BEFORE THE WYOMING PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION ROCKY MOUNTAIN POWER. Rebuttal Testimony of Bruce N. Williams
|
|
- Lilian Baker
- 5 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 Docket No ER- Witness: Bruce N. Williams BEFORE THE WYOMING PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION ROCKY MOUNTAIN POWER Rebuttal Testimony of Bruce N. Williams September 0
2 Q. Are you the same Bruce N. Williams who previously submitted direct testimony in this case on behalf of Rocky Mountain Power ( RMP or the Company )? A. Yes. PURPOSE AND SUMMARY Q. What is the purpose of your rebuttal testimony? A. The purpose of my rebuttal testimony is to: 0 provide an updated cost of debt that reflects recent financing activities and updated interest rates which results in a reduced overall cost of capital in this case; respond to Office of Consumer Advocate ( OCA ) witness Mr. Anthony Ornelas proposed cost of debt; and comment on the pro forma credit metric analysis used by Wyoming Industrial Energy Consumers ( WIEC ) witness Mr. Michael Gorman to support his recommended overall rate of return. 0 Company witness Dr. Samuel C. Hadaway will address return on equity issues raised by Messrs. Gorman and Ornelas. Q. Please summarize your testimony. A. I am sponsoring a change to the cost of debt that results in a decrease to the requested rate relief in this case of approximately $0. million. Additionally, I show why Mr. Ornelas proposed cost of debt is not appropriate and should not be used by the Commission. Finally, I comment on Mr. Gorman s discussion concerning financial integrity and explain why his credit metric analysis cannot Page Rebuttal Testimony of Bruce N. Williams
3 be relied upon. I show that his analysis is not consistent with Standard & Poor s ( S&P s ) current methodology and assessment for the Company. Q. Are there items in which Messrs. Gorman and Ornelas are in agreement with you? A. Yes. Most significantly the parties are in agreement with the Company s recommended capital structure as discussed in my direct testimony. No party is proposing any adjustments to the capital structure replicated below: Component Percent of Total Long Term Debt. % Preferred Stock 0.0 % Common Equity. % % 0 Mr. Gorman proposes no adjustment to the Company s cost of debt recommended in my direct testimony. WIEC Exhibit No. 00, page, lines through. UPDATED COST OF DEBT Q. Please discuss the recent financing work that the Company has completed. A. There were two significant financing activities that the Company completed earlier this year subsequent to my preparing and filing direct testimony in this case. First, during June 0, the Company completed the issuance of new long-term debt $0 million of. percent first mortgage bonds. This issuance of new long-term debt was included as a pro forma issuance in my direct testimony, which I update here to include the actual interest rate and related issuance costs. To properly reflect this financing, I have removed the pro-forma Page Rebuttal Testimony of Bruce N. Williams
4 financing that was in the Company s proposed cost of long-term debt and 0 0 included this new issuance. While I disagree with Mr. Ornelas proposed cost of long-term debt for other reasons, he has accurately included this recent debt issuance in his proposed cost of debt. Exhibit 0. page, line no.. Secondly, I have made a series of cost reductions related to letters of credit that the Company modified earlier this year. These letters of credit provide liquidity and credit support for certain series of the floating rate tax-exempt bond portfolio and replaced similar but higher cost letters of credit. The Company was able to negotiate new, multi-year letters of credit at more favorable pricing. As such, I have updated the cost of debt to capture these lower costs for the benefit of customers. Again, although I disagree with Mr. Ornelas proposed cost of debt for other reasons, he has accurately updated for these changes. Q. Please describe the interest rates that you updated. A. I have updated the projected rates for the Company s variable rate long-term debt. As more fully described in my direct testimony, the Company will have on average $0 million in principal amount of these variable rate securities during the test period of calendar year 0 ( Test Period ). The projected interest rate on these securities is based on forward 0-day London Interbank Offer Rate ( LIBOR ) rates at each future quarter-end spanning the test period. I have utilized current forward 0 day LIBOR rates during the Test Period and also updated the historical relationship between the interest rates on the securities and the corresponding LIBOR rates. As shown in Exhibit RMP (BNW-R) the average historical relationship for these securities is now percent of the See Exhibit RMP (BNW-) page, line no.. Page Rebuttal Testimony of Bruce N. Williams
5 0 corresponding 0 day LIBOR rate. In addition, Exhibit RMP (BNW-R) shows that although forward LIBOR rates during the Test Period are now lower than when my direct testimony was prepared, they are still projected to be significantly higher than current rates. The result of this update is that these securities are now expected to have an average cost of.% (including the cost of issuance and credit enhancements) during the Test Period. Importantly, the Company continues to consistently utilize the same methodology to project the costs of the securities. I will discuss later in my testimony an alternative proposed by Mr. Ornelas and why it is not appropriate. Q. What is the new cost of debt? A. As shown in Exhibit RMP (BNW-R), the updated cost of long-term debt is now.%. The Company s recently completed financings and updated interest rates have reduced the cost of debt by approximately basis points (0.0 percent). COMPANY S UPDATED OVERALL COST OF CAPITAL Q. Are you proposing a new overall cost of capital in this proceeding? A. Yes. The Company has updated the cost of long-term debt and combined with the capital structure produces an updated overall cost of capital as shown below. Updated Overall Cost of Capital Component Percent of Total Cost Weighted Average Long Term Debt. %. %. % Preferred Stock 0.0 %. % 0.00 % Common Equity. %. %.0 % %. % The updated overall cost of capital is.%, a reduction of. basis points (0.0 percent) from the Company s direct testimony. This reduction in the Page Rebuttal Testimony of Bruce N. Williams
6 0 0 overall cost of capital is estimated to reduce the revenue requirement in this case by approximately $0. million. Mr. Steven R. McDougal provides the final revenue requirement calculation with all of the rebuttal adjustments. REPLY TO OCA S PROPOSED COST OF DEBT Q. What is OCA s proposed cost of debt? A. Mr. Ornelas is proposing a cost of debt of.% at OCA Exhibit 0. page, line. Q. Do you agree with Mr. Ornelas s recommendation? If not, why not? A. No. While our respective costs of debt are relatively close, there is one significant and important difference. That difference is how to set the interest rate on the Company s variable rate debt. As I explained in my direct testimony and earlier in my rebuttal testimony, the Company s method of determining the variable interest rates during the Test Period has been used consistently when determining the cost of debt in previous Wyoming general rate cases and in the Company s other jurisdictions. Mr. Ornelas would deviate from that consistent practice and proposes utilizing the cost of the variable rate securities on June, 0. There are at least two significant issues with Mr. Ornelas s proposal. First, Mr. Ornelas s arbitrary cost determination date is outside the Test Period in this case and approximately months prior to the end of the Test Period (December, 0). The Company s method exclusively uses the short-term interest rate during the Test Period. Secondly, by using historical June 0 rates, Mr. Ornelas is precluding Page Rebuttal Testimony of Bruce N. Williams
