IN THE MATTER OF the Toronto Stock Exchange Act, R.S.O. 1990, c. T.15, as amended, and Part XVII of the General By-law of The Toronto Stock Exchange
|
|
- Eleanor Carpenter
- 5 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 Decision June 12, IN THE MATTER OF the Toronto Stock Exchange Act, R.S.O. 1990, c. T.15, as amended, and Part XVII of the General By-law of The Toronto Stock Exchange AND IN THE MATTER OF Taylor SHAMBLEAU, an Approved Person, at all material times employed with Sprott Securities Ltd., formerly a Member of The Toronto Stock Exchange (now a Participating Organization of The Toronto Stock Exchange Inc.) Members of the Panel: L. W. Houlden, Q.C., John Huckstep and Brigitte J. Geisler Counsel: Jane P. Ratchford for Market Regulation Services Inc. Matthew P. Gottlieb for Taylor Shambleau Heard: May 5, 6, 8 and 9, 2003 REASONS OF THE PANEL
2 2 [1] We are sitting as a Panel of the Hearing Committee of the Toronto Stock Exchange Inc. ("the Exchange"), to determine the guilt or innocence of Taylor Shambleau on the charges brought against him by the Exchange. The matter is being prosecuted by Market Regulation Services Inc. on behalf of the Exchange. [2] The notice of hearing alleges that Taylor Shambleau has committed the following infractions: TAYLOR SHAMBLEAU, on March 30, 1999 and March 31, 1999, while an Approved Person employed with Sprott Securities Ltd., formerly a Member of The Toronto Stock Exchange (now a Participating Organization of The Toronto Stock Exchange Inc.), Toronto Stock Exchange Inc.), made a bid and executed a trade for the account of a customer when there was reason to believe that the intended purpose of such action was to establish an artificial price or quotation in a listed security or to effect a high closing price or quotation in a listed security contrary to section 11.26(1) of the General By-law of the Toronto Stock Exchange. [3] Counsel for Shambleau waived the reading of the charge and pleaded not guilty. Onus of Proof [4] The parties are agreed that the burden on the Exchange is to establish the charge on a standard of clear and convincing proof based upon cogent evidence. We agree with defence counsel that the onus of proving each of the required elements of the charge is higher than the balance of probabilities standard in civil cases. [5] Each side called expert witnesses. The expert witness for the prosecution was Michael Prior, a member of the Exchange staff. Although objection was taken to the calling of Prior as a witness, after hearing evidence, we found that he was qualified to give expert testimony and, in our opinion, he gave his evidence in an impartial and independent manner. [6] The defence's expert was Sandra J. Macdonald. Ms. Macdonald was head of equity trading for Sun Life Canada from Although Ms. Macdonald had great experience in buying and selling securities, her time as a trader was limited to the period from , when she was employed by C.J. Hodgson & Co. We were not impressed with the evidence given by Ms. Macdonald. In our judgment, she was not an impartial and objective witness; rather, she was an advocate for the defence. However,
3 3 since we are sitting as an expert tribunal, we did not find the expert evidence to be of crucial importance in arriving at our decision. Section 11.26(1) of the General By-law [7] Section 11.26(1) of the General By-law reads as follows: Sec Manipulative or Deceptive Method of Trading. - (1) No member or Approved Person shall use or knowingly participate in the use of any manipulative or deceptive method of trading in connection with the purchase or sale of any security which creates a false or misleading appearance of trading activity or an artificial price for the said security. It is the creation of an artificial price that is the crux of the charge in this case. [8] Part XIV of the Rulings and Directions of the Board of Governors of the Exchange, "Establishing Artificial Prices", states, in part, the following: It shall constitute a manipulative or deceptive method of trading within the meaning of subsection 11.26(1)... of the General By-law for a member or an Approved Person to make a bid or offering or to execute a trade for the account of a customer when there is reason to believe that the intended purpose of such action is to establish an artificial price or quotation in a listed security..., or to effect a high... closing price or closing quotation in a listed security... An artificial price is one that is not justified by real demand or supply in a stock... Some of the relevant considerations which must be taken into account by the member and its traders in deciding whether or not an order, bid, offer or trade is proper are: (1) the prices of the immediately preceding and succeeding trades; (2) the change in price or quotation that would result from carrying the instruction or entering the order; (3) the time the order is entered, or any instructions relevant to the time of executing the order; (4) the effect that such a change would have on other members who are or have been interested in the stock or option; (5) whether or not the person entering the order is associated with a promotional group or other group with an interest in effecting an artificial price, either for banking and margin purposes or for purposes of effecting a distribution of the shares of the company. The responsibility for deciding whether or not an order has been entered with the bona fide intention of buying and selling shares... or to establish an artificial price or quotation lies with the member, and specifically with the person(s) responsible for handling the order...
4 4 Purchase orders for the account of an individual or company which may be for the purpose of closing a particular security... at a higher price or quotation than is justified by previous market activity are more likely to appear at year end than at any other time. Month ends, quarter ends and Option expiries are also periods where members should be particularly alert to this problem. [9] The Exchange publishes an Equities Trading Manual for the assistance of its Members. The Manual deals with manipulative or deceptive methods of trading and sets out the provisions of s.11.26(1) and explains the conduct that may infringe the section. On or about December 11, 1998, the Exchange sent a Notice to Members concerning Ruling XIV. Attached to the Notice was a copy of the Ruling. The Notice stated, in part, the following: The Ruling clarifies the existing prohibition on establishment of artificial trading prices. The Ruling states that it is improper for Members or Approved Persons to trade as principal for the purpose of establishing artificial prices, or to make a trade on behalf of a client where there is reason to believe that the intended purpose is to establish an artificial price. For the purpose of the Ruling, an "artificial price" includes high and low closing a stock or entering a bid or offering with the intent of establishing an artificial closing quotation. Taylor Shambleau [10] Taylor Shambleau is 57 years of age. He has been employed in the securities industry since He has an unblemished record. No person has ever lodged a complaint against him nor has he ever been an object of disciplinary proceedings. When he joined Sprott Securities in 1995, he was employed as a manager. After about two years, he ceased to be a manager and continued with that company as a trader. In March, 1999, he was employed as a salesman, registered representative and institutional trader. In March, 1999, he had about established clients that he traded for, one of which was RT Capital. RT Capital was one of the 10 largest clients of Sprott Securities and generated about $150,000 in commissions each year. Mr. Shambleau admitted in crossexamination that he was familiar with s.11.26(1) of the General By-law, the Equities Trading Manual and the Notice of December 11, Amended Agreed Statement of Facts [11] The parties agreed upon an Amended Agreed Statement of Facts. This was of great assistance to the Panel and saved considerable time at the hearing. The Amended Agreed
