Size Matters, if You Control Your Junk
|
|
- Piers Ellis
- 6 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 Discussion of: Size Matters, if You Control Your Junk by: Cliff Asness, Andrea Frazzini, Ronen Israel, Tobias Moskowitz, and Lasse H. Pedersen Kent Daniel Columbia Business School & NBER AFA Meetings 7 January, 2017
2 Outline Size Anomaly History History The quality measure Seasonalities Explanations
3 Non-linearities The Size Anomaly early evidence Banz (1981) presents evidence of a strong size (market cap) effect that is not explained by the loading on the market portfolio Keim (1983) shows that this effect is all in January From Keim (1983):
4 Non-linearities EW Size Decile Portfolio Returns Portfolio Value (Dollars) d01 d02 d03 d04 d05 d06 d07 d08 d09 d10 Size Decile Portfolios (EW) -- Cumulative Returns, 1926: :11 $1,824,735 $3, date
5 Non-linearities EW Size Decile Portfolio Returns Over the 1926: :11 period, the smallest size-decile portfolio outperforms the largest by 92 bps/month. r Jan = 909 bps/month; r non Jan = 17 bps/month, However, both Banz (1981) and Keim (1983) used equal-weighted portfolios Specifically, Banz (1981) uses the 25 size/beta-sorted, EW portfolios of Black and Scholes (1974). AFIMP note the discrepancy between their results and those of Banz, and argue that the discrepancy is probably the result of CRSP errors that were corrected. Most of the difference results from AFIMP using VW portfolios.
6 EW Portfolio Return Bias Price 2 1 Non-linearities Asset A Asset B R EW,2 = (1/2) ( 50%) +(1/2) (+100%) = 25% R EW,3 = (1/2) (+100%) +(1/2) ( 50%) = 25% Gain R EW,2 = InitialCost Gain R EW,3 = InitialCost = (1/4) ( 1)+(1/2) (+1) (1/4) 2+(1/2) 1 = 25% = (1/2) (+1)+(1/4) ( 1) (1/2) 1+(1/4) 2 = 25% To avoid this bias, AFIMP use all VW portfolios.
7 Non-linearities EW Size Decile Portfolio Returns Portfolio Value (Dollars) d01 d02 d03 d04 d05 d06 d07 d08 d09 d10 Size Decile Portfolios (EW) -- Cumulative Returns, 1926: :11 $1,824,735 $3, date
8 Non-linearities VW Size Decile Portfolio Returns Portfolio Value (Dollars) d01 d02 d03 d04 d05 d06 d07 d08 d09 d10 Size Decile Portfolios (VW) -- Cumulative Returns, 1926: :11 $37,182 $3, date
9 Size Decile Portfolio Returns Non-linearities Portfolio Value (Dollars) Hedged Size Decile Portfolios (VW) -- Cumulative Returns, 1926: :11 d01 ( ˆα = 2. 3%, t = 1. 0) d02 ( ˆα = 1. 0%, t = 0. 6) d03 ( ˆα = 1. 3%, t = 1. 0) d04 ( ˆα = 1. 4%, t = 1. 2) d05 ( ˆα = 1. 1%, t = 1. 1) d06 ( ˆα = 1. 4%, t = 1. 8) d07 ( ˆα = 0. 9%, t = 1. 3) d08 ( ˆα = 0. 8%, t = 1. 5) d09 ( ˆα = 0. 4%, t = 1. 0) d10 ( ˆα = 0. 1%, t = 0. 3) RF 10 1 $24.07 $ date
10 Size Decile Portfolio Returns Non-linearities 0.4 Small Decile - Large Decile (VW), Annual Returns, Calendar Year Return Difference year Some have argued that the small-cap effect has been arbitraged away post-1980 This plot shows the annual returns from end of the authors Golden Age period ( ), and the start of the Embarassment period ( ).
11 Size Decile Portfolio Returns Non-linearities 1.0 Small Decile - Large Decile (VW), Annual Returns, Calendar Year Return Difference year
12 Non-linearities Cumulative Returns & CAPM αs, FF25 Portfolios, 1926: :11 BigVal ( ˆα = 1. 3%/yr) BigGro ( ˆα = 0. 1%/yr) Mkt ( ˆα = 0. 0%/yr) Portfolio Value date
13 Non-linearities Cumulative Returns & CAPM αs, FF25 Portfolios, 1926: :11 BigVal ( ˆα = 1. 3%/yr) BigGro ( ˆα = 0. 1%/yr) 10 4 Portfolio Value date
14 Non-linearities Cumulative Returns & CAPM αs, FF25 Portfolios, 1926: :11 BigVal ( ˆα = 1. 3%/yr) BigGro ( ˆα = 0. 1%/yr) SmlVal ( ˆα = 5. 6%/yr) SmlGro ( ˆα = 6. 0%/yr) Portfolio Value date
15 Quality Size Anomaly History Measuring Quality January & Variability This paper is based on the Asness, Frazzini, and Pedersen (2014, AFP) Quality measure. The motivation for the AFP quality measure is the Gordon Growth Model: Defined in this way, Value i,t = e i,t δ i r i g i Quality i,t = Profitability i Payout i ( Safety i ) Growth i Quality( ) x j > 0 x j.
16 Calculating Quality: Size Anomaly History Measuring Quality January & Variability Quality is a z-scored combination of the four components: Quality = z(profitability + Payout + Safety + Growth) where each component is based on z-scored combinations of various instruments: Profitability = z(z gpoa + z roe + z cfoa + z gmar + z acc ) Payout = z(z eiss + z diss + z npop ) Safety = z(z bab + z ivol + z o + z z + z evol ) Growth = z(z gpoa + z roe + z roa + z cfoa + z acc )
17 Quality, Price and Returns Measuring Quality January & Variability AFP s empirical evidence suggests that the price/quality relationship is too weak. This means that quality should explain return, consistent with AFP s evidence However, on average small firms tend to be junky.
