FEMA Mapping Update Meeting: Contra Costa County. March 11, 2015

Similar documents
9/20/2016. Orange County Preliminary FIRM / Consultation Coordination Officer (CCO) Meeting

Community Coordination Meeting Sagadahoc County, Maine

FEMA Region IX May 30-31, 2017

OTTAWA COUNTY AND SANDUSKY COUNTY COMMUNITY CONSULTATION OFFICERS (CCO) MEETING December 7, 2017

Hazard Mitigation Grants. Technical Assistance Session Middlesex County, NJ December 7, 2011

Key Fundamentals of Flood Insurance in the NFIP!

BEING PREPARED FOR MAP CHANGES What to Know; What to Say National Flood Conference May 16, 2016

Floodplain Management 101. Mississippi Emergency Management Agency Floodplain Management Bureau

Community Coordination Meeting. York County, Maine. Risk MAP Study

Northern Alameda County Consultation Coordination Officer (CCO) Meeting

Location: Tampa, Florida March 6, 2013

Sources of FEMA Funding

WAYNE COUNTY COMMUNITY CONSULTATION OFFICERS (CCO) MEETING. February 27, 2019

Cameron County, TX. Consultation Coordination Officer (CCO) Meeting. Please sign in (sheet at front of the room) Meeting will begin at 9:00

Cumberland County, NJ. Risk MAP Project Status Update April 22, 2013

ADVISORY BASE FLOOD ELEVATIONS (ABFEs)

King County, WA DFIRM Update and Seclusion Process. Webinar June 14, 2016

Mitigation Measures: Sound Investments in Disaster Recovery

Physical Map Revisions as a Result of Updated Coastal Flood Hazards

10/5/2015. What Makes a Sound Floodplain Management Program? What are the Flood Problems in your Community?

National Flood Insurance Program BW-12

JAXGIS FEMA Flood Hazard Mapping -- Frequently Asked Questions

Erie County Flood Risk Review Meeting. January 18, 2018

Preliminary DFIRM Community Coordination (PDCC) Meeting Gilchrist & Levy Counties, FL. April 30, 2015

National Flood Insurance Program, Biggert-Waters 2012, and Homeowners Flood Insurance Affordability Act 2014

Durham County Preliminary Flood Hazard Data Public Meeting. July 28, 2016

Kevin Wagner Maryland Department of the Environment

Preliminary Work Map Release

Duval County, Florida Consultation Coordination Officer (CCO) Meeting. January 25, 2017 Jacksonville, Florida

Pinellas County Flood Map Information Service & Real Estate Disclosure Program Training January 26, 2017 COMMON FLOODPLAIN ACRONYMS

1.1. PURPOSE 1.2. AUTHORITIES 1. INTRODUCTION

Chapter 7 Appendix B: National Flood Insurance Program Summary for Kaua'i County, 2015 Update

Agenda. Introduction. Introduction -Map Study Lifecycle. Insurance Benefits of New Map

Updates to Maine Coastal Flood Insurance Rate Maps (FIRM s): What a Local Official Should Know. Presented by: Steve Johnson, P.E.

National Flood Insurance Program (NFIP) for Real Estate Professionals

Kentucky Risk MAP It s not Map Mod II

Piloting LAMP from Stream to Sea

Middlesex County Timeline

Flood Map Revisions. Town of Nags Head Public Information and Input Session. December 14, 2016, 6 pm

Door County Floodplain Program Informational Meeting

Volusia County Floodplain Management Plan 2012

Bucks County, PA Flood Risk Review Meeting. November 2014

July 31, 2017 NFIP Flood Map Open House Flood Maps 101 Flood Mapping acronyms History of the NFIP Flood Mapping Updates Flood Insurance Fairhope,

Administration and Projects Committee STAFF REPORT October 6, 2016 Page 2 of 4 Attachments (Attachment A, handout at APC meeting replaced Attachment A

National Flood Insurance Program. Jennifer Gilbert, CFM, ANFI New Hampshire NFIP State Coordinator

