What Does the Future of Public Private Partnerships Look Like in Oregon? AGC s Annual Business Meeting Friday January 10, :00 11:45am
|
|
- Martina Booth
- 6 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 What Does the Future of Public Private Partnerships Look Like in Oregon? AGC s Annual Business Meeting Friday January 10, :00 11:45am
2 Dee Burch President Advanced American Construction
3 Buck s American Cafe
4
5
6
7
8 Buck s American Cafe
9 John D. Carter President and Chief Executive Officer Schnitzer Steel
10 Public-Private Partnerships John D. Carter
11 Summary Why are We Discussing Public-Private Partnerships and What Are They? Why Would the Private Sector Participate? Why would the Public Sector want Private Sector Participation? Variations of the Model Examples Risk Factors Financial Risk Profile Mitigation Conclusion
12 Why Are We Discussing Public-Private Partnerships And What Are They? What Problems are we trying to solve? The nature of Public-Private Partnerships When do they work? What application do they have here? Timing
13 Why Would the Private Sector Participate? Opportunity to participate in a signature project Opportunity to make a reasonable return on capital and services Potential to create a template that has application elsewhere
14 Why Would the Public Sector Want Private Sector Participation? Assistance with risk mitigation: Cost control Completion guarantees Schedule guarantees Innovative assistance in financing Potential for engineering improvements and design optimization Private procurement flexibility Development opportunities to generate offsetting revenue Broaden Public Support
15 Variations of the Model Full Privatization Public Ownership/ Private Operation Public/Private Joint Ownership Concession Award
16 Examples Portland s Light Rail to the Airport Channel Tunnel Channel Tunnel Rail Link/Eurostar London Underground Meizouwan Power Plant (China) Polish Motorway Tacoma Narrows Bridge Luton Airport (England) Manila Water System (Philippines)
17 Risk Factors Political Risk Funding Risk Regulatory Risk Completion Costs Risk Schedule Risk Construction Risk Technology Management
18 Financial Risk Profile Seed Money Mezz. Debt Long-term High risk Development Construction Operation low risk
19 Mitigation Build public support through an understanding of why the private sector should be involved Include the private sector in incentive programs to ensure lowest cost funding Develop completion costs incentives Develop schedule incentives in conjunction with related public agencies Incentivize construction objectives
20 Selection How do you test private sector appetite for involvement? How do you identify likely candidates for proposals, and ensure competitive proposals? Identification of: Competitive selection process Governance structure Regulatory approach
21 Conclusion Not every project is a candidate Each project will have unique characteristics Financing will determine structure Where it works, major advantages: New sources of capital Long-term advantages in operations Public sector resources multiplied
22 Johnathan Woolworth Construction Client Advocate Willis
23 Groups Active in P3 Project Skanska Kiewit Development Cintra US Parsons Walsh Construction Group (Chicago) Macquarie Group of Australia PCL Constructors ACS Infrastructure Development Lane Construction Stacy & Witbeck Lane Construction Shimick Construction Honeywell Building Solutions
24 Types of P3 Delivery Models Pre-Development Agreement Design-Build Design, Build, Finance Design, Build, Operate, Maintain (DBOM) Design, Build, Finance, Operate, Maintain (DBFOM) Long-Term Concession or Lease
25 Pre-Development Agreement Early Private Partner Involvement Starts during the environmental impact phase Projects in early stages of procurement Technically challenging project Selection based on qualifications and project benefits from this approach or business case Private Business Group may undertake pre-development work at risk, or with shared public sector risk Private Business Group gets first rights to negotiate development agreement If agreement not reached; public sponsor has fully developed project to be available for public bid
26 Design/Build Model Designer and Contractor hired under a single contract Selection usually based on best value Majority of design and Construction is taken on by the Private Partnership Possibility of Private Sector Innovation Greater Cost and Schedule Certainty Public Sector has a single point of contact for the project Any disputes are usually handled between the contractor and the designer Public Entity/Sponsor retains the obligation to fund Public Entities retain full maintenance and operational responsibilities
27 Design, Build, Operate, Maintain Model (DBOM) Very Similar to Design/Build Model Private Partnership has the long term operational & maintenance responsibility Like an extended warranty Transfers the lifecycle costs to the Private Partnership DBOM balances upfront capital costs vs. long term maintenance costs Public Entity is responsible for the revenue collection and financing DBOM projects are suited for facilities with specialized operational and/or maintenance requirements
28 Design, Build, Finance, Operate, Maintain (DBFOM) Similar to DBOM Private Partnership is responsible for financing Public Entity is responsible for the revenue stream Applicable to both revenue and non-revenue facilities Suitability Where transfer of revenue risk may not be the best value for the money
29 Long-Term Concession or Lease Greatest Risk Transfer Model Design, Construction, Revenue, Finance, Operations, Maintenance, Capital Renewal Has the ability to be expanded in size as capacity deems Public Entity keeps the least control Rate Setting Operational/Performance Standards Payment to Public Entity(s) Upfront Payment Revenue Sharing Unplanned Refinancing Excess Revenue
30 Lessons for Contractors & Public Entities State of Oregon, County, City & Other Public Entity Golden Rule What would the project cost if the agency funded the project themselves? Things Contractors need to be aware of: 2% to 8% of the overall project value are: design, legal, financing and other pursuit cost. Legal clauses of most contract are very restrictive. No Special Exemption for unforeseen delay or change orders Penalties for not having the project ready on the exact day can be up to $100,000 per day.
