Trading Costs of Asset Pricing Anomalies
|
|
- Marianna Robinson
- 5 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 Trading Costs of Asset Pricing Anomalies Andrea Frazzini AQR Capital Management Ronen Israel AQR Capital Management Tobias J. Moskowitz University of Chicago, NBER, and AQR Copyright 2014 by Andrea Frazzini, Ronen Israel, and Tobias J. Moskowitz. The views and opinions expressed herein are those of the author and do not necessarily reflect the views of AQR Capital Management, LLC its affiliates, or its employees. The information set forth herein has been obtained or derived from sources believed by author to be reliable. However, the author does not make any representation or warranty, express or implied, as to the information s accuracy or completeness, nor does the author recommend that the attached information serve as the basis of any investment decision. This document is intended exclusively for the use of the person to whom it has been delivered by the author, and it is not to be reproduced or redistributed to any other person. This presentation is strictly for AQR educational Capital purposes Management, only. LLC Two Greenwich Plaza, Third Floor Greenwich, CT T: F:
2 Motivation Cross-section of expected returns typically analyzed gross of transactions costs Questions regarding market efficiency should be net of transactions costs Are profits within trading costs? Research Questions: How large are trading costs faced by large arbitrageurs? How robust are anomalies in the literature after realistic trading costs? At what size do trading costs start to constrain arbitrage capital? What happens if we take transactions costs into account ex ante? Tradeoff between expected returns and trading costs varies across anomalies 2
3 Objectives Measure trading costs of an arbitrageur Understand the cross-section of net returns on anomalies Model of trading costs for descriptive and prescriptive purposes Constructing optimized portfolios Conclusion 3
4 What We Do Take all (longer-term) equity orders and executions from AQR Capital 1998 to 2013, $1.1 trillion worth of trades, traded using automated algorithms U.S. (NYSE and NASDAQ) and 18 international markets *Exclude high frequency (intra-day) trades Use actual trade sizes and prices to calculate Price impact and implementation shortfall (e.g., Perold (1988)) More accurate picture of real-world transactions costs and tradeoffs Get vastly different measures than the literature Actual costs are 1/10 the size of those estimated in the literature Why? 1) Average trading cost cost facing an arbitrageur 2) Design portfolios that endogenously respond to expected trading costs 4
5 Measuring Trading Costs Literature has used a variety of models and types of data to approximate trading costs: Daily spread and volume data [Roll (1984), Huang and Stoll (1996), Chordia, Roll, and Subrahmanyam (2000), Amihud (2002), Acharya and Pedersen (2005), Pastor and Stambaugh (2003), Watanabe and Watanabe (2006), Fujimoto (2003), Korajczyk and Sadka (2008), Hasbrouck (2009), and Bekaert, Harvey, and Lundblad (2007)] Transaction-level data (TAQ, Rule 605, broker) [Hasbrouck (1991a, 1991b), Huberman and Stanzl (2000), Breen, Hodrick, and Korajczyk (2002), Loeb (1983), Keim and Madhavan (1996), Knez and Ready (1996), Goyenko (2006), Sadka (2006), Holden (2009), Goyenko, Holden, and Trzcinka (2009), Lesmond, Ogden, and Trzcinka (1999), Lesmond (2005), Lehmann (2003), Werner (2003), Hasbrouck (2009), and Goyenko, Holden, and Trzcinka (2009)] Proprietary broker data [Keim (1995), Keim and Madhavan (1997), Engle, Ferstenberg, and Russell (2008)] Several papers have applied trading cost models to anomalies, chiefly size, value, and momentum. Most find costs are significantly binding. Chen, Stanzl, and Watanabe (2002) Korajczyk and Sadka (2004) Lesmond, Schill, and Zhou (2003) 5
6 Trading Execution Database Trade execution database from AQR Capital Management Institutional investor, around 118 billion USD in assets (October 2014) Data compiled by the execution desk and covers all trades executed algorithmically in any of the firm s funds since inception (*excluding stat arb trades) Information on orders, execution prices and quantities Common stocks only: restrict to cash equity and equity swaps 19 Developed markets (drop emerging markets trades) Drop liqudity/statistical arbitrage trades Result: ~9,300 global stocks, 1.1 trillion USD worth of trades Price, return and volume data Union of the CRSP tapes and the XpressFeed Global database 6
7 Trade Execution Database This picture shows our trade execution database. Last year s data, the rest is in some nuclear-disaster-proof bunkers around the world Frazzini almost froze to death to take this photograph 7
8 Trade Execution Data, Summary Stats Panel A: Amount Traded (Billion USD) By region By size By portfolio type Year Total U.S. International Large Cap Small Cap Long short Long only 1998* ** Total 1, ,
9 Summary Stats cont. Panel B: Annual time series Mean Median Std Min Max Number of stocks per year 3,256 3,732 1, ,105 Number of countries per year Number of exchanges per year Panel C: Fama MacBeth averages Average trade size (1,000$) ,993 Fraction of average daily volume (%) Trade horizon (days)
