. The risk tolerance R is then approximately equal to the largest value of Y for which you would prefer to take the gamble rather than not to take it. Suppose that the expected value and variance of the payoffs are µ and σ 2, respectively. Then, Certainty Equivalence µ 0.5σ2 R when the utility function is of an exponential form.
22 22 Decreasing risk aversion and the logarithmic utility function If an individual s preferences show decreasing risk aversion, then the risk premium decreases if a constant amount is added to all payoffs in a gamble. For example, if we observe the following behavior, Gamble Expected Certainty Risk Between Value Equivalent Premium 10, , , , In other words, decreasing risk aversion means the more money you have, the less nervous you are about a particular bet.
23 Mathematically, if a decision maker is of a decreasing risk aversion, his/her degree of risk aversion r(x) is decreasing with respect to x. For decision makers with a decreasing risk aversion, their utility can be expressed as the following exponential form: 23 u(x) = ln(ax+b), where a > 0 and x is defined in {x ax+b 0}. Note r(x) = a ax+b which is decreasing with respect to x. Essentially the above table is generated by setting a = 1 and b = 0 in the above logarithmic utility function. This kind of experiments can be designed to test whether a decision maker is of a decreasing risk aversion. The problem of determining utility function is now reduced to parameter estimation problem for a and b.
Models and Decision with Financial Applications UNIT 1: Elements of Decision under Uncertainty
Models and Decision with Financial Applications UNIT 1: Elements of Decision under Uncertainty We always need to make a decision (or select from among actions, options or moves) even when there exists
More informationMaking Hard Decision. ENCE 627 Decision Analysis for Engineering. Identify the decision situation and understand objectives. Identify alternatives
CHAPTER Duxbury Thomson Learning Making Hard Decision Third Edition RISK ATTITUDES A. J. Clark School of Engineering Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering 13 FALL 2003 By Dr. Ibrahim. Assakkaf
More informationKey concepts: Certainty Equivalent and Risk Premium
Certainty equivalents Risk premiums 19 Key concepts: Certainty Equivalent and Risk Premium Which is the amount of money that is equivalent in your mind to a given situation that involves uncertainty? Ex:
More informationEconomic Risk and Decision Analysis for Oil and Gas Industry CE School of Engineering and Technology Asian Institute of Technology
Economic Risk and Decision Analysis for Oil and Gas Industry CE81.9008 School of Engineering and Technology Asian Institute of Technology January Semester Presented by Dr. Thitisak Boonpramote Department
More informationLecture 06 Single Attribute Utility Theory
Lecture 06 Single Attribute Utility Theory Jitesh H. Panchal ME 597: Decision Making for Engineering Systems Design Design Engineering Lab @ Purdue (DELP) School of Mechanical Engineering Purdue University,
More informationCHOICE THEORY, UTILITY FUNCTIONS AND RISK AVERSION
CHOICE THEORY, UTILITY FUNCTIONS AND RISK AVERSION Szabolcs Sebestyén szabolcs.sebestyen@iscte.pt Master in Finance INVESTMENTS Sebestyén (ISCTE-IUL) Choice Theory Investments 1 / 65 Outline 1 An Introduction
More informationChoice under Uncertainty
Chapter 7 Choice under Uncertainty 1. Expected Utility Theory. 2. Risk Aversion. 3. Applications: demand for insurance, portfolio choice 4. Violations of Expected Utility Theory. 7.1 Expected Utility Theory
More informationComparison of Payoff Distributions in Terms of Return and Risk
Comparison of Payoff Distributions in Terms of Return and Risk Preliminaries We treat, for convenience, money as a continuous variable when dealing with monetary outcomes. Strictly speaking, the derivation
More informationChoice under risk and uncertainty
Choice under risk and uncertainty Introduction Up until now, we have thought of the objects that our decision makers are choosing as being physical items However, we can also think of cases where the outcomes
More informationExercises for Chapter 8
Exercises for Chapter 8 Exercise 8. Consider the following functions: f (x)= e x, (8.) g(x)=ln(x+), (8.2) h(x)= x 2, (8.3) u(x)= x 2, (8.4) v(x)= x, (8.5) w(x)=sin(x). (8.6) In all cases take x>0. (a)
More informationManagerial Economics
Managerial Economics Unit 9: Risk Analysis Rudolf Winter-Ebmer Johannes Kepler University Linz Winter Term 2015 Managerial Economics: Unit 9 - Risk Analysis 1 / 49 Objectives Explain how managers should
More informationDecision Theory. Refail N. Kasimbeyli
Decision Theory Refail N. Kasimbeyli Chapter 3 3 Utility Theory 3.1 Single-attribute utility 3.2 Interpreting utility functions 3.3 Utility functions for non-monetary attributes 3.4 The axioms of utility
More informationRational theories of finance tell us how people should behave and often do not reflect reality.
