Community Coordination Meeting. York County, Maine. Risk MAP Study

Similar documents
Community Coordination Meeting Sagadahoc County, Maine

Physical Map Revisions as a Result of Updated Coastal Flood Hazards

Middlesex County Timeline

Updates to Maine Coastal Flood Insurance Rate Maps (FIRM s): What a Local Official Should Know. Presented by: Steve Johnson, P.E.

Nassau County, Florida Consultation Coordination Officer (CCO) Meeting. February 24, 2016 Fernandina Beach, Florida

St. Johns County, Florida Consultation Coordination Officer (CCO) Meeting. August 31, 2016 St. Augustine, Florida

OTTAWA COUNTY AND SANDUSKY COUNTY COMMUNITY CONSULTATION OFFICERS (CCO) MEETING December 7, 2017

Duval County, Florida Consultation Coordination Officer (CCO) Meeting. January 25, 2017 Jacksonville, Florida

Erie County Flood Risk Review Meeting. January 18, 2018

Martin County, Florida Consultation Coordination Officer (CCO) Meeting. March 22, 2018 Stuart, Florida

National Flood Insurance Program. Jennifer Gilbert, CFM, ANFI New Hampshire NFIP State Coordinator

WAYNE COUNTY COMMUNITY CONSULTATION OFFICERS (CCO) MEETING. February 27, 2019

Introduction to the National Flood Insurance Program: A Guide for Coastal Property Owners MAINE BEACHES CONFERENCE 2017

Taylor County, Florida Community Coordination and Outreach (CCO) Meeting

Cameron County, TX. Consultation Coordination Officer (CCO) Meeting. Please sign in (sheet at front of the room) Meeting will begin at 9:00

Cumberland County, NJ. Risk MAP Project Status Update April 22, 2013

JAXGIS FEMA Flood Hazard Mapping -- Frequently Asked Questions

Skagit County Flood Insurance Study Update. Ryan Ike, CFM FEMA Region 10

ASFPM Partnerships for Statewide Mitigation Actions. Alicia Williams GIS and HMP Section Manager, Amec Foster Wheeler June 2016

Preliminary DFIRM Community Coordination (PDCC) Meeting Gilchrist & Levy Counties, FL. April 30, 2015

Bullitt County, Kentucky Preliminary DFIRM Community Open House. October 8, 2014 Shepherdsville, Kentucky

LOCAL OFFICIALS MEETING Lake Wausau Physical Map Revision MARATHON COUNTY, WISCONSIN FEBRUARY 9, 2017

Dealing With Unnumbered A Zones in Maine Floodplain Management

Durham County Preliminary Flood Hazard Data Public Meeting. July 28, 2016

N.C. Floodplain Mapping Program

Enough about me! Topics Covered

Herkimer County, New York Flood Hazard Mapping Status Report for Property Owners

Bucks County, PA Flood Risk Review Meeting. November 2014

Federal Emergency Management Agency

FOR LOCAL GOVERNMENTS

Community Officials Meeting. Plumas and Sierra County Physical Map Revision

9/20/2016. Orange County Preliminary FIRM / Consultation Coordination Officer (CCO) Meeting

Abington Township Public Meeting

King County, WA DFIRM Update and Seclusion Process. Webinar June 14, 2016

AGENDA PLANNING ADVISORY BOARD SUBCOMMITTEE INDUSTRIAL STANDARDS FOR CONSTRUCTION WITHIN A FLOODPLAIN THURSDAY, AUGUST 25, :00-5:00 P.M.

RichSmith_slate-FEMA_320x240.wmv.

