TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION STATEWIDE TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM FISCAL YEARS

Transcription

1 TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION STATEWIDE TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM FISCAL YEARS Commission Approved: September 3, 21

2 TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION SELFCERTIFICATION In accordance with 23 CFR Part and , the Texas Department of Transportation, hereby certify that the transportation planning process is being conducted in accordance with all applicable requirements of: (1) 23 U.S.C. 134, 23 U.S.C. 135;49 U.S.C. 533 and 534, and this part; (2) In nonattainment and maintenance areas, sections 174 and 176 (c) and (d) of the Clean Air Act, as amended (42 U.S.C. 754, 756 (c) and (d» and 4 CFR part 93; (3) Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, as amended (42 U.S.C. 2d1) and 49 CFR part 21 ; (4) 49 U.S.C. 5332, prohibiting discrimination on the basis of race, color, creed, national origin, sex, or age in employment or business opportunity; (5) Section 111(b) of the SAFETEALU (Pub. L. 1959) and 49 CFR part 26 regarding the involvement of disadvantaged business enterprises in USDOT funded projects; (6) 23 CFR part 23, regarding the implementation of an equal employment opportunity program on Federal and Federalaid highway construction contracts; (7) The provisions of the Americans with Disabilities Act of 199 (42 U.S.C et seq.) and 49 CFR parts 27, 37, and 38; (8) The Older Americans Act, as amended (42 U.S.C. 611), prohibiting discrimination on the basis of age in programs or activities receiving Federal financial assistance; (9) Section 324 of title 23 U.S.C. regarding the prohibition of discrimination based on gender; and (1) Section 54 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973 (29 U.S.C. 794) and 49 CFR part 27 regarding discrimination against individuals with disabilities. ~ tor, Transportation Planning and Programming Division Texas Department of Transportation tfi3~/zo/d Date

3 I i * Texas Department of Transportation DEW/IT C GREER STATE HIGHWAY BLDG. 125 E 11 TH STREET. AUSTIN, TEXAS (512) Ms. Janice W. Brown Division Administrator Federal Highway Administration 3 East Eighth Street, Suite 826 Austin, Texas 7871 Attention: Mr. Kirk Fauver Dear Ms. Brown: October 6, 21 Attached are two hard copies and five compact disc copies of the Fiscal Year Statewide Transportation Improvement Program (STIP) approved by the Texas Transportation Commission Minute Order on September 3, 21. Also, attached is a copy of the minute order for your information. The financial summary in the Introduction shows how the STIP is financially constrained by year. There are several methods that the Texas Department of Transportation (TxDOT) has available to maintain financial constraint. TxDOT may shift funds for projects and operating expenses between sources (such as the Texas Mobility Fund or Proposition 14) to maintain financial constraint of available federal revenues or state gas tax and registration fees. TxDOT also uses the Letting Schedule to balance federal obligation limitation and cash flow to maintain financial constraint. TxDOT may use short term borrowing, up to 5 million, to fund projects or operating expenses. If you have any questions or need further information, please contact Lori A. Morel at Attachment Sincerely, C2n~~ Amadeo Saenz, Jr., P.E. Executive Director I cc: James L. Randall, P.E., Director, Transportation Planning and Programming Division, TxDOT Lori Morel, Transportation Planning and Programming Division, TxDOT An Equal Opportunity Employer

4 STATEWIDE TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM Texas Department of Transportation FY Approved by the exas Transport tion Commission on September 3, 21 Approved: 6 b Amadeo Saenz, Jr., P.E. Executive Director Dated: /2)/ ~ /1 I 7

5 ALL Counties ALL Districts TEXAS TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION MINUTE ORDER Page 1 of2 Title 23, United States Code, 134 and 135 require each designated metropolitan planning organization (MPO) and the State of Texas (state), respectively, to develop a Transportation Improvement Program (TIP) as a condition to securing federal funds for transportation projects under either Title 23 or the Federal Transit Act. Section 134U) requires an MPO to develop its TIP in cooperation with the state and affected transit operators, and further requires the TIP to be updated at least once every four years and to be approved by the MPO and the governor of Texas. Section 135(g) requires the state to develop a Statewide Transportation Improvement Program (STIP) for all areas of the state in cooperation with the MPOs designated for each metropolitan planning area and, with respect to nonmetropolitan areas, in consultation with affected local officials, and requires that the STIP be approved by the governor. By letter dated October 4, 25, the governor delegated the power and responsibility for approving the STIP to the Texas Transportation Commission (commission) or its designees. The commission has adopted rules governing the development of transportation plans and programs, codified as 43 TAC Chapter 15, Subchapter A. Sections 134(j) and 135(g) and 43 TAC 15.7 and 15.8 specify the requirements and eligibility criteria for projects to be included in the respective TIPs. In accordance with those requirements, TIPs have been developed for each metropolitan planning area, as well as those areas of the state outside designated MPO boundaries (rural TIPs). The individual TIPs are incorporated into the STIP. The various TIPs developed by the designated MPOs have been presented for public comment by means of various publ ic meetings conducted by relevant authorities throughout the state. Rural TIPs were made available to citizens, affected public agencies, representatives of transportation agency employees, freight shippers, private providers of transportation, providers of freight transportation services, representatives of users of public transit, and other interested parties for review and comment in each of the Texas Department of Transportation's (department's) 25 district offices and at the department's headquarters in Austin. A public hearing on the STIP was held on August 24,21. No oral or written comments were received. After due deliberation and consideration, the commission finds that the requirements of 134 have been fully satisfied as they pertain to the development of the prescribed TIPs by each of the 25 MPOs and that the STIP, attached as Exhibit A to this order, fully satisfies the requirements of I35 and 43 TAC 15.8 and is consistent with the Statewide Transportation Plan, the Unified Transportation Program, and the Strategic Plan.

6 TEXAS TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION ALL Counties MINUTE ORDER Page 2 of2 ALL Districts The commission also finds that the STIP: (A) develops, operates, and maintains efficient and effective transportation systems and services; (B) improves public safety and security on transportation systems; (C) facilitates economic and social prosperity through the efficient movement of people and goods; (D) protects, when feasible, and enhances, when practicable, the environment in transportation activities; (E) improves and promotes the connectivity of transportation services and systems; and (F) optimizes transportation funding to meet the mobile needs of the state. IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that the Fiscal Year STIP, which incorporates the respective TIPs of each designated MPO, as well as rural TIPs and is attached as Exhibit A to this order, is hereby adopted. IT IS FURTIIER ORDERED that the executive director, or his designee, shall sign all necessary certifications required by federal regulations. rector, Transportation Planning nd Programming Division Executive Director 1124;13 SfP 3 Minute Number Date Passed

7 INTRODUCTION The Statewide Transportation Improvement Program (STIP) is the Department of Transportation s (TxDOT s) fouryear capital improvement program developed under Title 23 United States Code (USC), Section 135 Statewide Planning, (f) Statewide Transportation Improvement Program and 43 TAC The STIP must also be compliant with the Safe, Accountable, Flexible, Efficient Transportation Equity Act: A Legacy for Users (SAFETEALU). TxDOT, authorized by the Governor to act on his behalf in the matter of public involvement, is making this STIP available on its website, in its District Offices around the state from July 23, 21 to September 7, 21 and will hold a public hearing on August 24, 21 in Austin, Texas, to provide interested parties the opportunity to comment on the contents of this document. TxDOT s Mission, Vision and Goals TxDOT s Strategic Plan a 5year management plan that provides the department with a means to continually assess its progress and performance outlines the department s mission, vision and goals. Mission Provide safe and efficient movement of people and goods, enhance economic viability, and improve the quality of life for the people that travel in the state of Texas by maintaining existing roadways and collaborating with private and local entities to plan, design, build and maintain expanded transportation infrastructure. Vision To be a trusted, performancedriven organization committed to collaborating with internal and external partners to deliver a modern, interconnected and multimodal transportation system that enhances the quality of life for Texas citizens and increases the competitive position for Texas industry. Goals TxDOT s departmentwide goals: Develop an organizational structure and strategies designed to address the future multimodal transportation needs of all Texans; Enhance safety for all Texas transportation system users; Maintain the existing Texas transportation system; Promote congestion relief strategies; Enhance system connectivity; and Facilitate the development and exchange of comprehensive multimodal transportation funding strategies with transportation program and project partners.

8 STIP and TIP Definitions A TIP is a capital improvement program developed cooperatively by local and state transportation entities that includes a list of multimodal (e.g., highway, transit, bicycle, etc.) transportation projects drawn from and consistent with a rural longrange plan (statewide plan), or Metropolitan Planning Organization (MPO) longrange plans known as a Metropolitan Transportation Plans (MTPs). Federal regulations, along with regional policies and practices, establish the process by which transportation projects are selected, modified, and implemented. The TIP serves as a shortterm programming document that lists approximately four years of funded (committed from local, state, and federal sources) transportation projects designed to construct, complete, implement, operate and maintain regional and statewide transportation systems in accordance with the recommendations of the longrange statewide transportation plan and/or an MPO s MTP. The STIP is the State s fouryear capital improvement program that includes the MPO and Rural TIPs, and contains all phases of transportation projects to be built during the fouryear period. Projects must be consistent with the state and metropolitan longrange plans; and in nonattainment areas (Houston, Dallas Fort Worth, Beaumont and El Paso), projects must conform to the State Implementation Plan. There are differences between the TIP and STIP documents: MPO TIPs are standalone documents, approved at the local level, that include projects within the MPO boundaries. The STIP includes projects for the entire state and is approved first by the Texas Transportation Commission, and then by both FTA and the Federal Highway Administration (FHWA). The STIP is subject to a statewide public involvement effort that culminates in a public hearing in Austin, Texas, and a subsequent comment period before commission adoption by minute order. Federal dollars cannot be expended on a project in a TIP unless that project is in the STIP listed individually or by reference. With few exceptions, projects must generally be included in the TIP and STIP in order to move forward. There must be one overlapping year of projects from one STIP document to the next to ensure that the state has an approved document from which to construct, complete, implement, operate and maintain projects. The STIP includes financial summary tables to demonstrate fiscal constraint. Projects that are funded in the TIPs/STIP and constructed, implemented, operated or maintained using federal dollars must conform to any and all federal, state or local regulations/statutes that are applicable based on the type of project, type of funding received, scope of work and/or impact to the natural or human environments.

9 Unified Transportation Program The Unified Transportation Program (UTP) is TxDOT s tenyear programming document to authorize and guide transportation project development and construction on Texas intermodal transportation network. It is updated, and adopted by the commission annually. The UTP includes funding strategies and projects to maintain and preserve the existing transportation system and taxpayer investments. The UTP also includes funding strategies and projects to construct transportation infrastructure. The UTP document can be viewed on TxDOT s website.. It takes several years for a project to be constructed once the need for that project has been identified. The following steps are elements of the project development process from conception to construction/implementation: Demographic, census, traffic data has indicated the need for a project. The project is scoped in general terms and listed in a long range plan and may receive plan authority from TxDOT. Projects may remain in the plan authority stage for up to 1 years. TxDOT identifies available funding for the project. After funding has been generally identified, a project may now receive develop authority and be placed in the UTP. Projects may remain in the development stage for up to 7 years while the following is completed: o PS&E (Plans, Specifications and Estimates) o RightofWay (ROW) acquisition o Local agreements (if required) o Environmental clearance (NEPA) o Public involvement The project receives construct authority and is placed in the TIP/STIP with all sources of funding to complete the project phases for projects to be let to construction/implemented within 1 to 4 years. The project has all funds identified/ committed, all local agreements in place, required rightsof way (ROW) are purchased, environmental clearance (including completion of public involvement), etc., and may then go to construction. As required to maintain fiscal constraint, the STIP (and TIPs contained therein) should include projects for which full funding is reasonably anticipated to be available in order to construct, complete, implement, operate and maintain the projects.

10 Transportation Planning and the NEPA Process TxDOT is committed to protecting, preserving, and enhancing the environment where feasible. There are severe consequences for not adhering to the requirements of the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) that include project delays, fines, and criminal liability not to mention a negative public image. We will reference documents that demonstrate compliance with SAFETEALU, instead of summarizing them in this Introduction to the STIP to save paper for those wanting a printed copy. In accordance with NEPA, environmental documents are prepared that state: The purpose and need of a TxDOT transportation project, Any existing environmental and socioeconomic conditions, Environmental consequences of the project, and Alternatives to the proposed alignment of the project. 23 CFR and 23 CFR encourage linkages between the transportation planning and project development and NEPA processes. To the extent that is possible and financially feasible, TxDOT works with the MPOs, state and federal oversight agencies, and the FHWA and FTA to ensure NEPA processes are complete before a project in the STIP is constructed or implemented. During project development, several TxDOT Divisions Design, Environmental Affairs, and RightofWay work with the Advance Planning Engineers in the TxDOT District Offices to accomplish some NEPA coordination while projects are still in the UTP, before these projects are moved into the MPO and Rural TIPs and STIP. Environmental resource documents can be found on the TxDOT website at PROGRAM ALLOCATION AND PROJECT SELECTION The allocation program is a funding management tool. The commission has delegated the responsibility for selecting and funding projects to the lowest responsible levels the TxDOT districts and divisions (in cooperation with the MPOs). Projects can be selected, developed and let to contract with each project s cost debited against the allocated funds for that program. Most allocation programs consist of projects requiring relatively short development times and are intended to preserve the existing highway system. Projects that improve mobility or safety are selected through a competitive process and funded with project specific highway construction programs managed by TxDOT. These projects are usually associated with longer development periods and higher construction costs. The TxDOT District offices follow the State of Texas project selection procedures adopted by the Commission (in accordance with 134 (h)(2) of Title 23 U.S.C. as amended) for projects in areas outside the metropolitan area boundaries. Projects with the metropolitan area boundaries are selected by the MPOs in cooperation with their TxDOT district office, and in accordance with procedures adopted by each MPO.

11 Transit Funding TxDOT s Public Transportation Division (PTN) will administer transit funds to ensure operation within the legal requirements in accordance with Federal Transit Administration (FTA) regulations. The following explanations are essential to understanding the financial feasibility of transit funding procedures as they relate to the preparation and approval of the TIPs and STIP: FTA Section 537 Mass transit apportionment to urbanized areas based on population, population density and operating performance. The department has authority over the distribution of funds to urbanized areas of less than 2, in population. PTN will limit annual project allocations to stay within the apportionment furnished by FTA. FTA Section 539 Mass transit discretionary funds for capital projects only. The presence of an identifier number in the project description indicates the transit agency has received the funds requested. Otherwise, the numbers shown in each fiscal year simply reflect needs as perceived by the requesting agencies and operators. Funding for the following programs is constrained to the Federal Transit Administration's published estimates of future funding levels. FTA Section 531 Provides federal funds to public and private nonprofit entities for the transportation of elderly individuals and/or individuals with disabilities. Grants are for capital equipment, preventive maintenance and purchase of service only. FTA Section 5311 Provides funds for Rural Transit Programs. Thirtynine entities blanketing the state provide service in the nonurbanized areas. FTA Section 5316 Funds projects that provide work transportation or transportation to support services such as training, job search and child care. FTA Section 5317 Provides funds for projects that provide new public transportation services and public transportation alternatives beyond those currently required by the Americans with Disabilities Act. PTN is responsible for ensuring consistency between the preparation of FTAmandated coordinated, regional, public transithuman service plans and applicable metropolitan or statewide transportation planning processes outlined in 23 CFR 45.36(g).

12 Transit Financial Summary TOTAL FOR STATE OF TEXAS FY Transportation Improvement Program >2K 2 Sec. 537 Urbanized Fonnula <2K 55,38,85 38,298,331 93,678,416 38,129,389 35,795,345 3 Sec. 539 Discretionary 4 Sec. 531 Elderty &Indfviduals w/oisabilitie& 5 Sec Nonurbanized Fonnula 863,473,521 7,236, ,279,395 1,424,21 1,34,752,916 8,66, ,254,288 6,618, ,831,54 1,483, ,85, ,82,151 45,919,833 6,345, ,797,926 1,176,89 6 Sec JARC >2K 7 Sec JARC <2K 8 Sec JARC Nonurbanlzed 21,213, ,5 a 12,784,51 136,5 a 33,977,39 273, 5,276,184 14, 2,55,629 14, 7,331,813 28, 5,286, ,5 2,65, ,5 9 Sec New Freedom >2K 1 Sec New Freedom <2K 11 Sec New Freedom Nonurbanlzed 11,25,684 1,9,772 a 3,539,12 253,193 a 14,584,784 1,262,965 a 2,29,62 913,515 a 848, ,129 a 2,878,179 1,142,844 a 2,29, a 848,571 35, nificant or Other 23,253 1,723,253 1,746,56 16, 8,7, 8,86, 6, 6,, Total Funds 1,522,598,733 Development Credits All FiQureS in Year of Exoenditure (VOE) Dollars FY 214 Transit Program Federal StatelOther Sec. 537 Urbanized Formula >2K 199,931,437 52,82(646 2 Sec. 537 Urbanized Form ula <2K 39,623,235 37,298,672 Total 252,756,83 76,921,97 Federal 1,163,276, ,927,186 Total State/Other 286,567,24 148,1,248 Total 1,449,843, ,928,434 3 Sec. 539 Discretionary 4 Sec. 531 Elderty &Individuals wldisabllities 5 Sec Nonurbanlzed Fonnula 579,273, ,897 49, ,166, ,939,897 7,322,352 2,332,92,69 1,747,575,71 26,357,4 5,231,269 4,8,498,4 31,586,273 Current as of Sec JARC >2K 7 Sec JARC<2K 8 Sec JARC Nonurbanized 5,296, , 2,75, , 7,371, , 37,71,81 18,96, , 567, a 56,32,746 1,134, 9 Sec New Freedom >2K 1 Sec New Freedom <2K 11 Sec, 5317 New Freedom Nonurbanized 2,29,82 846,571 2,678,179 17,114,47 6,84,851 2,6, ,343 23,199,321 2,577, Other FTA 13 ReQionaliV SiQnificant or Other 16, 16,84, ,956,34 16, 666,22,875 43,253 18,423,253 18,568,746 2,13,997,144 16,826,58 2,32,565,89 Total Funds I 848,68,974 1,155,986,132 2,4,667,16 3,77,266,945 4, I Transportation Development Credits Requested Awarded

13 Transit Financial Summary TOTAL FOR ALL MPOs FY Transportation Improvement Program All F~ures in Year of Expenditure (YOE) Dollars cell add FY 211 FY 212 FY 213 Transit Pro ram Federal State/Other Total Federal State/Other Total Federal State/Other Total 1 Sec, 537 Urbanized Fonnula >2K 563,99, ,663,55 69,763, ,883,17 53,169, ,52,536 2,361,844 52,99, ,271,522 2 Sec, 537 Urbanized Fonnula <2K 55,38,85 38,298,331 93,678,416 38,129,389 35,795,345 73,924,734 38,794,477 36,68,9 75,43,377 3 Sec, 539 Discretionary 863,473, ,279,395 1,34,752, ,254, ,831,54 879,85,828 45,919, ,797,926 97,717,759 4 Sec, 531 Elderly &Individuals w/disabilities 4,931, ,682 5,846,611 4,339,72 944,36 5,283,432 4,66,51 65,757 4,717,258 5 Sec, 5311 Nonurbanized Fonnula 6 Sec, 5316 JARC >2K 21,213,258 12,764,51 33,977,39 5,276,184 2,55,629 7,331,813 5,286,184 2,65,629 7,351,813 7 Sec, 5316 JARC <2K 136,5 136,5 273, 14, 14, 28, 143,5 143,5 287, 8 Sec, 5316 JARC Nonurbanized 9 Sec, 5317 New Freedom >2ooK 11,25,664 3,539,12 14,584,784 2,29,62 848,577 2,878,179 2,29,62 848,577 2,878,179 1 Sec, 5317 New Freedom <2K 1,9, ,193 1,262, , ,129 1,142, ,87 35,21 172,18 11 Sec, 5317 New Freedom Nonurbanized 12 Other FTA 23,253 1,723,253 1,746,56 16, 8,7, 8,86, 6, 8,, 8,6, 13 Reaionallv Sianificant or Other 324,86, ,86,193 56,737,997 56,737,997 2,54,175 53,494,65 532,998,825 Total Funds 1,52,293, ,378,268 2,471,672,211 69,125,22 1,48,451,943 1,738,577,163 74,33,23 1,88,554,638 1,792,857,841 Transportation Development Credits Requested 1,345,42 Awarded All Fiaures in Year of Expenditure (yoe) Dollars Transit Programs Transit Program 1 Sec, 537 Urbanized Fonnula >2K 2 Sec, 537 Urbanized Fonnula <2ooK FY 214 Federal State/Other Total 199,931,437 52,824, ,756,83 39,623,235 37,298,672 76,921,97 Federal 1,163,276, ,927,186 Total State/Other 286,567,24 147,8,731 Total 1,449,843, ,928,434 3 Sec, 539 Discretionary 4 Sec, 531 Elderly &Individuals w/disabilities 5 Sec, 5311 Nonurbanized Fonnula 579,273,48 49,666, ,939,897 4,61, ,323 4,71,444 2,332,92,69 16,883,683 1,747,575,71 2,755,65 4,8,496,41 2,557,745 Current July 23, 21 6 Sec, 5316 JARC >2K 7 Sec, 5316 JARC <2K 8 Sec, 5316 JARC Nonurbanized 5,296,184 2,75,629 7,371, , 147, 294, 37,71,81 567, 18,96, , 56,32,748 1,134, 9 Sec, 5317 New Freedom >2K 1 Sec, 5317 New Freedom <2ooK 11 Sec, 5317 New Freedom Nonurbanized 2,29,62 848,577 2,878,179 17,114,47 2,6,374 6,84, ,343 23,199,321 2,577, Other FTA 13 Reaionallv Sianificant or Other 16, 16, 16,64, ,958,34 668,22,875 43,253 18,568,746 18,4, 2,13,997,144 18,826,56 2,32,565,89 Total Funds 846,586,198 1,155,469, 2,2,55,198 3,761,38,564 4,243,853,849 8,5,162,413 Transportation Development Credits Requested Awarded 6,216, ,464

