BEFORE THE PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )
|
|
- Augustus Little
- 5 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 BEFORE THE PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA Order Instituting Rulemaking Regarding Policies, Procedures and Rules for Development of Distribution Resources Plans Pursuant to Public Utilities Code Section 769. And Related Matters (NOT CONSOLIDATED In the Matter of the Application of PacifiCorp (U901E Setting Forth its Distribution Resource Plan Pursuant to Public Utilities Code Section 769. And Related Matters Rulemaking (Filed August 14, 2014 Application Application Application Application (Filed July 1, 2015 Application Application COMMENTS OF PACIFIC GAS AND ELECTRIC COMPANY (U 39 E, SAN DIEGO GAS & ELECTRIC COMPANY (U 902 E, AND SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON COMPANY (U 338 E ON BEHALF OF ITSELF AND: JONATHAN J. NEWLANDER Attorney for SAN DIEGO GAS & ELECTRIC COMPANY 8330 Century Park Court, CP32D San Diego, California Phone: Fax: jnewlander@semprautilities.com CHRISTOPHER WARNER Attorney for: PACIFIC GAS AND ELECTRIC COMPANY 77 Beale Street San Francisco, California Telephone: ( Facsimile: ( CJW5@pge.com MATTHEW DWYER Attorney for SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON COMPANY 2244 Walnut Grove Avenue Rosemead, California Telephone: ( Facsimile: ( Matthew.Dwyer@sce.com July 10, 2017
2 BEFORE THE PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA Order Instituting Rulemaking Regarding Policies, Procedures and Rules for Development of Distribution Resources Plans Pursuant to Public Utilities Code Section 769. And Related Matters (NOT CONSOLIDATED In the Matter of the Application of PacifiCorp (U901E Setting Forth its Distribution Resource Plan Pursuant to Public Utilities Code Section 769. And Related Matters Rulemaking (Filed August 14, 2014 Application Application Application Application (Filed July 1, 2015 Application Application COMMENTS OF PACIFIC GAS AND ELECTRIC COMPANY (U 39 E, SAN DIEGO GAS & ELECTRIC COMPANY (U 902 E, AND SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON COMPANY (U 338 E Pursuant to the Administrative Law Judge s Ruling Requiring Investor-Owned Utilities to File Assumptions and Framework Addendum, and For Parties to File Comments, dated June 22, 2017 (the Ruling, San Diego Gas & Electric Company (U 902-E (SDG&E, on behalf of itself and Pacific Gas and Electric Company (U 39-E (PG&E and Southern California Edison Company (U 338-E (SCE, and collectively with SDG&E and PG&E, the IOUs, hereby submits the attached responses to questions posed therein. I. INTRODUCTION AND SUMMARY OF RESPONSES The IOUs appreciate the opportunity to respond to the questions posed in the Assigned Commissioner Ruling issued June 22, As discussed in the IOUs revised Distributed Energy Resources (DER Growth Scenarios Assumptions and Framework document, each of the IOUs places a high value on consistency between DER adoption projections that are used in distribution planning studies and statewide planning assumptions. As reflected in the revised 1
3 DER Growth Scenarios Assumptions and Framework document, and in the responses to the questions posed in the Ruling, below, the IOUs proposed methodologies are designed to reliably plan the distribution system and minimize inconsistencies between the planning processes. Each of the IOUs proposals attempts to align with either the most recently adopted IEPR projections or the IEPR projections that are most likely to be adopted in the next cycle. As described in the response to Question 2, the choice of which IEPR to align with is dependent upon the timing of the IOUs distribution planning process. PG&E aligns its distribution planning assumptions with the most recently adopted Transmission Planning Process (TPP assumptions because its distribution planning studies are undertaken largely in the period between September and December (immediately after the TPP studies are completed. SCE and SDG&E attempt to align their distribution planning assumptions with anticipated IEPR/TPP assumptions for the next cycle because their distribution planning studies are undertaken largely in the period between September and April (immediately prior to the next cycle's TPP studies. II. QUESTIONS ON 2017 GROWTH SCENARIOS Question 2: What are the implications, if any, of the IOUs aligning their DER growth scenario forecast with different Transmission Planning Process cycles? The IOUs recognize that it is important to align the DER growth scenario forecast with the TPP forecast to ensure continuity from the transmission system to the circuit level. The IOUs distribution planning timeline is based on the timing of each year s summer peak (driven largely by weather, which differs by utility. PG&E typically peaks earlier in the summer whereas SCE and SDG&E typically peak later. Therefore, the IOUs are seeking to align their DER growth scenarios with the IEPR/TPP process which most closely matches that timeline. Based on these timing differences, PG&E is seeking to align its Distribution Plan with the TPP while SCE and SDG&E are seeking to align their Distribution Plans with the
4 TPP. Given that the TPP relies on DER growth forecasts from the latest adopted IEPR forecast according to CPUC s annual Assigned Commissioner s Ruling (ACR, the IOU s choice of which TPP cycle to align its DER growth scenario forecast with does not impact the total magnitude of DERs modeled in the TPP. Differences between IOUs with respect to DER adoption assumptions, due to alignment of different vintage TPPs, is likely inconsequential. Regardless of the vintage of DER adoptions assumed in the IOUs distribution planning studies, each IOU adopts and adjusts the load growth and DER estimates it uses for transmission planning studies consistent with the assumptions and scenarios agreed to in the final transmission planning assumptions and scenarios document published by the CAISO. Any impacts would therefore be second-order because the different choices would only have a marginal impact on the relative allocation of DER adoptions across local areas. Question 4b: Please comment on the IOU s approach to locational disaggregation of their DER forecasts. What are the implications, if any, of the IOUs application of different disaggregation methodologies? As evidenced by the IOUs revised DER Growth Scenarios Assumptions and Framework document, as well as the accompanying working group sessions, there is no consensus as to industry best practices with respect to DER forecast allocation. Indeed, California and its IOUs are at the forefront of the real world application of these forecasts to distribution planning. At this point, the IOUs do not believe uniformity will create higher quality. In fact, uniformity may be counter-productive, as the testing of different allocation methods may actually lead to learnings about best practices that can be implemented in a more coordinated manner among the IOUs in the future. 3