10 Summary Stats cont. 10
11 Trading Execution Algorithm *The portfolio generation process is separate from the trading process - algorithms do not make any explicit aggregate buy or sell decisions Merely determine duration of a trade (most within 1 day) The trades are executed using proprietary, automated trading algorithms designed and built by the manager (aka Ronen) Direct market access through electronic exchanges Provide rather than demand liquidity using a systematic approach that sets opportunistic, liquidity-providing limit orders Break up total orders into smaller orders and dynamically manage them Randomize size, time, orders, etc. to limit market impact Limit prices are set to buy stocks at bid or below and sell stocks at ask or above generally We consider all of the above as part of the trading cost of a large arbitrageur 11
12 Measuring Market Impact: A Theoretical Example Market Impact (BPs) 15 Execution Prices Temporary Impact 10 Preexecution Market Impact Temporary Impact = 2.5 bps 5 0 Average Market Impact = 11 bps Permanent Impact Permanent Impact = 8.5 bps Time -5 Click to edit Master title Execution style Portfolio Formation Order Submission Period Portfolio Completed 12
13 Trade Execution Data, Realized Trading Costs Trading costs relative to theoretical prices = efficacy of strategy Trading costs relative to VWAP = costs vs. best price available Panel B All By Region By Size By Portfolio type Recent sample: sample US US Int. Large cap Small cap Long short Long only Nyse- Amex Nasdaq MI mean # # # MI median 7.22 # # # MI vw mean # # # IS mean # # # IS median 9.29 # # # IS vw mean # # # Standard errors MI mean MI median MI vw mean IS mean IS median IS vw mean Full sample: All sample By Region By size By portfolio type US US Large Cap Small Cap Long Nyse- Nasdaq short Amex Long only MI mean 2.68 # # # MI median 2.29 # # # MI vw mean 3.13 # # # IS mean 2.68 # # # IS median 2.29 # # # IS vw-mean 3.13 # # # Standard errors MI mean MI median MI vw mean
14 Interpretation How generalizable are the results? How exogenous are trading costs to the portfolios being traded by our manager? Trading costs we estimate are fairly independent from the portfolios being traded. 1. Only examine live trades of longer-term strategies, where portfolio formation process is separate from the trading process executing it. 2. Set of intended trades is primarily created from specific client mandates that often adhere to a benchmark subject to a tracking error constraint of a few percent. 3. Manager uses proprietary trading algorithms, but algorithms cannot make any buy or sell decisions. Only determine duration of trade (1-3 days). 4. Exclude all high frequency trading. We also examine only the first trade from new inflows. 14
15 Average market impact (basis points) Exogenous Trades Initial Trades from Inflows All trades Large cap Small cap Inflows (long-only) All other long-only trades Long-only trades, Trade type Only All other Difference t-statistics inflows trades MI mean All trades MI median All trades MI vw mean All trades MI mean Large cap MI median Large cap MI vw mean Large cap MI mean Small cap MI median Small cap MI vw mean Small cap
16 Regression Results: Tcost Model * * This table shows results from pooled regressions. The left-hand side is a trade s Market Impact (MI), in basis points. The explanatory variables include the contemporaneous market returns, firm size, volatility and trade size (all measured at order submission). All sample United States International (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) (6) (7) (8) (9) (10) (11) (12) Beta*IndexRet*buysell (17.37) (17.38) (17.38) (17.36) (8.43) (8.43) (8.43) (8.43) (24.03) (24.04) (24.04) (24.15) Time trend (Jun 1926 = 1) (2.34) -(1.61) -(1.92) -(1.33) -(0.51) -(0.08) -(0.24) -(0.02) -(5.23) -(4.11) -(4.88) -(3.80) Log of ME (Billion USD) (11.19) -(9.39) -(7.84) -(7.97) -(7.85) -(6.71) -(5.41) -(3.70) -(12.76) -(10.25) -(8.22) -(7.94) Fraction of daily volume (6.87) (3.39) (3.27). (3.28) (1.90) (1.84). (12.63) (4.53) (4.47) Sqrt(Fraction of daily volume) (3.50) (4.14).. (1.90) (2.10).. (5.68) (7.27) Idiosyncratic Volatility (2.06)... (0.70)... (6.02) Vix (4.47)... (2.62)... (3.53) Observations (1,000s) 2,125 2,125 2,125 2,125 1,005 1,005 1,005 1,005 1,120 1,120 1,120 1,120 Adjusted R Country Fixed Effects Yes Yes Yes Yes No No No No Yes Yes Yes Yes Use regression coefficients to compute predicted trading costs for all stocks 1. Fix trade size (as a % of DTV) equal to the median size in our execution data 2. Later, when running optimizations we ll allow for variable (endogenous) trade size 16
17 Market impact (basis points) Market Impact by Fraction of Trading Volume, This figure shows average Market Impact (MI). We sort all trades in our datasets into 30 bins based on their fraction of daily volume and compute average and median market impact for each bucket Average market impact (MI) Fitted mean % 2.00% 4.00% 6.00% 8.00% 10.00% 12.00% Average daily volume 17