14 AU Fioures in YeafQfEx ndoore OE} Dollars Transit Financial Summary TXDOT (District and Division) SUMMARY FY Transportation Improvement Program FY 211 FY212 FY 213 Transit Pr~ram Federal State/Other Total Federal State/Other Total Federal State/Other Total 1 Sec. 537 Urbanized Fonnula >2K 2 Sec. 537 Urbanized Formula <2ooK 3 Sec. 539 Discretionary 4 Sec. 531 Elderly &Individuals w/disabilities 2,34,79 59,528 2,814,318 2,279, ,356 2,798,719 2,279, , Sec Nonurbanized Fonnula 6 Sec, 5316 JARC >2K 7 Sec JARC <2K 8 Sec JARC Nonurbanized 9 Sec, 5317 New Freedom >2ooK 1 Sec New Freedom <2ooK 11 Sec New Freedom Nonurbanized 12 Other FTA 13 Reolonallv SI niflcant or Other Total Funds 2,34,79 59,528 2,814,318 2,279, ,356 2,798,719 2,279, ,133 2,85,585 Transportation Development Credits Requested Awarded 2 Sec. 537 Urbanized Formula <2ooK 3 Sec. 539 Discretionary 4 Sec. 531 Elderly &Indlviduais wldisabillties 5 Sec Nonurbanized Formula 2,94, ,132 2,611,98 8,958,381 2,72,147 Current as of 7/ Sec JARC >2ooK 7 Sec JARC <2ooK 8 Sec JARC Nonurbanized 9 Sec New Freedom >2K 1 Sec New Freedom <2K 11 Sec New Freedom Nonurbanized 12 OtherFTA R!lIional!x Significant or Other Total Funds Development Credils

15 Highway Funding TxDOT is responsible for selecting projects for following 12 funding categories: Preventive Maintenance and Rehabilitation, Metropolitan Corridor Projects, Urban Area Corridor Projects, Statewide Connectivity Corridor Projects, Structures Replacement and Rehabilitation, Safety, Transportation Enhancements, Miscellaneous Transportation, District Discretionary, and Strategic Priority. TxDOT division personnel work with engineering and planning staff in the district offices, local and county officials, and the public through a public involvement process to select and program projects in the areas outside the metropolitan area boundaries. MPO policy boards are responsible for programming projects in the following federal funding categories: Surface Transportation ProgramMetropolitan Mobility (STPMM), Congestion Mitigation and Air Quality Improvement Program (CMAQ) if the area is designated nonattainment for air quality and, transit funding (e.g., Section 537 Urbanized Area Formula Program) as applicable. MPOs develop their own Project Selection Procedures based on the transportation needs in their region. TxDOT s BUDGET TxDOT s budget is determined by its Finance Division which publishes forecasted and anticipated revenues the department receives from fuel taxes, vehicle registration fees, federal reimbursements, local matching funds, and other state and local federal funds. These forecasted revenue numbers are then provided to the districts and MPOs for allocation to projects that are listed in the rural and MPO TIPs. Funding levels are to be fiscally constrained throughout the life of the STIP. The April 21 cash forecast, in the Appendix to this Introduction chapter is the basis for the revenue forecasts used in the STIP.

16 STIP Financial Plan The STIP financial plan demonstrates the feasibility of the proposed STIP for fiscal years 211 through 2114, based on the use of innovate finance tools, state funding levels forecasted by TxDOT, and SAFETEALU federal funding amounts. The STIP includes federally supported surface transportation expenditures within the boundaries of the state. Projects in the STIP have been through the federallymandated planning process and are included in the UTP (excluding transit and locally funded projects). PTN is responsible for the allocation and fiscal constraint of transit funding. The Financial Summaries contain systemslevel estimates of costs and revenue sources to adequately operate and maintain federally funded highway and transit facilities as stipulated in 23 CFR (m), (f)(1)(i), and (hi). The financial Summaries contain systemslevel estimates of cost and revenue sources to adequately operate and maintain federally funded highway and transit facilities as stipulated in 23 CFR (n), (f)(1)(i), and (hi). Grouped Projects In cooperation with the Federal Highway Administration, TxDOT developed Grouped Project CSJ numbers for projects that are not determined to be regionally significant so that they may be grouped in one line item, as allowed for in Title 23 USC Section 135 Statewide Planning. Grouping such projects allows for more efficient programming and reduces the need for revisions to the TIPs and STIP. The Grouped Projects CSJs are listed in a table in the Appendix to this Introduction chapter. TxDOT will group projects in the rural TIPs to the fullest extent possible. The MPOs have been encouraged to participate, and have been provided with guidance with respect to the format and inclusion of grouped projects in their TIPs, but participation is optional, and the adoption and use of Grouped Project Categories is not uniform throughout the MPO TIPs. Nonattainment areas will not have any added capacity projects, or phases of added capacity projects, grouped under this provision. Funding Categories and Transfers Some districts are overprogrammed in specific categories for the fouryear period; however, SAFETEALU funds and TxDOT s forecasted revenues indicate adequate funding amounts will be made available to construct projects over that same period. The shifting of projects between fiscal years allows for the flexibility essential to efficient program management. The maximum transfer of funding among categories and programs will be accomplished to ensure TxDOT does not lose federal apportionments and obligation authority. Should federal apportionments be reduced by obligation authority, state and local dollars that would no longer be required to match federal funds will allow TxDOT to advance projects with state funds, seek advanced construction funds, or defer projects until federal obligation authority is available. Any source of funding that is reduced or eliminated will be represented in revisions to the TIP and STIP funding summaries, and the TIP/STIP project listing to ensure fiscal constraint.

17 Estimated Revenues by Category FY 211 FY 212 FY 213 FY 214 Total State Highway Fund (SHF) 7,7,246,55 7,263,946,764 7,338,923,96 7,388,852,45 29,691,968,86 Texas Mobility Fund 312,43,468 15,51,742 37,883,13 148,55,623 63,879,936 Proposition 14 1,34,936,62 1,13,169, ,297, ,922,526 2,613,326,774 Proposition 12 1,877,526,1 87,312,643 35,161,347 2,,, Local Toll, Bond, Pass Through, Other 1,25,53, ,31,88 1,555,162,342 1,424,154, 4,465,41,748 SH 121 Proceeds 1,26,659,66 857,361,63 38,116,64 11,328,658 2,473,465,994 Federal Economic Stimulus (ARRA) 26,19, 26,19, Local Contributions and match 1,919,184, ,966,854 1,368,446,55 389,288,471 4,648,886,367 Total Estimated Revenues 15,282,227,281 1,58,3,424 11,81,99,246 9,578,61,728 46,523,119,679 Estimated Expenditures by Category STIP YOE Costs (Individual Project Listings) Advanced Construction Conversions Pass Through Repayments Grouped Projects (Eng, ROW, Cat 1, 6, 8) TxDOT Operating Expenditures TxDOT Existing Project Payments Other Agency Expenditures from SHF Total Estimated Expenditures Balance STIP Financial Summary FY 211 FY 212 FY 213 FY 214 Total 7,27,68,927 2,657,387,65 3,624,726,169 2,485,678,685 15,794,861,431 23,, 211,, 16,, 293,, 894,, 64,, 12,8, 177,5, 27,5, 569,8, 1,714,667,281 1,831,858,613 1,785,546,73 1,359,564,974 6,691,637,598 2,586,925,469 2,98,6,634 3,53,355,718 2,825,72,583 11,445,99,44 1,434,925,946 94,615, ,96,92 42,19,178 3,259,611, ,22,36 938,, 91,, 911,, 3,678,22,36 13,985,87,659 9,643,668,69 1,22,89,519 8,484,555,42 42,334,121,27 1,296,419, ,631, ,9,727 1,94,46,38 4,188,998,472 Estimated Revenues by Source FY 211 FY 212 FY 213 FY 214 Total Federal 3,424,986,72 3,41,18,364 3,41,126,792 3,365,619,332 13,592,841,28 State 4,31,449,83 3,862,838,4 3,937,796,34 4,23,233,118 16,125,317,652 Local Contributions and match 1,919,184, ,966,854 1,368,446,55 389,288,471 4,648,886,367 Local Toll, Bond, Pass Through, Other 1,25,53, ,31,88 1,555,162,342 1,424,154, 4,465,41,748 SH 121 Proceeds 1,26,659,66 857,361,63 38,116,64 11,328,658 2,473,465,994 Texas Mobility Fund 312,43,468 15,51,742 37,883,13 148,55,623 63,879,936 Proposition 14 1,34,936,62 1,13,169, ,297, ,922,526 2,613,326,774 Proposition 12 1,877,526,1 87,312,643 35,161,347 2,,, Total Estimated Revenues 15,282,227,281 1,58,3,424 11,81,99,246 9,578,61,728 46,523,119,679 Estimated Expenditures by Source FY 211 FY 212 FY 213 FY 214 Total Federal 3,463,945,594 3,16,533,356 2,746,112,24 2,728,328,248 12,98,919,42 State 3,819,13,77 4,166,423,857 4,14,3,797 3,855,87,7 15,944,645,431 Local Contributions and match 1,919,184, ,966,854 1,368,446,55 389,288,471 4,648,886,367 Local Toll, Bond, Pass Through, Other 1,25,53, ,31,88 1,555,162,342 1,424,154, 4,465,41,748 SH 121 Proceeds 1,26,659,66 857,361,63 38,116,64 78,637,464 2,45,774,8 Texas Mobility Fund 68,334,127 57,44,869 37,883,13 163,262,99 Proposition ,79,421 59,689,893 67,58,232 8,923,57 688,984,53 Proposition 12 1,733,59,952 87,312,643 35,161,347 1,855,533,942 Total Estimated Expenditures 13,968,131,452 9,641,364,91 1,222,492,72 8,484,418,76 42,316,47,842

18 Notes for Financial Summary State Highway Fund Used 3,225,619,332 for Federal funds, based on Advance Notice of Anticipated Apportionments, July 21 Used State Gas Tax, Registration Fees, Other Federal Reimbursements, Other Revenue from page 6 of April 21 Cash Forecast Texas Mobility Fund used Total Expense from page 7 of April 21 Cash Forecast Proposition 14 used Total Expense from page 9 of April 21 Cash Forecast Proposition 12 used Total Expense from page 1 of April 21 Cash Forecast Local Bond, Toll, Pass Through, Other used totals from TIPs SH 121 Proceeds used totals from TIPs and Eng/ROW totals from Regional Service Centers Federal Economic Stimulus (ARRA) used totals from TIPs Local Contributions used totals from TIPs STIP Year Of Expenditure (YOE) Costs (Individual Project Listings) Project Estimated Contract Obligations from TIPs Advanced Construction Conversions used totals from Finance division Pass Through Repayments used totals from Finance division Grouped Projects (Eng, ROW, Cat 1, 6, 8) Used Engineering and ROW totals from Regional Service Centers Used Categories 1, 6, and 8 totals from 21 UTP TxDOT Operating Expenditures Non Letting expenditures less Pass Through, SHF ROW and Engineering TxDOT Existing Payments Payments on SHF projects already let Other Agency Expenditures from SHF Including TxDOT benefits, TxDPS, TxDMV, etc. TxDOT may shift funds between sources, such as Texas Mobility Fund, Proposition 14, etc. to maintain financial constraint of available federal revenues or state gas tax and registration fees In addition, TxDOT's Finance division uses the Letting Schedule to balance federal obligation limitation and cash flow in order to maintain financial constraint Finally, TxDOT may use short term borrowing, up to 5 million, to fund projects or operating expenses

19 Statewide Summary of Estimated Project Costs and Anticipated Revenues The STIP document contains MPO and rural TIPs that list the projects and their programmed costs by geographic area. Based on the PTN Division s transit funding tables for statewide expenditures and spreadsheets generated by the districts using the PC STIP program (not including Grouped Project Categories unless projects in those categories were also listed individually), the Transportation Planning and Programming (TPP) Division has compiled the financial summary tables for programmed dollars for rural and MPO projects. Transit summaries for the projects in specific rural or MPO areas (not statewide), in most cases, are included in the individual rural or MPO TIPs. These summaries are compiled using funding allocations provided by PTN. It is important to note that these summary tables contain cost estimates and dollars for the projects that were listed and programmed at the time the MPOs and districts compiled the project lists, and that the actual cost of any one project will be more or less when that project is constructed or implemented.

20 FY 212 District / MPO ABILENE DISTRICT Abilene MPO AMARILLO DISTRICT Amarillo MPO 624,29 44, ,645 ATLANTA DISTRICT Texarkana MPO AUSTIN DISTRICT CAMPO 56,9, 8,891,328 65,791, ,735,892 59,732,88 6,, BEAUMONT DISTRICT JHORTS 891, ,518 BROWNWOOD DISTRICT BRYAN DISTRICT B C S MPO 8,23,524 5,39,418 4,856,34 18,477,282 CHILDRESS DISTRICT CORPUS DISTRICT Corpus Christi MPO 2,163,2 3,993,6 416, 6,572,8 1,539,2 DALLAS DISTRICT (NCTCOG) 3,2, 3,667,154 3,683,784 36,124,129 2,43,54 3,, 16,78,67 499,196,444 84,424,198 3,12,83 3,699,84 FORT WORTH DISTRICT (NCTCOG) 2,158,551 14,117,24 4,654,696 19,74,16 733,12 15,18,922 2,158,55 57,915,23 41,357,765 PARIS DISTRICT (NCTCOG) 6,158,579 1,865, 8,23,579 NCTCOG EL PASO DISTRICT El Paso MPO 5,, 4,814,666 19,55,872 29,365,538 HOUSTON DISTRICT HGAC 22,935,466 49,145,548 33,76,957 3,761,261 4,71,769 2,5, 6,5, 158,621,1 3,847,262 11,539, 23,76, LAREDO DISTRICT 9,77, 9,77, 788, Laredo MPO 6,5,6 6,5,6 1,63,49 LUBBOCK DISTRICT Lubbock MPO LUFKIN DISTRICT 2,5, 11,345,933 38,62,58 2,5, 8,5, 62,98,513 2,763,262 ODESSA DISTRICT 2,598,783 2,598,783 MOTOR 2,598,783 2,598,783 PARIS DISTRICT 3,16,374 1,, 4,16,374 ShermanDenison MPO 1,147,54 1,147,54 PHARR DISTRICT 1,378,74 1,378,74 4,76,46 Brownsville MPO 4,39,518 4,39,518 HSB MPO 5,328,41 5,328,41 194,442 Hidalgo MPO 8,64,315 1,, 9,64,315 4,642 SAN ANTONIO DISTRICT 19,, 19,, 16,, SABC MPO 19,483, 4,295, 23,778, 43,725, SAN ANGELO DISTRICT San Angelo MPO 3,685,739 6,275,717 9,961,456 TYLER DISTRICT Tyler MPO Longview MPO WACO DISTRICT 19,45,635 1,, 2,45,635 WUTS KT MPO WICHITA FALLS DISTRICT Wichita Falls MPO YOAKUM DISTRICT Victoria MPO District / MPO Funding Category Funding Category 1 TOTAL 17,177,54 86,998,666 13,687,796 19,, 99,635,91 46,684, ,997,33 38,62,58 23,9,16 19,823,222 24,916,812 15,, 634,883, ,227,85 71,271,88 1,5,184,198 3,12,83 3,699, Total 112 Total Local Contribution Local Contribution PROP 12 PROP 14 PROP 12 PROP 14 PTF PTF Regional Toll Revenue Regional Toll Revenue ARRA ARRA PE / ROW PE / ROW 2,657,387,65

21 FY 213 District / MPO Funding Category Total Local Contribution PROP 12 PROP 14 PTF Regional Toll Revenue ARRA 536 PE / ROW ABILENE DISTRICT Abilene MPO AMARILLO DISTRICT Amarillo MPO ATLANTA DISTRICT 843, ,648 29,471,437 Texarkana MPO AUSTIN DISTRICT CAMPO 71,, 71,, 114,875, BEAUMONT DISTRICT JHORTS 3,599,565 4,59,199 7,658,764 1,565,121 BROWNWOOD DISTRICT 6,726,1 6,726,1 BRYAN DISTRICT B C S MPO CHILDRESS DISTRICT CORPUS DISTRICT Corpus Christi MPO 24,249,728 5,616, 3,334,816 33,2,544 7,466,432 DALLAS DISTRICT (NCTCOG) 28,114,674 44,842,89 5,5, 78,457,564 2,78,438 35,399,47 24,111,439 2,37,588 FORT WORTH DISTRICT (NCTCOG) 15,25 13,389,727 2,817,468 1,25, 546, 36,153,445 35,53,898 PARIS DISTRICT (NCTCOG) NCTCOG EL PASO DISTRICT El Paso MPO 2,, 26,, 5,25,81 8,737,456 41,762,537 72,25 2,16,75 HOUSTON DISTRICT HGAC 5,29,167 29,67,389 12,281,578 13,859,73 2,126,544 17,94,381 5,13,582 52,999, 1,52,163,342 LAREDO DISTRICT Laredo MPO 2,645,559 2,645, ,39 LUBBOCK DISTRICT Lubbock MPO LUFKIN DISTRICT 17,2,295 1,443,21 18,643,496 ODESSA DISTRICT MOTOR PARIS DISTRICT ShermanDenison MPO 2,244,75 2,244,75 PHARR DISTRICT Brownsville MPO HSB MPO Hidalgo MPO 3,917,43 8,, ,482 12,71,436 SAN ANTONIO DISTRICT SABC MPO 21,249,799 2,243,938 1,183, 42,676,737 1,58,291,121 SAN ANGELO DISTRICT San Angelo MPO TYLER DISTRICT Tyler MPO Longview MPO WACO DISTRICT WUTS KT MPO 8,841,4 8,841,4 WICHITA FALLS DISTRICT Wichita Falls MPO YOAKUM DISTRICT Victoria MPO TOTAL 13,637, ,499,527 2,244,75 1,158, ,865,692 17,2,295 12,281,578 24,438,262 21,134, ,459,911 1,318,178,669 35,399,47 52,999, 1,742,274,781 2,37,588 2,16,75 District / MPO Funding Category Total Local Contribution PROP 12 PROP 14 PTF Regional Toll Revenue ARRA 536 PE / ROW 3,624,726,169

22 FY 214 District / MPO Funding Category Total Local Contribution PROP 12 PROP 14 PTF Regional Toll Revenue ARRA 536 PE / ROW ABILENE DISTRICT Abilene MPO AMARILLO DISTRICT Amarillo MPO 4,486, ,94 4,971,88 ATLANTA DISTRICT 5,825,387 5,825,387 Texarkana MPO AUSTIN DISTRICT CAMPO 7,5, 7,5, BEAUMONT DISTRICT JHORTS BROWNWOOD DISTRICT BRYAN DISTRICT B C S MPO CHILDRESS DISTRICT CORPUS DISTRICT Corpus Christi MPO 2,339,717 3,996,234 6,335, ,59 DALLAS DISTRICT (NCTCOG) 2,, 28,176,814 75,, 46,775,41 16,, 185,952,224 2,237,273 8,923,57 91,779,581 1,72,836 1,928,376 FORT WORTH DISTRICT (NCTCOG) 13,518,473 2,693,219 3,742,5 37,954,192 49,21,966 PARIS DISTRICT (NCTCOG) NCTCOG EL PASO DISTRICT El Paso MPO 5,58,772 9,983,62 15,42,374 HOUSTON DISTRICT HGAC 81,35,17 28,181,843 56,126,668 3,546,63 2,5, 32,347, 24,7,311 63,894,269 1,424,154, LAREDO DISTRICT Laredo MPO 927,12 927,12 231,78 LUBBOCK DISTRICT Lubbock MPO 9,793,261 15,482,362 25,275,623 LUFKIN DISTRICT ODESSA DISTRICT MOTOR PARIS DISTRICT 8,947,641 2,5, 11,447,641 ShermanDenison MPO PHARR DISTRICT Brownsville MPO HSB MPO Hidalgo MPO 1,347,784 7,36,14 1,4, 269,556 1,53, ,247 SAN ANTONIO DISTRICT 2,5, 2,5, 5,, SABC MPO 16,467, 16,467, 27,24,17 SAN ANGELO DISTRICT San Angelo MPO TYLER DISTRICT Tyler MPO Longview MPO 1,3, 1,3, WACO DISTRICT 45,356 45,356 WUTS 5,2, 5,2, KT MPO WICHITA FALLS DISTRICT Wichita Falls MPO YOAKUM DISTRICT Victoria MPO TOTAL 12,795, ,938,148 1,986,994 74,935,92 75,, 176,56,59 25,616,25 14,484,393 32,347, 66,664, ,155,764 8,923,57 1,515,933,581 1,72,836 1,928,376 District / MPO Funding Category Total Local Contribution PROP 12 PROP 14 PTF Regional Toll Revenue ARRA 536 PE / ROW 2,485,678,685

23 Public Involvement TxDOT carried out public involvement activities for the STIP in accordance with its SAFETEALU compliant Statewide Public Involvement Plan ( Notices, signin sheets, comments and responses (if applicable) are included in an Appendix to this Introduction chapter. Public involvement activities for the individual TIPs were carried out at the local/regional level by TxDOT districts and/or MPOs. Information regarding these efforts can be found in the TIP documents on the individual MPO websites.

