Issues For 'Lonely' Life Cos. Under New Debt-Equity Regs.
|
|
- Laurel Warren
- 5 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 Portfolio Media. Inc. 111 West 19 th Street, 5th Floor New York, NY Phone: Fax: Issues For 'Lonely' Life Cos. Under New Debt-Equity Regs. Law360, New York (May 4, 2016, 11:10 AM ET) -- The rules of IRC 1504 and Treasury Regulation provide the general parameters for determining whether a domestic life insurance company (within the meaning of IRC 816(a)) may join in filing a consolidated U.S. federal income tax return with one or more domestic nonlife insurance company (or noninsurance company) affiliates (a life/nonlife consolidated return). Pursuant to those rules, a recently acquired domestic life insurance company is not allowed to join in a life/nonlife consolidated return filed by the acquiring group for a period of five taxable years following the acquisition. The same result generally follows where: A newly organized domestic life insurance company does not meet the requirements of the tacking rule found in Treas. Reg (d)(12)(v); William R. Pauls An existing nonlife member of a life/nonlife consolidated group experiences a change in tax character (as described in Treas. Reg (d)(12)(vii)) and, as a consequence, becomes a life insurance company; or An existing life member of a life/nonlife consolidated group undergoes a disproportionate asset acquisition (as described in Treas. Reg (d)(12)(viii)). Michael R. Miles Special consideration typically is given to these lonely life insurance companies (each, a Lonely Lifeco) while they reside outside the life/nonlife consolidated return. In a recent article, we offered our initial impressions of the recently proposed regulations under IRC 385 and we noted that the proposed regulations include a provision that treats the members of a consolidated group (as defined in Treas. Reg (h)) as one corporation for purposes of those rules. However, for the reasons noted above, a Lonely Lifeco is not encompassed by the application of Christopher W. Schoen this rule to the relevant life/nonlife consolidated group. As a consequence, the proposed regulations have the potential to create new issues with respect to a number of ordinary fact patterns involving Lonely Lifecos. For example, consider a situation where:
2 Lonely Lifeco cedes business to an affiliate that is a member of the life/nonlife consolidated group pursuant to an indemnity coinsurance arrangement completed on a funds withheld basis; Lonely Lifeco uses the same insurance-dedicated mutual funds (i.e., regulated investment companies (RICs)) as investment options for the separate accounts supporting the variable life insurance and annuity products offered by Lonely Lifeco as those used by an affiliate that is a member of the life/nonlife consolidated group; or Lonely Lifeco uses parent company stock to compensate an employee We discuss each of these scenarios in greater detail below. Assumed Facts For purposes of this discussion, assume that U.S. Holdco, a domestic corporation that operates as a holding company, owns 100 percent of the stock of each of the following entities: 953(d) Co., a life insurance company organized under Country X law that has made an election under IRC 953(d) to be treated as a domestic corporation for U.S. federal tax purposes; U.S. Lifeco1, a domestic life insurance company; and U.S. Lifeco2, a domestic life insurance company that U.S. Holdco acquired one year ago from an unrelated party. This corporate structure is illustrated below. Furthermore, assume that: At the beginning of Year 1: o U.S. Holdco, 953(d) Co. and U.S. Lifeco1 constitute a U.S. consolidated group, i.e., a life/nonlife consolidated group, that files a life/nonlife consolidated return; o U.S. Lifeco 2 files a separate return for U.S. federal income tax purposes; and o U.S. Holdco is the common parent of an expanded group (as defined in Prop. Treas. Reg (b)(3)) comprised of U.S. Holdco, 953(d) Co., U.S. Lifeco1 and U.S. Lifeco2.
3 All notes issued between members of the expanded group are debt instruments described in Prop. Treas. Reg (f)(3), and none of those notes is eligible for the ordinary course exception described in Prop. Treas. Reg (b)(3)(iv)(B)(2). No issuer of a debt instrument has current year earnings and profits described in IRC 316(a)(2) (thus calling off the exception that otherwise may be available under Prop. Treas. Reg (c)(1)). The expanded group has more than $50 million of debt instruments described in Prop. Treas. Reg (c)(2) at all times. Scenario #1: Coinsurance on a Funds Withheld Basis Facts. On Date A, Year 1, U.S. Lifeco2 cedes a block of life insurance business to 953(d) Co. pursuant to an indemnity coinsurance arrangement completed on a funds withheld basis. Pursuant to the terms of this arrangement, (i) U.S. Lifeco2 pays a reinsurance premium equal to $100x to 953(d) Co., and (ii) 953(d) Co. loans the assets comprising that $100x reinsurance premium back to U.S. Lifeco2, with 953(d) Co. booking a receivable and U.S. Lifeco2 booking a payable equal to the same amount. On Date B, Year 2, U.S. Lifeco2 distributes $150x to U.S. Holdco in a distribution. These facts are illustrated below. Analysis. On account of the nature of the funds withheld arrangement, a debt instrument (within the meaning of IRC 1275(a) and Treas. Reg (d)) likely arises between U.S. Lifeco2 and 953(d) Co., with U.S. Lifeco2 being viewed as the funded member for purposes of the funding rule of Prop.