18 Returns Results Trade Execution Sample U.S. Actual dollar traded in each portfolio (past 6 month) to estimate trading costs at each rebalance Trading costs and implied fund size are based on actual traded sizes Panel A: U.S. trade execution sample, Panel B: International trade execution sample, SMB HML UMD Combo SMB HML UMD Combo Dollar traded per month (Billion USD) Implied Fund size (Billion USD) Realized cost Break-even cost Realized minus breakeven t statistics (-7.78) (-18.55) (-12.59) (-21.81) (7.50) (-16.52) (-17.64) (-19.95) Return (Gross) (3.01) (1.12) (0.40) (3.17) (0.75) (1.83) (0.92) (2.88) Return (Net) (2.48) (0.80) -(0.14) (2.23) -(0.33) (1.32) (0.41) (1.86) Turnover (monthly) MI (bps) Sharpe ratio (gross) Sharpe ratio (net) Number of months
19 Optimized Portfolios So far, have ignored trading costs when building portfolios How can portfolios take into account trading costs to reduce total costs substantially? Can we change the portfolios to reduce trading costs without altering them significantly? Tradeoff between trading costs (market impact) and opportunity cost (tracking error) Construct portfolios that minimize trading costs while being close to the benchmark paper portfolios (SMB, HML, UMD, ) min Total Trading Cost (w) w Subject to: Tracking Error Constraint: w B Ω w B 1% $1 long and $1 short: w i = 0 and w i = 2 Trading Constraint: Fraction of daily volume <=5% *Working on separating tracking error into style drift vs. idiosyncratic error (done) 19
20 Sharpe Ratio (net) Sharpe Ratio (net) Total Trading Costs (Annual % ) Total Trading Costs (Annual % ) Trading Cost vs. Tracking Error Frontier Total trading costs, U.S. tradable sample Total trading costs, International tradable sample Ex-Ante Tracking (bps) SMB HML UMD Combo Ex-Ante Tracking (bps) SMB HML UMD Combo 0.7 Sharpe Ratio (net), U.S. tradable sample 0.8 Sharpe Ratio (net), International tradable sample Ex-Ante Tracking (bps) SMB HML UMD Combo Ex-Ante Tracking (bps) SMB HML UMD Combo 20
21 Break-Even Sizes after Tcost Optimization 21
22 Conclusions Unique dataset of live trades to approximate the real trading costs of a large institutional trader/arbitrageur Our trading cost estimates are many times smaller (and break even capacities many times larger) than those previously claimed: Size, Val, Mom all survive tcosts at high capacity, but STR does not Fit a model from live traded data to compute expected trading costs based on observable firm and trade characteristics We plan to make the coefficients and the price impact breakpoints available to researchers to be used to evaluate trading costs 22
23 APPENDIX 23
24 Defining Trading Costs 24
25 Realized Trading Costs by Trade Type This table shows average Market Impact (MI).We compute average, median and dollar weighted average cost of all trades during the month and report timeseries averages of the cross sectional estimates. Market Impact is in basis points. Panel B: Market Impact by Trade Type % of sample All sample By Region By Size Dollars Trades U.S. INT Large Cap Small Cap MI (VW-mean) Buy Long Buy Cover Sell Long Sell Short Differences Buy Cover - Buy Long Sell Short - Sell Cover t-statistics Buy Cover - Buy Long Sell Short - Sell Cover
26 Returns Results Trade Execution Sample U.S. Actual dollar traded in each portfolio (past 6 month) to estimate trading costs at each rebalance Trading costs and implied fund size are based on actual traded sizes Panle A: All stocks, United States, Panel B: All international stocks, SMB HML UMD Combo SMB HML UMD Combo Realized cost Break-even cost Realized minus breakeven t statistics ( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) (26.51) (-96.72) (-84.88) (-94.68) Return (Gross) (2.72) (3.10) (4.79) (9.14) (-0.12) (3.01) (2.98) (5.22) Return (Net) (2.10) (2.64) (3.77) (7.73) (-0.74) (2.49) (2.18) (3.95) Turnover (monthly) MI (bps) Sharpe ratio (gross) Sharpe ratio (net) Observations 1,039 1,039 1,039 1,
27 Returns Results Optimized Portfolios, U.S. Panel B: Tradable Stocks U.S. - Starting NAV 200M SMB HML UMD STR ValMom Combo Starting Nav (Million, USD) Ending Nav (Million, USD) 1, , , , , * * * Non-optimized Excess Return (Gross) (1.31) (1.68) (1.75) (1.98) (3.89) (4.81) Optimized Exess Return (Gross) (1.58) (1.60) (1.70) (1.01) (3.58) (4.30) Optimized Excess Return (Net) (1.42) (1.26) (0.75) -(2.68) (2.45) (1.50) Total trading costs (non-optimized) Total trading costs Turnover (non-optimized) Turnover MI (non-optimized, bps) MI (bps) Sharpe ratio (gross, non-optimized) Sharpe ratio (gross) Sharpe ratio (net) Beta to non-optimized Tracking error to non-optimized (%) Portfolio volatility Obs Break-even size (USD billion) ,
Trading Costs of Asset Pricing Anomalies Appendix: Additional Empirical Results
Trading Costs of Asset Pricing Anomalies Appendix: Additional Empirical Results ANDREA FRAZZINI, RONEN ISRAEL, AND TOBIAS J. MOSKOWITZ This Appendix contains additional analysis and results. Table A1 reports
More informationA Century of Evidence on Style Premia
A Century of Evidence on Style Premia Tobias Moskowitz, Ph.D Dean Takahashi Professor of Finance and Economics, Yale University, Principal, AQR, Research Associate, NBER March 2018 Introduction Based off
More informationTrading Costs ANDREA FRAZZINI, RONEN ISRAEL, AND TOBIAS J. MOSKOWITZ. Abstract. First draft: October 27, 2017 This draft: April 7, 2018
Trading Costs ANDREA FRAZZINI, RONEN ISRAEL, AND TOBIAS J. MOSKOWITZ First draft: October 27, 2017 This draft: April 7, 2018 Abstract Using 1.7 trillion dollars of live trade execution data from a large
