Tax Court Holds PUC Averaging Strategy to Be Abusive Tax Avoidance
|
|
- Colin Bryan
- 5 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 Tax Court Holds PUC Averaging Strategy to Be Abusive Tax Avoidance October 19, 2017 John G. Lorito With Canada s general anti-avoidance rule (GAAR) celebrating its 30 th birthday next year, it is surprising that certain basic aspects of the rule remain unsettled. The Supreme Court of Canada s 2005 decision in Canada Trustco clarified the general framework for determining when the GAAR applies. However, there is still considerable uncertainty about the individual components of the three-part analysis that the court developed in that case, with the result that it can still be quite difficult to predict the outcome of GAAR cases. Part of the problem the manner in which taxpayers have chosen to argue GAAR cases is well illustrated in the recent decision of the Tax Court in the case of Perry Wild v. Her Majesty the Queen.[1] In part because the taxpayer did not contest certain points, the court ended up making a ruling that arguably further muddies the waters on two key elements of the Canada Trustco analysis: whether the transaction conferred a tax benefit and (if so) whether it was an avoidance transaction. The Facts: A Butterfly Transaction With A Twist The facts were fairly straightforward, involving a clever twist on a standard butterfly transaction. Perry Wild (PW), an individual resident in Canada, owned all of the shares of P.W. Rentals Ltd. (PWR), a Canadian corporation. In an effort to protect the assets of the corporation, PW decided to have PWR transfer assets to two new corporations (the transferee corporations ) pursuant to a double-wing butterfly. In this reorganization, PW would transfer a portion of his shares of PWR to one of the transferee corporations for shares of the transferee corporation. PWR would then transfer a portion of its assets to that transferee corporation for shares of the transferee corporation. As a result of these transfers, PWR would own shares of the transferee corporation and the transferee corporation would own shares of PWR. The cross shareholdings would have equal values and would be redeemed in exchange for notes which would then be set-off one against the other. The same steps would be taken to transfer assets from PWR to the other transferee corporation. In a typical butterfly reorganization, on the first transfer, in this case the transfer of the shares of PWR by PW to the first transferee corporation, the transferor receives common shares of the transferee corporation. On the second transfer, in this case the transfer of the assets by PWR to the transferee corporation, the transferee corporation issues fixed value preferred shares having a value equal to the net value of the assets transferred. The clever twist employed by PW was to have the transferee corporations issue the same class of shares on the first and the second transfers. On the first transfer, the paid-up capital (PUC) of the shares issued by the transferee corporation would be limited, pursuant to subsection 84.1(1), to the PUC of the shares of PWR that were transferred. This was a nominal amount. However, on the second transfer, subsection Stikeman Elliott LLP
2 85(2.1) would apply to limit the PUC of the shares of the transferee corporation issued on this transfer to the cost of the assets transferred which was a much higher number. Because the same class of shares was issued on each transfer, the higher PUC of the second tranche of shares issued on the second transfer was averaged with the PUC of the first tranche of shares issued on the first transfer. The result was that the PUC of the shares of the transferee corporations held by PW was higher than the PUC of the shares of PWR that were transferred to the transferee corporations a result that section 84.1 is designed to avoid. In addition, because PW claimed the lifetime capital gains exemption on the transfer of the shares of PWR to the transferee corporations, the adjusted cost base of the shares of the transferee corporations held by PW was at least equal to the PUC of the shares. As a result, PW would be able to extract cash or other property from the transferee corporations having a value equal to the PUC of the shares without realizing either a deemed dividend or a capital gain. There was, however, no evidence that PW had extracted in this manner any amounts from either of the transferee corporations. The Assessment: There was a Misuse or Abuse The Canada Revenue Agency (CRA) assessed the transactions under GAAR alleging that the transactions resulted in a misuse or abuse of section Because no actual amounts had been extracted from the transferee corporations, the CRA used determinations to reduce the PUC of the shares of the transferee corporations to a nominal amount.[2] The taxpayer conceded that the series of transactions included avoidance transactions and resulted in a tax benefit. The only issue for the Tax Court was therefore whether the transactions resulted in a misuse or abuse. The Court cited the decision of Mr. Justice Hogan in Descarries, in which it was stated that the object, spirit or purpose of section 84.1 of the Act is to prevent taxpayers from performing transactions whose goal is to strip a corporation of its surpluses tax-free through the use of a tax-exempt margin or a capital gain exemption. The Court held that the transactions undertaken by PW frustrated the object, spirit or purpose of section Its reasons are summarized in the following passage: The avoidance transactions achieved an outcome, and in the context of the series of which those were part, that section 84.1 was intended to prevent (individual shareholders in a non-arm s length share for share exchange convert corporate distributions, that would otherwise be taxed as dividends, into exempt returns of capital by utilizing the capital gains exemption) and defeated its underlying rationale and the underlying rationale of subsection 89(1) by misusing the PUC calculation that triggered the share averaging effect. Our Analysis: Was Canada Trustco Correctly Applied? Based on the framework established in Canada Trustco, the first step in applying the GAAR is to determine whether there is a tax benefit arising from a transaction or series of transactions of which the transaction is part. The second requirement for application of the GAAR is that the transaction giving rise to the tax benefit be an avoidance transaction. While there was little analysis with respect to these first two aspects of the GAAR test given the taxpayer s concessions, it is interesting to consider these aspects of the case in light of statements made in prior cases. The tax benefit issue The Court defined the tax benefit to be the increase in the PUC of the shares of the transferee corporations. Tax benefit is defined in subsection 245(1) as a reduction, avoidance or deferral of tax or other amount payable under the Act or an increase in a refund of tax or other amount under the Act. It is well settled that the reference to tax or other amount under this Act is the object of the preposition of that precedes it so the benefit includes an increase in a refund of tax or an increase in the refund of some other amount under the Act, such as interest. A tax benefit does not include an increase in any amount under the Act so it would not include an increase in the PUC of shares. Stikeman Elliott LLP 2
