Transportation Improvement Program. 2018/ /23 Adopted June 14, 2018

Transcription

1 Transportation Improvement Program 2018/ /23 Adopted June 14, 2018 TP

2 Table of Contents Endorsement...2 Organization and Staff Members...3 INTRODUCTION Purpose... 7 How to Use the TIP... 7 Project Selection...8 Project Priority Statement...8 Transportation Improvement Program Schedule...9 Congestion Management Process Consistency with Other Plans Public Involvement Certification Regionally Significant Projects Financial Plan...12 Fiscal Constraint Table...12 Performance Management Polk TPO Priority Projects...17 Five Year TIP Fund Summary...21 Federally Obligated Funded Projects FY Transportation Disadvantaged Element LISTING OF STATE AND LOCAL TRANSPORTATION PROJECTS Highways...51 Turnpike...73 Transportation Planning...75 Aviation...79 Rail...83 Transit Intermodal Florida Rail Enterprise APPENDIX Appendix A - State and Federal Fund Codes...87 Appendix B - Polk Transportation Projects Guide Appendix C - Local Capital Improvement Plans Appendix D - Public Comments Appendix E - TIP Amendements TP Polk TPO Transportation Improvement Program TIP - Adopted June 14, 2018 Page 1

3 Endorsement Mayor Pro Tem Nat Birdsong Chairman Polk Transportation Planning Organization Prepared by the Polk Transportation Planning Organization with funding from the Federal Highway Administration (CFDA No Highway Planning and Construction), Federal Transit Administration (CFDA No Federal Transit Technical Studies Grant Metropolitan Planning), Florida Department of Transportation, and Polk County. The contents of this report do not necessarily reflect the official views or policies of the U.S. Department of Transportation. Polk TPO Transportation Improvement Program TIP - Adopted June 14, 2018 Page 2 TP

4 Transportation Planning Organization Board Polk County Commissioner Melony Bell Commissioner Todd Dantzler Commissioner John Hall Commissioner George Lindsey Commissioner Bill Braswell City of Lakeland Mayor Bill Mutz Commissioner Bill Read Commissioner Michael Dunn Commissioner Justin Troller Commissioner Phillip Walker Commissioner Scott Franklin City of Winter Haven Mayor Pro-Tem Nat Birdsong Commissioner William Twyford Commissioner J.P. Powell, Alt. City of Auburndale Commissioner Keith Cowie City of Haines City Commissioner Roy Tyler City of Lake Wales Mayor Eugene Fultz South County Block Mayor Rodney Cannon, Frostproof Commissioner Barbara Manley, Fort Meade Vice Mayor Collins Smith, Mulberry East County Block Mayor Marlene Wagner, Lake Hamilton Mayor Charles Lake, Lake Alfred Commissioner Willie Quarles, Dundee Commissioner Michael Burdelak, Eagle Lake Commissioner Robert Lynch, Davenport Mayor Joe LaCascia, Polk City City of Bartow Commissioner Patrick Huff TP Polk TPO Transportation Improvement Program TIP - Adopted June 14, 2018 Page 3

5 Technical Advisory Committee Chairperson, Amy Palmer, City of Auburndale Vice-Chairperson, Doug Leonard, Town of Lake Hamilton City of Auburndale Amy Palmer, Designee for City Manager Central Florida Regional Planning Council Jennifer Codo-Salisbury, Designee City of Bartow Bob Wiegers, Designee for City Manager City of Davenport Ramon Perez, Designee for City Manager City of Eagle Lake Tom Ernharth, City Manager City of Fort Meade Fred Hillard, City Manager City of Frostproof Nicole McDowell, Designee for City Manager Jeff Schmucker, Alternate City of Haines City Addie Javed, Designee for City Manager Joseph Ruiz, Alternate Lakeland Area Mass Transit District Rod Wetzel, Designee for Director City of Lake Alfred Amee Bailey, Designee for City Manager City of Lakeland Chuck Barmby, Transportation Planner Teresa Miao, Planning Manager Angelo Rao, Traffic Operations Manager City of Polk City Kathy Delp, Designee Jennifer Codo-Salisbury, Alternate Polk County John Bohde, Land Development Division Director Bill Skelton, Designee for Polk County Transportation Director Polk County School Board Jerry Rodriguez Pam Luce, Alternate City of Winter Haven Sean Byers, Designee for City Manager Merle Bishop, Alternate City of Auburndale Amy Palmer, Designee for City Manager Town of Dundee Deena Ware, Designee for City Manager City of Lake Wales Kathy Bangley, Designee for City Manager Town of Lake Hamilton Doug Leonard, Designee for Town Manager City of Mulberry Richard Johnson, City Manager Polk TPO Transportation Improvement Program TIP - Adopted June 14, 2018 Page 4 TP

6 Adviser Network The TPO s Transportation Adviser Network is comprised of 323 members (as of April 2018) that represent a broad, diverse cross-section of Polk County residents and interested parties. The Advisor Network s purpose is to function as an alternate mechanism for citizen involvement with the objective of increasing public involvement, especially by members of minority and low-income households. Formed through community outreach efforts of the TPO, the Adviser Network provides a less formal, more extensive structure than the TPO s traditional Citizens Advisory Committee (CAC) for soliciting public participation and comment. The Adviser Network includes current and former transportation industry professionals, people who serve on various boards and committees around the area and people between the ages of 23 to 82. The following municipalities are represented with membership on the Adviser Network: Auburndale, Bartow, Davenport, Frostproof, Haines City, Lake Alfred, Lake Wales, Lakeland, Mulberry, Poinciana, Polk City and Winter Haven. Beyond Polk County, there is representation from the following communities in Central and West Central Florida: Clermont, Kissimmee, Orlando, Safety Harbor, Tampa and Wesley Chapel. TP Polk TPO Transportation Improvement Program TIP - Adopted June 14, 2018 Page 5

7 Polk Transportation Planning Organization Staff Polk TPO Board Adviser Network Technical Advisory Committee Executive Director Tom Deardorff Title VI and ADA Nondiscrimination Compliance Office Manager I Annette Crews Director Ronnie Blackshear TPO Administrator Ryan Kordek Communication Specialist Tina Mann Web Programmer Analyst Judi Ashlock Senior Trans. Planner Diane Slaybaugh Senior Trans. Planner Vacant Senior Trans. Planner/Bilingual Vacant Senior Trans. Planner Julia Davis Trans. Planner Vacant Title VI and ADA Officer Approved AC Polk TPO Transportation Improvement Program TIP - Adopted June 14, 2018 Page 6 TP

8 INTRODUCTION PURPOSE The purpose of the Transportation Improvement Program (TIP) is to provide a prioritized list of all transportation projects in Polk County funded from federal and state sources over the next five year period. Projects are programmed by FDOT and are consistent with the Polk Transportation Planning Organization s (TPO) adopted long-range transportation plan (LRTP) and priority transportation projects. Projects in the TIP cover all modes of transportation and include locally funded and managed transportation projects, as well as regionally significant projects (regardless of funding source) and may be capital or non-capital projects. On an annual basis the Polk TPO adopts the TIP to include projects programmed in the new outer year and maintains the document throughout the year to ensure projects remain eligible to receive federal funding under the Fixing America s Surface Transportation (FAST) Act. The TIP is a financially feasible program and displays the priorities of multi-modal transportation improvement projects as adopted by state and local governments and transit agencies in Polk County. The TIP is developed through a continuing, comprehensive, and cooperative (3C) effort involving state and local agencies, including public transit agencies, with responsibility for planning, constructing, operating and maintaining public transportation infrastructure, services and programs. HOW TO USE THE TIP The TIP is a document prepared by the TPO which lists all of the cost feasible projects scheduled for a five year period which correspond to the Momentum 2040 LRTP. Projects in the TIP are listed by sections: Pedestrian/Bicycle, Turnpike, Highways, Transit, Maintenance, Aviation, Florida Rail Enterprise, Transportation Planning and Intermodal. The normal project production sequence is to have a Project Development and Environment (PD&E) phase, a Design (PE) phase, a Right of Way (ROW) phase and a Construction (CST) phase. Some projects may not have a ROW phase if land is not needed to complete the project. To download a copy of Polk TPO s tip, visit For a graphical depiction of our TIP, visit TP Polk TPO Transportation Improvement Program TIP - Adopted June 14, 2018 Page 7

9 INTRODUCTION Project costs shown on the TIP pages will include historical costs for five years prior to the current TIP and five years beyond the current TIP. The total shown may not be the total cost of the project depending on when the project began and/or when it is scheduled to be completed. If the CST phase is not on the TIP page then the entry will probably not be reflective of the total project cost. For some projects such as a resurfacing, safety, or operational project there may not be a total cost provided but rather additional details on that program. Strategic Intermodal System (SIS) facilities make up a network of high priority transportation facilities which includes the state s largest and most significant commercial service airports, spaceport, deep water seaports, freight rail terminals, passenger rail and inter-city bus terminals, rail corridors, waterways and highways. All projects on the SIS will have a SIS identifier on the TIP page and projects not on the SIS will have a Non-SIS identifier. PROJECT SELECTION The Polk TPO begins the priority project selection process in the late fall by soliciting project applications from local governments and public transportation agencies. TPO staff coordinates a workshop with local jurisdictions to introduce the project selection process and provide information to interested parties. Through a sub-committe comprised of members from the Adviser Network and Technical Advisory Committee, the TPO begins the evaluation of project applications. The sub-committee scores the projects based on criteria adopted by the TPO Board and then ranks the projects in order of priority. This process is conducted in accordance with federal requirements in the TPO planning process. Polk TPO Transportation Improvement Program TIP - Adopted June 14, 2018 Page 8 TP

10 INTRODUCTION PROJECT PRIORITY STATEMENT A list of priority projects is presented to the TPO Board for adoption and submitted to FDOT for use in developing the new fifth year of the Five-Year Work Program. All priority projects are consistent with the TPO s adopted long-range transportation plan. In an effort to meet performance measures, TPO encourages applicants to focus on safety pedestrian/bicycle projects resulting from recent planning studies conducted by TPO. TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM SCHEDULE The FDOT issued a directive on TIP development and review on March 15, This directive specifies a schedule for submission of the TIP to the Governor and federal agencies. Adopted TIP documents must be submitted to FDOT each year by July 15. The TPO will continue to prepare a list of Priority Transportation Projects for adoption by the TPO Board and will submit the list to FDOT by July 1 each year. The succeeding Tentative Work Program will be used for the annual update of the TIP. The state fiscal year runs from July 1 through June 30. In contrast, the fiscal year for Polk County and all of the local governments extends from October 1 through September 30. The Comprehensive Improvement Plans (CIPs) for Polk County and the local governments are not completely developed by the time the TIP is adopted, so additional information regarding new projects in local CIPs and for the TD element must be added to the TIP as an amendment at a later date. DISCLAIMER: The Total Project Cost amount displayed for each of the federal and state funded projects in the TIP represents 10 years of programming in the Florida Department of Transportation s (FDOT s) Work Program database. The Total Project Cost is included for projects on the Strategic Intermodal System (SIS) (FYs 2018 through 2027), and 5 years of programming in the FDOT Work Program for non-sis projects (FYs 2018 through 2022), plus historical cost information for all projects having expenditures paid by FDOT prior to FY2018. For a more comprehensive view of a particular project s anticipated total project cost for all phases of the project please refer to the LRTP. TP Polk TPO Transportation Improvement Program TIP - Adopted June 14, 2018 Page 9

11 CONGESTION MANAGEMENT PROCESS INTRODUCTION As part of the TPO s Long-Range Transportation Plan (LRTP), MOMENTUM 2040, significant Transportation Management Area (TMA) funding is provided to support the congestion management and related complete street improvements. Improvements resulting from the Congestion Management Process can include a full range of activies -- from demand management and multimodal improvements that reduce auto usage -- to significant intersection and roadway expansion projects. Key focus areas for the Congestion Management Process include: Constrained Roadways: These are roadways where additional widening projects are not feasible due to environmental, community or policy constraints. Unfunded Needs: The unfunded needs reflects corridors that were planned for improvement in the 2035 cost feasible plan but are not cost feasible in Momentum Freight Hot Spots: Adressing specific areas a of freight and goods movement operation deficiencies. CONSISTENCY WITH OTHER PLANS The projects included in the TIP are consistent with adopted short and longrange transportation plans, as well as the master plans of other agencies and jurisdictions in Polk County. Transportation projects which involve federal participation are also consistent with the Momentum 2040, an applicable transit development plan, or airport master plan. Transit projects programmed for Lakeland Area Mass Transit District (LAMTD) and Winter Haven Area Transit (WHAT) are consistent with the Polk Consolidated Transit Development Plan (TDP) and the Transportation Disadvantaged Service Plan (TSDP). Projects are also reviewed to ensure their consistency with adopted Comprehensive Plans of local governments in Polk County. Should a change in project funding, scope or limit arise, the TPO amends the TIP through a TIP amendment process. This process mirrors the same procedures required for developing and adopting the TIP. The TPO Polk TPO Transportation Improvement Program TIP - Adopted June 14, 2018 Page 10 TP

12 INTRODUCTION presents amendments in the TIP at regularly scheduled TPO Board meetings and public notices are published in the local newspaper. Social media is also used to promote the public hearing, as well as our list of contacts from the Adviser Network. Final approval of amendments is done via a roll call vote consistent with subsection (13) F.S. PUBLIC INVOLVEMENT In accordance with the TPO s Public Participation Plan, a public notice was published in the Ledger on April 30, 2018 to open a 30-day comment period and to notice the June 14, 2018 public hearing. An was sent to our Adviser Network prior to the June 14, 2018 public hearing explaining the TIP process with information on how to comment on the draft TIP. In addition, the TPO used the notices to route followers to our Community Remarks TIP Public Involvement website. The TIP website has collected 85 public comments. Of the total comments, 48 were related to Bicycle/ Pedestrian improvements and 35 related to Highway/Intersection improvements. Under the Bicycle/Pedestrian related comments, project number Fort Fraser over SR 60 Project received the most public support. Public comments are included as Appendix D. CERTIFICATION A joint review of the TPO s planning process is conducted each year with FDOT. The currently adopted certification review was completed on February 16, The purpose of this review is to evaluate the effectiveness of the planning process and to determine its compliance with applicable federal and state requirements. This joint review was conducted as part of the development of the FY 2018/ /20 UPWP. The referenced parties jointly certify, pursuant to Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) Section , Metropolitan Transportation Planning Process: Certification, that the metropolitan transportation planning process in the Lakeland/Winter Haven Urbanized Areas is addressing the major issues facing the area and is being conducted in accordance with all applicable requirements. REGIONALLY SIGNIFICANT PROJECTS I-4 at CR 557: Interchange Reconstruction Project Construction funded in Fiscal Year SR 542 From Buckeye Loop Road to US 27: Widen add lanes - Construction funded in Fiscal Year TP Polk TPO Transportation Improvement Program TIP - Adopted June 14, 2018 Page 11

13 INTRODUCTION FINANCIAL PLAN Projects in the TIP are financially constrained each fiscal year. The projects identified in the TIP can be implemented using current and proposed revenue sources that are reasonably expected to be in place when needed. Existing and anticipated revenues are the basis for the FDOT Work Program and local Capital Improvement Plans (CIP). The TIP includes highway, transit, aviation, bicycle and pedestrian facilities, multi-use trails, and funded transportation programs for the transportation disadvantaged (TD). The TIP also contains support from FHWA and FTA for projects related to interstate construction, interstate maintenance programs, and fixed guide-way modernization. The Five Year TIP Fund Summary is a document provided by the FDOT which includes total State and Federal Revenues in prior years as well as future years. Information from FDOT s Five Year TIP Fund Summary and the Polk TPO s interactive TIP Fund Source Summary was used to create the chart below which shows fiscal constraint. In accordance with planning regulations, TPO projects included in the TIP are presented in Year of Expenditure (YOE) dollars meaning they are already adjusted for inflation. YOE dollars are dollars that are adjusted for inflation from the present time to the expected year of construction. FISCAL CONSTRAINT TABLE $1,800 $1,600 $1,400 $1,200 $1,000 $800 $600 $400 $200 $0 < >2023 All Years Total State and Federal Revenues $493,600,395 $127,725,323 $410,824,479 $184,480,545 $96,813,188 $49,509,154 $285,663,508 $1,648,616,592 Total Expenditures for Programmed Projects $409,730,053 $127,725,323 $410,824,479 $184,480,545 $96,813,188 $49,509,154 $285,663,508 $1,564,746,250 *Funds are rounded and shown in millions. Polk TPO Transportation Improvement Program TP TIP - Adopted June 14, 2018 Page 12

14 INTRODUCTION PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT Performance Management is a strategic approach to connect investment and policy decisions to help achieve performance goals. Performance measures are quantitative criteria used to evaluate progress. Performance measure targets are the benchmarks against which collected data is gauged. The Moving Ahead for Progress in the 21st Century Act (MAP-21) requires State DOTs and MPOs to conduct performance-based planning by tracking performance measures and setting data-driven targets to improve those measures. Performance-based planning ensures the most efficient investment of federal transportation funds by increasing accountability, transparency, and providing for better investment decisions that focus on key outcomes related to seven national goals: Improving Safety; Maintaining Infrastructure Condition; Reducing Traffic Congestion; Improving the Efficiency of the System and Freight Movement; Protecting the Environment; and, Reducing Delays in Project Delivery. The Fixing America s Surface Transportation (FAST) Act supplements the MAP-21 legislation by establishing timelines for State DOTs and MPOs to comply with the requirements of MAP-21. State DOTs are required to establish statewide targets and MPOs have the option to support the statewide targets or adopt their own. The Polk TPO s TIP includes specific investment priorities for System, Bridge and Pavement Performance which are based on the TPO s Goals, Performance Objectives, Policies and Targets that were adopted as part of Momentum The TIP also includes projects that are supportive of FDOT s Asset Management and Freight Plans. Pursuant to the TPO s requirements related to the Federal Performance Management Process, the Polk TPO will work with FDOT, our member local governments and modal partners in developing additional targets for System, Bridge and Pavement Performance, as well as specific targets in support of the State Asset Management and Freight Plans. SAFETY PERFORMANCE Safety is the first national goal identified in the FAST Act. In March of 2016, the Highway Safety Improvement Program (HSIP) and Safety Performance Management Measures Rule (Safety PM Rule) was finalized and published in the Federal Register. The rule requires MPOs to set targets for the following safety-related performance measures and report progress to the State DOT: Fatalities; Serious Injuries; Nonmotorized Fatalities and Serious Injuries; Rate of Fatalities per 100M Vehicle Miles Traveled (VMT); and Rate of Serious Injuries per 100M VMT. TP Polk TPO Transportation Improvement Program TIP - Adopted June 14, 2018 Page 13

15 INTRODUCTION The 2016 Florida Strategic Highway Safety Plan (SHSP) is the statewide plan focusing on how to accomplish the vision of eliminating fatalities and reducing serious injuries on all public roads. The SHSP was developed in coordination with Florida s 27 MPOs through Florida s Metropolitan Planning Organization Advisory Council (MPOAC). The SHSP development process included review of safety-related goals, objectives, and strategies in MPO plans. The SHSP guides FDOT, MPOs, and other safety partners in addressing safety and defines a framework for implementation activities to be carried out throughout the State. The Florida SHSP and the Florida Transportation Plan (FTP) both highlight the commitment to a vision of zero deaths. The FDOT Florida Highway Safety Improvement Program (HSIP) annual report documents the statewide interim performance measures toward that zero deaths vision. Based on the Polk TPO s adopted goal of safe, fatality-free travel conditions on Polk County roads, on February 1, 2018, the Polk TPO approved TPO Resolution that adopts FDOT s statewide HSIP interim safety performance measures and 2018 Safety Performance Targets which set the target at 0 for each performance measure to reflect the Department s goal of zero deaths. TPO S PROGRESS TOWARDS MEETING SAFETY TARGETS The TPO s Momentum 2040 longrange transportation plan has a stated goal of zero deaths on Polk County roads by eliminating all traffic, bicycle and pedestrian fatalities by the year 2040 and annually these crashes will be reduced. In support of this goal, Momentum 2040 conducted several studies to help identify candidate projects that could be implemented for helping to achieve this goal. These include the TPO s Complete Street Program, Neighborhood Mobility Audits, Safe Routes to School, and Bicycle and Pedestrian Safety Action Plans. As a result of these studies and in coordination with the TPO s member local governments, nearly $15M worth of projects recommended from these plans and programs have been prioritized by the TPO as part of our annual priority setting process and are included in the TIP. Specifically, these projects consist of sidewalks, bicycle facilities, transit shelters, turn lane and intersection improvements, crosswalks, lighting, and multi-use trails. These projects were targeted for many of the worst corridors in Polk County in terms of traffic, bicycle and pedestrian injuries and fatalities, e.g., CR 655 (Rifle Range Rd), State Road 659 (Combee Rd), Wabash Ave, State Road 549 (1st Street), and US 17/92 (Haines City). Polk TPO Transportation Improvement Program TIP - Adopted June 14, 2018 Page 14 TP

16 Following the adoption of the TPO s Momentum 2040, the TPO Board supported these programs by directing a significant portion of the Transportation Management Area (TMA) - SU funds that are allocated to the Lakeland and Winter Haven TMAs towards candidate projects from these referenced plans and programs. In addition, these funds have been targeted for other safety and multimodal related projects including intersection and operational improvements identified through the congestion management process, bicycle and pedestrian projects, transit facility enhancements, safety projects and road resurfacing supplements on the state highway system (funding to make multimodal, safety or intersection improvements concurrent with routine resurfacing of the roadway). Another noteworthy priority safety project of the TPO which is included in the TIP is a Supplemental Safe Routes to Schools Education Program. The purpose of the project is to supplement the SRTS safety education currently offered by the Polk County School Board for kindergarten through eighth grade students per school year. The School Board currently has the resources to provide approximately one week of bicycle and pedestrian safety education per school year. The project s goal is to increase this to two weeks per year while addressing the types of bicycle and pedestrian crashes that are prevalent in Polk County. This project is scheduled to be underway in FY 2018/19 and will help the FDOT and TPO meet each agency s stated safety targets in Polk County. In addition to the planning and programming of safety projects, beginning in 2017 the TPO placed a significant effort in conducting public outreach in support of the TPO s Pledge to Slow Down Campaign. TPO staff attended many community groups and civic organizations throughout Polk County to get the message out about the campaign to increase awareness and enhance safety on Polk County s roads. Staff prepared educational materials explaining the importance and added safety benefits of slowing down. Staff attended City and County Commission meetings TP Polk TPO Transportation Improvement Program TIP - Adopted June 14, 2018 Page 15

17 throughout the County to solicit support which led to proclamations establishing June 2017 as Pledge to Slow Down month. With the help of Polk County s PGTV the TPO filmed several public service announcements by some of the TPO s board members and local law enforcement. These materials and information are intended to be portable so they could be used by other transportation planning agencies outside of Polk County if needed. These PSAs, as well as additional information can be found on the TPO s Pledge to Slow Down Website: Another example of the different methods employed by the TPO to advance safety concepts in Polk County include engaging in a partnership with Polk Vision to establish a Bicycle/ Pedestrian Safety Team. The Team was convened in 2017 to help the TPO and Polk County implement some of the countermeasures outlined in the TPO s recently completed Bicycle and Pedestrian Safety Action Plans. The Team hopes to reduce accidents/fatalities with a three pronged approach focusing on POLK VISION BIKE/PEDESTRIAN SAFETY TEAM engineering, education and enforcement. The TPO has also worked closely with Polk Vision s Infrastructure Task Force in determining sidewalk needs for public schools. Both of these groups have complemented the TPO s planning efforts by providing a forum of diverse public/private interests the TPO would not normally interact with. In summary, the TPO s TIP includes specific investment priorities that support all of the TPO s goals including safety, using a prioritization and project selection process established in the LRTP. This process evaluates projects that have an anticipated effect of reducing both fatal and injury crashes. The TPO s goal of reducing fatal and serious injury crashes is linked to this investment plan and the process used in prioritizing the projects is consistent with federal requirements. The TPO will continue to coordinate with FDOT and transit providers to take action on the additional targets and other requirements of the federal performance management process. Polk TPO Transportation Improvement Program TIP - Adopted June 14, 2018 Page 16 TP

18 2017 Polk TPO Priority Transportation Projects TIP - Adopted June 14, 2018 Page 17

19 Polk Transportation Planning Organization (TPO) Adopted 2017 Priority Transportation Projects Candidate Projects for Funding Consideration in FY 2016/ /20 Priority Project Project Description Project Status PD&E Design ROW CST Candidate Transportation Regional Incentive Program (TRIP) and County Incentive Grant Program (CIGP) Projects 1 Bartow Northern Connector New 4 lane road between US 17 and State Road 60. Complete Complete Complete Partially Phase II Funded 2017 Priority Request (Phase) Construction Fiscal Year Requested FY 2016/ /20 Funding Source Requested TRIP/Other State funds Project Cost ($1,000) $15,400 Candidate Projects for Funding Consideration in FY 2017/ /23 Priority Project Candidate Surface Transportation Program Projects Lakeland and Winter Haven TMA SU Funds 2 Lakeland/Winter Haven TMA Set aside of funds in new fifth year for candidate complete street, SU Funds congestion management, resurfacing supplement, multi use trail and 3 Bicycle/Pedestrian Safety Education Program Project Description safety projects. Safety education and awareness activities and programs to inform pedestrians, bicyclists, and motorists on bike/ped safety. Project Status PD&E Design ROW CST Set aside of funds. Candidate projects will be determined as part of future priority setting process Priority Request (Phase) Set aside of funds Education Program Fiscal Year Requested FY 2022/23 FY 2018/19 Funding Source Requested TMA SU ( ) TMA SU ( ) Project Cost ($1,000) $7,281 $200 4 Wabash Avenue Complete Street Complete Street improvements from Ariana St. to Elizabeth St. Improvements consist of sidewalks, multi use trail, center turn lane, pedestrian refuges, street lighting and landing pads at transit stops. Feasibility Study Completed Design FY 2018/19 TMA SU $247 Construction FY 2019/20 ( ) $2,586 5 North Crystal Lake Drive Sidewalk Construction of 5' wide sidewalk from Longfellow Blvd to Willow Point Drive. Design FY 2018/19 TMA SU $45 Construction FY 2019/20 ( ) $258 6 Transit Shelters Construction of transit shelters in Lakeland and Winter Haven per Design FY 2018/19 TMA SU $20 TPO's Neighborhood Mobility Audits. Construction FY 2019/20 ( ) $137 7 Old Combee Rd Bus Pull off Construct a bus pull off on Old Combee Rd, as well as transit stop Design FY 2018/19 TMA SU $11 improvements. High priority from 2016 that was not programmed due Construction FY 2019/20 ( ) $75 to ROW needs. 8 US 17/92 Sidewalk Design and Construction of a 5' wide sidewalk on east side of road Design FY 2018/19 TMA SU $49 between Hinson Ave and Johnson Ave. Construction FY 2019/20 ( ) $516 9 Avenue K NE Complete Street Sidewalk and complete street improvements between First Street and Construction FY 2019/20 TMA SU $600 Lake Martha Drive. City funding Design and CST costs over $600K ( ) with local funds. 10 Three Parks Trail West CST of a 10 foot wide asphalt path from Cleveland Heights Blvd to Design FY 2019/20 TMA SU $43 YMCA. Last portion of trail needed to complete loop. Construction FY 2020/21 ( ) $ Tenoroc Trail Phase I PD&E Study for 2.2 mile segment of trail between Lake Parker and SR Feas. Study PD&E FY 2017/18 TMA SU $ Completed ( ) 12 Haines City Rail Trail Phase II Phase II extends trail from Grace Ave to CR 544 and Ridge Scenic Design FY 2019/20 TMA SU $130 Highway. Construction FY 2020/21 ( ) $1,424 Candidate Transportation Alternative Program (TAP) Projects 13 Polk City Trail CST of a 10 to 12 foot wide asphalt path on along State Road 559 between Lakeshore Drive and SR 33 and the Van Fleet Trail. Total Cost (Excluding new fifth year TMA set aside) $7,197 Design FY 2019/20 TAP Funds $61 Construction FY 2020/21 $400 ADOPTED JUNE 8, TIP - Adopted June 14, 2018 Page 18

20 Polk Transportation Planning Organization (TPO) Adopted 2017 Priority Transportation Projects Priority 17 US 17/92 (Hinson Avenue) Haines City 18 US 92 (New Tampa Highway) Lakeland 19 SR 544 (Lucerne Park Rd) Winter Haven 20 State Road 572 (Dranefield Waring Road 21 Project US 17/92 Lake Alfred Project Description used to complete the project. Complete Streets evaluation of US 17/92 In Lake Alfred from US 17 to Dakota Avenue. PD&E Study for the intersection of CR 557 and US 17/92 in Downtown Lake Alfred. Candidate Regional Multi Use Trail Projects Regional TAP Funds and SUNTrail Funding 22 Tenoroc Trail Phase I PD&E Study for 2.2 mile segment of trail between Lake Parker and SR Feas. Study 33. Completed 23 Haines City Rail Trail Phase II Phase II extends trail from Grace Ave to CR 544 and Ridge Scenic Highway. 24 Tenoroc Trail Phase II PD&E Study for 12 miles of multi use trail that will connect Phase I to the Polk Parkway/Braddock Rd Overpass and the multi use trail to be Feas. Study Completed built by the Turnpike. 1 The City of Lakeland has committed $2M in local funding for the construction of SR 33 improvements. PD&E Design ROW CST 2017 Priority Request (Phase) Fiscal Year Requested Candidate Priority Road Projects (Non SIS Roads) State Funds and other Surface Transportation Program Funds 14 SR 659 (Combee Rd) Complete Street improvements from US 98 to Skyview Drive. FY 2017/18 Design FY 2019/20 STP/other $1,773 Improvements consist of constructing an urban roadway with a center State funds turn lane, sidewalks and bicycle lanes. The project will also include street lighting and intersection improvements. 15 US 98 Multi Modal Corridor Interim Intersection improvements at Commerce Point and in vicinity Underway Underway FY 19/20 Construction FY 2020/21 STP/other NA Improvements from Edgewood of Crystal Lake Dr N and S. Funding currently programmed for ROW 20/21 State funds Dr. to Main Street could be used to fund the intersection improvements. 21/22 16 State Road 33 Improvements 1 2 to 4 lane widening from Old Combee Road to University Blvd Complete Underway Construction FY 2020/21 STP/other $18,950 State funds I 4 Interchange reconstruction University Blvd to Tomkow Rd Complete Underway FY 16/17 Construction FY 2020/21 SIS $60,780 2 to 4 lane widening from 10th Street to 17th Street in Haines City. Underway FY 20/21 Right of way FY 2022/23 STP/other $610 State funds 2 to 4 lane widening from Hillsborough County Line to Wabash Underway FY 18/19 FY 20/21 Additional FY 2022/23 STP/other $56,000 Avenue. 21/22 ROW/CST State funds 2 to 4 lane widening from Avenue T to US 27. FY 2021/22 NA NA NA NA Construction of Intersection improvements at the intersection of Drane Field and Waring Roads. City has been awarded $1.2M in Enterprise Florida funds for design. Requested FDOT funds would be Project Status FY 2016/17 Construction FY 2020/21 STP/other State funds PD&E/Study FY 2019/20 STP/other State funds PD&E FY 2019/20 STP/other State funds PD&E Study FY 2017/ /22 Funding Source Requested RTAP/ SUNTrail Funds Regional TAP $1,200 NA NA $500 Design FY 2019/20 $130 Construction FY 2020/21 $1,424 PD&E Study FY 2017/18 $2, /22 Regional TAP/ SUNTRail Funds Project Cost ($1,000) ADOPTED JUNE 8, TIP - Adopted June 14, 2018 Page 19