5 The IOUs have independently developed methodologies to allocate DER forecasts from the system level to the feeder level based on a number of factors, including the maturity/penetration of the particular DER within the IOU service territory, the analytic platforms available, the data available and the best professional judgement and resource constraints of the IOU forecasting team. While the relative maturity / level of penetration for each DER may be relatively consistent across IOUs, the other factors could vary significantly, yielding different methods of allocation among different IOUs. Despite the different allocation methods, there are some general similarities in approach. For instance, each IOU starts with the system-level forecast for each DER and disaggregates that to the feeder level, rather than building bottom-up models. Given that the nascent state of DER forecasting (and the allocation of forecasts to the feeder level, along with the fact that IOUs bear the risk and responsibility for designing the distribution system to maintain reliability for each and every customer, it is reasonable and prudent to allow IOU distribution planners some latitude in selecting preferred distribution disaggregation forecast methods for the purposes of distribution planning. III. QUESTIONS ON FUTURE GROWTH SCENARIO UPDATES Question 1: Please comment on the process for future updates to the growth scenario forecasts. Do updates need to be formally or informally vetted? What issues need to be considered? The approach proposed in the IOUs revised DER Growth Scenarios Assumptions and Framework document does not need to be updated each year. This is because the IOUs have not proposed to develop new forecasts specifically for distribution planning. Rather, they have proposed an approach for selecting the most appropriate forum that has been, or will be, vetted in 4
6 other forums that are focused on developing forecasting methodologies. Thus, the outcome may vary, but there is no fundamentally new process that needs to change from year to year. The IOUs have not proposed any new forecasts (or forecast updates to be created and used in isolation in the DRP. To the contrary, the IOUs have proposed to use forecasts for distribution planning that have either already been developed in other forums, or will be used in other forums. In the IOUs revised DER Growth Scenarios Assumptions and Framework document, the IOUs have not proposed to develop new forecasts independent of other planning processes. Rather, the IOUs have proposed an approach to select the most appropriate forecast from those already finalized, already in development, or already planned to be developed. The specific approach proposed in the IOUs revised DER Growth Scenarios Assumptions and Framework document (i.e., 1. Select the appropriate public forecast. 2. Determine whether a new forecast provides more accurate information. 3. Provide rationale for selecting the most appropriate forecast does not need to change from year to year. The outcome of this process may vary, but the approach itself does not. Critically, it is important to note that regardless of which forecast is selected, that forecast will have been, or will be, vetted in other forums, such as the IEPR, PRG groups, etc. Question 2: Are consistent methodologies necessary across IOUs for system forecasts? If so which method should be adopted? The IOUs have sought to maintain consistency with ongoing statewide forecasting processes through the approach presented in the IOUs revised DER Growth Scenarios Assumptions and Framework document. Each IOU s application of this approach may be unique due to differences in each IOUs electrical system, service territory, the analytic platforms available, and distribution planning timeline. However, the IOUs are not developing any new system level DER forecasting methodologies exclusively for distribution planning purposes. 5
7 Rather, the IOUs are using methodologies consistent with methodologies either under development or proposed in the IEPR process. The IOU s system forecasts are developed for use in a variety of forums (such as ERRA, GRC, LTPP, FERC Rate Case, etc. in addition to DRP and the underlying methodologies are well documented and reviewed in those forums (IEPR, PRG groups, etc.. Therefore, IOU s should continue to utilize the approach proposed in the IOUs revised DER Growth Scenarios Assumptions and Framework document to select the appropriate forecast for that utility in each planning cycle. Question 3: What are the implications if the DER growth scenario forecasts used in DRP differ from the forecast used in TPP? The IOUs recognize that it is important to align the overall forecasted DER capacity with the TPP forecast to ensure consistency from the transmission system down to the circuit level. The IOU s distribution planning timeline is based on historical peak (driven largely by weather. Therefore, the IOUs are seeking to align their DER growth scenarios with the TPP process which most closely matches that timeline. Based on timing differences, PG&E is seeking to align its Distribution Plan with the TPP while SCE and SDG&E are seeking to align their Distribution Plans with the TPP. The IOUs believe that any impact from using different system level DER forecasts in the DRP and TPP are de minimis. The specific reasons are described in the above answers to 2017 Growth Scenarios Question 2. Question 4: Are consistent methodologies necessary IOUs f or locational disaggregation of the forecast? In section H of the IOUs revised DER Growth Scenarios Assumptions and Framework document, the IOUs describe their vision for the evolution of DER forecasting, and the principles that will guide that evolution. The principles are reiterated below: Utilize statistically appropriate, data-driven methodologies for each DER, customer segment, and level of disaggregation 6