FINC3023 Behavioral Finance TOPIC 1: Expected Utility Rational theories of finance tell us how people should behave and often do not reflect reality. A normative theory based on rational utility maximizers
More informationMock Examination 2010
[EC7086] Mock Examination 2010 No. of Pages: [7] No. of Questions: [6] Subject [Economics] Title of Paper [EC7086: Microeconomic Theory] Time Allowed [Two (2) hours] Instructions to candidates Please answer
More informationUnit 4.3: Uncertainty
Unit 4.: Uncertainty Michael Malcolm June 8, 20 Up until now, we have been considering consumer choice problems where the consumer chooses over outcomes that are known. However, many choices in economics
More informationUTILITY ANALYSIS HANDOUTS
UTILITY ANALYSIS HANDOUTS 1 2 UTILITY ANALYSIS Motivating Example: Your total net worth = $400K = W 0. You own a home worth $250K. Probability of a fire each yr = 0.001. Insurance cost = $1K. Question:
More informationProject Risk Analysis and Management Exercises (Part II, Chapters 6, 7)
Project Risk Analysis and Management Exercises (Part II, Chapters 6, 7) Chapter II.6 Exercise 1 For the decision tree in Figure 1, assume Chance Events E and F are independent. a) Draw the appropriate
More informationE&G, Chap 10 - Utility Analysis; the Preference Structure, Uncertainty - Developing Indifference Curves in {E(R),σ(R)} Space.
1 E&G, Chap 10 - Utility Analysis; the Preference Structure, Uncertainty - Developing Indifference Curves in {E(R),σ(R)} Space. A. Overview. c 2 1. With Certainty, objects of choice (c 1, c 2 ) 2. With
More informationApril 28, Decision Analysis 2. Utility Theory The Value of Information
15.053 April 28, 2005 Decision Analysis 2 Utility Theory The Value of Information 1 Lotteries and Utility L1 $50,000 $ 0 Lottery 1: a 50% chance at $50,000 and a 50% chance of nothing. L2 $20,000 Lottery
More informationRisk aversion and choice under uncertainty
Risk aversion and choice under uncertainty Pierre Chaigneau pierre.chaigneau@hec.ca June 14, 2011 Finance: the economics of risk and uncertainty In financial markets, claims associated with random future
More informationProblem Set 2. Theory of Banking - Academic Year Maria Bachelet March 2, 2017
Problem Set Theory of Banking - Academic Year 06-7 Maria Bachelet maria.jua.bachelet@gmai.com March, 07 Exercise Consider an agency relationship in which the principal contracts the agent, whose effort
More informationNotes 10: Risk and Uncertainty
Economics 335 April 19, 1999 A. Introduction Notes 10: Risk and Uncertainty 1. Basic Types of Uncertainty in Agriculture a. production b. prices 2. Examples of Uncertainty in Agriculture a. crop yields
More informationModule 1: Decision Making Under Uncertainty
Module 1: Decision Making Under Uncertainty Information Economics (Ec 515) George Georgiadis Today, we will study settings in which decision makers face uncertain outcomes. Natural when dealing with asymmetric
More informationConcave utility functions
Meeting 9: Addendum Concave utility functions This functional form of the utility function characterizes a risk avoider. Why is it so? Consider the following bet (better numbers than those used at Meeting
More informationUtility and Choice Under Uncertainty
Introduction to Microeconomics Utility and Choice Under Uncertainty The Five Axioms of Choice Under Uncertainty We can use the axioms of preference to show how preferences can be mapped into measurable
More informationExpected value is basically the average payoff from some sort of lottery, gamble or other situation with a randomly determined outcome.