3 This interpretation of tax benefit was confirmed by the Supreme Court of Canada in Copthorne in the following passage: In the agreed statement of facts, the parties agreed that the sale of VHHC Holdings to Big City, and the subsequent amalgamation of VHHC Holdings with Copthorne I to form Copthorne II were part of a series of transactions. However, these transactions themselves did not result in a tax benefit. The tax benefit was only realized when Copthorne III redeemed its shares without its shareholder incurring an immediate tax liability. In Copthorne, the sale of VHHC Holdings to Big City and subsequent amalgamation of VHHC Holdings with Copthorne I increased the PUC of the amalgamated entity but that increase was not the tax benefit. As the Court noted, the benefit did not arise until shares were redeemed thus utilizing the PUC so created to avoid withholding tax on the deemed dividend. As noted, in the Wild case, there is no evidence that the PUC created on the butterfly was ever used. Therefore, the transactions in issue did not result in a tax benefit. If and when the PUC is returned, it would be a question of fact whether the return of capital was part of the series that included the butterfly reorganization. The entire discussion of the meaning of series in Copthorne would have been irrelevant if the increase in PUC on the amalgamation was itself a tax benefit.[3] The avoidance transaction issue A similar issue arises with respect to the test for avoidance transaction. The agreed statement of facts identified the avoidance transactions as the first and second transfers to each of the transferee corporations, on which transfers the transferee corporation issued the same class of shares to the transferor. Based on prior case law, it is difficult to see how these transactions could be considered avoidance transactions. Both parties agreed that the purpose of the series of transactions was to protect the assets of the corporation. Each one of the transactions undertaken was required to effect that purpose on a tax-deferred basis. There was no suggestion that being able to split the assets on a tax-deferred basis resulted in an abusive tax benefit. The misuse or abuse related only to the increase in the PUC of the shares of the transferee corporations. While it is clear from MacKay that an overall non-tax purpose for a series of transactions does not save every transaction in the series, it is also clear from Canadian Pacific that it is necessary to identify at least one transaction that leads to the impugned tax benefit and that was not undertaken for bona fide purposes other than to obtain that tax benefit. In identifying such a transaction, it is not open to the Crown to artificially split off various aspects of the transaction in order to create an avoidance transaction. The Court referred to the following paragraph in the agreed statement of facts as an avoidance transaction: 18. Because Perry Wild caused 1245 [the first transferee corporation] to issue Class E preferred shares to himself and to PWR, the PUC of Perry Wild s 1,989 Class E preferred shares of 1245 was increased to $467, and the PUC of the 1, Class E preferred shares of 1245 received by PWR was reduced to a like amount as a result of subsection 89(1). This statement appears to be simply an explanation of a particular tax result arising from the transactions and not a transaction in and of itself. If the suggestion is that the choice to have the transferee corporations issue the same class of shares on the first and second transfers is an avoidance transaction, surely that contradicts the Federal Court of Appeal s findings in Canadian Pacific. In that case, the taxpayer obtained a tax benefit by borrowing in Australian dollars rather than Canadian dollars. As there was a bona fide non-tax purpose for the borrowing, the Crown attempted to classify the designation of the currency of the borrowing as a transaction. The Federal Court of Appeal noted that: Stikeman Elliott LLP 3
4 In the present case, the Australian dollar borrowing was one complete transaction and cannot be separated into two transactions by labelling the designation in Australian dollars as a separate transaction. Similarly, the first and second transfers were each complete transactions that cannot be separated into two transactions by treating the choice to issue the same class of shares as a separate transaction from the actual issuance of the shares. As noted above, the misuse analysis focused primarily on section 84.1 and the choice to have the transferee corporation issue the same class of shares on the first and second transfers. As the Court notes: The strategy directed by Mr. Wild, facilitated by indifferent non-arm s length parties (two of which were newly-created companies), resulted in a five thousand-fold increase in his PUC even though no new capital had been contributed by him to PWR nor 1245 [a transferee corporation]. The judgement contains excerpts from PW s examination for discovery in which he was questioned about the choice to use the same class of shares. While his answer was simply that this is what he was instructed to do by his advisors, could he not just as well have responded by asking why he would be required to take a separate class? From the comments made by the Court to the above question, the answer to this would appear to be that arm s length parties would have insisted on separate classes of shares. That answer appears too simplistic. Arm s length parties do not always negotiate for tax attributes that are not required or that cannot be used. In certain circumstances, an arm s length purchaser may take steps to acquire a separate class of shares to avoid PUC averaging but a Canadian resident corporate purchaser acquiring in excess of 10 per cent of the shares of another corporation may very well be indifferent. Arm s length non-residents that cannot benefit from a capital dividend account often accept structures that allow such dividends to be paid disproportionately to Canadian resident shareholders. The CRA has sanctioned such structures. By effectively requiring PW to structure the transactions using separate classes of shares to avoid PUC averaging, it seems the judgement offends the basic principle that the GAAR does not require a taxpayer to structure a transaction in the least tax efficient manner. While the transactions did create the attributes that would allow PW to use his capital gains exemption to strip surplus from PWR in the future, a result that section 84.1 is designed to avoid, this result by itself does not automatically lead to a finding of misuse or abuse. A similar tax benefit was obtained in Evans, a post Canada Trustco decision, in which the Tax Court found that the transactions that created this tax benefit did not result in an abuse or misuse of the provisions of the Act. As noted by Mr. Justice Bowman: I do not think that it can be said that there is an abuse of the provisions of the Act where each section operates exactly the way it is supposed to. The Crown s position seems to be predicated on the view that since everything worked like clockwork there must have been an abuse. The answer to this position is, of course, that if everything had not worked like clockwork we would not be here. Conclusion We are left with the GAAR applying to a series of transactions that arguably, did not result in a tax benefit, did not include an avoidance transaction and did not result in misuse or abuse. Nearly 30 years after the enactment of the GAAR and 12 years after the Supreme Court s guidance in Canada Trustco, taxpayers, their advisors and the courts continue to struggle with the basic principles of this perplexing rule. [1] Currently under appeal to the Federal Court of Appeal. [2] The CRA issued determinations against both PW and the transferee corporation. Given that PUC is an attribute of the transferee corporation, and there is no evidence that PW ever utilized such increased Stikeman Elliott LLP 4
