Town of Oakville Development Charge Background Study. Consolidated Report. In association with

Transcription

1 Development Charge Background Study Consolidated Report This report consolidates the December 22,2017 Background Study, the February 8, 2018 Addendum 1 Report, and the February 23, 2018 Addendum 2 Report In association with March 7, 2018

2

3 Contents Page Executive Summary... i 1. Introduction Purpose of this Document Summary of the Process Changes to the Development Charges Act: Bill Area Rating Asset Management Plan for New Infrastructure Transit Day Circulation of D.C. Background Study Timing of Collection of Development Charges Other Changes Current Policy Schedule of Charges Timing of D.C. Calculation and Payment Indexing Redevelopment Allowance Exemptions Anticipated Development in the Requirements of the Act Basis of Population, Household and Non-Residential Gross Floor Area Forecast Summary of Growth Forecast The Approach to Calculation of the Charge Introduction Services Potentially Involved Increase in the Need for Service Local Service Policy Capital Forecast Treatment of Credits Eligible Debt and Committed Excess Capacity Existing Reserve Funds Deductions Reduction Required by Level of Service Ceiling Reduction for Uncommitted Excess Capacity Reduction for Benefit to Existing Development Reduction for Anticipated Grants, Subsidies and Other Contributions The 10% Reduction Municipal-Wide vs. Area Rating Allocation of Development Asset Management Transit

4 5. Development Charge Eligible Cost Analysis by Service Introduction Service Levels and 10-Year Capital Costs for D.C. Calculation Municipal Parking Parks and Recreation Library Services General Government (Studies) Transit Service Levels and 15-Year Capital Costs for Oakville s D.C. Calculation Fire Protection Services Services Related to a Highway Development Charge Calculation Development Charge Policy Recommendations and Development Charge By-law Rules Introduction Development Charge By-law Structure Development Charge By-law Rules Payment in any Particular Case Determination of the Amount of the Charge Application to Redevelopment of Land (Demolition and Conversion) Exemptions (full or partial) Phasing in Timing of Collection Indexing The Applicable Areas Other Development Charge By-law Provisions Categories of Services for Reserve Fund and Credit Purposes By-law In-force Date Minimum Interest Rate Paid on Refunds and Charged for Inter-Reserve Fund Borrowing Area Rating Other Recommendations By-law Implementation Public Consultation Process Introduction Public Meeting of Council Other Consultation Activity Anticipated Impact of the Charge on Development Implementation Requirements Introduction Notice of Passage By-law Pamphlet Appeals Complaints

5 8.3.6 Credits Front-Ending Agreements Severance and Subdivision Agreement Conditions Appendix A Background Information on Residential and Non-residential Growth Forecast...A-1 Appendix B Level of Service...B-1 Appendix C Long Term Capital and Operating Cost Examination... C-1 Appendix D Development Charge Reserve Fund Policy... D-1 Appendix E Local Service Policy...E-1 Appendix F Asset Management Plan... F-1 Appendix G Proposed Development Charge By-law... G-1 Appendix H Dillon Consulting Limited... H-1

6 List of Acronyms and Abbreviations A.M.P. D.C. D.C.A. E.S.A. G.F.A. Asset Management Plan Development Charge Development Charges Act, 1997, as amended Environmentally Sensitive Areas Gross floor area N.F.P.O.W. No Fixed Place of Work O.M.B. O.P.A. O.Reg. P.P.U. S.D.E. S.D.U. s.s. sq.ft. sq.m. t.f.a. Ontario Municipal Board Official Plan Amendment Ontario Regulation Persons per unit Single detached equivalent Single detached unit Subsection Square foot Square metre Total Floor Area

7 Page (i) Executive Summary 1. The report provided herein represents the Development Charge (D.C.) Background Study for the required by the Development Charges Act,1997, as amended (D.C.A.). This report has been prepared in accordance with the methodology required under the D.C.A. The contents include the following: Chapter 1 Overview of the legislative requirements of the Act; Chapter 2 Review of present D.C. policies of the Town; Chapter 3 Summary of the residential and non-residential growth forecasts for the Town; Chapter 4 Approach to calculating the development charge; Chapter 5 Review of historical service standards and identification of future capital requirements to service growth and related deductions and allocations; Chapter 6 Calculation of the development charges; Chapter 7 Development charge policy recommendations and rules; and Chapter 8 By-law implementation. 2. Development charges provide for the recovery of growth-related capital expenditures from new development. The D.C.A. is the statutory basis to recover these charges. The methodology is detailed in Chapter 4; a simplified summary is provided below: 1) Identify amount, type and location of growth; 2) Identify servicing needs to accommodate growth; 3) Identify capital costs to provide services to meet the needs; 4) Deduct: Grants, subsidies and other contributions; Benefit to existing development; Statutory 10% deduction (soft services); Amounts in excess of 10-year historic service calculation; D.C. reserve funds (where applicable);

8 Page (ii) 5) Net costs are then allocated between residential and non-residential benefit; and 6) Net costs divided by growth to provide the D.C. charge. 3. A number of changes to the D.C. process need to be addressed as a result of Bill 73. These changes have been incorporated throughout the report and in the updated draft by-law, as necessary. These items include: a. Area-rating: Council must consider the use of area specific charges. b. Forward looking service standard for Transit, along with specific allocations between existing benefit and post period benefit. c. Asset Management Plan for New Infrastructure: The D.C. background study must include an asset management plan that deals with all assets proposed to be funded, in whole or in part, by D.C.s. The asset management plan must show that the assets are financially sustainable over their full lifecycle. d. 60-day Circulation Period: The D.C. background study must be released to the public at least 60-days prior to passage of the D.C. by-law. e. Timing of Collection of Development Charges: The D.C.A. now required D.C.s to be collected at the time of the first building permit except in the case where the development has two or more phases that are not constructed concurrently, each phase is deemed a separate development. 4. The growth forecast (Chapter 3) on which the Municipal-wide development charge is based, projects the following population, housing and non-residential floor area for the 10-year ( ) and 15-year ( ) periods. 10 Year 15 Year Measure (Net) Population Increase 42,360 48,716 Residential Unit Increase 17,420 21,020 Non-Residential Gross Floor Area Increase (ft²) 12,773,000 16,278,600 Source: Forecast 2017

9 Page (iii) 5. On March 5, 2013, the s D.C. By-law came into effect under the D.C.A. The by-law imposes development charges on residential and non-residential uses and will expire on March 4, The Town is undertaking a development charge public process and anticipates passing a new by-law in advance of the expiry date. The mandatory public meeting has been set for January 29, 2018 with adoption of the by-law subsequently (February 26, 2018). 6. On December 7, 2017, a Council D.C. Steering Committee was held to present the findings of the current D.C. study regarding the use of area rating and the associated calculations. Based on Council s input, it was recommended to staff that a uniform, Municipal-wide charge continue to be used. This decision is expected to be affirmed upon consideration of the D.C. background study. 7. The Town s development charges currently in effect are $25,283 for single detached dwelling units for all services. Non-residential charges are $10.62 per square foot (sq.ft.) for all services. This report has undertaken a recalculation of the charge based on future identified needs (presented in Schedule ES-1 for residential and non-residential). Charges have been provided on a Municipalwide basis for all services. The corresponding single-detached unit charge is $33,688. The non-residential charge is $10.27 per sq.ft. of total floor area (t.f.a.). These rates are submitted to Council for its consideration. 8. The D.C.A. requires a summary be provided of the gross capital costs and the net costs to be recovered over the life of the by-law. This calculation is provided by service and is presented in Chapter 6 (Table 6-4). A summary of these costs is provided below: Total gross expenditures planned over the next five years $ 356,458,346 Less: Benefit to existing development $ 81,822,610 Post planning period benefit $ 3,903,959 Prior project funding $ 21,185,779 Mandatory 10% deduction for certain services $ 6,412,683 Grants, subsidies and other contributions $ 43,404,340 Net Costs to be recovered from development charges $ 199,728,974 Hence, $ million (or an annual amount of $31.35 million) will need to be contributed from taxes and rates, or other sources. Of this amount, $3.9 million will be included in subsequent D.C. study updates to reflect the portion of capital that benefits growth in the post period D.C. forecasts. H:\Oakville\2017 DC\Report\Addendum 2\Report for Addendum 2.docx

10 Page (iv) Based on the above table, the Town plans to spend $ million over the next five years, of which $ million (56%) is recoverable from development charges. Of this net amount, $ million is recoverable from residential development and $53.01 million from non-residential development. It is noted also that any exemptions or reductions in the charges would reduce this recovery further. 9. Considerations by Council The background study represents the service needs arising from residential and non-residential growth over the forecast periods. The following services are calculated based on a forecast: Fire Protection Services; and Services Related to a Highway. All other services are calculated based on a forecast. These include: Parks and Recreation; Library Services; Transit Services; Municipal Parking; and General Government (Studies). Council will consider the findings and recommendations provided in the report and, in conjunction with public input, approve such policies and rates it deems appropriate. These directions will refine the draft D.C. by-law which is appended in Appendix G. These decisions may include: adopting the charges and policies recommended herein; considering additional exemptions to the by-law; and considering reductions in the charge by class of development (obtained by removing certain services on which the charge is based and/or by a general reduction in the charge). H:\Oakville\2017 DC\Report\Addendum 2\Report for Addendum 2.docx

11 Page (v) Table ES-1 RESIDENTIAL NON-RESIDENTIAL Service Single and Semi- Detached Dwelling Apartments - 2 Bedrooms + Apartments - Bachelor and 1 Bedroom Other Multiples Special Care/Special Dwelling Units (per ft² of Gross Floor Area) Municipal Wide Services: Services Related to a Highway 17,329 9,313 5,616 12,625 5, Transit Services Fire Protection Services Municipal Parking Parks and Recreation 13,019 6,996 4,219 9,485 3, Library Services General Government Total Municipal Wide Services 33,688 18,105 10,917 24,543 10, H:\Oakville\2017 DC\Report\Addendum\Report for Addendum.docx

12 Page Introduction 1.1 Purpose of this Document This background study has been prepared pursuant to the requirements of the Development Charges Act, 1997, as amended (D.C.A.) and, accordingly, recommends new development charges and policies for the. The Town retained (Watson), to undertake the development charges (D.C.) study process in April, With the changes to the D.C.A. with respect to Transit under Bill 73 (further explained in section 1.3.3), Watson retained Dillon Consulting Limited (Dillon) to assist with the Transit forecast on behalf of the Town. The Consulting team worked with Town staff in preparing the D.C. analysis and policy recommendations. This D.C. background study, containing the proposed D.C. by-law, will be distributed to members of the public in order to provide interested parties with sufficient background information on the legislation, the study s recommendations and an outline of the basis for these recommendations. This report has been prepared, in the first instance, to meet the statutory requirements applicable to the Town s development charge background study, as summarized in Chapter 4. It also addresses the requirement for rules (contained in Chapter 7) and the proposed by-law to be made available as part of the approval process (included as Appendix G). In addition, the report is designed to set out sufficient background on the legislation (Chapter 4), Oakville s current D.C. policy (Chapter 2) and the policies underlying the proposed by-law (Chapter 7), to make the exercise understandable to those who are involved. Finally, it addresses post-adoption implementation requirements (Chapter 8) which are critical to the successful application of the new policy. The Chapters in the report are supported by Appendices containing the data required to explain and substantiate the calculation of the charge. A full discussion of the statutory requirements for the preparation of a background study and calculation of a D.C. is provided herein.

13 Page Summary of the Process The public meeting required under Section 12 of the D.C.A., has been scheduled for January 29, Its purpose is to present the study to the public and to solicit public input. The meeting is also being held to answer any questions regarding the study s purpose, methodology and the proposed modifications to the Town s D.C. To date, the following process has taken place: Data collection, staff review, D.C. calculations and policy work (April September 2017); Executive Management Team Meeting #1 (July 14, 2016) Council Steering Committee Meeting #1 (September 20, 2016) Executive Management Team Meetings #2 (February 22, 2017) Internal Steering Committee Meeting #1 (July 12, 2017) Internal Steering Committee Meeting #2 (August 17, 2017) Council Steering Committee Meeting #2 (October 18, 2017) Internal Steering Committee Meeting #3 (October 30, 2017) Internal Steering Committee Meeting #4 (November 28, 2017) Council Steering Committee Meeting #3 (December 7, 2017) Stakeholder Meeting # 1 (December 8, 2017) Background study and draft D.C. by-law released to the public (December 22, 2017); and Public meeting advertisement placed in newspaper(s) in accordance with the requirements of the D.C.A. (at least 20 days prior to the public meeting) The process to be followed in finalizing the report and recommendations include: Public meeting of Council (January 29, 2018); Consideration of responses received prior to, at, or immediately following the Public Meeting; Council approval of Background Study & Draft By-law; Council passage of the D.C. by-law (February 26, 2018); Implementation of the D.C. By-law effective date of new by-law and rates (February 27, 2018); Notice in the newspaper(s) and to the Clerk of the Region and School Boards, given of by-law passage within 20 days of passage; Last day for by-law appeal is 40 days after by-law passage;

14 Page 1-3 Town makes pamphlet available (where by-law is not appealed) within 60 days after the by-law comes into force. 1.3 Changes to the Development Charges Act: Bill 73 With the amendment of the D.C.A. (as a result of Bill 73 and O.Reg. 428/15), there are a number of areas that must be addressed to ensure that the Town is in compliance with the D.C.A., as amended. The following provides an explanation of the changes to the Act that affect the Town s Background Study and how they have been dealt with to ensure compliance with the amended legislation Area Rating Bill 73 has introduced two new sections where Council must consider the use of area specific charges: 1) Section 2(9) of the Act now requires a municipality to implement area-specific D.C.s for either specific services which are prescribed and/or for specific municipalities which are to be regulated. (Note that at this time, no municipalities or services are prescribed by the Regulations.) 2) Section 10(2)c.1 of the D.C.A. requires that, the development charges background study shall include consideration of the use of more than one development charge by-law to reflect different needs for services in different areas. In regard to the first item, there are no services or specific municipalities identified in the regulations which must be area rated. The second item requires Council to consider the use of area rating Asset Management Plan for New Infrastructure The new legislation now requires that a D.C. background study must include an Asset Management Plan (s.10 (2) c.2). The asset management plan must deal with all assets that are proposed to be funded, in whole or in part, by D.C.s. The current regulations provide very extensive and specific requirements for the asset management plan related to transit services; however, they are silent with respect to how the asset management plan is to be provided for all other services. As part of any asset management plan, the examination should be consistent with the municipality s existing assumptions, approaches and policies on asset management planning. This examination may include both qualitative and quantitative measures such as examining

15 Page 1-4 the annual future lifecycle contributions needs (discussed further in Appendix F of this report) Transit As per O.Reg. 428/15 and O.Reg. 82/98, Transit services now require a revised form of calculation. The following changes and requirements are as follows: 10% mandatory deduction from the growth-related costs removed; Methodology for determining the planned level of service set out in the regulations; and Methodology requires ridership forecasts and ridership capacity for all modes of transit over the 10 years, identification of excess capacity which exists at the end of 10 years, identification of whether new ridership is from existing or planned development. In addition to the revisions above, a detailed evaluation for Transit asset management is required and consist of the following: Identifying the state of local infrastructure for the existing assets; Definition of service levels through time frames and provides performance measures; Provides an asset management strategy and a financial strategy for existing and future assets; Assessment of options to achieve level of service; Review of procurement measures to achieve level of service; and Review of risks associated with strategies. To this end, Watson has retained Dillon to undertake the Transit forecast as per the requirements of O.Reg 428/15. The findings of their work are in Appendix H to this study Day Circulation of D.C. Background Study Previously the legislation required that a D.C. background study be made available to the public at least two weeks prior to the public meeting. The amended legislation now provides that the D.C. background study must be made available to the public (including posting on the municipal website) at least 60 days prior to passage of the D.C. by-law. No other changes were made to timing requirements for such things as notice of the public meeting and notice of by-law passage.

16 This D.C. study is being provided to the public on December 22, 2017 to ensure the new requirements for release of the study is met Timing of Collection of Development Charges Page 1-5 The D.C.A. has been refined by Bill 73 to require that D.C.s are collected at the time of the first building permit except in the case where the development has two or more phases that are not constructed concurrently, each phase is deemed a separate development. For the majority of development, this will not impact the Town s present process. However, there may be instances where several building permits are to be issued and either the size of the development or the uses will not be definable at the time of the first building permit. In these instances, the Town may enter into a delayed payment agreement in order to capture the full development Other Changes It is also noted that a number of other changes were made through Bill 73 and O.Reg. 428/15 including changes to the inclusion of Waste Diversion and the restriction for collection of additional levies.

17 Page Current Policy 2.1 Schedule of Charges The s D.C. By-law came into effect on the 5 th day of March, The following summarizes the service categories for which D.C.s are collected pursuant to this By-law: Municipal-wide services include; Services Related to a Highway, Transit Services, Fire Protection Services, Municipal Parking, Parks and Recreation, Library Services, and General Government. The following table shows the development charges currently in effect (April 1, 2017): Service Single & Semi Detached Multiples Residential Apartments with >= 2 Bedrooms Apartments with < 2 Bedrooms Special Care Dwellings Non-Residential Services Related to a Highway 14,494 10,609 8,456 6,083 4, Transit Services Fire Protection Services Municipal Parking Parks and Recreation 9,010 6,594 5,256 3,781 2, Library Services General Government Total 25,283 18,505 14,750 10,610 7, per ft² The residential charges are imposed based on the number and type of dwelling units (and on a per bedroom basis for Special Care Dwellings). Non-residential charges are based on a per sq.ft. of gross floor area basis. 2.2 Timing of D.C. Calculation and Payment Development charges are payable at the time of building permit issuance and are collected by the Building Department. 2.3 Indexing The by-law provides for annual indexing of the charge on April 1 st of each year without amendment of the by-law using the Non-Residential Construction Price Index produced by Statistics Canada. 2.4 Redevelopment Allowance The follow redevelopment allowance is contained within the Town s current D.C. By-law:

18 If a development or redevelopment involves the demolition of and replacement of a building or structure, or the conversion from one principal use to another: Page 2-2 (1) A credit shall be allowed against the development charges otherwise payable, provided that where a demolition permit for the demolition of a building or structure on the site has been issued and not revoked: (a) before August 31, 2009, and a building permit has been issued for the development or redevelopment within ten years from the date the demolition permit; or (b) as of and after August 31, 2009, and a building permit has been issued for 2.5 Exemptions the development or redevelopment within five years from the date of the demolition permit. The Statutory exemptions under the D.C.A. are as follows: industrial building additions of up to and including 50% of the existing gross floor area (defined in O.Reg. 82/98, s.1) of the building; for industrial building additions which exceed 50% of the existing gross floor area, only the portion of the addition in excess of 50% is subject to development charges (s.4(3)) of the D.C.A.; buildings or structures owned by and used for the purposes of any municipality, local board or Board of Education (s.3); residential development that results only in the enlargement of an existing dwelling unit, or that results only in the creation of up to two additional dwelling units (based on prescribed limits set out in s.2 of O.Reg. 82/98). The following non-statutory exemptions are provided under By-law : Non-residential farm buildings; A part of a building or structure that is used as a public hospital under the Public Hospitals Act, R.S.O. 1990, c. P. 40, as amended; a publicly-funded university, community college or a college of applied arts and technology established under the Ontario Colleges of Applied Art and Technology Act, 2002, S.O. 2002, c.8, Schedule F, as amended; a provincial or federal crown agency; Buildings or structures owned and used for the purposes of a conservation authority, unless such buildings are used primarily for or in connection with

19 (i) recreational purposes for which the conservation authority charges admission and/or fees, or (ii) any commercial purposes; Page 2-3 Total floor area (t.f.a.) within non-residential buildings or structures used solely for the purposes of a non-profit, licensed, day nursery for the exclusive use by children of the employees of the owner; The gross floor area of the area of worship within a place of worship; and Temporary Buildings subject to certain criteria.

20 Page Anticipated Development in the Town of Oakville 3.1 Requirements of the Act Chapter 4 provides the methodology for calculating a development charge as per the Development Charges Act, Figure 4-1 presents this methodology graphically. It is noted in the first box of the schematic that in order to determine the development charge that may be imposed, it is a requirement of section 5(1) of the Development Charges Act that, the anticipated amount, type and location of development, for which development charges can be imposed, must be estimated. The growth forecast contained in this chapter (with supplemental tables in Appendix A) provides for the anticipated development for which the will be required to provide services, over a 10-year time horizon ( ), and long term ( ) period. 3.2 Basis of Population, Household and Non-Residential Gross Floor Area Forecast The D.C. growth forecast has been derived based on extensive discussions with Town staff regarding historical development trends, development phasing, land availability and residential/non-residential market demand. In compiling the growth forecast, the following reports were also consulted to help assess residential and non-residential development potential for the Town over the forecast period, including: Halton Region Official Plan (ROP), January 13, 2016 Halton Region June 2011 Best Planning Estimates of Population, Occupied Dwelling Units and Employment, ; Urban Structure Review, Growth Analysis and Accommodation Overview Report, May ; Employment and Commercial Review, October 2016; 2001, 2006, 2011 and 2016 residential Census data; historical residential and non-residential development activity over the past 10 years; 2001, 2006 and 2011 Census employment data.

21 Page Summary of Growth Forecast A detailed analysis of the residential and non-residential growth forecast is provided in Appendix A. The discussion provided herein summarizes the anticipated growth for the Town and describes the basis for the forecast. The results of the residential growth forecast analysis are summarized in Figure 3-1 below, and Schedule 1 in Appendix A. Figure 3-1 Household and Population Forecast Model DEMAND SUPPLY Historical Housing Construction Employment/Economic Outlook Local, Regional and Provincial Forecast of Residential Units Residential Units in the Development Process Housing Intensification Designated Lands Servicing Capacity Occupancy Assumptions Gross Population Increase Decline in Existing Population Net Population Increase

22 Page 3-3 As identified in Table 3-1 and Schedule 1, the Town s population is anticipated to reach approximately 240,040 by 2027 and 246,400 by This represents an increase of 42,360 persons and 48,716 persons, over the 10-year, and long-term forecast period, respectively. Provided below is a summary of the key assumptions and findings regarding the D.C. growth forecast update. 1. Housing Unit Mix (Appendix A Schedules 1 through 5) The housing unit mix for the Town was derived based on background data provided as part of the Urban Structure Review, Growth Analysis and Accommodation Overview Report, Based on the above, the long term ( ) household growth forecast is comprised of a housing unit mix of approximately 35% low density (single detached and semi-detached), 23% medium density (multiples except apartments) and 42% high density (bachelor, 1 bedroom and 2+ bedroom apartments). 2. Geographic Location of Residential Development (Appendix A Schedule 2) Schedule 2 summarizes the anticipated amount, type and location of development for the over the forecast period. In accordance with forecast demand and available land supply, housing growth has been allocated to the following geographic areas over the long term forecast period: 3. Planning Period Housing Growth (Units) % North Oakville 10,518 50% South Oakville 10,502 50% Total Town-wide forecast 21, % Short- and longer-term time horizons are required for the D.C. process. The D.C.A. limits the planning horizon for certain services, such as parks, recreation and libraries, to a 10-year planning horizon. Roads, fire and other hard services utilize the long term forecast period.

23 Incremental Forecast Historical Page 3-4 Year Mid 2001 Mid 2006 Mid 2011 Mid 2016 Mid 2017 Mid 2027 Mid 2031 Mid Mid 2006 Mid Mid 2011 Mid Mid 2016 Mid Mid 2017 Mid Mid 2027 Mid Mid 2031 Including Census Undercount 1 Population Population Excluding Census Undercount Institutional Population Table 3-1 Residential Growth Forecast Summary Population in Private Households Singles & Semi- Detached Multiple Dwellings 2 Apartments3 Other Total Households Equivalent Institutional Households 150, , ,595 34,590 6,165 8, ,260 1, , ,613 1, ,725 38,910 8,775 8, ,570 1, , ,520 2, ,430 42,030 10,610 9, ,410 1, , ,835 2, ,720 43,145 12,020 11, ,265 1, , ,684 2, ,433 43,424 12,619 11, ,070 2, , ,044 2, ,432 49,431 16,566 19, ,490 2, , ,400 2, ,680 50,763 17,430 20, ,090 2, ,710 20, ,130 4,320 2, , ,580 16, ,705 3,120 1, , ,770 11, ,290 1,115 1,410 1, , ,000 3, , , ,060 42, ,999 6,007 3,947 7, , ,670 48, ,247 7,339 4,811 8, , Census Undercount estimated at approximately 4%. Note: Population Including the Undercount has been rounded. 2. Includes townhomes and apartments in duplexes. 3. Includes bachelor, 1 bedroom and 2 bedroom+ apartments. Households Person Per Unit (PPU): Total Population/ Total Households Source: Derived by from Halton Region Best Planning Estimates, Urban Structure Review, Growth Analysis and Accommodation Overview Report. May 4, Town of Oakville Residential Growth Analysis Study - Technical Report. May 4, 2017 Persons in Private Households/ Total Households

24 4. Population in New Units (Appendix A Schedules 3 through 8) Page 3-5 The number of housing units to be constructed in the during the 10-year and long term period is presented on Figure 3-2. Over the long term ( ) forecast period, the Town is anticipated to average approximately 1,500 new housing units per year. Population in new units is derived from Schedules 3, 4a, and 4b, which incorporate historical development activity, anticipated units (see unit mix discussion) and average persons per unit by dwelling type for new households. Schedule 7 summarizes the average number of persons per unit (P.P.U.) for new housing units by age and type of dwelling, based on 2011 custom Census data for the Town. Generally, it is observed that within the new housing units, housing occupancy levels tend to increase in the short term (i.e years) as new home buyers form families, followed by a decline over the long term (i.e years) as children age and leave home. This trend is then followed by a period of gradual stabilization for housing units 30+years of age. The results of this pattern are that new housing units typically have a higher P.P.U. average in comparison to older units (i.e. 20+ years). Average P.P.U.s by dwelling type over the 2017 to 2031 forecast period are as follows: o Low density: 3.61 o Medium density: 2.63 o High density: Existing Units and Population Change (Appendix A Schedules 3, 4a, 4b and 5) Existing households as of 2017 are based on the 2016 Census households, plus estimated residential units constructed between 2016 and 2017, assuming a 6-month lag between construction and occupancy (see Schedule 3). The decline in average occupancy levels for existing households is calculated in Schedules 3, 4a, and 4b, by aging the existing population over the forecast period. The forecast population decline in existing households over the 2017 to 2031 forecast period is estimated at approximately - 5,050.

25 Housing Units Page 3-6 Figure 3-2 Annual Housing Forecast 3,500 3,000 2,920 2,500 2,000 1,938 1,782 1,805 1,950 1,950 1,950 1,500 1,436 1,593 1,550 1,550 1,550 1,550 1,550 1,241 1, Years Historical Low Density Medium Density High Density Historical Average Source: Historical housing activity ( ) based on Statistics Canada building permits, Catalogue XIB 2017 housing growth derived by Watson & Associates Economist Ltd. 1. Growth Forecast represents calendar year.

26 6. Employment (Appendix A Schedules 9a through 10) Page 3-7 Employment projections are largely based on the activity rate method, which is defined as the number of jobs in Oakville divided by the number of residents. 1 Key employment sectors include primary, industrial, commercial/ population-related, institutional and work-at-home, which are considered individually below. The Town s employment base by place of work is outlined in Schedule 9a. The 2011 employment base is comprised of the following sectors: o 160 primary (approx. <1%); o 8,315 work-at-home employment (approx. 10%); o 22,100 industrial (approx. 27%); o 34,450 commercial (approx. 43%); and o 15,860 institutional (approx. 20%). The 2011 employment base by usual place of work, including work at home, is approximately 80,885 jobs. An additional 7,520 jobs have been identified for the as having no fixed place of work (N.F.P.O.W.). 3 The total employment including N.F.P.O.W. in 2011 is 88,405. As of mid-2017, the Town s total employment base is estimated at approximately 97,200 including work at home and N.F.P.O.W employment. Schedule 9b, Appendix A, summarizes the employment forecast, excluding work-at-home employment and N.F.P.O.W. employment, which is the basis for the D.C. employment forecast. The impact on municipal services from work-at-home employees has already been included in the population forecast. The need for municipal services related to N.F.P.O.W. employees has largely been included in the employment forecast by usual place of work (i.e. employment and G.F.A. in the retail and accommodation sectors generated from N.F.P.O.W. construction employment). Furthermore, since these employees have no fixed work address, they cannot be captured in the non-residential gross floor area 1 As previously mentioned, the Town s long-term employment forecast has been based on the Employment and Commercial Review, October, employment based on Statistics Canada custom employment data. 3 Statistics Canada defines "No Fixed Place of Work" (N.F.P.O.W.) employees as, "persons who do not go from home to the same work place location at the beginning of each shift. Such persons include building and landscape contractors, travelling salespersons, independent truck drivers, etc.

27 (G.F.A.) calculation. Accordingly, work-at-home and N.F.P.O.W. Page 3-8 employees have been removed from the D.C. employment forecast and calculation. Total employment for the (excluding work-at-home and no fixed place of work) in 2031 is forecast to increase to approximately 106,100. This represents an employment increase of approximately 26,340 additional jobs over the long term ( ) forecast period. 7. Non-Residential Sq.ft. Estimates ((Gross Floor Area (G.F.A.), Appendix A Schedule 9b) Square footage estimates were calculated in Schedule 9b based on the following employee density assumptions: o 1,200 sq.ft. per employee for industrial; o 400 sq.ft. per employee for commercial; and o 413 sq.ft. per employee for institutional employment. The Town-wide incremental non-residential G.F.A. increase is anticipated to be approximately 16,278,600 sq.ft. over the long term ( ) forecast period. In terms of percentage growth, the incremental G.F.A. forecast by sector is broken down as follows: o industrial approx. 52%; o commercial approx. 36%; and o institutional approx. 12%.

28 Page The Approach to Calculation of the Charge 4.1 Introduction This chapter addresses the requirements of s.s.5(1) of the D.C.A. with respect to the establishment of the need for service which underpins the development charge calculation. These requirements are illustrated schematically in Figure Services Potentially Involved Table 4-1 lists the full range of Town service categories which are provided within the Town. A number of these services are defined in s.s.2(4) of the D.C.A. as being ineligible for inclusion in development charges. These are shown as ineligible on Table 4-1. Two ineligible costs defined in s.s.5(3) of the D.C.A. are computer equipment and rolling stock with an estimated useful life of (less than) seven years... In addition, local roads are covered separately under subdivision agreements and related means (as are other local services). Services which are potentially eligible for inclusion in the Town s development charge are indicated with a Yes. 4.3 Increase in the Need for Service The development charge calculation commences with an estimate of the increase in the need for service attributable to the anticipated development, for each service to be covered by the by-law. There must be some form of link or attribution between the anticipated development and the estimated increase in the need for service. While the need could conceivably be expressed generally in terms of units of capacity, s.s.5(1)3, which requires that Town Council indicate that it intends to ensure that such an increase in need will be met, suggests that a project-specific expression of need would be most appropriate. 4.4 Local Service Policy Some of the need for services generated by additional development consists of local services related to a plan of subdivision. As such, they will be required as a condition of subdivision agreements or consent conditions.

29 Page 4-2 Figure 4-1 The Process of Calculating a Development Charge under the D.C.A., 1997 The Process of Calculating a Development Charge under the Act that must be followed Anticipated Development 1. Tax Base, User Rates, etc. 2. Ineligible Services Estimated Increase in Need for Service Ceiling Re: Increased Need Non-Transit Services Historic Service Standard 4a. Subdivision Agreements and Consent Provisions 8. Specified Local Services Needs That Will Be Met 5. Transit Services Forward-looking Service Standard 4b. D.C. Needs By Service 9. 1 Examination of the Long-term Capital and Operating Costs for Capital Infrastructure 6. Asset Management Plan for All Capital Projects to be Funded by D.C.s 7. Less: Uncommitted Excess Capacity 10. Non-Transit Services Financially Sustainable 7a. Transit Services Detailed Requirements 7b. 2 Less: Benefit To Existing Development Less: Grants, Subsidies and Other Contributions 12. Financing, Inflation and Investment Considerations 15. D.C. Net Capital Costs Costs for new development vs. existing development for the term of the by-law and the balance of the period 14. Amount of the Charge By Type of Development (including apportionment of costs - residential and non-residential) Less: 10% Where Applicable D.C. By-law(s) Spatial Applicability Consideration of exemptions, phase-ins, etc.

30 Page 4-3 Table 4-1 Categories of Municipal Services to be Addressed as Part of the Calculation Categories of Municipal Services Eligibility for Inclusion in the D.C. Calculation Service Components Maximum Potential D.C. Recovery % 1. Services Related to a Highway Yes Yes Yes No Yes Yes Yes 1.1 Arterial roads 1.2 Collector roads 1.3 Bridges, Culverts and Roundabouts 1.4 Local municipal roads 1.5 Traffic signals 1.6 Sidewalks and streetlights 1.7 Active Transportation Other Transportation Services Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes n/a n/a 2.1 Transit vehicles 1 & facilities 2.2 Other transit infrastructure 2.3 Municipal parking spaces - indoor 2.4 Municipal parking spaces - outdoor 2.5 Works Yards 2.6 Rolling stock Ferries 2.8 Airport Stormwater Drainage and Control Services No No No 3.1 Main channels and drainage trunks 3.2 Channel connections 3.3 Retention/detention ponds Fire Protection Services Yes Yes Yes 4.1 Fire stations 4.2 Fire pumpers, aerials and rescue vehicles Small equipment and gear with 7+ year life time *same percentage as service component to which it pertains computer equipment excluded throughout

31 Page 4-4 Categories of Municipal Services Eligibility for Inclusion in the D.C. Calculation Service Components Maximum Potential D.C. Recovery % 5. Outdoor Recreation Services (i.e. Parks and Open Space) Ineligible Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes 5.1 Acquisition of land for parks, woodlots and E.S.A.s 5.2 Development of area municipal parks 5.3 Development of district parks 5.4 Development of municipal-wide parks 5.5 Development of special purpose parks 5.6 Parks rolling stock 1 and yards Indoor Recreation Services Yes Yes 6.1 Arenas, indoor pools, fitness facilities, community centres, etc. (including land) 6.2 Recreation vehicles and equipment Library Services Yes No Yes 7.1 Public library space (incl. furniture and equipment) 7.2 Library vehicles¹ 7.3 Library materials Electrical Power Services Ineligible Ineligible Ineligible 8.1 Electrical substations 8.2 Electrical distribution system 8.3 Electrical system rolling stock Provision of Cultural, Entertainment and Tourism Facilities and Convention Centres Ineligible Ineligible 9.1 Cultural space (e.g. art galleries, museums and theatres) 9.2 Tourism facilities and convention centres Wastewater Services n/a n/a n/a n/a 10.1 Treatment plants 10.2 Sewage trunks 10.3 Local systems 10.4 Vehicles and equipment with 7+ year life time

32 Page 4-5 Categories of Municipal Services 11. Water Supply Services 12. Waste Management Services 13. Police Services 14. Homes for the Aged Eligibility for Inclusion in the D.C. Calculation n/a n/a n/a n/a Ineligible Ineligible n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a 15. Child Care n/a n/a 16. Health n/a n/a 17. Social Housing 18. Provincial Offences Act (P.O.A.) 19. Social Services 20. Ambulance n/a n/a 21. Cemeteries n/a n/a 22. Hospital Provision 1 with 7+ year life time Service Components 11.1 Treatment plants 11.2 Distribution systems 11.3 Local systems 11.4 Vehicles and equipment Landfill collection, transfer vehicles and equipment 12.2 Landfills and other disposal facilities 12.3 Waste diversion facilities 12.4 Waste diversion vehicles and equipment Police detachments 13.2 Police rolling stock Small equipment and gear 14.1 Homes for the aged space 14.2 Vehicles Child care space 15.2 Vehicles Health department space 16.2 Health department vehicles¹ Maximum Potential D.C. Recovery % n/a 17.1 Social Housing space 90 n/a 18.1 P.O.A. space 90 n/a 19.1 Social service space Ambulance station space 20.2 Vehicles Cemetery facilities 21.2 Cemetery equipment Ineligible 23.1 Hospital capital contributions

33 Page 4-6 Categories of Municipal Services 23. Provision of Headquarters for the General Administration of Municipalities and Area Municipal Boards 24. Other Services 1 with a 7+ year life time Eligibility for Inclusion in the D.C. Calculation Ineligible Ineligible Ineligible Yes Yes Service Components 23.1 Office space 23.2 Office furniture 23.3 Computer equipment 24.1 Studies in connection with acquiring buildings, rolling stock, materials and equipment, and improving land 2 and facilities, including the D.C. background study cost 24.2 Interest on money borrowed to pay for growth-related capital 2 same percentage as service component to which it pertains Maximum Potential D.C. Recovery % Eligibility for Inclusion in the D.C. Calculation Yes No n/a Ineligible Description Municipality provides the service service has been included in the D.C. calculation. Municipality provides the service service has not been included in the D.C. calculation. Municipality does not provide the service. Service is ineligible for inclusion in the D.C. calculation. 4.5 Capital Forecast Paragraph 7 of s.s.5(1) of the D.C.A. requires that the capital costs necessary to provide the increased services must be estimated. The Act goes on to require two potential cost reductions and the Regulation sets out the way in which such costs are to be presented. These requirements are outlined below.

34 These estimates involve capital costing of the increased services discussed above. Page 4-7 This entails costing actual projects or the provision of service units, depending on how each service has been addressed. The capital costs include: a) costs to acquire land or an interest therein (including a leasehold interest); b) costs to improve land; c) costs to acquire, lease, construct or improve buildings and structures; d) costs to acquire, lease or improve facilities, including rolling stock (with a useful life of 7 or more years), furniture and equipment (other than computer equipment), materials acquired for library circulation, reference or information purposes; e) interest on money borrowed to pay for the above-referenced costs; f) costs to undertake studies in connection with the above-referenced matters; and g) costs of the development charge background study. In order for an increase in need for service to be included in the D.C. calculation, Town Council must indicate...that it intends to ensure that such an increase in need will be met (s.s.5 (1)3). This can be done if the increase in service forms part of a Councilapproved Official Plan, capital forecast or similar expression of the intention of Council (O.Reg. 82/98 s.3). The capital program contained herein reflects the Town s approved and proposed capital budgets and master servicing/needs studies. 4.6 Treatment of Credits Section 8 para. 5 of O.Reg. 82/98 indicates that a development charge background study must set out the estimated value of credits that are being carried forward relating to the service. s.s.17 para. 4 of the same Regulation indicates that...the value of the credit cannot be recovered from future development charges, if the credit pertains to an ineligible service. This implies that a credit for eligible services can be recovered from future development charges. As a result, this provision should be made in the calculation, in order to avoid a funding shortfall with respect to future service needs. The Town has no outstanding credits that are required to be included in the D.C. calculations undertaken within this study. 4.7 Eligible Debt and Committed Excess Capacity Section 66 of the D.C.A. states that, for the purposes of developing a development charge by-law, a debt incurred with respect to an eligible service may be included as a

35 Page 4-8 capital cost, subject to any limitations or reductions in the Act. Similarly, s.18 of O.Reg. 82/98 indicates that debt with respect to an ineligible service may be included as a capital cost, subject to several restrictions. In order for such costs to be eligible, two conditions must apply. First, they must have funded excess capacity which is able to meet service needs attributable to the anticipated development. Second, the excess capacity must be committed, that is, either before or at the time it was created, Council must have expressed a clear intention that it would be paid for by development charges or other similar charges; for example, this may have been done as part of previous development charge processes. 4.8 Existing Reserve Funds Section 35 of the D.C.A. states that: The money in a reserve fund established for a service may be spent only for capital costs determined under paragraphs 2 to 8 of subsection 5(1). There is no explicit requirement under the D.C.A. calculation method set out in s.s.5(1) to net the outstanding reserve fund balance as part of making the D.C. calculation; however, s.35 does restrict the way in which the funds are used in future. For services which are subject to a per capita based, service level cap, the reserve fund balance should be applied against the development-related costs for which the charge was imposed, once the project is constructed (i.e. the needs of recent growth). This cost component is distinct from the development-related costs for the next 10-year period, which underlie the D.C. calculation herein. The alternative would involve the Town spending all reserve fund monies prior to renewing each by-law, which would not be a sound basis for capital budgeting. Thus, the Town will use these reserve funds for the Town s cost share of applicable development-related projects, which are required but have not yet been undertaken, as a way of directing the funds to the benefit of the development which contributed them (rather than to future development, which will generate the need for additional facilities directly proportionate to future growth). The Town s Development Charge Reserve Fund Balance by service as of December 31, 2016 is shown below. We have reduced the balances to reflect the current commitments to each reserve fund based on the Town s prior years (2016 and prior) capital budgets for which capital works are currently underway. The adjusted reserve fund balances are rationalized as part of the D.C. calculations (Chapter 5):

36 Note: Amounts in brackets are Deficit balances. Page 4-9 Service 2017 Opening Balance (December 31, 2016) Less Commitments Adjusted Balance (December 31, 2016) Services Related to a Highway $ 68,794, $ (35,051,402.00) $ 33,743, Transit Services $ (7,039,656.98) $ (181,988.00) $ (7,221,644.98) Municipal Parking $ 12, $ (4,236,900.00) $ (4,224,387.80) Fire Protection Services $ (160,736.75) $ (3,596,446.00) $ (3,757,182.75) Parks and Recreation $ (29,349,716.11) $ (4,629,139.00) $ (33,978,855.11) Library Services $ 9,554, $ - $ 9,554, General Government $ (3,690,384.60) $ (941,156.00) $ (4,631,540.60) Total $ 38,120, $ (48,637,031.00) $ (10,516,360.78) The Town also has a reserve fund balance for stormwater in the amount of $495,473 as of December 31, 2016 (including commitments) that was collected under prior D.C. bylaws. As this study does not include stormwater in the analysis, the remaining funds within the reserve will continue to be utilized in accordance to the purposes for which it was originally collected for until depleted. 4.9 Deductions The D.C.A. potentially requires that five deductions be made to the increase in the need for service. These relate to: the level of service ceiling; uncommitted excess capacity; benefit to existing development; anticipated grants, subsidies and other contributions; and 10% reduction for certain services. The requirements behind each of these reductions are addressed as follows: Reduction Required by Level of Service Ceiling This is designed to ensure that the increase in need included in 4.3 does not include an increase that would result in the level of service (for the additional development increment) exceeding the average level of the service provided in the Municipality over the 10-year period immediately preceding the preparation of the background study O.Reg (s.4) goes further to indicate that both the quantity and quality of a service shall be taken into account in determining the level of service and the average level of service. In many cases, this can be done by establishing a quantity measure in terms of units as floor area, land area or road length per capita and a quality measure, in terms of the average cost of providing such units based on replacement costs, engineering

37 standards or recognized performance measurement systems, depending on Page 4-10 circumstances. When the quantity and quality factor are multiplied together, they produce a measure of the level of service, which meets the requirements of the Act, i.e. cost per unit. The average service level calculation sheets for each service component in the D.C. calculation are set out in Appendix B Reduction for Uncommitted Excess Capacity Paragraph 5 of s.s.5(1) requires a deduction from the increase in the need for service attributable to the anticipated development that can be met using the Town s excess capacity, other than excess capacity which is committed (discussed above in 4.6). Excess capacity is undefined, but in this case, must be able to meet some or all of the increase in need for service, in order to potentially represent a deduction. The deduction of uncommitted excess capacity from the future increase in the need for service would normally occur as part of the conceptual planning and feasibility work associated with justifying and sizing new facilities, e.g. if a road widening to accommodate increased traffic is not required because sufficient excess capacity is already available, then widening would not be included as an increase in need, in the first instance Reduction for Benefit to Existing Development Section 5(1)6 of the D.C.A. provides that, The increase in the need for service must be reduced by the extent to which an increase in service to meet the increased need would benefit existing development. The general guidelines used to consider benefit to existing development include the following: the repair or unexpanded replacement of existing assets that are in need of repair; an increase in average service level of quantity or quality (compare water as an example); the elimination of a chronic servicing problem not created by growth; and providing services where none previously existed (generally considered for water or wastewater services). This step involves a further reduction in the need, by the extent to which such an increase in service would benefit existing development. The level of services cap in 4.4 is related, but is not the identical requirement. Sanitary, storm and water trunks are

38 Page 4-11 highly localized to growth areas and can be more readily allocated in this regard than other services such as services related to a highway, which do not have a fixed service area. Where existing development has an adequate service level which will not be tangibly increased by an increase in service, no benefit would appear to be involved. For example, where expanding existing library facilities simply replicates what existing residents are receiving, they receive very limited (or no) benefit as a result. On the other hand, where a clear existing service problem is to be remedied, a deduction should be made accordingly. In the case of services such as recreation facilities, community parks, libraries, etc., the service is typically provided on a municipal-wide system basis. For example, facilities of the same type may provide different services (i.e. leisure pool vs. competitive pool), different programs (i.e. hockey vs. figure skating) and different time availability for the same service (i.e. leisure skating available on Wednesday in one arena and Thursday in another). As a result, residents will travel to different facilities to access the services they want at the times they wish to use them, and facility location generally does not correlate directly with residence location. Even where it does, displacing users from an existing facility to a new facility frees up capacity for use by others and generally results in only a very limited benefit to existing development. Further, where an increase in demand is not met for a number of years, a negative service impact to existing development is involved for a portion of the planning period Reduction for Anticipated Grants, Subsidies and Other Contributions This step involves reducing the capital costs necessary to provide the increased services by capital grants, subsidies and other contributions (including direct developer contributions required due to the local service policy) made or anticipated by Council and in accordance with various rules such as the attribution between the share related to new vs. existing development. That is, some grants and contributions may not specifically be applicable to growth or where Council targets fundraising as a measure to offset impacts on taxes (O.Reg s.6) The 10% Reduction Paragraph 8 of s.s.(1) of the D.C.A. requires that, the capital costs must be reduced by 10 percent. This paragraph does not apply to water supply services, waste water services, storm water drainage and control services, services related to a highway, police, fire protection services, and transit. The primary services to which the 10%

39 reduction does apply include services such as parks, recreation, libraries, childcare/social services, Provincial Offences Act, ambulance, homes for the aged, health and parking. Page 4-12 The 10% is to be netted from the capital costs necessary to provide the increased services, once the other deductions have been made, as per the infrastructure costs sheets in Chapter Municipal-Wide vs. Area Rating This step involves determining whether all of the subject costs are to be recovered on a uniform municipal-wide basis or whether some or all are to be recovered on an areaspecific basis. Under the amended D.C.A., it is now mandatory to consider area-rating of services (providing charges for specific areas and services), however, it is not mandatory to implement area-rating. Further discussion is provided in Section Allocation of Development This step involves relating the costs involved to anticipated development for each period under consideration and using allocations between residential and non-residential development and between one type of development and another, to arrive at a schedule of charges Asset Management The new legislation now requires that a D.C. Background Study must include an Asset Management Plan (s. 10 (2)c.2). The asset management plan must deal with all assets that are proposed to be funded, in whole or in part, by D.C.s. The current regulations provide very extensive and specific requirements for the asset management plan related to transit services (as noted in the subsequent subsection) however, are silent with respect to how the asset management plan is to be provided for all other services. As part of any asset management plan, the examination should be consistent with the municipality s existing assumptions, approaches and policies on the asset management planning. This examination has been included in Appendix F Transit The most significant changes to the Act relate to the transit service. These changes relate to four areas of the calculations, as follows:

40 Page 4-13 A. Transit no longer requires the statutory 10% mandatory deduction from the net capital cost (section 5.2.(i) of the D.C.A.). B. The Background Study requires the following in regard to transit costs (as per section 8(2) of the Regulations): 1. The calculations that were used to prepare the estimate for the planned level of service for the transit services, as mentioned in subsection 5.2 (3) of the Act. 2. An identification of the portion of the total estimated capital cost relating to the transit services that would benefit, i. the anticipated development over the 10-year period immediately following the preparation of the background study, or ii. the anticipated development after the 10-year period immediately following the preparation of the background study. 3. An identification of the anticipated excess capacity that would exist at the end of the 10-year period immediately following the preparation of the background study. 4. An assessment of ridership forecasts for all modes of transit services proposed to be funded by the development charge over the 10-year period immediately following the preparation of the background study, categorized by development types, and whether the forecasted ridership will be from existing or planned development. 5. An assessment of the ridership capacity for all modes of transit services proposed to be funded by the development charge over the 10-year period immediately following the preparation of the background study. C. A new forward-looking service standard (as per 6.1(2) of the Regulations): 1. The service is a discrete service. 2. No portion of the service that is intended to benefit anticipated development after the 10-year period immediately following the preparation of the background study may be included in the estimate.

41 Page No portion of the service that is anticipated to exist as excess capacity at the end of the 10-year period immediately following the preparation of the background study may be included in the estimate. D. A very detailed asset management strategy and reporting requirements (section 6.1(3) of the Regulation) that includes lifecycle costs, action plans that will enable the assets to be sustainable, summary of how to achieve the proposed level of service, discussion on procurement measures and risk. As stated in Chapter 1, Watson retained Dillon Consulting Limited to undertake the above calculations and reporting requirements and is attached to Appendix H of this study.

