RECENT TAX AVOIDANCE JURISPRUDENCE
|
|
- Benedict Black
- 5 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 RECENT TAX AVOIDANCE JURISPRUDENCE Prepared for: 2014 CPTS Annual Conference Christopher J. Montes Felesky Flynn LLP June 4, 2014
2 AGENDA Pièces Automobiles Lecavalier (debt forgiveness/parking) Lehigh Cement (para. 95(6)(b)) McKesson (transfer pricing) Devon Canada (successor rules) D & D Livestock (s. 55(2)) Swirsky (interest deductibility) Conclusions Page 2
3 Pièces Automobiles Lecavalier Inc TCC 310 Ford US owned shares of Greenleaf and debt owing from Greenleaf with a principal amount of $24 million Total value of shares and debt was $9 million Ford US wanted to sell its Greenleaf shares to realize a capital loss for US tax purposes Ford US subscribed for $15 million of Greenleaf shares and Greenleaf used the proceeds to repay a portion of the debt and accrued interest Purchaser bought the shares of Greenleaf from Ford US for $1 and bought $9 million of debt owing by Greenleaf (greater than 80% of the principal amount so not a specified obligation or parked obligation ) Page 3
4 Pièces Automobiles Lecavalier Inc. Page 4
5 Pièces Automobiles Lecavalier Inc. Both Greenleaf and the purchaser were predecessors of the appellant Minister reassessed the appellant under GAAR Treated $15 million as forgiven debt subject to s. 80 reduction of tax attributes and income inclusion Page 5
6 Pièces Automobiles Lecavalier Inc. TCC HELD: Appeal dismissed; GAAR applies Tax benefit: The appellant admitted that the non-application of s. 80 was a tax benefit Avoidance transaction: Appellant argued that the debt clean-up transactions and subsequent purchase of Greenleaf shares were not part of the same series because the former transactions were imposed by Ford US; Court was not convinced that they were imposed by Ford US Appellant argued that the transactions were carried out for bona fide purposes US tax considerations and considerations applicable to Ford US; Court was not convinced as they failed to call any US tax expert or representative from Ford US, but the Court acknowledged that seeking to reduce foreign tax is a bona fide purpose The debt clean-up transactions were avoidance transactions Page 6
7 Pièces Automobiles Lecavalier Inc. Misuse or abuse: Minister argued that s. 80, the debt parking rules, and para. 80(2)(g) in particular were abused Appellant argued: s. 80 is a detailed provision that simply did not apply s. 80 is intended to offset the increase in economic power and possibility of a bad debt deduction when a debt is forgiven the second purpose is not relevant here Same as capitalizing company with equity from the start Appellant did not make submissions on s or para. 80(2)(g) Page 7
8 Pièces Automobiles Lecavalier Inc. s. 80: Debtor realizes an economic gain when debt is forgiven tax cost /income should be adjusted Bad debt deduction provisions not part of scheme s (6), (7) and (8) Deem certain situations that effectively are debt forgiveness, but would not otherwise be caught by s. 80, to be within the scope of s. 80 De minimis exception if debt acquired for > 80% of principal amount Para. 80(2)(g) is intended to prevent a taxpayer from converting a debt into shares of lesser value Page 8
9 Pièces Automobiles Lecavalier Inc. TCC HELD: Appellant circumvented application of s. 80 and s in an abusive manner It was relieved of an obligation to pay $15 million, but maintained associated tax cost and expenditures Alternatively, the appellant misused para. 80(2)(g) by proceeding in two steps rather than just converting debt to shares Page 9
10 Pièces Automobiles Lecavalier Inc. Recommendations: Consider method of financing carefully when advancing funds within a corporate group Ensure debt clean-up transactions have a bona fide business purpose Page 10
11 Lehigh Cement Ltd TCC 176 / 2014 FCA 103 Double dip structure into the US Canadian parent borrowed money from arm s length bank Canadian parent set up a US LLC and contributed borrowed money to US LLC for an equity interest US LLC loaned money to a US corporation on an interest-bearing basis Interest income of US LLC deemed active business income under Canadian foreign affiliate/fapi rules US LLC paid dividends to Canadian parent Page 11
12 Lehigh Cement Ltd. Page 12
13 Lehigh Cement Ltd. US interest deduction; Canadian interest deduction; no net Canadian income inclusion double dip Minister reassessed on the basis that para. 95(6)(b) applied because the purpose of the acquisition of US LLC shares was the reduction of Canadian tax US LLC not a foreign affiliate of Canadian parent US LLC dividends not deductible under para. 113(1)(a) Page 13
14 Lehigh Cement Ltd. Para. 95(6)(b): where a person or partnership acquires or disposes of shares of the capital stock of a corporation or interests in a partnership, either directly or indirectly, and it can reasonably be considered that the principal purpose for the acquisition or disposition is to permit a person to avoid, reduce or defer the payment of tax, that acquisition or disposition is deemed not to have taken place... Page 14
15 Lehigh Cement Ltd. Appellant argued: Para. 95(6)(b) is intended only to prevent the manipulation of foreign affiliate or controlled foreign affiliate status Otherwise it would be like a mini-gaar with no misuse or abuse exception Consider limited consequences if the provision applies Para. 95(6)(b) only applies where the purpose of the acquisition or disposition of shares (as opposed to the series of transactions) is to avoid or reduce tax Here, the main purpose of acquisition of US LLC shares was to reduce US tax; the Canadian tax benefits would have been the same if the appellant subscribed for shares of the US corporation directly (interest deductibility and the deduction of exempt surplus dividends) Page 15
16 Lehigh Cement Ltd. Crown argued: The Canadian tax benefit exceeded the expected return on the US LLC shares A direct subscription for shares in the US corporation was not possible because it would have violated a banking covenant and it would have been impossible to pay dividends from the US corporation Page 16
17 Lehigh Cement Ltd. TCC HELD: Appeal allowed; s. 95(6) does not apply Only the purpose of the acquisition or disposition of shares is material the words of the provision are clear However, this is a question of fact to be determined based on all circumstances, which could include the purpose of the series of transactions of which the acquisition or disposition forms a part Para. 95(6)(b) not limited to preventing manipulations of foreign affiliate or controlled foreign affiliate status Page 17
18 Lehigh Cement Ltd. Determining tax that would otherwise be payable Different from a tax benefit in s. 245 (not following Univar Canada Ltd., 2005 TCC 723) Must compare to an alternative arrangement: where the relevant acquisition or disposition has not occurred, and that might reasonably have been carried out by the taxpayer Page 18
19 Lehigh Cement Ltd. Here, the appropriate alternative arrangement is a direct subscription for shares of the US corporation Because the Canadian tax results would have been the same under that alternative arrangement, no Canadian tax was avoided The principal purpose of the acquisition of US LLC shares was to avoid US tax, not Canadian tax Page 19
20 Lehigh Cement Ltd. FCA affirmed the TCC s decision, but for different reasons s. 95(6) only applies to prevent a manipulation of foreign affiliate / controlled foreign affiliate / related corporation status, not to prevent other tax benefits arising from the series The words of para. 95(6)(b) are clear and do not refer to series of transactions like other anti-avoidance provisions Para. 95(6)(b) is in the foreign affiliate section of the Act (Subdivision i of Division B of Part I), not with general provisions dealing with tax avoidance (Part XVI) If s. 95(6) was intended to be so broad, certain other amendments to the Act would not make sense The Crown s interpretation of para. 95(6)(b) would give the CRA an undesirable amount of discretion Page 20
