Activity Appraisal Document NCICD II: Knowledge Management

Transcription

1 Activity Appraisal Document NCICD II: Knowledge Management I REQUESTED DECISION CONCERNS Explanation of the policy data can be found in the glossary attached to this document Activity number Name of activity Brief description Budget holder National Capital City Integrated Development Development Program (NCICD) phase II: Knowledge Development component Technical Assistance to the establishment of the knowledge development system of the implementing organisation of the NCICD Jakarta Date of receipt of application 8 oktober 2015 Implementing organisation(s) Stichting Deltares Legal relationship Decision Commitment in foreign currency (if applicable) Corporate rate Commitment in euros SBE nvt (inclusive IndonesianVAT if this is payable) 0611S02 (integraal waterbeheer) Activity start date 1 July 2016 Activity end date 30 November 2019 Contract start date 1 July 2016 Contract end date 30 May 2019 Aid modality Donor role Other aid Single donor Technical assistance TA= % of the activity budget Beneficiary s country/region Indonesia Countries within the region Indonesia (if applicable) Location within the country (be as specific as possible) Provinces of Jakarta, West Java and Name location(s) Coastal area Greater Jakarta Banten CRS Code Flood control & prevention 1

2 Policy marker weight is principal Policy marker weight is significant. Integrated Water Management (GnwWat) Climate Change Adaptation (KlmAdp) Research and Knowledge Development (Ondrzk) Special pledges made by the Minister or State Secretary Intensivering Water 2

3 II. ACTIVITY APPRAISAL 2.0 Background of the activity The National Capital City Integrated Coastal Development program has been developed jointly by the Netherlands and Indonesia as a response to the soil subsidence of North Jakarta and the growing risk of flooding of North Jakarta from the sea and rivers. This risk is aggravated by the effects of climate change (extreme weather, sea level rise). After the completion of the strategy to deal with this risk (Jakarta Coastal Development Strategy in 2012) a Masterplan to protect and develop the coastal areas of Jakarta has been produced in 2013 and 2014, culminating in the adoption of this Masterplan by the outgoing government in October 2014 and the launch of the implementation of phase A. This Masterplan includes the establishment of a dedicated Implementing Organisation. The Netherlands has committed itself to support the GoI in establishing the Implementing Organisation and in the implementation of the Masterplan. This support will consist of four components: a. General consultancy for overall program and project management including the conceptual and detailed design process for the main phase (B) of the program ( ). This support (subject of BeMo no 28427) will be recruited by way of a European tender through RVO (Programma Bureau Partners for Water) b. General consultancy for the support to the procurement and business development divisions and activities of the organization ( ). This support (subject of BeMo no 28888) will be equally recruited by way of a European tender through RVO. c. Support to the Knowledge Management division of the implementing organization in order to establish a suitable knowledge basis to take the investment decision in 2018 and program and design individual program activities ( ). This support will be provided by the Netherlands knowledge organization Deltares on the basis of its mandate for and experience with the knowledge management proces for the Netherlands Delta Plan. d. High level support to the CEO of the implementing organization and the procurement and business development divisions of the organization ( This support will be supplied on a G-G base by the detachering of staff of the Ministry of Environment & Infrastructure (financed by I&M). During the first 24 month of the duration of the components a, b and c the Netherlands support will focus on preparing the investment decision for the main component of the NCICD Masterplan in 2018 and the effective start of this implementation by mid The Netherlands will cooperate with Korea and Indonesia in this process. A clear definition of tasks has been agreed based on each party s added value and role in the process. This division of tasks will be formalized in a Tri Partite MoU which will be signed in the coming month. The present BeMo appraises component C of the Netherlands support to the Knowledge Management division of NCICD implementation ( ) as described in the proposal submitted by the Stichting Deltares(annex 1). The overall rationale for a knowledge management component in the Netherlands contribution to NCICD is manifold: -During the evaluation of the Masterplanning phase (by the End of Project Review, EOP, in 2014) it has been concluded that the Masterplan has been based on a very limited set of primary data and knowledge. The data base of the Masterplan needs to be strengthened before going into detailed 3