8 Develop approaches to manage uncertainty associated with granular allocation of DER Periodically re-assess the modeling approach for each DER as increased adoption leads to better data Share best practices and leverage learning process to strive for continuous improvement, both in forecasting and in using the forecasts for distribution planning Integrate data from DER industry partners to enhance forecasting accuracy The application of these principles by the joint IOUs along with increased coordination through the DRP processes will lead to increased alignment among the IOUs in their methodological approaches. However, as with any evolutionary system, diversity (of methodologies in this case is critical to long-term success. As each IOU learns from its application of forecasting methods, they will share and integrate lessons learned and, as a result, make modifications, or improve methodologies that facilitate greater alignment. Prescribing uniform modeling approaches at this nascent stage could lead to suboptimal outcomes. Question 5: Under what conditions should the IOUs use different sources than the IEPR demand forecast to inform the DER growth scenarios? Address both the IEPR forecast year and the IEPR update year. The IOUs have laid out a framework in Section III to select the sources of system level DER assumptions (i.e., 1. Select the appropriate public forecast; 2. Determine whether a new forecast provides more accurate information; 3. Provide rationale for selecting most appropriate forecast. In application of this framework for the distribution planning process, the IOUs are seeking to align their forecasts with the latest IEPR. Given the nascent state of DER forecasting, and the impact from state and federal policy, regular updates of these DER forecasts is critical. Currently modeling of DER assumptions is only performed in the full IEPR update years (e.g IEPR with only a limited refresh performed in the interim update years (i.e. evennumbered years such as When seeking to align with the IEPR, timing causes differences for the IOUs. In some cases, it is more appropriate to align with the previous IEPR. In other cases, assumptions have changed significantly since the previous IEPR, and so it is more 7
9 important to align with the current IEPR in development or utilize the latest developed forecasts from utilities. Question 6: If the IOUs use different sources or develop new methodologies for the DER growth scenarios, what parameters are necessary to ensure that the forecasts are reliable? The IOUs are not proposing to use different sources or develop new methodologies for the DRP, and the DRP should not attempt to evaluate the merits of forecasting approaches that are reviewed at length by stakeholders in other forums. Rather, the DRP should simply evaluate whether the IOUs proposed approach for selecting the appropriate forecast is reasonable. The following response addresses different parts of the question in greater detail. a. If the IOUs use different sources: The IOUs are not using fundamentally different sources. The IOUs seek to align their distribution planning forecasts with the IEPR. The difference is one of timing: in some cases, it is more appropriate to align with the previous IEPR. In some cases, assumptions have changed significantly since the previous IEPR, and so it is more important to align with the current IEPR in development. Thus, it is not a question of different sources, per se. Rather, it a question of which IEPR forecast the IOUs are choosing to align their DER forecast with. b. If the IOUs develop new methodologies: The IOUs are not developing any new DER forecasting methodologies exclusively for distribution planning purposes. Rather, the IOUs are updating methodologies consistent with methodologies either under development or proposed in the IEPR process. As noted previously, any new methodologies are fully vetted not in the DRP (which is not a proceeding focused on developing forecasting methodologies but in the IEPR (which is a proceeding focused on developing forecasting methodologies. c. If the IOUs ensure that the forecasts are reliable: The DRP is not well-positioned to assess the merits of any particular forecasting methodology. The DRP has not developed a record to support any particular forecasting approach, nor have forecasting experts necessarily attended DRP events. The merits of a forecasting approach are discussed in the IEPR forum; this is the venue that captures forecasting expertise. The DRP proceeding should not attempt to evaluate a forecasting methodology. This should remain the realm of other more focused forums. 8
10 In summary, the IOUs have proposed an approach to select the appropriate DER forecast, not create new DER forecasting methodologies. The DRP should not attempt to review forecasts that are already subject to stakeholder review in other forums. IV. CONCLUSION The IOUs appreciate the opportunity to submit the foregoing comments. Respectfully submitted, /s/ Jonathan J. Newlander Jonathan J. Newlander Attorney for SAN DIEGO GAS & ELECTRIC COMPANY 8330 Century Park Court, CP32D San Diego, CA Phone: Fax: On Behalf of the IOUs: San Diego Gas & Electric Company (U 902-E, Pacific Gas and Electric Company (U 39-E, and Southern California Edison Company (U 338-E. July 10,
11 /s/ Darleen Evans
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
BEFORE THE PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA
BEFORE THE PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA Order Instituting Rulemaking Regarding Policies, Procedures and Rules for Development of Distribution Resources Plans Pursuant to Public
More informationBEFORE THE PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA
BEFORE THE PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA Application of Pacific Gas and Electric Company (U 39 E) for Authority to Establish the Wildfire Expense Memorandum Account. Application
More informationGeneral Discussion of System-wide DER Forecasting Assumptions. April 17, 2017
General Discussion of System-wide DER Forecasting Assumptions April 17, 2017 Presentation Purpose/Overview Purpose: Explain how the IOUs arrived at the proposed framework and highlight the trade-offs between
More informationUNITED STATES OF AMERICA BEFORE THE FEDERAL ENERGY REGULATORY COMMISSION ) ) ) MOTION TO INTERVENE AND COMMENTS OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON COMPANY
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA BEFORE THE FEDERAL ENERGY REGULATORY COMMISSION California Independent System Operator Corp., Docket No. ER15-1229-000 MOTION TO INTERVENE AND COMMENTS OF Pursuant to Rules 211
More informationPursuant to Rules 211, 213, and 214 of the Rules and Regulations of the Federal
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA BEFORE THE FEDERAL ENERGY REGULATORY COMMISSION Winding Creek Solar LLC ) ) ) Docket Nos. EL15-52-000 QF13-403-002 JOINT MOTION TO INTERVENE, PROTEST, AND ANSWER OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA
More informationUNITED STATES OF AMERICA BEFORE THE FEDERAL ENERGY REGULATORY COMMISSION. San Diego Gas & Electric Company ) Docket No.
