ASFPM Partnerships for Statewide Mitigation Actions. Alicia Williams GIS and HMP Section Manager, Amec Foster Wheeler June 2016

Similar documents
Non Regulatory Risk MAP Products Flood Depth and Probability Grids

Using Non-Regulatory RiskMAP Products in Floodplain Management. Ferrin Affleck, PE, CFM, Water Resources Engineer Project Manager Atkins

Best Practices. for Incorporating Building Science Guidance into Community Risk MAP Implementation November 2012

Use of FEMA Non regulatory Flood Risk Products in Planning

Are Risk MAP Products Really on Our Mind?

Kentucky Risk MAP It s not Map Mod II

Flood Risk Products. New Techniques for Identifying and Communicating Flood Risk

Bucks County, PA Flood Risk Review Meeting. November 2014

Michael Taylor, PE, CFM Project Manager, AECOM August 25, 2015

Discovery Meeting: Middle Potomac- Catoctin Watershed. FEMA REGION III September 26, 2012 Rockville, MD and Fairfax, VA

Flood Risk Assessment in the

New Tools for Mitigation & Outreach. Louie Greenwell Stantec

Delaware Bay / River Coastal Flood Risk Study. FEMA REGION II and III September 19, 2012

Flood Risk Review (FRR) Meeting. Cumberland County, Pennsylvania Carlisle, Pennsylvania December 5, 2016

NFIP Program Basics. KAMM Regional Training

Flood Risk in the Schuylkill Watershed. Planning for Resilient Communities

Using GISWeb to Determine Your Property s Flood Zone

Increasing Risk Communication for Property Owners with Risk NJAFM Conference Atlantic City, NJ

Findings/Debrief Meeting September 9, CDOT R4 Headquarters Big Thompson Conference Room W 10 th St. Greeley, CO 80634

FEMA FLOOD MAPS Public Works Department Stormwater Management Division March 6, 2018

Durham County Preliminary Flood Hazard Data Public Meeting. July 28, 2016

Upper Joachim Creek Public Survey on Potential Flood Risk Reduction

Cameron County, TX. Consultation Coordination Officer (CCO) Meeting. Please sign in (sheet at front of the room) Meeting will begin at 9:00

FREQUENTLY ASKED QUESTION ABOUT FLOODPLAINS Michigan Department of Environmental Quality

Now You re Cooking! Recipes for Resilience. Jerri Daniels, Dewberry Diane Howe, FEMA Region 6

CRISP COUNTY, GEORGIA AND INCORPORATED AREAS

Floodplain Management 101: UNIT II. Maps & Flood Insurance Studies

Skagit County Flood Insurance Study Update. Ryan Ike, CFM FEMA Region 10

Community Coordination Meeting. York County, Maine. Risk MAP Study

Federal Emergency Management Agency

Cumberland County, NJ. Risk MAP Project Status Update April 22, 2013

LOCAL OFFICIALS MEETING Lake Wausau Physical Map Revision MARATHON COUNTY, WISCONSIN FEBRUARY 9, 2017

Leveraging HAZUS for Risk Assessment Analysis within Risk MAP

Questions about the National Flood Insurance Program

Floodplain Management 101. Mississippi Emergency Management Agency Floodplain Management Bureau

Why do we care about floodplains?

Door County Floodplain Program Informational Meeting

HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN POINT OF CONTACT MUNICIPAL PROFILE

Community Rating System. National Flood Insurance Program

This survey is expected to take approximately 20 minutes and must be completed in one session.

Modernization, FEMA is Recognizing the connection between damage reduction and

GIS - Introduction and Sample Uses

Community Coordination Meeting Sagadahoc County, Maine

National Flood Insurance Program (NFIP) for Real Estate Professionals

Justification for Floodplain Regulatory Standards in Illinois

Preliminary DFIRM Community Coordination (PDCC) Meeting Gilchrist & Levy Counties, FL. April 30, 2015

JAXGIS FEMA Flood Hazard Mapping -- Frequently Asked Questions

HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN POINT OF CONTACT MUNICIPAL PROFILE

Town of Montrose Annex

Federal Emergency Management Agency

July 31, 2017 NFIP Flood Map Open House Flood Maps 101 Flood Mapping acronyms History of the NFIP Flood Mapping Updates Flood Insurance Fairhope,

Enough about me! Topics Covered

Requirements for Mapping Levees Complying with Section of the NFIP Regulations

This survey is expected to take approximately 20 minutes and must be completed in one session.