21 Lehigh Cement Ltd. Paragraphs 62-64, per Stratas J.A.: [T]he Crown seems to believe that the paragraph can be used even if the non-resident corporation has obtained foreign affiliate status without any artificial manipulation of share ownership. At the same time, however, the Crown does not take the view that whenever paragraph 95(6)(b) can be applied, it will. Rather, the Crown says that paragraph 95(6)(b) will be applied only where the tax avoidance is unacceptable. Unacceptability is in the eye of the beholder. It can shift depending on one's subjective judgment and mood at the time. Using it, as the Crown suggests, to restrain the indiscriminate use of paragraph 95(6)(b) creates the spectre of similarly-situated taxpayers being treated differently for no objective reason. This would violate the principle that, absent clear legislative wording, the same legal principles should apply to all taxpayers Page 21
22 Lehigh Cement Ltd. Paragraphs 66-67, per Stratas J.A.: A standard of unacceptability, even if it were open to us to invent it and insert it into paragraph 95(6)(b), is in itself unacceptable, as I have explained. Absent clear wording, I would be loath to interpret paragraph 95(6)(b) in a way that gives the Minister such a broad and ill-defined discretion a standardless sweep as to whether or not a tax is owing, limited only by her view of unacceptability. It would be contrary to fundamental principle. It would also promote arbitrary application, the bane of consistency, predictability and fairness. Page 22
23 Lehigh Cement Ltd. The principal purpose of an acquisition or disposition of shares is a question of fact to be determined based on all relevant circumstances, which could include the purpose of the series But the Minister cannot look at the series of transactions in determining a tax avoidance purpose that is not the target of para. 95(6)(b) Here, the purpose of the acquisition was not to manipulate foreign affiliate status therefore, the TCC correctly concluded that para. 95(6)(b) does not apply Page 23
24 Lehigh Cement Ltd. Comments: This decision should significantly reduce uncertainty regarding the scope of para. 95(6)(b) It provides greater certainty in transactions where a Canadian corporation borrows funds and invests those funds, directly or indirectly, in shares of a foreign affiliate (e.g., double dips) Page 24
25 McKesson Canada Corp TCC 404 McKesson Canada was part of a large multinational group McKesson Canada had significant receivables which were managed by its own credit department Luxembourg parent purchased McKesson Canada s receivables at a discount and paid McKesson Canada to continue to manage them Page 25
26 McKesson Canada Corp. McKesson Canada s receivables had a historical collection rate of 99.96% and were outstanding for approx. 32 days on average Receivables Sales Agreement Five-year revolving facility Discount rate of 2.206% (which resulted in McKesson Canada incurring losses in the relevant years) Servicing Agreement Flat fee paid periodically Page 26
27 McKesson Canada Corp. CRA reassessed under paras. 247(2)(a) and (c) to reduce the discount under the Receivables Sales Agreement to 1.013% No transfer pricing penalty was assessed Page 27
28 McKesson Canada Corp. TD Securities provided a report on the calculation of the discount rate at the time the transactions first were entered into Boyle J. went through it in detail and criticized it extensively, especially the assumptions made Boyle J. described it as an advocacy piece Page 28
29 McKesson Canada Corp. A major accounting firm prepared a transfer pricing report when the CRA reviewed the transactions Boyle J. went through it in detail and criticized it extensively, especially the assumptions made Boyle J. described it as primarily a piece of advocacy work, perhaps largely made as instructed (para. 202) Page 29
30 McKesson Canada Corp. Appellant had two expert witnesses; the Crown had three expert witnesses Court went through each expert s report in detail, assessing the reliability of each one and considering the weight to be given to each one Page 30
31 McKesson Canada Corp. TCC HELD: Appeal dismissed Boyle J. found that the discount rate was not what arm s length parties would have agreed to Boyle J. applied the principles from GlaxoSmithKline (2012 SCC 52), even though it was decided under former s. 69(2) he found that the wording of s. 247(2) was not inconsistent Page 31
32 McKesson Canada Corp. Boyle J. determined his own range based on his evaluation of expert evidence 0.959% to 1.17% The Minister s assumption that the discount rate between arm s length parties would have been no greater than % was not demolished Boyle J. stated that it was not appropriate for a court to reassess at high end of range this would reward overreaching taxpayers and encourage frequent use of the courts Page 32
33 McKesson Canada Corp. Timing of Part XIII Assessment McKesson Canada was assessed for its failure to withhold on the deemed dividend to its Luxembourg parent under s. 214(3) The transfer pricing reassessment of McKesson Canada was issued on March 25, 2008 (within 5 years of end of relevant tax year) The Part XIII withholding tax reassessment was issued on April 15, 2008 (not within 5 years of end of relevant tax year) Page 33
34 McKesson Canada Corp. Article 9 of the Canada-Luxembourg Treaty 1. Where an enterprise of a Contracting State participates directly or indirectly in the management, control or capital of an enterprise of the other Contracting State, and conditions are made or imposed between the two enterprises in their commercial or financial relations which differ from those which would be made between independent enterprises, then any income which would, but for those conditions, have accrued to one of the enterprises, but, by reason of those conditions, have not so accrued, may be included in the income of that enterprise and taxed accordingly. 3. A Contracting State shall not change the income of an enterprise in the circumstances referred to in paragraph 1 after the expiry of the time limits provided in its national laws and, in any case, after five years from the end of the year in which the income which would be subject to such change would, but for the conditions referred to in paragraph 1, have accrued to that enterprise. Page 34
35 McKesson Canada Corp. TCC HELD: Art. 9(3) of the Canada-Luxembourg Treaty does not apply to prohibit secondary transfer pricing adjustments The assessment under s. 215(6) is not an adjustment to the Luxembourg parent s income and an assessment of tax against the Luxembourg parent; therefore, art. 9(1) and 9(3) do not apply The reduced discount would not have resulted in income to the Luxembourg parent This result is consistent with the purpose of the treaty because no double tax resulted (no material amount of tax was paid in Luxembourg) Page 35
36 McKesson Canada Corp. Comments/recommendations: This case is being appealed to the FCA Engage properly qualified transfer pricing experts Review transfer pricing reports in detail before the transactions are put in place; question the assumptions Keep in mind that transfer pricing litigation can be a long, arduous and uncertain process Page 36
37 Devon Canada Corp TCC 415 Parent of Home Oil was acquired by Devon Prior to acquisition of control, Home Oil owned resource properties through Anderson Partnership After acquisition of control, Anderson Partnership transferred its resource properties to a subsidiary partnership, Devon Canada Partnership Page 37
38 Devon Canada Corp. Page 38
39 Devon Canada Corp. Home Oil was amalgamated and continued as Devon Canada Corp. Minister reassessed Devon Canada Corp. to deny its claim for successor deductions in respect of the transferred resource properties Minister s position was that para. 66.7(10)(j) ceased to apply after the properties were transferred to a lower tier partnership Page 39
40 Devon Canada Corp. The successor rules contain elective rules that allow a corporation which acquires all or substantially all of the resource properties of a vendor to claim the unused resource expenditures of the vendor against production income or proceeds from the properties These rules are deemed to apply upon an acquisition of control Page 40