Economics 352: Intermediate Microeconomics Notes and Sample Questions Chapter 18: Uncertainty and Risk Aversion Expected Value The chapter starts out by explaining what expected value is and how to calculate
More informationAMS Portfolio Theory and Capital Markets
AMS 69.0 - Portfolio Theory and Capital Markets I Class 5 - Utility and Pricing Theory Robert J. Frey Research Professor Stony Brook University, Applied Mathematics and Statistics frey@ams.sunysb.edu This
More informationMicro Theory I Assignment #5 - Answer key
Micro Theory I Assignment #5 - Answer key 1. Exercises from MWG (Chapter 6): (a) Exercise 6.B.1 from MWG: Show that if the preferences % over L satisfy the independence axiom, then for all 2 (0; 1) and
More informationInvestment and Portfolio Management. Lecture 1: Managed funds fall into a number of categories that pool investors funds
Lecture 1: Managed funds fall into a number of categories that pool investors funds Types of managed funds: Unit trusts Investors funds are pooled, usually into specific types of assets Investors are assigned
More informationExpected utility theory; Expected Utility Theory; risk aversion and utility functions
; Expected Utility Theory; risk aversion and utility functions Prof. Massimo Guidolin Portfolio Management Spring 2016 Outline and objectives Utility functions The expected utility theorem and the axioms
More informationChapter 18: Risky Choice and Risk
Chapter 18: Risky Choice and Risk Risky Choice Probability States of Nature Expected Utility Function Interval Measure Violations Risk Preference State Dependent Utility Risk-Aversion Coefficient Actuarially
More informationStat 6863-Handout 1 Economics of Insurance and Risk June 2008, Maurice A. Geraghty
A. The Psychology of Risk Aversion Stat 6863-Handout 1 Economics of Insurance and Risk June 2008, Maurice A. Geraghty Suppose a decision maker has an asset worth $100,000 that has a 1% chance of being
More informationLecture 11 - Risk Aversion, Expected Utility Theory and Insurance
Lecture 11 - Risk Aversion, Expected Utility Theory and Insurance 14.03, Spring 2003 1 Risk Aversion and Insurance: Introduction To have a passably usable model of choice, we need to be able to say something
More informationEngineering Risk Benefit Analysis
Engineering Risk Benefit Analysis 1.155, 2.943, 3.577, 6.938, 10.816, 13.621, 16.862, 22.82, ESD.72, ESD.721 DA 4. Introduction to Utility George E. Apostolakis Massachusetts Institute of Technology Spring
More informationLecture 3: Utility-Based Portfolio Choice
Lecture 3: Utility-Based Portfolio Choice Prof. Massimo Guidolin Portfolio Management Spring 2017 Outline and objectives Choice under uncertainty: dominance o Guidolin-Pedio, chapter 1, sec. 2 Choice under
More informationNOTES ON ATTITUDE TOWARD RISK TAKING AND THE EXPONENTIAL UTILITY FUNCTION. Craig W. Kirkwood
NOTES ON ATTITUDE TOWARD RISK TAKING AND THE EXPONENTIAL UTILITY FUNCTION Craig W Kirkwood Department of Management Arizona State University Tempe, AZ 85287-4006 September 1991 Corrected April 1993 Reissued
More informationPreferences and Utility
Preferences and Utility PowerPoint Slides prepared by: Andreea CHIRITESCU Eastern Illinois University 1 Axioms of Rational Choice Completeness If A and B are any two situations, an individual can always
More informationMICROECONOMIC THEROY CONSUMER THEORY
LECTURE 5 MICROECONOMIC THEROY CONSUMER THEORY Choice under Uncertainty (MWG chapter 6, sections A-C, and Cowell chapter 8) Lecturer: Andreas Papandreou 1 Introduction p Contents n Expected utility theory
More information05/05/2011. Degree of Risk. Degree of Risk. BUSA 4800/4810 May 5, Uncertainty
BUSA 4800/4810 May 5, 2011 Uncertainty We must believe in luck. For how else can we explain the success of those we don t like? Jean Cocteau Degree of Risk We incorporate risk and uncertainty into our
More informationManagerial Economics Uncertainty
Managerial Economics Uncertainty Aalto University School of Science Department of Industrial Engineering and Management January 10 26, 2017 Dr. Arto Kovanen, Ph.D. Visiting Lecturer Uncertainty general
More informationLecture 6 Introduction to Utility Theory under Certainty and Uncertainty
Lecture 6 Introduction to Utility Theory under Certainty and Uncertainty Prof. Massimo Guidolin Prep Course in Quant Methods for Finance August-September 2017 Outline and objectives Axioms of choice under
More informationSolution Guide to Exercises for Chapter 4 Decision making under uncertainty
THE ECONOMICS OF FINANCIAL MARKETS R. E. BAILEY Solution Guide to Exercises for Chapter 4 Decision making under uncertainty 1. Consider an investor who makes decisions according to a mean-variance objective.