7 0 the Company from the opportunity to recover increases in short-term interest rates that are widely expected by the financial markets. Currently, it is very difficult to find a financial publication that doesn t expect the Federal Reserve to start raising its target for short-term rates. Market prognosticators are largely debating the timing of the first increase by the Federal Reserve, and not if rates will increase. Mr. Ornelas s view that the Federal Reserve is unlikely to begin to increase interest rates is not the view of most market participants and cost-of-capital witnesses, including Mr. Gorman or Dr. Hadaway. WIEC S FINANCIAL INTEGRITY MODELS AND RATIOS Q. Please comment on Mr. Gorman s testimony concerning financial integrity and his credit metric analysis. A. Mr. Gorman s analysis is fatally flawed and cannot be relied upon to verify claims that his proposed rate of return ( ROR ) would support the Company s credit ratings. First, Mr. Gorman s model does not include any of the financing costs associated with construction work in progress ( CWIP ). The Company must finance the costs of assets while they are under construction and the Company incurs interest expense on the debt portion of these financings. To compensate the Company, there is an allowance for funds used during construction ( AFUDC ) Mr. Gorman cites Blue Chip Financial Forecasts projected 0 year Treasury bond yield of.0% vs. the current 0-year Treasury bond yield of.%. WIEC Exhibit No. 00 page, lines through. Dr. Hadaway discusses the expectation for shorter-term rates to increase significantly more relative to long-term rates in Direct Testimony, page - Table and in rebuttal testimony as shown in Exhibit RMP (SCH-R). Mr. Gorman s conclusion that ratings would not change is unclear. Mr. Gorman argues that certain ratios would support an investment grade credit rating. See WIEC Exhibit No. 00 page lines through 0. This leaves open the possibility of a multi-step downgrade from the Company s current bond ratings although ultimately still retaining an investment grade credit rating. Page Rebuttal Testimony of Bruce N. Williams
8 0 that is a non-cash offset to interest expense. As AFUDC is non-cash, it is not included in the rating agencies determination of earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization ( EBITDA ) or funds from operations ( FFO ). However, the debt and corresponding interest costs on the financings are real and are included in the rating agencies credit ratio analysis. By ignoring the financing cost of CWIP, Mr. Gorman s models have understated debt and interest expense, thereby producing erroneously high debt and interest coverage ratios. Further, Mr. Gorman does not include the full amount of adjustments that S&P makes when it assessed the Company s creditworthiness. The result is that Mr. Gorman has included less than one-quarter of the amount of S&P s debt adjustments. Q. Which specific rating agency adjustments does Mr. Gorman omit from his analysis? A. The table below lists each debt adjustment that S&P made at December, 0 and compares those amounts to what Mr. Gorman has included in his credit metrics in WIEC Exhibit No. 00. page of. For purposes of this rebuttal testimony, I am focusing on the more significant adjustments. I do not address the adjustment related to preferred stock due to the immaterial amount that remains outstanding. Page Rebuttal Testimony of Bruce N. Williams
9 0 As can be seen in the table, Mr. Gorman has correctly included S&P s adjustments related only to operating leases and purchase power agreements but omitted the balance of S&P s debt adjustments. The result is that Mr. Gorman s credit analysis model ignores $ million of debt adjustments that S&P included in its credit analysis. For all of these reasons, Mr. Gorman s credit metric analysis is unreliable. Mr. Gorman s conclusion that his proposed overall ROR will produce financial results that support the Company s credit ratings is unsubstantiated. Q. Does this conclude your rebuttal testimony? A. Yes. Page Rebuttal Testimony of Bruce N. Williams
10
11
Rocky Mountain Power Docket No Witness: Bruce N. Williams BEFORE THE PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION OF THE STATE OF UTAH ROCKY MOUNTAIN POWER
Rocky Mountain Power Docket No. 13-035-184 Witness: Bruce N. Williams BEFORE THE PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION OF THE STATE OF UTAH ROCKY MOUNTAIN POWER Rebuttal Testimony of Bruce N. Williams May 2014 1 2
More informationBEFORE THE WYOMING PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION ROCKY MOUNTAIN POWER. Rebuttal Testimony of Joelle R. Steward
Docket No. 0000--ER-1 Witness: Joelle R. Steward BEFORE THE WYOMING PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION ROCKY MOUNTAIN POWER Rebuttal Testimony of Joelle R. Steward September 01 11 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 1 Q. Are you
More informationBEFORE THE PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION OF THE STATE OF UTAH ROCKY MOUNTAIN POWER. Rebuttal Testimony of Samuel C. Hadaway
Rocky Mountain Power Docket No. 13-035-184 Witness: Samuel C. Hadaway BEFORE THE PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION OF THE STATE OF UTAH ROCKY MOUNTAIN POWER Rebuttal Testimony of Samuel C. Hadaway May 2014 1 2
More informationBEFORE THE WYOMING PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION ROCKY MOUNTAIN POWER. Direct Testimony of Cindy A. Crane
Docket No. 0000- -ER- Witness: Cindy A. Crane BEFORE THE WYOMING PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION ROCKY MOUNTAIN POWER Direct Testimony of Cindy A. Crane March 0 0 0 Introduction Q. Please state your name, business
More informationBEFORE THE WYOMING PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION ROCKY MOUNTAIN POWER. Rebuttal Testimony of Dana M. Ralston
Docket No. 0000--ER- Witness: Dana M. Ralston BEFORE THE WYOMING PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION ROCKY MOUNTAIN POWER Rebuttal Testimony of Dana M. Ralston September 0 1 1 1 0 1 Q. Please state your name, business
More informationBEFORE THE WYOMING PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION ROCKY MOUNTAIN POWER. Supplemental Rebuttal Testimony of Joelle R. Steward
Docket No. 0000-0-EA- Witness: Joelle R. Steward BEFORE THE WYOMING PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION ROCKY MOUNTAIN POWER Supplemental Rebuttal Testimony of Joelle R. Steward March 0 0 0 Q. Are you the same Joelle
More informationLine No. Description Source Amount. 1 Rate Base Exh. A-2, Sch. B1 $ 3,395, Adjusted Net Operating Income Exh. A-3, Sch.
