Allan MacDonald: Director General, Implementation Branch, AANDC

Similar documents
Information concerning the constitution, goals and functions of the agency, including 1 :

Steering Committee of the Global Nuclear Safety and Security Network (GNSSN)

AUDIT, RISK MANAGEMENT AND COMPLIANCE COMMITTEE CHARTER

Advocacy Prioritization Survey Results Executive Summary

Collaboration Assessment Worksheets

Active Sussex. Trustee Recruitment Pack

Community Hubs in Ontario: A Strategic Framework and Action Plan

UNCRC REPORTING AND NGO PARTICIPATION BY: SAMNANG MEAS ADVISOR AND FORMER SECRETARY GENERAL OF NOVEMBER 2016

Department of Environment Land, Water and Planning

Our vision is: New Zealand values the wellbeing of tamariki above all else.

Using Accrual Data in GFS

CHAIR AND MEMBERS COMMUNITY AND PROTECTIVE SERVICES NOVEMBER 15, 2016 ART ZUIDEMA CITY MANAGER COMMUNITY DIVERSITY AND INCLUSION STRATEGY UPDATE

PROJECT SUPPORT FUND OVERVIEW

Association Support Officer

Enterprise Risk Management Focusing on the Right Risks

Community Planning Association of Southwest Idaho FY Strategic Plan Report No Approved by the COMPASS Board, December 16, 2013

Oversight of Stewardship Programs

Terms of Reference. 1. Background/Context. 1.1 Purpose

Human Resources & Remuneration Committee Charter. Bank of Queensland

Frequently Asked Questions: Broader Public Sector Procurement Directive

A Civil Society Agenda for the OECD

This is a living document that can be adjusted by a majority of the NDS Steering Committee, in consultation with the NDSC general membership.

Call for nomination for members of the CSEM (civil society engagement mechanism) Advisory group in UHC2030

DMO Commercial Group Defence Watch Presentation Mr Harry Dunstall 2 October 2012

[AGENCY NAME] Mandate and Roles Document. (Pure Advisory Committees)

Board of Directors Job Description

Responsible Investment Policy

Corporate Governance Charter

National Planning Guide Summary A Practical Approach to Health Security Capacity Building Draft 21 July 2017

Objectives of the review. Context. February 2015

Commission d évaluation de l enseignement collégial. Analytical Framework. Evaluating the Effectiveness of Strategic Plans in the Cégeps

Canadian Embassy and Canada Spain Chamber of Commerce Encounter. Economic Agreement between the EU and Canada

Investor Money Regulations

o Continue to be a 'University of choice and opportunity' reaching out to students of all ages and backgrounds

UCEA/ECU Age Discrimination Working Group Guidance. Age Discrimination Legislation Guidance Note 1: Pay and Benefits A UCEA Publication

TASSAL GROUP LIMITED ABN Procedures for the Oversight and Management of Material Business Risks. (Approved by the Board 28 May 2015)

Local Code Of Corporate Governance

Geneva, 13 to 15 November (Speakers to be confirmed)

Telephone: Fax: Web: Job Description

Are you ready for the FUTURE of your Quality Management system?

Sound Management of Electronic Wastes in North America Operating Year(s):

TERMS OF REFERENCE. Audit and Risk Committee (the "Committee") of Wilmcote Holdings Plc (the "Company")

Academic and Administrative and Other Related Staff Annual Review

ABORIGINAL ECONOMIC PARTNERSHIPS Program Grant Application Guidelines

Policy and Procedures Date: April 23, Subject: Policy and Procedures for Establishment of New Schools at Virginia Tech

Institutional Self-Evaluation Report (ISER) for Accreditation. Mallory Newell, De Anza College, Accreditation Liaison Officer

OFFICIAL CHARTERS OF THE AUSTRALIAN SECURITISATION FORUM STANDING SUBCOMMITTEES

Official Information Act Request Relating to the Terms of Reference for ODESC Governance Boards

Artists working with communities; communities working with artists providing arts access to all.