4 programming and design of phase. The knowledge component is to guide the building up of this Coastal Zone Date basis -NCICD is a long term program and therefore also a process. This process is surrounded by many uncertainties about crucial drivers of flood risks and environment degradation (rate of subsidence, rate of sea level rise, land use conditions in the upper part of Jakarta river basins etc.). A different type of knowledge is needed to deal with these uncertainties: identification of critical success factors, of (acceptable) performance indicators and of acceptable risk levels. -The experience of the Netherlands in planning long term water availability/safety programs in uncertain conditions which have many resemblances to the conditions in Indonesia and Jakarta; notably in the National Water Plan and the Delta decisions underlying it. -The considerable experience, knowledge and data acquired/stored by the Netherlands (Deltares, consultancy and contractor firms) on water management in Jakarta and conditions in the Bay of Jakarta. Combined with the need for capacity development within existing knowledge organizations (like the Water Management Centre (PUSAIR) of the Ministry of Public Works) knowledge management has been defined as one of the four main components of the Netherlands support to the NCICD Masterplan implementation Contribution made by the activity to BZ policy objectives (policy relevance) NCICD is above all a flood management and safety project in the north of the Greater Jakarta area, which constitutes a coastal delta of 13 smaller and larger rivers. Due to the land subsidence in 2025 approximately 2.5 million people will live 2.5 meter or more under sea level and are at severe risk from flooding from the sea. This number will increase to 4.5 million people living up to 5 meter under sea level in The NCICD has as its main objective the protection of the North of Jakarta against seafloods. The proposed activity should therefore be primarily assessed from the angle of a water management and flood safety project in a delta environment. The project fits in this sense into the policy objectives of the Ministry of Foreign Affairs as described in the Water for Development (letter of January 2012) notably the objective of the improvement of water management in Delta s. It also ties in well with the Agenda for Aid, Trade and Investments ( Wat de Wereld Verdient ) of 2013, also on safe delta s and on private sector development as well as the promotion of the internationalisation of the Netherlands private sector. The activity has been explicitly identified in the MJSP of the embassy Jakarta. The activity will be one of the core activities in the International Water Ambition 2016 of the Netherlands government (notably the Ministries of I&M, BZ and EZ) which targets safety in urban delta s as the core of the Netherlands international water ambition. Relevance of the proposed intervention to the crosscutting themes. Women s rights and gender equality: No gender specific approach in the program and in the Netherlands contribution to it (relevance 0 %) Climate: 4

