Monterey Peninsula Water Supply Project A Evaluation of Capital Financing Alternatives For a 5.4 MGD Desalination Plant
|
|
- Albert Blair
- 5 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 A Evaluation of Capital Financing Alternatives For a 5.4 MGD Desalination Plant Prepared by Monterey Peninsula Water Management District September 2012 (DRAFT Version 1.0)
2 Introduction California American Water Company ( Cal Am ) has filed an application for the Monterey Peninsula Water Supply Project, A In the application, four alternative project scenarios are examined: (i) 9.0 MGD plant with no Groundwater Replenishment ( GWR ) and no State Revolving Fund loans ( SRF ) (ii) 9.0 MGD plant with no GWR and using SRF (iii) 5.4 MGD plant with GWR and no SRF (iv) 5.4 MGD plant with GWR and using SRF In the two alternatives that include SRF loans, the proposed capital financing structure is as follows: 9.0 MGD plant w/o GWR w/ SRF 5.4 MGD plant w/ GWR w/ SRF Surcharge 2 (Pay as You Go) $99.1 million $99.1 million Long Term Debt $79.9 million $56.2 million Equity $90.4 million $63.6 million Both scenarios utilize $20 million of low cost commercial paper for additional funding in the early phases of construction, which is ultimately taken out by permanent long term funding. The purpose of this report is to: Identify mechanisms and approaches that can improve upon the proposed Cal Am financing plan to the benefit of ratepayers, without jeopardizing the project schedule. Two key measures are used to compare scenarios: (i) the total 40 year lifecycle cost, and (ii) the discounted net present value of future costs in 2012 dollars. Evaluation of Capital Financing Alternatives for a 5.4 MGD Desalination Plant Monterey Peninsula Water Supply Project (A ) DRAFT Ver 1.0 Page 1
3 Recommendations In the event the project is not publicly-owned, the District will offer to be the Public Partner for financial issues. This means that the District will make the following commitments and request that the CPUC final order direct Cal-Am to accept the District s decision regarding these financing alternatives at the time of the permanent project financing if doing so saves ratepayers money. This includes six basic considerations: 1) If available, State Revolving Fund (SRF) loans should be maximized and considered for up to 100% of the project funding to reduce costs to Peninsula ratepayers; 2) If SRF loans are not available for the entire project, then require Cal-Am to examine tax-exempt private activity debt as a funding source for both the debt component, but preferably additionally in lieu of equity. 3) Consider a public agency (i.e. MPWMD) contribution in lieu of Cal-Am debt or equity to reduce costs to Peninsula ratepayers. The contribution would be made via public debt and the source of repayment either a surcharge on the Cal-Am bill or direct fees and charges to property owners in the District established with a Proposition 218 process; 4) Even in the event of a Cal-Am borrowing, the District should offer and the CPUC should accept the District s potential public credit backstop to enhance the Cal-Am borrowing credit rating and reduce costs to Peninsula ratepayers. The District offers to substitute its public credit as a backstop to Cal-Am s creditworthiness in order to reduce the cost of Cal-Am s debt. It is anticipated that Cal-Am s parent obligation carries a credit rating of Baa2, but the District could raise that to perhaps A1. This might require the use of a stand-by water purchase agreement, a rate covenant, and other standing commitments; 5) In all cases, the CPUC should require at that point in the future when permanent financing is considered that the then-current market conditions be considered and, if warranted, the public participation in financing as outlined above be required. 6) If it turns out that State Revolving Funds require a public partner, as it normally would in most cases, the District offers to serve in that role; Evaluation of Capital Financing Alternatives for a 5.4 MGD Desalination Plant Monterey Peninsula Water Supply Project (A ) DRAFT Ver 1.0 Page 2
4 Calibration of District Model to Cal-Am Model Key Conclusions The District model was calibrated against the four Cal-Am scenarios and it was determined that the District model and the Cal-Am model produce sufficiently identical results to allow the District model to be used for analysis of alternative scenarios and assessment of variations to Cal-Am s assumptions. Making Cal-Am s Financing Plan Better If SRF loans are not available, then in today s market the use of Cal-Am tax-exempt debt instead of taxable corporate debt would reduce the cost to ratepayers. This advantage will improve in the future if the tax-exempt marketplace returns to a more traditional relationship to the taxable marketplace (see discussion below.) Hence, based on market conditions at the time, Cal-Am should consider the benefits of tax-exempt debt. Providing a public credit backstop to Cal-Am s credit rating would further reduce the cost to ratepayers, for either taxable or tax-exempt debt. The most significant savings to ratepayers occurs when debt is used in lieu of Cal-Am equity, either through a public contribution, Cal-Am debt (tax-exempt or corporate), or additional SRF loans. A comparison of results is included beginning page 7. The conclusions would remain the same if a 9.0 MGD plant were evaluated. Discussion: Debt to Equity Ratio The concept of financing the desalination project entirely with debt, SRF loans or tax-exempt public agency debt, clearly reduces the cost to the ratepayer. However, Cal-Am may be concerned about their debt to equity ratio statewide being impacted solely by the Monterey County District. We do not believe that this is a significant concern for three reasons: First, the debt to equity ratio is already undergoing a significant swing as a result of A , which signifies that shifts in the ratio due to exogenous factors are already familiar and acceptable to Cal-Am. The current debt to equity ratio is 58% - 42%, but A would change that to 47% - 53%, a large inversion. Second, Cal-Am intends to invest more than $400 million in infrastructure over the next five years (Testimony of Bente Villadsen in A ). According to Table A2 of the proposed decision in A Cal-Am s adopted rate base is$374.4 million. If it is assumed that existing rate base was financed as 58% - 42% debt to equity, the current authorized structure, and new investment will be 47% - 53%, then in the case of the 5.4 MGD plant where a full $119.8 million could be debt financed it would result in a 60% - 40% debt to equity ratio for Cal-Am overall, which is less than 5% different than the current debt to equity structure of Cal-Am. And third, when there is an equity portion coupled with SRF loans or outside contributions, an amount equal to the contributions is removed from the rate base resulting in 100% of the undepreciated rate Evaluation of Capital Financing Alternatives for a 5.4 MGD Desalination Plant Monterey Peninsula Water Supply Project (A ) DRAFT Ver 1.0 Page 3
5 base that remains earning an authorized equity rate of return, rather than a return based on the debt to equity ratio. The contribution repayment is done via a surcharge and the interest component is not adjusted for taxes in the revenue requirement calculation, as traditional debt would. It is unclear if the SRF loan or contribution can even be considered a debt or how the treatment is consistent with maintaining company-wide debt to equity ratios. There may also be ways to isolate the financing of the desalination plant from the rest of Cal-Am through accounting methods, special purpose corporation, or a financing subsidiary. Uncertainties in Cal-Am s Proposed Financing Plan By 2016 the market conditions for the permanent take-out financing will be different than today or even a year from now when the CPUC renders its decision. For example, the charts below underscore how the relationship between tax-exempt municipal debt and taxable corporate and US Treasury debt is much different today than traditionally, represented by the year If the tax-exempt marketplace returns to a more traditional relationship to the taxable marketplace, the advantages of public debt presented herein would increase significantly. Therefore, financing decisions should be made in the context of the then-prevailing market conditions Yield Curve Relationships 2007 Yield Curve Relationships Public Ownership v. Private Ownership A public owned project using traditional public financing that borrows all interest during construction (capitalized interest), even without the advantages of pay-as-you-go capital during the construction period such as a Surcharge 2, still competes favorably with Cal-Am s financing proposal. This scenario has not been included in this report. If pay-as-you-go monies can be provided to a public owned project, either through direct collections from constituents (ratepayers) through a Proposition 218 process, or the CPUC allows direct contributions from ratepayers through a Surcharge 2 mechanism, then the publicly-financed project is even more advantageous to ratepayers. Evaluation of Capital Financing Alternatives for a 5.4 MGD Desalination Plant Monterey Peninsula Water Supply Project (A ) DRAFT Ver 1.0 Page 4
