Re: Collection of Information under notice of proposed rulemaking (IRC Section 385 REG )
|
|
- Benjamin McLaughlin
- 5 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 June 7, 2016 VIA Office of Management and Budget Attn: Desk Officer for the Department of the Treasury, Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs Washington, DC Re: Collection of Information under notice of proposed rulemaking (IRC Section 385 REG ) Dear Sir/Madam, In response to the collection of information requirements contained in the notice of proposed rulemaking USCIB provides the comments set forth below. The preamble states that the Office of Management and Budget has estimated that the paperwork burden associated with these regulations is 35 hours per respondent with 21,000 annual respondents, for an annual total burden of 735,000 hours. OMB has also estimated that the total annual cost of the burden this regulation imposes at approximately 13 million dollars. 1 These estimates grossly understate the burden associated with the regulations as proposed. USCIB has asked members for input on the potential costs associated with implementing the regulations as proposed. The costs could run to hundreds of millions or even billions of dollars across all persons affected by the regulations. This is in part because the documentation requirements are so broad with no exception for small or ordinary course loans, thereby potentially applying to hundreds of thousands or millions of loans per corporate group. The OMB estimates do not include the cost just to build the IT systems to do the required tracking and reporting. Many taxpayers will have to prepare new IT systems. Those systems will cost millions of dollars for each taxpayer that has to build one (preliminary estimates indicate that the costs could run between 5 and 30 million dollars) and could easily take 24 months to complete. Once these systems are developed, they would need to be maintained at a further cost of hundreds of thousands of dollars per year. Additional compliance staff would need to be hired. Initial estimates indicate that companies would need to hire between two to 1 Accepting OMB s numbers and assuming all the costs of complying with the documentation requirements are labor (which of course they will not be), then the cost of labor is estimated to be $18.00 an hour. This number itself is absurdly small.
2 four additional compliance staff per company, not just in the tax departments but also in treasury and accounting. 2 Some initial estimates indicate that the documentation costs associated for each loan could be between 35,000 and 50,000 dollars. The costs would be so high because of the transfer pricinglike analysis that would have to be performed to determine the ability to pay. Given the potentially dire consequences, companies might hire outside advisors to perform the analysis. Implementation would be so expensive because these regulations affect multiple aspects of corporate management including: the treasury, legal and accounting functions. The consequences of failing to provide documentation are punitive; therefore, companies need to be certain that they have satisfied all of the documentation requirements. The penalty for failing to comply with the documentation requirements 3 is the treatment of the instrument as equity, regardless of how the instrument ought to be characterized. If the instrument should be characterized as debt, then this mischaracterization results in denial of an interest deduction for 100% of the otherwise deductible interest expense. Further, the mischaracterization of the debt as equity could have significant collateral consequences that are out of proportion to the failure. No penalty should be so disproportionate to the underlying failure. USCIB is not in a position to determine whether the estimate of 21,000 annual respondents is accurate; but this figure seems low, based on the findings by the IRS own Statistics of Income division that over 1.6 million C corporation returns were filed in tax year 2012 (the most recent year for which data appears to be available). 4 The difficulty of ensuring documentation that is sufficient and timely especially with respect to cash pooling arrangements will result in some businesses using third party banks to manage liquidity even though they have cash elsewhere in their groups. Some initial estimates indicate that this might add 350 basis points to the cost of cash management. One member would strongly consider using a third-party bank as an intermediary for all cash-flow movements and has estimated that leading option to cost up to $20 million dollars annually. This increased interest expense would be fully deductible because it is third party debt. Although this is not a cost of reporting, it should be taken into account because it will be a cost of adopting these regulations. As a result, the effective cost of investing in future activities will increase for businesses affected by these regulations compared to businesses that are not affected. Additionally, to the extent that businesses use third party borrowing at the local 2 If OMB s estimate is entirely labor costs associated with implementation, then the cost of labor is approximately $18.00 per hour. Personnel with treasury, tax and accounting expertise cannot be hired for this amount. 3 Assuming there is not reasonable cause for the failure. Proposed regulation section (c)(1). The reasonable cause standard of section may be difficult to meet especially given that the documentation requirements apply globally to routine transactions with no de minimis threshold. 4 View Table 1, Number of Returns, Total Receipts, Business by Form of Business, Tax Years The regulations may also apply to entities that are not C corporations, including S corporations, partnerships and foreign corporations.
3 country levels this will result in additional internal resources including increased internal controls due to the decentralization of cash management. Alternatively, businesses will be forced to make equity contributions that will trap cash in high-risk jurisdictions. These burdens are especially questionable given that the authority cited for the collection of this information does not support the collection of the requested information. Section 385(c)(3) provides: The Secretary is authorized to require such information as the Secretary determines to be necessary to carry out the provisions of this subsection. This subsection is the subsection pertaining to consistent classification by the issuer and the holders of any instrument. The legislative history is short and contains only one sentence on the scope of the regulatory authority. That sentence provides: The Secretary of the Treasury is authorized to require such information as is deemed necessary to implement the provision. 5 The more natural reading of the regulatory authority is that it pertains only to whether the issuer and the holder have treated the instrument consistently as either debt or equity at the time the instrument was issued; and therefore the information that should be required to be provided should be limited to that determination of whether the issuer and holder have taken inconsistent positions, not the basis for those positions. In order to understand why USCIB believes the burden is grossly underestimated, an explanation of some of the documentation requirements are included in this letter. Documentation is Excessive The level of documentation is excessive. There is no sense that the documentation burden is proportionate to the value of the debt instrument or the amount of deductible interest. In negotiating the terms of a debt instrument, an issuer and creditor are more likely to extensively document the terms if the amount of the debt obligation is greater. In order to address this lack of proportionality USCIB suggests three changes. First, there should be a de minimis rule per obligation, such that the proposed rules do not apply to any obligation with a face amount below a certain level. 6 Second, the regulations should provide that if the expanded group can demonstrate that the level of documentation is equivalent to the documentation provided in a similar transaction between unrelated parties, then the requirements of section would be considered satisfied and not lead to treatment of an instrument as stock. The regulations should not demand more documentation than a lender would get from an unrelated party. Third, the documentation should not apply to any transaction that is within the ordinary course exception of proposed regulation (b)(3)(iv)(B)(2). The way in which the ordinary course exception is drafted, it only applies for purposes of the funding rule of proposed section A multi-national group could have millions of intercompany debt obligations if these ordinary course obligations are taken into account. This is also true for businesses that have numerous entities that participate in a cash pooling structure where daily or weekly cash 5 Energy Policy Act of 1992, Conference Report at The de minimis threshold would not prevent the IRS from challenging the character of an instrument as debt, it would simply mean that the rules of and -3 would not apply.