More informationBetting Against Beta
Betting Against Beta Andrea Frazzini AQR Capital Management LLC Lasse H. Pedersen NYU, CEPR, and NBER Copyright 2010 by Andrea Frazzini and Lasse H. Pedersen The views and opinions expressed herein are
More informationThe Supply and Demand of Liquidity: Understanding and Measuring Institutional Trade Costs
The Supply and Demand of Liquidity: Understanding and Measuring Institutional Trade Costs Donald B. Keim Wharton School University of Pennsylvania WRDS Advanced Research Scholar Program August 21, 2018
More informationSize Matters, if You Control Your Junk
Discussion of: Size Matters, if You Control Your Junk by: Cliff Asness, Andrea Frazzini, Ronen Israel, Tobias Moskowitz, and Lasse H. Pedersen Kent Daniel Columbia Business School & NBER AFA Meetings 7
More informationVALUE AND MOMENTUM EVERYWHERE
AQR Capital Management, LLC Two Greenwich Plaza, Third Floor Greenwich, CT 06830 T: 203.742.3600 F: 203.742.3100 www.aqr.com VALUE AND MOMENTUM EVERYWHERE Clifford S. Asness AQR Capital Management, LLC
More informationSmart Beta #
Smart Beta This information is provided for registered investment advisors and institutional investors and is not intended for public use. Dimensional Fund Advisors LP is an investment advisor registered
More informationBetting Against Correlation:
Betting Against Correlation: Testing Making Theories Leverage for Aversion the Low-Risk Great Again Effect (#MLAGA) Clifford S. Asness Managing and Founding Principal For Institutional Investor Use Only
More informationCore CFO and Future Performance. Abstract
Core CFO and Future Performance Rodrigo S. Verdi Sloan School of Management Massachusetts Institute of Technology 50 Memorial Drive E52-403A Cambridge, MA 02142 rverdi@mit.edu Abstract This paper investigates
More informationThinking. Alternative. Alternative Thinking Q4 2016: Superstar Investors. U.K. Supplement. Supplement released November 2017
Alternative Thinking Supplement released November 2017 Alternative Thinking Q4 2016: Superstar Investors U.K. Supplement This document accompanies AQR s 2016 article Superstar Investors, which analyzed
More informationHow Tax Efficient Are Equity Styles?
How Tax Efficient Are Equity Styles? RONEN ISRAEL AND TOBIAS J. MOSKOWITZ Updated Version: Oct. 2012 Abstract We examine the after-tax returns and tax efficiency of Size, Value, Growth, and Momentum equity
More informationHow Tax Efficient are Equity Styles?
Working Paper No. 77 Chicago Booth Paper No. 12-20 How Tax Efficient are Equity Styles? Ronen Israel AQR Capital Management Tobias Moskowitz Booth School of Business, University of Chicago and NBER Initiative
More informationLiquidity as risk factor
Liquidity as risk factor A research at the influence of liquidity on stock returns Bachelor Thesis Finance R.H.T. Verschuren 134477 Supervisor: M. Nie Liquidity as risk factor A research at the influence
More informationEconomic Valuation of Liquidity Timing
Economic Valuation of Liquidity Timing Dennis Karstanje 1,2 Elvira Sojli 1,3 Wing Wah Tham 1 Michel van der Wel 1,2,4 1 Erasmus University Rotterdam 2 Tinbergen Institute 3 Duisenberg School of Finance
More informationAre Momentum Profits Robust to Trading Costs?
THE JOURNAL OF FINANCE VOL. LIX, NO. 3 JUNE 2004 Are Momentum Profits Robust to Trading Costs? ROBERT A. KORAJCZYK and RONNIE SADKA ABSTRACT We test whether momentum strategies remain profitable after
More informationWhat You See Is Not What You Get: The Costs of Trading Market Anomalies
What You See Is Not What You Get: The Costs of Trading Market Anomalies Andrew J. Patton Duke University Brian M. Weller Duke University March 9, 2018 ERID Working Paper Number 255 This paper can be downloaded
More informationAre Momentum Profits Robust to Trading Costs?
Are Momentum Profits Robust to Trading Costs? Robert A. Korajczyk and Ronnie Sadka Working Paper #289 June 5, 2003 Abstract We test whether momentum-based strategies remain profitable after considering
More informationDaily Winners and Losers by Alok Kumar, Stefan Ruenzi, and Michael Ungeheuer
Daily Winners and Losers by Alok Kumar, Stefan Ruenzi, and Michael Ungeheuer American Finance Association Annual Meeting 2018 Philadelphia January 7 th 2018 1 In the Media: Wall Street Journal Print Rankings
More informationWhat You See is Not What You Get: The Costs of Trading Market Anomalies
What You See is Not What You Get: The Costs of Trading Market Anomalies Andrew J. Patton and Brian M. Weller Duke University November 28, 2018 Abstract Is there a gap between the profitability of a trading
More informationWhat You See Is Not What You Get: The Costs of Trading Market Anomalies
What You See Is Not What You Get: The Costs of Trading Market Anomalies Andrew J. Patton Duke University Brian M. Weller Duke University October 31, 2017 ERID Working Paper Number 255 This paper can be
More informationRobert Engle and Robert Ferstenberg Microstructure in Paris December 8, 2014
Robert Engle and Robert Ferstenberg Microstructure in Paris December 8, 2014 Is varying over time and over assets Is a powerful input to many financial decisions such as portfolio construction and trading
More informationCan We Lower Portfolio Volatility and Still Meet Equity Return Expectations?
