Office of Legacy Management. FY06-10 Program Plan. Office of Legacy Management US Department of Energy

Transcription

1 Office of Legacy Management FY06-10 Program Plan Office of Legacy Management US Department of Energy April 30, 2004

2 Executive Summary This Office of Legacy Management FY06-10 Program Plan outlines the major goals, objectives, and targets of the Office of Legacy Management through The Program Plan is the formal mechanism to ensure that the Department s strategic planning goals, as described in the recently issued Strategic Plan, cascade into lower Departmental level planning documents. The Program Plan is the planning mechanism that aligns the Department s major activities and resources against specific performance goals. In the simplest terms, the Program Plan discusses the how and when things are to be done. Finally, the Program Plan serves as the next step in institutionalizing the Department s planning, programming, budgeting, and evaluation processes. This planning effort is critical if the Department is to meet its commitments to the President, the Congress, and the taxpayers. Formation of the Office of Legacy Management The Department established the Office of Legacy Management (LM) in December 2003 to manage its responsibilities associated with the legacy of the Cold War. The Department has taken major steps toward fulfilling its commitment to cleanup the environmental portion of this legacy and is now faced with large scale closure of entire sites and the associated impacts on the federal and contractor workforce. Since the inception of the program in December 2003, LM has made significant progress in establishing an organization and associated policies and procedures. Establishing a solid base of operations is critical because LM scope is expected to grow rapidly over the next five years. The majority of this growth is the transfer of responsibility from the Office of Environmental Management (EM) to LM. Growth is expected in the Number of Sites and Resource Requirements At the end of 2004, LM will be responsible for protection of human health and the environment at 67 sites at an annual cost of $28 million. The majority of these are either former uranium mill tailing sites or sites associated with the Formerly Utilized Sites Remedial Action Program (FUSRAP). In general these sites require a minimal level of long-term care in some cases only record keeping. However, by 2010, LM is expected to be responsible for over 100 sites as EM completes its cleanup activities and additional sites transfer from private licensees and the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (USACE). The post-cleanup care of some of these new sites is expected to be much greater in scope and complexity than the sites currently within LM. By 2015, LM will be managing land, environmental liability, and/or records for 120 sites. During this period LM will have accepted responsibilities for over 60 sites from EM, the USACE and private licensees. i

3 Cumulative Number of LM Sites Per Year Number of LM Sites Fiscal Year *Site numbers do not reflect planned or possible disposal of real property at LM sites. *Many of these sites are not owned by the federal government but involve past or current liability. *LM activities for a number of these sites is limited to record keeping. Oversee the Continuity of Post-Closure Benefit The Department of Energy s oversight of benefits for its former contractors work force is unique in the Federal Government in that the agency s mission is to avoid benefit interruption or inconvenience while maintaining and improving the quality of service to post-closure plan participants. The benefits come in two primary forms: pension plans and medical benefits. With the completion of closure contracts at three major DOE sites, LM is exploring options to avoid interruption in providing those plans and benefits. The pension plans are highly dependent on the stocks and bonds in which they are invested and the medical plans are affected by the number and ages of former contractors and the rate of healthcare inflation. These uncertainties can have a significant impact on LM s budgeting and planning efforts. By 2010, LM will be overseeing the administration of post-closure benefits to thousands of former contractor employees associated with seven sites (Pinellas, Grand Junction, the Gaseous Diffusion Plants, Rocky Flats, Mound and Fernald). The Department has placed a Strong Emphasis on the Safe, Beneficial Reuse of Real Property As the Department, the USACE and the private licensees complete cleanup, the land will become available for other uses. The potential uses of these properties range from reindustrialization to wildlife refuges and park land to open space. LM will work closely with the affected communities, the local governments, our regulators, and the adjacent landowners to identify beneficial reuse that is safe for the public and protective of the environment. By 2015, LM will have disposed of real property at ten sites. Sites where LM will support or lead the real property transfer effort include: the Mound site, the Salmon site, the New Brunswick Laboratory, the Wayne, NJ site, the Rocky Flats site and the East Tennessee Technology Park. LM is working to ii