4 Treas. Reg (b)(3). As a result, the $150x distribution by U.S. Lifeco2 in Year 2 apparently would be caught by the nonrebuttable presumption set forth in Prop. Treas. Reg (b)(3)(iv)(B)(1), thus causing the entire funds withheld payable to be treated as stock of U.S. Lifeco2 for all U.S. federal tax purposes as of Date B, Year 2. Even if the $150x distribution did not occur in Scenario #1, consideration should be given to whether the funds withheld payable nevertheless could be treated as stock if that payable is not documented in the manner required by Prop. Treas. Reg and the exceptions to the application of that section otherwise do not apply (for example, because the stock of U.S. Holdco is publicly traded). In this regard, the funds withheld payable likely falls outside the definition of an applicable instrument provided in Prop. Treas. Reg (a)(4)(i); however, the U.S. Department of the Treasury and the IRS have indicated a desire to broaden that definition to cover interests that are not otherwise issued in form as a debt instrument. Scenario #2: RIC Overlap Facts. During Year 1, U.S. Lifeco1 begins to sell variable annuity contracts to the general public and offers two insurance-dedicated mutual funds RIC1 and RIC2 as investment options for the separate accounts supporting those contracts. Prior to Date A, Year 2, each of RIC1 and RIC2 (i) is wholly owned by the separate accounts of U.S. Lifeco1 and (ii) is treated as wholly owned by U.S. Lifeco1 for U.S. federal tax purposes. During Year 2, U.S. Lifeco2 begins to offer variable annuity contracts to the general public that offer RIC1 and RIC2 as possible investment options for the separate accounts supporting those contracts. On Date A, Year 2, the separate accounts of U.S. Lifeco2 invest $10x in each of RIC1 and RIC2 in exchange for a 10 percent interest in each of RIC1 and RIC2. On Date B, Year 2, U.S. Holdco lends $15x to U.S. Lifeco2 in exchange for a surplus note. These facts are illustrated below.
5 Analysis. Under the definition of expanded group used for purposes of the proposed regulations, each of RIC1 and RIC2 is a member of the U.S. Holdco expanded group. Thus, taking into account the 36- month look-back period included in the nonrebuttable presumption, U.S. Lifeco2 s acquisition of a 10 percent interest in each of RIC1 and RIC2 constitutes an acquisition of expanded group stock subject to the funding rule. As a consequence, the entirety of the surplus note issued by U.S. Lifeco2 on Date B, Year 2, constitutes stock of U.S. Lifeco2 for all U.S. federal tax purposes. The exception provided under Prop. Treas. Reg (c)(3) for funded acquisitions of subsidiary stock by issuance is not available under the facts of Scenario #2 because U.S. Lifeco2 acquires only a 10 percent interest in each of RIC1 and RIC2, rather than the greater than 50 percent interest required under that exception. As an alternative to the facts of Scenario #2, consider a situation in which U.S. Lifeco2 organizes RIC1 and RIC2 on Date A, Year 1, and puts a small amount of seed money capital into those funds in exchange for fund shares. Thereafter, on Date B, Year 2, U.S. Lifeco1 lends $15x to U.S. Lifeco2 in exchange for the surplus note. Finally, on Date C, Year 3, U.S. Lifeco2 s interest in each of RIC1 and RIC2 drops below 50 percent on account of the now seasoned funds being offered to the separate accounts of U.S. Lifeco1 or, for that matter, the separate accounts of one or more unrelated life insurance companies. Under these facts, the exception provided under Prop. Treas. Reg (c)(3) ceases to apply as of Date C, Year 3, thus causing U.S. Lifeco2 s acquisitions of RIC1 and RIC2 shares on Date A, Year 1, to be treated as acquisitions of expanded group stock that trigger the application of the funding rule. Scenario #3: Avoiding a Zero-Basis Problem, but Triggering a Debt-Equity Problem Facts. Y, an individual, is an employee of U.S. Lifeco2. Pursuant to an agreement between U.S. Holdco and U.S. Lifeco2 to compensate Y for services provided to U.S. Lifeco2, U.S. Holdco transfers 10 shares of U.S. Holdco stock with a fair market value of $10x to Y on Date A, Year 1. Under Treas. Reg , U.S. Lifeco2 is treated as purchasing the U.S. Holdco stock from U.S. Holdco for $10x of cash (i.e., cash deemed to have been contributed to U.S. Lifeco2 by U.S. Holdco), and then transferring the U.S. Holdco stock to Y. On Date B, Year 2, U.S. Lifeco1 lends $15x to U.S. Lifeco2 in exchange for a surplus note. These facts are illustrated below. Analysis. Taking into account the 36-month look-back period included in the nonrebuttable
6 presumption, U.S. Lifeco2 s acquisition of 10 shares of U.S. Holdco stock as directed by Treas. Reg constitutes an acquisition of expanded group stock subject to the funding rule. As a consequence, $10x of the $15x surplus note issued by U.S. Lifeco2 on Date B, Year 2, constitutes stock of U.S. Lifeco2 for all U.S. federal tax purposes. The remaining $5x of the $15x surplus note is not recharacterized as stock under the funding rule. As noted above, the fiction of Treas. Reg gives rise to the deemed stock acquisition by U.S. Lifeco2 that triggers the application of the funding rule in Scenario #3. Although this result seems unavoidable under the broad language of the funding rule, one has to question whether it should be the result obtained from the application of the proposed regulations. In effect, the proposed regulations cause what otherwise constitutes a taxpayer-friendly provision in Treas. Reg to give rise to a rather unfortunate result, i.e., an otherwise bona fide debt instrument being treated as stock for all U.S. federal tax purposes. Like Scenario #2, the exception provided under Prop. Treas. Reg (c)(3) is not available under the facts of Scenario #3 because U.S. Lifeco2 acquires only a transitory interest in the stock of U.S. Holdco. Concluding Thoughts The preamble to the proposed regulations offers little indication that any of the foregoing scenarios, and accompanying tax consequences, were considered during the process of drafting the new rules. Nevertheless, these results appear to be genuine possibilities for Lonely Lifecos under the proposed regulations. Accordingly, if the proposed regulations are finalized in substantially similar form, it will be advisable to monitor the transactions being undertaken by Lonely Lifecos while they reside outside the life/nonlife consolidated return, lest they run afoul of the new rules. By William R. Pauls, Michael R. Miles and Christopher W. Schoen, Sutherland Asbill & Brennan LLP William Pauls and Michael Miles are partners and Christopher Schoen is counsel in Sutherland's Washington, D.C., office. The opinions expressed are those of the author and do not necessarily reflect the views of the firm, its clients, or Portfolio Media Inc., or any of its or their respective affiliates. This article is for general information purposes and is not intended to be and should not be taken as legal advice. All Content , Portfolio Media, Inc.