Learning for All Meeting Country Paper of the Government of the Republic of the Union of Myanmar

ABORIGINAL ECONOMIC PARTNERSHIPS Program Application Guidelines

Gippsland Sports Academy Strategic Plan

AUDIT & RISK COMMITTEE CHARTER

NATIONAL IDENTITY THEFT VICTIM ASSISTANCE NETWORK EXPANSION PROGRAM (NITVAN II)

TERMS OF REFERENCE FOR THE PROVISION OF OUTSOURCED INTERNAL AUDIT SERVICE

Policy Coversheet. Link Tutors: appointment and responsibilities

Strategic Plan Request for Proposals. March 2018

TERMS OF REFERENCE FOR CONSULTANTS

RE: SUBMISSION TO INFRASTRUCTURE VICTORIA S LAYING THE FOUNDATIONS PAPER

1 This paper seeks agreement to the final Terms of Reference (the Terms) for the Welfare Expert Advisory Group (WEAG). The final Terms are attached.

June Dear Chairman Cuttita and Members of the Board of Fire Commissioners:

OIA Forum for LEADERS

Summary of Outstanding Issues Related to Collective Bargaining Between the Government of the Northwest Territories and Union of Northern Workers

ENNHRI Operational Plan 2018

Partner Agency Application Toque Campaign 2017/18

Copiague Chamber of Commerce

TASSAL GROUP LIMITED ABN

Audit & Risk Committee Charter

THE COMMUNITY NEEDS ASSESSMENT REQUIREMENT FOR THE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GRANT (CDBG) PROGRAM

STRATEGIC PLAN Page 1 of 11

Agenda item Data Quality Group. Terms of Reference and Operating Arrangements

Effective Practices for Managing Student-Athlete Insurance

Emergency Support Function (ESF) 18 Business and Industry

HSBC USA INC. HSBC BANK USA, N.A. CHARTER OF THE COMPLIANCE COMMITTEE

UNITED NATIONS OFFICE FOR PROJECT SERVICES (UNOPS) IN CAMBODIA (PRINCIPAL RECIPIENT) INTERNAL AUDIT REPORT. 14 July 2017

Policy Planning and Analysis Team (PAT) Charter

CYBG PLC BOARD REMUNERATION COMMITTEE. Charter

IABC Chapter Management Awards Entry Form

Written Submission for the Pre-Budget Consultations in Advance of the 2019 Budget. By: The Investment Funds Institute of Canada

Practice Review and Internal Audit Plan

Application Pack for Secondment Opportunity

Audit Committee Charter. St Andrew s Insurance (Australia) Pty Ltd St Andrew s Life Insurance Pty Ltd St Andrew s Australia Services Pty Ltd

Financial reporting update. Northern Client Update, May 2017

Risk and Audit Committee charter

Rural Tourism Infrastructure Fund Criteria, Conditions and Guidelines 2018

Attachment D Infrastructure Funding Agreements, Cost Allocation Methodology, Other Shared Costs

Lecture # 22 Cost-Benefit Analysis

Approval Process and Arrangements for University Consultancy Work

Grant Application Guidelines

CONCORD recommendations for a more effective and meaningful participation of Civil Society in the future EU- ACP relations

REA Space Unit guidelines for Individual Evaluation Report Coordination & support actions. DT-SPACE-07-BIZ-2018: Space hubs for Copernicus

Guidelines for the Development of a Cooperative Biosecurity Plan for Grazing Livestock

Scope of Work to Prepare Communities in Motion 2040: Regional Long-Range Transportation and Sustainability Plan

Chapter 1. Introduction and Overview of Audit & Assurance

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY INTERNAL AUDIT REPORT. IOM Kingston JM JULY 2017

A Strategic Plan for Ohio s Aspire Adult Readiness Education (formerly ABLE) Program

Midwest Association of Housing Cooperative. Board Candidates

NEENAH INC ETHICAL PURCHASING POLICY

Park Square Capital, LLP (the Firm, Park Square ) Remuneration Policy Statement

Lecture # Cost-Benefit Analysis

Transcription:

