Los Angeles County Metropolitan Transportation Authority, California

Similar documents
Summary: Mecklenburg County, North Carolina; General Obligation

Clark County Water Reclamation District, Nevada; General Obligation

1

Research Update: Petroliam Nasional Bhd. Ratings Affirmed; Proposed Notes Assigned 'A-' Rating

Los Angeles County Metropolitan Transportation Authority, California; Sales Tax

Research Update: Glitnir Bank Downgraded To 'BBB+' On Weak Economy, Reduced Funding And Earnings Prospects

1

Tri-County Metropolitan Transportation District, Oregon; Miscellaneous Tax

Research Update: Commerzbank AG And Dresdner Bank AG Outlooks To Negative On Worsening Credit Conditions; 'A/A-1' Ratings Affirmed

Research Update: Iceland Foreign Currency Rating Lowered To 'BBB-' On Mounting Debt Burden; Outlook Negative

Summary: Petróleos Mexicanos (PEMEX)

Southern California Metropolitan Water District; General Obligation; Water/Sewer

1

Municipal Finance Authority of British Columbia

Summary: Windsor, Connecticut; General Obligation. Table Of Contents. Rationale Outlook Related Research. March 12,

Summary: Petroleos Mexicanos (PEMEX)

Alameda Corridor Transportation Authority, California; Ports/Port Authorities

Canopius Managing Agents - Syndicate 4444

Glossary Of Islamic Finance Terms

Friendswood, Texas; General Obligation

Leveraged Finance: Standard & Poor s Revises Its Approach To Rating Speculative-Grade Credits

Illinois Housing Development Authority; Multifamily Whole Loan

Monrovia, California; Appropriations; General Obligation

Summary: Fresno, California; Appropriations; General Obligation. Table Of Contents. Rationale Outlook Related Criteria And Research.

Charlotte-Mecklenburg Hospital Authority, North Carolina; CP; Joint Criteria; System

Puerto Rico; General Obligation; General Obligation Equivalent Security

S&P Comments On Sequoia Mortgage Trust 2010-H1's Potential Credit Strengths And Risk Considerations

Banco Inbursa S.A. 1

Alameda Corridor Transportation Authority, California; Ports/Port Authorities

Nationale Borg-Maatschappij N.V.

Summary: San Mateo County Community College District, California; Appropriations; General Obligation. Table Of Contents

Connecticut; Gas Tax

Caisse de depot et placement du Quebec

Prince William County, Virginia; Appropriations; General Obligation

Santa Monica Public Financing Authority, California Santa Monica; Appropriations; General Obligation

Summary: San Benito, Texas; General Obligation

Illinois Finance Authority Rush University Medical Center Obligated Group; Joint Criteria; System

Chicago Board of Education; General Obligation

Metropolitan Transportation Authority, NY Issuer Credit Rating Lowered To 'A+' From 'AA-'

Gainesville, Florida Gainesville Regional Utilities; CP; Combined Utility

Cuyahoga County, Ohio; Sales Tax

Summary: Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center; Hospital. Table Of Contents. Rationale Outlook Related Criteria And Research.

Shenandoah, Texas; General Obligation

Luzerner Kantonalbank

Connecticut; State Revolving Funds/Pools

Montebello Public Financing Authority Montebello, California; Appropriations; General Obligation

Jacksonville, Florida; General Obligation; Miscellaneous Tax

Sales Tax Securitization Corporation of Chicago Chicago; Sales Tax

Canton, Massachusetts; General Obligation; Note

Research Update: Austria-Based KA Finanz 'A/A-1' Ratings Affirmed, Outlook Stable. Table Of Contents

National Public Finance Guarantee Corp., MBIA Inc. Ratings Raised On Reentry Into Financial Markets; Outlooks Are Stable

Dominion Resources Inc. And Subsidiaries Downgraded To 'BBB+' On Acquisition Of Questar Corp.; Outlook Stable

(/en_us/web/guest/home) MidMichigan Health, MI Bond Rating Outlook Revised To Positive On Operational Performance, Solid Balance Sheet Metrics

