CHOICE THEORY, UTILITY FUNCTIONS AND RISK AVERSION

Size: px
Start display at page:

Download "CHOICE THEORY, UTILITY FUNCTIONS AND RISK AVERSION"

Transcription

1 CHOICE THEORY, UTILITY FUNCTIONS AND RISK AVERSION Szabolcs Sebestyén Master in Finance INVESTMENTS Sebestyén (ISCTE-IUL) Choice Theory Investments 1 / 65

2 Outline 1 An Introduction to Choice Theory Dominance Choice Theory Under Certainty Choice Theory Under Uncertainty How Restrictive Is Expected Utility Theory? The Allais Paradox 2 Risk Aversion How To Measure Risk Aversion? Interpreting Risk Aversion Risk Premium and Certainty Equivalent Constant Absolute Risk Aversion Constant Relative Risk Aversion Quadratic Utility Sebestyén (ISCTE-IUL) Choice Theory Investments 2 / 65

3 An Introduction to Choice Theory Outline 1 An Introduction to Choice Theory Dominance Choice Theory Under Certainty Choice Theory Under Uncertainty How Restrictive Is Expected Utility Theory? The Allais Paradox 2 Risk Aversion How To Measure Risk Aversion? Interpreting Risk Aversion Risk Premium and Certainty Equivalent Constant Absolute Risk Aversion Constant Relative Risk Aversion Quadratic Utility Sebestyén (ISCTE-IUL) Choice Theory Investments 3 / 65

4 An Introduction to Choice Theory Dominance Outline 1 An Introduction to Choice Theory Dominance Choice Theory Under Certainty Choice Theory Under Uncertainty How Restrictive Is Expected Utility Theory? The Allais Paradox 2 Risk Aversion How To Measure Risk Aversion? Interpreting Risk Aversion Risk Premium and Certainty Equivalent Constant Absolute Risk Aversion Constant Relative Risk Aversion Quadratic Utility Sebestyén (ISCTE-IUL) Choice Theory Investments 4 / 65

5 An Introduction to Choice Theory Dominance Preliminaries Risk means uncertainty in the future cash flow stream The cash flow of an asset in any future period is typically modelled as a random variable Example Consider the following asset pay-offs ($) with π 1 = π 2 = 1/2 for the two states θ: t = 0 t = 1 θ = 1 θ = 2 Investment 1 1, 000 1, 050 1, 200 Investment 2 1, , 600 Investment 3 1, 000 1, 050 1, 600 Sebestyén (ISCTE-IUL) Choice Theory Investments 5 / 65

6 An Introduction to Choice Theory Dominance Dominance State-by-state dominance: the strongest possible form of dominance We assume that the typical individual is non-satiated in consumption: she prefers more rather than less of goods the pay-offs allow her to buy Most of the cases are not so trivial and the concept of risk enters necessarily Risk is not the only consideration, the ranking between investment opportunities is typically preference dependent Sebestyén (ISCTE-IUL) Choice Theory Investments 6 / 65

7 An Introduction to Choice Theory Dominance Mean-Variance Dominance In our example, the mean returns and their standard deviations are E (r 1 ) = 12.5% σ 1 = 7.5% E (r 2 ) = 5% σ 2 = 55% E (r 3 ) = 32.5% σ 3 = 27.5% Mean-variance dominance: higher mean and lower variance It is neither as strong nor as general as state-by-state dominance, and it is not fully reliable A criterion for selecting investments of equal magnitude, which plays a prominent role in modern portfolio theory, is For investments of the same expected return, choose the one with the lowest variance For investments of the same variance, choose the one with the greatest expected return Sebestyén (ISCTE-IUL) Choice Theory Investments 7 / 65

8 An Introduction to Choice Theory Choice Theory Under Certainty Outline 1 An Introduction to Choice Theory Dominance Choice Theory Under Certainty Choice Theory Under Uncertainty How Restrictive Is Expected Utility Theory? The Allais Paradox 2 Risk Aversion How To Measure Risk Aversion? Interpreting Risk Aversion Risk Premium and Certainty Equivalent Constant Absolute Risk Aversion Constant Relative Risk Aversion Quadratic Utility Sebestyén (ISCTE-IUL) Choice Theory Investments 8 / 65

9 An Introduction to Choice Theory Choice Theory Under Certainty Economic Rationality (1) Economic rationality: individuals behaviour is predictable in that it is systematic, i.e. they attempt to achieve a set objective Definition (Preference relation) There exists a preference relation, denoted by, that describes investors ability to compare various bundles of goods, services and money. For two bundles a and b, the expression a b means the following: the investor either strictly prefers bundle a to bundle b, or she is indifferent between them. Pure indifference is denoted by a b, whereas strict preference by a b. Sebestyén (ISCTE-IUL) Choice Theory Investments 9 / 65

10 An Introduction to Choice Theory Choice Theory Under Certainty Economic Rationality (2) Assumptions Economic rationality can be summarised by the following assumptions: A.1 Every investor possesses a preference relation and it is complete. Formally, for any two bundles a and b, either a b, or b a, or both. A.2 The preference relation satisfies the fundamental property of transitivity: for any bundles a, b and c, if a b and b c, then a c. A.3 The preference relation is continuous in the following sense: let {x n } and {y n } be two sequences of consumption bundles such that x n x and y n y. If x n y n for all n, then x y. Sebestyén (ISCTE-IUL) Choice Theory Investments 10 / 65

11 An Introduction to Choice Theory Choice Theory Under Certainty Existence of Utility Function Theorem Assumptions A.1 through A.3 are sufficient to guarantee the existence of a continuous, time-invariant, real-valued utility function u : R N R +, such that for any two bundles a and b, Remarks: a b u (a) u (b). Under certainty, utility functions are unique only up to monotone transformations The notion of a bundle is very general, different elements of a bundle may represent the consumption of the same good or service in different time periods Sebestyén (ISCTE-IUL) Choice Theory Investments 11 / 65

12 An Introduction to Choice Theory Choice Theory Under Uncertainty Outline 1 An Introduction to Choice Theory Dominance Choice Theory Under Certainty Choice Theory Under Uncertainty How Restrictive Is Expected Utility Theory? The Allais Paradox 2 Risk Aversion How To Measure Risk Aversion? Interpreting Risk Aversion Risk Premium and Certainty Equivalent Constant Absolute Risk Aversion Constant Relative Risk Aversion Quadratic Utility Sebestyén (ISCTE-IUL) Choice Theory Investments 12 / 65

13 An Introduction to Choice Theory Choice Theory Under Uncertainty Introduction Under uncertainty, the objects of choice are typically vectors of state-contingent money pay-offs Those vectors form an asset or an investment Assume that individuals have no intrinsic taste for the assets themselves (not really true in practice!), but rather they are interested in what pay-offs these assets will yield and with what likelihood Also assume that investors prefer a higher pay-off to a lower one Typically, no one investment prospect will strictly dominate the others There are two ingredients in the choice between two alternatives: The probability of the states The ex-post level of utility provided by the investment Sebestyén (ISCTE-IUL) Choice Theory Investments 13 / 65

14 An Introduction to Choice Theory Choice Theory Under Uncertainty Example Example The current price of all assets is $100. The forecasted prices per share in one period are the following: Which stock would you invest in? Asset State 1 State 2 A $100 $150 B $90 $160 C $90 $150 Sebestyén (ISCTE-IUL) Choice Theory Investments 14 / 65

15 An Introduction to Choice Theory Choice Theory Under Uncertainty Lotteries Definition (Lottery) A lottery is an object of choice, denoted by (x, y, π), that offers pay-off x with probability π and y with probability 1 π. Lottery (x, y, π): π x 1 π y Sebestyén (ISCTE-IUL) Choice Theory Investments 15 / 65

16 An Introduction to Choice Theory Choice Theory Under Uncertainty Example of a Compounded Lottery Example Lottery (x, y, π) = ( (x 1, x 2, τ 1 ), (y 1, y 2, τ 2 ), π ) : τ 1 x 1 π 1 τ 1 x 2 1 π τ2 1 τ 2 y 1 y 2 Sebestyén (ISCTE-IUL) Choice Theory Investments 16 / 65

17 An Introduction to Choice Theory Choice Theory Under Uncertainty Axioms and Conventions C.1 (a) (x, y, 1) = x (b) (x, y, π) = (y, x, 1 π) (c) (x, z, π) = ( x, y, π + (1 π) τ ) if z = (x, y, τ). C.2 There exists a preference relation, which is complete and transitive C.3 The preference relation is continuous C.4 Independence of irrelevant alternatives. Let (x, y, π) and (x, z, π) be any two lotteries; then, y z if and only if (x, y, π) (x, z, π) C.5 There exists a best (most preferred) lottery, b, as well as a worst lottery, w C.6 Let x, k, z be pay-offs for which x > k > z. Then there exists a π such that (x, z, π) k C.7 Let x y. Then (x, y, π 1 ) (x, y, π 2 ) if and only if π 1 > π 2 Sebestyén (ISCTE-IUL) Choice Theory Investments 17 / 65