24 s=* I Texas Department of Transportation P.O. BOX AUSTIN, TEXAS (512) 4865 July 28, 21 Mr. Dan Deerinwate File: TPP(S) Regional Director (512) Bureau of Indian Affairs P.O. Box 368 Anadarko, Oklahoma 735 Dear Mr. Deerinwate: Attached is the Texas Department of Transportation public hearing notice regarding the Statewide Transportation Improvement Program (STIP) that has been published in the Texas Register on July 23, 21. In accordance with 23 CFR (a), we are notifying you that projects under your purview are included in the STIP, and would like to provide you with the opportunity to comment on this document. A draft copy of the STIP is available online at or if you would like a copy on CD ROM, please contact Lori Morel at (512) We are not seeking comments under Section 16 of the National Historic Preservation Act and any response provided does not limit your rights under Section 16 or any other federal statute. In order to be considered, interested parties who are unable to attend the hearing may submit comments no later than September 7,21 at 4: p.m. to the following address: James L. Randall, P.E. Director, Transportation Planning and Programming P.O. Box Austin, Texas If you have any questions or need further information, Please contact Lori Morel at (512) Sincerely, r ~ ~a.lr Attachment James L. Randall, P.E. Director, Transportation Planning and Programming cc: bc: Mike Leary, Federal Highway Administration Jose Campos, Federal Highway Administration Kirk Fauver, Federal Highway Administration Jack Foster, P.E., Transportation Planning and Programming, TxDOT Lori Morel, Transportation Planning and Programming, TxDOT John Barton, P.E., ADM Angie Parker, OGC THE TEXAS PLAN REDUCE CONGESTION ENHANCE SAFETY EXPAND ECONOMIC OPPORTUNITY. IMPROVE AIR QUALITY INCREASE THE VALUE OF OUR TRANSPORTATION ASSETS An Equal Opportunity Employer

25 Last First Position Company Address City State / Zip Code Allen Robert MPO Director City of Abilene 4 Oak Street #1 Abilene Texas 7962 Holwick Gary MPO Director City of Amarillo P.O. Box 1971 Amarillo Texas 7915 McDanile Maureen MPO Director Capital Area Metropolitan Planning Organization Dickinson Bob MPO Director SETRPC P.O. Box 188 Austin Texas Eastex Freeway Beaumont Texas 7773 Lund Mark Lund MPO Director City of Brownsville P.O. Box 911 Brownsville Texas LaSut Linda MPO Director Niskala Tom MPO Director Morris, P.E. Michael MPO Director Gilyard Roy MPO Director Castillo Rebeca MPO Director Canon Andrew A. MPO Director Clark Alan MPO Director Shephers Annette MPO Director Selman Keith MPO Director Owen Karen MPO Director Jones H. David MPO Director Owens Melba MPO Director Bryan/College Station Metropolitan Planning Organization Corpus Christi Metropolitan Planning Organization North Central Texas Council of Governments El Paso Metropolitan Planning Organization HarlingenSan Benito Metropolitan Planning Organization Hidalgo County Metropolitan Planning Organization HoustonGalveston Area Council KilleenTemple Metropolitan Planning Organization Laredo Urban Transportation Study Longview Metropolitan Planning Organization Lubbock Metropolitan Planning Organization MidlandOdessa Transportation Organization 368 East 29th St., Ste Flynn Parkway, Ste. 44 Bryan Texas 7782 Corpus Christi Texas P.O. Box 5888 Arlington Texas Gateway Blvd. West, Ste East Tyler Street 51 S. Pleasantview Drive El Paso Texas Harlingen Texas 7855 Weslaco Texas P.O. Box Houston Texas P.O. Box 729 Belton Texas San Bernardo Ave. Laredo Texas 7842 P.O. Box 1952 Longview Texas Main St., Ste. 76 Lubbock Texas 7941 P.O. Box 6916 Odessa Texas 79711

26 Last First Position Company Address City State / Zip Code Smetana E Lisa MPO Director Martinez Sid MPO Director Wood Robert MPO Director McClaeb, P.E. Brad MPO Director Holly Barbara MPO Director City of San Angelo (MPO) San Antonio/Bexar County Metropolitan Planning Organization ShermanDenison Metropolitan Planning Organization Texarkana Metropolitan Planning Organization Tyler Metropolitan Planning Organization P.O. Box 1751 San Angelo Texas S. St Marys San Antonio Texas Gallagher Dr., Ste. 3 Sherman Texas Texas Blvd Texarkana Texas 7551 P. O. Box 259 Tyler Texas 7571 Miller, AICP Ray MPO Director City of Victoria P.O. Box 1758 Victoria Texas 7792 Evilia, AICP Christopher MPO Director Barnett Lin MPO Director McAllister Margie Planner Evans Heather Planner Crist Peggy Patrick Robert C. Administrator, Region VI Waco Metropolitan Planning Organization Wichita Falls Metropolitan Planning Organization Texas Commission on Environmental Quality Texas Commission on Environmental Quality Federal Transit Authority Federal Transit Authority Planning Dept. P.O. Box Seymour Highway Waco Texas 7672 Wichita Falls Texas 7631 P.O. Box 1387 Austin Texas P.O. Box 1387 Austin Texas 819 Taylor Street Fort Worth Texas Taylor Street Fort Worth Texas 7612 Henley Elijah Central Federal Lands Highway Division 123 W. Dakota Avenue Lakewood Colorado 8228 Smith Carter Executive Director Texas Parks and Wildlife Department 42 Smith School Road Austin Texas Sallese Christopher W. Commander U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Southwestern Division P.O Galveston Texas Joss Lora Acting Regional Director National Park Service / Intermountain Region W. Alameda Parkway Lakewood Colorado 8228 Stallings Robin Executive Director Texas Bicycle Coalition 192 E. 6th Street Austin Texas 7872

27 Last First Position Company Address City State / Zip Code Blanchard George Governor AbsenteeShawnee Tribe of Oklahoma 225 S. Cooper Dr. Shawnee Shawnee 7481 Celestine Bryant J. Yargee Tarpie Chief Maynahonah Louis Chairman Worthington Andele Archeologist Cast Robert THPO Smith Chadwick Principal Chief Pyle Gregory E. Chief Arterberry Jimmy THPO Sickey Kevin Chairperson Blythe Jeffrey Director Hobia Tiger Town King Salazar Gilbert Chairperson Garza, Jr. Juan Chairperson Eskew Naiche Palmer Ellis Jame Carleton A.D. President Principal Chief Rolin Buford Chairperson Berrey John Chairperson Harjo Leonard M. Principal Chief Francis Tamara Director Scott George Town King Historic Preservation Officer Alabama Quassarte Tribal Town Apache Tribe of Oklahoma Southern Plains Region Caddo Nation of Oklahoma Cherokee Nation of Oklahoma Choctaw Nation of Oklahoma Comanche Nation of Oklahoma Coushatta Tribe of Louisiana Cultural Affairs Office Kialegee Tribal Town Business Committee GPRA Coordinator c/o Kiowa Culture Preservation Authority c/o Holly Houghten, THPO Creek National Tribal Complex Poarch Band of Creek Indians Quapaw Tribe of Indians Seminole Nation of Oklahoma Cultural Preservation Thlopthlocco Tribal Town 575 State Park Rd 56 Livingston Livingston P.O. Box 187 Wetumka Wetumka P.O. Box 122 Anadarko Anadarko 735 P.O. Box 368 Anadarko Anadarko 735 P.O. Box 487 Binger Binger 739 P.O. Box 948 Tahlequah Tahlequah Drawer 121 Durant Durant 7472 Comanche Nation Office of Historic Preservation Lawton Lawton 7352 P.O. Box 818 Elton Elton 7532 P.O. Box 57 Dulce Dulce P.O. Box 332 Wetumka Wetumka P.O. Box 7 McLoud McLoud HC1 Route, Box 97 Eagle Pass Eagle Pass P.O. Box 885 Carnegie Carnegie 7315 P.O. Box 227 Mescalero Mescalero 8834 P.O. Box 58 Okmulgee Okmulgee Jack Springs Road Atmore Atmore 3652 P.O. Box 765 Quapaw Quapaw P.O. Box 1498 Wewoka Wewoka P.O. Box 825 Anadarko Anadarko 735 P.O. Box 188 Okemah Okemah 74859

28 Last First Position Company Address City State / Zip Code Patterson Don President Barbry Earl Chairperson Stopp Lisa C. LaRue Acting THPO Standing Leslie President Paiz Frank K. Deerinwate Dan Tribal Governor Regional Director Tonkawa Tribe of Indians of Oklahoma TunicaBiloxi Tribe of Louisiana United Keetoowah Band of Cherokee Indians Wichita and Affiliated Tribes Ysleta del Sur Pueblo Bureau of Indian Affairs 1 Rush Buffalo Rd Tonkawa Tonkawa P.O. Box 1589 Marksville Marksville P.O. Box 746 Tahlequah Tahlequah P.O. Box 729 Anadarko Anadarko 735 P.O. Box Ysleta Station El Paso El Paso P.O. Box 368 Anadarko Anadarko 735

29 Appendix

30 April 21 Cash Forecast

31 Table of Contents Texas Department of Transportation April 21 Forecast Executive Summary 1 Total Letting Amounts 2 Total Expenses 3 Bond Programs Debt Service 4 State Highway Fund Operating Balance 5 State Highway Fund Operating Account Cash Forecast 6 Texas Mobility Fund Bond Proceeds 7 Texas Mobility Fund Taxes and Fees 8 Proposition 14 State Highway Fund Bond Proceeds 9 Proposition 12 General Revenue Bond Proceeds 1 SH 121 Proceeds 11 SH 13 (Segments 5 & 6) Proceeds 12 Federal Economic Stimulus Funds (ARRA) 13

32 Executive Summary Forecasting of revenues, expenditures, and fund balances is a critical function of the Texas Department of Transportation (TxDOT). The cash balance of the State Highway Fund (SHF) changes daily. Likewise, the needs of the traveling public and subsequent responsibilities of TxDOT continue to change. TxDOT maintains a primary obligation to the citizens of Texas to efficiently construct and maintain the best possible highway system with the resources available. Therefore, it is important for TxDOT to maintain a method by which revenue sources and expenditure needs can be tied together in an effort to project the future cash flows so that adjustments to project schedules or other expenditures may be made to maintain positive cash balances. TxDOT monitors cash flows through the cash management system, which is strategically connected with the administrative, accounting, payment management, revenue collection, budgeting, letting, and planning and programming activities of the department. The cash forecasting system is a vital and integral part of the cash management system. The forecast is used by TxDOT executive staff and the Finance Division to plan and implement highway construction and maintenance projects. In addition, the forecast is submitted to the Legislative Budget Board and other state agencies for their use and reference. In addition to the groups mentioned above, the Financial Planning Group (FPG) meets quarterly to review TxDOT s financial status. The FPG consists of the Executive Director, Deputy Executive Director, Chief Financial Officer, Assistant Executive Directors, various division and office directors, and other relevant staff. These meetings provide for group discussion and action on issues affecting the Department s operations and finances, such as contract letting. The content of the cash forecast includes revenue and expenditure projections, historical revenue and expenditures, and monthly ending and lowest daily balances for the various funding sources appropriated to TxDOT. The forecast also includes revenue and expenditure activity from other agencies operating in the SHF. A chart of the actual and projected SHF balance is included on page 4 to provide a picture of the cash position at a glance. Future revenue is projected based on financial analysis that includes historical trends, current statutes, the Comptroller s Biennial Revenue Estimate (BRE), current events, and other sources as appropriate. Federal highway reimbursement projections also take into account the current highway bill (SAFETEALU), rescissions on obligation authority and apportionment, and other requirements made by the Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) and the Federal government for the use of those funds. Future expenditures are projected based on budgets established within the framework of the General Appropriations Act (GAA), contract letting amounts in TxDOT s eleven year Unified Transportation Program (UTP), remaining obligations on previously let projects, and other relevant data. To account for the effects of inflation, additional programs, legislative changes, etc., the forecast adds a percentage of total expenditures less contractor payments to a growth expenditure line item. Historical revenue and expenditure data is balanced monthly to the Comptroller s Uniform Statewide Accounting System (USAS) before inclusion in the cash forecast. The total USAS balance in the SHF includes dedicated and obligated funds, so ending balances in the cash forecast that take those into account may differ from the USAS total. For example, the Dallas area SH121 Toll Project led to an initial deposit of billion into a dedicated subaccount in the SHF for future use by that region. That balance is legally unavailable for general use and is subtracted from the SHF balance when determining the operating balance of the fund. Monthly Ending Balances and Lowest Daily Balances are projected so that TxDOT can manage SHF cash flow through the budget and letting process and through the use of shortterm borrowing. Historically, TxDOT could not borrow funds. The 78 th Legislature provided that capability, and TxDOT now manages 1618 billion in yearly SHF transactions while maintaining an average daily operating balance below 1 million. This permits TxDOT to maximize the use of available cash in the SHF while allowing for daily balance swings caused by the timing of revenue and expenditures. The cash forecast spans multiple funding sources, including the SHF, Texas Mobility Fund (TMF) Bond Proceeds, Proposition 14 Bond Proceeds, SH 121 Toll Project Revenue, SH 13 Concession Funds, and General Revenue. Proposition 12 General Revenue Bond Proceeds are included as a scenario in the event that those funds are appropriated to TxDOT. As mentioned previously, the cash forecast must take into account multiple funding sources, restrictions on the use of those funds, timing issues related to cash flow from revenue and expenditures, Federal and state regulations, economic uncertainty, other agency operations in the SHF, and many other variables. Texas Department of Transportation Executive Summary April 21 Forecast The cash forecast must therefore make some assumptions when projecting future revenue and expenditures. Notable assumptions, changes from previous forecasts, and brief discussions of the scenarios and cash balance effects are summarized below. Assumptions Revenue growth per year: Vehicle Registration Fees 4.5%, State Gas Tax for FY211FY221 is forecast based on.5% growth for gasoline while diesel grows at the projected retail sales growth rate, Lubricants Tax BRE for FY21FY211 then varies according to the Comptroller s GSP projections, miscellaneous revenue 1%. Some figures may not exactly match the percentages above due to rounding. State Gas Tax projections have been updated for FY21 FY221 based on TxDOT analysis and consultation with Global Insight. FY211 FY221 diesel revenue is projected based on the retail sales forecast by Global Insight. Diesel has been found to be highly correlated to retail sales historically. Gasoline is forecast at.5% growth annually based on historical trends and current analysis. Future corresponding federal reimbursements have also been adjusted. Proposition 14 debt service is based on issuing a total of 6.B in state highway fund bonds. Texas Emissions Reduction Program (TERP) continues through FY221. Other Expansion and Growth increases at 5% annually to account for future increases to TxDOT, inflation, new legislation, etc. The calculation does not include other agencies, TxDOT contractor payments, nor payments for debt service or passthrough toll agreements. Shortterm borrowing is completely repaid during FY211. PE/CE expenditures are approximately 17% of letting and ROW expenditures are approximately 5% for FY212FY221. Direct functions that transferred to the new Department of Motor Vehicles (DMV) in November, 29 are reflected in the Other Agency expenditure line item. This includes Vehicle Registration and Motor Vehicle Dealer Regulation. The Transportation Commission is considering a toll equity loan to NTTA for eligible expenses related to the SH 161 and/or Southwest Parkway Chisholm Trail projects. If such a loan is approved, the Department would make annual loans available to NTTA that could total 1.1B over ten years, with an overall total of 8.2B through FY242 possible. These amounts are not included in the cash forecast at this time. Due to the timing lag between the initial receipt of ARRA reimbursements into Fund 6 and the subsequent transfer of those funds into Fund 369 under Comptroller guidelines, the FHWA Reimbursements shown on page 6 of 13 is inflated by the amount of the ARRA reimbursements for the previous month. Transfer adjustments are made monthly to compensate. Changes from March 21 Cash Forecast Updated with actual revenue and expenditures for the month of March 21. Updated Proposition 14 and Texas Mobility Fund forecast expenditures with current obligation amounts. Current year projected totals were reviewed and adjusted in some cases based on current information. Shortterm borrowing repayments in FY 211 adjusted to reflect outstanding balance. State and federal motor fuels tax revenues were adjusted for FY21 FY221 (see comments above). Expenditure reductions for FTE vacancies have reduced projections in administrative, research, inhouse maintenance, and engineering areas. These reductions total about 44M per year. TxDOT Retirement & Insurance were also adjusted. Build America Bonds interest subsidy added to the TMF Taxes and Fees page. Adjustments made for preliminarily approved AFRs for FY211 FY213. Significant variances from March 21 Cash Forecast State motor fuels tax revenue projections declined by approximately 58M from FY21 FY221 (see comments above) Federal funds tied to motor fuels tax revenue declined by a net of approximately 48M. Impact of the projected letting schedule on cash balances The current letting schedule, when combined with previous obligations, Proposition 14 debt service, and the repayment of shortterm borrowing, results in a projected SHF ending balance of 519,679,892 in FY21. See pgs 45. Scenarios Proposition 12: This scenario assumes the full use of the 5B in general obligation bonds authorized under Proposition 12. Commitments made in the base forecast are 3B. Appropriations for FY21 FY211 are 2B, and a further 1B would need to be appropriated in the next biennium to support the 1.85B of letting in the forecast. The scenario for the remaining 2B will use 1M for engineering, 1M for rightofway, and 8M for letting in each of FY212 and FY213. Impact of scenarios on the projected letting schedule and cash balances The Proposition 12 scenario would result in 8M of additional letting in FY212 and 8M in FY213. There would be no impact to TxDOT fund balances, but the general revenue fund would pay additional debt service on the general obligation bonds used in this scenario. J:\Forecast\FORDATA\FY 1\Apr 21\Reports\April 21NEW Forecast FIL.xls Page 1 of 13 6/25/21 9:57 AM