18 Measuring Quality Size & Figure 5: Distribution of Quality/Junk Among Large and Small Stocks January & Variability The first figure plots the fraction of the number of stocks over time across five quality categories that make up the 20 percent of smallest stocks. The second figure plots the fraction of the number of stocks over time across five quality categories that make up the 20 percent of largest stocks. Quality Distribution for Small Firms 100.0% Quality Distribution Among Smallest Stocks %Junk %Q2 %Q3 %Q4 %Quality 90.0% 80.0% 70.0% 60.0% 50.0% 40.0% 30.0% 20.0% 10.0% 0.0% 6/1/1957 9/1/ /1/1959 3/1/1961 6/1/1962 9/1/ /1/1964 3/1/1966 6/1/1967 9/1/ /1/1969 3/1/1971 6/1/1972 9/1/ /1/1974 3/1/1976 6/1/1977 9/1/ /1/1979 3/1/1981 6/1/1982 9/1/ /1/1984 3/1/1986 6/1/1987 9/1/ /1/1989 3/1/1991 6/1/1992 9/1/ /1/1994 3/1/1996 6/1/1997 9/1/ /1/1999 3/1/2001 6/1/2002 9/1/ /1/2004 3/1/2006 6/1/2007 9/1/ /1/2009 3/1/2011 6/1/2012 9/1/2013 Quality Kent Daniel Distribution Columbia Among AFIMP Biggest Size Matters Stocks 2017 AFA Meetings
19 20.0% 10.0% Size Anomaly History Measuring Quality January & Variability 0.0% Quality Distribution for Big Firms 6/1/1957 9/1/ /1/1959 3/1/1961 6/1/1962 9/1/ /1/1964 3/1/1966 6/1/1967 9/1/ /1/1969 3/1/1971 6/1/1972 9/1/ /1/1974 3/1/1976 6/1/1977 9/1/ /1/1979 3/1/1981 6/1/1982 9/1/ /1/1984 3/1/1986 6/1/1987 9/1/ /1/1989 3/1/1991 6/1/1992 9/1/ /1/1994 3/1/1996 6/1/1997 9/1/ /1/1999 3/1/2001 6/1/2002 9/1/ /1/2004 3/1/2006 6/1/2007 9/1/ /1/2009 3/1/2011 6/1/2012 9/1/ % Quality Distribution Among Biggest Stocks %Junk %Q2 %Q3 %Q4 %Quality 90.0% 80.0% 70.0% 60.0% 50.0% 40.0% 30.0% 20.0% 10.0% 0.0% 6/1/1957 9/1/ /1/1959 3/1/1961 6/1/1962 9/1/ /1/1964 3/1/1966 6/1/1967 9/1/ /1/1969 3/1/1971 6/1/1972 9/1/ /1/1974 3/1/1976 6/1/1977 9/1/ /1/1979 3/1/1981 6/1/1982 9/1/ /1/1984 3/1/1986 6/1/1987 9/1/ /1/1989 3/1/1991 6/1/1992 9/1/ /1/1994 3/1/1996 6/1/1997 9/1/ /1/1999 3/1/2001 6/1/2002 9/1/ /1/2004 3/1/2006 6/1/2007 9/1/ /1/2009 3/1/2011 6/1/2012 9/1/2013
20 Quality, Price and Returns Measuring Quality January & Variability Table 3: Size and Junk Double Sorts The table reports results from time-series regression tests of 25 portfolios sorted on size (market cap) and quality/junk as defined by Asness, Frazzini, and Pedersen (2014). The 25 portfolios are formed from independent sorts of stocks into five quintiles using size and quality/junk. The average returns in excess of the monthly T-bill rate and their t-statistics are reported over the sample period from July 1957 to December Also reported are summary statistics from time-series regressions of the 25 portfolios on each of the following factor models: (i) the Fama and French (1993) factors RMRF, SMB, and HML plus UMD; (ii) the Fama and French (2014) five factor model, consisting of RMRF, SMB, HML, RMW, and CMA; and (iii) the Fama and French (1993) factors plus UMD Given and the the quality flat composite size-return factor, QMJ. At the relationship, bottom of the table we report this summary must statistics mean on Fama and that French s SMB factor, taken from Ken French s website, as well as an SMB factor adjusted for quality, which we non-junk call SMBQ, small which is an firms average of the earn small high minus big returns. within each quality/junk quintile, averaged equally across the five quality/junk groups. Reported are the annualized means and Sharpe ratios of SMB, SMBQ, as and, well as RMRF, that HML, big-junk UMD, and QMJ, firms along with earn their correlations really with all low of the other returns. factors. Small Big Small - Big Excess returns Junk 0.35% 0.42% 0.44% 0.40% 0.12% 0.23% % 0.73% 0.68% 0.56% 0.37% 0.46% % 0.77% 0.74% 0.59% 0.34% 0.54% % 0.86% 0.76% 0.77% 0.47% 0.42% Quality 0.97% 0.89% 0.83% 0.78% 0.53% 0.44% Quality - Junk 0.62% 0.47% 0.39% 0.38% 0.42% t -statistics Junk Quality Quality - Junk Annual correlation with mean Sharpe SMB RMRF HML UMD QMJ SMBQ Kent 5.0% Daniel Columbia AFIMP 0.15 Size Matters AFA -0.18Meetings -0.31