Miami-Dade County Expressway Authority, Florida; Toll Roads Bridges

Wicomico County, Maryland; General Obligation

Big Changes In Standard & Poor's Rating Criteria

Lafayette College, Pennsylvania Northampton County General Purpose Authority; Private Coll/Univ - General Obligation

Bay City, Michigan; General Obligation

Hartford County Metropolitan District, Connecticut; General Obligation

General Criteria: Rating Implications Of Exchange Offers And Similar Restructurings, Update

Albany County Airport Authority, New York Albany International Airport; Airport

Apex Town, North Carolina; General Obligation

Snohomish County Public Utility District No. 1, Washington; Retail Electric

Illinois Finance Authority UNO Charter School Network; Charter Schools

Metropolitan Water Reclamation District of Greater Chicago; General Obligation

Frederick City, Maryland; General Obligation

Transaction Update: Eiendomskreditt AS (Commercial Mortgage Covered Bonds)

Lubbock, Texas; Retail Electric

Mound, MInnesota; General Obligation

Parker Water & Sanitation District, Colorado; General Obligation

St. Marys County, Maryland; General Obligation

Transaction Update: BRFkredit A/S (Capital Center E Mortgage Covered Bonds)

Alaska; Appropriations; General Obligation; Moral Obligation

Research Update: DekaBank Deutsche Girozentrale Affirmed At 'A/A-1' On Bank Criteria Change; Outlook Revised To Stable.

DLR Kredit A/S Affirmed At 'A-/A-2'; Outlook Stable

RMBS ARREARS STATISTICS

Springfield, Michigan; General Obligation

Lubbock, Texas; Retail Electric

BNP Paribas 'A+/A-1' Ratings Affirmed, Off Watch; Outlook Negative; Subordinated Debt Rating Lowered

Prince William County, Virginia; Appropriations; General Obligation

Tacoma, Washington; Retail Electric

Bristol, Connecticut; General Obligation; Note

Marine Insurer The Swedish Club Outlook Revised To Positive On Continuing Solid Operating Performance; Ratings Affirmed

U.K. Life Insurer Scottish Equitable 'A+' Rating Affirmed; Outlook Remains Negative

Summary: Rhode Island Turnpike And Bridge Authority; Toll Roads Bridges. Table Of Contents. Rationale Outlook Related Criteria And Research

Anaheim Housing and Public Improvements Authority, California Anaheim; Retail Electric; Wholesale Electric

Research Update: The Currency Exchange Fund N.V. (TCX) Outlook Revised To Negative From Stable; 'A-/A-2' Ratings Affirmed.

Dutch Bank LeasePlan 'BBB+/A-2' Ratings Placed On Watch Negative On Potential Ownership Change

Austria-Based KA Finanz Downgraded To 'A-/A-2' On Revised Expectation Of State Support; Outlook Stable

Interactive Brokers LLC

Sweden-Based Truck and Bus Maker Scania (publ.) Outlook Revised To Stable; 'A-/A-2' Ratings Affirmed

Italy-Based Veneto Banca 'BB/B' Ratings Affirmed On Results Of ECB Review; Outlook Remains Negative

Lancaster County Hospital Authority, Pennsylvania Masonic Villages of the Grand Lodge of Pennsylvania; Long Term Care

Long Beach, California Long Beach Harbor Dept.; Ports/Port Authorities

Oak Park Village, Illinois; General Obligation

Temasek Holdings 'AAA/A-1+' Ratings Affirmed On Close Government Ties; Outlook Stable

CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO VOLUNTARY DISCLOSURE FILING RATING CHANGE OF BOND INSURER. June 30, 2017

ING Verzekeringen N.V.

Funds Rating Criteria: Market Price Exposure

Ameritas Life Insurance Corp.

Transcription:

September 18, 2008 Los Angeles County Metropolitan Transportation Authority, California Primary Credit Analyst: Ian Carroll, San Francisco (1) 415-371-5060; ian_carroll@standardandpoors.com Secondary Credit Analyst: Robert Williams, San Francisco (1) 415-371-5070; robert_williams@standardandpoors.com Table Of Contents Rationale Outlook Debt Derivative Profile www.standardandpoors.com/ratingsdirect 1 Standard & Poor's. All rights reserved. No reprint or dissemination without S&P s permission. See Terms of Use/Disclaimer on the last page.