33 Texas Department of Transportation Total Letting Amounts April 21 Forecast Letting Program FY 28 FY 29 FY 21 FY 211 FY 212 FY 213 FY 214 FY 215 FY 216 FY 217 FY 218 FY 219 FY 22 FY 221 Funding Source Actual Actual Forecast Forecast Forecast Forecast Forecast Forecast Forecast Forecast Forecast Forecast Forecast Forecast State Highway Fund 1 2,452,377,184 1,525,42,68 1,567,729,651 1,54,117,574 2,9,768,115 2,1,218,114 2,114,718,114 2,192,318,716 2,279,368,116 2,346,268,116 2,373,268,117 2,395,918,116 2,425,918,116 2,442,918,116 Texas Mobility Fund 272,742,323 Proposition 14 35,794,829 3,936,8 69,44,36 79,559,64 Proposition ,48,11 1,325,86,467 SH ,379, ,81,957 34,642, ,386, ,117, ,413,142 11,586,94 35,721,947 19,242,832 2,245,292,728 SH 13 (Seg. 5 & 6) 8,279,334 8,, 2,, 2,, 4,3, 6,, 6,, 5,, 4,5, 6,, 6,, 7,, 7,, Federal Economic Stimulus (ARRA) 728,753,183 1,278,461,963 Total Letting 3,22,573,8 2,827,893,288 4,2,682,86 4,97,87,27 2,642,885,412 2,381,931,256 2,132,35,18 2,234,4,663 2,33,61,948 2,35,768,116 2,379,268,117 2,41,918,116 2,432,918,116 4,695,21,844 Proposition 12 Scenario 8,, 8,, Total Potential Letting 3,22,573,8 2,827,893,288 4,2,682,86 4,97,87,27 3,442,885,412 3,181,931,256 2,132,35,18 2,234,4,663 2,33,61,948 2,35,768,116 2,379,268,117 2,41,918,116 2,432,918,116 4,695,21,844 Comprehensive Development Agreements (CDAs) FY 28 FY 29 FY 21 FY 211 FY 212 FY 213 FY 214 FY 215 FY 216 FY 217 FY 218 FY 219 FY 22 FY 221 Funding Source Actual Actual Forecast Forecast Forecast Forecast Forecast Forecast Forecast Forecast Forecast Forecast Forecast Forecast State Highway Fund 2 1,533,88,768 Local Funds 73,, Federal Economic Stimulus (ARRA) 25,, SH 121 1,, Private 3 3,827,87,47 Total CDA Letting 5 5,783,896,175 Grand Total Project Awards 3,22,573,8 8,611,789,463 4,2,682,86 4,97,87,27 3,442,885,412 3,181,931,256 2,132,35,18 2,234,4,663 2,33,61,948 2,35,768,116 2,379,268,117 2,41,918,116 2,432,918,116 4,695,21,844 Ongoing CDA O&M (Private) 4 4,,, Total CDA Value 9,783,896,175 Letting is a contract award amount. The letting figures above will have cash expenditures during the year of letting and during future years until the projects are completed. Subsequent pages of this forecast depict the actual and projected cash expenditures resulting from these letting amounts. 1 FY29FY211 SHF letting does not include funds committed over time for the CDAs in the Dallas area. See footnote #3 below for more information on the CDAs. 2 1B of Proposition 12 proceeds will be used to capitalize the State Infrastructure Bank (SIB) in FY Comprehensive Development Agreements do not go through the traditional statewide letting process and are therefore listed separately. TxDOT's total participation for Comprehensive Development Agreements awarded by the Commission to the DallasFort Worth region is billion, which will be charged to the letting program over a three year period beginning in FY 29. Payments will occur over an approximately five year period in accordance with the agreements. The figures include rightofway and engineering costs in addition to the construction costs. The figures do not include ongoing Operations and Maintenance expenditures nor financing costs, and for the NTE and LBJ projects this will be the responsibility of the private developer. 4 Ongoing operations and maintenance costs are the responsibility of the private developer. These costs are a significant part of the total value of the CDA projects, and that additional value is represented in the grey box below the letting totals. 5 Total CDA letting amount does not include rightofway costs approved as part of the project cost. J:\Forecast\FORDATA\FY 1\Apr 21\Reports\April 21NEW Forecast FIL.xls Page 2 of 13 6/25/21 9:57 AM

34 Texas Department of Transportation Total Expenses April 21 Forecast BASE CASE FY 28 FY 29 FY 21 FY 211 FY 212 FY 213 FY 214 FY 215 FY 216 FY 217 FY 218 FY 219 FY 22 FY 221 Actual Actual Forecast Forecast Forecast Forecast Forecast Forecast Forecast Forecast Forecast Forecast Forecast Forecast Expenses Research 22,532,21 21,328,177 22,75,134 22,73,44 22,18,924 22,189,17 21,7, 21,7, 21,7, 21,7, 21,7, 21,7, 21,7, 21,7, Engineering 663,193, ,133, ,55, ,387,299 69,577,362 58,81, ,981, ,98,32 39,385, ,, 394,, 399,, 399,, 399,, RightofWay 538,775, ,68, ,893, ,76,688 58,713, ,91, ,252,19 127,295, ,657,91 121,, 123,, 125,, 125,, 125,, Plan It 1,224,51,529 1,28,142,45 1,348,23,734 1,543,537,31 1,293,472,48 693,181, ,933,69 53,94, ,743,36 53,7, 538,7, 545,7, 545,7, 545,7, Build It 3,33,775,471 2,76,653,133 2,147,388,6 4,257,464,457 3,46,239,287 2,719,715,53 2,85,495,541 1,855,857,742 1,59,66,456 1,524,78,541 1,511,918,98 1,536,312,24 1,53,729,483 1,48,625,966 Maintain It 2,722,428,255 2,583,184,286 2,891,171,877 2,888,775,379 3,381,758,246 3,98,383,866 2,348,851,962 2,233,457,53 2,247,586,253 2,295,712,67 2,291,76,577 2,39,65,99 2,322,871,341 2,331,653,943 Use It 318,287,91 253,18,893 24,5, ,145, ,541,61 185,528, ,813, ,813, ,813, ,813, ,813, ,813, ,813, ,813,884 Manage It 23,428, ,192,35 224,684,438 24,46, ,327, ,732,315 21,9, 21,9, 21,9, 21,9, 21,9, 21,9, 21,9, 21,9, *ShortTerm Borrowing D/S 244,524, ,825,42 295,64,675 65,, *Proposition 14 Debt Service 15,664, ,359, ,826, ,831, ,537,529 5,794, ,135,52 497,135,52 497,135, ,135,5 497,135, ,135,51 497,135,54 497,135,497 Texas Mobility Fund Debt Service 28,846, ,397, ,258, ,24, ,836, ,45, ,39,939 37,9, ,25,97 382,761, ,255,18 394,973,864 42,533,548 41,764,885 Proposition 12 Debt Service 8,, 147,16, 22,74, 22,74, 22,74, 22,74, 22,74, 22,74, 22,74, 22,74, 22,74, **Inflation / Additional Programs 144,3, 261,8, 379,7, 497,9, 616,3, 735,1, 854,3, 973,5, Total Expenses 8,376,457,558 7,727,773,551 7,663,458,65 9,916,364,943 9,448,872,99 7,999,481,597 6,557,48,518 6,328,59,642 6,122,935,221 6,37,443,937 6,422,839,956 6,597,326,263 6,74,723,761 6,817,834,176 Funding Source State Highway Fund 1 5,733,721,767 5,74,719,681 4,528,616,278 5,257,889,841 5,946,453,752 5,794,715,382 5,338,64,44 5,614,973,574 5,465,694,744 5,682,21,13 5,787,377,739 5,973,37,416 6,56,437,225 6,177,24,37 Texas Mobility Fund Bond Proceeds 2 1,277,328,34 645,797,862 62,874, ,43,468 15,51,742 18,21,365 Texas Mobility Fund Taxes & Fees 3 28,846, ,397, ,258, ,24, ,836, ,45, ,39,939 37,9, ,25,97 382,761, ,255,18 394,973,864 42,533,548 41,764,885 Proposition ,154,997 5,361, ,55,45 1,34,936,62 1,13,169, ,297,663 56,651,97 5,54,146 Proposition ,192,412 1,625,453, ,91, ,921, ,384,473 29,817,425 SH ,46, ,48, ,24, ,562,975 78,767,18 649,984, ,831,29 43,829,289 37,237,394 14,935,996 1,454,212 SH 13 (Seg. 5 & 6) 7 16,, 2,, 2,, 4,3, 6,, 6,, 5,, 4,5, 6,, 6,, 7,, 7,, Federal Economic Stimulus (ARRA) 8 47,15, ,425,9 611,582, ,51, ,79,554 57,946,49 34,43,393 GR Debt Service 9 3,, 15,78,4 8,, 162,868,4 22,74, 236,448,4 22,74, 236,448,4 22,74, 236,448,4 22,74, 236,448,4 22,74, General Revenue (GR) 1 14,123,783 2,34,983 2,34,983 2,34,983 2,34,983 2,34,983 2,34,983 2,34,983 2,34,983 2,34,983 2,34,983 2,34,983 Total Funds 8,376,457,558 7,727,773,551 7,663,458,65 9,916,364,943 9,448,872,99 7,999,481,597 6,557,48,518 6,328,59,642 6,122,935,221 6,37,443,937 6,422,839,956 6,597,326,263 6,74,723,761 6,817,834,176 * Includes debt service paid from GR. Figures do not include TxDOT employee benefits (insurance premiums, Social Security, etc.) paid by other agencies. 1 See page 6 of 13 of this forecast for details. 2 See page 7 of 13 of this forecast for details. 3 See page 8 of 13 of this forecast for details. 4 See page 9 of 13 of this forecast for details. 5 See page 1 of 13 of this forecast for details. Amount and timing of funds for Proposition 12 to be determined. 6 See page 11 of 13 of this forecast for details. 7 See page 12 of 13 of this forecast for details. 8 See page 13 of 13 of this forecast for details. 9 Appropriation of 3M of General Revenue (GR) for debt service provided through Article IX Sec 19.8 of 289 General Appropriations Act (GAA). Appropriation of 15.7M for debt service provided through General Appropriations Act (GAA). 1 Previous cash forecasts did not include GR. Historical GR expenditures will be added beginning with the September 29 cash forecast. ** Inflation / Additional Programs refers to increased nonletting and other costs from inflationary factors and to any change in appropriation or statute requiring expenditures from the State Highway Fund in areas not previously receiving those funds. J:\Forecast\FORDATA\FY 1\Apr 21\Reports\April 21NEW Forecast FIL.xls Page 3 of 13 6/25/21 9:57 AM

35 Texas Department of Transportation Bond Programs Debt Service April 21 Forecast BASE CASE FY 28 FY 29 FY 21 FY 211 FY 212 FY 213 FY 214 FY 215 FY 216 FY 217 FY 218 FY 219 FY 22 FY 221 Texas Mobility Fund 28,846, ,397, ,258, ,24, ,836, ,45, ,39,939 37,9, ,25,97 382,761, ,255,18 394,973,864 42,533,548 41,764,885 Proposition 14 15,664, ,359, ,826, ,831, ,537,529 5,794, ,135,52 497,135,52 497,135, ,135,5 497,135, ,135,51 497,135,54 497,135,497 Proposition ,, 147,16, 22,74, 22,74, 22,74, 22,74, 22,74, 22,74, 22,74, 22,74, 22,74, Total Expenses 359,511,17 59,757, ,85,98 739,35, ,533,822 1,8,939,848 1,83,185,441 1,88,776,333 1,94,125,592 1,1,637,445 1,17,13,515 1,112,849,365 1,12,49,53 1,128,64,383 Funding Source Texas Mobility Fund Taxes & Fees 3 28,846, ,397, ,258, ,24, ,836, ,45, ,39,939 37,9, ,25,97 382,761, ,255,18 394,973,864 42,533,548 41,764,885 State Highway Fund 2 38,124,95 329,359, ,118, ,831, ,829,525 5,794, ,427, ,135,52 481,427, ,135,5 481,427, ,135,51 481,427,5 497,135,497 General Revenue (GR) 4 112,539,967 15,78,4 8,, 162,868,4 22,74, 236,448,4 22,74, 236,448,4 22,74, 236,448,4 22,74, 236,448,4 22,74, Total Funds 359,511,17 59,757, ,85,98 739,35, ,533,822 1,8,939,848 1,83,185,441 1,88,776,333 1,94,125,592 1,1,637,445 1,17,13,515 1,112,849,365 1,12,49,53 1,128,64,383 1 Proposition 12 debt service is on the first 3B of proceeds and does not include the 2B that may be appropriated in the future. 2 The State Highway Fund repays the majority of the principal and interest for the Proposition 14 bond program. General Revenue was also appropriated for FY28 and FY21. GR appropriations for Proposition 14 debt service are assumed to continue in even years in the future at the same level as FY21. 3 The Texas Mobility Fund, made up of taxes and fees set aside by statute for that purpose, repays the principal and interest for the Texas Mobility Fund bond program. 4 General Revenue repays the principal and interest for the Proposition 12 bond program. Some GR was also appropriated for Proposition 14 debt service in FY28 and FY21. GR appropriations for Proposition 14 debt service are assumed to continue in even years in the future. J:\Forecast\FORDATA\FY 1\Apr 21\Reports\April 21NEW Forecast FIL.xls Page 4 of 13 6/25/21 9:57 AM

36 USAS Ending Balance 3,132,667, Less dedicated/obligated funds: State Highway Fund Operating Balance as of March 31, 21 SH 121 (2,489,659,717.15) Prop 14 / SHF Bonds (275,369,438.59) SH 13 (Segments 5 & 6) (27,341,281.7) State Infrastructure Bank (86,82,534.93) North Tarrant Express Mobility Partners (169,783.13) CTTS Holding (1,175,312.16) Ending Balance 243,149, Cash Reserved for Payroll (96,8,397.88) Remaining Balance for Operations 147,14, ,, 625,, 55,, 475,, 4,, 325,, 25,, 175,, 1,, 25,, (5,,) (125,,) ACTUAL Balance of the State Highway Fund No. 6 PROJECTED The temporary increase is due to the delay in issuing additional Proposition 14 bonds, which delayed the need for additional debt service. It is also due to the delay in state participation for the DFW Connector. These funds will be needed for those expenses in the future and are not available for other purposes. Lowest Daily Balance Target Decline reflects the repayment of shortterm debt and the increased debt service for the additional 2.9B of Proposition 14 projected to be issued. (2,,) Shortterm borrowing outstanding 25,8,. Apr8 Jun8 Aug8 Oct8 Dec8 Feb9 Apr9 Jun9 Aug9 Oct9 Dec9 Feb1 Apr1 Jun1 Aug1 Oct1 Dec1 Feb11 Apr11 Jun11 Aug11 Oct11 Dec11 Feb12 Apr12 Ending Monthly Balance* LEGEND Highest Daily Balance Lowest Daily Balance * For the ending monthly balances, the actual months are shown by the blue line and the projected months are shown by the red line. ** If projected negative balances actually occur, additional shortterm borrowing will be needed to cover expenditures. Note that currently TxDOT has in place a facility to have no more than 5 million in shortterm borrowing outstanding. J:\Forecast\FORDATA\FY 1\Apr 21\Reports\April 21NEW Forecast FIL.xls Page 5 of 13 6/25/21 9:57 AM

37 Texas Department of Transportation State Highway Fund Operating Account Cash Forecast April 21 Forecast BASE CASE FY 28 FY 29 FY 21 FY 211 FY 212 FY 213 FY 214 FY 215 FY 216 FY 217 FY 218 FY 219 FY 22 FY 221 Actual Actual Forecast Forecast Forecast Forecast Forecast Forecast Forecast Forecast Forecast Forecast Forecast Forecast Beginning Balance 142,823, ,5, ,858, ,679, ,61, ,91,789 29,682,35 254,426, ,471,14 539,392,2 653,17,221 82,614, ,379,282 1,229,77,121 Revenue State Gas Tax 2,275,936,528 2,226,595,797 2,178,718,686 2,21,5, 2,224,8, 2,248,5, 2,272,8, 2,297,6, 2,322,9, 2,348,7, 2,375,1, 2,42,, 2,429,5, 2,457,7, Registration Fees 1,24,78,782 1,66,233,49 1,114,, 1,164,, 1,217,, 1,272,, 1,329,, 1,389,, 1,451,, 1,516,, 1,585,, 1,656,, 1,73,, 1,88,, FHWA Reimbursements 2,524,247,469 2,478,111,23 1,953,584,916 2,39,916,7 2,576,5,765 2,528,638,867 2,396,49,495 2,57,443,33 2,262,95,83 2,361,88,817 2,43,795,727 2,51,698,226 2,546,318,667 2,562,665,779 Other Fed Reimbursements 29,187,68 234,367, ,561,44 173,177, ,489,32 175,57,46 14,, 14,, 14,, 14,, 14,, 14,, 14,, 14,, ShortTerm Borrowing 27,, 445,, 6,, Other 458,68,454 45,995,49 48,928, ,269, ,38,4 417,296,34 421,433, ,58,47 435,64,651 44,93, ,94,37 455,455, ,7,396 47,897,485 Total Revenue 6,761,518,841 6,91,33,127 5,853,793,538 6,264,863,333 6,614,333,197 6,641,942,631 6,559,723,613 6,762,11,35 6,611,59,734 6,87,439,229 6,978,8,97 7,164,154,125 7,38,519,63 7,439,263,264 Available Funds 6,94,342,212 7,59,83,411 6,45,652,129 6,784,543,225 7,132,943,54 6,88,853,42 6,589,45,648 7,16,527,597 7,24,53,748 7,346,831,231 7,631,817,318 7,984,768,77 8,33,898,345 8,668,34,385 Expenses Research 22,532,21 21,328,177 22,75,134 22,73,44 22,18,924 22,189,17 21,7, 21,7, 21,7, 21,7, 21,7, 21,7, 21,7, 21,7, Engineering 525,842, ,671, ,494, ,33, ,665, ,21, ,, 38,, 384,, 388,, 394,, 399,, 399,, 399,, RightofWay 26,167, ,729, ,786, ,749,69 164,99,139 1,865, ,, 119,, 12,, 121,, 123,, 125,, 125,, 125,, Plan It 754,541, ,729, ,355,644 63,126,295 66,945, ,256, ,7, 52,7, 525,7, 53,7, 538,7, 545,7, 545,7, 545,7, Build It 1,948,896,191 1,797,55, ,158,366 1,699,717,887 1,745,456,51 1,652,777,921 1,619,183,122 1,774,744,758 1,484,33,45 1,59,825,344 1,54,91,32 1,53,312,24 1,496,729,483 1,473,625,966 Maintain It 2,413,377,859 2,2,88,696 2,199,44,722 2,129,789,899 2,689,481,523 2,653,753,983 2,224,48,5 2,24,7,58 2,237,951,113 2,29,54,435 2,289,463,48 2,38,474,157 2,321,694,58 2,33,477,11 Use It 318,287,91 253,18,893 23,253, ,17, ,413,46 184,4,61 154,685, ,685, ,685, ,685, ,685, ,685, ,685, ,685,734 Manage It 23,428, ,192,35 224,684,438 24,46, ,327, ,732,315 21,9, 21,9, 21,9, 21,9, 21,9, 21,9, 21,9, 21,9, *ShortTerm Borrowing D/S 57,64, ,825,42 295,64,675 65,, *Prop 14 Debt Service 38,124,95 329,359, ,118, ,831, ,829,525 5,794, ,427, ,135,52 481,427, ,135,5 481,427, ,135,51 481,427,5 497,135,497 Inflation / Additional Programs 144,3, 261,8, 379,7, 497,9, 616,3, 735,1, 854,3, 973,5, TxDOT State Highway Fund Total 1 5,733,721,767 5,74,719,681 4,528,616,278 5,257,889,841 5,946,453,752 5,794,715,382 5,338,64,44 5,614,973,574 5,465,694,744 5,682,21,13 5,787,377,739 5,973,37,416 6,56,437,225 6,177,24,37 Other Agencies 782,236,91 913,164, ,79, ,43,4 783,579, 748,456,4 76,374, ,83,4 783,444, 775,613, 787,824,996 78,82,4 782,384, 784,732, Other Agencies for TxDOT 229,883, ,6, ,646,52 236,, 236,, 236,, 236,, 236,, 236,, 236,, 236,, 236,, 236,, 236,, Total Expenses 6,745,841,929 6,867,944,817 5,525,972,219 6,265,932,881 6,966,32,752 6,779,171,386 6,334,979,4 6,63,56,578 6,485,138,744 6,693,814,13 6,811,22,735 6,989,389,42 7,74,821,225 7,197,756,37 Ending Balance 3 158,5, ,858, ,679, ,61, ,91,789 29,682,35 254,426, ,471,14 539,392,2 653,17,221 82,614, ,379,282 1,229,77,121 1,47,584,85 Lowest Daily Balance 1,91,536 2,965,431 1,431,18 252,827,492 61,6,958 (97,743,888) (119,825,441) 79,592, ,7,4 362,158,38 475,489, ,595, ,69,142 1,13,19,29 Traditional Letting 2,452,377,184 1,525,42,68 1,567,729,651 1,54,117,574 2,9,768,115 2,1,218,114 2,114,718,114 2,192,318,716 2,279,368,116 2,346,268,116 2,373,268,117 2,395,918,116 2,425,918,116 2,442,918,116 CDAs 2 585,, 585,, 489,, Total 2,452,377,184 2,11,42,68 2,152,729,651 2,29,117,574 2,9,768,115 2,1,218,114 2,114,718,114 2,192,318,716 2,279,368,116 2,346,268,116 2,373,268,117 2,395,918,116 2,425,918,116 2,442,918,116 Project Conversions 785,794,578 (2,,) 1 TxDOT State Highway Fund total is also reflected on page 3 of 11 under "Funding Source" * Excludes debt service paid from GR. Note: Projected revenue is based on current information available at the time of the forecast. Expenditures are based on historical information with adjustments for inflation or other known factors. Based on available projected revenue, future fiscal year expenditures and letting amounts may be adjusted years will depend upon current law and the direction of the Legislature, Transportation Commission and TxDOT Administration. for forecast purposes only. Actual budgets and lettings in those 2 State assistance for Comprehensive Development Agreements to be paid from the State Highway Fund, estimated. The three CDAs are planned to be executed during FY 29, but the state's participation is to be charged to letting caps over a threeyear period. 3 Ending balance does not include approximately 2M of Proposition 14 project conversions or 5M of reimbursements from SH121 for RTR projects paid by the State Highway Fund in FY21. Proposition 14 conversions will be included in the forecast as they are identified. SH121 reimbursments will be reflected when transferred into Fund 6. J:\Forecast\FORDATA\FY 1\Apr 21\Reports\April 21NEW Forecast FIL.xls Page 6 of 13 6/25/21 9:57 AM