18 An Introduction to Choice Theory Choice Theory Under Uncertainty The Expected Utility Theorem Theorem (The Expected Utility Theorem) If axioms C.1 through C.7 are satisfied, then there exists a utility function U defined on the lottery space such that U (x, y, π) = πu (x) + (1 π) u (y) where u (x) = U ( (x, y, 1) ). U is called the von Neumann Morgenstern (NM) utility function. Sebestyén (ISCTE-IUL) Choice Theory Investments 18 / 65

19 An Introduction to Choice Theory Choice Theory Under Uncertainty Remarks on the NM Utility Function Given the objective specification of probabilities, the NM utility function uniquely characterises an investor Different additional assumptions on u will identify the investor s tolerance for risk We require that u be increasing for all candidate utility functions The theorem confirms that investors are concerned only with an asset s final pay-off and the cumulative probabilities of achieving them, while the structure of uncertainty resolution is irrelevant Although the utility function is not defined over a rate of return, but on pay-off distribution, it can be generalised The NM representation is preserved under a certain class of monotone affine transformations: if U ( ) is a NM utility function, then V ( ) au ( ) + b with a > 0 is also such a function A non-linear transformation does not always respect the preference ordering Sebestyén (ISCTE-IUL) Choice Theory Investments 19 / 65

20 An Introduction to Choice Theory How Restrictive Is Expected Utility Theory? The Allais Paradox Outline 1 An Introduction to Choice Theory Dominance Choice Theory Under Certainty Choice Theory Under Uncertainty How Restrictive Is Expected Utility Theory? The Allais Paradox 2 Risk Aversion How To Measure Risk Aversion? Interpreting Risk Aversion Risk Premium and Certainty Equivalent Constant Absolute Risk Aversion Constant Relative Risk Aversion Quadratic Utility Sebestyén (ISCTE-IUL) Choice Theory Investments 20 / 65

21 An Introduction to Choice Theory How Restrictive Is Expected Utility Theory? The Allais Paradox The Allais Paradox (1) Example Consider the following four lotteries: L 1 = (10, 000; 0; 0.1) versus L 2 = (15, 000; 0; 0.09) L 3 = (10, 000; 0; 1) versus L 4 = (15, 000; 0; 0.9). Rank the pay-offs. Sebestyén (ISCTE-IUL) Choice Theory Investments 21 / 65

22 An Introduction to Choice Theory How Restrictive Is Expected Utility Theory? The Allais Paradox The Allais Paradox (2) Example (cont d) The following ranking is frequently observed in practice: L 2 L 1 and L 3 L 4. However, observe that ( ) L 1 = L 3, L 0, 0.1 ( ) L 2 = L 4, L 0, 0.1, where L 0 = (0, 0, 1). By the independence axiom, the ranking between L 1 and L 2, and between L 3 and L 4, should be identical. This is the Allais paradox (Allais, 1953). Sebestyén (ISCTE-IUL) Choice Theory Investments 22 / 65

23 An Introduction to Choice Theory How Restrictive Is Expected Utility Theory? The Allais Paradox How to Deal With the Allais Paradox? Possible reactions to the Allais paradox: 1 Yes, my choices were inconsistent; let me think again and revise them 2 No, I ll stick to my choices. The following things are missing from the theory: The pleasure of gambling; and/or The notion of regret The Allais paradox is but the first of many phenomena that appear to be inconsistent with standard preference theory Sebestyén (ISCTE-IUL) Choice Theory Investments 23 / 65

24 An Introduction to Choice Theory How Restrictive Is Expected Utility Theory? The Allais Paradox Example: Framing and Loss Aversion Example (Kahneman and Tversky, 1979) 1 In addition to whatever you own, you have been given $1, 000. You are now asked to choose between L A = (1, 000; 0; 0.5) versus L B = (500; 0; 1) 2 In addition to whatever you own, you have been given $2, 000. You are now asked to choose between L C = ( 1, 000; 0; 0.5) versus L D = ( 500; 0; 1) A majority of subjects chose B in case 1 and C in case 2, but this is inconsistent with any preference relation over wealth gambles. The difference between the two cases is that the outcomes are framed as gains relative to the reference wealth level in case 1, but as losses in case 2. Sebestyén (ISCTE-IUL) Choice Theory Investments 24 / 65

25 Outline 1 An Introduction to Choice Theory Dominance Choice Theory Under Certainty Choice Theory Under Uncertainty How Restrictive Is Expected Utility Theory? The Allais Paradox 2 Risk Aversion How To Measure Risk Aversion? Interpreting Risk Aversion Risk Premium and Certainty Equivalent Constant Absolute Risk Aversion Constant Relative Risk Aversion Quadratic Utility Sebestyén (ISCTE-IUL) Choice Theory Investments 25 / 65

26 Introduction Investors want to avoid risk, i.e., they want to smooth their consumption across states of nature Hence, restrictions on the NM expected utility representation must be imposed to guarantee such behaviour Since probabilities are objective and independent of investor preferences, we must restrict the utility function to capture risk aversion Sebestyén (ISCTE-IUL) Choice Theory Investments 26 / 65

27 How To Measure Risk Aversion? Outline 1 An Introduction to Choice Theory Dominance Choice Theory Under Certainty Choice Theory Under Uncertainty How Restrictive Is Expected Utility Theory? The Allais Paradox 2 Risk Aversion How To Measure Risk Aversion? Interpreting Risk Aversion Risk Premium and Certainty Equivalent Constant Absolute Risk Aversion Constant Relative Risk Aversion Quadratic Utility Sebestyén (ISCTE-IUL) Choice Theory Investments 27 / 65

28 How To Measure Risk Aversion? Definition of Risk Aversion Definition (Risk aversion) An investor is said to be (weakly) risk averse if u (w) E [ u ( w) ] for any random wealth w with mean w. Strict risk aversion is represented by strict inequality. An equivalent definition is: Definition (Risk aversion) An investor is said to be (weakly) risk averse if u (a) E [ u (a + ε) ], where ε is a zero-mean random variable and a is a constant. Sebestyén (ISCTE-IUL) Choice Theory Investments 28 / 65

29 How To Measure Risk Aversion? Concavity and Risk Aversion A risk-averse investor would prefer to avoid a fair bet The above inequalities are known as Jensen s inequality and are equivalent to concavity of the utility function See Appendix Concavity is preserved by monotone affine transformations, so, for given preferences, either all utility functions are concave or none are For a differentiable function u, concavity is equivalent to non-increasing marginal utility: u (w 1 ) u (w 0 ) if w 1 > w 0 Strict concavity is equivalent to decreasing marginal utility (strict inequality above) For a twice differentiable function u, concavity is equivalent to u (w) 0 for all w (strict concavity implies strict inequality) Sebestyén (ISCTE-IUL) Choice Theory Investments 29 / 65

30 How To Measure Risk Aversion? Concavity and Risk Aversion Intuition Consider a financial contract where the investor either receives an amount h with probability 1/2, or must pay an amount h with probability 1/2 (i.e., a lottery (h, h, 1/2)) Intuition tells us that a risk-averse investor would prefer to avoid such a security, for any level of personal income Y Formally, u (Y) > 1 2 u (Y + h) + 1 u (Y h) = E (u) = U (Y) 2 This inequality can only be satisfied for all income levels Y if the utility function is (strictly) concave Sebestyén (ISCTE-IUL) Choice Theory Investments 30 / 65

31 How To Measure Risk Aversion? A Strictly Concave Utility Function Source: Danthine and Donaldson (2005), Figure 4.1 Sebestyén (ISCTE-IUL) Choice Theory Investments 31 / 65

32 How To Measure Risk Aversion? Indifferent Curves Source: Danthine and Donaldson (2005), Figure 4.2 Sebestyén (ISCTE-IUL) Choice Theory Investments 32 / 65

33 How To Measure Risk Aversion? Measure Risk Aversion Given that u ( ) < 0, why not say that investor A is more risk averse than investor B iff u A (w) u B (w) for all wealth levels? Let u A (w) au A (w) + b with a > 0 Since the utility function is invariant to affine transformations, u A and u A must describe the identical ordering and must display identical risk aversion However, if a > 1, we have that u A (w) > u A (w) This a contradiction We need a measure of risk aversion that is invariant to affine transformations Sebestyén (ISCTE-IUL) Choice Theory Investments 33 / 65