Flood Map Revisions. Town of Nags Head Public Information and Input Session. December 14, 2016, 6 pm

Federal Emergency Management Agency

Federal Emergency Management Agency

Kevin Wagner Maryland Department of the Environment

Federal Emergency Management Agency

BUTTS COUNTY, GEORGIA AND INCORPORATED AREAS

NFIP Mapping Issues. Wendy Lathrop, PLS, CFM. Cadastral Consulting, LLC

Federal Emergency Management Agency

Table 1: Federal, State and Local Government Rules applicable to LOMRs/CLOMRS submittal

Michael Taylor, PE, CFM Project Manager, AECOM August 25, 2015

Federal Emergency Management Agency

Floodplain Management 101. Mississippi Emergency Management Agency Floodplain Management Bureau

CRISP COUNTY, GEORGIA AND INCORPORATED AREAS

ASSUMPTION PARISH, LOUISIANA AND INCORPORATED AREAS

Door County Floodplain Program Informational Meeting

Lake Erie. June 10 & 11, 2014

Consultation Coordination Officer (CCO) Meeting

Federal Emergency Management Agency

Flood Risk Review (FRR) Meeting. Cumberland County, Pennsylvania Carlisle, Pennsylvania December 5, 2016

Using GISWeb to Determine Your Property s Flood Zone

Questions about the National Flood Insurance Program

NFIP Overview Elevation Certificate Flood Insurance Rate Maps. By: Maureen O Shea, AICP, CFM State NFIP Coordinator

Federal Emergency Management Agency

Delaware Bay / River Coastal Flood Risk Study. FEMA REGION II and III September 19, 2012

Federal Emergency Management Agency

Hazard Mitigation Grants. Technical Assistance Session Middlesex County, NJ December 7, 2011

Requirements for Construction on Properties in the Special Flood Hazard Area (SFHA)

Understanding and Using NFIP Data

Use of FEMA Non regulatory Flood Risk Products in Planning

Federal Emergency Management Agency

Pinellas County Flood Map Information Service & Real Estate Disclosure Program Training January 26, 2017 COMMON FLOODPLAIN ACRONYMS

Federal Emergency Management Agency

Kentucky Risk MAP It s not Map Mod II

Best Practices. for Incorporating Building Science Guidance into Community Risk MAP Implementation November 2012

ADVISORY BASE FLOOD ELEVATIONS (ABFEs)

CITY OF PLANTATION ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT INTEROFFICE MEMORANDUM NO

Maryland Model Floodplain Management Ordinance (May, 2014) MODEL NOTES

Preliminary Work Map Release

Calhoun County Flood Insurance Study Update

Federal Emergency Management Agency

FEMA Region IX May 30-31, 2017

MEIGS COUNTY UNINCORPORATED AREAS

Discovery Meeting: Lake Ontario. FEMA REGION II November 12-14, 2013 and November 19-21, 2013 Lake Ontario Contributing Watersheds

FLOOD STUDY Atlantic County, NJ. FEMA REGION II July 12, :00

Location: Tampa, Florida March 6, 2013

FLOOD INSURANCE. Introduction

The New Maryland Model Floodplain Management Ordinance

Federal Emergency Management Agency

Federal Emergency Management Agency

Non Regulatory Risk MAP Products Flood Depth and Probability Grids

Federal Emergency Management Agency

FEMA Mapping Update Meeting: Contra Costa County. March 11, 2015

Table of Revisions for Appendix J,

Federal Emergency Management Agency

National Capitol Region HAZUS User Group Call

VOLUME 1 OF 1 CARROLL COUNTY, IOWA AND INCORPORATED AREAS

Northern Alameda County Consultation Coordination Officer (CCO) Meeting

DECATUR COUNTY, GEORGIA AND INCORPORATED AREAS

July 31, 2017 NFIP Flood Map Open House Flood Maps 101 Flood Mapping acronyms History of the NFIP Flood Mapping Updates Flood Insurance Fairhope,

SECTION 9: MAPS AND DATA

DES MOINES COUNTY, IOWA AND INCORPORATED AREAS

Orange County Flood Insurance Study Update

COLLIER COUNTY FLOODPLAIN MANAGEMENT

Floodplain Management 101: UNIT II. Maps & Flood Insurance Studies

Transcription:

Community Coordination Meeting York County, Maine Risk MAP Study January 9, 2014

Agenda Welcome and Introductions Project Timeline Flood Hazard Analysis Recap (Digital Conversion, Riverine and Coastal) Flood Risk Products Action: Hazard Mitigation & Flood Insurance PPP - Public Review and Appeal Period PPP - Effect on Existing Letters of Map Change PPP - Community Adoption Process Questions 2