5 5 Statement of Facts reads as follows: The charges AMENDED AGREED STATEMENT OF FACTS 1. These proceedings have been commenced against Taylor Shambleau ('Shambleau') to determine whether Shambleau breached Section 11.26(1) of the General By-law of the Toronto Stock Exchange (the 'Exchange') on March 30 and 31, Section 11.26(1) of the General By-law (the 'General By-Law') of the Exchange states as follows: Sec Manipulative or Deceptive Method of Trading. - (1) No member or Approved Person shall use or knowingly participate in the use of any manipulative or deceptive method of trading in connection with the purchase and sale of any security which creates a false or misleading appearance of trading activity or an artificial price for the said security. 3. It is alleged that the violations occurred with respect to a trade executed on March 30, 1999 and a bid entered on March 31, Parties and securities involved 4. Shambleau became an Approved Person in Since 1995, he has been employed with Sprott Securities Ltd. ('Sprott Securities'), at all material times a Member of the Exchange. On March 30 and 31, 1999, Shambleau was employed as a Salesman, Registered Representative and Institutional trader. 5. At all material times, RT Capital Management Inc. ('RT Capital') held numerous accounts (the 'RT Capital Accounts') at Sprott Securities. Shambleau was the assigned trader for the RT Capital Accounts. 6. As of March, 1999, RT Capital was a wholly-owned subsidiary of the Royal Bank of Canada and a vehicle for pension and institutional asset management services in the Royal Bank Financial Group. RT Capital described itself as one of Canada's leading institutional fund managers, with more than $25 billion in discretionary assets managed for pension funds, corporations, insurance firms, central banks and endowment/charities. 7. RT Capital portfolio positions were valued monthly using the last closing price with traded volumes within the month. For instance, if the last day of the month was a business day and there was a traded closing price for that day, the month end closing price would have been that day's traded closing price. If the last traded closing price
6 6 within the month was on the 20 th and only bid and ask were provided subsequent to the 20 th, the month end closing price would have been the closing price for the 20 th.. It is not admitted that Shambleau was aware how RT Capital valued its portfolio. The Trading on March 30 and March 31, 1999 March 30, As of March. 1999, shares of Pacifica Paper Limited Partnership were listed on the Exchange under the trading symbol 'PPP'. 9. At approximately 3:40 on March 30, 1999, Shambleau received the following instructions from Pat Shea ('Shea'), a trader employed with RT Capital: Just before the close, would you buy 1,000 PPP for me, please? 1,000 - Triple P. 1,000 triple P. Yes, I will. Only if necessary, eh? Okay, Got you. 10. At 3:40, the quotation for shares of PPP was 700 shares bid at $9.30 and 8,100 offered at $9.50. The last trade price was $9.30. As at 3:40, 42,150 shares of PPP had traded that day, with 41,500 of those trading at $ Shambleau prepared a trade ticket and time-stamped it at 3: Approximately 16 minutes later, Shambleau contacted Shea and had the following conversation: Hi, Pat. On the triple P. Yes. Did you want me to tick it at- $9.50. I think I'm confused on your instructions. Just buy 1,000 at $9.50. Okay. Got you. 13. At 15:59:33, Shambleau entered the order to buy 1,000 shares of PPP at $9.50 for the RT Capital Account. Shambleau's order resulted in a
7 7 purchase of 1,000 shares of PPP at $9.50. This was the last trade for that day in PPP. 14. The shares were transferred the following day to an RT Capital Account. 15. The immediately succeeding trade in PPP on March 31, 1999 was at $ At approximately 3:47 on March 31, 1999, Shambleau received the following instructions from You know this PPP thing again? The triple P, yeah. Yeah. What I want to do here tonight is something slightly different. Okay. Have you got it on your screen there? Yes, I do. Okay. You see it's offered below the last one. Yes. What I want to do is unless somebody sells it at 9.50, just in the last minute or so, would you put in a 9.90 bid for 2,000? Buy 2,000 at 9.90 fairly late in the day. OK. Yes. Okay. I'll keep an eye on it. If it does trade, I'll call you right away. Very good. Thanks, sir. 17. At 3:47, the quotation for shares of PPP was 1,000 shares bid at $9.50 and 5,000 shares offered at $9.95. The last trade price was $10.00 at 12:20:4. This was also the closing trade. 18. Shambleau prepared a trade ticket and time-stamped the ticket at 3: At 15:59:45, Shambleau entered the order to buy 2,000 shares of PPP at $9.90. The order expired unfilled at the end of the day but it changed the market quote from $9.50 bid to $9.90 bid with the offer side remaining at $ The immediately succeeding trade executed on April 1, 1999 was at $9.55 at 9:30:0.
8 8 21. For the purpose of 'artificial price' contained in s (1) of the General By-law and Part XIV of the Rulings and Directions of the Board only, it is agreed that RT Capital's intention was not bona fide with respect to the trade in the shares of PPP on March 30, 1999 and the bid in the shares of PPP on March 31, It is agreed that the admission in paragraph 21 above is not evidence of Shambleau's knowledge of RT Capital's intention and cannot be used by Market Regulation Services Inc. with respect to the issue of Shambleau's knowledge of RT Capital's intention. Pacifica Paper Partnership Limited ("PPP") [12] PPP is a very illiquid stock. We were given the trading records for PPP for the months of January, February, March and April, During these months, there were very few trades in the stock, the daily average being about 2-3 trades each day. However, on March 30, 1999, there were 14 trades, 43,150 shares being traded with a value of $409,825. On March 31, there were 5 trades, 14,700 shares were traded with a value of $142,630. Essential matters that must be proved for a conviction in this case [13] To obtain a conviction, the Exchange must prove two things: (a) That Shambleau knowingly participated in a manipulative or deceptive method of trading; and (b) That an artificial price was created by the trade on March 30 and by the bid on March 31, The five bullets [14] Ruling XIV sets out what have been referred to in these proceedings as five bullets, which must be taken into consideration by traders in deciding whether or not an order, bid, offer or trade is proper. These are the following: (i) the prices of the immediately preceding and succeeding trades. On March 30, the immediately preceding trade occurred at 15:29 at a price of $9.30. The immediately succeeding trade occurred on March 31, 1999 at $9.50. On March 31, 1999, the preceding trade occurred at 12:20 at $10. The succeeding trade occurred on April 1, 1999 at $9.50.