Los Angeles County Metropolitan Transportation Authority, California Credit Profile Los Angeles Cnty Metro Transp Auth Sales Tax rev rfdg bnds (Proposition A First Tier Senior) ser 2008-A1 due 07/01/2031 Los Angeles Cnty Metro Transp Auth Sales Tax rev rfdg bnds (Proposition A First Tier Senior) ser 2008-A2 Los Angeles Cnty Metro Transp Auth Sales Tax rev rfdg bnds (Proposition A First Tier Senior) ser 2008-A3 due 07/01/2031 Los Angeles Cnty Metro Transp Auth Sales Tax rev rfdg bnds (Proposition A First Tier Senior) ser 2008-A4 due 07/01/2031 Rationale Standard & Poor's Ratings Services affirmed its 'AAA' rating and underlying rating (SPUR) on Los Angeles County Metropolitan Transportation Authority (LACTMA), Calif.'s Proposition A sales tax revenue bonds. In addition, Standard & Poor's affirmed its 'AAA/A-1+' rating on the authority's Proposition A revenue refunding bonds, series 2008-A1 to A4. Rating factors include: The breadth of the Los Angeles County economy, with a growing population of more than 10 million residents; A very stable trend in sales tax revenue collections, with 5% average annual growth and only a 0.5% decline in 2002; and Strong legal restrictions against additional bonds, including an effective 2.46x additional bonds test (ABT), and a reliance on revenues remaining after the payment of debt service for subsidization of transit operations. The bonds are secured by a gross pledge of Proposition A first-tier senior sales tax revenues. Proposition A sales taxes, approved by county voters in 1980, are collected at a 0.5% rate on retail sales throughout Los Angeles County. The tax has no sunset provision. Separately, LACMTA collects an additional 0.5% sales tax pursuant to Proposition C that secures $1.2 billion in 'AA' rated subordinate bonds with a weaker 1.3x ABT. Additionally, a debt service reserve fund secures the bonds. The authority recently sold refunding bonds, and including these 2008 refunding bonds, there will be $1.67 billion in parity debt outstanding. The 2008 variable rate demand obligations (VRDOs) were issued to refund the authority's existing auction rate securities. Liquidity is provided pursuant to a standby bond purchase agreement (SBPA) provided by Bank of America and Dexia Credit Local. Variable exposure for the 2008 debt is managed with interest rate swaps first entered into in 2005 and amended in 2008, although key credit considerations remain unchanged and the debt derivative profile assigned by Standard & Poor's remains '2' on a four-point scale where '1' represents the lowest risk. The size and stability of the Los Angeles County economy is a key credit strength. Pledged revenue is collected Standard & Poor s RatingsDirect September 18, 2008 2