31 CALIFORNIA PROS: Functioning P3 Commission Public Hearing on Proposed P3 projects Constant Pipeline of Possible Projects Procurement Process: RFI, RFQ, RFP, Selection, Contract process All Unsolicited Project Proposals are put out to public bid for competing private proposals Delivered the first Civic Building in the U.S. with use of a P3 delivery model ($492- Million) Single Job Focus CONS: Confidential one-on-one meetings with the State of CA and Proposers of Unsolicited Projects are encouraged. All Commissioners are Public officials
32 FLORIDA PROS: P3 Task Force appointed with a mix of public employees, private business owners, and citizens Single job focus Public Requests for Proposals All P3 projects are up for Public Bid (Both Solicited & Unsolicited Proposals) o Must solicit competing proposals for the same job for 60 days after initial publication CONS: Laws have only been on the books for 2 years (5 projects completed, 7 under contract) Unsolicited Proposals publicly displayed in a newspaper publication (1 to 2 weeks) Task Force can set the timeline for bids for those Unsolicited Projects (min. 21 days and a maximum of 120 days) Lending Public Funds to Private Enterprises for existing publicly-owned facilities or infrastructure 32
33 TEXAS PROS: Overseer of projects managed by current TX DOT s Chief Planning & Projects Officer Notifies the public within 10 days of receiving a proposal that meets the P3 standards Procurement process: RFQ, RFP, Selection, Contract process Single job focus CONS: Comprehensive Development Agreements (CDAs) are approved by Legislature ONLY First Project in has only been law in Texas since All P3 Commissioners are appointed by the Governor, LT Governor and House Speaker
34 VIRGINIA PROS: One of the oldest states participating in P3 project (Legislative Framework began in 1995) Accepts both Solicited & Unsolicited project proposals Single job focus All Unsolicited Project Proposals are put out to public bid for competing private proposals Constant Pipeline of Possible Projects Procurement Process: RFQ, RFP, Selection, Contract process Seeks Public and affected jurisdictions for comments & concerns Sets standards of participation of DBE & SWAM contractors and suppliers prior to contracts being awarded Virginia s P3 Agency provides for more than 45 days for competing proposals if they are deemed complex CONS: Only elected or state officials make the final decisions on projects and who is awarded the projects Unsolicited Proposals only need to be listed for at least 45 days The Virginia P3 agency has to publish AT LEAST ONCE in one or more newspapers or periodicals of general circulation in the affected jurisdiction(s). No definition on what deems a project to be complex or not
35 Chip Hastie Vice President Clark Construction Company
36 PPP / PBI OVERVIEW Friday January 10, 2014
37 PPP / PBI Structure Design Build Finance Operate - Maintain Client Sponsor Entitlements Legal Finance Leasing Land Facilities Management Design/Builder Architect General Contractor
38 PBI model is used with great success in Canada Performance Based Infrastructure
39 Partnerships BC Established 2002 to develop provincial approach to alternate procurement Performance methods Based Infrastructure Serves public agencies through planning, delivery and oversight of major infrastructure projects 40 projects to date: $17B+ in value with $7B+ private capital at risk Origins in health care and transportation projects Includes social housing, justice, energy, education
40 Infrastructure Ontario P3 $1.5 B savings on investment of $35 B. Job creation and preservation estimated at 300,000 over the past three years Performance Based Infrastructure New facilities demonstrate higher employee satisfaction levels and working environment Wait times in Ontario for healthcare concerns has been reduced by new facilities
41 DBFOM Observations Projects Enabled + Execution Expedited Design and Innovation Focused on Owner Interests Up-time, Life Cycle and Operations Factors Emphasized Cash Flow Certainty (government and contractor) Guaranteed Building Up-time and Upkeep (private party risk)
42 Governor George Deukmejian Courthouse
43 Project Overview Program Courtrooms: 31 (+ 6 future expansion) Overall Square Footage: 529,000 SF o 425,000 SF Court o 7,000 SF Retail o 97,000 SF County Lease Construction Cost: $340,000,000 Financial Close: 12/20/2010 Occupancy Date: 8/30/2013
44 Mission Replace Outdated and Poorly Maintained Courthouse
45 Calif. Courts Approach Framework and Participants 2.5 years design & construction + 35 years operation Parking operation & commercial/retail leasing included 100% private capital Strong public counterparties Judicial Council of California (AOC) LA County
46 Calif. Courts Approach Solicitation Process 11 Consortiums submitted qualifications Five teams shortlisted for interview; three selected for final competition Six month competition with multiple proprietary meetings Long Beach Judicial Partners Selected June 2010 Financial Close December 2010
47 Long Beach Structure Design Build Finance Operate - Maintain CALIFORNIA COURTS LENDER(S) Agreement & Payment Debt PROJECT COMPANY Interest in Land Equity INVESTOR Design-Builder Facilities Maintenance Capital Replacement Architect Builder
48 Example of PBI Payment Model
49 PBI Influence on D/B Up-time Risk: Building Layout / Elevators
50 PBI Influence on D/B Life Cycle: Flooring Systems
51 PBI Influence on D/B Operations & Maintenance: Light Fixtures
52 Local Impacts of P3 Execution of Projects Potentially jump-start projects that might not otherwise have funding or authorized bond sales Once contracting underway, fewer de-railers (budget misalignment, appropriation factors, etc.) Aligned interests during project execution (Owner change orders less than 1% at Long Beach)
53 Local Impacts of P3 Contracting Opportunities Local presence is essential (subcontractors, general contractors, suppliers, etc.) 85% of sub-contracts in Long Beach let to firms Headquartered in Southern CA 92% of sub-contracts in Long Beach let to firms with regional offices and operations to support the project
54 Local Impacts of P3 Contracting Factors Performance assuredness (schedule + quality) in context of delivery risk Bricks & mortar execution labor, materials, site and community logistics, etc. Satisfying program in creative / innovative ways (design-build with different envelope)
55 Mike Day President Day CPM Services LLC
56 Agenda Introductions Procurement Methods: P3 PPP Developer Model review RFP Procurement Process Challenges Q & A P3 Alternative Project Delivery
57 Introductions Day CPM Services Recent/Current Delivery of Healthcare, Public Safety, Municipal, Institutional and Justice. Recent Major Capital Projects in Excess of $2 billion Currently Under Contract with 3 major Public Clients in the Portland Metro Area Experienced in Alternative forms of Contracting in Oregon and Washington: ( ORS, RCW) exemptions Innovator in IPD and Lean Project Delivery P3 experience: Mike Day, 30+ years experience in leading major Municipal Capital projects in the NW region P3 Alternative Project Delivery
58 Mike Day, Development Manager / Owner s Representative Mike is an Executive Leader with more than 30 years of Construction Management/Owner s Representative experience providing full-service project management expertise in both the public and private sectors. He is a dynamic principal who supports the foundation of teams and leads through example and mentoring. A money-wise Owner s Representative, he manages construction capital with strict accountability. His in-the-trenches contracting knowledge translates to protection of Owner interests with persuasive authority in dealing with construction entities. He is very well respected by major construction corporations and A/E firms throughout the Northwest. He has 30+ major CIP projects delivered under alternative forms of contracting in Washington and Oregon in the last 23 years including GC/CM, CM/GC, IPD, Design- Build / Developer led - P3, and CM Agency. Mike s recent project experience includes; Collaborative Life Sciences - OUS/OHSU; PCC Bond Program; MC-Courthouse; Oregon State Capital Pre- Development IPD; 3 Greenfield Hospital Programs; 1 International Medical Center Developer - P3. P3 Alternative Project Delivery
