Section 385 Proposed Regulations
|
|
- Abel Preston
- 5 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 Section 385 Proposed Regulations USS Where Have All the Factors Gone? Moderator Karen Gilbreath Sowell, EY, Washington, DC Panelists Jeff Maddrey, PwC, Washington, DC Peter Marrs, General Electric Company, Fairfield, CT Kevin Nichols, Senior Counsel, ITC, Department of Treasury, Washington, DC David Schnabel, Davis Polk & Wardwell LLP, New York, NY Tom West, Tax Legislative Counsel, TLC, Department of Treasury, Washington, DC Brett York, Attorney Advisor, TLC, Department of Treasury, Washington, DC ABA Tax Section Corporate Tax Committee May 7, 2016
2 Overview of Proposed Regulations Bifurcation Rules: Prop Reg Apply prospectively Commissioner may treat an EGI as part debt and part stock Documentation Rules: Prop. Reg Apply prospectively Extensive contemporaneous documentation required as necessary (but not sufficient) requirement for treatment of related party instruments as debt Per Se Stock Rules: Prop. Reg and -4 Apply to related party debt issued on or after April 4 Apply to related-party debt issued: (1) In a distribution (including a straight spin-off) (2) In exchange for stock of an affiliate (3) As boot in an asset reorganization (4) by an affiliate in exchange for property, where issued with a principal purpose of funding one of the transactions described in (1) (3) (the Funding Rule ); nonrebuttable presumption of principal purpose when issued within 36 months before or after such transaction described in (1) (3) contains rules for applying -3 to a consolidated group when an instrument ceases to be or becomes a consolidated group debt instrument All rules apply to foreign and domestic related parties, except members of a consolidated group are treated as a single entity. Page 2
3 Expanded Group / Modified Expanded Group Expanded Group ( EG ): an affiliated group as defined in Section 1504(a) with the following modifications: (i) includes foreign and tax-exempt corporations, (ii) includes corporations held directly or indirectly (through application of Section 304(c)(3)), and (iii) modifies the ownership test to 80 percent vote OR value (i.e., not vote AND value). applies generally for purposes of the Proposed Regulations the application of downward attribution under Section 318(a)(3) can result in otherwise unrelated corporations treated as members of an EG Modified Expanded Group ( MEG ): determined by substituting 50 for 80 in Section 1504(a)(2)(A) and (B); also includes 50 percent ownership of a partnership capital or profits interest, and persons who own at least 50 percent of a MEG member. applies solely for purposes of Bifurcation Rule Expanded Group Instrument ( EGI ): an instrument between EG members that is in form a debt obligation applies for purposes of Documentation Rule Broader definition of debt instrument under -3 (i.e., satisfies the requirements of -1 and -2 and that is indebtedness under general principles of federal income tax law) Page 3
4 The Per Se Stock Rules: Prop. Reg
5 Overview of the Per Se Stock Rules Subject to certain limited exceptions, the Per Se Stock Rules treat related party debt as stock if it is issued in certain enumerated transactions, even though it would otherwise be characterized as debt under existing case law General Rule: Treats related party debt as stock if issued (1) in a distribution, (2) in exchange for EG stock, or (3) as boot in an asset reorganization. The Funding Rule: Mechanical rule that recharacterizes related party debt issued in the 36-month period before or after a distribution or acquisition described in the General Rule. No Affirmative Use: Taxpayers cannot affirmatively use the Per Se Stock Rules to recharacterize related party debt as stock if the principal purpose of doing so is to reduce the federal tax liability of the taxpayer or any member of its EG. Page 5
6 Exceptions to the Per Se Stock Rules Current E&P Exception: The aggregate amount of any distributions or acquisitions described in the General Rule and the Funding Rule is reduced by an amount equal to the member s current E&P. See Slide 8. Threshold Exception: Aggregate amount of debt held by EG members that would be treated as stock under the General Rule or the Funding Rule does not exceed $50 million. Once $50 million, all debt is recharacterized (cliff rule). No other de minimis exception for small debt issuances Additional Exceptions Applicable to the Funding Rule: Funded Acquisitions of Subsidiary Stock: A transfer of property by a funded member (transferor) to an EG member (transferee) in exchange for stock if the transferor owns >50% for 36 months after. If applicable, subsidiary is treated as a successor Ordinary Course Exception: Debt issued in the ordinary course of business or in connection with the purchase of goods or services (e.g., trade payables). Requirements of ordinary course exception result in narrow applicability Page 6
7 Significance of April 4th Under and , all related party debt issued on or after April 4 th may be recharacterized when/if the regulations are final Debt issued on or after April 4 will be respected as debt until 90 days after final regulations; thereafter, it will be recharacterized as equity if the Per Se Stock Rules apply. Impact of recharacterization on characterization of original transaction? Interaction with step transaction doctrine? Planning for basic M&A transactions (e.g., sales or spins) must take into account the impact of the rules as proposed All distributions (including straight spin-offs), stock acquisitions and D reorganizations undertaken on or after April 4 th may result in the recharacterization of related party debt issued on or after April 4 th Why was it necessary to make the regulations retroactive? Page 7
8 Preamble: Policy Concerns Related party debt issued in the Per Se Stock Rules often lacks meaningful non-tax significance, such that respecting the [related party debt] as indebtedness for federal tax purposes produces inappropriate results. Base erosion: Inverted groups and other foreign-parented groups use these types of transactions to create interest deductions that reduce U.S. source income without investing any new capital in the U.S. operations. Avoidance of repatriation tax: U.S.-parented groups obtain distortive results by, for example, using these types of transactions to create interest deductions that reduce the earnings and profits of controlled foreign corporations (CFCs) and to facilitate the repatriation of untaxed earnings without recognizing dividend income. Page 8