Article from: Taxing Times. February 2013 Volume 9 Issue 1
Article from: Taxing Times February 2013 Volume 9 Issue 1 T 3 : TAXING TIMES TIDBITS Peter H. Winslow is a partner with the Washington, D.C. law firm of Scribner, Hall & Thompson, LLP and may be reached
More informationSPECIAL REPORT. tax notes. IRS Assumes Away Inconvenient Law in Reinsurance CCA. By William R. Pauls
IRS Assumes Away Inconvenient Law in CCA By William R. Pauls William R. Pauls is a partner in the Washington office of Sutherland Asbill & Brennan LLP. He gratefully acknowledges Michael Miles, a partner
More informationSection 385 Proposed Regulations
Section 385 Proposed Regulations USS Where Have All the Factors Gone? Moderator Karen Gilbreath Sowell, EY, Washington, DC Panelists Jeff Maddrey, PwC, Washington, DC Peter Marrs, General Electric Company,
More informationTax-Exempt Organization Restructurings Made Easier
Portfolio Media. Inc. 111 West 19 th Street, 5th Floor New York, NY 10011 www.law360.com Phone: +1 646 783 7100 Fax: +1 646 783 7161 customerservice@law360.com Tax-Exempt Organization Restructurings Made
More informationPassive Foreign Investment Company Tax Regulations Navigating Complex Tax Features of Foreign Investments Absent Clear IRS Guidance
presents Passive Foreign Investment Company Tax Regulations Navigating Complex Tax Features of Foreign Investments Absent Clear IRS Guidance A Live 110-Minute Teleconference/Webinar with Interactive ti
More informationNY State Untangles Unauthorized Insurance Co. Taxation
Portfolio Media. Inc. 111 West 19 th Street, 5th Floor New York, NY 10011 www.law360.com Phone: +1 646 783 7100 Fax: +1 646 783 7161 customerservice@law360.com NY State Untangles Unauthorized Insurance
More informationtax notes Volume 144, Number 13 September 29, 2014
tax notes Volume 144, Number 13 September 29, 2014 FATCA Implementation for Property and Casualty Insurers by Carol Tello, Kristan Rizzolo, and Saren Goldner Reprinted from Tax Notes, September 29, 2014,
More informationUS proposed regulations offer much-needed guidance on Section 163(j) business interest expense limitation
30 November 2018 Global Tax Alert US proposed regulations offer much-needed guidance on Section 163(j) business interest expense limitation NEW! EY Tax News Update: Global Edition EY s new Tax News Update:
More informationLEGAL ALERT. April 13, 2007
LEGAL ALERT April 13, 2007 IRS Issues Final Section 409A Regulations On April 10, 2007, the Treasury Department and the Internal Revenue Service (the IRS) released the final regulations interpreting section
More information26th Annual Health Sciences Tax Conference
26th Annual Health Sciences Tax Conference International and offshore captive issues for exempt December 5, 2016 Disclaimer EY refers to the global organization, and may refer to one or more, of the member
More informationThe Proposed Section 385 Regulations: An In-Depth Look
The Proposed Section 385 Regulations: An In-Depth Look Scott Levine (Moderator) Jones Day Didi Borden Deloitte Tax LLP Kevin Nichols U.S. Department of Treasury Ossie Borosh U.S. Department of Treasury
More informationUse of Limited Liability Companies in Corporate Transactions
College of William & Mary Law School William & Mary Law School Scholarship Repository William & Mary Annual Tax Conference Conferences, Events, and Lectures 1999 Use of Limited Liability Companies in Corporate
More informationRe: Collection of Information under notice of proposed rulemaking (IRC Section 385 REG )
June 7, 2016 VIA EMAIL Office of Management and Budget Attn: Desk Officer for the Department of the Treasury, Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs Washington, DC 20503 Re: Collection of Information
More informationSection 409A and Severance Arrangements
Section 409A and Severance Arrangements A Lexis Practice Advisor Practice Note by Alan M. Levine, Morrison Cohen LLP Alan M. Levine This practice note discusses how the nonqualified deferred compensation
More informationLEGAL ALERT. August 11, 2011
LEGAL ALERT August 11, 2011 SRLY? You Can t Be Serious. I Am Serious...and Don t Call Me SRLY. The IRS Issues Helpful Guidance on the Application of the SRLY Register Rules to Dual Consolidated Losses
More informationPosition Paper. Response to Treasury-IRS BEAT Regulations. Summary. Our reference: ECO-TAX-19. Referring to: Related documents: Contact person:
Position Paper Response to Treasury-IRS BEAT Regulations Our reference: ECO-TAX-19 Referring to: Related documents: Contact person: Alexandru Ciungu, Policy Advisor, Macroeconomics & Taxation E-mail: Ciungu@insuranceeurope.eu
More informationDodd-Frank's Eye On Energy Cos. Use Of Derivatives
Portfolio Media, Inc. 860 Broadway, 6th Floor New York, NY 10003 www.law360.com Phone: +1 646 783 7100 Fax: +1 646 783 7161 customerservice@law360.com Dodd-Frank's Eye On Energy Cos. Use Of Derivatives
More information12 Separation Pay Arrangements
12 Separation Pay Arrangements Joseph M. Yaffe Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLP I. Introduction... II. Key Separation Pay Concepts... A. Separation Pay Plan... B. Separation Pay... C. Window Program...