5 PUC, it is not clear from the judgment why the CRA needed (or wanted) to issue a determination against PW in his personal capacity. [3] An interesting procedural issue is whether the CRA can even issue a determination under subsection 152(1.1) if a tax benefit has not yet been realized by any taxpayer as a result of the series of transactions. This issue does not appear to have been raised by the taxpayer or addressed by the Court in the judgment. DISCLAIMER: This publication is intended to convey general information about legal issues and developments as of the indicated date. It does not constitute legal advice and must not be treated or relied on as such. Please read our full disclaimer at Stikeman Elliott LLP 5
Appeal heard on June 8, 2015, at Toronto, Ontario. Before: The Honourable Justice Valerie Miller. Michael Colborne. Tamara Watters JUDGMENT
BETWEEN: Docket: 2013-2834(IT)G UNIVAR HOLDCO CANADA ULC, Appellant, and HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN, Respondent. Appearances: Appeal heard on June 8, 2015, at Toronto, Ontario Before: The Honourable Justice
More informationCOPTHORNE: SUPREME COURT OF CANADA S LATEST VIEWS ON STATUTORY INTERPRETATION AND GAAR 1
Volume 22, No. 2 June 2012 Taxation Law Section COPTHORNE: SUPREME COURT OF CANADA S LATEST VIEWS ON STATUTORY INTERPRETATION AND GAAR 1 Ed Kroft and Deborah Toaze* Overview On December 16, 2011, the Supreme
More informationManaging the Sales of Canadian Businesses A Vendor s Perspective
, Borden Ladner Gervais LLP, Toronto, CPA, CA, TEP, Cadesky Tax, Toronto 67 th Annual Tax Conference 67e Conférence fiscale annuelle 2015 Our Current Tax and Business Environment Low corporate tax rates
More informationONTARIO LIMITED. and. Heard at Ottawa, Ontario, on September 25, Judgment delivered at Ottawa, Ontario, on October 15, 2012.
Federal Court of Appeal Cour d'appel fédérale Date: 20121015 Docket: A-359-11 Citation: 2012 FCA 259 CORAM: NOËL J.A. SHARLOW J.A. MAINVILLE J.A. BETWEEN: 1207192 ONTARIO LIMITED and Appellant HER MAJESTY
More informationJudicial and Legislative Developments Threaten Indirect Canadian Acquisitions. Reprinted from Tax Notes Int l, October 10, 2016, p.
taxnotes Judicial and Legislative Developments Threaten Indirect Canadian Acquisitions by Nathan Boidman Reprinted from Tax Notes Int l, October 10, 2016, p. 163 international Volume 84, Number 2 October
More informationALBERTA LTD.: TAX COURT APPLIES GAAR TO PUC AVERAGING TRANSACTION 1
June 2017 Number 653 Current Items of Interest... 4 1245989 ALBERTA LTD.: TAX COURT APPLIES GAAR TO PUC AVERAGING TRANSACTION 1 Jeremy Ho, Associate, Dentons Canada LLP; Margaret MacDonald, Associate,
More informationBuckwold and Kitunen, Canadian Income Taxation, Ed. 1. Tax planning and tax avoidance mean the same thing. Is this statement true? Explain.
Buckwold and Kitunen, Canadian Income Taxation, 2014-2015 Ed. CHAPTER 2 FUNDAMENTALS OF TAX PLANNING Review Questions 1. Tax planning and tax avoidance mean the same thing. Is this statement true? Explain.
More informationA discussion of corporate-owned life insurance
A discussion of corporate-owned life insurance Persons who seek their livelihood in business are often motivated by a need to place their fate in their own hands. Of course, the desire to make money for
More informationThe General Anti-Avoidance Rule
The General Anti-Avoidance Rule Ed Kroft Q.C. Ian MacGregor, Q.C. Deen Olsen Ed Harris Q.C. Tax Law for Lawyers June 1, 2011 Introduction Almost 24 years since GAAR was announced (June 1987 Tax Reform)
More informationInsights and Commentary from Dentons
dentons.com Insights and Commentary from Dentons On March 31, 2013, three pre-eminent law firms Salans, Fraser Milner Casgrain, and SNR Denton combined to form Dentons, a Top 10 global law firm with more
More informationCanada Releases Foreign Affiliate Dumping Amendments
Volume 71, Number 10 September 2, 2013 Canada Releases Foreign Affiliate Dumping Amendments by Steve Suarez Reprinted from Tax Notes Int l, September 2, 2013, p. 864 Reprinted from Tax Notes Int l, September
More informationRecent Developments in Corporate Taxation. Greg Bell, KPMG Chris Jerome, EY 7 June Ottawa
Recent Developments in Corporate Taxation Greg Bell, KPMG Chris Jerome, EY 7 June 2017 - Ottawa 2017 Agenda Budget overview Business income tax measures Personal income tax measures 2016 CTF Annual Conference
More informationPolicy Forum: Who, What, Where, When, Why, and How Discerning an Avoidance Transaction
canadian tax journal / revue fiscale canadienne (2009) vol. 57, n o 2, 294-306 Policy Forum: Who, What, Where, When, Why, and How Discerning an Avoidance Transaction Angelo Nikolakakis* A b s t r a c t
More informationand HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN, Appeal heard on June 6, 2013, at Edmonton, Alberta. Before: The Honourable Justice David E. Graham
BETWEEN: D & D LIVESTOCK LTD., and HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN, Docket: 2011-137(IT)G Appellant, Respondent. Appeal heard on June 6, 2013, at Edmonton, Alberta. Appearances: Before: The Honourable Justice David
More informationUtilization of Tax Losses And Debt Restructuring. January 13, 2009 James A. Hutchinson
Utilization of Tax Losses And Debt Restructuring January 13, 2009 James A. Hutchinson Triggering Accrued Losses -- The Stop-loss Rules Triggering Accrued Losses - The Stop-loss Rules (Cont d) The Old Rules
More informationTHE GAAR. Ed Kroft Q.C. Ian MacGregor, Q.C. Wayne Adams Ed Harris Q.C. Tax Law for Lawyers Niagara-on-the-Lake June 2, 2010
THE GAAR Ed Kroft Q.C. Ian MacGregor, Q.C. Wayne Adams Ed Harris Q.C. Tax Law for Lawyers Niagara-on-the-Lake June 2, 2010 Introduction Over 20 years since GAAR was announced (June 1987 Tax Reform) and
More informationDemystifying 55(2) and Butterfly Reorganizations. Mark Brender Osler, Hoskin & Harcourt LLP
Demystifying 55(2) and Butterfly Reorganizations Osler, Hoskin & Harcourt LLP Demystifying 55(2) & Butterfly Reorganizations Objectives: Review the basics of 55(2) Review the basics of 55(3)(a) and 55(3)(b)
More informationSECTION 86 ROLLOVERS, AMALGAMATIONS, SECTION 88 WIND-UPS
SECTION 86 ROLLOVERS, AMALGAMATIONS, SECTION 88 WIND-UPS This issue of the Legal Business Report provides current information to the clients of Alpert Law Firm on various types of corporate reorganisations.