21 January-Periodic Returns Measuring Quality January & Variability One of the intriguing findings here is that the variability of the Size Q premium is far smaller than the size premium. An ancillary finding is the finding that the Table 4: Seasonal Patterns and the Size Premium January-component of the Q premium is smaller and less variable. The table reports regression results for the size premium (SMB) on the factors RMRF, its lagged value, HML, and UMD and the composite quality factor from Asness, Frazzini, and Pedersen (2014), where the alphas are estimated for the months of January and non-january separately using dummy variables for those months. Also reported is the difference between January and other months, along with a t-statistic on that difference in the last column. Results are reported over four sample periods: the full quality sample period (July 1957 to December 2012), and the golden age (July 1957 to December 1979), embarrassment (January 1980 to December 1999), and resurrection (January 2000 to December 2012) periods for the size premium. SMB = RMRF + 1RMRF 1+ hhml + mumd + qqmj + t Non Jan Jan t t t t t t α Non-Jan. t (α) α Jan. t (α) β t (β) β-1 t (β-1) h t (h) m t (m) q t (q) R 2 Jan. diff t (diff) Quality sample Golden age Embarrassment Resurrection
22 SMB returns by month Measuring Quality January & Variability 2.5 SMB Mean Monthly Returns, 1956: : Mean Monthly Return (%) Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun month Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec
23 QMJ returns by month Measuring Quality January & Variability 1.5 QMJ Mean Monthly Returns, 1956: : Mean Monthly Return (%) Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun month Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec
24 Vas ist das? Size Anomaly History Explanations T-Costs Liquidity Shocks The empirical finding that Size Q earns a premium begs the question of what is causing this premium. 1 It is either: A premium that is related to covariance with marginal utility of all investors A result of biased expectations on the part of some or all investors. The authors explore a number of different possible explanations: risk-based behavioral liquidity/average t-costs time-varying liquidity 1 See Roll (1983)
25 Table 8: Liquidity level: Size, Junk, and Trading Costs Reported are average statistics on liquidity Size Anomaly and trading History cost measures Explanations for the 25 portfolios sorted on size (market cap) and quality/junk from Table 3. We report Size the & average Qualitybid-ask T-Costs spread as a percentage of share price (Panel A) and the market impact cost per dollar traded estimated from Frazzini, Liquidity Israel, Shocks and Moskowitz (2015) assuming a constant fund net asset value (NAV) of $1 billion plus one half of the effective bid-ask spread, all expressed in basis points (Panel B). The trading cost data cover the period January 2000 to December Is it average tcosts? Panel A: % Bid/Ask Spread Small Big Junk 3.1% 0.9% 0.3% 0.2% 0.1% 2 3.4% 1.0% 0.3% 0.2% 0.1% 3 3.8% 1.1% 0.3% 0.1% 0.1% 4 3.4% 1.2% 0.3% 0.1% 0.1% Quality 2.5% 1.2% 0.3% 0.1% 0.1% Panel B: Market Impact Cost per dollar traded (bps) Small Big Junk Quality Particularly given the strong persistence in size and quality, the t-costs associated with buying small quality/selling large junk appears small
26 Liquidity shocks? Size Anomaly History Explanations T-Costs Liquidity Shocks Table 9: Can Liquidity Risk Explain Size Controlling for Quality? This table reports regression results for the size premium, SMB, on the factors RMRF, HML, UMD, the quality factor QMJ, and two proxies for liquidity risk. Specifically, IML is the return of a portfolio that is long illiquid stocks and shorts liquid stocks, where liquidity is assessed by on the Amihud measure (Amihud, 2014). Likewise, LIQ is the decile spread in portfolios sorted on bid-ask spreads. The sample is 1956 to alpha RMRF HML UMD QMJ IML LIQ 0.20% (1.70) (6.49) (-3.64) (-0.10) -0.19% (-2.70) (16.01) (-13.07) (3.97) (33.47) 0.65% (6.64) (-3.58) (-6.69) (2.45) (-18.04) 0.16% (2.72) (4.44) (-17.65) (7.14) (-19.55) (34.94) 0.12% (2.03) (3.54) (-15.53) (6.82) (-17.59) (36.56) (6.53) The authors argue that what explains the premium is likely time-varying t-costs.. However, the same magnitudes argument, applied here, would I suspect rule this out as an explanation. Also: Liquidity is endogenous. In an Acharya and Pedersen (2005) like framework, there has to be a reason why the set of investors who are exposed to the shocks to the illiquid securities choose to hold the small stocks.