Allan MacDnald: Directr General, Implementatin Branch, AANDC Cntext Treaties are nt the end f smething; we spend many years negtiating them, but many, many mre years implementing them. On average, it takes 15 t 20 years t negtiate a treaty, and it s getting lnger. We put a lt f effrt int this, invlving many departments, and many visits t Cabinet. But as sn as the effective date arrives, much f the activity falls ff. We need t grapple with that. Treaties are wrking. Mdern treaties are a key cmpnent f Canadian natin-building, but agreements are nly as gd as their implementatin. They advance the shared bjective f recnciliatin; prmte strng and sustainable Abriginal cmmunities; and advance natinal sci-ecnmic bjectives, t the benefit f all Canadians. They are: Negtiated, tripartite agreements Nt time limited framewrk fr new and enduring relatinships Legally binding and cnstitutinally prtected T effectively implement mdern treaties, all departments and agencies need t be aware f and equipped t fulfill their bligatins; cgnizant f the brader implicatins f mdern treaties n their departmental mandates; and respectful f the intergvernmental relatinships created by mdern treaties. Challenge and pprtunity In pursuit f the shared bjectives f treaty-making, the parties dedicate significant time and resurces t the negtiatin f treaties: During negtiatins, Canada cnsults rigrusly acrss departments and agencies by means f a strng hrizntal management framewrk Mdern treaties will nly meet their intended bjectives if the parties fully implement their bligatins after the treaties cme int effect. After 30 years f experience implementing mdern treaties, much prgress has been made twards the gals f these agreements by all signatry partners: Imprved certainty with respect t land and resurces Defined jurisdictins and c-management Mre stable climate fr ecnmic develpment Hwever, the scpe and scale f Canada s mdern treaty bligatins creates sme management challenges fr the federal gvernment and its cmpnent departments and agencies. While Departments have a diverse range f mandates, respnsibilities and clients, almst every federal rganizatin delivers its prgrams, plicies, and services t Abriginal clients. In these circumstances, Mdern treaties prvide gvernment rganizatins with unique pprtunity and cntext t take advantage f in successfully delivering n their mandates: New, renewed, frward-lking relatinship with the Crwn Clarity: Legal and peratinal certainty, defined rights and bligatins Established frums t wrk with grups (implementatin cmmittees) Supprt thrugh treaty management directrates Client grups with established gvernance structures, accuntability, defined respnsibilities Treaties shuld make ur lives easier, nt harder. When we lk at the amunt f ur cuntry cvered by treaties, we shuld keep that in mind. Mdern Treaties change the way we d business

Mdern Treaties are unique in the wrld. They tuch n a multitude f subjects and jurisdictins, and include many types f bligatins and respnsibilities. Obligatins may be: One time vs. nging:! One time bligatins usually take place early in the pst-effective date perid (e.g. capital transfers, survey f settlement lands, and the establishment f mandated bards and cmmittees), while nging bligatins require regular r peridic actin n the parts f ne r mre parties (e.g. nging participatin n cmmittees; nging peratin f bards and cmmittees; issuing f fishing licenses) Direct vs. cntingent:! Direct bligatins are generally well-defined, and fall under the respnsibility f ne r tw departments (eg. The creatin f a new natinal park, repatriatin f artifacts). Cntingent bligatins are triggered by a future event (e.g. the establishment f a new natinal park may trigger an bligatin t negtiate an impact and benefits agreement) Sme bligatins are the respnsibility f ne r mre departments, while thers are the respnsibility f gvernment as a whle. These are ften triggered by departmental activity in mdern treaty areas (e.g. access, prcurement and emplyment prvisins). Mdern treaties are entered int n behalf f the Crwn. Virtually every federal rganizatin s mandate intersects with Abriginal treaty rights at sme pint, frm natural resurce develpment t heritage t prcurement. AANDC plays an imprtant crdinating rle, representing Canada in the verarching mdern treaty relatinship, and prviding guidance t ther departments and agencies in fulfilling treaty respnsibilities related t their mandates. AANDC als has its wn, distinct bligatins t implement. But all departments and agencies have bligatins. This creates a hrizntal management challenge fr Canada. Each mdern treaty creates hundreds f bligatins fr federal departments and agencies With 26 mdern treaties currently being implemented, Canada is respnsible fr ver 4,000 cnstitutinally-prtected bligatins. Over 30 departments and agencies have direct bligatins under mdern treaties, and all departments and agencies are subject t brader «whle-f-gvernment» bligatins related t issues like cntracting, emplyment, and cnsultatin. All departmental activities, prgrams, plicies and legislatin must be develped and implemented in a manner that cmplies with mdern treaty prvisins. Federal mdern treaty bligatins: snapsht Mdern treaties create specific bligatins fr many departments and agencies: Over 30 federal departments and agencies have specific bligatins pursuant t mdern treaties Departments are generally clsely cnsulted n the develpment f these clauses during negtiatins, and resurces are ften allcated t manage these bligatins Relatively high awareness and cmpliance