6 Assumptions Cal-Am Debt: 47% debt ratio per A (Stephenson A.11, A.51) 5.00% interest rate for Cal-Am s model and initial testimony (Linam A.13) 6.63% interest rate for Cal-Am s authorized debt cost (Stephenson A.11, A.51) 4.70% interest rate if using tax-exempt debt backed by AWW Capital Corp 3.70% interest rate if using tax-exempt debt with public credit backstop Baa2 credit rating for American Water Works Capital Corp backed debt (per Moody s 8/15/12 Credit Opinion) Cal-Am s stand-alone credit rating would be below investment grade. On a stand-alone basis, several key metrics are below those expected for an investment grade rating from Moody s (Testimony of Bente Villadsen in A ) Cal-Am Equity: 53% equity ratio per A (Stephenson A.11, A.51) 9.99% equity rate of return (Stephenson A.11, A.51) State Revolving Funds: 2.50% interest rate (Linam A.13) 20 year term It should be noted that typically the SRF moneys are limited by the State to $50 million annually to a recipient. Recipients may receive funds in multiple years. This limitation may affect the ability to use SRF monies as proposed. Public Debt: 3.70% (Based on actual market data 8/16/12) 30 year term Effective Tax Rate: 40.75% (Linam A.12) 35% Federal tax rate (Linam A.12) 8.84% California tax rate (Linam A.12) Ad Valorem Tax Rate: Uncollectibles: 1.05% (Stephenson A.57; Linam A.12) % (Stephenson A.36; Linam A.12) Evaluation of Capital Financing Alternatives for a 5.4 MGD Desalination Plant Monterey Peninsula Water Supply Project (A ) DRAFT Ver 1.0 Page 5
7 Depreciation: 40 year plant life / 2.50% (Linam A.12) 25 year tax life / 4.00% (Linam A.12) AFUDC Rate: 1.00% thru 2015 (approximation based on Stephenson Attachment 5) 3.20% % in 2016 for 5.4 MGD (approximation based on Stephenson Attachment 5) O&M: Purchased Water: Excluded Only capital costs of 5.4 MGD plant evaluated Excluded Only capital costs of 5.4 MGD plant evaluated Surcharge 2: Year Amount 2013 $7,500, $27,040, $31,830, $32,780,000 Construction Draws: 9.0 MGD 5.4 MGD Year Amount Amount 2013 $13,110,000 $11,920, $32,940,000 $27,460, $61,470,000 $50,010, $152,480,000 $123,610,000 $260,000,000 $213,000,000 Costs of Issuance: Where public debt is assumed, additional costs of debt equal to 1.0% of borrowed amount Tax Treatment on Contributions: Contributions such as SRF loans or tax-exempt debt are treated as repaid through a surcharge, and that portion is removed from rate base and not subject to a return. This model does not subject the interest component to gross-up for taxes and does not treat the interest expense as a deductible expense item. The debt is included in the revenue requirement for analytical purposes, but in the case of a contribution repaid directly from public entity revenues, rather than a surcharge, it would not actually be part of the Cal-Am revenue requirement for ratemaking purposes. Rather, is included here to gather the overall cost to ratepayers. Evaluation of Capital Financing Alternatives for a 5.4 MGD Desalination Plant Monterey Peninsula Water Supply Project (A ) DRAFT Ver 1.0 Page 6
8 Summary of Financing Capital Costs Monterey Peninsula Water Supply Project 5.4 MGD Plant Size including Surcharge 2 Financing Scenario A B C D D-2 E Title Traditional Utility Financing Traditional Equity, SRF Loans in Lieu of Debt 100% SRF Loans in Lieu of Debt and Equity Traditional Equity, Cal-Am Tax- Exempt Debt (Baa2 Rating) Traditional Equity, Cal-Am Tax- Exempt Debt (Baa2 Rating) 100% Cal-Am Tax-Exempt Debt (Baa2 Rating) Debt Amount (see note 1) $56,587,000 $56,587,000 $120,397,000 $56,859,000 $56,859,000 $121,636,000 Debt Interest Rate 5.00% 2.50% 2.50% 4.70% 4.70% 4.70% How Debt Paid (see note 2) ROR Surcharge Surcharge Surcharge ROR Surcharge Debt Amortization Period (note 3) Depreciable Life 20 Year 20 Year 30 Year Depreciable Life 30 Year Equity Amount $63,810,000 $63,810,000 $0 $64,117,000 $64,117,000 $0 Post-Tax Equity Return 9.99% 9.99% N/A 9.99% 9.99% N/A Total 40-Yr Capital Cost Recovery $435,618,000 $387,426,000 $253,612,000 $423,184,000 $434,579,000 $328,472,000 Net Present Value of Capital Costs $245,057,000 $228,063,000 $165,316,000 $236,591,000 $244,473,000 $182,807,000 Notes: (1) Where tax exempt debt is assumed, issuance costs of 1% are added (2) Debt can be repaid either as part of the rate of return on undepreciated rate base ( ROR ) or through the pass-thru of a surcharge ( Surcharge ) (3) SRF loans are 20 year; Bonded debt is 30 year; In the rate of return is the tax-adjusted depreciable life (4) AFUDC is the same in all scenarios, a simplification which does not alter relative results; Not all AFUDC is recoverable when SRF loans and Public Contributions are used to finance. Page 7
9 Summary of Financing Capital Costs Monterey Peninsula Water Supply Project 5.4 MGD Plant Size including Surcharge 2 Financing Scenario E-2 F F-2 G G-2 H Title 100% Cal-Am Tax-Exempt Debt (Baa2 Rating) Traditional Equity, Cal-Am Tax- Exempt Debt w/ Public Backstop (A1 Rating) or Public Contribution Traditional Equity, Cal-Am Tax- Exempt Debt w/ Public Backstop (A1 Rating) 100% Cal-Am Tax- Exempt Debt w/ Public Backstop (A1 Rating) or Public Contribution 100%, Cal-Am Tax- Exempt Debt w/ Public Backstop (A1 Rating) Public Contribution in Lieu of Equity, SRF Loans in Lieu of Debt Debt Amount (see note 1) $121,636,000 $56,859,000 $56,859,000 $121,636,000 $121,636,000 $56,894,000 Debt Interest Rate 4.70% 3.70% 3.70% 3.70% 3.70% 2.50% How Debt Paid (see note 2) ROR Surcharge ROR Surcharge ROR Surcharge Debt Amortization Period (note 3) Depreciable Life 30 Year Depreciable Life 30 Year Depreciable Life 20 Year SRF 30 Year Contrib. Equity Amount $0 $64,117,000 $64,117,000 $0 $0 $64,157,000 Post-Tax Equity Return N/A 9.99% 9.99% N/A N/A 3.70% Debt Cost Total 40-Yr Capital Cost Recovery $311,433,000 $411,070,000 $425,512,000 $302,557,000 $292,032,000 $279,428,000 Net Present Value of Capital Costs $182,223,000 $231,484,000 $239,895,000 $171,882,000 $172,426,000 $168,779,000 Notes: (1) Where tax exempt debt is assumed, issuance costs of 1% are added (2) Debt can be repaid either as part of the rate of return on undepreciated rate base ( ROR ) or through the pass-thru of a surcharge ( Surcharge ) (3) SRF loans are 20 year; Bonded debt is 30 year; In the rate of return is the tax-adjusted depreciable life (4) AFUDC is the same in all scenarios, a simplification which does not alter relative results; Not all AFUDC is recoverable when SRF loans and Public Contributions are used to finance. Page 8
10 Scenario A: Traditional Financing / No SRF Financing / With Surcharge 2 Revenue Requirements Calculation Capital Costs $0 $11,920,000 $27,460,000 $50,010,000 $123,610,000 Surcharge #1 AFUDC Amount 0 59, , ,284 5,578,298 AFUDC Excluded from ROR 0 37, , ,888 1,479,303 Plant(Transfer to CWIP) 0 11,979,899 39,698,290 90,358, ,546, ,546,873 Accumulated AFUDC Excluded from ROR 0 37, , ,016 2,185,318 2,185,318 Accumulated Depreciation 2,955,289 Cumulative Surcharge 2 0 7,500,000 34,540,000 66,370,000 99,150,000 99,150,000 Cumulative Outside Contributions Cumulative Deferred Taxes 758,189 Rate Base & Return 0 4,465,656 4,915,414 23,431, ,959, ,730,196 Average Rate Base 0 2,232,828 4,690,535 14,173,397 71,195, ,344,650 Equity Return Necessary 6,213,047 Debt Return Necessary 2,757,599 Return Necessary, Gross-Up for Taxes 15,100,361 Interest Income Tax Savings, Gross-Up for Taxes -1,891,570 Total Return Required (Pre-Tax) 13,208,791 Expenses O&M Expense 0 Purchased Water Cost 0 Ad Valorem Taxes 0 23,445 49, , ,550 1,232,119 Depreciation & Amortization 2,955,289 Total Expense 4,187,408 Revenues from Expenses, Gross-Up for Uncollectibles 4,198,492 SRF Loan Repayment 0 Public Agency Contribution Repayment 0 Total Revenue Requirement (Lifecycle) $435,618, ,500,000 27,040,000 31,830,000 32,780,000 17,407,283 NPV of Revenue Requirement (2012 $) $245,057, ,142,857 24,526,077 27,495,951 26,968,187 13,639,062 Cost of Water ($/A-F) $1,934 Assumptions: Purchase Water Annual Cost $0 (per AF and escalation at 1/2 the O&M rate) Reduction After Yr 30 $0 (assumes $76,288,000 at 3.70% for 30 years) Purchased Water in AF 3,500 (GWR included or not) Annual O&M Expense (2017) $0 () O & M Cost Inflation Index 3.0% (combination of 2.0% and 3.23%) Annual Surcharge 2 Contribution $0 $7,500,000 $27,040,000 $31,830,000 $32,780,000 Outside Contribution for Debt? N Amount ---> $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Contribution Principal Due $0 Contribution Interest Due $0 Contribution Length of Loan 20 years Contribution Interest Cost 2.50% (SRF at 2.5% per Linam testimony A.13; 3.70% for municipal debt) Outside Contribution for Equity? N Amount ---> $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Contribution 2 Principal Due $0 Contribution 2 Interest Due $0 Contribution 2 Length of Loan 30 years Contribution 2 Interest Cost 3.70% (SRF at 2.5% per Linam testimony A.13; 3.70% for municipal debt) AFUDC Rate % (approximation based on Stephenson testimony, Attachement 5) AFUDC Rate thru % (approximation based on Stephenson testimony, Attachement 5) Equity Ratio 53% (Stephenson testimony A.11, A.51; Assumes future capital structure per A ) Equity Rate of Return 9.99% (Stephenson testimony A.11, A.51; Assumes future capital structure per A ) Debt Ratio 47% (Stephenson testimony A.11, A.51; Assumes future capital structure per A ) Debt Interest Cost 5.00% (Linam testimony A.13; Future capital structure per A would be 6.63%) Effective Tax Rate % (Linam testimony A.12) Gross-Up Factor (based uncollectibles rate and state and federal tax rates as shown) Ad Valorem Tax Rate 1.050% (Stephenson testimony A.57; Linam testimony A.12) Gross-Up for Uncollectibles % ( % uncollectible revenues) Discount Rate for NPV 5.00% Total Acre-Feet Production 9,000 Depreciation Summary: Remaining Years of Book Depreciation 40 Composite Depreciation Rate 2.50% (based on 40 year life; Linam testimony A.12)) 2,955,289 Cumulative Book Depreciation 2,955,289 Remaining Years of Tax Depreciation 25 Tax Depreciation Rate 4.00% (based on 25 year tax life) 4,815,875 Cumulative Tax Depreciation 4,815,875 Excess of tax over book 1,860,586 Deferred Taxes 758,189 Page 9
