IN THE MATTER OF THE UNIVERSAL MARKET INTEGRITY RULES AND IN THE MATTER OF ZOLTAN HORCSOK OFFER OF SETTLEMENT
|
|
- Bertina Grant
- 5 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 Settlement Agreement July 18, IN THE MATTER OF THE UNIVERSAL MARKET INTEGRITY RULES AND IN THE MATTER OF ZOLTAN HORCSOK OFFER OF SETTLEMENT A. INTRODUCTION Market Regulation Services Inc. ( RS ) has conducted an investigation (the Investigation ) into the conduct of Zoltan Horcsok ( Horcsok ). The Investigation has disclosed matters for which RS seeks certain sanctions against Horcsok pursuant to Rule 10.5 of the Universal Market Integrity Rules ( UMIR ). If this Offer of Settlement is accepted by Horcsok, the resulting settlement agreement (the Settlement Agreement ), which has been negotiated in accordance with Part 3 of UMIR Policy 10.8, is conditional upon the approval by a hearing panel (the Hearing Panel ) of the Hearing Committee appointed under Part 10 of UMIR Policy 10.8.
2 Horcsok agrees to waive all rights under UMIR to a hearing or to an appeal or review if the Settlement Agreement is approved by the Hearing Panel. RS and Horcsok jointly recommend that the Hearing Panel accept this Settlement Agreement. B. AGREEMENT AS TO REQUIREMENTS CONTRAVENED It is agreed that the following Requirements have been contravened by Horcsok: (a) (b) In the period February 4-9, 2005, you failed to fulfill your supervisory responsibilities contrary to Universal Market Integrity Rules ("UMIR") 7.1(4). On February 4, 2005, you engaged in conduct which resulted in UBS Securities Canada Inc. ( UBS Securities Canada ) contravening UMIR 10.11(1) and 10.12(1), for which you are liable pursuant to UMIR 10.3(4). C. ADMITTED FACTS RS relies upon the admitted facts which are set out in the Statement of Allegations attached as Appendix A to this Settlement Agreement. D. DISPOSITION For the contraventions in paragraph 6 above, Horcsok and RS have agreed upon the following disposition: (a) A fine of $100, payable by Horcsok to RS; 2
3 (b) Suspension of access to marketplaces regulated by RS for 3 months commencing upon the execution of this Settlement Agreement by Horcsok; (c) Strict supervision for 6 months after completion of the suspension referred to in (b) above; (d) Prohibition against acting as supervisor for 1 year after completion of the suspension referred to in (b) above; and, (e) Costs of $25, payable to RS. If this Settlement Agreement is accepted by a Hearing Panel, Horcsok agrees to pay the amount referred to in paragraph 8 within 30 days of such acceptance. E. PROCEDURES FOR ACCEPTANCE OF OFFER OF SETTLEMENT AND APPROVAL OF SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT Horcsok shall have until 5:00 p.m. July 5, 2005 to accept the Offer of Settlement and serve an executed copy thereof on RS. This Settlement Agreement shall be presented to a Hearing Panel at a public hearing (the Approval Hearing ) held for the purpose of approving the Settlement Agreement, in accordance with the procedures described in UMIR Policy 10.8 in addition to any other procedures as may be agreed upon between the parties. Horcsok acknowledges that RS shall notify the public and media of the Approval Hearing in such manner and by such media as RS sees fit. Pursuant to Part 3.4 of UMIR Policy 10.8, the Hearing Panel may accept or reject this Settlement Agreement. In the event the Settlement Agreement is accepted by a Hearing Panel, the matter becomes final, there can be no appeal or review of the matter, the disposition of the matter agreed upon in this Settlement Agreement will be included in the 3
4 permanent record of RS in respect of Horcsok, and RS will publish a summary of the Requirements contravened, the facts, and the disposition agreed upon in the Settlement Agreement. In the event the Hearing Panel rejects the Settlement Agreement, RS may proceed with a hearing of the matter before a differently constituted Hearing Panel pursuant to Part 3.7 of UMIR Policy 10.8 and this Settlement Agreement may not be referred to without the consent of both parties. F. OTHER MATTERS Horcsok agrees that, in the event he fails to comply with any of the terms of the Settlement Agreement, RS may enforce this settlement in any manner it deems appropriate and may, without limiting the generality of the foregoing, suspend Horcsok s access to marketplaces regulated by RS until RS determines that Horcsok is in full compliance with all terms of the Settlement Agreement. Horcsok agrees that neither he, nor anyone on his behalf, will make a public statement inconsistent with this Settlement Agreement. IN WITNESS WHEREOF the parties have signed this Settlement Agreement as of the dates noted below. DATED at Toronto on the 5 th day of July, R. Colson Witness Signature Zoltan Horcsok Zoltan Horcsok 4
5 R. Colson Name of Witness 70 Bond St, Toronto Address of Witness DATED at Toronto, Ontario on the 5 th day of July, Per: Rosemary Chan Rosemary Chan Vice President Market Policy & General Counsel Market Regulation Services Inc. This foregoing Settlement Agreement is hereby accepted this 18 th day of July, 2005, by the following hearing panel constituted to review the terms thereof: Per: Murray A. Clemens Panel Chair Per: D. Lawson Per: Guenther W. Kleberg Panel Member Panel Member 5
6 APPENDIX "A" IN THE MATTER OF THE UNIVERSAL MARKET INTEGRITY RULES AND IN THE MATTER OF ZOLTAN HORCSOK STATEMENT OF ALLEGATIONS I. REQUIREMENTS CONTRAVENED 1. Zoltan Horcsok ( Horcsok ) agrees that he contravened Universal Market Integrity Rules ("UMIR") 7.1(4) and that he engaged in conduct which resulted in UBS Securities Canada Inc. ( UBS Securities Canada ) contravening UMIR 10.11(1) and 10.12(1), for which he is liable pursuant to UMIR 10.3(4). 2. The text of the relevant Requirements is set out at Schedule "A". II. THE FACTS RELIED UPON A. Overview 3. On February 10, 2005, UBS Securities Canada advised RS that it, and its US affiliate, UBS Securities LLC ( UBS LLC ), were conducting an internal review of the actions taken by two UBS Securities Canada employees and one UBS LLC employee on February 4, Horcsok and Glen Grossmith ( Grossmith ) were the Canadian employees involved. Mark Webb ( Webb ), a trader employed at UBS LLC, was the U.S. based employee involved. Horcsok was Grossmith s supervisor.