Georgia Flood M.A.P. Program

National Capitol Region HAZUS User Group Call

10526 Bermuda Isle Dr. Tampa, FL 33647

GIS - Introduction and Sample Uses

Action Items for Flood Risk Management on Wildcat Creek Interagency success with floodplain management plans and flood forecast inundation maps

ADVISORY BASE FLOOD ELEVATIONS (ABFEs)

Flood Hazard Risk Mapping:

RichSmith_slate-FEMA_320x240.wmv.

HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN POINT OF CONTACT MUNICIPAL PROFILE

Role of Disaster Insurance in Improving Resilience: An Expert Meeting The Resilient America Roundtable

Kevin Wagner Maryland Department of the Environment

HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN POINT OF CONTACT MUNICIPAL PROFILE

COMMUNITY CERTIFICATIONS

Updates to Maine Coastal Flood Insurance Rate Maps (FIRM s): What a Local Official Should Know. Presented by: Steve Johnson, P.E.

MUNICIPAL LAND USE STRATEGIES for Improving Flood Resilience

Chapter 5 Floodplain Management

HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN POINT OF CONTACT MUNICIPAL PROFILE

CITY OF PLANTATION ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT INTEROFFICE MEMORANDUM NO

HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN POINT OF CONTACT. MUNICIPAL PROFILE

Chapter 7 Appendix B: National Flood Insurance Program Summary for Kaua'i County, 2015 Update

Planning Process---Requirement 201.6(b): An open public involvement process is essential to the development of an effective plan.

Floodplain Management Plan

Chemung HUC-8 Watershed Project. February 1, 2011

HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN POINT OF CONTACT MUNICIPAL PROFILE

ANNEX B: TOWN OF BLUE RIVER

FLOODPLAIN MANAGEMENT PROGRAM ASSESSMENT GUIDANCE MANUAL

INSTRUCTIONS FOR COMPLETING THE APPLICATION FORMS FOR CONDITIONAL LETTERS OF MAP REVISION AND LETTERS OF MAP REVISION

10526 Bermuda Isle Dr. Tampa, FL 33647

National Flood Insurance Program (NFIP) Community Rating System (CRS) Together North Jersey Resilient Task Force Meeting

in coordination with Peoria County, Planning and Zoning Department

Discovery Report. Cache River Watershed, Alexander, Johnson, Pulaski, and Union Counties, Illinois

Floodplain Development Permit Application

AMENDMENTS TO CHAPTER 50: FLOODPLAIN DEVELOPMENT

Repetitive Loss Area Revisit # 6 Walter Road Area Jefferson Parish

Federal Emergency Management Agency

10/5/2015. What Makes a Sound Floodplain Management Program? What are the Flood Problems in your Community?

COLLIER COUNTY FLOODPLAIN MANAGEMENT

The National Flood Insurance Program Community Rating System: An Introduction and Discussion of the RDO Role. October 2, :00-3:15 pm ET

Pre-Development Floodplain Application

National Flood Insurance Program s Community Rating System:

Floodplain Development Permit Application

Overview of Capabilities and Current Limitations

HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN POINT OF CONTACT MUNICIPAL PROFILE

HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN POINT OF CONTACT. MUNICIPAL PROFILE

Chapter 6 - Floodplains

Community Resilience & NFIP s Community Rating system

Transcription:

ASFPM Partnerships for Statewide Mitigation Actions Alicia Williams GIS and HMP Section Manager, Amec Foster Wheeler June 2016

Summary The Concept Leveraging Existing Data and Partnerships to reduce risk The Opportunity Utilize FEMA Data Regulatory (DFIRM) RiskMAP Products Utilize MODOT Transportation Data Utilize MSDIS Statewide Structure Data Utilize Census Block Data The Potential Mitigation Ideas Using Out of the Box FEMA Products coupled with readily available data

What is Risk MAP? Mitigation is the effort to reduce loss of life and property by lessening the impact of disasters. In order for mitigation to be effective we need to take action now before the next disaster to reduce human and financial consequences later. 3

What is a Mitigation Project? A mitigation project is a specific undertaking by a community to reduce or eliminate long-term risk to people and property from hazards. Question? What s the best kind of Mitigation Project? Answer: The one you can/will do 4

