MARION COUNTY GROWTH SERVICES

Similar documents
June 24, Lely Resort (PUD) Insubstantial Change (PDI) PL Dear Ms. Beasley:

County-wide Planning Policies

Marion County Board of County Commissioners

Chapter CONCURRENCY

Policy CIE The following are the minimum acceptable LOS standards to be utilized in planning for capital improvement needs:

Project Plan for the Creation of Tax Incremental District No. 10

CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS ELEMENT

TABLE OF CONTENTS LIST OF TABLES

LAFCo 509 W. WEBER AVENUE SUITE 420 STOCKTON, CA 95203

Capital Improvements

UNOFFICIAL COPY OF HOUSE BILL Read and Examined by Proofreaders:

Tomei appointed Alternate Member John Gillott as Acting Member in place of Lisa Schleelein.

1. identifies the required capacity of capital improvements to serve existing and future development based on level-of-service (LOS) standards;

Chapter Ten, Capital Improvements Element City of St. Petersburg Comprehensive Plan

CHAPTER 9 CAPITAL FACILITIES ELEMENT

Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council. Elizabeth Corpuz, Director of Planning and Building Services Jason P. Clarke, Senior Planner

CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS ELEMENT GOALS, OBJECTIVES AND POLICIES. Goal 1: [CI] (EFF. 7/16/90)

Gary Godfrey, Chairperson. Invocation: Ron Anderson Pledge of Allegiance: Sharon Call

Georgetown Planning Department Plan Annual Update: Background

North Pecos Water & Sanitation District. Rates, Charges, Fees and Penalties Effective January 1, 2015

Community Development Department

2017 WATER AND WASTEWATER IMPACT FEE STUDY CITY OF AZLE, TEXAS

Village of Glenview Plan Commission

CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS ELEMENT:

Year 2014 Engineer s Report regarding the Status of ownership, Working order and Condition of the Public Infrastructure.

ORDINANCE NO

CASE NUMBER: 15SN0626 APPLICANT: Vernon McClure

EXHIBIT A CITY OF OLDSMAR PERMIT, INSPECTION AND PLANS EXAMINATION FEE SCHEDULE

CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT ELEMENT Inventory Analysis

PLANNING DEPARTMENT ADMINISTRATION

DECISION ON MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT

INSPECTION SERVICES DIVISION FEE SCHEDULE

Public Meeting Hood River, OR September 6, 2016

CITY OF MOUNTLAKE TERRACE RESOLUTION NO.

This page intentionally left blank

Chapter VIII. General Plan Implementation A. INTRODUCTION B. SUBMITTAL AND APPROVAL OF SUBSEQUENT PROJECTS C. SPHERE OF INFLUENCE

REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY STAFF MEMO. Stadler Rail Community Reinvestment Area Plan, and Interlocal Agreement for the Distribution of Tax Increment

Georgetown Planning Department Plan Annual Update: Background

Fee Schedule. Effective January 1, Administrative Services/All Departments: COPYING OF RECORDS

C APITA L IMPRO VEMENTS S CHEDULE (FIGURE CI-14)

Sketch Plan Alternatives: Summary of Planning Commission and Board of Supervisors Recommendations

Planning Commission Application Summary

Strategic Growth in the Rangeview Area Structure Plan

DRAFT. Stormwater Management Program Credit Policy and Appeals Process Manual Policies & Procedures LOWER ALLEN TOWNSHIP STORMWATER AUTHORITY

TOWNSHIP OF UPPER ST. CLAIR LONG-TERM PLAN

Maurice Kaufman, Director of Public Works / City Engineer Bartle Wells Associates DATE: September 7, 2016 MEMORANDUM

Oran Park and Turner Road Precincts Section 94 Contributions Plan

City of Redding, California Development Impact Mitigation Fee Nexus Study

City Services Appendix

CITY OF HEALDSBURG RESOLUTION NO

Chapter 6: Financial Resources

Introduced by the Council President at the request of the Joint. Planning Committee & substituted by the Land Use and Zoning Committee:

DECEMBER 1, 2014 BOARD OF SUPERVISORS MINUTES: 1151

ORDINANCE NO

DEVELOPMENT CHARGES BACKGROUND STUDY

NAPA COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS Board Agenda Letter