27 References I Size Anomaly History Explanations T-Costs Liquidity Shocks Acharya, Viral V., and Lasse H. Pedersen, 2005, Asset Pricing with Liquidity Risk, Journal of Financial Economics 77, Asness, Clifford S, Andrea Frazzini, and Lasse H Pedersen, 2014, Quality minus junk, AQR Capital Management working paper. Banz, Rolf W., 1981, The relationship between return and market value of common stocks, Journal of Financial Economics 9, Black, Fischer, and Myron Scholes, 1974, The effects of dividend yield and dividend policy on common stock prices and returns, Journal of financial economics 1, Keim, Donald B., 1983, Size-related anomalies and stock return seasonality: Further evidence, Journal of Financial Economics 12, Roll, Richard W., 1983, Vas ist das?, Journal of Portfolio Management 9,
Size Matters, if You Control Your Junk
Size Matters, if You Control Your Junk CLIFF ASNESS, ANDREA FRAZZINI, RONEN ISRAEL, TOBIAS MOSKOWITZ, AND LASSE H. PEDERSEN Preliminary and incomplete version First draft: January 2015 *Not for quotation
More informationTrading Costs of Asset Pricing Anomalies Appendix: Additional Empirical Results
Trading Costs of Asset Pricing Anomalies Appendix: Additional Empirical Results ANDREA FRAZZINI, RONEN ISRAEL, AND TOBIAS J. MOSKOWITZ This Appendix contains additional analysis and results. Table A1 reports
More informationHedging Factor Risk Preliminary Version
Hedging Factor Risk Preliminary Version Bernard Herskovic, Alan Moreira, and Tyler Muir March 15, 2018 Abstract Standard risk factors can be hedged with minimal reduction in average return. This is true
More informationInterpreting factor models
Discussion of: Interpreting factor models by: Serhiy Kozak, Stefan Nagel and Shrihari Santosh Kent Daniel Columbia University, Graduate School of Business 2015 AFA Meetings 4 January, 2015 Paper Outline
More informationHidden in Plain Sight: Equity Price Discovery with Informed Private Debt
Hidden in Plain Sight: Equity Price Discovery with Informed Private Debt Jawad M. Addoum 1 Justin R. Murfin 2 1 Cornell University 2 Yale University Chicago Financial Institutions Conference 2018 April
More informationThe Value Premium and the January Effect
The Value Premium and the January Effect Julia Chou, Praveen Kumar Das * Current Version: January 2010 * Chou is from College of Business Administration, Florida International University, Miami, FL 33199;
More informationMomentum Crashes. Kent Daniel. Columbia University Graduate School of Business. Columbia University Quantitative Trading & Asset Management Conference
Crashes Kent Daniel Columbia University Graduate School of Business Columbia University Quantitative Trading & Asset Management Conference 9 November 2010 Kent Daniel, Crashes Columbia - Quant. Trading
More informationInformation Release and the Fit of the Fama-French Model
Information Release and the Fit of the Fama-French Model Thomas Gilbert Christopher Hrdlicka Avraham Kamara Michael G. Foster School of Business University of Washington April 25, 2014 Risk and Return
More informationPersistence in Mutual Fund Performance: Analysis of Holdings Returns
Persistence in Mutual Fund Performance: Analysis of Holdings Returns Samuel Kruger * June 2007 Abstract: Do mutual funds that performed well in the past select stocks that perform well in the future? I
More informationIndex Models and APT
Index Models and APT (Text reference: Chapter 8) Index models Parameter estimation Multifactor models Arbitrage Single factor APT Multifactor APT Index models predate CAPM, originally proposed as a simplification
More informationQ FOR FINANCIAL PROFESSIONAL USE ONLY. FOR FINANCIAL PROFESSIONAL USE ONLY.
Factors De-Mystified Q1 2017 Introducing the Factors Framing the Factor Discussion Size Value Quality Momentum Low Volatility Should we use a three-factor model for asset pricing or a new five factor model
More informationExploiting Factor Autocorrelation to Improve Risk Adjusted Returns
Exploiting Factor Autocorrelation to Improve Risk Adjusted Returns Kevin Oversby 22 February 2014 ABSTRACT The Fama-French three factor model is ubiquitous in modern finance. Returns are modeled as a linear
More informationEmpirical Study on Market Value Balance Sheet (MVBS)
Empirical Study on Market Value Balance Sheet (MVBS) Yiqiao Yin Simon Business School November 2015 Abstract This paper presents the results of an empirical study on Market Value Balance Sheet (MVBS).
More informationOnline Appendix to. The Structure of Information Release and the Factor Structure of Returns
Online Appendix to The Structure of Information Release and the Factor Structure of Returns Thomas Gilbert, Christopher Hrdlicka, Avraham Kamara 1 February 2017 In this online appendix, we present supplementary
More informationPROFITABILITY OF CAPM MOMENTUM STRATEGIES IN THE US STOCK MARKET
International Journal of Business and Society, Vol. 18 No. 2, 2017, 347-362 PROFITABILITY OF CAPM MOMENTUM STRATEGIES IN THE US STOCK MARKET Terence Tai-Leung Chong The Chinese University of Hong Kong
More informationBetting against Beta or Demand for Lottery
Turan G. Bali 1 Stephen J. Brown 2 Scott Murray 3 Yi Tang 4 1 McDonough School of Business, Georgetown University 2 Stern School of Business, New York University 3 College of Business Administration, University
More informationTrading Costs of Asset Pricing Anomalies
Trading Costs of Asset Pricing Anomalies Andrea Frazzini AQR Capital Management Ronen Israel AQR Capital Management Tobias J. Moskowitz University of Chicago, NBER, and AQR Copyright 2014 by Andrea Frazzini,
More informationA Lottery Demand-Based Explanation of the Beta Anomaly. Online Appendix
A Lottery Demand-Based Explanation of the Beta Anomaly Online Appendix Section I provides details of the calculation of the variables used in the paper. Section II examines the robustness of the beta anomaly.
More informationBetting Against Beta
Betting Against Beta Andrea Frazzini AQR Capital Management LLC Lasse H. Pedersen NYU, CEPR, and NBER Copyright 2010 by Andrea Frazzini and Lasse H. Pedersen The views and opinions expressed herein are
More informationProblem Set 4 Solutions
Business John H. Cochrane Problem Set Solutions Part I readings. Give one-sentence answers.. Novy-Marx, The Profitability Premium. Preview: We see that gross profitability forecasts returns, a lot; its
More informationProfitability of CAPM Momentum Strategies in the US Stock Market
MPRA Munich Personal RePEc Archive Profitability of CAPM Momentum Strategies in the US Stock Market Terence Tai Leung Chong and Qing He and Hugo Tak Sang Ip and Jonathan T. Siu The Chinese University of
More informationIs Economic Uncertainty Priced in the Cross-Section of Stock Returns?