More informationLearning Objectives = = where X i is the i t h outcome of a decision, p i is the probability of the i t h
Learning Objectives After reading Chapter 15 and working the problems for Chapter 15 in the textbook and in this Workbook, you should be able to: Distinguish between decision making under uncertainty and
More informationCHAPTER 6: RISK AVERSION AND CAPITAL ALLOCATION TO RISKY ASSETS
CHAPTER 6: RISK AVERSION AND CAPITAL ALLOCATION TO RISKY ASSETS 1. a. The expected cash flow is: (0.5 $70,000) + (0.5 00,000) = $135,000 With a risk premium of 8% over the risk-free rate of 6%, the required
More informationPh.D. Preliminary Examination MICROECONOMIC THEORY Applied Economics Graduate Program August 2017
Ph.D. Preliminary Examination MICROECONOMIC THEORY Applied Economics Graduate Program August 2017 The time limit for this exam is four hours. The exam has four sections. Each section includes two questions.
More informationChoosing the Wrong Portfolio of Projects Part 4: Inattention to Risk. Risk Tolerance
Risk Tolerance Part 3 of this paper explained how to construct a project selection decision model that estimates the impact of a project on the organization's objectives and, based on those impacts, estimates
More informationCHAPTER 6: RISK AVERSION AND CAPITAL ALLOCATION TO RISKY ASSETS
CHAPTER 6: RISK AVERSION AND PROBLE SETS 1. (e). (b) A higher borrowing rate is a consequence of the risk of the borrowers default. In perfect markets with no additional cost of default, this increment
More informationDepartment of Economics The Ohio State University Midterm Questions and Answers Econ 8712
Prof. James Peck Fall 06 Department of Economics The Ohio State University Midterm Questions and Answers Econ 87. (30 points) A decision maker (DM) is a von Neumann-Morgenstern expected utility maximizer.
More informationExpected Utility and Risk Aversion
Expected Utility and Risk Aversion Expected utility and risk aversion 1/ 58 Introduction Expected utility is the standard framework for modeling investor choices. The following topics will be covered:
More informationCopyright (C) 2001 David K. Levine This document is an open textbook; you can redistribute it and/or modify it under the terms of version 1 of the
Copyright (C) 2001 David K. Levine This document is an open textbook; you can redistribute it and/or modify it under the terms of version 1 of the open text license amendment to version 2 of the GNU General
More informationProblem Set 3 Solutions
Problem Set 3 Solutions Ec 030 Feb 9, 205 Problem (3 points) Suppose that Tomasz is using the pessimistic criterion where the utility of a lottery is equal to the smallest prize it gives with a positive
More informationCharacterization of the Optimum
ECO 317 Economics of Uncertainty Fall Term 2009 Notes for lectures 5. Portfolio Allocation with One Riskless, One Risky Asset Characterization of the Optimum Consider a risk-averse, expected-utility-maximizing
More informationCONVENTIONAL FINANCE, PROSPECT THEORY, AND MARKET EFFICIENCY
CONVENTIONAL FINANCE, PROSPECT THEORY, AND MARKET EFFICIENCY PART ± I CHAPTER 1 CHAPTER 2 CHAPTER 3 Foundations of Finance I: Expected Utility Theory Foundations of Finance II: Asset Pricing, Market Efficiency,
More informationUncertainty. Contingent consumption Subjective probability. Utility functions. BEE2017 Microeconomics
Uncertainty BEE217 Microeconomics Uncertainty: The share prices of Amazon and the difficulty of investment decisions Contingent consumption 1. What consumption or wealth will you get in each possible outcome
More informationFINC3017: Investment and Portfolio Management
FINC3017: Investment and Portfolio Management Investment Funds Topic 1: Introduction Unit Trusts: investor s funds are pooled, usually into specific types of assets. o Investors are assigned tradeable
More informationOptimizing Portfolios
Optimizing Portfolios An Undergraduate Introduction to Financial Mathematics J. Robert Buchanan 2010 Introduction Investors may wish to adjust the allocation of financial resources including a mixture
More informationLecture 12: Introduction to reasoning under uncertainty. Actions and Consequences
Lecture 12: Introduction to reasoning under uncertainty Preferences Utility functions Maximizing expected utility Value of information Bandit problems and the exploration-exploitation trade-off COMP-424,
More informationBEEM109 Experimental Economics and Finance
University of Exeter Recap Last class we looked at the axioms of expected utility, which defined a rational agent as proposed by von Neumann and Morgenstern. We then proceeded to look at empirical evidence
More information16 MAKING SIMPLE DECISIONS
253 16 MAKING SIMPLE DECISIONS Let us associate each state S with a numeric utility U(S), which expresses the desirability of the state A nondeterministic action a will have possible outcome states Result(a)
More information16 MAKING SIMPLE DECISIONS
247 16 MAKING SIMPLE DECISIONS Let us associate each state S with a numeric utility U(S), which expresses the desirability of the state A nondeterministic action A will have possible outcome states Result
More informationUC Berkeley Haas School of Business Economic Analysis for Business Decisions (EWMBA 201A) Fall Module I
UC Berkeley Haas School of Business Economic Analysis for Business Decisions (EWMBA 201A) Fall 2018 Module I The consumers Decision making under certainty (PR 3.1-3.4) Decision making under uncertainty
More informationFigure 1: Smooth curve of through the six points x = 200, 100, 25, 100, 300 and 600.