4 movements between the participants and the cash pool leader occur. Applying the documentation requirements to all of these ordinary course obligations would be impossible and attempting to do so would be extremely costly. An example of this excessive documentation is the rule concerning whether the creditor has a reasonable expectation of repayment (section (b)(2)(iii)). 7 While documenting an expectation of repayment is not in and of itself unreasonable, the level of documentation required, particularly in light the lack of any sense of proportionality and materiality, is unreasonable. In determining whether there is a reasonable expectation that the issuer has the ability to repay the debt obligation, written documentation must be prepared that establishes that as of the date of the issuance and taking into account all the relevant circumstances (including all other obligations incurred by the issuer as of the date of issuance or reasonably anticipated to be incurred after the date of issuance of the applicable instrument) the issuer s financial position supported a reasonable expectation that the issuer intended to, and would be able to, meet its obligations. This is too unclear and too broad. What is an obligation? Is it only other debt obligations? Is a draw-down on an existing debt obligation an obligation that warrants additional documentation, including a new assessment of the creditworthiness of the borrower? If interest on an existing obligation is capitalized, is the capitalized amount considered an obligation that warrants additional documentation, including a new assessment of the creditworthiness of the borrower? Does it include obligations to pay rents and royalties? Is a non-recourse obligation an obligation of an issuer? How would an issuer prove that it had taken into account all of its obligations? Would all of the obligations have to be identified in the written documentation? Do these obligations include trade payables? How would a business document that it took into account reasonably anticipated obligations? Many obligations are not material and would not have any impact on the ability of an issuer to repay a debt obligation. Non-material obligations should not be required to be considered. (Outstanding obligations would also clearly be a better standard than incurred, since an obligation that has been incurred but satisfied ought not to be considered.) The burden of complying with these documentation requirements for a single instrument could easily exceed OMB s total annual estimate of 35 hours per respondent. Some initial estimates indicate the cost of compliance per obligation could be between 35,000 and 50,000 dollars. It is also common for a prior-in-time related party interest to be subordinated to new unrelated party debt. Would subordinated debt need to be re-documented in order to avoid the potentially punitive result of being treated as equity? That is, if a new obligation was not reasonably anticipated at the time the EGI was entered into and therefore was not taken into account in determining whether there was a reasonable expectation that the issuer could meet its repayment obligation, then the obligation would be tested under section (e)(4)(vi) to determine whether there was a modification. Under that standard, subordination would not 7 Generally, the first two requirements that the documentation indicate an unconditional obligation to pay and the documentation establish the existence of creditor rights are not problematic.
5 be considered a modification of a debt instrument unless there is a substantial impairment of the obligor s capacity to meet the payment obligations under the debt instrument. So, if the issuer concludes there is no substantial impairment, there would be no modification and the documentation requirements would not apply. Nevertheless, businesses may be forced to redocument the transaction even if they conclude that there is not a modification -- in order to avoid the penalty of converting debt to equity, doubling the cost of documentation in this common case. Time for Preparation of Documentation is Inadequate The deadlines for preparation of the documentation are too short and could lead to anomalous results. The regulations generally provide that the documentation is treated as timely prepared if it is prepared no later than 30 days after the relevant date, in the case of documenting the obligation to repay, the existence of creditor rights and the reasonable expectation of repayment. Documentation is considered as timely prepared if it is prepared no later than 120 days after the relevant date in the case of documenting payment or the exercise of creditor rights on default. These rules would require businesses to implement systems to track these dates because the penalty, as described above, for failing to meet them is so onerous. A better rule would be to require the documentation to be finalized by the time the tax return (including extensions) for the relevant year is required to be filed. This approach would permit companies to address such documentation as part of the annual compliance process to allocate resources more effectively. Furthermore, the information would be available to the government when needed. Indeed, the proposed regulations provide that if a taxpayer fails to provide the documentation and information described in paragraph (b)(2) of this section upon request by the Commissioner, the Commissioner will treat the requirements of this section as not satisfied. 8 So, in all cases the taxpayer will need to have the documentation prepared in time for the Commissioner to review the documentation and if the documentation is provided when requested, it is not clear why there should be a disproportionate penalty associated with completing the documentation say 35 days after the loan was entered into. Timing with Respect to Ordinary Course Transactions To the extent that documentation relates to ordinary course transactions, many businesses complete their sub-ledger calculations on a quarterly basis, not on a monthly basis. For those businesses, a 30-day documentation requirement would either require massive changes to their accounting systems 9 or would cause every intercompany trade payable or receivable to be treated as equity. Payment of the intercompany trade payable or receivable would apparently be a repurchase of equity. Both of these would trigger massive downstream tax consequences 8 Proposed section (b)(1)(ii). 9 Given the very short time frame for submitting comments on this regulation, we do not have cost estimates of how much these types of changes would cost, but these costs alone would not be orders of magnitude higher than the OMB estimate of total costs.