38 Texas Department of Transportation Texas Mobility Fund Bond Proceeds 1 April 21 Forecast BASE CASE FY 28 FY 29 FY 21 FY 211 FY 212 FY 213 FY 214 FY 215 FY 216 FY 217 FY 218 FY 219 FY 22 FY 221 Actual Actual Forecast Forecast Forecast Forecast Forecast Forecast Forecast Forecast Forecast Forecast Forecast Forecast Beginning Balance 772,136, ,836,612 1,26,754,385 63,879, ,449, ,938, ,917, ,917, ,917, ,917, ,917, ,917, ,917, ,917,361 Revenue Bond Proceeds 1,157,28,51 1,2,715,634 Available 1,929,164,953 1,852,552,247 1,26,754,385 63,879, ,449, ,938, ,917, ,917, ,917, ,917, ,917, ,917, ,917, ,917,361 Expenses Engineering 13,392,773 96,43,18 211,943, ,35,84 13,879,28 6,758,12 RightofWay 252,473,62 148,725,93 83,31,29 65,336,911 68,5, Plan It 355,866, ,156,11 295,244, ,371,995 82,379,28 6,758,12 Build It 2 921,461,947 4,641,752 37,629,457 7,58,473 23,131,714 11,263,353 Maintain It Use It Manage It Total Expense 1,277,328,34 645,797,862 62,874, ,43,468 15,51,742 18,21,365 Ending Balance 651,836,612 1,26,754,385 63,879, ,449, ,938, ,917, ,917, ,917, ,917, ,917, ,917, ,917, ,917, ,917,361 Letting 272,742,323 Project Conversions (695,794,578) 1 Texas Mobility Fund (TMF) Bond Proceeds are forecast separately from TMF Taxes & Fees as the proceeds fund project expenditures, not debt service. See page 7 of 11 for details. The positive ending balances forecast are reserved for one or more of the following: project over runs, increased obligations, and project conversion from another funding source. 2 Build It assumes 1M for DART project. J:\Forecast\FORDATA\FY 1\Apr 21\Reports\April 21NEW Forecast FIL.xls Page 7 of 13 6/25/21 9:57 AM

39 Texas Department of Transportation Texas Mobility Fund Taxes and Fees 1 April 21 Forecast BASE CASE FY 28 FY 29 FY 21 FY 211 FY 212 FY 213 FY 214 FY 215 FY 216 FY 217 FY 218 FY 219 FY 22 FY 221 Actual Actual Forecast Forecast Forecast Forecast Forecast Forecast Forecast Forecast Forecast Forecast Forecast Forecast Beginning Balance 353,48,51 34,71, ,323, ,19, ,395, ,529,79 526,683,11 562,948,96 6,285,2 658,673,37 717,844,26 777,949, ,898,12 91,985,398 Statewide Traffic Fine (64,379,462) Driver Resp Act (79,969,17) Driver's License Fees 117,93,971 12,32,195 96,672,16 113,775, 114,112, 117,558, 119,321, 121,111, 122,928, 124,772, 126,644, 128,544, 13,472, 132,429, Driver Record Info Fees 61,763,642 57,73,48 55,74,645 56,792, 57,644, 58,59, 59,387, 6,278, 61,182, 62,1, 63,32, 63,977, 64,937, 65,911, Vehicle Inspection Fees 86,166,829 83,432,592 85,992,192 87,79, 88,98, 9,864, 92,954, 94,813, 96,79, 98,643, 1,616, 12,628, 14,681, 16,775, United We Stand 2,777 3,555 4,74 2, 2, 2, 2, 2, 2, 2, 2, 2, 2, 2, Certificate of Title Fees 73,712,156 73,425,919 79,823, 81,579, 83,456, 85,375, 87,83, 18,444, 11,613, 112,825, 115,82, 117,384, 119,732, Motor Safety Violations 2,74,821 2,133,154 1,745,151 2,1, 2,1, 2,1, 2,1, 2,132, 2,164, 2,196, 2,229, 2,262, 2,296, 2,33, Interest 35,46,47 15,87,643 2,335,7 17,75, 18,322, 18,766, 19,132, 19,515, 19,95, 2,33, 2,79, 21,123, 21,545, 21,976, Build America Bonds 4 13,74,71 23,33,934 23,33,934 23,33,934 23,33,934 23,33,934 23,33,934 23,33,934 23,33,934 23,33,934 23,33,934 23,296,45 Miscellaneous 486,328 (482,446) (72) Total Revenue 159,51,27 333,649, ,954,361 38,579, ,97, ,558,934 41,574,934 48,237, ,637, ,932, ,36, ,921, ,62, ,451,45 Available 512,918, ,721, ,277,86 85,599, ,366,84 886,88, ,258,35 971,186,3 1,34,923,134 1,1,65,972 1,167,24,96 1,234,871,876 1,34,518,946 1,374,436,442 Expenses Debt Service 28,357, ,316,28 297,615, ,24, ,836, ,45, ,39,939 37,9, ,25,97 382,761, ,255,18 394,973,864 42,533,548 41,764,885 Other 488,465 81,59 642,66 Total Expense 28,846, ,397, ,258, ,24, ,836, ,45, ,39,939 37,9, ,25,97 382,761, ,255,18 394,973,864 42,533,548 41,764,885 Ending Balance 34,71, ,323, ,19, ,395, ,529,79 526,683,11 562,948,96 6,285,2 658,673,37 717,844,26 777,949, ,898,12 91,985, ,671,557 Lowest Daily Balance 3 16,629, ,543,21 449,785,16 272,522,145 28,16,62 288,377, ,415,373 39,672, ,756, ,583,667 4,29, ,784, ,359,92 56,484,184 1 Texas Mobility Fund (TMF) Taxes & Fees are forecast separately from TMF Bond Proceeds as the primary use of taxes & fees is for the payment of debt services. 2 Future revenue projections are from the Comptroller's August, 29 certified revenue estimate (CRE). 3 TMF RESERVE REQUIRMENTS: Prior to the issuance of bonds by TxDOT, a certified revenue estimate must be received from the Comptroller that projects the revenue to be received and the balance in the Mobility Fund will be equal to at least 11% of the principal and interest requirements on the obligations, both proposed and outstanding, during each year the obligations will be outstanding. The forecasted additional 1% would be available for any purpose of the TMF. As authorized by law, the Commission has elected to pledge the state s full faith and credit as a backstop on the TMF bonds issued to date. With the full faith credit as a backstop, General Revenue would be used to pay debt service if the revenues of the TMF prove to be insufficient. Debt service payments on fixed rate bonds are made twice a year, April 1 and October 1. Variable rate bonds pay debt service monthly. While the forecast produces a projected lowest daily balance, that projected balance serves as an internal balance reserve: so that if the funds projected to be in the TMF for future debt service are not available, the TMF would have funds in a reserve to assist in the debt service payment before looking to GR to fund the shortfall; to pay for potential future ongoing or termination payments on swap agreements; for cost escalations due to change orders on funded projects; and, to act as a hedge on interest rates for the variable rate bonds. While the interest paid on variable rate bonds has historically been less than that paid on fixed rate bonds, the variable rate bonds are subject to volatility in the rates as they are reset weekly. With balances available and invested the TMF is protected against a possible rise in variable interest rates because the rates earned on investments would also rise and the investment earning would offset any increase in debt service payments. Due to the many reasons listed above, the projected balances have not yet been committed to additional projects. 4 BUILD AMERICA BONDS: Build America Bonds are tax credit bonds introduced as part of the February 29 American Recovery and Reinvestment Act (ARRA) and are administered by the Treasury Department. A Build America Bond (BAB) is a bond issued prior to January 1, 211 by a state or local entity for governmental purposes (nonprivate activity purposes) and for which the issuer elects to have the interest on the bond be taxable in return for a federal interest subsidy. Governmental purposes include financing surface transportation projects. Direct Payment BABs allow issuers to receive a subsidy from the federal government equal to 35% of the interest paid to investors for purchasing the bonds. TxDOT issued 1.2B of Direct Payment BABs in Taxable Series 29A, and estimates it will receive 648M in interest subisidy. Those direct payments will be used to partially offset the cost of debt service. J:\Forecast\FORDATA\FY 1\Apr 21\Reports\April 21NEW Forecast FIL.xls Page 8 of 13 6/25/21 9:57 AM

40 Texas Department of Transportation Proposition 14 State Highway Fund Bonds Bond Proceeds April 21 Forecast BASE CASE FY 28 FY 29 FY 21 FY 211 FY 212 FY 213 FY 214 FY 215 FY 216 FY 217 FY 218 FY 219 FY 22 FY 221 Actual Actual Forecast Forecast Forecast Forecast Forecast Forecast Forecast Forecast Forecast Forecast Forecast Forecast Beginning Balance 285,963,138 1,6,744,65 56,382,179 1,213,326,774 1,578,39, ,22, ,922,526 7,271,429 64,731,283 64,731,283 64,731,283 64,731,283 64,731,283 64,731,283 Revenue Bond Proceeds 1,472,935,924 1,5,, 1,4,, Available 1,758,899,62 1,6,744,65 2,6,382,179 2,613,326,774 1,578,39, ,22, ,922,526 7,271,429 64,731,283 64,731,283 64,731,283 64,731,283 64,731,283 64,731,283 Expenses Engineering 26,36,31 26,21, ,674, ,, ,1,2 24,99,549 5,798, ,12 RightofWay 48,288, ,756, ,16, ,164,618 17,23,284 6,245,3 61,725 Plan It 26,36,31 74,498, ,43, ,17, ,174,62 41,329,833 12,43,934 1,177,826 Build It 362,798, ,966, ,537, ,37,77 379,77, ,362,628 24,87,868 2,355,653 Maintain It 39,5, ,897, ,87, ,521, ,917, ,65,22 2,519,295 2,6,667 Use It Manage It Total Expense 698,154,997 5,361, ,55,45 1,34,936,62 1,13,169, ,297,663 56,651,97 5,54,146 Ending Balance 1,6,744,65 56,382,179 1,213,326,774 1,578,39, ,22, ,922,526 7,271,429 64,731,283 64,731,283 64,731,283 64,731,283 64,731,283 64,731,283 64,731,283 Letting 35,794,829 3,936,8 69,44,36 79,559,64 Project Conversions (9,,) 2,, Prop 14 Debt Service 1 15,664, ,359, ,826, ,831, ,537,529 5,794, ,135,52 497,135,52 497,135, ,135,5 497,135, ,135,51 497,135,54 497,135,497 The base SHF forecast includes debt service for the full 6.B in proceeds used in this forecast. The timing and amount of letting for FY 21 and FY 211 may change as additional direction is received from the Transportation Commission. 1 Proposition 14 debt service is paid primarily by the State Highway Fund. 3M of General Revenue was appropriated for debt service in FY28, and 112.5M was expended for Proposition 14 debt service. The remainder of the 3M went to repay Shortterm Borrowing. 15.7M of General Revenue was appropriated in FY21 and is assumed to continue in even years. FY29 includes transfers used to establish a Proposition 14 debt service reserve in the State Highway Fund, which is used to make the semiannual principal and interest payments. Regular monthly transfers from the State Highway Fund replenish the reserve between payments. J:\Forecast\FORDATA\FY 1\Apr 21\Reports\April 21NEW Forecast FIL.xls Page 9 of 13 6/25/21 9:57 AM

41 Texas Department of Transportation Proposition 12 General Revenue Bonds April 21 Forecast BASE CASE FY 28 FY 29 FY 21 FY 211 FY 212 FY 213 FY 214 FY 215 FY 216 FY 217 FY 218 FY 219 FY 22 FY 221 Actual Actual Forecast Forecast Forecast Forecast Forecast Forecast Forecast Forecast Forecast Forecast Forecast Forecast Beginning Balance 178,87, ,353, ,443,532 19,521,92 (36,862,553) (66,679,978) (66,679,978) (66,679,978) (66,679,978) (66,679,978) (66,679,978) Revenue Proceeds 4,, 1,6,, 1,,, Available 4,, 1,778,87,589 1,153,353, ,443,532 19,521,92 (36,862,553) (66,679,978) (66,679,978) (66,679,978) (66,679,978) (66,679,978) (66,679,978) Expenses Engineering 14,942,273 12,673,131 RightofWay 96,5, 184,8, Plan It 11,992, ,473,131 Build It 11,2,139 1,427,98, ,91, ,921, ,384,473 29,817,425 Maintain It Use It Manage It Total Expense 221,192,412 1,625,453, ,91, ,921, ,384,473 29,817,425 Ending Balance 178,87, ,353, ,443,532 19,521,92 (36,862,553) (66,679,978) (66,679,978) (66,679,978) (66,679,978) (66,679,978) (66,679,978) (66,679,978) Letting 432,48,11 1,325,86,467 Project Conversions SCERIO FY 28 FY 29 FY 21 FY 211 FY 212 FY 213 FY 214 FY 215 FY 216 FY 217 FY 218 FY 219 FY 22 FY 221 Forecast Forecast Forecast Forecast Forecast Forecast Forecast Forecast Forecast Forecast Forecast Forecast Forecast Forecast Beginning Balance 178,87, ,353, ,997, ,597, ,229,45 116,6,39 (58,97,598) (66,679,978) (66,679,978) (66,679,978) (66,679,978) Revenue Bond Proceeds 4,, 1,6,, 1,,, 1,,, 1,,, Available 4,, 1,778,87,589 1,153,353,821 1,188,997,854 1,279,597, ,229,45 116,6,39 (58,97,598) (66,679,978) (66,679,978) (66,679,978) (66,679,978) Expenses Engineering 14,942,273 12,673,131 RightofWay 96,5, 184,8, Plan It 11,992, ,473,131 Engineering 1,, 1,, RightofWay 1,, 1,, Plan It 2,, 2,, Build It 11,2,139 1,427,98, ,91, ,921, ,384,473 29,817,425 Maintain It Use It Manage It Build It 128,445, ,479,31 495,983,333 49,811,59 175,57,988 7,79,38 Maintain It Use It Manage It Total Expense 221,192,412 1,625,453, ,355,967 99,4, ,367,86 439,629,15 175,57,988 7,79,38 Ending Balance 178,87, ,353, ,997, ,597, ,229,45 116,6,39 (58,97,598) (66,679,978) (66,679,978) (66,679,978) (66,679,978) (66,679,978) Letting 432,48,11 1,325,86,467 8,, 8,, Project Conversions Base forecast based on appropriations passed in the 1st Called Session of the 81st Legislature, and assumes additional Prop 12 appropriation after FY 211. "Build It" includes 1B in FY211 for capitalization of the State Infrastructure Bank. Debt service on Proposition 12 bonds is paid from General Revenue (GR). See pg. 3 of 12. Engineering estimates on the selected projects add up to an amount over the 3B of proceeds shown in the Base Case. Recent trends indicate that project bids will be lower than the estimates. If they are not, the Commission may adjust project timing, selection, or other factors to stay within the 3B of proceeds. The expenditures by strategy in the Base Case above would require Legislative Budget Board approval of transfers between strategies. J:\Forecast\FORDATA\FY 1\Apr 21\Reports\April 21NEW Forecast FIL.xls Page 1 of 13 6/25/21 9:57 AM

42 Texas Department of Transportation SH 121 Proceeds April 21 Forecast BASE CASE FY 28 FY 29 FY 21 FY 211 FY 212 FY 213 FY 214 FY 215 FY 216 FY 217 FY 218 FY 219 FY 22 FY 221 Actual Actual Forecast Forecast Forecast Forecast Forecast Forecast Forecast Forecast Forecast Forecast Forecast Forecast Beginning Balance 3,124,66,763 2,658,44,736 2,447,364,483 1,83,93,19 1,72,9, ,97, ,736,975 14,89,114 11,116,227 11,453,481 16,254, ,578, ,974,856 Revenue Proceeds 3,197,14,248 Interest 85,368,67 66,458,59 34,524,58 26,11,511 21,873,214 14,72,542 8,47,842 6,91,428 6,544,56 6,273,25 6,255,29 6,323,912 6,396,467 6,469,854 Available 3,282,472,918 3,19,525,272 2,692,569,315 2,473,465,994 1,852,776,233 1,86,81, ,568, ,638,43 147,353, ,389,477 17,78,69 112,578, ,974, ,444,71 Expenses Reimbursements to SHF Engineering 7,652,113 1,821,63 24,3,718 74,374,948 44,23,97 19,22,517 3,182,65 1,341,2 6,385,126 RightofWay 8,135, 48,937,134 3,999,67 74,83, ,95,5 44,814,588 1,7,16 7,685,126 2,657,91 Plan It 87,787,113 59,758,197 28,3, ,458, ,973,12 63,837,15 13,189,756 9,26,326 9,43,36 Build It 7,619,43 33,95, ,833, ,873, ,255,741 41,33, ,549,17 24,362,74 19,736,51 1,455,197 1,17,948 Maintain It 141,816,72 65,71, ,231, ,538, ,844,193 76,92,436 1,44,889 8,458,37 4,48, ,264 Use It Manage It Total Expense 158,46, ,48, ,24, ,562,975 78,767,18 649,984, ,831,29 43,829,289 37,237,394 14,935,996 1,454,212 Ending Balance 3,124,66,763 2,658,44,736 2,447,364,483 1,83,93,19 1,72,9, ,97, ,736,975 14,89,114 11,116,227 11,453,481 16,254, ,578, ,974, ,444,71 Letting 253,379, ,81,957 34,642, ,386, ,117, ,413,142 11,586,94 35,721,947 19,242,832 The ongoing project selection and letting process in conjunction with the MPO will ensure that actual expenditures remain within, and fully utilize, the available funds. As the selections are refined, future forecasts will be adjusted. J:\Forecast\FORDATA\FY 1\Apr 21\Reports\April 21NEW Forecast FIL.xls Page 11 of 13 6/25/21 9:57 AM