4 identify additional site where disposal of real property would enhance safe, beneficial reuse. Managing the Department s Liability and Honoring our Commitments A major responsibility associated with the cleanup sites and the oversight of former contractors benefits is the cost effective management of large volume of records and information. Records and information are needed to ensure long-term protection of human health and the environment, provide appropriate benefits, and be able to respond to claims including Energy Employees Occupational Illness Compensation Program Act claims. To ensure the cost-effective management of the Department s environmental and benefits related liabilities, LM will require a stand-alone repository for maintaining all legacy management records that meets federal requirements and industry standards. Planning for addressing this critical need is underway at the time this Program Plan was prepared. In summary, LM is actively working to establish its management goals and refine its organizational structures and operating principles to manage its anticipated expansion of scope. Although each site transferring into LM is unique, there are common goals that LM must achieve for all of its sites. LM is developing a cadre of staff experienced in site transition, long-term surveillance and maintenance, pensions and benefits and records management that can be deployed, as needed, to ensure LM's goals are achieved. Consistent with the Department s Strategic Plan, LM is working to ensure that the cleanup remedies remain protective, that the committments made regarding pensions and benefits are met, and that the stakeholders, state, local and Tribal governments and the public remain aware of LM's activities and are able to contribute its decision-making process. iii

5 Table of Contents Executive Summary. i Section 1 Program Name.1 Section 2 Program Manager Section 3 DOE Strategic Plan General Goal....1 Section 4 Mission Statement and Program Goal..1 Section 5 Objectives and Performance Targets....1 Section 6 Program Evaluation Section 7 External Factors Section 8 Five Year Budget and Performance Integration Addendum Appendix A List of Sites in LM 13 Appendix B Site Transition Schedule (not for public release).15 iv

6 Section 1 Program Name Legacy Management Section 2 Program Manager Michael Owen, Director Office of Legacy Management U.S. Department of Energy 1000 Independence Ave., S.W. Washington, DC michael.owen@hq.doe.gov Web site under development. Section 3 DOE Strategic Plan General Goal Environment Strategic Goal: To protect the environment by providing a responsible resolution to the environmental legacy of the Cold War and by providing for the permanent disposal of the Nation s high-level radioactive waste. General Goal 6, Environmental Management: Accelerate cleanup of nuclear weapons manufacturing and testing sites, completing cleanup of 108 contaminated sites by Section 4 Mission Statement and Program Goal Mission Statement: The mission of the Office of Legacy Management is ensure protection of human health and the environment through effective long-term stewardship of land, structures, facilities, and records, and oversee the Department s post-closure responsibilities for former contractor employees. Program Goal: By 2015, the Office of Legacy Management will be responsible for: the cost effective management of land, structures, facilities and/or records for over 120 sites, employee benefits for the Department s former contractor workforce at seven sites; and the disposal of real property at ten sites. Section 5 Objectives and Performance Targets The Office of Legacy Management was established to oversee the continuity of former contractor benefits and ensure the long-term management of the land and environmental remedies, the beneficial reuse of real property and facilities, and management of records associated with those DOE sites that no longer support a DOE mission. A complete list of LM s current site responsibility is provided in Appendix A. Although LM was established in December 2003, a 1