59 Procurement Methods Developer Developer Led process: Design, Build, Finance.. Public Private Partnership: P3 (PPP) Alternative Financing; Public Bonds and Private equity RFQ/RFP process: Qualifications Based Transfer of construction risk Efficient Delivery: Saves Time & Money Mirrors Private sector delivery model May include Operations and Maintenance: DBFM Life Cycle cost analysis considerations P3 Alternative Project Delivery
60 Procurement Method - Developer Pros Developer Led P3 Creative alternate funding solutions Tax Exempt bond financing (63-20) Lease-to-own or rent: "Off balance sheet Qualification based selection Efficient project delivery Highly collaborative (Use of IPD) Minimal initial capital investment for Owner May Require less owner staff & management May not be bound to requirements for pubic procurement (ORS, RCW) Private Development process (Knowledge and Efficiency) Cons Perceived loss of the control of the project and design Front end development of Bridging & Concession documents Potential debt service premiums for private sector financing P3 Alternative Project Delivery
61 Developer P3 Timeline Pre-Development Phase: Early Project Screening process for Project Procurement Business Case Analysis Functional Program Concept / Reference Design developed Cost Modeling; Benchmark estimates Hard/Soft costs & Life cycle Financial and Funding Models: Value For Money Analysis of Risk Matrix and adjusters Detailed Procurement options Analysis: comparison with other forms of project delivery: DB, CM/GC, DBM, DBFM Debt Service structure; Proposed sources of funding Development Phase: RFP/RFP Selection Process Transfer of Risk to Developer ( 1 st cost and life cycle) Design, Planning and Land use Construction & Closeout Operations and Maintenance P3 Alternative Project Delivery
62 Developer Selection Process The Developer selection process: Varies (8-12 months) Open to all qualified Developer teams Best Value Delivery approach Value Added Request for Qualifications: RFQ/RFP Describes the Project and submission requirements: Experience, Capacity, past performance Proposed Development plan and schedule, development agreement, estimated worksheet budget, Financial Strength Owner Develops Bridging Documents and Facilities Master Plan and functional program. Basis of Design and Blocking/stacking Diagrams Developed by Owner for bridging document exhibits RFQ Process: Developer submits initial SOQ Legal Counsel involvement in RFQ/RFP document development Establishes the timeline and describes the review process P3 Alternative Project Delivery
63 Developer Selection Process RFP: Short-list and interview of top Developer teams: Conceptual Design & Development Plan provided by Developer with proposal / interview process Developer estimated worksheet budget: Preliminary GMP guarantees: Fees, GC s, soft costs, hard costs, contingencies, financial Guarantees provided with RFP proposal response. Notice of award to selected Developer: Pre-Development agreement executed Pre-Development agreement phase: Organizes development process for planning and design. Establish Go/No Go decision Developer Agreement: Binds developer to delivery dates, and overall budget and functional program, as a result of the work funded by the Pre-development agreement Lease offer terms and conditions and Financing finalized P3 Alternative Project Delivery
64 Developer Preconstruction What happens in preconstruction: Prepare a detailed plan and schedule: Developer leads Pre-Development stage to Go/ No go Owner Provided funds to : Validate Basis of Design and program Prepare estimates Target value design in alignment with GMP & RFP Track and monitor budget & provide Value Engineering /Design Owner & Developer execute Development Agreement: Binds developer to develop and construct the project to the established delivery dates, program requirements and overall budget as a result of the work funded by the Pre-development agreement Binds the Developer to the Soft costs and Fees established in the RFP estimated worksheet budget. Developer assumes construction risk Finalize / validate GMP and lease offer term negotiations pursuant to the terms of the executed Development Agreement Market the project to local subs and suppliers & Expedite procurement P3 Alternative Project Delivery
65 Developer Questions & Answers Q: When is Developer led alternative delivery model best? A: For complex projects where alternative financing and speed of delivery are required Q: Does Developer model cost more? A: Varies. Initial costs to client can be lower with more reliable results & transfer of construction development risk. Projects may not be subject to Public works ORS and RCW s & mirror private sector delivery for procurement. Q: Are there change orders on Developer model projects? A: Yes. For owner-initiated programmatic scope changes Q: Are there savings on Developer model projects? A: Yes. Cost savings and Developer incentives developed as part of an IPD - Integrated project delivery approach result in savings $ success sharing. Q: Is this the way projects are built in the public/private sector? A: Yes: When alternative financing off balance sheet is preferred delivery option: Used in Washington Public sector: Harborview, King County, UW, City of Redmond; Task force and P3 Alternative Project Delivery
66 Challenges Educating Stakeholders on developer led option using P3 project delivery Go / No Go decision making model in Precon Objective Business Case Analysis process Risk Register and Adjuster Assumptions Develop Strategy for alternative Financing off balance sheet delivery model & Debt Service Owner Funding options of Debt Service P3 Alternative Project Delivery
67 Questions?
68 What Does the Future of Public Private Partnerships Look Like in Oregon?
THE OTTAWA HOSPITAL REGIONAL CANCER PROGRAM REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT
VALUE FOR MONEY ASSESSMENT THE OTTAWA HOSPITAL REGIONAL CANCER PROGRAM REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT - PAGE 1 - - PAGE 2 - - PAGE 3 - - PAGE 4 - - PAGE 5 - - PAGE 6 - - PAGE 7 - The Ottawa Hospital Artist s rendering
More informationVALUE FOR MONEY ASSESSMENT BLUEWATER HEALTH REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT
VALUE FOR MONEY ASSESSMENT BLUEWATER HEALTH REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT - PAGE 1 - - PAGE 2 - - PAGE 3 - - PAGE 4 - Bluewater Health Artist s Rendering Farrow Partnership Architects Inc. Enhanced Services at
More informationVALUE FOR MONEY ASSESSMENT TRILLIUM HEALTH PARTNERS CREDIT VALLEY HOSPITAL SITE PRIORITY AREAS REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT
VALUE FOR MONEY ASSESSMENT TRILLIUM HEALTH PARTNERS CREDIT VALLEY HOSPITAL SITE PRIORITY AREAS REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT - PAGE 1 - - PAGE 2 - - PAGE 3 - - PAGE 4 - - PAGE 5 - Credit Valley Hospital Priority
More informationVALUE FOR MONEY ASSESSMENT WATERLOO REGION CONSOLIDATED COURTHOUSE MAKING PROJECTS HAPPEN: WATERLOO REGION CONSOLIDATED COURTHOUSE - PAGE 1 -
VALUE FOR MONEY ASSESSMENT WATERLOO REGION CONSOLIDATED COURTHOUSE - PAGE 1 - - PAGE 2 - - PAGE 3 - - PAGE 4 - - PAGE 5 - ARTIST S RENDERING OF THE WATERLOO REGION CONSOLIDATED COURTHOUSE Courtesy of ITS
More informationP3: OPPORTUNITIES FOR AMERICA S INFRASTRUCTURE. Greg Hummel
P3: OPPORTUNITIES FOR AMERICA S INFRASTRUCTURE Greg Hummel Public Private Partnerships ( P3 ) Broadly refers to a variety of transactions in which a public or quasi-public entity shifts some degree of
More informationThe Benefits of P3s. Why do P3s work?