Regulatory Products Risk MAP regulatory products present the flood hazard data and consist of the Flood Insurance Rate Map (FIRM), Flood Insurance Study (FIS) report, and FIRM database. These regulatory products must be adopted by the community and incorporated into either their floodplain management ordinance, in order to participate in the National Flood Insurance Program (NFIP), or their local building code in order to comply with the flood hazard provisions contained therein. The regulatory products are further defined below: Flood Insurance Rate Map (FIRM) FIRMs are maps developed by FEMA to identify flood hazards. The FIRM is the official map of a community that shows the special flood hazard areas (SFHA) and the risk premium zones applicable to the community. The FIRM is published as the legal document for flood insurance rates. Flood Insurance Study (FIS) Report The FIS report accompanies the FIRM and provides the associated flood information and technical methods that were used to develop the FIRM. Flood information includes, at a minimum, the 1-percent-annual-chance flood elevations, velocity data, floodway widths, bridge and dam locations, and plotted flood profiles of the flood elevations along the stream reaches that were studied. FIRM Database - The FIRM Database is a Geographic Information Systems (GIS) version of the FIRM and most of the quantitative data in the FIS. The GIS data is designed to provide the community with the ability to determine the flood zone, base flood elevation and the floodway status for a particular location. The database also contains NFIP community information, map panel information, cross section and hydraulic structure information, and base map information such as road, stream, and public land survey data.

RiskMAP Products Flood Risk Map (FRM) The FRM presents a high-level, flood risk overview of the project area. The content and format of individual FRMs may vary among project areas to best represent the local conditions. Typical maps include the potential flood losses associated with the one-percent annual chance flood event for each census block, key watershed features that affect local flood risk, and information about potential or successful past mitigation projects to reduce flood risk. This graphical presentation of flood risk data enables communities to visually identify flood risk hot spots and to facilitate coordination with neighboring upstream and downstream communities. Flood Risk Report (FRR) The Flood Risk Report provides communities with a comprehensive understanding of flood risk exposure within their jurisdiction, watershed or other geographic project area. This report provides a narrative of the flood risk assessment methodology and results, as well as risk assessment information that can be incorporated into hazard mitigation plans. The FRR, used in combination with the Flood Risk Map, is a good tool for communities to use for raising local flood risk awareness. Flood Risk Database (FRD) - The FRD is the GIS version of the FRM and most of the quantitative data in the FRR. The FRD provides a wealth of data that may be used to analyze, communicate and visualize flood risk on an ad-hoc basis for a variety of uses. Communities are encouraged to use this database to support mitigation efforts and raise awareness. Data in the FRD represents a snapshot-in-time. Data is not updated regularly once the final FRD is posted to the Map Service Center. The primary datasets contained within the FRD include:

Flood Risk Database (FRD) Flood Depth Grid presents the depth of flooding at any given location in the floodplain. For new Risk MAP projects, depth grids may include the 10-, 4-, 2-, 1-, and 0.2-percent-annualchance flood events for riverine flooding and can be produced for areas affected by levee and dam flooding. Percent-Annual-Chance Probability Grid presents the probability of flooding in any given year (true risk of flooding as a statistical probability). 30-Year-Chance Probability Grid presents the probability of a location being flooded during the life of a 30-year mortgage. Water Surface Elevation Change Grid displays areas where the Risk MAP project resulted in changes to the calculated water surface elevations. Velocity Grid provides floodwater velocity information at any given location in the floodplain showing that hazards and risk vary across the floodplain. This information can be used to identify where building foundations in new or retrofit construction are at risk from higher velocity forces.

Where do RiskMAP Products in Missouri?

Mitigation Actions can be broadly categorized as..