5 The NCICD programme provides a comprehensive response to the impact of climate change on the water management issues of Jakarta notably the problem of sea level rise and of extreme weather events causing increased run-off, flooding by rivers and drainage congestion. NCICD will in this way increase the climate resilience of the city of Jakarta. It should however be realised that NCICD provides responses to a far broader range of environmental changes notable soil subsidence and deteriorating water quality which threaten the survival of the city. Relevance 40 % PSD: NCICD and the Netherlands technical support to it will create the conditions (transparency, security of investments and inclusion of private sector orientation in the NCICD organisation) for a strengthening of the role of the private sector in infrastructure development. The roles foreseen for Indonesian and international private sector companies and organisations in the actual implementation of the NCICD programme range from the implementation of works to concession holders and PPP constructions (like BOO, BOT BOOT). Given its size and broad scope the NCICD program will create the possibility for Indonesian companies to participate in consortia with international companies; this will contribute to transfer of knowledge and expertise. Relevance: 40 % Civil society organisations: The implementation of NCICD will have a major impact on the populations living in North Jakarta. Although the program will create safety from floods for the entire population, it will also affect specific groups by removal of existing settlements, limiting the access to the sea and the moving of industries inside the Bay area (on the long term). Civil society organisations will play an important role in voicing the interests of these groups (is already the experience). The Netherlands added value and role in these processes is however very limited, in particular in this knowledge component of the NL technical support. The government of Indonesia has always expressed that only the government and not NL technical support teams should communicate with the civil society as this are very politicized processes. For this reason the Netherland role regarding civil society organisations in Indonesia will be to advice, within the G-G cooperation, the Indonesian government in how to involve civil society in the program and the sharing of best practices from the Netherlands sie (e.g. involvement of environmental NGOs in the Maasvlakte II project). Relevance 0 % The degree of complementarity with other activities funded by BZ and the Rijksoverheid. In a more general sense the Netherlands support to NCICD is complementary to the overall objective of the Netherlands foreign and economic policy of strengthening the position of the Netherlands companies and sector organisation, notably of specific topsectors, abroad. The activity is complimentary to the efforts of the Ministry of Foreign Affairs to increase the water security world wide ( Wat de Wereld verdient ) notably in densely populated deltas ( veilige deltas : Letter Water for Development to Parliament, 2012). The activity is equally complementary to the interdepartmental programme Partners for Water (managed by I&M) which targets enhanced watersecurity in the selected urban delta-areas, among which Greater Jakarta, and already mentioned International Water Ambition. The relation with I&M, Partners for Water goes however far beyond complementarity but is based on intensive cooperation and coordination of the relevant programs in Indonesia. 5

6 At the level of the bilateral cooperation with Indonesia the activity is complementary (vice-versa) to: -other activities in the field of delta safety in Indonesia supported by the embassy, I&M, city of Rotterdam and the international window of the Netherlands Water Boards (Dutch Water Authorities, DWA) in Jakarta, Semarang, Pekalongan, Banjarmasin (planned), -the port (and maritime) development activities with Netherlands involvement in Jakarta (modernisation of Tanjung Priok, Port of Jakarta concept (O, P and Q islands), Semarang and potential other sites (Kendari, Makassar) -capacity development activities within the framework of MoU Water and specific programs like NICHE (coastal engineering program ), DUTEP (intern program Rotterdam/Waterboards- Jakarta -the cooperation between Netherlands and Indonesian knowledge institutes in the area of water management, notably the Joint Cooperation Program Appraisal. No. Criteria 2.1 Policy relevance Indicators ( score 0, 1, 2) Score The proposed intervention ties in with the operational objectives in the Explanatory Memorandum and the related policy memorandum (policy theory and intervention logic). The proposed intervention ties in with both the main objective and the secondary objectives. 2 The activity ties in with article 2 of the State Budget 2016 XVII Minister for Foreign Trade and Development Cooperation and specifically with secondary objective 2.2. Improved Water Management, sanitation and drinking water and secondary objective 2.3. Sustainable use of natural resources, mitigate climate change and enhanced resilience against unavoidable climate change The proposed intervention ties in with the ODA priorities The proposed intervention ties in with more than one of the result areas of the BH&OS priorities. 2 The activity also contributes directly to the priority result areas Strengthened Private Sector and Improved 6

7 Investment climate (article 1), Improved Water Management (2.2), Sustainable Use of Natural Resources & Climate change (2.3) The proposed intervention ties in with the annual plan and the result chain of the MIB/MASP The intervention is specifically mentioned in the result chain of the MIB/MASP. 2 MASP embassy The relevance of the proposed intervention to the crosscutting themes of women s rights and gender equality / climate / PSD / coherence and strengthening of civil society organisations The proposed intervention is relevant to more than one of the crosscutting themes. 2 See para of this BeMo Total score (maximum 8 out of 8 points) 8 EXPLANATION/REFERENCES 2.2 Problem analysis and lessons learned Description Need for a new organisation NCICD is a flood safety programme with investment costs of approximately US$ 8 billion. The program will generate opportunities for additional US$ 33 billion infrastructural and urban development investments in which the flood infrastructure can be integrated and which will largely be funded by the private sector. NCICD is, after the delivery and acceptance of the Masterplan, at present in transition from planning to implementation. The implementation of the program creates substantial funding, organizational and governance needs and challenges over a period of years. Effective institutional arrangements and capacities must be developed to ensure an effective and efficient delivery of the program. The main lesson learned in the period 2010 till present is however that the institutional and organisational embedding of the NCICD programme has been considerable at the level of steering mechanisms: echelon 1 coordination which has been very effective in getting policy and political support till 7