Historical Revenue Deficiency (Sufficiency) Schedule: A1 For the Historical Year Ended December 31, 2016 Witness: M. A. Suchta ($000) Page: 1 of 1 (a) (b) (c) No. Description Source Amount 1 Rate Base
More informationRocky Mountain Power Exhibit RMP (SRM-1R) Docket No ER-15 Witness: Steven R. McDougal BEFORE THE WYOMING PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION
Exhibit RMP (SRM-1R) BEFORE THE WYOMING PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION ROCKY MOUNTAIN POWER Exhibit Accompanying Rebuttal Testimony of Steven R. McDougal Revised Revenue Requirement Summary September 2015 Exhibit
More informationJUN FILED BEFORE THE PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION OF WYOMING
BEFORE THE PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION OF WYOMING IN THE MATTER OF THE APPLICATION ) OF ROCKY MOUNTAIN POWER FOR ) AUTHORITY TO INCREASE ITS RETAIL ) Docket No. 20000-384-ER-09 ELECTRIC UTILITY SERVICE RATES
More informationBEFORE THE WYOMING PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION ROCKY MOUNTAIN POWER. Supplemental Direct Testimony of Joelle R. Steward
Docket No. 20000-520-EA-17 Witness: Joelle R. Steward BEFORE THE WYOMING PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION ROCKY MOUNTAIN POWER Supplemental Direct Testimony of Joelle R. Steward January 2018 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
More informationRocky Mountain Power Docket No Witness: Douglas K. Stuver BEFORE THE PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION OF THE STATE OF UTAH ROCKY MOUNTAIN POWER
Rocky Mountain Power Docket No. 13-035-184 Witness: Douglas K. Stuver BEFORE THE PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION OF THE STATE OF UTAH ROCKY MOUNTAIN POWER Rebuttal Testimony of Douglas K. Stuver Prepaid Pension
More informationA. My name is Lisa J. Gast. My business address is Integrys Energy Group, Inc.
BEFORE THE PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION OF WISCONSIN Application of Wisconsin Public Service Corporation for ) Authority to Adjust Electric and Natural Gas Rates ) 0-UR- Revised Direct Testimony of Lisa J.
More informationBefore the Minnesota Public Utilities Commission State of Minnesota. Docket No. E002/GR Exhibit (GET-1)
Direct Testimony and Schedules George E. Tyson, II Before the Minnesota Public Utilities Commission State of Minnesota In the Matter of the Application of Northern States Power Company for Authority to
More informationBEFORE THE FLORIDA PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION
BEFORE THE FLORIDA PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION DOCKET NO. 000-EI IN RE: TAMPA ELECTRIC COMPANY S PETITION FOR AN INCREASE IN BASE RATES AND MISCELLANEOUS SERVICE CHARGES REBUTTAL TESTIMONY OF JEFFREY S.
More informationCASE NO.: ER Surrebuttal Testimony of Bruce E. Biewald. On Behalf of Sierra Club
Exhibit No.: Issue: Planning Prudence and Rates Witness: Bruce Biewald Type of Exhibit: Surrebuttal Testimony Sponsoring Party: Sierra Club Case No.: ER-0-0 Date Testimony Prepared: October, 0 MISSOURI
More informationPENNSYLVANIA PUBLIC UTILITY COMMISSION. METROPOLITAN EDISON COMPANY Docket No. R PENNSYLVANIA ELECTRIC COMPANY Docket No.
Statement No. -SR Witness: Lisa A. Gumby PENNSYLVANIA PUBLIC UTILITY COMMISSION v. METROPOLITAN EDISON COMPANY Docket No. R-0- PENNSYLVANIA ELECTRIC COMPANY Docket No. R-0- PENNSYLVANIA POWER COMPANY Docket
More informationSTATE OF VERMONT PUBLIC UTILITY COMMISSION
STATE OF VERMONT PUBLIC UTILITY COMMISSION Tariff filing of Green Mountain Power Corporation requesting a.% increase in its base rates effective with bills rendered January, 0, to be fully offset by bill
More informationBEFORE THE PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION OF WYOMING ) ) ) ) PREFILED REBUTTAL TESTIMONY AND EXHIBITS OF JONI JOHNSON-POWE INDEX QUALIFICATIONS...
BEFORE THE PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION OF WYOMING IN THE MATTER OF THE APPLICATION OF SOURCEGAS DISTRIBUTION LLC FOR AUTHORITY TO INCREASE ITS NATURAL GAS RATES BY $7.47 MILLION PER ANNUM, TO CONSOLIDATE
More informationLine No. WITNESS: JEFFREY L. ADAMS Page 1 A. INTRODUCTION. Q. Please state your name and business address. B. PURPOSE
No. WITNESS: JEFFREY L. ADAMS Page 0 A. INTRODUCTION Q. Please state your name and business address. A. My name is Jeffrey L. Adams. My business address is Fairmont Avenue, Fairmont, West Virginia. Q.