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA BEFORE THE FEDERAL ENERGY REGULATORY COMMISSION San Diego Gas & Electric Company ) Docket No. EL15-103-000 REQUEST FOR REHEARING OF PACIFIC GAS AND ELECTRIC COMPANY AND SOUTHERN
More informationBEFORE THE PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA
BEFORE THE PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA Application of Pacific Gas and Electric Company for Authority to Establish the Wildfire Expense Memorandum Account. (U39E) Application
More informationUNITED STATES OF AMERICA BEFORE THE FEDERAL ENERGY REGULATORY COMMISSION
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA BEFORE THE FEDERAL ENERGY REGULATORY COMMISSION California Independent System Operator Corporation ) ) ) Docket No. ER13-872-000 MOTION TO INTERVENE AND COMMENTS OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA
More informationUNITED STATES OF AMERICA BEFORE THE FEDERAL ENERGY REGULATORY COMMISSION ) ) )
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA BEFORE THE FEDERAL ENERGY REGULATORY COMMISSION Electric Quarterly Reports Docket No. RM01-8-000 Docket No. ER02-2001-000 COMMENTS OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON COMPANY ON THE
More informationBEFORE THE PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) ) ) ) )
BEFORE THE PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA Application of Southern California Edison Company (U 338-E for Authority to, Among Other Things, Increase its Authorized Revenues for Electric
More informationResidential Line and Service Extension Allowance Testimony. Application No.: Witnesses: C. Silsbee S. Reed J. Schichtl L. Vellanoweth (U 338-E)
Application No.: Exhibit No.: Witnesses: SCE-1 C. Silsbee S. Reed J. Schichtl L. Vellanoweth (U -E) Residential Line and Service Extension Allowance Testimony Before the Public Utilities Commission of
More informationBEFORE THE PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA
BEFORE THE PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA Order Instituting Rulemaking to Continue Implementation and Administration, and Consider Further Development of, California Renewables
More informationBEFORE THE PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA REPLY COMMENTS OF THE CALIFORNIA INDEPENDENT SYSTEM OPERATOR CORPORATION
BEFORE THE PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA Order Instituting Rulemaking to Develop an Electricity Integrated Resource Planning Framework and to Coordinate and Refine Long-Term Procurement
More informationAlignment of Key Infrastructure Planning Processes by CPUC, CEC and CAISO Staff December 23, 2014
Introduction and Summary Alignment of Key Infrastructure Planning Processes Since the restructuring of California s electric industry in the late 1990s pursuant to AB 1890, electric infrastructure planning
More informationBEFORE THE PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA
BEFORE THE PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA Application of San Diego Gas & Electric Company (U902M) for Review of its Model Assessment Proceeding Pursuant to Decision 14-12-025 Application
More informationBEFORE THE PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA COMMENTS OF THE CALIFORNIA INDEPENDENT SYSTEM OPERATOR CORPORATION
BEFORE THE PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA Order Instituting Rulemaking to Develop an Electricity Integrated Resource Planning Framework and to Coordinate and Refine Long-Term Procurement
More informationJanuary 31, 2006 ADVICE 1960-E (U 338-E) PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA ENERGY DIVISION
Akbar Jazayeri Director of Revenue and Tariffs January 31, 2006 ADVICE 1960-E (U 338-E) PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA ENERGY DIVISION SUBJECT: Statewide Pricing Pilot Advanced
More informationBEFORE THE PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA
BEFORE THE PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA Order Instituting Rulemaking to Continue Implementation and Administration, and Consider Further Development, of California Renewables
More informationBEFORE THE PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) ) ) ) )
BEFORE THE PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA Joint Application of Southern California Edison Company (U 338-E and San Diego Gas & Electric Company (U 902-E For Cost Recovery Of The
More informationBEFORE THE PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA. And Related Matters. Application Application
BEFORE THE PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA Application of San Diego Gas & Electric Company (U902E) for Authority to Implement Optional Pilot Program to Increase Customer Access to
More informationBEFORE THE PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA APPLICATION OF PACIFIC GAS AND ELECTRIC COMPANY ANN H. KIM GAIL L.