8 the end of 2014 (change of government). Real organisational development on the ground has however been lacking and the Masterplan preparation leant too much on consultancy inputs from the NL. Organisational development is therefore the key element in the Netherlands support to the NCICD implementation which will have as its general characteristic that it is support to a new NCICD organisation. Initial organisation By decision of a sub-council of the council of ministers in August 2016 the Ministry of Public Works and Housing has been appointed as the initial implementing body of the NCICD. For this purpose the Minister of Public Works and Housing (MPWH) has on 29 March 2016 issued a decision to create he Tim Persiapan Pembangunan Terpadu Pesisir Ibukota Negara (PTPIN), Preparation Tim for the NCICD, within the MPWH. This Preparation Team will have three main divisions which correspond with the three main division of the Dedicated Organisation mentioned in the project document and the institutional section of the Masterplan: Planning & Programming, Implementation and Technical Support (including knowledge). The knowledge component of the NCICD will be included in the Technical Support section and will be steered by the Research and Development wing of the MPWH organisation notably the Director of the Water R&D Centre (PUSAIR) and the DG General R&D of MPWH. Specific lessons learnt in the area of knowledge management Main lesson for the earlier NCICD projects (JCDS, NCICD masterplan) is that on the one hand the knowledge base for the formulation of the Masterplan has been relatively thin and that for detailed design and implementation a much broader and verified knowledge base will be essential on civil engineering related knowledge and data (soil, depth, subsidence rates etc) but also environmental and social data. On the other hand a lot of data exist and are being generated by the government agencies as part of the enthusiasm created by the NCICD process, but this data gathering is uncoordinated without common benchmarks, criteria, references and often stays within the line agencies who collect them. The main challenge for the knowledge division of the NCICD organisation is therefore to assure that relevant data sets are available for the taking of the investment decision by 2018, that qualified staff is available (capacity development) and that all stakeholders are willing to cooperate on gathering, sharing and using knowledge (NCICD as a learning organisation) Appraisal No. Criteria 2.2 Contextual analysis Indicators (score 0,1,2) Sc ore The proposal is based on a careful and thorough contextual analysis, from which a logical problem defini- 8 2 An elaborate analysis of the require-

9 tion and objective are generated. The proposal is based on and thorough analysis a in a logical problem defin objective. ment for the NCICD has been done as part of the PMU component of NCICD1. This analysis constitutes the basis for the shape of the NL support to the NCICD organisation a Based on the problem formulated, the proposal explains in a logical manner why the intervention is aimed at the specified geographical location. The proposal gives a realistic explanation of why the intervention is aimed at the specified geographical location and substantiates this with 2 Greater Jakarta. Self explanatory The proposal justifies the choice of target group. The proposal clearly justifies the choice of target group. 2 The Implementing Organisation of NCICD is the target group. Self explanatory The proposal sets out which relevant actors were involved in formulating the proposal and what influence they had on the content of the proposal. The proposal sets out the involvement of actors, both in formulating the proposal and in the proposed intervention (including its management). 2 The proposal has been based on the ToR for the Netherlands support to NCICD and the extensive organisational and stakeholder analysis of the NCICD masterplan A stakeholder analysis (incl. women and youth) has been carried out and the results incorporated in the 1 Stakeholder analysis has been carried out during 9