7 few months after the release of the most recent DOE Strategic Plan, LM has an important role in achieving the Department s Environment Strategic Goal. In addition to the primary functions identified above, LM is also responsible for the management of strategic materials, promoting local economic development, environmental justice activities, workforce restructuring, and labor relations. These crosscutting functions are performed by LM on a department wide basis and are not limited to sites that have been closed. These functions are either performed by federal employees or require minimal program funds relative to the other LM activities. For this reason, this Program Plan does not identify specific objectives or targets for those areas. Managing the Transfer of Responsibility from EM to LM While LM s primary functions are expected to remain the same, the magnitude of the scope associated with each function will increase dramatically over the next five years. The majority of this increase is the anticipated transfer of program scope from EM to LM and is associated with the completion of the EM cleanup mission at the Department s closure sites. The orderly transition of scope is critical to the achievement of the DOE key intermediate objectives identified below. DOE Order 430.1B, Real Property Asset Management, provides both the process and the requirements for the transition of real property and programmatic responsibility. Projected scope transfer includes: the Nevada Off sites, Rocky Flats, four Ohio sites, East Tennessee Technology Park, as well as numerous other small sites. A complete list of sites expected to transition to LM is provided in Appendix B. LM FUNDING RESPONSIBILITY FY , , , ,000 Additional Responsibilities Current Responsibility - Add Budget Transfer 304, ,000 Within Target 256, , , , , , , ,000 50,000 38,815 66,025 64,088 64,534 65,209 65,781 67,043 1,000 33,615 1,000 8,870 12,695 17,250 21, ,200 FY 2005 FY 2006 FY2007 FY2008 FY2009 FY2010 2

8 DOE Strategic Plan Key Intermediate Objectives There are a number of Key Intermediate Objectives associated with the Department s Environment Strategic Goal. Five of those seven relate to LM s mission, goals and objectives. These departmental objectives and the responsible Program Secretarial Officer (PSO) are listed below. While multiple PSOs have responsibility, boldface type, e.g., EM denotes the lead PSO. By the end of FY 2005, the Department completes cleanup and transfers approximately half of the Hanford site to the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. (EM) By the end of FY 2006, the Department completes cleanup of Fernald (Ohio) and Mound sites (Ohio) and transfers the Mound site to the Miamisburg Mound Community Improvement Corporation. (EM/LM) By the end of FY 2006, the Department completes the cleanup of Rocky Flats (Colorado) and transfers the Rocky Flats Wildlife Refuge to the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. (EM/LM) By 2008, the Department completes cleanup of the East Tennessee Technology Park. (EM/LM) By 2012, the Department completes cleanup of the Hanford River Corridor project. (EM) By 2025, the Department completes cleanup 108 of 114 sites, leaving six: Hanford, Idaho National Laboratory, the Nevada Test Site, Tonapah Test Range area, the Paducah site, and the Waste Isolation Pilot Plant. (EM/NNSA/SC/NE/LM) Throughout the planning period, the Department maintains long-term stewardship at the sites containing residual radioactive or hazardous material after cleanup has been completed until they are transferred. (EM/NNSA/NE/SC/LM) LM Support to the Key Intermediate Objectives To support achievement of these DOE key intermediate objectives LM has identified four primary objectives with associated performance targets. As noted in the key external factors section, LM s ability to achieve its performance objectives and associated targets (particularly those associated with disposal of real property) are highly dependent on the cleanup schedule of third parties and the extent to which cleanup is conducted. Note: The Objectives, Performance Targets, and schedules identified herein are for planning purposes only and do not constitute financial or contractual commitments by the Federal government. LM Objective 1: Long-term Management of Land and Environmental Remedies By the end of FY 2015, LM will be managing land, environmental liability, and/or records for over 120 sites. During this period LM will have accepted responsibility for over 60 sites from EM, the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (USACE) and private licensees. 3