Risk MAP Study Timeline Activities Project Timeline Products Risk MAP MOU Distributed March 2011 Work Map Meeting Feb 2013 Preliminary Nov 5, 2013 CCO Meeting Jan 9, 2014 Projected Effective July 2015 Risk MAP MOU Projected LFD* January 2015 *LFD scheduled in January due to the Town Meeting requirement 3

CONVERSION TO DIGITAL MAPS 4

Digital FIRM (DFIRM) Base + Topography + = Flood Data Digital FIRM 5

FIRM-Based Delineation Vector Base Map Ortho Base Map Also known as Digital Lift or Digital Conversion 6

Zone Designation Changes OLD ZONE NEW ZONE A1 through A30 AE V1 through V30 VE B X C X 7

Datum Conversion Previous FIRM referenced to NGVD Datum Conversion to NAVD88 Required by FEMA for new DFIRMs Process described in Appendix B of FEMA s Guidelines and Specifications 8

Conversion Factor The previous effective study was referenced to the NGVD Datum All new studies are referenced to the NAVD 88 (North American Vertical Datum of 1988) The conversion factor from NGVD 29 to NAVD 88 is -0.7, and from NAVD 88 to NGVD 29 is +0.7. 9

Paneling Scheme Existing Paneling System (town-wide format) 10

New Paneling Scheme New Paneling System (county-wide format based on USGS quadrangles) 11

RIVERINE FLOOD HAZARD ANALYSIS RECAP 12

Detailed Riverine Analysis - Berwick USGS study (2005-2007) 9 streams Coffin Brook Coffin Brook Tributary Driscoll Brook Ferguson Brook Keay Brook Little River Worster Brook Worster Brook Tributary Revised hydrology and hydraulics Mapped with new topography 13

Detailed Riverine Analysis - Kennebunk USGS study (2007-2008) 1 stream Mousam River Revised hydrology and hydraulics Mapped with new topography 14

Detailed Riverine Updates 15

COASTAL FLOOD HAZARD ANALYSIS RECAP 16

Coastal Analysis Source Performed new coastal flood hazard analysis Saco, Wells, York Leveraged community provided coastal flood hazard analysis Biddeford, Kennebunk, Kennebunkport Updated 2009 preliminary coastal flood hazard analysis Kittery, Ogunquit, Old Orchard Beach 17

LiDAR Coverage 2-foot contour data Contours generated from LiDAR mission LiDAR flown in 2006 18

Detailed Study Coastal Analysis Coastal analysis - includes 4 main components: Stillwater Level (storm surge) + Wave Set-up Overland Wave Propagation Wave Runup and Overtopping Primary Frontal Dune 19

Detailed Study Stillwater Level (SWEL) 1988 USACE Tidal Flood Profiles Based on analysis from 2007 coastal flood hazard update 20

Detailed Study Wave Setup Numerically determined at each coastal transect Determining factors Average nearshore slope [depth of wave breaking to SWEL] Deepwater significant wave height SWEL + Wave Setup = Total Water Level (TWL) Areas where floodplain is restrictive, wave setup is removed and SWEL is mapped Constrictions such as low bridges Narrowing of the floodplain 21

Detailed Study Overland Wave Propagation 22

Detailed Study Runup and Overtopping 23

Detailed Study Primary Frontal Dunes 24

Detailed Study Summary Significant Changes from previous study: Includes Wave Set-up Includes Wave Generation other than offshore waves Includes 2% Wave Runup Includes Primary Frontal Dune 25

Limit of Moderate Wave Action LiMWA Areas subject to wave heights greater than 1.5 feet Defines Coastal A Zone Recommendation of building to V zone standards 26

FEMA Coastal Outreach Website www.fema.gov/coastal-flood-risks 27

FLOOD RISK PRODUCTS 28

Flood Risk Products - Background These products are intended to help communities better understand and communicate flood risk All of these products are GIS based 29

Flood Risk Products - Background The following flood risk products were created for this study Changes Since Last Preliminary Maps Flood Risk Assessment Contributing Engineering Factors Coastal Hazard Identification maps Flood Risk Report 30

Changes Since Last Preliminary SFHA Decrease SFHA Increase 31

Flood Risk Assessment Annualized flood losses are displayed on the Census Block Data Aimed at depicting general flood loss areas 32