BEFORE THE PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA Application of Pacific Gas and Electric Company for Approval of Economic Development Rate for 2013-2017 (U 39 E) Application No. 12-03-
More informationBEFORE THE PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA
BEFORE THE PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA Petition of The Utility Reform Network to Adopt, Amend, or Repeal a Regulation Pursuant to Pub. Util. Code Section 1708.5 Petition 09-06-022
More informationBEFORE THE PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA
BEFORE THE PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA Application of Pacific Gas and Electric Company (U 39-E) for Approval of Demand Response Programs, Pilots and Budgets for Program Years
More informationBEFORE THE PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA NOTICE OF EX PARTE COMMUNICATION OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON COMPANY (U 338-E)
BEFORE THE PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA Application of Southern California Edison Company (U 338-E) for Authority to, Among Other Things, Increase its Authorized Revenues for
More informationBEFORE THE PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) ) ) )
BEFORE THE PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA Application of Southern California Edison Company (U 338-E) To Establish Marginal Costs, Allocate Revenues, Design Rates, and Implement
More informationRE: Southern California Edison Company s Formula Transmission Rate Annual Update Filing in Docket No. ER (TO11)
James A. Cuillier Director FERC Rates & Regulation Ms. Kimberly D. Bose, Secretary 888 First Street, N.E. Washington, DC 20426 RE: Southern California Edison Company s Formula Transmission Rate Annual
More informationPUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION
STATE OF CALIFORNIA EDMUND G. BROWN JR., Governor PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION 505 VAN NESS AVENUE SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94102-3298 FILED 10/29/18 02:02 PM October 29, 2018 Agenda ID #16979 Ratesetting TO PARTIES
More informationBEFORE THE PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA
BEFORE THE PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA Application of Southern California Edison Company (U 338-E) for Approval of Energy Efficiency Rolling Portfolio Business Plan. Application
More informationBEFORE THE PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA
BEFORE THE PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA Application of Southern California Edison Company (U 338-E) for Approval of Energy Efficiency Rolling Portfolio Business Plan. A.17-01-013
More informationExhibit A Affidavit of Alan Varvis
Affidavit of Alan Varvis Page 1 of 9 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA BEFORE THE FEDERAL ENERGY REGULATORY COMMISSION Southern California Edison Company ) Docket No. ER16- -000 AFFIDAVIT OF ALAN VARVIS FOR SOUTHERN
More informationEnergy Resource Recovery Account (ERRA) 2018 Forecast of Operations Rebuttal Testimony Public Version
Application No.: Exhibit No.: Witnesses: A.1-0-00 SCE-0 R. Sekhon D. Wong (U -E) Energy Resource Recovery Account (ERRA) 01 Forecast of Operations Rebuttal Testimony Public Version Before the Public Utilities
More informationBEFORE THE PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA
BEFORE THE PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA Order Instituting Rulemaking to Integrate and Refine Procurement Policies and Consider Long-Term Procurement Plans. Rulemaking 13-12-010
More informationApplication of PACIFIC GAS AND ELECTRIC COMPANY for Approval of the Energy Efficiency Programs and Budget A et al.
Pacific Gas and Electric Company TM Chonda J. Nwamu Mailing Address P.O. Box 7442 San Francisco, CA 94120 Street/Courier Address Law Department 77 Beale Street San Francisco, CA 94105 (415) 973-6650 Fax:
More informationApril 6, Your courtesy in this matter is appreciated. Very truly yours, James M. Lehrer
James M. Lehrer Senior Attorney James.Lehrer@sce.com April 6, 2005 Docket Clerk California Public Utilities Commission 505 Van Ness Avenue San Francisco, California 94102 RE: APPLICATION NO. 04-12-014
More informationBEFORE THE PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA
BEFORE THE PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA Order Instituting Rulemaking to Continue Implementation and Administration, and Consider Further Development, of California Renewables
More informationSUBJECT: Establishment of the Transportation Electrification Portfolio Balancing Account Pursuant to D
STATE OF CALIFORNIA Edmund G. Brown Jr., Governor PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION 505 VAN NESS AVENUE SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94102-3298 February 26, 2018 Advice Letter 3734-E Russell G. Worden Director, State Regulatory
More informationBEFORE THE PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA
BEFORE THE PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA Order Instituting Rulemaking to Review, Revise, and Consider Alternatives to the Power Charge Indifference Adjustment. Rulemaking 17-06-026
More informationBEFORE THE PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) ) ) ) ) ) )
BEFORE THE PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA Application of Southern California Edison Company (U 338-E For Applying the Market Index Formula And As-Available Capacity Prices Adopted
More informationSUBJECT: Establishment of Demand Response Load Shift Working Group Memorandum Account in Compliance with Decision
STATE OF CALIFORNIA Edmund G. Brown Jr., Governor PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION 505 VAN NESS AVENUE SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94102-3298 February 23, 2018 Advice Letter 3729-E Russell G. Worden Director, State Regulatory
More informationBEFORE THE PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) ) ) ) ) ) )
BEFORE THE PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA Application of Southern California Edison Company or Authorized Cost of Capital for Utility Operations for 2008. And Related Proceedings.
More informationLoad and Billing Impact Findings from California Residential Opt-in TOU Pilots
Load and Billing Impact Findings from California Residential Opt-in TOU Pilots Stephen George, Eric Bell, Aimee Savage, Nexant, San Francisco, CA ABSTRACT Three large investor owned utilities (IOUs) launched
More informationSDG&E REBUTTAL TESTIMONY OF CYNTHIA S. FANG (ELECTRIC RATES AND BILL COMPARISON) JUNE 18, 2018
Company: San Diego Gas & Electric Company (U902M) Proceeding: 2019 General Rate Case Application: A.17-10-007/-008 (cons.) Exhibit: SDG&E-246 SDG&E REBUTTAL TESTIMONY OF CYNTHIA S. FANG (ELECTRIC RATES
More informationTransmission Access Charge Informational Filing
California Independent System Operator September 27, 213 The Honorable Kimberly D. Bose, Secretary Federal Energy Regulatory Commission 888 First Street, N.E. Washington, D.C. 2426 Re: California Independent
More informationRevision to Electric Reliability Organization Definition of Bulk Electric System
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA BEFORE THE FEDERAL ENERGY REGULATORY COMMISSION Revision to Electric Reliability Organization Definition of Bulk Electric System ) ) ) ) ) Docket No. RM09-18-000 COMMENTS OF SOUTHERN
More informationFlexible Capacity Procurement. Market and Infrastructure Policy Issue Paper
Flexible Capacity Procurement Market and Infrastructure Policy Issue Paper January 27, 2012 Discussion Paper Table of Contents 1 Introduction... 3 2 Background... 4 2.1 ISO Renewable Integration Studies...