More informationSTATE OF NEW JERSEY BOARD OF PUBLIC UTILITIES
STATE OF NEW JERSEY BOARD OF PUBLIC UTILITIES In The Matter of the Petition of Public Service Electric and Gas Company for Approval of an Increase in Electric and Gas Rates and For Changes In the Tariffs
More informationDIRECT TESTIMONY AND EXHIBITS
Page of CA-T- DOCKET NO. 0-0 DIRECT TESTIMONY AND EXHIBITS OF RALPH C. SMITH, CPA THE DIVISION OF CONSUMER ADVOCACY SUBJECT: REVENUE REQUIREMENT Page of CA T- Docket No. 0-0 Page of ADIT balance for the
More informationBOARD OF PUBLIC UTILITIES
BEFORE THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY BOARD OF PUBLIC UTILITIES IN THE MATTER OF THE PETITION OF ) PUBLIC SERVICE ELECTRIC AND GAS ) COMPANY FOR APPROVAL OF AN ) EXTENSION OF A SOLAR GENERATION ) INVESTMENT PROGRAM
More informationPREPARED REBUTTAL TESTIMONY OF GARRY G. YEE ON BEHALF OF SAN DIEGO GAS & ELECTRIC COMPANY AND SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA GAS COMPANY
Application of San Diego Gas & Electric Company (U90M) for Authority, Among Other Things, to Increase Rates and Charges for Electric and Gas Service Effective on January, 0. A.0--00 (Filed December, 00)
More informationTHE STATE OF NEW HAMPSHIRE BEFORE THE PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION NORTHERN UTILITIES, INC. DIRECT TESTIMONY OF DAVID L. CHONG
THE STATE OF NEW HAMPSHIRE BEFORE THE PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION DG -0 NORTHERN UTILITIES, INC. DIRECT TESTIMONY OF DAVID L. CHONG EXHIBIT DLC- 0000 Table of Contents INTRODUCTION... SUMMARY OF TESTIMONY...
More informationUNITED STATES OF AMERICA BEFORE THE FEDERAL ENERGY REGULATORY COMMISSION
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA BEFORE THE FEDERAL ENERGY REGULATORY COMMISSION Exhibit No. PNM- Page of Public Service Company of New Mexico ) Docket No. ER - -000 PREPARED INITIAL TESTIMONY OF TERRY R. HORN
More informationSOURCEGAS DISTRIBUTION LLC DOCKET NO GR-10 (RECORD NO )
1 1 1 1 1 1 0 SOURCEGAS DISTRIBUTION LLC DOCKET NO. 00--GR- (RECORD NO. ) PRE FILED CROSS ANSWER TESTIMONY OF DON KRATTENMAKER SEMINOLE ENERGY SERVICES LLC I. INTRODUCTION AND PURPOSE Q. Please state your
More informationSTATE OF NEW HAMPSHIRE BEFORE THE PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION. DocketNo. DE REBUTTAL TESTIMONY STEVEN E. MULLEN AND HOWARDS.
.,- EXHIBIT Liberty U.. tiiities STATE OF NEW HAMPSHIRE BEFORE THE PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION DocketNo. DE - Liberty Utilities (Granite State Electric) Corp. d/b/a Liberty Utilities Distribution Service
More informationMichael Gorman s Responses to Mr. Aaron Engen
Michael Gorman s Responses to Mr. Aaron Engen 1. Références : (i) ACIG-7, Document 1, Written evidence of Michael Gorman for IGUA, page 2, lignes 26-31 (ii) ACIG-7, Document 1, Written evidence of Michael
More informationP-5 STATE OF NEW JERSEY BOARD OF PUBLIC UTILITIES
P- STATE OF NEW JERSEY BOARD OF PUBLIC UTILITIES IN THE MATTER OF THE PETITION OF PUBLIC SERVICE ELECTRIC AND GAS COMPANY FOR APPROVAL OF ITS ENERGY EFFICIENCY 01 PROGRAM AND RECOVERY OF ASSOCIATED COSTS
More informationFrequently Asked Questions
December 31, 2016 RiverPark Floating Rate CMBS Fund ( RCRIX ) Frequently Asked Questions 1. What is the Fund s primary strategy? The Fund invests primarily in performing floating-rate commercial mortgagebacked
More informationBEFORE THE PENNSYLVANIA PUBLIC UTILITY COMMISSION. PENNSYLVANIA PUBLIC UTILITY COMMISSION v. PECO ENERGY COMPANY DOCKET NO.
PECO ENERGY COMPANY STATEMENT NO. -R BEFORE THE PENNSYLVANIA PUBLIC UTILITY COMMISSION PENNSYLVANIA PUBLIC UTILITY COMMISSION v. PECO ENERGY COMPANY DOCKET NO. R-01-0001 REBUTTAL TESTIMONY WITNESS: ALAN
More informationBEFORE THE PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION OF WISCONSIN
BEFORE THE PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION OF WISCONSIN Application of Wisconsin Public Service Corporation for ) Authority to Adjust Electric and Natural Gas Rates ) 0-UR- Rebuttal Testimony of Rick J. Moras
More informationMr. Baudino s analyses result in a range of 8.70 percent to 9.35 percent for GMP s cost of
TECHNICAL RESPONSE TO MR. BAUDINO Mr. Baudino s analyses result in a range of.0 percent to. percent for GMP s cost of equity. He states that he would recommend.0 percent, but since GMP s proposed ROE of.0
More informationSTATE OF NEW JERSEY BOARD OF PUBLIC UTILITIES
STATE OF NEW JERSEY BOARD OF PUBLIC UTILITIES IN THE MATTER OF THE PETITION OF SUEZ WATER NEW JERSEY INC. FOR APPROVAL OF AN INCREASE IN RATES FOR WATER/SEWER SERVICE AND OTHER TARIFF CHANGES BPU DOCKET
More informationBefore the Minnesota Public Utilities Commission State of Minnesota. Docket No. E002/GR Exhibit (CRB-3) Multi-Year Rate Plan
Surrebuttal Testimony and Schedules Charles R. Burdick Before the Minnesota Public Utilities Commission State of Minnesota In the Matter of the Application of Northern States Power Company for Authority
More informationREPLY TESTIMONY OF JONATHAN WALLACH
STATE OF ILLINOIS BEFORE THE ILLINOIS COMMERCE COMMISSION COMMONWEALTH EDISON COMPANY ) ) Petition for Approval of Tariffs ) Docket No. 06-0411 Implementing ComEd s Proposed ) Residential Rate Stabilization
More informationBefore the Minnesota Public Utilities Commission State of Minnesota. Docket No. E002/GR Exhibit (JMC-2) Return on Equity
Rebuttal Testimony James M. Coyne Before the Minnesota Public Utilities Commission State of Minnesota In the Matter of the Application of Northern States Power Company for Authority to Increase Rates for
More informationSTATE OF NEW HAMPSHIRE PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION DG ENERGYNORTH NATURAL GAS, INC. D/B/A NATIONAL GRID NH
STATE OF NEW HAMPSHIRE PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION DG 08-009 ENERGYNORTH NATURAL GAS, INC. D/B/A NATIONAL GRID NH Petition for Permanent Rate Increase and for Temporary Rates Order Approving Settlement
More informationBEFORE THE PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION OF THE STATE OF UTAH ROCKY MOUNTAIN POWER. Direct Testimony of Michael G. Wilding
Rocky Mountain Power Docket No. 18-035-01 Witness: Michael G. Wilding BEFORE THE PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION OF THE STATE OF UTAH ROCKY MOUNTAIN POWER Direct Testimony of Michael G. Wilding March 2018 1
More informationBEFORE THE PENNSYLVANIA PUBLIC UTILITY COMMISSION. PENNSYLVANIA PUBLIC UTILITY COMMISSION v. PECO ENERGY COMPANY DOCKET NO.