21 Five Year TIP Fund Summary TIP - Adopted June 14, 2018 Page 20

22 Effective Date: 02/14/2018 Florida Department of Transportation Run: 02/26/ Year TIP - Fund Summary DISTRICT 1 Fund Fund Name < >2023 All Years TOTAL OUTSIDE YEARS 209,001, ,001,763 ACBR ADVANCE CONSTRUCTION (BRT) , ,250 3,386, ,932,291 ACCM ADVANCE CONSTRUCTION (CM) 2,000, ,000,000 ACFP AC FREIGHT PROG (NFP) 0 950, ,673, , ,000 4,843,660 ACNP ADVANCE CONSTRUCTION NHPP 9,587,884 5,130, ,949,858 47,373,057 3,300, ,713, ,054,910 ACSA ADVANCE CONSTRUCTION (SA) 52, ,043 ACSL ADVANCE CONSTRUCTION (SL) 45, ,927 ACSU ADVANCE CONSTRUCTION (SU) 201,000 5,736, ,937,613 BNIR INTRASTATE R/W & BRIDGE BONDS 0 0 1,044, ,672, ,717,203 BRP STATE BRIDGE REPLACEMENT 125, ,000 CM CONGESTION MITIGATION - AQ 50, ,879 D UNRESTRICTED STATE PRIMARY 16,128,133 4,560,750 4,196,766 3,282, ,168,399 DC STATE PRIMARY PE CONSULTANTS DDR DISTRICT DEDICATED REVENUE 52,888,064 25,394,802 65,249,245 26,413,495 52,898,562 12,083, ,927,237 DI ST. - S/W INTER/INTRASTATE HWY 22,931,787 11,144,100 1,430,272 40,650, ,014, ,171,061 DIH STATE IN-HOUSE PRODUCT SUPPORT 2,971, , , , , , ,500 5,310,878 DIS STRATEGIC INTERMODAL SYSTEM , ,127 DITS STATEWIDE ITS - STATE 100%. 2,740,339 1,215,205 1,501,055 2,694, ,239, ,390,656 DPTO STATE - PTO 11,241,030 3,705,117 5,570,335 4,368,893 1,439,658 2,696, ,021,053 DS STATE PRIMARY HIGHWAYS & PTO 6,467,081 9,501,187 4,527, ,500 1,042, , ,943,321 DU STATE PRIMARY/FEDERAL REIMB 3,338, , , , , , ,915,137 EB EQUITY BONUS 6,639, ,639,738 FAA FEDERAL AVIATION ADMIN 3,035,908 2,187,000 4,827,465 8,716,433 6,472,080 4,500, ,738,886 FTA FEDERAL TRANSIT ADMINISTRATION 42,742,195 5,047,328 5,094,136 5,095,554 5,207,961 4,758, ,945,965 FTAT FHWA TRANSFER TO FTA (NON-BUD) 0 137, , ,037 HSID INTERSECTION CRASHES 0 120, , ,000 HSP SAFETY (HIWAY SAFETY PROGRAM) 3,845, ,012,670 2,960,620 75, ,893,429 LF LOCAL FUNDS 36,552,392 8,773,272 16,445,577 8,334,670 8,494,798 10,052,832 2,400,000 91,053,541 NHPP IM, BRDG REPL, NATNL HWY-MAP21 792, ,130 PKLF LOCAL SUPPORT FOR TURNPIKE 0 10,171, ,171,346 PKM1 TURNPIKE TOLL MAINTENANCE 751, , , , , , ,251, TIP - Adopted June 14, 2018 Page 21

23 PKYI TURNPIKE IMPROVEMENT 34,818,496 7,013, ,009,163 16,382, ,223,259 PKYO TURNPIKE TOLL COLLECTION/OPER. 349, , , , , ,000 1,750,000 3,849,991 PKYR TURNPIKE RENEWAL & REPLACEMENT 318, ,000 20,110, ,838,628 PL METRO PLAN (85% FA; 15% OTHER) 0 682, , , , , ,470,074 RHH RAIL HIGHWAY X-INGS - HAZARD 0 790, ,274 SA STP, ANY AREA 2,141,975 10,798,178 10,794, , , ,466,431 SIB1 STATE INFRASTRUCTURE BANK 0 4,626, ,626,400 SIWR 2015 SB2514A-STRATEGIC INT SYS 0 0 1,161,528 50, ,773,817 45,985,345 SL STP, AREAS <= 200K 2,694,474 20,278 20,278 20,278 20,278 20, ,795,864 SR2T SAFE ROUTES - TRANSFER 0 69, , ,675 STED 2012 SB1998-STRATEGIC ECON COR ,642,580 43,642,580 SU STP, URBAN AREAS > 200K 10,429,693 6,238,371 7,063,365 7,087,101 7,087,101 7,087, ,992,732 TALT TRANSPORTATION ALTS- ANY AREA 0 150, ,969 60, ,606 TALU TRANSPORTATION ALTS- >200K 0 301, , , ,996 TLWR 2015 SB2514A-TRAIL NETWORK ,000, ,000,000 TRIP TRANS REGIONAL INCENTIVE PROGM 8,716, ,303 7,576,669 3,585, , ,697,981 Grand Total 493,600, ,725, ,824, ,480,545 96,813,188 49,509, ,663,508 1,648,616, TIP - Adopted June 14, 2018 Page 22

24 Federally Obligated Funded Projects TIP - Adopted June 14, 2018 Page 23

25 PAGE 1 FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION DATE RUN: 10/27/2017 OFFICE OF WORK PROGRAM TIME RUN: POLK TPO ANNUAL OBLIGATIONS REPORT MBROBLTP ================ HIGHWAYS ================ ITEM NUMBER: PROJECT DESCRIPTION:US 27 FROM BARRY ROAD TO LAKE COUNTY LINE *SIS* DISTRICT:01 COUNTY:POLK TYPE OF WORK:ADD LANES & RECONSTRUCT ROADWAY ID: PROJECT LENGTH: 4.175MI LANES EXIST/IMPROVED/ADDED: 4/ 4/ 2 FUND CODE 2017 PHASE: CONSTRUCTION / RESPONSIBLE AGENCY: MANAGED BY FDOT SA 138,444 TOTAL ,444 TOTAL ,444 ITEM NUMBER: PROJECT DESCRIPTION:CITY OF LAKELAND LEASE OF FIBER OPTIC NETWORK *NON-SIS* DISTRICT:01 COUNTY:POLK TYPE OF WORK:TRAFFIC CONTROL DEVICES/SYSTEM ROADWAY ID: PROJECT LENGTH:.000 LANES EXIST/IMPROVED/ADDED: 0/ 0/ 0 FUND CODE 2017 PHASE: GRANTS AND MISCELLANEOUS / RESPONSIBLE AGENCY: MANAGED BY FDOT SL 20,278 TOTAL ,278 TOTAL ,278 ITEM NUMBER: PROJECT DESCRIPTION:I-4 (SR 400) FROM W OF US 27 (SR 25) TO E OF CR 532 *SIS* DISTRICT:01 COUNTY:POLK TYPE OF WORK:ADD LANES & RECONSTRUCT ROADWAY ID: PROJECT LENGTH: 4.022MI LANES EXIST/IMPROVED/ADDED: 6/ 6/ 4 FUND CODE 2017 PHASE: PRELIMINARY ENGINEERING / RESPONSIBLE AGENCY: MANAGED BY FDOT NHPP 3,054,498 TOTAL ,054,498 TOTAL ,054,498 ITEM NUMBER: PROJECT DESCRIPTION:I-4 (SR 400) AT SR 559 INTERCHANGE *SIS* DISTRICT:01 COUNTY:POLK TYPE OF WORK:INTERCHANGE IMPROVEMENT ROADWAY ID: PROJECT LENGTH: 1.137MI LANES EXIST/IMPROVED/ADDED: 6/ 6/ 0 FUND CODE 2017 PHASE: CONSTRUCTION / RESPONSIBLE AGENCY: MANAGED BY FDOT CM 88,640 EB 35,000 SL 15,000 TOTAL ,640 TOTAL , TIP - Adopted June 14, 2018 Page 24

26 PAGE 2 FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION DATE RUN: 10/27/2017 OFFICE OF WORK PROGRAM TIME RUN: POLK TPO ANNUAL OBLIGATIONS REPORT MBROBLTP ================ HIGHWAYS ================ ITEM NUMBER: PROJECT DESCRIPTION:I-4 AT CSX RAILROAD *SIS* DISTRICT:01 COUNTY:POLK TYPE OF WORK:BRIDGE REPLACEMENT ROADWAY ID: PROJECT LENGTH:.004MI LANES EXIST/IMPROVED/ADDED: 6/ 6/ 0 FUND CODE 2017 PHASE: PRELIMINARY ENGINEERING / RESPONSIBLE AGENCY: MANAGED BY FDOT NHPP 792,130 TOTAL ,130 TOTAL ,130 ITEM NUMBER: PROJECT DESCRIPTION:US 98 (SR35/SR700) FROM NORTH OF CR 540 A TO SR 540 *SIS* DISTRICT:01 COUNTY:POLK TYPE OF WORK:ADD LANES & RECONSTRUCT ROADWAY ID: PROJECT LENGTH: 3.373MI LANES EXIST/IMPROVED/ADDED: 5/ 5/ 2 FUND CODE 2017 PHASE: CONSTRUCTION / RESPONSIBLE AGENCY: MANAGED BY FDOT NHPP 662,250 TOTAL ,250 TOTAL ,250 ITEM NUMBER: PROJECT DESCRIPTION:SR 542 FROM 1ST STREET TO BUCKEYE LOOP RD *NON-SIS* DISTRICT:01 COUNTY:POLK TYPE OF WORK:ADD LANES & RECONSTRUCT ROADWAY ID: PROJECT LENGTH: 2.305MI LANES EXIST/IMPROVED/ADDED: 2/ 2/ 1 FUND CODE 2017 PHASE: PRELIMINARY ENGINEERING / RESPONSIBLE AGENCY: MANAGED BY FDOT SL 167,762 PHASE: RIGHT OF WAY / RESPONSIBLE AGENCY: MANAGED BY FDOT SU 2,005,533 TOTAL ,173,295 TOTAL ,173,295 ITEM NUMBER: PROJECT DESCRIPTION:SR 542 FROM BUCKEYE LOOP ROAD TO US 27 *NON-SIS* DISTRICT:01 COUNTY:POLK TYPE OF WORK:WIDEN/RESURFACE EXIST LANES ROADWAY ID: PROJECT LENGTH: 3.648MI LANES EXIST/IMPROVED/ADDED: 2/ 2/ 0 FUND CODE 2017 PHASE: PRELIMINARY ENGINEERING / RESPONSIBLE AGENCY: MANAGED BY FDOT SA 329,937 TOTAL ,937 TOTAL , TIP - Adopted June 14, 2018 Page 25

27 PAGE 3 FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION DATE RUN: 10/27/2017 OFFICE OF WORK PROGRAM TIME RUN: POLK TPO ANNUAL OBLIGATIONS REPORT MBROBLTP ================ HIGHWAYS ================ ITEM NUMBER: PROJECT DESCRIPTION:SR 17 FROM SOUTH OF MARTIN ROAD TO S OF MTN LAKE CUTOFF *NON-SIS* DISTRICT:01 COUNTY:POLK TYPE OF WORK:RESURFACING ROADWAY ID: PROJECT LENGTH: 3.507MI LANES EXIST/IMPROVED/ADDED: 2/ 2/ 0 FUND CODE 2017 PHASE: CONSTRUCTION / RESPONSIBLE AGENCY: MANAGED BY FDOT TALT 2,667,084 TOTAL ,667,084 TOTAL ,667,084 ITEM NUMBER: PROJECT DESCRIPTION:SR 17 FROM SEMINOLE AVENUE TO OSCEOLA AVENUE *NON-SIS* DISTRICT:01 COUNTY:POLK TYPE OF WORK:DRAINAGE IMPROVEMENTS ROADWAY ID: PROJECT LENGTH:.011MI LANES EXIST/IMPROVED/ADDED: 0/ 0/ 0 FUND CODE 2017 PHASE: CONSTRUCTION / RESPONSIBLE AGENCY: MANAGED BY FDOT SA 108,631 TOTAL ,631 TOTAL ,631 ITEM NUMBER: PROJECT DESCRIPTION:I-4 FOG DETECTION FROM EAST OF POLK PARKWAY TO OSCEOLA COUNTY LINE *SIS* DISTRICT:01 COUNTY:POLK TYPE OF WORK:ITS FREEWAY MANAGEMENT ROADWAY ID: PROJECT LENGTH: MI LANES EXIST/IMPROVED/ADDED: 6/ 0/ 0 FUND CODE 2017 PHASE: PRELIMINARY ENGINEERING / RESPONSIBLE AGENCY: MANAGED BY FDOT HSP -25,404 SA -1,425 TOTAL ,829 TOTAL ,829 ITEM NUMBER: PROJECT DESCRIPTION:I-4 FROM EAST OF POLK PARKWAY TO OSCEOLA COUNTY LINE *SIS* DISTRICT:01 COUNTY:POLK TYPE OF WORK:ITS FREEWAY MANAGEMENT ROADWAY ID: PROJECT LENGTH: MI LANES EXIST/IMPROVED/ADDED: 6/ 0/ 0 FUND CODE 2017 PHASE: CONSTRUCTION / RESPONSIBLE AGENCY: MANAGED BY FDOT HSP 37,185 TOTAL ,185 TOTAL ,185 ITEM NUMBER: PROJECT DESCRIPTION:UPPER PEACE LEGACY TRAIL FROM FORT FRASER TRAIL TO SR 540 *NON-SIS* DISTRICT:01 COUNTY:POLK TYPE OF WORK:BIKE PATH/TRAIL ROADWAY ID: PROJECT LENGTH:.000 LANES EXIST/IMPROVED/ADDED: 0/ 0/ 0 FUND CODE 2017 PHASE: PRELIMINARY ENGINEERING / RESPONSIBLE AGENCY: MANAGED BY FDOT SU TIP - Adopted June 14, 2018 Page 26

28 PAGE 4 FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION DATE RUN: 10/27/2017 OFFICE OF WORK PROGRAM TIME RUN: POLK TPO ANNUAL OBLIGATIONS REPORT MBROBLTP ================ HIGHWAYS ================ PHASE: CONSTRUCTION / RESPONSIBLE AGENCY: MANAGED BY FDOT SU 445,510 TOTAL ,702 TOTAL ,702 ITEM NUMBER: PROJECT DESCRIPTION:SR 539 FROM PEAR STREET TO W ELLIOT STREET *NON-SIS* DISTRICT:01 COUNTY:POLK TYPE OF WORK:RESURFACING ROADWAY ID: PROJECT LENGTH: 1.756MI LANES EXIST/IMPROVED/ADDED: 4/ 4/ 0 FUND CODE 2017 PHASE: CONSTRUCTION / RESPONSIBLE AGENCY: MANAGED BY FDOT SA 214,124 TOTAL ,124 TOTAL ,124 ITEM NUMBER: PROJECT DESCRIPTION:SR 60 FROM DIESEL ROAD TO CR 555 *SIS* DISTRICT:01 COUNTY:POLK TYPE OF WORK:RESURFACING ROADWAY ID: PROJECT LENGTH: 7.692MI LANES EXIST/IMPROVED/ADDED: 4/ 4/ 0 FUND CODE 2017 PHASE: CONSTRUCTION / RESPONSIBLE AGENCY: MANAGED BY FDOT NHRE -111,355 TOTAL ,355 TOTAL ,355 ITEM NUMBER: PROJECT DESCRIPTION:SR 540 FROM OVERLOOK DR TO US 27 *NON-SIS* DISTRICT:01 COUNTY:POLK TYPE OF WORK:RESURFACING ROADWAY ID: PROJECT LENGTH: 4.836MI LANES EXIST/IMPROVED/ADDED: 4/ 4/ 0 FUND CODE 2017 PHASE: CONSTRUCTION / RESPONSIBLE AGENCY: MANAGED BY FDOT SA -8,552 TOTAL ,552 TOTAL ,552 ITEM NUMBER: PROJECT DESCRIPTION:SIXTH STREET S FROM WOOD AVE E TO HINSON AVE E *NON-SIS* DISTRICT:01 COUNTY:POLK TYPE OF WORK:SIDEWALK ROADWAY ID: PROJECT LENGTH:.304MI LANES EXIST/IMPROVED/ADDED: 0/ 0/ 0 FUND CODE 2017 PHASE: CONSTRUCTION / RESPONSIBLE AGENCY: MANAGED BY FDOT TALT -57,658 TOTAL ,658 TOTAL , TIP - Adopted June 14, 2018 Page 27

29 PAGE 5 FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION DATE RUN: 10/27/2017 OFFICE OF WORK PROGRAM TIME RUN: POLK TPO ANNUAL OBLIGATIONS REPORT MBROBLTP ================ HIGHWAYS ================ ITEM NUMBER: PROJECT DESCRIPTION:LK ALFRED TR AT US 17/92 BRIDGE *NON-SIS* DISTRICT:01 COUNTY:POLK TYPE OF WORK:PEDESTRIAN/WILDLIFE OVERPASS ROADWAY ID: PROJECT LENGTH:.286MI LANES EXIST/IMPROVED/ADDED: 2/ 0/ 0 FUND CODE 2017 PHASE: PRELIMINARY ENGINEERING / RESPONSIBLE AGENCY: MANAGED BY FDOT TALT -5,442 TALU 8,015 PHASE: CONSTRUCTION / RESPONSIBLE AGENCY: MANAGED BY FDOT CM 32,302 PHASE: GRANTS AND MISCELLANEOUS / RESPONSIBLE AGENCY: MANAGED BY FDOT TALT -6,472 TOTAL ,403 TOTAL ,403 ITEM NUMBER: PROJECT DESCRIPTION:SR 33 FROM OLD COMBEE RD TO N OF TOMKOW RD *NON-SIS* DISTRICT:01 COUNTY:POLK TYPE OF WORK:PRELIMINARY ENGINEERING ROADWAY ID: PROJECT LENGTH: 3.721MI LANES EXIST/IMPROVED/ADDED: 2/ 2/ 0 FUND CODE 2017 PHASE: PRELIMINARY ENGINEERING / RESPONSIBLE AGENCY: MANAGED BY FDOT SU 838,796 TOTAL ,796 TOTAL ,796 ITEM NUMBER: PROJECT DESCRIPTION:SPIRIT LAKE RD FROM CR 655 TO AVE G NW XING# J *NON-SIS* DISTRICT:01 COUNTY:POLK TYPE OF WORK:RAIL SAFETY PROJECT ROADWAY ID: PROJECT LENGTH:.265MI LANES EXIST/IMPROVED/ADDED: 2/ 2/ 0 FUND CODE 2017 PHASE: RAILROAD AND UTILITIES / RESPONSIBLE AGENCY: MANAGED BY FDOT RHP -19,004 TOTAL ,004 TOTAL ,004 ITEM NUMBER: PROJECT DESCRIPTION:US 27 AT STUDENT DRIVE *SIS* DISTRICT:01 COUNTY:POLK TYPE OF WORK:TRAFFIC SIGNALS ROADWAY ID: PROJECT LENGTH:.038MI LANES EXIST/IMPROVED/ADDED: 4/ 0/ 0 FUND CODE 2017 PHASE: CONSTRUCTION / RESPONSIBLE AGENCY: MANAGED BY FDOT HSP -26,610 TOTAL ,610 TOTAL , TIP - Adopted June 14, 2018 Page 28

30 PAGE 6 FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION DATE RUN: 10/27/2017 OFFICE OF WORK PROGRAM TIME RUN: POLK TPO ANNUAL OBLIGATIONS REPORT MBROBLTP ================ HIGHWAYS ================ ITEM NUMBER: PROJECT DESCRIPTION:SR 37 (SOUTH FLORIDA AVENUE) AT PIPKIN RD/LAKE MIRIAM DRIVE *NON-SIS* DISTRICT:01 COUNTY:POLK TYPE OF WORK:INTERSECTION IMPROVEMENT ROADWAY ID: PROJECT LENGTH:.066MI LANES EXIST/IMPROVED/ADDED: 4/ 0/ 0 FUND CODE 2017 PHASE: CONSTRUCTION / RESPONSIBLE AGENCY: MANAGED BY FDOT HSP -284,372 TALT -684 TOTAL ,056 TOTAL ,056 ITEM NUMBER: PROJECT DESCRIPTION:POLK AVENUE ELEMENTARY SRTS SAFETY SIDEWALKS *NON-SIS* DISTRICT:01 COUNTY:POLK TYPE OF WORK:SIDEWALK ROADWAY ID: PROJECT LENGTH:.330MI LANES EXIST/IMPROVED/ADDED: 1/ 0/ 0 FUND CODE 2017 PHASE: CONSTRUCTION / RESPONSIBLE AGENCY: MANAGED BY FDOT TALU 16,011 TOTAL ,011 TOTAL ,011 ITEM NUMBER: PROJECT DESCRIPTION:EASTSIDE ELEMENTARY SCHOOL SAFETY SIDEWALKS *NON-SIS* DISTRICT:01 COUNTY:POLK TYPE OF WORK:SIDEWALK ROADWAY ID: PROJECT LENGTH:.000 LANES EXIST/IMPROVED/ADDED: 0/ 0/ 0 FUND CODE 2017 PHASE: CONSTRUCTION / RESPONSIBLE AGENCY: MANAGED BY FDOT TALT -6,280 TOTAL ,280 TOTAL ,280 ITEM NUMBER: PROJECT DESCRIPTION:LK HOWARD DR TRAIL FROM AVE D NW TO AVE G NW *NON-SIS* DISTRICT:01 COUNTY:POLK TYPE OF WORK:BIKE PATH/TRAIL ROADWAY ID: PROJECT LENGTH:.000 LANES EXIST/IMPROVED/ADDED: 0/ 0/ 0 FUND CODE 2017 PHASE: CONSTRUCTION / RESPONSIBLE AGENCY: MANAGED BY CITY OF WINTER HAVEN TALU 125,000 TOTAL ,000 TOTAL , TIP - Adopted June 14, 2018 Page 29

31 PAGE 7 FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION DATE RUN: 10/27/2017 OFFICE OF WORK PROGRAM TIME RUN: POLK TPO ANNUAL OBLIGATIONS REPORT MBROBLTP ================ HIGHWAYS ================ ITEM NUMBER: PROJECT DESCRIPTION:SR 35/SR 555/US 17 FROM BARTOW RD TO BEAR CREEK APTS *SIS* DISTRICT:01 COUNTY:POLK TYPE OF WORK:RESURFACING ROADWAY ID: PROJECT LENGTH: 3.081MI LANES EXIST/IMPROVED/ADDED: 4/ 4/ 0 FUND CODE 2017 PHASE: CONSTRUCTION / RESPONSIBLE AGENCY: MANAGED BY FDOT SA -229,439 TOTAL ,439 TOTAL ,439 ITEM NUMBER: PROJECT DESCRIPTION:I-4 (SR 400) FROM CR 557 TO OSCEOLA C/L *SIS* DISTRICT:01 COUNTY:POLK TYPE OF WORK:RESURFACING ROADWAY ID: PROJECT LENGTH: MI LANES EXIST/IMPROVED/ADDED: 6/ 6/ 0 FUND CODE 2017 PHASE: CONSTRUCTION / RESPONSIBLE AGENCY: MANAGED BY FDOT NHPP 391,387 TOTAL ,387 TOTAL ,387 ITEM NUMBER: PROJECT DESCRIPTION:US 98 (SR 35) FROM LAKE BONNY PARK TO MAIN STREET *NON-SIS* DISTRICT:01 COUNTY:POLK TYPE OF WORK:RESURFACING ROADWAY ID: PROJECT LENGTH:.885MI LANES EXIST/IMPROVED/ADDED: 4/ 4/ 0 FUND CODE 2017 PHASE: CONSTRUCTION / RESPONSIBLE AGENCY: MANAGED BY FDOT SA -21,342 TOTAL ,342 TOTAL ,342 ITEM NUMBER: PROJECT DESCRIPTION:HAINES CITY TRAIL FROM GRACE AVE E TO LILY AVE *NON-SIS* DISTRICT:01 COUNTY:POLK TYPE OF WORK:BIKE PATH/TRAIL ROADWAY ID: PROJECT LENGTH: 1.596MI LANES EXIST/IMPROVED/ADDED: 1/ 0/ 0 FUND CODE 2017 PHASE: PRELIMINARY ENGINEERING / RESPONSIBLE AGENCY: MANAGED BY FDOT SU -2,026 PHASE: CONSTRUCTION / RESPONSIBLE AGENCY: MANAGED BY FDOT SU 998,627 TOTAL ,601 TOTAL ,601 ITEM NUMBER: PROJECT DESCRIPTION:COW CAMP ROAD BRIDGE NO OVER ROSALIE/ZIPPRER CANAL *NON-SIS* DISTRICT:01 COUNTY:POLK TYPE OF WORK:BRIDGE REPLACEMENT ROADWAY ID: PROJECT LENGTH:.128MI LANES EXIST/IMPROVED/ADDED: 0/ 0/ 0 FUND CODE 2017 PHASE: PRELIMINARY ENGINEERING / RESPONSIBLE AGENCY: MANAGED BY FDOT BRTZ 6, TIP - Adopted June 14, 2018 Page 30

32 PAGE 8 FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION DATE RUN: 10/27/2017 OFFICE OF WORK PROGRAM TIME RUN: POLK TPO ANNUAL OBLIGATIONS REPORT MBROBLTP ================ HIGHWAYS ================ PHASE: CONSTRUCTION / RESPONSIBLE AGENCY: MANAGED BY FDOT BRTZ 7,430 TOTAL ,725 TOTAL ,725 ITEM NUMBER: PROJECT DESCRIPTION:STRICKLAND RD FROM KATHLEEN RD TO YOUNGS RI DGE RD - XING# V *NON-SIS* DISTRICT:01 COUNTY:POLK TYPE OF WORK:RAIL SAFETY PROJECT ROADWAY ID: PROJECT LENGTH:.000 LANES EXIST/IMPROVED/ADDED: 0/ 0/ 0 FUND CODE 2017 PHASE: RAILROAD AND UTILITIES / RESPONSIBLE AGENCY: MANAGED BY FDOT RHH -57,511 TOTAL ,511 TOTAL ,511 ITEM NUMBER: PROJECT DESCRIPTION:KNIGHT STATION RD FROM GEORGE WHEELER RD TO KATHLEEN RD-XING# E *NON-SIS* DISTRICT:01 COUNTY:POLK TYPE OF WORK:RAIL SAFETY PROJECT ROADWAY ID: PROJECT LENGTH:.250MI LANES EXIST/IMPROVED/ADDED: 2/ 2/ 0 FUND CODE 2017 PHASE: RAILROAD AND UTILITIES / RESPONSIBLE AGENCY: MANAGED BY FDOT RHH -100,306 TOTAL ,306 TOTAL ,306 ITEM NUMBER: PROJECT DESCRIPTION:BAKER AVE FROM N VAN FLEET DR TO BRITTS LANE-XING# T *NON-SIS* DISTRICT:01 COUNTY:POLK TYPE OF WORK:RAIL SAFETY PROJECT ROADWAY ID: PROJECT LENGTH:.201MI LANES EXIST/IMPROVED/ADDED: 2/ 2/ 0 FUND CODE 2017 PHASE: RAILROAD AND UTILITIES / RESPONSIBLE AGENCY: MANAGED BY FDOT RHH -260,696 TOTAL ,696 TOTAL ,696 ITEM NUMBER: PROJECT DESCRIPTION:GALLOWAY RD FROM MT TABOR RD TO KATHLEEN RD-XING# J *NON-SIS* DISTRICT:01 COUNTY:POLK TYPE OF WORK:RAIL SAFETY PROJECT ROADWAY ID: PROJECT LENGTH:.079MI LANES EXIST/IMPROVED/ADDED: 2/ 2/ 0 FUND CODE 2017 PHASE: RAILROAD AND UTILITIES / RESPONSIBLE AGENCY: MANAGED BY FDOT RHH -199,302 TOTAL ,302 TOTAL , TIP - Adopted June 14, 2018 Page 31

33 PAGE 9 FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION DATE RUN: 10/27/2017 OFFICE OF WORK PROGRAM TIME RUN: POLK TPO ANNUAL OBLIGATIONS REPORT MBROBLTP ================ HIGHWAYS ================ ITEM NUMBER: PROJECT DESCRIPTION:BELLA VISTA FROM MLK JR AVE TO LAKE PARKER DRIVE *NON-SIS* DISTRICT:01 COUNTY:POLK TYPE OF WORK:BIKE PATH/TRAIL ROADWAY ID: PROJECT LENGTH:.000 LANES EXIST/IMPROVED/ADDED: 0/ 0/ 0 FUND CODE 2017 PHASE: CONSTRUCTION / RESPONSIBLE AGENCY: MANAGED BY FDOT TALU 1,500 TOTAL ,500 TOTAL ,500 ITEM NUMBER: PROJECT DESCRIPTION:NEW JERSEY TRAIL FROM CRYSTAL LAKE DRIVE TO EDGEWOOD DRIVE *NON-SIS* DISTRICT:01 COUNTY:POLK TYPE OF WORK:BIKE PATH/TRAIL ROADWAY ID: PROJECT LENGTH:.000 LANES EXIST/IMPROVED/ADDED: 0/ 0/ 0 FUND CODE 2017 PHASE: GRANTS AND MISCELLANEOUS / RESPONSIBLE AGENCY: MANAGED BY CITY OF LAKELAND SU -19,316 TOTAL ,316 TOTAL ,316 ITEM NUMBER: PROJECT DESCRIPTION:FT FRASER TRL EXT FROM SR 540 -WINTER LK RD TO COMBEE RD -LAKELAND *SIS* DISTRICT:01 COUNTY:POLK TYPE OF WORK:CORRIDOR/SUBAREA PLANNING ROADWAY ID: PROJECT LENGTH:.946MI LANES EXIST/IMPROVED/ADDED: 2/ 0/ 0 FUND CODE 2017 PHASE: PRELIMINARY ENGINEERING / RESPONSIBLE AGENCY: MANAGED BY FDOT TALU 43,776 TOTAL ,776 TOTAL ,776 ITEM NUMBER: PROJECT DESCRIPTION:FT FRASER TRAIL EXTENSION FM SR540/WINTER LK RD TO COMBEE RD- LAKELAND *SIS* DISTRICT:01 COUNTY:POLK TYPE OF WORK:BIKE PATH/TRAIL ROADWAY ID: PROJECT LENGTH:.946MI LANES EXIST/IMPROVED/ADDED: 3/ 0/ 0 FUND CODE 2017 PHASE: PRELIMINARY ENGINEERING / RESPONSIBLE AGENCY: MANAGED BY FDOT REPE 449,376 SU 50,000 TOTAL ,376 TOTAL ,376 ITEM NUMBER: PROJECT DESCRIPTION:CR 544 AT SR 17 *NON-SIS* DISTRICT:01 COUNTY:POLK TYPE OF WORK:INTERSECTION IMPROVEMENT ROADWAY ID: PROJECT LENGTH:.446MI LANES EXIST/IMPROVED/ADDED: 0/ 0/ 0 FUND CODE 2017 PHASE: PRELIMINARY ENGINEERING / RESPONSIBLE AGENCY: MANAGED BY FDOT SU 14, TIP - Adopted June 14, 2018 Page 32