Contributing Engineering Factors Provide insight into the factors behind the increase or decrease in the flood hazard areas Can prove to be useful for planning and mitigation measures 33

Coastal Hazard Identification 34

Flood Risk Report 35

ACTION: HAZARD MITIGATION AND FLOOD INSURANCE 36

Mitigation Actions Address specific existing assets (e.g., elevate critical facility, enlarge a culvert, acquisition of floodprone properties, floodproof properties) Address future risks (e.g., update building codes) Based on local capabilities Build on current strengths, ongoing efforts (add-on to stormwater management regulations) Coordinate with Federal programs (e.g., NFIP, CRS) Encourage property owners to purchase flood insurance 37

Mitigation Action Categories STRUCTURAL /NON STRUCTURAL PROJECTS Detention Drainage Acquisition Elevation Retrofits PLANNING MECHANISMS Zoning Building Codes Ordinances Open Space Plan EDUCATION & OUTREACH Public Awareness Outreach Educational programs 38 NATURAL RESOURCE PROTECTION Stream and wetland restoration Erosion control

Driving Action Through HMA Grants Hazard Mitigation Assistance (HMA)includes both post-disaster and pre-disaster grants HMGP is a post-disaster grant program. PDM and FMA are available annually subject to Congressional appropriations. Mitigation Plan Requirement Local/State Cost Share States Manage Programs and Set Funding Priorities State Hazard Mitigation Officer (SHMO) is contact These grants share the common goal of reducing risk to life and property due to natural hazards 39

Mitigation Grants/Programs: OFAs 40

Driving Action Through the CRS Rewards NFIP communities taking additional actions to reduce risk Most flood insurance policies can receive discounted rates (In New England generally ranging from 5%-15%) To be eligible FEMA must determine that the community is in full compliance with the NFIP If you are interested in joining, FEMA can provide assistance For additional information please contact: Chris Markesich, FEMA Region 1 CRS Coordinator christopher.markesich@fema.dhs.gov (617) 832-4712 41

Action Tracker We will input your community s action into the Action Tracker and send you a report and a link - http://fema.starr-team.com 42 New mitigation tool Houses communityidentified mitigation actions Actions can be edited by community officials A tool for communities to support future mitigation planning efforts

Meet the Action Form 43

POST-PRELIMINARY PROCESSING (PPP) 44

Post-Preliminary Phase Timeline Typical Post Preliminary Phase takes approximately 20 months to complete November 5, 2013 January 8, 2014 7 days Est. March 1, 2014 90 days Est. May 31, 2014 Est. January 2015* 6 months Est. July 2015 Review and Appeal Period Compliance Period Est. February 22, 2014 *LFD scheduled in January due to the Town Meeting requirement 45

Community Review Public Review and Expanded Appeal Period (EAP) Process Begin reviewing now! Outreach to your community members Templates available! Statutory 90-day Appeal Period: Publication in Federal Register Letter to Community Official Newspaper publication, and Maps and data available online! 46

Website www.fema.gov/preliminaryfloodhazarddata 47

Expanded Appeal Period (EAP) Process The Facts New process detailed in Procedure Memorandum issued to the public by FEMA on December 1, 2011 What s the same? An appeal must be based on data that shows the flood hazard information is scientifically or technically incorrect What s different? Anything that may have an impact on flood insurance requirements will now be given the same 90-day appeal period! 48

Expanded Appeal Period (EAP) Process Appeals versus Comments under the new EAP process Appeals : Areas showing new or revised Base Flood Elevations (BFEs) or Zone AO depths Areas showing new or revised Special Flood Hazard Area (SFHA) boundaries (including both increases and decreases in the extent of the SFHA) Areas where there is a change in SFHA zone designation Areas showing new or revised regulatory floodway boundaries (including both increases and decreases in the extent of the regulatory floodway) 49

Expanded Appeal Period (EAP) Process Appeals versus Comments under the new EAP process Comments: Corporate limit revisions Road name errors and revisions Flooding source name errors and revisions Base map errors Other possible omissions or potential improvements to the mapping 50