41 Devon Canada Corp. Successored resource expenditures are only deductible against income that can reasonably be regarded as attributable to production from the relevant properties In 1987, Parliament introduced deeming rules in para. 66.7(10)(j) to clarify that a corporation that was a member of a partnership that owned a Canadian resource property could deduct successored resource expenses against income from that property after an acquisition of control of the corporation Page 41
42 Devon Canada Corp. TCC HELD: Appeal allowed; successor deductions allowed Reframed question: whether a corporation can continue to deduct successored resource expenses against income from a resource property that has been transferred from a partnership of which it is a direct member to a subsidiary partnership following an acquisition of control. (para. 23) Page 42
43 Devon Canada Corp. Hogan J. rejected the Crown s argument that successored resource expenses expire if properties are transferred in a way that does not trigger the application of the successor rules Home Oil was deemed by subpara. 66.7(10)(j)(i) to have acquired its share of the properties owned by Anderson Partnership immediately before the acquisition of control; there was no subsequent event to terminate this status Page 43
44 Devon Canada Corp. Income earned through the subsidiary partnership can reasonably be regarded as being attributable to production from the resource properties Considered case law in s. 55(2) context on the meaning of reasonably be attributed fair and moderate allocation of the amount Considered CRA document regarding meaning of can reasonably be considered to relate if connection is easily discernable Page 44
45 Devon Canada Corp. At common law, partners own the property of a partnership s. 96(1) preserves source of partnership income in partners hands Tiered partnerships source and location of income preserved until allocated to corporate or individual partners see Fredette, [2001] 3 C.T.C s. 102(2) In this subdivision, a reference to a person or a taxpayer who is a member of a particular partnership shall include a reference to another partnership that is a member of the particular partnership. Home Oil ultimately pays tax on the income from these properties Page 45
46 Devon Canada Corp. Para. 66.7(10)(j) was introduced to ensure successor deductions would be available to corporate partners of partnerships that held resource properties at the time of an acquisition of control To deny the deduction in this circumstance would be contrary to that purpose Successored resource expenses then would be stranded; several other provisions are designed to prevent this from happening Page 46
47 Devon Canada Corp. Comments: Clearly the correct policy result Contrast to D&D Livestock (discussed below) Page 47
48 D & D Livestock Ltd TCC 318 Safe income of Parent was $1.5 million, made up of $976K of its own income and $517K of its Subsidiary s income Parent declared and paid a stock dividend ( First Dividend ) of $1.47 million which was reasonably attributable to safe income of Parent Parent rolled shares of Subsidiary to Newco Newco declared and paid a stock dividend to Parent ( Second Dividend ) of $517K (in several parts, under para. 55(5)(f)) Page 48
49 D & D Livestock Ltd. Page 49
50 D & D Livestock Ltd. Issue: Did Parent s payment of the First Dividend reduce the safe income of Subsidiary (and Newco), such that the Second Dividend was subject to s. 55(2)? The Minister reassessed under s. 55(2) The appellant admitted that there was a duplicate use of safe income in this case, but argued that the Act mandated that result Page 50
51 D & D Livestock Ltd. TCC HELD: Appeal allowed; Second Dividend was reasonably attributable to safe income of Newco Graham J. acknowledged that s. 55(2) is a specific anti-avoidance provision directed against capital gains stripping and that the appellant had engaged in capital gains stripping However, s. 55(2) should be interpreted based on its words; words are clear Capital gain was attributable to Newco s/subsidiary s income, not anything else GAAR was not argued Page 51
52 Swirsky 2013 TCC 73 / 2014 FCA 36 Husband and wife owned shares of a family corporation (Torgan) Corporation was a participant in a project that got into serious financial trouble; husband and other participant had provided personal guarantees on loans Husband transferred shares of corporation to his wife for creditorproofing reasons in 1991, 1993 and 1995 Wife borrowed from lender to fund each purchase; interest and carrying costs attributed back to husband to create a loss Husband used proceeds to repay shareholder loans; corporation used those funds to purchase a GIC, which it assigned to the lender Lender applied the interest from GIC against interest on loan Corporation guaranteed loan and actually paid residual interest; charged to husband s shareholder loan account (allegedly in error) Page 52
53 Swirsky Page 53
54 Swirsky Corporation did not have a history of paying dividends when shares were acquired by wife Family usually took money out of the corporation by way of shareholder loans and bonuses The corporation did not have a dividend policy A $2.5 million capital dividend was paid in 1999; a $1.6 million dividend was paid in 2003; dividends were also paid in 2004 and 2005 Page 54
55 Swirsky Minister reassessed to disallow husband s attributed losses from the deduction of interest and carrying charges on the basis that: Wife was not entitled to deduct interest and carrying charges because the loan proceeds were not used for an income-earning purpose s. 74.5(11) applied GAAR applied Page 55
56 Swirsky TCC HELD: Appeal dismissed; interest and carrying charges were not deductible There was no intention to acquire the shares for the purpose of earning dividend income income-earning potential was not even considered No history of paying dividends at time of share transfers; this continued for some time after the share transfers Share transfers were for creditor-proofing wife expected to return the shares after the corporation s financial difficulty passed (and later she did transfer the shares back) Wife did not have to pay interest or carrying charges herself, so she likely was not concerned with income-earning potential Page 56
57 Swirsky s. 74.5(11) does not apply (obiter) One of the main reasons for the transfers was not to reduce tax The main reasons were creditor-proofing and to pay off husband s shareholder loans GAAR does not apply (obiter) Tax benefit Crown has the onus because it first invoked GAAR at the confirmation stage No avoidance transaction purpose was for creditorproofing But otherwise transactions similar to Lipson, 2009 SCC 1 Page 57
58 Swirsky FCA affirmed TCC s decision: Interest and carrying charges were not deductible TCC looked at objective and subjective manifestations of purpose to determine whether wife acquired shares for an income-earning purpose Minister abandoned s. 74.5(11) argument at the FCA Dawson J.A. declined to comment on GAAR and specifically on Paris J. s comment with respect to onus in proving the alleged tax benefit Page 58
59 Swirsky Comments/recommendations: Potentially applicable in standard commercial situations Inconsistent with CRA policy? To minimize risk on interest deductibility, ensure that: dividends are paid on the shares acquired with loan proceeds there is a dividend policy consideration is given to whether income will be earned from the investment Page 59
60 Conclusions It is difficult to predict what the CRA will challenge and take to court Tax litigation is an uncertain process, particularly when dealing with broadly phrased anti-avoidance rules purpose tests reasonability standards arm s length comparisons comparisons to alternate arrangements misuse or abuse test in the GAAR These concepts are used throughout the Act; growing body of jurisprudence is providing some greater clarity and definition Page 60
Canada Tax Alert. FCA limits scope of foreign affiliate antiavoidance. Paragraph 95(6)(b) International Tax. 25 April 2014.