Let s look at the available data SFHA Layer from Map Service Center http://msc.fema.gov/portal

Structures File from MSDIS (Missouri Spatial Data Information) hosted by the University of Missouri http://www.msdis.missouri.edu/data/datalist.html#facstruc

Transportation Files from MODOT also on MSDIS (Missouri Spatial Data Information) hosted by the University of Missouri http://www.msdis.missouri.edu/data/datalist.html#facstruc

Preliminary FEMA SFHA -Example for Howard County, Missouri Preliminary Special Flood Hazard Area for Howard County Zone A = green Zone AE = red Floodway = orange hatch

MSDIS Structure Products for Howard County MSDIS Structures for Howard County as points on all structures in the county 9834 points or rooflines in the county Coded for type of Structure

Understanding the available data is the key All structures in the county 9834 points or rooflines in the county 3250 of which are residential 153 are Mobile Homes 55 are Multi-family dwelling 3036 are Single Family dwellings Coded for type of Structure

Simple Queries of the Data tell us a lot Intersect the structure points with the SFHA, a buffer can be applied easily Results of a Query of the data for residential structures within 250 feet of the Special Flood Hazard Area (SFHA) All structures in the county 9834 points or rooflines in the county Coded for type of Structure 3250 of which are residential 153 are Mobile Homes 55 are Multi-family dwelling 3036 are Single Family dwellings As FPAs, we re always concerned about all the citizens of a county but now efforts can be focused and limited resources used for the worst first.

Additional Queries coupled with symbology changes This Query shows residential structures within 250 feet of the SFHA symbolized with stars by differentiated by Zone type Zone A = red stars for structures near detailed studied areas 51 structures Zone AE = green stars for structures near Approximate areas 215 structures Floodway = purple stars for structures near the Floodway 44 structures I ve narrowed my efforts from 9000+ to 310 structures.

Determine the Depth of Water for all events for structures in the SFHA For structures in the SFHA, the Depth Grid is a great tool to describe risk to the homeowner Map Tips work great This structure would have an estimated 5.7 feet of Using the Extract Multi Values to Points tool in GIS, the values for depth for all the events can be added to a point making it easy to query.

Mitigation Action Identification Using RiskMAP Products Mitigation Categories Prevention Property Protection Public Education and Awareness Natural Resources Protection Emergency Services Structural Projects

Local Planning and Regulations Preventative Measures F1- Incorporate Flood Mitigation into Local Planning For the State Hazard Mitigation Plan, all counties with DFIRMs at least Preliminary will have depth grids created using the DFIRM data for the HAZUS Analysis This analysis will be available for local planning efforts to roll down to utilize.

Local Planning and Regulations Preventative Measures F2- Form Partnerships to Support Floodplain Management NRCS- Dam As-Builts USACE Leverage Studies and Levees MODOT Bridge Plans

Local Planning and Regulations Preventative Measures F3 Limit or Restrict Development in Floodplain Areas The Percent Annual Chance Grid can be used to determine which areas should be restricted for development. In this example any area in dark red has a 50% or greater chance of flooding once a year.

Local Planning and Regulations Preventative Measures F4- Adopt and Enforce Building Codes and Development Standards Low High Density Areas Areas Target the high density areas with greater than 1 foot of water for Building Code adoption actions using the depth grids

Local Planning and Regulations Preventative Measures F5 Improve Stormwater Management Planning High Density Areas Target the high density areas for Stormwater Management Planning actions with flooding depths greater than 1 foot as indicated by the flood depth grids.

Local Planning and Regulations Preventative Measures F6 Adopt Policies to Reduce Stormwater Runoff Target Homeowners in the floodplain in densely developed areas for outreach materials encouraging the use of permeable driveways and patios surfaces If further refinement is needed, the flood depth grid can be used to select for homes with more than 1 foot of depth.

Local Planning and Regulations Preventative Measures F7 Improve Flood Risk Assessment

Local Planning and Regulations Preventative Measures F8 Join or Improve Compliance with NFIP SFHAs in Missouri NFIP Participation as of May 31, 2016

Local Planning and Regulations Preventative Measures F9 Manage the Floodplain Beyond Minimum Requirements Sinkholes are a major issue in the southern half of Missouri. Managing sinkhole areas in addition to or conjunction with the SFHA is beyond the minimum requirements but an especially important mitigation action for this area.

Local Planning and Regulations Preventative Measures F10 Participate in the CRS Current Participants in CRS in Missouri If we want to focus our efforts, we can define the areas with dense populations with depth of water greater than 1 foot.

Local Planning and Regulations Preventative Measures F11 Establish Local Funding Mechanisms for Flood Mitigation Set aside general fund dollars equivalent to 5% of the assessed value of the homes located within the SFHA. An alternative would be for the homeowners who live within the SFHA who do not have LOMAs could be levied a tax to fund mitigation actions. I m not saying all actions would be popular

Structure and Infrastructure Projects F12 Removing Existing Structures from Flood Hazard Areas - Buyouts For the 44 structures in the FW in our example, perhaps buyout efforts are focused there Before-floodprone structures After- open green space

Structure and Infrastructure Projects F13 Improve Stormwater Drainage System Capacity Using floodplains and depth grids to determine undersized bridges and culverts.