Skagit County Flood Insurance Study Update. Ryan Ike, CFM FEMA Region 10

Federal Emergency Management Agency

Martin County, Florida Consultation Coordination Officer (CCO) Meeting. March 22, 2018 Stuart, Florida

Enough about me! Topics Covered

Best Practices. for Incorporating Building Science Guidance into Community Risk MAP Implementation November 2012

Taylor County, Florida Community Coordination and Outreach (CCO) Meeting

Consultation Coordination Officer (CCO) Meeting

Floodplain Development Permit Application

FEMA Leverages Building Codes and Standards to Advance Resiliency

Attachment B. King County Flood Control Zone District Work Program

AMENDMENTS TO CHAPTER 50: FLOODPLAIN DEVELOPMENT

St. Johns County, Florida Consultation Coordination Officer (CCO) Meeting. August 31, 2016 St. Augustine, Florida

California Building Code and the NFIP. John Ingargiola, Senior Engineer FEMA Building Science Branch

Community Officials Meeting. Plumas and Sierra County Physical Map Revision

Abington Township Public Meeting

Disaster Insurance: Are States and Insurance Companies Prepared?

Flood Insurance for Local Officials and Floodplain Managers. What Every Community Official Needs to Know About Flood Insurance

National Flood Insurance Program (NFIP) Biggert-Waters Act 2012 (BW12)

F E M A Mapping Changes. FEMA Mapping Changes. National Flood Insurance Program

YAVAPAI COUNTY FLOOD CONTROL DISTRICT STAKEHOLDER WORKSHOP. March 30 th & 31 st, 2015

Matthew W. Wall Recovery and Resilience Division Acting Director Virginia Department of Emergency Management

Changes to the National Flood Insurance Program: From Biggert to Grimm Waters. Click to edit Master title style. Click to edit Master subtitle style

Federal Emergency Management Agency

SECTION 9: MAPS AND DATA

MT-1 Basics: A Comprehensive Overview of LOMAs and Discussion of Common Application Setbacks

Flood: How to Protect Your Business from a Natural Disaster

Flood Risk Review (FRR) Meeting. Cumberland County, Pennsylvania Carlisle, Pennsylvania December 5, 2016

Changes Coming to the National Flood Insurance Program What to Expect. Impact of changes to the NFIP under Section 205 of the Biggert-Waters Act

Federal Emergency Management Agency

Orleans Parish, LA Initial Coordination Meeting Preliminary DFIRM Update September 29, 2011

History of Floodplain Management in Ascension Parish

Using GISWeb to Determine Your Property s Flood Zone

NFIP Mapping Issues. Wendy Lathrop, PLS, CFM. Cadastral Consulting, LLC

Impacts of Map Changes -Flood Insurance-

FEMA s Flood Map Modernization Preparing for FY09 and Beyond: Integrated Flood Data Update, Risk Assessment, and Mitigation Planning

CONTRA COSTA COUNTY FLOODPLAIN MANAGEMENT PROGRAM

This survey is expected to take approximately 20 minutes and must be completed in one session.

Calhoun County Flood Insurance Study Update

HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN POINT OF CONTACT MUNICIPAL PROFILE

Floodplain Management 101: UNIT II. Maps & Flood Insurance Studies

Herkimer County, New York Flood Hazard Mapping Status Report for Property Owners

The National Flood Insurance Program and Flood Insurance Rate Map for San Francisco. Presentation at Treasure Island Community Meeting

Adapting Maine s coastal communities to sea level rise and storm surge (2015 State of the Bay Presentation)

Federal Emergency Management Agency

in coordination with Peoria County, Planning and Zoning Department

National Flood Insurance Program 3. FEMA All rights reserved

Nassau County, Florida Consultation Coordination Officer (CCO) Meeting. February 24, 2016 Fernandina Beach, Florida

October 1, Write Your Own (WYO) Principal Coordinators and the National Flood Insurance Program (NFIP) Servicing Agent