International Tax Canada Tax Alert Contacts Sandra Slaats sslaats@deloitte.ca 25 April 2014 FCA limits scope of foreign affiliate antiavoidance rule in Lehigh For many years, the Canada Revenue Agency
More informationThe Canadian Federal Court of Appeal (FCA) on
Canadian Appeal Court Narrows Foreign Affiliate Antiavoidance Rule in Lehigh by Nathan Boidman Nathan Boidman is with Davies Ward Phillips & Vineberg LLP in Montreal. The Canadian Federal Court of Appeal
More informationand HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN, Appeal heard on June 6, 2013, at Edmonton, Alberta. Before: The Honourable Justice David E. Graham
BETWEEN: D & D LIVESTOCK LTD., and HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN, Docket: 2011-137(IT)G Appellant, Respondent. Appeal heard on June 6, 2013, at Edmonton, Alberta. Appearances: Before: The Honourable Justice David
More informationTechnical News. No. 36 July 27, Income Tax. Paragraph 95(6)(b) Principal Purpose
Income Tax Technical News No. 36 July 27, 2007 This version is only available electronically. In This Issue Paragraph 95(6)(b) The Income Tax Technical News is produced by the Legislative Policy and Regulatory
More informationSHAREHOLDER LOANS PART II
SHAREHOLDER LOANS PART II This issue of the Legal Business Report provides current information on shareholder loans and case law developments relating to shareholder loans. Alpert Law Firm is experienced
More informationOverview. General Anti-Avoidance Rule. The Role of a General Anti-Avoidance Rule in Protecting the Tax Base of Developing Countries
The Role of a General Anti-Avoidance Rule in Protecting the Tax Base of Developing Countries Thursday, 9 November 2017 (Session 1) Capacity Building Unit Financing for Development Office Department of
More informationTax Alert Canada. TCC dismisses appeal on transfer pricing reassessment of 2003 factoring transactions. Facts
2014 Issue No. 1 7 January 2014 Tax Alert Canada TCC dismisses appeal on transfer pricing reassessment of 2003 factoring transactions EY Tax Alerts cover significant tax news, developments and changes
More informationONTARIO LIMITED. and. Heard at Ottawa, Ontario, on September 25, Judgment delivered at Ottawa, Ontario, on October 15, 2012.
Federal Court of Appeal Cour d'appel fédérale Date: 20121015 Docket: A-359-11 Citation: 2012 FCA 259 CORAM: NOËL J.A. SHARLOW J.A. MAINVILLE J.A. BETWEEN: 1207192 ONTARIO LIMITED and Appellant HER MAJESTY
More informationTax Alert Canada. FCA finds GAAR does not apply to post-acquisition PUC step-up planning: Univar Holdco Canada ULC v. The Queen, 2017 FCA 207
2017 Issue No. 47 19 October 2017 Tax Alert Canada FCA finds GAAR does not apply to post-acquisition PUC step-up planning: Univar Holdco Canada ULC v. The Queen, 2017 FCA 207 EY Tax Alerts cover significant
More informationUtilization of Tax Losses And Debt Restructuring. January 13, 2009 James A. Hutchinson
Utilization of Tax Losses And Debt Restructuring January 13, 2009 James A. Hutchinson Triggering Accrued Losses -- The Stop-loss Rules Triggering Accrued Losses - The Stop-loss Rules (Cont d) The Old Rules
More informationHot Topics in Tax Disputes
McCarthy Tétrault Advance Building Capabilities for Growth Tom Akin, Chia-yi Chua, Jeffrey Love and Ron Mar Roadmap Strategic Document Management Mitigating the Cost of a Tax Dispute GAAR Update: the 25th
More informationBuckwold and Kitunen, Canadian Income Taxation, Ed. 1. Tax planning and tax avoidance mean the same thing. Is this statement true? Explain.
Buckwold and Kitunen, Canadian Income Taxation, 2014-2015 Ed. CHAPTER 2 FUNDAMENTALS OF TAX PLANNING Review Questions 1. Tax planning and tax avoidance mean the same thing. Is this statement true? Explain.