42 Page Development Charge Eligible Cost Analysis by Service 5.1 Introduction This chapter outlines the basis for calculating eligible costs for the D.C. to be applied on a uniform basis. In each case, the required calculation process set out in s.5(1) paragraphs 2 to 8 in the D.C.A. and described in Chapter 4, was followed in determining D.C. eligible costs. The nature of the capital projects and timing identified in the Chapter reflects Council s current intention. However, over time, Town projects and Council priorities change and accordingly, Council s intentions may alter and different capital projects (and timing) may be required to meet the need for services required by new growth. 5.2 Service Levels and 10-Year Capital Costs for D.C. Calculation This section evaluates the development-related capital requirements for all of the softer services over a 10-year planning period. Each service component is evaluated on two format sheets: the average historical 10-year level of service calculation (see Appendix B), which caps the D.C. amounts; and, the infrastructure cost calculation, which determines the potential D.C. recoverable cost Municipal Parking The Town currently provides 844 parking spaces, 41 pay and display/pay by license plate machines, and 6 enforcement vehicles. Over the past 10 years, this has resulted in an investment of $25/capita for parking spaces, equipment and vehicles, which provides $1,061,118 in D.C. eligible funding over the 10-year forecast period. In addition to the parking spaces, the area of land attributed to the Town s parking operation is currently 22,538 square metres (sq.m). Over the past 10 years, the average level of service was square metres of area per capita or an investment of $354 per capita. Based on this service standard, the Town would be eligible to collect $14,996,287 from D.C. s over the 10-year period. Finally, over the past 10-years, the Town has operated two parking facilities; the southeast satellite office (1,200 sq. ft.) prior to 2011, and the current Wyecroft Avenue Building (4,448 sq.ft.) as of This equates to $9 per capita in parking services which results in an amount of $363,025 in eligible DC funding over the 10-year period.

43 Page 5-2 Therefore, the total D.C.-eligible amount for municipal parking is $16,420,430. The Town has identified a need for additional parking spaces in the Downtown, Kerr Village, as well as various expansions to the on-street parking network. The Town has also identified the need for parking in the Midtown area, all of which will benefit the residential and non-residential users post The gross cost of the projects identified is $20,927,000, of which $19,069,000 (the costs of the Midtown Parking) has been deemed post period. In addition, the deficit reserve fund balance of $4,224,388 has been included in the calculations. After the 10% mandatory deduction of $185,800, the net growth-related amount of $5,896,588 has been included in the D.C. calculations. The growth-related costs for parking have been allocated 68% residential and 32% nonresidential based on the incremental growth in population to employment, for the 10- year forecast period.

44 Page 5-3 Service:Parking Spaces and Vehicles Prj.No Less: Less: Potential DC Recoverable Cost Grants, Gross Subsidies and Other (e.g. Capital Cost Post Period Other Net Capital Benefit to Other Residential Timing (year) Subtotal 10% Estimate Benefit Deductions Cost Existing Contributions Total Share Statutory (2017$) Development Attributable to Deduction) New Development % 32% Increased Service Needs Attributable to Anticipated Development Non- Residential Share 1 Downtown Parking Facility ,500,000-1,500,000-1,500, ,000 1,350, , ,000 2 Parking Lot - Kerr Village ,000-69,000-69,000 6,900 62,100 42,228 19,872 3 Parking Lot - Downtown Oakville ,000-77,000-77,000 7,700 69,300 47,124 22,176 4 Expansion to Parking Fleet ,000-32,000-32,000 3,200 28,800 19,584 9,216 5 Expansion to On Street Paid Parking ,000-45,000-45,000 4,500 40,500 27,540 12,960 6 Expansion to On Street Paid Parking ,000-45,000-45,000 4,500 40,500 27,540 12,960 7 Expansion to On Street Paid Parking ,000-45,000-45,000 4,500 40,500 27,540 12,960 8 Expansion to On Street Paid Parking ,000-45,000-45,000 4,500 40,500 27,540 12,960 9 Midtown Parking ,069,000 19,069, Reserve Adjustment 4,224,388-4,224,388-4,224,388-4,224,388 2,872,584 1,351,804 Total 25,151,388 19,069,000-6,082, ,082, ,800 5,896,588 4,009,680 1,886,908

45 Page Parks and Recreation Parks The Town currently has hectares of parkland within its jurisdiction. This parkland consists of neighbourhood, community, community link, tableland woodlot and undeveloped parkland. Over the historical 10-year period, the Town has averaged 4.5 hectares of parkland per 1,000 persons. The Town has also provided a level of service of 0.7 kilometres of natural trails, 3.8 parks amenities (e.g. ball diamonds, playground equipment, soccer fields, etc.), 1.9 vehicles, 0.1 harbour items, and square feet of building area per 1,000 persons over the historical 10-year period. Including parkland, trails, parks facilities, vehicles, harbours, parks buildings and park amenities (e.g. washrooms, shade structures, bandshells, etc.), the level of service provided is approximately $1,950/capita. When applied over the forecast period, this average level of service for this service subcomponent translates into a D.C. eligible amount of $82.62 million. Based on the projected growth over the 10-year forecast period ( ), the Town has identified $ million in future capital costs for parkland development (92% of the projects identified are attributed to the development North of Dundas), of which $69.9 million is attributable to growth in the post-2026 period. After taking the 10% statutory deduction, the amount of approximately $56.6 million has been included in the D.C. calculation. For parks buildings, the Town has included $9.24 million in gross capital costs for the expansion to the North Operations Depot over the 10-year forecast period, of which $3.55 million is attributed to growth post The net growth-related capital costs, after the 10% statutory deduction, equal $5.12 million and has been included in the D.C. calculation. Finally, the Town has identified the need for $7.22 million worth of park-related vehicles and equipment to service the additional parkland development in the forecast. The amount of those vehicles and equipment attributed to growth post 2026 equals $2.00 million. After the 10% deduction, the net growth-related capital costs to be included in the D.C. is $4.7 million. As the predominant users of parks tend to be residents of the Town, the forecasted growth-related costs have been allocated 95% to residential and 5% to non-residential.

46 Page 5-5 Indoor Recreation With respect to recreation facilities, the Town currently programs and/or operates 20 facilities. In total, the Town has approximately 941,500 sq.ft. of building space. These facilities provide residents with a level of service equating to 4.57 sq.ft. per capita or $2,273 per capita. This level of investment for this service subcomponent provides the Town with $96.29 million for eligible future D.C. funding, over the 10-year period. The associated vehicles and equipment that the Town presently maintains for the recreation facilities totals 214 items. These items include ice resurfacers, edgers, defibrillators and other various recreation equipment which provides the Town with a level of investment of $14 per capita. This results in a D.C. eligible amount of $587,533. The total cost of indoor recreation projects is $ million, of which $20.12 million is the outstanding debenture (principal and discounted interest) for the quad pad arena at North Park and the Joshua Creek Arena. In addition, the deficit reserve fund for parks and recreation of $33.98 million has been included within this capital sheet. Reductions to the gross amount includes $23.43 million in post period benefit, $34.35 million in existing benefit, and the 10% mandatory deduction totalling $5.16 million. Therefore, $ million has been included in the D.C. calculation. Regarding recreation vehicles and equipment capital, the Town has provided for the addition of ice resurfacing equipment at the future single pad arena in the amount of $105,000, with the full amount considered a post period benefit. As the predominant users of indoor recreation tend to be residents of the Town, the forecast growth-related costs have been allocated 95% to residential and 5% to nonresidential.

47 Page 5-6 Service:Parkland Development Prj.No 1 North of Dundas Less: Less: Potential DC Recoverable Cost Grants, Subsidies and Gross Capital Other (e.g. Post Period Other Net Capital Benefit to Other Residential Timing (year) Cost Estimate Subtotal 10% Benefit Deductions Cost Existing Contributions Total Share (2017$) Statutory Development Attributable to Deduction) New Development % 5% Increased Service Needs Attributable to Anticipated Development Non- Residential Share 2 North Park - South Parcel ,131,000-9,131,000-9,131, ,100 8,217,900 7,807, ,895 3 North Park - North Parcel , , ,000 20, , ,000 9,000 4 North Park - North Parcel ,336,000 13,336, Palermo Park Phase ,700,000-3,700,000-3,700, ,000 3,330,000 3,163, ,500 6 West Oakville Sports Park , , ,000 25, , ,750 11,250 7 West Oakville Sports Park ,000,000 21,000, Lands north of 407 parcel ,673,300 8,110,912 4,562,388-4,562, ,239 4,106,149 3,900, ,307 9 Joshua Meadows Community Park ,889,900 6,860,637 4,029,263-4,029, ,926 3,626,337 3,445, , Neighbourhood Park , , ,000 61, , ,390 27, Neighbourhood Park ,218,000-3,218,000-3,218, ,800 2,896,200 2,751, , Neighbourhood Park ,328,000-3,328,000-3,328, ,800 2,995,200 2,845, , Neighbourhood Park ,700,000-2,700,000-2,700, ,000 2,430,000 2,308, , Neighbourhood Park ,932,900 2,932, Neighbourhood Park ,030,000 3,030, Neighbourhood Park ,009,000 3,009, Neighbourhood Park ,900,000-2,900,000-2,900, ,000 2,610,000 2,479, , Neighbourhood Park ,030,000 3,030, Village Square , , ,000 52, , ,600 23, Village Square , , ,000 54, , ,555 24, Village Square , , ,000 50, , ,630 22, Village Square , , ,000 50, , ,065 22, Village Square , , ,000 53, , ,280 24, Village Square , , ,000 53, , ,280 24, Village Square , , ,000 53, , ,280 24, Village Square , , ,000 53, , ,280 24, Village Square , , ,000 53, , ,280 24, Village Square , , ,000 53, , ,280 24, Village Squares ,576,000 8,576, St. Ann's Park (Hixon) , , ,000 52, , ,600 23, Lisonally-Westdale Promenade , , ,000 30, , ,500 13, Shorewood Promenade - West , , ,000 25, , ,590 11,610

48 Page 5-7 Service:Parkland Development Prj.No 33 Trails - North of Dundas Less: Less: Potential DC Recoverable Cost Grants, Subsidies and Useful Timing Timing Gross Capital Other (e.g. Post Period Other Net Capital Benefit to Other Residential Life (year) (year) Timing (year) Cost Estimate Subtotal 10% Benefit Deductions Cost Existing Contributions Total Share (years) From To (2017$) Statutory Development Attributable to Deduction) New Development % 5% Increased Service Needs Attributable to Anticipated Development 34 NHS Trail Type A NOE , , ,000 78, , ,320 35, NHS Trail Type A NOE , , ,000 79, , ,870 35, NHS Trail Type A NOE ,749,000-1,749,000-1,749, ,900 1,574,100 1,495,395 78, NHS Trail Type A NOE , , ,500 38, , ,748 17, NHS Trail Type A NOE , , ,000 79, , ,870 35, NHS Trail Type A NOE , , ,000 79, , ,870 35, NHS Trail Type A NOE , , ,000 79, , ,870 35, NHS Trail Type A NOE , , ,000 79, , ,870 35, NHS Trail Type A NOE , , ,000 79, , ,870 35, NHS Trail Type A NOE , , ,000 79, , ,870 35, NHS Trail Type A NOW ,175,000-3,175,000-3,175, ,500 2,857,500 2,714, ,875 Non- Residential Share 45 South of Dundas 46 South Shell Waterfront Park Phase , , ,000 65, , ,025 29, Burloak Waterfront Community Park , , ,000 23, , ,490 10, Memorial Park , , ,000 23, , ,070 10, Memorial Park , , ,000 43, , ,345 19, Memorial Park ,640,000-1,640,000-1,640, ,000 1,476,000 1,402,200 73, Bronte Green (Merton) Neigh. Park ,080,000-2,080,000-2,080, ,000 1,872,000 1,778,400 93, Bronte Green (Merton) Vill.Sq , , ,000 59, , ,870 26, Bronte Green (Merton) Vill.Sq , , ,000 44, , ,055 19, Bronte Green (Merton) NHS Trails ,722,000-1,722,000-1,722, ,200 1,549,800 1,472,310 77, Trafalgar Works Site , , ,000 65, , ,460 29, Park Signs - New Growth ,000-15,000-15,000 1,500 13,500 12, Park Signs - New Growth ,000-15,000-15,000 1,500 13,500 12, Park Signs - New Growth ,000-15,000-15,000 1,500 13,500 12, Park Signs - New Growth ,000-15,000-15,000 1,500 13,500 12, Park Signs - New Growth ,000-15,000-15,000 1,500 13,500 12, Park Signs - New Growth ,000 15, Park Signs - New Growth ,000 15, Park Signs - New Growth ,000 15, Trails - South of Dundas 65 East 14 Mile Creek Trail , , ,000 74, , ,700 33, Fizsimmons Trail , , ,000 24, , ,765 10, Edgemere Waterfront Trail , , ,000 47, , ,835 21, Winston Park West Trail ,000-55,000-55,000 5,500 49,500 47,025 2,475 Total 132,866,600 69,930,449-62,936, ,936,151 6,293,615 56,642,536 53,810,409 2,832,127

49 Page 5-8 Service:Park Buildings Prj.No Less: Less: Potential DC Recoverable Cost Grants, Gross Subsidies and Post Other (e.g. Capital Cost Other Net Capital Benefit to Other Residential Timing (year) Period Subtotal 10% Estimate Deductions Cost Existing Contributions Total Share Benefit Statutory (2017$) Development Attributable to Deduction) New Development % 5% Increased Service Needs Attributable to Anticipated Development Non- Residential Share 1 North Operations Depot (Phase 2) Land ,124,885-4,124,885-4,124, ,488 3,712,396 3,526, ,620 2 North Operations Depot - Phase 1 Completion ,471,900 1,471, North Operations Depot (Phase 2) , , ,000 50, , ,485 22,815 4 North Operations Depot (Phase 2) ,055,000-1,055,000-1,055, , , ,025 47,475 5 North Operations Depot (Phase 2) ,080,200 2,080, Total 9,238,985 3,552,100-5,686, ,686, ,688 5,118,196 4,862, ,910

50 Page 5-9 Service:Parks Vehicles and Equipment Prj.No Less: Less: Potential DC Recoverable Cost Grants, Gross Subsidies and Post Other (e.g. Capital Cost Other Net Capital Benefit to Other Residential Timing (year) Period Subtotal 10% Estimate Deductions Cost Existing Contributions Total Share Benefit Statutory (2017$) Development Attributable to Deduction) New Development % 5% Increased Service Needs Attributable to Anticipated Development Non- Residential Share 1 Parks Vehicles and Equipment , , ,000 45, , ,460 20,340 2 Parks Vehicles and Equipment , , ,500 63, , ,208 28,643 3 Parks Vehicles and Equipment , , ,000 70, , ,775 31,725 4 Parks Vehicles and Equipment ,030,000-1,030,000-1,030, , , ,650 46,350 5 Parks Vehicles and Equipment , , ,000 60, , ,000 27,000 6 Parks Vehicles and Equipment , , ,000 61, , ,970 27,630 7 Parks Vehicles and Equipment , , ,000 31, , ,325 14,175 8 Parks Vehicles and Equipment , , ,000 52, , ,455 23,445 9 Parks Vehicles and Equipment , , ,000 12, , ,440 5, Parks Vehicles and Equipment , , ,000 21, , ,245 9, Parks Vehicles and Equipment ,000 84, Parks Vehicles and Equipment , , Parks Vehicles and Equipment , , Parks Vehicles and Equipment , , Parks Vehicles and Equipment , , Total 7,224,500 2,004,000-5,220, ,220, ,050 4,698,450 4,463, ,923

51 Page 5-10 Service:Indoor Recreation Facilities 18 Future Single Pad Arena - Building And Furniture & Equipment Less: Less: Potential DC Recoverable Cost Grants, Increased Service Needs Subsidies and Gross Capital Attributable to Anticipated Other (e.g. Non- Post Period Other Net Capital Benefit to Other Residential Prj.No Timing (year) Cost Estimate Subtotal Development 10% Residential Benefit Deductions Cost Existing Contributions Total Share (2017$) Statutory Share Development Attributable to Deduction) New Development 95% 5% Addition Of One (1) Youth Centre 1 (Leased Premise) - Building And , , ,000 15, , ,960 6,840 Furniture & Equipment 2 Addition Of One (1) Youth Centre (Leased Premise) - Building And , , ,000 41, , ,390 18,810 Furniture & Equipment 3 Sixteen Mile Creek Recreation Centre - Study ,000-50,000-50,000 5,000 45,000 42,750 2,250 4 Sixteen Mile Creek Recreation Centre - Land ,988,100-6,988,100-6,988, ,810 6,289,290 5,974, ,465 5 Sixteen Mile Creek Recreation Centre - Building And Furniture & ,289,000-1,289,000-1,289, ,900 1,160,100 1,102,095 58,005 Equipment 6 Sixteen Mile Creek Recreation Centre - Building And Furniture & ,482,000-12,482,000-12,482,000 1,248,200 11,233,800 10,672, ,690 Equipment 7 Sixteen Mile Creek Recreation Centre - Building And Furniture & ,723,600-18,723,600-18,723,600 1,872,360 16,851,240 16,008, ,562 Equipment 8 South East Recreation Centre - Building And Furniture & ,217,000-1,217, , ,250 30, , ,134 13,691 Equipment 9 South East Recreation Centre - Building And Furniture & ,787,000-7,787,000 5,840,250 1,946, ,675 1,752,075 1,664,471 87,604 Equipment 10 South East Recreation Centre - Land ,599,300-8,599,300 6,449,475 2,149, ,983 1,934,843 1,838,100 96, South East Recreation Centre - Building And Furniture & ,840,000-18,840,000 14,130,000 4,710, ,000 4,239,000 4,027, ,950 Equipment 12 South East Recreation Centre - Building And Furniture & ,354,000-9,354,000 7,015,500 2,338, ,850 2,104,650 1,999, ,233 Equipment 13 New Palermo Community Centre - Land ,603,300 2,603, New Palermo Community Centre - Building And Furniture & , , Equipment 15 New Palermo Community Centre - Building And Furniture & ,864,000 3,864, Equipment 16 New Palermo Community Centre - Building And Furniture & ,656,200 1,656, Equipment 17 Future Single Pad Arena - Land ,911,721 2,911, ,848,800 11,848,

52 Page 5-11 Service:Indoor Recreation Facilities Less: Less: Potential DC Recoverable Cost Grants, Increased Service Needs Subsidies and Useful Timing Timing Gross Capital Attributable to Anticipated Other (e.g. Non- Post Period Other Net Capital Benefit to Other Residential Prj.No Life (year) (year) Timing (year) Cost Estimate Subtotal Development 10% Residential Benefit Deductions Cost Existing Contributions Total Share (years) From To (2017$) Statutory Share Development Attributable to Deduction) New Development 95% 5% DEBT 19 Quad Pad Arena at North Park - Debt Principal ,935,466 17,935,466-17,935,466-17,935,466 17,038, , Quad Pad Arena at North Park - Debt Interest (Discounted) ,149,013 1,149,013-1,149,013-1,149,013 1,091,563 57, Joshua's Creek Arena - Debt Principal , , , , ,481 49, Joshua's Creek Arena - Debt Interest (Discounted) ,216-47,216-47,216-47,216 44,855 2, Reserve Fund Adjustment 33,978,855-33,978,855-33,978,855-33,978,855 32,279,912 1,698,943 Total 163,428,235 23,434, ,994,214 34,347, ,646,239 5,155, ,491,037 95,466,485 5,024,552

53 Page 5-12 Service:Recreation Vehicles and Equipment Prj.No Future Single Pad Arena Less: Less: Potential DC Recoverable Cost Grants, Gross Subsidies and Post Other (e.g. Capital Cost Other Net Capital Benefit to Other Residential Timing (year) Period Subtotal 10% Estimate Deductions Cost Existing Contributions Total Share Benefit Statutory (2017$) Development Attributable to Deduction) New Development % 5% Increased Service Needs Attributable to Anticipated Development 1 Ice Resufacers , , Non- Residential Share Total 105, ,

54 Page Library Services The Town currently operates its library services out of 7 locations providing a total of 103,307 sq.ft. in library space. Over the past 10 years, the average level of service was 0.56 sq.ft. of space per capita or an investment of $294 per capita. Based on the service standard over the past 10 years, the Town would be eligible to collect a total of $12,449,604 from D.C.s for library facilities. The Town has a current inventory of library collection items totaling 915,500 materials. These collection items include various materials including books, audio materials, electronic resources, multimedia platforms, etc., all of which have a total value of approximately $10.1 million. Over the past 10 years, the average level of service is approximately 3.24 collection items per capita or an investment of $60 per capita. Based on this service standard, the Town would be eligible to collect $2,528,892 from D.C.s for library collection items (over the 10-year period). Therefore, the total D.C.-eligible amount for library services is $14,978,496. Three new library branches, two temporary branches, and an expansion to the library incubators have been identified for inclusion in the D.C. to service growth. The gross cost of the projects has been included at a total of $50,896,900, with a post period benefit of $27,854,800 and an existing benefit of $1,793,000. In addition, the adjusted reserve fund balance of $9,554,177 has been applied to reduce the amount required to be recovered from future growth. The net growth capital cost after the mandatory 10% deduction is $9,570,013. Based on the projected growth over the 10-year forecast period ( ), expansion to the collection materials have been identified for future capital in the amount of $6,480,200. As two of the library facilities benefit growth post 2026, the same post period attribution has been applied to the associated collection materials for those facilities in the amount of $3,238,200. As well, an existing benefit of $710,000 is being allocated to the future Sixteen Mile library to account for the materials being used in the North Temporary branch. Therefore, the net growth-related capital cost to be included in the D.C. is $2,278,800 (after the mandatory 10% deduction). While library usage is predominately residential based, there is some use of the facilities by non-residential users, for the purpose of research. To acknowledge this use of the growth-related capital costs have been allocated 95% residential and 5% nonresidential.

55 Page 5-14 Service:Library Facilities Prj.No North Temporary Branch Library Less: Less: Potential DC Recoverable Cost Grants, Gross Subsidies and Other (e.g. Capital Cost Post Period Other Net Capital Benefit to Other Residential Timing (year) Subtotal 10% Estimate Benefit Deductions Cost Existing Contributions Total Share Statutory (2017$) Development Attributable to Deduction) New Development % 5% Increased Service Needs Attributable to Anticipated Development Non- Residential Share 1 Building And Furniture & Equipment ,793,000-1,793,000-1,793, ,300 1,613,700 1,533,015 80,685 QEPCCC Incubator Library Expansion 2 Building And Furniture & Equipment ,000-60,000-60,000 6,000 54,000 51,300 2,700 Incubator Libraries 3 Building And Furniture & Equipment , , ,000 12, , ,600 5,400 Palermo Temporary Branch Library 4 Building And Furniture & Equipment ,000,000-3,000,000-3,000, ,000 2,700,000 2,565, ,000 New Branch Library (Palermo) 5 Land ,005,000-4,005,000-4,005, ,500 3,604,500 3,424, ,225 6 Building And Furniture & Equipment , , Building And Furniture & Equipment ,659,700 7,659, New Branch Library - Sixteen Mile Sports Complex 8 Land ,747,000-1,747,000-1,747, ,700 1,572,300 1,493,685 78,615 9 Building And Furniture & Equipment ,510,900-1,510,900-1,510, ,090 1,359,810 1,291,820 67, Building And Furniture & Equipment ,282,000-3,282,000-3,282, ,200 2,953,800 2,806, , Building And Furniture & Equipment ,924,200-4,924,200 1,793,000 3,131, ,120 2,818,080 2,677, ,904 New Branch Library - Trafalgar Corridor North 12 Land ,600,000-2,600,000-2,600, ,000 2,340,000 2,223, , Building And Furniture & Equipment ,131,000 1,131, Building And Furniture & Equipment ,283,000 7,283, Building And Furniture & Equipment ,924,100 10,924, Reserve Fund Adjustment ,554,177 (9,554,177) - (9,554,177) (9,076,468) (477,709) Total 50,896,900 27,854,800-23,042,100 11,347,177-11,694,923 2,124,910 9,570,013 9,091, ,501

56 Page 5-15 Service:Library Collection Materials Prj.No Less: Less: Potential DC Recoverable Cost Grants, Gross Subsidies and Post Other (e.g. Capital Cost Other Net Capital Benefit to Other Residential Timing (year) Period Subtotal 10% Estimate Deductions Cost Existing Contributions Total Share Benefit Statutory (2017$) Development Attributable to Deduction) New Development % 5% Increased Service Needs Attributable to Anticipated Development Non- Residential Share 1 North Temporary Branch Library , , ,000 71, , ,050 31,950 2 Palermo Temporary Branch Library , , ,000 50, , ,500 22,500 3 New Branch Library (Palermo) , , New Branch Library - Sixteen Mile Sports Complex ,032,000-2,032, ,000 1,322, ,200 1,189,800 1,130,310 59,490 5 New Branch Library - Trafalgar Corridor North ,438,200 2,438, Total 6,480,200 3,238,200-3,242, ,000-2,532, ,200 2,278,800 2,164, ,940

57 Page General Government (Studies) The D.C.A. permits the inclusion of studies undertaken to facilitate the completion of the Town s capital works program. The Town has made provisions for the inclusion of new studies undertaken to facilitate this D.C. process, as well as other studies which benefit growth (in whole or in part). The list of studies includes the following: Fire Master Plans; Transit Service Plans; Parking Studies; Recreation Master Plan Updates; Library Master Plan Updates; Official Plan/Provincial Plan Conformity Reviews; Zoning Reviews; Urban Design Guidelines; Environmental Studies; Development Charge studies; and Other Studies. The gross cost of these studies is $6,350,000. In addition, the deficit in the reserve fund of $4,631,541 has been included. With a post period benefit of $680,000 and a benefit to existing amount of $220,000, the net growth-related capital cost after the mandatory 10% deduction is $9,583,541 and has been included in the development charge. These costs have been allocated 68% residential and 32% non-residential based on the incremental growth in population to employment for the 10-year forecast period. H:\Oakville\2017 DC\Report\Addendum\Report for Addendum.docx

58 Page 5-17 Service:General Government (Studies) Less: Less: Potential DC Recoverable Cost Grants, Gross Increased Service Needs Attributable Subsidies and Post Other (e.g. Non- Capital Cost Other Net Capital Residential Prj.No to Anticipated Development Benefit to Other Timing (year) Period Subtotal 10% Residential Estimate Deductions Cost Existing Contributions Total Share Benefit Statutory Share (2017$) Development Attributable to Deduction) New Development 68% 32% 1 Fire Master Plan , , , ,000 68,000 32,000 2 Fire Master Plan , , , ,000 68,000 32,000 3 Fire Master Plan , , Fire Master Plan , , Transit Service Plan , ,000 80, , ,000 81,600 38,400 6 Transit Service Plan , , , , , ,000 48,000 7 Parking Demand Study , , ,000 13, ,000 79,560 37,440 8 Parking Demand Study , , ,000 13, ,000 79,560 37,440 9 Parking Demand Study , , Mid-town Parking Study , , ,000 30, , ,660 87, Parking Demand Study - North Oakville and Uptown , , ,000 20, , ,400 57, Parking Demand Study - North Oakville and Uptown , , ,000 15, ,000 91,800 43, Town Wide Parking Strategy , ,000 40, ,000 16, ,000 97,920 46, Recreation Master Plan Update , , ,000 20, , ,400 57, Recreation Master Plan Update , , ,000 20, , ,400 57, Recreation Master Plan Update , , Library Master Plan Update ,000-50,000-50,000 5,000 45,000 30,600 14, Library Master Plan Update ,000-50,000-50,000 5,000 45,000 30,600 14, Library Master Plan Update ,000 50, Official Plan/Provincial Plan Conformity Review , , ,000 25, , ,000 72, Official Plan/Provincial Plan Conformity Review ,000-50,000-50,000 5,000 45,000 30,600 14, Official Plan/Provincial Plan Conformity Review , , ,000 10,000 90,000 61,200 28, Official Plan/Provincial Plan Conformity Review , , ,000 10,000 90,000 61,200 28, Official Plan/Provincial Plan Conformity Review , , ,000 20, , ,400 57, Official Plan/Provincial Plan Conformity Review , , ,000 10,000 90,000 61,200 28, Official Plan/Provincial Plan Conformity Review , , H:\Oakville\2017 DC\Report\Addendum\Report for Addendum.docx

59 Page 5-18 Service:General Government (Studies) Less: Less: Potential DC Recoverable Cost Grants, Gross Increased Service Needs Attributable Subsidies and Post Other (e.g. Non- Capital Cost Other Net Capital Residential Prj.No to Anticipated Development Benefit to Other Timing (year) Period Subtotal 10% Residential Estimate Deductions Cost Existing Contributions Total Share Benefit Statutory Share (2017$) Development Attributable to Deduction) New Development 68% 32% 27 Zoning Review , , ,000 10,000 90,000 61,200 28, Zoning Review , , ,000 10,000 90,000 61,200 28, Zoning Review , , ,000 10,000 90,000 61,200 28, Zoning Review , , ,000 10,000 90,000 61,200 28, Zoning Review , , ,000 10,000 90,000 61,200 28, Zoning Review , , ,000 10,000 90,000 61,200 28, Urban Design Guidelines ,000-55,000-55,000 5,500 49,500 33,660 15, Urban Design Guidelines , , ,000 10,000 90,000 61,200 28, Urban Design Guidelines , , ,000 10,000 90,000 61,200 28, Urban Design Guidelines , , ,000 10,000 90,000 61,200 28, Special Planning Studies , , ,000 50, , , , Environmental Studies ,000-40,000-40,000 4,000 36,000 24,480 11, Environmental Studies ,000-40,000-40,000 4,000 36,000 24,480 11, Environmental Studies ,000-40,000-40,000 4,000 36,000 24,480 11, Environmental Studies ,000-40,000-40,000 4,000 36,000 24,480 11, Environmental Studies ,000-40,000-40,000 4,000 36,000 24,480 11, DC Study , , ,000 20, , ,400 57, DC Study , , ,000 25, , ,000 72, DC Study , , ,000 25, , ,000 72, Parks and Open Space Strategy , , ,000 25, , ,000 72, Reserve Adjustment 4,631,541-4,631,541-4,631,541-4,631,541 3,149,448 1,482,093 Total 10,981, ,000-10,301, ,000-10,081, ,000 9,583,541 6,516,808 3,066,733 H:\Oakville\2017 DC\Report\Addendum\Report for Addendum.docx

60 Page Transit Under Bill 73, changes to the D.C.A. now require a forward-looking forecast for ridership in order to determine the D.C. eligibility of any future transit vehicles. Dillon Consulting Limited and Town staff have worked closely together to identify the required modal split targets for the Town as well as a ridership forecast. The 2031 modal split target of 4.4% (currently at 1.4%) translates to a peak ridership forecast of 10,966 over the next 15 years for Oakville transit trips. Based on the information provided in Dillon s technical write-up in Appendix H, which explains the transit forecast in detail, the inclusion of 73 new buses and 2 supervisor vehicles has been captured in the transit capital forecast. As well, 12 specialized vehicles have been included in the forecast as outlined in the Town s Transit Services Review. The gross cost included is $53.55 million, (which includes $7.22 million representing the deficit position as at December 31, 2016 in the D.C. Transit Reserve Fund). An attribution to recognize the population s benefit of these services beyond the forecast period has been identified in the amount of $20.38 million. A further reduction of $19.05 million has been applied with respect to existing benefit. The amount of growth related costs, after providing for grants of $2.39 million equals $11.74 million being included in the D.C. The growth costs have been allocated 68% residential and 32% non-residential based on the incremental growth in population to employment, for the ten-year forecast period. H:\Oakville\2017 DC\Report\Addendum\Report for Addendum.docx

61 Page 5-20 Service: Transit Vehicles Less: Potential DC Recoverable Cost Grants, Prj.No Increased Service Needs Gross Subsidies and Attributable to Anticipated Non- Capital Cost Post Period Other Net Capital Benefit to Other Residential Timing (year) Development Residential Estimate Benefit Deductions Cost Existing Contributions Total Share Share (2017$) Development Attributable to New Development 68% 32% 1 New Buses ,301, ,060 4,042,940 1,475,736 2,126, , , ,057 2 New Buses ,785, ,136 1,678,464 1,374, , ,415 97,137 3 New Buses ,190,400 71,424 1,118, , , ,610 64,758 4 New Buses ,785, ,136 1,678,464 1,374, , ,415 97,137 5 New Buses ,380, ,848 2,237,952 1,833, , , ,516 6 New Buses ,380, ,848 2,237,952 1,833, , , ,516 7 New Buses ,571, ,272 3,356,928 2,749, , , ,273 8 New Buses ,571, ,272 3,356,928 2,749, , , ,273 9 New Buses ,166, ,984 3,916,416 3,208, , , , New Buses ,856,000 17,856, Specialized Vehicles ,394, ,640 2,250,360 1,532, , , , , Specialized Vehicles , , Supervisor Vehicles , , ,000 51,000 24, Supervisor Vehicles ,000 75, Reserve Adjustment 7,221, ,221, ,221,645 4,910,719 2,310,926 Total 53,552,645 20,380, ,172,025 19,048,953 2,386,400 11,736,672 7,980,937 3,755,735 H:\Oakville\2017 DC\Report\Addendum\Report for Addendum.docx

62 5.3 Service Levels and 15-Year Capital Costs for Oakville s D.C. Calculation Page 5-21 This section evaluates the development-related capital requirements for those services with 15-year capital costs Fire Protection Services Oakville currently operates its fire services from 74,826 sq.ft. of facility space, providing for a per capita average level of service of 0.37 sq.ft. per capita or $333 per capita. This level of service provides the Town with a maximum D.C.-eligible amount for recovery over the forecast period of $16,240,940. The fire department has a current inventory of 53 vehicles. The total D.C.-eligible amount calculated for fire vehicles over the forecast period is $5,038,209, based on a standard of $103 per capita. The fire department provides 204 firefighters with equipment and gear for the use in fire services. This results in a calculated average level of service for the historical 10-year period of $10 per capita, providing for a D.C.-eligible amount over the forecast period of $510,057 for small equipment and gear. Therefore, the D.C.-eligible amount is $21,789,206. Based on growth-related needs, a need for two new fire stations (station #8 and # 9), an expansion to Fire Station #4, along with associated fire prevention vehicles, and new equipment has been identified to service growth over the forecast period at a combined cost of $25.89 million. In addition, $3.76 million has been included recover the current reserve fund deficit. A reduction of $9.26 million has been made to recognize the existing benefit to the Town. Therefore, the D.C. calculations results in a net growthrelated capital cost of $20,393,923. These costs have been allocated 65% residential and 35% non-residential based on the incremental growth in population to employment for the 15-year forecast period.

63 Page 5-22 Service: Fire Facilities Prj.No Fire Station No.8 Less: Potential DC Recoverable Cost Gross Grants, Subsidies and Timing Capital Cost Post Period Other Net Capital Benefit to Residential Other Contributions (year) Estimate Benefit Deductions Cost Existing Total Share Attributable to New (2017$) Development Development % 35% Increased Service Needs Attributable to Anticipated Development Non-Residential Share 1 Land Complete Building And Furniture & Equipment ,029,000-2,029,000-2,029,000 1,318, ,150 3 Building And Furniture & Equipment ,592,700-4,592,700-4,592,700 2,985,255 1,607,445 Fire Station No. 4 Expansion 4 Building And Furniture & Equipment , , , , ,500 87,500 5 Building And Furniture & Equipment ,365,000-1,365, , , , ,875 6 Building And Furniture & Equipment ,461,100-5,461,100 2,730,550 2,730,550 1,774, ,693 Fire Station No. 9 7 Land ,710,400-2,710,400-2,710,400 1,761, ,640 8 Building And Furniture & Equipment ,029,000-2,029,000 1,278, , , ,605 9 Building And Furniture & Equipment ,845,500-6,845,500 4,314,210 2,531,290 1,645, , Reserve Fund Adjustment 3,757,183-3,757,183-3,757,183 2,442,169 1,315,014 Total 29,289, ,289,883 9,255,960-20,033,923 13,022,050 7,011,873

64 Page 5-23 Service: Fire Vehicles Prj.No Increased Service Needs Attributable to Anticipated Development Less: Potential DC Recoverable Cost Gross Grants, Subsidies and Timing Capital Cost Post Period Other Net Capital Benefit to Residential Other Contributions (year) Estimate Benefit Deductions Cost Existing Total Share Attributable to New (2017$) Development Development % 35% Non-Residential Share 1 New Vehicle for Fire Prevention ,000-80,000-80,000 52,000 28,000 2 New Vehicle for Fire Prevention ,000-40,000-40,000 26,000 14,000 3 New Vehicle for Fire Prevention ,000-40,000-40,000 26,000 14,000 Total 160, , , ,000 56,000

65 Page 5-24 Service: Fire Small Equipment and Gear Prj.No Increased Service Needs Attributable to Anticipated Development Less: Potential DC Recoverable Cost Gross Grants, Subsidies and Timing Capital Cost Post Period Other Net Capital Benefit to Residential Other Contributions (year) Estimate Benefit Deductions Cost Existing Total Share Attributable to New (2017$) Development Development % 35% Non-Residential Share 1 Fire Station No , , , ,000 70,000 Total 200, , , ,000 70,000

66 Page Services Related to a Highway The Town has an inventory for services related to a highway valued at $3.57 billion for arterial and collector roads, bridges and culverts, etc. This level of service translates to an average investment of $19,143 per capita and a maximum D.C. eligible amount of approximately $ million for recovery over the 15-year forecast period. With respect to future needs, the forecasted road program is an extension from the previous D.C. study, as well as added components identified through the Town s 2018 Transportation Background Study, which includes projects for areas such as Midtown and other active transportation initiatives throughout the Town, all of which totals $920,840,600. Based on the location and timing of the road projects, a post period attribution has been allocated to recognize the benefit of those works to the Town post 2031 and amounts to $220,408,276. Further, a number of deductions have been allocated to recognize existing benefit, grants/subsidies, reserve fund surpluses and other funding. A summary of those deductions are as follows: Benefit to Existing: $102,973,685 Grants, Subsidies and Other Contributions: $151,326,280 Reserve Fund Surplus: $33,743,073 Other Deductions: $31,620,000 A large component of the grants, subsidies and other contributions are provided by Metrolinx to help fund the road components such as Burloak Drive and Kerr Street, while the other deductions are from monies that have already been allocated to the projects over previous years. Therefore, the net D.C. eligible amount to be recovered over the forecast period is $380,769,285. The Town currently utilizes 131,318 sq.ft. of depots and domes space and a fleet that includes 244 vehicles and equipment related to public works. This results in a calculated average level of service for the historical 10-year period of $263 per capita, providing for a D.C.-eligible amount over the forecast period of $12,826,923. With regards to depots and domes facilities, the North Operations Depot (Phase 1 and 2) and the Central Operations Expansion/Renovation capital projects have been identified over the forecast period (the North Operations Depot is a shared facility between services related to a highway and parks). A North Snow Disposal Site has also been identified in the forecast but has been attributed as 100% post period benefit. The gross cost of the services related to a highway portion of these projects is $25.29 million with a post period benefit of $16.5 million and a further reduction of $0.79 million to H:\Oakville\2017 DC\Report\Addendum 2\Report for Addendum 2.docx

67 Page 5-26 recognize benefit to existing development, results in growth-related capital cost of $7.99 million. This amount has been included in the D.C. calculations. Finally, additional vehicles and equipment items have been identified for the forecast period to support the associated facilities. The gross costs of the additional equipment are approximately $7.15 million, with a post period benefit of $2.32 million. Therefore, total amount of $4.83 million is to be included in the D.C. calculation. These costs have been allocated 65% residential and 35% non-residential based on the incremental growth in population to employment for the 15-year forecast period. H:\Oakville\2017 DC\Report\Addendum\Report for Addendum.docx

68 Page 5-27 Service: Services Related to a Highway - Roads Prj.No Increased Service Needs Attributable to Anticipated Development Timing (year) Gross Capital Cost Estimate (2017$) Less: Potential DC Recoverable Cost Residential Share Non-Residential Share 65% 35% Road Section From To 1 Cross Avenue - 2 West of Lyons Lane East of Lyons Lane , , ,683 43, , , ,760 2 Burloak Drive - 1 South of Wyecroft Road North of Prince William Drive ,155, ,000 54,000,000 2,676,750 40,616,250 10,707,000 6,959,550 3,747,450 3 Chartwell Road - 2 Industry Street Melvin Avenue ,506,000 20,744,080 9,761,920 5,186,020 4,575, Fourth Line Wyecroft Road Speers Road ,395,000 16,588,600 7,806,400 4,147,150 3,659, Kerr Street Wyecroft Road Speers Road ,676,000-8,835,000 53,841,000 4,500,600 31,340,000 18,000,400 11,700,260 6,300,140 6 Highway 403 Crossing Ninth Line Bristol Circle ,906,000 2,985,900 16,920, ,920,100 10,998,065 5,922,035 7 New Burnhamthorpe Road Tremaine Road Bronte Road ,651,000-16,651, ,651,000 10,823,150 5,827,850 8 Wyecroft Road - 2 RRL Burloak Lands Bronte Road ,870,000 8,980,500 50,889, ,889,500 33,078,175 17,811,325 9 Active Transportation Initiatives ,535,000-4,535, ,750 18,000 4,065,250 2,642,413 1,422, AT Cycle Lanes, Routes and Pathways ,657,000 1,724,587 26,932,413 2,865,700 1,045,380 23,021,333 14,963,866 8,057, AT Studies ,400,000-1,400, ,000-1,260, , , Lakeshore Road West - 1 East Street Third Line ,524, ,000 5,019,000 4,517, , , , Lakeshore Road West - 2 Third Line Sandwell Drive (100m west) ,209,000-8,209,000 7,388, , , , Lakeshore Road West - 3 Sandwell Drive Fourth Line ,372,000-10,372,000 9,334,800-1,037, , , Lakeshore Road West - 4 Fourth Line Dorval Drive ,508,000-11,508,000 10,357,200-1,150, , , Lower Base Line (excluding valley Bronte Road section) Fourth Line ,872,000-8,872,000 3,327,000 4,436,000 1,109, , , Chartwell Road - 1 South Service Road Cornwall Road ,399,000-5,399,000 1,079,800-4,319,200 2,807,480 1,511, Cornwall Road - 1 Chartwell Road Morrison Road ,504,000-7,745, , , , , , North Service Road - 1 West of Deerfield Golf Course Third Line ,455,000-8,455,000 1,691,000-6,764,000 4,396,600 2,367, North Service Road - 3 Third Line West of Fourth Line ,927,000-7,927,000 1,585,400-6,341,600 4,122,040 2,219, Sixth Line - Phase 1 Threshing Mill Road Dundas Street ,000,000-6,106,000 4,894,000 2,200,000-2,694,000 1,751, , Sixth Line - Phase 2 Burnhamthorpe Road Threshing Mill Road ,874,000-19,874,000 3,974,800-15,899,200 10,334,480 5,564, Sixth Line - Phase 3 William Halton Parkway Burnhamthorpe Road ,004,000-12,004,000 2,400,800-9,603,200 6,242,080 3,361, South Service Road - 1 Third Line West of Fourth Line ,864,000 3,716,000 11,148,000 2,972,800-8,175,200 5,313,880 2,861, Wyecroft Road - 4 East of Fourth Line Weller Court ,604, ,000 7,503,000 1,502,816-6,000,184 3,900,120 2,100, Wyecroft Road - 5 Sinclair Road Kerr Street ,799,000-3,799, ,800-3,039,200 1,975,480 1,063, Transportation Policy Update , ,000 25,000-75,000 48,750 26, Goods Movement Study Update ,000-82, ,000 53,300 28, Implementation Plan and Monitoring Study ,000 25,050 51, , ,950 92,268 49, Traffic Management - Intersections ,126,500 6,374,475 1,630,000 36,122, ,122,025 23,479,316 12,642, Signal Optimization Program Once every 5 years (key corridors)and optimize key corridors other years ,748, ,200 2,335, ,335,800 1,518, , Traffic Impact Assessment Guidelines Update ,500-54, ,500 35,425 19, Traffic Signals/Crossings ( ) ,600,000-3,600, ,600,000 2,340,000 1,260, Traffic Signals/Crossings ( ) ,199,000 1,079,850 6,119, ,119,150 3,977,448 2,141, Transportation Master Plan Studies ,659,000-1,659, ,659,000 1,078, , Travel Demand Management Studies , , , ,190 74, New Shelters , , , , ,600 Post Period Benefit Other Deductions Net Capital Cost Benefit to Existing Development Grants, Subsidies and Other Contributions Attributable to New Development Total H:\Oakville\2017 DC\Report\Addendum\Report for Addendum.docx

69 Page 5-28 Service: Services Related to a Highway - Roads Prj.No Increased Service Needs Attributable to Anticipated Development Timing (year) Gross Capital Cost Estimate (2017$) Less: Potential DC Recoverable Cost Residential Share Non-Residential Share 65% 35% Road Section From To 38 Transit Centres , , , , , Palermo Terminal ,440,000-7,440, ,440,000 4,836,000 2,604, Oakville Share - Park and Ride Facilities , , , , , Cornwall Road - 2 Ford Drive Winston Churchill Boulevard ,262,000 4,998, , , Eighth Line - 1 Falgarwood Drive Iroquois Shore Road ,663,000-3,663, ,150-3,479,850 2,261,903 1,217, Great Lakes Boulevard Burloak Drive Rebecca Street ,276, ,000 2,993, ,650-2,843,350 1,848, , Kerr Street North of QEW Wyecroft Road ,295,000-2,295, ,750-2,180,250 1,417, , Wyecroft Road - 3 Bronte Road Third Line ,687,000-12,687, ,350-12,052,650 7,834,223 4,218, Burloak Drive - 2 Superior Court Old Burloak Drive ,064,000 1,302,200 1,761, ,800 1,532, Speers Road Kerr Street Cross Avenue ,479,000-16,479,000 2,471,850-14,007,150 9,104,648 4,902, Speers Road - 1 Procor Third Line ,004,000-3,004, ,600-2,553,400 1,659, , Speers Road - 2 Third Line West of Fourth Line ,773,000-4,180,000 10,593,000 1,611,021-8,981,979 5,838,286 3,143, Speers Road - 5 East of Fourth Line West of Dorval Drive ,170,000-6,170, ,500-5,244,500 3,408,925 1,835, Speers Road - 6 East of Dorval Drive West of Kerr Street ,389,000-3,389, ,350-2,880,650 1,872,423 1,008, Speers Road - 7 Procor Bronte Road ,005,000-5,005, ,750-4,254,250 2,765,263 1,488, Speers Road - F1 Bronte Road Third Line ,903,000 16,067,550 2,835,450 2,835, Speers Road - F2 Third Line Fourth Line ,947,000 16,104,950 2,842,050 2,842, Speers Road - F3 Fourth Line Dorval Drive ,890,000 9,256,500 1,633,500 1,633, Speers Road - F4 Dorval Drive Kerr Street ,942,000 5,900,700 1,041,300 1,041, Speers Road - F5 Kerr Street Trafalgar Road ,361,000 13,906,850 2,454,150 2,454, North Service Road Extension over Sixteen Mile Creek Sixth Line Kerr Street ,190,000 33,190, Added 59 Third Line South Service Road North Service Road ,588,000 12,399,800-2,188,200 2,188, NSR 1km East of Invicta Drive Eighth Line ,591,000-2,029,000 6,562, ,562,000 4,265,300 2,296, Iroquois Shore Road Eighth Line Trafalgar Road ,830, ,830, ,500-4,955,500 3,221,075 1,734, RWD Extension 1 Eighth Line Future WB Off Ramp ,746, ,746,500-6,373,250 6,373,250 4,142,613 2,230, RWD Extension 2 Future WB Off Ramp Ford Plant Entrance/SSR ,310, ,310,000-7,155,000 7,155,000 4,650,750 2,504, RWD/SSR Intersection , , , , , , RWD/QEW EB Off-Ramp QEW Ford Plant Entrance/SSR ,572, ,572,000-3,286,000 3,286,000 2,135,900 1,150, RWD/QEW Eastbound On Ramp RWD QEW ,293, ,293,000-2,146,500 2,146,500 1,395, , RWD/QEW Westbound Off Ramp QEW RWD ,088, ,088,000-2,544,000 2,544,000 1,653, , New Cross Avenue 1 Argus Road SSR ,360, ,360,000-3,180,000 3,180,000 2,067,000 1,113, New Cross Avenue 2 South Service Road Chartwell Road ,077,000 2,215,400-8,861, ,861,600 5,760,040 3,101, New Cross Avenue 3 Chartwell Road RWD ,087,000 11,047,850-9,039, ,039,150 5,875,448 3,163, Traf/QEW Westbound Ramp Realignment QEW Trafalgar Road ,123,200 3,027,360-4,095,840-3,561, , , , Traf/QEW New Westbound Ramp QEW Trafalgar Road ,243,200 3,928,360-5,314,840-4,621, , , , N/S BRT 1 New Cross Ave Iroquois Shore Road ,122,000 10,676,850-14,445,150-12,561,000 1,884,150 1,224, , N/S BRT 2 Iroquois Shore Road White Oaks Blvd ,430,000 8,215,000-8,215,000-8,215, AT Crossing - East New Cross Ave Westbound QEW Off Ramp ,105,000 3,738,488-11,366, ,250 7,552,500 3,058,763 1,988,196 1,070, AT Crossing - West Argus Road NSR ,929,000 1,675,860-3,253, ,900 2,464, , , , Burnhamthorpe East Section 900m west of 9th Line Trafalgar Road ,730, ,730,800 3,146,160-12,584,640 8,180,016 4,404, Burnhamthorpe West Section Trafalgar Road 800m east of Neyagawa ,685, ,685,100 3,137,020-12,548,080 8,156,252 4,391, Reserve Adjustment ,743,073 (33,743,073) (21,932,998) (11,810,076) Post Period Benefit Other Deductions Net Capital Cost Benefit to Existing Development Grants, Subsidies and Other Contributions Attributable to New Development Total Total 920,840, ,408,276 31,620, ,812, ,716, ,326, ,769, ,500, ,269,250 H:\Oakville\2017 DC\Report\Addendum\Report for Addendum.docx

70 Page 5-29 Service: Services Related to a Highway - Depots and Domes Prj.No Less: Potential DC Recoverable Cost Gross Grants, Subsidies and Timing Capital Cost Post Period Other Net Capital Benefit to Residential Other Contributions (year) Estimate Benefit Deductions Cost Existing Total Share Attributable to New (2017$) Development Development % 35% Increased Service Needs Attributable to Anticipated Development Non-Residential Share 1 Central Operations - Sludge Decant Pit ,000-75,000 58,999 16,001 10,401 5,600 2 Central Operations - Sludge Decant Pit , , ,998 48,002 31,202 16,801 3 North Operations Depot (Phase 2) Land ,128,199-7,128,199-7,128,199 4,633,329 2,494,870 4 North Operations Depot - Phase 1 Completion ,294,700 2,294, North Operations Depot (Phase 2) ,000 10, , , , ,901 6 North Operations Depot (Phase 2) ,073,000 1,073, North Operations Depot (Phase 2) ,100,200 4,100, Central Operations Expansion/Renovation ,015, , , , Central Operations Expansion/Renovation ,827,000 1,644, , , Central Operations Expansion/Renovation ,740,600 2,466, , , Central Operations Land Expansion , , , , , North Snow Disposal Site ,000,000 2,000, North Snow Disposal Site ,000,000 2,000, Total 25,285,699 16,502,380-8,783, ,257-7,989,062 5,192,890 2,796,172

71 Page 5-30 Service: Services Related to a Highway - Roads and Related Vehicles Prj.No Less: Potential DC Recoverable Cost Gross Grants, Subsidies and Timing Capital Cost Post Period Other Net Capital Benefit to Residential Other Contributions (year) Estimate Benefit Deductions Cost Existing Total Share Attributable to New (2017$) Development Development % 35% Increased Service Needs Attributable to Anticipated Development Non-Residential Share 1 Roads & Works Equipment , , , , ,350 2 Roads & Works Equipment , , , , ,800 3 Roads & Works Equipment , , , , ,800 4 Roads & Works Equipment , , , , ,050 5 Roads & Works Equipment , , , , ,400 6 Roads & Works Equipment , , , , ,300 7 Roads & Works Equipment , , , , ,650 8 Roads & Works Equipment , , , , ,550 9 Roads & Works Equipment , , , , , Roads & Works Equipment , , , , , Roads & Works Equipment , , Roads & Works Equipment ,872,000 1,872, Total 7,150,000 2,315,000-4,835, ,835,000 3,142,750 1,692,250

72 Page Development Charge Calculation Table 6-1 calculates the proposed uniform development charge to be imposed on anticipated development in the Town for municipal-wide services over a 15-year planning horizon. Table 6-2 calculates the proposed uniform development charge to be imposed on anticipated development in the Town for municipal-wide services over a 10- year planning horizon. The calculation for residential development is generated on a per capita basis and is based upon five forms of housing types (single and semi-detached, apartments 2+ bedrooms, apartment s bachelor and 1 bedroom, all other multiples and special care/special dwelling units). The non-residential development charge for the noninfrastructure services have been calculated on a per sq.ft. of gross floor area basis for all types of non-residential development (industrial, commercial and institutional). The D.C.-eligible costs for each service component were developed in Chapter 5 for all Town services, based on their proposed capital programs. For the residential calculations, the total cost is divided by the gross (new resident) population to determine the per capita amount. The eligible D.C. cost calculations set out in Chapter 5 are based on the net anticipated population increase (the forecast new unit population less the anticipated decline in existing units). The cost per capita is then multiplied by the average occupancy of the new units (Appendix A, Schedule 7) to calculate the charge in Tables 6-1 and 6-2. With respect to non-residential development, the total costs in the uniform charge allocated to non-residential development (based on need for service) have been divided by the anticipated development over the planning period to calculate a cost per sq.ft. of gross floor area. Table 6-3 summarizes the total development charge that is applicable for municipalwide services and Table 6-4 summarizes the gross capital expenditures and sources of revenue for works to be undertaken during the 5-year life of the by-law.