10 proposal. The proposal sets out w ho has a stake in the programme/project but their relative interests are no set out in detail. the Masterplanning phase and the Strategic planning phase (JCDS)howe ver not for specific social categories as women and youth The proposal describes how the results of evaluations and/or studies feed into formulation of the proposal. The proposal clearly sets out how results from evaluations and/or studies contributed to formulation of the proposal. 2 The proposal is based on the Masterplan NCICD and the observations of the End of Project Review Total score (maximum 12 out of 12 points) 11 10

11 2.3 Objectives (outcomes), results (outputs), activities and resources, based on the SMART principle Description The overall objective of the Knowledge Management component of the NL support to NCICD is to develop and implement the NCICD Knowledge Management System based on the principles of the learning organisation. The project document elaborates this overall objective into four specific objectives: -NCICD knowledge management strategy developed -critical knowledge gaps for NCICD have been filled up by technical studies -Coastal Zone Date Base for Greater Jakarta created -Indonesian, Netherlands and international knowledge institutes involved in NCICD knowledge development activities. In a logical framework these objectives have been elaborated in a set of results, (partly) quantified outputs and activities Appraisal No. Criteria 2.3 Outcomes, outputs, activities and resources based on the SMART principle Explanation of score (1 point per indicator) Score The objectives at outcome level are clearly formulated, fall within the proposal s span of influence and are realistic. The outcomes follow logically from the problem formulated. The outcomes are specifically formulated. The objectives follow logically from the problem formulated. The objectives fall within the proposal's span of influence and are realistic (taking account of its duration and local circumstances). The objectives are acceptable to the target group and other stakeholders. The objectives formulated are realistic bearing in mind the scope of the activities and the capacity of the (local) organisation(s). 5 Refer to the result framework of the document Description of the services of the General Consultant (mei 2016) and the specific logframe of the Knowledge Management of NCICD proposal. Instead of outcomes however the overall result framework 11

12 refers to NCICD key tasks to be realised Progress in achieving the outcomes can be determined objectively on the basis of measurable performance indicators. Relevant performance indicators have been formulated for each outcome. A baseline measurement and a measurable target (quantitative and/or qualitative) have been formulated for each performance indicator. 2 Refer to the Logframe in the project document The verification method (the means by which data is collected and the sources of that data) is realistic and feasible The outputs formulated are concrete and fall within the proposal s span of control. The outputs follow logically from the outcomes formulated. The project proposal is divided into clear phases, each having concretely formulated outputs. The outputs are specific. 4 idem There is a clear link between the outputs and the out-comes, i.e. the outputs can be expected to contribute to achievement of the outcomes. The outputs are acceptable to the target group and other stakeholders. The outputs formulated are realistic bearing in mind the scope of the activities and the capacity of the (local) organisation(s) Progress in achieving the outputs can be determined objectively on the basis of measurable performance indicators. Relevant performance indicators have been formulated for each output. 2 Yes, in the logframe. 12

13 A baseline and a measurable target (quantitative and/or qualitative) have been formulated for each performance indicator. The verification method (the means by which data is collected and the sources of that data) is realistic and feasible There is a logical link between the proposed activities and the outputs formulated. The proposal sets out the nature of the activities and explains how the activities formulated will contribute to achieving the outputs There is a logical link between the activities and the project budget (efficiency). The budget is supported by figures on price and quantity (p x q). 1 The budget is broken down by output and/or outcome When the activity ends, its envisaged outputs will have a lasting effect for the ultimate target group. The proposal contains a clear vision (with objectives) as to how the activities will be continued when the intervention comes to an end. To achieve these objectives, specific measures will be taken during implementation of the activities to ensure that the target group will help continue the activities. The proposal includes a transition plan or exit strategy, identifying the various actors. The proposal contains suitable criteria against which progress in continuing the activities can be measured. 4 The central objective of the knowledge component is the institutionalizaton of and the strengthening of knowledge management within the NCICD organisation. The project document is logically and pragmatically geared in its concrete objectives and activities to the realization of the central objective. No real exit 13