AMS 221 Statistical Decision Theory Homework 2 May 7, 2016 Cheng-Han Yu 1. Problem 1 PRS Proof. (i) u(100) = (0.5)u( 25) + (0.5)u(300) 0 = (0.5)u( 25) + 0.5 u( 25) = 1 (ii) u(300) = (0.5)u(600) + (0.5)u(100)
More informationSession 9: The expected utility framework p. 1
Session 9: The expected utility framework Susan Thomas http://www.igidr.ac.in/ susant susant@mayin.org IGIDR Bombay Session 9: The expected utility framework p. 1 Questions How do humans make decisions
More informationMeasuring and Utilizing Corporate Risk Tolerance to Improve Investment Decision Making
Measuring and Utilizing Corporate Risk Tolerance to Improve Investment Decision Making Michael R. Walls Division of Economics and Business Colorado School of Mines mwalls@mines.edu January 1, 2005 (Under
More informationLecture 7. The consumer s problem(s) Randall Romero Aguilar, PhD I Semestre 2018 Last updated: April 28, 2018
Lecture 7 The consumer s problem(s) Randall Romero Aguilar, PhD I Semestre 2018 Last updated: April 28, 2018 Universidad de Costa Rica EC3201 - Teoría Macroeconómica 2 Table of contents 1. Introducing
More informationChapter 23: Choice under Risk
Chapter 23: Choice under Risk 23.1: Introduction We consider in this chapter optimal behaviour in conditions of risk. By this we mean that, when the individual takes a decision, he or she does not know
More informationCHAPTER 6: RISK AVERSION AND CAPITAL ALLOCATION TO RISKY ASSETS
CHAPTER 6: RISK AVERSION AND CAPITAL ALLOCATION TO RISKY ASSETS PROBLEM SETS 1. (e) 2. (b) A higher borrowing is a consequence of the risk of the borrowers default. In perfect markets with no additional
More information12.2 Utility Functions and Probabilities
220 UNCERTAINTY (Ch. 12) only a small part of the risk. The money backing up the insurance is paid in advance, so there is no default risk to the insured. From the economist's point of view, "cat bonds"
More informationPAPER NO.1 : MICROECONOMICS ANALYSIS MODULE NO.6 : INDIFFERENCE CURVES
Subject Paper No and Title Module No and Title Module Tag 1: Microeconomics Analysis 6: Indifference Curves BSE_P1_M6 PAPER NO.1 : MICRO ANALYSIS TABLE OF CONTENTS 1. Learning Outcomes 2. Introduction
More informationWe examine the impact of risk aversion on bidding behavior in first-price auctions.
Risk Aversion We examine the impact of risk aversion on bidding behavior in first-price auctions. Assume there is no entry fee or reserve. Note: Risk aversion does not affect bidding in SPA because there,
More informationConsumer s behavior under uncertainty
Consumer s behavior under uncertainty Microéconomie, Chap 5 1 Plan of the talk What is a risk? Preferences under uncertainty Demand of risky assets Reducing risks 2 Introduction How does the consumer choose
More informationLearning Objectives 6/2/18. Some keys from yesterday
Valuation and pricing (November 5, 2013) Lecture 12 Decisions Risk & Uncertainty Olivier J. de Jong, LL.M., MM., MBA, CFD, CFFA, AA www.centime.biz Some keys from yesterday Learning Objectives v Explain
More informationMicroeconomics 3200/4200:
Microeconomics 3200/4200: Part 1 P. Piacquadio p.g.piacquadio@econ.uio.no September 25, 2017 P. Piacquadio (p.g.piacquadio@econ.uio.no) Micro 3200/4200 September 25, 2017 1 / 23 Example (1) Suppose I take
More informationChapter 3 PREFERENCES AND UTILITY. Copyright 2005 by South-Western, a division of Thomson Learning. All rights reserved.