Can We Lower Portfolio Volatility and Still Meet Equity Return Expectations? Richard Yasenchak, CFA Senior Vice President, Client Portfolio Manager, INTECH FOR INSTITUTIONAL INVESTOR USE/NOT FOR PUBLIC
More informationExploiting Factor Autocorrelation to Improve Risk Adjusted Returns
Exploiting Factor Autocorrelation to Improve Risk Adjusted Returns Kevin Oversby 22 February 2014 ABSTRACT The Fama-French three factor model is ubiquitous in modern finance. Returns are modeled as a linear
More informationLiquidity, Liquidity Risk, and the Cross Section of Mutual Fund Returns. Andrew A. Lynch and Xuemin (Sterling) Yan * Abstract
Liquidity, Liquidity Risk, and the Cross Section of Mutual Fund Returns Andrew A. Lynch and Xuemin (Sterling) Yan * Abstract This paper examines the impact of liquidity and liquidity risk on the cross-section
More informationBetting against Beta or Demand for Lottery
Turan G. Bali 1 Stephen J. Brown 2 Scott Murray 3 Yi Tang 4 1 McDonough School of Business, Georgetown University 2 Stern School of Business, New York University 3 College of Business Administration, University
More informationInvestor Clienteles and Asset Pricing Anomalies *
Investor Clienteles and Asset Pricing Anomalies * David Lesmond Mihail Velikov November 6, 2015 PRELIMINARY DRAFT: DO NOT CITE OR CIRCULATE Abstract This paper shows that the profitability of anomaly trading
More informationDo Retail Trades Move Markets? Brad Barber Terrance Odean Ning Zhu
Do Retail Trades Move Markets? Brad Barber Terrance Odean Ning Zhu Do Noise Traders Move Markets? 1. Small trades are proxy for individual investors trades. 2. Individual investors trading is correlated:
More informationLocal Business Cycles and Local Liquidity *
Local Business Cycles and Local Liquidity * Gennaro Bernile George Korniotis Alok Kumar University of Miami Qin Wang University of Michigan at Dearborn July 1, 2012 Abstract This paper shows that the geographical
More informationSize Matters, if You Control Your Junk
Size Matters, if You Control Your Junk CLIFF ASNESS, ANDREA FRAZZINI, RONEN ISRAEL, TOBIAS MOSKOWITZ, AND LASSE H. PEDERSEN Preliminary and incomplete version First draft: January 2015 *Not for quotation
More informationDeactivating Active Share
Deactivating Active Share Andrea Frazzini Jacques Friedman Lukasz Pomorski April 21, 2016 AQR Capital Management, LLC Two Greenwich Plaza Greenwich, CT 06830 p: +1.203.742.3600 w: aqr.com Active Share
More informationLiquidity and the Post-Earnings-Announcement Drift
Liquidity and the Post-Earnings-Announcement Drift Tarun Chordia, Amit Goyal, Gil Sadka, Ronnie Sadka, and Lakshmanan Shivakumar First draft: July 31, 2005 This Revision: May 8, 2006 Abstract The post-earnings-announcement
More informationLiquidity and the Post-Earnings-Announcement Drift
Liquidity and the Post-Earnings-Announcement Drift Tarun Chordia, Amit Goyal, Gil Sadka, Ronnie Sadka, and Lakshmanan Shivakumar First draft: July 31, 2005 This Revision: July 31, 2006 Abstract The post-earnings-announcement
More informationImplied Funding Liquidity
Implied Funding Liquidity Minh Nguyen Yuanyu Yang Newcastle University Business School 3 April 2017 1 / 17 Outline 1 Background 2 Summary 3 Implied Funding Liquidity Measure 4 Data 5 Empirical Results
More informationAsset Pricing in the Dark: The Cross Section of OTC Stocks
Asset Pricing in the Dark: The Cross Section of OTC Stocks May 2011 Andrew Ang, Assaf A. Shtauber, and Paul C. Tetlock * Columbia University Abstract Over one thousand stocks trade in over-the-counter
More informationLiquidity and Asset Pricing. Evidence on the role of Investor Holding Period.
Liquidity and Asset Pricing. Evidence on the role of Investor Holding Period. Randi Næs Norges Bank Bernt Arne Ødegaard Norges Bank and Norwegian School of Management BI Third workshop on Market Microstructure
More informationWhat Drives the Earnings Announcement Premium?
What Drives the Earnings Announcement Premium? Hae mi Choi Loyola University Chicago This study investigates what drives the earnings announcement premium. Prior studies have offered various explanations
More informationLiquidity and IPO performance in the last decade
Liquidity and IPO performance in the last decade Saurav Roychoudhury Associate Professor School of Management and Leadership Capital University Abstract It is well documented by that if long run IPO underperformance
More informationTHE EFFECT OF LIQUIDITY COSTS ON SECURITIES PRICES AND RETURNS
PART I THE EFFECT OF LIQUIDITY COSTS ON SECURITIES PRICES AND RETURNS Introduction and Overview We begin by considering the direct effects of trading costs on the values of financial assets. Investors
More informationLiquidity and Asset Pricing. Evidence on the role of Investor Holding Period.
Liquidity and Asset Pricing. Evidence on the role of Investor Holding Period. Randi Næs Norges Bank Bernt Arne Ødegaard Norwegian School of Management BI and Norges Bank UiS, Sep 2007 Holding period This
More informationArbitrage Asymmetry and the Idiosyncratic Volatility Puzzle
Arbitrage Asymmetry and the Idiosyncratic Volatility Puzzle Robert F. Stambaugh The Wharton School University of Pennsylvania and NBER Jianfeng Yu Carlson School of Management University of Minnesota Yu
More informationDoes market liquidity explain the idiosyncratic volatility puzzle in the Chinese stock market?