More informationPART XVI TAX AVOIDANCE
Income Tax Act ( 1985, c. 1 (5th Supp.) ) Disclaimer: These documents are not the official versions (more). Act current to October 23rd, 2008 Attention: See coming into force provision and notes, where
More informationInternational Competitiveness in Asset Management
International Competitiveness in Asset Management Grace Pereira, Senior Counsel, Borden Ladner Gervais Sky Schapiro, Director, Taxation, Bank of Montreal GLOBALIZATION IN ASSET MANAGEMENT 2 KEY INDUSTRY
More informationTax Court Holds PUC Averaging Strategy to Be Abusive Tax Avoidance
Tax Court Holds PUC Averaging Strategy to Be Abusive Tax Avoidance October 19, 2017 John G. Lorito With Canada s general anti-avoidance rule (GAAR) celebrating its 30 th birthday next year, it is surprising
More informationRecent Developments in International Taxation: Canada
Recent Developments in International Taxation: Canada Stephanie A. Wong July 15, 2003 TABLE OF CONTENTS 1. Recent Legislative Developments...3 (a) (b) (a) Outbound Planning...3 (i) Proposed Amendments
More informationFundy Settlement v. Canada: FINAL DECISION ON THE PROPER RESIDENCY TEST FOR TRUSTS
Volume 22, No. 2 June 2012 Taxation Law Section Fundy Settlement v. Canada: FINAL DECISION ON THE PROPER RESIDENCY TEST FOR TRUSTS Jennifer Pocock* On April 12, 2012, the Supreme Court of Canada (SCC)
More informationCanadian Transfer Pricing Decision In Marzen: Points of Interest
Canadian Transfer Pricing Decision In Marzen: Points of Interest by Nathan Boidman Reprinted from Tax Notes Int l, February 15, 2016, p. 601 Volume 81, Number 7 February 15, 2016 Canadian Transfer Pricing
More informationAppeal heard on May 9 to 12, 2016, at Vancouver, British Columbia. Before: The Honourable Eugene P. Rossiter, Chief Justice
BETWEEN: Docket: 2013-4033(IT)G 594710 BRITISH COLUMBIA LTD., Appellant, and HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN, Respondent. Appeal heard on May 9 to 12, 2016, at Vancouver, British Columbia Appearances: Before: The
More informationCommittee of Experts on International Cooperation in Tax Matters Fourteenth session
Distr.: General * March 2017 Original: English Committee of Experts on International Cooperation in Tax Matters Fourteenth session New York, 3-6 April 2017 Agenda item 3(a)(ii) BEPS: Proposed General Anti-avoidance
More informationFINANCING ISSUES. Evelyn (Evy) Moskowitz
FINANCING ISSUES FINANCING OF NON-RESIDENTS AND SECTION 17 Evelyn (Evy) Moskowitz Moskowitz & Meredith LLP, an affiliate of KPMG LLP May 29, 2011 June 3, 2011 2 FINANCING OF NON-RESIDENTS AND SECTION 17
More informationTax Planning During an Economic Slowdown
During an Economic Slowdown Andrew Bateman, Felesky Flynn LLP, Felesky Flynn LLP Calgary, AB Introduction A slowing economy may give rise to a changing set of business circumstances, which may involve:
More informationTAX EXECUTIVES INSTITUTE, INC. PENDING CANADIAN INCOME TAX ISSUES. Submitted to THE DEPARTMENT OF FINANCE NOVEMBER 18, 2015
TAX EXECUTIVES INSTITUTE, INC. on PENDING CANADIAN INCOME TAX ISSUES Submitted to THE DEPARTMENT OF FINANCE NOVEMBER 18, 2015 Tax Executives Institute welcomes the opportunity to present the following
More informationTax Executives Institute (Calgary) May 30, 2017 Julie D Avignon
Transfer Pricing Update Imputing Transactions & the Appropriateness of Guarantee Fees Tax Executives Institute (Calgary) May 30, 2017 Julie D Avignon 707917 MAY 30, 2017 Today s Topics Appeals from Transfer
More informationGeneral Comments. Action 6 on Treaty Abuse reads as follows:
OECD Centre on Tax Policy and Administration Tax Treaties Transfer Pricing and Financial Transactions Division 2, rue André Pascal 75775 Paris France The Confederation of Swedish Enterprise: Comments on
More informationAppeal heard on June 8, 2015, at Toronto, Ontario. Before: The Honourable Justice Valerie Miller. Michael Colborne. Tamara Watters JUDGMENT
BETWEEN: Docket: 2013-2834(IT)G UNIVAR HOLDCO CANADA ULC, Appellant, and HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN, Respondent. Appearances: Appeal heard on June 8, 2015, at Toronto, Ontario Before: The Honourable Justice
More informationContents. INCOME TAX ACT Interest Deductibility and Related Issues
NO.: IT-533 DATE: October 31, 2003 SUBJECT: REFERENCE: INCOME TAX ACT Interest Deductibility and Related Issues Paragraph 20(1)(c) (also sections 9, 16, 20.1, 67.1 and 67.5, subsections 16(1), 20(2), 20(2.2),
More informationBuckwold and Kitunen, Canadian Income Taxation, Ed. 2. What distinguishes tax evasion from tax avoidance and tax planning?
Buckwold and Kitunen, Canadian Income Taxation, 2016-2017 Ed. CHAPTER 2 FUNDAMENTALS OF TAX PLANNING Review Questions 1. Tax planning and tax avoidance mean the same thing. Is this statement true? Explain.
More informationSubsection 55(2) is an anti-avoidance rule intended to prevent the inappropriate reduction of a capital gain by way of the payment of a deductible
1 2 Subsection 55(2) is an anti-avoidance rule intended to prevent the inappropriate reduction of a capital gain by way of the payment of a deductible intercorporate dividend. This provision generally
More informationTAXPAYERS, PUT UP YOUR DUKE(S) : SCC SPEAKS ON GAAR
OCTOBER 20, 2005 TAXPAYERS, PUT UP YOUR DUKE(S) : SCC SPEAKS ON GAAR On October 19, 2005, the Supreme Court of Canada ( SCC ) released two muchanticipated decisions considering the general anti-avoidance
More informationCOPTHORNE: SUPREME COURT OF CANADA S LATEST VIEWS ON STATUTORY INTERPRETATION AND GAAR 1
Volume 22, No. 2 June 2012 Taxation Law Section COPTHORNE: SUPREME COURT OF CANADA S LATEST VIEWS ON STATUTORY INTERPRETATION AND GAAR 1 Ed Kroft and Deborah Toaze* Overview On December 16, 2011, the Supreme
More informationSeptember 2014 TEN COMMON TAX MISTAKES THE TAX COST OF LEAVING (OR LOSING) YOUR JOB WHEN CAN THE CRA NO LONGER REASSESS YOU?