More informationPartnerships and the Proposed Debt-Equity Regulations
taxnotes Partnerships and the Proposed Debt-Equity Regulations By Charles Kaufman Reprinted from Tax Notes, September 26, 2016, p. 1843 Volume 152, Number 13 September 26, 2016 Partnerships and the Proposed
More informationSCRIBNER, HALL & THOMPSON, LLP
SCRIBNER, HALL & THOMPSON, LLP THOMAS C. THOMPSON, JR. MARK H. KOVEY STEPHEN P. DICKE PETER H. WINSLOW SUSAN J. HOTINE BIRUTA P. KELLY GREGORY K. OYLER LORI J. BROWN SAMUEL A. MITCHELL LYNLEE C. BAKER-GARBETT
More informationAll Cash D Reorganizations & Selected Issues under Section 108(i)
All Cash D Reorganizations & Selected Issues under Section 108(i) Donald W. Bakke Office of the Tax Legislative Counsel U.S. Department of Treasury Bruce A. Decker Office of Associate Chief Counsel (Corporate)
More informationSection 385 Regulations
Section 385 Regulations Peter Faber Partner, McDermott Will & Emery LLP December 12, 2016 Britt Haxton Associate, McDermott Will & Emery LLP www.mwe.com Boston Brussels Chicago Dallas Düsseldorf Frankfurt
More informationRecent Developments in Corporate Tax
Recent Developments in Corporate Tax Scott M. Levine Jones Day Washington D.C. Lori A. Hellkamp Jones Day Washington D.C. Todd R. Miller Jones Day Detroit Tax Executives Institute Dearborn, Michigan October
More informationArticle from Taxing Times. October 2017 Volume 13, Issue 3
Article from Taxing Times October 2017 Volume 13, Issue 3 In the Beginning A Column Devoted to Tax Basics The Taxation of Reinsurance Transactions By Jean Baxley and Eli Katz Reinsurance involves the transfer
More informationABA Tax Section Insurance Companies Committee 1 Important Developments Update January 20, 2017
ABA Tax Section Insurance Companies Committee 1 Important Developments Update January 20, 2017 The chairs of the subcommittees of the Insurance Companies Committee have summarized the following important
More information1111 Constitution Avenue, NW 1111 Constitution Avenue, NW Washington, DC Washington, DC 20224
January 10, 2019 The Honorable Charles P. Rettig Mr. William M. Paul Commissioner Acting Chief Counsel Internal Revenue Service Internal Revenue Service 1111 Constitution Avenue, NW 1111 Constitution Avenue,
More informationClient Alert May 3, 2016
Tax News and Developments North America Client Alert May 3, 2016 Treasury Issues Temporary Regulations on Inversions On April 4, 2016, the US Department of Treasury issued extensive temporary regulations
More informationBy Electronic Delivery
By Electronic Delivery Mr. Tom West Tax Legislative Counsel U.S. Department of the Treasury 1500 Pennsylvania Ave., NW Washington, DC 20220 Mr. William Paul Acting Chief Counsel and Deputy Chief Counsel
More informationTax Considerations in M&A Transactions. Anthony R. Boggs, Esq. Morris, Manning & Martin, LLP
Tax Considerations in M&A Transactions Anthony R. Boggs, Esq. Morris, Manning & Martin, LLP Diagram Legend C corp for U.S. federal income tax purposes Partnership for U.S. federal income tax purposes S
More informationDEVELOPING AND IMPLEMENTING PROCEDURES FOR POST-ISSUANCE TAX COMPLIANCE FOR ISSUERS OF GOVERNMENTAL BONDS GFOA DEBT COMMITTEE
DEVELOPING AND IMPLEMENTING PROCEDURES FOR POST-ISSUANCE TAX COMPLIANCE FOR ISSUERS OF GOVERNMENTAL BONDS GFOA DEBT COMMITTEE AUGUST 2016 DEVELOPING AND IMPLEMENTING PROCEDURES FOR POST-ISSUANCE TAX COMPLIANCE
More informationTax Reform Complicates Middle-Market CLOs
Portfolio Media. Inc. 111 West 19 th Street, 5th Floor New York, NY 10011 www.law360.com Phone: +1 646 783 7100 Fax: +1 646 783 7161 customerservice@law360.com Tax Reform Complicates Middle-Market CLOs
More informationTreasury Issues Final and Temporary Regulations on Related-Party Debt Instruments
Latham & Watkins Tax Practice October 26, 2016 Number 2023 Treasury Issues Final and Temporary Regulations on Related-Party Debt Instruments Seeking to curb excessive use of related-party debt, Treasury
More informationNovember 26, Dear Mr. Dinwiddie:
November 26, 2018 Mr. Scott Dinwiddie Associate Chief Counsel Income Tax & Accounting CC:PA:LPD:PR (REG-115420-18), room 5203, Internal Revenue Service, PO Box 7604, Ben Franklin Station, Washington, DC
More informationArticle from: Reinsurance News. March 2014 Issue 78
Article from: Reinsurance News March 2014 Issue 78 Determining Premiums Paid For Purposes Of Applying The Premium Excise Tax To Funds Withheld Reinsurance Brion D. Graber This article first appeared in
More informationFollow-Up Discussion of the Final Section 385 Related-Party Debt Rules
Follow-Up Discussion of the Final Section 385 Related-Party Debt Rules Final and Temporary Regulations Limit and Clarify Proposed Documentation and Recharacterization Rules That Now Apply Mainly to Inbound
More informationTemporary Regulations Addressing Inversions and Related Transactions and Proposed Section 385 Regulations