34 PAGE 10 FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION DATE RUN: 10/27/2017 OFFICE OF WORK PROGRAM TIME RUN: POLK TPO ANNUAL OBLIGATIONS REPORT MBROBLTP ================ HIGHWAYS ================ PHASE: CONSTRUCTION / RESPONSIBLE AGENCY: MANAGED BY FDOT SU 150,215 TOTAL ,258 TOTAL ,258 ITEM NUMBER: PROJECT DESCRIPTION:SR 37 AT CR 640 *NON-SIS* DISTRICT:01 COUNTY:POLK TYPE OF WORK:LIGHTING ROADWAY ID: PROJECT LENGTH:.133MI LANES EXIST/IMPROVED/ADDED: 2/ 0/ 0 FUND CODE 2017 PHASE: CONSTRUCTION / RESPONSIBLE AGENCY: MANAGED BY FDOT HSP -5,664 SA -673 TOTAL ,337 TOTAL ,337 ITEM NUMBER: PROJECT DESCRIPTION:US 17 (SR 35) FROM S OF 9TH ST SE TO N OF 9TH ST NE *SIS* DISTRICT:01 COUNTY:POLK TYPE OF WORK:LIGHTING ROADWAY ID: PROJECT LENGTH: 1.516MI LANES EXIST/IMPROVED/ADDED: 4/ 4/ 0 FUND CODE 2017 PHASE: CONSTRUCTION / RESPONSIBLE AGENCY: MANAGED BY FDOT HSP -44,006 SA -1,302 TOTAL ,308 TOTAL ,308 ITEM NUMBER: PROJECT DESCRIPTION:US 98 FROM US 17 TO PEACE RIVER BRIDGE *NON-SIS* DISTRICT:01 COUNTY:POLK TYPE OF WORK:LIGHTING ROADWAY ID: PROJECT LENGTH: 1.141MI LANES EXIST/IMPROVED/ADDED: 2/ 0/ 0 FUND CODE 2017 PHASE: CONSTRUCTION / RESPONSIBLE AGENCY: MANAGED BY FDOT HSP -58,404 SA -7,106 TOTAL ,510 TOTAL ,510 ITEM NUMBER: PROJECT DESCRIPTION:SR 17 AT HUNT BROTHERS ROAD *NON-SIS* DISTRICT:01 COUNTY:POLK TYPE OF WORK:ROUNDABOUT ROADWAY ID: PROJECT LENGTH:.296MI LANES EXIST/IMPROVED/ADDED: 2/ 2/ 0 FUND CODE 2017 PHASE: CONSTRUCTION / RESPONSIBLE AGENCY: MANAGED BY FDOT HSP -63,717 SA -7,589 TOTAL ,306 TOTAL , TIP - Adopted June 14, 2018 Page 33

35 PAGE 11 FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION DATE RUN: 10/27/2017 OFFICE OF WORK PROGRAM TIME RUN: POLK TPO ANNUAL OBLIGATIONS REPORT MBROBLTP ================ HIGHWAYS ================ ITEM NUMBER: PROJECT DESCRIPTION:SR 33 AT DEEN STILL ROAD *NON-SIS* DISTRICT:01 COUNTY:POLK TYPE OF WORK:ROUNDABOUT ROADWAY ID: PROJECT LENGTH:.303MI LANES EXIST/IMPROVED/ADDED: 2/ 2/ 0 FUND CODE 2017 PHASE: CONSTRUCTION / RESPONSIBLE AGENCY: MANAGED BY FDOT HSP -23,278 SA -29,296 TOTAL ,574 TOTAL ,574 ITEM NUMBER: PROJECT DESCRIPTION:SR 60 AT SOUTH CREEK DRIVE *SIS* DISTRICT:01 COUNTY:POLK TYPE OF WORK:INTERSECTION IMPROVEMENT ROADWAY ID: PROJECT LENGTH:.522MI LANES EXIST/IMPROVED/ADDED: 4/ 0/ 0 FUND CODE 2017 PHASE: CONSTRUCTION / RESPONSIBLE AGENCY: MANAGED BY FDOT HSP -19,871 SA -17,006 TOTAL ,877 TOTAL ,877 ITEM NUMBER: PROJECT DESCRIPTION:SR 659 (COMBEE RD) FROM E MAIN STREET TO NORTH OF US 92 *NON-SIS* DISTRICT:01 COUNTY:POLK TYPE OF WORK:INTERSECTION IMPROVEMENT ROADWAY ID: PROJECT LENGTH:.238MI LANES EXIST/IMPROVED/ADDED: 2/ 2/ 0 FUND CODE 2017 PHASE: CONSTRUCTION / RESPONSIBLE AGENCY: MANAGED BY FDOT HSP -93,823 SA -2,855 TOTAL ,678 TOTAL ,678 ITEM NUMBER: PROJECT DESCRIPTION:SR 60 AT WILLOW OAK RD *SIS* DISTRICT:01 COUNTY:POLK TYPE OF WORK:INTERSECTION IMPROVEMENT ROADWAY ID: PROJECT LENGTH:.238MI LANES EXIST/IMPROVED/ADDED: 4/ 4/ 0 FUND CODE 2017 PHASE: CONSTRUCTION / RESPONSIBLE AGENCY: MANAGED BY FDOT HSP -32,650 SA -16,518 TOTAL ,168 TOTAL , TIP - Adopted June 14, 2018 Page 34

36 PAGE 12 FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION DATE RUN: 10/27/2017 OFFICE OF WORK PROGRAM TIME RUN: POLK TPO ANNUAL OBLIGATIONS REPORT MBROBLTP ================ HIGHWAYS ================ ITEM NUMBER: PROJECT DESCRIPTION:SR 540 FROM 2ND ST SW TO 10TH ST SE *NON-SIS* DISTRICT:01 COUNTY:POLK TYPE OF WORK:PEDESTRIAN SAFETY IMPROVEMENT ROADWAY ID: PROJECT LENGTH: 1.135MI LANES EXIST/IMPROVED/ADDED: 4/ 0/ 0 FUND CODE 2017 PHASE: CONSTRUCTION / RESPONSIBLE AGENCY: MANAGED BY FDOT SA 2,298 TOTAL ,298 TOTAL ,298 ITEM NUMBER: PROJECT DESCRIPTION:PEACE RIVER TRAIL FROM MOUNT PISGAH ROAD TO US 98 *NON-SIS* DISTRICT:01 COUNTY:POLK TYPE OF WORK:BIKE PATH/TRAIL ROADWAY ID: PROJECT LENGTH: 2.597MI LANES EXIST/IMPROVED/ADDED: 0/ 0/ 0 FUND CODE 2017 PHASE: CONSTRUCTION / RESPONSIBLE AGENCY: MANAGED BY FDOT SU 28,969 TOTAL ,969 TOTAL ,969 ITEM NUMBER: PROJECT DESCRIPTION:FORT FRASER TRAIL AT BANANA CREEK BRIDGE *NON-SIS* DISTRICT:01 COUNTY:POLK TYPE OF WORK:PEDESTRIAN/WILDLIFE OVERPASS ROADWAY ID: PROJECT LENGTH:.044MI LANES EXIST/IMPROVED/ADDED: 0/ 0/ 0 FUND CODE 2017 PHASE: CONSTRUCTION / RESPONSIBLE AGENCY: MANAGED BY FDOT SU 122,873 PHASE: GRANTS AND MISCELLANEOUS / RESPONSIBLE AGENCY: MANAGED BY FDOT SU 94,217 TOTAL ,090 TOTAL ,090 ITEM NUMBER: PROJECT DESCRIPTION:SR 33 (LAKELAND HILLS BLVD) AT N SOCRUM LOOP RD *NON-SIS* DISTRICT:01 COUNTY:POLK TYPE OF WORK:INTERSECTION IMPROVEMENT ROADWAY ID: PROJECT LENGTH:.100MI LANES EXIST/IMPROVED/ADDED: 2/ 0/ 0 FUND CODE 2017 PHASE: PRELIMINARY ENGINEERING / RESPONSIBLE AGENCY: MANAGED BY FDOT SA 20,359 PHASE: CONSTRUCTION / RESPONSIBLE AGENCY: MANAGED BY FDOT HSP -11,020 TOTAL ,339 TOTAL , TIP - Adopted June 14, 2018 Page 35

37 PAGE 13 FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION DATE RUN: 10/27/2017 OFFICE OF WORK PROGRAM TIME RUN: POLK TPO ANNUAL OBLIGATIONS REPORT MBROBLTP ================ HIGHWAYS ================ ITEM NUMBER: PROJECT DESCRIPTION:OLD DIXIE HIGHWAY/ SADDLE CREEK ROAD *NON-SIS* DISTRICT:01 COUNTY:POLK TYPE OF WORK:SIDEWALK ROADWAY ID: PROJECT LENGTH:.463MI LANES EXIST/IMPROVED/ADDED: 2/ 0/ 0 FUND CODE 2017 PHASE: CONSTRUCTION / RESPONSIBLE AGENCY: MANAGED BY FDOT HSP -53,323 TOTAL ,323 TOTAL ,323 ITEM NUMBER: PROJECT DESCRIPTION:EWELL ROAD IMPROVEMENTS *NON-SIS* DISTRICT:01 COUNTY:POLK TYPE OF WORK:INTERSECTION IMPROVEMENT ROADWAY ID: PROJECT LENGTH: 2.249MI LANES EXIST/IMPROVED/ADDED: 3/ 2/ 0 FUND CODE 2017 PHASE: PRELIMINARY ENGINEERING / RESPONSIBLE AGENCY: MANAGED BY FDOT HSP 15,238 SA 39,136 TOTAL ,374 TOTAL ,374 ITEM NUMBER: PROJECT DESCRIPTION:US 27 AT MAIN ST/CRUMP RD *SIS* DISTRICT:01 COUNTY:POLK TYPE OF WORK:LIGHTING ROADWAY ID: PROJECT LENGTH:.906MI LANES EXIST/IMPROVED/ADDED: 6/ 0/ 0 FUND CODE 2017 PHASE: PRELIMINARY ENGINEERING / RESPONSIBLE AGENCY: MANAGED BY FDOT SA 5,408 PHASE: CONSTRUCTION / RESPONSIBLE AGENCY: MANAGED BY FDOT HSP 666,191 SA 40,871 TOTAL ,470 TOTAL ,470 ITEM NUMBER: PROJECT DESCRIPTION:SR 37 AT LAKE HARRIS DRIVE *NON-SIS* DISTRICT:01 COUNTY:POLK TYPE OF WORK:INTERSECTION IMPROVEMENT ROADWAY ID: PROJECT LENGTH:.188MI LANES EXIST/IMPROVED/ADDED: 4/ 0/ 0 FUND CODE 2017 PHASE: PRELIMINARY ENGINEERING / RESPONSIBLE AGENCY: MANAGED BY FDOT SA -1,580 PHASE: CONSTRUCTION / RESPONSIBLE AGENCY: MANAGED BY FDOT HSP -795,324 TOTAL ,904 TOTAL , TIP - Adopted June 14, 2018 Page 36

38 PAGE 14 FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION DATE RUN: 10/27/2017 OFFICE OF WORK PROGRAM TIME RUN: POLK TPO ANNUAL OBLIGATIONS REPORT MBROBLTP ================ HIGHWAYS ================ ITEM NUMBER: PROJECT DESCRIPTION:BOMBER ROAD AT SPRUCE ROAD AND GERBER DAIRY ROAD *NON-SIS* DISTRICT:01 COUNTY:POLK TYPE OF WORK:INTERSECTION IMPROVEMENT ROADWAY ID: PROJECT LENGTH: 1.879MI LANES EXIST/IMPROVED/ADDED: 0/ 0/ 0 FUND CODE 2017 PHASE: PRELIMINARY ENGINEERING / RESPONSIBLE AGENCY: MANAGED BY FDOT SA 3,485 PHASE: RAILROAD AND UTILITIES / RESPONSIBLE AGENCY: MANAGED BY FDOT SU 46,798 PHASE: CONSTRUCTION / RESPONSIBLE AGENCY: MANAGED BY FDOT HSP 1,404,386 SA 58,217 TOTAL ,512,886 TOTAL ,512,886 ITEM NUMBER: PROJECT DESCRIPTION:SR 60 AT BAILEY RD *SIS* DISTRICT:01 COUNTY:POLK TYPE OF WORK:INTERSECTION IMPROVEMENT ROADWAY ID: PROJECT LENGTH:.220MI LANES EXIST/IMPROVED/ADDED: 4/ 0/ 0 FUND CODE 2017 PHASE: CONSTRUCTION / RESPONSIBLE AGENCY: MANAGED BY FDOT HSP 1,389,029 SA 15,000 TOTAL ,404,029 TOTAL ,404,029 ITEM NUMBER: PROJECT DESCRIPTION:SR546(MEMORIAL BLVD) FROM I-4 TO WABASH AVE *NON-SIS* DISTRICT:01 COUNTY:POLK TYPE OF WORK:RIGID PAVEMENT RECONSTRUCTION ROADWAY ID: PROJECT LENGTH: 1.411MI LANES EXIST/IMPROVED/ADDED: 5/ 5/ 0 FUND CODE 2017 PHASE: PRELIMINARY ENGINEERING / RESPONSIBLE AGENCY: MANAGED BY FDOT SA 1,069,895 TOTAL ,069,895 TOTAL ,069,895 ITEM NUMBER: PROJECT DESCRIPTION:US 98 (PEACE RIVER-FT MEADE) AT BRIDGE NO 0064(JOHN SINGLETARY BRIDGE) *NON-SIS* DISTRICT:01 COUNTY:POLK TYPE OF WORK:PD&E/EMO STUDY ROADWAY ID: PROJECT LENGTH:.103MI LANES EXIST/IMPROVED/ADDED: 2/ 0/ 0 FUND CODE 2017 PHASE: PRELIMINARY ENGINEERING / RESPONSIBLE AGENCY: MANAGED BY FDOT SU 23,506 TOTAL ,506 TOTAL , TIP - Adopted June 14, 2018 Page 37

39 PAGE 15 FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION DATE RUN: 10/27/2017 OFFICE OF WORK PROGRAM TIME RUN: POLK TPO ANNUAL OBLIGATIONS REPORT MBROBLTP ================ HIGHWAYS ================ ITEM NUMBER: PROJECT DESCRIPTION:SR 60 FROM USS AGRI CHEM TO AMERICAN WAY - XING# V *SIS* DISTRICT:01 COUNTY:POLK TYPE OF WORK:RAIL SAFETY PROJECT ROADWAY ID: PROJECT LENGTH:.836MI LANES EXIST/IMPROVED/ADDED: 4/ 4/ 0 FUND CODE 2017 PHASE: RAILROAD AND UTILITIES / RESPONSIBLE AGENCY: MANAGED BY FDOT RHP -4,380 TOTAL ,380 TOTAL ,380 ITEM NUMBER: PROJECT DESCRIPTION:CREWS LAKE RD FROM LAKELAND HIGHLANDS RD TO E. OF BEAL LANE *NON-SIS* DISTRICT:01 COUNTY:POLK TYPE OF WORK:TRAFFIC OPS IMPROVEMENT ROADWAY ID: PROJECT LENGTH: 1.946MI LANES EXIST/IMPROVED/ADDED: 2/ 2/ 0 FUND CODE 2017 PHASE: PRELIMINARY ENGINEERING / RESPONSIBLE AGENCY: MANAGED BY FDOT HSP -186,205 SA -16,781 PHASE: CONSTRUCTION / RESPONSIBLE AGENCY: MANAGED BY FDOT HSP -1,326,224 TOTAL ,529,210 TOTAL ,529,210 ITEM NUMBER: PROJECT DESCRIPTION:ROSE STREET SIDEWALKS AT VARIOUS LOCATIONS *NON-SIS* DISTRICT:01 COUNTY:POLK TYPE OF WORK:SIDEWALK ROADWAY ID: PROJECT LENGTH:.533MI LANES EXIST/IMPROVED/ADDED: 2/ 0/ 0 FUND CODE 2017 PHASE: CONSTRUCTION / RESPONSIBLE AGENCY: MANAGED BY CITY OF LAKELAND TALU 269,118 PHASE: CONSTRUCTION / RESPONSIBLE AGENCY: MANAGED BY FDOT TALU 1,000 TOTAL ,118 TOTAL ,118 ITEM NUMBER: PROJECT DESCRIPTION:US 92 FROM GALLOWAY ROAD TO WABASH AVENUE *NON-SIS* DISTRICT:01 COUNTY:POLK TYPE OF WORK:SIDEWALK ROADWAY ID: PROJECT LENGTH: 1.376MI LANES EXIST/IMPROVED/ADDED: 3/ 0/ 0 FUND CODE 2017 PHASE: PRELIMINARY ENGINEERING / RESPONSIBLE AGENCY: MANAGED BY FDOT SU 355,651 TOTAL ,651 TOTAL , TIP - Adopted June 14, 2018 Page 38

40 PAGE 16 FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION DATE RUN: 10/27/2017 OFFICE OF WORK PROGRAM TIME RUN: POLK TPO ANNUAL OBLIGATIONS REPORT MBROBLTP ================ HIGHWAYS ================ ITEM NUMBER: PROJECT DESCRIPTION:OLD DIXIE TRAIL FROM AUBURNDALE TO HAINES CITY *NON-SIS* DISTRICT:01 COUNTY:POLK TYPE OF WORK:PD&E/EMO STUDY ROADWAY ID: PROJECT LENGTH:.001MI LANES EXIST/IMPROVED/ADDED: 1/ 0/ 0 FUND CODE 2017 PHASE: PRELIMINARY ENGINEERING / RESPONSIBLE AGENCY: MANAGED BY FDOT SU 1,048,752 TOTAL ,048,752 TOTAL ,048,752 ITEM NUMBER: PROJECT DESCRIPTION:SR 60 FROM HILLSBOROUGH C/L TO DIESEL RD *SIS* DISTRICT:01 COUNTY:POLK TYPE OF WORK:RESURFACING ROADWAY ID: PROJECT LENGTH: 5.298MI LANES EXIST/IMPROVED/ADDED: 4/ 4/ 0 FUND CODE 2017 PHASE: CONSTRUCTION / RESPONSIBLE AGENCY: MANAGED BY FDOT NHRE 6,997,680 TOTAL ,997,680 TOTAL ,997,680 ITEM NUMBER: PROJECT DESCRIPTION:SR 546 (US 92) FROM WABASH AVENUE TO E OF INGRAHAM AVENUE *NON-SIS* DISTRICT:01 COUNTY:POLK TYPE OF WORK:RIGID PAVEMENT REHABILITATION ROADWAY ID: PROJECT LENGTH: 2.765MI LANES EXIST/IMPROVED/ADDED: 6/ 6/ 0 FUND CODE 2017 PHASE: PRELIMINARY ENGINEERING / RESPONSIBLE AGENCY: MANAGED BY FDOT HSP 405,538 TOTAL ,538 TOTAL ,538 ITEM NUMBER: PROJECT DESCRIPTION:CR 542 OLD TAMPA HWY FROM GAY RD TO DOC GAY RD X-ING #624214S *NON-SIS* DISTRICT:01 COUNTY:POLK TYPE OF WORK:RAIL SAFETY PROJECT ROADWAY ID: PROJECT LENGTH:.199MI LANES EXIST/IMPROVED/ADDED: 2/ 2/ 0 FUND CODE 2017 PHASE: RAILROAD AND UTILITIES / RESPONSIBLE AGENCY: MANAGED BY FDOT RHH -119,252 TOTAL ,252 TOTAL , TIP - Adopted June 14, 2018 Page 39

41 PAGE 17 FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION DATE RUN: 10/27/2017 OFFICE OF WORK PROGRAM TIME RUN: POLK TPO ANNUAL OBLIGATIONS REPORT MBROBLTP ================ HIGHWAYS ================ ITEM NUMBER: PROJECT DESCRIPTION:PAYNE ST SR 600/US92 - BLUE JAY AVE X-ING #623084U *NON-SIS* DISTRICT:01 COUNTY:POLK TYPE OF WORK:RAIL SAFETY PROJECT ROADWAY ID: PROJECT LENGTH:.001MI LANES EXIST/IMPROVED/ADDED: 0/ 0/ 0 FUND CODE 2017 PHASE: RAILROAD AND UTILITIES / RESPONSIBLE AGENCY: MANAGED BY FDOT RHH 23,998 TOTAL ,998 TOTAL ,998 ITEM NUMBER: PROJECT DESCRIPTION:LEM CARNES RD CR 547N TO SR 600/US 17 X-ING #622960T *NON-SIS* DISTRICT:01 COUNTY:POLK TYPE OF WORK:RAIL SAFETY PROJECT ROADWAY ID: PROJECT LENGTH:.010MI LANES EXIST/IMPROVED/ADDED: 2/ 0/ 0 FUND CODE 2017 PHASE: RAILROAD AND UTILITIES / RESPONSIBLE AGENCY: MANAGED BY FDOT RHH -259,069 TOTAL ,069 TOTAL ,069 ITEM NUMBER: PROJECT DESCRIPTION:CR 542 OLD TAMPA HWY FROM GAY RD TO GAY RD X-ING #624215Y *NON-SIS* DISTRICT:01 COUNTY:POLK TYPE OF WORK:RAIL SAFETY PROJECT ROADWAY ID: PROJECT LENGTH:.034MI LANES EXIST/IMPROVED/ADDED: 2/ 2/ 0 FUND CODE 2017 PHASE: RAILROAD AND UTILITIES / RESPONSIBLE AGENCY: MANAGED BY FDOT RHH -119,199 TOTAL ,199 TOTAL ,199 ITEM NUMBER: PROJECT DESCRIPTION:SOUTH LAKE SILVER DR FROM 5TH STREET NW TO SR 549(1ST STREET) N *NON-SIS* DISTRICT:01 COUNTY:POLK TYPE OF WORK:SIDEWALK ROADWAY ID: PROJECT LENGTH:.330MI LANES EXIST/IMPROVED/ADDED: 0/ 0/ 0 FUND CODE 2017 PHASE: PRELIMINARY ENGINEERING / RESPONSIBLE AGENCY: MANAGED BY CITY OF WINTER HAVEN SU 125,000 PHASE: PRELIMINARY ENGINEERING / RESPONSIBLE AGENCY: MANAGED BY FDOT SU 1,000 TOTAL ,000 TOTAL ,000 ITEM NUMBER: PROJECT DESCRIPTION:ARIANA ST SIDEWALK FROM S. WABASH AVE TO LOTUS AVE *NON-SIS* DISTRICT:01 COUNTY:POLK TYPE OF WORK:SIDEWALK ROADWAY ID: PROJECT LENGTH:.740MI LANES EXIST/IMPROVED/ADDED: 0/ 0/ 0 FUND CODE 2017 PHASE: PRELIMINARY ENGINEERING / RESPONSIBLE AGENCY: MANAGED BY FDOT SU 1, TIP - Adopted June 14, 2018 Page 40

42 PAGE 18 FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION DATE RUN: 10/27/2017 OFFICE OF WORK PROGRAM TIME RUN: POLK TPO ANNUAL OBLIGATIONS REPORT MBROBLTP ================ HIGHWAYS ================ PHASE: PRELIMINARY ENGINEERING / RESPONSIBLE AGENCY: MANAGED BY POLK CO A POLITICAL SUBDIVISION SU 200,000 TOTAL ,000 TOTAL ,000 ITEM NUMBER: PROJECT DESCRIPTION:CR 580 (E JOHNSON AVE) FROM US 17/US 92 TO N 24TH STREET *NON-SIS* DISTRICT:01 COUNTY:POLK TYPE OF WORK:SIDEWALK ROADWAY ID: PROJECT LENGTH:.360MI LANES EXIST/IMPROVED/ADDED: 2/ 0/ 0 FUND CODE 2017 PHASE: PRELIMINARY ENGINEERING / RESPONSIBLE AGENCY: MANAGED BY FDOT SU 170,449 TOTAL ,449 TOTAL ,449 ITEM NUMBER: PROJECT DESCRIPTION:WABASH AVE FROM OLD TAMPA HWY/CR 542 TO MERSHON ST #624298P *NON-SIS* DISTRICT:01 COUNTY:POLK TYPE OF WORK:RAIL SAFETY PROJECT ROADWAY ID: PROJECT LENGTH:.028MI LANES EXIST/IMPROVED/ADDED: 2/ 0/ 0 FUND CODE 2017 PHASE: RAILROAD AND UTILITIES / RESPONSIBLE AGENCY: MANAGED BY FDOT RHH 57,730 TOTAL ,730 TOTAL ,730 ITEM NUMBER: PROJECT DESCRIPTION:E PARK AVE FROM N SCENIC HWY TO CYPRESS GARDENS LANE #625479X *NON-SIS* DISTRICT:01 COUNTY:POLK TYPE OF WORK:RAIL SAFETY PROJECT ROADWAY ID: PROJECT LENGTH:.039MI LANES EXIST/IMPROVED/ADDED: 2/ 0/ 0 FUND CODE 2017 PHASE: RAILROAD AND UTILITIES / RESPONSIBLE AGENCY: MANAGED BY FDOT RHH 264,409 TOTAL ,409 TOTAL ,409 ITEM NUMBER: PROJECT DESCRIPTION:AIRPORT RD RR XING AT ENTRANCE TO AIRPORT #625424K *NON-SIS* DISTRICT:01 COUNTY:POLK TYPE OF WORK:RAIL SAFETY PROJECT ROADWAY ID: PROJECT LENGTH:.001MI LANES EXIST/IMPROVED/ADDED: 0/ 0/ 0 FUND CODE 2017 PHASE: RAILROAD AND UTILITIES / RESPONSIBLE AGENCY: MANAGED BY FDOT RHH 176,072 TOTAL ,072 TOTAL , TIP - Adopted June 14, 2018 Page 41

43 PAGE 19 FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION DATE RUN: 10/27/2017 OFFICE OF WORK PROGRAM TIME RUN: POLK TPO ANNUAL OBLIGATIONS REPORT MBROBLTP ================ HIGHWAYS ================ ITEM NUMBER: PROJECT DESCRIPTION:SR 655/LAKE SHIPP DR FROM US 17/SR 555 TO EAGLE LAKE RD #623042H *NON-SIS* DISTRICT:01 COUNTY:POLK TYPE OF WORK:RAIL SAFETY PROJECT ROADWAY ID: PROJECT LENGTH:.103MI LANES EXIST/IMPROVED/ADDED: 3/ 0/ 0 FUND CODE 2017 PHASE: RAILROAD AND UTILITIES / RESPONSIBLE AGENCY: MANAGED BY FDOT RHH 8,865 TOTAL ,865 TOTAL ,865 ITEM NUMBER: PROJECT DESCRIPTION:BARTOW RD (SR548) INTERSECTION LIGHTING RETROFIT *NON-SIS* DISTRICT:01 COUNTY:POLK TYPE OF WORK:LIGHTING ROADWAY ID: PROJECT LENGTH:.100MI LANES EXIST/IMPROVED/ADDED: 3/ 0/ 0 FUND CODE 2017 PHASE: PRELIMINARY ENGINEERING / RESPONSIBLE AGENCY: MANAGED BY FDOT HSP 10,000 TOTAL ,000 TOTAL ,000 ITEM NUMBER: PROJECT DESCRIPTION:RECKER HWY SW (SR655) INTERSECTION LIGHTING RETROFIT *NON-SIS* DISTRICT:01 COUNTY:POLK TYPE OF WORK:LIGHTING ROADWAY ID: PROJECT LENGTH: 1.180MI LANES EXIST/IMPROVED/ADDED: 2/ 0/ 0 FUND CODE 2017 PHASE: PRELIMINARY ENGINEERING / RESPONSIBLE AGENCY: MANAGED BY FDOT HSP 10,000 TOTAL ,000 TOTAL ,000 ITEM NUMBER: PROJECT DESCRIPTION:WINTERLAKE RD (SR 540 ) INTERSECTION LIGHTING RETROFIT *NON-SIS* DISTRICT:01 COUNTY:POLK TYPE OF WORK:LIGHTING ROADWAY ID: PROJECT LENGTH:.200MI LANES EXIST/IMPROVED/ADDED: 2/ 0/ 0 FUND CODE 2017 PHASE: PRELIMINARY ENGINEERING / RESPONSIBLE AGENCY: MANAGED BY FDOT HSP 10,000 TOTAL ,000 TOTAL , TIP - Adopted June 14, 2018 Page 42

44 PAGE 20 FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION DATE RUN: 10/27/2017 OFFICE OF WORK PROGRAM TIME RUN: POLK TPO ANNUAL OBLIGATIONS REPORT MBROBLTP ================ HIGHWAYS ================ ITEM NUMBER: PROJECT DESCRIPTION:SR 60 W CANEL STREET / INTERSECTION LIGHTING RETROFIT *SIS* DISTRICT:01 COUNTY:POLK TYPE OF WORK:LIGHTING ROADWAY ID: PROJECT LENGTH: 7.586MI LANES EXIST/IMPROVED/ADDED: 4/ 0/ 0 FUND CODE 2017 PHASE: PRELIMINARY ENGINEERING / RESPONSIBLE AGENCY: MANAGED BY FDOT HSP 10,000 TOTAL ,000 TOTAL ,000 ITEM NUMBER: PROJECT DESCRIPTION:US 98 (N FL AVE) FROM W 10TH ST/PARKVIEW PL TO CRAWFORD ST *NON-SIS* DISTRICT:01 COUNTY:POLK TYPE OF WORK:INTERSECTION IMPROVEMENT ROADWAY ID: PROJECT LENGTH:.352MI LANES EXIST/IMPROVED/ADDED: 4/ 4/ 0 FUND CODE 2017 PHASE: PRELIMINARY ENGINEERING / RESPONSIBLE AGENCY: MANAGED BY FDOT HSP 20,225 SA 10,000 TOTAL ,225 TOTAL ,225 TOTAL DIST: 01 24,378,023 TOTAL HIGHWAYS 24,378, TIP - Adopted June 14, 2018 Page 43

45 PAGE 21 FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION DATE RUN: 10/27/2017 OFFICE OF WORK PROGRAM TIME RUN: POLK TPO ANNUAL OBLIGATIONS REPORT MBROBLTP ================ PLANNING ================ ITEM NUMBER: PROJECT DESCRIPTION:POLK COUNTY MPO FY 2015/2016 UPWP *NON-SIS* DISTRICT:01 COUNTY:POLK TYPE OF WORK:TRANSPORTATION PLANNING ROADWAY ID: PROJECT LENGTH:.000 LANES EXIST/IMPROVED/ADDED: 0/ 0/ 0 FUND CODE 2017 PHASE: PRELIMINARY ENGINEERING / RESPONSIBLE AGENCY: RESPONSIBLE AGENCY NOT AVAILABLE PL -431,063 TOTAL ,063 TOTAL ,063 ITEM NUMBER: PROJECT DESCRIPTION:COMPLETE STREET CORRIDOR FEASIBILITY VARIOUS LOCATIONS *NON-SIS* DISTRICT:01 COUNTY:POLK TYPE OF WORK:PD&E/EMO STUDY ROADWAY ID: PROJECT LENGTH: 7.521MI LANES EXIST/IMPROVED/ADDED: 2/ 2/ 0 FUND CODE 2017 PHASE: PRELIMINARY ENGINEERING / RESPONSIBLE AGENCY: MANAGED BY POLK CO A POLITICAL SUBDIVISION SU 500,000 TOTAL ,000 TOTAL ,000 ITEM NUMBER: PROJECT DESCRIPTION:POLK COUNTY MPO FY 2016/2017 UPWP *NON-SIS* DISTRICT:01 COUNTY:POLK TYPE OF WORK:TRANSPORTATION PLANNING ROADWAY ID: PROJECT LENGTH:.000 LANES EXIST/IMPROVED/ADDED: 0/ 0/ 0 FUND CODE 2017 PHASE: PRELIMINARY ENGINEERING / RESPONSIBLE AGENCY: RESPONSIBLE AGENCY NOT AVAILABLE PL 822,482 TOTAL ,482 TOTAL ,482 TOTAL DIST: ,419 TOTAL PLANNING 891, TIP - Adopted June 14, 2018 Page 44