73 Table 6-1 TOWN OF OAKVILLE DEVELOPMENT CHARGE CALCULATION Municipal-wide Services Page $ DC Eligible Cost 2017 $ DC Eligible Cost SERVICE Residential Non-Residential S.D.U. per ft² $ $ $ $ 1. Services Related to a Highway 1.1 Roads 247,500, ,269,250 16, Depots and Domes 5,192,890 2,796, Roads and Related Vehicles 3,142,750 1,692, ,835, ,757,671 17, Fire Protection Services 2.1 Fire facilities 13,022,050 7,011, Fire vehicles 104,000 56, Small equipment and gear 130,000 70, ,256,050 7,137, TOTAL $269,091,725 $144,895,544 $18,226 $8.90 DC ELIGIBLE CAPITAL COST $269,091,725 $144,895, Year Gross Population / GFA Growth (ft².) 53,300 16,278,600 Cost Per Capita / Non-Residential GFA (ft².) $5, $8.90 By Residential Unit Type p.p.u Single and Semi-Detached Dwelling 3.61 $18,226 Apartments - 2 Bedrooms $9,794 Apartments - Bachelor and 1 Bedroom 1.17 $5,907 Other Multiples 2.63 $13,278 Special Care/Special Dwelling Units 1.10 $5,553 H:\Oakville\2017 DC\Report\Addendum\Report for Addendum.docx

74 Table 6-2 Page 6-3 TOWN OF OAKVILLE DEVELOPMENT CHARGE CALCULATION Municipal-wide Services $ DC Eligible Cost 2017 $ DC Eligible Cost SERVICE Residential Non-Residential S.D.U. per ft² $ $ $ $ 3. Transit Services 3.1 Transit vehicles 7,980,937 3,755, ,980,937 3,755, Municipal Parking 4.1 Municipal parking spaces 4,009,680 1,886, ,009,680 1,886, Parks and Recreation 5.1 Parkland development, amenities & trails 53,810,409 2,832,127 4, Park Buildings 4,862, , Parks vehicles and equipment 4,463, , Recreation facilities 95,466,485 5,024,552 7, Recreation vehicles and equipment ,602,708 8,347,512 13, Library Services 6.1 Library facilities 9,091, , Library materials 2,164, , ,256, , General Government 7.1 Studies 6,516,808 3,066, TOTAL $188,366,505 $17,649,328 $15,462 $1.37 DC ELIGIBLE CAPITAL COST $188,366,505 $17,649, Year Gross Population / GFA Growth (ft².) 43,979 12,773,000 Cost Per Capita / Non-Residential GFA (ft².) $4, $1.38 By Residential Unit Type p.p.u Single and Semi-Detached Dwelling 3.61 $15,462 Apartments - 2 Bedrooms $8,309 Apartments - Bachelor and 1 Bedroom 1.17 $5,011 Other Multiples 2.63 $11,265 Special Care/Special Dwelling Units 1.10 $4,711 H:\Oakville\2017 DC\Report\Addendum\Report for Addendum.docx

75 Page 6-4 Table 6-3 TOWN OF OAKVILLE DEVELOPMENT CHARGE CALCULATION TOTAL ALL SERVICES 2017 $ DC Eligible Cost 2017 $ DC Eligible Cost Residential Non-Residential S.D.U. per ft² $ $ $ $ Municipal-wide Services 15 Year 269,091, ,895,544 18, Municipal-wide Services 10 Year 188,366,505 17,649,328 15, TOTAL 457,458, ,544,873 33, H:\Oakville\2017 DC\Report\Addendum\Report for Addendum.docx

76 Table 6-4 TOWN OF OAKVILLE GROSS EXPENDITURE AND SOURCES OF REVENUE SUMMARY FOR COSTS TO BE INCURRED OVER THE LIFE OF THE BY-LAW Page 6-5 SOURCES OF FINANCING TOTAL GROSS TAX BASE OR OTHER NON-DC SOURCE DC RESERVE FUND SERVICE OTHER BENEFIT TO OTHER FUNDING LEGISLATED POST DC COST NON- PERIOD BENEFIT RESIDENTIAL DEDUCTIONS EXISTING REDUCTION RESIDENTIAL 1. Services Related to a Highway 1.1 Roads 226,313,366 21,185,779 37,547,132 41,147, ,288,383 80,043,685 43,100, Depots and Domes 600, , , , Roads and Related Vehicles 2,464, ,601, , Fire Protection Services 2.1 Fire facilities 16,658, ,663, ,446,848 4,548, Fire vehicles 80, ,000 28, Small equipment and gear 200, ,000 70, Transit Services 3.1 Transit vehicles 10,297, ,908,456 2,256, ,576 1,031, , Municipal Parking 4.1 Municipal parking spaces 268, , ,016 77, Parks and Recreation 5.1 Parkland development, amenities & trails 32,703, ,270, ,961,065 1,471, Park Buildings Parks vehicles and equipment 3,423, , ,927, , Recreation facilities 47,398, ,347, ,201, ,255, , Recreation vehicles and equipment Library Services 6.1 Library facilities 11,578, ,157, ,899, , Library materials 1,210, , ,034,550 54, General Government 7.1 Studies 3,265, , , ,939, ,800 TOTAL EXPENDITURES & REVENUES $356,458,346 $21,185,779 $81,822,610 $43,404,340 $6,412,683 $3,903,959 $146,723,541 $53,005,433 H:\Oakville\2017 DC\Report\Addendum 2\Report for Addendum 2.docx

77 7. Development Charge Policy Recommendations and Development Charge By-law Rules 7.1 Introduction Page 7-1 s.s.5(1)9 states that rules must be developed:...to determine if a development charge is payable in any particular case and to determine the amount of the charge, subject to the limitations set out in subsection 6. Paragraph 10 of the section goes on to state that the rules may provide for exemptions, phasing in and/or indexing of D.C.s. s.s.5(6) establishes the following restrictions on the rules: the total of all development charges that would be imposed on anticipated development must not exceed the capital costs determined under 5(1) 2-8 for all services involved; if the rules expressly identify a type of development, they must not provide for it to pay development charges that exceed the capital costs that arise from the increase in the need for service for that type of development; however, this requirement does not relate to any particular development; and if the rules provide for a type of development to have a lower development charge than is allowed, the rules for determining development charges may not provide for any resulting shortfall to be made up via other development. With respect to the rules, Section 6 states that a D.C. by-law must expressly address the matters referred to above re s.s.5(1) para. 9 and 10, as well as how the rules apply to the redevelopment of land. The rules provided are based on the Town s existing policies; however, there are items that may arise from the stakeholder meetings taking place after this draft background study is released, which may be under consideration and refined prior to adoption of the by-law.

78 Page Development Charge By-law Structure It is recommended that: the Town uses a uniform municipal-wide D.C. calculation for all services; and one Municipal D.C. by-law be used for all services. 7.3 Development Charge By-law Rules The following subsections set out the recommended rules governing the calculation, payment and collection of development charges in accordance with Section 6 of the D.C.A. It is recommended that the following sections provide the basis for the development charges: Payment in any Particular Case In accordance with the D.C.A., s.2(2), a development charge be calculated, payable and collected where the development requires one or more of the following: a) the passing of a zoning by-law or of an amendment to a zoning by-law under section 34 of the Planning Act; b) the approval of a minor variance under Section 45 of the Planning Act; c) a conveyance of land to which a by-law passed under section 50(7) of the Planning Act applies; d) the approval of a plan of subdivision under Section 51 of the Planning Act; e) a consent under Section 53 of the Planning Act; f) the approval of a description under section 50 of the Condominium Act; or g) the issuing of a building permit under the Building Code Act in relation to a building or structure Determination of the Amount of the Charge The following conventions be adopted: 1) Costs allocated to residential uses will be assigned to different types of residential units based on the average occupancy for each housing type constructed during the previous decade. Costs allocated to non-residential uses will be assigned based on the amount of sq.ft. of total floor area constructed for eligible uses (i.e. industrial, commercial and institutional).

79 Page 7-3 2) Costs allocated to residential and non-residential uses are based upon a number of conventions, as may be suited to each municipal circumstance, e.g. for General Government (Studies), Transit and Municipal Parking, the costs have been based on a population vs. employment growth ratio (68%/32%) for residential and non-residential, respectively) over the 10- year forecast period; for Parks and Recreation and Library services, a 5% non-residential attribution has been made to recognize use by the non-residential sector; and for Fire Protection Services and Services Related to a Highway, a 65% residential/35% non-residential allocation has been made based on the population to employment growth ratio over the 15-year forecast period Application to Redevelopment of Land (Demolition and Conversion) If a development involves the demolition of and replacement of a building or structure on the same site, or the conversion from one principal use to another, the developer shall be allowed a credit equivalent to: 1) the number of dwelling units demolished/converted multiplied by the applicable residential development charge in place at the time the development charge is payable; and/or 2) the gross floor area of the building demolished/converted multiplied by the current non-residential development charge in place at the time the development charge is payable. The demolition credit is allowed only if the land was improved by occupied structures, and if the demolition permit related to the site was issued less than five years prior to the issuance of a building permit. If a development or redevelopment involves the demolition of and replacement of a residential building or structure, a credit shall be allowed equivalent to the number of dwelling units demolished multiplied by the applicable residential development charge in place at the time the development charge is payable. If a development or redevelopment involves the demolition of and replacement of a non-residential building or structure, a credit shall be allowed equivalent to the gross floor area demolished multiplied by the applicable nonresidential development charge in place at the time the development charge is payable. In no case, can the credit exceed the amount of development charges that would otherwise be payable. Note that a transitional provision from the Town s prior by-law has been continued and provides for demolitions which occur prior to August 31, In these instances, the demolition credit would be for a 10-year period.

80 Page Exemptions (full or partial) a) Statutory exemptions industrial building additions of up to and including 50% of the existing gross floor area (defined in O.Reg. 82/98, s.1) of the building; for industrial building additions which exceed 50% of the existing gross floor area, only the portion of the addition in excess of 50% is subject to development charges (s.4(3)) of the D.C.A.; buildings or structures owned by and used for the purposes of any municipality, local board or Board of Education (s.3); residential development that results only in the enlargement of an existing dwelling unit, or that results only in the creation of up to two additional dwelling units (based on prescribed limits set out in s.2 of O.Reg. 82/98). b) Non-statutory exemptions a non-residential farm building; a part of a building or structure that is used as a public hospital under the Public Hospital Act; a publicly-funded university, community college or a college of applied arts and technology established under the Ontario Colleges of Applied Art and Technology Act, 2002, S.O. 2002, c.8, Schedule F, as amended; a provincial or federal crown agency; buildings or structures owned and used for the purposes of a conservation authority, unless such buildings are used primarily for or in connection with (i) recreational purposes for which the conversation authority charges admission and/or fees, or (ii) any commercial purposes; the gross floor area of the area of worship within a place of worship; non-residential (non-retail development or use) the land area includes that land area of the parking required for the building, if on a separate lot, o for the portion of the total floor area of such development that is less than or equal to 2.0 times the area of the lot, the full charge applies; o for the portion of the total floor are of such development that is greater than 2.0 times the area of the lot, fifty percent of the charge applies; total floor area within non-residential buildings or structures used solely for the purposes of a non-profit, licensed day nursery for the exclusive use by children of the employees of the owner, provided that the day nursery is owned and operated by the owner and located upon the lands used by the

81 7.3.5 Phasing in owner s primary non-residential use or non-residentially zoned lands Page 7-5 owned by the owner immediately abutting the lands used by the owner for its primary non-residential use; and a temporary building or structure, subject to certain criteria. No provisions for phasing in the D.C. are provided in the draft D.C. by-law (Appendix G) Timing of Collection A development charge that is applicable under Section 5 of the D.C.A. shall be calculated and payable; Indexing in full in money or by provision of services as may be agreed upon, or by credit granted by the Act, on the date that the first building permit is issued in relation to a building or structure on land to which a development charge applies, or in a manner or at a time otherwise lawfully agreed upon; and Despite above, Council, from time to time, and at any time, may enter into agreements providing for all or any part of a development charge to be paid before or after it would otherwise be payable. Indexing of the development charges shall be implemented on a mandatory basis annually commencing on the 1 st of April (similar to the current D.C. by-law) and each anniversary date thereafter, in accordance with the Statistics Canada Quarterly, Non- Residential Building Construction Price Index (CANSIM Table ) 1 for the most recent year-over-year period The Applicable Areas The charges developed herein shall be imposed as follows: 1 O.Reg 82/98 referenced The Statistics Canada Quarterly, Construction Price Statistics, catalogue number as the index source. As of the end of December, 2013 this catalogue has been discontinued and replaced by this web based table.

82 Page 7-6 the residential and non-residential charge will be imposed on all lands within the Town. 7.4 Other Development Charge By-law Provisions It is recommended that: Categories of Services for Reserve Fund and Credit Purposes The Town s D.C. collections are currently reserved in seven separate reserve funds: i) Services Related to a Highway, ii) Fire Protection Services, iii) Parks & Recreation, iv) Municipal Parking, v) Library Services, vi) Transit and vii) General Government (Studies). It is recommended that the Town continue this practice. Appendix D outlines the reserve fund policies that the Town is required to follow as per the D.C.A By-law In-force Date A by-law under the D.C.A., 1997 comes into force on the day after which the by-law is passed by Council unless Council chooses to set a later date. It is recommended that the new by-law come into effect on February 27, Minimum Interest Rate Paid on Refunds and Charged for Inter-Reserve Fund Borrowing The minimum interest rate is the Bank of Canada rate on the day on which the by-law comes into force (as per s.11 of O.Reg. 82/98) Area Rating As noted earlier, Bill 73 has introduced two new sections where Council must consider the use of area specific charges: 1. Section 2(9) of the Act now requires a municipality to implement area specific D.C.s for either specific services which are prescribed and/or for specific municipalities which are to be regulated. (note that at this time, no municipalities or services are prescribed by the Regulations) 2. Section 10(2)c.1 of the D.C.A. requires that the development charges background study shall include consideration of the use of more than one development charge by-law to reflect different needs for services in different areas

83 Page 7-7 In regard to the first item, there are no services or specific municipalities identified in the regulations which must be area rated. The second item requires Council to consider the use of area rating. Presently, the Town s by-law does not provide for area rating. All Town services are recovered based on a uniform, municipal-wide basis. There have been several reasons why they have not been imposed including: 1. All Town services, with the exception of Transit, require that the average 10-year service standard be calculated. This average service standard multiplied by growth in the Town, establishes an upper ceiling on the amount of funds which can be collected from all developing landowners. Section 4(4) of O. Reg. 82/98 provides that if a development charge by-law applies to a part of the municipality, the level of service and average level of service cannot exceed that which would be determined if the by-law applied to the whole municipality. Put in layman terms, the average service standard multiplied by the growth within the specific area, would establish an area specific ceiling which would significantly reduce the total revenue recoverable for the Town hence potentially resulting in D.C. revenue shortfalls and impacts on property taxes. 2. Extending on item 1, attempting to impose an area charge potentially causes equity issues in transitioning from a municipal-wide approach to an area specific approach. For example, if all services were now built (and funded) within area A (which is 75% built out) and this was funded with some revenues from areas B and C, moving to an area rating approach would see Area A contribute no funds to the costs of services in Areas B & C. The development charges would be lower in Area A (as all services are now funded) and higher in B and C. As well, funding shortfalls may then potentially encourage the municipality to provide less services to B and C due to reduced revenue. 3. Many services which are provided (roads, parks, recreation facilities, library) are not restricted to one specific area and are often used by all residents. For example, arenas located in different parts of the Town will be used by residents from all areas depending on the programing of the facility (i.e. a public skate is available each night, but at a different arena; hence usage of any one facility at any given time is based on programing availability). Prior discussions with Council D.C. Steering Committee have directed to continue with the present policy of a uniform charge. A Public meeting will be held on January 29, 2018 to present the findings of the D.C. regarding the use of area rating and the

84 Page 7-8 associated calculations. It will be recommended to Council that based on the Steering Committee s recommendations that a uniform, municipal-wide charge is to be continued. Should Council wish to undertake an area rating calculation, Watson will work with staff to develop those calculations. 7.5 Other Recommendations It is recommended that Council: Whenever appropriate, request that grants, subsidies and other contributions be clearly designated by the donor as being to the benefit of existing development or new development, as applicable; Adopt the assumptions contained herein as an anticipation with respect to capital grants, subsidies and other contributions; Continue the D.C. approach to calculate the charges on a uniform municipalwide basis for all services ; Approve the capital project listing set out in Chapter 5 of the Development Charges Background Study dated December 22, 2017, subject to further annual review during the capital budget process; Approve the Development Charges Background Study dated December 22, 2017, as amended (if applicable);" Determine that no further public meeting is required; and Approve the Development Charge By-law as set out in Appendix G.

85 Page By-law Implementation 8.1 Public Consultation Process Introduction This chapter addresses the mandatory, formal public consultation process (Section 8.1.2), as well as the optional, informal consultation process (Section 8.1.3). The latter is designed to seek the co-operation and participation of those involved, in order to produce the most suitable policy. Section addresses the anticipated impact of the development charge on development from a generic viewpoint Public Meeting of Council Section 12 of the D.C.A. indicates that before passing a development charge by-law, Council must hold at least one public meeting, giving at least 20 clear days notice thereof, in accordance with the Regulation. Council must also ensure that the proposed by-law and background report are made available to the public at least two weeks prior to the (first) meeting. Any person who attends such a meeting may make representations related to the proposed by-law. If a proposed by-law is changed following such a meeting, Council must determine whether a further meeting (under this section) is necessary (i.e. if the proposed by-law which is proposed for adoption has been changed in any respect, Council should formally consider whether an additional public meeting is required, incorporating this determination as part of the final by-law or associated resolution. It is noted that Council s decision, once made, is final and not subject to review by a Court or the O.M.B.) Other Consultation Activity There are three broad groupings of the public who are generally the most concerned with municipal development charge policy: 1. The first grouping is the residential development community, consisting of land developers and builders, who are typically responsible for generating the majority of the development charge revenues. Others, such as realtors, are directly impacted by development charge policy. They are, therefore, potentially interested in all aspects of the charge, particularly the quantum by unit type,

86 Page 8-2 projects to be funded by the D.C. and the timing thereof, and Town policy with respect to development agreements, D.C. credits and front-ending requirements. 2. The second public grouping embraces the public at large and includes taxpayer coalition groups and others interested in public policy. 3. The third grouping is the industrial/commercial/institutional development sector, consisting of land developers and major owners or organizations with significant construction plans, such as hotels, entertainment complexes, shopping centres, offices, industrial buildings and institutions. Also involved are organizations such as Industry Associations, the Chamber of Commerce, the Board of Trade and the Economic Development Agencies, who are all potentially interested in Town s development charge policy. Their primary concern is frequently with the quantum of the charge, gross floor area exclusions such as basements, mechanical or indoor parking areas, or exemptions and phase-in or capping provisions in order to moderate the impact. 8.2 Anticipated Impact of the Charge on Development The establishment of sound development charge policy often requires the achievement of an acceptable balance between two competing realities. The first is that high nonresidential development charges can, to some degree, represent a barrier to increased economic activity and sustained industrial/commercial growth, particularly for capital intensive uses. Also, in many cases, increased residential development charges can ultimately be expected to be recovered via higher housing prices and can impact project feasibility in some cases (e.g. rental apartments). On the other hand, development charges or other Town capital funding sources need to be obtained in order to help ensure that the necessary infrastructure and amenities are installed. The timely installation of such works is a key initiative in providing adequate service levels and in facilitating strong economic growth, investment and wealth generation. 8.3 Implementation Requirements Introduction Once the Town has calculated the charge, prepared the complete background study, carried out the public process and passed a new by-law, the emphasis shifts to implementation matters.

87 These include notices, potential appeals and complaints, credits, front-ending Page 8-3 agreements, subdivision agreement conditions and finally the collection of revenues and funding of projects. The sections which follow overview the requirements in each case Notice of Passage In accordance with s.13 of the D.C.A., when a D.C. by-law is passed, the Town clerk shall give written notice of the passing and of the last day for appealing the by-law (the day that is 40 days after the day it was passed). Such notice must be given no later than 20 days after the day the by-law is passed (i.e. as of the day of newspaper publication or the mailing of the notice). Section 10 of O.Reg. 82/98 further defines the notice requirements which are summarized as follows: By-law Pamphlet notice may be given by publication in a newspaper which is (in the Clerk s opinion) of sufficient circulation to give the public reasonable notice, or by personal service, fax or mail to every owner of land in the area to which the by-law relates; s.s.10(4) lists the persons/organizations who must be given notice; and s.s.10(5) lists the eight items which the notice must cover. In addition to the notice information, the Town must prepare a pamphlet explaining each development charge by-law in force, setting out: a description of the general purpose of the development charges; the rules for determining if a charge is payable in a particular case and for determining the amount of the charge; the services to which the development charges relate; and a general description of the general purpose of the Treasurer s statement and where it may be received by the public. Where a by-law is not appealed to the O.M.B., the pamphlet must be readied within 60 days after the by-law comes into force. Later dates apply to appealed by-laws.

88 The Town must give one copy of the most recent pamphlet without charge, to any person who requests one Appeals Page 8-4 Sections of the D.C.A. set out the requirements relative to making and processing a D.C. by-law appeal and O.M.B. Hearing in response to an appeal. Any person or organization may appeal a D.C. by-law to the O.M.B. by filing a notice of appeal with the Town clerk, setting out the objection to the by-law and the reasons supporting the objection. This must be done by the last day for appealing the by-law, which is 40 days after the by-law is passed. The Town is carrying out a public consultation process, in order to address the issues which come forward as part of that process, thereby avoiding or reducing the need for an appeal to be made Complaints A person required to pay a development charge, or his agent, may complain to the Town Council imposing the charge that: the amount of the charge was incorrectly determined; the reduction to be used against the development charge was incorrectly determined; or there was an error in the application of the development charge. Sections of the D.C.A. set out the requirements that exist, including the fact that a complaint may not be made later than 90 days after a D.C. (or any part of it) is payable. A complainant may appeal the decision of City Council to the O.M.B Credits Sections of the D.C.A. set out a number of credit requirements, which apply where a municipality agrees to allow a person to perform work in the future that relates to a service in the D.C. by-law. These credits would be used to reduce the amount of development charges to be paid. The value of the credit is limited to the reasonable cost of the work which does not exceed the average level of service. The credit applies only to the service to which the work relates, unless the Town agrees to expand the credit to other services for which a development charge is payable.

89 Page Front-Ending Agreements The Town and one or more landowners may enter into a front-ending agreement which provides for the costs of a project which will benefit an area in the Town to which the D.C. by-law applies. Such an agreement can provide for the costs to be borne by one or more parties to the agreement who are, in turn, reimbursed in future by persons who develop land defined in the agreement. Part III of the D.C.A. (Sections 44-58) addresses front-ending agreements and removes some of the obstacles to their use which were contained in the D.C.A., Accordingly, the Town assesses whether this mechanism is appropriate for its use, as part of funding projects prior to Town funds being available Severance and Subdivision Agreement Conditions Section 59 of the D.C.A. prevents a Municipality from imposing directly or indirectly, a charge related to development or a requirement to construct a service related to development, by way of a condition or agreement under s.51 or s.53 of the Planning Act, except for: local services, related to a plan of subdivision or within the area to which the plan relates, to be installed or paid for by the owner as a condition of approval under section 51 of the Planning Act; and local services to be installed or paid for by the owner as a condition of approval under Section 53 of the Planning Act. It is also noted that s.s.59(4) of the D.C.A. requires that the municipal approval authority for a draft plan of subdivision under s.s.51(31) of the Planning Act, use its power to impose conditions to ensure that the first purchaser of newly subdivided land is informed of all the development charges related to the development, at the time the land is transferred. In this regard, if the municipality in question is a commenting agency, in order to comply with subsection 59(4) of the D.C.A. it would need to provide to the approval authority, information regarding the applicable Town development charges related to the site. If the municipality is an approval authority for the purposes of section 51 of the Planning Act, it would be responsible to ensure that it collects information from all entities which can impose a development charge.

90 Page 8-6 The most effective way to ensure that purchasers are aware of this condition would be to require it as a provision in a registered subdivision agreement, so that any purchaser of the property would be aware of the charges at the time the title was searched prior to closing a transaction conveying the lands.

91 Page A-1 Appendix A Background Information on Residential and Non-residential Growth Forecast

92

93 Page A-2 Historical Forecast Incremental Year Mid 2001 Mid 2006 Mid 2011 Mid 2016 Mid 2017 Mid 2027 Mid 2031 Mid Mid 2006 Mid Mid 2011 Mid Mid 2016 Mid Mid 2017 Mid Mid 2027 Including Census Undercount 1 Population Population Excluding Census Undercount Institutional Population Population in Private Households Schedule 1 Town Of Oakville Residential Growth Forecast Summary Singles & Semi- Detached Multiple Dwellings 2 Apartments3 Other Total Households Equivalent Institutional Households 150, , ,595 34,590 6,165 8, ,260 1, , ,613 1, ,725 38,910 8,775 8, ,570 1, , ,520 2, ,430 42,030 10,610 9, ,410 1, , ,835 2, ,720 43,145 12,020 11, ,265 1, , ,684 2, ,433 43,424 12,619 11, ,070 2, , ,044 2, ,432 49,431 16,566 19, ,490 2, , ,400 2, ,680 50,763 17,430 20, ,090 2, ,710 20, ,130 4,320 2, , ,580 16, ,705 3,120 1, , ,770 11, ,290 1,115 1,410 1, , ,000 3, , , ,060 42, ,999 6,007 3,947 7, , ,670 48, ,247 7,339 4,811 8, , Mid Mid 2031 Source: Derived by from Halton Region Best Planning Estimates, Census Undercount estimated at approximately 4%. Note: Population Including the Undercount has been rounded. 2. Includes townhomes and apartments in duplexes. 3. Includes bachelor, 1 bedroom and 2 bedroom+ apartments. Figure A-1 Housing Units Person Per Unit (PPU): Total Population/ Total Households Persons in Private Households/ Total Households 3,500 Annual Housing Forecast¹ 3,000 2,920 Housing Units 2,500 2,000 1,500 1,000 1, ,938 1,241 1,782 1,593 1,805 1,950 1,950 1,950 1,550 1,550 1,550 1,550 1, Years Historical Low Density Medium Density High Density Historical Average Source: Historical housing activity ( ) based on Statistics Canada building permits, Catalogue XIB 2017 housing growth derived by Watson & Associates Economist Ltd. 1. Growth Forecast represents calendar year. 10/12/2017 H:\Oakville\2017 DC\Growth\ 2017 DC Growth Oakville - Final

94 Page A-3 Schedule 2 Town Of Oakville Estimate of the Anticipated Amount, Type and Location of Residential Development for Which Development Charges can be Imposed Development Timing Single & Semi- Detached Location Multiples 1 Apartments 2 Total Residential Gross Population in Units New Units Existing Unit Population Change Net Population Increase Institutional Population Net Population Including Institutional North Oakville South Oakville ,077 2, ,889 24,943 (90) 24, , ,769 2,735 1,014 10,518 33,256 (90) 33, , ,895 6,706 9,531 19,036 (1,889) 17, , ,076 7,856 10,502 20,044 (4,963) 15, , ,007 3,947 7,466 17,420 43,979 (1,979) 41, , ,339 4,811 8,870 21,020 53,300 (5,053) 48, ,716 Source:, 2017 Existing population base in North Oakville 6,430 Residential distribution based on a combination of historical permit activity, available housing supply and discussions with Town staff regarding future development prospects. 1. Includes townhomes and apartments in duplexes. 2. Includes bachelor, 1 bedroom and 2 bedroom+ apartments. 10/12/2017 H:\Oakville\2017 DC\Growth\ 2017 DC Growth Oakville - Final

95 Page A-4 Schedule 3 Town Of Oakville Current Year Growth Forecast Mid 2016 to Mid 2017 Population Mid 2016 Population 193,835 Occupants of Units (2) 1,805 New Housing Units, multiplied by persons per unit (3) 2.17 Mid 2016 to Mid 2017 gross population increase 3,920 3,920 Occupants of New Units (3) 124 Equivalent Institutional Units, multiplied by persons per unit 1.10 Mid 2016 to Mid 2017 gross population increase Decline in Housing Units (4) 66,265 Unit Occupancy, multiplied by ppu decline rate (5) Mid 2016 to Mid 2017 total decline in population Population Estimate to Mid ,684 Net Population Increase,Mid 2016 to Mid ,849 (1) 2016 population based on StatsCan Census unadjusted for Census Undercount. (2) Estimated residential units constructed, Mid 2016 to the beginning of the growth period, assuming a six month lag between construction and occupancy. (3) Average number of persons per unit (ppu) is assumed to be: Persons % Distribution Weighted Persons Structural Type Per Unit¹ of Estimated Units² Per Unit Average Singles & Semi Detached % 0.57 Multiples (6) % 0.87 Apartments (7) % 0.74 Equivalent Institutional Households 1.10 Total 100% 2.17 ¹ Based on 2011 Census custom database ² Based on Building permit/completion activity (4) 2016 households taken from StatsCan Census. (5) Decline occurs due to aging of the population and family life cycle changes, lower fertility rates and changing economic conditions. (6) Includes townhomes and apartments in duplexes. (7) Includes bachelor, 1 bedroom and 2 bedroom+ apartments. 10/12/2017 H:\Oakville\2017 DC\Growth\ 2017 DC Growth Oakville - Final

96 Page A-5 Schedule 4b Town Of Oakville Ten Year Growth Forecast Mid 2017 to Mid 2027 Population Mid 2017 Population 197,684 Occupants of Units (2) 17,420 New Housing Units, multiplied by persons per unit (3) 2.52 Mid 2017 to Mid 2027 gross population increase 43,979 43,979 Occupants of New Units (3) 328 Equivalent Institutional Units, multiplied by persons per unit 1.10 Mid 2017 to Mid 2027 gross population increase Decline in Housing Units (4) 68,070 Unit Occupancy, multiplied by ppu decline rate (5) Mid 2017 to Mid 2027 total decline in population -1,979-1,979 Population Estimate to Mid ,044 Net Population Increase, Mid 2017 to Mid ,360 (1) Mid 2017 Population based on: 2016 Population (193,835) + Mid 2016 to Mid 2017 estimated housing units to beginning of forecast period (1,805 x 2.17 = 3,920) + (66,265 x = -207) = 197,684 (2) Based upon forecast building permits/completions assuming a lag between construction and occupancy. (3) Average number of persons per unit (ppu) is assumed to be: Persons % Distribution Weighted Persons Structural Type Per Unit¹ of Estimated Units² Per Unit Average Singles & Semi Detached % 1.25 Multiples (6) % 0.60 Apartments (7) % 0.68 one bedroom or less 1.17 two bedrooms or more 1.94 Equivalent Institutional Households 1.10 Total 100% 2.52 ¹ Persons per unit based on adjusted Statistics Canada Custom 2011 Census database. ² Forecast unit mix based upon historical trends and housing units in the development process. (4) Mid 2017 households based upon 66,265 (2016 Census) + 1,805 (Mid 2016 to Mid 2017 unit estimate) = 68,070 (5) Decline occurs due to aging of the population and family life cycle changes, lower fertility rates and changing economic conditions. (6) Includes townhomes and apartments in duplexes. (7) Includes bachelor, 1 bedroom and 2 bedroom+ apartments. 10/12/2017 H:\Oakville\2017 DC\Growth\ 2017 DC Growth Oakville - Final

97 Page A-6 Schedule 4c Town Of Oakville Fourteen Year Growth Forecast Mid 2017 to Mid 2031 Population Mid 2017 Population 197,684 Occupants of Units (2) 21,020 New Housing Units, multiplied by persons per unit (3) 2.54 Mid 2017 to Mid 2031 gross population increase 53,300 53,300 Occupants of New Units (3) 426 Equivalent Institutional Units, multiplied by persons per unit 1.10 Mid 2017 to Mid 2031 gross population increase Decline in Housing Units (4) 68,070 Unit Occupancy, multiplied by ppu decline rate (5) Mid 2017 to Mid 2031 total decline in population -5,053-5,053 Population Estimate to Mid ,400 Net Population Increase, Mid 2017 to Mid ,716 (1) Mid 2017 Population based on: 2016 Population (193,835) + Mid 2016 to Mid 2017 estimated housing units to beginning of forecast period (1,805 x 2.17 = 3,920) + (66,265 x = -207) = 197,684 (2) Based upon forecast building permits/completions assuming a lag between construction and occupancy. (3) Average number of persons per unit (ppu) is assumed to be: Persons % Distribution Weighted Persons Structural Type Per Unit¹ of Estimated Units² Per Unit Average Singles & Semi Detached % 1.26 Multiples (6) % 0.60 Apartments (7) % 0.67 one bedroom or less 1.17 two bedrooms or more 1.94 Equivalent Institutional Households 1.10 Total 100% 2.54 ¹ Persons per unit based on adjusted Statistics Canada Custom 2011 Census database. ² Forecast unit mix based upon historical trends and housing units in the development process. (4) Mid 2017 households based upon 66,265 (2016 Census) + 1,805 (Mid 2016 to Mid 2017 unit estimate) = 68,070 (5) Decline occurs due to aging of the population and family life cycle changes, lower fertility rates and changing economic conditions. (6) Includes townhomes and apartments in duplexes. (7) Includes bachelor, 1 bedroom and 2 bedroom+ apartments. 10/12/2017 H:\Oakville\2017 DC\Growth\ 2017 DC Growth Oakville - Final

98 Page A-7 Schedule 5 Town Of Oakville Summary Of Units In The Development Process Stage of Development Low Scenario Ground Oriented 1 Apartments 2 Total Density Type High Scenario Ground Oriented 1 Apartments 2 Total Registered Not Built % Breakdown 59% 41% 100% 59% 41% 100% Draft Plans Approved 5,153 3,160 8,313 5,153 3,160 8,313 % Breakdown 62% 38% 100% 62% 38% 100% Active Applications 3,591 6,714 10,305 3,591 6,714 10,305 % Breakdown 35% 65% 100% 35% 65% 100% Other Remaining Lands 3,786 3,238 7,024 3,786 3,238 7,024 % Breakdown 54% 46% 100% 54% 46% 100% Intensification Opportunities 1,220 10,942 12,162 1,220 21,846 23,066 % Breakdown 10% 90% 100% 5% 95% 100% Total 14,310 24,446 38,756 14,310 35,350 49,660 % Breakdown 37% 63% 100% 29% 71% 100% Source: Derived from Planning Services, July 2015 data 1. Includes townhomes and apartments in duplexes. 2. Includes bachelor, 1 bedroom and 2 bedroom+ apartments. 10/12/2017 H:\Oakville\2017 DC\Growth\ 2017 DC Growth Oakville - Final

99 Page A-8 Schedule 6 Town Of Oakville Historical Residential Building Permits Years Residential Building Permits Year Singles & Semi Detached Multiples 1 Apartments 2 Total , ,938 Sub-total 2,235 1,698 1,795 5,728 Average ( ) ,146 % Breakdown 39% 30% 31% 100% , , , , ,805 Sub-total 1,720 3,155 1,952 6,827 Average ( ) ,365 % Breakdown 25% 46% 29% 100% Total 3,955 4,853 3,747 12,555 Average ,256 % Breakdown 31% 39% 30% 100% 1. Includes townhomes and apartments in duplexes. 2. Includes bachelor, 1 bedroom and 2 bedroom+ apartments. 10/12/2017 H:\Oakville\2017 DC\Growth\ 2017 DC Growth Oakville - Final

100 Page A-9 Schedule 7 Town Of Oakville Persons Per Unit By Age And Type Of Dwelling (2011 Census) Age of Singles and Semi-Detached Dwelling < 1 BR 1 BR 2 BR 3/4 BR 5+ BR Total Adjusted PPU¹ 15 Year Average Total Age of Multiples 2 Dwelling < 1 BR 1 BR 2 BR 3/4 BR 5+ BR Total Adjusted PPU¹ 15 Year Average Total Age of Apartments 3 Dwelling < 1 BR 1 BR 2 BR 3/4 BR 5+ BR Total Adjusted PPU¹ 15 Year Average Total Age of All Density Types Dwelling < 1 BR 1 BR 2 BR 3/4 BR 5+ BR Total Total The Census PPU has been adjusted to account for the downward PPU trend which has been recently experienced in both new and older units, largely due to the aging of the population 2. Includes townhomes and apartments in duplexes. 3. Includes bachelor, 1 bedroom and 2 bedroom+ apartments. Note: Does not include Statistics Canada data classified as 'Other' PPU Not calculated for samples less than or equal to 50 dwelling units, and does not include institutional population 10/12/2017 H:\Oakville\2017 DC\Growth\ 2017 DC Growth Oakville - Final

101 Page A-10 Schedule 8 Town Of Oakville Persons Per Unit By Structural Type And Age Of Dwelling (2011 Census) Persons Per Dwelling Age of Dwelling Singles and Semi-Detached Multiples Apartments 10/12/2017 H:\Oakville\2017 DC\Growth\ 2017 DC Growth Oakville - Final

102 Page A-11 Mid , ,540 23,270 28,880 12,840 73,800 6,830 80,630 Mid , ,315 22,100 34,450 15,860 80,885 7,520 88,405 Mid , ,003 22,120 39,809 17,697 88,749 8,484 97,233 Mid , ,740 27,968 50,477 21, ,630 10, ,897 Mid , ,460 29,220 54,180 22, ,545 10, ,360 Mid Mid , ,905-1,775 3,365 2,030 5,645 1,855 7,500 Mid Mid , ,170 5,570 3,020 7, ,775 Mid Mid , ,359 1,837 7, ,828 Mid Mid , ,737 5,848 10,668 3,633 21,881 1,783 23,664 Mid Mid , ,457 7,100 14,371 4,873 28,796 2,331 31,127 Mid Mid , , ,500 Mid Mid , , , ,555 Mid Mid , , ,471 Mid Mid , , , ,366 Mid Mid , , , ,223 Source: Derived by from Halton Region Best Planning Estimates, 2011 Schedule 9a Town Of Oakville Employment Forecast, 2017 to 2031 Activity Rate Employment Total Period Population Total Commercial/ Work at Commercial/ Work at NFPOW 1 Employment Primary Industrial Institutional Total Including Primary Industrial Population Institutional Total NFPOW ¹ Home Population Related Home (Including NFPOW Related NFPOW) Mid , ,635 25,045 25,515 10,810 68,155 4,975 73,130 Incremental Change Annual Average 1. Statistics Canada defines no fixed place of work (NFPOW) employees as "persons who do not go from home to the same work place location at the beginning of each shift". Such persons include building and landscape contractors, travelling salespersons, independent truck drivers, etc. 10/12/2017 H:\Oakville\2017 DC\Growth\ 2017 DC Growth Oakville - Final

103 Page A-12 Period Population Primary Schedule 9b Town Of Oakville Employment and Gross Floor Area (GFA) Forecast, 2017 to 2031 Industrial Employment Commercial/ Population Related Institutional Mid , ,045 25,515 10,810 61,520 30,054,000 10,206,000 45,665,000 Mid , ,270 28,880 12,840 65,260 27,924,000 11,552,000 45,896,000 Mid , ,100 34,450 15,860 72,570 26,520,300 13,780,000 48,230,300 Mid , ,120 39,809 17,697 79,746 26,544,000 15,923,800 51,316,400 Mid , ,968 50,477 21,330 99,890 33,561,600 20,190,800 64,417,400 Mid , ,220 54,180 22, ,085 35,064,000 21,672,000 68,021,000 Incremental Change Mid Mid , ,775 3,365 2,030 3,740 Mid Mid , ,170 5,570 3,020 7,310 Mid Mid , ,359 1,837 7,176 23,700 2,143,800 3,086,100 Mid Mid , ,848 10,668 3,633 20,144 7,017,600 4,267,000 1,488,400 12,773,000 Mid Mid , ,100 14,371 4,873 26,339 8,520,000 5,748,200 2,010,400 16,278,600 Annual Average Mid Mid , Mid Mid , , ,462 Mid Mid , ,196 3, , ,350 Mid Mid , , , , , ,840 1,277,300 Mid Mid , , , , , ,600 1,162,757 Source: Derived by from Halton Region Best Planning Estimates, Square Foot Per Employee Assumptions Industrial 1,200 Commercial/ Population Related 400 Institutional * 413 * Reflects 2017 to 2031 forecast period Total Industrial Gross Floor Area in Square Feet (Estimated)¹ Commercial/ Population Institutional Related Total 10/12/2017 H:\Oakville\2017 DC\Growth\ 2017 DC Growth Oakville - Final

104 Page A-13 Schedule 9c Estimate of the Anticipated Amount, Type and Location of Non-Residential Development for Which Development Charges can be Imposed Development Timing Industrial Commercial Institutional Total Non-Res Employment Location GFA S.F GFA S.F. GFA S.F. GFA S.F. Increase 1 North Oakville South Oakville ,532,043 1,128,593 1,048,844 6,709,480 8, ,502,310 1,520,360 1,416,687 8,439,357 11, ,471,444 3,138, ,556 6,049,406 10, ,000,556 4,227, ,713 7,822,109 14, ,017,600 4,267,000 1,488,400 12,773,000 20, ,520,000 5,748,200 2,010,400 16,278,600 26,339 Source:, Employment Increase does not include No Fixed Place of Work. 2. Square feet per employee assumptions: Industrial 1,200 Commercial 400 Institutional * 413 * Reflects 2017 to 2031 forecast period 10/12/2017 H:\Oakville\2017 DC\Growth\ 2017 DC Growth Oakville - Final

105 Page A-14 Schedule 10 Town Of Oakville Non-Residential Construction Value Years (000's 2017 $) Year Industrial Commercial Institutional Total New Improve Additions Total New Improve Additions Total New Improve Additions Total New Improve Additions Total ,596 24,081 1,857 51, ,011 67,492 3, ,448 10,778 10,615 7,891 29, , ,188 13, , ,245 9,358 5,447 20,049 88,989 49,164 10, ,676 18,885 2,838 2,134 23, ,120 61,360 18, , ,933 3, , ,858 25, ,787 61,120 7,316 6,036 74, ,910 37,025 6, , ,036 4, ,483 21,680 55, ,962 11,618 28,820 3,228 43,666 90,334 88,549 3, , ,787 6,399 2,950 19,136 49,928 35,466 2,212 87,607 33,017 10, ,407 92,733 52,254 5, , ,280 1,863 32, ,393 47,343 12, , ,623 7,274 3, , ,349 84,896 17, , , ,257 47,697 62, , ,998 15,461 1, , ,868 90,189 1, , ,103 8, , ,870 49, ,803 15,989 13, , ,961 72, , ,806 9, ,718 38,985 49, ,039 16,539 10, ,191 57,330 69, , ,340 6, ,310 70,127 39,879 2, , ,799 6,777 5, , ,266 53,625 7, ,131 Subtotal 206, ,016 12, , , ,186 31,027 1,374,750 1,014, ,513 29,716 1,157,595 2,082, ,715 72,861 2,866,829 Percent of Total 61% 35% 4% 100% 63% 35% 2% 100% 87% 10% 3% 100% 72% 25% 3% 100% Average 20,635 11,602 1,212 33,448 86,154 48,219 3, , ,437 11,351 2, , ,225 71,171 7, , Period Total 157, , ,686 1,073, Average 31, ,096 42, ,616 % Breakdown 15% 65% 20% 100% Period Total 176, , ,910 1,793, Average 35, , , ,750 % Breakdown 10% 37% 53% 100% Period Total 334,484 1,374,750 1,157,595 2,866, Average 33, , , ,683 % Breakdown 12% 48% 40% 100% Source: Statistics Canada Publication, XIB Note: Inflated to year-end 2016 (January, 2017) dollars using Reed Construction Cost Index 10/12/2017 H:\Oakville\2017 DC\Growth\ 2017 DC Growth Oakville - Final

106

107 Page B-1 Appendix B Level of Service

108

109 Page B-2 TOWN OF OAKVILLE Service Category Services Related to a Highway SUMMARY OF SERVICE STANDARDS AS PER DEVELOPMENT CHARGES ACT, 1997, AS AMENDED 10 Year Average Service Standard Maximum Sub-Component Cost (per capita) Quantity (per capita) Quality (per capita) Ceiling LOS Services Related to a Highway - Roads $19, km of roadways 6,836,750 per lane km 932,565,516 Services Related to a Highway - Depots and Domes $ ft² of building area 250 per sq.ft. 7,552,441 Services Related to a Highway - Roads and Related V $ No. of vehicles and equipment 83,285 per vehicle 5,274,481 Fire Facilities $ ft² of building area 908 per sq.ft. 16,240,940 Fire Fire Vehicles $ No. of vehicles 344,733 per vehicle 5,038,209 Fire Small Equipment and Gear $ No. of equipment and gear 9,518 per Firefighter 510,057 Parking Spaces and Vehicles $ No. of spaces and vehicles 5,330 per space 1,061,118 Parking Parking Land $ m2 of Parking Lot area $2,977 per sq.m. 14,996,287 Parking Facilities $ ft² of building area 504 per sq.ft. 363,025 Park Buildings $ ft² of building area 244 per sq.ft. 4,565,561 Parkland Development $ Hectares of Parkland 158,091 per hectare 30,135,328 Parkland Amenities $ No. of parkland amenities 185,355 per amenity 29,836,266 Parks and Recreation Harbours $ No. of Harbours 627,900 per item 2,659,784 Parkland Trails $ Linear Km of Paths and Trails 405,814 per km. 12,033,205 Parks Vehicles and Equipment $ No. of vehicles and equipment 42,126 per vehicle 3,390,494 Indoor Recreation Facilities $2, ft² of building area 497 per sq.ft. 96,293,599 Recreation Vehicles and Equipment $ No. of vehicles and equipment 15,411 per vehicle 587,533 Library Library Facilities $ ft² of building area 527 per sq.ft. 12,449,604 Library Collection Materials $ No. of library collection items 18 per collection item 2,528,892 H:\Oakville\2017 DC\Report\Addendum 2\Report for Addendum 2.docx