Temporary Regulations Addressing Inversions and Related Transactions and Proposed Section 385 Regulations Allegheny Tax Society April 25, 2016 Steve Massed Managing Director Washington National Tax International
More informationTax Reform Implementation. American Bar Association Section of Taxation May 11, 2018
Tax Reform Implementation American Bar Association Section of Taxation May 11, 2018 Presenters Pete Bautz, American Council of Life Insurers Howard Stecker, EY Brenda Viehe Naess, Washington Advocates
More information26th Annual Health Sciences Tax Conference
26th Annual Health Sciences Tax Conference Cross-border financing and impact of Section 385 December 5, 2016 Disclaimer EY refers to the global organization, and may refer to one or more, of the member
More informationClient Update Treasury s Sweeping Proposed Regulations Attack Related-Party Debt
1 Client Update Treasury s Sweeping Proposed Regulations Attack Related-Party Debt NEW YORK Gary M. Friedman gmfriedman@debevoise.com Peter A. Furci pafurci@debevoise.com Vadim Mahmoudov vmahmoudov@debevoise.com
More informationFinal and temporary US Section 385 regulations significantly narrow scope of earlier proposed regulations
19 October 2016 International Tax Alert Final and temporary US Section 385 regulations significantly narrow scope of earlier proposed regulations EY Global Tax Alert Library Access both online and pdf
More informationIMPORTANT INFORMATION FOR THE LIVE PROGRAM
FOR LIVE PROGRAM ONLY Partnership Terminations: Mastering Section 708 Filing Short Year Returns, Revisiting Elections, Amortization Opportunities, Basis Adjustments and More WEDNESDAY, JANUARY 25, 2017,
More informationIRS Proposes Changes to the Taxation of Fee Waivers and Possibly Other Transactions in Which Partners Provide Services
IRS Proposes Changes to the Taxation of Fee Waivers and Possibly Other Transactions in Which Partners Provide Services IRS Proposals Would Re-characterize Partnership Income from Some Fee Waiver Arrangements
More informationTAKE AWAYS: Given the significant tax hikes facing many high income earners, insurance producers, planners, and consultants should:
The trusted source of actionable technical and marketplace knowledge for AALU members - the nation s most advanced life insurance professionals. The AALU Washington Report is published by AALUniversity,
More informationSUMMARY: This document contains final regulations that provide rules for determining
This document is scheduled to be published in the Federal Register on 08/12/2015 and available online at http://federalregister.gov/a/2015-19846, and on FDsys.gov [4830-01-p] DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY
More informationImportant Developments in the Federal Income Taxation of S Corporations
American Bar Association Section of Taxation S Corporation Committee Important Developments in the Federal Income Taxation of S Corporations Boca Raton, Florida January 21, 2011 Dana Lasley Tax Director
More informationFollowing the BEAT: IRS Issues Proposed Regulations on Application of Base Erosion and Anti-Abuse Tax
Latham & Watkins Transactional Tax Practice January 14, 2019 Number 2433 Following the BEAT: IRS Issues Proposed Regulations on Application of Base Erosion and Anti-Abuse Tax The proposed regulations provide
More informationRE: IRS REG Guidance Related to Section 951A (Global Intangible Low-Taxed Income)
Charles P. Rettig Commissioner Internal Revenue Service 1111 Constitution Avenue, NW Washington, DC 20044 RE: IRS REG-104390-18 - Guidance Related to Section 951A (Global Intangible Low-Taxed Income) Dear
More informationSSAP No. 101: Issues to consider
SSAP No. 101: Issues to consider Baker Tilly refers to Baker Tilly Virchow Krause, LLP, an independently owned and managed member of Baker Tilly International. Agenda 1) General observations 2) Valuation
More informationThe Intersection of Subchapter K and Consolidated Returns
The Intersection of Subchapter K and Consolidated Returns Affiliated & Related Corporations Committee American Bar Association Tax Section Greg Fairbanks Grant Thornton LLP Washington, DC E.J. Forlini
More informationRe: Recommendations for Priority Guidance Plan (Notice )
Courier s Desk Internal Revenue Service Attn: CC:PA:LPD:PR (Notice 2018-43) 1111 Constitution Avenue, N.W. Washington, DC 20224 Re: Recommendations for 2018-2019 Priority Guidance Plan (Notice 2018-43)
More informationOFFSHORE CAPTIVE TAX AND REGULATORY CONSIDERATIONS. Angela J. Walitt, Partner Baker & McKenzie LLP February 13, 2017
OFFSHORE CAPTIVE TAX AND REGULATORY CONSIDERATIONS Angela J. Walitt, Partner Baker & McKenzie LLP February 13, 2017 1 Discussion Topics Benefits of Using an Offshore Captive Direct U.S. Taxation of Offshore
More informationWhich Cos. Are Most Likely To Benefit From Innovation Box?