Every treaty als has several categries f bligatins that apply t all Departments and Agencies: Over 400 mdern treaty bligatins are the respnsibility f all departments and agencies These bligatins are ften triggered by departmental prgrams, plicies, legislatin and activities in mdern treaty areas Respnsibility fr these bligatins isn t delegated t specific departments. All departments need t remain vigilant t ensure that their activities in these areas are cnducted in cmpliance with the treaties These bligatins are nt as well understd, and departments are less prepared t manage them when an agreement cmes int effect Obligatins by categry

M re cmplicate d arrangeme nts where it s whle f gvernmen t apprach. This is when we tend t trip ver each ther, which creates the cnfusin and frustratin. manage mdern treaty implementatin? Hw d we currently The Implementatin Management Framewrk sets in place crdinatin mechanisms. It extends the rbust interdepartmental crdinatin framewrk already in place fr negtiatins t als include implementatin. It creates a cmmunity f implementers by cnnecting fficials acrss departments in regins, headquarters and management. The Implementatin Management Framewrk includes: Reginal caucuses, ensure cllabrative fulfillment f bligatins undertaken in the regins Federal Caucus, prvides a frum fr the develpment plicy, peratinal guidance and supprt t reginal peratins and senir management Federal Steering Cmmittee, prvides senir management guidance and directin t departments Evaluatin desn t have enugh teeth t ensure that federal departments are cmplying with the treaties and making decisins cnsistent with the treaties. Hw d we manage mdern treaty implementatin? Supprt t departments/agencies thrugh the Implementatin Branch Treaty management/intergvernmental relatins: Represents Canada in the verall management and maintenance f respectful treaty relatinships Crdinates management f ver 2,200 AANDC bligatins, bth ne-time and nging Represents the federal gvernment at implementatin cmmittees Chairs reginal caucuses Infrmal dispute reslutin/issue management Supprts OGDs/Central Agencies n treaty implementatin activities Implementatin Negtiatins: Supprts nging negtiatins and new negtiatin prcesses

Cllabrates with main table negtiatrs t ensure agreements are implementable Lead the negtiatin and drafting f implementatin plans Pst effective date, lead renewal negtiatins f fiscal agreements; implementatin plans; and ther agreements Planning, Plicy and Prmtin: Raise awareness and understanding f treaty issues acrss federal departments and agencies with respect t treaty bligatins Develp resurce material t assist federal implementers Bilateral wrk with ther federal departments and agencies n specific issues While we d gd wrk, we are hearing that we need t d mre. That s ne reasn why we re here tday. Mving frward: strengthening the whle f gvernment apprach Finding slutins t ur challenges requires innvatin, nging effrt and dedicated resurces in three areas; we are wrking with LCAC n sme f these: 1. Educatin and Awareness: Raising awareness f federal bligatins acrss departments and agencies Cnsidering the brader implicatins f mdern treaties n departmental mandates We are als wrking with the Calitin n principles f treaty implementatin which we hpe will guide the federal actins. 2. Crdinatin and Cnsistency: 3. Accuntability: We need versight with bite: strengthening crdinatin and strategic versight f key treaty implementatin issues Strnger gatekeeping in the develpment and delivery f federal prgrams, plicies and legislatin t ensure cmpliance with mdern treaty prvisins Strengthening senir-level accuntability fr departmental bligatins fr treaty implementatin, frm the Deputy Minister dwnwards What shuld departments and agencies d? Be aware f cmprehensive land claims and self-gvernment agreements; their imprtance and relevance Understand hw they wrk and interact with yu business lines (legislative/plicy/prgrams) Designate a single DG-level pint f cntact wh is respnsible fr navigating treaty issues in each department Ensure that prcesses fr cmmunicating and wrking hrizntally within the department/agencies are in place and understd Cncluding Ntes These treaties are ging t be enduring, and right nw, we are the Crwn. We have an pprtunity t imprve implementatin and strengthen relatinships fr future generatins. We never stp negtiating, and we all have a respnsibility t cntinue treaty relatinships We try t learn frm ur mistakes We are raising awareness, develping guidelines We need t imprve crdinatin and cnsistency

Departments need t be held accuntable/ must develp strnger accuntability, which is why we are here tday Hping fr a single pint f cntact in each department