34 How To Measure Risk Aversion? Coefficients of Risk Aversion Absolute risk aversion: α (w) = u (w) u (w) It depends on the preferences and not on the particular utility function representing the preferences For any risk-averse investor, α (w) 0 Relative risk aversion: ρ (w) = wα (w) = wu (w) u (w) Risk tolerance: τ (w) = 1 α (w) = u (w) u (w) Sebestyén (ISCTE-IUL) Choice Theory Investments 34 / 65

35 Interpreting Risk Aversion Outline 1 An Introduction to Choice Theory Dominance Choice Theory Under Certainty Choice Theory Under Uncertainty How Restrictive Is Expected Utility Theory? The Allais Paradox 2 Risk Aversion How To Measure Risk Aversion? Interpreting Risk Aversion Risk Premium and Certainty Equivalent Constant Absolute Risk Aversion Constant Relative Risk Aversion Quadratic Utility Sebestyén (ISCTE-IUL) Choice Theory Investments 35 / 65

36 Interpreting Risk Aversion Absolute Risk Aversion and the Odds of a Bet Consider an investor with wealth w who is offered the lottery L = (h, h, π) The investor will accept the bet if π is high enough and reject if π is low enough The willingness to accept the bet must also be related to her current level of wealth Proposition Let π = π (w, h) the probability at which the investor is indifferent between accepting and rejecting the bet. Then we have that π (w, h) = h α (w). Sebestyén (ISCTE-IUL) Choice Theory Investments 36 / 65

37 Interpreting Risk Aversion Proof. By definition, π (w, h) must satisfy u (w) = π (w, h) u (w + h) + [ 1 π (w, h) ] u (w h) Taylor approximation yields u (w + h) = u (w) + hu (w) h2 u (w) + R 1 u (w h) = u (w) hu (w) h2 u (w) + R 2 After substitution we have u (w) = π (w, h) [u (w) + hu (w) + 12 ] h2 u (w) + R [ 1 π (w, h) ] [ u (w) hu (w) + 1 ] 2 h2 u (w) + R 2 Sebestyén (ISCTE-IUL) Choice Theory Investments 37 / 65

38 Interpreting Risk Aversion Proof (cont d). Collecting terms yields u (w) = u (w) + [ 2π (w, h) 1 ] [ hu (w) + 1 ] 2 h2 u (w) + + π (w, h) R 1 + [ 1 π (w, h) ] R 2 }{{} R Solving for π (w, h) results in π (w, h) = h [ u (w) u (w) ] R 2hu (w) = h α (w) Sebestyén (ISCTE-IUL) Choice Theory Investments 38 / 65

39 Interpreting Risk Aversion Example: Exponential Utility Example Consider the utility function of the form It is easy to show that α (w) = ν. Hence, we have that u (w) = 1 ν e νw π (w, h) = h ν Now the odds demanded are independent of the level of initial wealth, but depend on the amount of wealth at risk. Sebestyén (ISCTE-IUL) Choice Theory Investments 39 / 65

40 Interpreting Risk Aversion Relative Risk Aversion and the Odds of a Bet Proposition Consider an investment opportunity similar to the one above, but now the amount at risk is proportional to the investor s wealth, i.e., h = θw. Then we have that π (w, θ) = θρ (w). 4 Proof. Very similar to the case of absolute risk aversion. Sebestyén (ISCTE-IUL) Choice Theory Investments 40 / 65

41 Interpreting Risk Aversion Example: Power Utility Example Consider the utility function of the form w 1 γ if γ > 0, γ = 1 u (w) = 1 γ ln w if γ = 1 It is easy to show that ρ (w) = γ. Hence, we have that π (w, h) = θγ Now the odds demanded are independent of the level of initial wealth. but depend on the fraction of wealth that is at risk. Sebestyén (ISCTE-IUL) Choice Theory Investments 41 / 65

42 Interpreting Risk Aversion Risk-Neutral Investors Risk-neutral investors are identified with an affine utility function with c > 0 u (w) = c w + d It is easy to see that both α (w) = 0 and ρ (w) = 0 Such investors do not demand better than even odds when considering risky investments (π (w, h) = π (w, θ) = 1/2) The are indifferent to risk and are concerned only with an asset s expected payoff Sebestyén (ISCTE-IUL) Choice Theory Investments 42 / 65

43 Risk Premium and Certainty Equivalent Outline 1 An Introduction to Choice Theory Dominance Choice Theory Under Certainty Choice Theory Under Uncertainty How Restrictive Is Expected Utility Theory? The Allais Paradox 2 Risk Aversion How To Measure Risk Aversion? Interpreting Risk Aversion Risk Premium and Certainty Equivalent Constant Absolute Risk Aversion Constant Relative Risk Aversion Quadratic Utility Sebestyén (ISCTE-IUL) Choice Theory Investments 43 / 65

44 Risk Premium and Certainty Equivalent Definitions Consider an investor, with current wealth w, evaluating an uncertain risky pay-off Z Relying on the definition of risk aversion, we have ( u w + E ( Z )) E [u ( w + Z )] If an uncertain pay-off is available for sale, a risk-averse agent will only be willing to buy it at a price less than its expected pay-off Certainty equivalent (CE): the maximal certain amount of money an investor is willing to pay for a lottery Risk premium (π): the maximum amount the agent is willing to pay to avoid the gamble The risk premium is the difference between the expected value of the bet and the certainty equivalent Sebestyén (ISCTE-IUL) Choice Theory Investments 44 / 65

45 Risk Premium and Certainty Equivalent Mathematical Formulation According to the above definition, the certainty equivalent and the risk premium are the solutions of the following equations: It follows that [ E u ( w + Z )] ( = u w + CE ( w, Z )) = = u (w + E ( Z ) π ( w, Z )) CE ( w, Z ) = E ( Z ) π ( w, Z ) or π ( w, Z ) = E ( Z ) CE ( w, Z ) Note that from the definition )) of CE we have that u (w + CE) < u (w + E ( Z Since u is increasing (recall that u > 0), we must have CE < E ( Z ) Sebestyén (ISCTE-IUL) Choice Theory Investments 45 / 65

46 Risk Premium and Certainty Equivalent CE and Risk Premium: An Illustration Source: Danthine and Donaldson (2005), Figure 4.3 Sebestyén (ISCTE-IUL) Choice Theory Investments 46 / 65

47 Risk Premium and Certainty Equivalent Example: Certainty Equivalent Example Consider an investor with log utility and initial wealth w 0 = 1, 000. She is offered the lottery Z = (200, 0, 0.5). What is the certainty equivalent of this gamble? Solution The equation that yields the CE is E [u ( w + Z )] = u ( w + CE ) Substitution results in 0.5 ln (1, 200) ln (1, 000) = ln (1, CE) from which CE = Sebestyén (ISCTE-IUL) Choice Theory Investments 47 / 65

48 Risk Premium and Certainty Equivalent Relation Between Risk Premium and Risk Aversion Assume that E ( Z ) = 0, u is twice continuously differentiable and the gamble is a bounded random variable It can be shown that π ( w, Z ) = 1 2 σ2 z α (w) The amount one would pay to avoid the gamble is approximately proportional to the coefficient of absolute risk aversion Let π = θw be the risk premium of w + w Z; then θ = 1 2 σ2 z ρ (w) The proportion θ of initial wealth that one would pay to avoid a gamble equal to the proportion Z of initial wealth depends on relative risk aversion and the variance of Z Sebestyén (ISCTE-IUL) Choice Theory Investments 48 / 65

49 Risk Premium and Certainty Equivalent Example: Power Utility Example Consider again the utility function u (w) = w1 γ 1 γ with γ = 3, w = $500, 000, and Z = ($100, 000; $100, 000; 0.5). Then the risk premium will be π ( w, Z ) = 1 2 σ2 z γ w = , 0002 To double-check the approximation, calculate 3 = $30, , 000 ( u w π ( w, Z )) = u (500, , 000) = [ E u ( w + Z )] = 1 2 u (600, 000) + 1 u (400, 000) = Sebestyén (ISCTE-IUL) Choice Theory Investments 49 / 65

50 Risk Premium and Certainty Equivalent Certainty Equivalent in Terms of Returns Let the equivalent risk-free return be defined as ( u w ( ) ) 1 + r f = u (w + CE ( w, Z )) The random pay-off Z can also be converted into a return distribution via Z = rw, or, r = Z/w Hence, r f is defined by the equation ( u w ( ) ) [ 1 + r f = E u (w ( 1 + r ))] The return risk premium, π r, is defined as π r = E ( r ) r f or E ( r ) = r f + π r Sebestyén (ISCTE-IUL) Choice Theory Investments 50 / 65