TAX LETTER September 2014 TEN COMMON TAX MISTAKES THE TAX COST OF LEAVING (OR LOSING) YOUR JOB WHEN CAN THE CRA NO LONGER REASSESS YOU? AROUND THE COURTS TEN COMMON TAX MISTAKES What are the most common
More informationThe relevant statutory regime
2017 Issue No. 24 05 June 2017 Tax Alert Canada FCA affirms release of trapped limited partnership losses in multi-tiered partnerships EY Tax Alerts cover significant tax news, developments and changes
More informationTHE GAAR. Ed Kroft Q.C. Ian MacGregor, Q.C. Wayne Adams Ed Harris Q.C. Tax Law for Lawyers Niagara-on-the-Lake June 2, 2010
THE GAAR Ed Kroft Q.C. Ian MacGregor, Q.C. Wayne Adams Ed Harris Q.C. Tax Law for Lawyers Niagara-on-the-Lake June 2, 2010 Introduction Over 20 years since GAAR was announced (June 1987 Tax Reform) and
More informationNON-ARM S LENGTH TRANSFERS OF PROPERTY
TABLE OF CONTENTS Dedication... Preface... Table of Cases... Table of Statutory References... iii v xiii xxxiii 1 INTRODUCTION... 1 1.1 General... 1 1.2 Arrangements... 2 2 NON-ARM S LENGTH TRANSFERS OF
More informationCRA OBJECTIONS AND APPEALS
CRA OBJECTIONS AND APPEALS Brought to you by: Preview: CRA Investigative Powers CRA Objections and Appeals CRA Collection Powers Substantive Discussions: Payment Plans Separation in Tax vs. Separation
More informationTAX NEWSLETTER. July 2018
TAX NEWSLETTER July 2018 INTEREST EXPENSE AND DISAPPEARING SOURCE RULE INTEREST EXPENSE AND DIRECT USE RULE TRANSFERS BETWEEN RELATED PERSONS TAX-FREE TRANSFERS TO YOUR CORPORATION AROUND THE COURTS INTEREST
More informationToronto Young Practitioners Group
Family Transactions Biggest issue for young practitioners is communication explaining difficult concepts in meaningful terms. 3 Robin MacKnight Family Transactions Biggest issues in estate planning: Expectations
More informationWhat You Need to Know About Successful Allowable Business Investment Loss (ABIL) Claims
What You Need to Know About Successful Allowable Business Investment Loss (ABIL) Claims Find Out if You Qualify for a Refund Includes: Qualifying for an ABIL Eight Common Situations That Can Trigger a
More informationIN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF NEW ZEALAND CA253/04
IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF NEW ZEALAND CA253/04 BETWEEN AND JEFFREY GEORGE LOPAS AND LORRAINE ELIZABETH MCHERRON Appellants THE COMMISSIONER OF INLAND REVENUE Respondent Hearing: 16 November 2005 Court:
More informationJustice Bowman s Decisions on the Deductibility of Interest
canadian tax journal / revue fiscale canadienne (2010) vol. 58 (supp.) 211-23 Justice Bowman s Decisions on the Deductibility of Interest Howard J. Kellough* KEYWORDS: INTEREST DEDUCTIBILITY n CASES n
More informationThe Joint Committee on Taxation of The Canadian Bar Association and Chartered Professional Accountants of Canada
The Joint Committee on Taxation of The Canadian Bar Association and Chartered Professional Accountants of Canada Chartered Professional Accountants of Canada, 277 Wellington St. W., Toronto Ontario, M5V3H2
More informationThe Irish GAAR 2015 Tax Nerd Version
The Irish GAAR 2015 Tax Nerd Version To the world we re a tax haven. In fact we have quite onerous anti-avoidance legislation most notably our GAAR, but we ve traditionally eschewed talking about anti
More informationThe Foreign Affiliate System. Robert Raizenne June 2, 2011
The Foreign Affiliate System Robert Raizenne June 2, 2011 3453191 The Legislative Scheme Subdivision (i) of Division B of Part I Section 90 Dividend received inclusion Sections 91 and 92 FAPI rules Section
More informationProfessional Level Options Module, Paper P6 (ZAF)
Answers Professional Level Options Module, Paper P6 (ZAF) Advanced Taxation (South Africa) December 2016 Answers Note: ACCA does not require candidates to quote section numbers or other statutory or case
More informationManaging the Sales of Canadian Businesses A Vendor s Perspective
, Borden Ladner Gervais LLP, Toronto, CPA, CA, TEP, Cadesky Tax, Toronto 67 th Annual Tax Conference 67e Conférence fiscale annuelle 2015 Our Current Tax and Business Environment Low corporate tax rates
More informationPENALTIES FOR FALSE STATEMENTS OR OMISSIONS PART II A. RECENT DEVELOPMENTS IN THE AREA OF PENALTIES
PENALTIES FOR FALSE STATEMENTS OR OMISSIONS PART II This issue of the Legal Business Report provides current information to the clients of Alpert Law Firm on penalties under the Income Tax Act (Canada)
More informationand HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN, Appeal heard on October 23, 2013, at Halifax, Nova Scotia By: The Honourable Justice Campbell J.
BETWEEN: WARD CARSON, and HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN, Docket: 2011-1382(IT)I Appellant, Respondent. Appeal heard on October 23, 2013, at Halifax, Nova Scotia Appearances: By: The Honourable Justice Campbell
More informationCanada Releases Foreign Affiliate Dumping Amendments
Volume 71, Number 10 September 2, 2013 Canada Releases Foreign Affiliate Dumping Amendments by Steve Suarez Reprinted from Tax Notes Int l, September 2, 2013, p. 864 Reprinted from Tax Notes Int l, September
More informationSELECTED TAX ISSUES AND TRAPS ASSOCIATED WITH ESTATE FREEZES
February 2013 Number 601 Discretionary Dividend Shares... 2 SELECTED TAX ISSUES AND TRAPS ASSOCIATED WITH ESTATE FREEZES Michael Goldberg, Minden Gross LLP There are many potential issues and traps that
More informationExplanatory Notes Relating to the Income Tax Act and Regulations. Published by The Honourable James M. Flaherty, P.C., M.P. Minister of Finance
Explanatory Notes Relating to the Income Tax Act and Regulations Published by The Honourable James M. Flaherty, P.C., M.P. Minister of Finance August 2012 Her Majesty the Queen in Right of Canada (2012)
More informationTHE PURPOSE OF SUBSECTION 55(2)
THE PURPOSE OF SUBSECTION 55(2) Eoin Brady, CPA, CA PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP Toronto Gwendolyn Watson PwC Law LLP Toronto 2015 Ontario Tax Conference The Purpose of Subsection 55(2) Eoin Brady, PricewaterhouseCoopers
More informationRestrictive Covenants
Restrictive Covenants Fondation canadienne de fiscalité 2015 Philippe Dunlavey, Ernst & Young Erica Lawee, Ernst & Young Agenda Introduction Overview of the relevant provisions of the Income Tax Act (the
More informationCURRENT ISSUES A SELECTION OF LEGISLATIVE AND ADMINISTRATIVE DEVELOPMENTS OF INTEREST TO THE OWNER-MANAGER
CURRENT ISSUES A SELECTION OF LEGISLATIVE AND ADMINISTRATIVE DEVELOPMENTS OF INTEREST TO THE OWNER-MANAGER Joan E. Jung Minden Gross LLP jjung@mindengross.com (416) 369-4306 INTRODUCTION... 2 LEGISLATIVE