Does market liquidity explain the idiosyncratic volatility puzzle in the Chinese stock market? Xiaoxing Liu Guangping Shi Southeast University, China Bin Shi Acadian-Asset Management Disclosure The views
More informationLiquidity Estimates and Selection Bias
Liquidity Estimates and Selection Bias Anna A. Obizhaeva July 5, 2012 Abstract Since traders often employ price-dependent strategies and cancel expensive orders, conventional estimates tend to overestimate
More informationLiquidity Creation as Volatility Risk
Liquidity Creation as Volatility Risk Itamar Drechsler Alan Moreira Alexi Savov Wharton Rochester NYU Chicago November 2018 1 Liquidity and Volatility 1. Liquidity creation - makes it cheaper to pledge
More informationCross Sectional Variation of Stock Returns: Idiosyncratic Risk and Liquidity
Cross Sectional Variation of Stock Returns: Idiosyncratic Risk and Liquidity by Matthew Spiegel Xiaotong (Vivian) Wang Cross Sectional Returns via Market Microstructure Liquidity Returns Liquidity varies
More informationEconomic Policy Uncertainty and Momentum
Economic Policy Uncertainty and Momentum Ming Gu School of Economics and WISE Xiamen University guming@xmu.edu.cn Minxing Sun Department of Finance University of Memphis msun@memphis.edu Yangru Wu Rutgers
More informationAre Momentum Profits Robust to Trading Costs?
Are Momentum Profits Robust to Trading Costs? Robert Korajczyk and Ronnie Sadka Working Paper #289 August 9, 2002 Abstract This paper tests whether momentum-based strategies remain profitable after considering
More informationThe Value of Equity Analysts Target Prices
The Value of Equity Analysts Target Prices Zhi Da and Ernst Schaumburg November 21, 2005 Abstract We document that short-run deviations between prices and fundamentals can be identified in real time using
More informationPrice Impact or Trading Volume: Why is the Amihud (2002) Illiquidity Measure Priced? XIAOXIA LOU TAO SHU * August 2016
Price Impact or Trading Volume: Why is the Amihud (2002) Illiquidity Measure Priced? XIAOXIA LOU TAO SHU * August 2016 * Lou is at the Alfred Lerner College of Business, University of Delaware. Email:
More informationThe Evolution of Alternative Beta: Using Index-Based Investment Strategies
Filed pursuant to Rule 433 Registration Statement No. 333-180300-03 Investor Solutions The Evolution of Alternative Beta: Using Index-Based Investment Strategies This presentation may not be altered except
More informationThe Fama-French Three Factors in the Chinese Stock Market *
DOI 10.7603/s40570-014-0016-0 210 2014 年 6 月第 16 卷第 2 期 中国会计与财务研究 C h i n a A c c o u n t i n g a n d F i n a n c e R e v i e w Volume 16, Number 2 June 2014 The Fama-French Three Factors in the Chinese
More informationHidden in Plain Sight: Equity Price Discovery with Informed Private Debt
Hidden in Plain Sight: Equity Price Discovery with Informed Private Debt Jawad M. Addoum 1 Justin R. Murfin 2 1 Cornell University 2 Yale University Chicago Financial Institutions Conference 2018 April
More informationDiscussion Paper Series
BIRMINGHAM BUSINESS SCHOOL Birmingham Business School Discussion Paper Series Does commonality in illiquidity matter to investors? Richard G Anderson Jane M Binner Bjorn Hagstromer Birger Nilsson 2015-02
More informationEmpirics of the Oslo Stock Exchange:. Asset pricing results
Empirics of the Oslo Stock Exchange:. Asset pricing results. 1980 2016. Bernt Arne Ødegaard Jan 2017 Abstract We show the results of numerous asset pricing specifications on the crossection of assets at
More informationPrice Impact Costs and the Limit of Arbitrage
Price Impact Costs and the Limit of Arbitrage Zhiwu Chen Yale School of Management Werner Stanzl Yale School of Management Masahiro Watanabe Yale School of Management March 12, 2002 Abstract This paper
More informationIs Information Risk Priced for NASDAQ-listed Stocks?