51 Risk Premium and Certainty Equivalent Example: Log Utility Example Consider the utility function u (w) = ln w, and assume w = $500, 000, and Z = ($100, 000; $50, 000; 0.5). Then the risky return is 20% with probability 0.5 and 10% with probability 0.5, and with an expected return of E ( r ) = 5%. The certainty equivalent must satisfy ln (500, CE) = 1 2 ln (600, 000) + 1 ln (450, 000) 2 which implies that CE = 19, 615 It follows then that the risk-free return is 1 + r f = 519, , 000 = The return risk premium is π r = 5% 3.92% = 1.08% Sebestyén (ISCTE-IUL) Choice Theory Investments 51 / 65

52 Constant Absolute Risk Aversion Outline 1 An Introduction to Choice Theory Dominance Choice Theory Under Certainty Choice Theory Under Uncertainty How Restrictive Is Expected Utility Theory? The Allais Paradox 2 Risk Aversion How To Measure Risk Aversion? Interpreting Risk Aversion Risk Premium and Certainty Equivalent Constant Absolute Risk Aversion Constant Relative Risk Aversion Quadratic Utility Sebestyén (ISCTE-IUL) Choice Theory Investments 52 / 65

53 Constant Absolute Risk Aversion CARA Utility Constant Absolute Risk Aversion (CARA): absolute risk aversion is the same at every wealth level Every CARA utility function is a monotone affine transform of the exponential utility function u (w) = e αw where α is a constant and equal to the absolute risk aversion Sebestyén (ISCTE-IUL) Choice Theory Investments 53 / 65

54 Constant Absolute Risk Aversion No Wealth Effects With CARA Utility With CARA utility there are no wealth effects Assuming that E ( Z ) = 0, we have that u (w π) = E [u ( w + Z )] Calculating the two sides yields u (w π) = e αw e απ and u ( w + Z ) = e αw e α Z Taking expectations and equating gives e απ = E ( e α Z ), from which it follows that π = 1 α ln E( e α Z ) Hence, an investor with CARA utility will pay the same to avoid a fair gamble no matter what her initial wealth might be Sebestyén (ISCTE-IUL) Choice Theory Investments 54 / 65

55 Constant Absolute Risk Aversion Normally Distributed Bet If the gamble Z is Gaussian, then the risk premium can be calculated more explicitly Recall that if x is Gaussian with mean µ and variance σ 2, then E ( e x) = e µ+ 1 2 σ2 Now we have x = α Z which has zero mean and variance α 2 σ 2 z ; thus the risk premium becomes π = 1 2 ασ2 z Sebestyén (ISCTE-IUL) Choice Theory Investments 55 / 65

56 Constant Relative Risk Aversion Outline 1 An Introduction to Choice Theory Dominance Choice Theory Under Certainty Choice Theory Under Uncertainty How Restrictive Is Expected Utility Theory? The Allais Paradox 2 Risk Aversion How To Measure Risk Aversion? Interpreting Risk Aversion Risk Premium and Certainty Equivalent Constant Absolute Risk Aversion Constant Relative Risk Aversion Quadratic Utility Sebestyén (ISCTE-IUL) Choice Theory Investments 56 / 65

57 Constant Relative Risk Aversion It is easy to show that ρ is the coefficient of relative risk aversion of the power utility function Sebestyén (ISCTE-IUL) Choice Theory Investments 57 / 65 CRRA Utility Constant Relative Risk Aversion (CRRA): relative risk aversion is the same at every wealth level Any CRRA utility function has decreasing absolute risk aversion as α (w) = ρ (w) /w Any monotone CRRA utility function is a monotone affine transform of one of the following functions: Log utility: u (w) = log w Power utility: u (w) = 1 γ wγ γ < 1, γ = 0 A more convenient formulation of power utility is u (w) = w1 ρ 1 ρ ρ = 1 γ > 0, ρ = 1

58 Constant Relative Risk Aversion Properties of CRRA Utility Functions Log utility has constant relative risk aversion equal to 1 An investor with power utility is said to be more risk averse than a log-utility investor if ρ > 1 and to be less risk averse if ρ < 1 The fraction of wealth a CRRA-utility investor would pay to avoid a gamble that is proportional to initial wealth is independent of her wealth Log utility is a limiting case of power utility obtained by taking ρ 1 (by l Hôpital s rule) Sebestyén (ISCTE-IUL) Choice Theory Investments 58 / 65

59 Quadratic Utility Outline 1 An Introduction to Choice Theory Dominance Choice Theory Under Certainty Choice Theory Under Uncertainty How Restrictive Is Expected Utility Theory? The Allais Paradox 2 Risk Aversion How To Measure Risk Aversion? Interpreting Risk Aversion Risk Premium and Certainty Equivalent Constant Absolute Risk Aversion Constant Relative Risk Aversion Quadratic Utility Sebestyén (ISCTE-IUL) Choice Theory Investments 59 / 65

60 Quadratic Utility Definition and Properties Quadratic utility takes the form u (w) = w b 2 w2 b > 0 The marginal utility of wealth is u (w) = 1 bw, and is positive only when b < 1/w Thus, this utility function makes sense only when w < 1/b, and the point of maximum utility, 1/b, is called the bliss point The absolute and relative risk aversion coefficients are α (w) = b 1 bw and ρ (w) = bw 1 bw It has increasing absolute risk aversion, an unattractive property Sebestyén (ISCTE-IUL) Choice Theory Investments 60 / 65

61 Quadratic Utility Quadratic Utility and Mean-Variance Preferences Quadratic utility has a special importance in finance as it implies mean-variance preferences Since all derivatives of order higher than 2 are equal to zero, the investor s expected utility becomes See Appendix E [ u ( w) ] = u ( E ( w) ) u ( E ( w) ) Var ( w) Specifically, E [ u ( w) ] = µ b 2 ( σ 2 + µ 2) For any probability distribution of wealth, the expected utility depends only on the mean and variance of wealth Sebestyén (ISCTE-IUL) Choice Theory Investments 61 / 65

62 APPENDIX Sebestyén (ISCTE-IUL) Choice Theory Investments 62 / 65

63 Some Important Definitions and Results Concavity and Jensen s Inequality Definition (Concavity) A function f is concave if, for any x and y and any λ (0, 1), f ( λx + (1 λ) y ) λf (x) + (1 λ) f (y). If the inequality is strict, the function is strictly concave. Theorem (Jensen s inequality) Let f be a concave function on the interval (a, b), and x be a random variable such that Pr [ x (a, b)] = 1. Provided that the expectations E ( x) and E [f ( x)] exist, E [ f ( x) ] f ( E ( x) ). Moreover, if f is strictly concave and Pr [ x = E ( x)] = 1, then the inequality is strict. Return Sebestyén (ISCTE-IUL) Choice Theory Investments 63 / 65

64 Some Important Definitions and Results Taylor Expansion of a Function Definition (Taylor Expansion of a Function) Let f (x) be a real- or complex-valued function, which is infinitely differentiable at a point x 0. Then the function can be written as a power series, called the Taylor expansion of the function, as f (x) = f (x 0 ) + f (x 0 ) 1! + f (x 0 ) 3! (x x 0 ) 3 + (x x 0 ) + f (x 0 ) 2! (x x 0 ) 2 + Sebestyén (ISCTE-IUL) Choice Theory Investments 64 / 65

65 Some Important Definitions and Results Taylor Expansion for the Mean of a Random Variable Theorem (Taylor Expansion for the Mean of a Random Variable) Let x be a random variable with mean µ and variance σ 2 (both finite), and let f be a twice differentiable function. Then the expected value of f ( x ) can be approximated as E [ f ( x) ] = f (µ) f (µ) σ 2. Proof. The Taylor expansion of the expected value of f ( x) is E [ f ( x) ] = E [ f (µ) + f (µ) ( x µ) f (µ) ( x µ) 2 ]. The expectation of the term containing the first derivative is zero, thus the expression simplifies to the one presented in the theorem. Return Sebestyén (ISCTE-IUL) Choice Theory Investments 65 / 65

Choice under Uncertainty

Choice under Uncertainty Chapter 7 Choice under Uncertainty 1. Expected Utility Theory. 2. Risk Aversion. 3. Applications: demand for insurance, portfolio choice 4. Violations of Expected Utility Theory. 7.1 Expected Utility Theory

More information

Risk aversion and choice under uncertainty

Risk aversion and choice under uncertainty Risk aversion and choice under uncertainty Pierre Chaigneau pierre.chaigneau@hec.ca June 14, 2011 Finance: the economics of risk and uncertainty In financial markets, claims associated with random future