Strategies for Data Sharing

ASFPM Partnerships for Statewide Mitigation Actions. Alicia Williams GIS and HMP Section Manager, Amec Foster Wheeler June 2016

April 3, 4, & 5, 2017 Pittsburgh, Butler, Erie Western PA

Questions about the National Flood Insurance Program

National Flood Insurance Program and Biggert-Waters 2012

Requirements for Construction on Properties in the Special Flood Hazard Area (SFHA)

Michael Taylor, PE, CFM Project Manager, AECOM August 25, 2015

Transcription:

FEMA Mapping Update Meeting: Contra Costa County March 11, 2015

Welcome and Introductions Mapping Update Meeting Contra Costa County Contra Costa County Riverine Physical Map Revision (PMR) San Francisco Bay Area Coastal (BAC) Study FEMA Region IX Eric Simmons Engineer Xing Liu Natural Hazards Program Specialist Production and Technical Services (PTS) contractor Daniel Zell BAC/Riverine Study Manager Brandon Banks Riverine Project Manager Wendy Chang Outreach Lead Community Representatives Contra Costa County Cities of Antioch, Brentwood, Clayton, Concord, Danville, El Cerrito, Hercules, Lafayette, Martinez, Oakley, Pinole, Pittsburg, Richmond, San Pablo, and Walnut Creek 2

Why We re Here Provide an overview of the San Francisco Bay Area Coastal Study Provide an overview of the Contra Costa Riverine Study Discuss how you re impacted by the Bay Area Coastal and Riverine study process Discuss how FEMA s flood maps can inform and communicate decisions to reduce flood risk and improve mitigation efforts Learn how to communicate about flood risk using the products and datasets Answer your questions 3

National Flood Insurance Program & Risk MAP Program

National Flood Insurance Program U.S. Congress established the National Flood Insurance Program with the passage of the National Flood Insurance Act of 1968 Community adopts and enforces a floodplain management ordinance to reduce flood risk to new and existing development in mapped floodplains Federal government makes flood insurance available to property owners in participating communities For more information on the NFIP visit www.fema.gov 5

Mitigation Division Our Mission Working in partnership to support sustainable, disasterresilient communities, to avoid or reduce the loss of life, loss of property, and financial impact of hazards. Three Branches Risk Analysis Floodplain Management & Insurance Hazard Mitigation Assistance 6

Risk MAP Vision To deliver quality data that increases public awareness and leads to action that reduces risk to life and property Objective (Coastal) To provide updated flood hazard data for 100% of the populated U.S. coast 7

San Francisco Bay Area Coastal Study

San Francisco Bay Area Coastal Study Contra Costa County is part of a larger study of the entire San Francisco Bay 9

Contra Costa County Bay Area Coastal 10

Contra Costa County Bay Area Coastal Updated coastal hazards for the Contra Costa County shoreline to reflect existing hazards Previous 2009 effective Flood Insurance Rate Map panels relied on the 1985 United States Army Corps of Engineers Study for coastal hazards No riverine analysis was completed Coastal to effective riverine tie-in used higher of the two hazards No Appeals Received Proof panels 0093 and 0094 were issued for the City of Concord to better represent the riverine/coastal tie-in 11

Bay Area Coastal Area of Mitigation Interest - Antioch 2009 FIRM: Zone AE 9 along Bay shoreline 2014 BAC Study Preliminary FIRM: Zone AE 9 12 along Bay shoreline The coastal analysis results for Transects 1 thru 13 are higher than 11.2 feet. In order to achieve a reasonable tie-in with the effective mapping of 9 feet at Transect 1, the BFEs were reduced in this region. The actual flood risk may be higher than mapped in this region. * Steep-sloped shorelines and shoreline structures (e.g. steep revetments, vertical walls) were analyzed with wave run-up; shallow-sloped shorelines and inland topography (e.g., marshes, developed areas) were analyzed with overland wave propagation, or WHAFIS. 12