43 Texas Department of Transportation SH 13 (Segments 5 &6) Proceeds April 21 Forecast BASE CASE FY 28 FY 29 FY 21 FY 211 FY 212 FY 213 FY 214 FY 215 FY 216 FY 217 FY 218 FY 219 FY 22 FY 221 Actual Actual Forecast Forecast Forecast Forecast Forecast Forecast Forecast Forecast Forecast Forecast Forecast Forecast Beginning Balance 26,499,57 27,11,586 11,474,465 9,598,338 8,372,611 6,127,15 3,37,893 1,552,441 1,339,69 2,77,486 1,821,64 2,15,148 1,985,513 Revenue Proceeds 25,75,778 Interest 748,792 62,16 372, ,873 15,453 85,78 88,82 61,647 43,662 43,584 54,894 54,787 61,281 63,331 Toll Revenue Sharing 668,82 1,968,696 3,155,76 4,119,9 4,743,588 5,194,212 5,689,224 6,228,756 6,819,84 7,462,692 Available 26,499,57 27,11,586 27,474,465 11,598,338 1,372,611 1,427,15 9,37,893 7,552,441 6,339,69 6,577,486 7,821,64 8,15,148 8,985,513 9,511,535 Expenses Engineering RightofWay Plan It Build It 16,, 2,, 2,, 4,3, 6,, 6,, 5,, 4,5, 6,, 6,, 7,, 7,, Maintain It Total Expense 16,, 2,, 2,, 4,3, 6,, 6,, 5,, 4,5, 6,, 6,, 7,, 7,, Ending Balance 26,499,57 27,11,586 11,474,465 9,598,338 8,372,611 6,127,15 3,37,893 1,552,441 1,339,69 2,77,486 1,821,64 2,15,148 1,985,513 2,511,535 Letting 8,279,334 8,, 2,, 2,, 4,3, 6,, 6,, 5,, 4,5, 6,, 6,, 7,, 7,, Project Conversions Specific projects that will fully utilize this funding have not been identified. As projects are identified, the timing of letting amounts and resulting expenditures may change. J:\Forecast\FORDATA\FY 1\Apr 21\Reports\April 21NEW Forecast FIL.xls Page 12 of 13 6/25/21 9:57 AM

44 Texas Department of Transportation Federal Economic Stimulus Funds American Recovery and Reinvestment Act 1 April 21 Forecast BASE CASE FY 28 FY 29 FY 21 FY 211 FY 212 FY 213 FY 214 FY 215 Total Actual Actual Forecast Forecast Forecast Forecast Forecast Forecast Forecast Beginning Balance Revenue Federal ARRA Funds 47,15, ,425,9 611,582, ,51, ,79,554 57,946,49 34,43,393 2,257,215,146 Available 47,15, ,425,9 611,582, ,51, ,79,554 57,946,49 34,43,393 2,257,215,146 Expenses Engineering RightofWay Plan It Build It 1,634,17 47,29,55 328,526, ,47,996 99,786,899 31,291,61 18,577,832 1,191,253,819 Maintain It 45,381,626 44,395,54 283,55,785 25,643,848 85,3,655 26,655,348 15,825,561 1,65,961,327 Use It Manage It Total Expense 47,15, ,425,9 611,582, ,51, ,79,554 57,946,49 34,43,393 2,257,215,146 Ending Balance Letting 978,753,183 1,278,461,963 2,257,215,146 Project Conversions 1 The American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 29 (ARRA) will provide federal funds for the purpose of economic stimulus. These funds are in addition to the typical Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) obligations and reimbursements. These funds will be available for obligation until September 3, 21 and available for reimbursement on expenses incurred until September 3, 215. These lettings are 1% federally funded and will not require state matching funds. However, engineering and contingencies will be state funded. 2 "Maintain It" includes a ferry boat awarded under the ARRA program for the Corpus Christi district. The ferry boat went to letting in August 29 and payments are expected in FY21FY211 and total approximately 7.2M. 3 Letting in FY29 includes 25M for CDAs and 7.2M for the ferry boat awarded under the ARRA program to Corpus Christi. See page 2 of 12. J:\Forecast\FORDATA\FY 1\Apr 21\Reports\April 21NEW Forecast FIL.xls Page 13 of 13 6/25/21 9:57 AM

45 STIP Public Involvement Documentation

46 Texas Department of Transportation Public Hearing Notice Statewide Transportation Improvement Program The Texas Department of Transportation will hold a public hearing on Tuesday, August 24, 2 I at 1: a.m. at the Texas Department of Transportation, 2 East Riverside Drive, Room IA2, in Austin, Texas to receive public comments on the Statewide Transportation Improvement Program (STIP) for FY The STIP reflects the federally funded transportation projects in the FY Transportation Improvement Programs (TIPs) for each Metropolitan Planning Organization (MPO) in the state. The STIP includes both state and federally funded projects for the nonattairilllent areas of Beaumont, DallasFort Worth, EI Paso, and Houston. The STIP also contains information on federally funded projects in rural areas that are not included in any MPO area, and other statewide programs as listed. Title 23, United States Code, 134 and 135 require each designated MPO and the state, respectively, to develop a TIP and STIP as a condition to securing federal funds for transportation projects under Title 23 or the Federal Transit Act (49 USC 53 I, et seq.). Section 134(h) requires an MPO to develop its TIP in cooperation with the state and aftected public transit operators, to provide an opportunity for interested parties to participate in the development of the program, and further requires the TIP to be updated at least once every two years and approved by the MPO and the Governor or Governor's designee. Section l35(g) requires the state to develop a STIP for all areas of the state in cooperation with the designated MPOs and, with respect to nonmetropolitan areas, in consultation with affected local officials, and further requires an opportunity for participation by interested parties as well as approval by the Governor or the Governor's designee. In accordance with 43 TAC I5.8(d), a copy ofthe proposed FY STIP will be available for review, at the time the notice of hearing is published, at each of the department's district offices, at the department's Transportation Planning and Programming Division offices located in Building 118, Second Floor, 118 East Riverside Drive, Austin, Texas, and on the department's website at: Persons wishing to review the FY STIP may do so online or contact the Transportation Planning and Programming Division at (512) Persons wishing to speak at the hearing may register in advance by notifying Lori Morel, Transportation Planning and Programming Division, at (512) not later than Monday, August 23, 2 I, or they may register at the hearing location beginning at 9: a.m. on the day of the hearing. Speakers will be taken in the order registered. Any interested person may appear and offer comments or testimony, either orally or in writing; however, questioning of witnesses will be reserved exclusively to the presiding authority as may be necessary to ensure a complete record. While any persons with pertinent comments or testimony will be granted an opportunity to present them during the course of the hearing, the presiding authority reserves the right to restrict testimony in terms of time or repetitive content. Groups, organizations, or associations should be represented by only one speaker. Speakers are requested to refrain from repeating previously presented testimony. Persons with disabilities who have special communication or accommodation needs or who plan to attend the hearing may contact the Government and Public Affairs Division, at 125 East 11 th Street, Austin, Texas , (512) Requests should be made no later than three days prior to the hearing. Every reasonable effort will be made to accommodate the needs. Further information on the FY STIP may be obtained from Lori Morel, Transportation Planning and Programming Division, 118 East Riverside Drive, Austin, Texas 7874, (5 12) Interested parties who are unable to attend the hearing may submit comments to James L. Randall, P.E., Director, Transportation Planning and Programming Division, 118 East Riverside Drive, Austin, Texas In order to be considered, all written comments must be received al the Transportation Planning and Programming office by Tuesday, September 7,21 at 4: p.m. TRD Joanne Wright Deputy General Counsel Texas Department of Transportation Filed: July 13, 21 Texas State University System Notice of Contract Award The Texas State University System (TSUS), announces this Notice of Contract Award in connection with the Request for QualificationslProposals (RFP #758111) inviting professional consultants experienced in providing electric energy consulting services (particularly institutions of higher education) to the TSUS institutions comprising the System (Lamar Institute of Technology in Beaumont Texas, Lamar University in Beaumont, Texas, Lamar State CollegeOrange in Orange, Texas, Lamar State CollegePort Arthur in Port Arthur, Texas, Sam Houston State University in Huntsville, Texas, SuI Ross State University in Alpine, Texas, Rio Grande College with campuses located in Del Rio, Eagle Pass and Uvalde Texas and Texas State UniversitySan Marcos. TSUS announces that a contract was awarded to Fowler Energy Company, 452 Spicewood Springs Road, Austin, Texas The amount and term of the contract is dependent upon the savings generated during a three and one half(3.5) year period. The Notice of Request for Proposals (RFP #7581 II) was published in the March 5, 21, issue of the Texas Register (35 TexReg 287). TRD Peter E. Graves Vice Chancellor for Contract Administration Texas State University System Filed: JUly 13, 21 IN ADDITION July 23,21 35 TexReg 6591

47 Public Hearing Notice Statewide Transportation Improvement Program The Texas Department of Transportation will hold a public hearing on Tuesday, August 24, 21 at 1: a.m. at the Texas Department of Transportation, 2 East Riverside Drive, Room 1A2, in Austin, Texas to receive public comments on the Statewide Transportation Improvement Program (STIP) for FY The STIP reflects the federally funded transportation projects in the FY Transportation Improvement Programs (TIPs) for each Metropolitan Planning Organization (MPO) in the state. The STIP includes both state and federally funded projects for the nonattainment areas of Beaumont, DallasFort Worth, El Paso, and Houston. The STIP also contains information on federally funded projects in rural areas that are not included in any MPO area, and other statewide programs as listed. Title 23, United States Code, 134 and 135 require each designated MPO and the state, respectively, to develop a TIP and STIP as a condition to securing federal funds for transportation projects under Title 23 or the Federal Transit Act (49 USC 531, et seq.). Section 134(h) requires an MPO to develop its TIP in cooperation with the state and affected public transit operators, to provide an opportunity for interested parties to participate in the development of the program, and further requires the TIP to be updated at least once every two years and approved by the MPO and the Governor or Governor's designee. Section 135(g) requires the state to develop a STIP for all areas of the state in cooperation with the designated MPOs and, with respect to nonmetropolitan areas, in consultation with affected local officials, and further requires an opportunity for participation by interested parties as well as approval by the Governor or the Governor's

48 designee. In accordance with 43 TAC 15.8(d), a copy of the proposed FY STIP will be available for review, at the time the notice of hearing is published, at each of the department's district offices, at the department's Transportation Planning and Programming Division offices located in Building 118, Second Floor, 118 East Riverside Drive, Austin, Texas, and on the department's website at: Persons wishing to review the FY STIP may do so online or contact the Transportation Planning and Programming Division at (512) Persons wishing to speak at the hearing may register in advance by notifying Lori Morel, Transportation Planning and Programming Division, at (512) not later than Monday, August 23, 21, or they may register at the hearing location beginning at 9: a.m. on the day of the hearing. Speakers will be taken in the order registered. Any interested person may appear and offer comments or testimony, either orally or in writing; however, questioning of witnesses will be reserved exclusively to the presiding authority as may be necessary to ensure a complete record. While any persons with pertinent comments or testimony will be granted an opportunity to present them during the course of the hearing, the presiding authority reserves the right to restrict testimony in terms of time or repetitive content. Groups, organizations, or associations should be represented by only one speaker. Speakers are requested to refrain from repeating previously presented testimony. Persons with disabilities who have special communication or accommodation needs or who plan to attend the hearing may contact the Government and Public Affairs Division, at 125 East 11th Street, Austin, Texas

49 , (512) Requests should be made no later than three days prior to the hearing. Every reasonable effort will be made to accommodate the needs. Further information on the FY STIP may be obtained from Lori Morel, Transportation Planning and Programming Division, 118 East Riverside Drive, Austin, Texas, 7874, (512) Interested parties who are unable to attend the hearing may submit comments to James L. Randall, P.E., Director, Transportation Planning and Programming Division, 118 East Riverside Drive, Austin, Texas, In order to be considered, all written comments must be received at the Transportation Planning and Programming office by Tuesday, September 7, 21 at 4: p.m.

50 r! Name ( Please Print) \m\hf\it rn t '..1 V\ ~ta:>a:7 ~._.._._._._._._..._. {f 11 ~tonl\{1~c.,.~}rl.j _J P.t,. 8M 3z~ Je\\~ lj~ ~ 3'l?&"' 1lZ1; tcait'd"l'\~ p~ ~VtLJ\ &. to~i:.u&tfl TxDOT Public Hearing FY Tuesday, August 1lf, 21, at 1: a.m. Texas Department of Transportation, 2 East Riverside Drive, Room 1A2 Address Attendance Signin Sheet _._ ~._._._..._._ Initials I Telephone Number _._. o t; J:J' L17!fr It er/)3 Organization ~._._.._._._._.. re QSf\ ~~~._._._._._._. ~._._._._._._... \,.

51 RECEIVED ~UG 32' GENERAL COUNSEL TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION PUBLIC HEARING FY STATEWIDE TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM Room 1A.2 TxDOT Riverside Campus 2 E. Riverside Drive Austin, Texas August 24, 21 1:5 a.m. BEFORE: BECKY BLEWETT, TxDOT Office of General Counsel ON THE RECORD REPORTING (512) 45342

52 2 1 2 MS. BLEWETT: We will now open this hearing. 3 It is 1:5 in the morning, Tuesday, August 24, 21. My name is Becky Blewett, and I'm an attorney with the Texas Department of Transportation, and I have been appointed as the presiding officer in this matter. We are here to consider public comment, both written and oral, on the Statewide Transportation 9 Improvement Program for Fiscal Years This hearing is being held pursuant to 23 U.S. Code, Sections 134 and 135, which call for an opportunity for public comment concerning this program. I will now enter into the record of this hearing Exhibit 1, a copy of Volume 35, Texas Register, Page 6591 from the Texas Register of July 23, 21 which is the published announcement of ttis proceeding. exhibit is now in the record. This 18 At this time I will go over a few procedures. 19 I will be receiving comments only. Questions from the 2 floor will not be entertained, nor will any debate be 21 entered into. All interested persons my appear and offer 22 comment either orally or in writing. Written comments will be accepted for the record today or may be submitted to Mr. James Randall, P.E., Director, Transportation Planning and Programming Division, 118 East Riverside ON THE RECORD REPORTING (512) 45342

53 3 1 Drive, Austin, Texas The deadline for receipt of written comments is 4: p.m. on September 7, 21. All interested persons wishing to make oral comment or a presentation for the record to be established here today should have registered or may register at any time during this hearing at the table by the door. Interested persons wishing to submit only written comments in the record and not wishing to make oral comments or presentations may submit written comments at the 1 registration table. Every interested person who is registered will be granted an opportunity to present their comments, but I will reserve the right to restrict testimony in terms of time and repetitive content. Questioning of persons making oral comments will be reserved to me as the presiding officer. We have a court reporter transcribing these 17 proceedings and she is seated to my right. If you wish to receive a transcript of this hearing, you can make arrangements with the court reporter. I will, for the record, note that we've had the registration table open since approximately 9: this morning, and we have had the Statewide Transportation Improvement Program for Fiscal Year available for public examination in this room for approximately that time this morning. ON THE RECORD REPORTING (512) 45342

54 comment. This proceeding is convened to hear public Is anyone here to testify? (No response.) 4 MS. BLEWETT: No one having indicated they are here for such a purpose, I declare this hearing adjourned. was concluded.) (Whereupon, at 1:8 a.m., the public hearing ON THE RECORD REPORTING (512) 45342

55 5 1 C E R T I F I CAT E IN RE: LOCATION: STIP public hearing Austin, Texas DATE: August 24, 21 I do hereby certify that the foregoing pages, numbers 1 through 5, inclusive, are the true, accurate, and complete transcript prepared from the verbal recording made by electronic recording by Nancy H. King before the Texas Department of Transportation. On the Record Reporting 337 Northland, Suite 315 Austin, Texas ON THE RECORD REPORTING (512) 45342

56 Statewide Programs Statewide Transit Federal Lands Recreational Trails Fund Indian Reservation Roads

57 FY 211 TRANSIT PROJECT DESCRIPTIONS TEXAS STATEWIDE PUBLIC TRANSIT TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM Based on the 21 Texas Unified Tt1Inportation Progt1lm Funding Information fyoe) YOE = Year ofexpenditure Project Sponsor TxDOT Federal Funding Category 531 MPO Projeet Information Federal (FTA) Funds 66, (reference number, etc) State Funds from TxDOT o Other Funds o Apportionment Year 211 Fiscal Year Cost 66, Brief Project Description Total Project Cost 66, State Administration Elderly Individuals and Individuals with Disabilities Program Trans. Dev. Credits Requested Trans. Dev. Credits Awarded Sec 5391 Number (Date & Amount) Funding Information (YOE) Project Sponsor TxOOT Federal Funding Category 5311 MPO Project Information Fcderal (FTA) Funds 88, (reference number, etc) State Funds from TxDOT o Other Funds o Apportionment Ycar 211 Fiscal Year Cost 88, Brief Project Description Total Project Cost 88, State Administration Nonurbanized Fonnula Grant Trans. Dev. Credits Requested Trans. Dev. Credits Awarded Sec 5391 Number (Date & Amount) so Funding Information (YOE) Project Sponsor TxOOT Federal Funding Category 5311 MPO Project Information Federal (FTA) Funds 5,74,474 (reference number, etc) State Funds from TxDOT o Other Funds 2,698,721 Apportionment Year 211 Fiscal Year Cost 7,773,195 Brief Project Description Total Project Cost 7,773,195 Intercity Bus Grants Competitively Selected Trans. Dev. Credits Rcqucsted Trans. Dev. Credits Awardcd Sec 5391 Number (Date & Amount) Amcndment Date & Action

58 FY 211 TRANSIT PROJECT DESCRIPTIONS TEXAS STATEWIDE PUBLIC TRANSIT TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM Based on the 21 Texas Unified Tranportatlon Program Funding Information (yoe) YOE = Year ofexpendirure Project Sponsor TxDOT Federal Funding Category 5311 MPO Project Information Federal (FTA) Funds 2,14,352 (reference number, etc) State Funds from TxDOT 18,681,694 Other Funds 5,925,971 Apportionment Year 211 Fiscal Year Cost 44,712,17 Brief Project Description Total Project Cost 44,712,17 Formula Grants to Rural Transit Districts See Attachment A Trans. Dev. Credits Requested Trans. Dev. Credits Awarded Sec 539 ID Number (Date & Amount) Funding Information (YOE) Project Sponsor TxDOT Federal Funding Category 5311 MPO Project Information Federal (FTA) Funds 7,771,2 (reference number, etc) State Funds from TxDOT TBD Other Funds TBD Apportionment Year 211 Fiscal Year Cost 7,771,2 BriefProject Description Total Project Cost 7,771,2 Competitive or prorata awards through the TX Transportation Commission Trans. Dev. Credits Requested Trans. Dev. Credits Awarded Sec 539 ID Number (Date & Amount) so Funding Information (YOE) Project Sponsor TxOOT Federal Funding Category 5311 MPO Project Information Federal (FTA) Funds 373,454 (reference number, etc) State Funds from TxDOT o Other Funds o Apportionment Year 211 Fiscal Year Cost 373,454 Brief Project Description Total Project Cost 373,454 RT AP Rural Transit Assistance Program Trans. Dev. Credits Requested Trans. Dev. Credits Awarded Sec 539 ID Number (Date & Amount) 2

59 FY 211 TRANSIT PROJECT DESCRIPTIONS TEXAS STATEWIDE PUBLIC TRANSIT TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM Based on the 21 Texas Unified Tranportation Program Gcneral Project Information Funding Information (YOE) YOE = Year ofexpenditure Project Sponsor TxDOT Federal Funding Category 5316 MPO Project Information Federal (FT A) Funds 41,829 (reference number, etc) State Funds from TxDOT o Other Funds o Apportionment Year 2ll Fiscal Year Cost 41,829 Brief Project Description Total Project Cost 41,829 State Administration for JARC Urban Program Trans. Dev. Credits Requested Trans. Dev. Credits Awarded Sec 539 ID Number (Date & Amount) Fundin!! Information (YOE) Project Sponsor TxDOT Federal Funding Category 5316 MPO Project Information Federal (FTA) Funds 3,697,468 (reference number, etc) State Funds from TxDOT o Other Funds 3,227,926 Apportionment Year 211 Fiscal Year Cost 6,925,394 Brief Project Description Total Project Cost 6,925,394 Competitively Selected JARC Urban Grants Trans. Dev. Credits Requested Trans. Dev. Credits Awarded Sec 539 ID Number (Date & Amount) Funding Information (YOE) Project Sponsor TxDOT Federal Funding Category 5316 MPO Project Information Federal (FTA) Funds 292,174 (reference number, etc) State Funds from TxDOT o Other Funds o Apportionment Year 211 Fiscal Year Cost 292,174 Brief Project Description Total Project Cost 292,174 State Administration for JARC Rural Program Trans. Dev. Credits Requested Trans. Dev. Credits Awarded Sec 539 ID Number (Date & Amount) 3