9 9 (ii) the change in price or quotation that would result from carrying the instruction or entering the order. On March 30, 1999, as a result of Shambleau's trade, the price of PPP was increased by $0.20. The market quotes of $9.30 bid and $9.50 offer remained unchanged. On March 31, 1999, as a result of Shambleau's bid, the closing market quote changed from $9.50 bid to $9.90, but the offering remained unchanged at $9.95. The closing market price remained at $ (iii) the time the order is entered, or any instructions relevant to the time of executing the order. On March 30, 1999, although Shambleau time stamped the order ticket at 3:40, he did not receive the firm offer to buy until some 16 minutes later. He did not enter the order until 15:59:33. On March 31, 1999, although Shambleau time stamped the order ticket at 3:47, he did not enter the purchase order until 15:59:45. (iv) the effect that such a change would have on other members who are or have been interested in the stock. March 30 was a day before the month end. March 31 was the last day of the month and was also the end of the first quarter. The $0.20 increase in price on March 30, 1999, inflated the market capitalization of PPP. (v) whether or not the person entering the order is associated with a promotional group or other group with an interest in effecting an artificial price, either for banking and margin purposes or for purposes of effecting a distribution of the shares of the company. Little emphasis was put on this bullet at the hearing and, accordingly, we make no comment about it. DECISION [15] In para. 21 of the Amended Agreed Statement of Facts, it is acknowledged that for the purpose of 'artificial price' contained in s.11.26(1) of the General By-law and Part XIV of the Rulings and Directions of the Board only, it is agreed that RT Capital's intention was not bona fide with respect to the trade in the shares of PPP on March 30, 1999 and the bid in the shares of PPP on March 31, This does not mean, of course, that Taylor Shambleau had an improper intent in making the trade or the bid; that is the issue this Tribunal has to decide. [16] With reference to the trade on March 30, 1999, while we are extremely troubled by Taylor Shambleau's actions and conversations on that day and while we believe that he should have known that the trade was an improper one, we are prepared to give him the
10 10 benefit of the doubt by accepting his explanation that he was confused by the order and to find him not guilty. [17] In connection with the bid on March 31, 1999, when we consider the evidence as a whole and the actions and conversations of Shambleau on that day, we are satisfied that he knowingly participated in a manipulative or deceptive trading and that an artificial price was created by the bid on March 31, In particular, considering that it was the last day of the month, the instructions given and the timing of the bid would not reasonably have allowed a response from the market. There was no genuine intent to complete a purchase of the shares and accordingly there will be a conviction for that offence. CONCLUSION [18] In the result, we find Taylor Shambleau guilty of making a bid on March 31, 1999 for the account of a customer when there was reason to believe that the intended purpose of such action was to establish an artificial quotation in a listed security or to effect a high closing quotation in a listed security contrary to section 11.26(1) of the General By-law of the Toronto Stock Exchange. We find him not guilty of executing a trade on March 30, 1999 for the account of a customer when there was reason to believe that the intended purpose of such action was to establish an artificial price in a listed security or to effect a high closing price in a listed security contrary to section 11.26(1) of the General By-law of the Toronto Stock Exchange. [19] Counsel may speak to us regarding a date and time for sentencing. Dated at Toronto, this 10 th day of June L.W. Houlden The Honourable L.W. Houlden, Q.C., Chair John Huckstep John Huckstep Brigitte J. Geisler Brigitte J. Geisler
INVESTMENT INDUSTRY REGULATORY ORGANIZATION OF CANADA IN THE MATTER OF: THE RULES OF THE INVESTMENT INDUSTRY REGULATORY ORGANIZATION OF CANADA
INVESTMENT INDUSTRY REGULATORY ORGANIZATION OF CANADA IN THE MATTER OF: THE RULES OF THE INVESTMENT INDUSTRY REGULATORY ORGANIZATION OF CANADA AND THE UNIVERSAL MARKET INTEGRITY RULES AND INTERACTIVE BROKERS
More informationIN THE MATIER OF a Proceeding under The Certified General Accountants Act, 2010 and the Bylaws. IN THE MATIER OF Bhavesh Patel, a member of
IN THE MATIER OF a Proceeding under The Certified General Accountants Act, 2010 and the Bylaws IN THE MATIER OF Bhavesh Patel, a member of The Certified General Accountants Association of Ontario BETWEEN:
More informationIN THE MATTER OF THE UNIVERSAL MARKET INEGRITY RULES AND IN THE MATTER OF JASON FEDIUK DECISION. Jean P. Whittow, Q.C. Chilwin C.
IN THE MATTER OF THE UNIVERSAL MARKET INEGRITY RULES AND IN THE MATTER OF JASON FEDIUK DECISION Hearing Panel: Chair Industry Member Industry Member Counsel For Market Regulation Services: Counsel For
More informationIN THE MATTER OF THE UNIVERSAL MARKET INTEGRITY RULES AND IN THE MATTER OF GLEN GROSSMITH OFFER OF SETTLEMENT
Settlement Agreement July 18, 2005 2005-004 IN THE MATTER OF THE UNIVERSAL MARKET INTEGRITY RULES AND IN THE MATTER OF GLEN GROSSMITH OFFER OF SETTLEMENT A. INTRODUCTION Market Regulation Services Inc.
More informationIN THE MATTER OF DISCIPLINARY PROCEEDINGS INITIATED BY THE INVESTMENT DEALERS ASSOCIATION OF CANADA. Re: ESTHER INGLIS DECISION AND REASONS
IN THE MATTER OF DISCIPLINARY PROCEEDINGS INITIATED BY THE INVESTMENT DEALERS ASSOCIATION OF CANADA Re: ESTHER INGLIS DECISION AND REASONS Contested Discipline Hearing held February 1 and 2, 2005 Hearing
More informationIN THE MATIER OF a Proceeding under the Certified General Accountants Act, 2010 and the Bylaws
IN THE MATIER OF a Proceeding under the Certified General Accountants Act, 2010 and the Bylaws IN THE MATIER OF Mr. Victor Herrera, a member of The Certified General Accountants Association of Ontario
More informationIN THE MATTER OF DISCIPLINARY PROCEEDINGS INITIATED BY THE INVESTMENT DEALERS ASSOCIATION OF CANADA
IN THE MATTER OF DISCIPLINARY PROCEEDINGS INITIATED BY THE INVESTMENT DEALERS ASSOCIATION OF CANADA RE: RESEARCH CAPITAL CORPORATION AND PATRICK GERALD WALSH District Council: The Honourable Robert S.
More informationRe Interactive Brokers Canada
Unofficial English Translation IN THE MATTER OF: Re Interactive Brokers Canada The Dealer Member Rules of the Investment Industry Regulatory Organization of Canada (IIROC) and The Universal Market Integrity
More informationINVESTMENT INDUSTRY REGULATORY ORGANIZATION OF CANADA MARKET REGULATION SERVICES INC. IN THE MATTER OF: THE MARKET INTEGRITY RULES OF THE
INVESTMENT INDUSTRY REGULATORY ORGANIZATION OF CANADA ON BEHALF OF MARKET REGULATION SERVICES INC. IN THE MATTER OF: THE MARKET INTEGRITY RULES OF THE INVESTMENT INDUSTRY REGULATORY ORGANIZATION OF CANADA
More informationIN THE MATTER OF THE UNIVERSAL MARKET INTEGRITY RULES AND IN THE MATTER OF ZOLTAN HORCSOK OFFER OF SETTLEMENT
Settlement Agreement July 18, 2005 2005-002 IN THE MATTER OF THE UNIVERSAL MARKET INTEGRITY RULES AND IN THE MATTER OF ZOLTAN HORCSOK OFFER OF SETTLEMENT A. INTRODUCTION Market Regulation Services Inc.
More informationIN THE MATTER OF THE SECURITIES ACT, R.S.O. 1990, c. S.5, AS AMENDED - AND - IN THE MATTER OF ZHEN (STEVEN) PANG and OASIS WORLD TRADING INC.