Bay Area Coastal Area of Mitigation Interest - Pittsburg 2009 FIRM: Zone AE 9 10, with some Zone A along the Bay shoreline 2014 BAC Study Preliminary FIRM: Zone AE 10 12, with some Zone A along the Bay shoreline * Steep-sloped shorelines and shoreline structures (e.g. steep revetments, vertical walls) were analyzed with wave run-up; shallow-sloped shorelines and inland topography (e.g., marshes, developed areas) were analyzed with overland wave propagation, or WHAFIS. 13

Bay Area Coastal Area of Mitigation Interest - Richmond 2009 FIRM: Zone VE 9 and along the Bay shorelines 2014 BAC Study Preliminary FIRM: Majority of Richmond as Zone AE 10, with Zone VE 11 17 along the Bay shoreline * Steep-sloped shorelines and shoreline structures (e.g. steep revetments, vertical walls) were analyzed with wave run-up; shallow-sloped shorelines and inland topography (e.g., marshes, developed areas) were analyzed with overland wave propagation, or WHAFIS. 14

Bay Area Coastal Area of Mitigation Interest - Richmond 2009 FIRM: Zone VE 9 and AE 19 along the Bay shoreline 2014 BAC Study Preliminary FIRM: Zone AE 10-12, with Zone VE 12 13 along the Bay shoreline * Steep-sloped shorelines and shoreline structures (e.g. steep revetments, vertical walls) were analyzed with wave run-up; shallow-sloped shorelines and inland topography (e.g., marshes, developed areas) were analyzed with overland wave propagation, or WHAFIS. 15

Bay Area Coastal Area of Mitigation Interest - Sanderling Island 2009 FIRM: Zone AE 9 and Zone VE 9 along the Bay shoreline 2014 BAC Study Preliminary FIRM: Zone AE 10 and Zone VE 11 12 along the Bay shoreline * Steep-sloped shorelines and shoreline structures (e.g. steep revetments, vertical walls) were analyzed with wave run-up; shallow-sloped shorelines and inland topography (e.g., marshes, developed areas) were analyzed with overland wave propagation, or WHAFIS. 16

Contra Costa County Bay Area Coastal Task End Date Flood Risk Review Meeting October 29, 2013 Preliminary Issuance May 29, 2014 Preliminary FIRM Meeting July 9, 2014 Projected Date of Letter of Final Determination March 30, 2015 Projected Effective Date September 30, 2015 17

Adapting to Rising Tides Program An initiative to increase the resilience of current and future Bay Area communities to sea level rise, storm flooding, and other current and future hazards that: Leads and supports multi-sector, cross-jurisdictional projects that build local and regional capacity to plan for and adapt to current and future risks Tests and refines adaptation planning methods that integrate all aspects of sustainability, support transparent decision-making, and foster robust collaborations that lead to action San Francisco Bay Conservation and Development Commission 18

Adapting to Rising Tides (ART) The ART Program works with local, state, regional and federal agencies to develop data, tools, maps and models needed to better understand shoreline resilience The ART Portfolio (Findings, Projects, How-to s, Help desk) FEMA SF Bay Study and Tidal Datums update Regional shoreline and flood infrastructure mapping* Refined sea level rise maps using the total water level approach (one map = many futures)* Projects conducted by the Adapting to Rising Tides Program, Alameda County Public Works, San Francisco Public Utilities Commission, Silicon Valley 2.0, AECOM and SFEI have leveraged data and information from FEMA s SF Bay Coastal Study 19

Contra Costa Adapting to Rising Tides Project The Adapting to Rising Tides Program is convening and staffing an adaptation planning project in west and central Contra Costa County First Stakeholder Working Group Meeting Day: Monday, March 23 Time: 9 am to 12 pm Location: 30 Muir Road, Martinez, ZA Meeting Room For more information: Wendy Goodfriend - wendy.goodfriend@bcdc.ca.gov - (415) 352-3645 www.adaptingtorisingtides.org/working-groups-overview/contracosta 20