More informationOverview. General Anti-Avoidance Rule. The Role of a General Anti-Avoidance Rule in Protecting the Tax Base of Developing Countries
The Role of a General Anti-Avoidance Rule in Protecting the Tax Base of Developing Countries Thursday, 9 November 2017 (Session 1) Capacity Building Unit Financing for Development Office Department of
More informationTax Alert Canada. FCA finds GAAR does not apply to post-acquisition PUC step-up planning: Univar Holdco Canada ULC v. The Queen, 2017 FCA 207
2017 Issue No. 47 19 October 2017 Tax Alert Canada FCA finds GAAR does not apply to post-acquisition PUC step-up planning: Univar Holdco Canada ULC v. The Queen, 2017 FCA 207 EY Tax Alerts cover significant
More informationSHARE CAPITAL DESIGN. Evelyn (Evy) Moskowitz
SHARE CAPITAL DESIGN PRICE ADJUSTMENT CLAUSES Evelyn (Evy) Moskowitz MOSKOWITZ & MEREDITH LLP, an affiliate of KPMG LLP May 29, 2011 June 3, 2011 PRICE ADJUSTMENT CLAUSES * CONSIDERATION RECEIVED FOR TRANSFERRED
More informationPART XVI TAX AVOIDANCE
Income Tax Act ( 1985, c. 1 (5th Supp.) ) Disclaimer: These documents are not the official versions (more). Act current to October 23rd, 2008 Attention: See coming into force provision and notes, where
More informationCCH Estate Planner Federal Budget Targets Planning Involving Minors
CCH Estate Planner Federal Budget Targets Planning Involving Minors By: Michael Goldberg, Tax Partner Minden Gross LLP, a member of MERITAS Law Firms Worldwide. The capital gains exemption for shares of
More informationHot Topics in Tax Disputes
McCarthy Tétrault Advance Building Capabilities for Growth Tom Akin, Chia-yi Chua, Jeffrey Love and Ron Mar Roadmap Strategic Document Management Mitigating the Cost of a Tax Dispute GAAR Update: the 25th
More informationRecent Developments in International Taxation: Canada
Recent Developments in International Taxation: Canada Stephanie A. Wong July 15, 2003 TABLE OF CONTENTS 1. Recent Legislative Developments...3 (a) (b) (a) Outbound Planning...3 (i) Proposed Amendments
More informationTHE MINISTER S BURDEN UNDER GAAR
The Supreme Court of Canada and the General Anti-Avoidance Rule: Tax Avoidance after Canada Trustco and Mathew Faculty of Law University of Toronto November 18, 2005 THE MINISTER S BURDEN UNDER GAAR Daniel
More informationCertain Canadian Federal Income Tax Considerations
The following summary is intended to provide information that may be of assistance to a beneficial owner of a Trust Unit or a Maple Leaf Share, as the case may be, who disposes, or is deemed to have disposed,
More informationTAXPAYERS, PUT UP YOUR DUKE(S) : SCC SPEAKS ON GAAR
OCTOBER 20, 2005 TAXPAYERS, PUT UP YOUR DUKE(S) : SCC SPEAKS ON GAAR On October 19, 2005, the Supreme Court of Canada ( SCC ) released two muchanticipated decisions considering the general anti-avoidance
More informationRecent Developments in Corporate Taxation Post-Mortem Tax Planning A Case Study
Recent Developments in Corporate Taxation Post-Mortem Tax Planning A Case Study 2017 Pamela Cross, Borden Ladner Gervais, LLP David Mason, Deloitte June 7, 2017, OTTAWA Agenda - Post Mortem Planning 1.
More informationBuckwold and Kitunen, Canadian Income Taxation, Ed. 2. What distinguishes tax evasion from tax avoidance and tax planning?
Buckwold and Kitunen, Canadian Income Taxation, 2016-2017 Ed. CHAPTER 2 FUNDAMENTALS OF TAX PLANNING Review Questions 1. Tax planning and tax avoidance mean the same thing. Is this statement true? Explain.
More informationApril 21, 2015 CPA CANADA FEDERAL BUDGET COMMENTARY
April 21, 2015 CPA CANADA FEDERAL BUDGET COMMENTARY TABLE OF CONTENTS BUSINESS INCOME TAX MEASURES... 4 Reduced Small Business Tax Rate... 4 Dividend Tax Credit (DTC) Adjustment for Non-eligible Dividends...