Ontario Commission des 22 nd Floor 22e étage Securities valeurs mobilières 20 Queen Street West 20, rue queen ouest Commission de l Ontario Toronto ON M5H 3S8 Toronto ON M5H 3S8 IN THE MATTER OF THE SECURITIES
More informationDISCIPLINARY COMMITTEE OF THE ASSOCIATION OF CHARTERED CERTIFIED ACCOUNTANTS
DISCIPLINARY COMMITTEE OF THE ASSOCIATION OF CHARTERED CERTIFIED ACCOUNTANTS REASONS FOR DECISION In the matter of: Mr Giles Barham Heard on: 11 March 2015 Location: ACCA Offices, 29 Lincoln s Inn Fields,
More informationMANIPULATIVE AND DECEPTIVE ACTIVITIES
January 30, 2004 No. 2004-003 Suggested Routing: Trading, Legal & Compliance REQUEST FOR COMMENTS MANIPULATIVE AND DECEPTIVE ACTIVITIES Summary The Board of Directors of Market Regulation Services Inc.
More informationDISCIPLINE COMMITTEE OF THE COLLEGE OF NURSES OF ONTARIO. PANEL: Michael Hogard, RPN Chairperson April Cheese, RPN Member Dennis Curry, RN Member
DISCIPLINE COMMITTEE OF THE COLLEGE OF NURSES OF ONTARIO PANEL: Michael Hogard, RPN Chairperson April Cheese, RPN Member Dennis Curry, RN Member Joan King Public Member Margaret Tuomi Public Member BETWEEN:
More informationINVESTMENT DEALERS ASSOCIATION OF CANADA
INVESTMENT DEALERS ASSOCIATION OF CANADA IN THE MATTER OF: THE BY-LAWS OF THE INVESTMENT DEALERS ASSOCIATION OF CANADA AND HARALAMBOS PANDELIDIS NOTICE OF HEARING TAKE NOTICE that pursuant to Part 10 of
More informationDISCIPLINARY COMMITTEE OF THE ASSOCIATION OF CHARTERED CERTIFIED ACCOUNTANTS
DISCIPLINARY COMMITTEE OF THE ASSOCIATION OF CHARTERED CERTIFIED ACCOUNTANTS REASONS FOR DECISION In the matter of: Mr Mikiel Aurokium Heard on: Friday 16 February 2018 Location: The Adelphi, 1-11 John
More informationDISCIPLINARY COMMITTEE OF THE ASSOCIATION OF CHARTERED CERTIFIED ACCOUNTANTS. ACCA s Offices, The Adelphi, 1-11 John Adam Street, London, WC2N 6AU
DISCIPLINARY COMMITTEE OF THE ASSOCIATION OF CHARTERED CERTIFIED ACCOUNTANTS REASONS FOR DECISION In the matter of: Ms Sandra Daphne Kansy Heard on: Friday, 26 January 2018 Location: ACCA s Offices, The
More informationNotice to Public. Contested Hearing. MICHAEL BOND and SESTO DELUCA. December 20, 2006 No Suggested Routing Trading Legal and Compliance
Notice to Public Contested Hearing December 20, 2006 No. 2006-010 Suggested Routing Trading Legal and Compliance MICHAEL BOND and SESTO DELUCA Relevant UMIR Provisions 2.2 Manipulative and Deceptive Method
More information1. Company/Organization/Individual named in the determination ( Appellant ) Name Address Postal Code
APPEAL FORM (Form 1) This Appeal Form, along with the required attachments, must be delivered to the Employment Standards Tribunal within the appeal period. See Rule 18(3) of the Tribunal s Rules of Practice
More informationADDIE NKOSINGIPHILE SHABANGU
SAFLII Note: Certain personal/private details of parties or witnesses have been redacted from this document in compliance with the law and SAFLII Policy IN THE HIGH COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA (GAUTENG DIVISION,
More informationTRIBUNAL D APPEL EN MATIÈRE DE PERMIS
LICENCE APPEAL TRIBUNAL Safety, Licensing Appeals and Standards Tribunals Ontario TRIBUNAL D APPEL EN MATIÈRE DE PERMIS Tribunaux de la sécurité, des appels en matière de permis et des normes Ontario Tribunal
More informationDISCIPLINARY COMMITTEE OF THE ASSOCIATION OF CHARTERED CERTIFIED ACCOUNTANTS
DISCIPLINARY COMMITTEE OF THE ASSOCIATION OF CHARTERED CERTIFIED ACCOUNTANTS REASONS FOR DECISION In the matter of: Mr Lee Martin Holberton Heard on: Wednesday, 13 April 2016 Location: ACCA Offices, The
More informationArbitration CAS 2010/A/2046 Samir Ibrahim Ali Hassan v. National Anti-Doping Committee of the United Arab Emirates (UAE), award of 5 October 2010
Tribunal Arbitral du Sport Court of Arbitration for Sport Arbitration Samir Ibrahim Ali Hassan v. National Anti-Doping Committee of the United Arab Emirates (UAE), Panel: Mr Gerhard Bubnik (Czech Republic),
More informationJuly 28, IN THE MATTER OF THE UNIVERSAL MARKET INTEGRITY RULES AND IN THE MATTER OF
Settlement Agreement July 28, 2005 2005-006 IN THE MATTER OF THE UNIVERSAL MARKET INTEGRITY RULES AND IN THE MATTER OF IAN MACDONALD, EDWARD BOYD, PETER DENNIS AND DAVID SINGH OFFER OF SETTLEMENT A. INTRODUCTION
More informationIN THE MATTER OF THE BY-LAWS OF THE INVESTMENT DEALERS ASSOCIATION OF CANADA. Re: KELLY JOHN CAMPBELL HUSKY
IN THE MATTER OF THE BY-LAWS OF THE INVESTMENT DEALERS ASSOCIATION OF CANADA Re: KELLY JOHN CAMPBELL HUSKY Heard: May 1, 2006 Decision: May 10, 2006 Hearing Panel: Eric Spink, Chair Kathleen Jost William
More informationRe Jones. The Dealer Member Rules of the Investment Industry Regulatory Organization of Canada (IIROC)
IN THE MATTER OF: Re Jones The Dealer Member Rules of the Investment Industry Regulatory Organization of Canada (IIROC) and The By-Laws of the Investment Dealers Association of Canada (IDA) and Michael
More informationREASONS FOR DECISION
Reasons for Decision File No. 201519 IN THE MATTER OF A DISCIPLINARY HEARING PURSUANT TO SECTIONS 20 AND 24OF BY-LAW NO. 1 OF THE MUTUAL FUND DEALERS ASSOCIATION OF CANADA Re: Terry William Sukman Heard:
More informationSOLICITORS DISCIPLINARY TRIBUNAL SOLICITORS ACT IN THE MATTER OF ANGELA JANE BUTLER, solicitor (The Respondent)
No. 10609-2010 SOLICITORS DISCIPLINARY TRIBUNAL SOLICITORS ACT 1974 IN THE MATTER OF ANGELA JANE BUTLER, solicitor (The Respondent) Upon the application of Lorraine Trench on behalf of the Solicitors Regulation
More informationRS Market Integrity Notice Notice of Amendment Approval Provisions Respecting Manipulative and Deceptive Activities
13.1.3 RS Market Integrity Notice Notice of Amendment Approval Provisions Respecting Manipulative and Deceptive Activities April 1, 2005 Summary NOTICE OF AMENDMENT APPROVAL PROVISIONS RESPECTING MANIPULATIVE
More informationDISCIPLINARY COMMITTEE OF THE ASSOCIATION OF CHARTERED CERTIFIED ACCOUNTANTS
DISCIPLINARY COMMITTEE OF THE ASSOCIATION OF CHARTERED CERTIFIED ACCOUNTANTS REASONS FOR DECISION In the matter of: Mr Alan Goddard Heard on: 30 August 2016 Location: The Adelphi, 1-11 John Adam Street,
More informationUnofficial English Translation
Unofficial English Translation IN THE MATTER OF: THE RULES OF THE INVESTMENT INDUSTRY REGULATORY ORGANIZATION OF CANADA AND REMO COSTA STATEMENT OF ALLEGATIONS Further to a Notice of Hearing dated December
More informationUNITED STATES OF AMERICA Before the SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION II.