TOOELE COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION 47 SOUTH MAIN STREET, TOOELE, UTAH (435) BUSINESS MEETING February 2, 2005

PLAN COMMISSION CITY OF BERLIN BERLIN, WISCONSIN

Schedule of Fees & Escrow Charges

City Council Report 915 I Street, 1 st Floor Sacramento, CA

CHAPTER 11. CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN ELEMENT

Rate Comparison & Benchmarking Analysis

PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION COMMUNICATION

Village of Lemont Planning and Zoning Commission Regular Meeting of June 20, 2018

APPENDIX B EVALUATION OF EXISTING PROGRAMS AND POLICIES. Hillsborough County Local Mitigation Strategy Appendix B-1

C APITA L IMPRO VEMENTS S CHEDULE (FIGURE CI-14)

SOUND TRANSIT STAFF REPORT RESOLUTION NO. R Sammamish Park-and-Ride Project Property Acquisition

political subdivision of the State of Florida, by and through its Board of County Commissioners, hereinafter

Minutes Granbury City Council Regular Meeting February 19, :00 p.m. City Hall, 116 W Bridge St. Granbury, Texas

GAINESVILLE REGIONAL UTILITIES PLAN REVIEW APPLICATION

Special Assessment Methodology

HARRIS TOWNSHIP Planning Commission Meeting Minutes May 21, 2018

CITY OF ESCONDIDO MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE ESCONDIDO PLANNING COMMISSION. August 13, 2013

County Barn Road RPUD. Deviation Justification

Planning Commission WORKSHOP: General Plan Implementation Program - Task 2 Refining the General Plan Implementation Checklist.

For Sale/Lease 800 NEW HOLLAND AVENUE LANCASTER, PA Ruth M. Devenney, CCIM, SIOR

Long Lake Ranch Community Development District

ORDINANCE LIST AND DISPOSITION TABLE

PLANNING DEPARTMENT. Town Goals. Goal: Ensure that infrastructure exists for current and future needs identified in the comprehensive plan.

On motion duly made, seconded and carried, the meeting thereupon adjourned. (Published in the Wichita Eagle on August 19, 2016 and August 26, 2016)

Self-Supported Municipal Improvement districts

Exhibit "B" TAX INCREMENT REINVESTMENT ZONE, NUMBER ONE CITY OF BAYTOWN. July 8, 2015

PWC SCHEDULE OF DEPOSITS, FEES AND CHARGES. Table of Contents

1. CALL TO ORDER The meeting was called to order at 7:05 p.m.

President Bradley called the Village Board Meeting to order at 7:00 p.m., at East Side Community Center, 6156 Douglas Avenue.

GARDEN GROVE PLANNING COMMISSION B Room, Community Meeting Center Stanford Avenue, Garden Grove, CA 92840

NORTHFIELD TOWNSHIP PLANNING COMMISSION Minutes of Regular Meeting February 18, 2015

HEMSON C o n s u l t i n g L t d

Barton Brierley, AICP, Community Development Director (Staff Contact: Tyra Hays, AICP, (707) )

SANTA BARBARA COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION

2025 Comprehensive Plan for the City of Temple Terrace Florida. Capital Improvements. Adopted by City Council June 30, 2009

REGULAR MEETING JULY 16, 2018 MINUTES

ATTACHMENT 1 Table 1- Summary of municipal actions in support of the Regional Growth Strategy

COUNTY OF SACRAMENTO CALIFORNIA

City of Sammamish Planning Commission November 17, Town Center Planning History Development Updates Implementation Strategies

TAUSSIG. & Associates, Inc. LAGUNA BEACH UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT No DAVID

Goals, Objectives, and Policies Capital Improvements Element

Official Minutes of MARION COUNTY BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS. July 18, 2011

THE CITY OF GROTON PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION MEETING MINUTES MAY 16, 2006

Capital Facilities Element 2/15/2016

Transcription:

MARION COUNTY GROWTH SERVICES Date: 6/27/2017 1 st PH - P&Z (LPA): 6/26/2017 2 nd PH - BCC: 7/18/2017 Application No: 2017-DT3 Type of Application: Developer s Agreement Termination Developer s Agreement: OR Bk/Pg: 4641/281 Related Comprehensive Plan Amendment(s): (2005-L02 & L29) 2017-s04 Related Rezoning(s): 20170704Z (20061208z) Owner: Utopia 42, LLC & D. Gaekwad Applicant: J. David Tillman, P.E./Tillman & Associates Parcel #/Acreage: 47659-000-00, 48366-000-00, 48367-000-00, & 48369-000-00 ±337.55 AC Location: North side of Hwy 42, across from the First Baptist Church at the Villages (of Marion) P&Z Recommendation: Approve subject to resolution of utilities development requirement Project Planner: Christopher D. Rison, AICP, Senior Planner Existing Use: Field/pasture, forested. Code Enforcement Action: Case #743786 Opened 2/7/2017 1) Junk & Litter 2) 911 Address Posting Item Summary Staff is recommending Approval to terminate a requirement for a Developer s Agreement, originally required in conjunction with Comprehensive Plan Amendments 2005-L02 & L29 and Rezoning Application 20061208Z, as related to concurrent Comprehensive Plan Amendment 2017-S04 and Rezoning Application 20170704Z. Public Notice Notice of public hearing was mailed to 63 property owners within 300 feet of the subject property, generally corresponding to referenced Comprehensive Plan Amendment 2017-S04 and Rezoning Application 20170704Z. Written comments in opposition have been received from 2 of 63 owners, or 3%, at the time of this report s distribution. Location The site is generally located along the north side of SE Hwy 42 across from the First Baptist Church at the Villages, and extending north ±1.5 miles between SE 73 rd Avenue and SE 80 th Avenue. Request/Background The Board of County Commissioners (Board) approved Comprehensive Plan Amendments 2005-L02 & L29 (Amendments) along with requiring a corresponding Developer s Agreement (Agreement) for a Medium Residential development site. The project, titled Utopia, was also granted a Planned Unit Development zoning classification 20061208Z). The Agreement establishes three key development 1 P a g e

limitations and/or requirements: 1) a maximum of 950 dwelling units, and 2) must be an age-restricted community, and 3) the development of a water treatment plant facility for conveyance to Marion County for ownership & operation. The development property was subsequently sold, and the new property owner has now submitted concurrent Comprehensive Plan Amendment (2017-S04) and Rezoning (20170704Z) Applications to amend the portions of the land use designations and amend the PUD zoning district for the site. As a PUD Rezoning Application, the Board may establish design and development conditions through the PUD. As such, the owner is seeking terminate the Agreement requirement and instead allow the site development to proceed solely under the PUD Zoning and/or the County s general Land Development Code s design and development standards wherein the Board may establish development conditions as part of the PUD consideration process. Analysis Marion County recently updated the Comprehensive Plan and Land Development Code (Plan 2011, Code - 2013) to functionally incorporate the Agreement s general design and development requirements, essentially negating the need to itemize those requirements in a separate Agreement. Further, the specialized requirements of the required Agreement may be included in an approval of the PUD Zoning Application as design and development conditions may be required as part of the PUD process. The table below summarizes the main provisions of the required Agreement and which provisions are addressed by current general LDC provisions and which provisions may be addressed by the concurrent PUD Rezoning Application (20161008Z). # AGREEMENT LDC 1 Recitals Parties agree n/a 2 Definitions n/a 3 Binding on property and subsequent owners 4 Density limitation 5 Usage restriction 6 Age-restricted community Specific development standards set by the PUD Rezoning Application (20170704Z) that would be binding for the project. Maximum 950 residential dwelling units. The maximum amount of residential and non-residential development may be set by the PUD Rezoning Application (20170704Z) that would be binding for the project. Applicant desires increase to the maximum number of dwelling units 1,395 units. All residential use shall be single-family residential. The maximum residential and nonresidential development uses may be set by the PUD Rezoning Application (20170704Z) that would be binding for the project. Applicant desires add multiple-family residential (using R-3 zoning standard) and commercial uses (using B-2 zoning standards). Must be developed as an age-restricted community. The age-restricted community requirement may be set by the PUD Rezoning Application (20170704Z) that would be binding for the project. 2 P a g e