9 Performance Targets: A: By the end of FY 2006, LM will have received responsibility for the eight Nevada Off sites, Project Chariot and four Oakland Sites (MURR, GTF, GA and UC Davis-LEHR) from EM. B: By the end of FY 2007, LM will have received responsibility for Rocky Flats, Fernald, Mound, Batelle Columbus (King Avenue and West Jefferson), Ashtabula, the General Electric Vallecitos Nuclear Center and Inhalation Toxicology Laboratory from EM. C: By the end of FY 2009, LM will have received responsibility for 16 additional sites under UMTRCA Title II. D: By the end of FY 2015, LM will have received responsibility for a total of 24 additional sites from EM. E: By the end of FY 2015, LM will have received responsibility for a total of 22 additional sites from the USACE. LM Objective 2: Post-Closure Benefit Continuity By 2008, LM will have developed and implemented a departmental approach and guidance for continuity of post-closure pension and medical benefits for Rocky Flats, Fernald and Mound. Performance Targets A: By the end of FY 2004, LM will select an Identified Closure Contractor. B: By the end of FY 2006, LM will award an Identified Closure Contractor subcontract to the National Stewardship Entity to provide post-closure benefit continuity. C: Provide for post-closure benefit continuity to Rocky Flats (start of FY2007) Fernald (start of FY2008) and Mound (start of FY 2008). LM Objective 3: Management of Real Property and Facilities for Beneficial Reuse By 2015, LM will have disposed of real property at ten sites. Performance Targets: A: By the end of fiscal year 2006, LM will have disposed (or supported the disposal) of real property at the Mound site, the Salmon site, the New Brunswick Laboratory, and the Wayne, NJ site. B: By the end of fiscal year 2007, LM will have disposed (or supported the disposal) of real property at the Rocky Flats Site. C: By the end of fiscal year 2009, LM will have disposed (or supported the disposal) of real property at the East Tennessee Technology Park. D: By the end of fiscal year 2015, LM will have disposed of real property at an additional four 4

10 sites. LM Objective 4: Legacy Records Management By 2007, LM will have a fully operational stand-alone repository for maintaining all archives in accord with applicable federal requirements and industry standards. Performance Targets: A: By the end of FY 2004, LM will complete and obtain approval for Critical Decision 1 for a records storage facility. B: By the end of FY 2005, LM will complete and obtain approval for Critical Decision 2/3 for a records storage facility (assumes design and construction of a facility). C: By the end of FY 2005, LM will complete and obtain approval for Critical Decision 4 for a records storage facility (assumes design and construction of a facility). 5

11 Table 1: Schedule of Performance Targets Objectives FY2004 FY2006 FY2008 FY2010 FY2012 FY2014 FY2016 ICC/NSE provide post-closure benefits Post-Closure Benefit Continuity Long Term Management of Land and Environmental Remedies Management of Real Property and Facilities for Beneficial Reuse Legacy Records Management Environment Strategic Goals Receive responsibility for eight Nevada Off sites and Project Chariot, and 3 Oakland sites from EM Complete and obtain approval for CD-1for a Records Storage Facility Select identified closure contractor Dispose of real property at Mound, Salmon, the New Brunswick Laboratory, and the Wayne, NJ site Complete cleanup and transfer approximately half of the Hanford site Complete and obtain approval for CD-2/3* Award subcontract to National Stewardship Entity to provide post-closure benefit continuity Receive responsibility for Rocky Flats, 4 Ohio sites, GE, ETEC, ITL, and U.C. Davis - LEHR from EM Dispose of real property at the Rocky Flats site. Complete and obtain approval for CD-4* Complete cleanup of Fernald, Mound, and Rocky Flats (RF) sites and transfer Mound site and RF Wildlife Refuge Complete cleanup of the East Tennessee Technology Park Receive responsibility for 16 additional sites under UMTRCA Title II Dispose of real property at the East Tennessee Technology Park Complete cleanup of Hanford River Corridor project Receive responsibility for 23 additional sites from EM and 22 additional sites from U.S. Army Corps of Engineers * Records Management Performance Targets for Critical Decisions 2/3 and 4 assumes design and construction of a facility 6