6 for the taxpayer. There is no discernable policy reason for forcing these business changes and expenses. Again, there are millions of ordinary course transactions, so ordinary course obligations (however defined) should be excluded from the requirement that they satisfy these documentation requirements. Nevertheless, there will always be a line between ordinary course and non-ordinary course as defined in the regulations and flexibility on the timing of documentation would make the consequences of being on one side or the other of that line less onerous and reduce the costs of complying with the documentation rules. Timing with Respect to Payment Documentation and Exercise of Default Rights The relevant date for documentation of payment and exercise of default rights leads to confusing and perhaps absurd results. It seems as if there could be multiple relevant dates for a single payment or an event of default. For example, the regulations provide that each date on which a payment of interest or principal is due, taking into account all additional time permitted under the terms of the EGI before there is (or holder can declare) an event of default for nonpayment, is a relevant date. 10 What does this mean? If a payment is due on January 1, but the holder cannot declare an event of default until February 1, and the issuer pays on time on January 1 st, when does the documentation concerning that payment need to be prepared. Is it 120 days after the actual payment date, January 1 st? Or 120 days after the date a default could have been declared if there had been a default even though there wasn t a default? Further, if the issuer does not pay on time, but pays more than 120 days after an event of default could have been declared, is it impossible to timely document that payment because the payment itself occurs outside of the deadline for providing the documentation? This is an absurd answer; but seems to be the result under the proposed regulation. All of these issues would be cleared up by a rule that permits documentation by the extended due date of the relevant tax return and costs would be correspondingly reduced. An additional point on documenting the exercise of creditor rights in the event of default is that there may be overlapping events of default that result in multiple relevant dates. If a company is in a difficult financial situation, there may be different triggers in different obligations. Creditors also may not be aware that a trigger has occurred. It is common for a default on one instrument to trigger defaults on other instruments; the creditor might not be immediately aware of an occurrence of such a default. If the occurrence of a default triggering event is not immediately obvious to the creditor, then it may not begin to take steps let alone document those steps -- within the 120 period. Creditors also may be more concerned about pursuing their creditor rights than documenting all the steps they have taken, essentially in real time, and therefore miss the 120-day deadline. Ambiguity Concerning the Person Responsible for Documentation 10 Proposed section (b)(3)(C).
7 The regulations do not provide any rules concerning who is supposed to prepare and maintain the required documentation. The relevant rules are clearly structured in the passive voice 11 if the documentation and information described in paragraph (b) (2) of this section are not prepared, documentation and information that must be prepared and maintained to satisfy the requirements of this section, [t]here must be written documentation prepared by the time required in paragraph (b)(3) of this section, among others. Presumably this structure is intentional; that is, the Treasury and IRS are deliberately not identifying the entity that must prepare the documentation. In most cases the issuer should be able to document the transaction and this would seem to be appropriate because the issuer is the party that will be claiming the interest deduction. In the case of the exercise of creditor rights, however, it is unlikely that the issuer would be able to prepare and maintain the required documentation without cooperation from the creditor. Thus, the issuer s interest deduction will depend on the compliance of the creditor with the documentation requirements including that the documentation is prepared timely. Even in the context of an expanded group where there is significant stock ownership, it may be difficult to compel the timely preparation of these documents by the creditor. This is another case where a significant difficulty would be reduced or eliminated by permitting the documentation to be prepared by the time (including extensions) that the return is due to be filed. Conclusion For the above reasons, USCIB believes that the OMB estimate grossly underestimated the cost and time required to comply with the documentation requirements under Proposed Regulation section Sincerely, William J. Sample Chair, Taxation Committee United States Council for International Business (USCIB) 11 Proposed regulation sections (b)(1)(i) and (b)(2).
Recent Developments in Corporate Tax
Recent Developments in Corporate Tax Scott M. Levine Jones Day Washington D.C. Lori A. Hellkamp Jones Day Washington D.C. Todd R. Miller Jones Day Detroit Tax Executives Institute Dearborn, Michigan October
More informationPartnerships and the Proposed Debt-Equity Regulations
taxnotes Partnerships and the Proposed Debt-Equity Regulations By Charles Kaufman Reprinted from Tax Notes, September 26, 2016, p. 1843 Volume 152, Number 13 September 26, 2016 Partnerships and the Proposed
More informationRE: IRS REG Guidance Related to Section 951A (Global Intangible Low-Taxed Income)
Charles P. Rettig Commissioner Internal Revenue Service 1111 Constitution Avenue, NW Washington, DC 20044 RE: IRS REG-104390-18 - Guidance Related to Section 951A (Global Intangible Low-Taxed Income) Dear
More informationACTION: Withdrawal of notice of proposed rulemaking and notice of proposed
This document is scheduled to be published in the Federal Register on 12/02/2013 and available online at http://federalregister.gov/a/2013-28409, and on FDsys.gov [4830-01-p] DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY
More informationFollow-Up Discussion of the Final Section 385 Related-Party Debt Rules
Follow-Up Discussion of the Final Section 385 Related-Party Debt Rules Final and Temporary Regulations Limit and Clarify Proposed Documentation and Recharacterization Rules That Now Apply Mainly to Inbound
More informationApril 30, Re: USCIB Comment Letter on the OECD discussion draft on BEPS Action 3: Strengthening CFC Rules. Dear Mr. Pross, General Comments
April 30, 2015 VIA EMAIL Mr. Achim Pross Head, International Cooperation and Tax Administration Division Center for Tax Policy and Administration (CTPA) Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development
More informationSUMMARY: This document contains proposed regulations relating to the tax treatment
This document is scheduled to be published in the Federal Register on 02/05/2013 and available online at http://federalregister.gov/a/2013-02260, and on FDsys.gov [4830-01-p] DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY
More informationNotice Announces New and Improved Substantial Assistance Rules
As originally published in: Tax Management International Journal April 13, 2007 Notice 2007-13 Announces New and Improved Substantial Assistance Rules By: Michael J. Miller INTRODUCTION Notice 2007-13
More informationDeemed Distributions Under Section 305(c) of Stock and Rights to Acquire Stock. SUMMARY: This document contains proposed regulations regarding deemed
This document is scheduled to be published in the Federal Register on 04/13/2016 and available online at http://federalregister.gov/a/2016-08248, and on FDsys.gov [4830-01-p] DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY
More informationThe Proposed Section 385 Regulations: An In-Depth Look
The Proposed Section 385 Regulations: An In-Depth Look Scott Levine (Moderator) Jones Day Didi Borden Deloitte Tax LLP Kevin Nichols U.S. Department of Treasury Ossie Borosh U.S. Department of Treasury
More informationCOMMENTS ON TEMPORARY AND PROPOSED REGULATIONS GOVERNING ALLOCATION OF PARTNERSHIP EXPENDITURES FOR FOREIGN TAXES (T.D. 9121; REG )
COMMENTS ON TEMPORARY AND PROPOSED REGULATIONS GOVERNING ALLOCATION OF PARTNERSHIP EXPENDITURES FOR FOREIGN TAXES (T.D. 9121; REG-139792-02) The following comments are the individual views of the members
More informationInternal Revenue Service
Internal Revenue Service Department of the Treasury Number: 200323015 Release Date: 6/6/2003 Index Number: 265.02-00, 671.02-00, 702.07-00, 704.01-02, 761.01-00, 7701.03-11 Washington, DC 20224 Person
More informationTemporary Regulations Addressing Inversions and Related Transactions and Proposed Section 385 Regulations
Temporary Regulations Addressing Inversions and Related Transactions and Proposed Section 385 Regulations Allegheny Tax Society April 25, 2016 Steve Massed Managing Director Washington National Tax International
More informationInternational Tax Update
International Tax Update Stephen Bates Jose Murillo Cynthia Yu 3 May 2016 Disclaimers This presentation is provided solely for the purpose of enhancing knowledge on tax matters. It does not provide tax
More informationDISREGARDED ENTITIES AND PARTNERSHIP LIABILITY ALLOCATIONS: PROPOSED REGS CRITIQUED
DISREGARDED ENTITIES AND PARTNERSHIP LIABILITY ALLOCATIONS: PROPOSED REGS CRITIQUED By Blake D. Rubin and Andrea Macintosh Whiteway Blake D. Rubin and Andrea Macintosh Whiteway are partners with Arnold
More informationRequest for Relief to Address "Legacy" Structured Finance Transactions
November 15, 2012 VIA ELECTRONIC MAIL: secretary@cftc.gov c/o Mr. David A. Stawick, Secretary Commodity Futures Trading Commission Three Lafayette Centre 1155 21 Street, N.W. Washington, DC 20581 Chairman
More informationNew Proposed Section 385 Regulations
New Proposed Section 385 Regulations Idan Netser, Partner Anil Kalia, Partner TEI Regions IX & X Annual Conference Portland, Oregon, May 22-25, 2016 Agenda I. Introduction II. III. A. Section 385 B. Scope
More informationSection 280G. Golden Parachute Payments T.D DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY Internal Revenue Service 26 CFR Parts 1. Golden Parachute Payments
DATES: Effective Date: August 4, 2003. These regulations apply to any payment that is contingent on a change in ownership or control if the change in ownership or control occurs on or after January 1,
More informationSection 385 Proposed Regulations
Section 385 Proposed Regulations USS Where Have All the Factors Gone? Moderator Karen Gilbreath Sowell, EY, Washington, DC Panelists Jeff Maddrey, PwC, Washington, DC Peter Marrs, General Electric Company,
More informationMay 16, Re: Recommendations for Priority Guidance Plan Pursuant to Notice
Steven T. Miller Willard Office Building, Suite 300 1455 Pennsylvania Avenue Washington, D.C. 20004 E-mail: Steven.Miller@alliantgroup.com 202-888-7006 May 16, 2016 VIA ELECTRONIC DELIVERY & FIRST-CLASS
More informationProposed Regulations Relating to the Foreign Account Tax Compliance Act (FATCA).
Francisca N. Mordi Vice President & Senior Tax Counsel (202) 663-5317 fmordi@aba.com September 26, 2012 Mr. John Sweeney Office of Associate Chief Counsel (International) 1111 Constitution Ave., N.W. RE:
More informationForeign Contingent Debt; Request for Comments Announcement 99 76
Foreign Contingent Debt; Request for Comments Announcement 99 76 I. Summary. The Department of Treasury ( Treasury ) and the Internal Revenue Service (the Service ) intend, in the near future, to withdraw
More informationProposed Removal of Section 385 Documentation Regulations. SUMMARY: This document proposes removing final regulations setting forth minimum
This document is scheduled to be published in the Federal Register on 09/24/2018 and available online at https://federalregister.gov/d/2018-20652, and on govinfo.gov [4830-01-p] DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY
More information1111 Constitution Avenue, NW 1111 Constitution Avenue, NW Washington, DC Washington, DC 20224
Mr. Steven Miller The Honorable William J. Wilkins Acting Commissioner Chief Counsel Internal Revenue Service Internal Revenue Service 1111 Constitution Avenue, NW 1111 Constitution Avenue, NW Washington,
More informationSummary 11/1/2018 4:21:57 PM. Differences exist between documents. Old Document: Orig-reg pages (118 KB) 11/1/2018 4:21:53 PM