PECO ENERGY COMPANY STATEMENT NO. -R BEFORE THE PENNSYLVANIA PUBLIC UTILITY COMMISSION PENNSYLVANIA PUBLIC UTILITY COMMISSION v. PECO ENERGY COMPANY DOCKET NO. R-01-0001 REBUTTAL TESTIMONY WITNESS: MARK
More informationBEFORE THE PENNSYLVANIA PUBLIC UTILITY COMMISSION. PENNSYLVANIA PUBLIC UTILITY COMMISSION v. PECO ENERGY COMPANY DOCKET NO.
PECO ENERGY COMPANY STATEMENT NO. -R BEFORE THE PENNSYLVANIA PUBLIC UTILITY COMMISSION PENNSYLVANIA PUBLIC UTILITY COMMISSION v. PECO ENERGY COMPANY DOCKET NO. R-01-0001 REBUTTAL TESTIMONY WITNESS: BENJAMIN
More informationBEFORE THE ARKANSAS PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION ) ) ) ) SURREBUTTAL TESTIMONY AND EXHIBIT OF DAVID E. DISMUKES, PH.D. ON BEHALF OF
BEFORE THE ARKANSAS PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION IN THE MATTER OF THE APPLICATION OF THE OKLAHOMA GAS AND ELECTRIC COMPANY FOR APPROVAL OF A GENERAL CHANGE IN RATES, CHARGES AND TARIFFS ) ) ) ) DOCKET NO.
More informationDIRECT TESTIMONY OF. Denise Kay Parrish
IN THE MATTER OF THE APPLICATION OF ) BEFORE THE PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION OF WYOMING Hearing Begins: June 18, 2012 Testimony Filed: May 25, 2012 IN SUPPORT OF THE STIPULATIONS AND AGREEMENTS On Behalf
More informationRocky Mountain Power Docket No Witness: Cindy A. Crane BEFORE THE PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION OF THE STATE OF UTAH ROCKY MOUNTAIN POWER
Rocky Mountain Power Docket No. 17-035-40 Witness: Cindy A. Crane BEFORE THE PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION OF THE STATE OF UTAH ROCKY MOUNTAIN POWER Supplemental Direct and Rebuttal Testimony of Cindy A. Crane
More informationBEFORE THE PUBLIC UTILITY COMMISSION OF OREGON UM 1910
BEFORE THE PUBLIC UTILITY COMMISSION OF OREGON UM 0 In the Matter of PacifiCorp, Resource Value of Solar. OPENING TESTIMONY OF THE OREGON CITIZENS UTILITY BOARD March th, 0 BEFORE THE PUBLIC UTILITY COMMISSION
More informationDIRECT TESTIMONY OF STEVEN D. ROETGER, WILLIAM R. JACOBS, JR PH.D, MARK D. RAUCKHORST AND DAVID P. POROCH,
DIRECT TESTIMONY OF STEVEN D. ROETGER, WILLIAM R. JACOBS, JR PH.D, MARK D. RAUCKHORST AND DAVID P. POROCH, IN SUPPORT OF THE STIPULATION REACHED BETWEEN THE GEORGIA PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION PUBLIC INTEREST
More informationPUC DOCKET NO CROSS-REBUTTAL TESTIMONY BRUCE BIEWALD ON BEHALF OF THE GULF COAST COALITION OF CITIES
PUC DOCKET NO. APPLICATION OF CENTERPOINT ENERGY HOUSTON ELECTRIC, LLC, RELIANT ENERGY RETAIL SERVICES, LLC AND TEXAS GENCO, LP TO DETERMINE STRANDED COSTS AND OTHER TRUE-UP BALANCES PURSUANT TO PURA.
More informationRocky Mountain Power Exhibit RMP (BNW-7) Docket No Witness: Bruce N. Williams BEFORE THE PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION OF THE STATE OF UTAH
Exhibit RMP (BNW-7) BEFORE THE PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION OF THE STATE OF UTAH ROCKY MOUNTAIN POWER Exhibit Accompanying Direct Testimony of Bruce N. Williams May 8, 2013 Moody s Investors Service January
More informationBEFORE THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY OFFICE OF ADMINISTRATIVE LAW BOARD OF PUBLIC UTILITIES
BEFORE THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY OFFICE OF ADMINISTRATIVE LAW BOARD OF PUBLIC UTILITIES IN THE MATTER OF THE PETITION ) BPU Docket No. GR000 OF PIVOTAL UTILITY HOLDINGS, INC. ) OAL Docket No. PUC-0-00N D/B/A
More informationBEFORE THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY BOARD OF PUBLIC UTILITIES
BEFORE THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY BOARD OF PUBLIC UTILITIES IN THE MATTER OF THE PETITION OF FOR APPROVAL OF INCREASED TARIFF RATES AND CHARGES FOR WATER AND WASTEWATER SERVICE, CHANGE IN DEPRECIATION RATES
More informationBEFORE THE PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION OF UTAH
R. Jeff Richards (7294) Yvonne R. Hogle (7550) 1407 West North Temple, Suite 320 Salt Lake City, Utah 84116 Telephone: (801) 220-4050 Facsimile: (801) 220-3299 Email: robert.richards@pacificorp.com yvonne.hogle@pacificorp.com
More informationRocky Mountain Power Docket No Witness: Nikki L. Kobliha BEFORE THE PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION OF THE STATE OF UTAH ROCKY MOUNTAIN POWER
Rocky Mountain Power Docket No. 17-035-39 Witness: Nikki L. Kobliha BEFORE THE PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION OF THE STATE OF UTAH ROCKY MOUNTAIN POWER Rebuttal Testimony of Nikki L. Kobliha October 2017 1
More informationUNITED STATES OF AMERICA BEFORE THE FEDERAL ENERGY REGULATORY COMMISSION. Public Service Company of Colorado ) Docket No.