46 PAGE 22 FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION DATE RUN: 10/27/2017 OFFICE OF WORK PROGRAM TIME RUN: POLK TPO ANNUAL OBLIGATIONS REPORT MBROBLTP ================ TRANSIT ================ ITEM NUMBER: PROJECT DESCRIPTION:LAMTD AT VARIOUS LOCATIONS *NON-SIS* DISTRICT:01 COUNTY:POLK TYPE OF WORK:PUBLIC TRANSPORTATION SHELTER ROADWAY ID: PROJECT LENGTH:.200MI LANES EXIST/IMPROVED/ADDED: 6/ 0/ 0 FUND CODE 2017 PHASE: GRANTS AND MISCELLANEOUS / RESPONSIBLE AGENCY: RESPONSIBLE AGENCY NOT AVAILABLE SU 59,061 TOTAL ,061 TOTAL ,061 TOTAL DIST: 01 59,061 TOTAL TRANSIT 59,061 GRAND TOTAL 25,328, TIP - Adopted June 14, 2018 Page 45

47 Transportation Disadvantaged Element TIP - Adopted June 14, 2018 Page 46

48 TRANSPORTATION DISADVANTAGED PROGRAM ELEMENT Each county in the state has a Transportation Disadvantaged program to provide transportation to those who, because of physical or mental disability, income status, or age, are unable to transport themselves or to purchase transportation and are, therefore, dependent upon others to obtain access to health care, employment, education, shopping, social activities, or other life-sustaining activities, or children who are handicapped or high-risk. The Polk TPO serves as the Designated Official Planning Agency for Polk County pursuant to s (1) F.S. and (2), F.A.C. Services for the Transportation Disadvantaged program in Polk County are provided through the Lakeland Area Mass Transit District (LAMTD). Each county has a Local Transportation Coordinating Board (LCB) to oversee the transit agency providing the service to the transportation disadvantaged population. This board is comprised of a cross-section of users or user representatives including, but not limited to, state social service agencies, local agencies, users of the system, elderly citizens, and school board representatives. Every year the LCB approves the Transportation Disadvantaged Service Plan (TDSP) which consists of a minor update annually and a major update every five years. For more detailed information, go to A copy of the TDSP for Polk County can be found at: com/docs/librariesprovider2/tpo/tdsp-adopted pdf?sfvrsn=11. The tables on the following pages include the annual allocations for the Trip and Equipment Grant, as well as the Planning Grant Allocations for FY 2018/19. TP Polk TPO Transportation Improvement Program TIP - Adopted June 14, 2018 Page 47

49 FY Transportation Disadvantaged Trip and Equipment Grant Allocations Trip & Equipment Grant Voluntary Dollar Proviso - Statute Formula County FY18-19 Local Match Total Local Match Total Local Match Total FY Funding Funding Option 1 (10%) Funds (10%) Funds (10%) Funds Total Funds Alachua $610,651 $67,850 $678,501 $73 $8 $81 $86,695 $9,633 $96,328 $774,910 Baker $270,119 $30,013 $300,132 $1 $0 $1 $29,028 $3,225 $32,253 $332,386 Bay $457,630 $50,848 $508,478 $74 $8 $82 $67,983 $7,554 $75,537 $584,097 Bradford $236,503 $26,278 $262,781 $5 $1 $6 $18,569 $2,063 $20,632 $283,419 Brevard $1,421,435 $157,937 $1,579,372 $242 $27 $269 $0 $0 $0 $1,579,641 Broward $4,237,931 $470,881 $4,708,812 $788 $88 $876 $0 $0 $0 $4,709,688 Calhoun $216,415 $24,046 $240,461 $3 $0 $3 $19,187 $2,132 $21,319 $261,783 Charlotte $488,645 $54,294 $542,939 $30 $3 $33 $0 $0 $0 $542,972 Citrus $543,589 $60,399 $603,988 $25 $3 $28 $0 $0 $0 $604,016 Clay $556,996 $61,888 $618,884 $46 $5 $51 $84,831 $9,426 $94,257 $713,192 Collier $746,889 $82,988 $829,877 $85 $9 $94 $0 $0 $0 $829,971 Columbia $288,129 $32,014 $320,143 $28 $3 $31 $34,829 $3,870 $38,699 $358,872 DeSoto $223,377 $24,820 $248,197 $2 $0 $2 $19,800 $2,200 $22,000 $270,200 Dixie $200,578 $22,286 $222,864 $2 $0 $2 $18,152 $2,017 $20,169 $243,036 Duval $1,806,190 $200,688 $2,006,878 $461 $51 $512 $0 $0 $0 $2,007,391 Escambia $604,073 $67,119 $671,192 $104 $12 $116 $0 $0 $0 $671,308 Flagler $424,680 $47,187 $471,867 $46 $5 $51 $55,723 $6,191 $61,914 $533,832 Franklin $197,075 $21,897 $218,972 $0 $0 $0 $15,070 $1,674 $16,744 $235,716 Gadsden $417,520 $46,390 $463,910 $26 $3 $29 $55,144 $6,126 $61,270 $525,209 Gilchrist $192,765 $21,418 $214,183 $2 $0 $2 $10,898 $1,211 $12,109 $226,294 Glades $237,444 $26,383 $263,827 $0 $0 $0 $24,655 $2,739 $27,394 $291,221 Gulf $230,560 $25,618 $256,178 $1 $0 $1 $22,195 $2,466 $24,661 $280,840 Hamilton $181,872 $20,208 $202,080 $0 $0 $0 $12,752 $1,417 $14,169 $216,249 Hardee $258,559 $28,729 $287,288 $0 $0 $0 $28,513 $3,168 $31,681 $318,969 Hendry $267,259 $29,695 $296,954 $2 $0 $2 $37,237 $4,137 $41,374 $338,330 Hernando $496,804 $55,200 $552,004 $51 $6 $57 $62,285 $6,921 $69,206 $621,267 Highlands $449,690 $49,966 $499,656 $9 $1 $10 $61,781 $6,865 $68,646 $568,312 Hillsborough $2,163,067 $240,341 $2,403,408 $188 $21 $209 $391,362 $43,485 $434,847 $2,838,464 Holmes $270,360 $30,040 $300,400 $0 $0 $0 $26,512 $2,946 $29,458 $329,859 Indian River $425,827 $47,314 $473,141 $16 $2 $18 $49,590 $5,510 $55,100 $528,259 Jackson $345,189 $38,354 $383,543 $38 $4 $42 $46,504 $5,167 $51,671 $435,256 Jefferson $227,826 $25,314 $253,140 $1 $0 $1 $22,231 $2,470 $24,701 $277,842 Lafayette $177,087 $19,676 $196,763 $0 $0 $0 $12,834 $1,426 $14,260 $211,023 Lake $785,775 $87,308 $873,083 $139 $15 $154 $0 $0 $0 $873,237 Lee $1,266,683 $140,743 $1,407,426 $666 $74 $740 $181,181 $20,131 $201,312 $1,609,478 Leon $509,493 $56,610 $566,103 $125 $14 $139 $0 $0 $0 $566,241 Levy $309,174 $34,353 $343,527 $2 $0 $2 $41,273 $4,586 $45,859 $389,387 Liberty $240,213 $26,690 $266,903 $0 $0 $0 $29,770 $3,308 $33,078 $299,981 Madison $246,240 $27,360 $273,600 $0 $0 $0 $25,843 $2,871 $28,714 $302,314 Manatee $750,254 $83,362 $833,616 $66 $7 $73 $0 $0 $0 $833,689 Marion $765,351 $85,039 $850,390 $85 $9 $94 $111,437 $12,382 $123,819 $974,304 Martin $398,979 $44,331 $443,310 $62 $7 $69 $45,463 $5,051 $50,514 $493,893 Miami-Dade $5,153,942 $572,660 $5,726,602 $1,300 $144 $1,444 $0 $0 $0 $5,728,046 Monroe $324,140 $36,016 $360,156 $33 $4 $37 $47,999 $5,333 $53,332 $413,525 Nassau $298,524 $33,169 $331,693 $12 $1 $13 $36,490 $4,054 $40,544 $372,250 Okaloosa $540,646 $60,072 $600,718 $39 $4 $43 $0 $0 $0 $600,761 Okeechobee $233,349 $25,928 $259,277 $0 $0 $0 $24,099 $2,678 $26,777 $286,054 Orange $2,956,168 $328,463 $3,284,631 $849 $94 $943 $0 $0 $0 $3,285,574 Osceola $810,073 $90,008 $900,081 $10 $1 $11 $0 $0 $0 $900,092 Palm Beach $3,675,235 $408,359 $4,083,594 $1,183 $131 $1,314 $0 $0 $0 $4,084,908 Pasco $878,838 $97,649 $976,487 $195 $22 $217 $0 $0 $0 $976,704 Pinellas $3,665,849 $407,317 $4,073,166 $550 $61 $611 $0 $0 $0 $4,073,778 Polk $1,300,175 $144,464 $1,444,639 $205 $23 $228 $0 $0 $0 $1,444,867 Putnam $429,859 $47,762 $477,621 $108 $12 $120 $62,333 $6,926 $69,259 $547,000 Saint Johns $616,989 $68,554 $685,543 $255 $28 $283 $118,503 $13,167 $131,670 $817,497 Saint Lucie $783,993 $87,110 $871,103 $56 $6 $62 $0 $0 $0 $871,166 Santa Rosa $378,836 $42,093 $420,929 $21 $2 $23 $53,369 $5,930 $59,299 $480,251 Sarasota $1,273,735 $141,526 $1,415,261 $278 $31 $309 $0 $0 $0 $1,415,570 Seminole $963,576 $107,064 $1,070,640 $165 $18 $183 $0 $0 $0 $1,070,822 Sumter $424,364 $47,152 $471,516 $6 $1 $7 $48,349 $5,372 $53,721 $525,244 Suwannee $251,528 $27,948 $279,476 $5 $1 $6 $26,452 $2,939 $29,391 $308,873 Taylor $230,315 $25,591 $255,906 $8 $1 $9 $30,376 $3,375 $33,751 $289,666 Union $197,626 $21,958 $219,584 $0 $0 $0 $10,452 $1,161 $11,613 $231,197 Volusia $1,383,565 $153,729 $1,537,294 $130 $14 $144 $0 $0 $0 $1,537,439 Wakulla $216,150 $24,017 $240,167 $6 $1 $7 $20,360 $2,262 $22,622 $262,797 Walton $330,006 $36,667 $366,673 $7 $1 $8 $46,972 $5,219 $52,191 $418,871 Washington $252,754 $28,084 $280,838 $1 $0 $1 $24,917 $2,769 $27,686 $308,525 TOTALS $52,715,132 $5,857,235 $58,572,367 $8,916 $987 $9,903 $2,300,000 $255,553 $2,555,553 $61,137,823 Rev. 4/20/ TIP - Adopted June 14, 2018 Page 48

50 TIP - Adopted June 14, 2018 Page 49

51 Listing of State and Local Transportation Projects TIP - Adopted June 14, 2018 Page 50

52 TIP - Adopted June 14, 2018 Page 51

53 TIP - Adopted June 14, 2018 Page 52

54 TIP - Adopted June 14, 2018 Page 53

55 TIP - Adopted June 14, 2018 Page 54

56 TIP - Adopted June 14, 2018 Page 55

57 TIP - Adopted June 14, 2018 Page 56

58 TIP - Adopted June 14, 2018 Page 57

59 TIP - Adopted June 14, 2018 Page 58

60 TIP - Adopted June 14, 2018 Page 59

61 TIP - Adopted June 14, 2018 Page 60

62 TIP - Adopted June 14, 2018 Page 61

63 TIP - Adopted June 14, 2018 Page 62

64 TIP - Adopted June 14, 2018 Page 63

65 TIP - Adopted June 14, 2018 Page 64

66 TIP - Adopted June 14, 2018 Page 65

67 TIP - Adopted June 14, 2018 Page 66

68 TIP - Adopted June 14, 2018 Page 67

69 TIP - Adopted June 14, 2018 Page 68

70 TIP - Adopted June 14, 2018 Page 69

71 TIP - Adopted June 14, 2018 Page 70

72 TIP - Adopted June 14, 2018 Page 71

73 TIP - Adopted June 14, 2018 Page 72

74 TIP - Adopted June 14, 2018 Page 73

75 TIP - Adopted June 14, 2018 Page 74

76 TIP - Adopted June 14, 2018 Page 75

77 TIP - Adopted June 14, 2018 Page 76

78 TIP - Adopted June 14, 2018 Page 77

79 TIP - Adopted June 14, 2018 Page 78

80 TIP - Adopted June 14, 2018 Page 79

81 TIP - Adopted June 14, 2018 Page 80

82 TIP - Adopted June 14, 2018 Page 81

83 TIP - Adopted June 14, 2018 Page 82

84 TIP - Adopted June 14, 2018 Page 83

85 TIP - Adopted June 14, 2018 Page 84

86 TIP - Adopted June 14, 2018 Page 85

87 TIP - Adopted June 14, 2018 Page 86

88 Appendix A State and Federal Funding Codes TIP - Adopted June 14, 2018 Page 87

89 State & Federal Funding Codes ACBZ Advance Construction Bridge Program Off System ACCM Advance Construction (CM) ACER Advance Construction (ER) ACNP Advance Construction -Interstate Maintenance, Bridge Replacement, National Highway combined ACSA Advance Construction (SA) ACSE Advance Construction (SE) ACSH Advance Construction (SH) ACSL Advance Construction (SL) ACSN Advance Construction (SN) ACSP Advance Construction (SP) ACSS Advance Construction (SS) ACSU Advance Construction (SU) ACTA Advance Construction- Transportation Alternatives ACTN Advance Construction Transportation Alternatives <5K ACTU Advance Construction Transportation Alternatives >200K TIP - Adopted June 14, 2018 Page 88

90 ACXA Advance Construction (XA) ACXL Advance Construction (XL) ACXU Advance Construction (XU) BNDS Bond State BNIR R/W & Bridge Bonds for Intrastate BRP State Bridge Replacement BRTD Federal Bridge Replacement Discretionary BRAC BRT (AC/Regular) BRRP State Bridge Repair and Rehab BRTD Federal Bridge Replacement Discretionary BRTZ BRT (AC/Repair) BU DB, Urban Areas >200K BZAC BRTZ (AC/Regular) CIGP County Incentive Grant Program CIGR CIGP for Growth Management CM Congestion Mitigation - ACQ D Unrestricted State Primary DDR District Dedicated Revenue DDRF State Match for XL funded projects TIP - Adopted June 14, 2018 Page 89

91 DEM Environmental Mitigation DI State Statewide Inter/Intrastate Highway DIH State in-house product support DIRS Advance Acquisition Intrastate Corridor DIS Strategic Intermodal System DPTO State PTO DS State Primary Highways & PTO DSF State match for XU funded projects DSB1 Skyway DSB2 Everglades Parkway/Alligator Alley DU State Primary/Federal Reimbursement EBBP Equity Bonus - Bridge EBNH Equity Bonus - NH ER05 Hurricane 2005 FAA Federal Aviation Administration FCO Primary/Fixed Capital Outlay FEDR Federal Research Activities FEMA Federal Emergency Management Activities FHPP Federal High Priority TIP - Adopted June 14, 2018 Page 90

92 F003 I-75 Discretionary FTA Federal Transit Administration GMR General Revenue for SIS HP Federal Highway Planning HPAC HP (AC/Regular) HPP High Priority Projects HR Federal Highway Research HRRR High Risk Rural Road HSP Highway Safety Program HSR High Speed Rail Corridor Section I Federal Interstate/State Primary IMAC IM (AC/Regular) IVH Intelligent Vehicle Highway System LF Local Funds LFD LF for STTF Utility Work LFF Local Fund for matching F/A LFP Local Fund for Participating LFR Local Funds/Reimbursable Future MA Minimum Allocation (Any area) TIP - Adopted June 14, 2018 Page 91

93 MABP Minimum Allocation Bridges (non-brt) MABR Minimum Allocation Bridges (BRT) MANH Minimum Allocation (NH) MCSA Motor Carrier Safety Assistance MG Minimum Guarantee MGBP Minimum Guarantee Bridge Supplemental MGNH Minimum Guarantee for NH ML MA, Areas <= 200K MU MA, Urban Areas >200K NCPD National Corridor Plan & Development NHRE National Hwy System Performance Program Resurfacing PKYI Turnpike Improvement PKYR Turnpike Maintenance Reserve PL Metro Plan (85% FA; 15% other) PLAC Metro Plan A/C Regular PLH Public Lands Highway PLHD Public Lands Highway Discretionary PORT Seaports RHH Rail Highway Crossings Hazard TIP - Adopted June 14, 2018 Page 92

94 RHP Rail Highway Crossings Prot. Device SA STP, any area SCOP Small County Outreach Program SCRA Small County Resurfacing SE STP, Enhancement SIBD State Funded Infrastructure Bank SIB1 State Infrastructure Bank SIS Strategic Intermodal System SL STP Areas <= 200K SN STP Mandatory Non-Urban SP STP Railroad Protective Devices SPAC STP Railroad Protective Devices (AC regular) SR STP Railroad Hazard Elimination SRAC STP RR Hazard Elimination AC/Regular SRTS Safe Routes to School infrastructure SR2N Safe Routes to School non-infrastructure SS STP Safety SU STP Urban Areas > 200K TALT Transportation Alternatives Any Area TIP - Adopted June 14, 2018 Page 93

95 TALU Transportation Alternatives > 200,000 TIMP Transportation Improvement TM01 Sunshine Skyway TM02 Everglades Parkway TOP Transportation Outreach Program TRIP Transportation Improvement Plan VPPP Value Pricing Pilot Program XA Any Area XL Areas <=200k population XU Areas >200k population TIP - Adopted June 14, 2018 Page 94

96 Appendix B Polk Transportation Projects Guide TIP - Adopted June 14, 2018 Page 95

97 TIP - Adopted June 14, 2018 Page 96

98 Table of Contents Overview...1 Project Prioritization. 2 Who Can Submit Projects?...2 Transportation Alternatives Projects... 2 Complete Streets Projects.4 Local Multi-Use Trails..6 Regional Multi-Use Trails...7 TPO Staff Support...7 Appendices: Appendix A Project Matrix....8 Appendix B Momentum 2040 Performance Targets..10 Appendix C Project Scoring Criteria...20 Appendix D FDOT Application.22 Appendix E Polk TPO Application...27 Appendix F FDOT RTAP Supplemental Application 31 Appendix G FDOT TRIP Supplemental Application.32 Maps: Map A Environmental Justice Area Map...37 Map B State Highway and Federal Aid Eligible System Map...38 Map C Bicycle/Pedestrian Priorities...39 Map D Multi-Use Trail Needs...40 Map E Regional Multi-Use Trail Network TIP - Adopted June 14, 2018 Page 97

99 Overview The Polk Transportation Planning Organization (TPO) is the lead transportation planning agency for Polk County. The TPO develops transportation plans and programs for Polk County as mandated by federal and state legislation. Each year the TPO is responsible for developing a list of Priority Transportation Projects and submitting the list to the Florida Department of Transportation (FDOT) for consideration during development of the Five Year Work Program for Polk County. The TPO accepts applications and project proposals from local governments for the Transportation Alternatives Program (TA), Complete Streets (CS), Multi-Use Trail (MUT), Regional Multi-Use Trail (RMUT), and Safe Routes to Schools (SRTS) projects as a method of prioritizing projects included in the annual TPO Priority Transportation Projects list. These projects are based on the goals and objectives of the TPO s adopted Momentum 2040 and are intended to promote safety, enhance mobility and reduce congestion, for all users of the transportation system. A project matrix is included as Appendix A with more detailed information. The TPO has adopted performance targets to help identify the strengths and weaknesses of Polk County s transportation system. Polk TPO staff encourages all applicants to review these targets before submiting project applications for review. Please note, priority will be given to those projects which assist the TPO in reaching the targets set forth in Momentum A copy of the Performance Targets is included as Appendix B. As such, the TPO has set the following level of priority for project applications: 1. Safe Route to School projects and improvements recommended in the Neighborhood Mobility Audits, as well as transportation alternative projects in traditionally underserved neighborhoods. 2. Improvements recommended in either the Complete Streets Action Plans or the Pedestrian and Bicycle Safety Action Plans. This includes engineering or educational measures. 3. Any other project included in Momentum 2040, e.g., multi-use trails, transit enhancements or other safety and multi-modal projects. If the applicant intends to construct the project (rather than FDOT) the local government will be responsible for design of the project and must be Local Agency Program (LAP) certified prior to the start of the fiscal year in which the project is programmed. Design of 60% of the project must be completed by March of the prior fiscal year that the project is programmed for construction. For example, if a project is programmed for construction in FY 2017/18, 60% design must be complete by March, If the applicant is not LAP certified, design funds should be requested in the project proposal TIP - Adopted June 14, 2018 Page 98

100 Important dates to know: November 7: TPO Workshop February 1: FDOT and TPO application forms are due to TPO. June: TPO Board adoption of Priority Projects. Project Prioritization The TPO will establish priorities for local and regional projects separately. There will also be separate lists for each eligible category of funding; CS, TA, MUT, and RMUT. Each list of projects will be ranked in ascending order with number one representing the top priority. A sub-committee comprised of members from Technical Advisory Committee and Advisor Network will evaluate, score, and rank each project proposal in the TA, MUT, and RMUT categories according to the adopted criteria provided in this document (See Appendix C Project Scoring Criteria). RMUT proposals will include an evaluation by the Regional Negotiating Committee comprised of elected officials from the Polk TPO Board and other FDOT District One (D1) MPO Board members (Sarasota-Manatee MPO). The highest ranked projects from each list will be included in the TPO Priority Project list. The Priority Project list is first reviewed by the advisory committees and recommendations are then forwarded to the TPO Board for adoption. Who can submit projects? A project applicant or sponsor can be any municipality, county, state, federal, or other public agency willing to accept future maintenance of the facility by entering into a maintenance agreement with FDOT and is willing to support any other actions necessary to fully implement the proposed project. Complete project applications must be submitted to the TPO by February 1. Polk TPO will forward applications to FDOT for their review. Each project application package must include the FDOT pre-application as well as the Polk TPO s application. See Appendix D and E for application forms. Transportation Alternatives (TA) Projects in this category are funded through the Moving Ahead for Progress in the 21 st Century Act (MAP-21). A Transportation Alternative (TA) project is a project related to transportation improvements or features which are considered enhancements since they are not typically included as part of the transportation system. TA projects must meet the requirements of eligible activities listed in the Florida Department of Transportation (FDOT) Policy for Transportation Alternatives Projects TIP - Adopted June 14, 2018 Page 99

101 Although there are a number of eligible projects that can be funded in this category the TPO gives additional consideration to projects that show consistentency with Momentum 2040 and enhance Polk County s multi-modal transportation network. Applicants may submit no more than two (2) projects proposals in this category. Projects in this category include: Safety improvements o Traffic calming o Pavement marking Multi-modal safety enhancements o Bicycle and pedestrian enhancements Sidewalks Bicycle facilities Multi-modal connections Crossing enhancements o Transit enhancements Passenger amenities Shelters Benches Bicycle racks Pedestrian connections/access improvements ADA access/compliance Bus pull offs Safety features Lighting Off road/off system trails o Local trails off the State and Federal Aid Eligible highway systems Streetscaping/corridor branding o Street lighting o Landscaping o Decorative brick in pavement (to mark crossings or intersections, or for use along sidewalks or pathways) FDOT D1 recieves an annual allocation of TA funds to program TA projects throughout the 12 counties within the district. Every effort is made to fund the top TA project priority in each county. There will be consideration given to equitable distribution of funds and projects. If an existing project is removed from the FDOT s Work Program, the TPO will request any available funds be used to program the next highest ranking project. The number of projects selected by FDOT for funding will depend on the cost of the individual projects and the estimated amount of available funding. The amount of available funds for each program is based on historical funding levels and direction provided by FDOT. It is important to understand these amounts can change from one TIP - Adopted June 14, 2018 Page 100

102 year to the next so applicants should inquire with TPO staff prior to submitting an application. In previous years, up to $600,000 has been offered in this category and a minimum project cost of $100,000 is mandatory in order to maintain efficiency and cost effectiveness. It is acceptable to submit larger projects in phases. Local governments may also consider funding any portion of a project exceeding the maximum of available funding. Projects can be on any roadway or Multi-use Trail corridor in public ownership. Right of way (ROW) acquisition is not an eligible project phase. See project matrix and applications in the Appendices Section for submission requirements, dates, and deadlines. Complete Street Projects The Polk TPO also has a funding set-aside for Complete Street Projects (CS) projects which are intended to be traffic operation, low-cost construction, safety, transit enhancements, pedestrian and bicycle facilities, or other enhancement projects that would improve safety conditions for all users, ease congestion, and/or improve efficiency of traffic operations on roadways. CS funds may also be used to supplement resurfacing projects and to include additional features in existing projects. Projects in this category include: Bike/Ped facilities o Supplement additions to resurfacing projects o Sidewalks o Bike lanes o Crossing enhancements o Access to transit Safety improvements o Lighting o Crossing signals o ITS o Safety audit/study to address high crash corridors Transit enhancements o Passenger amenities Stop amenities (ex.; shelters, benches, bike racks) Transit ITS (ex.; arrival information at stops, AVL, APC) o Pull offs o Corridor analysis Signal prioritization study Other studies to enhance transit as a means to ease congestion in a corridor o ADA access/compliance Concrete landing pads Ramps TIP - Adopted June 14, 2018 Page 101

103 Stop accessibility Low cost traffic operation and construction improvements to ease congestion o Intersection improvements Add turn lanes ITS improvements o Traffic calming Projects must be consistent with Momentum 2040 and the TPO will give additional consideration to projects that provide an opportunity to partner with the Florida Department of Transportation (FDOT) and local governments. Typically the TPO has an annual set aside of up to $5M for Complete Street Projects (CS). This amount is subject to change per FDOT funding availability. Funding in this category is meant to target more than one component of the congestion management strategy and project funding will be targeted as follows: Polk TPO Staff will use the following criteria to evaluate and prioritize Complete Street projects: 1. Project partnering a. Part of existing FDOT project b. Local match provided 2. Planned project a. Part of current Momentum 2040? i. Is the project consistent with the Momentum 2040 Goals, Objectives and Policies (GOPs)? ii. Consistent with Bike/Ped Safety Action Plan iii. Consistent with Complete Street Plans iv. Is the candidate project listed in the Needs or Cost-Feasible Plan? v. Pedestrian/Bicycle Priorities (Map C) vi. Neighborhood Mobility Audit TIP - Adopted June 14, 2018 Page 102

104 3. Safety a. High crash intersection i. Identified as unfunded need in Momentum 2040 ii. Consistent with Bike/Ped Safety Action Plan iii. Consistent with Complete Street Plans b. High crash corridor i. Identified as unfunded need in Momentum 2040 ii. Consistent with Bike/Ped Safety Action Plan iii. Consistent with Complete Street Plans c. Enhances safety conditions 4. Transit a. Multi-Modal LOS district i. Project identified in MM LOS district in Momentum 2040 b. Core Transit Corridor i. Project is in a Core Transit Corridor in the Momentum 2040 c. Enhances multi-modal travel i. Project would improve travel conditions on the multi-modal transportation system ii. Performance target senior population iii. Neighborhood mobility audit d. Stop activity and route ridership i. Does the stop have high daily activity? ii. Ridership on route is the route one of the most used? Local Multi-Use Trails (MUT) Local MUT projects are considered for funding from a TPO set-aside and must be identified in the currently adopted Momentum 2040 (see Map D). Applicants may submit no more than two (2) projects proposals in this category. Projects in this category include: New trail (ex.; Lake Alfred Trail along US 17/92) Extension or new phase of existing trail Improved trail crossings at major roads (ex.; Chain of Lakes Trail bridge at SR 544 in Winter Haven) Typically the annual TPO set aside in this category is $1M. This amount is subject to change per FDOT funding availability. It is acceptable to submit larger projects in phases. Local governments may also consider funding any portion of a project exceeding the maximum of available funding. Projects must be on the State Highway System or Federal Aid Eligible Road Network. See Map B. ROW acquisition is not an eligible project phase TIP - Adopted June 14, 2018 Page 103

105 Regional Multi-Use Trails (RMUT) Projects in this category must be identified on the RMUT network in both the TPO s Momentum 2040 (Map D) and the West Central Florida Chairs Coordinating Committee s (CCC) LRTP. RMUT projects will compete against projects from the other counties in FDOT District One for funding. Typically the amount of funding from FDOT in this category is up to $1.2M district-wide. This amount is subject to change per FDOT funding availability. It is acceptable to submit larger projects in phases. Local governments may also consider funding any portion of a project exceeding the maximum of available funding. Projects must be on the Regional Multi-use Trail Network. FDOT will consider ROW acquisition as an eligible project phase in this category, however depending on the amount needed this may not be the most effective use of funds. Applicants may submit one (1) project proposal in this category. If the applicant intends to construct the project (rather than FDOT) the local entity will be responsible for design of the project and must be Local Agency Program (LAP) certified prior to the start of the fiscal year in which the project is programmed. Design at 60% must be completed by March of the prior fiscal year that the project is programmed for construction. For example, if a project is programmed for construction in FY 2018/19, 60% design must be complete by March, If the applicant is not LAP certified, design funds should be requested in the project proposal. See project matrix, and RMUT application in the Appendices Section for submission requirements, dates, and deadlines. TPO Staff Support For assistance and support with project applications, proposals, policies, and process TPO staff is available to provide help to any agency. TPO Staff strongly encourages applicants to begin the FDOT pre-application process early so that adequate review time is assured. If you have any questions please contact: Xiomara Meeks Senior Transportation Planner xiomarameeks@polk-county.net TIP - Adopted June 14, 2018 Page 104

106 1. FDOT preapplication 2. Polk TPO application 1. FDOT preapplication 2. Polk TPO application 1. FDOT preapplication 2. Polk TPO application March of prior Fiscal Year* (Only applies to LAP projects) March of prior Fiscal Year* (Only applies to LAP projects) March of prior Fiscal Year* (Only applies to LAP projects) Project Type Description State/Fed/Reg Road System? Examples Funding Type Approximate Amount Year Funded Applications 60% Design TIP - Adopted June 14, 2018 Page 105 Tranportation Alternatives Program Complete Streets, Neighborhood Mobility Audits, Pedestrian and Bicycle Safety Action Plans Multi-use Trail (MUT) Multi-modal improvements including Bike, Ped, MUT, Transit enhancement, Complete Street, streetcaping, lighting, safety improvements Low-cost traffic operation and construction projects intended to ease congestion, improve safety, and enhance transit, bicycle, and pedestrian facilities Trail projects identified in the TPO's Long-Range Transportation Plan (LRTP) Any roadway or MUT corridor in public ownership Must be on State Highway Sytems or Federal Aid Eligible Road Network Must be on State Highway Sytems or Federal Aid Eligible Road Network Chain of Lakes Trailhead (Winter Haven), Lake Wales Trail, E Parker St. multi-modal corridor (Lakeland) Intersection improvements - add turn lanes (US 98 & SR 540) Transit - shelters (US 98), ADA improvments (SR33), Lighting - street/highway lighting (SR 60 & Central Ave in Lake Wales) Sidewalk, bike lanes, supplement additions to resurfacing projects Lake Alfred Trail (along US 17/92), Chain of Lakes Trail Bridge (SR 544) TAP $600,000 TMA SU Funds TMA SU Funds - set aside for MUT 2019/20 through 2020/21 $5M NA $1M NA

107 1. FDOT preapplication 2. Polk TPO application March of prior Fiscal Year* (Only applies to LAP projects) Project Type Description State/Fed/Reg Road System? Examples Funding Type Approximate Amount Year Funded Applications 60% Design TIP - Adopted June 14, 2018 Page 106 Regional Multiuse Trail (RMUT) Trail projects identified on the Regional Trail network in the TPO's LRTP and the CCC's LRTP Must be on the Regional Multi-use Trail Network Projects will compete with other FDOT D1 projects each year. Upper Peace Legacy Trail (between Ft. Fraser Trail and SR 540 along shore of Lake Hancock) and Haines City Trail. TAP (funds are awarded district-wide) $1M 2020/21