7 2. 5. RS s investigation disclosed that on February 4, 2005, Webb used Horcsok and Grossmith to assist him in substantiating and perpetuating what they later learned was Webb s lie to the compliance department of UBS LLC concerning his principal trading in Phelps Dodge Corporation ( PD.N ), a stock traded on the New York Stock Exchange. 6. On that day, Webb received an order to buy 120,000 shares of PD.N from an US client. After filling 6,000 shares of the order, the client cancelled the outstanding order and moved it to another dealer for completion. Webb became angry and he immediately bought 10,000 shares of PD.N as principal. When the client complained to UBS LLC, resulting in Webb being questioned by the UBS LLC compliance department, he lied and stated that the 10,000 shares were purchased for a Canadian client. 7. Webb then contacted Horcsok and without disclosing the facts set out in paragraph 6, Webb asked Horcsok whether he had any tickets which had been stamped at 2:15 that day. In a subsequent telephone call Webb told Horcsok that he needed a buyer for 10,000 PD.N. Horcsok related Webb s requests to Grossmith and Grossmith found a Canadian purchaser for the shares. 8. At Webb s request, some of Webb s and Horcsok s communications were deliberately conducted on untaped telephone lines at UBS Securities Canada. 9. With Horcsok s knowledge, Grossmith then altered an existing trade ticket for another Canadian client s purchase of a TSX listed security. 10. Subsequently, Horcsok destroyed the altered trade ticket. 11. Grossmith, with Horcsok s knowledge, also entered false information on an electronic trade ticket in the OASIS trading system prepared for the Canadian client s purchase of the 10,000 shares of PD.N. 12. Grossmith, with Horcsok s knowledge, created a false and misleading Chat communication to Webb and made false statements to a UBS LLC employee.
8 Horcsok was not forthcoming about all of the circumstances of his and Grossmith s involvement in this matter when he spoke with by the President of UBS Securities Canada on the evening of February 4, That conversation focused on the issue of business continuity in Webb s absence. 14. Horcsok and Grossmith were questioned together once by UBS Securities Canada on February 7, They were individually questioned once by UBS LLC compliance personnel on February 8, At these interviews, Grossmith and Horcsok did not disclose all of the circumstances described herein. On February 9, 2005, when UBS LLC requested another interview of Grossmith, Horcsok asked to speak to UBS LLC Compliance. At this time, he disclosed all of the circumstances relating to his and Grossmith s and Trader A s involvement in the matter to UBS Securities Canada and UBS LLC compliance, who participated in the meeting via teleconference. 15. By destroying the Canadian trade ticket, and participating in the altering of the ticket with Grossmith, Horcsok engaged in conduct which resulted in UBS contravening UMIR 10.11(1) and 10.12(1), for which he is liable pursuant to UMIR 10.3(4). 16. Horcsok was Grossmith s direct supervisor. By involving Grossmith in the fulfillment of Webb s request, deliberately conducting telephone conversations with Webb on untaped telephone lines, failing to bring Webb s request to the immediate attention of UBS Securities Canada s compliance department and instead, misleading UBS Securities Canada about his and Grossmith s involvement for several days, Horcsok contravened his supervisory obligations under UMIR 7.1(4). 17. Horcsok obtained the Canadian trade ticket (which was altered and which Horcsok later destroyed) from another trader who directly reported to him. Such conduct contravened Horcsok s supervisory obligations under UMIR 7.1(4).