9 Effects of Per Se Stock Rules Intended? Conversion of true debt into equity Bias in favor of external debt; increased role for third parties (e.g., banks) Uncertainty for taxpayers due to complexity Inconsistent treatment of transactions depending upon consideration and interaction with other Code sections Impacts normal business transactions (e.g., Treasury center lending) Loss of Section 902 credits Creation of hybrid instruments Creation of hook stock Potential listed transactions: Fast-pay stock and basis shifting Inability to utilize Treas. Reg to purchase property or to compensate employees Impact on future nonrecognition transactions (e.g., Sections 351 and 355) Deconsolidation Significant and costly compliance burdens Complex due diligence Costly financial audit analysis Page 9
10 Similar Transactions (May Be) Characterized Differently Facts: Case 1A CFC 3 acquires CFC 2 stock for cash Case 1B CFC 3 acquires CFC 2 stock for note Case 2 CFC 3 acquires CFC 2 stock for cash; contemporaneously, CFC 3 issues note to CFC 4 Case 1 CFC 1 CFC 2 USP stock A) cash B) note CFC 3 CFC 4 Questions/Issues: Policy reasons for differential treatment of economically similar transactions? Case 2 USP Interaction with No Affirmative Use Rule (e.g., recharacterization dependent on E&P consequences associated with characterization)? Recast of the Section 304 recast CFC 1 stock cash CFC 3 What if CFC 1 loans an amount equal to the sale proceeds to CFC 3 a year prior to the acquisition? CFC 2 CFC 4 loan Page 10
11 Purchase of Assets vs. Stock Facts: FS sells UST DRE to USP in exchange for a USP Note. Proposed Regulations: The USP Note is not recharacterized (unless -1 or -2 applies). Questions: Why the different treatment for sales of stock and sales of assets? Recharacterization may still result where (i) USP engages in a funding transaction or (ii) the asset acquisition is principal purpose transaction does a sale of assets implicate the principal purpose test? FS UST FP UST Note USP Page 11
12 Current E&P Exception Facts: USS has current E&P of $50. Case 1: USS distributes $50 cash to FP and, subsequently, distributes a note worth $50 to FP. Case 2: USS Note is distributed first and cash is distributed second Proposed Regulations: Case 1: Does the Current E&P exception apply to the USS Note? Case 2: Current E&P exception applies to USS Note Questions: Partial recharacterization could result in bifurcated instrument if current E&P is less than $50 Why is accumulated E&P not considered? Treatment of PTI? If the cash in Case 1 makes the Current E&P exception unavailable to the USS Note, why? USS may not ever borrow from a related party. Interaction of uncertain interpretation with immediate effective date. CEP $50 CEP $50 Case 1 FP USS Case 2 FP USS 1) $50 distribution 2) USS Note distribution 1) USS Note distribution 2) $50 distribution Page 12
13 The Mechanical Funding Rule: Many Unintended(?) Consequences
14 Treasury Centers and Ordinary Transactions Facts: Treasury Center engages in numerous lending transactions to fund ordinary-course needs of affiliated group. CFC OpCo 1 enters into a 3-year revolving borrowing facility with Treasury Center to fund its ongoing operating needs. Within 36 months of making a cash draw under the facility, CFC Opco 1 distributes cash to CFC Holdco. USP CFC Holdco 2) Cash Distribution Proposed Regulations: Under the Funding Rule, the CFC Opco 1 Note is recharacterized as stock. Questions/Issues: Is it intended that such debt incurred to fund ordinary-course operating needs be recharacterized as equity? Uniform application to all treasury center activities? Distinguish cash pools? Consequences if note repaid before distribution? Same vs different year? Possibility of cascading recharacterization? Impact on tax treatment of hedges? Mechanical application creates substantial diligence/compliance burdens CFC OpCo 3 CFC OpCo 4 Cash Pool Draw Cash Pool Deposit Centralized Treasury Center Cash Pool Deposit 1) 3-Year Revolver Loan CFC Opco 1 CFC OpCo 2 Page 14 No Current E&P
15 Third Party Acquisitions: Form Matters Case 1 Case 2 UST P 2 UST FP Note P 1 Cash FP Note Cash 1 2 UST USS Cash UST USS UST stock Facts Case 1: 1) FP loans cash to USS in exchange for note 2) USS purchases UST stock for cash Facts Case 2: 1) FP purchases UST stock for cash 2) USS purchases UST stock from FP in exchange for note Questions: Are these two cases treated differently? There is new capital in both Case 1 and Case 2. Page 15
16 Common Transactions: Equity Compensation Facts: CFC 1 issues note to CFC3. Within 36 months after issuance, CFC1 compensates employee EE with stock of USP. USP USP Stock Result: Reg treats this transaction as if, immediately before CFC1 disposes of the USP stock, CFC1 purchased the USP stock from USP for fair market value with cash contributed to CFC1 by USP. CFC3 Prior Note CFC1 USP Stock EE Question: Is this an acquisition of expanded group stock, other than in an exempt exchange, by the funded member from a member of the funded member s expanded group in an exchange for property other than expanded group stock under Prop. Reg (b)(3)(ii)(B)? Page 16
17 Predecessors and Successors The Funding Rule applies to predecessors and successors of the funded member: Predecessor: (1) the distributor or transferor corporation in a Section 381(a) transaction in which the funded member is the acquiring corporation; (2) the distributing corporation in a D/355 transaction. Successor: (1) the acquiring corporation in a Section 381(a) transaction in which the funded member is the distributor or transferor corporation; (2) the controlled corporation in a D/355 transaction. It appears the Funding Rule applies regardless of when the transaction occurs that creates a predecessor/successor. Thus, the Funding Rule expands well beyond the 72-month timeframe. Page 17
18 Predecessors and Successors Beyond 72 months Year 1 Year 2 or Year 10 USP 2) Cash distribution USP FS3 FS1 FS2 FS3 FS1 FS2 1) Note In Year 1, FS3 loans $100 to FS1 in exchange for the FS1 Note. Later in Year 1, FS2 distributes $100 to USP. 2) Merger In Year 2, FS1 merges into FS2 in a Section 381 transaction, thereby becoming a successor to FS3. Under the Funding Rule, the FS1 Note is treated as stock because it was issued to FS3 within 36-months of the distribution by FS1 s successor, FS2. Same result if merger occurs in Year 10? Preamble: For purposes of [the Funding Rule] references to the funded member include references to any predecessor or successor of such member. Questions: Why do the predecessor/successor rules apply to recharacterize debt in Year 10? Page 18