More informationRECENT TAX AVOIDANCE JURISPRUDENCE
RECENT TAX AVOIDANCE JURISPRUDENCE Prepared for: 2014 CPTS Annual Conference Christopher J. Montes Felesky Flynn LLP June 4, 2014 AGENDA Pièces Automobiles Lecavalier (debt forgiveness/parking) Lehigh
More informationAppeal heard on May 9 to 12, 2016, at Vancouver, British Columbia. Before: The Honourable Eugene P. Rossiter, Chief Justice
BETWEEN: Docket: 2013-4033(IT)G 594710 BRITISH COLUMBIA LTD., Appellant, and HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN, Respondent. Appeal heard on May 9 to 12, 2016, at Vancouver, British Columbia Appearances: Before: The
More informationSubsection 55(2) is an anti-avoidance rule intended to prevent the inappropriate reduction of a capital gain by way of the payment of a deductible
1 2 Subsection 55(2) is an anti-avoidance rule intended to prevent the inappropriate reduction of a capital gain by way of the payment of a deductible intercorporate dividend. This provision generally
More informationMagical Mystery Tour The Supreme Court s GAAR Cases
Magical Mystery Tour The Supreme Court s GAAR Cases by David Louis, B. Com., J.D., C.A., Tax Partner Minden Gross LLP, a member of MERITAS Law Firms Worldwide. Thanks to the Minden Gross Toronto Tax Group
More informationCanada Tax Alert. FCA limits scope of foreign affiliate antiavoidance. Paragraph 95(6)(b) International Tax. 25 April 2014.
International Tax Canada Tax Alert Contacts Sandra Slaats sslaats@deloitte.ca 25 April 2014 FCA limits scope of foreign affiliate antiavoidance rule in Lehigh For many years, the Canada Revenue Agency
More informationCCH Tax Notes June Taxpayer Victories: Coincidence or Trend?
CCH Tax Notes June Taxpayer Victories: Coincidence or Trend? By: David Louis, J.D., C.A., Tax Partner Minden Gross LLP, a member of MERITAS Law Firms Worldwide. It is relatively infrequent that most tax
More informationJustice Bowman s Decisions on the Deductibility of Interest
canadian tax journal / revue fiscale canadienne (2010) vol. 58 (supp.) 211-23 Justice Bowman s Decisions on the Deductibility of Interest Howard J. Kellough* KEYWORDS: INTEREST DEDUCTIBILITY n CASES n
More informationAugust 2017 Tax Newsletter
FRUITMAN KATES LLP CHARTERED PROFESSIONAL ACCOUNTANTS 1055 EGLINTON AVENUE WEST TORONTO, ONTARIO M6C 2C9 TEL: 416.920.3434 FAX: 416.920.7799 www.fruitman.ca Email: info@fruitman.ca August 2017 Tax Newsletter
More informationCanada Barbados Tax Treaty New Protocol Bad News for Aggressive Taxpayers Canada Revenue Agency Wins Another GAAR Case... 4
In This Issue Canada Barbados Tax Treaty New Protocol... 1 Bad News for Aggressive Taxpayers Canada Revenue Agency Wins Another GAAR Case... 4 Payments to Non-Resident Financial Intermediaries Update on
More informationTAX NEWSLETTER. October 2017
TAX NEWSLETTER October 2017 CAPITAL GAINS EXEMPTION AND PROPOSED CHANGES EMPLOYEE LOANS (INCLUDING RECENT CHANGES TO HOME RELOCATION LOANS) TAXATION OF DIVIDENDS TRANSFERS OF PROPERTY TO TRUSTS AROUND
More informationCanada s federal budget affects back-to-back arrangements
Canada s 2016-17 federal budget affects back-to-back arrangements On 22 March 2016, Canada s Minister of Finance introduced the first budget of the new Liberal government. The budget contains limited measures
More information2009 International Taxation Conference TRANSFER PRICING: THE YEAR IN REVIEW. ITC Maratha Hotel, Mumbai, India December 3-5, 2009
2009 International Taxation Conference TRANSFER PRICING: THE YEAR IN REVIEW Elinore Richardson Borden Ladner Gervais LLP erichardson@blgcanada.com Al Meghji Osler Hoskin & Harcourt LLP ameghji@osler.com
More informationFor 2016 and subsequent taxation years, various post mortem tax planning strategies will only be available to a Graduated Rate Estate ( GRE ).