14 strategy has been formulated as this is largely a capacity development activity At the end of the activity, the envisaged outputs will have a lasting effect on the local partners. The proposal contains a clear vision (with objectives) as to how the quality of the activi-ties and/or financial inde-pendence of the local partner will be enhanced. To achieve these objectives, specific measures will be taken during implementation of the activity. 3 Given the focus of the programme on the establishment of the implementing organisation for NCICD this is the core area of the activitity The proposal devotes attention to the capacity of the local partner to generate income from various sources. The proposal sets out suitable criteria against which progress in regard to institutional sustainability can be measured. Total score (maximum score 27 points) 22 EXPLANATION/ REFERENCES The logframe of the activity is to be made more smart with more precise outcomes, output and performance indicators. As the proces of starting up the NCICD (organisation) is still ongoing it is not feasible and to desirable to do this now. This is to be done in the detailed activity plan to be presented within three month after the start of the activity. 14

15 2.4 Cooperation, harmonisation and added value The activity is part of a long term collaboration between the (central and Jakarta) governments, private sector organisations and knowledge institutes of the Netherlands and Indonesia on urban flooding and coastal protection & development on the North Coast of Java, notably Jakarta. This cooperation is directed by the Netherlands Embassy & the Ministry of Foreign Affairs, the Ministry of Infrastructure & Environment and Ministry of Economic Affairs within the framework of the Delta-program Indonesia with coordination structures in the Hague, Jakarta and by weekly meetings of the regieteam (directing team). With the Indonesian government coordination takes place at the level of regular meetings. Originally these were organised by the Ministry of Coordination of Economic Development at Echelon 1 and 2 level. Recently the MPWH took over this task, however largely at echelon 2 level. It is expected that after the establishment of a new Steering committee (Tim Pengarah) for NCICD the level of discussion will be raised again to Echelon 1. The added value of the cooperation in the field of Water Management and Coastal Protection in Greater Jakarta is very high given the general expertise of the Netherlands in water management, in integrating water management in broader governance and in infrastructure development and water management in Greater Jakarta. Given the scope and size of the program the embassy and Indonesia has for a long time tried to involve other bilateral and international development partners. For reasons of complementarity Japan was sought after but subsequent to contact between the Ministry of I&M and its Korean counterpart and a request by the GoI to Korea, Korea has become a partner in NCICD. An initial letter of intents was signed in September 2015 between Korea and the Netherlands with the purpose of elaborating the modalities of cooperation and defining a distribution of tasks. A trilateral MoU (RI, NL, Korea) is almost ready for signing now, supported by specific ToRs for NL and Korean input. The Korean ToR was jointly developed by Korea and the NL 2.5 Channel and aid modality (including alignment) The chosen aid modality of direct bilateral aid is most appropriate given the Aid to Trade agenda, the strong added value of the Netherlands in the specific area and the wishes of the Indonesian government. The aid modality is appropriate for mobilizing this Netherlands contribution. The Netherlands will only provide technical support and advice to NCICD; all capital expenditure for the project is done by the Indonesian government and private sector. The alignment of the activity with the policy of the central and local (Jakarta) government has always been high. After the change of central and local government in the end of the 2014 there has been a period of policy reconsideration regarding the NCICD project (while the implementation of phase A went ahead). The meeting of the under-council of the council of ministers in August 2015 confirmed the intention of the new government to go ahead with NCICD. However political insecurity continued till April 2016 among others by the identification of the project with the, often criticized, 17 islands reclamation activities in the Bay of Jakarta. Only in April 2016 the president made a clear statement in favour of the NCICD project and the political basis for actual project implementation was created. V. IMPLEMENTATION 5.1 Budget Breakdown of costs In the budget presented by Deltares a breakdown of the cost per output has not been provided. Given the fact that the main input into the project is the advisory capacity (man month + tickets and DSA, about 80 % of the costs) and that this input is provided by a very limited number of ad- 15