11 Scenario A: Traditional Financing / No SRF Financing / With Surcharge 2 20,000,000 Ad Valorem Taxes 18,000,000 16,000,000 Purchased Water Cost O&M Expense Total Return Required (Pre Tax) Depreciation & Amortization SRF Loan Repayment Public Agency Contribution Repayment 14,000,000 12,000,000 10,000,000 8,000,000 6,000,000 4,000,000 2,000, Page 10
12 Scenario B: Traditional Equity Portion with SRF Financing for Debt Portion / With Surcharge 2 Revenue Requirements Calculation Capital Costs $0 $11,920,000 $27,460,000 $50,010,000 $123,610,000 Surcharge #1 AFUDC Amount 0 59, , ,284 5,578,298 AFUDC Excluded from ROR 0 37, , ,888 4,032,952 Plant(Transfer to CWIP) 0 11,979,899 39,698,290 90,358, ,546, ,546,873 Accumulated AFUDC Excluded from ROR 0 37, , ,016 4,738,967 4,738,967 Accumulated Depreciation 1,476,784 Cumulative Surcharge 2 0 7,500,000 34,540,000 66,370,000 99,150,000 99,150,000 Cumulative Outside Contributions ,586,530 56,586,530 Cumulative Deferred Taxes 438,319 Rate Base & Return 0 4,465,656 4,915,414 23,431,380 59,506,801 57,771,986 Average Rate Base 0 2,232,828 4,690,535 14,173,397 41,469,090 58,639,393 Equity Return Necessary 5,858,075 Debt Return Necessary 0 Return Necessary, Gross-Up for Taxes 9,860,945 Interest Income Tax Savings, Gross-Up for Taxes 0 Total Return Required (Pre-Tax) 9,860,945 Expenses O&M Expense 0 Purchased Water Cost 0 Ad Valorem Taxes 0 23,445 49, , , ,714 Depreciation & Amortization 1,476,784 Total Expense 2,092,498 Revenues from Expenses, Gross-Up for Uncollectibles 2,098,037 SRF Loan Repayment 3,629,863 Public Agency Contribution Repayment 0 Total Revenue Requirement (Lifecycle) $387,425, ,500,000 27,040,000 31,830,000 32,780,000 15,588,846 NPV of Revenue Requirement (2012 $) $228,062, ,142,857 24,526,077 27,495,951 26,968,187 12,214,268 Cost of Water ($/A-F) $1,732 Assumptions: Purchase Water Annual Cost $0 (per AF and escalation at 1/2 the O&M rate) Reduction After Yr 30 $0 (assumes $76,288,000 at 3.70% for 30 years) Purchased Water in AF 3,500 (GWR included or not) Annual O&M Expense (2017) $0 () O & M Cost Inflation Index 3.0% (combination of 2.0% and 3.23%) Annual Surcharge 2 Contribution $0 $7,500,000 $27,040,000 $31,830,000 $32,780,000 Outside Contribution for Debt? Y Amount ---> $0 $0 $0 $0 $56,586,530 Contribution Principal Due $2,215,200 Contribution Interest Due $1,414,663 Contribution Length of Loan 20 years Contribution Interest Cost 2.50% (SRF at 2.5% per Linam testimony A.13; 3.70% for municipal debt) Outside Contribution for Equity? N Amount ---> $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Contribution 2 Principal Due $0 Contribution 2 Interest Due $0 Contribution 2 Length of Loan 30 years Contribution 2 Interest Cost 3.70% (SRF at 2.5% per Linam testimony A.13; 3.70% for municipal debt) AFUDC Rate % (approximation based on Stephenson testimony, Attachement 5) AFUDC Rate thru % (approximation based on Stephenson testimony, Attachement 5) Equity Ratio 53% (Stephenson testimony A.11, A.51; Assumes future capital structure per A ) Equity Rate of Return 9.99% (Stephenson testimony A.11, A.51; Assumes future capital structure per A ) Debt Ratio 47% (Stephenson testimony A.11, A.51; Assumes future capital structure per A ) Debt Interest Cost 5.00% (Linam testimony A.13; Future capital structure per A would be 6.63%) Effective Tax Rate % (Linam testimony A.12) Gross-Up Factor (based uncollectibles rate and state and federal tax rates as shown) Ad Valorem Tax Rate 1.050% (Stephenson testimony A.57; Linam testimony A.12) Gross-Up for Uncollectibles % ( % uncollectible revenues) Discount Rate for NPV 5.00% Total Acre-Feet Production 9,000 Depreciation Summary: Remaining Years of Book Depreciation 40 Composite Depreciation Rate 2.50% (based on 40 year life; Linam testimony A.12)) 1,476,784 Cumulative Book Depreciation 1,476,784 Remaining Years of Tax Depreciation 25 Tax Depreciation Rate 4.00% (based on 25 year tax life) 2,552,414 Cumulative Tax Depreciation 2,552,414 Excess of tax over book 1,075,629 Deferred Taxes 438,319 Page 11
13 Scenario B: Traditional Equity Portion with SRF Financing for Debt Portion / With Surcharge 2 20,000,000 Ad Valorem Taxes 18,000,000 16,000,000 Purchased Water Cost O&M Expense Total Return Required (Pre Tax) Depreciation & Amortization SRF Loan Repayment Public Agency Contribution Repayment 14,000,000 12,000,000 10,000,000 8,000,000 6,000,000 4,000,000 2,000, Page 12
14 Scenario C: 100% with SRF Financing / With Surcharge 2 Revenue Requirements Calculation Capital Costs $0 $11,920,000 $27,460,000 $50,010,000 $123,610,000 Surcharge #1 AFUDC Amount 0 59, , ,284 5,578,298 AFUDC Excluded from ROR 0 37, , ,888 6,912,598 Plant(Transfer to CWIP) 0 11,979,899 39,698,290 90,358, ,546, ,546,873 Accumulated AFUDC Excluded from ROR 0 37, , ,016 7,618,614 7,618,614 Accumulated Depreciation 0 Cumulative Surcharge 2 0 7,500,000 34,540,000 66,370,000 99,150,000 99,150,000 Cumulative Outside Contributions ,396, ,396,873 Cumulative Deferred Taxes 0 Rate Base & Return 0 4,465,656 4,915,414 23,431, Average Rate Base 0 2,232,828 4,690,535 14,173,397 11,715,690 0 Equity Return Necessary 0 Debt Return Necessary 0 Return Necessary, Gross-Up for Taxes 0 Interest Income Tax Savings, Gross-Up for Taxes 0 Total Return Required (Pre-Tax) 0 Expenses O&M Expense 0 Purchased Water Cost 0 Ad Valorem Taxes 0 23,445 49, , ,015 0 Depreciation & Amortization 0 Total Expense 0 Revenues from Expenses, Gross-Up for Uncollectibles 0 SRF Loan Repayment 7,723,114 Public Agency Contribution Repayment 0 Total Revenue Requirement (Lifecycle) $253,612, ,500,000 27,040,000 31,830,000 32,780,000 7,723,114 NPV of Revenue Requirement (2012 $) $165,315, ,142,857 24,526,077 27,495,951 26,968,187 6,051,262 Cost of Water ($/A-F) $858 Assumptions: Purchase Water Annual Cost $0 (per AF and escalation at 1/2 the O&M rate) Reduction After Yr 30 $0 (assumes $76,288,000 at 3.70% for 30 years) Purchased Water in AF 3,500 (GWR included or not) Annual O&M Expense (2017) $0 () O & M Cost Inflation Index 3.0% (combination of 2.0% and 3.23%) Annual Surcharge 2 Contribution $0 $7,500,000 $27,040,000 $31,830,000 $32,780,000 Outside Contribution for Debt? Y Amount ---> $0 $0 $0 $0 $120,396,873 Contribution Principal Due $4,713,192 Contribution Interest Due $3,009,922 Contribution Length of Loan 20 years Contribution Interest Cost 2.50% (SRF at 2.5% per Linam testimony A.13; 3.70% for municipal debt) Outside Contribution for Equity? N Amount ---> $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Contribution 2 Principal Due $0 Contribution 2 Interest Due $0 Contribution 2 Length of Loan 30 years Contribution 2 Interest Cost 3.70% (SRF at 2.5% per Linam testimony A.13; 3.70% for municipal debt) AFUDC Rate % (approximation based on Stephenson testimony, Attachement 5) AFUDC Rate thru % (approximation based on Stephenson testimony, Attachement 5) Equity Ratio 0% (Assumes no equity) Equity Rate of Return 9.99% (Stephenson testimony A.11, A.51; Assumes future capital structure per A ) Debt Ratio 100% (Assumes 100% SRF Loans for debt component) Debt Interest Cost 5.00% (Linam testimony A.13; Future capital structure per A would be 6.63%) Effective Tax Rate % (Linam testimony A.12) Gross-Up Factor (based uncollectibles rate and state and federal tax rates as shown) Ad Valorem Tax Rate 1.050% (Stephenson testimony A.57; Linam testimony A.12) Gross-Up for Uncollectibles % ( % uncollectible revenues) Discount Rate for NPV 5.00% Total Acre-Feet Production 9,000 Depreciation Summary: Remaining Years of Book Depreciation 40 Composite Depreciation Rate 2.50% (based on 40 year life; Linam testimony A.12)) 0 Cumulative Book Depreciation 0 Remaining Years of Tax Depreciation 25 Tax Depreciation Rate 4.00% (based on 25 year tax life) 0 Cumulative Tax Depreciation 0 Excess of tax over book 0 Deferred Taxes 0 Page 13
15 Scenario C: 100% with SRF Financing / With Surcharge 2 20,000,000 Ad Valorem Taxes 18,000,000 16,000,000 Purchased Water Cost O&M Expense Total Return Required (Pre Tax) Depreciation & Amortization SRF Loan Repayment Public Agency Contribution Repayment 14,000,000 12,000,000 10,000,000 8,000,000 6,000,000 4,000,000 2,000, Page 14