The Benefits of P3s Why do P3s work? P3s are a long-term performance-based approach for procuring public infrastructure where the private sector assumes a major share of the responsibility in terms of
More informationIntroduction to Alternative Procurement Delivery
Introduction to Alternative Procurement Delivery for Florida Transportation Commission January 24, 2013 TABLE OF CONTENTS Alternative Project Delivery (APD) US Market Overview APD Funding and Financing
More informationValue for Money (VfM) Analysis Virginia s experiences and lessons learned
Value for Money (VfM) Analysis Virginia s experiences and lessons learned May 28, 2013 Morteza Farajian Program Manager Virginia s Enabling P3 Legislation Public-Private Transportation Act of 1995 Intent
More informationPublic Private Partnerships. Alberta Infrastructure Guidance Document
P3 Public Private Partnerships Alberta Infrastructure Guidance Document P3 Public Private Partnerships Alberta Infrastructure Guidance Document Excerpt from the February 18, 2003 Speech from the Throne
More informationPublic-Private Partnerships for Public Buildings. Discussion Materials May 3, 2011
Public-Private Partnerships for Public Buildings Discussion Materials May 3, 2011 P3 Team FY 14 Kick Off Meeting December 11, 2013 What is a Performance Based PPP for Public Buildings? Objectives of the
More informationMeasure M. Board of Trustees Study Session. January 16, 2013
January 16, 2013 Measure M Board of Trustees Study Session Presented by: Andy Dunn, Vice Chancellor, Finance & Administrative Services and Jerry Marchbank, Facilities Director Discussion Measure M Vote
More informationNational Conference of State Legislatures
National Conference of State Legislatures Spring Forum April 22 23, 2009 Pamela Bailey-Campbell Parsons Brinckerhoff What is a PPP? An Agreement Between the Public and Private Sector Parties that Transfers
More informationPublic Private Partnerships 101
Public Private Partnerships 101 Tony Elkins, Commercial Director October 6, 2016 Cintra s LBJ Managed Lanes P3, Dallas, Texas The Ferrovial Group Development Over The Entire Infrastructure Lifecycle INFRASTRUCTURE
More informationVALUE FOR MONEY ASSESSMENT HIGHWAY 407 EAST PHASE 1 PROJECT
VALUE FOR MONEY ASSESSMENT HIGHWAY 407 EAST PHASE 1 PROJECT 1 2 3 4 Highway 407 East Phase 1 Project Artist s rendering Highlights of Highway 407 East Phase 1 Highway 407 East will help to relieve congestion
More informationPublic-Private Partnerships in Maryland. Canada-US Forum on Public-Private Partnerships October 3, 2013
Public-Private Partnerships in Maryland Canada-US Forum on Public-Private Partnerships October 3, 2013 Towards a More Comprehensive P3 Approach 2010 P3 Law (Chapters 640 and 641 of 2010) Joint Legislative
More informationFollow-Up on VFM Section 3.05, 2014 Annual Report RECOMMENDATION STATUS OVERVIEW
Chapter 1 Section 1.05 Ministry of Infrastructure (formerly the Ministry of Economic Development, Employment and Infrastructure) Infrastructure Ontario Alternative Financing and Procurement Follow-Up on
More informationThe City of Tarpon Springs
Prepared By: Carr, Riggs & Ingram August 29, 2018 The City of Tarpon Springs Contract Compliance Assessment of The Reverse Osmosis Water Treatment Facility Table of Contents Transmittal Letter... 1 Executive
More informationOREGON STATE UNIVERSITY CM/GC CONTRACT. (Construction Manager/General Contractor)
OREGON STATE UNIVERSITY CM/GC CONTRACT (Construction Manager/General Contractor) THE CONTRACT IS BETWEEN: OWNER: Oregon State University And CONSTRUCTION MANAGER/ GENERAL CONTRACTOR (referred to as Contractor
More informationP3 CONTRACTS. Morteza Farajian, Ph.D. November 2016
P3 CONTRACTS Morteza Farajian, Ph.D. November 2016 What is a Public-Private Partnership (P3)? Overview of P3s Definition P3 Defined A P3 involves a partnership between the public and private sector to
More informationGranville Township Request for Qualifications Construction Manager at Risk (CMAR)
Article 1 Project Identification Granville Township Request for Qualifications Construction Manager at Risk (CMAR) Project Owner: Project Name: Project Description: Granville Township Trustees P.O. Box
More informationPUBLIC-PRIVATE PARTNERSHIPS
BTYGROUP C O S T A N D R I S K A D V I S O R S MODELS AND PROCESSES FOR OVERVIEW INTRODUCTION ABOUT BTY GROUP THE PROCURMENT SPECTRUM SAMPLE DETERMINANTS PPP MODELS PPP PROCESS Q&A + DISCUSSION 2 ABOUT
More informationCentral Florida Expressway Authority
Central Florida Expressway Authority Fiscal Year 2016 Bond Financing Review December 2015 2016 Protiviti Inc. All Rights Reserved. This document has been prepared for use by CFX s management, audit committee,
More informationREQUEST FOR QUALIFICATIONS FOR GENERAL CONTRACTOR/CONSTRUCTION MANAGER SERVICES FOR ALTERNATIVE PROJECT DELIVERY FOR THE CONSTRUCTION OF A NEW LIBRARY
Missoula Public Library P a g e 1 REQUEST FOR QUALIFICATIONS FOR GENERAL CONTRACTOR/CONSTRUCTION MANAGER SERVICES FOR ALTERNATIVE PROJECT DELIVERY FOR THE CONSTRUCTION OF A NEW LIBRARY September 2015 Missoula
More informationWhy surety gets the job done on P3 projects
Why surety gets the job done on P3 projects 1 Why surety gets the job done on P3 projects Public-Private Partnership projects (P3s) involve a complex mix of new relationships and risk transfers for the
More informationRequest for Qualifications for General Contractors. 8th & Cooper Multi-use Project
Request for Qualifications for General Contractors The 8 th & Cooper Ownership Group is seeking qualifications from General Contractors to provide both preconstruction and construction services for the
More informationREQUEST FOR PROPOSAL (RFP) OWNER S REPRESENTATION/PROJECT MANAGER. New Combined Court Facility In Montezuma County
REQUEST FOR PROPOSAL (RFP) OWNER S REPRESENTATION/PROJECT MANAGER New Combined Court Facility In Montezuma County 12/11/2015 Prepared by: Montezuma County 109 W. Main, Room 302 Cortez, CO 81321 Melissa
More informationVALUE FOR MONEY ASSESSMENT CENTRE FOR ADDICTION AND MENTAL HEALTH CENTRE FOR ADDICTION AND MENTAL HEALTH REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT - PAGE 1 -
VALUE FOR MONEY ASSESSMENT CENTRE FOR ADDICTION AND MENTAL HEALTH - PAGE 1 - - PAGE 1 - - PAGE 2 - Architectural rendering of CAMH Gateway Building Courtesy of Carillion Health Solutions Highlights of
More informationPublic Private Partnerships
Public Private Partnerships A Presentation to the Association of Financial Professionals of Canada Edmonton Chapter March 20, 2013 Alternative Capital Financing Office Alberta Treasury Board and Finance
More informationPublic Private Partnerships What is That??? Raymond Partridge, Program Manager July 17, 2013
Public Private Partnerships What is That??? Raymond Partridge, Program Manager July 17, 2013 Agenda What is a Public-Private Partnership? P3 Lessons Learned Locality Concerns Pop Quiz: Is this a P3 Project????