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA Before the SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 Release No. 79578 / December 16, 2016 ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEEDING File No. 3-17731 In the Matter of
More informationMarch 11, IN THE MATTER OF THE UNIVERSAL MARKET INTEGRITY RULES AND IN THE MATTER OF RHONDA HYMERS OFFER OF SETTLEMENT
Settlement Agreement March 11, 2004 2004-004 IN THE MATTER OF THE UNIVERSAL MARKET INTEGRITY RULES AND IN THE MATTER OF RHONDA HYMERS OFFER OF SETTLEMENT A. INTRODUCTION 1. Market Regulation Services Inc.
More informationHEARING DISCIPLINARY COMMITTEE OF THE ASSOCIATION OFCHARTERED CERTIFIED ACCOUNTANTS
DISCIPLINARY COMMITTEE OF THE ASSOCIATION OFCHARTERED CERTIFIED ACCOUNTANTS REASONS FOR DECISION In the matter of: Mr Mebrahtom Kidanemariam Melese Heard on: Thursday, 1 March 2018 Location: ACCA Offices,
More informationTEXT OF POLICIES UNDER THE UNIVERSAL MARKET INTEGRITY RULES POLICY 2.1 JUST AND EQUITABLE PRINCIPLES
TEXT OF POLICIES UNDER THE UNIVERSAL MARKET INTEGRITY RULES POLICY 2.1 JUST AND EQUITABLE PRINCIPLES Part 1 Examples of Unacceptable Activity Rule 2.1 provides that a Participant shall transact business
More informationUNITED STATES OF AMERICA Before the SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 Release No. 79580 / December 16, 2016 ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEEDING File No. 3-17733 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA Before the SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION In the Matter of
More informationTHE LAW SOCIETY OF ALBERTA IN THE MATTER OF THE LEGAL PROFESSION ACT AND
THE LAW SOCIETY OF ALBERTA IN THE MATTER OF THE LEGAL PROFESSION ACT AND IN THE MATTER OF A HEARING REGARDING THE CONDUCT OF ANDREW GEISTERFER A MEMBER OF THE LAW SOCIETY OF ALBERTA Hearing Committee:
More informationIN THE INDUSTRIAL COURT COMMUNICATION WORKERS - PARTY NO. 1 UNION TELECOMMUNICATIONS SERVICES - PARTY NO. 2 OF TRINIDAD AND TOBAGO LIMITED
23 TRINIDAD AND TOBAGO E.S.D. T.D. No. 52 OF 2006 IN THE INDUSTRIAL COURT Between COMMUNICATION WORKERS - PARTY NO. 1 UNION And TELECOMMUNICATIONS SERVICES - PARTY NO. 2 OF TRINIDAD AND TOBAGO LIMITED
More informationContrary to Rule 3 of the Rules of Conduct for Members 2007 Particulars
Disciplinary Panel Hearing Case of Mr John Russell FRICS and Jack Russell Associates Seaton, Devon, EX12 On Monday 2 July 2018 By telephone Panel Helen Riley (Surveyor Chair) Gregory Hammond (Lay Member)
More informationDISCIPLINARY COMMITTEE OF THE ASSOCIATION OF CHARTERED CERTIFIED ACCOUNTANTS
DISCIPLINARY COMMITTEE OF THE ASSOCIATION OF CHARTERED CERTIFIED ACCOUNTANTS In the matter of: Mr Karim Khan and Parker Lloyd Limited Heard on: 8, 9, 10 March 2016 Location: The Adelphi, 1-11 John Adam
More informationCase Name: LAW SOCIETY OF ALBERTA v. MING J. FONG
Case Name: LAW SOCIETY OF ALBERTA v. MING J. FONG IN THE MATTER OF A HEARING REGARDING THE CONDUCT OF MING J. FONG, A MEMBER OF THE LAW SOCIETY OF ALBERTA LAW SOCIETY HEARING FILE: HEARING COMMITTEE PANEL:
More informationRe Savard. The Rules of the Investment Industry Regulatory Organization of Canada. The By-Laws of the Investment Dealers Association of Canada
Unofficial English Translation Re Savard IN THE MATTER OF: The Rules of the Investment Industry Regulatory Organization of Canada and The By-Laws of the Investment Dealers Association of Canada and Michel
More informationBEFORE THE REAL ESTATE AGENTS DISCIPLINARY TRIBUNAL
BEFORE THE REAL ESTATE AGENTS DISCIPLINARY TRIBUNAL [2016] NZREADT 78 READT 042/16 IN THE MATTER OF BETWEEN AND An application to review a decision of the Registrar pursuant to section 112 of the Real
More informationIN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO SIXTH APPELLATE DISTRICT WILLIAMS COUNTY. Court of Appeals No. WM Appellee Trial Court No.