19 Predecessors and Successors D/355 transactions Year 1 2 Year 10 1 USP USP External Spinco $ FD External Spinco Treasury Center FD FC FC FC Note In Year 1, FD contributes assets to newly formed FC and distributes the stock of FC to USP FC is a successor to FD Later in Year 1, USP contributes FC to newly formed External Spinco and distributes the stock of External Spinco to the shareholders of USP In Year 10, FC distributes cash to External Spinco. Later in Year 10, Treasury Center loans money to FD in exchange for a note. Under the Funding Rule, is the FD Note treated as stock because it was issued to Treasury Center within 36-months of the distribution by FD s successor, FC? Questions/Issues: Is this result intended? What policy objective is served? Creates reporting obligations between unrelated parties Page 19
20 Common Restructurings: Liquidations Facts: CFC3 loans money to CFC2. Later that year, CFC2 makes a checkthe-box election to be disregarded as an entity separate from CFC1. CFC1 issued debt to CFC3 the prior year. Proposed Regulations: Deemed liquidation is a distribution with respect to the CFC2 stock. Note is recharacterized as equity upon issuance. Questions/Issues: Is the deemed liquidation also an acquisition of EG stock? Can convert a tax-free liquidation into taxable was this intended? If Section 332 applies, debt of CFC1, a successor to CFC2, may be recharacterized Can t qualify as an upstream reorganization Significant diligence burdens CFC3 USP Prior Note 1) Note CFC1 CFC2 2) CTB to DRE Page 20
21 The Funded Member s Expanded Group Testing and Timing Facts: P1 and P2 are unrelated public companies. In Year 1, when Target is a member of the P2 expanded group, Target issues a note to Target Sub. In Year 2, P1 acquires the stock of Target in exchange for cash with Target Note still outstanding. Later in Year 2, Target makes a distribution of property to P1. 3) Distribution P1 2) Acquisition P2 Questions: At what point in time is the funded member s expanded group measured for purposes of the Funding Rule? Target Target 1) Target Note If measured at two points in time, how do you account for changes in expanded group membership? Target Sub Target Sub Page 21
22 Examples of Collateral Consequences of Recharacterization as Stock
23 Listed Transaction? Fast Pay and Basis Hopping Facts: FS1 holds a $100 note issued by FS2 (the FS2 Note ) that is treated as nonvoting stock under Prop. Reg FS2 repays the FS2 Note at a time when it has $150 of E&P. Results: FS2 is treated as redeeming the FS2 Note in a dividend-equivalent redemption. Questions: Is the FS2 Note fast-pay stock? Is the overall transaction a fast-pay arrangement? The basis in the FS2 Note shifts to USP s basis in its FS2 stock under Treas. Reg (c), and FS2 s E&P moves to FS1? Should USP report the transaction under Notice and/or Treas. Reg (l)-3? FS1 $100 USP FS2 Note FS2 E&P = $150 Page 23
24 Loss of FTCs Facts Same facts as previous. FS2 has foreign tax credits of $25. Questions/Issues: Section 902 applies when shareholder owns 10% voting power What are the consequences to the foreign tax credits as a result of Section 302(d) characterization of FS2 Note repayment? Compare Rev. Ruls and FS1 $100 USP FS2 Note FS2 FTC $25 Page 24
25 Creation of Hybrid Instruments Facts: USP makes loan to FS1 in exchange for a Note, which is recharacterized as nonvoting stock under under Prop. Reg Impact of Recharacterization: Note is respected as debt for foreign tax purposes, but treated as stock for US federal tax purposes. Creates hybrid instrument. Question: How does this result comport with the OECD BEPS project? 1) Note USP FS1 Page 25
26 Unanticipated Taxable Transactions Facts: In Year 1, FS2 issues the FS2 Note that is recharacterized as nonvoting stock under Prop. Reg In Year 2, USP contributes appreciated property to FS2. USP 2) Contribution Impact of Recharacterization: USP recognizes gain on the property. USP does not have Section 368(c) control of FS2. Note USP could not spin FS2 under Section 355. FS1 1) FS2 Note FS2 Page 26
27 The Bifurcation and Documentation Rules: Prop. Reg and -2
28 Bifurcation Rule Prop. Reg (d)(1): Commissioner may treat an EGI as part debt and part stock Preamble: all-or-nothing approach is particularly problematic in cases where only slightly more support for characterization of the entire interest as indebtedness than for equity characterization Bifurcation Rule only applicable where Documentation Rules has been satisfied When will the Bifurcation Rule be applied? Convertible debt? What is the threshold for slightly more support? Is the 3:2 ratio in the preamble example informative? (Preamble example) FP USS $5M note Facts: USS issues a $5M note to FP. Commissioner determines that at time of issuance, USS can t reasonably be expected to repay more than $3M Page 28
29 Documentation Rules Expanded Group members must maintain contemporaneous documentation to establish: 1. Binding obligation to repay: issuer has an unconditional and legally binding obligation to pay a sum certain 2. Creditor s rights to enforce terms: holder has traditional creditor s rights to enforce obligation (e.g., ability to trigger default or acceleration, preferred right to share in assets upon issuer s dissolution before shareholders) 3. Reasonable expectation of repayment: documents necessary to establish (e.g., cash flow projections, financial statements and forecasts, appraisals, debt-to-equity ratio) 4. Ongoing arm s length creditor-debtor documentation: payments of principal or interest (or, in the event of default, a holder s reasonable exercise of diligence and judgment of a creditor) Satisfaction of these requirements is a necessary but not sufficient condition for treatment of an intercompany debt as debt for federal tax purposes. Taxpayers may not fail to comply with the Documentation Rules in order to obtain equity characterization ( no affirmative use ) Page 29
30 Documentation Rules Cash Pooling Facts: Pursuant to a cash pooling arrangement, CFC1, CFC2, and CFC3 transfer cash received from operations to a treasury center (TC) in exchange for an intercompany receivable at the end of every day. Documentation Rules apply to cash pooling arrangements (as well as revolvers) Is a comprehensive agreement that governs all of the operations of a cash pooling arrangement sufficient? Is the examination of standalone creditworthiness on a daily basis required to establish reasonable expectation of repayment? USP CFC 1 CFC 2 CFC 3 $ $ $ Treasury Center Page 30
The Proposed Section 385 Regulations: An In-Depth Look
The Proposed Section 385 Regulations: An In-Depth Look Scott Levine (Moderator) Jones Day Didi Borden Deloitte Tax LLP Kevin Nichols U.S. Department of Treasury Ossie Borosh U.S. Department of Treasury