7 8 Central water & central sewer service Buffers Zones/Perimeter SE 73 rd Avenue buffer SE 73 rd Avenue trail PUD zoning required Applicant desires to not provide an agerestricted community (neither adult- nor retirement-community) to provide market flexibility. Must be served by central water and central sanitary sewer (wastewater) service. (LDC Section 6.14.2) Must complete a separate Utilities (Developer s) Agreement and provide regional lift station(s) and a MC Utilities water plant on-site in order to receive the first Certificate of Occupancy. Applicant anticipates completing a Utilities Developer s Agreement that will formalize the utility improvements to be provided based on the final project plans and existing conditions. Provide project perimeter buffers, and internal development zone perimeter buffers. LDC Section 4.2.6 PUD standards, and Divisions 6.7, 6.8, and 6.9 (Trees, Landscaping, and Irrigation). Applicant desires to revised the perimeter buffers and eliminate specific interior buffers. The proposed perimeter buffers are consistent with the LDC or provide adjustments for wider buffers in lieu of providing buffer walls. Provide expanded, minimum 100 wide, buffer along SE 73 rd Avenue. Applicant desires to eliminate the expanded buffer and provide a modified Type B Buffer which will exceed the Type C Buffer required by the LDC. Provide 50 ROW dedication with minimum 8 wide ped/bike path. Applicant desires to comply with LDC regarding ROW dedication including accommodating future ped/bike needs. However, in lieu of providing external improvements along SE 73 rd Avenue, the applicant proposes providing an internal ped/bike plan to connect south to SE Hwy 42. Ped/bike requirements along SE Highway 42 will be addressed with the PUD and the commercial area development. Rezoning Application for a PUD is under concurrent consideration (20170704Z). 9 School concurrency School concurrency is now managed via the County & Marion County Public Schools (MCPS) Interlocal Agreement; additionally, an Education Impact Fee Ordinance is in place, though currently suspended per MCPS. 10 Traffic study & concurrency LDC Section 6.11.3 & LDC Division 1.8 11 Stormwater design related to Buffer, sidewalk, and stormwater management plans shall insure that no 3 P a g e

12 Northwest Outparcel Relocation of water treatment plant and amenity locations shift southward to increase the buffer width to the north stormwater runoff from the Project Property to the Outparcel will occur, and shall also insure the stormwater management plan will not result in the impoundment of water adjacent to the boundaries of the Outparcel. LDC Division 6.13 Applicant desires to follow LDC requirements regarding stormwater management. The 50 wide buffer to the water treatment plant and amenities in the area that projects to the northeast shall be increased to provide a sufficient buffer; however a minimum width of the buffer and the planting methods are not specified. Applicant desires to follow LDC by providing a 30 wide Type A Buffer along with providing a linear drainage retention area (DRA) along the south side of the Buffer (The proposed Type A Buffer exceeds current LDC buffer requirements.) 13 Environmental impact assessment LDC Section 6.5 14 Stormwater design & maintenance LDC Section 6.11.3 & LDC Division 1.8 High-efficiency, low-flow plumbing fixtures& appliances; and Treated wastewater/effluent when available as primary irrigation source with groundwater as last resort. LDC Section 6.9 (WMD oversight) 15 Water Conservation County LDC & WMD prioritize wastewater/effluent, then stormwater reuse for irrigation with groundwater as a last resort. PUDs are subject to common area planting (MFLA) and irrigation standards, and to establish project-wide irrigation operations and procedures. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: APPROVAL, subject to resolution of utility facility provision requirements (water treatment plant & regional lift station). P&Z RECOMMENDATION: APPROVE as recommended by staff. RECOMMENDED BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONER ACTION: Motion to approve and authorize the Chairman to execute the Developer s Agreement Termination (OR Bk/Pg: 4641/281) related to Amendment 2005-L02 and 2005-L29, subject to the execution and recording of a replacement Utility Developer s Agreement for the Gaekwad Village PUD, and thereby authorize development of the site to proceed consistent with the Marion County Land Development Code, as amended, and the concurrently approved Plan Amendment (2017-S04) and Rezoning (20170704Z) Applications, and the completed replacement Utility Developer s Agreement. 4 P a g e

CURRENT DEVELOPER S AGREEMENT EXHIBIT B UTOPIA PUD BUFFER PLAN 5 P a g e

CURRENT DEVELOPER S AGREEMENT EXHIBITS C-1 AND C-2 UTOPIA PUD BUFFER DETAILS C-1 C-2 6 P a g e

UTOPIA PLAN AMENDMENT CONCEPT PLAN COLOR VERSION 7 P a g e