1 2 For 2016 and subsequent taxation years, various post mortem tax planning strategies will only be available to a Graduated Rate Estate ( GRE ). Therefore it is essential that planning is undertaken
More informationCONTENTS VOLUME II VOLUME I. Detailed contents of Volume II, Chapters 11 to 21 follows. The textbook is published in two Volumes:
xi CONTENTS The textbook is published in two Volumes: Volume I = Chapters 1 to 10 Volume II = Chapters 11 to 21 Chapter VOLUME I Chapter VOLUME II 1 Introduction To Federal Taxation In Canada 11 Taxable
More informationPersonal Tax Planning
Personal Tax Planning Co-Editors: T.R. Burpee* and P.E. Schusheim** ESTATE FREEZES INVOLVING TRUSTS Charles P. Marquette*** Trusts have a multitude of purposes and, in estate planning, can be used in conjunction
More informationHARPER S FIRST MAJORITY GOVERNMENT BUDGET TAX CHANGES INCLUDE TARGETED MEASURES TO CLOSE PERCEIVED LOOPHOLES
HARPER S FIRST MAJORITY GOVERNMENT BUDGET TAX CHANGES INCLUDE TARGETED MEASURES TO CLOSE PERCEIVED LOOPHOLES Taxnet Pro March 2012 Prepared by the McCarthy Tétrault Tax Group and published by Carswell,
More informationThe Estate Freeze: Balancing Tax Incentives with Fairness & Simplicity. Nicholas depencier Wright
The Estate Freeze: Balancing Tax Incentives with Fairness & Simplicity Nicholas depencier Wright Osgoode Hall Law School of York University LLM in Taxation LAW 6736.60 Advanced Taxation of Corporations
More informationThe $750,000 Capital Gains Exemption
The $750,000 Capital Gains Exemption Introduction This Tax Topic briefly reviews the rules contained in section 110.6 of the Income Tax Act (the "Act") concerning the $750,000 enhanced capital gains exemption
More informationCONTENTS VOLUME II VOLUME I. The detailed contents of both Volume I and II follow. The textbook is published in two Volumes:
CONTENTS The textbook is published in two Volumes: Volume I = Chapters 1 to 10 Volume II = Chapters 11 to 21 Chapter I Chapter II 1 Introduction To Federal Taxation In Canada 11 Taxable Income and Tax
More informationCONTENTS VOLUME II VOLUME I. The detailed contents of both Volume I and II follow. The textbook is published in two Volumes:
CONTENTS The textbook is published in two Volumes: Volume I = Chapters 1 to 10 Volume II = Chapters 11 to 21 Chapter I Chapter II 1 Introduction To Federal Taxation In Canada 11 Taxable Income and Tax
More informationAppeal heard on April 15, 2013, at Montreal, Quebec. Before: The Honourable Justice Paul Bédard
BETWEEN: Docket: 2010-3708(IT)G CalAmp WIRELESS NETWORKS INC., Appellant, and HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN, Respondent. Appeal heard on April 15, 2013, at Montreal, Quebec Appearances: Before: The Honourable
More informationEXPLANATORY NOTES - FOREIGN AFFILIATE AMENDMENTS
Page 1 EXPLANATORY NOTES - FOREIGN AFFILIATE AMENDMENTS Overview Various provisions of the Income Tax Act (the Act ) and Income Tax Regulations (the Regulations ) that deal with foreign affiliates of taxpayers
More informationCanada: Taxation Law Overview
Canada: Taxation Law Overview Stikeman Elliott LLP Taxation Law Overview Income Tax... 2 General... 2 Taxation of Canadian Residents (Basic Principles)... 2 Taxation of Non-Residents of Canada (Basic Principles)...
More informationFederal Budget Commentary 2011
On March 22, 2011 the Honourable Jim Flaherty, Minister of Finance, presented his sixth Budget to the House of Commons. \ The Government's fiscal positions include deficits in the years 2010/2011 ($40.5
More informationOctober 2017 Tax Newsletter
FRUITMAN KATES LLP CHARTERED PROFESSIONAL ACCOUNTANTS 1055 EGLINTON AVENUE WEST TORONTO, ONTARIO M6C 2C9 TEL: 416.920.3434 FAX: 416.920.7799 www.fruitman.ca Email: info@fruitman.ca October 2017 Tax Newsletter
More informationMSRB Rule G-17: Interpretive Notice on Duties of Underwriters to Issuers
MSRB Rule G-17: Interpretive Notice on Duties of Underwriters to Issuers Webinar Part 4: Required Manner and Timing of Disclosures, and Financial Aspects of Underwriting Transactions Required Manner of
More informationUNSUCCESSFUL CROWN ATTEMPT TO APPLY GAAR TO THE CANADA LUXEMBOURG TAX TREATY
BULLETIN ON Tax OCTOBER 2007 UNSUCCESSFUL CROWN ATTEMPT TO APPLY GAAR TO THE CANADA LUXEMBOURG TAX TREATY KATHLEEN PENNY Taxpayers have greater certainty regarding their ability to enjoy the benefits of
More informationFundy Settlement v. Canada: FINAL DECISION ON THE PROPER RESIDENCY TEST FOR TRUSTS
Volume 22, No. 2 June 2012 Taxation Law Section Fundy Settlement v. Canada: FINAL DECISION ON THE PROPER RESIDENCY TEST FOR TRUSTS Jennifer Pocock* On April 12, 2012, the Supreme Court of Canada (SCC)
More informationLifetime Capital Gains Exemption and Converting Income Into Capital Gains
and Converting Income Into Capital Gains Presented by: Josh Harnett September 14, 2017 Table of Contents 1. Lifetime Capital Gains Exemption a) Current Rules b) Perceived Evils c) New Measures i. Age Limits
More informationCurrent Cases- Part 3 JOHN SAUNDERS
2012 BC Tax Conference Current Cases- Part 3 JOHN SAUNDERS First Published by the Canadian Tax Foundation in the 2012 British Columbia Conference Report (Toronto: Canadian Tax Foundation, September, 2012)
More informationUPDATE. October Did You Know
TAX UPDATE Did You Know Davidson & Company LLP will be hosting the second seminar of the Back to School Seminar Series on November 1st at the Four Seasons Hotel: 2017 IFRS Update & Current Issues. Register
More informationSHAREHOLDER LOANS PART II
SHAREHOLDER LOANS PART II This issue of the Legal Business Report provides current information on shareholder loans and case law developments relating to shareholder loans. Alpert Law Firm is experienced
More informationA Detailed Analysis of 280F Depreciation Recapture for Business Aircraft
DEDICATED TO HELPING BUSINESS ACHIEVE ITS HIGHEST GOALS. A Detailed Analysis of 280F Depreciation Recapture for Business Aircraft By John B. Hoover 1 Disclaimer: This article was not prepared by or under
More informationTax Letter CAPITAL GAINS EXEMPTION AND PROPOSED CHANGES. Example
Marc Brazeau CPA, CA, Partner Tax Letter Monthly Newsletter October 2017 CAPITAL GAINS EXEMPTION AND PROPOSED CHANGES The capital gains exemption allows Canadian resident individuals to earn tax-free capital
More informationCONTENTS CHAPTER 1. CHAPTER 1, continued CHAPTER 2. Introduction To Federal Taxation In Canada. Income Or Loss From An Office Or Employment.
xvii CONTENTS CHAPTER 1 Introduction To Federal Taxation In Canada The Canadian Tax System.......... 1 Alternative Tax Bases.......... 1 Taxable Entities In Canada........ 2 Federal Taxation And The Provinces....