More informationTemporary Regulations Addressing Inversions and Related Transactions and Proposed Section 385 Regulations
Temporary Regulations Addressing Inversions and Related Transactions and Proposed Section 385 Regulations Allegheny Tax Society April 25, 2016 Steve Massed Managing Director Washington National Tax International
More informationRecent Developments in Corporate Tax
Recent Developments in Corporate Tax Scott M. Levine Jones Day Washington D.C. Lori A. Hellkamp Jones Day Washington D.C. Todd R. Miller Jones Day Detroit Tax Executives Institute Dearborn, Michigan October
More informationInternational Tax Update
International Tax Update Stephen Bates Jose Murillo Cynthia Yu 3 May 2016 Disclaimers This presentation is provided solely for the purpose of enhancing knowledge on tax matters. It does not provide tax
More informationSection 385 Regulations
Section 385 Regulations Peter Faber Partner, McDermott Will & Emery LLP December 12, 2016 Britt Haxton Associate, McDermott Will & Emery LLP www.mwe.com Boston Brussels Chicago Dallas Düsseldorf Frankfurt
More informationUniversity of Chicago Federal Tax Conference. Final and Temporary Section 385 Regulations
University of Chicago Federal Tax Conference Final and Temporary Section 385 Regulations Julie A. Roin, Moderator L.G. Chip Harter Kevin C. Nichols Deborah L. Paul November 11, 2016 Section 385 Congress
More informationGW/IRS 29 th Annual Institute on Current Issues in International Taxation Final and Temporary Section 385 Regulations
GW/IRS 29 th Annual Institute on Current Issues in International Taxation Final and Temporary Section 385 Regulations L.G. Chip Harter, PwC, Chair Bruce Lassman, VP-International Tax, IBM Corp. Kevin Nichols,
More information26th Annual Health Sciences Tax Conference
26th Annual Health Sciences Tax Conference Cross-border financing and impact of Section 385 December 5, 2016 Disclaimer EY refers to the global organization, and may refer to one or more, of the member
More informationNEW SECTION 385 PROPOSED REGULATIONS CHANGING THE DEBT-EQUITY LANDSCAPE
@BDO_USA_Tax NEW SECTION 385 PROPOSED REGULATIONS CHANGING THE DEBT-EQUITY LANDSCAPE August 2, 2016 BDO USA, LLP, a Delaware limited liability partnership, is the U.S. member of BDO International Limited,
More informationPartnerships and the Proposed Debt-Equity Regulations
taxnotes Partnerships and the Proposed Debt-Equity Regulations By Charles Kaufman Reprinted from Tax Notes, September 26, 2016, p. 1843 Volume 152, Number 13 September 26, 2016 Partnerships and the Proposed
More informationTreasury Issues Final and Temporary Regulations on Related-Party Debt Instruments
Latham & Watkins Tax Practice October 26, 2016 Number 2023 Treasury Issues Final and Temporary Regulations on Related-Party Debt Instruments Seeking to curb excessive use of related-party debt, Treasury
More informationKIRKLAND ALERT. Proposed Treasury Regulations on Debt- Equity Classification Change the Landscape for Related Party Financings.
KIRKLAND ALERT April 13, 2016 Proposed Treasury Regulations on Debt- Equity Classification Change the Landscape for Related Party Financings Executive Summary On April 4, 2016, the U.S. Treasury Department
More informationNew Proposed Section 385 Regulations
New Proposed Section 385 Regulations Idan Netser, Partner Anil Kalia, Partner TEI Regions IX & X Annual Conference Portland, Oregon, May 22-25, 2016 Agenda I. Introduction II. III. A. Section 385 B. Scope
More informationTax Management International Journal
Tax Management International Journal Reproduced with permission from Tax Management International Journal, 45 TMIJ 387 (July 8, 2016), 07/08/2016. Copyright 2016 by The Bureau of National Affairs, Inc.
More informationThe 30th Annual Institute on Current Issues in International Taxation
The 30th Annual Institute on Current Issues in International Taxation November 30 December 1, 2017 Cross Border Spin-Offs, Issues and Planning John Merrick Brenda Zent Nicholas J. DeNovio Rachel D. Kleinberg
More informationIRS Issues Proposed Regulations That Would Recast Certain Debt Instruments as Equity
IRS Issues Proposed Regulations That Would Recast Certain Debt Instruments as Equity On April 4, 2016, the IRS and U.S. Treasury Department issued proposed Treasury Regulations designed to curb the ability
More informationClient Update Treasury s Sweeping Proposed Regulations Attack Related-Party Debt
1 Client Update Treasury s Sweeping Proposed Regulations Attack Related-Party Debt NEW YORK Gary M. Friedman gmfriedman@debevoise.com Peter A. Furci pafurci@debevoise.com Vadim Mahmoudov vmahmoudov@debevoise.com
More informationComments on proposed regulations issued under Section 385 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as Amended
Comments on proposed regulations issued under Section 385 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as Amended Copyright 2016 Deloitte Development LLC. All rights reserved. 1 Proposed Regulations are effective
More informationCurrent Developments in Consolidated Returns
Current Developments in Consolidated Returns Affiliated & Related Corporations Committee American Bar Association Tax Section William D. Alexander Associate Chief Counsel (Corporate) Internal Revenue Service
More informationFinal and temporary Section 385 regulations: FAQs and initial reactions
Final and temporary Section 385 regulations: FAQs and initial reactions Guidance on new international tax developments from Grant Thornton s Washington National Tax Office International Tax Services October
More informationStock Basis and Boot Considerations Inside Consolidation
Stock Basis and Boot Considerations Inside Consolidation Neil Barr Davis olk & Wardwell LL Rebecca O. Burch Ernst & Young LL Gordon Warnke Linklaters LL (Moderator) Kevin M. Jacobs Internal Revenue Service
More informationGWU Law School / IRS 30 th Annual Institute
GWU Law School / IRS 30 th Annual Institute and Washington, DC December 15, 2016 Elena Virgadamo, U.S. Department of Treasury Brian Jenn, U.S. Department of Treasury Jason Smyczek, IRS Office of Chief
More informationPartnership Issues in International Tax Planning Tax Executives Institute February 16, 2015
www.pwc.com Partnership Issues in International Tax Planning Tax Executives Institute Instructors Craig Gerson WNTS Principal Craig Gerson recently rejoined as a Principal in the Mergers and Acquisitions
More informationFederal Bar Association March 6, 2015 Notice : Selected Issues
Federal Bar Association March 6, 2015 Notice 2014-52: Selected Issues Private Sector Chris Bowers, Skadden Arps Joe Calianno, Grant Thornton Scott Levine, Jones Day Government Panelists Brenda Zent, Dept.