60 FY 211 TRANSIT PROJECT DESCRIPTIONS TEXAS STATEWIDE PUBLIC TRANSIT TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM Based on the 21 Texas Unified Tranportation Program YOE Year of Expenditure Funding Information (YOE) Project Sponsor TxDOT Federal Funding Category 5316 MPO Project Information Federal (FTA) Fnnds 2,629,57 (reference number, etc) State Funds from TxDOT o Other Fnnds 2,852,127 Apportionment Year 211 Fiscal Year Cost 55,481,697 Brief Project Description Total Project Cost 5,481,697 Competitively Selected JARC Rural Grants Trans. Dev. Credits Requested so Trans. Dev. Credits Awarded Sec 539 ID Number (Date & Amount) so Funding Information (YOEl Project Sponsor TxDOT Federal Funding Category 5317 MPO Project Information Federal (FTA) Funds SI77,388 (reference number, etc) State Funds from TxDOT o Other Funds o Apportionment Year 211 Fiscal Year Cost 177,388 Brief Project Description Total Project Cost 177,388 State Administration for New Freedom Urban Program Trans. Dev. Credits Requested so Trans. Dev. Credits Awarded Sec 539 ID Number (Date & Amount) so Funding Information (YOEl Project Sponsor TxDOT Federal Funding Category 5317 MPO Project Information Federal (FTA) Funds 1,596,494 (reference number, etc) State Funds from TxDOT Other Funds 73,418 Apportionment Year 211 Fiscal Year Cost 2,326,912 Brief Project Description Total Project Cost S2,326,912 Competitively Selected New Freedom Urban Grants Trans. Dcv, Credits Requested so Trans. Dev. Credits Awarded Sec 539 ID Number (Date & Amount) so 4

61 FY 211 TRANSIT PROJECT DESCRIPTIONS TEXAS STATEWIDE PUBLIC TRANSIT TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM Based on the 21 Texas Unified Tranportation Program Funding Information (YOE) YOE = Year ofexpenditure Project Sponsor TxDOT Federal Funding Category 5317 MPO Project Information Federal (FTA) Funds 138,48 (reference number, etc) State Funds from TxDOT o Other Funds o Apportionment Year 211 Fiscal Year Cost 138,48 BriefProject Description Total Project Cost \38,48 State Administration for New Freedom Rural Program Trans. Dev. Credits Requested Trans. Dev. Credits Awarded Sec 5391 Number (Date & Amount) Funding Information (YOE) Project Sponsor TxDOT Federal Funding Category 5317 MPO Project Information Federal (FTA) Funds 1,245,681 (reference number, etc) State Funds from TxDOT Other Funds 945,36 Apportionment Year 211 Fiscal Year Cost 2,19,717 BriefProject Description Total Project Cost 2,19,717 Competitively Selected New Freedom Rural Grants Trans. Dev. Credits Requested Trans. Dev. Credits Awarded Sec 539 ID Number (Date & Amount) Funding Information (YOE) 539 Project Sponsor TxDOT Federal Funding Category FTA Other on FinSum MPO Project Information Federal (FTA) Funds 15,152,215 (reference number, etc) State Funds from TxDOT o Other Funds o Apportionment Year 211 Fiscal Year Cost 15,152,215 Brief Project Description Info Item and Place Holder Total Project Cost 15,152,215 State ofgood Repair Competitive Call for Projects Rural Fleet See Attachment B Trans. Dev. Credits Requested 3,3,443 Trans. Dev. Credits Awarded Sec 5391 Number (Date & Amount) 5

62 FY 211 TRANSIT PROJECT DESCRIPTIONS TEXAS STATEWIDE PUBLIC TRANSIT TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM Based on the 21 Texas Unffled Tranponation Program Funding Information (YOE) YOE = Year of Expenditure 539 Project Sponsor TxOOT Federal Funding Category ITA Other on FinSum MPO Project Information Federal (ITA) Funds 13,965,618 (reference number, etc) State Funds from TxDOT o Other Funds o Apportionment Year 211 Fiscal Year Cost 13,965,618 Brief Project Description Info Item and Place Holder Total Project Cost 13,965,618 State ofgood Repair Competitive Call for Projects Rural Facilities. See Attachment C Trans. Dey. Credits Requested 2,793,124 Trans. Dey. Credits Awarded Sec 539 ID Number (Date & Amount) Funding Information (YOE) 539 Project Sponsor TxDOT Federal Funding Category FTA Other on FinSum MPO Project Information Federal (ITA) Funds 4,779,366 (reference number, etc) State Funds from TxDOT o Other Funds o Apportionment Year 211 Fiscal Year Cost 4,779,366 Brief Project Description Info Item and Place Holder Total Project Cost 4,779,366 State ofgood Repair Competitive Call for Projects Rural Equipment. See Attachment Trans. Dev. Credits Requested 955,873 Trans. Dev. Credits Awarded Sec 539 ID Number (Date & Amount) General Projeet Information Funding Information (YOE) 539 Project Sponsor TxDOT Federal Funding Category "la Other on FinSum MPO Project Information Federal (ITA) Funds 4,15, (reference number, etc) State Funds from TxDOT o Other Funds o Apportionment Year 211 Fiscal Year Cost 4,15, Brief Project Description Info Item and Place Holder Total Project Cost 4,15, State of Good Repair Competitive Call for Projects Intercity Bus. See Attachment E Trans. Dey. Credits Requested 83, Trans. Dey. Credits Awarded Sec 5391D Number (Date & Amount} 6

63 FY 211 TRANSIT PROJECT DESCRIPTIONS TEXAS STATEWIDE PUBLIC TRANSIT TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM Based on the 21 Texas Unified TranportatJon Program YOE = Year of Expenditure Attachments A B C D E 5311 Rural Formula State of Good Repair Fleet State of Good Repair Facility State of Good Repair Equipment State ofgood Repair intercity Bus,

64 ATTACHMENT A Annual Estimates by Known Rural Recipients 21~214 Section 5311 Nonurbanlzed Transit District Rural Transit Agency Federal State Local Total San Antonio Atlanta Abilene Corpus Christi Bryan Austin Brownwood Fort Worth Dallas Yoakum Pharr San Antonio Dallas San Angelo Laredo Tyler EI Paso Houston Yoakum Houston Waco Brownwood Dallas Corpus Christi Pharr AmarillO Fort Worth Childress Corpus Christi Paris Beaumont Pharr Lubbock Dallas Paris Fort Worth Laredo Odessa Alamo Area Council of Governments MTex Council of Governments Aspennont Small Business Development Center Bee Community Action Agency Brazos Transit District Capital Area Rural Transportation System Central Texas Rural Transit District Cleburne, City of Collin County Committee on Aging Colorado Vaney Transit Community Action Council of South Texas Community Council of Southwest Texas Community Services, Inc. Concho Valley Rural Transit District Del Rio, City of East Texas Council of Governments EI Paso. County of Fort Bend County Rural Transit District Golden Crescent Regional Planning Commission Gulf Coast Center Heart of Texas Council of Governments Hill Country Transit District Kaufman Area Rural Transportation K1eberg County Human Services Lower Rio Grande Valley Development Council Panhandle Community Services Public Transit Services Rolling Plains Management Corporation Rural Economic Assistance League Senior Center Resources and Public Transit. Inc. South East Texas Regional Planning Commission South Padre Island, Town of South Plains Community Action Association. Inc. SPAN, Inc. Texoma Area Paratransit System The Transit System, Inc. Webb County Community Action Agency West Texas Opportunities. Inc 991, , , ,646 1,927,45 1,77, ,62 319, ,54 429, , , , ,812 56,13 277, ,51 357, , , , , , , ,93 264, , ,217 1,1, , , , , ,617 12,84 518,57 257, , , , , ,1,596 1,54,526 2,962, ,36 1,461, ,6 894, ,39 4, ,79,523 1, , , , 895, , , , , ,835, , ,992 1,78, , , 841, , , Total 2,14,352 18,681,694 5,925,971 44,712,17

65 Attachment B Texas State of Good Repair Rural Program Fleet Replacement and Capacity Update Project Summary by Transit Agency Rural Agency Name Total Vehicle Quantity FTA Requested Local match from AmountITotal TOC's'" Project Cost Alamo Area Council of Governments 12 1,1, 22, Aspermont Small Business Development Center 3 144, 28,8 CARTS 31 32, 64, Central Texas Rural Transit District , 169,2 Colorado Valley Transit 4 45, 81, Community Action Councit of South Texas 4 28, 56, Community Council of Southwest Texas 5 2, 4, Community Services, INC 3 199,715 39, Concho Valley Transit District 5 2, 4, East Texas Council of Governments 15 1,, 2, EI Paso County 2 3, 6, Fort Bend Rural Transit District 16 1,656, 331,2 Golden Crescent Regional Planning Commission 1 532, 16,4 Hill Country Transit District 7 437, 87,4 Panhandle Transit 1 295, 59, Rolling Plains Management Corp. 7 39, 78, SPAN Inc. 6 39, 78, SPCAA, SPARTAN Transportation 9 589,5 117,9 Texoma Area Paratransit System 32 1,75, 35, The Transit System 3 216, 43,2 Town of South Padre Island 2 35, 7, Webb County CommiJnity Action Agency 7 82, 164, West Texas Opportunities, Inc , 24,4 Total ,152,215 3,3,443.. TDC's Transportation Development Credits

66 Attachment C TxDOT 21 SGR Facility Initiative Summary by Transit Agency Rural Agency Name FTA Requested Local match from AmountITotal TDC's* Project Cost ~ Council of Governments 1,538 2,18 uncil of Governments 1,2, 24, Brazos Transit District 3,, 6, CARTS 894, 178,8 Central Texas Rural Transit District 11485, 297, City of Cleburne 7, 1,4 Colorado Valley Transit 125, 25, Community Action Council of South Texas 15, 3, Community Council of Southwest Texas 375, 75, East Texas Council of Governments 1,125, 225, Kaufman Area Rural Transit 4, 8, Panhandle Transit 2, 4, Public Transit Services 1,42, 28,4 ~s Management Corp. 85, 17, Rural Economic Assistance League 75, 15, South East Texas Regional Planning Commission 5, 1, SPCM, SPARTAN Transportation 2, 4, Texoma Area Paratransit System 35, 7, The Transit System, Inc. 222, 44,4 West Texas Opportunities, Inc. 2,7,8 I TOTAL 13,965,618 2,793,124 * TDCs Transportation Development Credits

67 Attachment TxDOT 21 SGR Equipment Initiative Summary by Transit Agency Rural Agency Name FTA Requested AmountITotal Project Cost Local match from TDC s Alamo Area Council of Governments 414, 82.8 Aspermont Small Business Development Center, 21, 42, Bee Community Action Agency 2, CARTS 26, 5,2 Rural Transit District 25, 5, City of Cleburne 136, City of Del Rio 3, 6, o Valley Transit 239, 47,8 Community Action Council of South Texas 15, 3, Community Council of Southwest Texas 2, 4, Community Services, INC 6, 12, Concho Valley Transit District 748, ,71 East Texas Council of Governments 3, 6, EI Paso County 12, 2,4 Golden Crescent Regional Planning Commission 43,9 8,78 Gulf Coast Center 65, 13, Heart of Texas Council of Governments 85, 17. Kaufman Area Rural Transit 269, 53,8 Kleberg County Human Services 84,326 16,865 Lower Rio Girande Valley Development Council 95, 19, Panhandle Transit 36, 72, Public Transit Services 65, 13, Rural Economic Assistance League 25, 5, South East Texas Regional Planning Commission 5, 1, SPAN Inc. 321, 64,2 SPCAA, SPARTAN Transportation 165, 33, Texoma Area Paratransit System 14, 28, The Transit System, Inc. 18,3 21,66 Webb County Community Action Agency 51, 1,2 West Texas Opportunities, Inc. 74, 14,8 TDCs Transportation Development Credits TOTAL 4,779, ,873

68 Attachment E Texas State of Good Repair Intercity Bus Fleet Replacement and Capacity Update Project Summary Project Coach America, Kerrville Bus FTA Requested AmountITotal Local Match Items Project Cost from TOCs* 4 5, each 2,, 4, 4 3, each 1,2, 24, Facility Improvements 95, 19, Total 4,15, 83, * TDC's Transportation Development Credits

69 FY 212 TRANSIT PROJECT DESCRIPTIONS TEXAS STATEWIDE PUBLIC TRANSIT TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM Based on the 21 Texas Unified Tranportation Program Project Sponsor TxDOT MPO Project Information (reference number, etc) Apportionment Year 212 BriefProject Description Sec 539 ID Number State Administration Elderly Individuals and Individuals with Disabilities Program YOE; Year ofexpenditure Funding Information (yoe) Federal Funding Category 531 Federal (FfA) Funds 66, State Funds from TxDOT Other Funds Fiscal Year Cost 66, Total Project Cost 66, Trans. Dev. Credits Requested Trans. Dev. Credits Awarded (Date & Amount) Funding Information (YOE) Project Sponsor TxDOT Federal Funding Category 5311 MPO Project Information Federal (FfA) Funds 88, (reference number, etc) State Funds from TxDOT o Other Funds o Apportionment Year 212 Fiscal Year Cost 88, Brief Project Description Total Project Cost 88, o o State Administration Nonurbanized Formula Grant Trans. Dev. Credits Requested Trans. Dev. Credits Awarded Sec 539 ID Number (Date & Amount) Funding Information (YOE) Project Sponsor TxDOT Federal Funding Category 5311 MPO Project Information Federal (FfA) Funds 5,74,474 (reference number, etc) State Funds from TxDOT o Other Funds 2,698,721 Apportionment Year 212 Fiscal Year Cost 7,773,195 BriefProject Description Total Project Cost 7,773,195 Intercity Bus Grants Competitively Selected Trans. Dev. Credits Requested Trans. Dev. Credits Awarded Sec 539 ID Number (Date & Amount) 8

70 FY 212 TRANSIT PROJECT DESCRIPTIONS TEXAS STATEWIDE PUBLIC TRANSIT TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM Based on the 21 Texas Unified TranportBtlon Program YOE ~ Year of Expenditure Funding Information (YOE) Project Sponsor TxDOT Federal Funding Category 5311 MPO Project Information Federal (FrA) Funds 2,14,352 (reference number, etc) State Funds from TxDOT 18,681,694 Other Funds 5,925,911 Apportionment Year 212 Fiscal Year Cost 44,712,17 Brief Project Description Total Project Cost 44,712,11 Formula Grants to Rural Transit Districts See Attachment A Trans. Dey. Credits Requested Trans. Dey. Credits Awarded Sec 539 ID Number (Date & Amount) General Proiect Information Funding Information (YOE) Project Sponsor TxDOT Federal Funding Category 5311 MPO Project Information Federal (FTA) Funds 1,711,2 (reference number, etc) State Funds from TxDOT TBD Other Funds TBD Apportionment Year 212 Fiscal Year Cost 1,771,2 Brief Project Description Total Project Cost 1,111,2 Competitive or prorata awards through the TX Transportation Commission Trans. Dey. Credits Requested Trans. Dey. Credits Awarded Sec 5391 Number (Date & Amount) Funding Information (YOE) Project Sponsor TxDOT Federal Funding Category 5311 MPO Project Information Federal (FrA) Funds 313,454 (reference number, etc) State Funds from TxDOT o Other Funds o Apportionment Year 212 Fiscal Year Cost 313,454 Brief Project Description Total Project Cost 313,454 RTAP Rural Transit Assistance Program Trans. Dey. Credits Requested Trans. Dey. Credits Awarded Sec 539 ID Number (Date & Amount) 9

71 FY 212 TRANSIT PROJECT DESCRIPTIONS TEXAS STATEWIDE PUBLIC TRANSIT TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM Based on the 21 Texas Unified Tranportlltlon Program Funding Information (YOE) YOE = Year of Expenditure Project Sponsor TxDOT Federal Funding Category 5316 MPO Project Information Federal (FTA) Funds 541,829 (reference number, etc) State Funds from TxDOT o Other Funds o Apportionment Year 212 Fiscal Year Cost 41,829 Brief Project Description Total Project Cost 541,829 State Administration for ]ARC Urban Program Trans. Dev. Credits Requested Trans. Dev. Credits Awarded Sec 539 ID Number (Date & Amount) 5 Funding Information (YOE) Project Sponsor TxDOT Federal Funding Category 5316 MPO Project Information Federal (FTA) Funds 53,697,468 (reference number, etc) State Funds from TxDOT o Other Funds 3,227,926 Apportionment Year 212 Fiscal Year Cost 56,925,394 Brief Project Description Total Project Cost 56,925,394 Competitively Selected JARC Urban Grants Trans. Dev. Credits Requested Trans. Dev. Credits Awarded Sec 539 ID Number (Date & Amount) Funding Information (YOE) Project Sponsor TxDOT Federal Funding Category 5316 MPO Project Information Federal (FTA) Fnnds 5292,174 (reference number, etc) State Funds from TxDOT Other Funds Apportionment Year 212 Fiscal Year Cost 292,174 Brief Project Description Total Project Cost 5292,174 Slate Administration for JARC Rural Program Trans. Dev. Credits Requested 5 Trans. Dev. Credits Awarded Sec 539 ID Number (Date & Amount) 1

72 FY 212 TRANSIT PROJECT DESCRIPTIONS TEXAS STATEWIDE PUBLIC TRANSIT TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM Based on rhe 21 Texas Unified Tranportation Program Funding Information (YOE) YOE = Year of Expenditure Project Sponsor TxDOT Federal Funding Category 5316!\fPO Project Information Federal (ITA) Funds 2,629,57 (reference number, etc) State Funds from TxDOT o Other Funds 2,852,127 Apportionment Year 212 Fiscal Year Cost 5,481,697 Brief Project Description Total Project Cost 5,481,697 Competitively Selected JARC Rural Grants Trans. Dev. Credits Requested Trans. Dev. Credits Awarded Sec 539 ID Number (Date & Amount) Funding Information (YOE) Project Sponsor TxDOT Federal Funding Category 5317!\fPO Project Information Federal (FTA) Funds 177,388 (reference number, etc) State Funds from TxDOT o Other Funds o Apportionment Year 212 Fiscal Year Cost 177,388 BriefProject Description Total Project Cost 177,388 State Administration for New Freedom Urban Program Trans. Dey. Credits Requested Trans. Dey. Credits Awarded Sec 539 ID Number (Date & Amount) Funding Information (YOE) Project Sponsor TxDOT Federal Funding Category 5317!\fPO Project Information Federal (ITA) Funds 1,596,494 (reference number, etc) State Funds from TxDOT Other Funds 73,418 Apportionment Year 212 Fiscal Year Cost 52,326,912 BriefProject Description Total Project Cost 2,326,912 Competitively Selected New Freedom Urban Grants Trans. Dey. Credits Requested Trans. Dey. Credits Awarded Sec 539 ID Number (Date & Amount) 11

73 FY 212 TRANSIT PROJECT DESCRIPTIONS TEXAS STATEWIDE PUBLIC TRANSIT TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM Based on the 21)1 Texas Unified TranportatJon Program Project Sponsor TxDOT MPO Project Information (reference number. etc) Apportionment Year 212 Brief Project Description YOE = Year of Expenditure Funding Information (YOE) Federal Funding Category 5317 Federal (FfA) Funds 138,48 State Funds from TxDOT o Other Funds o Fiscal Year Cost 138,48 Total Project Cost 138,48 Sec 539 ID Number State Administration for New Freedom Rural Program Trans. Dev. Credits Requested Trans. Dev. Credits Awarded (Date & Amount) Project Sponsor TxDOT MPO Project Information (referenee number, etc) Apportionment Year 212 Brief Project Description Funding Information (YOEl Federal Funding Category 5317 Federal (FTA) Funds 1,245,681 State Funds from TxDOT o Other Funds 945,36 Fiscal Year Cost 2,19,717 Total Project Cost 2,19,717 Sec 539 ID Number Competitively Selected New Freedom Rural Grants Trans. Dev. Credits Requested Trans. Dev. Credits Awarded (Date & Amount) Attachment A 5311 Rural Formula, same as for FY