Portfolio Media. Inc. 860 Broadway, 6th Floor New York, NY 10003 www.law360.com Phone: +1 646 783 7100 Fax: +1 646 783 7161 customerservice@law360.com Which Cos. Are Most Likely To Benefit From Innovation
More informationUniversity of Chicago Federal Tax Conference. Final and Temporary Section 385 Regulations
University of Chicago Federal Tax Conference Final and Temporary Section 385 Regulations Julie A. Roin, Moderator L.G. Chip Harter Kevin C. Nichols Deborah L. Paul November 11, 2016 Section 385 Congress
More informationThe Purpose of a Captive Captives vs. Traditional Insurance Structuring a Captive Determining the Feasibility and Goals of a Captive Domicile
The Purpose of a Captive Captives vs. Traditional Insurance Structuring a Captive Determining the Feasibility and Goals of a Captive Domicile Selection Partner Selection Operating a Captive Captive Advantages
More informationRepatriation Tax Planning: Inbound Asset Transfers, Cash Dividends and Other Strategies for Tax Professionals
Repatriation Tax Planning: Inbound Asset Transfers, Cash Dividends and Other Strategies for Tax Professionals FOR LIVE PROGRAM ONLY TUESDAY, OCTOBER 30, 2018, 1:00-2:50 pm Eastern IMPORTANT INFORMATION
More informationThe analysis regarding securities law in this memorandum has been drafted by Clifford Kirsh of Sutherland Asbill & Brennan LLP.
TO: Robert Wuelfing, Executive Director, The SPARK Institute FROM: Michael Hadley, Partner DATE: April 2, 2015 RE: You have asked us to provide views on the implications under the Employee Retirement Income
More informationACA Sec Annual Fee Overview. Lawrence M. Brauer Ernst & Young LLP Washington, DC
I. Background II. III. IV. ACA Sec. 9010 Annual Fee Overview Lawrence M. Brauer Ernst & Young LLP Washington, DC larry.brauer@ey.com A. The Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (P.L. 111-148) (ACA)
More informationIRS Issues Proposed Regulations on Qualified Opportunity Funds
IRS Issues Proposed Regulations on Qualified Opportunity Funds Proposed Regulations Would Clarify a Number of Threshold Issues But Also Leave Many Other Issues to be Resolved by Future Guidance SUMMARY
More information11 th Biennial Parker C. Fielder Oil and Gas Tax Conference
11 th Biennial Parker C. Fielder Oil and Gas Tax Conference Like-Kind Exchanges in the Energy Sector J. Peter Baumgarten, Internal Revenue Service, Washington D.C. Todd D. Keator, Thompson & Knight LLP,
More informationKPMG report: Initial impressions of proposed regulations under section 163(j), business interest limitation
KPMG report: Initial impressions of proposed regulations under section 163(j), business interest limitation November 28, 2018 kpmg.com 1 The Treasury Department released proposed regulations (REG-106089-18)
More informationSUMMARY: This document contains final regulations relating to basis of indebtedness
This document is scheduled to be published in the Federal Register on 07/23/2014 and available online at http://federalregister.gov/a/2014-17336, and on FDsys.gov [4830-01-p] DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY
More informationKIRKLAND ALERT. Proposed Treasury Regulations on Debt- Equity Classification Change the Landscape for Related Party Financings.
KIRKLAND ALERT April 13, 2016 Proposed Treasury Regulations on Debt- Equity Classification Change the Landscape for Related Party Financings Executive Summary On April 4, 2016, the U.S. Treasury Department
More information1500 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW 1111 Constitution Avenue, NW Washington, DC Washington, DC 20224
November 6, 2018 The Honorable David J. Kautter Mr. William M. Paul Assistant Secretary for Tax Policy Acting Chief Counsel Department of the Treasury Internal Revenue Service 1500 Pennsylvania Avenue,
More informationGW/IRS 29 th Annual Institute on Current Issues in International Taxation Final and Temporary Section 385 Regulations
GW/IRS 29 th Annual Institute on Current Issues in International Taxation Final and Temporary Section 385 Regulations L.G. Chip Harter, PwC, Chair Bruce Lassman, VP-International Tax, IBM Corp. Kevin Nichols,
More informationTreasury Issues Inversion Regulations, Proposes Sweeping Changes to Debt/Equity Classification
April 11, 2016 Treasury Issues Inversion Regulations, Proposes Sweeping Changes to Debt/Equity Classification On April 4, 2016, as the most recent step in its ongoing battle against inversion transactions,
More informationFINAL REGULATIONS REGARDING CAPITALIZATION OF EXPENDITURES RELATING TO INTANGIBLE S
FINAL REGULATIONS REGARDING CAPITALIZATION OF EXPENDITURES RELATING TO INTANGIBLE S March 1, 2004 The IRS issued final regulations on December 31, 2003, which further clarify whether expenditures incurred
More informationNEW YORK STATE BAR ASSOCIATION TAX SECTION
NEW YORK STATE BAR ASSOCIATION TAX SECTION REPORT ON THE PROPOSED REGULATIONS RELATING TO PARTNERSHIP OPTIONS AND CONVERTIBLE SECURITIES January 23, 2004 Report No. 1048 NEW YORK STATE BAR ASSOCIATION
More informationCC:PA:LPD:PR (REG ) Courier s Desk Internal Revenue Service 1111 Constitution Avenue, N.W. Washington, DC
COMMITTEE ON ESTATE AND GIFT TAXATION PAUL A. FERRARA CHAIR 114 WEST 47 TH STREET NEW YORK, NY 10036 Phone: (212) 852-2817 paul.a.ferrara@ustrust.com JOHN BATTERTON SECRETARY 114 WEST 47 TH STREET NEW
More informationDISREGARDED ENTITIES AND PARTNERSHIP LIABILITY ALLOCATIONS: PROPOSED REGS CRITIQUED