110 Page B-3 Service Standard Calculation Sheet Service: Unit Measure: Services Related to a Highway - Roads km of roadways Description Value ($/km) Arterial Road Network $5,410,000 ROW Land on Arterial Network (sq.km) $308,881,000 Bridges and Culverts $51,454,000 Arterial Traffic Signals (per intersection) $273,000 Collector Road Network $4,340,000 ROW Land on Collector Network (sq.km) $494,210,000 Transit Shelters $6,000 Total Population 170, , , , , , , , , ,832 Per Capita Standard Year Average Quantity Standard Quality Standard $6,836,750 Service Standard $19,143 DC Amount (before deductions) 15 Year Forecast Population 48,716 $ per Capita $19,143 Eligible Amount $932,565,516 H:\Oakville\2017 DC\Report\Addendum 2\Report for Addendum 2.docx

111 Page B-4 Service Standard Calculation Sheet Service: Unit Measure: Services Related to a Highway - Depots and Domes ft² of building area Description Bld'g Value ($/ft²) Value/ft² with land, site works, etc. Central Operations Depot 68,631 68,631 68,631 68,631 68,631 68,631 68,631 68,631 68,631 68,631 $226 $283 Traffic Storage Building 11,625 11,625 11,625 11,625 11,625 11,625 11,625 11,625 11,625 11,625 $207 $207 Salt/Sand Dome (Large) 116' Di 10,792 10,792 10,792 10,792 10,792 10,792 10,792 10,792 10,792 10,792 $32 $32 Salt/Sand Dome (Small) 8,023 8,023 8,023 8,023 8,023 8,023 8,023 8,023 8,023 8,023 $35 $35 Southeast Satellite 2,600 2,600 2,600 2,600 2,600 2,600 2,600 2,600 2,600 2,600 $208 $272 Salt & Sand Structure 4,368 4,368 4,368 4,368 4,368 4,368 4,368 4,368 4,368 4,368 $45 $430 North Operations Sand/Salt Building 16,665 16,665 16,665 $345 $416 North Operations Depot 6,475 6,475 6,475 $527 $617 North Operations Pk and Traffic Storage 2,139 2,139 2,139 $189 $245 Total 106, , , , , , , , , ,318 Population 170, , , , , , , , , ,832 Per Capita Standard Year Average Quantity Standard Quality Standard $250 Service Standard $155 DC Amount (before deductions) 15 Year Forecast Population 48,716 $ per Capita $155 Eligible Amount $7,552,441

112 Page B-5 Service Standard Calculation Sheet Service: Unit Measure: Services Related to a Highway - Roads and Related Vehicles No. of vehicles and equipment Description Value ($/Vehicle) Wm - R & W Operations Attachment - Snow Blower (5 Units) $16,000 Attachment - Snow Blower 1 1 $16,000 Attachment - Snow Blower 1 1 $16,000 Attachment - Sweepers (4 Units $8,750 Attachment - Tow Behind Sander $74,000 Attachment - Vee Plows (7 Unit $6,000 Attachment, Broom - Model: Bu $5,500 Attachment, Underbody Plow - V $11,100 Attachment, Underbody Plow - V $11,100 Attachment, Underbody Plow - V $11,100 Attachment, Underbody Plow - V $11,100 Attachment, Underbody Plow - V $11,100 Attachments,Seasonal - Attachment, Plow $1,500 Attachments,Seasonal-Windrow $13,600 Attachment, Broom $5,500 Attenuator, Truck Mounted - Mps $45,600 Backhoe, Extendahoe, 4X4-590 Sm $170,000 Backhoe, Extendahoe, 4X4 1 1 $170,000 Blower, Backpack - Bp 65Le $1,100 Blower, Snow, 2-Stage Detachab - Lm $106,000 Blower, Snow, $3,000 Body, Leaf Vacuum $40,000 Camera, CCTV, Pipe Inspection 1 $100,100 Compressor, Air - Compressor, Skidded $16,000 Conveyor, Stockpiling $143,000 Chipper, Brush, Attachment $5,200 Crack Router, Pavement - Cr250K Or Ch52S $14,500 Router, Crack - Mk Iv Or Ch52S $10,400 Router, Crack - Mk Iv $10,400 Crane Assembly $26,000 Crane, Articulated Type - Pk7000B $54,200 Cutter, Sod, Jr. 18" A $6,700 Detachable Plow - Plow, V-Wing 8' 6" $11,000 Dump, 1 Ton Crew Cab - C $82,000 Dump, 1 Ton Crew Cab - F450 Hd Xl $82,000

113 Page B-6 Service Standard Calculation Sheet Service: Unit Measure: Services Related to a Highway - Roads and Related Vehicles No. of vehicles and equipment Description Value ($/Vehicle) Dump, 1 Ton Hd Crew Cab - F450 Hd Xl $82,000 Dump, 1 Ton Hd Crew Cab - F450 Hd Xl 1 1 $82,000 Dump, 1 Ton Hd Crew Cab - F450 Hd Xl $82,000 Pickup, 1 Ton Hd Crew Cab Dump F-450 XL HD $82,000 Truck, Dump, 1 Way - Topkick $176,400 Dump, 1 Ton Hd Crew Cab with Crane - F-550 Hd $148,000 Dump, 1 Ton Hd Crew Cab - F450 Hd Xl $82,000 Dump, 1 Ton Hd Crew Cab - F450 Hd Xl 1 1 $82,000 Dump, 1 Ton Hd Crew Cab - F450 Hd Xl $82,000 Pickup, 1 Ton Hd Crew Cab Dump F-450 XL HD $82,000 Dump, 1 Ton Hd Crew Cab - F450Hd Xl $82,000 Dump, 1 Ton Hd Crew Cab 4X4 - F450 Xl 1 $82,000 Dump, 1 Ton Hd Reg Cab - F450 Sd $82,000 Dump, 1 Ton Hd Regular Cab - F450 Hd Xl $82,000 Dump, 1 Ton Hd Crew Cab 4X2 - F-450Xl 1 $82,000 Dump, 1 Ton Regular Cab - Gmc Pickup $82,000 Dump, 1-Ton Hd Crew Cab - F450 Hd Xl $82,000 Dump, 1 Ton Hd Crew Cab 4X2 - F-450Xl 1 $82,000 Excavator, Wheeled, Gradall $396,000 Excavator, Mini, Kubota 1 $98,000 Grader,Articulated,Class 6 - G $315,000 Grinder $10,400 Grinder, Sidewalk $10,400 Grinder-FP8G $10,400 Grinder-FP8G $10,400 Leaf Vacuum $44,400 Leaf Vacuum $44,400 Vacuum Leafer, Skid Type - Skb $57,000 Leafer, Vacuum - Box Only $7,000 Leafer, Vacuum $44,400 Leafer, Vacuum - Pm $44,400 Vacuum Leafer, Skid Type - Skb $45,000 Leafer, Vacuum - Pm $40,000 Leafer, Vacuum - Skb $40,000 Leafer, Vacuum - Skb $40,000

114 Page B-7 Service Standard Calculation Sheet Service: Unit Measure: Services Related to a Highway - Roads and Related Vehicles No. of vehicles and equipment Description Value ($/Vehicle) LFVAC Power Unit 1 $40,000 LFVAC Power Unit 1 $40,000 Loader, Bucket & Tool Carrier - L70D $261,000 Loader, Bucket & Tool Carrier - L90F Volvo $261,000 Loader, Bucket Type - L-70-C 1 1 $261,000 Loader, Bucket Type - Volvo Model L90F $261,000 Loader, Bucket Type - L-70-C $261,000 Paver,Hydrostatic,Self-Prop $40,100 Paver,Hydrostatic,Self-Prop - Leeboy $112,000 Pickup, 1/2 Ton, Longbx - Silverado $27,000 Pickup, 1-Ton, Crewcab, Longbx - Ford F-350Xl $45,000 Pickup, 1-Ton, Crewcab, Longbx - Ford F-350Xl $45,000 Pickup, 3/4 Ton Crewcab Longbx - F250 Hd Xl $36,000 Pickup, 3/4 Ton Crewcab Longbx - F250 Hd Xl $36,000 Pickup, 3/4 Ton Longbx Hd - F250 Hd 1 1 $49,000 Pickup, 3/4 Ton Rcab L/Bx 4X4 - F250 Xl Hd $49,000 Pickup, 3/4 Ton, Rcab, Lbx 4X2 - F-250 Xl $49,000 Pickup, 3/4 Ton, Rcab, Lbx 4X2 - F-250 Xl $49,000 Pickup, R Cab, Longbx 4X4 - Ford F250 Hd Xl $49,000 Pickup, 3/4 Ton Rcab L/Bx F250 Hd $49,000 Pickup, 1/2 Ton R Cab, F150 XL $31,000 Pickup, 1/2 Ton Ext Cab, S/Bx F-150 XL $31,000 Pickup, 1/2 Ton E Cab, S/Box - F150XL 1 1 $31,000 Pickup, 1/2 Ton E Cab, S/Box - F150XL 1 1 $31,000 Plow, Pusher, 12' For Loader - Ldat $11,000 Plow, Vee Type $11,000 Plow, Vee, Combination - Plow, Ez-Vector 1 1 $7,300 Roller, Asphalt, Combination - Hd12K $55,000 Roller, Ride-On, Non-Vibratory $21,700 Roller, Vibratory - Bw-120Ad $50,000 Roller, Vibratory - SW $50,000 Roller, Vibratory, 1 1/2 Ton - T-175-V $50,000 Roller, Vibratory, 1 1/2 Ton - T-175-V $50,000 Roll-On/Off Body, Brine/Pre-Wet 1 $50,000 Roll-On/Off Body, Brine/Pre-Wet 1 $50,000 Roll-On/Off Body, Dump 1 $28,000

115 Page B-8 Service Standard Calculation Sheet Service: Unit Measure: Services Related to a Highway - Roads and Related Vehicles No. of vehicles and equipment Description Value ($/Vehicle) Roll-On/Off Body, Dump 1 $28,000 Sander Body, 3 Cu.Mtr.1 Spin - Sh $96,000 Sander Body, 6 Cu. M. W/Brine - Stratos B $100,000 Sander Body, 6 Cu. M. W/Brine - Stratos B $100,000 Sander Body,10 Cu.Yd.Dual Spin - All102Sdj $46,000 Sander Body, 8.5 Cu. Yd Dual Spin - Viking-Cives $63,000 Sander Body,10 Cu.Yd.Dual Spin - All102Sdj $46,000 Sander Body, 8.5 Cu. Yd Dual Spin - Viking-Cives $63,000 Sander Body,10 Cu.Yd.Dual Spin - All102Sdj $46,000 Sander Body,10 Cu.Yd.Dual Spin - All10Y $46,000 Sander Body, 8.5 Cu. Yd 2 Spin - Viking-Cives $129,000 Sander Body,10 Cu.Yd.Dual Spin - All10Y $46,000 Sander Body, 8.5 Cu. Yd 2 Spin - Viking-Cives $129,000 Sander, Slip-In, Stainless Cu. Yd. 4' $17,300 Sander, Slip-In, Stainless, 8' 1 1 $17,300 Spreader, Slip-In Type - G4D17Nc51B $17,300 Sander, Slip-In, Stainless 8' 1 $17,300 Skidsteer - 226B Hf $91,000 Skidsteer - 262D HF $94,000 Sprayer, Skid Mount 800 Gal. - Pes800S $7,700 Sprayer, Power Emulsion $7,700 Spreader - MT5T $140,300 Sweeper, Dual, Mech. Mobil - Mobil M9E 1 $332,000 Sweeper, Dual, Mech., Elgin - Broom Bear H1532D $332,000 Sweeper, Dual, Mechanical - Sr $332,000 Sweeper, Dual, Regen. - Dst6 Tymco $332,000 Sweeper, Dual, Regen., Tymco - Fc $332,000 Sweeper, Dual, Regen., Tymco - Gmc T $332,000 Sweeper, Ride-On - Atlv $60,000 Sweeper, Ride-On - Mu101D $60,000 Sweeper, Ride-On - Mu101D $60,000 Sweeper, Ride-On - Atlv $60,000 Sweeper, Ride-On - Mu101D $60,000 Sweeper, Ride-On - Atlv $60,000 Sweeper, Sidewalk Vacuum - Hako $143,000 Tractor, Sidewalk - Mt $152,000

116 Page B-9 Service Standard Calculation Sheet Service: Unit Measure: Services Related to a Highway - Roads and Related Vehicles No. of vehicles and equipment Description Value ($/Vehicle) Tractor, Sidewalk - Mt $152,000 Tractor, Sidewalk - Mt5T $152,000 Tractor, Sidewalk $152,000 Tractor, Sidewalk - Mt5T $152,000 Tractor, Sidewalk $152,000 Tractor, Sidewalk - Mt-5T $152,000 Tractor, Sidewalk, Wheeled - MT6 1 $152,000 Tractor, Sidewalk - Mt-5T $152,000 Tractor, Sidewalk, Wheeled - MT6 1 $152,000 Tractor, Sidewalk - Mt5T $152,000 Tractor, Sidewalk, Tracked - Sw-48-Da $152,000 Tractor, Sidewalk, Tracked - Sw-48-Da $152,000 Tractor, Sidewalk, W/Sander - Mt $169,300 Tractor, Sidewalk - MT $152,000 Tractor, Sidewalk, W/Sander - Mt $169,300 Tractor, Sidewalk - MT $152,000 Tractor, Sidewalk, W/Sander - Mt $169,300 Utility Vehicle, 4X $18,000 Trailer, Brush Chipper Bc 1 1 $75,000 Trailer, Compressor - P185Wjd $45,600 Trailer, Compressor - Xas 185 Jd $45,600 Trailer, Compressor, 185 Cfm - Atlas-Copco Xas973D $45,600 Trailer, Crash Attenuator - Vorteq $43,000 Trailer, Culvert Steamer - A $15,000 Trailer, Culvert Steamer - A $15,000 Trailer, Culvert Steamer - A $15,000 Trailer, Culvert Steamer - Culurrt 1 1 $15,000 Trailer, Hot Mix - Hmt8000Hd $31,900 Trailer, Hot Mix Transport - Hmt $22,800 Trailer, Kettle, Compound Melt - Ucmk $22,800 Trailer, Lanechanger - Tc-12 Freeway $8,100 Trailer, Lanechanger - Tc-12 Striper $8,100 Trailer, Leaf Vacuum - Trailer, S.Axle Leaf Vacuum $108,000 Trailer, Leaf Vacuum, 25 Cu.Yd - Tandem Axle, Body # $108,000

117 Page B-10 Service Standard Calculation Sheet Service: Services Related to a Highway - Roads and Related Vehicles Unit Measure: No. of vehicles and equipment Description Value ($/Vehicle) Trailer, Leaf Vacuum, 25 Cu.Yd - Tandem Axle, Body # $108,000 Trailer, Leaf Vacuum, 25 Cu.Yd - Trailer, Leaf Vacuum, 25 Cu.Yd $108,000 Trailer, Leaf Vacuum, 30 Cu Td - Tandem Dual Axles 1 1 $108,000 Trailer, Sewer Cleaner - Hv2060Tr/D $60,000 Trailer, Sewer Cleaner 1 1 $60,000 Trailer, Sgl Axle, Leaf Vacuum - Lct $62,000 Trailer, Sgl Axle, Leaf Vacuum - Lct $62,000 Trailer, Sgl Axle, Leaf Vacuum - Lct $62,000 Trailer, Sgl Axle, Leaf Vacuum - Lct $62,000 Trailer, Sgl Axle, Leaf Vacuum - Lct $62,000 Trailer, Sgl Axle, Leaf Vacuum - Lct $62,000 Trailer, Sgl Axle, Leaf Vacuum - Trailer, S.Axle Leaf Vacuu $62,000 Trailer, Sgl Axle, Leaf Vacuum - Lct $62,000 Trailer, Sgl E, Leaf Vacuum $62,000 Trailer, Single Axle Vee Nose $10,700 Trailer, Street Flusher Tank Gallon $162,500 Trailer, Sweeper - No Model Number 1 1 $7,700 Trailer, Tandem - No Model Number $15,000 Trailer, Float, 15 Ton - OD-02 1 $40,900 Trailer, Tandem, Environment - No Model Number $13,800 Trailer, Tandem Enclosed $13,800 Trailer, Environment $13,800 Trailer, Tandem, Low Bed - Ld $19,500 Trailer, Tandem, Low Bed - Ld $19,500 Trailer, Tandem, Lowbed - Ld $19,500 Trailer, Tandem, Lowbed - Ld-2 1 $19,500 Trailer, Tandem, Utility - No Model Number 1 1 $12,000 Trailer, Tandem 7 Ton $12,000 Trailer, Triaxle $20,000 Trailer, Triaxle - Od $20,000 Trailer, Tandem, Float 15 Ton - OD $40,900 Trailer, Vacuum / Water Edu - Tgv $200,000 Trailer,Tandem, Lowbed Const. - Ld $19,500

118 Page B-11 Service Standard Calculation Sheet Service: Unit Measure: Services Related to a Highway - Roads and Related Vehicles No. of vehicles and equipment Description Value ($/Vehicle) Truck, Class 8 15' Dump Body - Class 8 Truck With Dump Body $285,000 Truck, Class 8 Cab & Chassis - For Sanders $285,000 Truck, Class 8 With Plow Sba 6X4, Tandem 'U' Body $285,000 Truck, Class 8, 15' Dump Body $285,000 Truck, Class 8, Tandem - Cab & Chassis Only For Sanders $285,000 Truck, Dump 1-Way, Sand/Salter - Viking Cives E $285,000 Truck, Dump 1-Way, Sand/Salter-Tandem Plow 1 1 $285,000 Truck, Dump 1-Way, Sand/Salter - Viking-Cives 1415 Lwht $285,000 Truck, Dump, 1-Way Sand/Salter Sba 6X $285,000 Truck, Dump, 1 Way - Fl $142,000 Truck, Dump, 1 Way - Topkick $142,000 Truck, Dump, 1-Way w Plow-7500 SBA 9X $285,000 Truck, Dump, 1-Way - Lagace Lf $285,000 Truck, Dump, 1-Way Sand/Salter - Vhd64B $285,000 Truck, Dump, 1-Way Sand/Salter X $285,000 Truck, Dump, 1Way, Sand/Salter - Proline 1112 Lw $285,000 Truck, Dump, 1Way, Sand/Salter - Proline 1112 Lw $285,000 Truck, Dump, Single, 1 Way w Plow 1 $285,000 Truck, Dump, 1Way, Sand/Salter - Proline 1112Lw $285,000 Truck, Dump, Single, 1 Way w Plow 1 $285,000 Truck, Dump, 1-Way, With Plows International $285,000 Truck, Dump, 1-Way w Plow IHC 7400 SBA 6X4 1 $285,000 Truck, Dump, 1-Way,Sand/Salter (6X4) $285,000 Truck, Dump, Tandem 1-Way w Plow 1 $297,000 Truck, Dump, 2 Way $208,000 Truck, Dump, 2 Way - Fl $208,000 Truck, Dump,1 Way, Sand/Salter - Vhd64B $285,000 Truck, Dump,1 Way, Sand/Salter X $285,000 Truck, Flusher, Tandem Axle Series 6X $345,000 Truck, Leafer $203,000 Truck, Packer $203,000

119 Page B-12 Service Standard Calculation Sheet Service: Unit Measure: Services Related to a Highway - Roads and Related Vehicles No. of vehicles and equipment Description Value ($/Vehicle) Truck, Packer $203,000 Truck, Packer $217,000 Truck, Packer $217,000 Truck, Packer $217,000 Truck, Tractor, Single Axle $170,600 Truck,Dump 1-Way,Sand/Salter Sba 6X $285,000 Truck,Dump 1-Way,Sand/Salter Sba 6X $285,000 Vacuum Leafer, Skid Type - Skb $40,000 Van, Cube, 16' Aerocell - Ford E-450Sd $70,000 Van, Cube, 18' Body - Fl $116,100 Van, Cube, 16' Body - Cargo 1-Ton $68,000 Wm - R & W - Fleet Truck, 1/2 Ton 4X4 - Ford F $31,000 Truck, Dump 2 Way Freightlinfl-80 1 $200,400 Truck, Dump 2 Way - International 7400 Sba 4X2 1 $200,400 Compressor/Welder/Charger $10,900 Forklift, Diesel - Dp40D $86,000 Forklift, Electric - 7Fbeu $46,000 Mower, 62 " - F $29,000 Mower, 62 " - F $29,000 Mower, 62 " - F $29,000 Mower, 62" - F $29,000 Mower, Attachment, Interstater - Rh88 1 $19,500 Mower, Attachment, Interstater - Shd 96 1 $19,500 Pickup, 1/2 Ton, R Cab, Longbx - Silverado Cc $31,000 Pickup,1/2 Ton, E. Cab,S/Bx,4X - F150Xl $31,000 Pickup, 1/2 Ton, R Cab, Longbx - Silverado Cc $31,000 Pickup, 1/2 Ton, E Cab S Box - F150XL $31,000 Spreader, Sand/Salt - Mspv $8,000 Tractor, Mower - John Deere $70,400 Trailer, Compressor $45,600 Wm - R & W -Traffic Operations Trailer, Tandem Flatbed - No Model Number $9,200 1-Ton Hd Ex Cab, Body & Crane - F550 Hd Xl $148,000 1-Ton E Cab, Body & Crane - F550 Hd Xl 1 $148,000 1-Ton Hd, Ext Cab 4X4 F450 Xl 1 $75,200

120 Page B-13 Service Standard Calculation Sheet Service: Unit Measure: Services Related to a Highway - Roads and Related Vehicles No. of vehicles and equipment Description Value ($/Vehicle) 1 Ton Hd Flatbed Hd $43,300 1-Ton Hd Ex Cab, Body & Crane - F550 Hd Xl $148,000 1-Ton Flatbed, 9' Aluminum - F450 Hd Xl $96,700 1-Ton Hd Ex Cab, Body & Crane - F550 Hd Xl $148,000 1-Ton Flatbed, 9' Steel - F450Hdxl 4X $114,000 1-Ton Hd Ext Cab, Body & Crane 1 $148,000 3/4 Ton Hd Pickup R Cab L/Bx - Silverado 2500Hd $49,000 1-Ton Hd, Ext Cab 4X4 F $75,200 Blower, Handheld - Bg $300 Crane Assembly $25,000 Crane Assembly For Truck H $25,000 Pickup, 1/2 Ton Rcab,Shortbx - F-150 4X $31,000 Trailer, Single, Light Duty - No Model Number $5,500 Trailer, Tandem, Emergency - Custom $8,000 Trailer, Tandem, Utility - Trailers $19,500 Trailer, Tandem Axle Lowbed $19,500 Trailer, Traffic Pole $8,000 Trailer, Tandem, Cbl Reel, 22' - No Model Number $8,000 Trailer, Traffic Reele/Pole 1 $46,900 Trailer, Tandem Single Axle Utility $8,500 Trailer, Compressor 375 CFM 1 1 $45,600 Truck, Aerial - F $173,000 Truck, Aerial 37' with JIB $242,000 Truck, Aerial - Fl $242,000 Truck, Aerial 37' with JIB $242,000 Truck, Aerial 37' - F $173,000 Truck, Aerial 37' F550 Hd Xl 1 $173,000 Truck, Auger, Boom, Aerial $242,000 Van, 3/4 Ton - Savana $32,000 Van, Cargo, 1 Ton - E $34,000 Van, Cargo, 1 Ton - Ford E-350 Hd $34,000 Van, Cube, 1 Ton $61,000 Van, Cube, 14' Unicell - E $61,000 Pickup, 1/2 Ton E Cab ShortBx WT $31,000 Sander, Slp-in Stainless 8' 1 $17,300 Scissor Lift 1 1 $60,300

121 Page B-14 Service Standard Calculation Sheet Service: Unit Measure: Services Related to a Highway - Roads and Related Vehicles No. of vehicles and equipment Description Value ($/Vehicle) Paint Stripper $11,000 Sodablaster/Graffiti Remover $10,700 Sweeper $6,700 Power Pack, Hydraulic, Troller $5,300 Traffic -Supervisors Pickup, 1/2 Ton, E Cab, S Box - Silverado CC $31,000 Pickup, 1/2 Ton, E Cab, S Box - F150 XL $31,000 Pickup, 1/2 Ton, E Cab, S Box - F150XL 1 1 $31,000 R & W -Supervisors Pickup, 1/2 Ton, R Cab, S Box - F150XL $31,000 Pickup, 1/2 Ton - F150 XL $31,000 Pickup, 1/2 Ton, R Cab, S Box - F150XL $31,000 Pickup, 1/2 Ton, E Cab, 4 Door - F $31,000 Pickup, 1/2 Ton E Cab ShortBx WT $31,000 Pickup, 1/2 Ton, E Cab, S Box - F150XL $31,000 Pickup, 3/4 Ton Hd, R Cab, L Box - Silverado 2500HD $49,000 Pickup, 1/2 Ton, E Cab, S Box - F150XL $31,000 Pickup, 1/2 Ton, E Cab, S Box - F150XL $31,000 Truck, 1/2 Ton, L Box - F150 XL $31,000 Pickup, 1/2 Ton, E Cab, S Box - F150 XL 1 $31,000 Pickup, 1/2 Ton, E Cab, S Box - F150 XL $31,000 Pickup, 1/2 Ton - F $31,000 Pickup, 1/2 Ton E Cab ShortBx WT $31,000 E & C -Surveys Van, 1 Ton - Van Express $34,000 Pickup, 1/2 Ton Ext Cab Shtbox Wt $31,000 Van, 1 Ton Super Duty - E350SD $34,000 Van, Cargo, 3/4 Ton - E250 HD $34,000 Van, 1 Ton - Express $34,000 Van, Cargo, 1 Ton - E $34,000 Engineering & Construction Van, 3/4 Ton - E $32,000 Van, 3/4 Ton - E $32,000 Pickup, 1/2 Ton, S Box - Silverado CC $31,000 Pickup, 1/2 Ton, E Cab, S Box - F150 XL $31,000 Pickup, 1/2 Ton, R Cab, L Box - F150 XLT $37,000

122 Page B-15 Service Standard Calculation Sheet Service: Unit Measure: Services Related to a Highway - Roads and Related Vehicles No. of vehicles and equipment Description Value ($/Vehicle) Pickup, 1/2 Ton, E Cab - C $31,000 Pickup, 1/2 Ton E Cab ShortBx WT $31,000 Pickup, 1/2 Ton, R Cab, S Box - F150XL $27,000 Sewer Inspection Camera pearpoint 200' camera $12,000 Sewer Flow Monitoring Equipment $30,000 Truck, Vacuum Eductor El-Con $200,000 Development Services Pickup, 1/2 Ton, R Cab, S Box - F150XL $31,000 Pickup, 1/2 Ton, E Cab, S Box - F150XL $31,000 Pickup, 1/2 Ton, R Cab, S Box - F150 HX $31,000 Pickup, 1/2 Ton E Cab ShortBx WT $31,000 Pickup, 1/2 Ton, E Cab, S Box - F150XL $31,000 Central Operations Admin Pickup, 3/4 Ton - GMC $36,000 Pickup, 1/2 Ton E Cab ShortBx WT $31,000 Pickup, 1/2 Ton - 4X2 ShortBx $31,000 Central Operations Fuel System $500,000 Building Automation System $175,000 Crane - West service bays $50,000 Crane - South sides $72,000 Crane - Body shop $35,000 Crane - Eng/Ag tech area $4,000 Crane - Welding bay $27,000 Waste Oil Tank $30,000 Paint Booth - Tech Services $80,000 Paint Booth - Fleet Garage $182,000 Hoist - Small Engine Area - Bay $20,000 Hoist - Small Engine Area - Bay $25,000 Hoist - Small Engine Area - Bay $25,000 Hoist - Main Fleet Garage - Bay $150,000 Hoist - Main Fleet Garage - Bay $25,000 Hoist - Main Fleet Garage - Bay $150,000 Hoist - Main Fleet Garage - Bay $30,000 Hoist - Main Fleet Garage - Bay $150,000

123 Page B-16 Service Standard Calculation Sheet Service: Unit Measure: Services Related to a Highway - Roads and Related Vehicles No. of vehicles and equipment Description Value ($/Vehicle) Hoist - Main Fleet Garage - Bay $35,000 Hoist - Main Fleet Garage - Bay 14 1 $372,000 Hoist - Main Fleet Garage - Bay $30,000 Hoist - Main Fleet Garage - Bay $150,000 South East Depot Fuel System $300,000 Waste Oil Tank $30,000 North Operations Fuel System $540,000 Total Population 170, , , , , , , , , ,832 Per Capita Standard Year Average Quantity Standard Quality Standard $83,285 Service Standard $108 DC Amount (before deductions) 15 Year Forecast Population 48,716 $ per Capita $108 Eligible Amount $5,274,481

124 Page B-17 Service Standard Calculation Sheet Service: Unit Measure: Fire Facilities ft² of building area Description Bld'g Value ($/ft²) Value/ft² with land, site works, etc. Fire Station No.1 5,619 5,619 5,619 5,619 5,619 5,619 5,619 5,619 5,619 5,619 $369 $883 Fire Station No. 2 5,673 5,673 5,673 5,673 5,673 5,673 5,673 5,673 5,673 5,673 $418 $1,025 Fire Station No. 3 11,090 11,090 11,090 11,090 11,090 11,090 11,090 11,090 11,090 11,090 $370 $732 Fire Station No. 4 4,525 4,525 4,525 4,525 4,525 4,525 4,525 4,525 4,525 4,525 $408 $947 Fire Station No. 5 5,906 5,906 5,906 5,906 5,906 5,906 5,906 5,906 5,906 5,906 $470 $1,280 Fire Training Facility 5,856 5,856 5,856 5,856 5,856 5,856 5,856 5,856 5,856 5,856 $743 $1,554 Fire Protection Office 2,000 2,000 2,000 2,000 2,000 2,000 2,000 2,000 2,000 $290 $1,099 Fire Prevention Training $295 $1,107 Fire Training Centre Fitness Tower $342 $342 Burn-Smoke Building 5,288 5,288 5,288 5,288 5,288 5,288 5,288 5,288 5,288 5,288 $349 $1,159 Quonset Hut No $126 $947 Quonset Hut No. 2 1,250 1,250 1,250 1,250 1,250 1,250 1,250 1,250 1,250 1,250 $138 $946 Fire Station No. 6 (Two Storey) 8,470 8,470 8,470 8,470 8,470 8,470 8,470 8,470 8,470 8,470 $336 $509 Fire Station No. 7 (One Storey) 6,335 6,335 6,335 6,335 6,335 6,335 6,335 7,951 7,951 7,951 $378 $645 Fire Station No. 9A 2 7,687 7,687 7,687 $527 $527 Fire Administration Space at Town Hall 2,015 2,015 2,015 2,015 2,015 2,015 2,015 $239 $300 Fire Station No. 8 (Land Only - Acres) $1,056,921 $1,056,921 Total 61,188 63,188 63,188 65,203 65,203 65,203 65,203 74,506 74,826 74,826 Population 170, , , , , , , , , ,832 Per Capita Standard Year Average Quantity Standard Quality Standard $908 Service Standard $333 1 Land cost is part of the Fire Training Facility 2 Land cost is part of the Public Works/Parks Facilities DC Amount (before deductions) 15 Year Forecast Population 48,716 $ per Capita $333 Eligible Amount $16,240,940

125 Page B-18 Service Standard Calculation Sheet Service: Unit Measure: Fire Vehicles No. of vehicles Description Value ($/Vehicle) Aerial - Crewcab 75' Lad $1,130,000 Aerial - Crewcab 105' Lad $1,130,000 Aerial - Ladder 101' L $1,525,000 Aerial - Tandem $1,525,000 Aerial - Gladiator Ff 23M1000 Sg Fm $1,275,000 Aerial - Truck, Mr686P 1 $1,130,000 Aerial - Pumper,L242 1 $1,275,000 Car & Sw - Focus, 4-Door $30,000 Car & Sw - 2-Door $25,000 Car & Sw - Versa, 5-Door $37,000 Command V - Rexhall $1,000,000 Haz-Mat P $796,000 Haz-Mat - Truck, S-1954 Series 1 $796,000 Pumper - La France $852,000 Pumper - Fl $852,000 Pumper P $852,000 Pumper - Custom Smeal/Spartan Dia $852,000 Pumper - Spartan $852,000 Pumper - Truck, Volvo Fe 1 $852,000 Pumper - Ga41M $852,000 Pumper $852,000 Pumper - Spartan,Thibeault P $852,000 Pumper - Spartan P $852,000 Rescue - Fl $650,000 Rescue - Spartan R $852,000 Rescue - Gladiator Ff $682,000 Rescue - Spartan $852,000 Tanker P $650,000

126 Page B-19 Service Standard Calculation Sheet Service: Unit Measure: Fire Vehicles No. of vehicles Description Value ($/Vehicle) Trailer - Trailer, Single Axle, Enclosed $5,400 Trailer - Trailer, Single Axle $2,200 Trailer - Trailer, Single Axle $2,200 Trailer - Tandem, Lowbed $12,000 Truck/Suv - F $36,000 Truck/Suv - F250 Hd $41,000 Truck/Suv - F250 Hd $41,000 Truck/Suv - 1/2 Ton $35,000 Truck/Suv - Blazer Ls $39,000 Truck/Suv - Excursion Xlt $68,000 Truck/Suv - Ford, 3/4 Ton Ext Cab $34,000 Truck/Suv - Expedition $57,000 Truck/Suv - Explorer Xlt $39,000 Truck/Suv - Explorer Xlt $39,000 Truck/Suv - Explorer Xlt $39,000 Truck/Suv - Explorer Xlt $39,000 Truck/Suv - Explorer Xlt $39,000 Truck/Suv - Explorer Xlt $39,000 Truck/Suv - 3/4 Ton Hd, Crewcab $41,000 Truck/Suv - Explorer Xlt $39,000 Truck/Suv - Explorer Xlt $39,000 Truck/Suv - Expedition Max $57,000 Truck/Suv - Cab 3/4 Ton Hd 4X2 Sw $41,000 Truck/Suv Silverado, 1-Ton $41,000 Truck/Suv - Ford Escape $41,000 Truck/Suv - Ford Escape $41,000

127 Page B-20 Service Standard Calculation Sheet Service: Unit Measure: Fire Vehicles No. of vehicles Description Value ($/Vehicle) Van , 1-Ton $67,000 Minivan - Cargo Public Educ $31,000 Van , 1-Ton $67,000 Van , 1-Ton $67,000 Minivan - Cargo SCBA $31,000 Van - 18' Aluminum Body $75,000 Minivan - Cargo $31,000 Van - Passenger $33,000 Total Population 170, , , , , , , , , ,832 Per Capita Standard Year Average Quantity Standard Quality Standard $344,733 Service Standard $103 DC Amount (before deductions) 15 Year Forecast Population 48,716 $ per Capita $103 Eligible Amount $5,038,209

128 Page B-21 Service Standard Calculation Sheet Service: Unit Measure: Fire Small Equipment and Gear No. of equipment and gear Description Value ($/item) Personal Firefighter Equipment $10,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Total Population 170, , , , , , , , , ,832 Per Capita Standard Year Average Quantity Standard Quality Standard $9,518 Service Standard $10 DC Amount (before deductions) 14 Year Forecast Population 48,716 $ per Capita $10 Eligible Amount $510,057

129 Page B-22 Service Standard Calculation Sheet Service: Unit Measure: Parking Spaces and Vehicles No. of spaces and vehicles Description Value ($/space) Spaces $0 Lot Church St $3,000 Lot Church St $2,800 Lot Church St $2,700 Lot 5 - Dunn St $2,500 Lot Randall St $6,000 Lot 6A Church St $3,000 Lot Dunn St - South Of Church $10,500 Lot Randall St $3,800 Lot 10 - Central Library Site $3,100 Lot 11A - Oakville Centre Site $3,800 Lot 11B - Fire Station Site $3,300 Lot Washington St $3,400 Lot Navy St $2,100 Lot Thomas St $3, Church St Parking Garage $8,300 Pay And Display Machines Church St $9, Church St $9,300 Church St $9,300 Robinson St $9,300 Dunn & Church $9, Reynolds St $9,300 1St Fl Parking Garage $9,300 Lakeshore Rd E $9, Navy St $9, Washington Ave $9,300 Navy St $9,300 Thomas St $9,300 Lakeshore Rd E - Navy to Thomas $9,300 Lakeshore Rd E - Thomas to George $9,300 Lakeshore Rd E - George to Dunn $9,300 Lakeshore Rd E - Dunn to Trafalgar $9,300

130 Page B-23 Service Standard Calculation Sheet Service: Unit Measure: Parking Spaces and Vehicles No. of spaces and vehicles Description Value ($/space) Lakeshore Rd E - Trafalgar to Reynolds $9,300 Lakeshore Rd E - Reynolds to Allan $9,300 Navy St - LSRE to Church $9,300 Thomas St - LSRE to Robinson $9,300 Thomas St - LSRE to Church $9,300 George St - LSRE to Church $9,300 Dunn St - LSRE to Robinson $9,300 Dunn St - LSRE to Church $9,300 Trafalgar Rd - LSRE to Robinson $9,300 Reynolds St - LSRE to Robinson $9,300 Sealed Collection System $11,300 Pay By License Plate Machines Lot Church St $9,300 Lot Church St $9,300 Lot Church St $9,300 Lot 5 - Dunn St $9,300 Lot 6A Church St $9,300 Lot Dunn St - South Of Church $9,300 Lot Randall St $9,300 Lot 10 - Central Library Site $9,300 Lot 11A - Oakville Centre Site $9,300 Lot 11B - Fire Station Site $9,300 Lot Washington St $9,300 Lot Navy St $9,300 Lot Thomas St $9,300 $0 Vehicles Car, Compact - Dodge SX $18,000 Car, Compact - Cavalier 2 $18,000 Car, Mid-size 4 Door - SX $18,000 Car, Compact - SX $18,000 Car, Mid-size - Focus SE $31,000 Car, Mid-size - Focus SE $31,000

131 Page B-24 Service Standard Calculation Sheet Service: Unit Measure: Parking Spaces and Vehicles No. of spaces and vehicles Description Value ($/space) Car, Compact - Civic Hybrid $32,000 Car, Compact 4 Door - Fiesta SE $25,000 Car, Compact - Civic Hybrid $34,800 Car, Compact - 200LX $31,000 Car, Compact - Civic Hybrid $32,000 Car, Compact - Cruze LT Turbo $31,000 SUV - Ford Escape 5 $32,000 Minivan, Cargo $35,000 Total Population 170, , , , , , , , , ,832 Per Capita Standard Year Average Quantity Standard Quality Standard $5,330 Service Standard $25 DC Amount (before deductions) 10 Year Forecast Population 42,360 $ per Capita $25 Eligible Amount $1,061,118

132 Page B-25 Service Standard Calculation Sheet Service: Unit Measure: Parking Land m 2 of Parking Lot area Description Value ($/m 2 ) Land Lot Church St. 1,285 1,285 1,285 1,285 1,285 1,285 1,285 1,285 1,285 1,285 $3,700 Lot Church St. 2,401 2,401 2,401 2,401 2,401 2,401 2,401 2,401 2,401 2,401 $3,700 Lot Church St. 1,678 1,678 1,678 1,678 1,678 1,678 1,678 1,678 1,678 1,678 $3,800 Lot 5 - Dunn St. 1,124 1,124 1,124 1,124 1,124 1,124 1,124 1,124 1,124 1,124 $2,900 Lot Randall St $3,800 Lot 6A Church St. 1,410 1,410 1,410 1,410 1,410 $3,800 Lot Dunn St $3,500 Lot Randall St. 2,095 2,095 2,095 2,095 2,095 2,095 2,095 2,095 2,095 2,095 $3,500 Lot 10 - Central Library Site 1,953 1,953 1,953 1,953 1,953 1,953 1,953 1,953 1,953 1,953 $1,900 Lot 11A - Oakville Centre Site $1,900 Lot 11B - Fire Station Site 1,877 1,877 1,877 1,877 1,877 1,877 1,877 1,877 1,877 1,877 $1,900 Lot Washington St 1,500 1,500 1,500 1,500 1,500 1,500 1,500 1,500 1,500 1,500 $1,900 Lot Water Street 1,440 1,440 1,440 1,440 1,440 1,440 1,440 1,440 1,440 1,440 $1,900 Lot Water Street $1,900 Lot Navy St $3,500 Lot Thomas St $3,500 Parking Reynolds 2,143 2,143 2,143 2,143 2,143 2,143 2,143 2,143 2,143 2,143 $3,800 Total 20,137 21,128 21,128 21,128 21,128 22,538 22,538 22,538 22,538 22,538 Population 170, , , , , , , , , ,832 Per Capita Standard Year Average Quantity Standard Quality Standard $2,977 Service Standard $354 DC Amount (before deductions) 10 Year Forecast Population 42,360 $ per Capita $354 Eligible Amount $14,996,287

133 Page B-26 Service Standard Calculation Sheet Service: Unit Measure: Parking Facilities ft² of building area Description Bld'g Value ($/ft²) Value/ft² with land, site works, etc. Parking Operations 4,448 4,448 4,448 4,448 4,448 4,448 $176 $202 Wyecroft Southeast Satellite 1,200 1,200 1,200 1,200 $281 $288 Total 1,200 1,200 1,200 1,200 4,448 4,448 4,448 4,448 4,448 4,448 Population 170, , , , , , , , , ,832 Per Capita Standard Year Average Quantity Standard Quality Standard $504 Service Standard $9 DC Amount (before deductions) 10 Year Forecast Population 42,360 $ per Capita $9 Eligible Amount $363,025

134 Page B-27 Service Standard Calculation Sheet Service: Unit Measure: Park Buildings ft² of building area Description Bld'g Value ($/ft²) Bronte Athletic Park - Utility $326 Bronte Heritage - Utility $326 Busby - Utility $326 Sovereign Park - Fieldhouse $252 Greenhouse - Major Bldg St 12,250 12,250 12,250 12,250 12,250 12,250 12,250 12,250 12,250 12,250 $114 Gairloch Gardens - Maintenance/Work Shed $236 Coronation Park - Utility $326 Wallace Park Tennis Club - Major Bldg St $183 Bronte Tennis Club - Major Bldg St 1,700 1,700 1,700 1,700 1,700 1,700 1,700 1,700 1,700 1,700 $178 Oakville Lawn Bowling Club - Major Bldg 2,335 2,335 2,335 2,335 2,335 2,335 2,335 2,335 2,335 2,335 $253 Oakville Little League - Major Bldg St 2,000 2,000 2,000 2,000 2,000 2,000 2,000 2,000 2,000 2,000 $179 Bloomfield Park - Utility $326 Castlebrook Park - Utility $416 Cornwall Road Sports Park - Utility $326 Gairloch Gardens - Utility $326 Glenashton Park - Utility $326 Glenashton Park - Utility $326 Grand Oak Park - Utility $326 Harman Gate Park - Utility $326 Heritage Way - Utility $326 Memorial Park - Utility $326 Millbank Park - Utility $326 Millstone Park - Utility $326 Munn's Creek - Utility $326 Nautical Park 1 - Utility/ Hy-Grade Service $326 Neyagawa - Utility $326 North Park - Utility $326 Nottinghill - Utility $326 Old Abbey Lane - Utility $326 Palermo Park - Utility/ Hy-Grade Building $326 Pine Glen Community Park - Fieldhouse $246 Pine Glen - Utility $326 Pinery Park - Utility $325 Post Park - Utility $322 Postridge Park - Utility $326

135 Page B-28 Service Standard Calculation Sheet Service: Unit Measure: Park Buildings ft² of building area Description Bld'g Value ($/ft²) Q.E Park - Utility $326 River Glen Park - Utility $326 River Oaks - Utility $326 Southeast Sports Fields - Utility $326 Sixteen Hollow - Utility $326 Valleybrook - Utility $326 Valleyridge - Utility $326 West Oak Trails Community Park - Utility $326 West Oak Trails Community Park - Utility $326 West Oak Trails Community Park - Utility $326 West Oak Trails Community Park - Utility $326 Aspen Forest - Utility $291 Isaac Park - Utility 96 $326 Holton Heights - Utility $506 Westwood Park - Utility $326 Central Operations Depot 32,297 32,297 32,297 32,297 32,297 32,297 32,297 32,297 32,297 32,297 $260 Parks Central Depot 11,100 11,100 11,100 11,100 11,100 11,100 11,100 11,100 11,100 11,100 $200 Southeast Satellite * 7,700 7,700 7,700 7,700 8,900 8,900 8,900 8,900 8,900 8,900 $363 Southeast Satellite 2,600 2,600 2,600 2,600 2,600 2,600 2,600 2,600 2,600 2,600 $208 Salt & Sand Structure 1,872 1,872 1,872 1,872 1,872 1,872 1,872 1,872 1,872 1,872 $430 North Operations Depot 3,747 3,747 3,747 $527 North Operations Pk and Traffic Storage 1,237 1,237 1,237 $189 Total 78,292 78,292 78,660 78,441 79,836 79,836 79,836 85,015 85,117 85,213 Population 170, , , , , , , , , ,832 Per Capita Standard Year Average Quantity Standard Quality Standard $244 Service Standard $108 DC Amount (before deductions) 10 Year Forecast Population 42,360 $ per Capita $108 Eligible Amount $4,565,561 * Parking Operations occupied 1,200 sq. ft. of space at the Southeast Satellite Depot from 2007 to 2010

136 Page B-29 Service Standard Calculation Sheet Service: Unit Measure: Parkland Development Hectares of Parkland Description Value ($/Ha) Community Link Park Avonhead Ridge Trail $169,700 Avonhead Ridge Trail $169,700 Crosstown Trail (Ir) $169,700 Crosstown Trail (Ro) $169,700 Crosstown Trail (Wot) $169,700 Donovan Bailey Park $169,700 Glen Abbey Trail $169,700 Indian Ridge Trail $169,700 Interprovincial Pipeline (Ir) $169,700 Interprovincial Pipeline (Ro) $169,700 Interprovincial Pipeline (Wot) $169,700 Morrison-Wedgewood Channel $169,700 Morrison-Wedgewood Channel $169,700 Ontario Hydro/College Park $169,700 Ontario Hydro/Glen Abbey $169,700 Ontario Hydro/River Oaks $169,700 Petro Canada Pipeline Alley $169,700 Community Park Bronte Athletic Park $305,100 Bronte Beach Park $305,100 Bronte Bluffs $305,100 Bronte Harbour Park $305,100 Bronte Heritage Park $305,100 Busby Park $305,100 Burloak Waterfront Park 0.17 $305,100 Centennial Park $305,100 Chris Volkes Memorial Park $305,100 Cornwall Road Greenhouses $87,700 Coronation Park $305,100 Crusaders Rugby Club Park $305,100 Erchless Estates Park $305,100 Fisherman's Wharf $305,100

137 Page B-30 Service Standard Calculation Sheet Service: Unit Measure: Parkland Development Hectares of Parkland Description Value ($/Ha) Gairloch Gardens $305,100 Glen Abbey Park $305,100 Glenashton Park $305,100 Glenashton Park $305,100 Hampstead Road Parkette $305,100 Hillmer Park $305,100 Memorial Park $305,100 North Park South $305,100 Oakville Park $305,100 Palermo Park $305,100 Pine Glen Community Park $305,100 River Oaks Park $305,100 Shell Park $305,100 Shipyard Park $305,100 South Shell Waterfront Park $305,100 Tannery Park $305,100 Towne Square $305,100 Trafalgar Park $305,100 Valley Crest Parkette $305,100 Water Street Park $305,100 West Oak Trails Comm Park Ph $305,100 West Oak Trails Community Park $305,100 Neighbourhood Park Albion Park $194,000 Aldercrest Park $194,000 Algrove Park $194,000 Anderson Street Parkette $194,000 Annapolis Park $194,000 Applewood Park $194,000 Ardleigh Park $194,000 Arkendo Park $194,000 Aspen Forest Park $194,000 Aspen Forest Park $194,000 Aspen Forest Park $194,000 Bel Air Promenade $194,000 Birch Hill Promenade $194,000

138 Page B-31 Service Standard Calculation Sheet Service: Unit Measure: Parkland Development Hectares of Parkland Description Value ($/Ha) Birchtree Trail $194,000 Bishopstoke Park $194,000 Bloomfield Park $194,000 Brock Parkette $194,000 Bronte Gore Park $194,000 Brookdale Park $194,000 Burnet Park $194,000 Candy Cane Park $194,000 Canonridge Park $194,000 Carol Park $194,000 Carrington Promenade $194,000 Castlebrook Park $194,000 Castlebrook Park $194,000 Castlefield Park $194,000 Chamberlain Walk Park $194,000 Chancery Promenade $194,000 Chisholm Street Parkette $194,000 Clear Creek Park $194,000 Clearview Park $194,000 Cornwall Road Sports Park $194,000 Craigleith Parkette $194,000 Dashwood Parkette $194,000 Deer Run Park $194,000 Dingle Park $194,000 Dorval Trail $194,000 Dunvegan Park $194,000 Edgeware Park $194,000 Elm Road Park $194,000 Elmwood Parkette $194,000 Emily Cline Neighbourhood Park $194,000 Esplanade Promenade $194,000 Fairmount Park $194,000 Falgarwood Park $194,000