108 TheTPOhasadoptedperformancetargets tohelpidentifythestrengthsandweakneses ofthetransportationsystyem. PolkTransportation PlanningOrganization TIP - Adopted June 14, 2018 Page 107 Performance Targetsata G lance

109 TIP - Adopted June 14, 2018 Page 108

110 TIP - Adopted June 14, 2018 Page 109

111 TIP - Adopted June 14, 2018 Page 110

112 TIP - Adopted June 14, 2018 Page 111

113 TIP - Adopted June 14, 2018 Page 112

114 TIP - Adopted June 14, 2018 Page 113

115 TIP - Adopted June 14, 2018 Page 114

116 TIP - Adopted June 14, 2018 Page 115

117 TIP - Adopted June 14, 2018 Page 116

118 Project Scoring Criteria The following evaluation criteria and point system will be used to rank Candidate Transportation Alternative Projects, Local Multi-Use Trail Projects, and Regional Multi-Use Trail Projects and Complete Streets Projects. Priorities will be established after the sub-committee completes this process. While application of the evaluation criteria involves a subjective assessment the overall approach is intended to provide an objective evaluation of each project proposal. 1. Project Linkage - 30 Points Proposed projects should demonstrate a benefit to the intermodal transportation system identified in TPO plans and documents such as the currently adopted LRTP, the Congestion Management Plan (CMP), and the Consolidated Transit Development Plan (TDP), and the Neighborhood Mobility Audits prepared in support of Momentum Strategic Multi-Use Trails Is the proposed trail project a part of the multi-use trail network identified in the LRTP or Trails Master Plan? Does the project enhance an existing trail, or provide connectivity between a trail and other modes of transportation? Does the project help the TPO reach performance targets set forth in Momentum 2040? For example, does the trail provide connectivity to the regional multi-use trail from a city which doesn t currently have a connection? Or does the proposed trail increase the population connected within 5 miles or 3 miles of a regional trail? Strategic Bicycle/Pedestrian Needs Does the proposed project address a need identified in Momentum 2040, or recent bike/ped safety study/safety action plan, or the Neighborhood Mobility Audits? Projects could consist of sidewalk and/or bicycle facilities that enhance the nonmotorized travel conditions on a portion of the the Complete Street Network, or provide crucial connections between bicycle and pedestrian generators and attractors such as schools, transit service, employment, parks, trails, commercial areas and transit dependent areas, e.g., the bike and pedestrian needs referenced in the Neighborhood Mobility Audits. Proposed Transit Service Improvements Does the proposed project enhance access and use of transit service? Potential projects may include adding bicycle racks at bus stops where a high number of bicyclists are accessing the transit system or adding bus shelters at bus stops along core transit routes. The Transit TDP and the Neighborhood Mobility Audits identify core transit corridors, transit needs, and future projects. High Crash Corridors The CMP and Momentum 2040 identify several corridors in Polk County which exhibit a high number of bicycle and pedestrian crashes based on analysis of crash TIP - Adopted June 14, 2018 Page 117

119 data. Candidate projects in this category may consist of corridor specific studies intended to identify improvements to enhance safety, as well as other improvements to address specific safety issues in these corridors. 2. System Continuity - 15 Points Does the project complete, extend or enhance the existing transportation system? Does the project improve intermodal access? Is the project part of a larger local effort? Does the project enhance access to essential services in a traditionally underserved neighborhood or Environmental Justice area? For example, a trailhead improvement that provides access to a trail and transit service, or a new trail or sidewalk link that provides connectivity to existing trails or sidewalks from a park, neighborhood, or downtown area. 3. Community Benefit - 25 Points Will the project provide benefits to a large segment of the community? Or will the proposed project serve a traditionally underserved neighborhood or Environmental Justice area? The benefits derived can be related to safety, quality of life, and the economy. 4. Cost to Benefit Comparison - 10 Points Is the project cost-effective in relation to the benefits derived? Are there other more cost-effective project alternatives? For instance, if the proposed project may be considered expensive when compared to similar type projects, the applicant should demonstrate there is a substantial benefit associated with the project. For example, the proposed project addresses a significant safety problem that is documented and there is strong support from area residents to fix the problem. 5. Public/Private Support - 10 Points Is there demonstrated public and/or private support for the project? Demonstrations of support may include written endorsements, formal declarations, public comments received at meetings held in support of the project, resolutions, financial donations, or other appropriate forms of support for the project. In addition, the TPO s Plans and Documents could be considered as demonstrating public support, e.g., Momentum 2040, Neighborhood Mobility Audits, MyRide Transit Development Plan or the Ridge Scenic Highway Corridor Management Plan. 6. Commitment - 10 Points Does the community have a financial commitment to the project? This may include property and/or rights-of-way acquisition, site plans, or other investments that signify the project is above and beyond an idea or desire on the part of the community TIP - Adopted June 14, 2018 Page 118

120 District One Priority Project Information Packet Name of Applying Agency: Click here to enter text Project Name: Click here to enter text. Project Category: Congestion Management TRIP CIGP Transportation Alternative RTAP Transit/Modal Will this be a LAP project? (If yes, applicant must be LAP certified) Yes No Project Limits/Location: Describe beginning and end points of project, ex.; from ABC Rd. to XYZ Ave. Limits run south to north or west to east. Include jurisdiction (city/county), project length attach a labeled project map. Click here to enter text. Is the roadway on the State Highway System? Is the roadway on the Federal Aid Eligible System? Yes No Yes No If no, give local jurisdiction: Click here to enter text. Is this project consistent with the MPO/TPO Long Range Transportation Plan? Yes No Page number (attach page from LRTP): Click here to enter text. Is this project in the local jurisdiction s Capital Improvement Plan? Yes No (attach page from CIP)Click here to enter text. Project Description Phase(s) requested: Planning Study PD&E PE ROW CST CEI Project cost estimates by phase: TIP - Adopted June 14, 2018 Page 119

121 Planning Study $ Click here to enter text. ROW $Click here to enter text. PD&E $Click here to enter text. CST $Click here to enter text. PE $Click here to enter text. CEI $Click here to enter text. TOTAL Project Cost: $Click here to enter text. Project Details: Clearly describe the project and desired improvements in detail and indicate if work will be completed in-house. Include labeled photos and maps. (Add additional pages if needed) Click here to enter text. Constructability Review For items 2-7 provide labeled and dated photos (add additional pages if needed) 1. Are there any other projects (ex. drainage, utility, etc.) programmed (local, state or federal) within the limits of this project? Yes No If yes, provide details of the other project(s), including project scope and schedule: Click here to enter text. 2. Does the applicant have an adopted ADA transition plan? Yes No Identify areas within the project limits that will require ADA retrofit. (Include GIS coordinates for stops and labeled photos and/or map) Click here to enter text. 3. Are there any transit stops/shelters/amenities within the project limits? Yes No How many? Click here to enter text. Stop ID number: Click here to enter text. 4. Are any improvements needed or requested for bus stops? Yes No Description of existing conditions at stop and desired improvements (add additional pages if needed): Click here to enter text. 5. Are turn lanes being added? Yes No If yes, provide length of turn lanes TIP - Adopted June 14, 2018 Page 120

122 Click here to enter text. 6. Drainage structures: Number of culverts or pipes currently in place: Click here to enter text. Type: Click here to enter text. Replacement? Click here to enter text. Details Click here to enter text. Will drainage ditches be filled in? Yes No If yes, provide the limits and quantify in linear feet: Click here to enter text. Describe the proposed conveyances system (add additional pages if needed Click here to enter text. Are there any existing permitted stormwater management facilities/ponds within the project limits? Yes No If yes, provide the location and permit number (add additional pages if needed Click here to enter text. Utilities within project limits: Yes No If yes, list specific utilities within project limits and describe any potential conflicts (add additional pages if needed): Click here to enter text. Are there Bridges within project limits: Yes No If yes, can bridges accommodate proposed improvements? Yes No If no, what bridge improvements are proposed? (add additional pages if needed): Click here to enter text. 7. Is needed Right-of-Way (ROW) within public ownership? Yes No Provide details of potential ROW issues and how they will be addressed, evidence of ROW (GIS, maps, etc.) as well as a detailed breakdown of costs. Also include information about any potential encroachment issues (add additional pages if needed): Click here to enter text. 8. Are permits required? Yes No If yes, list the types of permits required: TIP - Adopted June 14, 2018 Page 121

123 Click here to enter text. If no, state the qualified exemption: Click here to enter text. 9. Are there any wetlands within the project limits? Yes No If yes, list the type of wetlands and if mitigation will be required. Provide any additional information: Click here to enter text. Is there critical habitat within the project limits? Yes No Click here to enter text. 10. Are there any endangered species within the project limits? Yes No (Provide details) If yes, list the species and what, if any mitigation or coordination will be necessary: Click here to enter text. 11. Is a historic survey required? Yes No (Provide details) Click here to enter text. 12. Is Recreational or 4(f) property within the project limits? Yes No (Provide details) Click here to enter text. 13. Are there any contamination areas within the project limits? Yes No (Provide details) Click here to enter text. Required Attachments A. Detailed Project Scope with Project Location Map B. Project Photos - dated and labeled C. Detailed Cost Estimates including Pay Items D. LRTP and Local CIP page E. Survey/As-builts/ROW documentation/utility/drainage information F. Detailed breakdown of ROW costs included in estimate (if ROW is needed/included in request or estimate) TIP - Adopted June 14, 2018 Page 122

124 Agency Name: Click here to enter text. Mailing Address: Click here to enter text. Applicant Contact Information Contact Name and Title: Click here to enter text. Click here to enter text.phone: Click here to enter text. Signature: Date: Your signature indicates that the information included with this application is accurate. Maintaining Agency: Click here to enter text. Contact Name and Title: Click here to enter text. Click here to enter text. Phone: Click here to enter text. Signature: Date: Your signature serves as a commitment from your agency to maintain the facility requested. MPO/TPO: Contact Name and Title: Click here to enter text. Click here to enter text. Phone: Click here to enter text. Signature: Date: Your signature confirms the requested project is consistent with all MPO/TPO plans and documents, is eligible, and indicates MPO/TPO support for the project TIP - Adopted June 14, 2018 Page 123

125 POLK TPO PRIORITY TRANSPORTATION PROJECT APPLICATION Project Title: Applicant Agency: Contact Name: Phone: Project Type: TAP SRTS Complete Street LMUT RMUT Project Description (must include location map): From: To: Length: Width: Surface Type: Funding Requested: Local Match: Total Project Cost: 1. Project Linkage 30 Points Explain how this project demonstrates a benefit to the intermodal transportation system identified in TPO s LRTP, Congestion Management Plan, Consolidated Transit Development Plan or Neighborhood Mobility Audits. a) STRATEGIC MULTI-USE TRAILS a) Is this proposed trail a regional trail? Yes No a. Regional Trail Questions i. If Regional Trail, is the project included in the Office of Greenways and Trails statewide system? ii. If Regional Trail, is it currently designated as a regional trail by a regional entity? TIP - Adopted June 14, 2018 Page 124

126 b) Is this proposed trail a local multi-use trail? Yes No a. Local Multi-Use Trail (i) If Multi-Use Trail, will this project address or improve safety conditions for bicycle and pedestrian conditions along the corridor in which is proposed? (ii) If Multi-Use Trail, will this project cross or intersect with any major roadways or motorized vehicle traffic? (iii) Is the proposed trail project part of the multi-use trail network identified in the LRTP or Trails Master Plan? Yes No (If yes, explain how does this project help the TPO reach performance targets set forth in Momentum 2040?) b) STRATEGIC BICYCLE/PEDESTRIAN NEEDS a) Does the proposed project address bicycle/pedestrian needs identified in Momentum2040 or recent bike/ped safety plan or the Neighborhood Mobility Audits? Yes No If yes, explain how does this project help the TPO reach performance targets set forth in Momentum2040? c) PROPOSED TRANSIT SERVICE IMPROVEMENT a) Does the proposed transit service improvement enhance access and use of transit service? Yes No If yes, explain how does this project help the TPO reach performance targets set forth in Momentum2040? TIP - Adopted June 14, 2018 Page 125

127 d) HIGH CRASH CORRIDORS a) Is the proposed project identified as a corridor which exhibits a high number of bicycle and pedestrian crashes? Yes No If yes, please explain how does this project help the TPO reach performance targets set forth in Momentum2040? 2. System Continuity 15 Points Does this project complete, extend or enhance the existing transportation system? Does this project enhance access to essential services (i.e. shopping, medical, financial, government, school facilities) in a traditionally underserved (or Environmental Justice) area? 3. Community Benefit- 25 Points Will the project provide benefits to a large segment of the community, or will the project serve an traditionally underserved (or Environmental Justice) area? 4. Cost to Benefit Comparison 10 Points Is the project cost-effective in relation to the benefits derived? TIP - Adopted June 14, 2018 Page 126

128 5. Public/Private Support 10 Points Is there demonstrated public and/or private support for this project? Public support gathered from the individual municipalities or jurisdictions as well as TPO s efforts such as Momentum2040, Neighborhood Mobility Audits and Complete Street projects qualifies for public support. 6. Commitment 10 Points Does the community have a financial commitment to the project? If the municipality or jurisdiction is unable to provide a financial commitment, please explain other levels of commitment such as service-inkind which the applicant will provide (i.e. Right of way acquisition, design services). Additional project information: TIP - Adopted June 14, 2018 Page 127

129 District One Priority Project Information Packet Regional Transportation Alternative Project Supplemental Information Form Is project prioritized by a regional entity? Choose an item. Please address the proposed projects connectivity items below: Connects two or more existing major activity centers/attractors. Click here to enter text. Traverses more than one county. Click here to enter text. Connects to or will connect with the statewide or existing regional trail Click here to enter text. Please address the proposed projects significance items below: Included in the Office of Greenways and Trails regional or statewide systems. Click here to enter text. Currently designated a regional trail by regional entity. Click here to enter text. Included in the National Trail System. Click here to enter text. Please address the proposed projects significance items below: Provides exposure for users to significant ecological/environmental resources. Click here to enter text. Part of an economic development initiative at county or regional level. Click here to enter text. Promotes use of non-motorized modes of travel for non-recreational trips. Click here to enter text. Additional project information Click here to enter text TIP - Adopted June 14, 2018 Page 128

130 District One Priority Project Information Packet Transportation Regional Incentive Program Supplemental Information Form Is project prioritized by a regional entity? Choose an item. Detail requested funding including source and type of asset(s) available as match. Amount(s) Requested Total Project Costs (for activity) Local Funding Commitment(s) ( match ) Source(s) of Match Type of match (cash, in-kind) Click here to enter text. Click here to enter text. Click here to enter text. Click here to enter text. Click here to enter text. Minimum Criteria: 1. Does the project support facilities that serve national, statewide or regional functions and function as an integrated transportation system? Yes No How? Click here to enter text. 2. Is the project identified in the capital improvements element of a comprehensive plan that has been determined to be in compliance with part II of chapter 163, after July 1, 2005, or to implement a long-term concurrency management system adopted by a local government; further the project shall be in compliance with local government comprehensive plan policies relative to corridor management? Yes No (Attach (CIE) Page) 3. Is the project consistent with the Strategic Intermodal System (SIS)? Yes No How? Click here to enter text. 4. Is there a commitment of local, regional or private matching funds? Yes No TIP - Adopted June 14, 2018 Page 129

131 Prioritization Considerations 1. Is the project in compliance with local corridor management policies? Yes No Describe Click here to enter text. 2. Describe how this project implementation will manage growth. Click here to enter text. 3. Describe how the project will improve regional mobility within the Regional Transportation Area. Click here to enter text. 4. Describe why priority should be given to the project based on the following: Provides connectivity to the SIS, Supports economic development and goods movement in rural areas of critical economic concern, Are subject to local ordinances that establish corridor management techniques, Improve connectivity between military installations and the Strategic Highway Network (STRAHNET) or the Strategic Rail Corridor Network (STRACNET). Click here to enter text. 5. How TRIP funding will accelerate the project s implementation? Click here to enter text. 6. Will the local government with jurisdiction adopt the FDOT level-of-service standard? Yes No TIP - Adopted June 14, 2018 Page 130

132 Program Guidance for Transportation Regional Incentive Program (TRIP) Background Pursuant to Section , F.S., the 2005 Legislature created within the Department a Transportation Regional Incentive Program (TRIP) for the purpose of providing funds to improve regionally significant transportation facilities in regional transportation areas created pursuant to s (5). Regionally significant transportation facilities include: Regional transportation corridors such as highway, waterway, rail, and regional transit corridors that serve major regional commercial, industrial, or medical facilities; Regional transportation hubs such as passenger terminals (examples include commuter rail, light rail, intercity transit and intermodal transfer centers), commercial service and major reliever airports, deepwater and special generator seaports, and major regional freight terminals and distribution centers. All facilities on the SIS and Emerging SIS are regionally significant. Other regionally significant facilities serve as an integral part of an interconnected regional network. The purpose of the TRIP is to provide an incentive for regional planning; to leverage investments in regionally significant transportation facilities (roads and public transportation); and link investments to growth management objectives. The intent for the use of these funds is to generate additional capacity through growth in the transportation program. All proposed projects will be evaluated in light of this policy. The department shall allocate funding available for TRIP by statutory formula to the districts. (Equal parts of population and motor fuel tax collections). Local/Regional Funding Sources for TRIP Match The percentage of state matching funds provided from the TRIP shall be matched on a dollar for dollar basis by eligible funds or eligible in-kind sources as described below. TRIP funds may be used to fund up to 50 percent of the non-federal share of the eligible project cost for a public transportation facility project. Projects on the State Highway System: The District/MPO may use Federal funds attributable to urbanized areas over 200,000 population (XU funds) or Local funds for the required match. Projects off the State Highway System but on the Federal System: The District/MPO may use Federal XU funds or Local funds for the required TRIP match. If XU funds are used to match projects off the State Highway System, the 25% match required for XU must be provided by local funds. (e.g. $100 XU = $75 pure federal and $25 local) TIP - Adopted June 14, 2018 Page 131

133 Projects off the State Highway System and Federal System: Local funds must be used for the required match. SIB Loans: Funds loaned from the State Infrastructure Bank may be used to fund up to 25% of the required match for TRIP funds. Future repayments must be made from Federal XU or Local funds. Public Transportation Projects: The match for TRIP must come from a local funds. XU funds cannot be used as the local match. TRIP is intended for capital expenses, not operational. TRIP funds cannot be used to purchase replacement buses, but they can be used to add capacity and service to a regionally significant route. Federal earmarks may not be used as a match. In-Kind Match for TRIP In-kind services are goods, commodities, or services received in lieu of cash payments. (a) Goods and commodities should be valued based on their current market value in accordance with generally accepted accounting standards as determined by the Office of the Comptroller. The value for land donated should be determined in accordance with guidelines established by the Office of Right of Way. (b) The excess of an in kind match valued in excess of the required match will not generally be applied towards another project. On a case by case basis, an exception may be made for project segments in a regional corridor that are part of an implementation plan for that corridor. (c) In accepting in-kind matches for TRIP funds, the districts need to exercise caution in distinguishing between the funding requirements and the cash requirements. For example, there is a $10 million construction project for which a local government is seeking TRIP funds. Normally the match split would be $5 million TRIP and $5 million local. If a local government offers $4 million in right of way and $1 million in cash, technically they have met the local match requirement. However, there is still a $4 million cash requirement that must be met through some source of funding in order to pay the $10 million total. Districts will have to determine the source(s) for the remaining $4 million cash requirement, taking into consideration such issues as whether the project is on or off the Federal and/or State Highway System. Right of Way Contributions and Acquisition Procedures (a) Only those properties necessary for the qualified project itself are eligible for local government matching contribution credit. Rights of way for prior projects are not eligible TIP - Adopted June 14, 2018 Page 132

134 (b) Projects with Federal funds: Rights of way must be/have been acquired in accordance with the federal Uniform Relocation Assistance and Real Property Acquisition Policy Act (Uniform Act). 42 U.S.C. 4601, et sec., 49 CFR Part 24 and 23 CFR Part 710 (c) Projects without Federal Funds and on the State Highway System: Rights of way must be/have been acquired in accordance with the laws and rules applicable to Florida DOT. This includes providing relocation assistance to displaced persons in accordance with Rule Chapter 14-66, Florida Administrative Code. (d) Projects without Federal Funds and off the State Highway System: Rights of way acquired by the local government may be accepted for contribution credit regardless of the acquisition method or procedures used. However, if the acquisition procedures do not comply with the Uniform Act, this will preclude the use of Federal funds in the future. Other Match Issues (a) Private funds may be part of local matching funds required for a TRIP project. (b) Rural Areas of Economic Concern may be eligible for a waiver of or reduction in the required match for TRIP funds (see section 3.5 of the Work Program Instructions for guidance on the Rural Economic Development Initiative). Only that portion of the project that falls within the qualified Rural Area is eligible for the waiver TIP - Adopted June 14, 2018 Page 133

135 TIP - Adopted June 14, 2018 Page 134

136 OLD HWY 37 MARIGOLD AVE F e d e r a l A i d E l i g i b i l i t y M a p P O L K C O U N T Y - F L O R I D A - November 2, 2015 SR-471 COUNTY LINE RD «471 SR 35,700 / US 98 KATHLEEN ROAD US-92 EWELL RD CR SR 37 ROCK RIDGE RD PROVIDENCE RD KNIGHTS STATION RD SHEPHERD RD SR-674 «572 W PIPKIN RD SR-60 NICHOLS RD PAR K BYRD RD W 10TH ST ARIANA AVE SR 37 POLK PKWY E CANAL ST «37 ± On State Highway System Not on State Highway System Federal Aid Eligible Not Federal Aid Eligible!" Interstate Eligible for FEMA compensation WX US Hwy State Hwy FT GREEN RD SR 33 COMBEE RD HALLAM DR Lakeland US 98 (BARTOW RD) CR 540 A AGRICOLA RD/CR 555 GREEN POND RD OLD POLK CITY RD 4 COMMONWEALTH AVE BER KLEY RD US 17 US-17 DEEN STILL RD CR 557A SR 559 AUBURNDALE HWY/US92 «570 SR-60 LYLE PKWY CR Turnpike Toll Road «33 BOLEN DER RD CR542/OLD LKLD.RD. WINTER LAKE ROAD EAST AVE Bartow 17 MT PISGAH RD Miles NE 6TH ST 80 FOOT RD/CR559 I-4 CR 557 US 92 RIFLE RANGE RD COX RD LAKE HENRY RD BUENA VISTA DR AVE T NE US 17/92 CR 540A LK BUFFUM RD WEST «25 «559 «542 «« «540 «700 US 27 Winter Haven CR 653 SR-60 SR 544 SR 700 RONALD REAGAN PKWY 10TH ST S CR 547 BATES RD 27 SCENIC HWY US-17/92 KOKOMO RD ALTURAS-BABSON CUTOF Haines City LK MARION RD «17 CR 630A 98 « W BELLA VISTA STREET CYPRESS PARKWAY TIMBERLANE RD AIRPORT RD WATKINS RD Lake Wales POINCIANA PKWY I-4 US-92 OLD TAMPA H WY/CR542 OLD AVON PARK RD KNIGHTS STATION RD 4 DRANEFIELD RD LK WALK IN THE WATER W 10TH ST US92/MEMORIAL DR 92 OLIVE ST W HIGHLAND ST ARIANA AVE HARDEN BLVD CAMP MACK DR PROVIDENCE RD MAIN ST «570 CR 64 S FLORIDA AVE «60 «35 «37 «33 Lakeland E ROSE ST E LIME ST CLEVELAND HTS BLVD CR 630 NEVADA RD US 98 (BARTOW RD) MAIN ST MINEOLA DRIVE «659 COMBEE RD «35 SR 60 MAIN STREET REYNOLDS RD POLK PKWY «540 Any public road NOT shown as Federal Aid Eligible, whether on this map or not, is eligible for FEMA (Federal Emergency Management Agency) funds. F L O R I D A D E P A R T M E N T O F T R A N S P O R T A T I O N T r a n s p o r t a t i o n S t a t i s t i c s O f f i c e TIP - Adopted June 14, 2018 Page 135

137 TIP - Adopted June 14, 2018 Page 136

138 TIP - Adopted June 14, 2018 Page 137

139 POLK HIGHLANDS Adopted: December 10, 2015 Updated: November 4, 2016 DADE CITY ZEPHYRHILLS ZEPHYRHILLS MUNICIPAL AIRPORT PLANT CITY ") HILLSBOROUGH PASCO SUMTER Withlacoochee ") ") ") ") 1 3 ") LAKELAND LINDER REGIONAL AIRPORT River ") ") 33 ") PIERCE BRADLEY LAKE Lake Parker ") ") ") ") 38 ") 10 ") ") ") 23 ") 18 ") 17 ") 14 ") POLK CITY WINTER HAVEN MUNICIPAL AIRPORT Peace River EAGLE LAKE 48 ") BARTOW MUNICIPAL AIRPORT LAKE Lake Eloise ALTURAS 55 ") LAKE WALES MUNICIPAL AIRPORT Lake Buffum ") 11 8 ") ") 6 58 ") ") 1A ") 60 ORLANDO ") 62 LAKE HAMILTON Crooked Lake 68 ") 67 ") 65 ") 64A ") 3 ") ") 64B 2 ") 62 Lake Clinch Lake Marion Lake Pierce HIGHLAND PARK HILLCREST HEIGHTS BABSON PARK Reedy Lake ") ") ORLANDO UA 6 ") ") ") KISSIMMEE Lake Rosalie Lake Weohyakapka Lake Arbuckle ") ") ") ") 249 Tiger Lake 244 ") INDIAN LAKE ESTATES e e e e e e e TIP - Adopted June 14, 2018 Page 138!"#$4 A{ Hillsborough River PLANT CITY MUNICIPAL AIRPORT?ò?â Alafia River ") ") Az AÛ Al POLK A Kathleen LAKELAND ?á A{ A?á MULBERRY?ò!"#$ AÙ A Az Highland Lake City Hancock A{ HOMELAND?ß AUBURNDALE FT. MEADE Ä Ao A{ !"#$4 BARTOW Eloise POLK LAKE ALFRED WINTER HAVEN Wahneta Aª A?ò Ä DAVENPORT HAINES CITY DUNDEE Lake of the Hills LAKE WALES POINCIANA Makinson Island Lake Hatchineha Lake Tohopekaliga?ò 242 ") ") 240 Cypress Lake ORLANDO INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT East Lake Tohopekaliga ST. CLOUD Á ?k A Ao As A{ As 429?Ï As A AoAz?Ï !"#$ ") 22 Lake Kissimmee ") 23 ¹ RIVER RANCH FROSTPROOF?ò AVON PARK AIR FORCE RANGE Bramha Island?Ì Alligator Lake Kissimmee River A OSCEOLA ORANGE OSCEOLA Lake Marian Regional Multi-Use Trail Network Legend Existing + Committed Regional Trails Existing Multi-Use Trails Under Construction PD&E Study Programmed Committed/Programmed Other Planned Regional Trails Proposed Multi-Use Trails Regional Trail Network All Trails - Existing, Committed and Planned Other Map Features City Limits Urbanized Areas Conservation Lands Miles HILLSBOROUGH POLK MANATEE HARDEE?õ Ao WAUCHULA AVON PARK?ö As SEBRING - AVON PARK UA

140 Appendix C Local Capital Improvement Plans TIP - Adopted June 14, 2018 Page 139

141 Polk County FY FY2022 COMMUNITY INVESTMENT PROGRAM ROADS & DRAINAGE CIP SUMMARY REVENUES FY18 FY19 FY20 FY21 FY Fund (CIP Road Projects) Revenue 2,244, Fund (District C) Revenue 1,455,000 1,100, Fund (District D) Revenue 2,075,000 1,100,000 8,250,000 3,500, Fund (District E) Revenue 2,575,000 1,600,000 1,250,000 2,000, Fund (District A) Revenue 1,256, ,500, Fund (District B) Revenue 150, , Fund (Transportation 1-Mill) Revenue 23,613,001 26,710,631 26,399,949 28,594,946 21,295, Fund (County Transportation Trust) Revenue 11,350,000 8,700,000 20,200,000 19,200,000 5,200, Fund (Northridge) Revenue 2,312,872 1,542, Fund CDBG Fd School Impace Fees 420, , , , , , Fd 1,443, General Fund Grant Funds 405,818 1,112, , TOTAL 49,550,420 42,514,685 56,821,107 55,044,946 26,745,794 Prior FY16/17 Proposed Prior Project Cumm. Projected Future Project Year Project Page # Number Project Name Expense Expense FY18 FY19 FY20 FY21 FY22 Years Total Total Changes Pavement Management On Going 10,532,517 15,000,000 15,000,000 15,000,000 15,000,000 15,000, ,532,517 71,297,255 14,235, Culvert Failure Contingency On Going 2,571,728 2,545,000 2,500,000 2,500,000 2,500,000 2,500, ,116,728 9,769,961 5,346, Railroad Grade Crossings On Going 284, , , , , , ,925,423 1,927,936 (2,513) Maintenance of Storm Water Facilities On Going 598, , , , , , ,173,058 2,810, , Sidewalk Renewal and Replacement On Going 446, , , , , , ,540,156 1,420, , Future Right-of-Way and Maintenance On Going 70, , , , , , , , Guardrail Program On Going 175, , , , , , , ,678 91, Raised Pavement Marking Program On Going 257, , , , , , ,665,615 1,400, , Sidewalk Projects On Going 726,451 2,280,000 2,250,000 2,250,000 2,250,000 2,250, ,006,451 6,486,088 5,520, Americans with Disabilities Act Intersection Improvements On Going 683, , , , , , ,417,239 3,190, , Roadway Improvements On Going 3,342,072 2,595,600 2,673,468 2,753,672 2,836,282 2,921, ,122,464 16,278, , Traffic Striping On Going 1,536, , , ,454 1,012,958 1,043, ,457,848 6,032, , Bridge Rehabilitation Program On Going 1,015, , , , , , ,843,652 4,641, , Ernie Caldwell Blvd Phase IIB &III (Northridge CRA) 22,237,373 7,600, , ,338,177 29,241,653 1,096, Bartow Northern Connector PH II (US17 to SR60) 3,141,512 1,585, , ,127,507 4,727, , Eagle Lake Loop Rd Bridge 325, ,359 1,860, ,757,738 2,143, , Northwest Quadrant Trail 541, , , , ,640,314 1,157, , Wabash Ave: Memorial Blvd to 10th St 368, , , ,019, , , North Ridge Trail Phase III 1,892,433 2,014, , ,498,300 3,500, , Dunson Buckingham Intersection 18,671 60,000 1,256, ,335, , , CR547 Signalization & Intersection Improvements 1, , , , , , US17/92 Bates Ave Intersection Improvements , , , , , Lake Wilson CR54 to CR532 13, ,009 1,000,000 2,000,000 5,500,000 7,500, ,317, ,059 15,986, New Roads and Drainage Office Buildings at Sheffield Road 0 160, ,000 3,000, ,460,000 3,420,000 40, Moss/Jones Road Drainage 0 74, , , , Aldine Circle Drainage Improvements 0 28, , , , , CR54: U-Turn Bay - Old Kissimmee Road 0 50, , , ,000 80, Johnson Power Line Road Signalization 0 50, ,000 1,000, ,500, ,000 1,300, Ariana Street Sidewalks 0 90, ,000 1,112, , ,783,158-1,783, Florence Villa Grove Road 0 100, , , , Garden Grove Drainage 0 169,730 1,700, ,870,000-1,870, Alturas SR60 Turnlane , , , , th Street Turnlane , , , , Recker Hwy Turnlane , , , , , Reynolds US92 Turnlane , , , , , CR557 at Evenhouse Road , , , , Berkley Rd at Lena Vista Elementary , , , Snively Rd at Snively Elementary , , , Walk In Water Rd Bridge Replacement ,000 2,200, ,400,000-2,400, West Lk Eloise Dr Drainage Improvements ,000 1,000, ,150,000-1,150, Coronet Rd Outfall Drainage Improvements , , , West Pipkin Rd (from Medulla Rd to Harden Blvd) 0 0 8,500,000 4,000,000 16,000,000 16,000, ,500,000-44,500, CR557 Widening (US17/92 to I4) 0 0 2,000,000 1,000,000 8,000,000 5,000, ,000,000 80,000,000-80,000, Bomber Rd Sidewalks and Drainage , , ,000 Project Total: 28,541,905 36,249,363 49,550,420 42,514,685 56,821,107 55,044,946 26,745,794 64,000, ,468, ,563, ,904, TIP - Adopted June 14, 2018 Page 140