More informationGenerally, three tests must be met in order for shares to be considered QSBC shares:
December 23, 2013 The Capital Gain Exemption on the Sale of Shares By Jonathan Charron There are various ways to structure the sale of a business in a taxefficient manner. These include a share sale, an
More informationTax Update August 14, 2017
Tax Update August 14, 2017 Overview On July 19, 2017, we issued a Tax Alert regarding Potential Changes to Tax Planning Using Private Corporations, and we have had an opportunity to review these changes
More informationFinance Comfort Letter on the 95(2)(f) and (f.1) FAPI Accrual Rules A Comment on its Implications for the Tax Cost Bump. by Geoffrey S.
Finance Comfort Letter on the 95(2)(f) and (f.1) FAPI Accrual Rules A Comment on its Implications for the Tax Cost Bump by Geoffrey S. Turner Davies Ward Phillips & Vineberg LLP Citation: Geoffrey S. Turner,
More informationTHE PURPOSE OF SUBSECTION 55(2)
THE PURPOSE OF SUBSECTION 55(2) Eoin Brady, CPA, CA PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP Toronto Gwendolyn Watson PwC Law LLP Toronto 2015 Ontario Tax Conference The Purpose of Subsection 55(2) Eoin Brady, PricewaterhouseCoopers
More informationExplanatory Notes to Legislative Proposals Relating to Income Tax. Published by The Honourable James M. Flaherty, P.C., M.P. Minister of Finance
Explanatory Notes to Legislative Proposals Relating to Income Tax Published by The Honourable James M. Flaherty, P.C., M.P. Minister of Finance July 2010 Explanatory Notes to Legislative Proposals Relating
More informationContents. Application. Summary INCOME TAX INTERPRETATION BULLETIN
INCOME TAX INTERPRETATION BULLETIN NO.: IT-269R4 DATE: April 24, 2006 SUBJECT: REFERENCE: INCOME TAX ACT Part IV Tax on Taxable Dividends Received by a Private Corporation or a Subject Corporation Sections
More informationCONSULTATION: TAX PLANNING USING PRIVATE CORPORATIONS. BDO CANADA LLP s RESPONSE TO THE DEPARTMENT OF FINANCE CANADA
Tel: 416 865 0200 Fax: 416 865 0887 www.bdo.ca BDO Canada LLP TD Bank Tower 66 Wellington Street West, Suite 3600, P.O. Box 131 Toronto, ON M5K 1H1 Canada CONSULTATION: TAX PLANNING USING PRIVATE CORPORATIONS
More informationSELECTED TAX ISSUES AND TRAPS ASSOCIATED WITH ESTATE FREEZES
February 2013 Number 601 Discretionary Dividend Shares... 2 SELECTED TAX ISSUES AND TRAPS ASSOCIATED WITH ESTATE FREEZES Michael Goldberg, Minden Gross LLP There are many potential issues and traps that
More informationSECTION 85 TRANSFERS - ADDITIONAL TAX CONSIDERATIONS
SECTION 85 TRANSFERS - ADDITIONAL TAX CONSIDERATIONS This issue of the Legal Business Report provides current information to the clients of Alpert Law Firm on various types of corporate reorganisations.
More informationTax Alert Canada. Proposed changes to section 55. Background. Current section 55
2015 Issue No. 35 8 June 2015 Tax Alert Canada Proposed changes to section 55 EY Tax Alerts cover significant tax news, developments and changes in legislation that affect Canadian businesses. They act
More informationBill C-33 Proposed Amendments to Paragraphs 52(3)(a) and 53(1)(b)
The Joint Committee on Taxation of The Canadian Bar Association and The Canadian Institute of Chartered Accountants The Canadian Institute of Chartered Accountants 277 Wellington St. W., Toronto Ontario,
More informationNON-ARM S LENGTH TRANSFERS OF PROPERTY
TABLE OF CONTENTS Dedication... Preface... Table of Cases... Table of Statutory References... iii v xiii xxxiii 1 INTRODUCTION... 1 1.1 General... 1 1.2 Arrangements... 2 2 NON-ARM S LENGTH TRANSFERS OF
More informationThe credit will apply in respect of expenditures made on or after January 1, 2016.