Summary 11/1/2018 4:21:57 PM Differences exist between documents. New Document: New-reg-114540-18 21 pages (194 KB) 11/1/2018 4:21:53 PM Used to display results. Old Document: Orig-reg-114540-18 21 pages
More information1111 Constitution Avenue, NW 1111 Constitution Avenue, N W Washington, DC Washington, DC 20224
The Honorable John Koskinen The Honorable William J. Wilkins Commissioner Chief Counsel Internal Revenue Service Internal Revenue Service 1111 Constitution Avenue, NW 1111 Constitution Avenue, N W Washington,
More informationCertain Transfers of Property to Regulated Investment Companies [RICs] and Real Estate Investment Trusts [REITs]
[4830-01-p] Published March 18, 2003 DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY Internal Revenue Service 26 CFR Parts 1 and 602 [TD 9047] RIN 1545-BA36 and 1545-AW92 Certain Transfers of Property to Regulated Investment
More informationComments on proposed regulations issued under Section 385 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as Amended
Comments on proposed regulations issued under Section 385 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as Amended Copyright 2016 Deloitte Development LLC. All rights reserved. 1 Proposed Regulations are effective
More informationClient Update Treasury s Sweeping Proposed Regulations Attack Related-Party Debt
1 Client Update Treasury s Sweeping Proposed Regulations Attack Related-Party Debt NEW YORK Gary M. Friedman gmfriedman@debevoise.com Peter A. Furci pafurci@debevoise.com Vadim Mahmoudov vmahmoudov@debevoise.com
More informationRe: Comments on Notice , Section 704(c) Layers relating to Partnership Mergers, Divisions and Tiered Partnerships
April 30, 2010 The Honorable William J. Wilkins IRS Chief Counsel Internal Revenue Service 1111 Constitution Avenue, Room Washington, DC 20224 VIA E-MAIL: Notice.comments@irscounsel.treas.gov Re: Comments
More informationDear Mr. Seymour: September 7, 2007
` Deloitte & Touche LLP Ten Westport Road P.O. Box 820 Wilton, CT 06897-0820 USA www.deloitte.com Public Company Accounting Oversight Board Office of the Secretary Attn: J. Gordon Seymour 1666 K Street,
More informationRedemptions of Partnership Interests and Divisions of Partnerships
College of William & Mary Law School William & Mary Law School Scholarship Repository William & Mary Annual Tax Conference Conferences, Events, and Lectures 2006 Redemptions of Partnership Interests and
More informationDEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY Internal Revenue Service 26 CFR Part 1
Section 985. Functional Currency 26 CFR 1.985 1: Functional currency. T.D. 8765 DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY Internal Revenue Service 26 CFR Part 1 Change From Dollar Approximate Separate Transactions Method
More informationAugust 7, The Honorable Steven Mnuchin Secretary of the Treasury 1500 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW Washington, DC 20220
August 7, 2017 The Honorable Steven Mnuchin Secretary of the Treasury 1500 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW Washington, DC 20220 RE: SIFMA Response to Notice 2017-38 Dear Secretary Mnuchin: The Securities Industry
More informationSeptember 2, Re: USCIB Comment Letter on the OECD Discussion Draft on BEPS Actions 8-10 Revised Guidance on Profits Splits ( discussion draft )
September 2, 2016 VIA EMAIL Jefferson VanderWolk Head Tax Treaty, Transfer Pricing & Financial Transactions Division Centre for Tax Policy and Administration Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development
More information[ P] Published January 22, 2003
[4830-01-P] Published January 22, 2003 DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY Internal Revenue Service 26 CFR Part 1 [REG-103580-02] RIN 1545-BA53 Noncompensatory Partnership Options AGENCY: Internal Revenue Service
More informationAmerican Payroll Association
Government Relations Washington, DC January 16, 2015 Office of Child Support Enforcement, Administration for Children and Families 370 L Enfant Promenade SW Washington, DC 20447 Attn: Director, Division
More informationDecember 24, Delivered Electronically
December 24, 2010 Delivered Electronically The Honorable Michael F. Mundaca Assistant Secretary (Tax Policy) U.S. Department of the Treasury 1500 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW Room 3120 Washington, DC 20220
More informationJuly 27, Barbara Angus International Tax Counsel Department of the Treasury 1500 Pennsylvania Avenue, N.W. Washington, D.C.
July 27, 2001 Barbara Angus International Tax Counsel Department of the Treasury 1500 Pennsylvania Avenue, N.W. Washington, D.C. 20220 Patricia Brown Deputy International Tax Counsel Department of the
More informationFinal and temporary US Section 385 regulations significantly narrow scope of earlier proposed regulations
19 October 2016 International Tax Alert Final and temporary US Section 385 regulations significantly narrow scope of earlier proposed regulations EY Global Tax Alert Library Access both online and pdf
More informationFeedback for REG ( Transition Tax) as of 10/3/2018 SECTION TITLE ISSUE RECOMMENDATION ADDITIONAL EXPLANATION /QUERIES
Feedback for REG-104226-18 ( 965 1 Transition Tax) as of 10/3/2018 PROPOSED REGS Preamble Pages 63-64 Double counting for November 2017 distributions to the United States from 11/30 year end deferred foreign
More informationKPMG LLP 2001 M Street, NW Washington, D.C Comments on the Discussion Draft on Cost Contribution Arrangements
KPMG LLP 2001 M Street, NW Washington, D.C. 20036-3310 Telephone 202 533 3800 Fax 202 533 8500 To Andrew Hickman Head of Transfer Pricing Unit Centre for Tax Policy and Administration OECD From KPMG cc
More information1. Section 1. Section 1 of the Model Agreement permits a U.S. financial institution to designate one or more of its foreign branches to become QIs
July 2, 1998 John T. Lyons, Assistant Commissioner (International), Internal Revenue Service, 950 L Enfant Plaza South, S.W., Washington, D.C. 20024. Re: Model Qualified Intermediary Agreement Dear Assistant
More informationTHE REGULATIONS GOVERNING INTERCOMPANY TRANSACTIONS WITHIN CONSOLIDATED GROUPS. August Mark J. Silverman Steptoe & Johnson LLP Washington, D.C.