More information

PORTFOLIO THEORY. Master in Finance INVESTMENTS. Szabolcs Sebestyén

PORTFOLIO THEORY. Master in Finance INVESTMENTS. Szabolcs Sebestyén PORTFOLIO THEORY Szabolcs Sebestyén szabolcs.sebestyen@iscte.pt Master in Finance INVESTMENTS Sebestyén (ISCTE-IUL) Portfolio Theory Investments 1 / 60 Outline 1 Modern Portfolio Theory Introduction Mean-Variance

More information

Models and Decision with Financial Applications UNIT 1: Elements of Decision under Uncertainty

Models and Decision with Financial Applications UNIT 1: Elements of Decision under Uncertainty Models and Decision with Financial Applications UNIT 1: Elements of Decision under Uncertainty We always need to make a decision (or select from among actions, options or moves) even when there exists

More information

Lecture 3: Utility-Based Portfolio Choice

Lecture 3: Utility-Based Portfolio Choice Lecture 3: Utility-Based Portfolio Choice Prof. Massimo Guidolin Portfolio Management Spring 2017 Outline and objectives Choice under uncertainty: dominance o Guidolin-Pedio, chapter 1, sec. 2 Choice under

More information

Lecture 6 Introduction to Utility Theory under Certainty and Uncertainty

Lecture 6 Introduction to Utility Theory under Certainty and Uncertainty Lecture 6 Introduction to Utility Theory under Certainty and Uncertainty Prof. Massimo Guidolin Prep Course in Quant Methods for Finance August-September 2017 Outline and objectives Axioms of choice under

More information

Choice under risk and uncertainty

Choice under risk and uncertainty Choice under risk and uncertainty Introduction Up until now, we have thought of the objects that our decision makers are choosing as being physical items However, we can also think of cases where the outcomes

More information

ECON 581. Decision making under risk. Instructor: Dmytro Hryshko

ECON 581. Decision making under risk. Instructor: Dmytro Hryshko ECON 581. Decision making under risk Instructor: Dmytro Hryshko 1 / 36 Outline Expected utility Risk aversion Certainty equivalence and risk premium The canonical portfolio allocation problem 2 / 36 Suggested

More information

MICROECONOMIC THEROY CONSUMER THEORY

MICROECONOMIC THEROY CONSUMER THEORY LECTURE 5 MICROECONOMIC THEROY CONSUMER THEORY Choice under Uncertainty (MWG chapter 6, sections A-C, and Cowell chapter 8) Lecturer: Andreas Papandreou 1 Introduction p Contents n Expected utility theory

More information

Copyright (C) 2001 David K. Levine This document is an open textbook; you can redistribute it and/or modify it under the terms of version 1 of the

Copyright (C) 2001 David K. Levine This document is an open textbook; you can redistribute it and/or modify it under the terms of version 1 of the Copyright (C) 2001 David K. Levine This document is an open textbook; you can redistribute it and/or modify it under the terms of version 1 of the open text license amendment to version 2 of the GNU General

More information

Financial Economics: Making Choices in Risky Situations

Financial Economics: Making Choices in Risky Situations Financial Economics: Making Choices in Risky Situations Shuoxun Hellen Zhang WISE & SOE XIAMEN UNIVERSITY March, 2015 1 / 57 Questions to Answer How financial risk is defined and measured How an investor

More information

Expected utility theory; Expected Utility Theory; risk aversion and utility functions

Expected utility theory; Expected Utility Theory; risk aversion and utility functions ; Expected Utility Theory; risk aversion and utility functions Prof. Massimo Guidolin Portfolio Management Spring 2016 Outline and objectives Utility functions The expected utility theorem and the axioms

More information

Rational theories of finance tell us how people should behave and often do not reflect reality.

Rational theories of finance tell us how people should behave and often do not reflect reality. FINC3023 Behavioral Finance TOPIC 1: Expected Utility Rational theories of finance tell us how people should behave and often do not reflect reality. A normative theory based on rational utility maximizers

More information

If U is linear, then U[E(Ỹ )] = E[U(Ỹ )], and one is indifferent between lottery and its expectation. One is called risk neutral.

If U is linear, then U[E(Ỹ )] = E[U(Ỹ )], and one is indifferent between lottery and its expectation. One is called risk neutral. Risk aversion For those preference orderings which (i.e., for those individuals who) satisfy the seven axioms, define risk aversion. Compare a lottery Ỹ = L(a, b, π) (where a, b are fixed monetary outcomes)

More information

Expected Utility and Risk Aversion

Expected Utility and Risk Aversion Expected Utility and Risk Aversion Expected utility and risk aversion 1/ 58 Introduction Expected utility is the standard framework for modeling investor choices. The following topics will be covered:

More information

Comparison of Payoff Distributions in Terms of Return and Risk

Comparison of Payoff Distributions in Terms of Return and Risk Comparison of Payoff Distributions in Terms of Return and Risk Preliminaries We treat, for convenience, money as a continuous variable when dealing with monetary outcomes. Strictly speaking, the derivation

More information

1 Consumption and saving under uncertainty

1 Consumption and saving under uncertainty 1 Consumption and saving under uncertainty 1.1 Modelling uncertainty As in the deterministic case, we keep assuming that agents live for two periods. The novelty here is that their earnings in the second

More information

Utility and Choice Under Uncertainty

Utility and Choice Under Uncertainty Introduction to Microeconomics Utility and Choice Under Uncertainty The Five Axioms of Choice Under Uncertainty We can use the axioms of preference to show how preferences can be mapped into measurable

More information

BEEM109 Experimental Economics and Finance

BEEM109 Experimental Economics and Finance University of Exeter Recap Last class we looked at the axioms of expected utility, which defined a rational agent as proposed by von Neumann and Morgenstern. We then proceeded to look at empirical evidence

More information

Course Handouts - Introduction ECON 8704 FINANCIAL ECONOMICS. Jan Werner. University of Minnesota

Course Handouts - Introduction ECON 8704 FINANCIAL ECONOMICS. Jan Werner. University of Minnesota Course Handouts - Introduction ECON 8704 FINANCIAL ECONOMICS Jan Werner University of Minnesota SPRING 2019 1 I.1 Equilibrium Prices in Security Markets Assume throughout this section that utility functions

More information

Models & Decision with Financial Applications Unit 3: Utility Function and Risk Attitude

Models & Decision with Financial Applications Unit 3: Utility Function and Risk Attitude Models & Decision with Financial Applications Unit 3: Utility Function and Risk Attitude Duan LI Department of Systems Engineering & Engineering Management The Chinese University of Hong Kong http://www.se.cuhk.edu.hk/

More information

PhD Qualifier Examination

PhD Qualifier Examination PhD Qualifier Examination Department of Agricultural Economics May 29, 2014 Instructions This exam consists of six questions. You must answer all questions. If you need an assumption to complete a question,

More information

Micro Theory I Assignment #5 - Answer key

Micro Theory I Assignment #5 - Answer key Micro Theory I Assignment #5 - Answer key 1. Exercises from MWG (Chapter 6): (a) Exercise 6.B.1 from MWG: Show that if the preferences % over L satisfy the independence axiom, then for all 2 (0; 1) and

More information

Consumption- Savings, Portfolio Choice, and Asset Pricing

Consumption- Savings, Portfolio Choice, and Asset Pricing Finance 400 A. Penati - G. Pennacchi Consumption- Savings, Portfolio Choice, and Asset Pricing I. The Consumption - Portfolio Choice Problem We have studied the portfolio choice problem of an individual

More information

Foundations of Financial Economics Choice under uncertainty

Foundations of Financial Economics Choice under uncertainty Foundations of Financial Economics Choice under uncertainty Paulo Brito 1 pbrito@iseg.ulisboa.pt University of Lisbon March 9, 2018 Topics covered Contingent goods Comparing contingent goods Decision under

More information

Characterization of the Optimum

Characterization of the Optimum ECO 317 Economics of Uncertainty Fall Term 2009 Notes for lectures 5. Portfolio Allocation with One Riskless, One Risky Asset Characterization of the Optimum Consider a risk-averse, expected-utility-maximizing

More information

Name. Final Exam, Economics 210A, December 2014 Answer any 7 of these 8 questions Good luck!

Name. Final Exam, Economics 210A, December 2014 Answer any 7 of these 8 questions Good luck! Name Final Exam, Economics 210A, December 2014 Answer any 7 of these 8 questions Good luck! 1) For each of the following statements, state whether it is true or false. If it is true, prove that it is true.