12 Section 6 Program Evaluation LM will ensure that an effective and well disciplined Planning, Programming, Budgeting, and Evaluation (PPBE) process is implemented that will: support established Program Strategic Performance Goals (PSPGs); identify the level of performance to be achieved in meaningful, objective, quantifiable, and measurable terms; include the necessary resources required to meet performance goals; and, establish how performance will be measured and compared to established goals. The LM PPBE process provides a systematic framework for planning and prioritizing program needs, allocating resources, measuring performance and delivering desired results in order to achieve established performance goals. Combined with the Department s Strategic Management Cascade, the LM PPBE process clearly links annual performance with annual budget resources and the PSPGs. The LM PPBE system will be dynamic enough to integrate interdependent mission elements into synchronized performance management system. This system will accommodate ongoing operational activities with no set duration periods, acquisition activities with specific durations, or combined acquisition and operational programs. A key component of LM s PPBE is the development and maintenance of life-cycle baselines. Life-cycle baselines provide key performance, scope, cost and schedule parameters necessary to achieve long-term programmatic strategic goals. Established Earned Value Management (EVM) systems will be employed to integrate all baseline elements (scope, schedule, and cost) and measure program performance. LM currently uses a PPBE system that meets the requirements established by the Office of Environmental Management (EM) for their Integrated Planning, Accountability, and Budgeting System (IPABS) for a majority of its work. IPABS is a high-level project-based management system that was developed to support the (EM) PPBE process. In the short-term, LM will continue to use this system and expand it to accommodate new LM program missions. Over the long-run LM will refine and improve on its performance management systems to more closely align those systems with the Department s desire to expand established project management (DOE O 413.3) principles to ongoing operational activities. In the short-term LM will continue to develop standardized operating policies and procedures (SOPPs) that are necessary to assure uniform application and execution of its performance management system components. Draft SOPPs that describe how program/project life-cycle baselines are planned, developed, validated, managed and modified have already been developed. Over the short term these SOPPs will be finalized and implemented across the entire LM organization. Baseline change control, configuration management processes, and status reporting requirements will also be formalized to support Departmental requirements. Over the long-term LM will continue to develop, update and integrate its PPBE processes and system to create a dynamic continuous cycle of planning, program execution, and reporting that meets Departmental, Government Performance Results Act of 1993 (GPRA), and Office of Management and Budget (OMB) requirements. Section 7 Key External Factors 7

13 Fluctuations in the Value of Pension Plans Funding requirements associated with retired contractor pension plans are highly dependent on the underlying value of the pension plan investment portfolio. Changes in the bond and stock markets can have significant impacts on the financial viability of the pension plans and in turn cause sudden and potentially significant impacts on the Department s responsibility to maintain the minimum balances associated with the plans. Significant and Uncontrollable Increases in the Cost of Healthcare The Department is currently responsible for the administration of thousands of retired contractors medical plans. There are several factors that can serve to substantially increase the costs associated with these plans. These factors include: the inflation rate associated with healthcare (15% versus the standard 2.6% for typical government services); the number of retired contractors eligible for care; the offsets associated with payments provided through Medicare; the age of the retirees and their health. Completion of Cleanup Work by Third Parties LM is dependent on the level of cleanup (industrial, residential, recreational), the number and types of residual hazards (disposal cells, contaminated groundwater) and the schedules of the entities performing the cleanup. LM will receive responsibility for sites cleaned up by the Office of Environmental Management, the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers and the private licensees associated with uranium mill tailings sites. Remedy decisions and acceleration or delays in the cleanup work could have significant impacts on LM s ability to achieve its stated goals and objectives. Regulatory Authority LM is responsible for the long-term surveillance and maintenance of a significant number of environmental remedies that have been installed on federal property. Regulatory authority at these sites varies but includes: the Nuclear Regulatory Commission, the United States Environmental Protection Agency, individual State regulators, and in some cases, local governments. The DOE Organization Act may be viewed as providing LM with only limited authority to make and/or conduct regulatory decisions and/or actions. LM needs to clarify its authority in this area to ensure long-term effectiveness. Stakeholder Interface Successful coordination and collaboration with external stakeholder groups, governmental organizations, and Tribal Nations is vital to successfully transition and manage sites that are not cleaned up to unrestricted use. Section 8 Five-Year Budget and Performance Integration Addendum The appropriation for Office of Legacy Management has been divided between Defense and Energy Supply activities. The Defense activities include long-term surveillance and maintenance, pension and benefit continuity, records management, worker and community transition, environmental justice and all program direction. The Energy Supply activities are long-term surveillance and maintenance and pension and benefit continuity. 8