Is Economic Uncertainty Priced in the Cross-Section of Stock Returns? Turan Bali, Georgetown University Stephen Brown, NYU Stern, University Yi Tang, Fordham University 2018 CARE Conference, Washington
More informationA Columbine White Paper: The January Effect Revisited
A Columbine White Paper: February 10, 2010 SUMMARY By utilizing the Fama-French momentum data set we were able to extend our earlier studies of the January effect back an additional forty years. On an
More informationDecimalization and Illiquidity Premiums: An Extended Analysis
Utah State University DigitalCommons@USU All Graduate Plan B and other Reports Graduate Studies 5-2015 Decimalization and Illiquidity Premiums: An Extended Analysis Seth E. Williams Utah State University
More informationInternet Appendix to Leverage Constraints and Asset Prices: Insights from Mutual Fund Risk Taking
Internet Appendix to Leverage Constraints and Asset Prices: Insights from Mutual Fund Risk Taking In this Internet Appendix, we provide further discussion and additional empirical results to evaluate robustness
More informationLiquidity Risk Management for Portfolios
Liquidity Risk Management for Portfolios IPARM China Summit 2011 Shanghai, China November 30, 2011 Joseph Cherian Professor of Finance (Practice) Director, Centre for Asset Management Research & Investments
More informationLiquidity and Return Reversals
Liquidity and Return Reversals Kent Daniel Columbia University Graduate School of Business No Free Lunch Seminar November 19, 2013 The Financial Crisis Market Making Past-Winner & Loser Portfolios Feb-08
More informationVolatility Appendix. B.1 Firm-Specific Uncertainty and Aggregate Volatility
B Volatility Appendix The aggregate volatility risk explanation of the turnover effect relies on three empirical facts. First, the explanation assumes that firm-specific uncertainty comoves with aggregate
More informationMortgage REITs and Reaching for yield. Aurel Hizmo, Stijn Van Nieuwerburgh and James Vickery
Mortgage REITs and Reaching for yield Aurel Hizmo, Stijn Van Nieuwerburgh and James Vickery 1 Financial intermediation and low interest rates Important for policymakers to monitor emerging financial system
More informationBetting Against Correlation:
Betting Against Correlation: Testing Making Theories Leverage for Aversion the Low-Risk Great Again Effect (#MLAGA) Clifford S. Asness Managing and Founding Principal For Institutional Investor Use Only
More informationCross Sectional Variation of Stock Returns: Idiosyncratic Risk and Liquidity
Cross Sectional Variation of Stock Returns: Idiosyncratic Risk and Liquidity by Matthew Spiegel Xiaotong (Vivian) Wang Cross Sectional Returns via Market Microstructure Liquidity Returns Liquidity varies
More informationOptimal Debt-to-Equity Ratios and Stock Returns
Utah State University DigitalCommons@USU All Graduate Plan B and other Reports Graduate Studies 5-2014 Optimal Debt-to-Equity Ratios and Stock Returns Courtney D. Winn Utah State University Follow this
More informationDiscussion of: Carry. by: Ralph Koijen, Toby Moskowitz, Lasse Pedersen, and Evert Vrugt. Kent Daniel. Columbia University, Graduate School of Business
Discussion of: Carry by: Ralph Koijen, Toby Moskowitz, Lasse Pedersen, and Evert Vrugt Kent Daniel Columbia University, Graduate School of Business LSE Paul Woolley Center Annual Conference 8 June, 2012
More informationA Review of the Historical Return-Volatility Relationship
A Review of the Historical Return-Volatility Relationship By Yuriy Bodjov and Isaac Lemprière May 2015 Introduction Over the past few years, low volatility investment strategies have emerged as an alternative
More informationDiscussion: Bank Risk Dynamics and Distance to Default
Discussion: Bank Risk Dynamics and Distance to Default Andrea L. Eisfeldt UCLA Anderson BFI Conference on Financial Regulation October 3, 2015 Main Idea: Bank Assets 1 1 0.9 0.9 0.8 Bank assets 0.8 0.7
More informationSecurity Analysis: Performance
Security Analysis: Performance Independent Variable: 1 Yr. Mean ROR: 8.72% STD: 16.76% Time Horizon: 2/1993-6/2003 Holding Period: 12 months Risk-free ROR: 1.53% Ticker Name Beta Alpha Correlation Sharpe
More informationQuality minus junk. Clifford S. Asness 1 & Andrea Frazzini 1,2 & Lasse Heje Pedersen 1,2,3,4
Review of Accounting Studies https://doi.org/10.1007/s11142-018-9470-2 Quality minus junk Clifford S. Asness 1 & Andrea Frazzini 1,2 & Lasse Heje Pedersen 1,2,3,4 # The Author(s) 2018, corrected publication
More informationFUND OF HEDGE FUNDS DO THEY REALLY ADD VALUE?
FUND OF HEDGE FUNDS DO THEY REALLY ADD VALUE? Florian Albrecht, Jean-Francois Bacmann, Pierre Jeanneret & Stefan Scholz, RMF Investment Management Man Investments Hedge funds have attracted significant
More informationEvolving Equity Investing: Delivering Long-Term Returns in Short-Tempered Markets
March 2012 Evolving Equity Investing: Delivering Long-Term Returns in Short-Tempered Markets Kent Hargis Portfolio Manager Low Volatility Equities Director of Quantitative Research Equities This information
More informationHow Tax Efficient are Equity Styles?