More information

Department of Economics The Ohio State University Final Exam Questions and Answers Econ 8712

Department of Economics The Ohio State University Final Exam Questions and Answers Econ 8712 Prof. Peck Fall 016 Department of Economics The Ohio State University Final Exam Questions and Answers Econ 871 1. (35 points) The following economy has one consumer, two firms, and four goods. Goods 1

More information

Microeconomics 3200/4200:

Microeconomics 3200/4200: Microeconomics 3200/4200: Part 1 P. Piacquadio p.g.piacquadio@econ.uio.no September 25, 2017 P. Piacquadio (p.g.piacquadio@econ.uio.no) Micro 3200/4200 September 25, 2017 1 / 23 Example (1) Suppose I take

More information

ECON4510 Finance Theory Lecture 1

ECON4510 Finance Theory Lecture 1 ECON4510 Finance Theory Lecture 1 Kjetil Storesletten Department of Economics University of Oslo 15 January 2018 Kjetil Storesletten, Dept. of Economics, UiO ECON4510 Finance Theory Lecture 1 15 January

More information

Asset Pricing. Teaching Notes. João Pedro Pereira

Asset Pricing. Teaching Notes. João Pedro Pereira Asset Pricing Teaching Notes João Pedro Pereira Nova School of Business and Economics Universidade Nova de Lisboa joao.pereira@novasbe.pt http://docentes.fe.unl.pt/ jpereira/ June 18, 2015 Contents 1 Introduction

More information

Optimizing Portfolios

Optimizing Portfolios Optimizing Portfolios An Undergraduate Introduction to Financial Mathematics J. Robert Buchanan 2010 Introduction Investors may wish to adjust the allocation of financial resources including a mixture

More information

CONVENTIONAL FINANCE, PROSPECT THEORY, AND MARKET EFFICIENCY

CONVENTIONAL FINANCE, PROSPECT THEORY, AND MARKET EFFICIENCY CONVENTIONAL FINANCE, PROSPECT THEORY, AND MARKET EFFICIENCY PART ± I CHAPTER 1 CHAPTER 2 CHAPTER 3 Foundations of Finance I: Expected Utility Theory Foundations of Finance II: Asset Pricing, Market Efficiency,

More information

Financial Mathematics III Theory summary

Financial Mathematics III Theory summary Financial Mathematics III Theory summary Table of Contents Lecture 1... 7 1. State the objective of modern portfolio theory... 7 2. Define the return of an asset... 7 3. How is expected return defined?...

More information

Asymmetric Information: Walrasian Equilibria, and Rational Expectations Equilibria

Asymmetric Information: Walrasian Equilibria, and Rational Expectations Equilibria Asymmetric Information: Walrasian Equilibria and Rational Expectations Equilibria 1 Basic Setup Two periods: 0 and 1 One riskless asset with interest rate r One risky asset which pays a normally distributed

More information

Choice Under Uncertainty

Choice Under Uncertainty Chapter 6 Choice Under Uncertainty Up until now, we have been concerned with choice under certainty. A consumer chooses which commodity bundle to consume. A producer chooses how much output to produce

More information

Expected Utility And Risk Aversion

Expected Utility And Risk Aversion Expected Utility And Risk Aversion Econ 2100 Fall 2017 Lecture 12, October 4 Outline 1 Risk Aversion 2 Certainty Equivalent 3 Risk Premium 4 Relative Risk Aversion 5 Stochastic Dominance Notation From

More information

Review Session. Prof. Manuela Pedio Theory of Finance

Review Session. Prof. Manuela Pedio Theory of Finance Review Session Prof. Manuela Pedio 20135 Theory of Finance 12 October 2018 Three most common utility functions (1/3) We typically assume that investors are non satiated (they always prefer more to less)

More information

Uncertainty in Equilibrium

Uncertainty in Equilibrium Uncertainty in Equilibrium Larry Blume May 1, 2007 1 Introduction The state-preference approach to uncertainty of Kenneth J. Arrow (1953) and Gérard Debreu (1959) lends itself rather easily to Walrasian

More information

Attitudes Toward Risk. Joseph Tao-yi Wang 2013/10/16. (Lecture 11, Micro Theory I)

Attitudes Toward Risk. Joseph Tao-yi Wang 2013/10/16. (Lecture 11, Micro Theory I) Joseph Tao-yi Wang 2013/10/16 (Lecture 11, Micro Theory I) Dealing with Uncertainty 2 Preferences over risky choices (Section 7.1) One simple model: Expected Utility How can old tools be applied to analyze

More information

Martingale Pricing Theory in Discrete-Time and Discrete-Space Models

Martingale Pricing Theory in Discrete-Time and Discrete-Space Models IEOR E4707: Foundations of Financial Engineering c 206 by Martin Haugh Martingale Pricing Theory in Discrete-Time and Discrete-Space Models These notes develop the theory of martingale pricing in a discrete-time,

More information

Ph.D. Preliminary Examination MICROECONOMIC THEORY Applied Economics Graduate Program June 2017

Ph.D. Preliminary Examination MICROECONOMIC THEORY Applied Economics Graduate Program June 2017 Ph.D. Preliminary Examination MICROECONOMIC THEORY Applied Economics Graduate Program June 2017 The time limit for this exam is four hours. The exam has four sections. Each section includes two questions.

More information

Andreas Wagener University of Vienna. Abstract

Andreas Wagener University of Vienna. Abstract Linear risk tolerance and mean variance preferences Andreas Wagener University of Vienna Abstract We translate the property of linear risk tolerance (hyperbolical Arrow Pratt index of risk aversion) from

More information

B. Online Appendix. where ɛ may be arbitrarily chosen to satisfy 0 < ɛ < s 1 and s 1 is defined in (B1). This can be rewritten as

B. Online Appendix. where ɛ may be arbitrarily chosen to satisfy 0 < ɛ < s 1 and s 1 is defined in (B1). This can be rewritten as B Online Appendix B1 Constructing examples with nonmonotonic adoption policies Assume c > 0 and the utility function u(w) is increasing and approaches as w approaches 0 Suppose we have a prior distribution

More information

Consumption and Asset Pricing

Consumption and Asset Pricing Consumption and Asset Pricing Yin-Chi Wang The Chinese University of Hong Kong November, 2012 References: Williamson s lecture notes (2006) ch5 and ch 6 Further references: Stochastic dynamic programming:

More information

ECON FINANCIAL ECONOMICS

ECON FINANCIAL ECONOMICS ECON 337901 FINANCIAL ECONOMICS Peter Ireland Boston College April 3, 2018 These lecture notes by Peter Ireland are licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommerical-ShareAlike 4.0 International

More information

Financial Economics: Risk Aversion and Investment Decisions

Financial Economics: Risk Aversion and Investment Decisions Financial Economics: Risk Aversion and Investment Decisions Shuoxun Hellen Zhang WISE & SOE XIAMEN UNIVERSITY March, 2015 1 / 50 Outline Risk Aversion and Portfolio Allocation Portfolios, Risk Aversion,

More information

Microeconomics of Banking: Lecture 2

Microeconomics of Banking: Lecture 2 Microeconomics of Banking: Lecture 2 Prof. Ronaldo CARPIO September 25, 2015 A Brief Look at General Equilibrium Asset Pricing Last week, we saw a general equilibrium model in which banks were irrelevant.

More information

Making Hard Decision. ENCE 627 Decision Analysis for Engineering. Identify the decision situation and understand objectives. Identify alternatives

Making Hard Decision. ENCE 627 Decision Analysis for Engineering. Identify the decision situation and understand objectives. Identify alternatives CHAPTER Duxbury Thomson Learning Making Hard Decision Third Edition RISK ATTITUDES A. J. Clark School of Engineering Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering 13 FALL 2003 By Dr. Ibrahim. Assakkaf

More information

3. Prove Lemma 1 of the handout Risk Aversion.

3. Prove Lemma 1 of the handout Risk Aversion. IDEA Economics of Risk and Uncertainty List of Exercises Expected Utility, Risk Aversion, and Stochastic Dominance. 1. Prove that, for every pair of Bernouilli utility functions, u 1 ( ) and u 2 ( ), and

More information

Financial Economics. A Concise Introduction to Classical and Behavioral Finance Chapter 2. Thorsten Hens and Marc Oliver Rieger

Financial Economics. A Concise Introduction to Classical and Behavioral Finance Chapter 2. Thorsten Hens and Marc Oliver Rieger Financial Economics A Concise Introduction to Classical and Behavioral Finance Chapter 2 Thorsten Hens and Marc Oliver Rieger Swiss Banking Institute, University of Zurich / BWL, University of Trier July

More information

Ph.D. Preliminary Examination MICROECONOMIC THEORY Applied Economics Graduate Program August 2017

Ph.D. Preliminary Examination MICROECONOMIC THEORY Applied Economics Graduate Program August 2017 Ph.D. Preliminary Examination MICROECONOMIC THEORY Applied Economics Graduate Program August 2017 The time limit for this exam is four hours. The exam has four sections. Each section includes two questions.