Page of UNITED STATES OF AMERICA BEFORE THE FEDERAL ENERGY REGULATORY COMMISSION Public Service Company of Colorado ) Docket No. ER- -000 PREPARED TESTIMONY OF Deborah A. Blair XCEL ENERGY SERVICES INC.
More informationREBUTTAL TESTIMONY OF THOMAS FALCONE LONG ISLAND POWER AUTHORITY
BEFORE THE LONG ISLAND POWER AUTHORITY IN THE MATTER of a Three-Year Rate Plan Matter Number: -00 REBUTTAL TESTIMONY OF THOMAS FALCONE LONG ISLAND POWER AUTHORITY JUNE, 0 Matter Number: -00 Rebuttal Testimony
More informationSTATE OF VERMONT PUBLIC UTILITY COMMISSION ) ) ) ) PREFILED TESTIMONY OF LAUREN HAMMER ON BEHALF OF VERMONT GAS SYSTEMS, INC.
STATE OF VERMONT PUBLIC UTILITY COMMISSION Petition of Vermont Gas Systems, Inc. for change in rates, and for use of the System Reliability and Expansion Fund in connection therewith ) ) ) ) PREFILED TESTIMONY
More informationRebuttal Testimony and Schedules of:
The Narragansett Electric Company d/b/a National Grid INVESTIGATION AS TO THE PROPRIETY OF PROPOSED TARIFF CHANGES Rebuttal Testimony and Schedules of: Depreciation - Ned W. Allis Electric Sales Forecast
More informationUNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION WASHINGTON, D.C FORM 10-Q
UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549 FORM 10-Q (MARK ONE) QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 FOR THE QUARTERLY PERIOD
More informationRocky Mountain Power Exhibit RMP (JKL-5) Docket No Witness: Jeffrey K. Larsen BEFORE THE PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION OF THE STATE OF UTAH
Exhibit RMP (JKL-5) BEFORE THE PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION OF THE STATE OF UTAH ROCKY MOUNTAIN POWER Exhibit Accompanying Direct Testimony of Jeffrey K. Larsen Proposed Schedule June 2017 Exhibit RMP (JKL-5)
More informationPREPARED REBUTTAL TESTIMONY OF MICHAEL R. WOODRUFF ON BEHALF OF SAN DIEGO GAS & ELECTRIC COMPANY CHAPTER 16
Application: A.1-0-0 Exhibit No.: Witness: -1 Woodruff PREPARED REBUTTAL TESTIMONY OF MICHAEL R. WOODRUFF ON BEHALF OF SAN DIEGO GAS & ELECTRIC COMPANY CHAPTER 1 BEFORE THE PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION
More informationSTATE OF IOWA BEFORE THE IOWA UTILITIES BOARD : : : : : : : : : : : : MIDAMERICAN ENERGY COMPANY S INITIAL BRIEF
STATE OF IOWA BEFORE THE IOWA UTILITIES BOARD IN RE MIDAMERICAN ENERGY COMPANY Docket No. EAC-2016-0006 Docket No. EAC-2017-0006 MIDAMERICAN ENERGY COMPANY S INITIAL BRIEF Table of Contents I. PROCEDURAL
More informationPUBLIC UTILITY COMMISSION OF OREGON UM 1355 STAFF REPLY TESTIMONY OF. Kelcey Brown
PUBLIC UTILITY COMMISSION OF OREGON UM STAFF REPLY TESTIMONY OF Kelcey Brown In the Matter of THE PUBLIC UTILITY COMMISSION OF OREGON Investigation into Forecasting Forced Outage Rates for Electric Generating
More informationSTATE OF NEW JERSEY OFFICE OF ADMINISTRATIVE LAW BEFORE THE HONORABLE WALTER J. BRASWELL ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )
STATE OF NEW JERSEY OFFICE OF ADMINISTRATIVE LAW BEFORE THE HONORABLE WALTER J. BRASWELL I/M/O THE PETITION OF PUBLIC SERVICE ELECTRIC AND GAS COMPANY FOR APPROVAL OF AN INCREASE IN ELECTRIC AND GAS RATES
More informationUNITED STATES OF AMERICA BEFORE THE FEDERAL ENERGY REGULATORY COMMISSION
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA BEFORE THE FEDERAL ENERGY REGULATORY COMMISSION California Independent System ) Docket Nos. ER0--000 Operator Corporation ) ER0--00 ) Pacific Gas and Electric Company ) Docket
More informationRocky Mountain Power Exhibit RMP (JRS-3SS) Docket No EA-17 Witness: Joelle R. Steward BEFORE THE WYOMING PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION
Exhibit RMP (JRS-3SS) BEFORE THE WYOMING PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION ROCKY MOUNTAIN POWER Exhibit Accompanying Second Supplemental Direct Testimony of Joelle R. Steward Example Monthly RTM Deferral Calculation
More informationREqUEST: Re: CoBank s patronage refunds. Please provide a history of patronage refunds over the last five years.