MYTHS! The Expanded Appeal Period (EAP) means I have more time to submit an appeal. NO The 90- day appeal/comment period is my only chance to change FEMA s maps? NO What are my other options? Letter of Map Amendments (LOMA): A request to FEMA for removal of individual properties or structures from the SFHA Letter of Map Revisions (LOMR): A request to FEMA to modify an effective Flood Insurance Rate Map (FIRM), or Flood Boundary and Floodway Map (FBFM), or both. Results in the modification of the floodway, BFEs, or the Special Flood Hazard Area (SFHA). 51

Post-Preliminary Processing Summary of Map Actions (SOMA) Background Letters of Map Change (LOMCs) are legally binding changes to the map Summary of Map Actions is an assessment of all existing LOMCs compared with the new FEMA maps 52

Summary of Map Actions Category 1: shown on the new DFIRM panel Category 2: NOT shown on the new DFIRM panel due to scale limitations (revalidated after the new DFIRMs become effective) 53

Summary of Map Actions (continued) Category 3: superseded, and no longer valid, due to revised flood hazards Category 4: property owner must request this be re-determined 54

Post-Preliminary Processing Revalidation of Letters of Map Change (LOMCs) The Summary of Map Actions (SOMA) is used to generate a Revalidation Letter The Revalidation Letter is issued to the community Community officials are encouraged to disseminate this information. 55

Post-Preliminary Processing Revalidation Letter Distribution Community FEMA Regional Office State NFIP Coordinator LOMC Compendium NOT to Homeowners or Developers IS available through Map Service Center: http://msc.fema.gov/ 56

Post-Preliminary Processing The compliance and map adoption period begins at the date the Letter of Final Determination is sent, and ends at the effective date. During this period, community officials review, and if appropriate, revise the community s floodplain ordinances to ensure they are compliant with NFIP regulations. To avoid suspension from the NFIP, the community must adopt a compliant floodplain management ordinance. Communities should contact their State NFIP Coordinator's Office for model language and any questions regarding higher standards. Once the State has reviewed the ordinance and the community has adopted it, the ordinance must be approved by FEMA before close of business on the effective date. Do not wait until the last day to adopt your ordinance! 57

Points of Contact STARR Contacts Brian Caufield, R1 Coastal Lead, STARR Brian.Caufield@starr-team.com Amol Daxikar, Project Manager, STARR Amol.Daxikar@starr-team.com FEMA Contacts Kerry Bogdan, Project Manager and Senior Engineer, FEMA Region I Kerry.Bogdan@fema.dhs.gov Marilyn Hilliard, Planning, FEMA Region I Marilyn.Hilliard@fema.dhs.gov Bob Desaulniers, Regional Insurance Specialist Robert.Desaulniers@fema.dhs.gov STARR Regional Service Center Alex Sirotek, RSC Lead, STARR Alex.Sirotek@starr-team.com National Flood Insurance Program iservice Team Tom Young, Manger Region I New England tyoung@nfip-iservice.com Maine Department of Agriculture, Conservation and Forestry, Floodplain Management Program Contacts Sue Baker, State NFIP Coordinator, Sue.Baker@maine.gov Please send all comments/protests/appeals to: Brian Caufield, CDM Smith, 50 Hampshire Street, Cambridge, MA 02139 Please copy: Kerry Bogdan, FEMA Region 1, 99 High Street, 6 th Floor, Boston, MA 02110 Alex Sirotek, STARR, 99 High Street, 3 rd Floor, Boston, MA 02110 Sue Baker, Maine Floodplain Management Program Dept. of Agriculture, Conservation & Forestry, 93 SHS, 17 Elkins Lane, Augusta, ME 04333-0093 58

Questions?

WEB LINKS Preliminary Data www.fema.gov/preliminaryfloodhazarddata Effective Data (including Future Effective) msc.fema.gov Coastal Outreach Material www.fema.gov/coastal-flood-risks Mitigation Action Tracker fema.starr-team.com Multi-Hazard Planning Website www.fema.gov/multi-hazard-mitigation-planning Mitigation Ideas www.fema.gov/library/viewrecord.do?id=6938 National Flood Insurance Program www.floodsmart.gov Flood Insurance Reform Act www.fema.gov/national-flood-insurance-program/flood-insurance-reform-act-2012 60