Contra Costa County Riverine Study

Contra Costa County Riverine Study 22

Contra Costa County Riverine Study Updated riverine hazards for Contra Costa County to reflect existing hazards Detail Study Brushy Creek Frisk Creek Kellogg Creek Marsh Creek Mount Diablo Creek Limited Detail Study Various Flooding Sources Redelineation using newer topography Various Flooding Sources 23

Contra Costa County Riverine Study Flooding Source Frisk Creek Brushy Creek Kellogg Creek Marsh Creek Mt. Diablo Creek Appian Creek Tributary2 of Rodeo Head water of Rodeo Sycamore Creek Head water 2 of Rodeo East Antioch Creek Stream Miles Limited Detail Detailed Redel 3.8 5.7 6.4 9.1 9.3 0.5 1.2 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.7 0.6 0.8 Flooding Source Tributary of Rodeo Tributary 3 of Rodeo San Ramon Creek E Branch Green Valley Creek Unnamed Creek Franklin Creek Rodeo Creek San Pablo Creek Arroyo Del Hambra Creek Trib of W Green Valley Creek Mitchell Creek Mt Diablo Creek Split Tributary of Refugio Tice Creek Split Indian Creek Pacheco Creek Stream Miles Limited Detail Detailed Redel 0.9 1.0 1.3 0.3 1.3 0.4 2.7 0.4 3.1 3.3 1.1 3.7 1.5 6.6 1.3 0.1 0.1 0.4 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.6 Flooding Source Sand Creek W Branch Green Valley Creek Peyton Slough Ohlone Creek Shore Acres Creek Mt Diablo Creek Tributary of Sans Crainte Reliez Creek Wildcat Creek Tice Creek Green Valley Creek Pinole Creek Las Trampas Creek Refugio Creek Galindo Creek Walnut Creek Total Stream Miles Limited Detail Detailed Redel 0.7 0.7 0.9 1.1 1.3 1.4 1.4 1.5 1.6 1.8 2.2 2.4 2.6 2.8 3.0 3.1 27.3 34.3 38.1 24

Contra Costa County Riverine Study Levee Considerations Byron Tract / Reclamation District 800 Provisionally accredited on effective FIRM FEMA fully accredits the levee system on the riverine PMR panels 0388G and 0530G Cypress Grove Certified levee accredited on FIRM via LOMR Maintenance assurance required for continued accreditation San Pablo and Wildcat Creeks BAC provisionally accredited levee secluded on FIRM panels 0226G and 0228G Riverine PMR will not issue FIRM panels 0226G and 0228G preliminary 25

Riverine Study Schedule Task End Date Discovery February and March 2012 Draft Preliminary Products October 2014 Preliminary Issuance Summer 2015 Prelim FIRM Meeting Fall 2015 Formal Appeal/Comment Period Projected Date of Letter of Final Determination Spring 2016 Summer 2016 Projected Effective Date Winter 2016 26

Contra Costa County Riverine Study Bay Area Coastal Flood Insurance Rate Map Panels 27

Contra Costa County Riverine Study Riverine Flood Insurance Rate Map Panels 28

Contra Costa County Riverine Study Overlapping Flood Insurance Rate Map Panels 29

Changes Since Last FIRM r9map.org KMZ/KML (file types) for Google Earth Adobe Acrobat Maps 30

Changes Since Last FIRM City of Antioch 31

Changes Since Last FIRM City of Clayton 32

What Does This Mean for You?

Impacts from Coastal and Riverine Coastal Study will issue Letter of Final Determination (LFD) on March 30, 2015 All panels will move forward to effective September 30, 2015 Riverine Study will issue preliminary Summer 2015 42 FIRM panels 5 volume FIS Preliminary Summary of Map Actions LOMAs and LOMCs Riverine Study incorporates both revised coastal and riverine studies Riverine Study will proceed through regulatory process 34