More informationDemystifying 55(2) and Butterfly Reorganizations. Mark Brender Osler, Hoskin & Harcourt LLP
Demystifying 55(2) and Butterfly Reorganizations Osler, Hoskin & Harcourt LLP Demystifying 55(2) & Butterfly Reorganizations Objectives: Review the basics of 55(2) Review the basics of 55(3)(a) and 55(3)(b)
More informationHARPER S FIRST MAJORITY GOVERNMENT BUDGET TAX CHANGES INCLUDE TARGETED MEASURES TO CLOSE PERCEIVED LOOPHOLES
HARPER S FIRST MAJORITY GOVERNMENT BUDGET TAX CHANGES INCLUDE TARGETED MEASURES TO CLOSE PERCEIVED LOOPHOLES Taxnet Pro March 2012 Prepared by the McCarthy Tétrault Tax Group and published by Carswell,
More informationThe General Anti-Avoidance Rule
The General Anti-Avoidance Rule Ed Kroft Q.C. Ian MacGregor, Q.C. Deen Olsen Ed Harris Q.C. Tax Law for Lawyers June 1, 2011 Introduction Almost 24 years since GAAR was announced (June 1987 Tax Reform)
More informationPolicy Forum: Who, What, Where, When, Why, and How Discerning an Avoidance Transaction
canadian tax journal / revue fiscale canadienne (2009) vol. 57, n o 2, 294-306 Policy Forum: Who, What, Where, When, Why, and How Discerning an Avoidance Transaction Angelo Nikolakakis* A b s t r a c t
More informationTax Letter YOU CAN BE LIABLE FOR A FAMILY MEMBER S TAX DEBTS! Example
Julie Bureau CPA, CA, partner Tax Letter Monthly Newsletter September 2016 YOU CAN BE LIABLE FOR A FAMILY MEMBER S TAX DEBTS! Beware of getting money, gifts or transfers of property from a family member,
More informationDealing with Debt & Interest. Course Description
Dealing with Debt & Interest Course Description This course brings the practitioner up-to-date information on tax issues affecting interest and debt. It covers the definition of bona fide debt, the avoidance
More informationRecent Developments in Corporate Taxation. Greg Bell, KPMG Chris Jerome, EY 7 June Ottawa
Recent Developments in Corporate Taxation Greg Bell, KPMG Chris Jerome, EY 7 June 2017 - Ottawa 2017 Agenda Budget overview Business income tax measures Personal income tax measures 2016 CTF Annual Conference
More informationCanada: Limitation on the Elimination of Double Taxation Under the Canada-Brazil Income Tax Treaty
The Peter A. Allard School of Law Allard Research Commons Faculty Publications Faculty Publications 2017 Canada: Limitation on the Elimination of Double Taxation Under the Canada-Brazil Income Tax Treaty
More informationGeneral Anti-Avoidance Rules (GAAR) Kuntal Sen Friday, 28 February 2014
General Anti-Avoidance Rules (GAAR) Kuntal Sen Friday, 28 February 2014 Content Scheme and Architecture of GAAR Illustrations on GAAR by the Expert Committee International Perspective of GAAR GAAR Approaches
More informationFinance Comfort Letter on the 95(2)(f) and (f.1) FAPI Accrual Rules A Comment on its Implications for the Tax Cost Bump. by Geoffrey S.
Finance Comfort Letter on the 95(2)(f) and (f.1) FAPI Accrual Rules A Comment on its Implications for the Tax Cost Bump by Geoffrey S. Turner Davies Ward Phillips & Vineberg LLP Citation: Geoffrey S. Turner,
More informationALTER EGO TRUSTS AND JOINT PARTNER TRUSTS
ALTER EGO TRUSTS AND JOINT PARTNER TRUSTS This issue of the Legal Business Report provides current information to the clients of Alpert Law Firm on estate planning, including alter ego and joint partner
More informationBEPS strengthening our interest limitation rules
BEPS documents release - August 2017: #15 In Confidence Office of the Minister of Finance Office of the Minister of Revenue Cabinet Economic Growth and Infrastructure Committee BEPS strengthening our interest
More informationInsights and Commentary from Dentons
dentons.com Insights and Commentary from Dentons On March 31, 2013, three pre-eminent law firms Salans, Fraser Milner Casgrain, and SNR Denton combined to form Dentons, a Top 10 global law firm with more
More informationPROPOSED GENERAL ANTI-AVOIDANCE RULE COMMENTARY FOR A NEW ARTICLE
Distr.: General 30 November 2016 Original: English Committee of Experts on International Cooperation in Tax Matters Thirteenth Session New York, 5-8 December 2016 Item 3 (a) (iii) of the provisional agenda*
More informationJP MORGAN A ROAD MAP LEADING IN THE WRONG DIRECTION?
January 16, 2014 Number 2184 JP MORGAN A ROAD MAP LEADING IN THE WRONG DIRECTION? Joel Nitikman, Partner in the Tax Department of the Vancouver office of Dentons Canada LLP It s important not to lie to
More informationTaxing securities lending transactions: substance over form
Taxing securities lending transactions: substance over form A government discussion document Hon Dr Michael Cullen Minister of Finance Minister of Revenue First published in November 2004 by the Policy
More informationRecent Developments in Corporate Taxation Post-Mortem Tax Planning A Case Study
Recent Developments in Corporate Taxation Post-Mortem Tax Planning A Case Study 2017 Pamela Cross, Borden Ladner Gervais, LLP David Mason, Deloitte June 7, 2017, OTTAWA Agenda - Post Mortem Planning 1.
More informationSECTION 86 ROLLOVERS, AMALGAMATIONS, SECTION 88 WIND-UPS
SECTION 86 ROLLOVERS, AMALGAMATIONS, SECTION 88 WIND-UPS This issue of the Legal Business Report provides current information to the clients of Alpert Law Firm on various types of corporate reorganisations.
More informationTargeting the Wealthy - Good Tax Policy or Good Politics?
Targeting the Wealthy - Sarah Chiu, Felesky Flynn LLP, Calgary 67 th Annual Tax Conference 67e Conférence fiscale annuelle 2015 Targeting the Wealthy Wealthy taxpayers should pay their fair share of taxes!
More informationTax Alert Canada. TCC rejects mark-to-market accounting for option contracts. The decision
2015 Issue No. 42 24 June 2015 Tax Alert Canada TCC rejects mark-to-market accounting for option contracts EY Tax Alerts cover significant tax news, developments and changes in legislation that affect
More informationSOCIAL SECURITY TRIBUNAL DECISION Appeal Division
Citation: G. S. v. Minister of Employment and Social Development, 2018 SST 554 Tribunal File Number: AD-17-924 BETWEEN: G. S. Appellant and Minister of Employment and Social Development Respondent SOCIAL
More informationCalgary Young Practitioners Group
November 20, 2013 Introduction Partnerships have been a very popular choice for carrying on business in Canada, particularly in the oil and gas industry Over the last few years, there has been a legislative
More informationTax Brief. 15 May In-house Finance Companies. 1. Background
Tax Brief 15 May 2009 In-house Finance Companies It is no secret that the Australian Taxation Office ( ATO ) has been concerned for some time about the tax issues arising from in-house finance companies
More information2011 Canadian Federal Budget - How will it affect the Canadian charitable sector?