Is Information Risk Priced for NASDAQ-listed Stocks? Kathleen P. Fuller School of Business Administration University of Mississippi kfuller@bus.olemiss.edu Bonnie F. Van Ness School of Business Administration
More informationThe Volatility of Liquidity and Expected Stock Returns
The Volatility of Liquidity and Expected Stock Returns Ferhat Akbas, Will J. Armstrong, Ralitsa Petkova January, 2011 ABSTRACT We document a positive relation between the volatility of liquidity and expected
More informationAn Alternative Four-Factor Model
Master Thesis in Finance Stockholm School of Economics Spring 2011 An Alternative Four-Factor Model Abstract In this paper, we add a liquidity factor to the Chen, Novy-Marx & Zhang (2010) three-factor
More informationDecimalization and Illiquidity Premiums: An Extended Analysis
Utah State University DigitalCommons@USU All Graduate Plan B and other Reports Graduate Studies 5-2015 Decimalization and Illiquidity Premiums: An Extended Analysis Seth E. Williams Utah State University
More informationHigh Idiosyncratic Volatility and Low Returns. Andrew Ang Columbia University and NBER. Q Group October 2007, Scottsdale AZ
High Idiosyncratic Volatility and Low Returns Andrew Ang Columbia University and NBER Q Group October 2007, Scottsdale AZ Monday October 15, 2007 References The Cross-Section of Volatility and Expected
More informationActiveAllocator Insights
ActiveAllocator Insights www.activeallocator.com DISCLAIMER: ActiveAllocator.com provides simple and useful analytical tools as well as education to help investors make better financial decisions. We rely
More informationAsset Pricing in the Dark: The Cross Section of OTC Stocks
Asset Pricing in the Dark: The Cross Section of OTC Stocks October 2012 Andrew Ang, Assaf A. Shtauber, and Paul C. Tetlock * Columbia University Abstract Compared to listed stocks, OTC stocks are far less
More informationPrice Impact Costs and the Limit of Arbitrage
Costs and the Limit of Arbitrage Zhiwu Chen Yale School of Management Werner Stanzl Yale School of Management December 7, 2005 Masahiro Watanabe Rice University Abstract This paper investigates whether
More informationThe effect of liquidity on expected returns in U.S. stock markets. Master Thesis
The effect of liquidity on expected returns in U.S. stock markets Master Thesis Student name: Yori van der Kruijs Administration number: 471570 E-mail address: Y.vdrKruijs@tilburguniversity.edu Date: December,
More informationPricing the Commonality Across Alternative Measures of Liquidity
Pricing the Commonality Across Alternative Measures of Liquidity ROBERT A. KORAJCZYK and RONNIE SADKA November 17, 2006 Abstract We estimate latent factor models of liquidity, aggregated across a variety
More informationApplied Macro Finance
Master in Money and Finance Goethe University Frankfurt Week 2: Factor models and the cross-section of stock returns Fall 2012/2013 Please note the disclaimer on the last page Announcements Next week (30
More informationLiquidity Variation and the Cross-Section of Stock Returns *
Liquidity Variation and the Cross-Section of Stock Returns * Fangjian Fu Singapore Management University Wenjin Kang National University of Singapore Yuping Shao National University of Singapore Abstract
More informationMomentum and Post-Earnings-Announcement Drift Anomalies: The Role of Liquidity Risk
Momentum and Post-Earnings-Announcement Drift Anomalies: The Role of Liquidity Risk Ronnie Sadka May 3, 2005 Abstract This paper investigates the components of liquidity risk that are important for asset-pricing
More informationThe Pricing of Liquidity Risk Around the World
Master Thesis The Pricing of Liquidity Risk Around the World Author: D.W.J. Röttger Studentnumber/ANR: u1255565/985824 Master Programme: Master in Finance, CFA track Faculty: Tilburg School of Economics
More informationLiquidity Creation as Volatility Risk
Liquidity Creation as Volatility Risk Itamar Drechsler Alan Moreira Alexi Savov New York University and NBER University of Rochester March, 2018 Motivation 1. A key function of the financial sector is
More informationAnalyst Disagreement, Mispricing and Liquidity
WORK IN PROGRESS Comments welcome Analyst Disagreement, Mispricing and Liquidity Ronnie Sadka and Anna Scherbina June 18, 2004 Sadka is at the University of Washington Business School (rsadka@u.washington.edu).
More informationVariation in Liquidity and Costly Arbitrage
Variation in Liquidity and Costly Arbitrage Badrinath Kottimukkalur George Washington University Discussed by Fang Qiao PBCSF, TSinghua University EMF, 15 December 2018 Puzzle The level of liquidity affects
More informationLiquidity skewness premium
Liquidity skewness premium Giho Jeong, Jangkoo Kang, and Kyung Yoon Kwon * Abstract Risk-averse investors may dislike decrease of liquidity rather than increase of liquidity, and thus there can be asymmetric
More informationAnalyst Disagreement, Mispricing and Liquidity
Analyst Disagreement, Mispricing and Liquidity Ronnie Sadka and Anna Scherbina November 6, 2004 Abstract Examining returns of stocks with high levels of analyst disagreement about future earnings reveals
More informationWhen Low Beats High: Riding the Sales Seasonality Premium
When Low Beats High: Riding the Sales Seasonality Premium Gustavo Grullon Rice University grullon@rice.edu Yamil Kaba Rice University yamil.kaba@rice.edu Alexander Núñez Lehman College alexander.nuneztorres@lehman.cuny.edu
More informationIlliquidity and Stock Returns:
Illiquidity and Stock Returns: Empirical Evidence from the Stockholm Stock Exchange Jakob Grunditz and Malin Härdig Master Thesis in Accounting & Financial Management Stockholm School of Economics Abstract:
More informationCommon Factors in Return Seasonalities
Common Factors in Return Seasonalities Matti Keloharju, Aalto University Juhani Linnainmaa, University of Chicago and NBER Peter Nyberg, Aalto University AQR Insight Award Presentation 1 / 36 Common factors
More informationCharacteristic liquidity, systematic liquidity and expected returns
Characteristic liquidity, systematic liquidity and expected returns M. Reza Baradarannia a, *, Maurice Peat b a,b Business School, The University of Sydney, Sydney 2006, Australia Abstract: We investigate
More informationOptimal Debt-to-Equity Ratios and Stock Returns
Utah State University DigitalCommons@USU All Graduate Plan B and other Reports Graduate Studies 5-2014 Optimal Debt-to-Equity Ratios and Stock Returns Courtney D. Winn Utah State University Follow this
More informationThe beta anomaly? Stock s quality matters!