[Cite as State v. Robbins, 2012-Ohio-3862.] IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO SIXTH APPELLATE DISTRICT WILLIAMS COUNTY State of Ohio Court of Appeals No. WM-11-012 Appellee Trial Court No. 10 CR 103 v. Barry
More informationStatement of Practice on penalties for incorrect returns
Statement of Practice on penalties for incorrect returns States of Guernsey Income Tax PO Box 37 St Peter Port Guernsey GY1 3AZ Telephone: (01481) 724711 Facsimile: (01481) 713911 E-mail: taxenquiries@gov.gg
More informationAmendments Respecting Trading Supervision Obligations
Rules Notice Notice of Approval/Implementation UMIR Please distribute internally to: Institutional Legal and Compliance Senior Management Trading Desk Retail Contact: Sanka Kasturiarachchi Policy Counsel,
More informationRE: Paul Joseph PALIOTTI NOTICE OF HEARING
IN THE MATTER OF A DISCIPLINE HEARING PURSUANT TO BY-LAW 20 OF THE INVESTMENT DEALERS ASSOCIATION OF CANADA Quebec District Council RE: Paul Joseph PALIOTTI NOTICE OF HEARING NOTICE is hereby given that
More informationDISCIPLINARY COMMITTEE OF THE ASSOCIATION OF CHARTERED CERTIFIED ACCOUNTANTS. ACCA s Offices, 29 Lincoln s Inn Fields, London, WC2A 3EE
DISCIPLINARY COMMITTEE OF THE ASSOCIATION OF CHARTERED CERTIFIED ACCOUNTANTS REASONS FOR DECISION In the matter of: Mr David Peter Lowe Heard on: 21 August 2015 Location: ACCA s Offices, 29 Lincoln s Inn
More informationCANADIAN UNLISTED BOARD INC. USER AGREEMENT. (the Agreement )
CANADIAN UNLISTED BOARD INC. USER AGREEMENT (the Agreement ) WHEREAS the Canadian Venture Exchange Inc. ("CDNX" or the "Exchange") has entered into an agreement with the Toronto Stock Exchange Inc. ("TSE")
More informationIN THE HIGH COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA (EASTERN CAPE, GRAHAMSTOWN) CASE NO: CA&R 303/2009 DATE HEARD: 25/08/2010 DATE DELIVERED: 13/9/10 NOT REPORTABLE
1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA (EASTERN CAPE, GRAHAMSTOWN) CASE NO: CA&R 303/2009 DATE HEARD: 25/08/2010 DATE DELIVERED: 13/9/10 NOT REPORTABLE In the matter between MZAMO NGCAWANA Appellant and THE
More informationDISCIPLINARY COMMITTEE OF THE ASSOCIATION OF CHARTERED CERTIFIED ACCOUNTANTS
DISCIPLINARY COMMITTEE OF THE ASSOCIATION OF CHARTERED CERTIFIED ACCOUNTANTS REASONS FOR DECISION In the matter of: Mr Nemchand Proag Heard on: Thursday, 15 September 2016 and Thursday 30 March 2017 Location:
More informationRe Trudeau UNANIMOUS DECISION ON THE MERITS
Unofficial English Translation Re Trudeau IN THE MATTER OF: The Rules of the Investment Industry Regulatory Organization of Canada (IIROC) and Jean-Louis Trudeau 2017 IIROC 51 Hearing Panel of the Investment
More informationTEXT OF THE UNIVERSAL MARKET INTEGRITY RULES PART 1 DEFINITIONS AND INTERPRETATION
TEXT OF THE UNIVERSAL MARKET INTEGRITY RULES PART 1 DEFINITIONS AND INTERPRETATION 1.1 Definitions In these Rules, unless the subject matter or context otherwise requires: Access Person means a person
More informationTHE IMMIGRATION ACTS. Before DEPUTY UPPER TRIBUNAL JUDGE JUSS. Between. and THE SECRETARY OF STATE FOR THE HOME DEPARTMENT DECISION AND REASONS
Upper Tribunal (Immigration and Asylum Chamber) Appeal Number: IA/29910/2015 THE IMMIGRATION ACTS Heard at Field House Decision & Reasons Promulgated On 15 th June 2017 On 27 th June 2017 Before DEPUTY
More informationDISCIPLINARY COMMITTEE OF THE ASSOCIATION OF CHARTERED CERTIFIED ACCOUNTANTS
DISCIPLINARY COMMITTEE OF THE ASSOCIATION OF CHARTERED CERTIFIED ACCOUNTANTS REASONS FOR DECISION In the matter of: Mr Saiful Islam Heard on: Wednesday, 20 September 2017 Location: The Chartered Institute
More informationIN THE MATTER OF THE UNIVERSAL MARKET INTEGRITY RULES AND IN THE MATTER OF DESJARDINS SECURITIES INC., JEAN-PIERRE DE MONTIGNY AND JEAN-LUC BRUNET
Settlement Agreement March 16, 2005 2005-002 IN THE MATTER OF THE UNIVERSAL MARKET INTEGRITY RULES AND IN THE MATTER OF DESJARDINS SECURITIES INC., JEAN-PIERRE DE MONTIGNY AND JEAN-LUC BRUNET OFFER OF
More informationREAL ESTATE COUNCIL OF ONTARIO DISCIPLINE DECISION
REAL ESTATE COUNCIL OF ONTARIO DISCIPLINE DECISION IN THE MATTER OF A DISCIPLINE HEARING HELD PURSUANT TO BY-LAW NO. 10 OF THE REAL ESTATE COUNCIL OF ONTARIO John Van Dyk Respondent This document also
More informationDISCIPLINARY COMMITTEE OF THE ASSOCIATION OF CHARTERED CERTIFIED ACCOUNTANTS. 29 Lincoln's Inn Fields, London WC2A 3EE
DISCIPLINARY COMMITTEE OF THE ASSOCIATION OF CHARTERED CERTIFIED ACCOUNTANTS REASONS FOR DECISION In the matter of: Mr Adrian David Neave Thompson Heard on: Tuesday, 6 January 2015 Location: Committee:
More informationTHE IMMIGRATION ACTS. Promulgated On : 11 November 2014 On : 12 November Before UPPER TRIBUNAL JUDGE KEBEDE. Between SHAPLA BEGUM CHOWDHURY.
Upper Tribunal (Immigration and Asylum Chamber) THE IMMIGRATION ACTS Heard at : Field House Determination Promulgated On : 11 November 2014 On : 12 November 2014 Before UPPER TRIBUNAL JUDGE KEBEDE Between
More informationASYLUM AND IMMIGRATION TRIBUNAL
BA (321A Immigration Rules mandatory) Nigeria [2006] UKAIT 00080 ASYLUM AND IMMIGRATION TRIBUNAL THE IMMIGRATION ACTS Heard at Field House Determination Promulgated: On 10 th October 2006 On 7 th November
More informationFINANCIAL SERVICES TRIBUNAL
FST 05-018 FINANCIAL SERVICES TRIBUNAL IN THE MATTER OF THE MORTGAGE BROKERS ACT R.S.B.C. 1996, c. 313 AS AMENDED BETWEEN: JOHN WINSTON CARSON APPELLANT AND: THE STAFF OF THE REGISTRAR OF MORTGAGE BROKERS
More informationORGANIZATION OF CANADA
INVESTMENT INDUSTRY REGULATORY ORGANIZATION OF CANADA IN THE MATTER OF: THE RULES OF THE INVESTMENT INDUSTRY REGULATORY ORGANIZATION OF CANADA AND THE BY-LAWS OF THE INVESTMENT DEALERS ASSOCIATION OF CANADA
More information2004 BCSECCOM 634. Sections 161(1) and 162 of the Securities Act, RSBC 1996, c Hearing. Panel Brent W. Aitken Vice Chair.