PRACTISING LAW INSTITUTE TAX STRATEGIES FOR CORPORATE ACQUISITIONS, DISPOSITIONS, SPIN-OFFS, JOINT VENTURES FINANCINGS, REORGANIZATIONS AND RESTRUCTURINGS 2001 THE REGULATIONS GOVERNING INTERCOMPANY TRANSACTIONS
More informationThis notice announces that the Department of the Treasury ( Treasury
Additional Guidance Under Section 965; Guidance Under Sections 62, 962, and 6081 in Connection With Section 965; and Penalty Relief Under Sections 6654 and 6655 in Connection with Section 965 and Repeal
More informationREVISED TAX SHELTER REGULATIONS
REVISED TAX SHELTER REGULATIONS FEBRUARY 20, 2004 SIMPSON THACHER & BARTLETT LLP REVISED TAX SHELTER REGULATIONS TABLE OF CONTENTS Page TAX SHELTER DISCLOSURE STATEMENTS... 2 PARTICIPATION IN REPORTABLE
More informationSeptember 14, Dear Mr. VanderWolk,
September 14, 2017 VIA EMAIL Jefferson VanderWolk Head Tax Treaties, Transfer Pricing and Financial Transactions Division Centre for Tax Policy and Administration Organisation for Economic Cooperation
More informationRE: RIN 1545-BN23 (Information Reporting of Catastrophic Health Coverage and Other Issues Under Section 6055)
The ERISA Industry Committee The Only National Association Advocating Solely for the Employee Benefit and Compensation Interests of America s Largest Employers 1400 L Street, NW, Suite 350, Washington,
More informationOctober 1, CC:PA:LPD:PR (REG ) Room 5203 Internal Revenue Service P.O. Box 7604 Ben Franklin Station Washington, DC 20044
October 1, 2018 CC:PA:LPD:PR (REG-107892-18) Room 5203 Internal Revenue Service P.O. Box 7604 Ben Franklin Station Washington, DC 20044 Attention: Regina Johnson RE: Comment on IRS Notice of Proposed Rulemaking
More informationBEPS Action 12: Mandatory disclosure rules Response by the Chartered Institute of Taxation
BEPS Action 12: Mandatory disclosure rules Response by the Chartered Institute of Taxation 1 Introduction 1.1 The Chartered Institute of Taxation (CIOT) is pleased to respond to the Public discussion draft
More informationGW/IRS 29 th Annual Institute on Current Issues in International Taxation Final and Temporary Section 385 Regulations
GW/IRS 29 th Annual Institute on Current Issues in International Taxation Final and Temporary Section 385 Regulations L.G. Chip Harter, PwC, Chair Bruce Lassman, VP-International Tax, IBM Corp. Kevin Nichols,
More informationIssues For 'Lonely' Life Cos. Under New Debt-Equity Regs.
Portfolio Media. Inc. 111 West 19 th Street, 5th Floor New York, NY 10011 www.law360.com Phone: +1 646 783 7100 Fax: +1 646 783 7161 customerservice@law360.com Issues For 'Lonely' Life Cos. Under New Debt-Equity
More informationIRS and Treasury Issue Proposed Regulations Easing Some of the Burden of the Fractions Rule
Tax Practice Group December 1, 2016 IRS and Treasury Issue Proposed Regulations Easing Some of the Burden of the Fractions Rule For more information, contact: Jonathan Talansky +1 212 790 5321 jtalansky@kslaw.com
More informationTreasury Issues Final and Temporary Regulations on Related-Party Debt Instruments
Latham & Watkins Tax Practice October 26, 2016 Number 2023 Treasury Issues Final and Temporary Regulations on Related-Party Debt Instruments Seeking to curb excessive use of related-party debt, Treasury
More informationPassive Foreign Investment Company Tax Regulations Navigating Complex Tax Features of Foreign Investments Absent Clear IRS Guidance
presents Passive Foreign Investment Company Tax Regulations Navigating Complex Tax Features of Foreign Investments Absent Clear IRS Guidance A Live 110-Minute Teleconference/Webinar with Interactive ti
More information1111 Constitution Avenue, NW 1111 Constitution Avenue, NW Washington, DC Washington, DC 20224
Mr. Daniel Werfel Acting Commissioner Chief Counsel Internal Revenue Service Internal Revenue Service 1111 Constitution Avenue, NW 1111 Constitution Avenue, NW Washington, DC 20224 Washington, DC 20224
More informationREPORT ON REPORT NO JANUARY 23, 2012
NEW YORK STATE BAR ASSOCIATION TAX SECTION REPORT ON PROPOSED REGULATIONS WITHDRAWING THE DE MINIMIS EXCEPTION FROM THE SECTION 704(b) REGULATIONS REPORT NO. 1256 JANUARY 23, 2012 W/1899286v3 TABLE OF
More informationCentralized Partnership Audit Regime: Adjusting Tax Attributes. SUMMARY: This document contains proposed regulations implementing section 1101
This document is scheduled to be published in the Federal Register on 02/02/2018 and available online at https://federalregister.gov/d/2018-01989, and on FDsys.gov 4830-01-p DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY
More informationAdvanced Municipal Lease Financing: Equipment Leasing for Research and Development
Advanced Municipal Lease Financing: Equipment Leasing for Research and Development Gregory V. Johnson Patton Boggs LLP 1660 Lincoln Street, Suite 1900 Denver, CO 80264 (303) 894-6187 Two Structures for
More informationSubmitted Electronically. September 16, 2013
Submitted Electronically September 16, 2013 Ms. Elizabeth M. Murphy Secretary Securities and Exchange Commission 100 F Street, NE., Washington, D.C. 20549 Re: Money Market Mutual Fund Reform - File Number
More informationACTION: Final regulations and removal of temporary regulations. SUMMARY: This document contains final regulations that provide guidance on
This document is scheduled to be published in the Federal Register on 05/09/2014 and available online at http://federalregister.gov/a/2014-10661, and on FDsys.gov [4830-01-p] DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY
More informationClient Alert. Tax News and Developments. Proposed Regulations Under Code Section 385. North America
Tax News and Developments North America Client Alert April 19, 2016 Proposed Regulations Under Code Section 385 The U.S. Department of Treasury ("Treasury") and the IRS recently issued proposed regulations
More informationImplementing the UK-US FATCA Agreement. STEP Response to consultation issued on 18 September 2012
Implementing the UK-US FATCA Agreement STEP Response to consultation issued on 18 September 2012 Main Points STEP welcomes the UK Government s initiative to conclude an Intergovernmental Agreement (IGA)
More informationSUMMARY: This document contains proposed regulations that would require annual
This document is scheduled to be published in the Federal Register on 12/23/2015 and available online at http://federalregister.gov/a/2015-32145, and on FDsys.gov [4830-01-p] DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY
More informationDecember 27, 2018 CC:PA:LPD:PR (REG ), Room 5203 Internal Revenue Service P.O. Box 7604, Ben Franklin Station, Washington, DC 20044
December 27, 2018 CC:PA:LPD:PR (REG-115420-18), Room 5203 Internal Revenue Service P.O. Box 7604, Ben Franklin Station, Washington, DC 20044 Submitted electronically at www.regulations.gov Re: Treasury
More informationKIRKLAND ALERT. Proposed Treasury Regulations on Debt- Equity Classification Change the Landscape for Related Party Financings.