More informationClient Alert May 3, 2016
Tax News and Developments North America Client Alert May 3, 2016 Treasury Issues Temporary Regulations on Inversions On April 4, 2016, the US Department of Treasury issued extensive temporary regulations
More informationA Little of This, A Little of That: Cherry- Picking Gains and Losses in Transactions
A Little of This, A Little of That: Cherry- Picking Gains and Losses in Transactions Moderator: Panelists: Michael Mollerus, Davis Polk LLP Lisa Fuller, Chief, Branch 5, Office of Associate Chief Counsel
More informationTax Executives Institute
Tax Executives Institute International Tax Update - Hot Topics & Planning Opportunities Kevin Cunningham Managing Director Washington National Tax May 9, 2017 Notice The following information is not intended
More informationFollow-Up Discussion of the Final Section 385 Related-Party Debt Rules
Follow-Up Discussion of the Final Section 385 Related-Party Debt Rules Final and Temporary Regulations Limit and Clarify Proposed Documentation and Recharacterization Rules That Now Apply Mainly to Inbound
More informationTax Executives Institute
Tax Executives Institute International Tax Update - Hot Topics & Planning Opportunities Ron Dabrowski Principal Washington National Tax Kimberly Roth Managing Director International Tax Houston, TX May
More informationFinal and temporary US Section 385 regulations significantly narrow scope of earlier proposed regulations
19 October 2016 International Tax Alert Final and temporary US Section 385 regulations significantly narrow scope of earlier proposed regulations EY Global Tax Alert Library Access both online and pdf
More informationFinal US related-party debt regulations will impact US subsidiaries of Canadian parent companies
Final US related-party debt regulations will impact US subsidiaries of Canadian parent companies October 2016 On October 13, the US Treasury Department and the IRS released new final and temporary Section
More informationAll Cash D Reorganizations & Selected Issues under Section 108(i)
All Cash D Reorganizations & Selected Issues under Section 108(i) Donald W. Bakke Office of the Tax Legislative Counsel U.S. Department of Treasury Bruce A. Decker Office of Associate Chief Counsel (Corporate)
More informationImpact of the Proposed 385 Regulations on Cash-Pooling Arrangements
U.S. Inbound Corner Navigating complexity. In this issue: Impact of the Proposed 385 Regulations on Cash-Pooling Arrangements... 1 Proposed debt-equity regulations: Unintended state tax headache?... 10
More informationDebt Shmebt What's really at stake if a related party "note" is recast as equity? ABA Tax Section May 9, 2014
www.pwc.com Debt Shmebt What's really at stake if a related party "note" is recast as equity? ABA Tax Section May 9, 2014 Presenters Dave Friedel PwC Washington National Tax (202) 414 1606 david.b.friedel@us.pwc.com
More informationAnti-Loss Importation & Anti-Loss Duplication Rules Update
Anti-Loss Importation & Anti-Loss Duplication Rules Update Scott M. Levine Partner Jones Day Krishna Vallabhaneni Attorney-Advisor (Tax Legislation) U.S. Department of the Treasury Office of Tax Policy
More informationThe State of Debt Under the Proposed Section 385 Regulations
Robb Chase Andrew Appleby TEI Denver May 11, 2016 The State of Debt Under the Proposed Section 385 Regulations All Rights Reserved. This communication is for general informational purposes only and is
More informationAnti-Inversion Guidance: Treasury Releases Temporary and Proposed Regulations
Inbound Tax U.S. Inbound Corner Navigating complexity In this issue: Anti-Inversion Guidance: Treasury Releases Temporary and Proposed Regulations... 1 Proposed regulations addressing treatment of certain
More information11th Annual Domestic Tax Conference. 17 May 2016 Chicago
11th Annual Domestic Tax Conference 17 May 2016 Chicago Current issues in Treasury risk management Disclaimer EY refers to the global organization, and may refer to one or more, of the member firms of
More informationThe Proposed Regulations at a Glance. Legal Update April 7, 2016
Legal Update April 7, 2016 Treasury s New Anti-Inversion Regulations: Do They Go Too Far? THE PROPOSED AND TEMPORARY REGULATIONS WILL AFFECT FUTURE TAX PLANNING FOR ALL MULTINATIONAL BUSINESSES On April
More informationUse of Limited Liability Companies in Corporate Transactions
College of William & Mary Law School William & Mary Law School Scholarship Repository William & Mary Annual Tax Conference Conferences, Events, and Lectures 1999 Use of Limited Liability Companies in Corporate
More informationInternational Tax Update
International Tax Update AMERICAN BAR ASSOCIATION SECTION OF TAXATION 26TH ANNUAL PHILADELPHIA TAX CONFERENCE November 6, 2015 11:20 a.m. 12:35 p.m. International Tax Update The panel will discuss the
More informationB = C = Distributing 1 = Distributing 2 = Controlled 1 = Controlled 2 =
Internal Revenue Service Number: 200230006 Release Date: 7/26/2002 Index Number: 355.00-00 Department of the Treasury Washington, DC 20224 Person to Contact: Telephone Number: Refer Reply To: CC:CORP:1-PLR-158635-01
More informationLimitation on Loss Duplication and Importation of Built-in Losses
Limitation on Loss Duplication and Importation of Built-in Losses 1 Internal Revenue Service Circular 230 Disclosure: As provided for in Treasury regulations, advice (if any) relating to federal taxes
More information(b) (1) through (b)(2). [Reserved]. For further guidance, see (b)(1) through (b)(2).