14 The following table shows three values for each major activity. The Office of Legacy Management received a target to use in preparing the Program Plan and this has been allocated among the activities in the Within Target amounts. The second value of Current Responsibilities Additional Budget Transfer encompasses the amount needed to fund the responsibilities of the Office of Legacy Management that exist at the end of FY The budget target was based upon the target that was transferred with the various activities in FY Improved estimates and inflation have indicated that additional budget target must be transferred to provide adequate funding. The third value is for the activities that will transfer in FY 2006 or later years. The significant increase in FY 2007 is due to the transfer of the pension and benefit responsibility for the three sites scheduled to close within FY This budget amount would be transferred from the Office of Environmental Management. Note: The values shown for FY 2005 in the table assume that the program activities will receive appropriations as requested. The values shown for FY are only projections of program activity that assume certain appropriation levels and critical milestones will be accomplished as scheduled. As each specific budget is prepared and reviewed, these estimates are likely to change. 9

15 Office of Legacy Management FY FY 2010 Projection of Costs April 30, 2004 (Dollars in Thousands) FY 2005 FY2006 FY 2007 FY 2008 FY 2009 FY 2010 Defense Pensions & Benefits (Objective 2) Within Target 8,050 6,503 6,551 6,623 6,685 6,819 Current Responsibilities - Additional Budget Transfer 0 1,100 2,200 3,500 5,000 6,500 Additional Responsibilities 0 9, , , , ,000 Subtotal, P&B 8,050 16, , , , ,319 Long-Term Surveillance and Maintenance (Objectives 1 & 3) Within Target 10,574 10,498 10,575 10,691 10,790 11,007 Current Responsibilities - Additional Budget Transfer Additional Responsibilities 0 11,000 21,000 32,000 28,000 20,000 Subtotal, LTS&M 10,574 21,698 31,795 42,911 39,010 31,107 Records Management (Objective 4) Within Target Current Responsibilities - Additional Budget Transfer Additional Responsibilities 0 12,000 1,100 1,144 1,190 1,237 Subtotal, RM 0 12,000 1,100 1,144 1,190 1,237 Worker and Community Transition (Minor Activity No Objective) Within Target 2,500 2,500 2,500 2,500 2,500 2,500 Current Responsibilities - Additional Budget Transfer Additional Responsibilities Subtotal, W&CT 2,500 2,500 2,500 2,500 2,500 2,500 10

16 Environmental Justice (Minor Activity No Objective) Within Target Current Responsibilities - Additional Budget Transfer Additional Responsibilities 0 1,200 1,200 1,200 1,200 1,200 Subtotal, EJ 570 1,770 1,770 1,770 1,770 1,770 Program Direction (For All Objectives) Within Target 13,201 13,108 13,203 13,348 13,471 13,741 Current Responsibilities - Additional Budget Transfer 0 1,100 1,100 1,125 1,180 1,180 Additional Responsibilities Subtotal, PD 13,201 14,208 14,303 14,473 14,651 14,921 Subtotal, Defense 34,895 68, , , , ,267 Energy Supply Pensions & Benefits (Objective 2) Within Target 14,083 13,983 14,086 14,240 14,370 14,660 Current Responsibilities - Additional Budget Transfer 0 2,500 5,000 7,500 10,500 14,000 Additional Responsibilities Subtotal, P&B 14,083 16,483 19,086 21,740 24,870 28,660 Long-Term Surveillance and Maintenance (Objectives 1 & 3) Within Target 17,047 16,926 17,049 17,237 17,395 17,746 Current Responsibilities - Additional Budget Transfer Additional Responsibilities Subtotal, LTS&M 17,047 17,641 17,949 18,162 18,345 18,621 Subtotal, Energy Supply 31,130 34,124 37,035 39,902 43,215 47,281 11