More information

Choice Under Uncertainty

Choice Under Uncertainty Choice Under Uncertainty Lotteries Without uncertainty, there is no need to distinguish between a consumer s choice between alternatives and the resulting outcome. A consumption bundle is the choice and

More information

Advanced Risk Management

Advanced Risk Management Winter 2014/2015 Advanced Risk Management Part I: Decision Theory and Risk Management Motives Lecture 1: Introduction and Expected Utility Your Instructors for Part I: Prof. Dr. Andreas Richter Email:

More information

Lecture 11 - Risk Aversion, Expected Utility Theory and Insurance

Lecture 11 - Risk Aversion, Expected Utility Theory and Insurance Lecture 11 - Risk Aversion, Expected Utility Theory and Insurance 14.03, Spring 2003 1 Risk Aversion and Insurance: Introduction To have a passably usable model of choice, we need to be able to say something

More information

Answers to chapter 3 review questions

Answers to chapter 3 review questions Answers to chapter 3 review questions 3.1 Explain why the indifference curves in a probability triangle diagram are straight lines if preferences satisfy expected utility theory. The expected utility of

More information

Choose between the four lotteries with unknown probabilities on the branches: uncertainty

Choose between the four lotteries with unknown probabilities on the branches: uncertainty R.E.Marks 2000 Lecture 8-1 2.11 Utility Choose between the four lotteries with unknown probabilities on the branches: uncertainty A B C D $25 $150 $600 $80 $90 $98 $ 20 $0 $100$1000 $105$ 100 R.E.Marks

More information

Representing Risk Preferences in Expected Utility Based Decision Models

Representing Risk Preferences in Expected Utility Based Decision Models Representing Risk Preferences in Expected Utility Based Decision Models Jack Meyer Department of Economics Michigan State University East Lansing, MI 48824 jmeyer@msu.edu SCC-76: Economics and Management

More information

Department of Economics The Ohio State University Midterm Questions and Answers Econ 8712

Department of Economics The Ohio State University Midterm Questions and Answers Econ 8712 Prof. James Peck Fall 06 Department of Economics The Ohio State University Midterm Questions and Answers Econ 87. (30 points) A decision maker (DM) is a von Neumann-Morgenstern expected utility maximizer.

More information

Financial Risk Management

Financial Risk Management Financial Risk Management Professor: Thierry Roncalli Evry University Assistant: Enareta Kurtbegu Evry University Tutorial exercices #4 1 Correlation and copulas 1. The bivariate Gaussian copula is given

More information

Outline. Simple, Compound, and Reduced Lotteries Independence Axiom Expected Utility Theory Money Lotteries Risk Aversion

Outline. Simple, Compound, and Reduced Lotteries Independence Axiom Expected Utility Theory Money Lotteries Risk Aversion Uncertainty Outline Simple, Compound, and Reduced Lotteries Independence Axiom Expected Utility Theory Money Lotteries Risk Aversion 2 Simple Lotteries 3 Simple Lotteries Advanced Microeconomic Theory

More information

Mock Examination 2010

Mock Examination 2010 [EC7086] Mock Examination 2010 No. of Pages: [7] No. of Questions: [6] Subject [Economics] Title of Paper [EC7086: Microeconomic Theory] Time Allowed [Two (2) hours] Instructions to candidates Please answer

More information

Investment and Portfolio Management. Lecture 1: Managed funds fall into a number of categories that pool investors funds

Investment and Portfolio Management. Lecture 1: Managed funds fall into a number of categories that pool investors funds Lecture 1: Managed funds fall into a number of categories that pool investors funds Types of managed funds: Unit trusts Investors funds are pooled, usually into specific types of assets Investors are assigned

More information

The mean-variance portfolio choice framework and its generalizations

The mean-variance portfolio choice framework and its generalizations The mean-variance portfolio choice framework and its generalizations Prof. Massimo Guidolin 20135 Theory of Finance, Part I (Sept. October) Fall 2014 Outline and objectives The backward, three-step solution

More information

LECTURE NOTES 10 ARIEL M. VIALE

LECTURE NOTES 10 ARIEL M. VIALE LECTURE NOTES 10 ARIEL M VIALE 1 Behavioral Asset Pricing 11 Prospect theory based asset pricing model Barberis, Huang, and Santos (2001) assume a Lucas pure-exchange economy with three types of assets:

More information

Expected value is basically the average payoff from some sort of lottery, gamble or other situation with a randomly determined outcome.

Expected value is basically the average payoff from some sort of lottery, gamble or other situation with a randomly determined outcome. Economics 352: Intermediate Microeconomics Notes and Sample Questions Chapter 18: Uncertainty and Risk Aversion Expected Value The chapter starts out by explaining what expected value is and how to calculate

More information

LECTURE NOTES 3 ARIEL M. VIALE

LECTURE NOTES 3 ARIEL M. VIALE LECTURE NOTES 3 ARIEL M VIALE I Markowitz-Tobin Mean-Variance Portfolio Analysis Assumption Mean-Variance preferences Markowitz 95 Quadratic utility function E [ w b w ] { = E [ w] b V ar w + E [ w] }

More information

Macroeconomics Sequence, Block I. Introduction to Consumption Asset Pricing

Macroeconomics Sequence, Block I. Introduction to Consumption Asset Pricing Macroeconomics Sequence, Block I Introduction to Consumption Asset Pricing Nicola Pavoni October 21, 2016 The Lucas Tree Model This is a general equilibrium model where instead of deriving properties of

More information

1. Expected utility, risk aversion and stochastic dominance

1. Expected utility, risk aversion and stochastic dominance . Epected utility, risk aversion and stochastic dominance. Epected utility.. Description o risky alternatives.. Preerences over lotteries..3 The epected utility theorem. Monetary lotteries and risk aversion..

More information

Attitudes Towards Risk

Attitudes Towards Risk Attitudes Towards Risk 14.123 Microeconomic Theory III Muhamet Yildiz Model C = R = wealth level Lottery = cdf F (pdf f) Utility function u : R R, increasing U(F) E F (u) u(x)df(x) E F (x) xdf(x) 1 Attitudes

More information

Risk preferences and stochastic dominance

Risk preferences and stochastic dominance Risk preferences and stochastic dominance Pierre Chaigneau pierre.chaigneau@hec.ca September 5, 2011 Preferences and utility functions The expected utility criterion Future income of an agent: x. Random

More information

A. Introduction to choice under uncertainty 2. B. Risk aversion 11. C. Favorable gambles 15. D. Measures of risk aversion 20. E.

A. Introduction to choice under uncertainty 2. B. Risk aversion 11. C. Favorable gambles 15. D. Measures of risk aversion 20. E. Microeconomic Theory -1- Uncertainty Choice under uncertainty A Introduction to choice under uncertainty B Risk aversion 11 C Favorable gambles 15 D Measures of risk aversion 0 E Insurance 6 F Small favorable

More information

Analytical Problem Set

Analytical Problem Set Analytical Problem Set Unless otherwise stated, any coupon payments, cash dividends, or other cash payouts delivered by a security in the following problems should be assume to be distributed at the end

More information

Comparing Allocations under Asymmetric Information: Coase Theorem Revisited

Comparing Allocations under Asymmetric Information: Coase Theorem Revisited Comparing Allocations under Asymmetric Information: Coase Theorem Revisited Shingo Ishiguro Graduate School of Economics, Osaka University 1-7 Machikaneyama, Toyonaka, Osaka 560-0043, Japan August 2002

More information

Slides III - Complete Markets

Slides III - Complete Markets Slides III - Complete Markets Julio Garín University of Georgia Macroeconomic Theory II (Ph.D.) Spring 2017 Macroeconomic Theory II Slides III - Complete Markets Spring 2017 1 / 33 Outline 1. Risk, Uncertainty,

More information

Stat 6863-Handout 1 Economics of Insurance and Risk June 2008, Maurice A. Geraghty

Stat 6863-Handout 1 Economics of Insurance and Risk June 2008, Maurice A. Geraghty A. The Psychology of Risk Aversion Stat 6863-Handout 1 Economics of Insurance and Risk June 2008, Maurice A. Geraghty Suppose a decision maker has an asset worth $100,000 that has a 1% chance of being

More information

Session 9: The expected utility framework p. 1

Session 9: The expected utility framework p. 1 Session 9: The expected utility framework Susan Thomas http://www.igidr.ac.in/ susant susant@mayin.org IGIDR Bombay Session 9: The expected utility framework p. 1 Questions How do humans make decisions

More information

Period State of the world: n/a A B n/a A B Endowment ( income, output ) Y 0 Y1 A Y1 B Y0 Y1 A Y1. p A 1+r. 1 0 p B.