Working Paper No. 77 Chicago Booth Paper No. 12-20 How Tax Efficient are Equity Styles? Ronen Israel AQR Capital Management Tobias Moskowitz Booth School of Business, University of Chicago and NBER Initiative
More informationDaily Data is Bad for Beta: Opacity and Frequency-Dependent Betas Online Appendix
Daily Data is Bad for Beta: Opacity and Frequency-Dependent Betas Online Appendix Thomas Gilbert Christopher Hrdlicka Jonathan Kalodimos Stephan Siegel December 17, 2013 Abstract In this Online Appendix,
More informationBetting Against Betting Against Beta
Betting Against Betting Against Beta Robert Novy-Marx Mihail Velikov November, 208 Abstract Frazzini and Pedersen s (204) Betting Against Beta (BAB) factor is based on the same basic idea as Black s (972)
More informationMomentum Crashes. Kent Daniel and Tobias J. Moskowitz. - Abstract -
August 08, 2014 Comments Welcome Momentum Crashes Kent Daniel and Tobias J. Moskowitz - Abstract - Despite their strong positive average returns across numerous asset classes, momentum strategies can experience
More informationLiquidity and IPO performance in the last decade
Liquidity and IPO performance in the last decade Saurav Roychoudhury Associate Professor School of Management and Leadership Capital University Abstract It is well documented by that if long run IPO underperformance
More informationDaily Winners and Losers by Alok Kumar, Stefan Ruenzi, and Michael Ungeheuer
Daily Winners and Losers by Alok Kumar, Stefan Ruenzi, and Michael Ungeheuer American Finance Association Annual Meeting 2018 Philadelphia January 7 th 2018 1 In the Media: Wall Street Journal Print Rankings
More informationThe Fama-French Three Factors in the Chinese Stock Market *
DOI 10.7603/s40570-014-0016-0 210 2014 年 6 月第 16 卷第 2 期 中国会计与财务研究 C h i n a A c c o u n t i n g a n d F i n a n c e R e v i e w Volume 16, Number 2 June 2014 The Fama-French Three Factors in the Chinese
More informationApplied Macro Finance
Master in Money and Finance Goethe University Frankfurt Week 2: Factor models and the cross-section of stock returns Fall 2012/2013 Please note the disclaimer on the last page Announcements Next week (30
More informationThe Worst, The Best, Ignoring All the Rest: The Rank Effect and Trading Behavior
: The Rank Effect and Trading Behavior Samuel M. Hartzmark The Q-Group October 19 th, 2014 Motivation How do investors form and trade portfolios? o Normative: Optimal portfolios Combine many assets into
More informationTable I Descriptive Statistics This table shows the breakdown of the eligible funds as at May 2011. AUM refers to assets under management. Panel A: Fund Breakdown Fund Count Vintage count Avg AUM US$ MM
More informationCommon Factors in Return Seasonalities
Common Factors in Return Seasonalities Matti Keloharju, Aalto University Juhani Linnainmaa, University of Chicago and NBER Peter Nyberg, Aalto University AQR Insight Award Presentation 1 / 36 Common factors
More informationTHE PENNSYLVANIA STATE UNIVERSITY SCHREYER HONORS COLLEGE DEPARTMENT OF FINANCE
THE PENNSYLVANIA STATE UNIVERSITY SCHREYER HONORS COLLEGE DEPARTMENT OF FINANCE EXAMINING THE IMPACT OF THE MARKET RISK PREMIUM BIAS ON THE CAPM AND THE FAMA FRENCH MODEL CHRIS DORIAN SPRING 2014 A thesis
More informationHigh Idiosyncratic Volatility and Low Returns. Andrew Ang Columbia University and NBER. Q Group October 2007, Scottsdale AZ
High Idiosyncratic Volatility and Low Returns Andrew Ang Columbia University and NBER Q Group October 2007, Scottsdale AZ Monday October 15, 2007 References The Cross-Section of Volatility and Expected
More informationArbitrage Pricing Theory and Multifactor Models of Risk and Return
Arbitrage Pricing Theory and Multifactor Models of Risk and Return Recap : CAPM Is a form of single factor model (one market risk premium) Based on a set of assumptions. Many of which are unrealistic One
More informationThe beta anomaly? Stock s quality matters!
The beta anomaly? Stock s quality matters! John M. Geppert a (corresponding author) a University of Nebraska Lincoln College of Business 425P Lincoln, NE, USA, 8588-0490 402-472-3370 jgeppert1@unl.edu
More informationRisk-managed 52-week high industry momentum, momentum crashes, and hedging macroeconomic risk
Risk-managed 52-week high industry momentum, momentum crashes, and hedging macroeconomic risk Klaus Grobys¹ This draft: January 23, 2017 Abstract This is the first study that investigates the profitability
More informationUnderstanding defensive equity
Understanding defensive equity Robert Novy-Marx University of Rochester and NBER March, 2016 Abstract High volatility and high beta stocks tilt strongly to small, unprofitable, and growth firms. These
More informationThinking. Alternative. Alternative Thinking Q4 2016: Superstar Investors. U.K. Supplement. Supplement released November 2017
Alternative Thinking Supplement released November 2017 Alternative Thinking Q4 2016: Superstar Investors U.K. Supplement This document accompanies AQR s 2016 article Superstar Investors, which analyzed
More informationA Century of Evidence on Style Premia
A Century of Evidence on Style Premia Tobias Moskowitz, Ph.D Dean Takahashi Professor of Finance and Economics, Yale University, Principal, AQR, Research Associate, NBER March 2018 Introduction Based off
More informationDebt/Equity Ratio and Asset Pricing Analysis
Utah State University DigitalCommons@USU All Graduate Plan B and other Reports Graduate Studies Summer 8-1-2017 Debt/Equity Ratio and Asset Pricing Analysis Nicholas Lyle Follow this and additional works
More informationOPTIMAL CONCENTRATION FOR VALUE AND MOMENTUM PORTFOLIOS
A Work Project, presented as part of the requirements for the Award of a Master Degree in Finance from the NOVA School of Business and Economics. OPTIMAL CONCENTRATION FOR VALUE AND MOMENTUM PORTFOLIOS
More informationDoes Transparency Increase Takeover Vulnerability?