142 RECURRING PROGRAMS PROJECT # PAGE # 1 FY2018 Community Investment Budget / FY FY 2022 Project Detail GENERAL PROJECT DATA: COMPREHENSIVE PLAN INFORMATION: PROJECT NEED PROJECT FY18 FY19 FY20 FY21 FY22 Project Title: Project listed in CIE? Yes CRITERIA SCHEDULE Pavement Management Comp. Plan reference: Objective A Safety X Design/Arch Functional Area : Roads and Drainage Mandate Land/ROW Department: LOS/Concurrency Related: No Replace X Construct Location: Polk County-Various Locations Growth Equipment PROJECT DESCRIPTION: PROJECT RATIONALE (Include Additional LOS Detail, if necessary): With almost 5,000 lane miles of roadway to maintain, the County has a year-round Pavement maintenance and rehabilitation program that threats and Program is required to maintain the integrity of the roadway surface and ensure average of 120 miles of roadway each year. Candidate roads are identified using our Pavement Condition Index or PCI, (which is an assessment rating of the safety of the motoring public. the road's condition. They are also evaluated considering other factors such as, their classification, traffic volume, and recommended treatment. OPERATING BUDGET IMPACT: FUND / COST CENTER None REPLACEMENT COUNTY PROPERTY NO.: N/A N/A Prior Cumm. FY17 Budget FY17 Projected Expenses FY18 FY19 FY20 FY21 FY22 FUTURE YEARS EXPENDITURE PLAN Proposed Project Total Design/Arch/Eng On Going Land (or ROW) Construction On Going 10,532,517 9,832,517 15,000,000 15,000,000 15,000,000 15,000,000 15,000,000 84,832,517 Other On Going 700, ,000 Equipment Total Project Cost On Going 10,532,517 10,532,517 15,000,000 15,000,000 15,000,000 15,000,000 15,000,000 85,532,517 1-Mill Fund Trans.Trust Fund FUNDING PLAN On Going 10,517,620 10,517,620 7,555,900 9,800,000 9,800,000 9,800,000 9,800,000 57,273,520 On Going 14,897 14,897 5,200,000 5,200,000 5,200,000 5,200,000 5,200,000 26,014,897 On Going 2,244,100 2,244,100 Total Funding On Going 10,532,517 10,532,517 15,000,000 15,000,000 15,000,000 15,000,000 15,000,000 85,532,517 OPERATING BUDGET IMPACT Personal Svc. Non-personal Capital Total Operating TIP - Adopted June 14, 2018 Page 141

143 RECURRING PROGRAMS PROJECT # PAGE # 2 FY2018 Community Investment Budget / FY FY 2022 Project Detail GENERAL PROJECT DATA: COMPREHENSIVE PLAN INFORMATION: PROJECT NEED PROJECT FY18 FY19 FY20 FY21 FY22 Project Title: Project listed in CIE? Yes CRITERIA SCHEDULE Culvert Failure Contingency Comp. Plan reference: Policy A-2e.3 Safety X Design/Arch Functional Area : Roads and Drainage Mandate Land/ROW Department: LOS/Concurrency Related: No Replace X Construct Location: Polk County-Various Locations Growth Equipment PROJECT DESCRIPTION: PROJECT RATIONALE (Include Additional LOS Detail, if necessary): This program is an on going rehabilitation activity. Drainage systems are repaired or replaced as necessary. Program is required to fund projects that result due to culvert collapse, pipe deterioration, structure failure, or other drainage related problems. OPERATING BUDGET IMPACT: FUND / COST CENTER None REPLACEMENT COUNTY PROPERTY NO.: N/A N/A Prior Cumm. FY17 Budget FY17 Projected Expenses FY18 FY19 FY20 FY21 FY22 FUTURE YEARS EXPENDITURE PLAN Proposed Project Total Design/Arch/Eng On Going Land (or ROW) On Going Construction On Going 2,571,728 2,571,728 2,545,000 2,500,000 2,500,000 2,500,000 2,500,000 15,116,728 Other On Going Equipment Total Project Cost On Going 2,571,728 2,571,728 2,545,000 2,500,000 2,500,000 2,500,000 2,500,000 15,116,728 1-Mill Fund Fund FUNDING PLAN On Going 2,571,728 2,571,728 2,545,000 2,500,000 2,500,000 2,500,000 2,500,000 15,116,728 On Going Total Funding On Going 2,571,728 2,571,728 2,545,000 2,500,000 2,500,000 2,500,000 2,500,000 15,116,728 OPERATING BUDGET IMPACT Personal Svc. Non-personal Capital Total Operating TIP - Adopted June 14, 2018 Page 142

144 RECURRING PROGRAMS PROJECT # PAGE # 3 FY2018 Community Investment Budget / FY FY 2022 Project Detail GENERAL PROJECT DATA: COMPREHENSIVE PLAN INFORMATION: PROJECT NEED PROJECT FY18 FY19 FY20 FY21 FY22 Project Title: Project listed in CIE? No CRITERIA SCHEDULE Railroad Grade Crossings Comp. Plan reference: Objective B Safety X Design/Arch Functional Area : Roads and Drainage Mandate Land/ROW Department: LOS/Concurrency Related: No Replace X Construct Location: Polk County-Various Locations Growth Equipment PROJECT DESCRIPTION: PROJECT RATIONALE (Include Additional LOS Detail, if necessary): The Railroad Grade Crossings Project Budget exists to fund the maintenance and repair of railroad crossings on County-maintained roads. Crossings Program is required to ensure the safety of the motoring public at the railroad where County roads cross the railroad s property often have flashing lights and gates in place for the safety of the traveling public. Flat-rate maintenance signals and the approaches to the crossings. fees for these devices are billed to the County annually. Additionally, the County pays for a portion of the cost of repairs to railroad crossing surfaces on an as-needed basis, as well as the signs, cones, and information boards necessary to detour traffic while crossings are being repaired. OPERATING BUDGET IMPACT: None FUND / COST CENTER REPLACEMENT COUNTY PROPERTY NO.: N/A N/A Prior Cumm. FY17 Budget FY17 Projected Expenses FY18 FY19 FY20 FY21 FY22 FUTURE YEARS EXPENDITURE PLAN Proposed Project Total Design/Arch/Eng On Going Land (or ROW) On Going Construction On Going 284, , , , , , ,783 1,925,423 Other On Going Equipment Total Project Cost On Going 284, , , , , , , ,925,423 1-Mill Fund FUNDING PLAN On Going 284, , , , , , ,783 1,925,423 Total Funding On Going 284, , , , , , , ,925,423 OPERATING BUDGET IMPACT Personal Svc. Non-personal Capital Total Operating TIP - Adopted June 14, 2018 Page 143

145 RECURRING PROGRAMS PROJECT # PAGE # 4 FY2018 Community Investment Budget / FY FY 2022 Project Detail GENERAL PROJECT DATA: COMPREHENSIVE PLAN INFORMATION: PROJECT NEED PROJECT FY18 FY19 FY20 FY21 FY22 Project Title: Project listed in CIE? Yes CRITERIA SCHEDULE Maintenance of Stormwater Facilities Comp. Plan reference: Objective A Safety Design/Arch Functional Area : Roads and Drainage Mandate X Land/ROW Department: LOS/Concurrency Related: No Replace X Construct Location: Polk County-Various Locations Growth Other PROJECT DESCRIPTION: PROJECT RATIONALE (Include Additional LOS Detail, if necessary): This program is an ongoing maintenance and rehabilitation activity. When roadway improvements impact existing wetlands or floodplains, new areas must Program is required to maintain the stormwater areas as per permits received be created. Once created, maintenance must be performed to remove undesirable vegetation and ensure growth of wetland plants. Also, stormwater from the Water Management Districts. ponds are necessary when roadway improvements are made. This program pays for upkeep and recertification of these facilities. OPERATING BUDGET IMPACT: FUND / COST CENTER None REPLACEMENT COUNTY PROPERTY NO.: N/A N/A Prior Cumm. FY17 Projected Expenses FY18 FY19 FY20 FY21 FY22 FUTURE YEARS EXPENDITURE PLAN Proposed Project Total Design/Arch/Eng On Going Land (or ROW) On Going Construction On Going Other On Going 598, , , , , , ,872 3,173,058 Equipment Total Project Cost On Going 598, , , , , , ,872 3,173,058 1-Mill Fund FUNDING PLAN On Going 598, , , , , , ,872 3,173,058 Total Funding On Going 598, , , , , , ,872 3,173,058 OPERATING BUDGET IMPACT Personal Svc. Non-personal Capital Total Operating TIP - Adopted June 14, 2018 Page 144

146 RECURRING PROGRAMS PROJECT # PAGE # 5 FY2018 Community Investment Budget / FY FY 2022 Project Detail GENERAL PROJECT DATA: COMPREHENSIVE PLAN INFORMATION: PROJECT NEED PROJECT FY18 FY19 FY20 FY21 FY22 Project Title: Project listed in CIE? Yes CRITERIA SCHEDULE Sidewalk Repair and Replacement Comp. Plan reference: Objective E Safety X Design/Arch Functional Area : Roads and Drainage Mandate Land/ROW Department: LOS/Concurrency Related: No Replace X Construct Location: Polk County-Various Locations Growth Equipment PROJECT DESCRIPTION: PROJECT RATIONALE (Include Additional LOS Detail, if necessary): This program is an ongoing activity. Existing sidewalks adjacent to Polk County roadways are replaced as necessary. Broken or cracked sidewalks are a hazard to pedestrians and a liability to the County. OPERATING BUDGET IMPACT: None FUND / COST CENTER REPLACEMENT COUNTY PROPERTY NO.: N/A N/A Prior Cumm. FY17 Budget FY17 Projected Expenses FY18 FY19 FY20 FY21 FY22 FUTURE YEARS EXPENDITURE PLAN Proposed Project Total Design/Arch/Eng On Going Land (or ROW) Construction On Going 446, , , , , , ,854 1,540,156 Other Equipment Total Project Cost On Going 446, , , , , , ,854 1,540,156 1-Mill Fund FUNDING PLAN On Going 446, , , , , , ,854 1,540,156 Total Funding On Going 446, , , , , , ,854 1,540,156 OPERATING BUDGET IMPACT Personal Svc. Non-personal Capital Total Operating TIP - Adopted June 14, 2018 Page 145

147 RECURRING PROGRAMS PROJECT # PAGE # 6 FY2018 Community Investment Budget / FY FY 2022 Project Detail GENERAL PROJECT DATA: COMPREHENSIVE PLAN INFORMATION: PROJECT NEED PROJECT FY18 FY19 FY20 FY21 FY22 Project Title: Project listed in CIE? Yes CRITERIA SCHEDULE Future Right-of-Way and Maintenance Comp. Plan reference: Objective E Safety Design/Arch Functional Area : Roads and Drainage Mandate Land/ROW Department: LOS/Concurrency Related: No Replace Construct Location: Polk County - Various Locations Growth X Equipment PROJECT DESCRIPTION: PROJECT RATIONALE (Include Additional LOS Detail, if necessary): Costs associated with right-of-way purchases and right-of-way maintenance for future projects for which funding is not currently available. Frequently the County has an opportunity to save money purchasing right-of-way prior to the start of a project. OPERATING BUDGET IMPACT: FUND / COST CENTER REPLACEMENT COUNTY PROPERTY NO.: N/A N/A Prior Cumm. FY17 Budget FY17 Projected Expenses FY18 FY19 FY20 FY21 FY22 FUTURE YEARS EXPENDITURE PLAN Proposed Project Total Design/Arch/Eng On Going Land (or ROW) On Going Construction On Going 70,000 70, , , , , , ,000 Other On Going Equipment Total Project Cost On Going 70,000 70, , , , , , ,000 Impact ( E ) Mill Fund FUNDING PLAN 70,000 70,000 70,000 On Going 100, , , , , ,000 Total Funding On Going 70,000 70, , , , , , ,000 OPERATING BUDGET IMPACT Personal Svc. Non-personal Capital Total Operating TIP - Adopted June 14, 2018 Page 146

148 RECURRING PROGRAMS PROJECT # PAGE # 7 FY2018 Community Investment Budget / FY FY 2022 Project Detail GENERAL PROJECT DATA: COMPREHENSIVE PLAN INFORMATION: PROJECT NEED PROJECT FY18 FY19 FY20 FY21 FY22 Project Title: Project listed in CIE? No CRITERIA SCHEDULE Guardrail Program Comp. Plan reference: Objective B Safety X Design/Arch Functional Area : Roads and Drainage Mandate Land/ROW Department: LOS/Concurrency Related: No Replace X Construct Location: Polk County - Various Locations Growth Equipment PROJECT DESCRIPTION: PROJECT RATIONALE (Include Additional LOS Detail, if necessary): Funds are used to install new guardrail and for repairing damaged guardrail that is attached to a bridge. To install new guardrail in areas for safety purposes. This is necessary to protect the traveling public from driving into an unsafe area that could be a liability to the County. OPERATING BUDGET IMPACT: FUND / COST CENTER REPLACEMENT COUNTY PROPERTY NO.: N/A N/A Prior Cumm. FY17 Budget FY17 Projected Expenses FY18 FY19 FY20 FY21 FY22 FUTURE YEARS EXPENDITURE PLAN Proposed Project Total Design/Arch/Eng Land (or ROW) Construction On Going 175, , , , , , , ,525 Other On Going Equipment Total Project Cost On Going 175, , , , , , , ,525 1-Mill Fund FUNDING PLAN On Going 175, , , , , , , ,525 Total Funding On Going 175, , , , , , , ,525 OPERATING BUDGET IMPACT Personal Svc. Non-personal Capital Total Operating TIP - Adopted June 14, 2018 Page 147

149 RECURRING PROGRAMS PROJECT # PAGE # 8 FY2018 Community Investment Budget / FY FY 2022 Project Detail GENERAL PROJECT DATA: COMPREHENSIVE PLAN INFORMATION: PROJECT NEED PROJECT FY18 FY19 FY20 FY21 FY22 Project Title: Project listed in CIE? No CRITERIA SCHEDULE Raised Pavement Marking Program Comp. Plan reference: Objective B Safety X Design/Arch Functional Area : Roads and Drainage Mandate Land/ROW Department: LOS/Concurrency Related: No Replace X Construct Location: Polk County - Various Locations Growth Equipment PROJECT DESCRIPTION: PROJECT RATIONALE (Include Additional LOS Detail, if necessary): Replacement of raised pavement markers on the County collector road system. The markers should be replaced every 2 years to be effective. To install new and replace old Raised Pavement Markings (RPMs) for safety purposes. OPERATING BUDGET IMPACT: FUND / COST CENTER REPLACEMENT COUNTY PROPERTY NO.: N/A N/A Prior Cumm. FY17 Budget FY17 Projected Expenses FY18 FY19 FY20 FY21 FY22 FUTURE YEARS EXPENDITURE PLAN Proposed Project Total Design/Arch/Eng Land (or ROW) Construction On Going 257, , , , , , ,513 1,665,615 Other On Going Equipment Total Project Cost On Going 257, , , , , , ,513 1,665,615 FUNDING PLAN 1-Mill Fund On Going 257, , , , , , ,513 1,665,615 Total Funding On Going 257, , , , , , ,513 1,665,615 OPERATING BUDGET IMPACT Personal Svc. Non-personal Capital Total Operating TIP - Adopted June 14, 2018 Page 148

150 RECURRING PROGRAMS PROJECT # PAGE # 9 FY2018 Community Investment Budget / FY FY 2022 Project Detail GENERAL PROJECT DATA: COMPREHENSIVE PLAN INFORMATION: PROJECT NEED PROJECT FY18 FY19 FY20 FY21 FY22 Project Title: Project listed in CIE? Yes CRITERIA SCHEDULE Sidewalk Projects Comp. Plan reference: Objective E Safety X Design/Arch Functional Area : Roads and Drainage Mandate Land/ROW Department: LOS/Concurrency Related: No Replace Construct Location: Polk County-Various Locations Growth Equipment PROJECT DESCRIPTION: PROJECT RATIONALE (Include Additional LOS Detail, if necessary): Candidate sidewalk projects provided by cities, and other sources are evaluated and prioritized by the Sidewalk Advisory Committee based on their Program is required to enhance the safety of pedestrians, especially school age proximity to schools, speed limits, accident history, and pedestrian traffic. The prioritzed sidewalk list is then reviewed by the county staff and the projects children. are constructed as the budget allows. OPERATING BUDGET IMPACT: FUND / COST CENTER None REPLACEMENT COUNTY PROPERTY NO.: N/A N/A Prior Cumm. FY17 Budget FY17 Projected Expenses FY18 FY19 FY20 FY21 FY22 FUTURE YEARS EXPENDITURE PLAN Proposed Project Total Design/Arch/Eng On Going Land (or ROW) On Going Construction On Going 726, ,451 2,280,000 2,250,000 2,250,000 2,250,000 2,250,000 12,006,451 Other On Going Equipment Total Project Cost On Going 726, ,451 2,280,000 2,250,000 2,250,000 2,250,000 2,250,000 12,006,451 1-Mill Fund School Imp Fee FUNDING PLAN On Going 476, ,451 2,030,000 2,000,000 2,000,000 2,000,000 2,000,000 10,506,451 On Going 250, , , , , , ,000 1,500,000 Total Funding On Going 726, ,451 2,280,000 2,250,000 2,250,000 2,250,000 2,250,000 12,006,451 OPERATING BUDGET IMPACT Personal Svc. Non-personal Capital Total Operating TIP - Adopted June 14, 2018 Page 149

151 RECURRING PROGRAMS PROJECT # PAGE # 10 FY2018 Community Investment Budget / FY FY 2022 Project Detail GENERAL PROJECT DATA: COMPREHENSIVE PLAN INFORMATION: PROJECT NEED PROJECT FY18 FY19 FY20 FY21 FY22 Project Title: Americans with Disabilities Act Project listed in CIE? Yes CRITERIA SCHEDULE Intersection Improvements Comp. Plan reference: Objective C, A, B, E Safety X Design/Arch Functional Area : Roads and Drainage Mandate Land/ROW Department: LOS/Concurrency Related: No Replace X Construct Location: Polk County-Various Locations Growth Equipment PROJECT DESCRIPTION: PROJECT RATIONALE (Include Additional LOS Detail, if necessary): This program is an ongoing activity of constructing upgrades to pedestrian facilities on the county road network so that they comply with the American with Improves safety Disabilities Act (ADA). Specifically, all sidewalks on county roads have to be upgraded to ADA standards at the time of resurfacing. OPERATING BUDGET IMPACT: FUND / COST CENTER None REPLACEMENT COUNTY PROPERTY NO.: N/A N/A Prior Cumm. FY17 Budget FY17 Projected Expenses FY18 FY19 FY20 FY21 FY22 FUTURE YEARS EXPENDITURE PLAN Proposed Project Total Design/Arch/Eng On Going 484, ,171 25,750 26,523 27,318 28,138 28, ,882 Land (or ROW) On Going 79,698 79,698 25,750 26,523 27,318 28,138 28, ,409 Construction On Going 119, , , , , , ,673 2,579,947 Other On Going Equipment Total Project Cost On Going 683, , , , , , ,638 3,417,239 1-Mill Fund FUNDING PLAN On Going 683, , , , , , ,638 3,417,239 Total Funding On Going 683, , , , , , , ,417,239 OPERATING BUDGET IMPACT Personal Svc. Non-personal Capital Total Operating TIP - Adopted June 14, 2018 Page 150

152 RECURRING PROGRAMS PROJECT # PAGE # 11 FY2018 Community Investment Budget / FY FY 2022 Project Detail GENERAL PROJECT DATA: COMPREHENSIVE PLAN INFORMATION: PROJECT NEED PROJECT FY18 FY19 FY20 FY21 FY22 Project Title: Project listed in CIE? No CRITERIA SCHEDULE Roadway Improvements Comp. Plan reference: Safety X Design/Arch Functional Area : Roads and Drainage Mandate Land/ROW Department: LOS/Concurrency Related: No Replace X Construct Location: Polk County-Various Locations Growth Equipment PROJECT DESCRIPTION: PROJECT RATIONALE (Include Additional LOS Detail, if necessary): Program provides funding source for safety compliance for damaged guardrail, fence replacement, culvert repair and replacement, tree trimming/tree Enhance safety and rideability on roadways and County rights-of-way. removal, paved and unpaved road materials and drainage materials. OPERATING BUDGET IMPACT: FUND / COST CENTER No additional cost REPLACEMENT COUNTY PROPERTY NO.: N/A N/A Prior Cumm. FY17 Budget FY17 Projected Expenses FY18 FY19 FY20 FY21 FY22 FUTURE YEARS EXPENDITURE PLAN Proposed Project Total Design/Arch/Eng Land (or ROW) Construction On Going 3,342,072 3,342,072 2,595,600 2,673,468 2,753,672 2,836,282 2,921,370 17,122,464 Other Equipment Total Project Cost On Going 3,342,072 3,342,072 2,595,600 2,673,468 2,753,672 2,836,282 2,921,370 17,122,464 1-Mill Fund FUNDING PLAN On Going 3,342,072 3,342,072 2,595,600 2,673,468 2,753,672 2,836,282 2,921,370 17,122,464 Total Funding On Going 3,342,072 3,342,072 2,595,600 2,673,468 2,753,672 2,836,282 2,921,370 17,122,464 OPERATING BUDGET IMPACT Personal Svc. Non-personal Capital Total Operating TIP - Adopted June 14, 2018 Page 151

153 RECURRING PROGRAMS PROJECT # PAGE # 12 FY2018 Community Investment Budget / FY FY 2022 Project Detail GENERAL PROJECT DATA: COMPREHENSIVE PLAN INFORMATION: PROJECT NEED PROJECT FY18 FY19 FY20 FY21 FY22 Project Title: Project listed in CIE? No CRITERIA SCHEDULE Traffic Striping Comp. Plan reference: Objective B Safety X Design/Arch Functional Area : Roads and Drainage Mandate Land/ROW Department: LOS/Concurrency Related: No Replace X Construct Location: Polk County-Various Locations Growth Equipment PROJECT DESCRIPTION: PROJECT RATIONALE (Include Additional LOS Detail, if necessary): Replace existing striping to maintain visibility and install new markings as necessary. Existing roadway markings should be refurbished every 24 months to Install new and replace existing traffic markings to enhance safety. be effective. OPERATING BUDGET IMPACT: FUND / COST CENTER None REPLACEMENT COUNTY PROPERTY NO.: N/A N/A Prior Cumm. FY17 Budget FY17 Projected Expenses FY18 FY19 FY20 FY21 FY22 FUTURE YEARS EXPENDITURE PLAN Proposed Project Total Design/Arch/Eng Land (or ROW) Construction On Going 1,536,279 1,536, , , ,454 1,012,958 1,043,347 6,457,848 Other Equipment Total Project Cost On Going 1,536,279 1,536, , , ,454 1,012,958 1,043,347 6,457,848 1-Mill Fund FUNDING PLAN On Going 1,536,279 1,536, , , ,454 1,012,958 1,043,347 6,457,848 Total Funding On Going 1,536,279 1,536, , , ,454 1,012,958 1,043, ,457,848 OPERATING BUDGET IMPACT Personal Svc. Non-personal Capital Total Operating TIP - Adopted June 14, 2018 Page 152

154 RECURRING PROGRAMS PROJECT # PAGE # 13 FY2018 Community Investment Budget / FY FY 2022 Project Detail GENERAL PROJECT DATA: COMPREHENSIVE PLAN INFORMATION: PROJECT NEED PROJECT FY18 FY19 FY20 FY21 FY22 Project Title: Project listed in CIE? Yes CRITERIA SCHEDULE Bridge Rehabilitation Program Comp. Plan reference: Objective A Safety X Design/Arch Functional Area : Roads and Drainage Mandate Land/ROW Department: LOS/Concurrency Related: No Replace X Construct Location: Polk County-Various Locations Growth Equipment PROJECT DESCRIPTION: PROJECT RATIONALE (Include Additional LOS Detail, if necessary): If minor or major repairs are needed on any County bridge, it will be funded by this program. Also, program funds inspection of non-qualifying FDOT The FDOT provides inspection services for County bridges with greater than a bridge structures. 20 foot span. The inspection of all smaller bridges is the responsibility of the County. Inspections must occur on a 2 year cycle. Polk County is responsible for making the repairs to all bridges. OPERATING BUDGET IMPACT: FUND / COST CENTER None REPLACEMENT COUNTY PROPERTY NO.: N/A N/A Prior Cumm. FY17 Budget FY17 Projected Expenses FY18 FY19 FY20 FY21 FY22 FUTURE YEARS EXPENDITURE PLAN Proposed Project Total Design/Arch/Eng On Going 541, , , , , , ,854 1,635,544 Land (or ROW) On Going Construction On Going 473, , , , , , ,637 3,208,109 Other Equipment Total Project Cost On Going 1,015,767 1,015, , , , , ,491 4,843,652 1-Mill Fund FUNDING PLAN On Going 1,015,767 1,015, , , , , ,491 4,843,652 Total Funding On Going 1,015,767 1,015, , , , , ,491 4,843,652 Personal Svc. Non-personal Capital Total Operating TIP - Adopted June 14, 2018 Page 153

155 PROJECT # PAGE # 14 FY2018 Community Investment Budget / FY FY 2022 Project Detail GENERAL PROJECT DATA: COMPREHENSIVE PLAN INFORMATION: PROJECT NEED PROJECT FY18 FY19 FY20 FY21 FY22 Project Title: Project listed in CIE? Yes CRITERIA SCHEDULE Ernie Caldwell Blvd Phase IIB &III (Northridge CRA) Comp. Plan reference: Objective C, A, B, C Safety X Design/Arch Functional Area : Roads and Drainage Mandate Land/ROW Department: LOS/Concurrency Related: Yes Replace Construct Location: Davenport Growth X Equipment PROJECT DESCRIPTION: PROJECT RATIONALE (Include Additional LOS Detail, if necessary): Construct new 4 lane roadway from Pine Tree Trail to CR547 and to 17/92. This project also includes new traffic signals at Pine Tree Trail and at CR547, Project improves traffic level of service. a new bridge overpass of the CSX railroad tracks and the construction of a new 2 lane access road approximately 600 feet in length that will serve as a spine road for future economic development. OPERATING BUDGET IMPACT: FUND / COST CENTER Increase roadway maintenance (15271) REPLACEMENT COUNTY PROPERTY NO.: N/A N/A Prior Cumm. FY17 Budget FY17 Projected Expenses FY18 FY19 FY20 FY21 FY22 FUTURE YEARS EXPENDITURE PLAN Proposed Project Total Design/Arch/Eng 3,980,062 3,980,062 Land (or ROW) 1,177, , ,842 1,677,419 Construction 17,079,734 7,100,962 7,100, , ,680,696 Other (Utilities) Equipment Total Project Cost 22,237,373 7,600,804 7,600, , ,338,177 Fund Fund Grant Fund FUNDING PLAN 3,462,058 3,462,058 14,330,056 6,575,540 6,575, ,000 21,405,596 4,445,259 1,025,264 1,025,264 5,470,523 Total Funding 22,237,373 7,600,804 7,600, , ,338,177 OPERATING BUDGET IMPACT Personal Svc. Non-personal 32,746 32,746 32,746 32,746 32,746 Capital Total Operating TIP - Adopted June 14, 2018 Page 154

156 PROJECT # PAGE # 15 FY2018 Community Investment Budget / FY FY 2022 Project Detail GENERAL PROJECT DATA: COMPREHENSIVE PLAN INFORMATION: PROJECT NEED PROJECT FY18 FY19 FY20 FY21 FY22 Project Title: Bartow Northern Project listed in CIE? No CRITERIA SCHEDULE Connector PH II (US 17 to SR 60) Comp. Plan reference: Objective C, A, B, C Safety X Design/Arch Functional Area : Roads and Drainage Mandate Land/ROW Department: LOS/Concurrency Related: Yes Replace Construct Location: Bartow Growth X Equipment PROJECT DESCRIPTION: PROJECT RATIONALE (Include Additional LOS Detail, if necessary): This project consists of the construction of a new 4-lane roadway to extend Ernest Smith Blvd. from US17 to SR60. It includes the construction of a Connect to Bartow Northern Connector Phase I at US 17. Relieve signalized intersection at SR60. traffic congestion on US 98/SR 60 in Bartow. OPERATING BUDGET IMPACT: Increase roadway maintenance FUND / COST CENTER REPLACEMENT COUNTY PROPERTY NO.: N/A N/A Prior Cumm. FY17 Budget FY17 Projected Expenses FY18 FY19 FY20 FY21 FY22 FUTURE YEARS EXPENDITURE PLAN Proposed Project Total Design/Arch/Eng 2,317, , , ,000 2,801,726 Land (or ROW) 824,086 1,481,695 1,481,695 20,000 2,325,781 Construction - Other Equipment Total Project Cost 3,141,512 1,585,995 1,585, , ,127,507 FUNDING PLAN Impact ( D ) ,145, , ,300-2,249,600 Impact ( B ) , , Fund ,148,870 1,148, ,149,375 1-Mill Fund , , , , ,478,132 ` Unfunded 35,686,200 Total Funding 3,141,512 1,585,995 1,585, , ,686,200 5,127,507 OPERATING BUDGET IMPACT Personal Svc. Non-personal Capital Total Operating TIP - Adopted June 14, 2018 Page 155

157 PROJECT # PAGE # 16 FY2018 Community Investment Budget / FY FY 2022 Project Detail GENERAL PROJECT DATA: COMPREHENSIVE PLAN INFORMATION: PROJECT NEED PROJECT FY18 FY19 FY20 FY21 FY22 Project Title: Project listed in CIE? Yes CRITERIA SCHEDULE Eagle Lake Loop Rd Bridge Comp. Plan reference: Objective Safety X Design/Arch Functional Area : Roads and Drainage Mandate Land/ROW Department: LOS/Concurrency Related: No Replace X Construct Location: Eagle Lake Growth Equipment PROJECT DESCRIPTION: PROJECT RATIONALE (Include Additional LOS Detail, if necessary): Replace substandard bridge to meet current design standards. Meets replacement criteria under sufficiency rating program. OPERATING BUDGET IMPACT: FUND / COST CENTER No operating costs REPLACEMENT COUNTY PROPERTY NO.: N/A N/A Prior Cumm. FY17 Budget FY17 Projected Expenses FY18 FY19 FY20 FY21 FY22 FUTURE YEARS EXPENDITURE PLAN Proposed Project Total Design/Arch/Eng 35,359 35,359 10,500 45,859 Land (or ROW) 1, , , ,119 Construction 324,760 1,282,107 36,000 1,850,000 2,210,760 Other Equipment Total Project Cost 325,879 1,817, ,359 1,860, ,757,738 1-Mill Fund FUNDING PLAN 325,879 1,817, ,359 1,860, ,757,738 Total Funding 325,879 1,817, ,359 1,860, ,757,738 OPERATING BUDGET IMPACT Personal Svc. Non-personal Capital Total Operating TIP - Adopted June 14, 2018 Page 156