16 Scenario D: Traditional Equity Portion with Cal-Am Tax-Exempt Financing for Debt Portion (Repaid thru Surcharge) / With Surcharge 2 Revenue Requirements Calculation Capital Costs $0 $11,920,000 $27,460,000 $50,010,000 $124,178,587 Surcharge #1 AFUDC Amount 0 59, , ,284 5,588,720 AFUDC Excluded from ROR 0 37, , ,888 4,034,234 Plant(Transfer to CWIP) 0 11,979,899 39,698,290 90,358, ,125, ,125,882 Accumulated AFUDC Excluded from ROR 0 37, , ,016 4,740,249 4,740,249 Accumulated Depreciation 1,484,424 Cumulative Surcharge 2 0 7,500,000 34,540,000 66,370,000 99,150,000 99,150,000 Cumulative Outside Contributions ,858,664 56,858,664 Cumulative Deferred Taxes 440,208 Rate Base & Return 0 4,465,656 4,915,414 23,431,380 59,814,006 58,071,234 Average Rate Base 0 2,232,828 4,690,535 14,173,397 41,622,693 58,942,620 Equity Return Necessary 5,888,368 Debt Return Necessary 0 Return Necessary, Gross-Up for Taxes 9,911,937 Interest Income Tax Savings, Gross-Up for Taxes 0 Total Return Required (Pre-Tax) 9,911,937 Expenses O&M Expense 0 Purchased Water Cost 0 Ad Valorem Taxes 0 23,445 49, , , ,898 Depreciation & Amortization 1,484,424 Total Expense 2,103,322 Revenues from Expenses, Gross-Up for Uncollectibles 2,108,889 SRF Loan Repayment 3,573,222 Public Agency Contribution Repayment 0 Total Revenue Requirement (Lifecycle) $423,183, ,500,000 27,040,000 31,830,000 32,780,000 15,594,048 NPV of Revenue Requirement (2012 $) $236,590, ,142,857 24,526,077 27,495,951 26,968,187 12,218,344 Cost of Water ($/A-F) $1,733 Assumptions: Purchase Water Annual Cost $0 (per AF and escalation at 1/2 the O&M rate) Reduction After Yr 30 $0 (assumes $76,288,000 at 3.70% for 30 years) Purchased Water in AF 3,500 (GWR included or not) Annual O&M Expense (2017) $0 () O & M Cost Inflation Index 3.0% (combination of 2.0% and 3.23%) Annual Surcharge 2 Contribution $0 $7,500,000 $27,040,000 $31,830,000 $32,780,000 Outside Contribution for Debt? Y Amount ---> $0 $0 $0 $0 $56,858,664 Contribution Principal Due $900,865 Contribution Interest Due $2,672,357 Contribution Length of Loan 30 years Contribution Interest Cost 4.70% (AWW tax-exempt debt rate assumed 4.7%) Outside Contribution for Equity? N Amount ---> $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Contribution 2 Principal Due $0 Contribution 2 Interest Due $0 Contribution 2 Length of Loan 30 years Contribution 2 Interest Cost 3.70% (SRF at 2.5% per Linam testimony A.13; 3.70% for municipal debt) AFUDC Rate % (approximation based on Stephenson testimony, Attachement 5) AFUDC Rate thru % (approximation based on Stephenson testimony, Attachement 5) Equity Ratio 53% (Stephenson testimony A.11, A.51; Assumes future capital structure per A ) Equity Rate of Return 9.99% (Stephenson testimony A.11, A.51; Assumes future capital structure per A ) Debt Ratio 47% (Stephenson testimony A.11, A.51; Assumes future capital structure per A ) Debt Interest Cost 5.00% (Linam testimony A.13; Future capital structure per A would be 6.63%) Effective Tax Rate % (Linam testimony A.12) Gross-Up Factor (based uncollectibles rate and state and federal tax rates as shown) Ad Valorem Tax Rate 1.050% (Stephenson testimony A.57; Linam testimony A.12) Gross-Up for Uncollectibles % ( % uncollectible revenues) Discount Rate for NPV 5.00% Total Acre-Feet Production 9,000 Depreciation Summary: Remaining Years of Book Depreciation 40 Composite Depreciation Rate 2.50% (based on 40 year life; Linam testimony A.12)) 1,484,424 Cumulative Book Depreciation 1,484,424 Remaining Years of Tax Depreciation 25 Tax Depreciation Rate 4.00% (based on 25 year tax life) 2,564,689 Cumulative Tax Depreciation 2,564,689 Excess of tax over book 1,080,264 Deferred Taxes 440,208 Page 15
17 Scenario D: Traditional Equity Portion with Cal-Am Tax-Exempt Financing for Debt Portion (Repaid thru Surcharge) / With Surcharge 2 20,000,000 Ad Valorem Taxes 18,000,000 16,000,000 Purchased Water Cost O&M Expense Total Return Required (Pre Tax) Depreciation & Amortization SRF Loan Repayment Public Agency Contribution Repayment 14,000,000 12,000,000 10,000,000 8,000,000 6,000,000 4,000,000 2,000, Page 16
18 Scenario D-2: Traditional Equity Portion with Cal-Am Tax-Exempt Financing for Debt Portion / With Surcharge 2 Revenue Requirements Calculation Capital Costs $0 $11,920,000 $27,460,000 $50,010,000 $124,178,587 Surcharge #1 AFUDC Amount 0 59, , ,284 5,588,720 AFUDC Excluded from ROR 0 37, , ,888 1,475,281 Plant(Transfer to CWIP) 0 11,979,899 39,698,290 90,358, ,125, ,125,882 Accumulated AFUDC Excluded from ROR 0 37, , ,016 2,181,296 2,181,296 Accumulated Depreciation 2,969,865 Cumulative Surcharge 2 0 7,500,000 34,540,000 66,370,000 99,150,000 99,150,000 Cumulative Outside Contributions Cumulative Deferred Taxes 761,687 Rate Base & Return 0 4,465,656 4,915,414 23,431, ,545, ,301,228 Average Rate Base 0 2,232,828 4,690,535 14,173,397 71,488, ,923,221 Equity Return Necessary 6,243,681 Debt Return Necessary 2,604,924 Return Necessary, Gross-Up for Taxes 14,894,927 Interest Income Tax Savings, Gross-Up for Taxes -1,786,842 Total Return Required (Pre-Tax) 13,108,085 Expenses O&M Expense 0 Purchased Water Cost 0 Ad Valorem Taxes 0 23,445 49, , ,627 1,238,194 Depreciation & Amortization 2,969,865 Total Expense 4,208,058 Revenues from Expenses, Gross-Up for Uncollectibles 4,219,197 SRF Loan Repayment 0 Public Agency Contribution Repayment 0 Total Revenue Requirement (Lifecycle) $434,579, ,500,000 27,040,000 31,830,000 32,780,000 17,327,282 NPV of Revenue Requirement (2012 $) $244,473, ,142,857 24,526,077 27,495,951 26,968,187 13,576,379 Cost of Water ($/A-F) $1,925 Assumptions: Purchase Water Annual Cost $0 (per AF and escalation at 1/2 the O&M rate) Reduction After Yr 30 $0 (assumes $76,288,000 at 3.70% for 30 years) Purchased Water in AF 3,500 (GWR included or not) Annual O&M Expense (2017) $0 () O & M Cost Inflation Index 3.0% (combination of 2.0% and 3.23%) Annual Surcharge 2 Contribution $0 $7,500,000 $27,040,000 $31,830,000 $32,780,000 Outside Contribution for Debt? N Amount ---> $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Contribution Principal Due $0 Contribution Interest Due $0 Contribution Length of Loan 20 years Contribution Interest Cost 2.50% (SRF at 2.5% per Linam testimony A.13; 3.70% for municipal debt) Outside Contribution for Equity? N Amount ---> $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Contribution 2 Principal Due $0 Contribution 2 Interest Due $0 Contribution 2 Length of Loan 30 years Contribution 2 Interest Cost 3.70% (SRF at 2.5% per Linam testimony A.13; 3.70% for municipal debt) AFUDC Rate % (approximation based on Stephenson testimony, Attachement 5) AFUDC Rate thru % (approximation based on Stephenson testimony, Attachement 5) Equity Ratio 53% (Stephenson testimony A.11, A.51; Assumes future capital structure per A ) Equity Rate of Return 9.99% (Stephenson testimony A.11, A.51; Assumes future capital structure per A ) Debt Ratio 47% (Stephenson testimony A.11, A.51; Assumes future capital structure per A ) Debt Interest Cost 4.70% (AWW Capital Corp Baa2 credit rating) Effective Tax Rate % (Linam testimony A.12) Gross-Up Factor (based uncollectibles rate and state and federal tax rates as shown) Ad Valorem Tax Rate 1.050% (Stephenson testimony A.57; Linam testimony A.12) Gross-Up for Uncollectibles % ( % uncollectible revenues) Discount Rate for NPV 5.00% Total Acre-Feet Production 9,000 Depreciation Summary: Remaining Years of Book Depreciation 40 Composite Depreciation Rate 2.50% (based on 40 year life; Linam testimony A.12)) 2,969,865 Cumulative Book Depreciation 2,969,865 Remaining Years of Tax Depreciation 25 Tax Depreciation Rate 4.00% (based on 25 year tax life) 4,839,035 Cumulative Tax Depreciation 4,839,035 Excess of tax over book 1,869,171 Deferred Taxes 761,687 Page 17
19 Scenario D-2: Traditional Equity Portion with Cal-Am Tax-Exempt Financing for Debt Portion / With Surcharge 2 20,000,000 Ad Valorem Taxes 18,000,000 16,000,000 Purchased Water Cost O&M Expense Total Return Required (Pre Tax) Depreciation & Amortization SRF Loan Repayment Public Agency Contribution Repayment 14,000,000 12,000,000 10,000,000 8,000,000 6,000,000 4,000,000 2,000, Page 18
20 Scenario E: 100% with Cal-Am Tax-Exempt Debt Financing (repaid thru Surcharge) Revenue Requirements Calculation Capital Costs $0 $11,920,000 $27,460,000 $50,010,000 $124,826,355 Surcharge #1 AFUDC Amount 0 59, , ,284 5,600,594 AFUDC Excluded from ROR 0 37, , ,888 6,928,173 Plant(Transfer to CWIP) 0 11,979,899 39,698,290 90,358, ,785, ,785,524 Accumulated AFUDC Excluded from ROR 0 37, , ,016 7,634,189 7,634,189 Accumulated Depreciation 0 Cumulative Surcharge 2 0 7,500,000 34,540,000 66,370,000 99,150,000 99,150,000 Cumulative Outside Contributions ,635, ,635,524 Cumulative Deferred Taxes 0 Rate Base & Return 0 4,465,656 4,915,414 23,431, Average Rate Base 0 2,232,828 4,690,535 14,173,397 11,715,690 0 Equity Return Necessary 0 Debt Return Necessary 0 Return Necessary, Gross-Up for Taxes 0 Interest Income Tax Savings, Gross-Up for Taxes 0 Total Return Required (Pre-Tax) 0 Expenses O&M Expense 0 Purchased Water Cost 0 Ad Valorem Taxes 0 23,445 49, , ,015 0 Depreciation & Amortization 0 Total Expense 0 Revenues from Expenses, Gross-Up for Uncollectibles 0 SRF Loan Repayment 7,644,054 Public Agency Contribution Repayment 0 Total Revenue Requirement (Lifecycle) $328,471, ,500,000 27,040,000 31,830,000 32,780,000 7,644,054 NPV of Revenue Requirement (2012 $) $182,807, ,142,857 24,526,077 27,495,951 26,968,187 5,989,316 Cost of Water ($/A-F) $849 Assumptions: Purchase Water Annual Cost $0 (per AF and escalation at 1/2 the O&M rate) Reduction After Yr 30 $0 (assumes $76,288,000 at 3.70% for 30 years) Purchased Water in AF 3,500 (GWR included or not) Annual O&M Expense (2017) $0 () O & M Cost Inflation Index 3.0% (combination of 2.0% and 3.23%) Annual Surcharge 2 Contribution $0 $7,500,000 $27,040,000 $31,830,000 $32,780,000 Outside Contribution for Debt? Y Amount ---> $0 $0 $0 $0 $121,635,524 Contribution Principal Due $1,927,185 Contribution Interest Due $5,716,870 Contribution Length of Loan 30 years Contribution Interest Cost 4.70% (AWW tax-exempt debt rate assumed 4.7%) Outside Contribution for Equity? N Amount ---> $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Contribution 2 Principal Due $0 Contribution 2 Interest Due $0 Contribution 2 Length of Loan 30 years Contribution 2 Interest Cost 3.70% (SRF at 2.5% per Linam testimony A.13; 3.70% for municipal debt) AFUDC Rate % (approximation based on Stephenson testimony, Attachement 5) AFUDC Rate thru % (approximation based on Stephenson testimony, Attachement 5) Equity Ratio 0% (assume 100% debt financed) Equity Rate of Return 9.99% (Stephenson testimony A.11, A.51; Assumes future capital structure per A ) Debt Ratio 100% (assume 100% debt financed) Debt Interest Cost 5.00% (Linam testimony A.13; Future capital structure per A would be 6.63%) Effective Tax Rate % (Linam testimony A.12) Gross-Up Factor (based uncollectibles rate and state and federal tax rates as shown) Ad Valorem Tax Rate 1.050% (Stephenson testimony A.57; Linam testimony A.12) Gross-Up for Uncollectibles % ( % uncollectible revenues) Discount Rate for NPV 5.00% Total Acre-Feet Production 9,000 Depreciation Summary: Remaining Years of Book Depreciation 40 Composite Depreciation Rate 2.50% (based on 40 year life; Linam testimony A.12)) 0 Cumulative Book Depreciation 0 Remaining Years of Tax Depreciation 25 Tax Depreciation Rate 4.00% (based on 25 year tax life) 0 Cumulative Tax Depreciation 0 Excess of tax over book 0 Deferred Taxes 0 Page 19