CLICK HERE to return to the home page Reg. Section 1.385-3T Certain distributions of debt instruments and similar transactions (temporary) (a) [Reserved]. For further guidance, see 1.385-3(a). (b) (1)
More informationAttribute planning and reporting for strategic transactions
Attribute planning and reporting for strategic transactions Mike Medley, Ernst & Young LLP Stephen O Neil, Ernst & Young LLP Sue Lippe, Ernst & Young LLP John Morris, Ernst & Young LLP Disclaimer Ernst
More informationTHE REGULATIONS GOVERNING INTERCOMPANY TRANSACTIONS WITHIN CONSOLIDATED GROUPS. August Mark J. Silverman Steptoe & Johnson LLP Washington, D.C.
PRACTISING LAW INSTITUTE TAX STRATEGIES FOR CORPORATE ACQUISITIONS, DISPOSITIONS, SPIN-OFFS, JOINT VENTURES FINANCINGS, REORGANIZATIONS AND RESTRUCTURINGS 2001 THE REGULATIONS GOVERNING INTERCOMPANY TRANSACTIONS
More informationAMERICAN JOBS CREATION ACT OF 2004
AMERICAN JOBS CREATION ACT OF 2004 OCTOBER 26, 2004 TABLE OF CONTENTS Page REPEAL OF EXCLUSION FOR EXTRATERRITORIAL INCOME AND DEDUCTIONS FOR DOMESTIC PRODUCTION ACTIVITIES... 1 TAX SHELTERS... 2 Information
More informationTax Executives Institute Houston chapter Indebtedness and Consolidated Returns
Tax Executives Institute Houston chapter Indebtedness and Consolidated Returns Matt Gareau, Partner, Deloitte Tax LLP, Washington National Tax magareau@deloitte.com, +1 202 879 5387 Diana Estrada, Senior
More informationTax Considerations in M&A Transactions. Anthony R. Boggs, Esq. Morris, Manning & Martin, LLP
Tax Considerations in M&A Transactions Anthony R. Boggs, Esq. Morris, Manning & Martin, LLP Diagram Legend C corp for U.S. federal income tax purposes Partnership for U.S. federal income tax purposes S
More informationTax Management International Journal TM
Tax Management International Journal TM Reproduced with permission from Tax Management International Journal, 46 TM International Journal 101, 2/10/17. Copyright 2017 by The Bureau of National Affairs,
More informationIvins, Phillips & Barker
The New Anti-Inversion Regulations (Incl. Proposed Debt/Equity Rules) J. Brian Davis Penn State Law Center for the Study of Mergers & Acquisitions New Treasury / IRS Tax Inversion and 385 Interest-Stripping
More informationChapter 9 - Acquisitive Corporate Reorganizations
Chapter 9 - Acquisitive Corporate Reorganizations Concept of a corporate reorganization - the exchange of an equity interest in the old corporation for shares in the new corporation; cf., 1001 re possible
More informationWhether an account receivable established by an election to apply Rev. Proc constitutes related party indebtedness under I.R.C. 965(b)(3).
Office of Chief Counsel Internal Revenue Service Memorandum Number: AM2008-010 Release Date: 9/12/2008 CC:INTL:B03:JLParry POSTN-120024-08 UILC: 965.00-00 date: September 04, 2008 to: from: Area Counsel
More informationHigh Tech M&A Developments Selected Topics
High Tech M&A Developments Selected Topics 2015 High-Tech Tax Institute November 10, 2015 Gabe Gartner PWC Nate Giesselman Skadden Arps Ivan Humphreys WSGR Laynie Pavio E&Y AGENDA High-Tech Spin-offs Inversion
More informationAmerican Bar Association Section of Taxation Section 2011 Midyear Meeting. Hot Topics in Partnerships January 21, 2011
American Bar Association Section of Taxation Section 2011 Midyear Meeting January 21, 2011 Panelists Paul F. Kugler, KPMG LLP Dawn Duncan, Ernst & Young LLP Beverly Katz, Special Counsel to the Associate
More informationInternational tax update. 1 May 2018
International tax update 1 May 2018 Disclaimer EY refers to the global organization, and may refer to one or more, of the member firms of Ernst & Young Global Limited, each of which is a separate legal
More informationNumber: Release Date: 5/24/2002 CC:INTL:4 POSTF UILC: ; ; ; ; 6038B.00-00
DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE WASHINGTON, D.C. 20224 OFFICE OF CHIEF COUNSEL February 19, 2002 Number: 200221046 Release Date: 5/24/2002 CC:INTL:4 POSTF-150593-01 UILC: 367.01-00;
More informationTreasury Issues Inversion Regulations, Proposes Sweeping Changes to Debt/Equity Classification
April 11, 2016 Treasury Issues Inversion Regulations, Proposes Sweeping Changes to Debt/Equity Classification On April 4, 2016, as the most recent step in its ongoing battle against inversion transactions,
More informationReport No New York State Bar Association Tax Section. Report on Final Regulations on Reorganizations under Section 368(a)(1)(F)
Report No. 1349 New York State Bar Association Tax Section Report on Final Regulations on Reorganizations under Section 368(a)(1)(F) June 1, 2016 Contents I. Summary of Recommendations... 1 II. Overview
More informationRedemptions of Partnership Interests and Divisions of Partnerships
College of William & Mary Law School William & Mary Law School Scholarship Repository William & Mary Annual Tax Conference Conferences, Events, and Lectures 2006 Redemptions of Partnership Interests and
More informationFinal Section 385 Rules
Final Section 385 Rules A mixed bag for sovereign wealth and pension funds kpmg.com The good news regarding the final Section 385 rules is that they are significantly less burdensome than the proposed
More informationRecommendations for the Department of the Treasury and Internal Revenue Service Priority Guidance Plan Related to the Act
RECOMMENDATIONS 1 Recommendations for the 2018-2019 Department of the Treasury and Internal Revenue Service Priority Guidance Plan Related to the Act AMERICAN BAR ASSOCIATION SECTION OF TAXATION May 24,
More informationThe State of Debt Under the Proposed Section 385 Regulations
Todd A. Lard Daniel R.B. Nicholas May 5, 2016 The State of Debt Under the Proposed Section 385 Regulations Overview On April 4, proposed regulations were issued under IRC 385 (the Proposed Regulations)
More informationCalifornia Tax Bar and Tax Policy Conference 2004 CURRENT CORPORATE DEVELOPMENTS
California Tax Bar and Tax Policy Conference 2004 CURRENT CORPORATE DEVELOPMENTS William Alexander, Internal Revenue Service Julie Divola, Pillsbury Winthrop LLP David Gerson, Wilson Sonsini Goodrich &
More informationInternational Tax Primer Andrew D. Oppenheimer, Esq. October 31, 2017
International Tax Primer Andrew D. Oppenheimer, Esq. October 31, 2017 Agenda International tax concepts Taxation of foreign earnings Sourcing of income and expenses Foreign tax credits Subpart F income
More informationTransition Tax and Notice Foreign Tax Credits BEAT Interactions
Transition Tax and Notice 2018-26 Foreign Tax Credits BEAT Interactions Steve Blore Greg Kernek Deloitte Tax LLP May 11, 2018 Transition Tax and Anti-Avoidance Copyright 2018 Deloitte Development LLC.