139 Page B-32 Service Standard Calculation Sheet Service: Unit Measure: Parkland Development Hectares of Parkland Description Value ($/Ha) First Street Promenade $194,000 Fleetwood Park $194,000 Florence Park $194,000 Forster Park $194,000 Gainsborough Park $194,000 George Street Parkette $194,000 George's Square $194,000 George's Square Bt $194,000 Glen Allen Park $194,000 Glen Oak Park $194,000 Golden Meadow Park $194,000 Grand Oak Park $194,000 Greenery Parkette $194,000 Grenville Park $194,000 Harbourside Promenade $194,000 Harbourside Walkway $194,000 Harman Gate Park $194,000 Heath Parkette $194,000 Heritage Park $194,000 Heritage Way Park $194,000 Holten Heights Park $194,000 Holyrood Park $194,000 Hopedale Park $194,000 Horton Way Parkette $194,000 Isaac Park $194,000 Jennings Park $194,000 Jonathan Park $194,000 Kaitting House Parkette $194,000 Kingsford Gardens $194,000 Kingsridge Parkette $194,000 Kingsway Park $194,000 Lakeside Park $194,000 Langtry Park $194,000 Laurelwood Park $194,000 Lawson Park $194,000 Lawson Playground Park $194,000 Leewood Parkette $194,000

140 Page B-33 Service Standard Calculation Sheet Service: Unit Measure: Parkland Development Hectares of Parkland Description Value ($/Ha) Leighland Park $194,000 Lindsay Park $194,000 Lisonally Promenade $194,000 Litchfield Park $194,000 Lyndhurst Park $194,000 Lyndhurst Parkette $194,000 Lyons Lane Garden Plots $194,000 Maple Valley Park $194,000 Maplegrove Park $194,000 Margaret Drive Park $194,000 Margot Street Park $194,000 Marine Drive Park $194,000 Market Square $194,000 Martindale Park $194,000 Millbank Park $194,000 Millstone Park Pk $194,000 Mississaga Parkette $194,000 Mohawk Park $194,000 Montrose Abbey Park $194,000 Morden Park $194,000 Munn's Creek Park $194,000 Nautical Park $194,000 Nena Woods Park $194,000 Nena Woods Pond $194,000 Neyagawa Park $194,000 Normandy Park $194,000 North Ridge Parkette $194,000 North Ridge Trail Park $194,000 Notley Park $194,000 Nottinghill Park $194,000 Oakdale Park $194,000 Odessa Parkette $194,000 Old Abbey Park $194,000 Old Mill Parkette $194,000

141 Page B-34 Service Standard Calculation Sheet Service: Unit Measure: Parkland Development Hectares of Parkland Description Value ($/Ha) Ontario Street Park $194,000 Orsett Park $194,000 Ortona Park $194,000 Oxford Park $194,000 Palermo School $194,000 Pearson Park $194,000 Perkin's Passage $194,000 Pilgrim's Way $194,000 Pinegrove Park $194,000 Pinery Park $194,000 Post Park $194,000 Postridge Park $194,000 Potters Wheel Park $194,000 Preserve Promenade $194,000 Q.E. Park $194,000 Queens Parkette $194,000 Raymar Promenade $194,000 Rebecca Gardens $194,000 Reservoir Park $194,000 Ridgeview Park $194,000 Rimmington Park $194,000 River Glen Park $194,000 Riverbank Park $194,000 Riverview Park $194,000 Runnymead Park $194,000 Samuel Curtis Parkette $194,000 Sandy Lane Parkette $194,000 Seabrook Park $194,000 Second Street Promenade $194,000 Sedgewick Forest $194,000 Sheridan Gardens Parkette $194,000 Sheridan Hills $194,000 Sheridan Valley Park $194,000 Sheridan Valley Park South $194,000

142 Page B-35 Service Standard Calculation Sheet Service: Unit Measure: Parkland Development Hectares of Parkland Description Value ($/Ha) Grand Boulevard Park $194,000 Shorewood Promenade $194,000 Sir John Colborne Park $194,000 Sixteen Hollow Park $194,000 Sixth Line Parkette $194,000 South Shell Park $194,000 Southeast Sports Fields $194,000 Sovereign Park $194,000 Spring Garden Park $194,000 Stratus Drive Park $194,000 Suffolk Park $194,000 Sunningdale Park $194,000 Tecumseh Park $194,000 Thornlea Park $194,000 Twelve Mile Creek Lookout $194,000 Valleybrook Park $194,000 Valleyridge Park $194,000 Victoria Park $194,000 Walker Street Promenade $194,000 Wallace Park $194,000 Warren Drive Park $194,000 Water's Edge Park $194,000 Waterworks Park $194,000 Waubanoka Parkette $194,000 Wedgewood Park $194,000 West Ham Parkette $194,000 Westbrook Park $194,000 Westview Terrace Parkette $194,000 Westwood Park $194,000 Westwood Park $194,000 West Street Promenade $194,000 Wilder Park $194,000 Wilmot Park $194,000 Windfield Parkette $194,000 Windrush Park $194,000 Woodhaven Park $194,000

143 Page B-36 Service Standard Calculation Sheet Service: Unit Measure: Parkland Development Hectares of Parkland Description Value ($/Ha) Woodridge Parkette $194,000 Worthington Park $194,000 Wynten Way Park $194,000 Tableland Woodlot Arbourview Woods $87,700 Bayshire Woods Park $87,700 Beechnut Forest Park $87,700 Brockberry Woods Park $87,700 Chalmers Park $87,700 Charnwood Park $87,700 Clearview Woods $87,700 Colonel Williams Woods Parkette $87,700 Colonel Williams Woods Parkette $87,700 Cornwall Road Buffer $87,700 Cornwall Woods $87,700 Creek Path Woods $87,700 Deerwood Park $87,700 Glen Abbey Woods $87,700 Grand Oak Woods $87,700 Great Lakes Woods $87,700 Iroquois Shoreline Wood $87,700 Kings Park Woods $87,700 Lancaster Woods $87,700 Manor Parkette $87,700 Nautical Woods $87,700 Neyagawa Woods $87,700 Nightingale Woods $87,700 Oakville Woods $87,700 Old Upper Middle Road Park $87,700 Pelee Woods Park $87,700 Preserve Woods $87,700 Taplow Creek Woods $87,700 Village Wood Park $87,700 Winston Woods $87,700 Woodgate Woods $87,700

144 Page B-37 Service Standard Calculation Sheet Service: Unit Measure: Parkland Development Hectares of Parkland Description Value ($/Ha) Undeveloped Parkland Buttonbush Parkette 0.29 $13,400 Fowley Park 2.11 $13,400 George Savage Park $13,400 George Savage Promenade $13,400 Greenwich Neighbourhood Park $13,400 Joshua Meadows Community Park $13,400 Linbrook Park $13,400 Lower Base Line Park $13,400 North Park Northwest $13,400 ORC North of $13,400 Squire Parkette $13,400 The Parkway $13,400 West Oakville Sports Park $13,400 Total Population 170, , , , , , , , , ,832 Per Capita Standard Year Average Quantity Standard Quality Standard $158,091 Service Standard $711 DC Amount (before deductions) 10 Year Forecast Population 42,360 $ per Capita $711 Eligible Amount $30,135,328

145 Page B-38 Service Standard Calculation Sheet Service: Unit Measure: Parkland Amenities No. of parkland amenities Description Value ($/item) Boardwalks Clear Creek Park BW $411,000 Sixteen Mile Creek N Umr Bwalk $108,600 Fisherman's Wharf $159,300 Washrooms Bronte Heritage Park MS (Fisherman's Wharf) $130,600 Bronte Heritage Park Washroom $540,500 Bronte Heritage/Marina Washroom $540,500 Forster Park MS $132,100 Lakeside Park MS $420,000 Oakville Park MS $273,900 South Shell Park - Washroom $226,000 Wallace Park MS $155,300 West Oak Trails Community Park $483,700 Isaac Park Washroom 1 $308,400 Bronte Athletic Park - Fieldhouse $564,800 Shell Park - Washroom $775,600 Coronation Park - Fieldhouse $218,600 Coronation Park - Washroom $1,390,500 Coronation Park - Stone Barn - Designated $216,700 Lawson Park - Washroom $567,400 Bronte Beach Park - Fieldhouse $840,800 Bronte Beach Park - Washroom $1,245,300 Tannery Park - Fieldhouse $577,500 Tannery Park Work Shed - Washroom $1,099,600 Shade Structures Bloomfield Park - Shelter Pavilions $44,400 Bronte Heritage Park - Shelter Pavilions $147,100 Castlebrook Park - Picnic Shelter $55,000 Castlebrook Park - Picnic Shelter $55,000 Colonel Willams Pond Park - Picnic Shelter $70,200 Colonel Williams Woods - Shelter Pavilions $52,200

146 Page B-39 Service Standard Calculation Sheet Service: Unit Measure: Parkland Amenities No. of parkland amenities Description Value ($/item) Coronation Park - Picnic Pad A $11,500 Coronation Park - Picnic Pad B $12,500 Coronation Park - Picnic Pad C $12,500 Coronation Park - Picnic Pad D $16,800 Craigleith Parkette - Shelter Pavilions Pg $8,500 Craigleith Parkette - Shelter Pavilions Pg $8,500 Creek Path Woods Shade Structure $40,000 Fairmount Park - Shelter Pavilions $59,200 Falling Green Pond - Shelter Pavilions $137,700 Glenashton Park - Hard cover seating $47,600 Glenashton Park - Hard cover seating $47,600 Glenashton Park - Picnic Shelter $86,600 Glenashton Park - Entrance Feature $36,800 Grand Oak Park - Shelter Pavilions $45,700 Heritage Way Pk Picnic Shelter Heritage Way $81,300 Lawson Park - Shelter Pavilion Tennis Court $21,200 Lyndhurst Park - Shelter Pavilions $27,100 Lyndhurst Park - Shelter Pavilions $27,100 Millbank Park - Shelter Pavilions $27,700 Millstone Park - Pavilion $51,800 Nautical Park - Picnic Shelter $58,100 Neyagawa Park $36,800 Nena Woods Park - Shelter Pavilions $28,700 North Ridge Trail Park - Shelter Pavilions $31,400 North Ridge Trail Park - Shelter Pavilions $31,400 Nottinghill Park Pergola 1 $15,000 Old Mill Parkette $65,000 Pine Glen Community Park - Shelter Pavilions $86,300 Pinery Park - Shelter Pavilions $86,200 Postridge Park - Shelter Pavilions $85,600 Sixteen Hollow Park $36,800 South Shell Park - Shade Structure $75,000 Shell Park Pergola $15,000 South Shell Park / Great Lakes - Shelter $50,000

147 Page B-40 Service Standard Calculation Sheet Service: Unit Measure: Parkland Amenities No. of parkland amenities Description Value ($/item) Valleyridge Park - Shade Structure $69,300 Woodgate Woods - Shelter Pavilions $31,600 George's Square - Shelter Pavilions $71,600 Lakeside Park - Shelter Pavilions $123,800 Memorial Park - Shade Structure 1 1 $18,500 Memorial Park - Shade Structure 2 1 $18,500 Memorial Park - Shade Structure 3 1 $18,500 Memorial Park - Shade Structure 4 1 $18,500 Greenwhich Park - Shade Structure $40,000 Old Abbey Lane - Shade Structure 1 $40,000 Preserve Promenade - Shade Structure 1 1 $255,000 Preserve Promenade - Shade Structure 2 1 $150,000 Kaitting House Park - Shade Structure $64,000 Horton Park - Shade Structure $69,000 Isaac Park - Shade Structure 1 1 $94,000 Isaac Park - Shade Structure 2 1 $55,000 Emily Cline Park - Shade Structure $56,000 Lion's Valley - Picnic Shelter A 1 $77,500 Lion's Valley - Picnic Shelter B 1 $77,500 Ortona Park - Shade Structure 1 $40,500 Kingsford Gardens - Shade Structure $34,000 Valleybrook Park - Shade Structure $48,000 Maitland Pond - Shade Structure $40,000 Greenery Parkette - Shelter $60,000 Picnic Shelters Bronte Harbour - Shelter Pavilions $83,200 Busby Park - Shelter Pavilions $83,300 Busby Park - Shelter Pavilions $39,000 Coronation Park - Shelter Pavilions $146,300 Lion's Valley - Picnic Shelter A 1 $77,500 Lion's Valley - Picnic Shelter B 1 $77,500

148 Page B-41 Service Standard Calculation Sheet Service: Unit Measure: Parkland Amenities No. of parkland amenities Description Value ($/item) Bandshell Coronation Park Bandshell $1,023,200 Gateways and Entrance Features Memorial Park Steel Gateway 1 $44,000 Memorial Park Wood Gateway 1 $44,000 Greenery Parkette Trellis $40,000 Harman Gate Park Trellis $40,000 Horton Park Entrance Feature $10,000 Kaitting Park Entrance Feature $10,000 Kaitting Park Commemorative Wall $35,000 Isaac Park Trellis 1 $38,000 Information Kiosks Sixteen Mile Information Kiosks $15,000 Sixteen Mile Trail Information Kiosks $15,000 Kingsford Gardens Information Kiosk $15,000 Glenashton Park Information Kiosk $15,000 Shipyard Park Information Kiosk $15,000 Fisherman's Wharf Information Kiosk $15,000 Tannery Park Information Kiosk $15,000 Bronte Creek Lands Information Kiosk $15,000 Community Gardens Kingsford Gardens $56,100 Lyons Lane $45,600 Shell Park $36,600 Outdoor Pools Bronte Pool-Lawson Park $910,100 Brookdale Park Pool $910,100 Falgarwood Park Pool $910,100 Lions Pool-Trafalgar Park $910,100 Wedgewood Park Pool $910,100

149 Page B-42 Service Standard Calculation Sheet Service: Unit Measure: Parkland Amenities No. of parkland amenities Description Value ($/item) Major Soccer Lit Fields Bronte Athletic Park SF $1,846,000 North Park SF $572,000 Pine Glen Community Park SF $572,000 Pine Glen Community Park SF $572,000 Pine Glen Community Park SF $572,000 Pine Glen Community Park SF $572,000 Shell Park SF $572,000 Shell Park SF $572,000 West Oak Trails Community SF $572,000 West Oak Trails Community SF $572,000 Unlit Fields Bloomfield Park SF $388,000 Glen Allen Park SF $388,000 Grand Oak Park SF $388,000 Harman Gate Park SF $388,000 Heritage Way Park SF $388,000 Holten Heights Park SF $388,000 Isaac Park SF 1 $388,000 Isaac Park SF 1 $388,000 Kingsford Gardens SF $388,000 Nautical Sports Fields SF $388,000 Oakville Park SF $388,000 Oakville Park SF $388,000 Post Park SF $388,000 Q.E. Park SF $388,000 Q.E. Park SF $388,000 Q.E. Park SF $388,000 Rebecca Gardens SF $388,000 Shell Park SF $388,000 Shell Park SF $388,000 Southeast Sports Fields SF $388,000

150 Page B-43 Service Standard Calculation Sheet Service: Unit Measure: Parkland Amenities No. of parkland amenities Description Value ($/item) Westbrook Park SF $388,000 Oakville Park - Soccer Field North (formerly WOSS) 1 $388,000 Oakville Park - Soccer Field North (formerly WOSS) 1 $388,000 Oakville Park - Soccer Field North (formerly WOSS) 1 $388,000 Shared use of School Fields for Major Soccer Holy Trinity Secondary School $388,000 St. Ignatius of Loyola $388,000 St. Thomas Aquinas $388,000 Abbey Park High School $388,000 Iroquois Ridge High School $388,000 Maple Grove Public School $388,000 Oakville Trafalgar High School $388,000 T.A. Blakelock High School $388,000 W.O.S.S. North Campus $388,000 W.O.S.S. North Campus - north $388,000 W.O.S.S. North Campus - south $388,000 W.O.S.S. South Campus - north $388,000 W.O.S.S. South Campus - south $388,000 St. Dominic RC School $388,000 Garth Webb SS $388,000 Minor Soccer Aldercrest Park SF $146,000 Aspen Forest Park SF $146,000 Aspen Forest Park SF $150,500 Aspen Forest Park SF $150,500 Castlebrook Park SF $146,000 Clearview Park SF $146,000 Clearview Park SF $146,000 Falgarwood Park SF $146,000 Glen Allen Park SF $146,000 Glenashton Park SF $146,000 Glenashton Park SF $146,000

151 Page B-44 Service Standard Calculation Sheet Service: Unit Measure: Parkland Amenities No. of parkland amenities Description Value ($/item) Holten Heights Park SF $146,000 Hopedale Park SF $146,000 Jonathan Park SF $146,000 Kingsford Gardens SF $146,000 Kingsford Gardens SF $146,000 Millstone Park SF $146,000 Morden Park SF $146,000 Munn's Creek Park $146,000 Nottinghill Park SF $146,000 Nottinghill Park SF $146,000 Oxford Park SF $146,000 Petro Canada Park SF $146,000 Petro Canada Park SF $146,000 Pilgrim's Way SF $146,000 Pilgrim's Way SF $146,000 Pine Glen Community Park SF 1 $146,000 Pine Glen Community Park SF 1 $146,000 Pinery Park SF $146,000 Pinery Park SF $146,000 Postridge Park SF $146,000 Ridgeview Park SF $146,000 Sheridan Hills SF $146,000 Sunningdale Park SF $146,000 Valleyridge Park SF $146,000 Shared use of School Fields for Minor Soccer St. Thomas Aquinas $146,000 New Central Public School 0.66 $146,000 New Central Public School $146,000 Brookdale Public School $146,000 E.J. James Public School $146,000 Eastview Public School $146,000 Falgarwood School $146,000 Linbrook Public School $146,000 Linbrook Public School $146,000

152 Page B-45 Service Standard Calculation Sheet Service: Unit Measure: Parkland Amenities No. of parkland amenities Description Value ($/item) Lorne Skuce Public School $146,000 Munn's Public School $146,000 Montclair Public School $146,000 Oakwood Public School $146,000 Post's Corners Public School $146,000 Sunningdale Public School $146,000 W.H. Morden Public School $146,000 West Oak Public School $146,000 St. Johns SS $146,000 Artificial Turf Fields Bronte Athletic Park - Football Field $1,846,000 North Park - Soccer Field $1,846,000 River Oaks Park - Soccer Field $1,846,000 Hardball Diamonds Lit Diamonds Cornwall Road Sports Park BD $814,000 Cornwall Road Sports Park BD $814,000 Glen Abbey Park BD $814,000 Oakville Park BD $814,000 River Oaks Park BD $814,000 River Oaks Park BD $814,000 Unlit Diamonds Neyagawa Park BD $529,000 Neyagawa Park BD $529,000 Postridge Park BD $529,000 River Glen Park BD $529,000 Wallace Park BD $529,000 Shared use of School Fields for Hardball Diamond Oakwood Public School $529,000

153 Page B-46 Service Standard Calculation Sheet Service: Unit Measure: Parkland Amenities No. of parkland amenities Description Value ($/item) Softball Diamonds (Major & Minor) Major Lit Glen Abbey Park BD $648,000 Glenashton Park BD $648,000 Glenashton Park BD $648,000 River Oaks Park BD $648,000 Trafalgar Park BD $648,000 Trafalgar Park BD $648,000 West Oak Trails Park BD $648,000 Major Unlit Clearview Park BD $404,000 Deer Run Park BD $404,000 Langtry Park BD $404,000 Laurelwood Park BD $404,000 Millbank Park BD $404,000 Morden Park $404,000 Munn's Creek P.S. BD 1 1 $404,000 Nottinghill Park BD $404,000 Sixteen Hollow Park BD $404,000 Westbrook Park BD $404,000 Woodhaven Park BD $404,000 Wynten Way Park BD $404,000 Minor Lit Palermo Park BD $602,000 Palermo Park BD $602,000 Minor Unlit Bronte Athletic Park BD $358,000 Brookdale Park BD $358,000 Falgarwood Park BD $358,000 Heritage Way Park BD $358,000 Hopedale Park BD $358,000 Lawson Park BD (Grass Diamond) $358,000 Lindsay Park BD $358,000 Millbank Park BD $358,000 Neyagawa Park 1 1 $358,000 Q.E. Park BD $358,000

154 Page B-47 Service Standard Calculation Sheet Service: Unit Measure: Parkland Amenities No. of parkland amenities Description Value ($/item) Reservoir Park BD 1 1 $358,000 Seabrook Park BD $358,000 Southeast Sports Fields BD $358,000 Sunningdale Park BD $358,000 Thornlea Park BD $358,000 Wedgewood Park BD $358,000 Windrush Park BD $358,000 Shared use of School Fields for Softball Holy Family RC School $358,000 St. John RC School $358,000 Eastview Public School $358,000 Gladys Speers Public School $358,000 Maple Grove Public School $358,000 Munn's Public School $358,000 Pilgrim Wood Public School $358,000 Tennis Courts Lit Courts Forster Park TC $254,000 Glen Abbey Park TC $254,000 Holten Heights Park TC $254,000 Lawson Park TC $254,000 Q.E. Park TC $254,000 River Oaks Park TC $254,000 Trafalgar Park TC $254,000 Wallace Park TC $254,000 Wallace Park TC $254,000 Unlit Courts Aldercrest Park TC $162,000 Ardleigh Park TC $162,000 Bishopstoke Park TC $162,000 Bloomfield Park TC $162,000 Castlefield Park TC $162,000 Deer Run Park TC $162,000 Glen Oak Park TC $162,000

155 Page B-48 Service Standard Calculation Sheet Service: Unit Measure: Parkland Amenities No. of parkland amenities Description Value ($/item) Glenashton Park TC $162,000 Heritage Way Park TC $162,000 Hopedale Park TC $162,000 Jonathan Park TC $162,000 Leighland Park TC $162,000 Litchfield Park TC $162,000 Maplegrove Park TC $162,000 Old Abbey Park TC $162,000 Oxford Park TC $162,000 River Glen Park TC $162,000 Sheridan Hills Park TC $162,000 Sovereign Park TC $162,000 Valleybrook Park TC $162,000 Windrush Park TC $162,000 Bocce Courts Trafalgar Park Bocce Crts $5,400 Basketball Courts Full Courts Bloomfield Park Basketball Crt $29,000 Castlebrook Park Basketball Crt $29,000 Falgarwood Park Basketball Crt $29,000 Forster Park Basketball Crt $29,000 Glen Abbey Park Basketball Crt $29,000 Maplegrove Park Basketball Crt 1 $29,000 Nautical Park Basketball Crt 1 1 $29,000 Old Abbey Lane Park Basketball Crt 1 $29,000 River Glen Park Basketball Crt $29,000 Trafalgar Park Basketball Crt $29,000 Valleybrook Park Basketball Crt $29,000 Half Courts Deer Run Park 1 1 $14,000 Kingsford Gardens Basketball Crt (half) $14,000 Normandy Park Basketball Crt (half) $14,000 Pelee Woods Basketball Crt (half court) $14,000 Q.E. Park Basketball Crt $14,000

156 Page B-49 Service Standard Calculation Sheet Service: Unit Measure: Parkland Amenities No. of parkland amenities Description Value ($/item) Volleyball Courts Coronation Park Volleyball Crt $1,881,500 Hockey Court Kingsford Gardens Hockey Crt $12,000 Field Hockey Glen Abbey Park FH $200,000 Glenashton Park FH $124,900 Cricket Pitches Glenashton Park Cricket Pitch $82,000 Leash Free Dog Parks Glenashton Park Leash Free $66,500 Kingsford Gardens Leash Free $66,500 North Park Leash Free $66,500 Palermo Park Leash Free $66,500 Post Park Leash Free $66,500 Shell Park Leash Free $66,500 Waterplay - Splash Pads Coronation Park Splash Pad $238,000 Forster Park Splash Pad $238,000 Heritage Way Park Splash Pad $238,000 Isaac Park Splash Pad 1 $238,000 Millbank Park Splash Pad $238,000 Munn's Creek Park Splash Pad $238,000 Nautical Park Splash Pad $238,000 Neyagawa Park Splash Pad $238,000 Old Abbey Lane Park Splash Pad $238,000 Pine Glen Park Splash Pad $238,000 Postridge Park Splash Pad $238,000 Sixteen Hollow Park Splash Pad $238,000 Valleybrook Park Splash Pad $238,000 Valleyridge Park Splash Pad $238,000 West Oak Trails Park Sp Pad $238,000 Wynten Way Park Splash Pad $238,000

157 Page B-50 Service Standard Calculation Sheet Service: Unit Measure: Parkland Amenities No. of parkland amenities Description Value ($/item) Colonel William Pkwy PG Sr $207,000 Cornwall Road Sports Park PG $207,000 Coronation Park PG #1 Sr $207,000 Coronation Park PG #2 Jr $105,000 Craigleith Parkette PG Jr $105,000 Craigleith Parkette PG Sr $207,000 Creek Path Woods Park PG Sr $207,000 Deer Run Park PG Sn $207,000 Dunvegan Park PG Sr $207,000 E. J. James School PG Sr $207,000 Eastview School PG Sr $207,000 Ecole Forest Trail PS PG $207,000 Elm Road Park PG Sr $207,000 Emily Cline Park PG Combo $251,000 Fairmount Park PG #1 Sr $207,000 Fairmount Park PG #2 Jr $105,000 Falgarwood Park PG Sr $207,000 Falgarwood Public School PG Sr $207,000 Florence Park PG Sn $207,000 Forster Park PG # 1 Sr $207,000 Forster Park PG # 2 Jr $105,000 Gladys Speers School PG Sr $207,000 Glen Abbey Park PG #1 Sr $207,000 Glen Abbey Park PG #2 Jr $105,000 Glen Allen Park PG #1 Sr $207,000 Glen Allen Park PG #2 Jr $105,000 Glen Oak Creek Trail PG Sr $207,000 Glen Oak Creek Trail PG Sr $207,000 Glen Oak Park PG Sr $207,000 Glenashton Park PG # $207,000 Glenashton Park PG Jr $105,000 Golden Meadow Park PG $207,000 Grand Blvd Park PG SR $207,000 Grand Blvd Park PG JR $105,000 Grand Oak Park PG #1 Sr $207,000 Grand Oak Park PG #2 Jr $105,000

158 Page B-51 Service Standard Calculation Sheet Service: Unit Measure: Parkland Amenities No. of parkland amenities Description Value ($/item) Greenery Parkette PG Sr $207,000 Greenwich Playground Combo $251,000 Grenville Park PG $207,000 Harman Gate Park PG # $207,000 Harman Gate Park PG # $105,000 Harman Gate Park PG Jr $105,000 Harman Gate Park PG Sr $207,000 Heritage Way Park PG 1 1 $251,000 Heritage Way Park PG Jr $105,000 Heritage Way Park PG Sr $207,000 Holten Heights Park PG #1 Sr $207,000 Holten Heights Park PG #2 Jr $105,000 Hopedale Park PG $251,000 Hopedale Park PG Jr $105,000 Hopedale Park PG Sr $207,000 Horton Parkette PG $207,000 Isaac Park PG 1 $190,000 James W Hill School PG $207,000 Jennings Park PG $207,000 Jonathan Park PG Sr $207,000 Kaitting House Parkette PG $105,000 Kingsford Gardens PG $105,000 Kingsway Park PG #1 Sr $207,000 Kingsway Park PG #2 Jr $105,000 Lakeside Park PG $207,000 Langtry Park PG #1 Sr $207,000 Langtry Park PG # $105,000 Laurelwood Park PG #1 Sr $207,000 Laurelwood Park PG #2 Jr $105,000 Lawson Park PG # $207,000 Lawson Playground Park PG Jn $105,000 Lawson Playground Park PG Sn $207,000 Lindsay Park PG Sr $207,000 Lion's Valley Park PG Sr $207,000 Litchfield Park PG Sr $207,000 Ecole Secondaire Gaetan (formerly Lorne Skuc $207,000

159 Page B-52 Service Standard Calculation Sheet Service: Unit Measure: Parkland Amenities No. of parkland amenities Description Value ($/item) Lyndhurst Park PG #1 Sr $207,000 Lyndhurst Park PG #2 Jr $105,000 Maple Grove School PG Sr $207,000 Maple Valley Park PG Sn $207,000 Maplegrove Park PG Sn $207,000 Margaret Drive Park PG Sr $207,000 Margot Street Park PG Sr $207,000 Marine Drive Park PG $207,000 Martindale Park PG #1 Sr $207,000 Martindale Park PG #2 Jr $105,000 Memorial Park PG 1 $251,000 Millbank Park PG Combo $251,000 Millstone Park PG Jr $105,000 Millstone Park PG Sr $207,000 Mohawk Park PG $251,000 Mohawk Park PG Sr $207,000 Montclair School PG $207,000 Morden Park PG Sr $207,000 Morden School PG Sr $207,000 Munn's Creek Park PG Jr $105,000 Munn's Creek Park PG Sr $207,000 Nautical Park PG Jr $105,000 Nautical Park PG Sr $207,000 Nena Woods Park PG #1 Sr $207,000 Nena Woods Park PG #2 Jr $105,000 New Central School PG Sr $207,000 Neyagawa Park PG #1 Sr $207,000 Neyagawa Park PG #2 Jr $105,000 Normandy Park PG Sr $207,000 North Ridge Trail Park PG Jr $105,000 North Ridge Trail Park PG Sr $207,000 Notley Park PG Sr $207,000 Nottinghill Gate Park PG Sr $207,000 Oakdale Park PG $251,000 Oakdale Park PG Sr $207,000 Oakwood School PG Jr $105,000

160 Page B-53 Service Standard Calculation Sheet Service: Unit Measure: Parkland Amenities No. of parkland amenities Description Value ($/item) Oakwood School PG Sr $207,000 Old Abbey Lane Park PG Jn $105,000 Old Abbey Lane Park PG Sn $207,000 Ortona Park SR PG 1 $207,000 Ortona Park JR PG 1 $105,000 Oxford Park PG #1 Sr $207,000 Oxford Park PG #2 Jr $105,000 Palermo School PG $207,000 Pelee Woods Park PG Sr $207,000 Pilgrim's Way Park PG Sr $207,000 Pine Glen Park PG #1 Sr $207,000 Pine Glen Park PG #2 Jr $105,000 Pinegrove Park PG Sr $207,000 Pinegrove School PG Sr $207,000 Pinery Park PG #1 Sr $207,000 Pinery Park PG #2 Jr $105,000 Pinewood Park PG Sn $207,000 Post Corners P School PG Sr $207,000 Post Park PG Sn $207,000 Postridge Park PG #1 Sr $207,000 Postridge Park PG #2 Jr $105,000 Potters Wheel Park PG Sr $207,000 Queen Elizabeth Park PG Sr $207,000 Rebecca Gardens PG Sr $207,000 Ridgeview Park PG Sr $207,000 River Glen Park PG #1 Sr $207,000 River Glen Park PG #2 Jr $105,000 Riverbank Way Park PG Sn $207,000 Runnymead Park PG Sr $207,000 Seabrook Park PG Sr $207,000 Shell Park PG $207,000 Sheridan School PG Sr $207,000 Sheridan Valley Park PG Combo $251,000 Sixteen Hollow Park PG #1 Sr $207,000

161 Page B-54 Service Standard Calculation Sheet Service: Unit Measure: Parkland Amenities No. of parkland amenities Description Value ($/item) Sixteen Hollow Park PG #2 Jr $105,000 South Shell Park PG Combo $251,000 Spring Garden Park PG $207,000 Stratus Parkette PG SN (Falling Green Pond) $251,000 Suffolk Park PG Sr $207,000 Sunningdale Park PG #1 Sr $207,000 Sunningdale Park PG #2 Jr $105,000 Tecumseh Park PG Sr $207,000 Thornlea Park PG Sr $207,000 Trafalgar Park PG #1 Sr $207,000 Trafalgar Park PG #2 Jr $105,000 Valleybrook Park PG Jn $105,000 Valleybrook Park PG Sn $207,000 Valleyridge Park PG #1 Sr $207,000 Valleyridge Park PG #2 Jr $105,000 Waubanoka Parkette PG Sr $207,000 Wedgewood Park PG Sn $207,000 West Oak Trail Comm Park PG Jr $105,000 West Oak Trail Comm Park PG Sr $207,000 Westbrook Park PG Sr $207,000 Wilder Park PG Sr $207,000 Wilmot Park PG $207,000 Windrush Park PG Sr $207,000 Woodgate Woods PG Jr $105,000 Woodgate Woods PG Sr $207,000 Woodhaven Park PG #1 Sr $207,000 Woodhaven Park PG #2 Jr $105,000 Wynten Way Park PG Sr $207,000 Stairs Birch Hill Promenade St $53,500 Bronte Bluffs St $59,600

162 Page B-55 Service Standard Calculation Sheet Service: Unit Measure: Parkland Amenities No. of parkland amenities Description Value ($/item) Bronte Bluffs St $104,000 Bronte Creek Trail Stairs 1 1 $89,500 Bronte Harbor Park St $35,000 Brook Valley Park St $16,000 Centennial Plaza St S/B $291,400 Erchless Estate St $71,900 Fisherman's Wharf St $20,600 Fisherman's Wharf St $16,500 Fisherman's Wharf St $16,500 Fisherman's Wharf St $14,400 Fisherman's Wharf St $20,600 Gairloch Gardens St $39,100 Gairloch Gardens St $6,600 Gairloch Gardens ST $9,500 Gairloch Gardens ST $9,800 Gairloch Gardens ST $8,500 Gairloch Gardens ST $30,400 Gairloch Gardens ST $10,000 Glen Oak Creek Trail St $59,600 Hillmer Park St $26,700 Hillmer Park St $71,900 Hopedale Park ST $1,500 Iroquois Shore Line Woods $16,300 Iroquois Shore Line Woods 1 1 $57,000 Iroquois Shore Line Woods 2 1 $14,000 Joshua Valley Park St $78,000 Joshua Valley Park St $90,400 Kings Park Woods St $18,200 Kings Park Woods St $6,100 Kings Park Woods St $8,000 Laurelwood Park St $101,100 Laurelwood Park St $19,800 Lion's Valley Park St $18,500 Lion's Valley Park St $37,000

163 Page B-56 Service Standard Calculation Sheet Service: Unit Measure: Parkland Amenities No. of parkland amenities Description Value ($/item) Market Square S/B 1-24, Lawn Bowling Club $24,700 Mccraney Creek Trail St $74,000 Mccraney Creek Trail St $47,300 Mccraney Valley Park St $22,700 Mccraney Valley Park St $82,200 Mccraney Valley Park St $27,700 Mccraney Valley Park St $20,100 Morrison Valley S Umr St $43,200 Morrison Valley S Umr St 1 1 $70,000 Morrison Valley S Umr St $108,900 Munn's Creek Trail St $24,700 Munn's Creek Trail St $18,500 Oakdale Park St $37,000 Raymar Promenade ST $40,000 River Oaks Park ST $2,000 River Oaks Park St $2,000 Sheridan Valley Park St $42,500 Sheridan Valley Park St $46,500 Sheridan Valley Park St $8,100 Sheridan Valley Park St $18,600 Sheridan Valley Park St $101,500 Sheridan Valley Park St $134,900 Sheridan Valley Park St $101,500 Sheridan Valley Park St $134,900 Sheridan Valley Park St $3,500 Shipyard Park St $69,900 Shipyard Park St $74,000 Shipyard Park St $80,100 Shipyard Park St $226,100 Shipyard Park St $185,000 Sixteen Mile Creek N Umr St $160,300 Sixteen Mile Creek N Umr St $59,600 Sixteen Mile Creek N Umr St $59,600 Sixteen Mile Creek N Umr St $59,600

164 Page B-57 Service Standard Calculation Sheet Service: Unit Measure: Parkland Amenities No. of parkland amenities Description Value ($/item) Sixteen Mile Creek N Umr St $59,600 Tannery Park St $45,200 Tannery Park St $69,900 Tannery Park St 3 (Closed) $45,200 Tannery Park St $16,300 Tannery Park St $6,000 Tannery Park St $6,000 Taplow Creek Trail (Ga) St $26,700 Taplow Creek Trail (Ga) St 1 1 $78,500 Trafalgar Park $22,700 Wedgewood Park St $4,400 Wedgewood Park St $39,100 Wedgewood Park St $12,100 Wedgewood Park St $20,800 West Street Promenade St $4,000 Wildwoods Park St $6,600 Wildwoods Park St $6,600 Bridges Arbourview Trail BRG $96,800 Arbourview Trail BRG $96,800 Arbourview Trail BRG $84,000 Arbourview Trail BRG $96,800 Bayshire Woods Park BRG $30,400 Bayshire Woods Park BRG $30,400 Bayshire Woods Park BRG $30,400 Bayshire Woods Park BRG $30,400 Brook Valley Park BRG $53,600 Brook Valley Park BRG $200,100 Castlebrook Park BRG $141,100 Clear Creek Park BRG $131,300 Colonel Williams Trail Br $60,900 Coronation Park BRG $50,100 Coronation Park BRG $30,400 Coronation Park BRG $17,600

165 Page B-58 Service Standard Calculation Sheet Service: Unit Measure: Parkland Amenities No. of parkland amenities Description Value ($/item) Coronation Park BRG $15,000 Creek Path Woods BRG $66,400 Creek Path Woods BRG $260,300 East Fourteen Mile Creek BRG $50,700 East Fourteen Mile Creek BRG $102,500 East Joshua Creek Trail BRG $81,200 Falling Green Pond BRG (Stratus) $37,500 Fourteen Mile Creek Trail BRG $101,900 Fourteen Mile Creek Trail BRG $72,100 Fourteen Mile Creek Trail BRG $60,900 Fourteen Mile Creek Trail BRG $60,900 Fourteen Mile Creek Trail BRG $60,900 Fourteen Mile Creek Trail BRG $60,900 Gairloch Gardens BRG $30,400 Glen Abbey Trail BRG $23,800 Glen Abbey Trail BRG $100,000 Glen Oak Creek Trail BRG $60,800 Glen Oak Creek Trail BRG $77,300 Glen Oak Creek Trail BRG $86,900 Glen Oak Creek Trail BRG $96,300 Glen Oak Park BRG $59,300 Glen Oak Park BRG $97,400 Glen Oak Park BRG $49,500 Glen Oak Park BRG $91,500 Glenayr Gate Trail BRG $89,600 Glen Orchy Bridge $188,000 Hays Trail BRG2 1 $110,000 Hemmford Pond BRG $27,500 Indian Ridge Trail BRG $20,500 Indian Ridge Trail BRG $71,100 Iroquois Shoreline Wood BRG $27,500 Iroquois Shoreline Wood BRG1 1 $70,500 Iroquois Shoreline Wood BRG $53,600 Iroquois Shoreline Wood BRG3 1 1 $23,300 Iroquois Shoreline Wood BRG $20,500 Joshua Valley Park BRG $33,200 Joshua Valley Park BRG $57,000

166 Page B-59 Service Standard Calculation Sheet Service: Unit Measure: Parkland Amenities No. of parkland amenities Description Value ($/item) Joshua Valley Park BRG $120,500 Kings Park Woods BRG $25,700 Kings Park Woods BRG $95,800 Lion's Valley Park BRG $230,000 Lion's Valley Park BRG $50,700 Lion's Valley Park BRG $50,700 Mccraney Creek Trail BRG1 (behind Pilgrim Wood School) $29,000 Mccraney Creek Trail BRG1 (N UMR, E 3rd Line) $35,000 Mccraney Creek Trail BRG2 (N UMR, E 3rd Line) $73,500 Mccraney Creek Trail BRG3 (behind 1218 Old Colony Rd) $4,000 Mccraney Valley Park BRG $55,200 Mccraney Valley Park BRG $92,000 Mccraney Valley Park BRG $26,600 Mccraney Valley Park BRG $29,000 Mccraney Valley Park BRG $84,000 Mccraney Valley Park BRG $38,400 Mccraney Valley Park BRG $47,900 Mccraney Valley Park BRG $42,000 Mccraney Valley Park BRG $40,400 Memorial Park Galvanized ST BR $162,000 Morrison Valley North Umr BRG $21,600 Morrison Valley North Umr BRG $99,700 Morrison Valley North Umr BRG $96,800 Morrison Valley North Umr BRG $189,200 Morrison Valley North Umr BRG $41,000 Morrison Valley North Umr BRG $41,000 Morrison Valley South Umr BRG $47,900 Morrison Valley South Umr BRG $47,900 Morrison Valley South Umr BRG $38,400 Morrison Valley South Umr BRG $47,900 Morrison Valley South Umr BRG $56,500

167 Page B-60 Service Standard Calculation Sheet Service: Unit Measure: Parkland Amenities No. of parkland amenities Description Value ($/item) Morrison Valley South Umr BRG $68,800 Munn's Creek Trail BRG $79,700 Munn's Creek Trail BRG1 1 $317,200 Munn's Creek Trail BRG $23,300 Munn's Creek Trail BRG $23,300 Munn's Creek Trail BRG $41,700 Munn's Creek Trail - 3 BRG 1 1 $235,000 Nipegon Trail BRG $218,100 Oakdale Park BRG $21,900 Oakdale Park BRG $96,700 Oakville Park BR $35,000 Oakville Woods BRG $44,600 Old Abbey Park BRG $31,300 Old Abbey Park BRG $81,300 Old Abbey Park BRG $31,800 Perkin's Passage BR $10,000 Pinewood Park BRG $57,900 Pinewood Park BRG $67,000 Pinery Pond BRG $75,000 Shannon Creek Trail BRG $23,300 Shannon Creek Trail BRG $37,500 Sheldon Creek Trail BRG $60,800 Sheldon Creek Park BRG $115,000 Sheldon Creek Park BRG $115,000 Shell Park BRG $82,700 Shell Park BRG $180,200 Shell Park BRG $31,300 Shell Park BRG $168,400 Sheridan Valley Park BRG $28,900 Sheridan Valley Park BRG $117,500 Sheridan Valley Park BRG $40,400 Sixteen Mile Creek N Umr BRG $29,000 Sixteen Mile Creek N Umr BRG $47,900 Sixteen Mile Creek N Umr BRG $29,000 Sixteen Mile Creek N Umr BRG $125,200

168 Page B-61 Service Standard Calculation Sheet Service: Unit Measure: Parkland Amenities No. of parkland amenities Description Value ($/item) Sixteen Mile Creek N Umr BRG $29,000 Sixteen Mile Creek N Umr BRG $29,000 Sixteen Mile Creek N Umr BRG $158,800 Sixteen Mile Creek N Umr BRG $49,300 Sixteen Mile Creek N Umr BRG $43,200 Sixteen Mile Creek N Umr BRG $55,000 Sixteen Mile Creek N Umr BRG $138,900 Sixteen Mile Creek N Umr BRG $216,700 Sixteen Mile Creek N Umr BRG $37,000 Spring Garden Park BRG $82,600 Taplow Creek Trail (Ga) BRG $115,700 Taplow Creek Trail (Ga) BRG $108,600 Taplow Creek Trail (GA) BRG $41,000 Taplow Creek Trail (GA) BRG3 1 $117,000 Taplow Creek Trail (Wot) BRG $96,300 Taplow Creek Trail (Wot) BRG $86,300 Taplow Creek Trail (Wot) BRG $76,800 Taplow Creek Trail (Wot) BRG $95,800 The Parkway BRG $57,900 The Parkway BRG $187,800 The Parkway BRG $30,400 The Parkway BRG $91,600 Thornlea Park BRG $21,900 Village Wood Park BRG $23,800 Wedgewood Park BRG $46,600 Wedgewood Park BRG $61,000 West Oak Trails Community Park $67,400 Wildwoods Park BRG $35,600 Wildwoods Park BRG $34,200

169 Page B-62 Service Standard Calculation Sheet Service: Unit Measure: Parkland Amenities No. of parkland amenities Description Value ($/item) NEW Tannery Park Observation Deck 1 1 $345,000 Tannery Park Beacon 1 1 $685,000 Total Population 170, , , , , , , , , ,832 Per Capita Standard Year Average Quantity Standard Quality Standard $185,355 Service Standard $704 DC Amount (before deductions) 10 Year Forecast Population 42,360 $ per Capita $704 Eligible Amount $29,836,266

170 Page B-63 Service Standard Calculation Sheet Service: Unit Measure: Parkland Trails Linear Km of Paths and Trails Description Value ($/Km) Natural Trails (Valley and T-O-B) $408,900 Total Population 170, , , , , , , , , ,832 Per Capita Standard Year Average Quantity Standard Quality Standard $405,814 Service Standard $284 DC Amount (before deductions) 10 Year Forecast Population 42,360 $ per Capita $284 Eligible Amount $12,033,205

171 Page B-64 Service Standard Calculation Sheet Service: Unit Measure: Harbours No. of Harbours Description Value ($/item) Harbour Infrastructure East Pier $6,197,400 West Pier $1,746,500 Dockage $779,000 Wet Moorings $54,500 Ramps $53,100 Electrical $134,300 Off-Site Security Cameras $58,500 Harbour Buildings (Sq Ft) Bronte Harbour Office Trailer $100 Bronte Harbour Wshrm Trailer $350 Oakville Harbour Washroom Trailer $350 Bronte Marina 5,600 5,600 5,600 5,600 5,600 5,600 5,600 5,600 5,600 5,600 $300 T.O.W.A.R.F. Rescue Facility 2,157 2,157 2,157 2,157 2,157 2,157 2,157 2,157 2,157 2,157 $300 Total 8,323 8,324 8,564 8,564 8,564 8,564 8,564 8,564 8,564 8,564 Population 170, , , , , , , , , ,832 Per Capita Standard Year Average Quantity Standard Quality Standard $627,900 Service Standard $63 DC Amount (before deductions) 10 Year Forecast Population 42,360 $ per Capita $63 Eligible Amount $2,659,784

172 Page B-65 Service Standard Calculation Sheet Service: Unit Measure: Parks Vehicles and Equipment No. of vehicles and equipment Description Value ($/Vehicle) Wm - Parks - Horticulture 1 Ton Pickup Regular Cab - Longbox 4X4 With Plow $70,000 Dump, 1 Ton Crew Cab - F450 Hd Xl $82,000 Excavator - Bv $14,000 Mower, 60" - F $22,500 Mower, 60" - F $22,500 Mower, 60", Side Discharge - F $22,500 Mower, 60",Rear Discharge - F $22,500 Mower, 62 " $22,500 Mower, Ride-On 62 " $29,000 Mower, Ride-On 62 " $29,000 Mower, Rotary 16' - Toro 580-D $116,000 Mower, Rotary, 16' - Hr $116,000 Pickup 3/4 Ton Hd Ext. Cab - F450 Hd $39,000 Pickup 3/4 Ton Hd Ext. Cab - F250 Xl Sbox 1 $39,000 Pickup, 1 Ton E Cab $32,200 Pickup,1 Ton Hd,Crew Cab,Dump - F450 Hd X L $82,000 Pickup,1 Ton Hd,Crew Cab,Dump - F450 Hd X L $82,000 Pickup,1 Ton Hd,Crew Cab,Dump - F450 Hd Xl $82,000 Pickup,1 Ton Hd,Crew Cab,Dump - F450 Hd Xl 1 1 $82,000 Pickup,1 Ton Hd,Crew Cab,Dump - F- 450 Hd Xl $82,000 Pickup,1 Ton Hd,Crew Cab,Dump - F- 450 Hd Xl $82,000 Pickup,1 Ton Hd,Crew Cab,Dump - F4505Dxl $82,000 Pickup,1 Ton Hd,Crew Cab,Dump - F450 Hd Xl 1 1 $82,000

173 Page B-66 Service Standard Calculation Sheet Service: Unit Measure: Parks Vehicles and Equipment No. of vehicles and equipment Description Pickup,1 Ton Hd,Crew Cab,Dump - F- 450Hd 4X2 Xl Pickup,1 Ton Hd,Crew Cab,Dump - F- 450Hd 4X4 Pickup,1 Ton Hd,Crew Cab,Dump - F450Hd Xl 2017 Value ($/Vehicle) $82, $82, $82,000 Dump, 1 Ton Hd Crew Cab - F450 Hd Xl $82,000 Pickup,1 Ton Hd,Crew Cab,Dump - F450 Hd Xl $82,000 Dump, 1 Ton Hd Crew Cab - F450 Hd Xl $82,000 Pickup, 1 Ton Hd Crew Cab,Dump - F- 450 Hd Xl $82,000 Plow, Snow 5-Way 88" $13,000 Plow, Snow, 2-Way 8' - B $13,000 Rake, Power Bar - Attachments, Other $7,100 Tractor - Ford $85,000 Tractor, Ag, 4X4, 56 Hp, W Cab $70,000 Loader, Front End - John Deere $70,000 Tractor, Front End Loader - John Deere $75,000 Tractor, Front End Loader, 4X4 Backhoe $170,000 Tractor, Trails, 4 Wd 33 Hp - New Holland Tc33D Tractor, Loader, Backhoe, 4X4 - John Deere Tractor, Loader & Backhoe - Kubota B21 Tractor, Loader & Backhoe 4X4 - John Deere $43, $70, $35, $75,000 Tractor, Loader & Backhoe 4X4-310SJ $104,000 Trailer, Chipper Bc $90,000