17 Subtotal, Within Target 66,025 64,088 64,534 65,209 65,781 67,043 Subtotal, Current Resp - Add Bud Trans 0 5,200 8,870 12,695 17,250 21,980 Subtotal, Additional Responsibilities 0 33, , , , ,525 TOTAL 66, , , , , ,548 12

18 Appendix A Site Name State Type 1 Monticello Remedial Action Project UT CERCLA/RCRA 2 Pinellas FL CERLA/RCRA 3 Weldon Spring MO CERLA/RCRA 4 Acid/Pueblo Canyons NM FUSRAP 5 Alba Craft OH FUSRAP 6 Albany Research Center OR FUSRAP 7 Aliquippa Forge PA FUSRAP 8 Associate Aircraft Tool and Manufacturing OH FUSRAP 9 B&T Metals OH FUSRAP 10 Baker and Williams Warehouses NY FUSRAP 11 Baker Brothers OH FUSRAP 12 Bayo Canyon NM FUSRAP 13 C.H. Schnoor PA FUSRAP 14 Chapman Valve MA FUSRAP 15 Chupadera Mesa NM FUSRAP 16 Elza Gate Site Warehouses TN FUSRAP 17 General Motors MI FUSRAP 18 Granite City Steel IL FUSRAP 19 Herring-Hall Marvin Safe Co. OH FUSRAP 20 Kellex/Pierpont NJ FUSRAP 21 Middlesex Municipal Landfill NJ FUSRAP 22 National Guard Armory IL FUSRAP 23 New Brunswick Laboratory NJ FUSRAP 24 Niagara Falls Storage Site Vicinity Properties NY FUSRAP 25 Seymour Specialty Wire CT FUSRAP 26 University of California, Berkley CA FUSRAP 27 University of Chicago IL FUSRAP 28 Ventron Corporation MA FUSRAP 29 Bliss and Laughlin NY FUSRAP/C 30 Madison IL FUSRAP/C 32 BONUS Reactor (Center for Energy and Evironmental Research) PR Other 33 Grand Junction Office CO Other 34 Hallam Nuclear Power Facility NE Other 35 Maxey Flats KY Other 31 Parkersburg WV Other 36 Piqua Nuclear Power Facility OH Other 37 Site A/Plot M IL Other 38 Ambrosia Lake NM UMTRCA I 39 Burrel PA UMTRCA I 40 Canonsburg PA UMTRCA I 41 Durango CO UMTRCA I 42 Falls City TX UMTRCA I 43 Grand Junction Mill Tailings Site (1) CO UMTRCA I 13

19 44 Green River UT UMTRCA I 45 Gunnison CO UMTRCA I 46 Lakeview OR UMTRCA I 47 Lowman Site ID UMTRCA I 48 Maybell CO UMTRCA I 49 Mexican Hat UT UMTRCA I 50 Monument Valley AZ UMTRCA I 51 Naturita CO UMTRCA I 52 Rifle (2) CO UMTRCA I 53 Riverton WY UMTRCA I 54 Salt Lake City UT UMTRCA I 55 Shiprock NM UMTRCA I 56 Slick Rock CO UMTRCA I 57 Spook WY UMTRCA I 58 Tuba City AZ UMTRCA I 59 Bear Creek (Union Pacific - Anadarko) WY UMTRCA II 60 Arco - Bluewater NM UMTRCA II 61 Kennecott (Sohio Western) L-Bar NM UMTRCA II 62 Petrotomics - Shirley Basin South WY UMTRCA II 63 TVA - Edgemont SD UMTRCA II 64 WNI - Sherwood WA UMTRCA II 65 Oxnard Facility (4) CA Misc 66 Belfield (4) ND Misc 67 Bowman (4) ND Misc Notes: (1) Includes LTRM (Cheney) but not as a separate site. (2) Old Rifle and New Rifle counted as one site. (3) Slick Rock Old North Continent and Slick Rock Union Carbide counted as one site. (4) Leave this site on list due to records requirements - per Dave Geiser. 14