Does Transparency Increase Takeover Vulnerability? Finance Working Paper N 570/2018 July 2018 Lifeng Gu University of Hong Kong Dirk Hackbarth Boston University, CEPR and ECGI Lifeng Gu and Dirk Hackbarth
More informationEconomics of Behavioral Finance. Lecture 3
Economics of Behavioral Finance Lecture 3 Security Market Line CAPM predicts a linear relationship between a stock s Beta and its excess return. E[r i ] r f = β i E r m r f Practically, testing CAPM empirically
More informationFama-French in China: Size and Value Factors in Chinese Stock Returns
Fama-French in China: Size and Value Factors in Chinese Stock Returns November 26, 2016 Abstract We investigate the size and value factors in the cross-section of returns for the Chinese stock market.
More informationUNIVERSITY OF ROCHESTER. Home work Assignment #4 Due: May 24, 2012
UNIVERSITY OF ROCHESTER William E. Simon Graduate School of Business Administration FIN 532 Advanced Topics in Capital Markets Home work Assignment #4 Due: May 24, 2012 The point of this assignment is
More informationFINANCE RESEARCH SEMINAR SUPPORTED BY UNIGESTION
FINANCE RESEARCH SEMINAR SUPPORTED BY UNIGESTION The Pricing of the Illiquidity Factor s Systematic Risk Prof. Yakov AMIHUD New York University, Stern School of Business Abstract This paper presents a
More informationCarry Investing on the Yield Curve
Carry Investing on the Yield Curve Paul Beekhuizen a Johan Duyvesteyn b, Martin Martens c, Casper Zomerdijk d,e January 2017 Abstract We investigate two yield curve strategies: Curve carry selects bond
More informationLiquidity and asset pricing
Liquidity and asset pricing Bernt Arne Ødegaard 21 March 2018 1 Liquidity in Asset Pricing Much market microstructure research is concerned with very a microscope view of financial markets, understanding
More informationLiquidity skewness premium
Liquidity skewness premium Giho Jeong, Jangkoo Kang, and Kyung Yoon Kwon * Abstract Risk-averse investors may dislike decrease of liquidity rather than increase of liquidity, and thus there can be asymmetric
More informationDiscount Rates. John H. Cochrane. January 8, University of Chicago Booth School of Business
Discount Rates John H. Cochrane University of Chicago Booth School of Business January 8, 2011 Discount rates 1. Facts: How risk discount rates vary over time and across assets. 2. Theory: Why discount
More informationStocks with Extreme Past Returns: Lotteries or Insurance?
Stocks with Extreme Past Returns: Lotteries or Insurance? Alexander Barinov Terry College of Business University of Georgia June 14, 2013 Alexander Barinov (UGA) Stocks with Extreme Past Returns June 14,
More informationQuantitative vs. Fundamental Institutional Money Managers: An Empirical Analysis
Quantitative vs. Fundamental Institutional Money Managers: An Empirical Analysis Josef Lakonishok and Bhaskaran Swaminathan LSV Asset Management May 2010 Executive Summary The performance of quantitative
More informationThe bottom-up beta of momentum
The bottom-up beta of momentum Pedro Barroso First version: September 2012 This version: November 2014 Abstract A direct measure of the cyclicality of momentum at a given point in time, its bottom-up beta
More informationAppendix. In this Appendix, we present the construction of variables, data source, and some empirical procedures.
Appendix In this Appendix, we present the construction of variables, data source, and some empirical procedures. A.1. Variable Definition and Data Source Variable B/M CAPX/A Cash/A Cash flow volatility
More informationMeasuring Performance with Factor Models
Measuring Performance with Factor Models Bernt Arne Ødegaard February 21, 2017 The Jensen alpha Does the return on a portfolio/asset exceed its required return? α p = r p required return = r p ˆr p To
More informationEconomic Fundamentals, Risk, and Momentum Profits
Economic Fundamentals, Risk, and Momentum Profits Laura X.L. Liu, Jerold B. Warner, and Lu Zhang September 2003 Abstract We study empirically the changes in economic fundamentals for firms with recent
More informationStatistical Understanding. of the Fama-French Factor model. Chua Yan Ru
i Statistical Understanding of the Fama-French Factor model Chua Yan Ru NATIONAL UNIVERSITY OF SINGAPORE 2012 ii Statistical Understanding of the Fama-French Factor model Chua Yan Ru (B.Sc National University
More informationFIN822 project 3 (Due on December 15. Accept printout submission or submission )
FIN822 project 3 (Due on December 15. Accept printout submission or email submission donglinli2006@yahoo.com. ) Part I The Fama-French Multifactor Model and Mutual Fund Returns Dawn Browne, an investment
More informationThe New Issues Puzzle
The New Issues Puzzle Professor B. Espen Eckbo Advanced Corporate Finance, 2009 Contents 1 IPO Sample and Issuer Characteristics 1 1.1 Annual Sample Distribution................... 1 1.2 IPO Firms are
More informationFinansavisen A case study of secondary dissemination of insider trade notifications
Finansavisen A case study of secondary dissemination of insider trade notifications B Espen Eckbo and Bernt Arne Ødegaard Oct 2015 Abstract We consider a case of secondary dissemination of insider trades.