April 21, 2015 Federal Budget STEP Canada Summary 1. PERSONAL INCOME TAX PROPOSALS Tax-Free Savings Account Increased Contribution Limit Budget 2015 proposes to increase the annual contribution limit for
More informationThe Capital Dividend Account. January 2017 Jean Turcotte, B.B.A., LL.B., D.Fisc, Fin.Pl., TEP Director, Tax, Wealth and Insurance Planning Group
The Capital Dividend Account January 2017 Jean Turcotte, B.B.A., LL.B., D.Fisc, Fin.Pl., TEP Director, Tax, Wealth and Insurance Planning Group Capital Dividend Account Why the Capital Dividend Account
More informationRevised Explanatory Notes Relating to Income Tax
Revised Explanatory Notes Relating to Income Tax Published by The Honourable Paul Martin, P.C., M.P. Minister of Finance June 2000 Revised Explanatory Notes Relating to Income Tax Published by The Honourable
More informationSHARE EXCHANGES TAX LAW FOR LAWYERS. Donald N. Cherniawsky F. Patrick Kirby Mike Dolson. Felesky Flynn LLP. May 23, 2011 H2O
TAX LAW FOR LAWYERS SHARE EXCHANGES Donald N. Cherniawsky F. Patrick Kirby Mike Dolson May 23, 2011 H2O 929234 1 Section 51 > Section 51 provides a tax-free rollover for certain conversions of debt issued
More informationSALE OF BUILDING USED FOR
TAX LETTER August 2017 SALE OF BUILDING USED FOR BUSINESS OR RENTAL POSSIBLE DENIAL OF TERMINAL LOSS CANADIAN INTER-CORPORATE DIVIDENDS SMALL BUSINESS CORPORATION GOING PUBLIC SECTION 84.1: THE DEEMED
More informationExtractive Sector Transparency Measures Act. Guidance
Extractive Sector Transparency Measures Act Guidance Extractive Sector Transparency Measures Act Guidance Her Majesty the Queen in Right of Canada, as represented by the Minister of Natural Resources
More informationCourse-Level Assessment Project: Computation of Taxes Payable and Providing Tax Planning Advice to a Corporate Client
Course Description This course builds on concepts learned in introductory financial accounting and microeconomics and in the study of the fundamentals of the Canadian Income Tax System with respect to
More informationELECTION ON DISPOSITION OF PROPERTY BY A PARTNERSHIP TO A TAXABLE CANADIAN CORPORATION
ELECTION ON DISPOSITION OF PROPERTY BY A PARTNERSHIP TO A TAXABLE CANADIAN CORPORATION For use by a taxable Canadian corporation and all the members of a partnership, to jointly elect under subsection
More informationTechnical News. No. 36 July 27, Income Tax. Paragraph 95(6)(b) Principal Purpose
Income Tax Technical News No. 36 July 27, 2007 This version is only available electronically. In This Issue Paragraph 95(6)(b) The Income Tax Technical News is produced by the Legislative Policy and Regulatory
More informationThe Supreme Court of Canada and the General Anti-Avoidance Rule: Canada Trustco and Mathew
The Peter A. Allard School of Law Allard Research Commons Faculty Publications Faculty Scholarship 2006 The Supreme Court of Canada and the General Anti-Avoidance Rule: Canada Trustco and Mathew David
More informationPurchase and Sale of a Business Share Sales. Douglas A. Cannon
Purchase and Sale of a Business Share Sales Douglas A. Cannon Planning the Transaction Individuals are generally subject to a combined Ontario/federal tax rate of 26.57% on eligible dividends and at a
More informationAnti-avoidance provisions in Malaysia
RELEVANT TO ACCA QUALIFICATION PAPER P6 (MYS) AND PERFORMANCE OBJECTIVES 19 AND 20 Anti-avoidance provisions in Malaysia This article is relevant to candidates preparing for Paper P6 (MYS) and the laws
More informationTAX LETTER. April 2012 THE CAPITAL GAINS EXEMPTION
THE CAPITAL GAINS EXEMPTION TAX LETTER April 2012 THE CAPITAL GAINS EXEMPTION NEW RRSP PENALTIES RRSP LIFELONG LEARNING PLAN TRANSFER OF DIVIDEND TAX CREDIT TO SPOUSE DONATIONS OF PUBLICLY-LISTED SECURITIES
More informationTAX NEWSLETTER. July 2018
TAX NEWSLETTER July 2018 INTEREST EXPENSE AND DISAPPEARING SOURCE RULE INTEREST EXPENSE AND DIRECT USE RULE TRANSFERS BETWEEN RELATED PERSONS TAX-FREE TRANSFERS TO YOUR CORPORATION AROUND THE COURTS INTEREST
More informationSubmission to the Department of Finance Canada on the August 14, 2012 Legislative Proposals Relating to the Income Tax Act and Regulations
Submission to the Department of Finance Canada on the August 14, 2012 Legislative Proposals Relating to the Income Tax Act and Regulations September 13, 2012 The Canadian Chamber of Commerce is pleased
More informationtaxnotes The Tax Court of Canada Strikes Offshore Bank in Loblaw international by Nathan Boidman and Michael N. Kandev
taxnotes The Tax Court of Canada Strikes Offshore Bank in Loblaw by Nathan Boidman and Michael N. Kandev Volume 92, Number 5 October 29, 2018 Reprinted from Tax Notes Interna onal, October 29, 2018, p.
More informationTAX EXECUTIVES INSTITUTE, INC. INCOME TAX QUESTIONS. Submitted to DEPARTMENT OF FINANCE DECEMBER 6, 2017
TAX EXECUTIVES INSTITUTE, INC. INCOME TAX QUESTIONS Submitted to DEPARTMENT OF FINANCE DECEMBER 6, 2017 Tax Executives Institute Inc. ( TEI or the Institute ) welcomes the opportunity to present the following
More informationTax Alert Canada. TCC rejects mark-to-market accounting for option contracts. The decision
2015 Issue No. 42 24 June 2015 Tax Alert Canada TCC rejects mark-to-market accounting for option contracts EY Tax Alerts cover significant tax news, developments and changes in legislation that affect
More informationCurrent Issues British Columbia Tax Conference Vancouver, BC
2016 British Columbia Tax Conference Vancouver, BC Current Issues Disclaimer: This material is for educational purposes only and is not intended to be advice on any particular matter. No one should act
More informationSAINT CHRISTOPHER AND NEVIS No. 10 of 2012
1 No. 10 of 2012. Income Tax (Amendment) Act, 2012. 10. Saint Christopher and Nevis. I assent, CUTHBERT M SEBASTIAN Governor-General. 2 nd April, 2012. SAINT CHRISTOPHER AND NEVIS No. 10 of 2012 AN ACT
More informationThe Paragraph 88(1)(d) Bump: Planning, Pitfalls and Developments. 19 th Taxation of Corporate Reorganization Conference, January 20, 2015
The Paragraph 88(1)(d) Bump: Planning, Pitfalls and Developments 19 th Taxation of Corporate Reorganization Conference, January 20, 2015 Steve Suarez Partner Borden Ladner Gervais LLP Issues Covered Bump
More informationThe RBC Dominion Securities
The RBC Dominion Securities Family Trust A guide for clients Professional Wealth Management Since 1901 Table of contents Is an RBC Dominion Securities Family Trust right for you? 2 What is a trust? 2 Inter-vivos
More information