www.globalphilanthropy.ca 2011 Canadian Federal Budget - How will it affect the Canadian charitable sector? By Mark Blumberg 1 (March 22, 2011) There is about 20 pages of material in the budget dealing
More informationIn the World Trade Organization
In the World Trade Organization CHINA MEASURES RELATED TO THE EXPORTATION OF RARE EARTHS, TUNGSTEN AND MOLYBDENUM (DS432) on China's comments to the European Union's reply to China's request for a preliminary
More informationNew Proposed Section 385 Regulations
New Proposed Section 385 Regulations Idan Netser, Partner Anil Kalia, Partner TEI Regions IX & X Annual Conference Portland, Oregon, May 22-25, 2016 Agenda I. Introduction II. III. A. Section 385 B. Scope
More informationUsing Tax Losses Within a Canadian Group of Companies
Volume 66, Number April, 0 Using Tax Losses Within a Canadian Group of Companies by Steve Suarez Reprinted from Tax Notes Int l, April, 0, p. 59 Using Tax Losses Within a Canadian Group of Companies by
More informationCanada s federal budget affects back-to-back arrangements
Canada s 2016-17 federal budget affects back-to-back arrangements On 22 March 2016, Canada s Minister of Finance introduced the first budget of the new Liberal government. The budget contains limited measures
More informationEmigration from Canada: Tax Implications
Emigration from Canada: Tax Implications Introduction Liability for tax under the Canadian income tax system is based on residency. Neither the concept of residency, nor the notion of termination of Canadian
More informationDrafting Enforceable Termination Clauses
Drafting Enforceable Termination Clauses Outline of Presentation The importance of written employment contracts Implementing written employment contracts Modifying written employment contracts for existing
More informationWHAT IS AN AVOIDANCE TRANSACTION? THE FEDERAL COURT OF APPEAL FINDS FOR THE TAXPAYER IN SPRUCE CREDIT UNION
June 19, 2014 Number 2206 Tax Court of Canada... 2 Federal Court of Appeal... 2 Standing Committee on Finance Announces Pre-Budget Consultation Process... 3 WHAT IS AN AVOIDANCE TRANSACTION? THE FEDERAL
More informationT a x. O w n e r - M a n a g e r. f o r t h e. Aborted Purchase: Vendor s Tax Issues 1
f o r t h e Editor: Thomas E. McDonnell, QC Volume 8, Number 3, July 2008 Aborted Purchase: Vendor s Tax Issues Dubois (2007 TCC 461) deals with the deductibility of expenses incurred by the taxpayer in
More informationTAX UPDATE. By Marc G. Darmo and Gwendolyn G. Watson. The Advisory Panel on Canada s System of International Taxation released its Final Report:
March 2009 TAX UPDATE A report on cross-border developments in Canadian tax law Final Report of the Advisory Panel on Canada s System of International Taxation By Marc G. Darmo and Gwendolyn G. Watson
More informationModule Partnerships. Learning Objectives. 7-1A: Definition of a partnership
Module 7 Partnerships Learning Objectives Definition of a partnership Computation of income Computation of ACB of partnership interest Transfer of property to the partnership and admission of a new partner
More informationInsights and Commentary from Dentons
dentons.com Insights and Commentary from Dentons On March 31, 2013, three pre-eminent law firms Salans, Fraser Milner Casgrain, and SNR Denton combined to form Dentons, a Top 10 global law firm with more
More informationHighland Foundry Ltd. v. R. Highland Foundry Ltd. v. Her Majesty The Queen. Tax Court of Canada. McArthur J.T.C.C. Judgment: August 15, 1994
Highland Foundry Ltd. v. R. Highland Foundry Ltd. v. Her Majesty The Queen Tax Court of Canada McArthur J.T.C.C. Judgment: August 15, 1994 Year: 1994 Docket: Court File No. 92-264 Counsel: T.C. Armstrong
More informationTAX LETTER. February 2019
TAX LETTER February 2019 DEBT FORGIVENESS RULES TAXATION OF TRUSTS AND BENEFICIARIES RRSP vs. TFSA WHERE TO CONTRIBUTE? PRESCRIBED AUTOMOBILE RATES FOR 2019 AROUND THE COURTS DEBT FORGIVENESS RULES If
More informationMINISTER OF NATIONAL REVENUE. and ROBERT MCNALLY. Dealt with in writing without appearance of parties.
CORAM: NEAR J.A. DE MONTIGNY J.A. Date: 20151106 Docket: A-358-15 Citation: 2015 FCA 248 BETWEEN: MINISTER OF NATIONAL REVENUE and Appellant ROBERT MCNALLY Respondent Dealt with in writing without appearance
More informationINCORPORATING YOUR FARM BUSINESS
INCORPORATING YOUR FARM BUSINESS If you carry on a farm business, and have significant income, transferring the farm business to a corporation may provide some benefits as there are tax planning opportunities
More informationIN THE MATTER OF the Toronto Stock Exchange Act, R.S.O. 1990, c. T.15, as amended, and Part XVII of the General By-law of The Toronto Stock Exchange
Decision June 12, 2003 2003-002 IN THE MATTER OF the Toronto Stock Exchange Act, R.S.O. 1990, c. T.15, as amended, and Part XVII of the General By-law of The Toronto Stock Exchange AND IN THE MATTER OF
More informationIN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT. No D.C. Docket No. 2:17-cv RLR. versus
Case: 18-11098 Date Filed: 04/09/2019 Page: 1 of 14 [DO NOT PUBLISH] IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT No. 18-11098 D.C. Docket No. 2:17-cv-14222-RLR MICHELINA IAFFALDANO,
More information2016-CFPB-0005 Document 1 Filed 02/23/2016 Page 1 of 19 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA CONSUMER FINANCIAL PROTECI'ION BUREAU
2016-CFPB-0005 Document 1 Filed 02/23/2016 Page 1 of 19 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA CONSUMER FINANCIAL PROTECI'ION BUREAU ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEEDING File No. 2016-CFPB- In the Matter of: CONSENT ORDER SOLOMON
More informationThe Capital Dividend Account. January 2017 Jean Turcotte, B.B.A., LL.B., D.Fisc, Fin.Pl., TEP Director, Tax, Wealth and Insurance Planning Group
The Capital Dividend Account January 2017 Jean Turcotte, B.B.A., LL.B., D.Fisc, Fin.Pl., TEP Director, Tax, Wealth and Insurance Planning Group Capital Dividend Account Why the Capital Dividend Account
More informationAdverse Canada-U.S. Tax Treaty Hybrid Entity Rules Coming into Effect January 1, 2010
Update page 1 Adverse Canada-U.S. Tax Treaty Hybrid Entity Rules Coming into Effect January 1, 2010 New rules in the Canada-United States Income Tax Convention (Treaty) will deny treaty benefits for many
More informationNON-COMPETITION AGREEMENTS: THE NEW RESTRICTIVE COVENANT RULES
NON-COMPETITION AGREEMENTS: THE NEW RESTRICTIVE COVENANT RULES This issue of the Legal Business Report provides current information to the clients of Alpert Law Firm on important tax changes regarding
More informationUnofficial consolidation for financial years beginning on or after January 1, 2011
This is an unofficial consolidation of National Policy 41-201 Income Trusts and other Indirect Offerings reflecting amendments made effective January 1, 2011 in connection with Canada s changeover to IFRS.
More information