Los Angeles County Metropolitan Transportation Authority, California throughout Los Angeles County and is applicable to all retail sales with certain exceptions, such as groceries. The population of more than 10 million represents an 11% increase since 1998, when the population was 9.2 million. Leading employment sectors are international trade, tourism, motion picture/television production, technology, and professional services. Although there was a dramatic reduction in manufacturing in the early 1990s, particularly in the aerospace industry, the county is still the leading manufacturing county in the nation, providing almost half a million jobs in the sector tied to apparel, food, metal fabrication, and computer and electronic products. Sales tax revenue collections have been very stable, with only a single, small decline in 2002. On average since 1996, sales tax revenues have grown 5.1% annually, reaching $686 million in 2007, up from $403 million in 1996. After a 25% allocation to local governments, $514.6 million in pledged revenue remained. In 2008, based on an unaudited number for the year ended June 30, pledged revenue totaled $516.9 million. During the economic recession in 2002, sales taxes in Los Angeles County declined only 0.5%, compared to much greater declines in other major U.S. counties. The last substantial decline was in 1992, when the loss of much of the region's aerospace industry led to an 8.3% drop. In the current economic climate, there is no evidence so far of a decline in revenue. Historic revenue was sufficient to provide 3.5x maximum annual debt service (MADS) coverage based on 2007 audited numbers. Revenues are flat for 2008 based on unaudited numbers for the fiscal year. There are no immediate plans to issue additional debt. The short-term component of the rating represents the likelihood of payment of tenders and reflects a liquidity facility provided by Dexia Credit Local (A-1+) for the series 2008A-1 and A-2 bonds and a liquidity facility provided by Bank of America (A-1+) for the series 2008A-3 and 2008B bonds. The liquidity facilities, which are SBPAs, shall provide coverage for principal and 35 days of interest at the 12% maximum rate for the purchase price of bonds that are not successfully remarketed. The Dexia and Bank of America SBPAs are expected to terminate Sept. 12, 2011, unless earlier terminated or extended according to their terms. The bonds will initially bear interest in the weekly rate mode and may be converted to the daily, flexible, term, or fixed rate modes. The Dexia SBPA will enhance bonds in the weekly rate mode only and the Bank of America SBPA will enhance bonds in the daily and weekly rate modes. During the daily and weekly interest rate modes the bondholders may optionally tender their bonds upon providing appropriate notice. The bonds are subject to mandatory tender upon the following occurrences: On the first business day following the last day of a flexible and term rate periods; On the date the bonds are converted to another interest rate mode, except between daily and weekly-modes on coverage for SBPAs; On the effective date of a substitute liquidity facility; On the fifth business day preceding the expiration date of the SBPA; On a business day 20-25 days following the trustee's receipt of notice that a notice termination event has occurred under the SBPA; On the date specified by the authority not less than 20 days following trustee's receipt of such notice; and On the fifth business day following trustee's receipt of notice that a notice of non-reinstatement has occurred. The SBPA providers' obligation to purchase unremarketed tendered bonds will be terminated without notice to the bondholders upon the occurrence of various events in the SBPA. Additionally, bonds may be called due to optional or mandatory redemption as fully outlined in the bond documents. www.standardandpoors.com/ratingsdirect 3

Los Angeles County Metropolitan Transportation Authority, California Outlook The stable outlook reflects Standard & Poor's explanation that regional economic stability and the breadth of the Los Angeles County economy should support continued exceptional credit strengths, mainly steady growth in pledged revenue. Additionally, a restrictive additional bonds test and a reliance on remaining sales taxes for transportation subsidies should support continued high debt service coverage levels. Debt Derivative Profile Standard & Poor's assigned LACMTA's swaps a Debt Derivative Profile (DDP) score of '2' on a four-point scale where '1' represents the lowest risk. A score of '2' indicates that LACMTA's swap program is neutral from a credit standpoint. Additionally, the DDP score reflects: A low-to-moderate degree of termination risk, reflecting a good ratings trigger spread; Low counterparty risk, due to the counterparties' high creditworthiness as well as strong collateral posting requirements; Good economic viability of the swap portfolio; and Formal swap management policies that adequately address risks. With the 2008 refunding of the 2005 auction rate securities, LACMTA has made slight changes to its swap portfolio; these changes do no affect the credit of LACMTA's Proposition A bonds. LACMTA has $1.67 billion in debt secured by Proposition A sales tax revenues, including commercial paper (CP). General revenues, including sales tax revenues remaining after operations, secure an additional $256 million in revenue bonds. The 1992 bonds and the 2004 gateway general revenue bonds were both issued as variable-rate debt but have been swapped to fixed-rate debt. The 1992 swap was entered into with AIG Financial Products Corp. (A-/Watch Dev) with a notional amount of $98.7 million and as of Sept. 17, 2008; this swap remained unchanged, but a termination payment, if made, would be about $3 million. LACMTA receives the actual floating rate on the bonds and pays a fixed rate of 5.86% through 2012. Pursuant to the 2004 swap with Bank of Montreal (A+), LACMTA pays 3.5% and receives 64% of LIBOR plus 21 basis points on the amortizing notional amount of $197 million through 2027. The expiration date and bonds' final maturity is the same for both swaps. The series 2005 bonds were auction rate securities that were synthetically fixed by entering into identical swaps with counterparties Bank of Montreal and Deutsche Bank (AA-) and these swaps will be assigned to the 2008 bonds that were used to refund the 2005 debt. Swap provisions are being modified, however, mainly to remove XL swap insurance and to adjust the schedule definition of bonds to include 2008 bonds' principal and interest. Swap management policies adopted by LACMTA's board include high minimum ratings of counterparties, collateral posting requirements, and optional early termination. LACMTA's debt management policy, moreover, establishes that net variable-rate exposure will be no more than 20% of debt outstanding and variable-rate bonds, whether hedged or not, and will not be more than 50% of debt outstanding. Ratings Detail (As Of September 18, 2008) Standard & Poor s RatingsDirect September 18, 2008 4