KIRKLAND ALERT April 13, 2016 Proposed Treasury Regulations on Debt- Equity Classification Change the Landscape for Related Party Financings Executive Summary On April 4, 2016, the U.S. Treasury Department
More informationSUMMARY: This document contains final regulations regarding the implementation of
This document is scheduled to be published in the Federal Register on 01/02/2018 and available online at https://federalregister.gov/d/2017-28398, and on FDsys.gov [4830-01-p] DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY
More informationRevenue Procedure , Request for Comment on de minimis Safe Harbor Limit
Internal Revenue Service Attn: CC: PA: LPD: PR (Rev. Proc. 2015-20), Room 5203 P.O. Box 7604 Ben Franklin Station Washington, DC 20044 Re: Revenue Procedure 2015-20, Request for Comment on de minimis Safe
More informationOctober 5, Charles P. Rettig Commissioner Internal Revenue Service 1111 Constitution Avenue, NW Washington, DC 20044
October 5, 2018 Charles P. Rettig Commissioner Internal Revenue Service 1111 Constitution Avenue, NW Washington, DC 20044 RE: IRS REG-104226-18 - Guidance Regarding the Transition Tax Under Section 965
More informationGuidance on Passive Foreign Investment Company (PFIC) Purging Elections. ACTION: Final regulations and removal of the temporary regulations.
[4830-01-p] DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY Internal Revenue Service 26 CFR Parts 1 and 602 [TD 9360] RIN 1545-BC37 Guidance on Passive Foreign Investment Company (PFIC) Purging Elections AGENCY: Internal Revenue
More informationFOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: William M. Kostak at (202) (not a toll-free number). SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Paperwork Reduction Act
Section 469. Passive Activity Losses and Credits Limited 26 CFR 1.469 4: Definition of activity. T.D. 8645 DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY Internal Revenue Service 26 CFR Part 1 Rules for Certain Rental Real
More informationBy Electronic Delivery
By Electronic Delivery Mr. Tom West Tax Legislative Counsel U.S. Department of the Treasury 1500 Pennsylvania Ave., NW Washington, DC 20220 Mr. William Paul Acting Chief Counsel and Deputy Chief Counsel
More informationInterim Final Rule Health Insurance Issuers Implementing Medical Loss Ratio (MLR) Requirements under the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act
January 31, 2011 Office of Consumer Information and Insurance Oversight Department of Health and Human Services Attention: OCIIO-9998-IFC Room 445-G, Hubert Humphrey Building 200 Independence Avenue, SW
More informationGuidance under Section 851 Relating to Investments in Stock and Securities
This document is scheduled to be published in the Federal Register on 09/28/2016 and available online at https://federalregister.gov/d/2016-23408, and on FDsys.gov DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY Internal Revenue
More informationFebruary 14, 2012 Technical Director Financial Accounting Standards Board 401 Merritt 7 P.O. Box 5116 Norwalk, CT
February 14, 2012 Technical Director Financial Accounting Standards Board 401 Merritt 7 P.O. Box 5116 Norwalk, CT 06856-5116 File Reference No. 2011-200 Dear Ms. Cosper: The Financial Reporting Executive
More informationGeneral Allocation and Accounting Regulations Under Section 141; Remedial Actions
This document is scheduled to be published in the Federal Register on 10/27/2015 and available online at http://federalregister.gov/a/2015-27328, and on FDsys.gov [4830-01-p] DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY
More informationClassification of financial instruments under IFRS 9
Applying IFRS Classification of financial instruments under IFRS 9 May 2015 Contents 1. Introduction... 4 2. Classification of financial assets... 4 2.1 Debt instruments... 5 2.2 Equity instruments and
More informationDocumentation Rules Round 2 A Taxpayer Project for 2016 Not 2018
Documentation Rules Round 2 A Taxpayer Project for 2016 Not 2018 October 21, 2016 The final and temporary section 385 regulations released on October 13 are immeasurably better than the version floated
More informationA summary of our views expressed in this letter are as follows:
Bond Dealers of America Council of Infrastructure Financing Authorities Education Finance Council Government Finance Officers Association National Association of Counties National Association of Health
More informationCredit for Increasing Research Activities. Announcement
Credit for Increasing Research Activities Announcement 2004 9 AGENCY: Internal Revenue Service (IRS), Treasury. ACTION: Advance notice of proposed rulemaking. SUMMARY: This document invites comments from
More information26th Annual Health Sciences Tax Conference
26th Annual Health Sciences Tax Conference Cross-border financing and impact of Section 385 December 5, 2016 Disclaimer EY refers to the global organization, and may refer to one or more, of the member
More informationRe: Comments on the Exposure Draft Accounting Policy Changes (Proposed amendments to IAS 8)
27 July 2018 Mr. Hans Hoogervorst Chairman International Accounting Standards Board 30 Cannon Street London EC4M 6XH United Kingdom Re: Comments on the Exposure Draft Accounting Policy Changes (Proposed
More informationQuestions To Answer Before Investing In An Opportunity Fund
Portfolio Media. Inc. 111 West 19th Street, 5th floor New York, NY 10011 www.law360.com Phone: +1 646 783 7100 Fax: +1 646 783 7161 customerservice@law360.com Questions To Answer Before Investing In An