More informationSUDBURY REGIONAL HOSPITAL REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT
VALUE FOR MONEY ASSESSMENT SUDBURY REGIONAL HOSPITAL REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT - PAGE 1 - - PAGE 2 - - PAGE 3 - - PAGE 4 - Sudbury Regional Hospital Artists Rendering Nicholls Yallowega Belanger Architects
More informationConstruction Management at Risk. Cheryl Olson, CPPO, C.P.M., FCCN Kristine Rumping, CPPB, FCCM
Construction Management at Risk Cheryl Olson, CPPO, C.P.M., FCCN Kristine Rumping, CPPB, FCCM 1 Welcome and Introductions Construction Management at Risk Defined Benefits Statutory Guidelines Solicitation
More informationCHAPTER Committee Substitute for Senate Bill No. 124
CHAPTER 2016-153 Committee Substitute for Senate Bill No. 124 An act relating to public-private partnerships; transferring, renumbering, and amending s. 287.05712, F.S.; revising definitions; deleting
More informationVALUE FOR MONEY ASSESSMENT TORONTO SOUTH DETENTION CENTRE M AK I N G P R O J E C T S H AP P EN: TORONTO SOUTH DETENTION CENTRE - P AG E 1 -
VALUE FOR MONEY ASSESSMENT TORONTO SOUTH DETENTION CENTRE - P AG E 1 - - P AG E 2 - - P AG E 3 - - P AG E 4 - - P AG E 5 - ARTIST S RENDERING OF THE TORONTO SOUTH DETENTION CENTRE Image Courtesy of Integrated
More informationThe Capital Outlay Process in Virginia
Department of General Services Division of Engineering & Buildings The Capital Outlay Process in Virginia January 24, 2008 Commonwealth of Virginia s agencies and institutions design and construct facilities
More informationPublic Private Partnerships. Virginia GFOA s 2015 Fall Conference. prepared for. by JoAnne Carter, Managing Director.
Public Private Partnerships prepared for Virginia GFOA s 2015 Fall Conference by JoAnne Carter, Managing Director October 21, 2015 4350 North Fairfax Drive, Suite 580 Arlington, Virginia 22203 2015 Public
More informationPORT OF EVERETT MANAGEMENT OF PERSONAL SERVICE CONTRACTS
PORT OF EVERETT MANAGEMENT OF PERSONAL SERVICE CONTRACTS A. INTRODUCTION... 1 2SHB 3274... 1 Effective Date for Implementation... 1 B. DEFINITIONS... 1 A&E Services See Professional Services... 1... 1
More informationThe Federal Perspective: Project Finance, TIFIA and Public Private Partnerships
The Federal Perspective: Project Finance, TIFIA and Public Private Partnerships Mark Sullivan, Federal Highway Administration Innovative Transportation Finance Workshop Shoreview, Minnesota October 20,
More informationPublic Private Partnerships (PPP)- The Financial Perspective October 2014
Public Private Partnerships (PPP)- The Financial Perspective October 2014 The Logo is a trademark of Canadian Imperial Bank of Commerce, used by FirstCaribbean International Bank under license Table of
More informationP3 Procurement Lessons Learned: Regina WWTP
P3 Procurement Lessons Learned: Regina WWTP 1 WWTP City of Regina 2 Jayne Krueger and Rob Court Project Awesomeness Group February 25, 2016 3 4 Reasons for Project Tighter effluent limits (December 31,
More informationRICHMOND HEIGHTS LOCAL SCHOOL DISTRICT REQUEST FOR QUALIFICATIONS ( RFQ ) FOR OWNER S REPRESENTATIVE SERVICES
RICHMOND HEIGHTS LOCAL SCHOOL DISTRICT REQUEST FOR QUALIFICATIONS ( RFQ ) FOR OWNER S REPRESENTATIVE SERVICES The Board of Education of the Richmond Heights Local School District Board of Education ( Owner
More informationARTICLE 8: BASIC SERVICES
THE SCOPE OF SERVICES ADDED BY THIS AMENDMENT IS FOR A CM AT RISK PROJECT ONLY. THE SCOPE OF SERVICES SPECIFIED BELOW INCLUDES ARTICLES 8.1, 8.3, 8.4, 8.5, 8.6, 8.7 AND 8.8. THE SERVICES SPECIFIED IN ARTICLE
More informationTHE OFFICE OF TRANSPORTATION PUBLIC PRIVATE PARTNERSHIPS ( OTP3 )
THE OFFICE OF TRANSPORTATION PUBLIC PRIVATE PARTNERSHIPS ( OTP3 ) VIRGINIA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION ( VDOT ) VIRGINIA DEPARTMENT OF RAIL AND PUBLIC TRANSPORTATION ( DRPT ) RESPONSE TO REQUEST FOR INFORMATION
More informationUNDERSTANDING PUBLIC-PRIVATE PARTNERSHIPS (P3) THROUGH A THEORETICAL COST COMPARISON
UNDERSTANDING PUBLIC-PRIVATE PARTNERSHIPS (P3) THROUGH A THEORETICAL COST COMPARISON MATT CALCAVECCHIA, ERIN BIRKENKOPF AND JOHN FINKE PUBLIC FACILITIES GROUP This study compares three P3 approaches for
More informationHelena Public Schools. Helena, MONTANA REQUEST FOR QUALIFICATIONS FOR GENERAL CONTRACTOR/CONSTRUCTION MANAGER SERVICES FOR
Helena Public Schools P a g e 1 Helena Public Schools Helena, MONTANA REQUEST FOR QUALIFICATIONS FOR GENERAL CONTRACTOR/CONSTRUCTION MANAGER SERVICES FOR ALTERNATIVE PROJECT DELIVERY FOR NEW CENTRAL ELEMENTARY
More informationI-66 RFI Response Vinci Concessions USA 25 November 2013
General: 1. Please describe your firm, its experience in relation to public-private partnership projects, and its potential interest in relation to the Project (e.g., design/engineering firm, construction
More informationPlease feel free to ask questions or express view points.