Period State of the world: n/a A B n/a A B Endowment ( income, output ) Y 0 Y1 A Y1 B Y0 Y1 A Y1. p A 1+r. 1 0 p B. ECONOMICS 7344, Spring 2 Bent E. Sørensen April 28, 2 NOTE. Obstfeld-Rogoff (OR). Simplified notation. Assume that agents (initially we will consider just one) live for 2 periods in an economy with uncertainty

More information

Chapter 1. Utility Theory. 1.1 Introduction

Chapter 1. Utility Theory. 1.1 Introduction Chapter 1 Utility Theory 1.1 Introduction St. Petersburg Paradox (gambling paradox) the birth to the utility function http://policonomics.com/saint-petersburg-paradox/ The St. Petersburg paradox, is a

More information

3 Arbitrage pricing theory in discrete time.

3 Arbitrage pricing theory in discrete time. 3 Arbitrage pricing theory in discrete time. Orientation. In the examples studied in Chapter 1, we worked with a single period model and Gaussian returns; in this Chapter, we shall drop these assumptions

More information

Microeconomic Theory August 2013 Applied Economics. Ph.D. PRELIMINARY EXAMINATION MICROECONOMIC THEORY. Applied Economics Graduate Program

Microeconomic Theory August 2013 Applied Economics. Ph.D. PRELIMINARY EXAMINATION MICROECONOMIC THEORY. Applied Economics Graduate Program Ph.D. PRELIMINARY EXAMINATION MICROECONOMIC THEORY Applied Economics Graduate Program August 2013 The time limit for this exam is four hours. The exam has four sections. Each section includes two questions.

More information

Advanced Financial Economics Homework 2 Due on April 14th before class

Advanced Financial Economics Homework 2 Due on April 14th before class Advanced Financial Economics Homework 2 Due on April 14th before class March 30, 2015 1. (20 points) An agent has Y 0 = 1 to invest. On the market two financial assets exist. The first one is riskless.

More information

Notes for Session 2, Expected Utility Theory, Summer School 2009 T.Seidenfeld 1

Notes for Session 2, Expected Utility Theory, Summer School 2009 T.Seidenfeld 1 Session 2: Expected Utility In our discussion of betting from Session 1, we required the bookie to accept (as fair) the combination of two gambles, when each gamble, on its own, is judged fair. That is,

More information

SAC 304: Financial Mathematics II

SAC 304: Financial Mathematics II SAC 304: Financial Mathematics II Portfolio theory, Risk and Return,Investment risk, CAPM Philip Ngare, Ph.D April 25, 2013 P. Ngare (University Of Nairobi) SAC 304: Financial Mathematics II April 25,

More information

FINC3017: Investment and Portfolio Management

FINC3017: Investment and Portfolio Management FINC3017: Investment and Portfolio Management Investment Funds Topic 1: Introduction Unit Trusts: investor s funds are pooled, usually into specific types of assets. o Investors are assigned tradeable

More information

STOCHASTIC CONSUMPTION-SAVINGS MODEL: CANONICAL APPLICATIONS FEBRUARY 19, 2013

STOCHASTIC CONSUMPTION-SAVINGS MODEL: CANONICAL APPLICATIONS FEBRUARY 19, 2013 STOCHASTIC CONSUMPTION-SAVINGS MODEL: CANONICAL APPLICATIONS FEBRUARY 19, 2013 Model Structure EXPECTED UTILITY Preferences v(c 1, c 2 ) with all the usual properties Lifetime expected utility function

More information

KIER DISCUSSION PAPER SERIES

KIER DISCUSSION PAPER SERIES KIER DISCUSSION PAPER SERIES KYOTO INSTITUTE OF ECONOMIC RESEARCH http://www.kier.kyoto-u.ac.jp/index.html Discussion Paper No. 657 The Buy Price in Auctions with Discrete Type Distributions Yusuke Inami

More information

Labor Economics Field Exam Spring 2011

Labor Economics Field Exam Spring 2011 Labor Economics Field Exam Spring 2011 Instructions You have 4 hours to complete this exam. This is a closed book examination. No written materials are allowed. You can use a calculator. THE EXAM IS COMPOSED

More information

AMS Portfolio Theory and Capital Markets

AMS Portfolio Theory and Capital Markets AMS 69.0 - Portfolio Theory and Capital Markets I Class 5 - Utility and Pricing Theory Robert J. Frey Research Professor Stony Brook University, Applied Mathematics and Statistics frey@ams.sunysb.edu This

More information

Problem Set 2. Theory of Banking - Academic Year Maria Bachelet March 2, 2017

Problem Set 2. Theory of Banking - Academic Year Maria Bachelet March 2, 2017 Problem Set Theory of Banking - Academic Year 06-7 Maria Bachelet maria.jua.bachelet@gmai.com March, 07 Exercise Consider an agency relationship in which the principal contracts the agent, whose effort

More information

Lecture 2: Stochastic Discount Factor

Lecture 2: Stochastic Discount Factor Lecture 2: Stochastic Discount Factor Simon Gilchrist Boston Univerity and NBER EC 745 Fall, 2013 Stochastic Discount Factor (SDF) A stochastic discount factor is a stochastic process {M t,t+s } such that

More information

Comparative Risk Sensitivity with Reference-Dependent Preferences

Comparative Risk Sensitivity with Reference-Dependent Preferences The Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, 24:2; 131 142, 2002 2002 Kluwer Academic Publishers. Manufactured in The Netherlands. Comparative Risk Sensitivity with Reference-Dependent Preferences WILLIAM S. NEILSON

More information

Optimizing S-shaped utility and risk management

Optimizing S-shaped utility and risk management Optimizing S-shaped utility and risk management Ineffectiveness of VaR and ES constraints John Armstrong (KCL), Damiano Brigo (Imperial) Quant Summit March 2018 Are ES constraints effective against rogue

More information

Topic Four Utility optimization and stochastic dominance for investment decisions. 4.1 Optimal long-term investment criterion log utility criterion

Topic Four Utility optimization and stochastic dominance for investment decisions. 4.1 Optimal long-term investment criterion log utility criterion MATH4512 Fundamentals of Mathematical Finance Topic Four Utility optimization and stochastic dominance for investment decisions 4.1 Optimal long-term investment criterion log utility criterion 4.2 Axiomatic

More information

UC Berkeley Haas School of Business Economic Analysis for Business Decisions (EWMBA 201A) Fall Module I

UC Berkeley Haas School of Business Economic Analysis for Business Decisions (EWMBA 201A) Fall Module I UC Berkeley Haas School of Business Economic Analysis for Business Decisions (EWMBA 201A) Fall 2016 Module I The consumers Decision making under certainty (PR 3.1-3.4) Decision making under uncertainty

More information

Unraveling versus Unraveling: A Memo on Competitive Equilibriums and Trade in Insurance Markets

Unraveling versus Unraveling: A Memo on Competitive Equilibriums and Trade in Insurance Markets Unraveling versus Unraveling: A Memo on Competitive Equilibriums and Trade in Insurance Markets Nathaniel Hendren October, 2013 Abstract Both Akerlof (1970) and Rothschild and Stiglitz (1976) show that

More information

UC Berkeley Haas School of Business Economic Analysis for Business Decisions (EWMBA 201A) Fall Module I

UC Berkeley Haas School of Business Economic Analysis for Business Decisions (EWMBA 201A) Fall Module I UC Berkeley Haas School of Business Economic Analysis for Business Decisions (EWMBA 201A) Fall 2018 Module I The consumers Decision making under certainty (PR 3.1-3.4) Decision making under uncertainty

More information

EconS Micro Theory I Recitation #8b - Uncertainty II

EconS Micro Theory I Recitation #8b - Uncertainty II EconS 50 - Micro Theory I Recitation #8b - Uncertainty II. Exercise 6.E.: The purpose of this exercise is to show that preferences may not be transitive in the presence of regret. Let there be S states

More information

16 MAKING SIMPLE DECISIONS

16 MAKING SIMPLE DECISIONS 253 16 MAKING SIMPLE DECISIONS Let us associate each state S with a numeric utility U(S), which expresses the desirability of the state A nondeterministic action a will have possible outcome states Result(a)

More information

4: SINGLE-PERIOD MARKET MODELS

4: SINGLE-PERIOD MARKET MODELS 4: SINGLE-PERIOD MARKET MODELS Marek Rutkowski School of Mathematics and Statistics University of Sydney Semester 2, 2016 M. Rutkowski (USydney) Slides 4: Single-Period Market Models 1 / 87 General Single-Period

More information