Staff Data Requests - Set I Date Request Received: August 10, 2009 Date of Response: August 28, 2009 Request No. Staff 1-1 Witness: Thomas C. Leonard REqUEST: Re: CoBank s patronage refunds. Please provide
More informationFORM 10-Q SEI INVESTMENTS CO - SEIC. Filed: May 02, 2008 (period: March 31, 2008)
FORM 10-Q SEI INVESTMENTS CO - SEIC Filed: May 02, 2008 (period: March 31, 2008) Quarterly report which provides a continuing view of a company's financial position Table of Contents PART I. FINANCIAL
More informationSOUTHERN CALIFORNIA GAS COMPANY ADVANCED METERING INFRASTRUCTURE AMENDED REBUTTAL TESTIMONY CHAPTER 3 SOCALGAS AMI DEPLOYMENT PLAN, COSTS,
Application No.: A.0-0-0 Exhibit No.: SCG 1 Date: June 1, 00 Witness: Mark L. Serrano SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA GAS COMPANY ADVANCED METERING INFRASTRUCTURE AMENDED REBUTTAL TESTIMONY CHAPTER SOCALGAS AMI DEPLOYMENT
More informationIn the Matter of Anthony Hearn, Department of Education DOP Docket No (Merit System Board, decided October 10, 2007)
In the Matter of Anthony Hearn, Department of Education DOP Docket No. 2005-1341 (Merit System Board, decided October 10, 2007) The appeal of Anthony Hearn, an Education Program Development Specialist
More informationBEFORE THE PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION OF THE STATE OF COLORADO
BEFORE THE PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION OF THE STATE OF COLORADO Attachment A RE: THE INVESTIGATION AND SUSPENSION ) OF TARIFF SHEETS FILED BY PUBLIC SERVICE ) COMPANY OF COLORADO ADVICE LETTER NO. ) DOCKET
More informationBEFORE THE FLORIDA PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION
BEFORE THE FLORIDA PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION DOCKET NO. 00-EI IN RE: TAMPA ELECTRIC COMPANY S PETITION FOR AN INCREASE IN BASE RATES AND MISCELLANEOUS SERVICE CHARGES REBUTTAL TESTIMONY OF STEVEN P. HARRIS
More informationPREPARED DIRECT TESTIMONY OF MICHAEL W. FOSTER ON BEHALF OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA GAS COMPANY
Application of Southern California Gas Company (U 90 G) for Authority to: (i) Adjust its Authorized Return on Common Equity, (ii) Adjust its Authorized Embedded Costs of Debt and Preferred Stock, (iii)
More informationSTATE OF NEW HAMPSHIRE BEFORE THE PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION. Docket No. DE DIRECT TESTIMONY
EXHIBIT Liberty Utilities STATE OF NEW HAMPSHIRE BEFORE THE PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION Liberty Utilities (Granite State Electric) Corp. d/b/a Liberty Utilities Distribution Service Rate Case DIRECT TESTIMONY
More informationBEFORE THE IDAHO PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION ) ) ) ) CASE NO. PAC-E APPLICATION FOR CHANGE TO DEPRECIATION RATES APPLICABLE TO ELECTRIC PROPERTY
Yvonne R. Hogle (#8930 Rocky Mountain Power 1407 West North Temple, Suite 320 Salt Lake City, Utah 84116 Telephone No. (801 220-4050 Facsimile No. (801 220-3299 yvonne.hogle@pacificorp.com D. Matthew Moscon
More informationMagellan Midstream Partners, L.P.
UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION Washington, D.C. 20549 FORM 10-Q QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 For the quarterly period ended
More informationLeveraged Bank Loans. Prudential Investment Management-Fixed Income. Leveraged Loans: Capturing Investor Attention July 2006
Prudential Investment Management-Fixed Income Leveraged Loans: Capturing Investor Attention July 2006 Timothy Aker Head of US Bank Loan Team Martha Tuttle Portfolio Manager, US Bank Loan Team Brian Juliano
More informationNEW ENGLAND POWER COMPANY
DE 00-148 NEW ENGLAND POWER COMPANY Petition for Authorization and Approval of: (1) Extension of the Authority to Issue Not Exceeding $300 Million of New Long-Term Debt, Which May Be in the Form of Bonds,
More informationBEFORE THE PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE
BEFORE THE PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE IN THE MATTER OF THE APPLICATION OF ) DELMARVA POWER & LIGHT COMPANY FOR ) PSC DOCKET NO. 06-284 A CHANGE IN NATURAL GAS BASE RATES ) (FILED
More informationBEFORE THE PENNSYLVANIA PUBLIC UTILITY COMMISSION
BEFORE THE PENNSYLVANIA PUBLIC UTILITY COMMISSION PETITION OF UGI UTILITIES, INC. ELECTRIC DIVISION FOR APPROVAL OF ITS ENERGY EFFICIENCY AND CONSERVATION PLAN DOCKET NO. M-0- TESTIMONY OF BRIAN J. FITZPATRICK
More informationBefore the Minnesota Public Utilities Commission State of Minnesota. Docket No. E002/GR Exhibit (LRP-2) Decoupling and Sales True-Up
Rebuttal Testimony and Schedule Lisa R. Peterson Before the Minnesota Public Utilities Commission State of Minnesota In the Matter of the Application of Northern States Power Company for Authority to Increase
More informationRocky Mountain Power Docket No Witness: Nikki L. Kobliha BEFORE THE PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION OF THE STATE OF UTAH ROCKY MOUNTAIN POWER
Rocky Mountain Power Docket No. 17-035-40 Witness: Nikki L. Kobliha BEFORE THE PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION OF THE STATE OF UTAH ROCKY MOUNTAIN POWER Supplemental Direct and Rebuttal Testimony of Nikki L.
More informationBoard of Public Utilities Prepared Testimony of Lori Austin September, 2010
Board of Public Utilities Prepared Testimony of Lori Austin September, 2010 Q: Please state your name and your business address. A: My name is Lori Austin, 540 Minnesota Avenue, Kansas City, KS 66101.