Edward Andrew Durante aka Ed Simmons, Gillian Hobson, Berkshire Capital Partners, Inc., Commonwealth Associates, Ltd., Dottenhoff Financial, Ltd., and Galton Scott & Golett Inc. Sections 161(1) and 162
More informationDECISION ON A PRELIMINARY ISSUE
Financial Services Commission of Ontario Commission des services financiers de l Ontario BETWEEN: EUSTACHIO (STEVE) GIORDANO Applicant and ROYAL & SUNALLIANCE INSURANCE COMPANY OF CANADA Insurer DECISION
More informationTHE IMMIGRATION ACTS. Before UPPER TRIBUNAL JUDGE CRAIG. Between MR ABDUL KADIR SAID. and. THE SECRETARY OF STATE FOR THE HOME DEPARTMENT Respondent
IAC-FH-NL-V1 Upper Tribunal (Immigration and Asylum Chamber) Appeal Number: DA/00950/2014 THE IMMIGRATION ACTS Heard at Royal Courts of Justice Oral determination given immediately following the hearing
More informationIN THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE. and. Appearances For the Claimant: Ms. A. Cadie-Bruney For the Defendant: Mr. K. Monplaisir QC and Ms. M.
SAINT LUCIA IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE SUIT NO.: 595 of 2001 BETWEEN NATIONAL INSURANCE CORPORATION Claimant and ROCHAMEL CONSTRUCTION LIMITED GARVIN FRENCH GARRY LILYWHITE Defendants Appearances For
More informationDISCIPLINARY TRIBUNAL
ASHLEY B. CROZIER IN CASE 201 0-3 AND CASE 201 0-5 IN THE MATTER OF CHARGES FILED AGAINST REASONS FOR DECISION Heard: October 24 and 25, 2011 Did not appear, and was not represented by counsel Ashley B.
More informationRe Richardson. The By-Laws of the Investment Dealers Association of Canada
Re Richardson IN THE MATTER OF: The By-Laws of the Investment Dealers Association of Canada and The Dealer Member Rules of the Investment Industry Regulatory Organization of Canada (IIROC) and Paul Frederick
More informationPART 7 TRADING IN A MARKETPLACE
Universal Market Integrity Rules Rules & Policies PART 7 TRADING IN A MARKETPLACE 7.1 Trading Supervision Obligations (1) Each Participant shall adopt written policies and procedures to be followed by
More informationEDITORIAL NOTE: SOME NAMES AND/OR DETAILS IN THIS JUDGMENT HAVE BEEN ANONYMISED
EDITORIAL NOTE: SOME NAMES AND/OR DETAILS IN THIS JUDGMENT HAVE BEEN ANONYMISED IN THE DISTRICT COURT AT NORTH SHORE CRI-2016-044-000555 [2017] NZDC 6342 COMMISSIONER OF INLAND REVENUE Prosecutor v SOLE
More informationTHE IMMIGRATION ACTS. Heard at Field House Decision & Reasons Promulgated On 12 th April 2018 On 14 th May Before
Upper Tribunal (Immigration and Asylum Chamber) Appeal Number: EA/02223/2016 THE IMMIGRATION ACTS Heard at Field House Decision & Reasons Promulgated On 12 th April 2018 On 14 th May 2018 Before DEPUTY
More informationRE: MAURICE GUY BRAZEAU
IN THE MATTER OF A DISCIPLINE HEARING PURSUANT TO BY-LAW 20 OF THE INVESTMENT DEALERS ASSOCIATION OF CANADA RE: MAURICE GUY BRAZEAU NOTICE OF HEARING NOTICE is hereby given that a hearing will be held
More informationDISCIPLINARY COMMITTEE OF THE ASSOCIATION OF CHARTERED CERTIFIED ACCOUNTANTS
DISCIPLINARY COMMITTEE OF THE ASSOCIATION OF CHARTERED CERTIFIED ACCOUNTANTS REASONS FOR DECISION In the matter of: Mr Dilshad Hussain Heard on: Tuesday, 19 September 2017 Location: The Chartered Institute
More informationHEARING DISCIPLINARY COMMITTEE OF THE ASSOCIATION OF CHARTERED CERTIFIED ACCOUNTANTS. Heard on: Tuesday, 4 September 2018
DISCIPLINARY COMMITTEE OF THE ASSOCIATION OF CHARTERED CERTIFIED ACCOUNTANTS REASONS FOR DECISION In the matter of: Roger William Bessent Heard on: Tuesday, 4 September 2018 Location: Committee: Legal
More informationPAPADIMOS, P Professional Conduct Committee May 2015 Page -1/6-
HEARING HEARD IN PUBLIC PAPADIMOS, Panagiotis Registration No: 100797 PROFESSIONAL CONDUCT COMMITTEE MAY 2015 Outcome: Erasure and Immediate Suspension Panagiotis PAPADIMOS, a dentist, DipDS Thessaloniki
More informationGuidance on Trading Supervision Obligations
Rules Notice Guidance Note UMIR Please distribute internally to: Institutional Legal and Compliance Senior Management Trading Desk Retail Contact: Sanka Kasturiarachchi Policy Counsel, Market Regulation
More informationIN THE MATTER OF THE SECURITIES ACT R.S.O. 1990, c. S. 5, AS AMENDED AND
IN THE MATTER OF THE SECURITIES ACT R.S.O. 1990, c. S. 5, AS AMENDED AND IN THE MATTER OF BRIAN ANDERSON, LESLIE BROWN, DOUGLAS BROWN, DAVID SLOAN AND FLAT ELECTRONIC DATA INTERCHANGE (a.k.a. F.E.D.I.)
More informationDISCIPLINARY COMMITTEE - RECORD OF DECISION
DISCIPLINARY COMMITTEE - RECORD OF DECISION Mr Gerard Keith Rooney (a Member of the Insolvency Practitioners Association) A tribunal of the Disciplinary Committee made the decision recorded below having
More informationJAMES ALEXANDER MOON, MICHAEL EDWARD COMEAU AND MITCHELL TORCH
IN THE MATTER OF: THE RULES OF THE INVESTMENT INDUSTRY REGULATORY ORGANIZATION OF CANADA AND JAMES ALEXANDER MOON, MICHAEL EDWARD COMEAU AND MITCHELL TORCH SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT PART I INTRODUCTION 1. The
More informationMarch 7,
March 7, 2002 2002-061 UNIVERSAL MARKET INTEGRITY RULES Background On December 1, 2001, National Instrument 21-101 Marketplace Operation (the Marketplace Operation Instrument ) and National Instrument
More informationDISCIPLINARY COMMITTEE OF THE ASSOCIATION OF CHARTERED CERTIFIED ACCOUNTANTS
DISCIPLINARY COMMITTEE OF THE ASSOCIATION OF CHARTERED CERTIFIED ACCOUNTANTS REASONS FOR DECISION In the matter of: Mr Saadat Ali Heard on: Monday, 18 September 2017 Location: The Chartered Institute of
More informationNEW ZEALAND LAWYERS AND CONVEYANCERS DISCIPLINARY TRIBUNAL. Decision No. [2009] NZLCDT 9 LCDT 08/2009. IN THE MATTER of the Law Practitioners Act 1982
NEW ZEALAND LAWYERS AND CONVEYANCERS DISCIPLINARY TRIBUNAL Decision No. [2009] NZLCDT 9 LCDT 08/2009 IN THE MATTER of the Law Practitioners Act 1982 BETWEEN CANTERBURY DISTRICT LAW SOCIETY AND DAVID ALAN
More informationInsurance Coverage Law
Ohio State Bar Association Insurance Coverage Law Attorney Information and Standards Accredited by the Supreme Court Commission on Certification of Attorneys as Specialists Contents Insurance Coverage
More informationRe Credit Suisse Securities (Canada) Inc
Re Credit Suisse Securities (Canada) Inc IN THE MATTER OF: The Market Integrity Rules of the Investment Industry Regulatory Organization of Canada and The Universal Market Integrity Rules and Credit Suisse
More informationBefore: THE HONOURABLE SIR STEPHEN STEWART MR GODWIN BUSUTTIL DR. ROSEMARY GILLESPIE
APPEAL TO THE VISITORS TO THE INNS OF COURT ON APPEAL FROM THE DISCIPLINARY TRIBUNAL OF THE COUNCIL OF THE INNS OF COURT Royal Courts of Justice Strand, London, WC2A 2LL Date: 09/10/2013 Before: THE HONOURABLE
More informationUNITED STATES AIR FORCE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS UNITED STATES. Senior Airman JOSEPH R. FEARS United States Air Force ACM S32331.