More informationPresenting a live 90-minute webinar with interactive Q&A. Today s faculty features:
Presenting a live 90-minute webinar with interactive Q&A Leveraging Outbound Transfers of Corporate Stock and Other Property Navigating Sect. 367 Gain Recognition Agreements and Sect. 6038B Regs in Cross-Border
More informationThis notice announces that the Department of the Treasury ( Treasury
Additional Guidance Under Section 965; Guidance Under Sections 62, 962, and 6081 in Connection With Section 965; and Penalty Relief Under Sections 6654 and 6655 in Connection with Section 965 and Repeal
More informationFeedback for REG ( Transition Tax) as of 10/3/2018 SECTION TITLE ISSUE RECOMMENDATION ADDITIONAL EXPLANATION /QUERIES
Feedback for REG-104226-18 ( 965 1 Transition Tax) as of 10/3/2018 PROPOSED REGS Preamble Pages 63-64 Double counting for November 2017 distributions to the United States from 11/30 year end deferred foreign
More informationClient Alert. Tax News and Developments. Proposed Regulations Under Code Section 385. North America
Tax News and Developments North America Client Alert April 19, 2016 Proposed Regulations Under Code Section 385 The U.S. Department of Treasury ("Treasury") and the IRS recently issued proposed regulations
More informationChapter 9 - Acquisitive Corporate Reorganizations. AcquisitiveReorganizations (cf., Divisive Reorgs), p /23/2010
Chapter 9 - Acquisitive Corporate Reorganizations Concept of a corporate reorganization - the exchange of an equity interest in the old corporation for shares in the new corporation; cf., 1001. Effects
More informationCurrent issues and transaction structures for tax-free spin-offs
Current issues and transaction structures for tax-free spin-offs David Wheat, dwheat@kpmg.com Steven Qualls, squalls@kpmg.com May 1, 2017 Disclaimer The following information is not intended to be written
More informationRepatriation Tax Planning: Inbound Asset Transfers, Cash Dividends and Other Strategies for Tax Professionals
Repatriation Tax Planning: Inbound Asset Transfers, Cash Dividends and Other Strategies for Tax Professionals FOR LIVE PROGRAM ONLY TUESDAY, OCTOBER 30, 2018, 1:00-2:50 pm Eastern IMPORTANT INFORMATION
More informationIssues For 'Lonely' Life Cos. Under New Debt-Equity Regs.
Portfolio Media. Inc. 111 West 19 th Street, 5th Floor New York, NY 10011 www.law360.com Phone: +1 646 783 7100 Fax: +1 646 783 7161 customerservice@law360.com Issues For 'Lonely' Life Cos. Under New Debt-Equity
More informationNEW YORK STATE BAR ASSOCIATION TAX SECTION
NEW YORK STATE BAR ASSOCIATION TAX SECTION REPORT ON THE PROPOSED REGULATIONS RELATING TO PARTNERSHIP OPTIONS AND CONVERTIBLE SECURITIES January 23, 2004 Report No. 1048 NEW YORK STATE BAR ASSOCIATION
More information26th Annual Health Sciences Tax Conference
26th Annual Health Sciences Tax Conference Partnerships and joint ventures: M&A, current developments and JVs with exempt organizations December 7, 2016 Disclaimer EY refers to the global organization,
More informationJune 5, Mr. Daniel I. Werfel Acting Commissioner Internal Revenue Service 1111 Constitution Avenue, Room 3000 Washington, DC 20024
June 5, 2013 Mr. Daniel I. Werfel Acting Commissioner Internal Revenue Service 1111 Constitution Avenue, Room 3000 Washington, DC 20024 Re: Comments on Revenue Ruling 99-5 Dear Mr. Werfel: The American
More informationSection 367 limits use of the reorganization
8 POINTS TO REMEMBER Editor s Note: POINTS TO REMEMBER are individual submissions to the Newsletter from Section of Taxation members with insights to share. Although these items are subject to selection
More informationNEW YORK STATE BAR ASSOCIATION TAX SECTION REPORT ON REVENUE RULING v2
NEW YORK STATE BAR ASSOCIATION TAX SECTION REPORT ON REVENUE RULING 99-6 TABLE OF CONTENTS Page I. SUMMARY OF PRINCIPAL RECOMMENDATIONS...4 II. BACKGROUND...5 A. The Ruling... 5 1. Situation 1 Partner
More informationInternal Revenue Service
Internal Revenue Service Number: 9845012 Release Date: 11/06/1998 Department of the Treasury Washington, DC 20224 Third Party Communication: None Date of Communication: Not Applicable Index Number: 0351.00-00;
More informationTax Management International Journal
Tax Management International Journal Reproduced with permission from Tax Management International Journal, 44 TMIJ 698, 11/13/2015. Copyright 2015 by The Bureau of National Affairs, Inc. (800-372- 1033)
More information23 rd Annual Health Sciences Tax Conference
23 rd Annual Health Sciences Tax Conference Treasury tax issues for life sciences companies December 9, 2013 Disclaimer EY refers to the global organization, and may refer to one or more, of the member
More informationSpin-offs and Corporate Separations: Issues and Planning
Spin-offs and Corporate Separations: Issues and Planning TEI Houston Chapter February 22, 2017 Nicholas J. DeNovio & Laurence J. Stein Latham & Watkins operates worldwide as a limited liability partnership
More informationINTERNATIONAL PROVISIONS OF THE TCJA: IMPLICATIONS FOR INDIVIDUALS