Post Prelim Mapping Process Map Production Preliminary maps Community review Preliminary FIRM meeting Preliminary Maps Community Review Preliminary FIRM Meeting Post-Prelim Processing Statutory process for proposed Base Flood Elevations Map adoption: 6-month compliance period Maps become Effective Post-Preliminary Processing Base Flood Elevation (BFE) Docket Preparation and Appeal Period Final Map Preparation and Issue Letter of Final Determination Compliance Period (Map panels adopted by ordinance) 30 Days or 30-45 Days More + 90 Days 90 Days 6 Months Community Meetings Revised maps become effective Resilience Meeting 35

New Flood Zones -> Ordinance Update Communities receiving new flood zones for the first time on these new maps will need to update their ordinance to reflect the current level of regulations 6 months is not a long time City of Brentwood Flood Zone Designations Effective AE A X BAC Riverine AE AH A X City of Martinez Effective AE AO A X BAC VE AE AO A X Riverine AE AO A X City of San Ramon Effective AE A X BAC AE AH A X Riverine US Naval Weapons Station Effective AE AO A D X BAC VE AE A D X Riverine VE AE A X 36

Insurance Implications For structures coming out of SFHA, may help to send letters out to owners urging them to reach out to their lenders for flood insurance removal For structures going into SFHA, April 2015 flood insurance change bring new rules and rates under the Newly Mapped into an SFHA Program Current PRP EE policies and new policies for insured buildings that are newly mapped into SFHA eligible to receive PRP rates for 1 year after maps become effective Rates at renewal will increase no more than 18% per year Grandfathering remains a cost-saving option for existing (non-lapsed) policy holders with buildings built in compliance with the FIRM in effect at the time of construction Outreach to impacted neighborhoods is critical 37

Outreach and Communication

FEMA Flood Maps Belong to You NFIP participating communities agree to adopt FEMA flood maps and enforce floodplain management ordinances FEMA provides technical assistance and support for you to relay Upcoming slides present lessons learned and available resources 39

Lessons Learned Relaying flood risk information local officials prefer vs. community members Community engagement is essential 40

Stay Informed Throughout this Study Meetings Materials Study Updates Website: www.r9map.org 41

Tools, Templates and Products Tools & Resources FEMA website - library www.r9map.org California Contra Costa County 1-877-FEMA-MAP Study Brochures Coastal Beat including archived articles Templates Community Outreach Plan Template Press release Open House Materials 42

FEMA Region 9 Webpage FEMA Resources www.fema.gov/fema-region-ix-arizona-california-hawaii-nevada-pacificislands Follow FEMA R9 via Twitter @femaregion9 Sign up for FEMA Email Updates www.fema.gov/subscribe-receive-free-email-updates Topics: Region 9 NFIP / CCAMP / Region 9 Risk MAP Sign up for the California Coastal Analysis and Mapping Project (CCAMP) E-newsletter www.r9map.org/siteassets/signupnewsletter.html FloodSmart: floodsmart.gov - Get a quote, Find an agent Flood Map Center: msc.fema.gov - Print a flood map Ready.gov, Listo.gov, Ready.gov/business - Fact sheets, links to training 43

Hazard Mitigation Planning

Mitigation What is Hazard Mitigation? Any sustained action taken to reduce or eliminate long-term risk to human life and property from hazards Why are Hazard Mitigation Plans Important? Foundation for a long-term strategy to reduce disaster losses and break the cycle of disaster damage, reconstruction, and repeat damage Provides a framework for risk-based decision making involving stakeholders and the public. Creates opportunities for grant funding. 45

Unified Hazard Mitigation Grant Assistance 1. Pre-Disaster Mitigation (PDM) Can apply to mitigation of any hazard, not just flood 75%/25% cost share What s available depends on amount appropriated by Congress each year; no Presidential Declaration needed Nationally-competed 2. Flood Mitigation Assistance (FMA) Flood mitigation projects Includes repetitive loss structures with rep loss strategy - 90%/10%. Severe rep loss structures get 100% funding, other projects 75%/25% cost share Funding comes from flood insurance policy premiums, allocated to each state 3. Hazard Mitigation Grant Program (HMGP) Usually funds larger mitigation projects, not only flood 75%/25% cost share Funding becomes available after presidentially-declared disaster and is15% of the total Federal funding given to a state for a disaster All 3 require FEMA approved Local Hazard Mitigation Plan 46