DISREGARDED ENTITIES AND PARTNERSHIP LIABILITY ALLOCATIONS: PROPOSED REGS CRITIQUED By Blake D. Rubin and Andrea Macintosh Whiteway Blake D. Rubin and Andrea Macintosh Whiteway are partners with Arnold
More informationCertain Transfers of Property to Regulated Investment Companies [RICs] and Real Estate Investment Trusts [REITs]; Final and Temporary Regulations
This document is scheduled to be published in the Federal Register on 06/08/2016 and available online at http://federalregister.gov/a/2016-13443, and on FDsys.gov [4830-01-p] DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY
More informationJune 5, Mr. Daniel I. Werfel Acting Commissioner Internal Revenue Service 1111 Constitution Avenue, Room 3000 Washington, DC 20024
June 5, 2013 Mr. Daniel I. Werfel Acting Commissioner Internal Revenue Service 1111 Constitution Avenue, Room 3000 Washington, DC 20024 Re: Comments on Revenue Ruling 99-5 Dear Mr. Werfel: The American
More informationAnti-Loss Importation & Anti-Loss Duplication Rules Update
Anti-Loss Importation & Anti-Loss Duplication Rules Update Scott M. Levine Partner Jones Day Krishna Vallabhaneni Attorney-Advisor (Tax Legislation) U.S. Department of the Treasury Office of Tax Policy
More informationForeign Contingent Debt; Request for Comments Announcement 99 76
Foreign Contingent Debt; Request for Comments Announcement 99 76 I. Summary. The Department of Treasury ( Treasury ) and the Internal Revenue Service (the Service ) intend, in the near future, to withdraw
More informationA Look at the Final Section 2053 Regulations
A PROFESSIONAL CORPORATION ATTORNEYS AT LAW A Look at the Final Section 2053 Regulations 2009 by Jonathan G. Blattmachr & Mitchell M. Gans All Rights Reserved. Introduction As a general rule, expenses
More informationArticle from: Taxing Times. October 2013 Volume 9, Issue 3
Article from: Taxing Times October 2013 Volume 9, Issue 3 IRS Issues Ruling Applying Diversification Rules to Illiquid Funds By Bryan W. Keene and Alison R. Peak On March 1, 2013, the Internal Revenue
More informationRecent Developments Affecting Qualified and Nonqualified Deferred Compensation, Part I: New Proposed Regulations
PRACTICE POINT Recent Developments Affecting Qualified and Nonqualified Deferred Compensation, Part I: New Proposed Regulations By David Pratt, Professor of Law, Albany Law School, Albany, NY There have
More informationAs filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on December 15, SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION Washington, D.C.
Section 1: SC TO-I (SC TO-I) As filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on December 15, 2016 SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION Washington, D.C. 20549 SCHEDULE TO Tender Offer Statement under
More informationLEXIS FEDERAL TAX JOURNAL QUARTERLY
LEXIS FEDERAL TAX JOURNAL QUARTERLY September 2016 IN THIS ISSUE: Featured Articles Elaine Gagliardi on Consistent Basis Reporting: Are Proposed Regulations Consistent with Congress s Basis for Enactment?
More informationDrafting Cash Distribution and Tax Allocation Provisions
THE UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS SCHOOL OF LAW Presented: LLCs, LPs and Partnerships July 10-12, 2013 Austin, Texas Drafting Cash Distribution and Tax Allocation Provisions Kevin Thomason Christopher Alan Cunningham
More informationTHE REGULATIONS GOVERNING INTERCOMPANY TRANSACTIONS WITHIN CONSOLIDATED GROUPS. August Mark J. Silverman Steptoe & Johnson LLP Washington, D.C.
PRACTISING LAW INSTITUTE TAX STRATEGIES FOR CORPORATE ACQUISITIONS, DISPOSITIONS, SPIN-OFFS, JOINT VENTURES FINANCINGS, REORGANIZATIONS AND RESTRUCTURINGS 2001 THE REGULATIONS GOVERNING INTERCOMPANY TRANSACTIONS
More informationDICKSON G. BROWN, JOHN C. HART, STEVEN C. TODRYS AND KATHARINE P. MOIR
IRS PROPOSES REGULATIONS REGARDING CAPITALIZATION OF EXPENDITURES RELATING TO INTANGIBLE ASSETS DICKSON G. BROWN, JOHN C. HART, STEVEN C. TODRYS AND KATHARINE P. MOIR SIMPSON THACHER & BARTLETT LLP JANUARY
More information2015 In Review: Tax Regulators Attempt To Strike Back
Portfolio Media. Inc. 860 Broadway, 6th Floor New York, NY 10003 www.law360.com Phone: +1 646 783 7100 Fax: +1 646 783 7161 customerservice@law360.com 2015 In Review: Tax Regulators Attempt To Strike Back
More informationUnited States Tax Alert Transition tax guidance: proposed regulations released
International Tax 10 August 2018 United States Tax Alert Transition tax guidance: proposed regulations released On August 1, 2018, Treasury and the IRS released proposed regulations (the Proposed Regulations
More informationArticle from: Taxing Times. September 2011 Volume 7 Issue 3
Article from: Taxing Times September 2011 Volume 7 Issue 3 T 3 : TAXING TIMES TIDBITS AFTER GOING 0 FOR 6 IN THE UNITED STATES TAX COURT, WILL TAXPAYERS FINALLY GIVE UP THE FIGHT? By Daniel Stringham Consider
More informationNEW SECTION 385 PROPOSED REGULATIONS CHANGING THE DEBT-EQUITY LANDSCAPE
@BDO_USA_Tax NEW SECTION 385 PROPOSED REGULATIONS CHANGING THE DEBT-EQUITY LANDSCAPE August 2, 2016 BDO USA, LLP, a Delaware limited liability partnership, is the U.S. member of BDO International Limited,
More informationClient Alert February 14, 2019
Tax News and Developments North America Client Alert February 14, 2019 Voluminous Proposed Regulations Interpret Section 163(j) Overview On November 26, 2018, the Treasury and IRS released proposed regulations
More informationApportionment of Tax Items among the Members of a Controlled Group of Corporations. ACTION: Final regulations and removal of temporary regulations.