21 Scenario E: 100% with Cal-Am Tax-Exempt Debt Financing (repaid thru Surcharge) 20,000,000 Ad Valorem Taxes 18,000,000 16,000,000 Purchased Water Cost O&M Expense Total Return Required (Pre Tax) Depreciation & Amortization SRF Loan Repayment Public Agency Contribution Repayment 14,000,000 12,000,000 10,000,000 8,000,000 6,000,000 4,000,000 2,000, Page 20
22 Scenario E-2: 100% with Cal-Am Tax-Exempt Debt Financing / With Surcharge 2 Revenue Requirements Calculation Capital Costs $0 $11,920,000 $27,460,000 $50,010,000 $124,826,355 Surcharge #1 AFUDC Amount 0 59, , ,284 5,600,594 AFUDC Excluded from ROR 0 37, , ,888 1,470,743 Plant(Transfer to CWIP) 0 11,979,899 39,698,290 90,358, ,785, ,785,524 Accumulated AFUDC Excluded from ROR 0 37, , ,016 2,176,758 2,176,758 Accumulated Depreciation 2,986,469 Cumulative Surcharge 2 0 7,500,000 34,540,000 66,370,000 99,150,000 99,150,000 Cumulative Outside Contributions Cumulative Deferred Taxes 765,673 Rate Base & Return 0 4,465,656 4,915,414 23,431, ,212, ,951,738 Average Rate Base 0 2,232,828 4,690,535 14,173,397 71,822, ,582,318 Equity Return Necessary 0 Debt Return Necessary 5,573,369 Return Necessary, Gross-Up for Taxes 9,381,697 Interest Income Tax Savings, Gross-Up for Taxes -3,823,041 Total Return Required (Pre-Tax) 5,558,655 Expenses O&M Expense 0 Purchased Water Cost 0 Ad Valorem Taxes 0 23,445 49, , ,132 1,245,114 Depreciation & Amortization 2,986,469 Total Expense 4,231,583 Revenues from Expenses, Gross-Up for Uncollectibles 4,242,784 SRF Loan Repayment 0 Public Agency Contribution Repayment 0 Total Revenue Requirement (Lifecycle) $311,433, ,500,000 27,040,000 31,830,000 32,780,000 9,801,440 NPV of Revenue Requirement (2012 $) $182,222, ,142,857 24,526,077 27,495,951 26,968,187 7,679,684 Cost of Water ($/A-F) $1,089 Assumptions: Purchase Water Annual Cost $0 (per AF and escalation at 1/2 the O&M rate) Reduction After Yr 30 $0 (assumes $76,288,000 at 3.70% for 30 years) Purchased Water in AF 3,500 (GWR included or not) Annual O&M Expense (2017) $0 () O & M Cost Inflation Index 3.0% (combination of 2.0% and 3.23%) Annual Surcharge 2 Contribution $0 $7,500,000 $27,040,000 $31,830,000 $32,780,000 Outside Contribution for Debt? N Amount ---> $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Contribution Principal Due $0 Contribution Interest Due $0 Contribution Length of Loan 20 years Contribution Interest Cost 2.50% (SRF at 2.5% per Linam testimony A.13; 3.70% for municipal debt) Outside Contribution for Equity? N Amount ---> $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Contribution 2 Principal Due $0 Contribution 2 Interest Due $0 Contribution 2 Length of Loan 30 years Contribution 2 Interest Cost 3.70% (SRF at 2.5% per Linam testimony A.13; 3.70% for municipal debt) AFUDC Rate % (approximation based on Stephenson testimony, Attachement 5) AFUDC Rate thru % (approximation based on Stephenson testimony, Attachement 5) Equity Ratio 0% (assume 100% debt financed) Equity Rate of Return 9.99% (Stephenson testimony A.11, A.51; Assumes future capital structure per A ) Debt Ratio 100% (assume 100% debt financed) Debt Interest Cost 4.70% (AWW Capital Corp Baa2 credit rating) Effective Tax Rate % (Linam testimony A.12) Gross-Up Factor (based uncollectibles rate and state and federal tax rates as shown) Ad Valorem Tax Rate 1.050% (Stephenson testimony A.57; Linam testimony A.12) Gross-Up for Uncollectibles % ( % uncollectible revenues) Discount Rate for NPV 5.00% Total Acre-Feet Production 9,000 Depreciation Summary: Remaining Years of Book Depreciation 40 Composite Depreciation Rate 2.50% (based on 40 year life; Linam testimony A.12)) 2,986,469 Cumulative Book Depreciation 2,986,469 Remaining Years of Tax Depreciation 25 Tax Depreciation Rate 4.00% (based on 25 year tax life) 4,865,421 Cumulative Tax Depreciation 4,865,421 Excess of tax over book 1,878,952 Deferred Taxes 765,673 Page 21
23 Scenario E-2: 100% with Cal-Am Tax-Exempt Debt Financing / With Surcharge 2 20,000,000 Ad Valorem Taxes 18,000,000 16,000,000 Purchased Water Cost O&M Expense Total Return Required (Pre Tax) Depreciation & Amortization SRF Loan Repayment Public Agency Contribution Repayment 14,000,000 12,000,000 10,000,000 8,000,000 6,000,000 4,000,000 2,000, Page 22
24 Scenario F: Traditional Equity Portion with Cal-Am Tax-Exempt Financing w/ Public Backstop for Debt Portion (Repaid thru Surcharge) / With Surcharge 2 Revenue Requirements Calculation Capital Costs $0 $11,920,000 $27,460,000 $50,010,000 $124,178,587 Surcharge #1 AFUDC Amount 0 59, , ,284 5,588,720 AFUDC Excluded from ROR 0 37, , ,888 4,034,234 Plant(Transfer to CWIP) 0 11,979,899 39,698,290 90,358, ,125, ,125,882 Accumulated AFUDC Excluded from ROR 0 37, , ,016 4,740,249 4,740,249 Accumulated Depreciation 1,484,424 Cumulative Surcharge 2 0 7,500,000 34,540,000 66,370,000 99,150,000 99,150,000 Cumulative Outside Contributions ,858,664 56,858,664 Cumulative Deferred Taxes 440,208 Rate Base & Return 0 4,465,656 4,915,414 23,431,380 59,814,006 58,071,234 Average Rate Base 0 2,232,828 4,690,535 14,173,397 41,622,693 58,942,620 Equity Return Necessary 5,888,368 Debt Return Necessary 0 Return Necessary, Gross-Up for Taxes 9,911,937 Interest Income Tax Savings, Gross-Up for Taxes 0 Total Return Required (Pre-Tax) 9,911,937 Expenses O&M Expense 0 Purchased Water Cost 0 Ad Valorem Taxes 0 23,445 49, , , ,898 Depreciation & Amortization 1,484,424 Total Expense 2,103,322 Revenues from Expenses, Gross-Up for Uncollectibles 2,108,889 SRF Loan Repayment 3,169,430 Public Agency Contribution Repayment 0 Total Revenue Requirement (Lifecycle) $411,070, ,500,000 27,040,000 31,830,000 32,780,000 15,190,256 NPV of Revenue Requirement (2012 $) $231,484, ,142,857 24,526,077 27,495,951 26,968,187 11,901,963 Cost of Water ($/A-F) $1,688 Assumptions: Purchase Water Annual Cost $0 (per AF and escalation at 1/2 the O&M rate) Reduction After Yr 30 $0 (assumes $76,288,000 at 3.70% for 30 years) Purchased Water in AF 3,500 (GWR included or not) Annual O&M Expense (2017) $0 () O & M Cost Inflation Index 3.0% (combination of 2.0% and 3.23%) Annual Surcharge 2 Contribution $0 $7,500,000 $27,040,000 $31,830,000 $32,780,000 Outside Contribution for Debt? Y Amount ---> $0 $0 $0 $0 $56,858,664 Contribution Principal Due $1,065,660 Contribution Interest Due $2,103,771 Contribution Length of Loan 30 years Contribution Interest Cost 3.70% (assumes MPWMD public credit rated A1/A+) Outside Contribution for Equity? N Amount ---> $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Contribution 2 Principal Due $0 Contribution 2 Interest Due $0 Contribution 2 Length of Loan 30 years Contribution 2 Interest Cost 3.70% (SRF at 2.5% per Linam testimony A.13; 3.70% for municipal debt) AFUDC Rate % (approximation based on Stephenson testimony, Attachement 5) AFUDC Rate thru % (approximation based on Stephenson testimony, Attachement 5) Equity Ratio 53% (Stephenson testimony A.11, A.51; Assumes future capital structure per A ) Equity Rate of Return 9.99% (Stephenson testimony A.11, A.51; Assumes future capital structure per A ) Debt Ratio 47% (Stephenson testimony A.11, A.51; Assumes future capital structure per A ) Debt Interest Cost 5.00% (Linam testimony A.13; Future capital structure per A would be 6.63%) Effective Tax Rate % (Linam testimony A.12) Gross-Up Factor (based uncollectibles rate and state and federal tax rates as shown) Ad Valorem Tax Rate 1.050% (Stephenson testimony A.57; Linam testimony A.12) Gross-Up for Uncollectibles % ( % uncollectible revenues) Discount Rate for NPV 5.00% Total Acre-Feet Production 9,000 Depreciation Summary: Remaining Years of Book Depreciation 40 Composite Depreciation Rate 2.50% (based on 40 year life; Linam testimony A.12)) 1,484,424 Cumulative Book Depreciation 1,484,424 Remaining Years of Tax Depreciation 25 Tax Depreciation Rate 4.00% (based on 25 year tax life) 2,564,689 Cumulative Tax Depreciation 2,564,689 Excess of tax over book 1,080,264 Deferred Taxes 440,208 Page 23
25 Scenario F: Traditional Equity Portion with Cal-Am Tax-Exempt Financing w/ Public Backstop for Debt Portion (Repaid thru Surcharge) / With Surcharge 2 20,000,000 Ad Valorem Taxes 18,000,000 16,000,000 Purchased Water Cost O&M Expense Total Return Required (Pre Tax) Depreciation & Amortization SRF Loan Repayment Public Agency Contribution Repayment 14,000,000 12,000,000 10,000,000 8,000,000 6,000,000 4,000,000 2,000, Page 24
PREPARED DIRECT TESTIMONY OF RANDALL G. ROSE ON BEHALF OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA GAS COMPANY
Application of Southern California Gas Company (U0G) for authority to update its gas revenue requirement and base rates effective on January 1, 01. Application -1- Exhibit No.: (SCG-) PREPARED DIRECT TESTIMONY
More informationDEBT MANAGEMENT POLICY
DEBT MANAGEMENT POLICY County Sanitation District No. 8 of Los Angeles County October 2017 DOC 4295703 TABLE OF CONTENTS 1. Policy Statement... 1 2. Treasurer; Administration... 1 3. Purpose of Debt...