174 Page B-67 Service Standard Calculation Sheet Service: Unit Measure: Parks Vehicles and Equipment No. of vehicles and equipment Description Value ($/Vehicle) Trailer, Chipper - Vermeer BC 1000 Xl $90,000 Trailer, Chipper - Vermeer 2007 Bc 1000 Xl $90,000 Trailer, Chipper - Vermeer BC 1000 Xl $90,000 Trailer, Single Axle Utility - Painted $8,000 Trailer, Single Axle Utility - Rp L $8,000 Trailer, Tandem Axle, Dump - Trailer, Tandem, Dump $10,300 Trailer, Tandem Axle, Dump - Trailer, Tandem, Dump $10,300 Trailer, Tandem, Dump - 7 Ton Dump $12,000 Trailer, Tandem, Dump - 7 Ton Dump $12,000 Trailer, Tandem, Dump - 6X $12,000 Trailer, Tandem, Water, 500 G - Aw6 Ton $19,500 Trailer, Tandem, Water, 500 G - J&J Ld- 2W $19,500 Trailer, Tandem, Water, 500 G - J&J Ld- 2W $19,500 Trailer, Tandem, Water, 500 G - Ld $19,500 Trailer, Tandem, Water, 500 G - WT-2 1 $19,500 Trailer, Tandem, Water, 500 G - WT-2 1 $19,500 Trailer, Tandem, Water, 500 G - Ld $19,500 Trailer, Tandem, Water, 500 G - Ld-2W $19,500 Trailer, Tandem, Water, 500 G - Ld-2W $19,500 Trailer, Tandem, Water, 500 G - No Model Number 1 $19,500 Trailer, Tandem, Water, 500 G - No Model Number 1 $19,500 Trailer, Tandem, Water, 500 G - No Model Number $19,500 Trailer, Tandem, Water - No Model Number $19,500 Trailer, Tandem, Water, 500 G - J&J WT $19,500

175 Page B-68 Service Standard Calculation Sheet Service: Unit Measure: Parks Vehicles and Equipment No. of vehicles and equipment Description Value ($/Vehicle) Trailer, Tandem, Water, 500 G - J&J WT $19,500 Trailer,Tandem,Water,500 G - J&J Ld $19,500 Truck, 1 Ton Crew Cab Hd - F450 Hd Xl 9' Tip $82,000 Truck, 1 Ton Hd 9' Tipbody Cab-F450 Hd Xl $82,000 Utility V Trail Gator 6X4 - Trail Gator 6X $23,500 Utility Vehicle Gator 6X4-6X $23,500 Utility Vehicle Gator 4X4-855D $31,000 Utility Vehicle Gator 6X4-6X $20,000 Van, 3/4 Ton - E $32,000 Van, Cargo, 1/2 Ton - Ford E $30,000 Watering Unit, Skidded Usg (1155 Litre) $6,000 Watering Unit, Skidded - 305Gal Rittenhouse $6,000 Watering Unit, Skidded - 305Gal Rittenhouse $6,000 Watering Unit, Skidded - 200Gal Rittenhouse $6,000 Watering Unit, Skidded - 325Gal Rittenhouse $6,000 Wm - Parks - Turf Maintenance Blower, Leaf, Tractor Attach 1 1 $9,500 Dump, 1 Ton Crew Cab - F450 Hd Xl $82,000 Dump, 1 Ton Crew Cab - F450 Hd Xl $82,000 Mower, 11' 4Wd, 3-Deck D $60,000 Mower, 11' 4Wd, 3-Deck - Toro 4000D 1 1 $60,000 Mower, 3 Deck, 11' Rear Disc - Toro 4000-D $60,000 Mower, 3 Deck, 11' Rear Disc - Toro 4000-D $60,000

176 Page B-69 Service Standard Calculation Sheet Service: Unit Measure: Parks Vehicles and Equipment No. of vehicles and equipment Description Value ($/Vehicle) Mower, 3-Deck 11' Rear Disch - Gm4000D/ $60,000 Mower, 3 Deck, 11' Rear Disc D $60,000 Mower, 62 " 2 Wd Ii $21,000 Mower, 62 " 2 Wd Ii $21,000 Mower, 62" 4Wd Cab II $26,000 Mower, 62 " 2 Wd Ii $21,000 Mower, 62 " 2 Wd Ii $21,000 Mower, 62 " Wheel/Track Convr $58,000 Mower, 62 " Wheel/Track Convr $58,000 Mower, 62 " Wheel/Track Convr $58,000 Mower, 62 " Wheel/Track Convr / $58,000 Mower, 62 " Wheel/Track Convr Toro $58,000 Mower, 62 " Wheel/Track Convr - Toro 30465/ $58,000 Mower, 62 " Wheel/Track Convr $58,000 Mower, 62 " Wheel/Track Convr / $58,000 Mower, 62 " Wheel/Track Convr. 1 1 $58,000 Mower, 62 " Wheel/Track Convr / $58,000 Mower, 62 " Wheel/Track Convr. 1 1 $58,000 Mower, 62 " Wheel/Track Convr. - Toro $58,000 Mower, 62 " Wheel/Track Convr. - Toro $58,000 Mower, 62 " Wheel/Track Convr. - Toro $58,000 Mower, 62 " Wheel/Track Convr. - Toro $58,000 Mower, 62 " Wheel/Track Convr. - Toro $58,000 Mower, 60" - F $22,500

177 Page B-70 Service Standard Calculation Sheet Service: Unit Measure: Parks Vehicles and Equipment No. of vehicles and equipment Description Value ($/Vehicle) Mower, 62 " 4 WD w Cab II $26,000 Mower, 60 ", Rear Discharge - F $22,500 Mower, 62 " 2 WD - John Deere 1435 II $21,000 Mower, 7-Plex 13' Cut D $88,000 Mower, Flail, Rear, 88" - Sh $7,500 Mower, Flail, Rear, Sideshift - Ta $14,000 Mower, 62 " $27,000 Mower, Flail, Side & Rear $41,000 Mower, Ride-On, 62" 2Wd I I $29,000 Mower, Ride-On, 60" Zero Turn - Z997 R 1 $22,500 Mower, Ride-On, 62" 2Wd I I $29,000 Mower, Ride-On, 60" Zero Turn - Z997 R 1 $22,500 Mower, Ride-On, 62" 4Wd I I $29,000 Mower, Ride-On, 62" 4Wd Ii $29,000 Mower, Ride-On, 62" 4Wd Ii $29,000 Mower, Flail, Rear Mount - Sh $7,500 Mower, Flail, Wing Mount - 1S74R $34,500 Mower, Ride-On, 62" 2Wd $29,000 Mower, Ride-On, 62" 2Wd II $29,000 Mower, Ride-On, 62" 2Wd $29,000 Mower, Ride-On, 62" 2Wd II $29,000 Mower, Ride-On, 62" 2Wd $29,000 Mower, Ride-On, 62" 2Wd II $29,000 Mower, Ride-On, 62" 2Wd $29,000 Mower, Ride-On, 62" 4Wd II $29,000 Mower, Ride-On, 62" 2Wd $29,000 Mower, Ride-On, 62" 2Wd II $29,000 Mower, Ride-On, 62" 2Wd $29,000 Mower, Ride-On, 62" 4Wd w Cab II $29,000 Mower, 62 " $29,000 Mower, 62" 2Wd II $29,000

178 Page B-71 Service Standard Calculation Sheet Service: Unit Measure: Parks Vehicles and Equipment No. of vehicles and equipment Description Value ($/Vehicle) Mower, 62 " $29,000 Mower, 62 " Wheel/Track Convr. - Toro $29,000 Mower, 62 " 4 Wd Ii $29,000 Mower, 62 " Wheel/Track Convr. 1 1 $29,000 Mower, 62 " 4 Wd Ii $29,000 Mower, 62 " Wheel/Track Convr. 1 1 $29,000 Mower, 62 " 4 Wd Ii $29,000 Mower, 62 " WD Terrain Cut $29,000 Mower, 62" $29,000 Mower, 62 " Wheel/Track Convr. - Toro $29,000 Mower, 62" $29,000 Mower, 62 " Wheel/Track Convr. - Toro $29,000 Mower, Rotary 16' - Toro 580-D $116,000 Mower, Rotary 16' - Toro 5910-D $116,000 Mower, Rotary, 16' D $116,000 Mower, Rotary, 16' D $116,000 Mower, Rotary, 16' D 1 $116,000 Mower, Rotary, 16 ' - Jacobsen Hr $116,000 Mower, Rotary, 16' - HR $116,000 Pickup 3/4 Ton Hd E.Cab,Winch - F $37,000 Hd 4X4 Srw Pick up, 3/4 Ton E. Cab L Box - F250 Xl $37,000 Pickup, 1 Ton Crew Cab, Dump $82,000 Pickup, 1 Ton, Crew Cab, Dump - Sierra $82,000 Pickup, 1-Ton Hd Crewcab Stake - F450 Hd $55,000 Pickup, 1-Ton Hd Crewcab Dump - F450 Hd 4X $82,000

179 Page B-72 Service Standard Calculation Sheet Service: Unit Measure: Parks Vehicles and Equipment No. of vehicles and equipment Description Value ($/Vehicle) Pickup, 1-Ton Hd Crewcab Stake - F450 Hd $55,000 Pickup, 1-Ton Hd Crewcab Dump - F450 Hd $82,000 Pickup, 1-Ton Hd,Packer - F450 Hd Xl $147,000 Pickup, 1-Ton Hd,Packer - F550 Hd Xl $147,000 Pickup, 1-Ton Hd,Packer - F550 Hd Xl $147,000 Pickup, 1-Ton Hd,Packer - F-550 Hd Xl $147,000 Pickup, 1-Ton Hd,Packer - F-550 Xlt $147,000 Pickup, 1-Ton Hd,Packer - F-550Sdxlt $147,000 Pickup, 3/4 Ton E Cab - Gmc C $39,000 Pickup, 3/4 Ton E.Cab L/Bx 4X4 - F250Xl $39,000 Pickup,1 Ton Hd,Crew Cab,Dump - F450 Hd Xl $82,000 Dump, 1 Ton Hd, Crew Cab, Plow 4X4 - F450 Xl 1 1 $82,000 Pickup,1 Ton Hd,Crew Cab,Dump - F- 450 Hd Xl $82,000 Dump, 1 Ton Hd, Crew Cab, 4X2 - F450 Xl 1 1 $82,000 Pickup,1 Ton Hd,Crew Cab,Dump - F450Hdxl $82,000 Pickup,1 Ton Hd,Crew Cab,Dump - F450Hdxl 4X $82,000 Pickup,1 Ton Hd,Crew Cab,Dump - F450Hd Xl 1 $82,000 Pickup,1 Ton Hd,Crew Cab,Dump - F450Hd Xl 1 $82,000 Pickup,1-Ton Hd Packer,Rear Ld - F550 Sd Xl $100,000 Pickup,1-Ton Hd Packer,Rear Ld - F550Sd Xl $100,000 Pickup,1-Ton Hd Packer,Rear LD 1 1 $100,000 Pickup,1-Ton Hd Packer,Rear LD 1 1 $100,000

180 Page B-73 Service Standard Calculation Sheet Service: Unit Measure: Parks Vehicles and Equipment No. of vehicles and equipment Description Value ($/Vehicle) Pickup,1-Ton Hd,Tip Bdy Crane - F-550 Hd Xl $148,000 Truck, 1/2 Ton Longbx - F150 Xl $25,000 Pickup, 1/2 Ton E.Cab, L/Bx - F $31,000 Plow, Snow, 9 ' 32 Series - 32 Series $13,000 Sander - Sander,Slip-In 8' 1.7 Cu.Yd $17,300 Sander - Slip-In 8' 2.0 Cu Yd 1 1 $17,300 Sander, Slip-In, 8 ' Hydraulic $17,300 Sander - Slip-In 8' 2.0 Cu Yd 1 1 $17,300 Sweeper, Turf - Sweeper Star $41,000 Tractor, 4 WD w Cab M $85,000 Trailer, Single $8,000 Trailer, Single $8,000 Trailer, Single Axle Utility - Ld $8,000 Trailer, Single Axle Utility - Rp L $8,000 Trailer, Triaxle, Lowbed - Ld-3 1 $20,000 Trailer, Single Axle Utility - Rp L $8,000 Trailer, Tandem $19,500 Trailer, Triaxle $20,000 Trailer, Triaxle, Lowbed Galv - LD $20,000 Trailer, Triaxle - Ld $20,000 Trailer, Triaxle, Lowbed Galv - Ld $20,000 Trailer, Triaxle - Trailer, Triaxle, Lowbed, $20,000 Trailer, Triaxle, Lowbed - 24Tr $20,000 Trailer, Triaxle, Lowbed - Ld $20,000 Trailer, Triaxle, Lowbed - Ld $20,000 Trailer, Triaxle, Lowbed - Ld $20,000 Trailer, Triaxle, Lowbed - Ld $20,000 Trailer, Triaxle, Lowbed - Ld $20,000 Trailer, Triaxle, Lowbed - Ld $20,000 Trailer, Triaxle, Lowbed - Ld $20,000 Trailer, Triaxle, Lowbed - Ld $20,000 Trailer, Triaxle, Lowbed - Ld $20,000

181 Page B-74 Service Standard Calculation Sheet Service: Unit Measure: Parks Vehicles and Equipment No. of vehicles and equipment Description Value ($/Vehicle) Trailer, Triaxle, Lowbed - Ld $20,000 Trailer, Triaxle, Lowbed - Ld $20,000 Trailer,Triaxle,Lowbed, Galvan - J&J Ld $20,000 Wm - Parks - Sports Fields 1 Ton Hd Crewcab W/ 9' Dump - F-450 Hd Xl $82,000 Aerator B $6,500 Aerator D Lawn Air E $6,500 Aerator, 7', 3-Pt. Hitch Type - Vc $26,000 Aerator, Attachment, Tractor - Aw050S- 1B37-D $6,500 Aerator - Pro Core $53,000 Aerator, Greens, Self propelled Pro Core $22,000 Attachment, Comb Plane - 526Hd $5,500 Attachment, Plow - 29 Series $8,000 Attachment, Plow - 29Series $8,000 Cab Assembly, Tractor - Eclipse cab $14,500 Cutter, Sod, 18" - Ryan C $5,100 Cutter, Sod, Jr. 18" $6,700 Cutter, Sod, Jr. 18" A $6,700 Cutter, Sod, Jr. 18" A $6,700 Cutter, Sod, 18" - Ryan C $6,700 Cutter, Sod, 18" - Ryan C $6,700 Dump, 1 Ton Hd Crew Cab - F450 Hd $82,000 Groomer, Ball Diamond - Bdm $8,100 Groomer, Ball Diamond - B-Dm $8,100 Groomer, Ball Diamond - Groomer, Ball Diamond $8,100 Groomer, Ball Diamond - PG841PSHB $8,100 Groomer, Synthetic Sports Turf $8,100 Mower, 10' 2" - Hr $64,500 Mower, 10' 2" - Hr $64,500 Mower, 10' 2" - Hr $66,700

182 Page B-75 Service Standard Calculation Sheet Service: Unit Measure: Parks Vehicles and Equipment No. of vehicles and equipment Description Value ($/Vehicle) Mower, 11' Rear Discharge - Gm4000D/ $67,200 Mower, 3-Deck 11' Rear Disch D $60,000 Mower, 3-Deck 11' Rear Disch - Gm4000D/ $60,000 Mower, 5-Plex 9' Cut D $83,800 Mower, 7-Plex 13' Cut D $81,000 Mower, 60" - F $22,500 Mower, 60" - F $22,500 Mower, 7-Plex 13' Cut D $81,000 Mower, Rotary, D 1 1 $116,000 Mower, Rotary, 5-Gang, 8' 8" - Ransome Ar250 Turbo 4Wd $83,300 Mower, 7-Plex 13' Cut D $81,000 Mower, 7-Plex 13' Cut D $81,000 Mower, Ride-On, 62" 4Wd $29,000 Mower, Rotary, 16' - Hr $116,000 Mower, Rotary, 16' - HR $116,000 Mower, Rotary, 16' - Jacobsen Hr $116,000 Mower, Walk Behind, 48" - Hd $8,800 Overseeder - Os1500A $33,000 Overseeder, Attachment A $33,000 Pickup, 1 Ton, E.Cab, 4X4 - F350 Hd Hl $41,000 Pickup, 1/2 Ton, E.Cab, S/Box - F150 Xl $31,000 Pickup 1 Ton E Cab, Dump - Pickup C $65,000 Pickup,1 Ton Hd,Crew Cab,Dump - F450 Hd Xl $82,000 Pickup, 1 Ton, Crew Cab $45,000 Pickup, 1 Ton, Packer - F450 Hd $147,000 Pickup, 3/4 Ton E Cab 4X2 - F250Hd Xl $39,000 Pickup, 3/4 Ton E Cab 4X2 - F250Hd Xl 1 $39,000

183 Page B-76 Service Standard Calculation Sheet Service: Unit Measure: Parks Vehicles and Equipment No. of vehicles and equipment Description Value ($/Vehicle) Pickup, 3/4 Ton E Cab 4X2 - F250Hd Xl $39,000 Pickup, 3/4 Ton E Cab 4X4 - F250Hd Xl 1 $39,000 Pickup,1 Ton Hd,Crew Cab,Dump - F450 Dump $82,000 Pickup,1 Ton Hd,Crew Cab,Dump - F450 Hd 4X $82,000 Pickup,1 Ton Hd,Crew Cab,Dump - F450 Hd Xl $82,000 Pickup,1 Ton Hd,Crew Cab,Dump - F450 Hd 4X $82,000 Pickup,1 Ton Hd,Crew Cab,Dump - F450Hd Xl $82,000 Pickup,1 Ton,Crew Cab,Dump 4X4 - F450Hd Xl 1 $82,000 Pickup,1 Ton Hd,Crew Cab,Dump - F- 450Hdxl 4X $82,000 Dump, 1 Ton Hd, Crew Cab, Plow 4X4 - F450 Xl 1 1 $82,000 Rake, Bunker, Powered D $18,000 Rake, Bunker, Powered Sand Pro $18,000 Roller, Turf, Self Propelled - Tr $6,800 Roller, Asphalt, Combination - Hd12K 1 1 $55,000 Sander, Slip-In 8' 2.1 Cu.Yd. - Mp $17,300 Sander, Slip-In, 8' 2 Cu. Yd. - Procaster 8' Rcsts $17,300 Sander, Slip-In, 8' 2 Cu. Yd. - Fisher Procaster 8' 1 1 $17,300 Sander, Slip-In, 8' 2 Cu. Yd. - Western 8 SS $17,300 Sidewalk Tractor - Mt5 1 1 $85,000 Spreader, Attach, 3-Pt. Hitch $4,100

184 Page B-77 Service Standard Calculation Sheet Service: Unit Measure: Parks Vehicles and Equipment No. of vehicles and equipment Description Value ($/Vehicle) Sweeper, Synthetic Turf - Greens groomer $9,200 Top Dresser, Attachment - Cr $42,200 Top Dresser, Walk Behind - Metermatic F15B $14,900 Tow Type Spreader - E $9,300 Tractor,Loader,4X4 72 Hp,W Cab - Tn75A $75,000 Tractor - John Deere $70,000 Tractor, 4X4, 65 Hp, W Cab - John Deere 5065 M $70,000 Tractor, 4X4, 65 Hp, W Cab - John Deere 5065 M $70,000 Tractor, 4X4, 72 Hp, With Cab - New Holland Tn 755A $70,000 Tractor, 4X4, 72 Hp, With Cab - New Holland Tn 75Sa $70,000 Tractor, Ag, 4X4, 56 Hp, W Cab $70,000 Tractor, Ag, 4X4, 56 Hp, W Cab $70,000 Tractor, Ag, 4X4, 56 Hp, W Cab $70,000 Tractor, Ag, 4X4, 56 Hp, W Cab $70,000 Tractor, Ag, 4X4, 72 Hp, W Cab - Tn75Sa $70,000 Tractor, Utility 2 Wd - John Deere 5220 Tractor $70,000 Tractor, 4X4 w Cab 1 1 $70,000 Tractor, 4X4 w Cab $70,000 Tractor,Loader, 4X4 58 Hp,W Cb - John Deere $70,000 Trailer, Single Axle Low Bed - Ld $8,000 Trailer, Single Axle, Utility - Custom $8,000 Trailer, Single Axle, Utility - Galvanized, Ld $8,000 Trailer, Single Axle, Utility - J&J Ld $8,000 Trailer, Tandem - No Model Number 1 $19,500

185 Page B-78 Service Standard Calculation Sheet Service: Unit Measure: Parks Vehicles and Equipment No. of vehicles and equipment Description Value ($/Vehicle) Trailer, Tandem Axle, Bed Over - Od $19,500 Trailer, Tandem Axle, Bed Over - Od $19,500 Trailer, Tandem Axle, Lowbed - Ld $19,500 Trailer, Tandem, Bed Over - 20T $19,500 Trailer, Tandem Axle, Bed Over - OD $19,500 Trailer, Tandem, Bed-Over - J&J 2005 Od $19,500 Trailer, Topdresser - Td $35,700 Truck, 1 Ton Crew Cab Hd - F450 Hd Xl 9' Tip $82,000 Truck, 1-Ton - C $65,000 Utility Vehicle - Gator 4X $18,000 Watering Unit - Skidded, 375 L 1 $6,000 Sv - Cemetery Operations Trailer, Dump - 4' X 5' Box $5,500 Trailer, Dump - 4' X 5' Box $5,500 Aerator - Dn62N $6,700 Attachments,Seasonal - Attachment, Plow 1 1 $1,500 Chipper, Brush, Tractor Attach D Cyclone $16,000 Detachable Plow - Plow, V-Wing, 8 ' 6 " $7,400 Groomer, Trail, Power Bx Rake - Pr $7,900 Power Rake 1 1 $9,400 Loader, Backhoe, & Plow E $170,000 Backhoe, Extendahoe, 4X4 - BL70B $170,000 Mower, 3-Deck 11' Rear Disch - Gm4000D/ $60,000 Mower, Push - Js $1,100 Pickup, 1 Ton Hd, Dump HD 1 1 $82,000 Pickup 1 Ton Hd, R Cab 4X4 - F 350 Xl 4X $70,000

186 Page B-79 Service Standard Calculation Sheet Service: Unit Measure: Parks Vehicles and Equipment No. of vehicles and equipment Description Dump, 1 Ton Hd, Crew Cab 4X4 - F450 Hd XL SRW 2017 Value ($/Vehicle) 1 1 $82,000 Pickup 3/4 Ton Hd Rcab,Longbx - F250Hd $39,000 Pickup 3/4 Ton Hd Ext cab, 4X4 - F250 Xl 1 $39,000 Pickup 3/4 Ton Hd Reg Cab 4X4 - F-250 Hd (Fitted With Plow) $52,000 Pickup, 1 Ton - C $65,000 Pickup, 1 Ton Hd, E Cab - F350 Xl $42,000 Pickup, 1-Ton, 4X4 W/Slip Tip $65,000 Pickup, 3/4 Ton Hd 4X4-2500Hd $41,000 Pickup, 3/4 Ton Hd R Cab 4X4 - Ford F $49,000 Pickup, 1 Ton Hd Cre Cab,Dump - F-450 Hd 4X $82,000 Pickup, 1 Ton Hd, Dump, R Cab - F450SDXL 4X $82,000 Plow, Snow 5-Way 8' - 8' Super Duty $13,000 Plow, Snow, 8 ' - Sw $13,000 Pump, Centrifugal $10,000 Pump, Water with Pressure Tank 1 1 $7,500 Power Pack, Hydraulic - D $13,500 Sander Body, Slip-In - Sander Body, Slip In $16,500 Saw, Chain - Ms 200T $1,100 Skid Steer - Jd $91,000 Skid Steer - Case SV $91,000 Spreader - Af $400 Top Dresser, Dual Spinners - Mh400 Toro $32,500 Tractor, 4 Wd Ag. W/Cab - Model $70,000

187 Page B-80 Service Standard Calculation Sheet Service: Unit Measure: Parks Vehicles and Equipment No. of vehicles and equipment Description Value ($/Vehicle) Tractor, 4 Wd, Front End Load - Model $70,000 Tractor, Utility, 53 Hp Wd $40,000 Tractor, Front End Loader, 4X4 - Model $70,000 Tractor, Loader - JD $85,000 Trailer, Hydraulic Dump - 4X5 Box House $5,200 Trailer, Single $8,000 Trailer, Single $8,000 Trailer, Single Axle Utility - Galvanized $8,000 Trailer, Single Axle Utility - Galvanized $8,000 Trailer, Single Axle Utility, - Galvanized $8,000 Trailer, Single Axle Utility, - Galvanized $8,000 Trailer, Single Axle, Low Bed - Ld $8,000 Trailer, Single Axle, Low Bed - Ld $8,000 Trailer, Single Axle, Lowbed - Ld $8,000 Trailer, Single Axle,5 Utility - Galvanized $8,000 Trailer, Tandem Axle, Low Bed - Galvanized, Ld $19,500 Trailer, Tandem Axle, Lowbed - Rp L $19,500 Trailer, Tandem, Backhoe, Hd - Od $25,000 Trailer, Tandem, Lowbed - 7 Ton Lowbed Float $19,500 Trailer, Tandem, Lowbed - LD $19,500 Trailer, Tandem, Lowbed - LD $19,500 Trailer, Tandem Water $19,500 Trailer, Tandem Water 500G $19,500 Trailer, Tandem Water 500G 1 $19,500 Trailer, Triaxle $20,000 Trailer, Triaxle, Bed-Over - 24Tr $20,000 Trailer, Triaxle, Low Bed - Galvanized, Ld $20,000 Trailer, Triaxle, Lowbed - Ld $20,000 Trailer, Triaxle, Lowbed - Ld $20,000 Trailer, Triaxle,Low Bed - Rpl $20,000

188 Page B-81 Service Standard Calculation Sheet Service: Unit Measure: Parks Vehicles and Equipment No. of vehicles and equipment Description Value ($/Vehicle) Trailer,Triaxle,Lowbed,Galvan - J&J Ld $20,000 Trimmer, Line - Fs110Rx 1 1 $500 Truck, Class 8 W 12' Dump Body $198,000 Truck, Hd Class 8, RO/RO Dump X4 1 $198,000 Roll-On/Off Body, Dump 14' - Viking Cives 1 $28,000 Truck, Class 8, 14' Dump Body X $198,000 Utility V Trail Gator 6X4 - Trail Gator 6X $24,000 Utility Vehicle, 4X4 w Cab - RTVX1100C $31,000 Utility Vehicle Gator 4X2-4X $18,000 Utility Vehicle, 4X4 - RTV900XT $31,000 Utility Vehicle, Gator 4X4-850D Xuv $31,000 Utility Vehicle, Gator 4X4 - Xuv 855D $31,000 Utility Vehicle, Gator 4X4 - Xuv 855D $31,000 Utility Vehicle, Gator 6X4 - Gator 6X $31,000 Utility Vehicle, 4X4 - RTV900XT 1 1 $31,000 Utility Work Vehicke, Bobcat - Toolcat $83,000 Utility Work Vehicke, Toolcat - Bobcat TC $83,000 Vacuum, Leaf, Push Cart - Hpv Lw $1,100 Vacuum, Leaf, Push Cart - Lw $1,100 Van, 1-Ton - 35C $61,000 Van, Cargo, 1-Ton Hd - E-350 Hd $34,000 Van, Cargo, 1-Ton, High Roof - Transit $34,000 Van, Cube, 1 Ton - E350Hd $61,000 Pickup 1 Ton Hd, E Cab 4X4 S - F 350 Hd Xl 1 1 $61,000 Van, Cube, 1 Ton - E $61,000 Van, Cube, 1 Ton - E $61,000

189 Page B-82 Service Standard Calculation Sheet Service: Unit Measure: Parks Vehicles and Equipment No. of vehicles and equipment Description Value ($/Vehicle) Van , 1-Ton $61,000 Van, Cube, 1 Ton, Savana $61,000 Van, Mini, Astro - Chevrolet 1997 M $34,000 Sv - Harbours Operations Tractor, 24 Hp - B2410Hsd $34,000 Van , 1-Ton $61,000 Wm -Parks - Urban Forestry Car, Compact - Honda Civic Hybrid $30,000 Car, Compact, Hatchback - Focus SE 1 1 $22,000 Car, Compat - Civic Hybrid $30,000 Car, Compact, Hatchback - Focus SE 1 1 $22,000 Cutter, Stump - Grinder $50,000 Loader, Bucket type, Wheeled-R530C 1 1 $96,500 Pickup, 3/4 Ton, Rcab, Lbx 4X2 - F $39,000 Pickup,1 Ton Hd W 12' Dump Bdy - F $82,000 Pickup,1 Ton Hd W 12' Dump Bdy - F-550 Hd Xl 1 1 $82,000 Pickup,1 Ton Hd W 12' Dump Bdy - F $82,000 Pickup,1 Ton, 12' Chip Bdy 4X4 - F-550 Hd Xl 1 $82,000 Pickup, 1 Ton Hd, Tip Body, 4X4 - F $82,000 Pickup, 1/2 Ton, E.Cab, S/Box - F150 Xl $31,000 Pickup, 1/2 Ton, E.Cab, S/Box - F150 Xl 1 $31,000 Skid Steer - Vermeer S650TX $27,000 Trailer, Tandem - Water 500 Gal $19,500 Trailer, Tandem - Water 500 Gal $19,500 Trailer, Brush Chipper - Bc1500Xl $90,000 Trailer, Chipper Bc $90,000 Trailer, Chipper Bc $90,000 Trailer, Chipper, 18 - BC 1800 XL $90,000 Trailer, Chipper Xp $90,000 Trailer, Chipper - Blizzard $90,000 Trailer, Chipper - Vermeer $90,000 Trailer, Chipper - Tornado $90,000

190 Page B-83 Service Standard Calculation Sheet Service: Unit Measure: Parks Vehicles and Equipment No. of vehicles and equipment Description Value ($/Vehicle) Trailer, Chipper - BC1800XL $90,000 Trailer, Chipper - Vermeer $90,000 Trailer, Tandem, Enclosed 18' $13,500 Trailer, Tandem - Wtral 1 $19,500 Trailer, Tandem, Water - 90Wt991 1 $19,500 Trailer, Tandem, Water - 91Wt $19,500 Trailer, Tandem, Water - 91Wt $19,500 Trailer, Tandem, Water, 500G - Wt $19,500 Trailer, Tandem, Water, 500 G - Aw 6 Ton $19,500 Trailer, Tandem, Water, 500 G - Ld-2 W $19,500 Trailer, Tandem, Water, 500 G - Ld-2W $19,500 Trailer, Tandem, Water, 500 G - Ld-2W $19,500 Trailer, Tandem, Dump - LD-2T $17,500 Trailer, Tandem, Tilt N Load - LD-2T $20,000 Truck, Aerial Bucket $272,000 Truck, Aerial, Chip Body X $272,000 Truck, Aerial, Chip Body - Fl $272,000 Truck, Aerial, Chip Body X2 1 1 $272,000 Truck, Crane, Chip Body - Ihc $272,000 Wm - Parks - Forestry Heritage Atv, Gator, W/Trailer - Gator Tm6X $26,000 Truck, Aerial Bucket X $272,000 Forestry Supervisors Pickup, 1/2 Ton $31,000 Pickup, 1/2 Ton, E Cab, S Box - F150 XL $31,000 Pickup, 1/2 Ton, Reg Cab - Silverado CC $31,000 Pickup, 1/2 Ton, E Cab, S Box - F150 XL 1 $31,000 Pickup, 1/2 Ton, E Cab - F $31,000

191 Page B-84 Service Standard Calculation Sheet Service: Unit Measure: Parks Vehicles and Equipment No. of vehicles and equipment Description Value ($/Vehicle) Harbour Equipment Pickup, 1 Ton, Ext Cab, 4X $41,000 Pickup, 1 Ton, 4X2, Crew Cab 1 1 $45,000 Pickup 1/2 Ton Longbx $37,000 Pickup, 1 Ton, Hd Crew Cab, 4X4-F350 Hl S/Box 1 $45,000 Pickup, Compact, E Cab - Chev S10 LS $20,000 Pickup, 1/2 Ton, E.Cab, S/Box - F150 Xl $31,000 Tractor, Front End Loader - TN 75D $85,000 Tractor, Loader, Wheeled - John Deere 224 J $85,000 Trailer, Tandem $19,500 Trailer, Single Axle, Boat $4,200 Trailer, Single Axle, Boat $4,200 Trailer, Triaxle, Lowbed $20,000 Trailer, Tandem, Dump $12,000 Trailer, Single Axle, Enclosed $8,000 Trailer, Tandem, Water, 500 G $19,500 Trailer, Boat, Single Axle $4,200 Truck, Crane, With Jib $242,000 Boat, Aluminum, 16' $9,100 Boat, Aluminum, 14' $7,500 Boat, Aluminum, 17' $9,100 Boat Barge - Anchor Barge $16,000 Boat, Aluminum, Mini-Barge-Predator $16,000 Manlift, Elevating Platform - Z-30/20N $70,000 Gantry, Boat, Self Propelled $270,000 Forklift, Marine 1 1 $162,500 Forklift, Boat Handling $98,300 Utility Vehicle 6 X $26,000 Work Barges $10,800 Attachment, Outboard $4,400 Attachment, Outboard $8,700

192 Page B-85 Service Standard Calculation Sheet Service: Unit Measure: Parks Vehicles and Equipment No. of vehicles and equipment Description Value ($/Vehicle) Motor, Outerboard, 40 HP - Mercury 1- A41453KZ $8,500 Motor, Outerboard, 40 HP - Mercury 40ELPTBF $8,500 Motor, Outerboard, 60 HP, High T - Yamaha $9,200 Plow, 8'6" Attachment $8,100 Plow, 8'-14' $8,100 Aerial Lift $10,800 Pay And Display Units $15,000 Lookout Binocular - Tannery Park 1 $8,200 Parks Supervisors Pickup, 1/2 Ton, Ext Cab - F150 XLT $31,000 Pickup, 1/2 Ton, E Cab, S/Box - F150 XL $31,000 Pickup, Compact, E Cab - Dodge Dakota $31,000 Pickup, 1/2 Ton, E Cab, S/Box - F150 XL 1 $31,000 Pickup, 1/2 Ton, E Cab - F150 XLT $31,000 Pickup, 1/2 Ton, E Cab, S/Box - F150 XL $31,000 Pickup, 1/2 Ton, E Cab, S/Box - F150 XL $31,000 Pickup, 1/2 Ton, E Cab, S Box - F150 XL $31,000 Wm - Parks - Technical Services Pickup, 1 Ton HD, E Cab 4X4 - F350 XL S Box 1 $42,000 1 Ton HD, E Cab, Body & Crane - F550 HD XL $148,000 Car, Compact, Hatchback - Focus SE $22,000 Trailer, Bleachers $15,600 Trailer, Chipper $90,000

193 Page B-86 Service Standard Calculation Sheet Service: Unit Measure: Parks Vehicles and Equipment No. of vehicles and equipment Description Value ($/Vehicle) Trailer, Tandem, Pressure Wash $26,000 Tractor, AG 4X4, 85HP, w Cab M $70,000 Utility Work Vehicle, Tool Cat $83,000 Pickup, 3/4 Ton, E Cab - Ford $39,000 Forklift, Diesel - 25D-7E $26,600 Sifter, Sand $17,200 Sifter, Sand $17,200 Plow, Snow $4,500 Attachment, Plow $2,200 Attachment, Plow $2,200 Blower, Snow 8 HP $2,000 Snowblower, Single Stage $2,000 Plow, Snow 10' $2,500 Plow Attachment $2,100 Poly Plow 8.5' - CP $5,200 Groomer, Trail $2,200 Attachment, Comb Plane - 526HD $7,400 Attachment, Comb Plane - 526HD $7,400 Snow Blade $2,100 Spreader - E $3,200 Spreader, 3-PT Hitch - HR $3,200 Spreader, 3-PT Hitch - HR $3,200 Spreader, 3-PT Hitch - HR $3,200 Aerator $4,100 Aerator, 3-point Hitch type $3,200 Aerator, 6' 3Pt. Hitch type $5,200

194 Page B-87 Service Standard Calculation Sheet Service: Unit Measure: Parks Vehicles and Equipment No. of vehicles and equipment 2017 Value Description ($/Vehicle) Sprayer, Skid mounted - ES $4,100 Total Population 170, , , , , , , , , ,832 Per Capita Standard Year Average Quantity Standard Quality Standard $42,126 Service Standard $80 DC Amount (before deductions) 10 Year Forecast Population 42,360 $ per Capita $80 Eligible Amount $3,390,494

195 Page B-88 Service Standard Calculation Sheet Service: Unit Measure: Indoor Recreation Facilities ft² of building area Description Bld'g Value ($/ft²) Value/ft² with land, site works, etc. River Oaks Recreation Centre 113, , , , , , , , , ,028 $283 $442 Glen Abbey Recreation Centre 131, , , , , , , , , ,797 $342 $492 Kerr Street Seniors' Centre 8,072 8,072 8,072 8,072 8,072 8,072 8,072 8,072 8,072 8,072 $252 $780 Sir John Colborne Centre 9,065 9,065 9,065 9,065 9,065 9,065 9,065 9,065 9,065 9,065 $354 $1,384 Kinoak Arena 21,000 21,000 21,000 21,000 21,000 21,000 21,000 21,000 21,000 21,000 $364 $856 Maplegrove Arena 28,808 28,808 28,808 28,808 28,808 28,808 28,808 28,808 28,808 28,808 $310 $461 Oakville Arena 39,643 39,643 39,643 39,643 39,643 39,643 39,643 39,643 39,643 39,643 $298 $728 Centennial Pool 17,640 17,640 17,640 17,640 17,640 17,640 17,640 17,640 17,640 17,640 $426 $511 White Oaks Pool 13,841 13,841 13,841 13,841 13,841 13,841 13,841 13,841 13,841 13,841 $411 $651 Q.E. Park Centre 12,700 12,700 12,700 $195 $314 Queen Elizabeth Park Community and Cultural Centre 80,168 80,168 80,168 80,168 80,168 $379 $611 Iroquois Ridge Recreation Centre 45,020 45,020 45,020 45,020 45,020 45,020 45,020 45,020 45,020 45,020 $379 $611 Joshua's Creek Arena 73,400 73,400 73,400 73,400 73,400 73,400 73,400 73,400 73,400 73,400 $333 $ Mile Sports Complex 196, , , , , , ,000 $244 $492 Pine Glen Indoor Soccer 100, , , , , , , , ,606 $109 $260 Youth Development Centre - Cross Avenue 1,500 1,500 1,500 1,500 1,500 1,500 1,500 1,500 1,500 $244 $474 Youth Development Centre - Nottinghill 2,400 $244 $244 Youth Development Centre - Bronte 3,000 3,000 3,000 3,000 3,000 3,000 3,000 3,000 3,000 $244 $244 Parks & Recreation Admin Space at Town Hall 6,440 6,440 6,440 6,440 6,440 6,440 6,440 6,440 6,440 6,440 $239 $300 Indoor Recreation - Shared Use-School Facilities Summer Camps 42,949 36,371 29,927 45,963 23,286 19,656 19,656 19,656 19,656 19,620 $277 $277 Fitness Programs 7,127 7,127 $277 $277 Community Rentals - HCDSB 7,778 10,429 8,798 10,243 10,915 10,325 9,863 11,405 11,270 13,053 $277 $277 Community Rentals - HDSB 16,916 16,550 16,081 16,547 15,176 15,509 18,058 16,776 17,898 18,900 $277 $277 Total 596, , , , , , , , , ,500 Population 170, , , , , , , , , ,832 Per Capita Standard Year Average Quantity Standard Quality Standard $497 Service Standard $2,273 DC Amount (before deductions) 10 Year Forecast Population 42,360 $ per Capita $2,273 Eligible Amount $96,293,599

196 Page B-89 Service Standard Calculation Sheet Service: Unit Measure: Recreation Vehicles and Equipment No. of vehicles and equipment Description Value ($/Item) Ice Resurfacers $105,000 Ice Edgers $5,000 Oakville Arena Trailer, Single Axle $5,500 Defibrillator $2,000 Kinoak Arena Defibrillator $2,000 Maplegrove Arena Defibrillator $2,000 River Oaks Ice Painting Equipment $32,400 Defibrillator $2,000 Elliptical Trainer $6,000 Elliptical Trainer $6,000 Elliptical Trainer $6,000 Elliptical Trainer $6,000 Elliptical Trainer $6,000 Leg Press $7,600 Leg Press $7,600 Leg Press 1 $7,600 Treadmill $6,500 Treadmill W Embedded Screen $6,500 Treadmill $6,500 Star Trac Spinner Bikes $1,700 Recumbent Bike $5,200 Mintpo spin bikes $1,700 Upright Bike $5,500 Upright Bike E-series $5,500 Upright Bike, 95C 2 $5,500 Stair Master $4,800 Rowing Machine $3,400 Rowing Machine with PM5 Monitor 1 $3,400 Nautilus Self Weight Machine $8,000 Nautilus Cable Cross Over $4,200

197 Page B-90 Service Standard Calculation Sheet Service: Unit Measure: Recreation Vehicles and Equipment No. of vehicles and equipment Description Value ($/Item) Pull down $3,000 Lat pull down 1 $3,000 Multi Hip $3,400 Pectoral Fly/Rear $4,900 Nautilus Gravitron $8,000 Chest press $3,400 Glute isolator $3,900 Overhead press $3,600 Hip Abd/Add $3,400 Abdominal Machine $1,100 Hammer Strength Loaded Smith $4,800 Hammer Strength Loaded Smith Machine $4,800 Hammer Strength Elite half rack 1 1 $2,400 Arc Trainer $6,800 Leg Extension $5,300 Leg Curl $4,900 Functional Trainer $5,500 TRX Hang Training machine $2,000 Motion Trainer 1 1 $4,100 Motion Rowing 1 1 $3,400 E Series Stepper 1 1 $3,200 Freedom Climber 1 1 $12,500 Ascent Trainer 1 $6,800 Iroquois Ridge Treadmill Tag# $6,500 Treadmill $6,500 Treadmill $6,500 Treadmill, Cybex 770T $6,500 Startrac Treadmill 1 1 $6,500 Cross-Trainer Tag# $5,000 Cross Trainer $5,000 Weight Resistance Tag $8,000 Dip/Chin Assist $1,200 Shoulder Lateral $4,000

198 Page B-91 Service Standard Calculation Sheet Service: Unit Measure: Recreation Vehicles and Equipment No. of vehicles and equipment Description Value ($/Item) Multi Press $4,000 Pec Fly/Rear Deltoid $4,900 Hamstring Curl $4,900 Leg Extension $5,300 Smith Machine $4,800 Double Tower $6,600 Stair Master $4,000 Recumbent Bike $5,200 Recumbent Bike $5,200 Upright Bike $5,500 Upright Bike $5,500 Concept 2 rower $3,400 Arc Trainer $6,800 Elliptical $6,000 Stair Master Treadmill $6,500 Heavy Duty Half Rack $1,200 Hip Add/Ab 1 $3,400 Seated Leg Press 1 $7,600 Defibrillator $2,000 Aquatic Equipment $136,000 Glen Abbey Defibrillator $2,000 Leg Press $7,600 Upright Bike $5,500 Elliptical Trainer $6,000 Elliptical Trainer $6,000 Elliptical Trainer $6,000 Elliptical Trainer 1 $6,000 Elliptical Trainer $6,000 Treadmill $6,500 Engage Recumbent Bike $5,200 Star Trac Spinner Bikes $1,700 Stair Master $4,000 Hip Add/Ab $3,400 Cable Sitted Row $3,400

199 Page B-92 Service Standard Calculation Sheet Service: Unit Measure: Recreation Vehicles and Equipment No. of vehicles and equipment Description Value ($/Item) Gravitron $4,000 APAK Smith $4,800 Leg Curl $4,900 Leg Extension $5,300 Lateral Raise $4,000 Pec Fly/Rear Deltoid $4,900 Lat Pulldown $3,000 Overhead Press $3,600 Abdominal Crunch $1,100 Chest Press $3,400 Dual Adjust Pulley $4,600 Stair Climber 1 1 $4,000 Abdominal Crunch 1 1 $1,100 Back Extension 1 1 $1,200 Stair Climber 1 $4,800 Smith Machine 1 $4,800 Aquatic Equipment $136,000 Joshua Creek Defibrillator $2, Mile Facility Defibrillator $2,000 QEPCCC Facility Aquatic Equipment $136,000 Defibrillator $2,000 Spin Bikes $1,700 Peak Pilates Fit Reformer $1,800 Flexstrider 1 $12,800 Seated Row $3,400 Seated Chest Press $3,400 Lat Pulldown $3,000 Shoulder Press $3,600 Pectoral Fly/Rear $4,900 Seated Leg Press $7,600 Seated Leg Curl $4,900 Dual Hip Add/Ab $3,400

200 Page B-93 Service Standard Calculation Sheet Service: Unit Measure: Recreation Vehicles and Equipment No. of vehicles and equipment Description Value ($/Item) Cable Motion Dual Adj Pulley $4,600 Smith Machine $4,800 Multi Jungle Station $5,700 Multi-Adj Bench $1,000 Treadmill $6,500 Elliptical $6,000 Upright Bike $5,500 Recumbent Bike $5,200 Centennial Pool Aquatic Equipment $136,000 Defibrillator $2,000 White Oaks Pool Aquatic Equipment $136,000 Defibrillator $2,000 Queen Elizabeth Pool Aquatic Equipment $136,000 Defibrillator $2,000 Sir John Colborne Centre Defibrillator $2,000 Kerr Street Seniors' Centre Defibrillator $2,000 Total Population 170, , , , , , , , , ,832 Per Capita Standard Year Average Quantity Standard Quality Standard $15,411 Service Standard $14 DC Amount (before deductions) 10 Year Forecast Population 42,360 $ per Capita $14 Eligible Amount $587,533

201 Page B-94 Service Standard Calculation Sheet Service: Unit Measure: Library Facilities ft² of building area Description Bld'g Value ($/ft²) Value/ft² with land, site works, etc. Central Branch Library Navy Street 43,920 43,920 43,920 43,920 43,920 43,920 43,920 43,920 43,920 43,920 $400 $427 Woodside Branch Library Rebecca 18,890 18,890 18,890 18,890 18,890 18,890 18,890 18,890 18,890 18,890 $306 $595 White Oaks Library Branch 9,172 9,172 9,172 9,172 9,172 9,172 9,172 9,172 9,172 9,172 $378 $620 Glen Abbey Branch 14,984 14,984 14,984 14,984 14,984 14,984 14,984 14,984 14,984 14,984 $405 $552 Iroquois Ridge Library 12,141 12,141 12,141 12,141 12,141 12,141 12,141 12,141 12,141 12,141 $432 $661 Clearview Branch 4,000 4,000 4,000 4,000 4,000 4,000 4,000 $378 $620 QEPCCC Holds Depot 200 $379 $611 Total 99,107 99,107 99, , , , , , , ,307 Population 170, , , , , , , , , ,832 Per Capita Standard Year Average Quantity Standard Quality Standard $527 Service Standard $294 DC Amount (before deductions) 10 Year Forecast Population 42,360 $ per Capita $294 Eligible Amount $12,449,604

202 Page B-95 Service Standard Calculation Sheet Service: Unit Measure: Library Collection Materials No. of library collection items Description Value ($/item) Books 320, , , , , , , , , ,799 $26.31 Audiocassettes 3, $18.52 Compact Discs 23,966 26,552 28,686 29,609 29,443 27,130 26,646 22,402 21,596 18,242 $17.96 Videocassettes 9,402 8, $22.61 DVDs 17,422 19,862 22,770 24,416 25,242 25,728 25,422 25,395 26,954 30,234 $32.06 CD-ROMs 1,944 1,734 1,438 1, $33.62 Talking Books 2,662 2,825 2,630 2,379 2,555 3,357 3,423 3,109 3,510 3,584 $42.94 Seniors Resources 1 $24.45 Kits $ Microfilm 504 2,137 2,161 2,185 4,211 4,211 4,855 4,855 4,855 $ Microfiche 8,620 9,086 8,559 8,559 8,559 4,014 4,104 4,104 4,104 4,104 $3.75 Electronic Games ,106 1,335 1,569 1,849 $56.46 Periodicals and Newspapers 674 2, $74.17 Books, Magazines, Videos Available for Download Periodical Databases 22,179 23,848 25,643 26,244 46,521 45,247 56,817 48,674 45,931 23,275 $0.31 ebook/eaudio Platforms (Tumble / Overdrive / GVR) 7,590 8,162 8,776 12,439 15,051 11,050 24,587 32,397 27,500 35,014 $3.97 Magazine Platforms (Zinio) 1,422 2,232 2,328 1,344 $24.76 Course Platforms (Lynda / Mango) ,012 $3.33 Music Platforms (Naxos) 46,000 59,800 73,600 74,872 88, , , ,072 $0.06 Multimedia Platforms (Hoopla) 122, , ,518 $0.25 Total 418, , , , , , , , , ,500 Population 170, , , , , , , , , ,832 Per Capita Standard Year Average Quantity Standard Quality Standard $18 Service Standard $60 DC Amount (before deductions) 10 Year Forecast Population 42,360 $ per Capita $60 Eligible Amount $2,528,892

203 Page C-1 Appendix C Long Term Capital and Operating Cost Examination

204

205 Page C-2 Appendix C Long Term Capital and Operating Cost Examination Annual Capital and Operating Cost Impact As a requirement of the Development Charges Act, 1997 under subsection 10(2)(c), an analysis must be undertaken to assess the long-term capital and operating cost impacts for the capital infrastructure projects identified within the development charge. As part of this analysis, it was deemed necessary to isolate the incremental operating expenditures directly associated with these capital projects, factor in cost saving attributable to economies of scale or cost sharing where applicable, and prorate the cost on a per unit basis (i.e. sq.ft. of building space, per vehicle, etc.). This was undertaken through a review of the Town s approved 2016 Financial Information Return (FIR). In addition to the operational impacts, over time the initial capital projects will require replacement. This replacement of capital is often referred to as life cycle cost. By definition, life cycle costs are all the costs which are incurred during the life of a physical asset, from the time its acquisition is first considered, to the time it is taken out of service for disposal or redeployment. The method selected for life cycle costing is the sinking fund method which provides that money will be contributed annually and invested, so that those funds will grow over time to equal the amount required for future replacement. The following factors were utilized to calculate the annual replacement cost of the capital projects (annual contribution = factor X capital asset cost) and are based on an annual growth rate of 2% (net of inflation) over the average useful life of the asset: Lifecycle Cost Factors Asset Average Useful Life Factor Roads Facilities (Fire, Depots/Domes, Parking, Recreation, Library) Vehicles and Equipment (Public Works, Parks) Vehicles and Equipment (Fire, Parking) Transit Buses Parking Spaces Parkland Development Table C-1 depicts the annual operating impact resulting from the proposed gross capital projects at the time they are all in place. It is important to note that, while Town program expenditures will increase with growth in population, the costs associated with

206 Page C-3 the new infrastructure (i.e. facilities) would be delayed until the time these works are in place. Table C-1 Operating and Capital Expenditure Impacts For Future Capital Expenditures SERVICE GROSS COST LESS BENEFIT TO EXISTING ANNUAL LIFECYCLE EXPENDITURES ANNUAL OPERATING EXPENDITURES TOTAL ANNUAL EXPENDITURES 1. Services Related to a Highway 1.1 Roads 784,123,841 35,458,676 7,927,426 43,386, Depots and Domes 24,491, , , , Roads and Related Vehicles 7,150, ,558 72, , Fire Protection Services 2.1 Fire facilities 20,033, ,597 9,294,910 10,008, Fire vehicles 160,000 23,615 74,233 97, Small equipment and gear 200,000 29,518 92, , Transit Services 3.1 Transit vehicles 34,503,692 2,711,373 7,002,968 9,714, Municipal Parking 4.1 Municipal parking spaces 25,151,388 1,098, ,769 1,892, Parks and Recreation 5.1 Parkland development, amenities & trails 132,866,600 9,209,081 2,496,367 11,705, Park Buildings 9,238,985 1,257, ,587 1,430, Parks vehicles and equipment 7,224, , ,738 1,022, Recreation facilities 129,080,260 3,170,924 1,707,900 4,878, Recreation vehicles and equipment 105,000 12,887 1,389 14, Library Services 6.1 Library facilities 39,549,723 2,156,197 2,017,042 4,173, Library materials 5,770, , ,281 1,066, General Government 7.1 Studies 10,761, Total 1,230,411,094 59,065,184 32,332,295 91,397,479 H:\Oakville\2017 DC\Report\Addendum\Report for Addendum.docx

207 Page D-1 Appendix D Development Charge Reserve Fund Policy

208

209 Page D-1 Appendix D Development Charge Reserve Fund Policy D.1 Legislative Requirements The D.C.A. requires development charge collections (and associated interest) to be placed in separate reserve funds. Sections 33 through 36 of the Act provide the following regarding reserve fund establishment and use: a municipality shall establish a reserve fund for each service to which the D.C. by-law relates; s.7(1), however, allows services to be grouped into categories of services for reserve fund (and credit) purposes, although only 100% eligible and 90% eligible services may be combined (minimum of two reserve funds); the municipality shall pay each development charge it collects into a reserve fund or funds to which the charge relates; the money in a reserve fund shall be spent only for the capital costs determined through the legislated calculation process (as per s.5(1) 2-8); money may be borrowed from the fund but must be paid back with interest (O.Reg. 82/98, s.11(1) defines this as the Bank of Canada rate either on the day the by-law comes into force or, if specified in the by-law, the first business day of each quarter); and D.C. reserve funds may not be consolidated with other municipal reserve funds for investment purposes (s.37). Annually, the Treasurer of the Town is required to provide Council with a financial statement related to the D.C. by-law(s) and reserve funds. This statement must also be forwarded to the Minister of Municipal Affairs and Housing upon request. O.Reg. 82/98 prescribes the information that must be included in the Treasurer s statement, as follows: opening balance; closing balance; description of each service and/or service category for which the reserve fund was established; transactions for the year (e.g. collections, draws);

210 Page D-2 list of credits by service or service category (outstanding at beginning of the year, given in the year and outstanding at the end of the year by holder); amounts borrowed, purpose of the borrowing and interest accrued during previous year; amount and source of money used by the Town to repay municipal obligations to the fund; schedule identifying the value of credits recognized by the Town, the service to which it applies and the source of funding used to finance the credit; and for each draw, the amount spent on the project from the D.C. reserve fund and the amount and source of any other monies spent on the project. Based upon the above, Figure D-1 sets out an example of the format for which annual reporting to Council could be provided. D.2 D.C. Reserve Fund Application Section 35 of the D.C.A. states that: The money in a reserve fund established for a service may be spent only for capital costs determined under paragraphs 2 to 8 of subsection 5(1). This provision clearly establishes that reserve funds collected for a specific service are only to be used for that service.