[4830-01-p] DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY Internal Revenue Service 26 CFR Part 1 [TD 9476] RIN 1545-BI62; RIN 1545-BG39 Apportionment of Tax Items among the Members of a Controlled Group of Corporations AGENCY:
More informationStates May Escheat IRAs But Who Gets The Tax Bill?
Portfolio Media. Inc. 111 West 19 th Street, 5th Floor New York, NY 10011 www.law360.com Phone: +1 646 783 7100 Fax: +1 646 783 7161 customerservice@law360.com States May Escheat IRAs But Who Gets The
More informationSession 58 PD, Tax Considerations for the Life Actuary. Moderator: Jacqueline F. Yang, FSA, ACIA, MAAA
Session 58 PD, Tax Considerations for the Life Actuary Moderator: Jacqueline F. Yang, FSA, ACIA, MAAA Presenters: Jean Baxley, JD, LLM Timothy Gregory Branch, FSA, MAAA Mark S. Smith, CPA, Esq. Session
More informationTax Election to Treat Disposition of Stock of a Subsidiary as a Sale of Its Assets
Tax Election to Treat Disposition of Stock of a Subsidiary as a Sale of Its Assets Proposed Regulations Would Allow a Corporation to Treat Certain Dispositions of Stock of a Subsidiary as a Sale of Its
More informationNOTICE OF NOTE SALE CITY OF WATERVLIET ALBANY COUNTY, NEW YORK $2,970,000 BOND ANTICIPATION NOTES
Sale Date: October 17, 2018 Time of Sale: 11:00 A.M. (Prevailing Time) Place of Sale: NOTICE OF NOTE SALE CITY OF WATERVLIET ALBANY COUNTY, NEW YORK $2,970,000 BOND ANTICIPATION NOTES - 2018 Munistat Services,
More informationNew Foreign Tax Credit
Presenting a live 110 minute teleconference with interactive Q&A New Foreign Tax Credit and FTC Splitting Regulations Mastering Section 909 and 901 Rules to Maximize Efficiencies in Complex FTC Planning
More informationVMware, Inc. (Name of Issuer)
UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION Washington, D.C. 20549 SCHEDULE 13D Under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (Amendment No. 13)* VMware, Inc. (Name of Issuer) Class A Common Stock, par
More information20 Tax Executives Institute
20 www.tei.org Tax Executives Institute COVER TAX DEVELOPMENTS IN 2016 Part 1: Federal Tax Sections 355, 382, and 385; and new rules on partnership audits dominate landscape By Todd Reinstein, Annette
More informationIRS Finalizes Regulations Relating to Allocations of Partnership Items Involving Partners That Are Look-Through Entities
IRS Finalizes Regulations Relating to Allocations of Partnership Items Involving Partners That Are Look-Through Entities SUMMARY On May 19, 2008, the Internal Revenue Service issued final regulations on
More informationTaxNewsFlash. Proposed regulations: CFC s foreign currency gain or loss; election for mark-to-market accounting for section 988 transactions
TaxNewsFlash United States No. 2017-571 December 18, 2017 Proposed regulations: CFC s foreign currency gain or loss; election for mark-to-market accounting for section 988 transactions The U.S. Treasury
More informationIRS rules on application of manufacturing exception where sales activities did not include taking of title
1 July 2013 IRS rules on application of manufacturing exception where sales activities did not include taking of title Executive summary In a private letter ruling (PLR 201325005), the Internal Revenue
More informationTABLE OF CONTENTS PAGE GENERAL INFORMATION B-3 CERTAIN FEDERAL INCOME TAX CONSEQUENCES B-3 PUBLISHED RATINGS B-8 ADMINISTRATION B-8
STATEMENT OF ADDITIONAL INFORMATION INDIVIDUAL VARIABLE ANNUITY ISSUED BY JEFFERSON NATIONAL LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY AND JEFFERSON NATIONAL LIFE ANNUITY ACCOUNT G ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICE: P.O. BOX 36840,
More informationDistributions from a Pension Plan upon Attainment of Normal Retirement Age
[4830-01-p] DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY Internal Revenue Service 26 CFR Part 1 [TD 9325] RIN 1545-BD23 Distributions from a Pension Plan upon Attainment of Normal Retirement Age AGENCY: Internal Revenue
More informationInternational Tax Update
International Tax Update AMERICAN BAR ASSOCIATION SECTION OF TAXATION 26TH ANNUAL PHILADELPHIA TAX CONFERENCE November 6, 2015 11:20 a.m. 12:35 p.m. International Tax Update The panel will discuss the
More information