More informationBEFORE THE PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA
BEFORE THE PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA Order Instituting Rulemaking on the ) Commission s Own Motion to address the ) R.10-02-005 Issue of customers electric and natural gas
More informationSUBJECT: Establishment of the Distribution Resources Plan Demonstration Balancing Account (DRPDBA) Pursuant to Decision
STATE OF CALIFORNIA Edmund G. Brown Jr., Governor PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION 505 VAN NESS AVENUE SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94102-3298 June 2, 2017 Advice Letter 3579-E Russell G. Worden Director, State Regulatory
More informationStakeholder Process: Congestion Revenue Rights Auction Efficiency. Summary of Submitted Comments
Stakeholder Process: Congestion Revenue Rights Auction Efficiency Attachment A Summary of Submitted Comments Stakeholders submitted four rounds of written comments to the ISO under the congestion revenue
More informationBEFORE THE PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA OPENING BRIEF OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON COMPANY (U 338-E)
BEFORE THE PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA Expedited Application Of Southern California Edison Company (U 338-E) Regarding Energy Resource Recovery Account Trigger Mechanism. Application
More informationBEFORE THE PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA REPLY BRIEF OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON COMPANY (U 338-E)
BEFORE THE PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA Expedited Application of Southern California Edison Company (U338E) Regarding Energy Resource Recovery Account Trigger Mechanism. Application
More informationBEFORE THE PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA
BEFORE THE PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA Application of Southern California Edison Company (U 338-E) for Approval of the Results of Its 2016 Energy Storage and Distribution Deferral
More informationADVICE LETTER (AL) SUSPENSION NOTICE ENERGY DIVISION
ADVICE LETTER (AL) SUSPENSION NOTICE ENERGY DIVISION Utility Name: Southern California Edison Co. Utility Number/Type: U 338-E Advice Letter Number(s): 3695-E Date AL(s) Filed: Nov. 16, 2017 Utility Contact
More informationSouthern California Edison Company s Testimony on Tehachapi Renewable Transmission Project (TRTP)
Application Nos.: Exhibit No.: Witnesses James A. Cuillier Gary L. Allen (U -E) Southern California Edison Company s Testimony on Tehachapi Renewable Transmission Project (TRTP) Cost Recovery And Renewable
More information2016 Statewide Retrocommissioning Policy & Procedures Manual
2016 Statewide Retrocommissioning Policy & Procedures Manual Version 1.0 Effective Date: July 19, 2016 Utility Administrators: Pacific Gas and Electric San Diego Gas & Electric Southern California Edison
More informationCalifornia Net Energy Metering Ratepayer Impacts Evaluation
California Net Energy Metering Ratepayer Impacts Evaluation October 2013 Introduction to the California Net Energy Metering Ratepayer Impacts Evaluation Prepared by California Public Utilities Commission
More informationSECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION. Washington, D.C FORM 8-K CURRENT REPORT
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION Washington, D.C. 20549 FORM 8-K CURRENT REPORT Pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 Date of Report: June 19, 2003 Exact Name of Registrant
More informationOF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA
BEFORE THE PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA Order Instituting Rulemaking to Examine the Commission s Post-2008 Energy Efficiency Policies, Programs, Evaluation, Measurement, and Verification,
More informationUNITED STATES OF AMERICA BEFORE THE FEDERAL ENERGY REGULATORY COMMISSION
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA BEFORE THE FEDERAL ENERGY REGULATORY COMMISSION Credit and Capital Issues Affecting the ) Docket No. AD09-2-000 Electric Power Industry ) COMMENTS OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON
More informationBEFORE THE PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA
BEFORE THE PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA Application of Pacific Gas and Electric Company for Approval of its Residential Rate Design Window Proposals, including to Implement a
More informationBEFORE THE PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA
BEFORE THE PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA Application of Pacific Gas and Electric Company for Authority to Establish the Wildfire Expense Memorandum Account. (U 39E) Application
More informationUNITED STATES OF AMERICA FEDERAL ENERGY REGULATORY COMMISSION
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA FEDERAL ENERGY REGULATORY COMMISSION Before Commissioners: Pat Wood, III, Chairman; William L. Massey, and Nora Mead Brownell. California Power Exchange Corporation Docket No.
More informationUNITED STATES OF AMERICA BEFORE THE FEDERAL ENERGY REGULATORY COMMISSION
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA BEFORE THE FEDERAL ENERGY REGULATORY COMMISSION California Independent System Operator ) Docket No. ER14-2824-000 Corporation ) ) MOTION TO INTERVENE, LIMITED PROTEST AND COMMENTS
More informationSECOND REVISED SDG&E DIRECT TESTIMONY OF KENNETH J. DEREMER (POST-TEST YEAR RATEMAKING) April 6, 2018
Company: San Diego Gas & Electric Company (U 0 M) Proceeding: 01 General Rate Case Application: A.1--00 Exhibit: SDG&E--R SECOND REVISED SDG&E DIRECT TESTIMONY OF KENNETH J. DEREMER (POST-TEST YEAR RATEMAKING)
More informationBEFORE THE PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA. And Related Matters. Application Application
BEFORE THE PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA Application of Pacific Gas and Electric Company (U39E) for Approval of Demand Response Programs, Pilots and Budgets for Program Years 2018-2022.