Los Angeles County Metropolitan Transportation Authority, California Ratings Detail (As Of September 18, 2008) (cont.) Los Angeles Cnty Metro Transp Auth sales tax (Proposition A) 1st tier sr (wrap of insured) (MBIA & FSA) (SEC MKT) Unenhanced Rating AAA(SPUR)/Stable Affirmed Los Angeles Cnty Metro Transp Auth Sales Tax rev rfdg bnds (Proposition A First Tier Senior) ser 2008B due 07/01/2031 Long Term Rating AAA/Stable Affirmed Los Angeles Cnty Metro Transp Auth proposition A 1st tier sr sales tax Unenhanced Rating AAA(SPUR)/Stable Affirmed Los Angeles Cnty Metro Transp Auth sales tax (Proposition A) 1st tier sr Unenhanced Rating AAA(SPUR)/Stable Affirmed Many issues are enhanced by bond insurance. www.standardandpoors.com/ratingsdirect 5

Copyright 2008 Standard & Poor's, a division of The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. ( S&P ). S&P and/or its third party licensors have exclusive proprietary rights in the data or information provided herein. This data/information may only be used internally for business purposes and shall not be used for any unlawful or unauthorized purposes. Dissemination, distribution or reproduction of this data/information in any form is strictly prohibited except with the prior written permission of S&P. Because of the possibility of human or mechanical error by S&P, its affiliates or its third party licensors, S&P, its affiliates and its third party licensors do not guarantee the accuracy, adequacy, completeness or availability of any information and is not responsible for any errors or omissions or for the results obtained from the use of such information. S&P GIVES NO EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING, BUT NOT LIMITED TO, ANY WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE OR USE. In no event shall S&P, its affiliates and its third party licensors be liable for any direct, indirect, special or consequential damages in connection with subscriber s or others use of the data/information contained herein. Access to the data or information contained herein is subject to termination in the event any agreement with a thirdparty of information or software is terminated. Analytic services provided by Standard & Poor's Ratings Services (Ratings Services) are the result of separate activities designed to preserve the independence and objectivity of ratings opinions. The credit ratings and observations contained herein are solely statements of opinion and not statements of fact or recommendations to purchase, hold, or sell any securities or make any other investment decisions. Accordingly, any user of the information contained herein should not rely on any credit rating or other opinion contained herein in making any investment decision. Ratings are based on information received by Ratings Services. Other divisions of Standard & Poor's may have information that is not available to Ratings Services. Standard & Poor's has established policies and procedures to maintain the confidentiality of non-public information received during the ratings process. Ratings Services receives compensation for its ratings. Such compensation is normally paid either by the issuers of such securities or third parties participating in marketing the securities. While Standard & Poor's reserves the right to disseminate the rating, it receives no payment for doing so, except for subscriptions to its publications. Additional information about our ratings fees is available at www.standardandpoors.com/usratingsfees. Any Passwords/user IDs issued by S&P to users are single user-dedicated and may ONLY be used by the individual to whom they have been assigned. No sharing of passwords/user IDs and no simultaneous access via the same password/user ID is permitted. To reprint, translate, or use the data or information other than as provided herein, contact Client Services, 55 Water Street, New York, NY 10041; (1) 212.438.9823 or by e-mail to: research_request@standardandpoors.com. Copyright 1994-2008 Standard & Poor's, a division of The McGraw-Hill Companies. All Rights Reserved. Standard & Poor s RatingsDirect September 18, 2008 6