More informationREVISED PREPARED DIRECT TESTIMONY OF RANDALL G. ROSE ON BEHALF OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA GAS COMPANY
Application of San Diego Gas & Electric Company (U0M) for Authority, Among Other Things, to Increase Rates and Charges for Electric and Gas Service Effective on January 1, 0. A.--00 (Filed December 1,
More informationCompany: Southern California Gas Company (U 904 G) Proceeding: 2019 General Rate Case Application: A Exhibit: SCG-37 SOCALGAS
Company: Southern California Gas Company (U 0 G) Proceeding: 01 General Rate Case Application: A.1-- Exhibit: SCG- SOCALGAS DIRECT TESTIMONY OF RAGAN G. REEVES (TAXES) October, 01 BEFORE THE PUBLIC UTILITIES
More informationRULE REGULATORY PRODUCTION TARGETS AND PHYSICAL STORAGE TARGET
RULE 160 - REGULATORY PRODUCTION TARGETS AND PHYSICAL STORAGE TARGET The monthly distribution of water production from sources within the Monterey Peninsula Water Resource System (MPWRS), as shown in Tables
More information2018 General Rate Case
Application No.: Exhibit No.: Witnesses: A.16-09-001 SCE-60 M. Childs J. McCarson S. Menon D. Tessler (U 338-E) 2018 General Rate Case Tax Update Before the Public Utilities Commission of the State of
More informationSOUTHERN CALIFORNIA GAS COMPANY ADVANCED METERING INFRASTRUCTURE CHAPTER VII SOCALGAS AMI BUSINESS CASE MODELING METHODOLOGY AND REVENUE REQUIREMENT
Application No.: A.08-09-023 Exhibit No.: SCG 7 Date: March 6, 2009 Witness: Michael W. Foster SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA GAS COMPANY ADVANCED METERING INFRASTRUCTURE CHAPTER VII SOCALGAS AMI BUSINESS CASE MODELING
More informationApril 6, Katherine Godbey Director of Finance, Coachella Valley Water District Hovley Lane East Palm Desert, CA 92260
April 6, 2016 Katherine Godbey Director of Finance, Coachella Valley Water District 75515 Hovley Lane East Palm Desert, CA 92260 Dear Ms. Godbey: Hawksley Consulting (a subsidiary of MWH Global) is pleased
More informationContrasting the new US GAAP and IFRS credit impairment models
Contrasting the new and credit impairment models A comparison of the requirements of ASC 326 and 9 No. US2017-24 September 26, 2017 What s inside: Background....1 Overview......1 Key areas....2 Scope......2
More informationSECOND REVISED SDG&E DIRECT TESTIMONY OF RAGAN G. REEVES (TAXES) April 6, 2018 BEFORE THE PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA
Company: San Diego Gas & Electric Company (U 0 M) Proceeding: 01 General Rate Case Application: A.1--00 Exhibit: SDG&E--R SECOND REVISED SDG&E DIRECT TESTIMONY OF RAGAN G. REEVES (TAXES) April, 01 BEFORE
More informationSouthwest Power Pool, Inc.
Independent Auditor s Report and Financial Statements Contents Independent Auditor s Report... 1 Financial Statements Balance Sheets... 3 Statements of Operations... 4 Statements of Members Deficit...
More informationPREPARED REBUTTAL TESTIMONY OF MICHAEL R. WOODRUFF ON BEHALF OF SAN DIEGO GAS & ELECTRIC COMPANY CHAPTER 16
Application: A.1-0-0 Exhibit No.: Witness: -1 Woodruff PREPARED REBUTTAL TESTIMONY OF MICHAEL R. WOODRUFF ON BEHALF OF SAN DIEGO GAS & ELECTRIC COMPANY CHAPTER 1 BEFORE THE PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION
More informationDEBT SERVICE. Overall Debt Obligations Summary. Debt Obligations Principal Outstanding Summary
DEBT SERVICE Overall Debt Obligations Summary Debt Obligations Principal Outstanding Summary Fiscal Year 2018-19 Budget Total Principal and Interest Debt Service Payments Annual Debt Service Payments by
More informationFINANCIAL PLAN REVIEW AND FORECAST
Napa Sanitation District Cost of Service Rate and Capacity Charge Study Technical Memorandum #2 FINANCIAL PLAN REVIEW AND FORECAST DRAFT March 2018 Contents 1 Introduction 1 1.1 Project Background 1 1.1.1
More informationCompany: Southern California Gas Company (U 904 G) Proceeding: 2019 General Rate Case Application: A Exhibit: SCG-37-2R SECOND REVISED
Company: Southern California Gas Company (U 0 G) Proceeding: 01 General Rate Case Application: A.1--00 Exhibit: SCG--R SECOND REVISED SOCALGAS DIRECT TESTIMONY OF RAGAN G. REEVES (TAXES) April, 01 BEFORE
More informationNew Issue: Moody's assigns MIG 1 to Oakland City's (CA) TRAN
New Issue: Moody's assigns MIG 1 to Oakland City's (CA) TRAN Global Credit Research - 02 Jun 2015 $159.0M short-term debt affected OAKLAND (CITY OF) CA Cities (including Towns, Villages and Townships)
More informationDIRECT TESTIMONY OF AMANDA D. WHITE SAN DIEGO GAS & ELECTRIC COMPANY
Application: 1--XXX Exhibit No.: SDGE-X Witness: Amanda D. White Application of San Diego Gas & Electric Company (U 0 E) and Citizens Energy Corporation for Authorization Pursuant to Public Utilities Code
More informationFourth Quarter 2017 Earnings Call Presentation FEBRUARY 14, 2018
Fourth Quarter 2017 Earnings Call Presentation FEBRUARY 14, 2018 Cautionary Statement This presentation includes "forward-looking statements". Such forward-looking statements are subject to a number of
More informationNew Regulations Impact How to Evaluate Municipal Investments
New Regulations Impact How to Evaluate Municipal Investments 1 Municipal Bonds General Obligation - A Municipal Bond, backed by the full faith and credit of the issuer, which is repaid from either the
More informationSecuritization: A Case Study in Ratepayer Benefits
Securitization: A Case Study in Ratepayer Benefits NARUC Accounting and Finance Meeting, March 7, 2016 Victor Prep, P.E. Byron S. Watson, CFA Denver, Colorado www.ergconsulting.com 2016, Introduction o
More informationBefore the Minnesota Public Utilities Commission State of Minnesota. Docket No. E002/GR Exhibit (GET-1)
Direct Testimony and Schedules George E. Tyson, II Before the Minnesota Public Utilities Commission State of Minnesota In the Matter of the Application of Northern States Power Company for Authority to
More informationPublic Finance Tools to Fund Infrastructure February 22, 2018
Public Finance Tools to Fund Infrastructure February 22, 2018 August 15, 2016 Presentation Title Second Line 1 Introductions JOAN MICHAELS AGUILAR DEPUTY CITYMANAGER ADMINSERVICES CITY OF DIXON KENNETH
More informationBIENNIAL BUDGET SUMMARY FY 2016/17 & 2017/18
BIENNIAL BUDGET SUMMARY FY & PROPOSED APPROPRIATIONS The FY proposed appropriation of $1,648.7 million is comprised of $1,200.2 million or 72.8 percent for operations expense, $328.5 million or 19.9 percent
More informationSEASIDE GROUNDWATER BASIN WATERMASTER SPECIAL MEETING AGENDA FRIDAY, OCTOBER 27, 2006, 2:30 P.M. SOPER FIELD, 220 COE AVENUE SEASIDE, CALIFORNIA
SEASIDE GROUNDWATER BASIN WATERMASTER SPECIAL MEETING AGENDA FRIDAY, OCTOBER 27, 2006, 2:30 P.M. SOPER FIELD, 220 COE AVENUE SEASIDE, CALIFORNIA WATERMASTER BOARD: City of Seaside Mayor Ralph Rubio, Chairman
More informationRECOMMENDATION Adopt a Resolution approving the Debt Management and Disclosure Policy.
Page 1 of 14 Office of the City Manager ACTION CALENDAR March 14, 2017 To: From: Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council Dee Williams-Ridley, City Manager Submitted by: Henry Oyekanmi, Director,
More informationApplicant: The city of Seaside is located in Clatsop County. The city has a 2017 population of 6,620 and is rural and distressed.
Memorandum November 6, 2018 TO: THRU: FROM: SUBJ: Chris Cummings, Assistant Director, Economic Development Ed Tabor, Programs & Incentives Manager Becky Bryant, Regional Project Manager Rich Rodriguez,
More informationLake Powell Pipeline Economic Feasibility Analysis for Washington County, UT
Lake Powell Pipeline Economic Feasibility Analysis for Washington County, UT October 2015 Lake Powell Pipeline Feasibility for Washington County Water District The following summarizes concerns about
More informationTHE METROPOLITAN WATER DISTRICT OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA. Statement of Cash and Investments. (Cash Receipts and Disbursements Basis) March 31, 2011
Statement of Cash and Investments (With Independent Auditors Report Thereon) Table of Contents Page Independent Auditors Report 1 Statement of Cash and Investments 2 Notes to Statement of Cash and Investments
More informationAlameda County Water District. Financial Workshop Proposed Rates & Charges
Alameda County Water District Financial Workshop Proposed Rates & Charges Month, October Day, Year 25, 2018 Presentation Overview Review Financial Workshops Timeline Proposed Development Charges Financial
More informationSouthwest Power Pool, Inc.