UNITED STATES AIR FORCE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS UNITED STATES v. Senior Airman JOSEPH R. FEARS United States Air Force ACM S32331 3 January 2017 Sentence adjudged 9 April 2015 by SPCM convened at Lajes
More informationDISCIPLINARY COMMITTEE OF THE ASSOCIATION OF CHARTERED CERTIFIED ACCOUNTANTS
DISCIPLINARY COMMITTEE OF THE ASSOCIATION OF CHARTERED CERTIFIED ACCOUNTANTS REASONS FOR DECISION In the matter of: Mr Ioannis Andronikou Heard on: Tuesday, 25 July 2017 and Wednesday, 26 July 2017 Location:
More informationHEARING DISCIPLINARY COMMITTEE OF THE ASSOCIATION OF CHARTERED CERTIFIED ACCOUNTANTS
DISCIPLINARY COMMITTEE OF THE ASSOCIATION OF CHARTERED CERTIFIED ACCOUNTANTS REASONS FOR DECISION In the matter of: Miss Ayesha Sidiqa Heard on: Thursday, 2 August 2018 Location: ACCA s Offices, The Adelphi,
More informationHEARING DISCIPLINARY COMMITTEE OF THE ASSOCIATION OF CHARTERED CERTIFIED ACCOUNTANTS
HEARING DISCIPLINARY COMMITTEE OF THE ASSOCIATION OF CHARTERED CERTIFIED ACCOUNTANTS REASONS FOR DECISION In the matter of: Mr Arsalan Shoukat Heard on: Monday, 25 February 2019 Location: The Adelphi,
More informationDip Chand and Sant Kumari. Richard Uday Prakash
BEFORE THE IMMIGRATION ADVISERS COMPLAINTS AND DISCIPLINARY TRIBUNAL Decision No: [2012] NZIACDT 60 Reference No: IACDT 006/11 IN THE MATTER BY of a referral under s 48 of the Immigration Advisers Licensing
More informationTHE RULES OF ARBITRATION OF THE PERMANENT ARBITRATION COURT AT THE CROATIAN CHAMBER OF ECONOMY
Please note that the translation provided below is only provisional translation and therefore does NOT represent an official document of the Republic of Croatia. It confers no rights and imposes no obligations
More informationON BEHALF OF. TAKE FURTHER NOTICE that pursuant to Rule 6.2 of IIROC s Rules of Practice and Procedure, that the hearing shall be designated on the:
INVESTMENT INDUSTRY REGULATORY ORGANIZATION OF CANADA ON BEHALF OF INVESTMENT DEALERS ASSOCIATION OF CANADA IN THE MATTER OF: THE DEALER MEMBER RULES OF THE INVESTMENT INDUSTRY REGULATORY ORGANIZATION
More informationMetro Nashville vs. Angela Coleman, Appellant
University of Tennessee, Knoxville Trace: Tennessee Research and Creative Exchange Tennessee Department of State, Opinions from the Administrative Procedures Division Law 8-10-2006 Metro Nashville vs.
More informationHEARING PARTLY HEARD IN PRIVATE
HEARING PARTLY HEARD The Committee has made a determination in this case that includes some private information. That information has been omitted from this text. GARNETT, Dean Andrew Registration No:
More informationON BEHALF OF. TAKE FURTHER NOTICE that pursuant to Rule 6.2 of IIROC s Rules of Practice and Procedure, that the hearing shall be designated on the:
INVESTMENT INDUSTRY REGULATORY ORGANIZATION OF CANADA ON BEHALF OF INVESTMENT DEALERS ASSOCIATION OF CANADA IN THE MATTER OF: THE DEALER MEMBER RULES OF THE INVESTMENT INDUSTRY REGULATORY ORGANIZATION
More informationTrevor John Conquer. The name of the complainant and any information identifying him or his wife is not to be published.
BEFORE THE IMMIGRATION ADVISERS COMPLAINTS AND DISCIPLINARY TRIBUNAL Decision No: [2015] NZIACDT 49 Reference No: IACDT 067/12 IN THE MATTER of a referral under s 48 of the Immigration Advisers Licensing
More informationBanking (Deposit Protection) Regulations, 2003 Statutory Instrument 29 of ARRANGEMENT OF SECTIONS
Banking (Deposit Protection) Regulations, 2003 Statutory Instrument 29 of 2003. ARRANGEMENT OF SECTIONS PART I PRELIMINARY Section 1. Title and date of commencement. 2. Interpretation. PART II APPOINTED
More informationGARY HORNE Respondent
NEW ZEALAND LAWYERS AND CONVEYANCERS DISCIPLINARY TRIBUNAL [2016] NZLCDT 36 LCDT 021/16 BETWEEN CANTERBURY WESTLAND STANDARDS COMMITTEE 1 Applicant AND GARY HORNE Respondent CHAIR Judge BJ Kendall (retired)
More informationHEARING DISCIPLINARY COMMITTEE OF THE ASSOCIATION OF CHARTERED CERTIFIED ACCOUNTANTS
DISCIPLINARY COMMITTEE OF THE ASSOCIATION OF CHARTERED CERTIFIED ACCOUNTANTS REASONS FOR DECISION In the matter of: Ms Fatima Fatima Heard on: Friday, 6 April 2018 Location: ACCA s Offices, The Adelphi,
More informationHEARING DISCIPLINARY COMMITTEE OF THE ASSOCIATION OF CHARTERED CERTIFIED ACCOUNTANTS. Heard on: Monday, 06 August 2018
DISCIPLINARY COMMITTEE OF THE ASSOCIATION OF CHARTERED CERTIFIED ACCOUNTANTS REASONS FOR DECISION In the matter of: Mr Gulfam Arshad Heard on: Monday, 06 August 2018 Location: The Adelphi, 1-11 John Adam
More information