More informationASA & NAIFA Comments On The Re-Proposed Risk-Retention Rule
October 30, 2013 Securities and Exchange Commission Office of Comptroller of the Currency Federal Reserve Board of Governors Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation Department of Housing & Urban Development
More informationVIA . Pragya Saksena Coordinator, Subcommittee on Royalties UN Committee of Tax Experts
November 30, 2016 VIA EMAIL Pragya Saksena Coordinator, Subcommittee on Royalties UN Committee of Tax Experts Re: Amendments to the Commentary on Article 12 (Royalties) Dear Pragya, USCIB appreciates the
More informationNovember 21, The Honorable George Miller Chairman Education and Labor Committee U.S. House of Representatives Washington, DC 20515
November 21, 2008 The Honorable George Miller Chairman Education and Labor Committee U.S. House of Representatives Washington, DC 20515 Dear Chairman Miller: On behalf of the Project on Student Debt, I
More informationTreasury Decision 9347, 08/06/2007, IRC Sec(s). 6655
Treasury Decision 9347, 08/06/2007, IRC Sec(s). 6655 Estimated tax rules for corps. Headnote: IRS issued final regs explaining estimated tax rules for corps. Final regs reflect multiple law changes effected
More informationUniversity of Chicago Federal Tax Conference. Final and Temporary Section 385 Regulations
University of Chicago Federal Tax Conference Final and Temporary Section 385 Regulations Julie A. Roin, Moderator L.G. Chip Harter Kevin C. Nichols Deborah L. Paul November 11, 2016 Section 385 Congress
More informationA. Cash Position - Regulatory Authority to Determine Cash Positions and Non-Cash Positions and Relevant Examples
December 14, 2017 Chip Harter Deputy Assistant Secretary (International Tax Affairs) U.S. Department of the Treasury 1500 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW Washington, DC 20220 Dear Mr. Harter, USCIB 1 is writing
More informationJune 5, Mr. Daniel I. Werfel Acting Commissioner Internal Revenue Service 1111 Constitution Avenue, Room 3000 Washington, DC 20024
June 5, 2013 Mr. Daniel I. Werfel Acting Commissioner Internal Revenue Service 1111 Constitution Avenue, Room 3000 Washington, DC 20024 Re: Comments on Revenue Ruling 99-5 Dear Mr. Werfel: The American
More informationSUMMARY: This rule finalizes the proposed rule that the U.S. Small Business
This document is scheduled to be published in the Federal Register on 03/21/2014 and available online at http://federalregister.gov/a/2014-06237, and on FDsys.gov Billing Code: 8025-01 SMALL BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION
More information=======================================================================
[Federal Register: October 2, 28 (Volume 73, Number 23)] [Rules and Regulations] [Page 62199-6223] From the Federal Register Online via GPO Access [wais.access.gpo.gov] [DOCID:fr2oc8-5] [[Page 62199]]
More informationSection 385 Proposed Regulations Treatment of Certain Interests in Corporations as Stock of Indebtedness [REG ]
Submitted electronically via http://www.regulations.gov Internal Revenue Service via Federal e-rulemaking Portal Re: Section 385 Proposed Regulations Treatment of Certain Interests in Corporations as Stock
More informationC H A M B E R O F C O M M E R C E O F T H E U N I T E D S T A T E S O F A M E R I C A
C H A M B E R O F C O M M E R C E O F T H E U N I T E D S T A T E S O F A M E R I C A R A N D E L K. J O H N S O N S E N I O R V I C E P R E S I D E N T L A B O R, I M M I G R A T I O N & E M P L O Y E
More informationRe: USCIB Comment Letter on the OECD Revised Discussion Draft on BEPS Action 7: Prevent the Artificial Avoidance of PE Status
June 12, 2015 VIA EMAIL Marlies de Ruiter Head, Tax Treaties, Transfer Pricing and Financial Transactions Division Centre for Tax Policy and Administration Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development
More informationSUMMARY: This document contains proposed regulations relating to disguised
This document is scheduled to be published in the Federal Register on 07/23/2015 and available online at http://federalregister.gov/a/2015-17828, and on FDsys.gov [4830-01-p] DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY
More informationClient Alert October 5, 2016
Tax News and Developments North America Client Alert October 5, 2016 GAO s Report on Treasury and the IRS s Regulatory Guidance Process The United States Government Accountability Office ( GAO ) recently
More informationApril 25, CC:PA:LPD:PR (REG ) Room 5205 Internal Revenue Service PO Box 7604 Ben Franklin Station Washington, D.C.
April 25, 2012 CC:PA:LPD:PR (REG-121647-10) Room 5205 Internal Revenue Service PO Box 7604 Ben Franklin Station Washington, D.C. 20044 RE: I.R. 2012-15. February 8, 2012, REG-121647-10, Notice of Proposed
More informationIRS Issues Proposed Regulations That Would Recast Certain Debt Instruments as Equity
IRS Issues Proposed Regulations That Would Recast Certain Debt Instruments as Equity On April 4, 2016, the IRS and U.S. Treasury Department issued proposed Treasury Regulations designed to curb the ability
More informationJPMorgan Chase Bank, National Association $1,200,000 Upside Knock-Out Certificates of Deposit Linked to the S&P 500 Index due October 11, 2019
Disclosure supplement To disclosure statement dated September 21, 2012 and underlying supplement no. CD-5-I dated August 3, 2012 JPMorgan Chase Bank, National Association $1,200,000 due October 11, 2019
More information