Independence Respect Integrity Troy Kelley Change Order Pricing APWA Contract Administration Sub Committee s Change Order Workshop Series May 1, 8, 15, and 19, 2015 Chris Cortines, CPA and Principal Auditor
More informationDEVELOPING A FRAMEWORK FOR EX-POST VALUE FOR MONEY ANALYSIS IN PUBLIC PRIVATE PARTNERSHIP PROJECTS
DEVELOPING A FRAMEWORK FOR EX-POST VALUE FOR MONEY ANALYSIS IN PUBLIC PRIVATE PARTNERSHIP PROJECTS Final Report by Qingbin Cui Department of Civil Engineering University of Maryland College Park, MD 20742
More informationREQUEST FOR QUALIFICATIONS FOR. ISSUE DATE: November 3, 2017 DUE DATE: November 20, 2017
REQUEST FOR QUALIFICATIONS FOR Design/Build Construction Services Merriam Community Center ISSUE DATE: DUE DATE: November 20, 2017 Project Manager: Meredith Hauck, Assistant City Administrator Contact
More informationREQUEST FOR QUALIFICATIONS DESIGN-BUILD NEW SERVICE CENTER PROJECT Solicitation Number: Q DD Job Nos.: ADDENDUM 2 FEBRUARY 7, 2014
REQUEST FOR QUALIFICATIONS DESIGN-BUILD NEW SERVICE CENTER PROJECT Solicitation Number: Q-14-001-DD Job Nos.: 11-7701 ADDENDUM 2 FEBRUARY 7, 2014 This addendum includes responses to questions, as well
More informationF = MA : CSG SLC WEBINAR DECEMBER 16, J. Douglas Koelemay, Director
F = MA : CSG SLC WEBINAR DECEMBER 16, 2014 J. Douglas Koelemay, Director VIRGINIA LEADERSHIP IN PUBLIC-PRIVATE PARTNERSHIPS PPTA enabling legislation adopted 1995; PPEA followed PPTA implementation guidelines
More informationWAYPOINT CENTRE FOR MENTAL HEALTH CARE REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT (FORMERLY MENTAL HEALTH CENTRE PENETANGUISHENE)
VALUE FOR MONEY ASSESSMENT WAYPOINT CENTRE FOR MENTAL HEALTH CARE REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT (FORMERLY MENTAL HEALTH CENTRE PENETANGUISHENE) - PAGE 1 - - PAGE 2 - - PAGE 3 - - PAGE 4 - - PAGE 5 - Waypoint Centre
More informationFlorida Transportation Commission PUBLIC-PRIVATE PARTNERSHIPS (P3)
Florida Transportation Commission PUBLIC-PRIVATE PARTNERSHIPS (P3) AGENDA Current Status in Florida Federal Reauthorization/ SEP-15 P-3 Options Overview Key aspects of P-3 Georgia Status P-3 Initiatives
More informationPublic Private Partnerships (PPPs) Projects
Development Process of Public Private Partnerships (PPPs) Projects By Dr Paul H K Ho 1 Disclaimer Funded by Commerce, Industry and Technology Bureau, The Government of the Hong Kong Special Administrative
More informationRequest for Proposal #2036. Orange Coast College Exterior Lighting Energy Efficiency Project Implementation
Request for Proposal #2036 Orange Coast College Exterior Lighting Energy Efficiency Project Implementation I. NOTICE A. Statement of Proposal NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that Coast Community College District
More informationAirport Owners Guide. to Project Delivery Systems
Airport Owners Guide to Project Delivery Systems 2 nd Edition 2012 Developed by a Joint Committee of the Airports Council International North America (ACI NA), Airport Consultants Council (ACC) and the
More informationConstruction Contracting. Agents and Vendors. Contractual Relationships. Agents and Vendors. Agents and Vendors. Outline
Construction Contracting Institute for Facilities Management Outline 1. Contractual Relationships 2. Delivery Approaches 3. Bidding & Award Don Guckert The University of Iowa Agents and Vendors Contractual
More informationPublic-private partnerships: opportunities in infrastructure. Wednesday, February 1, 2017
Public-private partnerships: opportunities in infrastructure Wednesday, February 1, 2017 Join the conversation Tweet using #NLawMotion and connect with @NLawGlobal Connect with us on LinkedIn linkedin.com/company/nortonrosefulbright
More informationPublic Private Partnerships (PPPs) in North America The Advent of a Market
Public Private Partnerships (PPPs) in North America The Advent of a Market RBS North American Infrastructure Advisory and Finance optional client logo 24 June 2008 Sell-Side Driver: The PPP market, while
More informationAlpena County Sheriff s Office & Jail Expansion April 16, 2018 RFP for Construction Manager at Risk Services
SECTION 1: ADVERTISEMENT FOR PROPOSALS / GENERAL INFORMATION Alpena County ( County ) requests proposals for Construction Manager at Risk ( CMAR ) to provide preconstruction and construction services for
More informationEXHIBIT "A" RESPONSIBILITIES AND SERVICES OF PROGRAM MANAGER 1. BASIC SERVICES A-1 2. GENERAL PROGRAM SERVICES A-6
EXHIBIT "A" RESPONSIBILITIES AND SERVICES OF PROGRAM MANAGER 1. BASIC SERVICES A-1 2. GENERAL PROGRAM SERVICES A-6 3. PLANNING AND ADMINISTRATION A-6 OF THE PROJECT 4. PRECONSTRUCTION PHASE A-7 5. PRE-BIDDING
More informationInfrastructure Impact and Challenges P3s in the Water/Wastewater Sector. Stefan Dery, PPP Canada June 8, 2016 Ottawa, ON