Independent Auditor s Report and Financial Statements Contents Independent Auditor s Report... 1 Financial Statements Balance Sheets... 3 Statements of Income... 4 Statements of Members Deficit... 5 Statements
More informationBond Basics March 2007
Municipal Bonds: A Unique Fixed-Income Asset Class Municipal bonds (munis), which are issued by U.S. state and local governments, are unique among fixed-income asset classes. First, most muni bonds offer
More informationREVISED WORKPAPERS TO PREPARED DIRECT TESTIMONY OF RONALD M. VAN DER LEEDEN ON BEHALF OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA GAS COMPANY
Application of SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA GAS ) COMPANY for authority to update its gas revenue ) requirement and base rates ) effective January 1, 2016 (U 904-G) ) Application No. 14-11-004 Exhibit No.: (SCG-35-R-WP)
More informationNew Issue: Moody's assigns Aa1 rating to Hartford MDC's (CT) $58.9 million General Obligation Bonds, Issue of 2013, Series A & B; outlook is stable
New Issue: Moody's assigns Aa1 rating to Hartford MDC's (CT) $58.9 million General Obligation Bonds, Issue of 2013, Series A & B; outlook is stable Global Credit Research - 24 Jan 2013 Maintains Aa1 rating
More informationGLOBAL INDEMNITY REINSURANCE COMPANY, LTD. Consolidated Financial Statements For the Years Ended December 31, 2017 and 2016
. Consolidated Financial Statements For the Years Ended December 31, 2017 and 2016 . Table of Contents Report of Independent Auditors 2 Consolidated Balance Sheets 3 Consolidated Statements of Operations
More informationREVISED PREPARED DIRECT TESTIMONY OF JACK S. LEWIS ON BEHALF OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA GAS COMPANY
Application of San Diego Gas & Electric Company (U0M) for Authority, Among Other Things, to Increase Rates and Charges for Electric and Gas Service Effective on January, 0. A.0--00 (Filed December, 00)
More informationMunicipal Market Update
Municipal Market Update November 30, 2015 Julie Santamaria Director St. Petersburg, Florida 727-895-8871 Julie.santamaria@rbccm.com Tax-Exempt Bonds and Federal Government Legislative proposals relating
More informationCITY OF SACRAMENTO DEBT-MANAGEMENT POLICY Adopted by the City Council on June 19, 2018
CITY OF SACRAMENTO DEBT-MANAGEMENT POLICY Adopted by the City Council on June 19, 2018 1. Introduction 1.1 Background. The City of Sacramento (the City ) has a long history of issuing multiple types of
More informationOPERATING BUDGET. Fiscal Year Dedicated to Satisfying our Community s Water Needs. MesaWater.org. Mesa Water District, Costa Mesa, California
C OPERATING BUDGET Fiscal Year 2017 Mesa Water District, Costa Mesa, California Dedicated to Satisfying our Community s Water Needs MesaWater.org ADOPTED BUDGET FISCAL YEAR 2017 Dedicated to Satisfying
More informationPreliminary Rates Customer Workshop April 10, 2014 Gary Given, Sr. Business Analyst Doug Dunlap, Finance and Accounting Manager
Preliminary 2015 2020 Rates Customer Workshop April 10, 2014 Gary Given, Sr. Business Analyst Doug Dunlap, Finance and Accounting Manager Topics for Today Base Case Assumptions Considerations Costs / Rate
More informationFor personal use only
Updater Inc. Results for Announcement to the Market Appendix 4D & Half Year Financial Statements Reporting Period Six month period ended: Six month period ended: 30 June 2018 30 June 2017 Results for announcement
More informationDebt, Obligations and Debt Management Policies
Contents: 1. Introduction...D 458 2. Debt...D 458 3. Objectives of the County Debt Management Policy...D 459 4. Credit Ratings...D 459 5. Debt Service Ratios...D 460 6. Short Term Obligations...D 460 7.
More informationCalifornia Water Service Company
California Water Service Company Napa County Water & Wastewater Assets Shawn Heffner, Dir. Corp. Development Lake Berryessa & Napa Berryessa April 29/30, 2009 Resort Improvement Districts http://www.calwater.com
More informationBEFORE THE WYOMING PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION ROCKY MOUNTAIN POWER. Rebuttal Testimony of Bruce N. Williams
Docket No. 0000--ER- Witness: Bruce N. Williams BEFORE THE WYOMING PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION ROCKY MOUNTAIN POWER Rebuttal Testimony of Bruce N. Williams September 0 Q. Are you the same Bruce N. Williams
More informationFGFOA Nature Coast Chapter Meeting Linda S. Howard, CPA, CTP, MBA Nick Rocca January 2017
The Municipal Financing Puzzle FGFOA Nature Coast Chapter Meeting Linda S. Howard, CPA, CTP, MBA Nick Rocca January 2017 Outline for Today Current Municipal Market Issuance Process Ratings and Other Credit
More informationCITY OF SACRAMENTO DEBT-MANAGEMENT POLICY Adopted by the City Council on February 07, 2017
1. Introduction CITY OF SACRAMENTO DEBT-MANAGEMENT POLICY Adopted by the City Council on February 07, 2017 1.1 Background. The City of Sacramento (the City ) has a long history of issuing multiple types
More informationBEFORE THE PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA
BEFORE THE PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA Application of California-American Water Company (U210W) for Authorization to Increase its Revenues for Water Service by $34,559,200 or
More informationPREPARED DIRECT TESTIMONY OF JONATHAN B. ATUN CHAPTER 4 ON BEHALF OF SAN DIEGO GAS & ELECTRIC COMPANY
Application No. A.1-0- Exhibit No.: Witness: Jonathan B. Atun Application of SAN DIEGO GAS & ELECTRIC ) COMPANY (U 0 E) For Approval of its ) Application No. 1-0- Electric Vehicle-Grid Integration Pilot
More informationFINANCIAL STATEMENTS DECEMBER 31, 2016
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS DECEMBER 31, 2016 PO Box 1430 18 Georgia Heritage Place Dallas, GA 30132 P: 770.445.8888 F: 770.445.8889 www.georgiaheritagebank.com GEORGIA HERITAGE BANK FINANCIAL REPORT DECEMBER
More informationPREPARED DIRECT TESTIMONY OF JACK S. LEWIS ON BEHALF OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA GAS COMPANY
Application of Southern California Gas Company for authority to update its gas revenue requirement and base rates effective on January 1, 01. (U0G) Application -1- Exhibit No.: (SCG-) PREPARED DIRECT TESTIMONY
More informationTO MEMBERS OF THE FINANCE AND CAPITAL STRATEGIES COMMITTEE: ACTION ITEM
Office of the President TO MEMBERS OF THE FINANCE AND CAPITAL STRATEGIES : For Meeting of ACTION ITEM AUTHORIZATION TO INCREASE THE UNIVERSITY EMPLOYER CONTRIBUTION RATE, MAKE ADDITIONAL CONTRIBUTIONS
More informationCreating a planet run by the sun
2015 Q4 REVIEW March 10, 2016 Creating a planet run by the sun 1 Safe Harbor & Forward Looking Statements This presentation contains forward-looking statements within the meaning of Section 27A of the
More informationInvestor Presentation
Investor Presentation Forward-Looking Statements Some statements contained in this report constitute forward-looking statements within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.
More informationCity of El Segundo Office of the City Treasurer
City of El Segundo Office of the City Treasurer Date: September 15, 2015 From: Office of the City Treasurer To: El Segundo City Council RE: Investment Portfolio Report As of June 30, 2015 Introduction:
More informationINVESTMENT POLICY. I. Introduction
INVESTMENT POLICY I. Introduction The purpose of this document is to identify policies and procedures that enhance opportunities for a prudent and systematic investment program and to organize and formalize
More informationThe Art Of Seller Financing ESOPs - Beyond The Basics
Presented by: Kevin G. Long Chang, Ruthenberg & Long PC 2033 Gateway Place, Suite 500 San Jose, CA 95110 (408) 467-3860 kgl@seethebenefits.com James F. Higgins Pilot Hill Advisors, LLC 55 Union Place,
More informationSTORM WATER USER RATE STUDY
LY STORM WATER USER RATE STUDY STORM WATER UTILITY OREM CITY, UTAH JANUARY 2016 PREPARED BY LEWIS YOUNG ROBERTSON & BURNINGHAM, INC. TABLE OF CONTENTS SECTION I: EXECUTIVE SUMMARY... 3 SECTION II: OVERVIEW
More informationRULE PEBBLE BEACH COMPANY, J. LOHR PROPERTIES, INC., AND THE HESTER HYDE GRIFFIN TRUST ENTITLEMENTS
RULE 23.5 - PEBBLE BEACH COMPANY, J. LOHR PROPERTIES, INC., AND THE HESTER HYDE GRIFFIN TRUST ENTITLEMENTS A. ISSUANCE OF WATER USE PERMITS MPWMD has granted Water Entitlements to Pebble Beach Company
More informationMarina Coast Water District Marina, California
Marina Coast Water District Marina, California Comprehensive Annual Financial Report For The Fiscal Year Ended June 30, 2011 11 Reservation Road, Marina California 93933 Marina Coast Water District Marina,
More informationMoody s Local Government Ratings PASBO Vanessa Youngs, Analyst, Moody s Investors Service
Moody s Local Government Ratings PASBO 2017 Vanessa Youngs, Analyst, Moody s Investors Service 1 Agenda 1. What Goes into a Moody s Rating? 2. General Obligation Methodology 3. State Aid Intercept Methodology
More informationCITY OF RIO RANCHO, NEW MEXICO DEBT OBLIGATIONS. There are five types of bonds that the City of Rio Rancho normally issues:
CITY OF RIO RANCHO, NEW MEXICO DEBT OBLIGATIONS Types of City Bonds There are five types of bonds that the City of Rio Rancho normally issues: General Obligation Bonds Gross Receipts Revenue Bonds Utility
More informationFITCH RATES METRO WATER DIST OF SOUTHERN CA SUB LIEN REVS 'AA+' & SIFMA INDEX BONDS 'AA+/F1+'
FITCH RATES METRO WATER DIST OF SOUTHERN CA SUB LIEN REVS 'AA+' & SIFMA INDEX BONDS 'AA+/F1+' Fitch Ratings-Austin-12 June 2017: Fitch Ratings has assigned the following ratings to bonds issued by the
More informationARKANSAS PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION
ARKANSAS PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION First Revised Sheet No. 4-9.1/34 Replacing: Original Sheet No. CenterPoint Energy Resources Corp. d/b/a CenterPoint Energy Arkansas Gas (Name of Company) Kind of Service:
More informationBOARD POLICY NO. 036 SAN DIEGO COUNTY REGIONAL TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION DEBT POLICY
BOARD POLICY NO. 036 SAN DIEGO COUNTY REGIONAL TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION DEBT POLICY The purpose of the Debt Policy for the San Diego County Regional Transportation Commission (SANDAG) is to establish
More informationWATER AND SEWER RATE STUDY
FINAL WATER AND SEWER RATE STUDY B&V PROJECT NO. 179322.0100 PREPARED FOR City of Lynwood, CA JANUARY 11, 2017 Black & Veatch Holding Company 2011. All rights reserved. City of Lynwood, CA WATER AND SEWER
More information5-yr Investment Grade Corporate CDS Markit (bps) 500
Treasury Yield Curve (percent) 2-yr/1-yr Treasury Spread (bps) % 7. 35 6. 3 25 5. 2 4. 15 3. 2. 1. Treasury Curve 'A' Composite 1 5-5. 1-yr 5-yr 1-yr 3-yr The Treasury yield curve is derived from available
More informationMEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING REGARDING FORT ORD WATER AUGMENTATION AND A THREE PARTY EFFORT TO STUDY ALTERNATIVES
4/26/2016 12:27 PM MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING REGARDING FORT ORD WATER AUGMENTATION AND A THREE PARTY EFFORT TO STUDY ALTERNATIVES This Memorandum of Understanding Regarding Fort Ord Water Augmentation
More informationConnecticut (State of) State Revolving Fund
CREDIT OPINION Connecticut (State of) State Revolving Fund New Issue - Moody's assigns Aaa to CT's State Revolving Fund Gen Rev Bds (Green Bds, 2017 Ser A) & New Issue Summary Rating Rationale Contacts
More informationBonds 101. Michigan Association of School Boards. November 10, PFM Financial Advisors LLC. 555 Briarwood Circle Suite 333
Bonds 101 Michigan Association of School Boards November 10, 2017 PFM Financial Advisors LLC 555 Briarwood Circle Suite 333 P: 734-994-9700 F: 734-994-9710 Ann Arbor, MI 48108 www.pfm.com PFM 1 Overview
More informationInvestor Presentation
Investor Presentation Forward-Looking Statements Some statements contained in this report constitute forward-looking statements within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.