158 PROJECT # PAGE # 17 FY2018 Community Investment Budget / FY FY 2022 Project Detail GENERAL PROJECT DATA: COMPREHENSIVE PLAN INFORMATION: PROJECT NEED PROJECT FY18 FY19 FY20 FY21 FY22 Project Title: Project listed in CIE? Yes CRITERIA SCHEDULE Northwest Quadrant Trail Comp. Plan reference: Objective C Safety X Design/Arch Functional Area : Roads and Drainage Mandate Land/ROW Department: LOS/Concurrency Related: Yes Replace Construct Location: Growth X Equipment PROJECT DESCRIPTION: PROJECT RATIONALE (Include Additional LOS Detail, if necessary): Construct the southern part of the North Ridge Trail and utilities to serve the NWQ Project and the northwest sector of the interchange of US Hwy 27 and Jones Development Company and JDC NWQ, LLC requests that the North Interstate 4. Ridge Community Redevelopment Agency enter into a Development Agreement concerning the construction of a southern part of the North Ridge Trail. The agreement includes the developer conveying right-of-way, funding and constructing a segment of the North Ridge Trail; providing utility easements and a master wastewater pump station site. OPERATING BUDGET IMPACT: FUND / COST CENTER Increase roadway maintenance (15271) REPLACEMENT COUNTY PROPERTY NO.: N/A N/A Prior Cumm. FY17 Budget FY17 Projected Expenses FY18 FY19 FY20 FY21 FY22 FUTURE YEARS EXPENDITURE PLAN Proposed Project Total Design/Arch/Eng 107, ,225 Land (or ROW) Construction 434, , , , ,054 1,533,089 Other Equipment Total Project Cost 541, , , , , ,640,314 Fund Sp Rev Grant FUNDING PLAN 449, , , , ,054 1,437,314 92, , , ,000 Total Funding 541, , , , , ,640,314 OPERATING BUDGET IMPACT Personal Svc. Non-personal Capital Total Operating TIP - Adopted June 14, 2018 Page 157

159 PROJECT # PAGE # 18 FY2018 Community Investment Budget / FY FY 2022 Project Detail GENERAL PROJECT DATA: COMPREHENSIVE PLAN INFORMATION: PROJECT NEED PROJECT FY18 FY19 FY20 FY21 FY22 Project Title: Project listed in CIE? Yes CRITERIA SCHEDULE Wabash Ave: Memorial Blvd to 10th St Comp. Plan reference: Objective E, Safety X Design/Arch Functional Area : Roads and Drainage Mandate Land/ROW Department: LOS/Concurrency Related: No Replace Construct Location: Lakeland Growth X Equipment PROJECT DESCRIPTION: PROJECT RATIONALE (Include Additional LOS Detail, if necessary): Convert a substandard two lane rural roadway to a two lane urban roadway with sidewalks, paved shoulders and subsurface drainage. Overall project will Project improves traffic level of service. extend North Wabash Avenue from 10th Street to Fairbanks Street (.85 mile). Polk County entered into a development agreement for widening N. Wabash Avenue from Memorial Blvd.(US Hwy. 92) to Crutchfield Road (.16 mile). The City of Lakeland is funding the remainder of N. Wabash Avenue from W. Tenth Street northeast to Fairbanks Street. Upon completion of design and permitting, County plans will be combined into the City s project and both segments will be constructed concurrently with the same contractor. OPERATING BUDGET IMPACT: FUND / COST CENTER No operating costs REPLACEMENT COUNTY PROPERTY NO.: N/A N/A Prior Cumm. FY17 Budget FY17 Projected Expenses FY18 FY19 FY20 FY21 FY22 FUTURE YEARS EXPENDITURE PLAN Proposed Project Total Design/Arch/Eng 68, , ,000 10, ,508 Land (or ROW) ,000 50,720 Construction 299, , , ,210 Other Equipment Total Project Cost 368, , , , ,019,438 1-Mill Fund FUNDING PLAN 368, , , , ,019,438 Total Funding 368, , , , ,019,438 OPERATING BUDGET IMPACT Personal Svc. Non-personal Capital Total Operating TIP - Adopted June 14, 2018 Page 158

160 PROJECT # PAGE # 19 FY2018 Community Investment Budget / FY FY 2022 Project Detail GENERAL PROJECT DATA: COMPREHENSIVE PLAN INFORMATION: PROJECT NEED PROJECT FY18 FY19 FY20 FY21 FY22 Project Title: North Ridge Trail Phase III Project listed in CIE? Yes CRITERIA SCHEDULE Comp. Plan reference: Objective C Safety X Design/Arch Functional Area : Roads and Drainage Mandate Land/ROW Department: LOS/Concurrency Related: Yes Replace Construct Location: Davenport Growth X Equipment PROJECT DESCRIPTION: PROJECT RATIONALE (Include Additional LOS Detail, if necessary): Construction of part of the North Ridge Trail and Access Road NW, south of Waverly Barn Road. This portion of the trail provides access to the Walmart Economic Development Transportation Fund (EDTF) Grant Agreement with the Distribution-Fulfillment Center. It also includes construction of intersection improvements and new traffic signal at Access Rd NW. Florida Department of Transportation for construction of part of the North Ridge Trail and Access Road NW, south of Waverly Barn Rd which will provide access to the Walmart Distribution-Fulfillment Center. The EDTF grant will also partially fund the Access Rd NW intersection improvements. The developer is providing the balance of the funds for the intersection improvements. OPERATING BUDGET IMPACT: $3,600 yr pond mowing FUND / COST CENTER $9,600 yr ROW mowing REPLACEMENT COUNTY PROPERTY NO.: N/A N/A Prior Cumm. FY17 Budget FY17 Projected Expenses FY18 FY19 FY20 FY21 FY22 FUTURE YEARS EXPENDITURE PLAN Proposed Project Total Design/Arch/Eng 22,042 22,042 Land (or ROW) Construction 1,869,440 2,310,049 2,014, ,636 4,475,307 Other Equipment Total Project Cost 1,892,433 2,310,049 2,014, , ,498,300 Grant Fd Fund FUNDING PLAN 904,182 1,095, , ,818 2,000, ,252 1,214,231 1,214, ,818 2,498,301 Total Funding 1,892,434 2,310,049 2,014, , ,498,301 OPERATING BUDGET IMPACT Personal Svc. Non-personal 13,200 13,200 13,200 13,200 Capital Total Operating TIP - Adopted June 14, 2018 Page 159

161 PROJECT # PAGE # 20 FY2018 Community Investment Budget / FY FY 2022 Project Detail GENERAL PROJECT DATA: COMPREHENSIVE PLAN INFORMATION: PROJECT NEED PROJECT FY18 FY19 FY20 FY21 FY22 Project Title: Dunson Buckingham Dr Project listed in CIE? Yes CRITERIA SCHEDULE Intersection Comp. Plan reference: Objective C Safety Design/Arch Functional Area : Roads and Drainage Mandate Land/ROW Department: LOS/Concurrency Related: Yes Replace Construct Location: Growth X Equipment PROJECT DESCRIPTION: PROJECT RATIONALE (Include Additional LOS Detail, if necessary): Project is to be constructed in two phases. County is contributing with the two subdvision developers for the improvements. Phase One is being Project will improve connectivity of county road network. constructed by Danson Properties and includes improvements to Dunson Road. Phase Two includes improvements to the Buckingham Drive and the intersection. OPERATING BUDGET IMPACT: FUND / COST CENTER No operating costs REPLACEMENT COUNTY PROPERTY NO.: N/A N/A Prior Cumm. FY17 Budget FY17 Projected Expenses FY18 FY19 FY20 FY21 FY22 FUTURE YEARS EXPENDITURE PLAN Proposed Project Total Design/Arch/Eng 18,671 25,000 25,000 43,671 Land (or ROW) 35,000 35,000 35,000 Construction 556,329 1,256,329 1,256,329 Other Equipment Total Project Cost 18, ,329 60,000 1,256, ,335,000 Impact ( A ) FUNDING PLAN 18, ,329 60,000 1,256,329 1,335,000 Total Funding 18, ,329 60,000 1,256, ,335,000 OPERATING BUDGET IMPACT Personal Svc. Non-personal Capital Total Operating TIP - Adopted June 14, 2018 Page 160

162 PROJECT # PAGE # 21 FY2018 Community Investment Budget / FY FY 2022 Project Detail GENERAL PROJECT DATA: COMPREHENSIVE PLAN INFORMATION: PROJECT NEED PROJECT FY18 FY19 FY20 FY21 FY22 Project Title: Ronald Reagan Parkway at CR 547 / Project listed in CIE? Yes CRITERIA SCHEDULE Old Lake Wilson Rd Intersection Improvements Comp. Plan reference: Objective C, Safety X Design/Arch Functional Area : Roads and Drainage Mandate Land/ROW Department: LOS/Concurrency Related: Yes Replace Construct Location: Growth X Equipment PROJECT DESCRIPTION: PROJECT RATIONALE (Include Additional LOS Detail, if necessary): This project consists of widening a segment of CR547 nearing Ronald Reagan Parkway (CR 54), to accommodate a dedicated left-turn lane, as well as Project will improve traffic movement through the intersection and enhance the construction of a traffic signal system for the intersection. safety. OPERATING BUDGET IMPACT: FUND / COST CENTER REPLACEMENT COUNTY PROPERTY NO.: N/A N/A Prior Cumm. FY17 Budget FY17 Projected Expenses FY18 FY19 FY20 FY21 FY22 FUTURE YEARS EXPENDITURE PLAN Proposed Project Total Design/Arch/Eng 1, , , ,170 Land (or ROW) 250, , , ,000 Construction 283, , , ,000 Other Equipment Total Project Cost 1, , , , ,170 Impact ( C ) FUNDING PLAN 1, , , , ,170 Total Funding 1, , , , ,170 OPERATING BUDGET IMPACT Personal Svc. Non-personal 1,000 1,000 1,000 1,000 Capital Total Operating TIP - Adopted June 14, 2018 Page 161

163 PROJECT # PAGE # 22 FY2018 Community Investment Budget / FY FY 2022 Project Detail GENERAL PROJECT DATA: COMPREHENSIVE PLAN INFORMATION: PROJECT NEED PROJECT FY18 FY19 FY20 FY21 FY22 Project Title US 17/92 at Bates Rd Project listed in CIE? Yes CRITERIA SCHEDULE Intersection Improvements Comp. Plan reference: Objective C, Safety X Design/Arch Functional Area : Roads and Drainage Mandate Land/ROW Department: LOS/Concurrency Related: Yes Replace Construct Location: Growth X Equipment PROJECT DESCRIPTION: PROJECT RATIONALE (Include Additional LOS Detail, if necessary): Construction of an eastbound to soutbound right turn lane on Bates Rd. The limits of the right turn lane are from the CSX railroad tracks to US17/92. Project will improve traffic movement through the intersection and enhance safety. OPERATING BUDGET IMPACT: FUND / COST CENTER REPLACEMENT COUNTY PROPERTY NO.: N/A N/A Prior Cumm. FY17 Budget FY17 Projected Expenses FY18 FY19 FY20 FY21 FY22 FUTURE YEARS EXPENDITURE PLAN Proposed Project Total Design/Arch/Eng 55,729 55,729 55,729 Land (or ROW) ,000 25,000 50,000 75,260 Construction 43, , ,000 Other Equipment Total Project Cost ,480 80, , ,989 Impact ( C ) FUNDING PLAN ,480 80, , ,989 Total Funding ,480 80, , ,989 OPERATING BUDGET IMPACT Personal Svc. Non-personal 1,000 1,000 1,000 1,000 4,000 Capital Total Operating TIP - Adopted June 14, 2018 Page 162

164 PROJECT # PAGE # 23 FY2018 Community Investment Budget / FY FY 2022 Project Detail GENERAL PROJECT DATA: COMPREHENSIVE PLAN INFORMATION: PROJECT NEED PROJECT FY18 FY19 FY20 FY21 FY22 Project Title: Lake Wilson Road Project listed in CIE? Yes CRITERIA SCHEDULE CR 54 to CR 532 Comp. Plan reference: Objective C, Safety X Design/Arch Functional Area : Roads and Drainage Mandate Land/ROW Department: LOS/Concurrency Related: Yes Replace Construct Location: Growth X Equipment PROJECT DESCRIPTION: PROJECT RATIONALE (Include Additional LOS Detail, if necessary): This project includes the design, permitting, right-of-way acquisition, and construction of a widened roadway alignment along the Lake Wilson Rd corridor Relieve traffic congestion on Lake Wilson Rd caused by daily traffic volume that from Ronald Reagan Parkway (CR 54) to Osceola-Polk Line Road (CR 532). exceeds the current roadway capacity. OPERATING BUDGET IMPACT: FUND / COST CENTER Increase roadway maintenance REPLACEMENT COUNTY PROPERTY NO.: N/A N/A Prior Cumm. FY17 Budget FY17 Projected Expenses FY18 FY19 FY20 FY21 FY22 FUTURE YEARS EXPENDITURE PLAN Proposed Project Total Design/Arch/Eng 8, , , , ,000 1,198,551 Land (or ROW) 5,265 58,936 58, ,000 1,500,000 3,000,000 5,064,201 Construction 55,000 55,000 2,500,000 7,500,000 10,055,000 Other Equipment Total Project Cost 13, , ,009 1,000,000 2,000,000 5,500,000 7,500, ,317,752 Fund Impact C FUNDING PLAN 13, , ,009 1,000,000 1,200,000 2,517, ,000 5,500,000 7,500,000 13,800,000 Total Funding 13, , ,009 1,000,000 2,000,000 5,500,000 7,500, ,317,752 OPERATING BUDGET IMPACT Personal Svc. Non-personal 1,000 Capital Total Operating TIP - Adopted June 14, 2018 Page 163

165 PROJECT # PAGE # 24 FY2018 Community Investment Budget / FY FY 2022 Project Detail GENERAL PROJECT DATA: COMPREHENSIVE PLAN INFORMATION: PROJECT NEED PROJECT FY18 FY19 FY20 FY21 FY22 Project Title: New Roads & Drainage Office Buildings Project listed in CIE? No CRITERIA SCHEDULE at Sheffield Complex Comp. Plan reference: Safety Design/Arch Functional Area : Roads and Drainage Mandate Land/ROW Department: LOS/Concurrency Related: No Replace Construct Location: Winter Haven Growth X Equipment PROJECT DESCRIPTION: PROJECT RATIONALE (Include Additional LOS Detail, if necessary): Replacement of modular building. Design and construct office facility to house various Sections within the Roads & Drainage Division located at the The existing structures used by the Division are past their expected useful life Sheffield complex. and the amount of space available for the size of staff relocated to this site since 2010 is inadequate. OPERATING BUDGET IMPACT: FUND / COST CENTER Increase in operations building maintenance costs REPLACEMENT COUNTY PROPERTY NO.: N/A N/A Prior Cumm. FY17 Budget FY17 Projected Expenses FY18 FY19 FY20 FY21 FY22 FUTURE YEARS EXPENDITURE PLAN Proposed Project Total Design/Arch/Eng 300, ,000 Land (or ROW) Construction 160, ,000 3,000,000 3,160,000 Other Equipment Total Project Cost 0 160, , ,000 3,000, ,460,000 1-Mill Fund FUNDING PLAN 160, , ,000 3,000,000 3,460,000 Total Funding 0 160, , ,000 3,000, ,460,000 OPERATING BUDGET IMPACT Personal Svc. Non-personal 54,600 54,600 54,600 54,600 Capital Total Operating TIP - Adopted June 14, 2018 Page 164

166 PROJECT # PAGE # 25 FY2018 Community Investment Budget / FY FY 2022 Project Detail GENERAL PROJECT DATA: COMPREHENSIVE PLAN INFORMATION: PROJECT NEED PROJECT FY18 FY19 FY20 FY21 FY22 Project Title: Project listed in CIE? No CRITERIA SCHEDULE Moss/Jones Road Drainage Comp. Plan reference: B2 Safety X Design/Arch Functional Area : Roads and Drainage Mandate Land/ROW Department: LOS/Concurrency Related: Yes Replace X Construct Location: Section 04, Township 28S, Range 25E Growth X Equipment PROJECT DESCRIPTION: PROJECT RATIONALE (Include Additional LOS Detail, if necessary): This project is located in Section 04, Township 28 South, Range 25 East in the Auburndale area of Unincorporated Polk County. Residents within the Moss Road and Jones Road area have experienced chronic street and yard floodings over the years. The project will re-establish and improve the existing Several residents within the area experience yard and street flooding. Reestablishing drainage system so stormwater can adequately be conveyed through the area. The existing drainage outfall has become compromised over the years the historic drainage system will increase the drainage systems due to lack of maintenance, obstructions, and man-made alterations. LOS and help alleviate the chronic flooding. OPERATING BUDGET IMPACT: Once constructed, maintenance of this outfall will be performed under the annual maintenance contract. FUND / COST CENTER Prior Cumm. FY17 Budget FY17 Projected Expenses FY18 FY19 FY20 FY21 FY22 FUTURE YEARS EXPENDITURE PLAN N/A Proposed Project Total Design/Arch/Eng 60,000 44,200 15,800 60,000 Land (or ROW) 65,000 30,000 35,000 65,000 Construction 462, ,000 Other Equipment Total Project Cost 0 125,000 74, , ,000 Fund FUNDING PLAN 125,000 74, , ,000 Total Funding 0 125,000 74, , ,000 OPERATING BUDGET IMPACT Personal Svc. Non-personal 5,000 5,000 5,000 5,000 Capital Total Operating TIP - Adopted June 14, 2018 Page 165

167 PROJECT # PAGE # 26 FY2018 Community Investment Budget / FY FY 2022 Project Detail GENERAL PROJECT DATA: COMPREHENSIVE PLAN INFORMATION: PROJECT NEED PROJECT FY18 FY19 FY20 FY21 FY22 Project Title: Aldine Circle Drainage Project listed in CIE? No CRITERIA SCHEDULE Comp. Plan reference: Policy and Objective C Safety X Design/Arch Functional Area : Roads and Drainage Mandate Land/ROW Department: LOS/Concurrency Related: Yes Replace Construct Location: Lakeland Growth Equipment PROJECT DESCRIPTION: PROJECT RATIONALE (Include Additional LOS Detail, if necessary): This project is located in Section 10, Township. 28, Range 24 just east of Combee Road and north of Hwy 92 in the Combee Wood area of Unincorporated Combee Acers Subdivision has had a history of flooding, especially the Aldine Polk County. The residents along Aldine Circle currently experience yard and home flooding during heavy storm events. The project will commission an Circle area. The project will improve the flood protection LOS for the engineering/watershed evaluation of the area. Improvements identified in the evaluation will be evaluated and implemented as needed to alleviate the surrounding residents and provide adequate drainage for the area. chronic flooding. OPERATING BUDGET IMPACT: FUND / COST CENTER REPLACEMENT COUNTY PROPERTY NO.: N/A N/A Prior Cumm. FY17 Budget FY17 Projected Expenses FY18 FY19 FY20 FY21 FY22 FUTURE YEARS EXPENDITURE PLAN Proposed Project Total Design/Arch/Eng 30,000 28,500 1,500 30,000 Land (or ROW) Construction 425, ,000 Other Equipment Total Project Cost 0 30,000 28, , ,000 Fund FUNDING PLAN 30,000 28, , ,000 Total Funding 0 30,000 28, , ,000 OPERATING BUDGET IMPACT Personal Svc. Non-personal Capital Total Operating TIP - Adopted June 14, 2018 Page 166

168 PROJECT # PAGE # 27 FY2018 Community Investment Budget / FY FY 2022 Project Detail GENERAL PROJECT DATA: COMPREHENSIVE PLAN INFORMATION: PROJECT NEED PROJECT FY18 FY19 FY20 FY21 FY22 Project Title: CR54: U Turn Bay - Old Kissimmee Road Project listed in CIE? Yes CRITERIA SCHEDULE Comp. Plan reference: Safety X Design/Arch Functional Area : Roads and Drainage Mandate Land/ROW Department: LOS/Concurrency Related: Yes Replace Construct Location: Loughman Growth X Equipment PROJECT DESCRIPTION: PROJECT RATIONALE (Include Additional LOS Detail, if necessary): In order to provide a safe turning area for larger vehicles, the County proposes the construction of u-turn bay or widened area on the northside of CR54 at Provides better access to Old Kissimmee Road for CR54 east bound traffic. the existing turn lane near Old Kissimmee Rd, similar to those provided in other areas of CR54. r OPERATING BUDGET IMPACT: FUND / COST CENTER REPLACEMENT COUNTY PROPERTY NO.: N/A N/A Prior Cumm. FY17 Budget FY17 Projected Expenses FY18 FY19 FY20 FY21 FY22 FUTURE YEARS EXPENDITURE PLAN Proposed Project Total Design/Arch/Eng 25,000 25,000 25,000 Land (or ROW) 25,000 25,000 50,000 75,000 Construction 100, , ,000 Other Equipment Total Project Cost 0 150,000 50, , ,000 Impact (C) FUNDING PLAN 150,000 50, , ,000 Total Funding 0 150,000 50, , ,000 OPERATING BUDGET IMPACT Personal Svc. Non-personal Capital Total Operating TIP - Adopted June 14, 2018 Page 167

169 PROJECT # PAGE # 28 FY2018 Community Investment Budget / FY FY 2022 Project Detail GENERAL PROJECT DATA: COMPREHENSIVE PLAN INFORMATION: PROJECT NEED PROJECT FY18 FY19 FY20 FY21 FY22 Project Title: Johnson Power Line Road Project listed in CIE? No CRITERIA SCHEDULE Signalization Comp. Plan reference: Policy and Objective C Safety X Design/Arch Functional Area : Roads and Drainage Mandate Land/ROW Department: LOS/Concurrency Related: Yes Replace Construct Location: Haines City Growth X Equipment PROJECT DESCRIPTION: PROJECT RATIONALE (Include Additional LOS Detail, if necessary): Project involves intersection improvements. A traffic study will be completed to determine if this improvement will require a new roundabout or if the Project will improve traffic level of service. improvements will require new turn lanes and modification of the traffic signal. OPERATING BUDGET IMPACT: FUND / COST CENTER REPLACEMENT COUNTY PROPERTY NO.: N/A N/A Prior Cumm. FY17 Budget FY17 Projected Expenses FY18 FY19 FY20 FY21 FY22 FUTURE YEARS EXPENDITURE PLAN Proposed Project Total Design/Arch/Eng 200,000 50, , ,000 Land (or ROW) 300, ,000 Construction 1,000,000 1,000,000 Other Equipment Total Project Cost 0 200,000 50, ,000 1,000, ,500,000 Impact (C) FUNDING PLAN 200,000 50, ,000 1,000,000 1,500,000 Total Funding 0 200,000 50, ,000 1,000, ,500,000 OPERATING BUDGET IMPACT Personal Svc. Non-personal 1,000 1,000 1,000 Capital Total Operating TIP - Adopted June 14, 2018 Page 168

170 PROJECT # PAGE # 29 FY2018 Community Investment Budget / FY FY 2022 Project Detail GENERAL PROJECT DATA: COMPREHENSIVE PLAN INFORMATION: PROJECT NEED PROJECT FY18 FY19 FY20 FY21 FY22 Project Title: Ariana Street Sidewalk Project listed in CIE? Yes CRITERIA SCHEDULE Comp. Plan reference: Objective E Safety X Design/Arch Functional Area : Roads and Drainage Mandate Land/ROW Department: LOS/Concurrency Related: No Replace Construct Location: PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Growth Equipment PROJECT RATIONALE (Include Additional LOS Detail, if necessary): LAP-funded project to fund the design, construction and CEI of the Ariana Street Sidewalk Project from South Wabash Avenue to Lotus Avenue; Project will improve pedestrian safety along roadways. completing a continuous sidewalk segment from West Highland Street to Harden Boulevard. OPERATING BUDGET IMPACT: FUND / COST CENTER REPLACEMENT COUNTY PROPERTY NO.: N/A N/A Prior Cumm. FY17 Budget FY17 Projected Expenses FY18 FY19 FY20 FY21 FY22 FUTURE YEARS EXPENDITURE PLAN Proposed Project Total Design/Arch/Eng 200,000 90, , ,000 48, ,000 Land (or ROW) Construction 1,000, ,158 1,423,158 Other Equipment Total Project Cost 0 200,000 90, ,000 1,112, , ,783,158 Grant Fund FUNDING PLAN 200,000 90, ,000 1,112, ,158 1,783,158 Total Funding 0 200,000 90, ,000 1,112, , ,783,158 OPERATING BUDGET IMPACT Personal Svc. Non-personal Capital Total Operating TIP - Adopted June 14, 2018 Page 169

171 PROJECT # PAGE # 30 FY2018 Community Investment Budget / FY FY 2022 Project Detail GENERAL PROJECT DATA: COMPREHENSIVE PLAN INFORMATION: PROJECT NEED PROJECT FY18 FY19 FY20 FY21 FY22 Project Title: US27 at Florence Villa Grove Rd Project listed in CIE? Yes CRITERIA SCHEDULE Comp. Plan reference: Objective C, Safety X Design/Arch Functional Area : Roads and Drainage Mandate Land/ROW Department: LOS/Concurrency Related: No Replace Construct Location: Growth X Equipment PROJECT DESCRIPTION: PROJECT RATIONALE (Include Additional LOS Detail, if necessary): Addition of westbound turn lane on Florence Villa Grove Rd to ease congestion on the westbound approach. A traffic study will be used to determine the Project will improve traffic movement through the intersection and enhance required length for the new turn lane. safety. OPERATING BUDGET IMPACT: FUND / COST CENTER REPLACEMENT COUNTY PROPERTY NO.: N/A N/A Prior Cumm. FY17 Budget FY17 Projected Expenses FY18 FY19 FY20 FY21 FY22 FUTURE YEARS EXPENDITURE PLAN Proposed Project Total Design/Arch/Eng Land (or ROW) Construction 275, , , ,000 Other Equipment Total Project Cost 0 275, , , ,000 Fund FUNDING PLAN 275, , , ,000 Total Funding 0 275, , , ,000 OPERATING BUDGET IMPACT Personal Svc. Non-personal Capital Total Operating TIP - Adopted June 14, 2018 Page 170

172 PROJECT # PAGE # 31 FY2018 Community Investment Budget / FY FY 2022 Project Detail GENERAL PROJECT DATA: COMPREHENSIVE PLAN INFORMATION: PROJECT NEED PROJECT FY18 FY19 FY20 FY21 FY22 Project Title: Garden Grove Drainage Project listed in CIE? No CRITERIA SCHEDULE Comp. Plan reference: Safety Design/Arch Functional Area : Roads and Drainage Mandate Land/ROW Department: LOS/Concurrency Related: Yes Replace Construct Location: Winter Haven Growth X Equipment PROJECT DESCRIPTION: PROJECT RATIONALE (Include Additional LOS Detail, if necessary): The Garden Grove area was developed back in the 1970's and was constructed without adequate drainage for stormwater runoff. Over the years the Project will improve the drainage system within the Garden Grove Community has experienced significant home and street flooding from heavy storm events. The County previously conducted a comprehensive drainage Development. The project will increases the LOS related to flood control for the study in 2009 as a result of the ongoing issues. This project will design, permit, and construct some of the improvements identified in the study. area and enhance safety for citizens by collecting and appropriately conveying stormwater away from roads and homes. OPERATING BUDGET IMPACT: FUND / COST CENTER REPLACEMENT COUNTY PROPERTY NO.: N/A N/A Prior Cumm. FY17 Budget FY17 Projected Expenses FY18 FY19 FY20 FY21 FY22 FUTURE YEARS EXPENDITURE PLAN Proposed Project Total Design/Arch/Eng 200, ,730 30, ,000 Land (or ROW) 50,000 50,000 Construction 1,620,000 1,620,000 Other Equipment Total Project Cost 0 200, ,730 1,700, ,870,000 1-Mill Fund FUNDING PLAN 200, ,730 1,700,270 1,870,000 Total Funding 0 200, ,730 1,700, ,870,000 OPERATING BUDGET IMPACT Personal Svc. Non-personal Capital Total Operating TIP - Adopted June 14, 2018 Page 171

173 PROJECT # PAGE # 32 FY2018 Community Investment Budget / FY FY 2022 Project Detail GENERAL PROJECT DATA: COMPREHENSIVE PLAN INFORMATION: PROJECT NEED PROJECT FY18 FY19 FY20 FY21 FY22 Project Title: Alturas SR60 Turnlane Project listed in CIE? Yes CRITERIA SCHEDULE Comp. Plan reference: Objective C, Safety X Design/Arch Functional Area : Roads and Drainage Mandate Land/ROW Department: LOS/Concurrency Related: Yes Replace Construct Location: Alturas Growth X Equipment PROJECT DESCRIPTION: PROJECT RATIONALE (Include Additional LOS Detail, if necessary): Turnlane construction on Alturas Rd at SR60. Improves traffic level of service and reduces delay OPERATING BUDGET IMPACT: FUND / COST CENTER REPLACEMENT COUNTY PROPERTY NO.: N/A N/A Prior Cumm. FY17 Budget FY17 Projected Expenses FY18 FY19 FY20 FY21 FY22 FUTURE YEARS EXPENDITURE PLAN Proposed Project Total Design/Arch/Eng 75,000 75,000 Land (or ROW) Construction 200, ,000 Other Equipment Total Project Cost , , ,000 Impact ( B ) FUNDING PLAN 75, , ,000 Total Funding , , ,000 OPERATING BUDGET IMPACT Personal Svc. Non-personal Capital Total Operating TIP - Adopted June 14, 2018 Page 172

174 PROJECT # PAGE # 33 FY2018 Community Investment Budget / FY FY 2022 Project Detail GENERAL PROJECT DATA: COMPREHENSIVE PLAN INFORMATION: PROJECT NEED PROJECT FY18 FY19 FY20 FY21 FY22 Project Title: 9th Street Turnlane Project listed in CIE? Yes CRITERIA SCHEDULE Comp. Plan reference: Objective C, Safety X Design/Arch Functional Area : Roads and Drainage Mandate Land/ROW Department: LOS/Concurrency Related: Yes Replace Construct Location: Fort Meade Growth X Equipment PROJECT DESCRIPTION: PROJECT RATIONALE (Include Additional LOS Detail, if necessary): Construct right turn lane on 9th Street, NE at the intersection with US 17 in Fort Meade. Project improves traffic level of service OPERATING BUDGET IMPACT: FUND / COST CENTER REPLACEMENT COUNTY PROPERTY NO.: N/A N/A Prior Cumm. FY17 Budget FY17 Projected Expenses FY18 FY19 FY20 FY21 FY22 FUTURE YEARS EXPENDITURE PLAN Proposed Project Total Design/Arch/Eng 75,000 75,000 Land (or ROW) Construction 200, ,000 Other Equipment Total Project Cost , , ,000 Impact ( B ) FUNDING PLAN 75, , ,000 Total Funding , , ,000 OPERATING BUDGET IMPACT Personal Svc. Non-personal Capital Total Operating TIP - Adopted June 14, 2018 Page 173

175 PROJECT # PAGE # 34 FY2018 Community Investment Budget / FY FY 2022 Project Detail GENERAL PROJECT DATA: COMPREHENSIVE PLAN INFORMATION: PROJECT NEED PROJECT FY18 FY19 FY20 FY21 FY22 Project Title: Recker Hwy Turnlane Project listed in CIE? Yes CRITERIA SCHEDULE Comp. Plan reference: Objective C, Safety X Design/Arch Functional Area : Roads and Drainage Mandate Land/ROW Department: LOS/Concurrency Related: Yes Replace Construct Location: Growth X Equipment PROJECT DESCRIPTION: PROJECT RATIONALE (Include Additional LOS Detail, if necessary): Add right turn lane at Recker Hwy. Project improves traffic level of service OPERATING BUDGET IMPACT: FUND / COST CENTER REPLACEMENT COUNTY PROPERTY NO.: N/A N/A Prior Cumm. FY17 Budget FY17 Projected Expenses FY18 FY19 FY20 FY21 FY22 FUTURE YEARS EXPENDITURE PLAN Proposed Project Total Design/Arch/Eng 75,000 75,000 Land (or ROW) 100, ,000 Construction 250, ,000 Other Equipment Total Project Cost , , , ,000 Impact ( D ) FUNDING PLAN 75, , , ,000 Total Funding , , , ,000 OPERATING BUDGET IMPACT Personal Svc. Non-personal Capital Total Operating TIP - Adopted June 14, 2018 Page 174