Infrastructure Impact and Challenges P3s in the Water/Wastewater Sector Stefan Dery, PPP Canada June 8, 2016 Ottawa, ON Introduction PPP Canada Leading the Government s P3 Agenda Acts as a Source of Expertise
More informationMajor Capital Construction Audit
Major Capital Construction Audit Good progress, but continued vigilance needed April 2018 Multnomah County Auditor s Office Steve March, Multnomah County Auditor Office of Multnomah County Auditor Steve
More informationONTARIO INFRASTRUCTURE AND LANDS CORPORATION. Value for Money Assessment. Sinai Health System Phase 3A Redevelopment Project at Mount Sinai Hospital
ONTARIO INFRASTRUCTURE AND LANDS CORPORATION Value for Money Assessment Sinai Health System Phase 3A Redevelopment Project at Mount Sinai Hospital June 2017 Table of Contents I. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 2 Ð 2
More informationPolicy Session Worksheet
CLACKAMAS COUNTY BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS Policy Session Worksheet Presentation Date: June 26, 2018 Approx. Start Time: 10:30 AM Approx. Length: 60 min Presentation Title: Courthouse Replacement Project
More informationEvaluating Potential PBI Projects. April 22, 2016 Portland, Oregon
Evaluating Potential PBI Projects April 22, 2016 Portland, Oregon What Is WCX? 501(c)(3) non-profit Formed by Oregon, Washington, California Advised by British Columbia A publicly-funded resource to public
More informationPublic-Private Partnerships The Canadian Experience
T h e C a n a d i a n C o u n c i l f o r P u b l i c - P r i v a t e P a r t n e r s h i p s Public-Private Partnerships The Canadian Experience Mark Romoff President & Chief Executive Officer The Expanding
More informationUsing Pension Funds to Build Infrastructure and Put Americans to Work. Donna Cooper and John F. Craig March 2013
Using Pension Funds to Build Infrastructure and Put Americans to Work Donna Cooper and John F. Craig March 2013 WWW.AMERICANPROGRESS.ORG Introduction and summary America s infrastructure its roads, bridges,
More informationSolutions: Accelerating Infrastructure Projects Goldman, Sachs & Co. April 22, 2008
MUNIROOT\V_NY\MuniVol0\Shared\Zach\PPP\Greg Carey's Speech for Texas Transportation Forum v4.10.08.doc effroz 11 Apr 2008 16:46 1/13 Solutions: Accelerating Infrastructure Projects Goldman, Sachs & Co.
More informationAVAILABILITY PAYMENTS What Can We Learn from Surface Transportation Projects? Pamela Bailey Campbell President, LeighFisher
AVAILABILITY PAYMENTS What Can We Learn from Surface Transportation Projects? Pamela Bailey Campbell President, LeighFisher What IS a Availability Payment P3? Direct payments From public sector to private
More informationApplicability of Spanish PPP experience to Russian market
Applicability of Spanish PPP experience to Russian market Fernando Gutiérrez de Vera Chairman of SEOPAN Concessions Commission 21 October 2008 1 What is SEOPAN? The Association of Major Spanish Contractors
More informationFIXED ASSET INVENTORY REQUEST FOR QUALIFICATIONS (RFQ) Los Angeles County Children and Families First Proposition 10 Commission (aka First 5 LA)
FIXED ASSET INVENTORY REQUEST FOR QUALIFICATIONS (RFQ) Los Angeles County Children and Families First Proposition 10 Commission (aka First 5 LA) RELEASE DATE: January 11 th, 2009 TABLE OF CONTENTS I. TIMELINE
More informationFAYETTE COUNTY SCHOOL DISTRICT REQUEST FOR PROPOSAL FOR CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT AT RISK SERVICES
FAYETTE COUNTY SCHOOL DISTRICT REQUEST FOR PROPOSAL FOR CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT AT RISK SERVICES The Fayette County School District (FCSD) desires to retain the services of a professional Construction
More informationIndustrial Developer Loan Fund Request for Proposals
Industrial Developer Loan Fund Request for Proposals Question & Answer Information Session: Friday, May 4, 2018 RFP Submission Deadlines: June 29, 2018 September 28, 2018 December 28, 2018 March 29, 2019
More informationSAN IPSE CAPITAL OP SILICON VALLEY
CITY OF SAN IPSE CAPITAL OP SILICON VALLEY TO: HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL SUBJECT: SEE BELOW COUNCIL AGENDA: 10/25/16 ITEM: Memorandum FROM: Kerrie Romanow Barry Ng DATE: Approved Date /O 1 /^/j(e>
More informationWILLIAMS COUNTY HIGHWAY COMPLEX REQUEST FOR QUALIFICATIONS CONSTRUCTION MANAGER AT-RISK. January 2nd, PO Box E.
WILLIAMS COUNTY HIGHWAY COMPLEX REQUEST FOR QUALIFICATIONS CONSTRUCTION MANAGER AT-RISK January 2nd, 2014 PO Box 2047 205 E. Broadway Williston, ND 58802 1 TABLE OF CONTENTS INSTRUCTIONS TO RESPONDENTS
More informationInfrastructure Ontario TRACK RECORD 2017 REPORT
Infrastructure Ontario TRACK RECORD 2017 REPORT CONTENTS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY A. BACKGROUND INFORMATION A1 Background of Infrastructure Ontario...4 A2 Background of Third-Party Consultant - Hanscomb...5 B.