INTERNATIONAL PROVISIONS OF THE TCJA: IMPLICATIONS FOR INDIVIDUALS Panelists: Sally Thurston Skadden Arps Slate Meagher & Flom LLP Benjamin Handler Deloitte LLP Melinda Harvey Internal Revenue Service
More informationTreatment of Certain Interests in Corporations as Stock or Indebtedness. SUMMARY: This document contains proposed regulations under section 385 of the
This document is scheduled to be published in the Federal Register on 04/08/2016 and available online at http://federalregister.gov/a/2016-07425, and on FDsys.gov [4830-01-p] DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY
More informationLet s Be Rational Here: Tax Considerations in Intercompany Restructurings
Let s Be Rational Here: Tax Considerations in Intercompany Restructurings TEI Nashville Meeting April 19, 2017 Robb Chase, Partner Madison Barnett, Counsel 2017 (US) LLP All Rights Reserved. This communication
More informationTECHNICAL EXPLANATION OF THE REVENUE PROVISIONS OF H.R. 5982, THE SMALL BUSINESS TAX RELIEF ACT OF 2010
TECHNICAL EXPLANATION OF THE REVENUE PROVISIONS OF H.R. 5982, THE SMALL BUSINESS TAX RELIEF ACT OF 2010 Prepared by the Staff of the JOINT COMMITTEE ON TAXATION July 30, 2010 JCX-43-10 CONTENTS INTRODUCTION...
More informationThe Proposed Section 951A Regulations The First Round of GILTI Guidance
The Proposed Section 951A Regulations The First Round of GILTI Guidance Wednesday, October 10, 2018 1:30 3:00 pm ET If you experience any technical difficulties, contact 877.398.9939 or GTWebcast@centurylink.com
More informationClient Alert August 24, 2018
Tax News and Developments North America Client Alert August 24, 2018 Proposed Regulations Under Section 965 Introduction On August 9, 2018, the Treasury Department ( Treasury ) and the Internal Revenue
More informationFollowing the BEAT: IRS Issues Proposed Regulations on Application of Base Erosion and Anti-Abuse Tax
Latham & Watkins Transactional Tax Practice January 14, 2019 Number 2433 Following the BEAT: IRS Issues Proposed Regulations on Application of Base Erosion and Anti-Abuse Tax The proposed regulations provide
More informationManaging Effective Tax Rate: Global Tax Reform Tax Executive Institute. May 1, 2017 Houston, TX
Managing Effective Tax Rate: Global Tax Reform Tax Executive Institute May 1, 2017 Houston, TX Notice The content presented in this presentation is for discussion purposes only and is not intended to be
More informationTax Provisions in Administration s FY 2016 Budget Proposals
Tax Provisions in Administration s FY 2016 Budget Proposals General Corporate February 2015 kpmg.com HIGHLIGHTS OF GENERAL CORPORATE TAX PROPOSALS IN THE ADMINISTRATION S FISCAL YEAR 2016 BUDGET KPMG has
More informationSENATE TAX REFORM PROPOSAL INTERNATIONAL
The following chart sets forth some of the international tax provisions in the Senate s version of the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act, as approved by the Senate on December 2, 2017. This chart highlights only some
More informationNew Foreign Tax Credit
Presenting a live 110 minute teleconference with interactive Q&A New Foreign Tax Credit and FTC Splitting Regulations Mastering Section 909 and 901 Rules to Maximize Efficiencies in Complex FTC Planning
More informationPlanning with the New FTC Baskets
Planning with the New FTC Baskets 2018 U.S. Cross-Border Tax Conference May 15 17, 2018 kpmg.com Agenda 01 Significant Tax Reform changes to FTC rules - New FTC baskets and FTC limitation - Deemed paid
More informationIt s All About That Basis
It s All About That Basis ABA Section of Taxation May 9, 2015 Karen Gilbreath Sowell, Moderator Kevin M. Jacobs Krishna Vallabhaneni Ernst & Young LLP Internal Revenue Service U.S. Department of the Treasury
More informationTransfers of Certain Property by U.S. Persons to Partnerships with Related Foreign Partners
This document is scheduled to be published in the Federal Register on 01/19/2017 and available online at https://federalregister.gov/d/2017-01049, and on FDsys.gov [4830-01-p] DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY
More informationInternal Revenue Service
Internal Revenue Service Department of the Treasury Number: 200046001 Release Date: 11/17/2000 Index Number: 355.05-00, 332.02-00, 368.05-00 Washington, DC 20224 Person to Contact: Telephone Number: Refer
More informationRE: IRS REG Guidance Related to Section 951A (Global Intangible Low-Taxed Income)
Charles P. Rettig Commissioner Internal Revenue Service 1111 Constitution Avenue, NW Washington, DC 20044 RE: IRS REG-104390-18 - Guidance Related to Section 951A (Global Intangible Low-Taxed Income) Dear
More informationProposed Regulations Would Permit Cross-Border A Reorganizations For the First Time in 70 Years. July 2005
PRACTICING LAW INSTITUTE TAX STRATEGIES FOR CORPORATE ACQUISITIONS, DISPOSITIONS, SPIN-OFFS, JOINT VENTURES, FINANCINGS, REORGANIZATIONS AND RESTRUCTURINGS 2005 Proposed Regulations Would Permit Cross-Border
More information