More informationDIRECT TESTIMONY OF THE FINANCE PANEL
BEFORE THE NEW YORK STATE PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION ----------------------------------------------------------------------------x Proceeding on Motion of the Commission as to the Rates, Charges, Rules
More informationMarch 13, MPSC Case No. U-18124: Consumers Energy Company s 2016 Gas General Rate Case
Clark Hill PLC 212 East Grand River Avenue Lansing, Michigan 48906 Sean P. Gallagher T 517.318.3100 T 517.318.3060 F 517.318.3099 F 517.318.3085 Email: sgallagher@clarkhill.com clarkhill.com VIA ELECTRONIC
More informationBEFORE THE STATE OF RHODE ISLAND AND PROVIDENCE PLANTATIONS PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION ) ) ) ) ) MATTHEW I. KAHAL ON BEHALF OF THE
BEFORE THE STATE OF RHODE ISLAND AND PROVIDENCE PLANTATIONS PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION RE: INVESTIGATION OF NARRAGANSETT ELECTRIC COMPANY d/b/a/ NATIONAL GRID S PROPOSED CHANGES TO ELECTRIC AND GAS DISTRIBUTION
More informationUNITED STATES OF AMERICA BEFORE THE FEDERAL ENERGY REGULATORY COMMISSION. ) Southern California Edison ) Docket No. ER Company )
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA BEFORE THE FEDERAL ENERGY REGULATORY COMMISSION ) Southern California Edison ) Docket No. ER12-239-000 Company ) SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON COMPANY S REQUEST FOR LEAVE AND RESPONSE
More information12/11/2008. Gary Falde, FSA, MAAA Vice-Chair, Life Reserve Work Group Chair, LRWG Asset Subgroup
Purposes of Presentation A Proposed Methodology for Setting Prescribed Net Spreads on New Investments in VM- Gary Falde, FSA, MAAA Vice-Chair, Life Reserve Work Group Chair, LRWG Asset Subgroup Alan Routhenstein,
More informationBEFORE THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY BOARD OF PUBLIC UTILITIES OFFICE OF ADMINISTRATIVE LAW
BEFORE THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY BOARD OF PUBLIC UTILITIES OFFICE OF ADMINISTRATIVE LAW I/M/O THE VERIFIED PETITION OF JERSEY ) CENTRAL POWER & LIGHT COMPANY FOR ) REVIEW AND APPROVAL OF INCREASES IN ) OAL
More informationMonterey Peninsula Water Supply Project A Evaluation of Capital Financing Alternatives For a 5.4 MGD Desalination Plant
A.12-04-019 Evaluation of Capital Financing Alternatives For a 5.4 MGD Desalination Plant Prepared by Monterey Peninsula Water Management District September 2012 (DRAFT Version 1.0) Introduction California
More informationREDACTED Rocky Mountain Power Docket No Witness: Chad A. Teply BEFORE THE PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION OF THE STATE OF UTAH
REDACTED Rocky Mountain Power Docket No. 17-035-40 Witness: Chad A. Teply BEFORE THE PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION OF THE STATE OF UTAH ROCKY MOUNTAIN POWER REDACTED Surrebuttal Testimony of Chad A. Teply
More informationPRE.-FILED DIRECT TESTIMONY OF. Denise Kay Parrish
BEFORE THE PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION OF WYOMING IN THE MATI ER OF THE COMMISSION ) INVESTIGATION UPON ITS OWN MOTION ) TO DETERMINE WHETHER SOURCEGAS ) DISTRIBUTION, LLC IS EXCEEDING ITS ) Docket No. 30022-192-GI-12
More informationBEFORE THE PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION OF THE STATE OF UTAH ROCKY MOUNTAIN POWER. Exhibit 1 Utah STEP Pilot Program Instructions
Exhibit RMP (SRM-1) BEFORE THE PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION OF THE STATE OF UTAH ROCKY MOUNTAIN POWER Exhibit 1 Utah STEP Pilot Program Instructions October 2016 Exhibit RMP (SRM-1) Page 1 of 6 Utah STEP
More informationSouthern California Edison Company ) Docket No. ER ANSWER OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON COMPANY TO PROTEST TO COMPLIANCE FILING
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA BEFORE THE FEDERAL ENERGY REGULATORY COMMISSION Southern California Edison Company ) Docket No. ER11-3697-001 ANSWER OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON COMPANY TO PROTEST TO COMPLIANCE
More informationPREPARED REBUTTAL TESTIMONY OF LEE SCHAVRIEN SAN DIEGO GAS & ELECTRIC COMPANY
Application No: Exhibit No.: Witness: A.0-0-01 Lee Schavrien ) In the Matter of the Application of ) San Diego Gas & Electric Company (U 0 E) ) A.0-0-01 for Authorization to Recover Unforeseen Liability
More informationCISCO SYSTEMS, INC. (Exact name of Registrant as specified in its charter)
UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549 (Mark one) FORM 10-Q QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 For the quarterly period
More informationEXECUTIVE SUMMARIES. Mr. Fredric Stoffel
EXECUTIVE SUMMARIES Mr. Fredric Stoffel Mr. Stoffel provides an overview of the Company s electric rate case filing, outlines the Company s requests, discusses the primary drivers for the revenue increase
More informationBEFORE THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY OFFICE OF ADMINISTRATIVE LAW BEFORE HONORABLE RICHARD MCGILL, ALJ ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )
BEFORE THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY OFFICE OF ADMINISTRATIVE LAW BEFORE HONORABLE RICHARD MCGILL, ALJ IN THE MATTER OF THE VERIFIED PETITION OF JERSEY CENTRAL POWER & LIGHT COMPANY FOR REVIEW AND APPROVAL OF
More informationThe Golub Capital Altman Index
The Golub Capital Altman Index Edward I. Altman Max L. Heine Professor of Finance at the NYU Stern School of Business and a consultant for Golub Capital on this project Robert Benhenni Executive Officer
More informationPublic consultation. Draft guidance of the European Central Bank on leveraged transactions. Template for comments
Public consultation Draft guidance of the European Central Bank on Template for comments Contact details (will not be published) Institution/Company European Savings and Retail Banking Group (ESBG) Contact
More informationsets the price investors are willing to pay for a share of a company's stock.161
TIEC and Cities argued that regulator$y protections make utilities less risky than firms operating in competitive markets.15 However, the Non-Utility Proxy Group is limited to a low-risk group of companies
More informationBEFORE THE GEORGIA PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION PUBLIC DISCLOSURE DIRECT TESTIMONY AND EXHIBITS PHILIP HAYET ON BEHALF OF THE
BEFORE THE GEORGIA PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION IN THE MATTER OF: GEORGIA POWER COMPANY S NINTH AND TENTH SEMI- ANNUAL VOGTLE CONSTRUCTION MONITORING REPORT DOCKET NO. PUBLIC DISCLOSURE DIRECT TESTIMONY AND
More information