16 visors, such a break down would be of limited value. The recipient will however be asked to provide for such an overview when presenting its detailed plan of action (inception report). The tariffs of the Deltares experts are high but these are the tariffs which have been agreed with the Netherlands government (see also the Financial Proposal of Deltares). The embassy has consulted with the water-division of IGG-DGIS (Karin Roelofs) who has assured that the ministry never managed to get these tariffs reduced. In the case of this project Deltares gave a somewhat symbolic reduction. 5.3 Monitoring 16

17 5.3.1 Narrative and financial reports Use the performance assessment decision tree. Organisational capacity Activity-related risks Scale of the activity Required for performance assessment Inadequate Outcome 1 Not applicable (do not work with this party NO Very poor/ poor High/ moderate Outcome 2 Audit opinion + report of findings + additional measures NO NO > EUR 500,000 Outcome 3 Audit opinion + report of findings Low < EUR 500,000 Outcome 4 Narrative and financial reports * Adequate High/ moderate > EUR 5 mln. > EUR 500,000 Outcome 5 Audit opinion + report of findings + additional measures + final evaluation of efficiency and effectiveness Outcome 6 Additional measures NO < EUR 500,000 Outcome 7 Narrative and financial reports * > EUR 5 mln. Outcome 8 Audit opinion + report of findings + final evaluation of efficiency and effectiveness Low < EUR 5 mln. Outcome 9 Narrative and financial reports 17

18 5.3.2 Audit opinion Not applicable IATI - International Aid transparency Initiative Deltares is registering for IATI and will has indicated that it will comply with the IATI standards Annual plans and other reports Given the incertitudes in the institutional and policy environment of the activity regular reports will be requested from Deltars Monitoring calendar Set out the reporting requirements in the table below, to ensure they are accurately incorporated in the decision/agreement. Soort rapportage Betreft de periode: Uiterste datum van inlevering Inceptierapport 1 juli mei september 2016 Jaarplan en jaarbegroting 1 jan dec jan dec jan mei november november november 2018 Inhoudelijke voortgangsrapportage bestaand uit: 1. Periodieke updates van de inhoudelijke voortgang volgens de IATI standaard zoals beschreven in de BZ/ DGIS Reporting Guidelines 1 jul sep okt dec jan mar apr jun jul sep okt dec jan mar apr jun jul sep okt dec jan mar apr mei jan apr jul okt jan apr jul okt jan apr jul sep Jaarlijks inhoudelijk analytisch voortgangsoverzicht volgens de IATI standaard zoals beschreven in de BZ/ DGIS Reporting Guidelines, te publiceren in IATI onder related documents / document link 3. Eind inhoudelijk analytisch voortgangsoverzicht volgens de IATI standaard zoals beschreven in de BZ/ DGIS Reporting Guidelines, 1 jul dec jan dec jan dec jan mei jul mei apr apr apr nov 2019* 1 dec

19 te publiceren in IATI onder related documents / document link Jaarlijkse financiële voortgangsrapportage 1 jul dec jan dec jan dec jan mei apr apr apr nov 2019* Financiële eindrapportage 1 jul mei nov 2019 Gecombineerd met eindrapport Evaluations 19

20 Decision tree evaluations The evaluation is part of the central evaluation programme? Justification in the evaluation programme; decision by the SG/DG after being advised by the Audit Committee NO The evaluatie is a pledge to parliament? NO To be carried out in consultation with IOB Helpdesk (ToR, engaging of evaluation expertise). Evaluation is planned based on the fact that: a. the activity s financial value is more than 5 million; or b. the activity is strategically important to the achievement of outcomes underpinning the policy objective of a policy theme department; or c. there are political risks/interests attached to the activity. Explanation in the Activity Appraisal Document (BEMO) after consultation with the policy theme department. To be carried out in consultation with IOB Helpdesk (ToR, engaging of evaluation expertise). NO No evaluation 20