74 FY 213 TRANSIT PROJECT DESCRIPTIONS TEXAS STATEWIDE PUBLIC TRANSIT TRANSPORT A TION IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM Based on the 21 Texas Unified Tranportatfon Program YOE = Year of Expenditure Fundin!! Information (YOEl Project Sponsor TxDOT Federal Funding Category 531 MPO Project Information Federal (FTA) Funds 66, (reference number, etc) State Funds from TxDOT Other Funds Apportionment Year 213 Fiscal Year Cost 66, Brief Project Description Total Project Cost 66, State Administration Elderly Individuals and Individuals with Disabilities Program Trans. Dev. Credits Requested Trans. Dev. Credits Awarded Sec 539 ID Number (Date & Amount) Funding Information (YOEl Project Sponsor TxDOT Federal Funding Category 53Il MPO Project Information Federal (FfA) Funds 88, (reference number, etc) State Funds from TxDOT o Other Funds o Apportionment Year 213 Fiscal Year Cost 88, Brief Project Description Total Project Cost 88, State Administration Nonurbanized Formula Grant Trans. Dev. Credits Requested Trans. Dev. Credits Awarded Sec 539 ID Number (Date & Amount) Funding Information (YO E) Project Sponsor TxDOT Federal Funding Category 53Il MPO Project Information Federal (FfA) Funds 5,74,474 (reference number, etc) State Funds from TxDOT o Other Funds 2,698,721 Apportionment Year 213 Fiscal Year Cost 7,773,195 Brief Project Description Total Project Cost 7,773,195 Intercity Bus Grants Competitively Selected Trans. Dev. Credits Requested Trans. Dev. Credits Awarded Sec 539 ID Number (Date & Amount) 13

75 FY 213 TRANSIT PROJECT DESCRIPTIONS TEXAS STATEWIDE PUBLIC TRANSIT TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM Based on the 21 Texas Unified Tranportation Program YOE Year of Expenditure Funding Information (YOE) Project Sponsor TxDOT Federal Funding Category 5311 MPO Project Information Federal (FTA) Funds 2,14,352 (reference number, etc) State Funds from TxDOT 18,681,694 Other Funds 5,925,971 Apportionment Year 213 Fiscal Year Cost 44,712,17 Brief Project Description Total Project Cost 44,712,17 Fonnula Grants to Rural Transit Districts See Attachment A Trans. Dev. Credits Requested Trans. Dev. Credits Awarded Scc 539 ID Number (Date & Amount) General Project InCormation Funding InCormation (YOE) Project Sponsor TxDOT Federal Funding Category 5311 MPO Project Information Federal (FfA) Funds 7,771,2 (reference number, etc) State Funds Crom TxDOT TBD Other Funds TBD Apportionment Year 213 Fiscal Year Cost 57,771,2 Brief Project Description Total Project Cost 7,771,2 Competitive or prorata awards through the TX Transportation Commission Trans. Dev. Credits Requested Trans. Dev. Credits Awarded Sec 539 ID Number (Date & Amount) Gencral Project Information Funding Information (YOE) Project Sponsor TxDOT Federal Funding Category 5311 MPO Project InCormation Federal (FfA) Funds 373,454 (reference number, etc) State Funds from TxDOT o Other Funds o Apportionment Year 213 Fiscal Year Cost 373,454 Brief Project Description Total Project Cost 373,454 RTAP Rural Transit Assistance Program Trans. Dev. Credits Requested Trans. Dev. Credits Awarded Sec 539 ID Number (Date & Amount) 14

76 FY 213 TRANSIT PROJECT DESCRIPTIONS TEXAS STATEWIDE PUBLIC TRANSIT TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM Based on the 21 Texas Unified Tranportatlon Program YOE = Year ofexpenditure Funding Information (YO E) Project Sponsor TxDOT Federal Funding Category 5316 MPO Project Information Federal (ITA) Funds 41,829 (reference number, etc) State Funds from TxDOT o Other Funds o Apportionment Year 213 Fiscal Year Cost 41,829 Brief Project Description Total Project Cost 41,829 State Administration for JARC Urban Program Trans. Dey. Credits Requested Trans. Dey. Credits Awarded Sec 539 ID Number (Date & Amount) Funding Information (yoe) Project Sponsor TxDOT Federal Funding Category 5316 MPO Project Information Federal (ITA) Funds 3,697,468 (reference number, etc) State Funds from TxDOT o Other Funds 3,227,926 Apportionment Year 213 Fiscal Year Cost 6,925,394 Brief Project Description Total Project Cost 6,925,394 Competitively Selected JARC Urban Grants Trans. Dey. Credits Requested Trans. Dey. Credits Awarded Sec 539 ID Number (Date & Amount) Funding Information (YOE) Project Sponsor TxDOT Federal Funding Category 5316 MPO Project Information Federal (ITA) Funds 292,174 (reference number, etc) State Funds from TxDOT o Other Funds o Apportionment Year 213 Fiscal Year Cost 292,174 Brief Project Description Total Project Cost 292,174 State Administration for JARC Rural Program Trans. Dey. Credits Requested Trans. Dey. Credits Awarded Sec 539 ID Number (Date & Amount) 15

77 FY 213 TRANSIT PROJECT DESCRIPTIONS TEXAS STATEWIDE PUBLIC TRANSIT TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM Based on the 21 Texas Unified Tranportatlon Program YOE =Year of Expenditure Funding Information (YOE) Project Sponsor TxDOT Federal Funding Category 5316 MPO Project Information Federal (FTA) Funds 2,629,57 (reference nnmber, etc) State Funds from TxDOT Other Funds 2,852,127 Apportionment Year 213 Fiscal Year Cost 5,481,697 Brief Project Description Total Project Cost 5,481,697 Competitively Selected JARC Rural Grants Trans. Dev. Credits Requested Trans. Dev. Credits Awarded Sec 539 ID Number (Date & Amount) Funding Information (YOE) Project Sponsor TxDOT Federal Funding Catcgory 5317 MPO Project Information Federal (FTA) Funds 177,388 (reference number, etc) State Funds from TxDOT o Other Funds o Apportionment Year 213 Fiscal Year Cost 177,388 Brief Project Description Total Project Cost 177,388 State Administration for New Freedom Urban Program Trans. Dev. Credits Requested Trans. Dev. Credits Awarded Sec 539 ID Number (Date & Amount) Funding Information (YOE) Project Sponsor TxDOT Federal Funding Catcgory 5317 MPO Project Information Federal (FTA) Funds 1,596,494 (refcrcncc number, etc) State Funds from TxDOT o Other Funds 73,418 Apportionment Year 213 Fiscal Year Cost 2,326,912 Bricf Project Description Total Project Cost 2,326,912 Competitively Selected New Freedom Urban Grants Trans. Dev. Credits Requested Trans. Dev. Credits Awarded Sec 539 ID Number (Date & Amount) 16

78 FY 213 TRANSIT PROJECT DESCRIPTIONS TEXAS STATEWIDE PUBLIC TRANSIT TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM Based on the 21 Texas Unified Tranportatlon Program Funding Information (YOE) YOE ~ Year of Expenditure Project Sponsor TxDOT Federal Funding Category 5317 MPO Project Information Federal (FfA) Funds 138,48 (reference number, etc) State Funds from TxDOT o Other Funds o Apportionment Year 213 Fiscal Year Cost 138,48 Brief Project Description Total Project Cost 138,48 State Administration for New Freedom Rural Program Trans. Dev. Credits Requested Trans. Dev. Credits Awarded Sec 539 ID Number (Date & Amount) Funding Information (YOE) Project Sponsor TxDOT Federal Funding Category 5317 MPO Project Information Federal (FfA) Funds 1,245,681 (reference number, etc) State Funds from TxDOT Other Funds 945,36 Apportionment Year 213 Fiscal Year Cost 2,19,717 Brief Project Description Total Project Cost 2,19,7\7 Competitively Selected New Freedom Rural Grants Trans. Dev. Credits Requested Trans. Dev. Credits Awarded Sec 539 ID Number (Date & Amount) Attachment A 5311 Rural Formula, same as for FY

79 FY 214 TRANSIT PROJECT DESCRIPTIONS TEXAS STATEWIDE PUBLIC TRANSIT TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM Based on the 21 Texas Unified TranportatJon Program Funding Information (YOE) YOE = Year ofexpenditure Project Sponsor TxDOT Federal Funding Category 531 MPO Project Information Federal (FTA) Funds S66, (reference number, etc) State Funds from TxDOT o Other Funds o Apportionment Year 214 Fiscal Year Cost 66, Brief Project Description Total Project Cost S66, State Administration Elderly Individuals and Individuals with Disabilities Program Trans. Dev. Credits Requested so Trans. Dev. Credits A warded Sec 539 ID Number (Date & Amount) so Fundinl! Information (yoe) Project Sponsor TxDOT Federal Funding Category 5311 MPO Project Information Federal (FTA) Funds S88, (reference number, etc) State Funds from TxDOT o Other Funds o Apportionment Year 214 Fiscal Year Cost S88, Brief Project Description Total Project Cost 88, State Administration Nonurbanized Formula Grant Trans. Dev. Credits Requested so Trans. Dev. Credits Awarded Sec 539 ID Number (Date & Amount) so Funding Information (YOE) Project Sponsor TxDOT Federal Funding Category 5311 MPO Projed Information Federal (FTA) Funds 5,74,474 (reference number, etc) State Funds from TxDOT Other Funds 2,698,721 Apportionment Year 214 Fiscal Year Cost 7,773,195 Brief Project Description Total Project Cost 7,773,195 Intercity Bus Grants Competitively Selected Trans. Dev. Credits Requested so Trans. Dev. Credits Awarded Sec 539 ID Number (Date & Amount) so 18

80 FY 214 TRANSIT PROJECT DESCRIPTIONS TEXAS STATEWIDE PUBLIC TRANSIT TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM Based on the 21 Texas Unified Tranportatlon Program YOE = Year of Expenditure Funding Information (YOEl Project Sponsor TxDOT Federal Funding Category 5311 MPO Project Information Federal (FTA) Funds 2,14,352 (reference number, etc) State Funds from TxDOT 18,681,694 Other Funds 5,925,971 Apportionment Year 214 Fiscal Year Cost 44,712,17 Brief Project Description Total Project Cost 44,712,17 Fonnula Grants to Rural Transit Districts See Attachment A Trans. Dev. Credits Requested Trans. Dev. Credits Awarded Sec 5391 Number (Date & Amount) General Proiect Information Funding Information (YOEl Project Sponsor TxDOT Federal Funding Category 5311 MPO Project Information Federal (FTA) Funds 7,771,2 (reference number, etc) State Funds from TxDOT TBD Other Funds TBD Apportionment Year 214 Fiscal Year Cost 7,771,2 Brier Project Description Total Project Cost 7,771,2 Competitive or prorata awards through the TX Transportation Commission Trans. Dev. Credits Requested Trans. Dev. Credits Awarded Sec Number (Date & Amount) Funding Information (YOE) Project Sponsor TxDOT Federal Funding Category 5311 MPO Project Information Federal (FTA) J;'unds 373,454 (reference number, etc) State Funds from TxDOT o Other Funds o Apportionment Year 214 Fiscal Year Cost 5373,454 Brief Project Description Total Project Cost 373,454 RTAP Rural Transit Assistance Program Trans. Dev. Credits Requested so Trans. Dev. Credits Awarded Sec Number (Date & Amount) 19

81 FY 214 TRANSIT PROJECT DESCRIPTIONS TEXAS STATEWIDE PUBLIC TRANSIT TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM Bued on the 21 Te)(u Unified TranportJJtion Program YOE =Year of Expenditure Funding Information (YOE) Project Sponsor TxDOT Federal Funding Category 5316 MPO Project Information Federal (FfA) Funds S41,829 (reference number, etc) State Funds from TxDOT o Other Funds o Apportionment Year 214 Fiscal Year Cost S41,829 Brief Project Description Total Project Cost S41O,829 State Administration for JARC Urban Program Trans. Dev. Credits Requested so Trans. Dev. Credits Awarded Sec 5391 Number (Date & Amount) so Fundin!! Information (YOE) Project Sponsor TxDOT Federal Funding Category 53]6 MPO Project Information Federal (FfA) Funds S3,697,468 (reference number, etc) State Funds from TxDOT Other Funds 3,227,926 Apportionment Year 214 Fiscal Year Cost S6,925,394 Brief Project Description Total Project Cost S6,925,394 Competitively Selected JARC Urban Grants Trans. Dev. Credits Requested so Trans. Dev. Credits Awarded Sec 5391 Number (Date & Amount) so Funding Information (YOE) Project Sponsor TxDOT Federal Funding Category 5316 MPO Project Information Federal (FTA) Funds S292,174 (reference number, etc) State Funds from TxDOT Other Funds Apportionment Year 214 Fiscal Year Cost 292,174 Brief Project Description Total Project Cost 292,174 State Administration for JARC Rural Program Trans. Dev. Credits Requested SO Trans. Dev. Credits Awarded Sec 5391 Number (Date & Amount) SO 2

82 FY 214 TRANSIT PROJECT DESCRIPTIONS TEXAS STATEWIDE PUBLIC TRANSIT TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM Based on the 21 Texas Unified Tranportatlon Program YOE = Year ofexpenditure Funding Information (YOE) Project Sponsor TxDOT Federal Funding Category 5316 MPO Project Information Federal (FfA) Funds 2,629,57 (reference number, etc) State Funds from TxDOT Other Funds 2,852,127 Apportionment Year 214 Fiscal Year Cost 5,481,697 Proj ect Phase Brief Project Description Total Project Cost 5,481,697 Competitively Selected JARC Rural Grants Trans. Dev. Credits Requested Trans. Dev. Credits Awarded Sec 539 ID Number (Date & Amount) Funding Information (YOE) Project Sponsor TxDOT Federal Funding Category 5317 MPO Project Information Federal (FfA) Funds 177,388 (reference number, etc) State Funds from TxDOT o Other Funds o Apportionment Year 214 Fiscal Year Cost 177,388 Brief Project Description Total Project Cost 177,388 Stale Administration for New Freedom Urban Program Trans. Dev. Credits Requested Trans. Dev. Credits Awarded Sec 539 ID Number (Date & Amount) Funding Information (YOE) Project Sponsor TxDOT Federal Funding Category 5317 MPO Project Information Federal (FfA) Funds 1,596,494 (reference number, etc) State Funds from TxDOT Other Funds 73,418 Apportionment Year 214 Fiscal Year Cost 2,326,912 Brief Project Description Total Project Cost 2,326,912 Competitively Selected New Freedom Urban Grants Trans. Dev. Credits Requested Trans. Dev. Credits Awarded Sec 539 ID Number (Date & Amount) 21

83 FY 214 TRANSIT PROJECT DESCRIPTIONS TEXAS STATEWIDE PUBLIC TRANSIT TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM Based on the 21 Texas Unif1ed Tranportation Program Project Sponsor TxOOT MPO Project Information (reference number, etc) Apportionment Year 214 Brief Project Description YOE = Year of Expenditure Funding Information (YOE) Federal Funding Category 5317 Federal (FTA) Funds 138,48 State Funds from TxDOT Other Funds Fiscal Year Cost 5138,48 Total Project Cost 138,48 o o Sec 539 ID Number State Administration for New Freedom Rural Program Project Sponsor TxDOT MPO Project Information (reference number, etc) Apportionment Year Brief Project Description 214 Trans. Dev. Credits Requested Trans. Dev. Credits Awarded (Date & Amount) Funding Information (YOE) Federal Funding Category 5317 Fedcral (FTA) Funds 1,245,681 State Funds from TxDOT o Other Funds 945,36 Fiscal Year Cost 2,19,717 Total Project Cost 2,19,717 Sec 539 ID Number Competitively Selected New Freedom Rural Grants Trans. Dev. Credits Requested Trans. Dev. Credits Awarded (Date & Amount) Attachment A 5311 Rural Formula, same as for,fy

84 All in Year of Dollars Transit Financial Summary TxDOT Division FY Transportation Improvement Program Transit 2 See. 537 Urbanized Fonnula <2ooK 3 See. 539 Discretionary 4 Sec. 531 Elderly &Individuals w/disabilitles 5 See Nonurbanized Fonnula 66, 34,23,282 a 27,36,386 66, 61,59,668 66, 34,23,282 27,36,386 66, 61,59,668 66, 34,23,282 66, 27,36,386 61,59,668 6 Sec JARC >2ooK 7 Sec JARC <2ooK 8 Sec JARC Nonurbanized 4,18,297 2,921,744 3,227,926 2,852,127 7,336,223 5,773,871 4,18,297 2,921,744 3,227,926 2,852,127 7,336,223 5,773,871 4,18,297 2,921,744 3,227,926 7,336,223 2,852,127 5,773,871 9 Sec New Freedom >2ooK 1 Sec, 5317 New Freedom <2ooK 11 See New Freedom Nonurbanized 1,773,882 3,157,971 73,418 1,675,454 2,54,3 4,833,425 1,773,882 3,157,971 73,418 1,675,454 2,54,3 4,833,425 1,773,882 3,157,971 73,418 1,675, Other FTA (SGR) 13 ReaionallY Sianiflcant or Other 33,897,199 Total Funds ITransportation Development Credits 3 Sec. 539 Discretionary 4 Sec. 531 Elderly &Indlvlduals w/dlsabllitles 5 Sec Nonurbanized Fonnula 6 Sec JARC >2K 7 Sec JARC <2K 8 Sec JARC Nonurbanized 9 Sec New Freedom >2K 1 Sec New Freedom <2K 11 66, 2,54, o 34,23,282 27,36, ,128 19,225,544 4,18,297 3,227,926 16,433,188 12,911,74 2,921,744 2,852,127 11,686,976 11,48,58 1,773,882 73,418 7,95,528 2,921,672 3,157,971 1,675,454 12,631,854 6,71,816 o o o o o o c~rr~~t A~~~~~~:;~~~~ 12 OtherFTA Total Funds Transportation Development Credits I Requested

85 Grouped Projects (Definitions)

86 Grouped Project CSJs Table 1 Definition of Grouped Projects for Use in the STIP Revised May 18, 25 PROPOSED CSJ GROUPED PROJECT 595 PE Preliminary Engineering 5951 Right of Way Acquisition Preventive Maintenance and Rehabilitation Bridge Replacement and Rehabilitation 5954 Railroad Grade Separations 5895 Safety 5956 Landscaping DEFINITION Preliminary Engineering for any project that is not added capacity in a nonattainment area. Includes activities which do not involve or lead directly to construction such as planning and technical studies, grants for training and research programs. Right of Way acquisition for any project that is not added capacity in a nonattainment area. Includes relocation assistance, hardship acquisition and protective buying. Projects to include pavement repair to preserve existing pavement so that it may achieve its designed loading. Includes seal coats, overlays, resurfacing, restoration and rehabilitation done with existing ROW. Also includes modernization of a highway by reconstruction, adding shoulders or adding auxiliary lanes (e.g., parking, weaving, turning, climbing, nonadded capacity). Projects to replace and/or rehabilitate functionally obsolete or structurally deficient bridges. Projects to construct or replace existing highwayrailroad grade crossings and to rehabilitate and/or replace deficient railroad underpasses, resulting in no added capacity. Projects to include the construction or replacement/rehabilitation of guard rails, median barriers, crash cushions, pavement markings, skid treatments, medians, lighting improvements, curb ramps, railroad/highway crossing warning devices, fencing, intersection improvements (e.g., turn lanes), signalization projects and interchange modifications. Also includes projects funded via the Federal Hazard Elimination Program and the Federal Railroad Signal Safety Program. Project consisting of typical rightofway landscape development, establishment and aesthetic improvements to include any associated erosion control and environmental mitigation activities.

87 Grouped Project CSJs Table 1 Definition of Grouped Projects for Use in the STIP Revised May 18, 25 PROPOSED CSJ GROUPED PROJECT DEFINITION Highway traffic operation improvement projects including the installation of ramp Intelligent Transportation metering control devices, variable message signs, traffic monitoring equipment Systems Deployment and projects in the Federal ITS/IVHS programs Bicycle and Pedestrian Construction or rehabilitation of bicycle and pedestrian lanes, paths and facilities Safety Rest Areas and Truck Weigh Stations 5918 Transit Improvements Construction and improvement of rest areas and truck weigh stations. Projects include the construction and improvement of small passenger shelters and information kiosks. Also includes the construction and improvement of rail storage/maintenance facilities bus transfer facilities where minor amounts of additional land are required and there is not a substantial increase in the number of users.

88 District Boundary Map