The beta anomaly? Stock s quality matters! John M. Geppert a (corresponding author) a University of Nebraska Lincoln College of Business 425P Lincoln, NE, USA, 8588-0490 402-472-3370 jgeppert1@unl.edu
More informationThe New Issues Puzzle
The New Issues Puzzle Professor B. Espen Eckbo Advanced Corporate Finance, 2009 Contents 1 IPO Sample and Issuer Characteristics 1 1.1 Annual Sample Distribution................... 1 1.2 IPO Firms are
More informationRun Lengths and Liquidity
Run Lengths and Liquidity Sanjiv R. Das Santa Clara University Paul Hanouna Villanova University March 9, 2008 Abstract We develop a market-wide illiquidity risk factor based on run lengths and find that
More informationDebt/Equity Ratio and Asset Pricing Analysis
Utah State University DigitalCommons@USU All Graduate Plan B and other Reports Graduate Studies Summer 8-1-2017 Debt/Equity Ratio and Asset Pricing Analysis Nicholas Lyle Follow this and additional works
More informationReturn Reversals, Idiosyncratic Risk and Expected Returns
Return Reversals, Idiosyncratic Risk and Expected Returns Wei Huang, Qianqiu Liu, S.Ghon Rhee and Liang Zhang Shidler College of Business University of Hawaii at Manoa 2404 Maile Way Honolulu, Hawaii,
More informationCycles of Declines and Reversals. following Overnight Market Declines
Cycles of Declines and Reversals * following Overnight Market Declines Farshid Abdi Job Market Paper This version: October 2018 Latest version available at farshidabdi.net/jmp ABSTRACT This paper uncovers
More informationMomentum Crashes. Kent Daniel. Columbia University Graduate School of Business. Columbia University Quantitative Trading & Asset Management Conference
Crashes Kent Daniel Columbia University Graduate School of Business Columbia University Quantitative Trading & Asset Management Conference 9 November 2010 Kent Daniel, Crashes Columbia - Quant. Trading
More informationArbitrageurs identify and trade on
Jieun Lee is an economist with the Financial and Monetary Studies Team, Economic Research Institute, Bank of Korea in Seoul, South Korea. jelee@bok.or.kr Joseph P. Ogden is a professor of finance in the
More informationQ FOR FINANCIAL PROFESSIONAL USE ONLY. FOR FINANCIAL PROFESSIONAL USE ONLY.
Factors De-Mystified Q1 2017 Introducing the Factors Framing the Factor Discussion Size Value Quality Momentum Low Volatility Should we use a three-factor model for asset pricing or a new five factor model
More informationOrder flow and prices
Order flow and prices Ekkehart Boehmer and Julie Wu * Mays Business School Texas A&M University College Station, TX 77845-4218 March 14, 2006 Abstract We provide new evidence on a central prediction of
More informationReturns, Volatility, and Information Transmission Dynamics in Public and Private Real Estate Markets
Returns, Volatility, and Information Transmission Dynamics in Public and Private Real Estate Markets by David Ling and Andy Naranjo University of Florida For presentation at: NCREIF s Summer Conference
More informationLong-Term Rewarded Equity Factors What Can Investors Learn from Academic Research? Felix Goltz
Long-Term Rewarded Equity Factors What Can Investors Learn from Academic Research? Felix Goltz Outline The venerable academic grounding Three Lessons from academic research What academic grounding does
More informationVariation in Liquidity, Costly Arbitrage, and the Cross-Section of Stock Returns
Variation in Liquidity, Costly Arbitrage, and the Cross-Section of Stock Returns Badrinath Kottimukkalur * January 2018 Abstract This paper provides an arbitrage based explanation for the puzzling negative
More informationFurther Test on Stock Liquidity Risk With a Relative Measure
International Journal of Education and Research Vol. 1 No. 3 March 2013 Further Test on Stock Liquidity Risk With a Relative Measure David Oima* David Sande** Benjamin Ombok*** Abstract Negative relationship
More informationMOMENTUM INVESTING: SIMPLE, BUT NOT EASY
MOMENTUM INVESTING: SIMPLE, BUT NOT EASY As Of Date: 9/5/2018 Wesley R. Gray, PhD T: +1.215.882.9983 F: +1.216.245.3686 ir@alphaarchitect.com 213 Foxcroft Road Broomall, PA 19008 Empower Investors Through
More informationA Lottery Demand-Based Explanation of the Beta Anomaly. Online Appendix
A Lottery Demand-Based Explanation of the Beta Anomaly Online Appendix Section I provides details of the calculation of the variables used in the paper. Section II examines the robustness of the beta anomaly.
More informationThe Value of True Liquidity
The Value of True Liquidity Working Paper This version: December 2016 Abstract This study uncovers the ability of liquid stocks to generate significant higher riskadjusted portfolio returns than their
More informationOn the importance of Quality, Liquidity-Level and Liquidity-Beta: A Markov-Switching Regime approach
On the importance of Quality, Liquidity-Level and Liquidity-Beta: A Markov-Switching Regime approach Tarik BAZGOUR HEC Management School-University of Liège, Rue Louvrex 14,4000 Liège, Belgium E-mail:
More informationResearch Division Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis Working Paper Series
Research Division Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis Working Paper Series Does commonality in illiquidity matter to investors? Richard G. Anderson Jane M. Binner Bjӧrn Hagstrӧmer And Birger Nilsson Working
More informationCapital Markets (FINC 950) Introduction. Prepared by: Phillip A. Braun Version:
Capital Markets (FINC 950) Introduction Prepared by: Phillip A. Braun Version: 6.26.17 Syllabus 2 Introduction to the Capital Markets Class The capital markets class provides a structure for thinking about
More informationRevisiting Idiosyncratic Volatility and Stock Returns. Fatma Sonmez 1
Revisiting Idiosyncratic Volatility and Stock Returns Fatma Sonmez 1 Abstract This paper s aim is to revisit the relation between idiosyncratic volatility and future stock returns. There are three key
More information