General Requirements for All Hazard Mitigation Projects Must be cost-effective Technically feasible and effective Meet Environmental Planning and Historic Preservation requirements in accordance with HMA Unified Guidance Must adhere to all relevant statutes, regulations, and requirements including other applicable Federal, State, Tribal, and local laws, implementing regulations, and Executive Orders All Applicants and sub-applicants (now called recipients) must have hazard mitigation plans that meet the requirements of 44 CFR Part 201. 47

HMA Eligible Activities Eligible Activities The table below summarizes eligible activities that may be funded by HMA programs. Detailed descriptions of these activities can be found in the HMA Unified Guidance. ELIGIBLE ACTIVITIES Mitigation Activities HMGP PDM FMA Property Acquisition and Structure Demolition or Relocation 48 Structure Elevation Mitigation Reconstruction Dry Floodproofing of Historic Residential Structures Dry Floodproofing of Non- Residential Structures Minor Localized Flood Reduction Projects Structural Retrofitting of Existing Buildings Non-Structural Retrofitting of Existing Buildings and Facilities Safe Room Construction Wind Retrofits Infrastructure Retrofit Soil Stabilization Wildfire Mitigation Post-Disaster Code Enforcement Generators Advance Assistance Management Costs = Mitigation activity is eligible for program funding 5% Initiatives Hazard Mitigation Planning

Hazard Mitigation Plans The purpose of hazard mitigation planning is to identify policies and actions that can be implemented over the long term to reduce risk and future losses. Mitigation Plans form the foundation for a community's long-term strategy to reduce disaster losses and break the cycle of disaster damage, reconstruction, and repeated damage. With a HM Plan you are eligible for more federal disaster aid after a presidential declaration. Requirement for all FEMA grants! 49

Hazard Mitigation Plans Contra Costa Community Plan Status Contra Costa County (unincorporated) Plan Type Approved Until Current Status City of Antioch Multi-Jurisdiction 2/28/2017 Approved City of Brentwood City of Clayton Multi-Jurisdiction Multi- Jurisdiction(ABAG) Approvable Pending Adoption Awaiting Revisions City of Concord Multi- Jurisdiction(ABAG) 3/25/16 Approved City of Danville Multi-Jurisdiction 2/28/2017 Approved City of El Cerrito Multi-Jurisdiction 2/28/2017 Approved City of Hercules City of Lafayette No Plan Multi- Jurisdiction(ABAG) 3/25/16 Approved City of Martinez Multi-Jurisdiction 2/28/2017 Approved City of Oakley No Plan City of Pinole Multi-Jurisdiction 2/28/2017 Approved City of Pittsburg No Plan City of Richmond Multi-Jurisdiction 2/28/2017 Approved City of San Pablo Multi- Jurisdiction(ABAG) 3/25/16 Approved City of Walnut Creek Multi-Jurisdiction 2/28/2017 Approved 50

Hazard Mitigation Plan Resources FEMA(http://www.fema.gov/multi-hazard-mitigationplanning) Laws, Regulations, Guidance, Policies How-To Guides Mitigation Grant Funding Programs Training Cal EMA (http://hazardmitigation.calema.ca.gov/) State Hazard Mitigation Plan, other Plans, and Guidance Grant Information Hazard Data and Information Maps, GIS Data, Analysis Tools (MyPlan/MyHazards) ABAG (http://quake.abag.ca.gov/resilience/) 2010 Hazard Mitigation Plan and Participating Jurisdictions Annexes Hazard Maps and Information Housing and Infrastructure Losses Data 51

Next Steps FEMA Actions Distribute final Bay Area Coastal Products Distribute Preliminary Products and hold Preliminary FIRM/Open House Meeting Community Actions Review draft Preliminary FIRMs Work with FEMA to ensure compliant ordinance Tailor outreach plan template Consider areas of mitigation interest Begin communicating about flood risk 52

Questions & Answers