211 Page D-3 Figure 1 Annual Treasurer's Statement of Development Charge Reserve Funds Services to which the Development Charge Relates Non-Discounted Services Discounted Services Services Fire Related to a Protection Transit Parks and Library General Highway Services Services Recreation Services Government Municipal Parking Description Total Opening Balance, January 1, 0 Plus: Development Charge Collections 0 Accrued Interest 0 Repayment of Monies Borrowed from Fund and Associated Interest 1 0 Sub-Total Less: Amount Transferred to Capital (or Other) Funds 2 0 Amounts Refunded 0 Amounts Loaned to Other DC Service Category for Interim Financing 0 Credits 3 0 Sub-Total Closing Balance, December 31, Source of funds used to repay the D.C. reserve fund 2 See Attachment 1 for details 3 See Attachment 2 for details The Municipality is compliant with s.s (1) of the Development Charges Act, whereby charges are not directly or indirectly imposed on development nor has a requirement to construct a service related to development been imposed, except as permitted by the Development Charges Act or another Act.

212 Page D-4 Capital Fund Transactions Gross Capital Cost DC Reserve Fund Draw Attachment 1 Amount Transferred to Capital (or Other) Funds - Capital Fund Transactions DC Forecast Period DC Debt Financing DC Recoverable Cost Share Grants, Subsidies Other Contributions Post DC Forecast Period Post-Period Benefit/ Capacity Interim Financing Grants, Subsidies Other Contributions Other Reserve/Reser ve Fund Draws Tax Supported Operating Fund Contributions Non-DC Recoverable Cost Share Rate Supported Operating Fund Contributions Debt Financing Grants, Subsidies Other Contributions Services Related to a Highway Capital Cost A Capital Cost B Capital Cost C Sub-Total - Services Related to Highways $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Fire Protection Services Capital Cost D Capita Cost E Capital Cost F Sub-Total - Fire Protection Services $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Transit Services Capital Cost G Capita Cost H Capital Cost I Sub-Total - Transit Services $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Amount Transferred to Operating (or Other) Funds - Operating Fund Transactions Annual Debt DC Reserve Fund Draw Post DC Forecast Period Non-DC Recoverable Cost Share Repayment Operating Fund Transactions Amount Principal Interest Principal Interest Source Principal Interest Source Services Related to a Highway Capital Cost J Capita Cost K Capital Cost L Sub-Total - Services Related to Highways $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Fire Protection Services Capital Cost M Capita Cost N Capital Cost O Sub-Total - Fire Protection Services $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Transit Services Capital Cost P Capita Cost Q Capital Cost R Sub-Total - Transit Services $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0

213 Page D-5 Credit Holder A Credit Holder B Credit Holder C Credit Holder D Credit Holder E Credit Holder F Credit Holder Attachment 2 Statement of Credit Holder Transactions Applicable DC Reserve Fund Credit Balance Outstanding Beginning of Year Additional Credits Granted During Year Credits Used by Holder During Year Credit Balance Outstanding End of Year

214

215 Page E-1 Appendix E Local Service Policy

216

217 Page E-2 Appendix E Local Service Policy This Appendix sets out the Town s General Policy Guidelines on Development Charges (D.C.) and local service funding for Services Related to a Highway, Stormwater Management Works and Parkland Development. The guidelines outline, in general terms, the size and nature of engineered infrastructure that is included in the study as a development charge project, versus infrastructure that is considered as a local service, to be emplaced separately by landowners, pursuant to a development agreement. The following policy guidelines are general principles by which staff will be guided in considering development applications. However, each application will be considered, in the context of these policy guidelines and subsection 59(2) of the Development Charges Act, 1997, S.O. 1997, c. 27 (D.C.A.), on its own merits having regard to, among other factors, the nature, type and location of the development and any existing and proposed development in the surrounding area, as well as the location and type of services required and their relationship to the proposed development and to existing and proposed development in the area. A. SERVICES RELATED TO A HIGHWAY A highway and services related to a highway are intended for the transportation of people and goods via many different modes including, but not limited to passenger automobiles, commercial vehicles, transit vehicles, bicycles and pedestrians. The highway shall consist of all land and associated infrastructure built to support (or service) this movement of people and goods regardless of the mode of transportation employed, thereby achieving a complete street. A complete street is the concept whereby a highway is planned, designed, operated and maintained to enable pedestrians, cyclists, public transit users and motorists to safely and comfortably be moved, thereby allowing for the efficient movement of persons and goods. The associated infrastructure to achieve this concept shall include, but is not limited to: road pavement structure and curbs; grade separation / bridge structures (for any vehicles, railways and/or pedestrians); grading, drainage and retaining wall features; culvert structures; storm water drainage systems; traffic control systems and pedestrian crossover systems; active transportation facilities (e.g. sidewalks, multi-use trails, cycle facilities, bike lanes etc.); transit lanes, stops and amenities; roadway illumination systems; boulevard and median surfaces (e.g. sod & topsoil, paving, etc.); street trees including support systems and landscaping/streetscaping; parking lanes and driveway entrances; noise attenuation systems; railings and safety barriers.

218 Page E-3 1. LOCAL AND COLLECTOR ROADS (INCLUDING LAND) a) All Roads, other than those designated as Arterial Roads within the Town s Official Plan, inclusive of all land and associated infrastructure related to or within the area needed to support development or required to link with the area to which the plan relates: direct developer responsibility under s. 59 of the D.C.A. as a local service. b) Where roadway improvements are required on Arterial roadways to support a specific development or required to link the development area with the existing community, and where these Arterial roadway improvements have not been identified within the current D.C. study, these road improvements shall be a direct developer responsibility under s. 59 of the D.C.A. as a local service. 2. ARTERIAL ROADS a) New, widened, extended or upgraded arterial roads, identified within the current D.C. study, inclusive of all associated infrastructure: Included as part of Services related to a Highway funded through D.C.s. b) Land Acquisition for arterial roads on existing rights-of-way to achieve a complete street shall be addressed and secured in the following manner: As a required dedication where possible under the Planning Act provisions (s. 41, 51 and s. 53) Included in the D.C. and acquired through negotiation and/or expropriation. c) Land acquisition for arterial roads on new rights-of-way to achieve a complete street shall be addressed and secured in the following manner: As a required dedication (up to 26m of the required right of way), where possible, under the Planning Act provisions (s. 41, 51 and s. 53) Included in the D.C. and acquired through negotiation and/or expropriation. Where land beyond a 26m right of way is dedicated by the developer as a Planning Act condition, and the costs of acquiring the land has been included in the D.C. calculation, the developer shall receive a D.C. credit equal to the value of the land dedicated beyond 26m, at such value as has been determined by the D.C. Background Study as adjusted in accordance with the non-residential Construction Price Index ( CPI ) d) Land acquisition beyond dedication requirements to achieve transportation corridors as services related to highways including grade separation infrastructure for the movement of pedestrians, cyclists, public transit and/or railway vehicles: Included in the D.C.

219 3. TRAFFIC CONTROL SYSTEMS, SIGNALS AND INTERSECTION IMPROVEMENTS ON AREA MUNICIPAL HIGHWAYS Page E-4 a) On New Arterial Roads and Arterial Road Improvements unrelated to a specific development or the area to which it relates, to the extent identified in the current D.C. study: Included as part of Services related to a Highway funded through D.C.s. b) On Non-Arterial roads, or for any Private Site Entrances or Entrances to Specific Developments or the area to which it relates: Direct developer responsibility under s. 59 of the D.C.A. as a local service. c) Intersection Improvements/New or Modified Signalization/Signal Timing & Optimization Plans / Area Traffic Studies for Highways attributed to growth and unrelated to a specific development or the area to which it relates and to the extent identified in the current D.C. Study: Included in D.C. calculation as permitted under s.5(1) of the D.C.A. 4. STREETLIGHTS a) Streetlights on new arterial roads and arterial road Improvements: considered part of the complete street and included as part of services related to a highway funded through D.C.s. b) Streetlights on non-arterial roads Internal to development: Considered part of the complete street and direct developer responsibility under s. 59 of the D.C.A. as a local service. c) Streetlights on non-arterial roads external to development related to or within the area needed to support the development or required to link with the area to which the plan relates: Considered part of the complete street and direct developer responsibility under s. 59 of the D.C.A. as a local service. 5. TRANSPORTATION RELATED TO PEDESTRIAN AND CYCLING FACILITIES a) Sidewalks, multi-use trails, cycle facilities, and bike lanes, inclusive of all associated infrastructure, located within arterial road and provincial highway corridors: Considered part of the complete street and included in the D.C. b) Sidewalks, multi-use trails, cycle facilities, and bike lanes, inclusive of all associated infrastructure, located within or linking to non-arterial corridors, park blocks or key destination points internal to development: Considered part of the complete street and direct developer responsibility under s. 59 of the D.C.A. as a local service.

220 Page E-5 c) Sidewalks, multi-use trails, cycle facilities, and bike lanes, inclusive of all associated infrastructure, located within non-arterial road corridors external to development related to or within the area needed to support the development or required to link with the area to which the plan relates: Direct developer responsibility under s. 59 of the D.C.A. as a local service. d) Sidewalks, multi-use trails, cycle facilities and bike lanes (not associated with a complete street) inclusive of all land and associated infrastructure, that extends beyond the function of a (parkland) recreational trail and forms part of the town s active transportation network for cycling and/or walking: Included in the D.C. 6. NOISE ABATEMENT MEASURES a) External and Internal to Development where it is a requirement of or related to, or within the area needed to support the development: Direct developer responsibility under s. 59 of the D.C.A. as a local service. b) As a requirement to mitigate noise impacts due to: 1) new arterial roads 2) arterial road Improvements (e.g. widening) 3) increased traffic growth on arterial roads unrelated to a specific development and excluding noise abatement measures imposed as a condition of development approval: Included as part of Services related to a Highway and included in the D.C. 7. TRANSIT NODES, TERMINALS, AND BUS STOP INFRASTRUCTURE a) Transit node and bus stop infrastructure and amenities located within town arterial and regional road corridors, and including transit stations or terminals located on lands to serve these road corridors: Considered part of the complete street and included the D.C. b) Transit node and bus stop infrastructure and amenities located within non-arterial road corridors internal to development: Considered part of the complete street and direct developer responsibility under s. 59 of the D.C.A. as a local service. c) Transit node and bus stop infrastructure and amenities located within non-arterial road corridors external to development related to, or within the area needed to support the development or required to link with the area to which the plan relates: Direct developer responsibility under s. 59 of the D.C.A. as a local service.

221 Page E-6 B. STORM WATER MANAGEMENT 1. Storm Sewer systems and drainage works that are required, related to, or within the area needed to support the development, either internal or external to the area to which the plan relates: Direct developer responsibility under s. 59 of the D.C.A. as a local service. 2. Storm Water facility for quality and/or quantity management: a) inclusive of land and all associated infrastructure, such as landscaping and perimeter fencing: Direct developer responsibility under s. 59 of the D.C.A. as a local service. b) the over-sizing cost of a facility s capacity, excluding land, to accommodate runoff from new, widened, extended or upgraded arterial roadways that are included in the D.C.: Included as part of Services related to a Highway funded through D.C.s. 3. Erosion Works, inclusive of all restoration requirements, related to, or within the area needed to support the development: Direct developer responsibility under s. 59 of the D.C.A. as a local service. C. PARKLAND DEVELOPMENT 1. RECREATIONAL TRAILS a) Recreational trails (Multi-use trails and Major Type A trails) that do not form part of the town s active transportation network, and their associated infrastructure (landscaping, bridges, trail surface, etc.); included in the D.C. b) Minor Type B trails (generally located within NHS) that do not form part of the town s active transportation network, and their associated infrastructure; direct developer responsibility as a local service provision under s. 59 of the D.C.A. 2. PARKLAND a) Parkland Development for Community Parks, Neighbourhood Parks and Village Squares: responsibility to provide up to base condition is a direct developer responsibility as a local service provision under s. 59 of the D.C.A. including, but not limited to, the following: Clearing and grubbing. Topsoil Stripping and stockpiling, (Topsoil or any fill or soils shall not be stockpiled on parkland without the approval of the Town).

222 Parkland shall be free of any contaminated soil or subsoil. Page E-7 Servicing - Water, Hydro, Stormwater, Sanitary, Electrical, Fibre/phone, catch basins, meter and meter boxes to a point just inside the property line as per Town requirements. This includes providing a catch basin, manhole, access boxes and meter boxes within the park property. Rough grading (pre-grading) and the supply of topsoil to the required depth as per Town requirements. Parkland shall not be mined for engineering fill and replaced with fill or topsoil. Parkland shall be conveyed free and clear of all encumbrances. When parkland parcels cannot be developed in a timely manner, they shall be graded to ensure positive drainage and seeded to minimize erosion and dust. Temporary fencing may also be required where there is no permanent fence to prevent illegal dumping. Temporary Park sign advising future residents that the site is a future park is a direct developer responsibility as a local service under s. 59 of the D.C.A. Perimeter fencing of parkland to the Town standard located on the public property side of the property line adjacent land uses (residential, industrial, commercial) as required by the Town is a direct developer responsibility as a local service under s. 59 of the D.C.A. Required heritage features within the park as set out within the Planning approval conditions. c) Program facilities within parkland are included in the D.C. 3. LANDSCAPE BUFFER BLOCKS, FEATURES, CUL-DE-SAC ISLANDS AND BERMS a) The cost of developing all landscape buffer blocks, landscape features, cul-de-sac islands, berms grade transition areas, walkway connections to adjacent arterial roads, open space and other remnant pieces of land conveyed to the town shall be a direct developer responsibility as a local service under s. 59 of the D.C.A. Such costs include but are not limited to: pre-grading, sodding or seeding, supply and installation of amended topsoil, (to the Town s required depth), landscape features, perimeter fencing and amenities and all planting. Perimeter fencing to the Town standard located on the public property side of the property line adjacent land uses (residential, industrial, commercial) as required by the Town.

223 Page E-8 4. NATURAL HERITAGE SYSTEM (NHS) The NHS includes engineered and in situ stream corridors, natural buffers for woodlots, wetland remnants, etc. as well as sub watersheds within the boundaries of the municipality. Direct developer responsibility as a local service provision under s. 59 of the D.C.A. including but not limited to the following: a) Riparian planting and landscaping requirements (as required by the Town or authorities having jurisdiction), as a result of road construction or other municipal works required to be installed or constructed by the developer within in the NHS. b) Perimeter fencing of the NHS to the Town standard located on the public property side of the property line adjacent land uses (residential, industrial, commercial) as required by the Town is a direct developer responsibility as a local service provision under s. 59 of the D.C.A.

224

225 Page F-1 Appendix F Asset Management Plan

226

227 Page F-2 Appendix F Asset Management Plan The recent changes to the D.C.A. (new clause 10(2)(c.2)) require that the Background Study must include an asset management plan related to new infrastructure. Subsection 10 (3) of the D.C.A. provides: The asset management plan shall, (a) deal with all assets whose capital costs are proposed to be funded under the development charge by-law; (b) demonstrate that all the assets mentioned in clause (a) are financially sustainable over their full life cycle; (c) contain any other information that is prescribed; and (d) be prepared in the prescribed manner. In regard to the above, O.Reg. 428/15 amends O.Reg. 82/92, section 8 to include subsections (2), (3) and (4) which set out for specific detailed requirements for transit (only). For all services except transit, there are no prescribed requirements at this time thus requiring the municipality to define the approach to include within the Background Study. For transit, the amended regulations provide for a prescriptive evaluation (as discussed later in this Appendix). At a broad level, the Asset Management Plan (A.M.P.) provides for the long-term investment in an asset over its entire useful life along with the funding. The schematic below identifies the costs for an asset through its entire lifecycle. For growth related works, the majority of capital costs will be funded by the D.C. Non-growth related expenditures will then be funded from non-d.c. revenues as noted below. During the useful life of the asset, there will be minor maintenance costs to extend the life of the asset along with additional program related expenditures to provide the full services to the residents. At the end of the life of the asset, it will be replaced by non-d.c. financing sources.

228 Page F-3 In 2012, the Province developed Building Together: Guide for Municipal Asset Management Plans which outlines the key elements for an A.M.P., as follows: State of local infrastructure: asset types, quantities, age, condition, financial accounting valuation and replacement cost valuation. Desired levels of service: defines levels of service through performance measures and discusses any external trends or issues that may affect expected levels of service or the municipality s ability to meet them (for example, new accessibility standards, climate change impacts). Asset management strategy: the asset management strategy is the set of planned actions that will seek to generate the desired levels of service in a sustainable way, while managing risk, at the lowest lifecycle cost. Financing strategy: having a financial plan is critical for putting an A.M.P. into action. By having a strong financial plan, municipalities can also demonstrate that they have made a concerted effort to integrate the A.M.P. with financial planning and municipal budgeting, and are making full use of all available infrastructure financing tools. The above provides for the general approach to be considered by Ontario municipalities. At this time there is not a mandated approach for municipalities hence leaving discretion to individual municipalities as to how they plan for the long-term

229 replacement of their assets. Over the past several years, the staff for the Town of Page F-4 Oakville have been including components of the Town s asset management plan to council as part of the Capital budget process and through specific reports to Council. These components have been compiled into the following documents: The Town of Oakville s Asset Management Plan 2017, The s Strategic Asset Management Plan, The s State of Infrastructure Report Part 1, The s State of Infrastructure Report Part 2. These documents are identified as part of this discussion herein. In regard to the D.C.A. requirements for asset management for the Transit Service, Ontario Regulation 82/98 (as amended) provides the following: 8 (3) If a council of a municipality proposes to impose a development charge in respect of transit services, the asset management plan referred to in subsection 10 (2) (c.2) of the Act shall include the following in respect of those services: The table below provides the individual items prescribed by subsection 8(3) of the Regulation (as amended) and how these items were addressed for this D.C. Background Study:

230 Page F-5 Ontario Regulation 82/98, as amended subsection 8(3) Requirements 1. A section that sets out the state of local infrastructure and that sets out, Compliance See State of Infrastructure Reports (SOIR) i. the types of assets and their quantity or extent, See SOIR Section 3.1 ii. the financial accounting valuation and replacement cost valuation for all assets, iii. the asset age distribution and asset age as a proportion of expected useful life for all assets, and iv. the asset condition based on standard engineering practices for all assets. See SOIR Section 3.2 See SOIR Section 3.3 See SOIR Section A section that sets out the proposed level of service and that, i. defines the proposed level of service through timeframes and performance measures, ii. discusses any external trends or issues that may affect the proposed level of service or the municipality s ability to meet it, and iii. shows current performance relative to the targets set out. See A.M.P., Section 5 See A.M.P., Section 5 See the 2018 Operating Budget and Forecast document

231 Page F-6 Ontario Regulation 82/98, as amended Compliance subsection 8(3) Requirements 3. An asset management strategy that, See A.M.P., section 6 i. sets out planned actions that will enable the assets to provide the proposed level of service in a sustainable way, while managing risk, at the lowest life cycle cost, ii. is based on an assessment of potential options to achieve the proposed level of service, which assessment compares, See A.M.P., section 6 See A.M.P., section 6 A. life cycle costs, B. all other relevant direct and indirect costs and benefits, and C. the risks associated with the potential options, iii. contains a summary of, in relation to achieving the proposed level of service, (not defined clearly) A. non-infrastructure solutions, B. maintenance activities, C. renewal and rehabilitation activities, D. replacement activities, E. disposal activities, and F. expansion activities, iv. discusses the procurement measures that are intended to achieve the proposed level of service, and v. includes an overview of the risks associated with the strategy and any actions that will be taken in response to those risks. See A.M.P., section 6 See Procurement Policy By-law See A.M.P., section 6

232 Page F-7 Ontario Regulation 82/98, as amended subsection 8(3) Requirements 4. A financial strategy that, i. shows the yearly expenditure forecasts that are proposed to achieve the proposed level of service, categorized by, A. non-infrastructure solutions, B. maintenance activities, C. renewal and rehabilitation activities, D. replacement activities, E. disposal activities, and F. expansion activities, ii. provides actual expenditures in respect of the categories set out in sub-subparagraphs i A to F from the previous two years, if available, for comparison purposes, iii. gives a breakdown of yearly revenues by source, iv. discusses key assumptions and alternative scenarios where appropriate, (see associated text) and v. identifies any funding shortfall relative to financial requirements that cannot be eliminated by revising service levels, asset management or financing strategies, and discusses the impact of the shortfall and how the impact will be managed. See A.M.P., Section 7 Compliance See A.M.P., Section 7; the 2017 Capital Budget and 10 Year Financial Plan document; and the 2018 Operating Budget and Forecast document. The 2018 Capital Budget and 10 Year Financial Plan will be released in February See the 2017 Capital Budget and 10 Year Financial Plan document and the 2018 Operating Budget and Forecast document. See Executive Summary in the 2017 Capital Budget and 10 Year Financial Plan document and the 2018 Operating Budget and Forecast document. See A.M.P., Section 7 Note 1 Reference to A.M.P. means The Asset Management Plan 2017 dated December, 2017 Note 2 Reference to SOIR means The s State of Infrastructure Report Part 1 and The s State of Infrastructure Report Part 2 dated December, 2017

233 Page G-1 Appendix G Proposed Development Charge By-law

234

235 Page G-2 THE CORPORATION OF THE TOWN OF OAKVILLE BY-LAW NUMBER A by-law to establish development charges generally for The Corporation of the, and to repeal By-law WHEREAS subsection 2(1) of the Development Charges Act, 1997, S.O. 1997, c. 27 (hereinafter called the Act ) provides that the council of a municipality may pass bylaws for the imposition of development charges against land for increased capital costs required because of the needs for services arising from development in the area to which the by-law applies; WHEREAS the Council of The Corporation of the ( ) has given notice in accordance with section 12 of the Act, of its intention to pass a bylaw under section 2 of the said Act; WHEREAS the Council of the has heard all persons who applied to be heard no matter whether in objection to, or in support of, the development charges proposal at a public meeting held January 29, 2018; WHEREAS in accordance with the legislation, the Development Charge Background Study dated December 22, 2017, as amended and proposed By-law were available for public review on December 22, 2017; WHEREAS at a meeting open to the public held on January 29, 2018, the Council of The considered the final development charges proposals, received written submissions and heard further comments and representations from the public; WHEREAS by resolution adopted by Council of The on January 29, 2018, Council determined that no further public meetings were required under Section 12 of the Act; WHEREAS the Council of The had before it a report, entitled Development Charge Background Study, dated December 22, 2017, prepared by ; WHEREAS by resolution adopted by Council of The on January 29, 2018, Council has indicated that it intends to ensure that the increase in the need for services attributable to the anticipated development, including any capital costs, will be met, by updating its capital budget and forecast where appropriate; 1 P age

236 By-Law Number: Page G-3 WHEREAS by resolution adopted by Council of The Corporation of the Town of Oakville on January 29, 2018, Council has indicated its intent that the future excess capacity identified in the Development Charge Background Study, dated December 22, 2017, prepared by, shall be paid for by the development charges or other similar charges; COUNCIL ENACTS AS FOLLOWS: DEFINITIONS 1. In this By-law, (1) accessory dwelling means a dwelling unit that is naturally or normally incidental to or subordinate in purpose and is exclusively devoted to a single or semi-detached dwelling located on the same lot; (2) Act means the Development Charges Act, 1997, S.O. 1997, c. 27, as amended or successor legislation; (3) agricultural development means a bona fide farming operation (as evidenced by membership of the owner/operator of the farm operation in the Ontario Federation of Agriculture), including greenhouses which are not connected to Regional water services or wastewater services, sod farms and farms for the breeding and boarding of horses, and includes, but is not limited to, barns, silos and other ancillary buildings to such agricultural development but excluding any component thereof that is; (a) (b) (c) A residential use, A commercial use, including but not limited to marijuana production facilities, or Retail development, including but not limited to the breeding, boarding and/or grooming of household pets; (4) air supported structure means a structure consisting of a pliable membrane which achieves and maintains its shape and support by internal air pressure; (5) apartment dwelling means any dwelling unit within a building containing more than three dwelling units, including stacked townhouse dwellings, where the units are connected by an interior corridor and includes a dwelling unit within a retirement home or lodge where the unit has its own private sanitary and full culinary facilities. (6) area of worship means the area within a place of worship in which a religious service, ceremony or other practice is normally held; 2 P age

237 By-Law Number: Page G-4 (7) Assessment Act means the Assessment Act, R.S.O. 1990, c. A. 31, as amended, or successor legislation; (8) back-to-back townhouse dwelling means a building or structure containing four or more dwelling units, separated vertically by a common wall, including a rear common wall, that do not have rear yards; (9) bedroom means a habitable room of at least seven (7) square metres, including a den, study, loft or other similar area, but does not include a living room, dining room or kitchen; (10) board of education means an English-language district school board, an English-language separate district school board, a French-language district school board and a French-language separate district school board; (11) Building Code Act means the Building Code Act, 1992, S.O. 1992, c. 23, as amended, or successor legislation; (12) building or structure means a permanent enclosed structure occupying an area greater than ten square metres (10 m²) and despite the foregoing includes, but is not limited to: (a) (b) (c) (e) (f) (g) above grade storage tanks; a permanent air-supported sport structure; an industrial tent; a roof-like structure over a gas-bar or service station; garden centres ancillary to a retail use; and an area attached to and ancillary to a retail development delineated by one or more walls or part walls, a roof-like structure or any of them, but specifically excluding a patio on a municipal sidewalk ancillary but not attached to a retail development; (13) building permit means a permit under the Building Code Act, in relation to a building or structure, (14) capital cost means costs incurred or proposed to be incurred by the municipality or a local board thereof directly or by others on behalf of, and as authorized by the municipality or local board, (a) to acquire land or an interest in land, including a leasehold interest; (b) to improve land; 3 P age

238 By-Law Number: Page G-5 (c) (d) to acquire, lease, construct or improve buildings and structures; to acquire, lease, construct or improve facilities including (i) (ii) (iii) rolling stock with an estimated useful life of seven years or more, furniture and equipment, other than computer equipment, and materials acquired for circulation, reference or information purposes by a library board as defined in the Public Libraries Act, R.S.O. 1990, c. P.44, as amended, or successor legislation; (e) (f) (g) to undertake studies in connection with any of the matters referred to in subsections 1(11)(a) to (d); to complete the development charge background study under section 10 of the Act; and, includes interest on money borrowed to pay for costs in subsections 1(11) (a) to (d); required for provision of services designated in this By-law within or outside the municipality. (15) charitable dwelling means a part of a residential building or a part of the residential portion of a mixed-use building maintained and operated by a corporation approved under the Long-Term Care Homes Act, 2007 S.O. 2007, c.8, as amended or successor legislation as a home or joint home, an institution, or nursing home for persons requiring residential, specialized or group care and includes a children s residence under the Child and Family Services Act, R.S.O. 1990, c. C.11, as amended or successor legislation, and a home for special care under the Homes for Special Care Act, R.S.O. 1990, c. H.12, as amended or successor legislation; (16) commercial use means land, buildings or portions thereof used, designed or intended for a non-residential use that is not retail or industrial, and includes uses which serve academic, medical/dental, and cultural needs that are not located within or part of a retail development; (17) council means the council of the municipality; (18) development means the construction, erection or placing of one or 4 P age

239 By-Law Number: Page G-6 more buildings or structures on land or the making of an addition or alteration to a building or structure that has the effect of increasing the size or usability thereof, and includes redevelopment; (19) development charge means a charge imposed pursuant to this By-law; (20) dwelling unit means, (a) (b) a room or suite of rooms used, or designed or intended for use, by one or more persons living together, in which full culinary and sanitary facilities are provided for the exclusive use of such person or persons; except in the case of a special care/special need dwelling, as defined in this By-law, in which case dwelling unit means either: (i) (ii) (iii) a room or suite of rooms designated for residential occupancy, used, designed or intended for use by one person with or without exclusive sanitary and/or full culinary facilities; a room or suite of rooms used, designated for residential occupancy, used, designed or intended for use, by more than one person with no more than two persons sharing a bedroom and with sanitary facilities directly connected and accessible to each room; or every seven (7) square metres of area within a room or suite of rooms used, designed or intended for use, by one or more persons with no more than two persons sharing a bedroom. (21) existing industrial building shall have the same meaning as the term is defined in the Regulation, and shall not include self-storage facilities and retail warehouses; (22) grade means the average level of finished ground adjoining a building or structure at all exterior walls; (23) group home means a residential building or structure or the residential portion of a mixed-use building or structure containing a single housekeeping unit which may or may not be supervised on a 24-hour basis on site by agency staff on a shift rotation basis, and funded wholly or in part by any government or agency, or by public subscription or donation, or by any combination thereof, and licensed, approved or supervised by the Province of Ontario for the accommodation of persons under any general or special act as amended or successor legislation, and includes a correctional group home, which may contain 5 P age

240 By-Law Number: Page G-7 an office provided that the office is only used for the operation of the correctional group home, but does not include any detention facility operated or supervised by the federal government, or any secure custody and detention facility operated by the provincial government; (24) industrial means non-residential uses, excluding commercial and retail uses, where the land or buildings, or portions thereof are intended or designed for manufacturing, producing, processing, storing or distribution of something, including research or development in connection with manufacturing, producing or processing something, and the retail sale by a manufacturer, producer or processor of something that they have manufactured, produced or processed, if the retail sales are at the site where the manufacturing, production or processing takes place, as well as office space that is ancillary to the producing, processing, storing or distribution of something at the site, but shall not include self-storage facilities or retail warehouses which shall be considered retail uses; (25) local board means municipal service board, municipal business corporation, public library board, local board of health, or any other board, commission, committee or body or local authority established or exercising any power or authority under any general or special Act with respect to any of the affairs or purposes, including school purposes, of the municipality or any part or parts thereof, excluding a conservation authority, any municipal business corporation not deemed to be a local board under O.Reg. 168/03 under the Municipal Act, 2001, S.O. 2001, c. 25, as amended, and any corporation enacted under the Electricity Act, 1998, S.O. 1998, c. 15, Sched. A, as amended, or successor legislation; (26) local services means those services or facilities which are under the jurisdiction of the municipality and are related to a plan of subdivision or within the area to which the plan relates, required as a condition of approval under section 51 of the Planning Act, or as a condition of approval under section 53 of the Planning Act; (27) mezzanine means an intermediate floor assembly between the floor and ceiling of any room or storey and includes an interior balcony; (28) multiple dwelling means all dwellings other than single detached dwellings, semi-detached dwellings, apartment dwellings, special care/special need dwellings, and accessory dwellings, and includes but is not limited to, back-to-back townhouse dwellings; (29) municipality means The Corporation of the ; (30) non-residential means the use of lands, buildings or structures for other than a residential use, including an industrial use, a retail use or a commercial use; 6 P age

241 By-Law Number: Page G-8 (31) nursing home means a residential building or structure or the residential portion of a mixed-use building or structure licensed as a nursing home by the Province of Ontario; (32) official plan means the Official Plan of the and any amendments thereto; (33) owner means the owner of land or a person who has made application for an approval for the development of land upon which a development charge is imposed; (34) place of worship means a building or structure, or part thereof, that is exempt from taxation as a place of worship pursuant to paragraph 3 of the Assessment Act; (35) Planning Act means the Planning Act, R.S.O. 1990, P. 13, as amended, or successor legislation; (36) redevelopment means the construction, erection or placing of one or more buildings or structures on land where all or part of a building or structure has previously been demolished on such land, or changing the use of a building or structure from a residential use to a nonresidential use or from a non-residential use to a residential use, or changing a building or structure from one form of residential use to another form of residential use or from one form of non-residential use to another form of non-residential use; (37) Regulation means O. Reg. 82/98, as amended or successor regulation (38) residential means lands, buildings or structures, or portions thereof, used, or designed or intended for use as a home or residence of one or more individuals, and shall include but not be limited to a single detached dwelling, a semi-detached dwelling, a multiple dwelling, an apartment dwelling, a special care/special need dwelling, an accessory dwelling, and the residential portion of a mixed-use building or structure; (39) retail means lands, buildings or structures, or portions thereof, used, designed or intended to be used for the sale. lease or rental of any manner of goods commodities, services or entertainment to the public, for consumption or use, whether directly or through membership, but shall exclude commercial, industrial, hotels/motels/bed and breakfast facilities, as well as offices not located within or as part of a retail development, and self-storage facilities; (40) retirement home or lodge means a residential building or structure or the residential portion of a mixed-use building or structure which provides accommodation primarily for retired persons or couples where each private bedroom or living accommodation has a separate private 7 P age

242 By-Law Number: Page G-9 bathroom and separate entrance from a common hall but where common facilities for the preparation and consumption of food are provided, and common lounges, recreation rooms and medical care facilities may also be provided; (41) seasonal structure means a building placed or constructed on land and used, designed or intended for use for a non-residential purpose during a single season of the year where such building is designed to be demolished or removed from the land at the end of the season; (42) semi-detached dwelling means a building divided vertically into two (2) dwelling units each of which has a separate entrance and access to grade; (43) services mean services designated in this By-law; (44) single detached dwelling means a completely detached building containing only one dwelling unit; (45) site hectare means a site area in hectares, including residential lots or blocks only and excludes any public lands. In the case of a development, any public land required to be dedicated or conveyed shall not be included for the purpose of calculating the site hectares; (46) special care/special need dwellings mean a residential building or portion thereof; (a) (b) (c) (d) (e) containing more than two (2) dwelling units, which units have a common entrance from street level; where the occupants have the right to use in common, halls, stairs, yards, common rooms and accessory buildings but which do not have their own private sanitary and full culinary facilities; that is designed to accommodate individuals with specific needs, including independent permanent living arrangements; and where support services such as meal preparation, grocery shopping, laundry, housekeeping, nursing, respite care and attendant services are provided at various levels; and includes but is not limited to, retirement homes or lodges, nursing homes, charitable homes, granny flats, group homes (including correctional group homes) and hospices; (47) stacked townhouse dwelling means a building containing two or more dwelling units where each dwelling unit is separated horizontally and/or 8 P age

243 By-Law Number: Page G-10 vertically from another dwelling unit by a common wall; (48) temporary building or structure means a building or structure used, designed or intended for a non-residential use that is constructed or placed upon lands and which is demolished or removed from the lands within three years of building permit issuance, including but not limited to sales trailers, office trailers and industrial tents, provided that such a building or structure meets the aforementioned criteria; (49) temporary venue means a building that is placed or constructed on land and is used, designed or intended for use for a particular event where the event has a duration of 30 days or less and the building is erected immediately before the beginning of the event and is demolished or removed from the land immediately following the end of the event; (50) total floor area means the total area of all floors of buildings and structures, above or below grade, measured between the outside surfaces of the exterior walls, or between the outside surfaces of exterior walls and the centre line of party walls dividing a non-residential use and a residential use, except those areas used exclusively for parking garages or structures, but includes the area of a mezzanine; (51) Treasurer means the Treasurer of the municipality or his or her designate. RULES 2. For the purpose of complying with section 6 of the Act: (1) the area to which this By-law applies shall be the area described in section 5 of this By-law; (2) the rules developed under paragraph 9 of subsection 5(1) of the Act for determining if development charges are payable under this By-law in any particular case and for determining the amount of the charges shall be as set forth in sections 3, 4 and 12 of this By-law; (3) the rules for exemptions, relief, credits and adjustments shall be as set forth in sections 6, 7, 9, 10, 11 and 13 of this By-law; (4) the indexing of charges shall be in accordance with section 17 of this By-law; and (5) except as set out in the Act and this By-law, there are no other credits, exemptions, relief or adjustments in respect of any land in the area to which this By-law applies. 9 P age

244 By-Law Number: Page G-11 APPROVAL FOR DEVELOPMENT 3. (1) Subject to the provisions of this By-law, development charges against land shall be imposed, calculated and collected in accordance with the rates set out in Schedule B (Town Services), which relate to the services set out in Schedule A. (2) Development in the municipality may be subject to one or more by-laws of the municipality and the development charges under this By-law are in addition to any other development charges imposed by the municipality under other by-laws. Phasing-in of Development Charges (3) This By-law does not provide for the phasing in of the schedule of the base rates in Schedule "B". Calculation of Development Charges (4) The development or redevelopment of land in the municipality may be subject to one or more development charges by-laws of the municipality. (5) The development charge with respect to the use of any land, buildings or structures shall be calculated as follows: (a) (b) in the case of residential development or redevelopment, or the residential portion of a mixed-use development or redevelopment, based upon the number and type of dwelling units; in the case of non-residential development or redevelopment, or the non-residential portion of a mixed-use development or redevelopment, based upon the total floor area of such development. Development and Redevelopment (6) Council hereby determines that the development or redevelopment of lands, buildings or structures for residential and non-residential uses will require the provision, enlargement or expansion of services referred to in Schedule "A", including, and without limiting the foregoing, any capital costs associated with the development or redevelopment. APPROVAL FOR DEVELOPMENT 4. (1) Subject to subsection 4(2), development charges shall be calculated and collected in accordance with the provisions of this Bylaw and be imposed on land to be developed or redeveloped for 10 P age

245 By-Law Number: Page G-12 residential and/or non-residential use, where the development or redevelopment requires: (a) (b) (c) (d) (e) (f) (g) the passing of a zoning by-law or an amendment thereto under section 34 of the Planning Act; the approval of a minor variance under section 45 of the Planning Act; a conveyance of land to which a by-law passed under subsection 50(7) of the Planning Act applies; the approval of a plan of subdivision under section 51 of the Planning Act; a consent under section 53 of the Planning Act; the approval of a description under section 50 of the Condominium Act, R.S.O. 1990, c.26, as amended; or the issuing of a permit under the Building Code Act, in relation to a building or structure. (2) Subsection 4(1) shall not apply in respect to: (a) (b) local services, related to a plan of subdivision or within the area to which the plan relates, to be installed or paid for by the owner as a condition of approval under section 51 of the Planning Act; local services to be installed or paid for by the owner as a condition of approval under section 53 of the Planning Act; LANDS AFFECTED 5. (1) Subject to subsection 6(1) to (6) ( Statutory Exemptions ), and subsections 7(1) to (5) ("Non-Statutory Exemptions"), this By-law applies to all lands in the municipality, whether or not the land or use is exempt from taxation under section 3 of the Assessment Act. EXEMPTIONS 6. (1) This By-law shall not apply to land that is owned by and used for the purposes of: (a) (b) (c) a board of education; a provincial or federal crown agency; a publicly-funded university, community college or a college of 11 Page

246 By-Law Number: Page G-13 applied arts and technology established under the Ontario Colleges of Applied Art and Technology Act, 2002, S.O 2002, c.8, Schedule F, as amended, or (d) any municipality or local board thereof. Rules With Respect to Exemptions from Intensification of Existing Housing (2) This By-law shall not apply to that category of exempt development or redevelopment described in subsection 2(3) of the Act and section 2 of O.Reg. 82/98, namely: (a) (b) the enlargement of an existing dwelling unit or the creation of one or two additional dwelling units in an existing single detached dwelling where the total gross floor area of the dwelling unit(s) created does not exceed the gross floor area of the existing dwelling unit already in the single detached dwelling; or the creation of one additional dwelling unit in any other existing residential building, provided the gross floor area of the additional dwelling unit does not exceed the gross floor area of the smallest existing dwelling unit in the case of a semi-detached dwelling, or does not exceed the residential gross floor area of the smallest dwelling unit contained in any other residential building; (3) Notwithstanding subsection 6(2)(a), development charges shall b e calculated and collected in accordance with Schedule "B" where the total floor area of the additional one or two dwelling units is greater than the total floor area of the existing single detached dwelling unit. (4) Notwithstanding subsection 6(2)(b), development charges shall be calculated and collected in accordance with Schedule "B" where the additional dwelling unit has a total floor area greater than: (a) (b) in the case of semi-detached dwelling or multiple dwelling, the total floor area of the smallest existing dwelling unit; and in the case of any other residential building, the total floor area of the smallest dwelling unit. Rules With Respect to an "Industrial" Expansion Exemption (5) This By-law does not apply to the enlargement of the gross floor area of an existing industrial building, if the gross floor area is enlarged by 50 percent or less. (a) For the purpose of applying this exemption, the terms "gross 12 P age

247 By-Law Number: Page G-14 floor area" and "existing industrial building" shall have the same meaning as those terms have in O.Reg. 82/98 made under the Act; (b) for the purpose of interpreting the definition of existing industrial building contained in O. Reg. 82/98, regard shall be had to the classification of the lands in question pursuant to the Assessment Act, and in particular: (i) (ii) whether the lands fall within a tax class such that taxes on the lands are payable at the industrial tax rate; and whether more than fifty percent (50%) of the total floor area of the building has an industrial property code for assessment purposes; (c) (d) (e) (f) despite paragraph (b), self-service storage facilities and retail warehouses are not considered to be industrial buildings; in particular, for the purposes of applying this exemption, the industrial building is considered existing if it is built, occupied and assessed for property taxation at the time of passage of this Bylaw; the exemption applies where there is a bona fide increase in the size of the existing industrial building and the enlarged area is attached to the existing industrial building, and is used for or in connection with an industrial purpose as set out in subsection 1(1) of O. Reg. 82/98 made under the Act. Without limiting the generality of the foregoing, this exemption shall not apply where the enlargement is attached to the existing industrial building by means only of a tunnel, bridge, canopy, corridor or other passageway, or through a shared below-grade connection such as a service tunnel, foundation, footing or a parking facility; and The exemption for an existing industrial building provided by this section shall be applied to a maximum of fifty percent (50%) of the total floor area before the first enlargement for which an exemption from the payment of development charges was granted pursuant to this By-law or any previous development charges bylaw of the municipality made pursuant to the Development Charges Act, 1997, as amended or its predecessor legislation. (6) Notwithstanding subsection 6(5), if the gross floor area of an existing industrial building is enlarged by more than 50 percent, development charges shall be calculated and collected in accordance with Schedule "B" on the amount by which the enlargement exceeds 50 percent of the gross floor area before the enlargement. 13 P age

248 By-Law Number: Page G (1) This By-law shall not apply to land that is owned by and used for the purposes of: (a) (b) (c) (d) an agricultural development; a seasonal structure or a temporary venue; a part of a building or structure that is used as a public hospital under the Public Hospitals Act, R.S.O. 1990, c. P. 40, as amended, or successor legislation, but does not include any other lands or buildings or structures owned by a hospital board that are used for purposes other than as a public hospital; buildings or structures owned by and used for the purposes of a conservation authority, unless such buildings or structures are used primarily for or in connection with (i) recreational purposes for which the conservation authority charges admission and/or fees, or (ii) any commercial purposes. (2) Despite anything else in this By-law, development charges shall not be imposed in respect of the gross floor area of the area of worship within a place of worship. Cap on Coverage (3) Notwithstanding subsection 3(5)(b), where there is non-residential development, the development charge otherwise payable pursuant to this By-law shall be calculated in accordance with the following: (a) (b) (c) (d) for the portion of the total floor area of such development that is less than or equal to 2.0 times the area of the lot, the nonresidential development charges as set out in Schedule "B" applies; and for the portion of the total floor area of such development that is greater than 2.0 times the area of the lot, fifty percent of the nonresidential development charges as set out in Schedule "B" applies; the land area includes the land area of the parking required for the building, if on a separate lot; and this section does not apply to retail use or retail development. 14 P age

249 By-Law Number: Page G-16 Categories of Exempt Institutions (4) The following categories of institutions are hereby designated as being exempt from the payment of development charges: (a) total floor area within non-residential buildings or structures used solely for the purposes of a non-profit, licensed, day nursery for the exclusive use by children of the employees of the owner, provided that the day nursery is owned and operated by the owner and located upon the lands used by the owner's primary nonresidential use or non-residentially zoned lands owned by the owner immediately abutting the lands used by the owner for its primary non-residential use. Temporary Buildings (5) Notwithstanding any other provisions of this by-law, a temporary building or structure shall be exempt from the payment of development charges provided that: (a) (b) (c) (d) prior to the issuance of the building permit for the temporary building or structure, the owner shall provide to the municipality securities in the form of a certified cheque or bank draft or a letter of credit acceptable to the Treasurer in the full amount of the development charges otherwise payable; within three (3) years of building permit issuance or any extension permitted in writing by the Treasurer, the owner shall provide to the municipality evidence, to the municipality s satisfaction, that the temporary building or structure was demolished or removed from the lands within three (3) years of building permit issuance or any extension herein provided, whereupon the municipality shall return to the owner the securities provided pursuant to subsection (a), without interest; in the event that the owner does not provide satisfactory evidence of the demolition or removal of the temporary building or structure in accordance with subsection (b), the temporary building or structure shall be deemed conclusively not to be a temporary building or structure for the purposes of this by-law and the municipality shall, without prior notification to the owner, transfer the funds or draw upon the letter(s) of credit provided pursuant to subsection (a) and transfer the amount so drawn into the appropriate development charges reserve funds; and the timely provision of satisfactory evidence of the demolition or 15 P age