More informationMEMORANDUM. Executive Summary.
11500 WEST OLYMPIC BOULEVARD, SUITE 502 LOS ANGELES, CALIFORNIA 90064 TEL: (310) 477 8487 FAX: (310) 477 0105 WWW.PRAGADVISORS.COM PUBLIC RESOURCES ADVISORY GROUP MEMORANDUM TO: Mary Lewis, Chief Financial
More informationFinal COST OF SERVICE STUDY SEPTEMBER City of San Clemente
Final COST OF SERVICE STUDY SEPTEMBER 2017 City of San Clemente Contents CONTENTS Executive Summary... 1 Study Goals and Drivers... 1 Water Rate Analysis & Adoption... 2 Recycled Water Rate Analysis &
More informationANNUAL DEBT GUIDE. Palm Beach County, Florida C L ERK & C O MP TRO L L ER S O F F IC E F ISC AL Y EA R E N D ED S EP T EMB E R 30, 2009
ANNUAL DEBT GUIDE Palm Beach County, Florida P R EP A R ED B Y TH E C L ERK & C O MP TRO L L ER S O F F IC E FOR THE F ISC AL Y EA R E N D ED S EP T EMB E R 30, 2009 PREPARED BY THE CLERK & COMPTROLLER
More informationGARVEE Bonds, TIFIA and State Infrastructure Bank. David Tyeryar, CFO, Fiscal Management Division March 14, 2017
GARVEE Bonds, TIFIA and State Infrastructure Bank David Tyeryar, CFO, Fiscal Management Division March 14, 2017 Transportation Traditional Financing Techniques 1. Cash to Capital or Pay-as-you-go 2. General
More informationMARINA COAST WATER DISTRICT FINANCIAL PLAN AND RATE AND FEE STUDY FINAL REPORT. September 2013
MARINA COAST WATER DISTRICT FINANCIAL PLAN AND RATE AND FEE STUDY FINAL REPORT September 2013 10540 TALBERT AVENUE, SUITE 200 EAST FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92708 P. 714.593.5100 F. 714.593.5101 MARINA
More informationValencia Water Company. Cost of Service Study
Valencia Water Company Cost of Service Study 2018 2020 Prepared By: Kenneth J. Petersen, P.E. Beverly Johnson, CPA John Garon, Consultant September 2017 1 P age Contents EXECUTIVE SUMMARY... 1 INTRODUCTION...
More informationTexas Association of County Auditors
David K. Medanich Vice Chairman 777 Main Street Suite 1200 Fort Worth, Texas 76102 817.332.9710 david.medanich@firstsw.com January 15, 2015 Current Issues in Public Finance: New Regulations & Current Market
More informationBEXAR COUNTY DEBT MANAGEMENT POLICY
BEXAR COUNTY DEBT MANAGEMENT POLICY Adopted by Commissioners Court on August 14, 2007 Revised October 7, 2008 Revised February 3, 2015 Revised March 21, 2017 Table of Contents Section Title Page 1 Purpose
More information2012 RECAP AND 2013 QUARTERLY REVIEW. May 2013
2012 RECAP AND 2013 QUARTERLY REVIEW May 2013 2012 YEAR IN REVIEW Citizens started 2013 in its strongest financial position, with year-end surplus of $6.3 billion and total claims-paying capacity from
More informationSubject: City Monthly Cash and Investment Report for February 2011
Information Item Date: August 11, 2011 To: From: Mayor and City Council Carol Swindell, Director of Finance/City Treasurer Subject: City Monthly Cash and Investment Report for February 2011 Introduction
More informationREPORT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS 1 2
2014 Annual Report CONTENTS REPORT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS 1 2 PAGE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS Balance sheets 3 Statements of income 4 Statements of comprehensive income (loss) 5 Statements of changes in stockholders
More informationFILED :56 AM
BEFORE THE PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION Application of (U-162-W for an Order authorizing it to increase rates charges for water service by $1,442,313 or 8.50% in 2016, by 1,051,887 or 5.71% in 2017, and
More informationGREAT OAKS WATER COMPANY
GREAT OAKS WATER COMPANY California Public Utilities Commission Division of Water and Audits Room 3102 505 Van Ness Avenue San Francisco, CA 94102-3298 March 31, 2015 Advice Letter 244-W-A Great Oaks Water
More informationComments on Your Government
Comments on Your Government A SPECIAL PUBLICATION OF THE RHODE ISLAND PUBLIC EXPENDITURE COUNCIL Bond Issuance and Default This RIPEC comments provides an overview of the state s current debt position,
More informationWater Rate Study FINAL January 31, 2018
Water Rate Study FINAL January 31, 2018 1889 Alcatraz Avenue Berkeley, CA 94703 Tel: 510 653 3399 www.bartlewells.com January 31, 2018 Joshua Basin Water District P.O. Box 675 / 61750 Chollita Road Joshua
More informationPUBLIC VERSION WORKPAPERS TO PREPARED DIRECT TESTIMONY OF KAREN C. CHAN BEFORE THE PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA
Application of SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA GAS ) COMPANY for authority to update its gas revenue ) requirement and base rates ) effective January 1, 2019 (U 904-G) ) Application No. 17-10- Exhibit No.: (SCG-38-WP)
More informationSewer Rate Study CRESCENT CITY CALIFORNIA
CRESCENT CITY CALIFORNIA Sewer Rate Study 27368 Via Industria, Suite 110, Temecula, California 925904856 T 951.587.3500 800.755.6864 F 888.326.6864 www.willdan.com Mr. Eugene Palazzo City Manager City
More informationFirst Bancshares of Texas, Inc. and Subsidiary
Report of Independent Auditors and Consolidated Financial Statements Contents Report of Independent Auditors... 1 Consolidated Financial Statements Statements of Financial Condition... 2 Statements of
More informationEntergy Gulf States Louisiana, L.L.C. Second Revised Sheet No.: 22 ISSUED: Canceling First Revised Sheet No.: 22 ISSUED BY: Jim Berkau
Entergy Gulf States Louisiana, L.L.C. Second Revised Sheet No.: 22 ISSUED: 5-30-13 Canceling First Revised Sheet No.: 22 I. GENERAL Schedule RSP ("Rider RSP") defines the procedure by which the applicable
More informationUpdated Financial Analysis Final Draft
Solar Market Pathways: San Francisco Solar and Storage for Resilience Project December 2017 Final Draft Important Notice This report was prepared by Arup North America Ltd. ( Arup ) in its capacity as
More informationDebt Administration 101. FGFOA Palm Beach Chapter. April 10, Presenters:
Presenters: Matthew Sansbury Alex Bugallo Managing Director Managing Director 450 S. Orange Avenue, Suite 460 450 S. Orange Avenue, Suite 460 Orlando, FL 32801 Orlando, FL 32801 (407) 428-5006 (407) 428-5004
More informationDallas Austin Chicago Houston Miami New York San Antonio San Diego
January 2017 DIMMIT COUNTY, TEXAS Financing 101 Dallas Austin Chicago Houston Miami New York San Antonio San Diego Financing Team Issuer A state, political subdivision, agency or authority which borrows
More informationINDIANA BOND BANK (A COMPONENT UNIT OF THE STATE OF INDIANA)
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND INDEPENDENT AUDITORS REPORT WITH SUPPLEMENTARY AND OTHER INFORMATION June 30, 2014 and 2013 Table of Contents Page(s) Independent Auditors Report 1 2 Management s Discussion and
More informationMUNICIPALITY OF ANCHORAGE, ALASKA ELECTRIC UTILITY FUND. Financial Statements, Required Supplementary Information and Other Information
Financial Statements, Required Supplementary Information and Other Information (With Independent Auditor s Report Thereon) Table of Contents Financial Section: Independent Auditor s Report 1-3 Management
More informationREBUTTAL TESTIMONY OF THOMAS FALCONE LONG ISLAND POWER AUTHORITY
BEFORE THE LONG ISLAND POWER AUTHORITY IN THE MATTER of a Three-Year Rate Plan Matter Number: -00 REBUTTAL TESTIMONY OF THOMAS FALCONE LONG ISLAND POWER AUTHORITY JUNE, 0 Matter Number: -00 Rebuttal Testimony
More informationFountain Valley Authority (A Component Unit of the City of Colorado Springs, Colorado)
(A Component Unit of the City of Colorado Springs, Colorado) Financial Statements and Report of Independent Certified Public Accountants (A Component Unit of the City of Colorado Springs, Colorado) Financial
More informationValidus Reinsurance, Ltd. (Incorporated in Bermuda)
(Incorporated in Bermuda) Consolidated financial statements For the Years Ended December 31, 2010 and 2009 (expressed in U.S. dollars) Consolidated Balance Sheets As at December 31, 2010 and 2009 December
More informationGigi Decavalles-Hughes, Acting Director of Finance/City Treasurer
Information Item Date: September 21, 2011 To: From: Mayor and City Council Gigi Decavalles-Hughes, Acting Director of Finance/City Treasurer Subject: City Monthly Cash and Investment Report for June 2011
More informationAttachment 2 to Appendix IX Formula Rate Spreadsheet
Attachment 2 to Appendix IX Formula Rate Spreadsheet Table of Contents Worksheet Name Schedule Purpose Overview Base TRR Components. BaseTRR 1 Full Development of Retail and Wholesale Base TRRs IFPTRR
More informationAttachment 2 to Appendix IX Formula Rate Spreadsheet
Attachment 2 to Appendix IX Formula Rate Spreadsheet Table of Contents Worksheet Name Schedule Purpose Overview Base TRR Components. BaseTRR 1 Full Development of Retail and Wholesale Base TRRs IFPTRR
More informationTransparency Continue to provide a platform for transparent communication and timely reporting.
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Appendix F Executive Summary The Agency s Operating Budget for Fiscal Year (FYs) 2017/18 2018/19 and FYs 2017/18-2026/27 Ten Year Capital Improvement Plan (FY 2018-2027 TYCIP) focuses
More information