More informationMomentum Crashes. Kent Daniel and Tobias Moskowitz. - Abstract -
April 12, 2013 Comments Welcome Momentum Crashes Kent Daniel and Tobias Moskowitz - Abstract - Across numerous asset classes, momentum strategies have historically generated high returns, high Sharpe ratios,
More informationVariation in Liquidity, Costly Arbitrage, and the Cross-Section of Stock Returns
Variation in Liquidity, Costly Arbitrage, and the Cross-Section of Stock Returns Badrinath Kottimukkalur * January 2018 Abstract This paper provides an arbitrage based explanation for the puzzling negative
More informationSize and Book-to-Market Factors in Returns
Utah State University DigitalCommons@USU All Graduate Plan B and other Reports Graduate Studies 5-2015 Size and Book-to-Market Factors in Returns Qian Gu Utah State University Follow this and additional
More informationMeasuring Factor Exposures: Uses and Abuses
The of The Voices of Influence iijournals.com Summer 2017 Volume 20 Number 1 www.iijai.com Measuring Factor Exposures: Uses and Abuses RONEN ISRAEL AND ADRIENNE ROSS Measuring Factor Exposures: Uses and
More informationThe Capital Asset Pricing Model
INTRO TO PORTFOLIO RISK MANAGEMENT IN PYTHON The Capital Asset Pricing Model Dakota Wixom Quantitative Analyst QuantCourse.com The Founding Father of Asset Pricing Models CAPM The Capital Asset Pricing
More informationB35150 Winter 2014 Quiz Solutions
B35150 Winter 2014 Quiz Solutions Alexander Zentefis March 16, 2014 Quiz 1 0.9 x 2 = 1.8 0.9 x 1.8 = 1.62 Quiz 1 Quiz 1 Quiz 1 64/ 256 = 64/16 = 4%. Volatility scales with square root of horizon. Quiz
More informationAn analysis of momentum and contrarian strategies using an optimal orthogonal portfolio approach
An analysis of momentum and contrarian strategies using an optimal orthogonal portfolio approach Hossein Asgharian and Björn Hansson Department of Economics, Lund University Box 7082 S-22007 Lund, Sweden
More informationRevisiting Idiosyncratic Volatility and Stock Returns. Fatma Sonmez 1
Revisiting Idiosyncratic Volatility and Stock Returns Fatma Sonmez 1 Abstract This paper s aim is to revisit the relation between idiosyncratic volatility and future stock returns. There are three key
More informationInternet Appendix for: Change You Can Believe In? Hedge Fund Data Revisions
Internet Appendix for: Change You Can Believe In? Hedge Fund Data Revisions Andrew J. Patton, Tarun Ramadorai, Michael P. Streatfield 22 March 2013 Appendix A The Consolidated Hedge Fund Database... 2
More informationShould Benchmark Indices Have Alpha? Revisiting Performance Evaluation. Martijn Cremers (Yale) Antti Petajisto (Yale) Eric Zitzewitz (Dartmouth)
Should Benchmark Indices Have Alpha? Revisiting Performance Evaluation Martijn Cremers (Yale) Antti Petajisto (Yale) Eric Zitzewitz (Dartmouth) How Would You Evaluate These Funds? Regress 3 stock portfolios
More informationThe Beta Anomaly and Mutual Fund Performance
The Beta Anomaly and Mutual Fund Performance Paul Irvine Texas Christian University Jue Ren Texas Christian University November 14, 2018 Jeong Ho (John) Kim Emory University Abstract We contend that mutual
More informationThe Effect of Kurtosis on the Cross-Section of Stock Returns
Utah State University DigitalCommons@USU All Graduate Plan B and other Reports Graduate Studies 5-2012 The Effect of Kurtosis on the Cross-Section of Stock Returns Abdullah Al Masud Utah State University
More informationModelling Stock Returns in India: Fama and French Revisited
Volume 9 Issue 7, Jan. 2017 Modelling Stock Returns in India: Fama and French Revisited Rajeev Kumar Upadhyay Assistant Professor Department of Commerce Sri Aurobindo College (Evening) Delhi University
More informationInexperienced Investors and Bubbles
Inexperienced Investors and Bubbles Robin Greenwood Harvard Business School Stefan Nagel Stanford Graduate School of Business Q-Group October 2009 Motivation Are inexperienced investors more likely than
More informationManager Comparison Report June 28, Report Created on: July 25, 2013
Manager Comparison Report June 28, 213 Report Created on: July 25, 213 Page 1 of 14 Performance Evaluation Manager Performance Growth of $1 Cumulative Performance & Monthly s 3748 3578 348 3238 368 2898
More informationAbsolving Beta of Volatility s Effects
Absolving Beta of Volatility s Effects by * Jianan Liu, Robert F. Stambaugh, and Yu Yuan First Draft: April 17, 2016 Abstract The beta anomaly negative (positive) alpha on stocks with high (low) beta arises
More informationALTERNATIVE MOMENTUM STRATEGIES. Faculdade de Economia da Universidade do Porto Rua Dr. Roberto Frias Porto Portugal
FINANCIAL MARKETS ALTERNATIVE MOMENTUM STRATEGIES António de Melo da Costa Cerqueira, amelo@fep.up.pt, Faculdade de Economia da UP Elísio Fernando Moreira Brandão, ebrandao@fep.up.pt, Faculdade de Economia
More informationBATSETA Durban Mark Davids Head of Pre-retirement Investments
BATSETA Durban 2016 Mark Davids Head of Pre-retirement Investments Liberty Corporate VALUE Dividend yield Earning yield Key considerations in utilising PASSIVE and Smart Beta solutions in retirement fund
More informationMomentum Crashes. Kent Daniel and Tobias Moskowitz. - Abstract -
Comments Welcome Momentum Crashes Kent Daniel and Tobias Moskowitz - Abstract - Across numerous asset classes, momentum strategies have historically generated high returns, high Sharpe ratios, and strong
More informationEconomic Policy Uncertainty and Momentum
Economic Policy Uncertainty and Momentum Ming Gu School of Economics and WISE Xiamen University guming@xmu.edu.cn Minxing Sun Department of Finance University of Memphis msun@memphis.edu Yangru Wu Rutgers
More informationHigh Dividend Stocks In Rising Interest Rate Environments
High Dividend Stocks In Rising Interest Rate Environments July 2016 Disclosure: This research is provided for educational purposes only and is not intended to provide investment or tax advice. All numbers
More information