Chapter 3 PREFERENCES AND UTILITY Copyright 2005 by South-Western, a division of Thomson Learning. All rights reserved. 1 Axioms of Rational Choice ( 理性选择公理 ) Completeness ( 完备性 ) if A and B are any two
More informationChoose between the four lotteries with unknown probabilities on the branches: uncertainty
R.E.Marks 2000 Lecture 8-1 2.11 Utility Choose between the four lotteries with unknown probabilities on the branches: uncertainty A B C D $25 $150 $600 $80 $90 $98 $ 20 $0 $100$1000 $105$ 100 R.E.Marks
More informationUC Berkeley Haas School of Business Economic Analysis for Business Decisions (EWMBA 201A) Fall Module I
UC Berkeley Haas School of Business Economic Analysis for Business Decisions (EWMBA 201A) Fall 2016 Module I The consumers Decision making under certainty (PR 3.1-3.4) Decision making under uncertainty
More informationAdvanced Microeconomic Theory
Advanced Microeconomic Theory Lecture Notes Sérgio O. Parreiras Fall, 2016 Outline Mathematical Toolbox Decision Theory Partial Equilibrium Search Intertemporal Consumption General Equilibrium Financial
More informationProject Risk Evaluation and Management Exercises (Part II, Chapters 4, 5, 6 and 7)
Project Risk Evaluation and Management Exercises (Part II, Chapters 4, 5, 6 and 7) Chapter II.4 Exercise 1 Explain in your own words the role that data can play in the development of models of uncertainty
More informationRepresenting Risk Preferences in Expected Utility Based Decision Models
Representing Risk Preferences in Expected Utility Based Decision Models Jack Meyer Department of Economics Michigan State University East Lansing, MI 48824 jmeyer@msu.edu SCC-76: Economics and Management
More informationMicroeconomic Theory III Spring 2009
MIT OpenCourseWare http://ocw.mit.edu 14.123 Microeconomic Theory III Spring 2009 For information about citing these materials or our Terms of Use, visit: http://ocw.mit.edu/terms. MIT 14.123 (2009) by
More informationDepartment of Economics The Ohio State University Final Exam Questions and Answers Econ 8712
Prof. Peck Fall 016 Department of Economics The Ohio State University Final Exam Questions and Answers Econ 871 1. (35 points) The following economy has one consumer, two firms, and four goods. Goods 1
More informationA. Introduction to choice under uncertainty 2. B. Risk aversion 11. C. Favorable gambles 15. D. Measures of risk aversion 20. E.
Microeconomic Theory -1- Uncertainty Choice under uncertainty A Introduction to choice under uncertainty B Risk aversion 11 C Favorable gambles 15 D Measures of risk aversion 0 E Insurance 6 F Small favorable
More informationTheory of Consumer Behavior First, we need to define the agents' goals and limitations (if any) in their ability to achieve those goals.
Theory of Consumer Behavior First, we need to define the agents' goals and limitations (if any) in their ability to achieve those goals. We will deal with a particular set of assumptions, but we can modify
More informationPh.D. Preliminary Examination MICROECONOMIC THEORY Applied Economics Graduate Program June 2017
Ph.D. Preliminary Examination MICROECONOMIC THEORY Applied Economics Graduate Program June 2017 The time limit for this exam is four hours. The exam has four sections. Each section includes two questions.