250 By-Law Number: Page G-17 removal of the temporary building or structure in accordance with subsection (b) shall be solely the owner s responsibility. LOCAL SERVICES INSTALLATION 8. Nothing in this By-law prevents council from requiring: (a) (b) local services, related to a plan of subdivision or within the area to which the plan relates, to be installed or paid for by the owner as a condition of approval under section 51 of the Planning Act; local services to be installed or paid for by the owner as a condition of approval under section 53 of the Planning Act. MULTIPLE CHARGES 9. (1) Where two or more of the actions described in subsection 4(1) may be required before land to which a development charge applies can be developed, only one development charge shall be calculated and collected in accordance with the provisions of this By-law. (2) Notwithstanding subsection 9(1), if two or more of the actions described in subsection 4(1) occur at different times, or a second or subsequent building permit is issued, resulting in increased, additional or different development, an additional development charge on the additional residential units and non-residential floor area, shall be calculated and collected in accordance with the provisions of this By-law. DEVELOPMENT CHARGE CREDITS FOR SERVICES IN LIEU 10. (1) Council may authorize an owner, through an agreement under section 38 of the Act, to substitute such part of the development charge applicable to the owner's development as may be specified in the agreement, by the provision at the sole expense of the owner, of services in lieu. Such agreement shall further specify that where the owner provides services in lieu in accordance with the agreement, council shall give to the owner acredit against the related service component of the development charge in accordance with the agreement provisions and the provisions of section 39 of the Act, equal to the reasonable cost to the Owner of providing the services in lieu. In no case shall the agreement provide for a credit which exceeds the total development charge payable by an owner to the municipality in respect of the development to which the agreement relates. (2) In any agreement under subsection 10(1), council may also give a further credit to the owner equal to the reasonable cost of providing services in addition to, or of a greater size or capacity, than would be 16 P age

251 By-Law Number: Page G-18 required under this By-law. (3) The credit provided for in subsection 10(2) shall not be charged to any development charge reserve fund. DEVELOPMENT CHARGE CREDITS FOR DEMOLITION 11. If a development or redevelopment involves the demolition of and replacement of a building or structure, or the conversion from one principal use to another: (1) A credit shall be allowed against the development charges otherwise payable, provided that where a demolition permit for the demolition of a building or structure on the site has been issued and not revoked: (a) (b) before August 31, 2009, and a building permit has been issued for the development or redevelopment within ten years from the date the demolition permit. or as of and after August 31, 2009, and a building permit has been issued for the development or redevelopment within five years from the date of the demolition permit. (2) The credit shall be calculated: (a) (b) for any portion of a building or structure used for residential uses, based on the number of dwelling units demolished and/or converted multiplied by the applicable residential development charge in place at the time the development charge is payable; and/or for any portion of a building or structure used for non-residential uses, based on the total floor area of the building demolished and/or converted multiplied by the current non-residential development charge in place at the time the development charge is payable. (3) The credit can, in no case, exceed the amount of the development charge that would otherwise be payable. Where the amount of any credit pursuant to this section exceeds the amount of the development charge otherwise payable under this By-law with respect to the redevelopment, the excess credit shall be reduced to zero and shall not be carried forward unless the carrying forward of such excess credit is expressly permitted by a phasing plan for the development that is acceptable to the Treasurer. (4) For greater certainty, where a building cannot be demolished and/or converted until the new building is constructed, development charges will be payable pursuant to section 12, with any refund related to the demolition credit made, without interest, provided that an application for a refund is made within twelve (12) months after the building permit for 17 P age

252 By-Law Number: Page G-19 the new building is issued. If more than twelve (12) months is required to demolish the existing building, the owner shall make a written request to the municipality and the Treasurer may extend the time in which the existing building must be demolished in his or her sole and absolute discretion and upon such terms and conditions as he or she considers necessary or desirable and such decision shall be made prior to the issuance of the first building permit for the new building. (5) This section does not apply and no credit shall be given for a demolished building or structure, or any part thereof, for which a demolition credit is sought, where (a) the building or structure, or any part thereof, when originally constructed was exempt from the payment of development charges pursuant to this By-law, or any predecessor thereof; or (b) the building or structure was originally constructed prior to imposition of development charges, the building or structure as originally constructed would be exempt under this By-law if it were built as of the date of demolition. TIME OF CALCULATION AND PAYMENT 12. (1) Development charges shall be calculated and payable in full in money or by provision of services as may be agreed upon, or by credit granted under the Act, on the date that the building permit is issued in relation to a building or structure on land to which a development charge applies. (2) Where development charges apply to land in relation to which a building permit is required, the building permit shall not be issued until the development charge has been paid in full. (3) Where development or redevelopment requires an action described in subsection 4(1) after the issuance of a building permit and no development charges have been paid, then the development charges shall be paid prior to the granting of approval for any action required under subsection 4(1) of this By-law. (4) If a development or redevelopment does not require a building permit but does require one or more of the actions described in subsection 4(1) then, notwithstanding subsection 12(1) above, development charges shall nonetheless be payable prior to the approval of the action described in subsection 4(1). (5) Council may enter into an agreement with an owner to make any development charges payable earlier or later than the date provided for (6) In the case of a temporary, conditional or below grade building permit that constitute a first building permit, the owner shall be required to enter into Into an agreement under section 27 of the Act to (a) defer the development 18 P age

253 By-Law Number: Page G-20 development charges payable to the earlier of the first above grade permit issuance or the expiry of the agreement and (b) to require the the amount payable to be calculated at the rates in effect at the time of payment. EXEMPTIONS, RELIEF AND ADJUSTMENTS NOT CUMULATIVE 13. Only one of the applicable exemption(s), relief or adjustment(s) set out in this By-law shall be applicable to development or redevelopment. Where the circumstances of a development or redevelopment are such that more than one exemption, relief or adjustment could apply, only one exemption, relief or adjustment shall apply and it shall be the exemption, relief or adjustment that results in the lowest development charges being payable pursuant to this Bylaw. DEVELOPMENT NOT AS REFERENCED IN BUILDING PERMIT 14. (1) Where a building permit is obtained and development charges are paid, but the actual development or redevelopment which is completed is (a) less total floor area than what had been planned and paid for, or (b) a different type of residential use than originally planned, or (c) has fewer dwelling units than originally planned and paid for, then a refund for the excess of the development charges paid over the development charges which would have been payable for the actual development or redevelopment which was completed is only payable if: (a) a new building permit is obtained reflecting the actual development or redevelopment; and (b) the application for such new building permit is filed within five (5) years of the issuance of the initial building permit. (2) Any such refund which may be payable pursuant to subsection 14(1) above by the municipality shall be paid without interest. RESERVE FUNDS 15. (1) Monies received from payment of development charges shall be maintained in separate reserve funds as follows: discounted and nondiscounted funds. (2) Monies received for the payment of development charges shall be used only in accordance with the provisions of section 35 of the Act. 19 P age

254 By-Law Number: Page G-21 (3) Council directs the Treasurer to divide the reserve funds created hereunder into separate sub-accounts in accordance with the service categories set out in Schedule "A" to which the development charge payments shall be credited in accordance with the amounts shown, plus interest earned thereon. (4) Income received from investment of the development charge reserve funds shall be credited to the development charge reserve funds in relation to which investment income applies. (5) Where any development charge, or part thereof, remains unpaid after the date that the development charge is first payable, the amount unpaid shall be added to the tax roll and shall be collected as taxes. (6) Where any unpaid development charges are collected as taxes under subsection 15(5), the monies so collected shall be credited to the development charge reserve funds referred to in subsection 15(1). (7) The Treasurer shall, in each year, furnish to council a statement in respect of the reserve funds established hereunder for the prior year, containing the information set out in section 12 of O.Reg. 82/98. BY-LAW AMENDMENT OR REPEAL OR COMPLAINT 16. (1) Where this By-law or any development charge prescribed thereunder is amended or repealed either by order of the Ontario Municipal Board or by resolution of the municipal council, the Treasurer shall calculate forthwith the amount of any overpayment to be refunded as a result of said amendment or repeal. (2) Refunds that are required to be paid under subsection 16(1) shall be paid with interest to be calculated as follows: (a) interest shall be calculated from the date on which t h e overpayment was collected to the date on which the refund is paid; (b) (c) the refund shall include the interest owed under this section; and the Bank of Canada interest rate in effect on the date of enactment of this By-law shall be used. (3) Where a person disputes or files a complaint regarding the imposition or calculation of development charges under this By-law, the Treasurer may, but is not required to, resolve the dispute or complaint in such manner as the Treasurer deems appropriate. BY-LAW INDEXING 17. The development charges set out in Schedule "B" to this By-law shall be 20 P age

255 By-Law Number: Page G-22 adjusted annually on April 1, without amendment to this By-law, in accordance with the most recent twelve month change in the Statistics Canada Quarterly, Construction Price Statistics, or an successor thereto. BY-LAW REGISTRATION 18. A certified copy of this By-law may be registered on title to any land to which this By-law applies. SEVERABILITY 19. If, for any reason, any provision, section, subsection or paragraph of this Bylaw is held to be invalid, it is hereby declared to be the intention of council that all the remainder of this By-law shall continue in full force and effect until repealed, re-enacted or amended, in whole or in part or dealt with in any other way. REPEAL 20. Upon the coming into force of this By-law and effective at 12:01 am on February 27, 2018, the current Development Charge By-law is repealed. BY-LAW ADMINISTRATION 21. This By-law shall be administered by the Treasurer. SCHEDULES TO THE BY-LAW 22. The following Schedules to this By-law form an integral part of this By-law: Schedule A - Schedule B - Schedule of Municipal Service Schedule of Development Charges DATE BY-LAW EFFECTIVE 23. This By-law shall come into force and effect at 12:01 am on February 27, SHORT TITLE 24. This By-law may be cited as the Development Charge Bylaw, PASSED this 26th day of February, 2018 MAYOR CLERK 21 Page

256 By-Law Number: Page G-23 SCHEDULE A SCHEDULE OF MUNICIPAL SERVICES Discounted Non-Discounted 1. Services Related to a Highway 2. Fire Protection Services 3. Public Transit 4. Municipal Parking 5. Parks and Recreation 6. Library Services 7. General Government

257 By-Law Number: Page G-24 SCHEDULE B SCHEDULE OF DEVELOPMENT CHARGES Residential Development Charge (By Type of Residential Use per dwelling Unit) Service Municipal Wide Services: Single and Semi- Detached Dwelling Apartments - 2 Bedrooms + RESIDENTIAL Apartments - Bachelor and 1 Bedroom Other Multiples Special Care/Special Dwelling Units Services Related to a Highway 17,329 9,313 5,616 12,625 5,280 Transit Services Fire Protection Services Municipal Parking Parks and Recreation 13,019 6,996 4,219 9,485 3,967 Library Services General Government Total Municipal Wide Services 33,688 18,105 10,917 24,543 10,265

258 By-Law Number: Page G-25 Non-Residential Development Charge NON-RESIDENTIAL Service (per ft² of Gross Floor Area) Municipal Wide Services: Services Related to a Highway 8.46 Transit Services 0.29 Fire Protection Services 0.44 Municipal Parking 0.14 Parks and Recreation 0.65 Library Services 0.05 General Government 0.24 Total Municipal Wide Services NOTE: The development charges described in Schedule B are applicable on the date this By-law comes into effect (12:01 am February 27, 2018). These development charges shall be adjusted annually in accordance with section 17 of this By-law.

259 Page H-1 Appendix H Dillon Consulting Limited

260

261 TOWN OF OAKVILLE Transit Development Charges Technical Appendix February

262

263 i Table of Contents 1.0 Introduction Growth Forecasts Transit Network Today (2017) End of D.C. Period (2026) Oakville Transit Services Review Oakville Transportation Master Plan (TMP) Update Ten-Year Ridership Forecast Ten-Year Capital Plan for D.C. Application New Conventional Transit Vehicles New Supervisor Vehicles Apportioning Benefit In-Period Growth and Existing Conventional Transit Vehicles Supervisor Vehicles In-Period and Post-Period Conventional Transit Vehicles Supervisor Vehicles Recommended Future Methodology In-Period and Post-Period Growth and Existing Summary of Key Values 25 Figures Figure 1: Oakville Transit System Map... 5 Figure 2: Calculation of ridership to/from and within Oakville... 7 Figure 3: Conventional Ridership and Revenue Hours (from Transit Services Review, pg.108)... 8 Figure 4: TMP Update Existing and 2031 Target Mode Share (from TMP Technical Advisory Committee Meeting #1, September 18, 2015)... 9 Figure 5: 2031 Transit Trips Taken by Post-Period Existing and Growth Population/Employment Transit Development Charges - Technical Appendix February

264 ii Tables Table 1: Population and Employment Forecasts ( )... 3 Table 2: Oakville Transit Ridership ( )... 4 Table 3: Year-to-Year Increase in Ridership and Revenue Hours ( , from Transit Services Review)... 8 Table 4: Ridership Forecast (2017, 2026, 2031) Table 5: Peer Review (from Canadian Urban Transit Association 2015 Factbook) Table 6: Conventional Transit Vehicle Requirements (2026, 2031) Table 7: Supervisor Vehicle Requirements (2026, 2031) Table 8: Transit Mode Shares by Town Quadrant (2031) Table 9: Key Values for Transit D.C. Calculations (2017, 2026, 2031) Appendices A Detailed Conventional Transit Ridership Forecasts Transit Development Charges - Technical Appendix February

265 1 1.0 Introduction The has experienced growth over the last several years, and will continue to experience growth in terms of both population and employment. Over the next ten years, population is anticipated to increase from almost 200,000 to almost 240,000, and employment is anticipated to increase from almost 80,000 to almost 100,000. Through the application of Development Charges (D.C.), the development community contributes an appropriate share of infrastructure capital costs for necessary growth-related transit improvements over the ten-year planning period. D.C. are a tool for municipalities to ensure that growth pays for growth. The Development Charges Act, 1997, as amended (D.C.A.) regulates when and how municipalities may collect D.C. The provincial government recently enacted changes to the D.C.A. with direct implications for how the Town plans and funds future transit services. Historically, transit services could only be funded through D.C. in the following manner: Service costs could only be recovered at up to 90% of total capital cost due to a D.C.A. mandatory 10% reduction of eligible growth related capital cost applied to transit services; and, Growth-related capital expenditures for transit infrastructure were limited to expenditures that supported maintaining historic service levels. This was calculated based on the average level of service over the prior ten years. Changes in the D.C.A., which came into effect in January 2016, have resulted in alterations to the Town s growth-related transit funding mechanisms. These changes are summarized as follows: The mandatory 10% reduction of eligible growth-related capital costs has been removed for transit services, allowing growth related transit services to be 100% recoverable through D.C. The introduction of planned levels of services for transit, with the prescribed method and criteria to establish the service level (outlined in O.Reg. 428/15). This allows municipalities to be forward-looking in estimating future level of service for transit D.C. calculations and apportion them to growth accordingly. It also included new highly prescriptive reporting requirements associated with the background reporting for D.C. The new reporting requirements that need to be outlined in the D.C. background study related to transit include: The calculations that were used to prepare the estimate for the planned level of service for transit services; An identification of the portion of the total estimated capital costs related to the transit service that would benefit the anticipated development over the ten-year D.C. period and after the tenyear D.C. period; Transit Development Charges - Technical Appendix February

266 2 An identification of the anticipated excess capacity that would exist at the end of the ten-year D.C. period; An assessment of ridership forecasts for all modes of transit services proposed to be funded, categorized by development types and whether the ridership will be from existing or planned development; and, An assessment of the ridership capacity for all modes of transit services proposed to be funded by the D.C. The s current D.C. By-law will expire in early 2018 and the Town is currently preparing a new by-law. The purpose of this memo is to identify the conventional transit expenditures that can be funded through D.C. in the Town s 2017 D.C. Background Study for transit prepared by Watson and Associates. Expenditures related to specialized transit (Care-a-Van) are covered separately. Transit Development Charges - Technical Appendix February

267 3 2.0 Growth Forecasts Table 1 presents the population and employment growth anticipated in Oakville. Population and employment data for mid-2011, mid-2017, mid-2027, and mid-2031 were provided by Watson and Associates. Population and employment was assumed to grow linearly between these horizon years. Population and employment data used was based on the population forecast excluding the net census undercount but including institutional population, and the employment forecast excluding work at home and no fixed place of work. A significant portion of this growth is planned to occur in North Oakville 1. Table 1: Population and Employment Forecasts ( ) Mid Mid-2027 Mid-2031 Population 2 197, , , ,400 Employment 3 79,746 97,876 99, ,085 1 Population and employment in 2026 have been interpolated linearly from the mid-2017 and mid-2027 values provided by Watson and Associates. 2 Population count includes institutional population, but excludes census undercount. 3 Employment count excludes no-fixed-place-of-work and work at home. 1 (2017, April 4). Livable Oakville: Official Plan 2009 (Office Consolidation, Last Updated April 4, 2017). pp.c-5. Transit Development Charges - Technical Appendix February

268 4 3.0 Transit Network The following sections describe the Oakville Transit network in 2017 and at the end of the D.C. period (in 2026). 3.1 Today (2017) The current Oakville Transit system map is shown in Figure 1. Oakville Transit currently operates 23 routes, servicing destinations within and outside of Oakville, as well as GO Train and GO Bus stations within and outside Oakville. Ridership has remained at approximately 3 million riders over the past several years (see Table 2). This includes riders using Oakville Transit within Oakville only, as well as those riders who use Oakville Transit to access destinations outside of Oakville (e.g., South Common Centre in Mississauga, or Appleby GO rail station in Burlington). Table 2: Oakville Transit Ridership ( ) Ridership 2 2,874,794 2,914,603 2,961,712 3,014,613 2,833,825 2,851,369 2,950,000 Boardings 2 3,616,491 3,666,571 3,725,834 3,792,383 3,564,952 3,587,022 3,711, ridership and boardings are based on forecasts provided by Oakville Transit. 2 Ridership indicates the number of linked trips on Oakville Transit, while boardings include each ride on an Oakville Transit bus. One linked trip may include several boardings. On average, Oakville Transit experiences a transfer rate of 25.8%, meaning that 1 linked trip on average equates to boardings. Transit Development Charges - Technical Appendix February

269 5 Figure 1: Oakville Transit System Map Transit Development Charges - Technical Appendix February

270 6 The Oakville Transportation Master Plan Update defines future transit mode share targets for trips within Oakville and trips to/from Oakville, and therefore it was necessary to understand the proportion of existing Oakville Transit ridership within Oakville versus to/from Oakville (refer to Section for further discussion of the future transit mode share targets in the Oakville Transportation Master Plan Update). The following methodology was used to estimate the breakdown of ridership on Oakville Transit that use the service to for local trips (within Oakville) and for regional trips (between Oakville and another municipality). Cross boundary trips include passengers that use Oakville Transit to access a GO Station for travel to another municipality. The ridership estimate uses 2017 forecasted ridership as it represents the most up-to-date ridership behaviour: Total Oakville Transit Ridership: a) Total projected 2017 Oakville Transit ridership is 2,950,000; Cross Boundary Ridership on Oakville Transit: b) Approximately 28% of total Oakville Transit riders (826,000) use Oakville Transit to access GO stations; c) Approximately 6.3% of Oakville Transit riders (186,521) use Oakville Transit routes that cross municipal borders to access destinations outside Oakville; d) Of the 186,521 riders that use cross-border routes to access destinations outside Oakville, it has been assumed that 28% access GO stations outside Oakville (52,225), using the system-wide ridership to GO stations as noted in (b) above; e) Therefore, the number of riders using Oakville Transit to access destinations outside Oakville that are not GO stations is 134,295 (difference between 186,521 and 52,225); f) Total cross boundary trips to/from Oakville on Oakville Transit routes is therefore 960,295, which is the sum of: i. Riders using Oakville Transit to access all GO stations (826,000); and ii. Riders using Oakville Transit to access all destinations outside Oakville that are not GO stations (134,295). Local Ridership on Oakville Transit g) The number of local trips on Oakville Transit represents the total trips minus the cross-boundary trips (2,950,000 total Oakville Transit Trips minus 960,295 cross boundary trips = 1,989,705) Summary h) Based on the above, total Oakville Transit trips are broken down as follows: i. 32% trips to/from Oakville (960,295/2,950,000); and ii. 68% trips within Oakville (1-0.32). This is illustrated in Figure 2. Transit Development Charges - Technical Appendix February

271 7 Figure 2: Calculation of ridership to/from and within Oakville 3.2 End of D.C. Period (2026) The following sections define the planning documents used to define the transit network and ridership at the end of the D.C. period (2026) Oakville Transit Services Review The Oakville Transit Services Review (approved by Council in 2015) outlines recommended transit network changes from 2016 through 2020, and forecasts the corresponding ridership if these changes are made. Figure 3 shows the ridership and revenue hours recommended from 2016 through 2020, and Table 3 shows the year-to-year increases in these values. Transit Development Charges - Technical Appendix February

272 8 Figure 3: Conventional Ridership and Revenue Hours (from Transit Services Review, pg.108) Table 3: Year-to-Year Increase in Ridership and Revenue Hours ( , from Transit Services Review) Increase in Ridership from Previous Year (pg.108) Increase in Revenue Hours from Previous Year (pg.67-70) 8.4% 7.2% 4.7% 6.2% 7.4% 2.9% The ridership and revenue hours forecast for 2016 and 2017 in the Transit Services Review do not match the actual 2016 values, or the forecasted 2017 values. As such, the 2018, 2019, and 2020 ridership forecasts in the Transit Services Review could not be used. To maintain consistency with this document, the year-to-year increases from the 2015 Transit Services Review have been used to estimate Oakville Transit ridership and revenue hours in 2018, 2019, and 2020 (e.g., 8.4% increase in ridership from 2017 to 2018 as shown in Table 3). The Transit Services Review was used to forecast Oakville Transit ridership in 2018, 2019, and Transit Development Charges - Technical Appendix February

273 Oakville Transportation Master Plan (TMP) Update The has undertaken an interim TMP Update to identify future transportation system policy direction, targets and needs. It is not a full and final update, and a full TMP update will be undertaken in the coming years, because: 2041 population and employment forecasts are being finalized by the province; Modelling is based on data from the 2011 Transportation Tomorrow Survey (2016 data is currently being processed and finalized); Transportation services and partnerships are evolving; and Related transportation plans and policies by other municipalities and transportation organizations (e.g., Metrolinx) are not finalized. The TMP Update notes that current transit mode shares are 1% for trips within Oakville and 3% for trips to/from Oakville. The preferred Scenario D for the interim TMP Update includes higher use of transit, both within and to/from Oakville, setting 2031 mode share targets of 3% for trips within Oakville and 9% for trips to/from Oakville. These are shown in Figure 4. Figure 4: TMP Update Existing and 2031 Target Mode Share (from TMP Technical Advisory Committee Meeting #1, September 18, 2015) The TMP Update does not consider changes to the transit network such as new routes, changes to existing routes, or changes to schedules. The TMP Update solely considers future targets for transit system use. The TMP Update is informed by a transportation model, which forecasts transportation needs and system use over the P.M. peak period (defined as 3:00-6:00 P.M.). The model forecasts total trips by all modes, as well as trips by each mode (including transit). Transit mode share is an input to this model that is, it is assumed that in 2031, a total of 12% of all trips within and to/from Oakville are taken by transit, and these trips are removed from the road network. The model does not define transit use by route or area. Transit Development Charges - Technical Appendix February

274 10 The mode shares for transit to/from Oakville (3% existing and 9% target) include transit trips on any transit service provider with service to/from Oakville this includes Oakville Transit, GO Transit, and others. This D.C. study considers use of the Oakville Transit system only, and therefore the mode share target of Oakville Transit only must be isolated. Section 3.1 defines the method used to separate existing Oakville Transit ridership into trips within Oakville and trips to/from Oakville. This method estimated that 68% of Oakville Transit trips were within Oakville, while 32% were to/from Oakville. This ratio has been assumed to be constant through future years. The 3% mode share target for 2031 transit within Oakville refers to trips on Oakville Transit only. The 9% mode share target for 2031 transit to/from Oakville refers to trips on Oakville Transit and other inter-municipal service providers. It has been assumed that system-wide ridership on Oakville Transit grows at a rate equal to the growth rate for transit within Oakville from 1% existing mode share to 3% mode share target in 2031 (as illustrated in Figure 4). The calculations and assumptions are further discussed in Section 4.0. The Oakville TMP Update was used to forecast Oakville Transit ridership from 2021 through Transit Development Charges - Technical Appendix February

275 Ten-Year Ridership Forecast This section outlines the detailed calculations that were performed to forecast ridership over the tenyear D.C. period (2017 to 2026), and over the post-period (2026 to 2031). Total Person Trips Total person trips (by all modes) in the P.M. peak period for 2011, 2021, and 2031 were taken from the TMP Update model. Trips were assumed to grow linearly between these horizon years. Ridership Conversion between P.M. Peak Period and Annual A factor of approximately was calculated to convert P.M. peak period values from the TMP Update model into annual values. Oakville Transit provided 2016 annual ridership, and 2016 ridership during the P.M. peak period for every weekday in the year. These two numbers were compared to determine a P.M. peak period factor. Ridership in 2017 The forecasted 2017 ridership provided by Oakville Transit was converted to P.M. peak period ridership within Oakville and to/from Oakville, using the factor mentioned above and assuming 68% of Oakville Transit trips within Oakville, and 32% of Oakville Transit trips to/from Oakville (as discussed in Section 3.1). Ridership from Oakville Transit ridership in 2018, 2019, and 2020 was estimated based on annual percent increases in the Transit Services Review (further discussed in Section 3.2.1). Ridership was broken down into ridership within Oakville and to/from Oakville. It was assumed that 68% of Oakville Transit trips are within Oakville, and 32% of Oakville Transit trips are to/from Oakville (as discussed in Section 3.1). Ridership from The following process was used to forecast ridership from 2021 through 2031: Target ridership for 2031 P.M. peak period within Oakville was taken from TMP Update model (7,457). Ridership within Oakville was assumed to grow at a constant percent increase year-over-year. This results in actual ridership numbers growing at an increasing rate exponentially starting in 2021 through This takes into consideration the time it takes for ridership gains to be realized. It was calculated that an 11% increase in ridership year-over-year would be required to reach the 2031 target. Ridership within Oakville was estimated for each year by interpolating from 2021 to 2031 using this exponential relationship. Transit Development Charges - Technical Appendix February

276 12 Cross-boundary ridership to/from Oakville was assumed to grow at the same rate as ridership within Oakville. Ridership to/from Oakville was estimated for each year by interpolating from 2021 to 2031 using this exponential relationship. Total Oakville Transit ridership was calculated as the sum of ridership within Oakville and crossboundary ridership to/from Oakville. The resulting ridership forecast, transit mode share, and total trips by all modes in 2017, 2026, and 2031 are shown in Table 4. A complete summary for all years from 2017 through 2031 is included in Appendix A. Table 4: Ridership Forecast (2017, 2026, 2031) Annual Oakville Transit Ridership (within Oakville and to/from Oakville) P.M. Peak Period Oakville Transit Ridership (within Oakville and to/from Oakville) ,950,000 6,866,622 11,790,579 2,744 6,387 10,966 P.M. Peak Period Total Trips by All Modes 201, , ,043 P.M. Peak Period Oakville Transit Mode Share 1.4% 2.7% 4.4% (within Oakville and to/from Oakville) Note: Please refer to Appendix A for an annual breakdown of ridership within and to/from Oakville. Transit Development Charges - Technical Appendix February

277 Ten-Year Capital Plan for D.C. Application A ten-year capital plan was developed corresponding to the ten-year ridership forecasts detailed in Section 4.0. This capital plan included costs for new conventional transit vehicles and supervisor vehicles (to support operations management). Costs related to the Palermo terminal, new bus stops/shelters, and intelligent transportation systems (ITS) technologies are covered under Services Related to a Highway. Capital costs for additional Care-A-Van vehicles have been covered separately. 5.1 New Conventional Transit Vehicles A first principles method was used to estimate future bus requirements, based on the ridership forecasts detailed in Section 4.0. This method assumed increases in both level of service provided and the efficiency of system use over the ten-year D.C. period. The method was based on known values, a peer review of similar municipalities, and several assumptions. These are detailed below Level of Service and Effectiveness of Service (Productivity) Peak buses per capita were estimated for 2017, based on the number of peak buses (provided by Oakville Transit) and population estimate (provided by Watson and Associates). Oakville currently provides 3.4 peak buses per 10,000 capita. Ridership per P.M. peak revenue hour was estimated, by dividing P.M. peak period ridership by the 3 hours in the P.M. peak period. This provides a conservatively low estimate of buses, since the peak hour requirements are often greater than one-third of the peak period requirements. Boardings per P.M. peak revenue hour were estimated, by multiplying ridership per P.M. peak revenue hour by (based on a 25.8% transfer ratio defined by Oakville Transit). Boardings per P.M. peak revenue vehicle hour were estimated, by dividing boardings per P.M. peak revenue hour by the number of peak vehicles (provided by Oakville Transit). Currently, on average each vehicle accommodates 17.2 boardings per revenue vehicle hour of service in the P.M. peak period Planned New Vehicles In 2018, 8 new 30-foot buses will be received by Oakville Transit. These buses are included in the tenyear capital plan for D.C. application at a cost of $545,200 (2017$) each. Peer System Review A review was undertaken of municipalities with similar current ridership and population as Oakville in This assisted in benchmarking appropriate targets for level of service and efficiency of system use. Table 5 shows the findings of this review. A range of peer transit systems were used to estimate the service levels that are required to reach a higher ridership forecast. This includes systems such as Kingston and St. Catharines with a slightly lower population and ridership but that provide higher riders per capita in line with future 2031 Oakville Transit mode share targets. It also includes slightly larger Transit Development Charges - Technical Appendix February

278 14 systems such as London and Halifax that have a relatively higher population. Since there is no one system that is directly comparable to Oakville (each have unique characteristics), a blended average was used to estimate service level requirements needed for Oakville Transit to reach the 2031 mode share target. The key takeaways from this review are: On average, peer systems provide 4.9 peak buses per 10,000 capita. On average, peer systems require 122 buses to serve an annual ridership of about 11 million. Table 5: Peer Review (from Canadian Urban Transit Association 2015 Factbook) Municipality (2015) Population Ridership 1 Peak Buses Revenue Hours Peak Buses per 10,000 Capita Ridership per Revenue Hour 2 Ridership per Capita Kingston 127,250 4,659, , Regina 221,407 5,176, , St. Catharines 149,331 5,489, , Windsor 210,875 6,348, , Guelph 141,097 6,386, , Saskatoon 262,900 12,216, , Gatineau 276,577 19,004, , Halifax 372,679 19,333, , London 381,300 22,369, , AVERAGE 238,157 11,220, , Oakville (2015) 188,000 2,833, , Oakville (2031) 249,120 10,762, Ridership in Gatineau, Halifax, and London is much higher than Oakville s 2031 forecast ridership. These municipalities have been included in the peer review because they represent similar levels of transit use to that targeted by Oakville in Ridership per revenue hour is used here as an approximation of boardings per revenue hour, since the latter is not included in the Canadian Urban Transit Association 2015 Factbook Level of Service and Efficiency of System Use The current value of 17.2 boardings per P.M. peak revenue vehicle hour suggests there is capacity in the system to accommodate additional riders, and to use resources more effectively. The number of peak buses can be estimated by dividing P.M. peak boardings by the maximum trigger value for boardings per P.M. peak revenue vehicle hour. If the current value of 17.2 boardings per P.M. peak revenue vehicle hour was used as a maximum trigger by which to estimate bus requirements through to 2031, the existing Oakville Transit fleet of 95 buses would have to be increased to 371 total buses by This is significantly higher than peer systems, which use on average 122 peak buses to serve a similar ridership (see Table 5). Transit Development Charges - Technical Appendix February

279 15 It was therefore determined that an improvement in the effectiveness of service (productivity) would be required, and the maximum trigger value for boardings per P.M. peak revenue vehicle hour should be increased from 2017 through However, the effectiveness of the system must also be balanced with level of service improvements, in order to encourage transit use to reach mode share targets. Level of service is measured through peak buses per 10,000 capita. As shown in Table 5, peer systems provide on average 4.9 peak buses per 10,000 capita. The existing 17.2 boardings per P.M. peak revenue vehicle hour was gradually increased until the resulting peak buses per 10,000 capita reached 4.9 in 2031 (to align Oakville with the peer average). Using this technique, boardings per P.M. peak revenue vehicle hour rose to 38.0 in This represents an improvement in productivity. Using the assumptions above, 121 peak buses are required by Oakville Transit maintains 28% of its total fleet as spare buses. Based on the peak buses required in 2031, this yields a total fleet size of 168 buses. In total, an additional 73 buses are required by Level of Service and Efficiency of System Use An interim maximum trigger value of 27 boardings per P.M. peak revenue vehicle hour was established for 2026, which maintains consistent increases in level of service (peak buses per 10,000 capita), as well as improvements to productivity (increase from 17.2 boardings per P.M. peak revenue vehicle hour in 2017). This results in a requirement of 99 peak buses by Oakville Transit maintains 28% of its total fleet as spare buses. Based on the peak buses required in 2031, this yields a total fleet size of 138 buses. In total, an additional 43 buses are required by Table 6 shows the conventional transit vehicle requirements by 2026 and The capital cost has been calculated using a cost of $595,200 (2017$) per 40-foot bus. It has been assumed that all buses purchased in the future are 40-foot buses. This excludes the 8 new 30-foot buses that will be operational in 2018, which have been included at a total cost of $4,301,000 (2017$). These costs include all in-vehicle technologies. Table 6: Conventional Transit Vehicle Requirements (2026, 2031) Peak Fleet Total Fleet (incl. Spares) Additional Vehicles Required Cost (2017$) - $25,133,000 $42,989,000 Transit Development Charges - Technical Appendix February

280 New Supervisor Vehicles Additional non-bus supervisor vehicles are required for on-street supervision, as ridership and service levels increase. These supervisor vehicles are used to respond to incidents and emergencies (a higher amount of which can be anticipated with increased passengers and service levels). The existing ratio of supervisor vehicles to buses has been extrapolated to the future, to estimate the additional supervisor vehicles needed by Using this assumption, it has been assumed that every 25 additional buses will necessitate one additional supervisor vehicle. Table 7 shows the supervisor vehicles required and their estimated cost. A per-vehicle cost of $75,000 (2017$) has been assumed, based on discussion with Oakville Transit. By 2031, two new supervisor vehicles will be required. Table 7: Supervisor Vehicle Requirements (2026, 2031) Additional Vehicles Required (Additional from 2018) Cost (2017$) $75,000 $150,000 Transit Development Charges - Technical Appendix February

281 Apportioning Benefit This section details how the D.C.-eligible portion of the ten-year capital plan is determined. 6.1 In-Period Growth and Existing The D.C.A. requires that the increased need for service be reduced by the extent to which a service would benefit existing development. The in-period benefit is therefore further broken down into benefit to existing populations and benefit to growth populations Conventional Transit Vehicles New developments and their corresponding populations often have an increased propensity to use transit, due to changing views on transit, higher densities, and increased adoption of transit-oriented design in new developments. As mentioned in Section 2.0, North Oakville is a significant growth area within the Town, representing 35,000 employees and 55,000 residents by The North Oakville East and North Oakville West Secondary Plans establish the detailed planning framework to guide the general intent of future development in these special policy areas. These secondary plans propose several features which align with transit supportive developments as characterized by the Ministry of Transportation 3. The plans promote transit opportunities through a transit first policy which ensures development and phasing aligns with the early provision of transit services. The plans also identify areas of high density to be developed along high-frequency transit corridors. As well, the plans note that the road network to be developed in North Oakville is intended to promote safe and efficient circulation of traffic including transit vehicles. Though the TMP Update model does not define transit ridership by route, it does define ridership by quadrant of the Town. Table 8 shows the 2031 transit mode shares for trips with an origin or destination in Oakville, based on TMP Update model data. 2 (2017, April 4). Livable Oakville: Official Plan 2009 (Office Consolidation, Last Updated April 4, 2017). pp.c-5. 3 Ministry of Transportation, Ontario (2012). Transit Supportive Guidelines. Transit Development Charges - Technical Appendix February

282 18 Table 8: Transit Mode Shares by Town Quadrant (2031) Mode Share for Transit Trips Beginning or Ending in 2031 South Oakville 9.5% East Oakville 10.8% West Oakville 10.9% North Oakville 14.6% Average of South, East, and West Oakville 10.4% The forecasted transit mode share for North Oakville is 1.41 times the average mode share of all other quadrants in This indicates that there is a higher propensity for transit use within North Oakville. Because a significant portion of the growth experienced Town-wide is anticipated in North Oakville, it has been assumed that the travel behaviours in North Oakville are representative of the travel behaviours of new growth populations overall. Section 4.0 notes that ridership on Oakville Transit was assumed to grow at a constant percent increase year-over-year, resulting in actual ridership numbers growing at an exponentially increasing rate. This takes into consideration the time it takes for ridership gains to be realized. The increased propensity for transit use by growth population and employment compared to existing population and employment is also assumed to increase exponentially. In 2017, the transit mode share of the existing population and employment is 1.4% (as shown in Table 4). By 2026, this transit mode share has risen, and there is also growth population and employment that has a higher transit mode share. As mentioned above, the 2031 transit mode share of growth population and employment is 1.41 times more than the 2031 transit mode share of existing population and employment. Using an exponential relationship to interpolate, it is estimated that, in 2026, the transit mode share of growth population and employment is 1.25 times the average transit mode share of existing population and employment. The following calculation was then used to determine the existing and growth transit mode shares: (Existing Total Trips by All Modes Existing Transit Mode Share) + (Growth in Total Trips by All Modes from 2017 to 2026 Growth Transit Mode Share) = Transit Trips in 2026 Inputting known values for the P.M. peak period from Table 4, the calculation becomes: (201,818 Existing Transit Mode Share) + ([237, ,818] [1.25 Existing Transit Mode Share) = 6,387 Transit Development Charges - Technical Appendix February

283 19 Solving the above, the transit mode share of existing population and employment is estimated as 2.59%, while the transit mode share of growth population and employment (from 2017 through 2026) is estimated as 3.23%. The existing and growth transit mode shares are applied to calculate the benefit to existing and growth in 2026, as shown below: 2026 Transit Trips for Existing Population and Employment = Existing Transit Mode Share Existing Total Trips by All Modes = 2.59% 201,818 = 5, Transit Trips for Growth Population and Employment = Growth Transit Mode Share Growth in Total Trips by All Modes from 2017 to 2026 = 3.23% [237, ,818] = 1,164 Benefit to Existing = 5,222 transit trips in 2026 by existing pop.emp. 6,387 transit trips in 2026 = 82% benefit to existing Benefit to Growth = 1,164 transit trips in 2026 by growth pop.emp. 6,387 transit trips in 2026 = 18% benefit to growth Therefore, the benefit to existing and growth for conventional vehicles is as follows: 82% benefit to existing; and 18% benefit to growth Supervisor Vehicles The method used to apportion benefits related to supervisor vehicles is different from that used for the conventional transit vehicles (buses). The need for additional supervisor vehicles is primarily related to the increased level of service (requiring additional buses and drivers), over an increased service area (incorporating new developments). While existing supervisor vehicles can be used within existing service areas, new vehicles are required to supervise services in growth areas. As such, supervisor vehicles have been fully apportioned to growth (i.e., 100% benefit to growth). Transit Development Charges - Technical Appendix February

284 In-Period and Post-Period The D.C.A. requires that no portion of the service intended to benefit anticipated development after the ten-year D.C. period nor to exist as excess capacity at the end of the ten-year D.C. period be included within the D.C. Therefore, the in-period and post-period benefit must be identified Conventional Transit Vehicles Vehicle capacity is based on the number of seats and room for standees on a transit vehicle. This is a fixed unit based on the size of the vehicle. Transit agencies typically purchase one or two standard bus units to reduce overall maintenance and driver change-over costs, and there is therefore little ability to adjust vehicle capacity to meet demand. If a service level trigger is reached and additional frequency is required to accommodate demand, the entire bus is needed to accommodate this demand, whether the bus is full or not. There is limited ability to right-size a bus to limit the amount of excess vehicle capacity that results in a service change. Instead of assessing post-period benefit based on excess vehicle capacity, the analysis has considered the degree to which in-period capital investments (in this case, buses) benefit post-period population and employment growth. In 2031, there are 10,966 projected transit trips in the P.M. peak period. These trips are a combination of: a) Trips taken in 2026 by in-period population and employment; b) Increased trips taken from 2026 to 2031, by in-period population and employment (due to increased willingness to use transit as the level of service increases); and c) New trips taken by post-period population and employment in New trips taken by post-period population and employment (listed in (c) above) will at one point be taken on buses that were purchased in-period (before 2026). Riders transfer between routes, and riders in new growth areas may take new local routes to connect to existing base grid routes (using in-period resources). Because a service plan is not currently available, there is no ability to determine exactly how many post-period trips will use in-period buses. It has been assumed that all do at some point, since riders will likely take new local routes within their residential neighbourhood to an existing base grid or arterial route, and because key base grid/arterial route frequencies will have to be increased to serve increased demand). The post-period population and employment trips (included in (c) above) therefore represent a postperiod benefit. This is shown graphically in Figure 5. Transit Development Charges - Technical Appendix February

285 21 Figure 5: 2031 Transit Trips Taken by Post-Period Existing and Growth Population/Employment The trips taken by in-period and post-period population and employment were calculated using a similar method as descried in Section 6.1. The following formula was used to determine the 2031 mode shares for in-period population and employment, and post-period population and employment: (2026 Total Trips by All Modes 2031 Transit Mode Share of In-Period Pop.Emp. + (Growth in Total Trips by All Modes from 2026 to Transit Mode Share of Post-Period Pop.Emp.) = Transit Trips in 2031 Inputting known values for the P.M. peak period from Table 4, the calculation becomes: (237, Transit Mode Share of In-Period Pop.Emp. + ([249, ,887] [ Transit Mode Share of In-Period Pop.Emp.]) = 10,966 Solving the above, the in-period population and employment transit mode share is estimated as 4.14%, while the post-period population and employment transit mode share is estimated as 9.98%. The transit mode shares are applied to calculate the proportion of 2031 transit trips taken by in-period versus post-period population and employment, as shown below: Transit Development Charges - Technical Appendix February

286 Transit Trips for In-Period Population and Employment = In-Period Transit Mode Share 2026 Total Trips by All Modes = 4.32% 237,887 = 10, Transit Trips for Post-Period Population and Employment = Post-Period Transit Mode Share Growth in Total Trips by All Modes from 2026 to 2031 = 6.08% [249, ,887] = 678 Therefore, the in-period and post-period benefit for conventional transit vehicles is as follows: 94% in-period benefit; and 6% post-period benefit. The in-period and post-period benefits are applied to the benefits to existing and growth for conventional transit vehicles, yielding: 77% in-period benefit to existing; 17% in-period benefit to growth; and 6% post-period benefit Supervisor Vehicles The method used to apportion in-period and post-period benefits related to supervisor vehicles is different from that used for the conventional transit vehicles (buses). Additional supervisor vehicle needs have been determined based on the number of buses (as discussed in Section 5.2). Based on this, it was determined that one new supervisor vehicle is required by 2026 (in-period), and another additional new supervisor vehicles is required by 2031 (post-period). Therefore, one supervisor vehicle has been allocated as in-period, and one has been allocated as post-period. 6.3 Recommended Future Methodology The methodology used was developed based on data available. The data available did not include a detailed service plan corresponding to the ridership and mode share targets. When future D.C. studies are completed, more detailed data may be available, and thus a more detailed methodology may be feasible. The following sections outline the recommended future methodology to calculate capital requirements and apportion benefit between in-period and post-period, and existing and growth populations, to be used when a detailed future service plan is available. The detailed future service plan allows for ridership forecasting based on planned future transit service levels. Typically, this will allow for route-by-route ridership forecasts based on population growth, Transit Development Charges - Technical Appendix February

287 23 increased propensity for transit use, and service changes. If ridership cannot be forecasted at the route level, and can only be forecasted at the neighbourhood level, the methodologies described below can be modified slightly In-Period and Post-Period If a detailed future service plan is available, the number of future vehicles required to serve future ridership can be calculated more accurately, in-line with the service plan. If this is the case, service level capacity can be used to calculate in-period and post-period benefit. There are two elements of capacity: vehicle capacity and service level capacity. Vehicle capacity is based on the number of seats and room for standees on a transit vehicle. This is a fixed unit based on the size of the vehicle. Transit agencies typically purchase one or two standard bus units to reduce overall maintenance and driver change-over costs, therefore, there is little ability to adjust vehicle capacity to meet demand. Service level capacity is based on the number of vehicles operating on a route per hour (frequency of service). Frequency can be adjusted by a transit agency to reflect the demand, typically based on clockface intervals (bus operating every 60, 30, 20, 15, 10 and 5 minutes). There are limitations as to adjustment factors since transit routes operate as part of a system and there is a need to ensure connections are made at a central terminal to ensure effective operations and customer satisfaction. Service level capacity should be used to calculate in-period and post-period benefit. This methodology treats a bus as a whole unit when determining the capital cost to be apportioned to the in-period or post-period benefit. This is a more favourable methodology than vehicle capacity. If a service level trigger is reached and a new route is required to a developing area, or additional frequency is required in an existing area to accommodate demand, the entire bus is needed to accommodate this demand, whether the bus is full or not. There is limited ability to right-size a bus to limit the amount of excess vehicle capacity that results in a service change. By using service level capacity to calculate in-period and post-period benefit, a transit vehicle is treated as a whole. A trigger value for boardings per revenue vehicle hour should be established to determine when a new service is required or proposed service level increases (and resulting additional bus needs) are warranted. For example, Oakville Transit s current service standards establish a trigger of 13 boardings per revenue vehicle hour to consider an increase in service levels. If a route achieves a value higher than this trigger value, a service level increase and the additional buses needed to support this increase are warranted. The trigger value should be taken from approved service standards documents, wherever possible. If service standards are not available, a peer review should be undertaken. If the planned service frequency of the new or improved service at the end of the D.C. period results in a boardings per revenue vehicle hour value which is equal to or above the trigger value, the capital cost of Transit Development Charges - Technical Appendix February

288 24 the entire vehicle(s) should be included as in-period benefit. If the planned service frequency at the end of the D.C. period results in a boardings per revenue vehicle hour value which is less than the trigger value, the entire transit vehicle(s) required to achieve the planned service frequency should be considered a post-period benefit Growth and Existing The following methodology can be used to forecast ridership growth by route, for existing and growth populations: Allocate ridership growth from new population: Any ridership growth calculated that is a result of new population growth should be 100 percent allocated to growth. This includes both population growth in new greenfield areas as well as new intensification in the existing urban area. Determine length of route within existing versus growth areas: The length of the route within the existing urban area versus newly developing area should be calculated. This is used to portion the forecasted ridership growth as a result of service level improvements to existing population versus new population growth. Determine allocation of ridership growth from service improvements: The above calculated split of each route length between existing urban areas and new growth areas should be used to allocate ridership growth from existing routes service improvements (e.g., service frequency, span of service, general improvements) to existing and growth populations. This will result in a ridership for each route allocated to existing versus growth populations. This ridership should be totalled to determine a system-wide allocation to existing versus growth populations. Transit Development Charges - Technical Appendix February

289 Summary of Key Values Table 9 provides a summary of key values for the transit D.C. calculations. Table 9: Key Values for Transit D.C. Calculations (2017, 2026, 2031) Annual Ridership 2,950,000 6,866,622 11,790,579 P.M. Peak Period Oakville Transit Ridership 2,744 6,387 10,966 P.M. Peak Period Total Trips by All Modes 201, , ,043 P.M. Peak Period Oakville Transit Mode Share 1.4% 2.7% 4.4% Additional Conventional Transit Vehicles Required (Additional from 2017) Additional Supervisor Vehicles Required (Additional from 2017) Total Cost - $25,208,000 $43,139,000 In-Period Benefit to Existing - 77% - In-Period Benefit to Growth - 17% - Post-Period Benefit - 6% - In-Period, Non-D.C.-Eligible Cost 1 - $17,516, In-Period, D.C.-Eligible Cost 1 - $4,057,240 - Post-Period Cost 1 - $1,507,980 - Numbers have been rounded. 1 Please refer to the D.C. Background Study by Watson & Associates for tables detailing the transit D.C. cost components. 2 Grant funding of $2,126,400 is additional to this. Transit Development Charges - Technical Appendix February

290

291 A - 1 Appendix A A Detailed Conventional Transit Ridership Forecasts Transit Development Charges February

292 Transit Development Charges - Technical Appendix February A - 2

293 A - 3 Table A1: Year-by-Year Ridership Forecasts Oakville Transit Trips within Oakville Oakville Transit Trips to/from Oakville Total Oakville Transit Trips P.M. Peak Period Mode Share P.M. Peak Period Trips P.M. Peak Period Mode Share P.M. Peak Period Trips P.M. Peak Period Mode Share P.M. Peak Period Trips 0.9% 1.0% 1.0% 1.0% 1.1% 1.2% 1.4% 1.5% 1.7% 1.8% 2.0% 2.2% 2.5% 2.7% 3.0% 1,866 2,022 2,168 2,270 2,529 2,818 3,140 3,498 3,898 4,343 4,839 5,391 6,007 6,693 7, % 0.5% 0.5% 0.5% 0.5% 0.6% 0.6% 0.7% 0.8% 0.9% 0.9% 1.0% 1.2% 1.3% 1.4% ,020 1,068 1,190 1,326 1,478 1,646 1,834 2,044 2,277 2,537 2,827 3,150 3, % 1.4% 1.5% 1.5% 1.6% 1.8% 2.0% 2.2% 2.4% 2.7% 3.0% 3.3% 3.6% 4.0% 4.4% 2,744 2,974 3,188 3,338 3,719 4,144 4,617 5,145 5,732 6,387 7,116 7,928 8,834 9,842 10,966 Total P.M. Peak Period Trips by All Modes 201, , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,043 Population and Employment 277, , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,485 Transit Development Charges February