Structure and Infrastructure Projects F14 Conduct Regular Maintenance for Drainage Systems and Flood Control Structures Utilizing partnerships with the USACE and local Levee owners, maintenance records for these systems can be assessed to ensure actions are being implemented. RiskMAP products can be used to assist in Freeboard analysis

Structure and Infrastructure Projects F15 Elevate or Retrofit Structures and Utilities All structures in the county 9834 points or rooflines in the county Coded for type of Structure 3250 of which are residential 153 are Mobile Homes 55 are Multi-family dwelling 3036 are Single Family dwellings

Structure and Infrastructure Projects F16 Floodproof Residential and Non- Residential Structures Target the most vulnerable homes for Floodproofing Outreach

Structure and Infrastructure Projects F17- Protect Infrastructure Using the depth grids and transportations lines, bridges that show road overtopping can be identified for high priority replacement.

Emergency Services F18 Protect Critical Facilities Flood Depth Grids Raster (grid) of water depth Depth is calculated as the difference (in feet) between the water surface elevation and the ground Produced for 10%, 4%, 2%, 1%, and 0.2% annual chance events

Emergency Services F19 Construct Flood Control Measures Flood depth grids would be excellent for assessing water treatment facilities which have the potential to flood.

Natural Systems Protection F20 Protect and Restore Natural Flood Mitigation Features Percent Annual Chance of Flooding Grid can be used to designate areas natural wetlands and retaining thick vegetative cover on public lands flanking rivers In this example the dark red is 50% or greater flooding annually.

Natural Systems Protection F21 Preserve Floodplains as Open Space Use the Annual Chance Depth Grids to develop stream buffers 10% shown here

Education and Awareness Programs F22 Increase Awareness of Flood Risk and Safety Conduct Open Houses Use CSLF or Polygon areas of changes to 1% and 0.2% annual chance floodplains and floodways. Polygons will contain attributes that indicate regulatory zone changes as well as contributing engineering factors (e.g. changes to peak discharges, modeling methodology). Structures: the total estimated count of affected buildings within the area of change Population: the total estimated affected population within the area of change Changes Since Last FIRM Data

Education and Awareness Programs F23 Educate Property Owners about Flood Mitigation Techniques Percent Chance of Flooding over a 30-year Period Grid A grid dataset that represents the percent chance of flooding within a 30- year period for locations along a flooding source We can use this dataset to focus communications with Homeowners to purchase flood insurance policies

Using the RiskMAP Products: 30% Annual Chance For structures in the SFHA, the % Annual Chance Grid is a great tool to describe risk to the homeowner Map Tips work great This structure would have an estimated 95.8% chance of flooding over the life of a 30 year mortgage Using Extract Values to Points Tool Target outreach for Flood Insurance to structures with more than a 50% chance of flooding in 30 years.

Emergency Services There are 29 School Facilities in the County in this Structures file. For structures in the SFHA, the Depth Grid is a great tool to describe risk to the Emergency Managers or School Official Using Extract Values to Points Tool Consider relocation of structures in the floodplain An Intersection of the MODOT roads file with the stream centerline file result in 226 bridges/culverts in the county that cross the SFHA. Are there any schools near those crossing? These crossings need to be considered for school bus routing-rerouting during storm events.

The Mitigation Action Tracker Web based collection tool: Identify Areas of Mitigation Interest (AoMI) and actions Document & Organize mitigation activities Communicate progress on mitigation activities Identify point(s) of contact for each mitigation action https://mat.msc.fema.gov/about.aspx 45

Risk MAP Performance Measures Action Measure 1 is defined as the percentage of population where Risk MAP helped identify new strategies or improved current planned mitigation actions in direct collaboration with communities. Action Measure 2 is defined as the percentage of population that has advanced identified mitigation actions. This includes communities that began implementing mitigation actions, either from their Mitigation Plan or from new strategies identified during Risk MAP. Status Q2 Number of Mitigation Actions in MO AM1- Identified 127 AM2-In Progress 2 AM2- Completed 7 Grand Total 136 46