176 PROJECT # PAGE # 35 FY2018 Community Investment Budget / FY FY 2022 Project Detail GENERAL PROJECT DATA: COMPREHENSIVE PLAN INFORMATION: PROJECT NEED PROJECT FY18 FY19 FY20 FY21 FY22 Project Title: Reynolds US92 Turnlane Project listed in CIE? Yes CRITERIA SCHEDULE Comp. Plan reference: Objective C, Safety X Design/Arch Functional Area : Roads and Drainage Mandate Land/ROW Department: LOS/Concurrency Related: Yes Replace Construct Location: Growth X Equipment PROJECT DESCRIPTION: PROJECT RATIONALE (Include Additional LOS Detail, if necessary): Construct left turn lane for Reynolds Rd onto US92. Project improves traffic level of service OPERATING BUDGET IMPACT: FUND / COST CENTER REPLACEMENT COUNTY PROPERTY NO.: N/A N/A Prior Cumm. FY17 Budget FY17 Projected Expenses FY18 FY19 FY20 FY21 FY22 FUTURE YEARS EXPENDITURE PLAN Proposed Project Total Design/Arch/Eng 75,000 75,000 Land (or ROW) 100, ,000 Construction 250, ,000 Other Equipment Total Project Cost , , , ,000 Impact ( E ) FUNDING PLAN 75, , , ,000 Total Funding , , , ,000 OPERATING BUDGET IMPACT Personal Svc. Non-personal Capital Total Operating TIP - Adopted June 14, 2018 Page 175

177 PROJECT # PAGE # 36 FY2018 Community Investment Budget / FY FY 2022 Project Detail GENERAL PROJECT DATA: COMPREHENSIVE PLAN INFORMATION: PROJECT NEED PROJECT FY18 FY19 FY20 FY21 FY22 Project Title: CR557 at Evenhouse Rd Project listed in CIE? No CRITERIA SCHEDULE Comp. Plan reference: Safety X Design/Arch Functional Area : Roads and Drainage Mandate Land/ROW Department: LOS/Concurrency Related: Yes Replace Construct Location: Growth X Equipment PROJECT DESCRIPTION: PROJECT RATIONALE (Include Additional LOS Detail, if necessary): Install new traffic signal at CR557 and Evenhouse Rd. Project will improve traffic level of service OPERATING BUDGET IMPACT: FUND / COST CENTER REPLACEMENT COUNTY PROPERTY NO.: N/A N/A Prior Cumm. FY17 Budget FY17 Projected Expenses FY18 FY19 FY20 FY21 FY22 FUTURE YEARS EXPENDITURE PLAN Proposed Project Total Design/Arch/Eng 75,000 75,000 Land (or ROW) Construction 100, , ,000 Other Equipment Total Project Cost , , ,000 Impact ( C ) FUNDING PLAN 175, , ,000 Total Funding , , ,000 OPERATING BUDGET IMPACT Personal Svc. Non-personal Capital Total Operating TIP - Adopted June 14, 2018 Page 176

178 PROJECT # PAGE # 37 FY2018 Community Investment Budget / FY FY 2022 Project Detail GENERAL PROJECT DATA: COMPREHENSIVE PLAN INFORMATION: PROJECT NEED PROJECT FY18 FY19 FY20 FY21 FY22 Project Title: Berkley Rd to Lena Vista Elementary Project listed in CIE? No CRITERIA SCHEDULE Comp. Plan reference: Safety X Design/Arch Functional Area : Roads and Drainage Mandate Land/ROW Department: LOS/Concurrency Related: Replace Construct Location: PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Growth Equipment PROJECT RATIONALE (Include Additional LOS Detail, if necessary): School zone upgrade State standards have been revised since the existing school zone was installed. New standards provide for longer school zones. In effort to enhance safety at the school crossing, we recommend bringing the school zone up to current standards. OPERATING BUDGET IMPACT: FUND / COST CENTER REPLACEMENT COUNTY PROPERTY NO.: N/A N/A Prior Cumm. FY17 Budget FY17 Projected Expenses FY18 FY19 FY20 FY21 FY22 FUTURE YEARS EXPENDITURE PLAN Proposed Project Total Design/Arch/Eng 52,000 52,000 Land (or ROW) Construction 70,000 70,000 Other Equipment Total Project Cost , ,000 1-Mill Fund FUNDING PLAN 122, ,000 Total Funding , ,000 OPERATING BUDGET IMPACT Personal Svc. Non-personal Capital Total Operating TIP - Adopted June 14, 2018 Page 177

179 PROJECT # PAGE # 38 FY2018 Community Investment Budget / FY FY 2022 Project Detail GENERAL PROJECT DATA: COMPREHENSIVE PLAN INFORMATION: PROJECT NEED PROJECT FY18 FY19 FY20 FY21 FY22 Project Title: Snively Rd to Snively Elementary Project listed in CIE? No CRITERIA SCHEDULE Comp. Plan reference: Safety X Design/Arch Functional Area : Roads and Drainage Mandate Land/ROW Department: LOS/Concurrency Related: Replace Construct Location: PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Growth Equipment PROJECT RATIONALE (Include Additional LOS Detail, if necessary): School zone upgrade State standards have been revised since the existing school zone was installed. New standards provide for longer school zones. In effort to enhance safety at the school crossing, we recommend bringing the school zone up to current standards. OPERATING BUDGET IMPACT: FUND / COST CENTER REPLACEMENT COUNTY PROPERTY NO.: N/A N/A Prior Cumm. FY17 Budget FY17 Projected Expenses FY18 FY19 FY20 FY21 FY22 FUTURE YEARS EXPENDITURE PLAN Proposed Project Total Design/Arch/Eng 52,000 52,000 Land (or ROW) Construction 70,000 70,000 Other Equipment Total Project Cost , ,000 1-Mill Fund FUNDING PLAN 122, ,000 Total Funding , ,000 OPERATING BUDGET IMPACT Personal Svc. Non-personal Capital Total Operating TIP - Adopted June 14, 2018 Page 178

180 PROJECT # PAGE # 39 FY2018 Community Investment Budget / FY FY 2022 Project Detail GENERAL PROJECT DATA: COMPREHENSIVE PLAN INFORMATION: PROJECT NEED PROJECT FY18 FY19 FY20 FY21 FY22 Project Title: Walk In Water Rd Bridge Replacement Project listed in CIE? No CRITERIA SCHEDULE Comp. Plan reference: Safety Design/Arch Functional Area : Roads and Drainage Mandate Land/ROW Department: LOS/Concurrency Related: No Replace X Construct Location: Growth Equipment PROJECT DESCRIPTION: PROJECT RATIONALE (Include Additional LOS Detail, if necessary): Replace bridge on Walk in Water Rd located 5.3 miles south of State Rd 60. (Bridge#164304) Existing bridge is functionally obsolete. OPERATING BUDGET IMPACT: FUND / COST CENTER REPLACEMENT COUNTY PROPERTY NO.: N/A N/A Prior Cumm. FY17 Budget FY17 Projected Expenses FY18 FY19 FY20 FY21 FY22 FUTURE YEARS EXPENDITURE PLAN Proposed Project Total Design/Arch/Eng 200, , ,100 Land (or ROW) Construction 1,999,900 1,999,900 Other Equipment Total Project Cost ,000 2,200, ,400,000 1-Mill Fund FUNDING PLAN 200,000 2,200,000 2,400,000 Total Funding ,000 2,200, ,400,000 OPERATING BUDGET IMPACT Personal Svc. Non-personal Capital Total Operating TIP - Adopted June 14, 2018 Page 179

181 PROJECT # PAGE # 40 FY2018 Community Investment Budget / FY FY 2022 Project Detail GENERAL PROJECT DATA: COMPREHENSIVE PLAN INFORMATION: PROJECT NEED PROJECT FY18 FY19 FY20 FY21 FY22 Project Title: West Lk Eloise Dr Drainage Improvements Project listed in CIE? No CRITERIA SCHEDULE Comp. Plan reference: Safety X Design/Arch Functional Area : Roads and Drainage Mandate Land/ROW Department: LOS/Concurrency Related: No Replace Construct Location: Eloise Growth Equipment PROJECT DESCRIPTION: PROJECT RATIONALE (Include Additional LOS Detail, if necessary): Roadway modifications to West Lake Eloise Drive to prevent overtopping. Project will improve roadway safety. OPERATING BUDGET IMPACT: FUND / COST CENTER REPLACEMENT COUNTY PROPERTY NO.: N/A N/A Prior Cumm. FY17 Budget FY17 Projected Expenses FY18 FY19 FY20 FY21 FY22 FUTURE YEARS EXPENDITURE PLAN Proposed Project Total Design/Arch/Eng 150, ,000 Land (or ROW) Construction 1,000,000 1,000,000 Other Equipment Total Project Cost ,000 1,000, ,150,000 Trans.Trust FUNDING PLAN 150,000 1,000,000 1,150,000 Total Funding ,000 1,000, ,150,000 OPERATING BUDGET IMPACT Personal Svc. Non-personal Capital Total Operating TIP - Adopted June 14, 2018 Page 180

182 PROJECT # PAGE # 41 FY2018 Community Investment Budget / FY FY 2022 Project Detail GENERAL PROJECT DATA: COMPREHENSIVE PLAN INFORMATION: PROJECT NEED PROJECT FY18 FY19 FY20 FY21 FY22 Project Title: Coronet Rd Outfall Drainage Improvements Project listed in CIE? No CRITERIA SCHEDULE Comp. Plan reference: Safety X Design/Arch Functional Area : Roads and Drainage Mandate Land/ROW Department: LOS/Concurrency Related: Yes Replace Construct Location: Highland City Growth Equipment PROJECT DESCRIPTION: PROJECT RATIONALE (Include Additional LOS Detail, if necessary): Design, permit, and construct stormwater infrastructure within the Coronet Road Outfall. The outfall ditch has experienced severe erosion and scour Project will improve the drainage system for Coronet Road along with stabilizing issues over the years and no longer functions at an appropriate LOS. The compromised drainage system has also had an adverse impacts on adjacent the Coronet Road Outfall. The project will increases the LOS related to flood homes and properties during high flow events. control for the area and enhance safety for citizens by addressing the ongoing erosoin issues and appropriately conveying stormwater away from existing roads and homes. OPERATING BUDGET IMPACT: FUND / COST CENTER REPLACEMENT COUNTY PROPERTY NO.: N/A N/A Prior Cumm. FY17 Budget FY17 Projected Expenses FY18 FY19 FY20 FY21 FY22 FUTURE YEARS EXPENDITURE PLAN Proposed Project Total Design/Arch/Eng 25,000 25,000 Land (or ROW) Construction 479, ,000 Other Equipment Total Project Cost , ,000 Fund FUNDING PLAN 504, ,000 Total Funding , ,000 OPERATING BUDGET IMPACT Personal Svc. Non-personal Capital Total Operating TIP - Adopted June 14, 2018 Page 181

183 PROJECT # PAGE # 42 FY2018 Community Investment Budget / FY FY 2022 Project Detail GENERAL PROJECT DATA: COMPREHENSIVE PLAN INFORMATION: PROJECT NEED PROJECT FY18 FY19 FY20 FY21 FY22 Project Title: West Pipkin Rd Project listed in CIE? Yes CRITERIA SCHEDULE (from Medulla Rd to Harden Blvd) Comp. Plan reference: Objective C, Safety X Design/Arch Functional Area : Roads and Drainage Mandate Land/ROW Department: LOS/Concurrency Related: Yes Replace Construct Location: Lakeland Growth X Equipment PROJECT DESCRIPTION: PROJECT RATIONALE (Include Additional LOS Detail, if necessary): Widen road from 2 lanes to 4 from Medulla Road to Harden Boulevard; approx. 3.2 miles. This improvement is necessary based on the projected level of service. OPERATING BUDGET IMPACT: FUND / COST CENTER Increased roadway and/or traffic maintenance REPLACEMENT COUNTY PROPERTY NO.: N/A N/A Prior Cumm. FY17 Budget FY17 Projected Expenses FY18 FY19 FY20 FY21 FY22 FUTURE YEARS EXPENDITURE PLAN Proposed Project Total Design/Arch/Eng 500, ,000 Land (or ROW) 8,000,000 4,000,000 12,000,000 Construction 16,000,000 16,000,000 32,000,000 Other Equipment Total Project Cost ,500,000 4,000,000 16,000,000 16,000, ,500,000 Impact Fee E Trans. Trust FUNDING PLAN 2,500,000 1,500,000 1,000,000 2,000,000 7,000,000 6,000,000 2,500,000 15,000,000 14,000,000 37,500,000 Total Funding ,500,000 4,000,000 16,000,000 16,000, ,500,000 OPERATING BUDGET IMPACT Personal Svc. Non-personal Capital Total Operating TIP - Adopted June 14, 2018 Page 182

184 PROJECT # PAGE # 43 FY2018 Community Investment Budget / FY FY 2022 Project Detail GENERAL PROJECT DATA: COMPREHENSIVE PLAN INFORMATION: PROJECT NEED PROJECT FY18 FY19 FY20 FY21 FY22 Project Title CR557 Widening Project listed in CIE? Yes CRITERIA SCHEDULE (US17/92 to I-4) Comp. Plan reference: Objective C, Safety X Design/Arch Functional Area : Roads and Drainage Mandate Land/ROW Department: LOS/Concurrency Related: Yes Replace Construct Location: Lake Alfred Growth X Equipment PROJECT DESCRIPTION: PROJECT RATIONALE (Include Additional LOS Detail, if necessary): Widen road from 2 lanes to 4 lanes from US 17/92 to I-4 approx miles. This improvement is necessary based on the projected level of service. OPERATING BUDGET IMPACT: FUND / COST CENTER Increased roadway and/or traffic maintenance REPLACEMENT COUNTY PROPERTY NO.: N/A N/A Prior Cumm. FY17 Budget FY17 Projected Expenses FY18 FY19 FY20 FY21 FY22 FUTURE YEARS EXPENDITURE PLAN Proposed Project Total Design/Arch/Eng 2,000,000 1,000,000 1,000,000 4,000,000 Land (or ROW) 7,000,000 5,000,000 12,000,000 Construction 64,000,000 64,000,000 Other Equipment Total Project Cost ,000,000 1,000,000 8,000,000 5,000, ,000,000 80,000,000 Impact Fee D Impact Fee A FUNDING PLAN 2,000,000 1,000,000 8,000,000 3,500,000 14,500,000 1,500,000 1,500,000 Unfunded 64,000,000 64,000,000 Total Funding ,000,000 1,000,000 8,000,000 5,000, ,000,000 80,000,000 OPERATING BUDGET IMPACT Personal Svc. Non-personal Capital Total Operating TIP - Adopted June 14, 2018 Page 183

185 PROJECT # PAGE # 44 FY2018 Community Investment Budget / FY FY 2022 Project Detail GENERAL PROJECT DATA: COMPREHENSIVE PLAN INFORMATION: PROJECT NEED PROJECT FY18 FY19 FY20 FY21 FY22 Project Title Bomber Road Sidewalks and Project listed in CIE? No CRITERIA SCHEDULE Drainage Comp. Plan reference: Safety X Design/Arch Functional Area : Roads and Drainage Mandate Land/ROW Department: LOS/Concurrency Related: Yes Replace Construct Location: Winter Haven Growth Equipment PROJECT DESCRIPTION: PROJECT RATIONALE (Include Additional LOS Detail, if necessary): Design, permit, and construct a new sidewalk along the north side of Bomber Road from Rifle Range Road to Gerber Dairy Road in conjunction with Project will improve the pedestrian saftey and mobility through the area and drainage improvements to the existing drainage system to address chronic flooding issues experienced during heavy storm events. improve choronic flooding coditions which occur after heavy storm events. The project will be constructed in several phases with the first phase starting at Rifle Range Road. OPERATING BUDGET IMPACT: FUND / COST CENTER None REPLACEMENT COUNTY PROPERTY NO.: N/A N/A Prior Cumm. FY17 Budget FY17 Projected Expenses FY18 FY19 FY20 FY21 FY22 FUTURE YEARS EXPENDITURE PLAN Proposed Project Total Design/Arch/Eng 200, ,000 Land (or ROW) Construction 220, ,000 Other Equipment Total Project Cost , , CDBG Funds FUNDING PLAN 420, ,000 Total Funding , ,000 OPERATING BUDGET IMPACT Personal Svc. Non-personal Capital Total Operating TIP - Adopted June 14, 2018 Page 184

186 Lakeland TRANSPORTATION CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PLAN REVENUES Local Ontion Gas Tax - 6 cents Local Ootion Gas Tax- 5 cents State Revenue Sharina Gas Tax - 8th cent Local Ootion Gas Tax - 9th cent Investments & Eaminas Soecial Assessments - Allevs St & Sidewalks lmoact Fees - District 1 lmoact Fees - District 2 FOOT Grants: US 92 at Wabash Avenue Uoarades USF Camous Develoo Aoreement - SR33 Countv Line Rd US 92 Westaate-Central Multi-Use Trail Crvstal Lake Dr. (New Jersey Rd. to Bartow Rd.\ Lincoln Ave. rsw Middle School to Beacon Rd.) Brunnell Parkway (Memorial Bl. To 10th St.) New York Avenue Cvcte Track Rose Street (Main Street to lnaraham Ave) Main Street Pathwavs FOOT Traffic Sianat Maintenance Reimb. FOOT Advanced Traffic Manaaement Svstem Develooer Contributions Transfer from Par1dnn - Handcian Parkin Fine Revenue Refund of Prior Year Exoenses - Wabash Extension Unaooropriated Surplus ADJUSTED 2017 BUDGET , , PROPOSED PROJECTED PROJECTED PROJECTED PROJECTED PROJECTED PROJECTED PROJECTED I PROJECTED PROJECTED 2019 I 2020 I I \ , \ \ I ,000 85, ,281' I I \ TOTAL REVENUES , Q EXPENSES _, Facilities Proiects Sidewalk Proiects Street Resurfacina and Sea1ina Street Improvements lmoact Fee Pmiects - District 1 lmoact Fee Proiects - District 2 Traffic Onerations Proiects Miscellaneous lmorovements Contributions to Other Funds , , , , , , , , , , , , , TOT AL EXPENSES , , ,987 1, ,601,567 1,601, ,883 1,050,6_84 1,050, ,137 1Jl1& , , ,295 1,450, ,784 2,184,079 2,184, ,580,412 2, ,495,136 85, ,281 2,495,137 3, , ,877 3,525,294 3,525, ,2J_Q 3.346,0!!-4_ 3.346, ,093 3,984,177 UPQrades to C&M/L&S Office Facili 159, ,533 SIDEWALK PROJECTS Sidewalk Reoair & Replacement (includes ADA) Sidewalk Continaencv - Develoner Contrib. Sidewalks for Collector Streets Lincoln Ave tsw Middle School to Beacon Rdl Westaate-Central Multi-Use Trail Luce Rd. ihaham Dr. to Lk. Miriam Dr.l FOOT LAP Rose St. (Main St. to lnaraham Ave.) Rose St.!Main St. to lnnraham Ave. l FOOT LAP Crvstat Lake Dr. /US 98 to New Jersev Rd. l Crvstat Lake Dr. (New Jersey Rd. to Bartow Rd.) Lincoln Ave. (Beacon Road to Ariana St.\ , , Fiscal Year 2018 Annual Budget Appendix TIP - Adopted June 14, 2018 Page 185

187 TIP - Adopted June 14, 2018 Page 186

188 TIP - Adopted June 14, 2018 Page 187

189 TIP - Adopted June 14, 2018 Page 188

190 TIP - Adopted June 14, 2018 Page 189

191 Appendix D Public Comments TIP - Adopted June 14, 2018 Page 190

192 Polk TPO - Community Remarks Map - Project Comments & General Comments -May 1, 2018 to June 11/2018 DRAFT POLK TIP / /23 Source Topic Comment TIP Related Y/N Community Remarks Ft. Fraser Trail/Bridge Use PD&E money for construction (use previous data) Y Community Remarks Ft. Fraser Trail Bridge Needed project for safety Y Community Remarks Ft. Fraser Trail Bridge For safety Y Community Remarks Ft. Fraser Trail Bridge For safety Y Community Remarks Ft. Fraser Trail Bridge For Safety Y Community Remarks Ft. Fraser Trail Bridge For safety; user friendly Y Community Remarks Ft. Fraser Trail Bridge For safety Y Community Remarks Ft. Fraser Trail Bridge For safety Y Community Remarks Ft. Fraser Trail Bridge For safety Y Community Remarks Ft. Fraser Trail Bridge A ped/bike bridge will help cyclists, walking commuters, jury duty, school children & people in general Y Community Remarks Ft. Fraser Trail Bridge Consider pedestrian overpass at Wilson/60 Y Community Remarks Ft. Fraser Trail Bridge Would love to ride bike from museum to trail without fear of becoming road kill Y Community Remarks Ft. Fraser Trail For safety; extremely dangerous at Wilson Y Community Remarks Ft. Fraser Trail Needs to be extended into downtown Lakeland Y Community Remarks Ft. Fraser Trail/Bridge Very dangerous to cross 60 at Wilson Y Community Remarks Ft. Fraser Trail/Bridge Also need bridge over Ernest Smith Blvd. intersection Y Community Remarks Ft. Fraser Trail/Bridge For safety & would allow more people access to downtown Bartow Y Community Remarks Ft. Fraser Trail/Bridge For safety; heavily used but cannot navigate entire trail Y Community Remarks Ft. Fraser Trail/Bridge Denying funding for this would be short sighted & put cyclist and walkers in harms way Y Community Remarks Ft. Fraser Trail/Bridge Great for trail users. Bartow could capitalize on this, becoming a biking destination/stop. Y Community Remarks Ft. Fraser Trail/Bridge This would be great project for the community; much safer. Y Community Remarks Ft. Fraser Trail/Bridge Many cyclists & pedestrians would benefit from increased SAFE access crossing 60 via the bridge Y Community Remarks Ft. Fraser Trail/Bridge Many cyclists & pedestrians would benefit from increased SAFE access crossing 60 via the bridge Y Community Remarks Ft. Fraser Trail/Bridge As someone who has ridden across this section of SR 60 on numerous occasions, I can atteest this is needed Y Community Remarks Ft. Fraser Trail/Bridge Great idea for safety reasons & positive impact on Main Street & Bartow community. Y Community Remarks Ft. Fraser Trail/Bridge This project will enhance cycling in the Bartow area, making Bartow & Highland City more attractive and safer for cyclists. Y Community Remarks Ft. Fraser Trail/Bridge The light at Wilson & Hwy 60 lasts only 60 seconds. A pedestrian bridge will promote tourist & local use. Y Community Remarks Ft. Fraser Trail/Bridge This will bring more riders into downtown Bartow; major economic development boost for Bartow. Y Community Remarks Ft. Fraser Trail/Bridge A bridge for bike/ped to safety cross 60 would be a perfecgt addition to a great trail. Please build without delay. Y Community Remarks Ft. Fraser Trail/Bridge Similar projects (Lake Alfred/Winter Haven) have brought positive impact to local community Y Community Remarks Ft. Fraser Trail/Bridge Anything to extend this trail is an important project Y Community Remarks Ft. Fraser Trail/Bridge Addition of this bridge essential for safety Y Community Remarks Ft. Fraser Trail/Bridge Given the heavy cycling community FDOT should strongly consider this addition to the trail system Y Community Remarks Ft. Fraser Trail/Bridge As a bicyclist, this bridge is needed for safety Y Community Remarks Ft. Fraser Trail/Bridge This project would keep traffic flowing & improve safety for cyclists & pedestrians Y Community Remarks Cycling Trails Want more N Community Remarks Bike Lanes With injuries & deaths of cyclists by automobiles increasing many cyclist turn to rails to trails for safety. Anything that can be N done to separate peds/bikes from traffic lanes should be considered. Safety & economic impacts for these improvements. Community Remarks Bike Lanes Bike lanes around high activity intersections need to be cleaned on regular basis; 98/540a full of debris N Community Remarks Bike Lanes Need bike lanes on Pipkin; near Geico N Community Remarks Clubhouse Road Needs sidewalk entire length N Community Remarks Van Fleet Trail Needs bridge replacement N Community Remarks Van Fleet Trail Needs new bridge and resurfacing N Community Remarks Van Fleet Trail Needs new bridge and resurfacing N Community Remarks Van Fleet Trail Needs new bridge and resurfacing N Community Remarks Intersection Cypress Gardens Road & Lake Ruby Dr Needs right hand turn lane N Community Remarks Ave D & Hwy 17 N, WH Need left turn signal heading easts on Ave D onto Hwy 17 N Community Remarks Ave D & Hwy 17 N, WH N Community Remarks School Buses School buses should not be allowed to stop on major highways N Community Remarks Spirit Lake Road, WH Constant congestion with trucks, doubling commute time N Community Remarks Old Tampa Highway Widen to 4 lanes with bike lanes; many workers bicycle to warehouses around County Line Road Y Community Remarks Central Polk Pkwy Good idea to build a connection from 570 to 27, but focus on improving traffic on I-4 going to Orlando Y Community Remarks Central Polk Pkwy Wonder if this is needed just to accommodate some CSX rigs. Huge environmental impact. Suggest widening Spirit Lake Road, prohibit trucks from Y using Thornhill as short cut. Make them use 4-lane highways already designed for this purpose. Community Remarks Central Polk Pkwy Polk County needs to demonstrate that it can effectively address infrastructure and traffic flow before increasing traffic volume Y Community Remarks Central Polk Pkwy Concerned about project; cutting through what green belt remains without development. If this is just for the benefit of CSX direct them to use Y Community Remarks 4-lane highways already built. Huge taxpayer cost, huge environmental cost, unlikely to generate the traffic or revenue to justify TIP - Adopted June 14, 2018 Page 191

193 Community Remarks SunRail Expand SunRail to Haines City N Community Remarks Dundee Road & Overlook Drive, WH This intersection needs a traffic light N Community Remarks Wabash & 542 Needed project! Y Community Remarks Mockingbird Lane, Lkld This is definitely needed; especially during morning & evening commute times N Community Remarks SR540 (Cypress Gardens Blvd. & SE Plaza Drive) Block off left turn lane heaading west on CG Blvd; dangerous turn N Community Remarks Lake Alfred-N. Lake Shore Way/N. Buena Vista Problem area! People make left turns from center lane on Hwy 92; heavy congestion Y Community Remarks E.F. Griffin Road/Smith Lane, Lakeland This light needs to be signalized 24/7 N Community Remarks Smith Lane, Lakeland Smith Lane needs lighting N Community Remarks Spessard Holland ElementarySchool, Lakeland This school needs a sidewalk leading to the neighborhoods; kids are walking along road in the evenings N Community Remarks Osceola/Polk Line Road (532 & Lake Wilson road) Who thought that putting an entrance for the new WaWa at an ALREADY busy Publix exit was a good idea? Horrible.. N Community Remarks " " " Anonymous reply to above: This is a mess, etc. Community Remarks Poinciana Retired here 15 years ago & we've asked for sidewalks, bike lanes & nothing has been done. Have asked elected officlals with N Community Remarks no response. Community Remarks Champions Gate Blvd./532 Someone is going to get killed at this intersection. WHY is there no SLOW DOWN LANE off I-4 at Exit 58? The exit ramp also needs to be N Community Remarks " " " 2 lanes sooner so those making a right at Exit 58 can turn & ease the traffic that backs up onto I-4. N Community Remarks " " " Anonymous reply to above: Completely Agree. The champions gate - gate blocks visibility as well N Community Remarks " " " Anonymous reply to above: The merging of traffic from the 417 to 27 on I-4 is a disgrace & evidence of poor planning. There should be an N Community Remarks " " " alternative way to enter Championsgate from I-4 to allieviate the backup of vehicles; make this a priority. N Community Remarks Hwy 33 & 557 Need traffic light N Community Remarks W. Pipkin & Doman Road, Lakeland Please make a 3-way stop or add traffic light. This intersection becomes almost undriveable on busy school day or during evening rush hour. N Community Remarks 540A-Scott Lake Elementary Intersection Takes over 5 lights to get through intersection on school mornings. School buses turning in/out of school just west of traffic light creating N Community Remarks " " " more congestion. While the safety of children is a concern, so is the flow of traffic with additional development along 540A. Community Remarks Bike Path Need on west side of New Jersey Road, Lakeland N Community Remarks Roundabout at Commonwealth Ave, N. (33) They are fine until you have flow of cars coming from one direction; that doesn't allow vehicles from other directions to enter the intersection. Y Community Remarks Cars are not yielding as they should. Community Remarks Bicyclists Need to enforce rules/education. Too many times I see cyclists not stopping at stop signs becqause they have straps on their pedals. They should N Community Remarks be fined and obey the laws just like vehicle drivers. Community Remarks Bartow Airport Love this little airport. Whatever we can do to upgrade hangers, new hangers, paving, roads, turn lanes would be an asset to airport & industrial center. Y Community Remarks Harden Blvd. & frontage roads by Oakbridge Publix Very dangerous to make the turn from north to south frontage road. Have witnessed accidents by careless drivers. N Community Remarks Planned Oakbridge Expansion $111,100 from Drummond for traffic mitigation of its planned expansion is not enough. $250,000-$300,000 would be more appropriate. N Community Remarks U.S. 98 North between Daughtery & Gib Galloway Out of control! We allowed Walmart to go in decades ago without lights & improving the roads & making a complete streets area. As this area is divided N Community Remarks " " on either side by the county and City of Lakeland, the City is allowing unchecked growth in this area without improving it. My property values continue Community Remarks " " to be strangled by the uncontgrolled growth & I would really like to see improvements in this area. Community Remarks Floral Lakes 55+ community/hwy 60 As a part time resident of Floral Lakes it becomes quite challenging to safely navigate the crazy busy Hwy 60 area. Worst yet, we avoit it & instead N Community Remarks choose to load our bikes & head for the VanFleet trail in the Auburndale area. Community Remarks Thompson Nursery Road An overpass is badly needed on Thompson Nursery Road; or build the TNR realignment asap. Trains continually stop on tracks for over an hour causing N Community Remarks " " large backups. Community Remarks " " Anonymous reply to above: CSX needs to be advised & recitify with crew detaching cars for those long periods. I believe more than 15 min. is guideline. N Community Remarks Eagle Lake Loop Road - RR tracks Residents in this area want a quiet zone. N Community Remarks Thompson Nursery Road Grade separation is badly needed; traffic backup when trains block roads in this area. N Community Remarks Broadway (557) & Camp Gilead Road, Polk City A dangerous intersection; a roundabout would solve the problem N Community Remarks US 27 & Sunshine Blvd. (west side), Haines City Great need for safer intersection. This intersection has seen many accidents & fatalities N Community Remarks Intersection 540A & Lakeland Highlands Road Intersections improvements needed; cars crossing over double lines to make left turns in and out of Walgreens & Publix shopping plaza. N Community Remarks Polo Park Blvd./Highway 27 Very important safety project. Due to the local & tourist traffic coming off the 192/27 interchange. Y *A total of 85 comments were collected. 5 were duplicates or test entries. Many general comments pertaining to improvements TIP - Adopted June 14, 2018 Page 192

194 Appendix E TIP Amendments TIP - Adopted June 14, 2018 Page 193

195 TIP - Adopted June 14, 2018 Page 194

196 TIP - Adopted June 14, 2018 Page 195