More informationTotal /20 /30 /30 /20 /100. Economics 142 Midterm Exam NAME Vincent Crawford Winter 2008
1 2 3 4 Total /20 /30 /30 /20 /100 Economics 142 Midterm Exam NAME Vincent Crawford Winter 2008 Your grade from this exam is one third of your course grade. The exam ends promptly at 1:50, so you have
More informationFinancial Economics. A Concise Introduction to Classical and Behavioral Finance Chapter 2. Thorsten Hens and Marc Oliver Rieger
Financial Economics A Concise Introduction to Classical and Behavioral Finance Chapter 2 Thorsten Hens and Marc Oliver Rieger Swiss Banking Institute, University of Zurich / BWL, University of Trier July
More informationAnswers to chapter 3 review questions
Answers to chapter 3 review questions 3.1 Explain why the indifference curves in a probability triangle diagram are straight lines if preferences satisfy expected utility theory. The expected utility of
More informationECON 312: MICROECONOMICS II Lecture 11: W/C 25 th April 2016 Uncertainty and Risk Dr Ebo Turkson
ECON 312: MICROECONOMICS II Lecture 11: W/C 25 th April 2016 Uncertainty and Risk Dr Ebo Turkson Chapter 17 Uncertainty Topics Degree of Risk. Decision Making Under Uncertainty. Avoiding Risk. Investing
More informationAversion to Risk and Optimal Portfolio Selection in the Mean- Variance Framework
Aversion to Risk and Optimal Portfolio Selection in the Mean- Variance Framework Prof. Massimo Guidolin 20135 Theory of Finance, Part I (Sept. October) Fall 2018 Outline and objectives Four alternative
More informationUniversity of California, Davis Department of Economics Giacomo Bonanno. Economics 103: Economics of uncertainty and information PRACTICE PROBLEMS
University of California, Davis Department of Economics Giacomo Bonanno Economics 03: Economics of uncertainty and information PRACTICE PROBLEMS oooooooooooooooo Problem :.. Expected value Problem :..
More informationChapter Three. Preferences. Preferences. A decisionmaker always chooses its most preferred alternative from its set of available alternatives.
Chapter Three Preferences 1 Preferences Behavioral Postulate: A decisionmaker always chooses its most preferred alternative from its set of available alternatives. So to model choice we must model decisionmakers
More information3.1 The Marschak-Machina triangle and risk aversion
Chapter 3 Risk aversion 3.1 The Marschak-Machina triangle and risk aversion One of the earliest, and most useful, graphical tools used to analyse choice under uncertainty was a triangular graph that was
More information8/28/2017. ECON4260 Behavioral Economics. 2 nd lecture. Expected utility. What is a lottery?
ECON4260 Behavioral Economics 2 nd lecture Cumulative Prospect Theory Expected utility This is a theory for ranking lotteries Can be seen as normative: This is how I wish my preferences looked like Or
More informationUncovered Interest Rate Parity: Risk-Behavior
Uncovered Interest Rate Parity: Risk-Behavior Assume investors are risk-neutral, i.e. they are indifferent between a safe bet and a lottery that offer the same expected return, E(x). Example: Lottery A:
More informationChapter 1. Utility Theory. 1.1 Introduction
Chapter 1 Utility Theory 1.1 Introduction St. Petersburg Paradox (gambling paradox) the birth to the utility function http://policonomics.com/saint-petersburg-paradox/ The St. Petersburg paradox, is a
More informationECO 203: Worksheet 4. Question 1. Question 2. (6 marks)
ECO 203: Worksheet 4 Question 1 (6 marks) Russel and Ahmed decide to play a simple game. Russel has to flip a fair coin: if he gets a head Ahmed will pay him Tk. 10, if he gets a tail he will have to pay
More informationMean-Variance Portfolio Theory
Mean-Variance Portfolio Theory Lakehead University Winter 2005 Outline Measures of Location Risk of a Single Asset Risk and Return of Financial Securities Risk of a Portfolio The Capital Asset Pricing
More informationECON 581. Decision making under risk. Instructor: Dmytro Hryshko
ECON 581. Decision making under risk Instructor: Dmytro Hryshko 1 / 36 Outline Expected utility Risk aversion Certainty equivalence and risk premium The canonical portfolio allocation problem 2 / 36 Suggested
More informationIntroduction. Two main characteristics: Editing Evaluation. The use of an editing phase Outcomes as difference respect to a reference point 2
Prospect theory 1 Introduction Kahneman and Tversky (1979) Kahneman and Tversky (1992) cumulative prospect theory It is classified as nonconventional theory It is perhaps the most well-known of alternative
More informationUtilities and Decision Theory. Lirong Xia
Utilities and Decision Theory Lirong Xia Checking conditional independence from BN graph ØGiven random variables Z 1, Z p, we are asked whether X Y Z 1, Z p dependent if there exists a path where all triples
More information