More informationRequest for Proposal for Construction Manager-at Risk Responses Due: 3:00 p.m. Thursday, September 10, 2015
Request for Proposal for Construction Manager-at Risk Responses Due: 3:00 p.m. Thursday, September 10, 2015 The Housing Authority of the Town of Glastonbury (the GHA ) is seeking a qualified firm to serve
More informationMini-Brooks Qualifications Based Selection Supplement of Design/Build Statutes
The Supplement Presentation as of August, 2015 Mini-Brooks Qualifications Based Selection Supplement of Design/Build Statutes (the full Statutes for Design/Build approaches with an analysis of each) David
More informationRequest For Qualifications Construction Management at Risk
Request For Qualifications Construction Management at Risk DAVIE COUNTY HIGH SCHOOL REPURPOSING PROJECT SOLICITATION: REC-2018-020 Representative for RFQ: Brad Blackwelder bblackwelder@daviecountync.gov
More informationAon Infrastructure Solutions
Aon Risk Solutions Aon Infrastructure Solutions Aon Infrastructure Solutions Alternative Project Delivery Risk Advisors Risk. Reinsurance. Human Resources. Empower Results Aon plc is the leading global
More informationDRAFT REQUEST FOR QUALIFICATIONS RELATING TO THE TRANSFORM 66 P3 PROJECT UNDER THE VIRGINIA PUBLIC-PRIVATE TRANSPORTATION ACT OF 1995 (AS AMENDED)
DRAFT REQUEST FOR QUALIFICATIONS RELATING TO THE TRANSFORM 66 P3 PROJECT UNDER THE VIRGINIA PUBLIC-PRIVATE TRANSPORTATION ACT OF 1995 (AS AMENDED) VIRGINIA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION POSTED AUGUST 31,
More informationRequest for Qualifications Facilities Condition Assessment and Development Consulting Services City of Mobile Mobile, Alabama PL
Request for Qualifications Facilities Condition Assessment and Development Consulting Services City of Mobile Mobile, Alabama PL-220-16 1.0 INTRODUCTION The City of Mobile is inviting qualified consultants
More informationINDEX annual management plan, terminology in credit agreement
INDEX Aboriginal rights Aboriginal title, establishment of, 316 claims, suggested clauses, 321-323 consultation, process for, 318-321 duty to consult and accommodate, 317-318 generally, 313-315 risk assessment,
More informationIPP TRANSACTION ADVISOR TERMS OF REFERENCE
IPP TRANSACTION ADVISOR TERMS OF REFERENCE Terms of reference for transaction advisor services to the Government of [ ] for the [insert description of the project] (the Project ). Contents 1. Introduction
More informationTri-Cities Academic Building Washington State University Richland, WA Project Manual
Tri-Cities Academic Building Washington State University Richland, WA Project Manual Project No. 8589-2016 Issued 9/25/2018 Washington State University Facility Services, Capital Tri-Cities Academic Building
More informationChange Order Pricing
Change Order Pricing APWA CAEC Change Order Workshop Series February 2, 2017 - Renton February 9, 2017 - Yakima February 16, 2017 - Camas February 23, 2017 - Everett March 2, 2017 Spokane Valley Chris
More informationIntegrated Capital Planning Manual
0 Integrated Capital Planning Manual August 2017 0 Contents Introduction... 1 Annual Integrated Capital Planning Cycle... 3 Integrated Capital Plan Submission... 8 Business Case Guide and Template... 11
More informationHOOD RIVER COUNTY ADMINISTRATIVE CODE. Adopted by Hood River County Board of Commissioners December 9, 1985
HOOD RIVER COUNTY ADMINISTRATIVE CODE Adopted by Hood River County Board of Commissioners December 9, 1985 Reviews & Revisions February 1988 January 1991 December 1994 August 2011 TABLE OF CONTENTS HOOD
More informationCOMMISSION ADOPTED POLICY Procurement Policy
Procurement Policy Adopted: December 16, 2014 Revised: N/A Page 1 of 6 1.0 Purpose and Need All procurement shall be in accordance with the Code of Virginia 2.2-4300, the Virginia Public Procurement Act,
More informationThe Development Agreement. Long-Term Care Home Renewal Branch October 2016
The Development Agreement Long-Term Care Home Renewal Branch October 2016 Learning Objectives By the end of this session, you will have a solid understanding of: The description and purpose of a Development
More informationAward of Performance Energy Engineering Services Contract
Finance, Administration and Oversight Committee Action Item III-E September 13, 2007 Award of Performance Energy Engineering Services Contract Washington Metropolitan Area Transportation Authority Board
More informationProject Delivery via P3: International v. American Approach
Project Delivery via P3: International v. American Approach February 8, 2017 Contact Information: Raul Amezcua, Managing Director 515 South Figueroa Street, Suite 1800 Los Angeles, CA 90071 (213) 443-5202
More informationLessons Learned: Construction Bidding & Procurement Item D.1
Lessons Learned: Construction Bidding & Procurement Item D.1 Facilities Subcommittee Meeting February 28, 2017 Bid Limits The District must competitively bid any contract involving an expenditure of: Bid
More informationAGREEMENT BETWEEN OWNER AND CONSTRUCTION MANAGER-AT-RISK
AGREEMENT BETWEEN OWNER AND CONSTRUCTION MANAGER-AT-RISK MD ANDERSON AGREEMENT No. This Agreement is made as of, 2015 (the Effective Date ), by and between The Owner: The University of Texas M. D. Anderson
More informationDocument Comparison Matrix
Document Comparison Matrix 200 200 Series General Contracting 2014 AIA & Document Document Name AGC AGC Document Name 2007 AIA Year Constructor (Lump Sum) 200.1 Amendment 1: Time and Price Impacted Materials
More informationD.A. Davidson & Co. Engineering & Construction Conference September 20, 2017 Chicago, IL
D.A. Davidson & Co. Engineering & Construction Conference September 20, 2017 Chicago, IL Alaskan Way Viaduct (SR-99) Replacement Project, Seattle Forward-Looking Statements Statements contained in this
More informationAn Overview of P3s in Maryland
An Overview of P3s in Maryland Greater Baltimore Committee Transportation Summit May 19, 2015 1 Discussion Outline Public Private Partnerships (P3s) overview Maryland P3 Law Transportation P3 Process (Regulatory)
More informationThe Liberia Annual Conference Monrovia, Liberia. REQUEST FOR PROPOSAL TO PROVIDE CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT and GENERAL CONTRACTOR SERVICES FOR
The Liberia Annual Conference Monrovia, Liberia REQUEST FOR PROPOSAL TO PROVIDE CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT and GENERAL CONTRACTOR SERVICES FOR NEW RESIDENTIAL TWO-STORY CLASSROOM BUILDING AND VOCATIONAL SCHOOL
More informationAGENDA Regular Commission Meeting Port of Portland Headquarters 7200 N.E. Airport Way, 8 th Floor October 12, :30 a.m.
AGENDA Regular Commission Meeting Port of Portland Headquarters 7200 N.E. Airport Way, 8 th Floor October 12, 2016 9:30 a.m. Minutes Approval of Minutes: Regular Commission Meeting September 14, 2016 Executive
More informationRequest for Fee Proposals (RFFP) Progressive Design-Build Services. New High School
Request for Fee Proposals (RFFP) Progressive Design-Build Services New High School Issaquah School District February 12, 2018 TABLE OF CONTENTS 1. INTRODUCTION 2. PROJECT OVERVIEW 3. APPLICATION OF FEE
More information