More informationBEFORE THE PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA. And Related Matter. Rulemaking
BEFORE THE PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA Application of SAN DIEGO GAS & ELECTRIC COMPANY (U902E) for Approval of its Electric Vehicle-Grid Integration Pilot Program. Application
More informationApril 9, ADVICE 2099-E (Pacific Gas and Electric Company ID U 39 E) Public Utilities Commission of the State of California
April 9, 2001 ADVICE 2099-E (Pacific Gas and Electric Company ID U 39 E) Public Utilities Commission of the State of California Subject: Electric Interruptible Load Programs Pacific Gas and Electric Company
More informationJuly 9, Advice Letters: 3050-E
STATE OF CALIFORNIA Edmund G. Brown Jr., Governor PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION 505 VAN NESS AVENUE SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94102-3298 July 9, 2014 Advice Letters: 3050-E Megan Scott-Kakures Vice President, Regulatory
More informationBEFORE THE PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) ) ) )
BEFORE THE PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA Application Of Southern California Edison Company (U 338-E) For Approval Of Its Forecast 2019 ERRA Proceeding Revenue Requirement. ) )
More informationSOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON COMPANY
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA BEFORE THE FEDERAL ENERGY REGULATORY COMMISSION Southern California Edison Company ) Docket No. ER17- -000 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON COMPANY ANNUAL UPDATE FILING OF THE TRANSMISSION
More information2015 General Rate Case
Application No.: Exhibit No.: SCE-, Vol. 0, Revision 1 Witnesses: J. Carrillo M. Childs P. Wong R. Fisher P. Hunt D. Lee K. Shimmel R. Worden (U -E) 01 General Rate Case Public Version ERRATA Results of
More informationSeptember 22, Advice Letter 3033-E
STATE OF CALIFORNIA PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION 505 VAN NESS AVENUE SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94102-3298 Edmund G. Brown Jr., Governor September 22, 2014 Advice Letter 3033-E Megan Scott-Kakures Vice President,
More informationRussell G. Worden Director, Regulatory Operations Southern California Edison Company 8631 Rush Street Rosemead, CA 91770
;STATE OF CALIFORNIA PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94102-3298 Edmund G. Brown Jr., Governor November 13, 2015 Advice Letter 3219-E and 3219-E-A Russell G. Worden Director, Regulatory Operations
More informationREBUTTAL TESTIMONY OF NEIL MILLAR ON BEHALF OF THE CALIFORNIA INDEPENDENT SYSTEM OPERATOR CORPORATION
Application No.: --00 Exhibit No.: Witness: Neil Millar In the Matter of the Application of SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON COMPANY (UE) for a Certificate of Public Convenience and Necessity for the West of
More information2018 General Rate Case Rebuttal Testimony
Application No.: A.16-09-001 Exhibit No.: SCE-23, Vol. 01 Witnesses: D. Daigler D. McMullen T. Guntrip D. Neal P. Jeske S. Schuffels K. Landrith (U 338-E) 2018 General Rate Case Rebuttal Testimony Operational
More informationBEFORE THE PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA
BEFORE THE PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA Application Of Southern California Edison Company (U 338-E) For Approval Of Its Forecast 2017 ERRA Proceeding Revenue Requirement. A.16-05-001
More informationUNITED STATES OF AMERICA BEFORE THE FEDERAL ENERGY REGULATORY COMMISSION. Docket No. ER
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA BEFORE THE FEDERAL ENERGY REGULATORY COMMISSION PacifiCorp Docket No. ER16-193-000 MOTION TO INTERVENE AND COMMENTS OF THE WESTERN POWER TRADING FORUM Pursuant to Rules 211, 212
More informationSOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON COMPANY
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA BEFORE THE FEDERAL ENERGY REGULATORY COMMISSION Southern California Edison Company ) Docket No. ER18- -000 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON COMPANY ANNUAL UPDATE FILING OF THE TRANSMISSION
More informationPrepared Remarks of Edison International CEO and CFO Second Quarter 2018 Earnings Teleconference July 26, 2018, 1:30 p.m. (PDT)
Prepared Remarks of Edison International CEO and CFO Second Quarter 2018 Earnings Teleconference July 26, 2018, 1:30 p.m. (PDT) Pedro Pizarro, President and Chief Executive Officer, Edison International
More informationCITY OF DANA POINT. FINANCIAL REVIEW COMMITTEE Agenda Report
01/23/18 Page 1 Item #3B CITY OF DANA POINT FINANCIAL REVIEW COMMITTEE Agenda Report DATE: JANUARY 23, 2018 TO: FROM: FINANCIAL REVIEW COMMITTEE MIKE KILLEBREW, ASSISTANT CITY MANAGER SUBJECT: UTILITY
More informationBEFORE THE PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA
BEFORE THE PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA Southern California Edison Company s (U 338- E) Application for Approval of Advanced Metering Infrastructure Deployment Activities and
More informationMay 25, Revisions to Southern California Edison s Critical Peak Pricing Programs for Large Customers with Demands Above 200 kw
Akbar Jazayeri Director of Revenue and Tariffs May 25, 2005 ADVICE 1895-E (U 338-E) PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA ENERGY DIVISION SUBJECT: Revisions to Southern California Edison
More informationISO Transmission Planning Process. Supplemental Sensitivity Analysis: Risks of early economic retirement of gas fleet
ISO 2016-2017 Transmission Planning Process Supplemental Sensitivity Analysis: Risks of early economic retirement of gas fleet January 4, 2018 Contents 1. Introduction... 1 2. Background... 1 3. Objectives
More informationSUBJECT: Modification of the Distribution Resources Plan Memorandum Account Pursuant to Decision
STATE OF CALIFORNIA Edmund G. Brown Jr., Governor PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION 505 VAN NESS AVENUE SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94102-3298 April 13, 2018 Advice Letter 3764-E Russell G. Worden Director, State Regulatory
More informationAkbar Jazayeri Vice President, Regulatory Operations Southern California Edison Company P O Box 800 Rosemead, CA 91770
STATE OF CALIFORNIA PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94102-3298 Edmund G. Brown Jr. Governor February 1, 2012 Advice Letter 2677-E Akbar Jazayeri Vice President, Regulatory Operations Southern
More informationPrepared Remarks of Edison International CEO and CFO Third Quarter 2018 Earnings Teleconference October 30, 2018, 1:30 p.m. (PDT)
Prepared Remarks of Edison International CEO and CFO Third Quarter 2018 Earnings Teleconference October 30, 2018, 1:30 p.m. (PDT) Pedro Pizarro, President and Chief Executive Officer, Edison International
More informationSeptember 4, Advice Letter 3622-G/4693-E
STATE OF CALIFORNIA PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION 505 VAN NESS AVENUE SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94102-3298 Edmund G. Brown Jr., Governor September 4, 2015 Erik Jacobson Director, Regulatory Relations Pacific Gas
More informationRE: Southern California Edison Company s Formula Transmission Rate Annual Update Filing in Docket No. ER (TO11)
Jeffrey L. Nelson Director FERC Rates & Market Integration Ms. Kimberly D. Bose, Secretary 888 First Street, N.E. Washington, DC 20426 RE: Southern California Edison Company s Formula Transmission Rate
More informationBEFORE THE PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA
BEFORE THE PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA Application of Southern California Edison Company (U 338-E) to Establish the Wildfire Expense Memorandum Account. Application 18-04-XXX
More informationSouthern California Edison s Renewable Auction Mechanism (RAM) Program. June 6, 2014 EPRG Workshop on Distributed Generation and Smart Connections
Southern California Edison s Renewable Auction Mechanism (RAM) Program June 6, 2014 EPRG Workshop on Distributed Generation and Smart Connections The RAM Contracting Tool In D.10-12-048 ( the RAM Decision
More informationAdvice Letters 2311-E and 2311-E-A
STATE OF CALIFORNIA ARNOLD SCHWARZENEGGER, Governor PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94102-3298 April 27, 2009 Advice Letters 2311-E and 2311-E-A Akbar Jazayeri Vice President, Regulatory
More informationRe: Joint Protest of TURN and ORA to SCE Advice Letter 3768-E (Request for Z Factor Recovery for Wildfire-Related Liability Insurance)
April 3, 2018 California Public Utilities Commission Energy Division Attention: Tariff Unit 505 Van Ness Avenue San Francisco, CA 94102 Re: Joint Protest of TURN and ORA to SCE Advice Letter 3768-E (Request
More informationExhibit SCE-1
Exhibit SCE-1 Exhibit SCE-2 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA BEFORE THE FEDERAL ENERGY REGULATORY COMMISSION ) Southern California Edison Company ) Dkt. No. ER18- -000 ) DECLARATION OF BERTON J. HANSEN FOR
More informationCASE 17-M-0178 Draft Discussion Document, November 2017 Session, Publicly Released November 15, 2017 STATE OF NEW YORK PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION
STATE OF NEW YORK PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION At a session of the Public Service Commission held in the City of COMMISSIONERS PRESENT: CASE 17-M-0178 - Petition of Orange and Rockland Utilities, Inc. for
More informationJune 30, 2015 ADVICE 3241-E (U 338-E) PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA ENERGY DIVISION
Russell G. Worden Managing Director, State Regulatory Operations June 30, 2015 ADVICE 3241-E (U 338-E) PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA ENERGY DIVISION SUBJECT: Establishment of New
More informationBEFORE THE PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA
BEFORE THE PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA Application of San Diego Gas & Electric Company (U 902 M) for Authority, Among Other Things, to Increase Rates and Charges for Electric
More informationUNITED STATES OF AMERICA BEFORE THE FEDERAL ENERGY REGULATORY COMMISSION
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA BEFORE THE FEDERAL ENERGY REGULATORY COMMISSION Southern California Edison Company, et al. ) ) ) Docket No. EL18-164-000 ANSWER OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON COMPANY TO ORDER INSTITUTING
More informationENERGY DIVISION Resolution E-4663 June 26, 2014 RESOLUTION
Date of Issuance: June 27, 2014 PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA ENERGY DIVISION Resolution E-4663 June 26, 2014 RESOLUTION Resolution E-4663: Submit for approval by the Commission
More informationBEFORE THE PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA
BEFORE THE PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA Application of Southern California Edison Company (U 338-E) to Establish Marginal Costs, Allocate Revenues, and Design Rates. A.17-06-030
More informationBEFORE THE PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA
BEFORE THE PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA Application of Southern California Edison Company (U 338-E) to Establish Marginal Costs, Allocate Revenues, Design Rates, and Implement
More informationSUBJECT: SCEs 2014 Assembly Bill 57 Bundled Procurement Plan Compliance Filing
STATE OF CALIFORNIA Edmund G. Brown Jr., Governor PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION 505 VAN NESS AVENUE SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94102-3298 February 16, 2016 Advice Letter: 3349-E Russell G. Worden Managing Director,
More information