9 4. Relevant Personnel Horcsok 18. Horcsok has been employed in the securities industry since He has been employed with UBS Securities Canada Inc. ( UBS Securities Canada ) and its predecessor companies since As of February 2005, he was the Executive Director, Head of Sales Trading. In this capacity, Horcsok supervised 10 sales traders in the Toronto office, and 2 sales traders in the Montreal office, of UBS Securities Canada. 20. As of February 2005, Horcsok had directly supervised Grossmith and the other trader involved in this matter (the Trader A ) for at least 12 months. 21. On February 22, 2005, Horcsok was dismissed by UBS Securities Canada because of the seriousness with which it viewed the circumstances set out herein. 22. Horcsok has no prior disciplinary history. Grossmith 23. Grossmith has been employed in the securities industry since In 2000, he became employed with the predecessor of UBS Securities Canada as a sales trader. As of February 2005, he was Executive Director, Equity Sales Trading. 25. In 2000, Grossmith was fined $35,000 by the Toronto Stock Exchange ( TSX ) and suspended for one month for several high-closing trades he executed while employed at another investment dealer for the account of Royal Capital Management. 26. In 1995, Grossmith was fined $2,500 by the TSX for opening trading in one of his stock of responsibility later than the time fixed by the TSX.
10 On February 22, 2005 Grossmith was dismissed by UBS Securities Canada because of the seriousness with which it viewed the circumstances set out herein. Webb 28. As of February 2005, Webb was employed as a trader for UBS LLC. 29. As of July 28, 2004, Webb became the Head of Facilitation Trading for Canadian securities at UBS Securities Canada. He held that position at the time of the events in issue. Webb worked on the Canadian desk of UBS LLC s Stamford, Connecticut office and he reported directly to the CEO of UBS Securities Canada. Webb was responsible for trading in interlisted Canadian equity securities and select US stocks, including PD.N. 30. On February 22, 2005, Webb was dismissed from UBS LLC. The Events of February 4, Between 9:41 a.m. and 9:54 a.m., Trader A received a series of orders via to purchase shares of Cameco Corporation ( CCO ) totaling 35,000 shares for the account of Client X. CCO is a TSX listed security. The type of communication used by the client is known at UBS Securities Canada as a Chat. 32. At 9:43 a.m., a trade ticket was time stamped by Trader A for the purchase of the 35,000 shares of CCO ( the Client X ticket ). 33. Between 9:55:59 a.m. and 9:59:51 a.m., Trader A bought 5,000 CCO through 4 trades for Client X. The market moved away from the limit prices set by Client X and no additional shares were bought. 34. At 2:17:06 p.m., Webb, working on the Stamford, Connecticut desk of UBS LLC, received a buy order for 120,000 Phelps Dodge shares ( PD.N ), which trades on the New York Stock Exchange, from a U.S. client. At 2:18:54 p.m.,
11 6. after Webb filled 6,000 shares of the U.S. client s order, the U.S. client cancelled the order and moved it to another U.S. dealer for completion. 35. As retaliation for the client moving the order, Webb bought 10,000 PD.N shares as principal between 2:20:06 p.m. and 2:24:23 p.m. 36. Shortly after these principal trades were conducted by Webb, the U.S. client contacted UBS LLC s compliance department and complained about Webb s purchase of PD.N. Webb was questioned and advised his supervisors that the 10,000 PD.N had been bought for a Canadian client, pursuant to an order received earlier that day. This explanation was untrue. 37. At 2:34:08 p.m., Webb called Horcsok in Toronto. Horcsok s telephone line is tape recorded. Horcsok was asked to call Webb back at an internal number for the Stamford office. Webb told Horcsok, I need your help with something badly right away. 38. Seconds later, Horcsok returned Webb s call and Webb asked not taped, right?. When Horcsok replied that the call was taped, Webb said so phone me somewhere else. Horcsok agreed. 39. At 2:44:39 p.m., Webb called Horcsok again. The following comments were made: Webb: I need to talk to you somewhere off here. Horcsok: Okay, just give me the number where I can reach you. Webb: I don t know where you can reach me, you gotta run though because it s got to be quick. Horcsok: Okay, what number did I give before? Webb: Do you have any tickets stamped like 2:15?
12 Some time following the 2:44:39 p.m. telephone conversation, Horcsok called and spoke to Webb on a non-taped line in a conference room at UBS Securities Canada. According to Horcsok, Webb said: you need to find a buyer for 10,000 Phelps Dodge. I may have a problem. and you ve got to be quick. Horcsok told Webb he would see what he could do. 41. Horcsok then approached Grossmith and advised him that Webb needed to find a buyer for 10,000 PD.N shares. Horcsok advised Grossmith there was an urgency and panic in Webb s tone when he made the request. 42. Subsequently, Grossmith contacted Canadian Client Y to solicit a purchase by Client Y of 10,000 shares of PD.N. Client Y agreed to buy the shares. A new ticket was not completed. 43. Horcsok then spoke to approximately twelve UBS Securities Canada traders, including Trader A, at their respective trading desks in an attempt to find a paper buy trade ticket stamped around 2:15 p.m. He told the traders that Webb is in trouble. 44. Because UBS Securities Canada generally uses electronic trading tickets generated by its OASIS trade system, there were very few paper trade tickets being used that day. 45. Eventually, after reviewing the few paper tickets that were in use, Horcsok asked Trader A for the Client X ticket which was stamped at 9:43 a.m. Trader A advises that he felt obliged to provide the ticket to Horcsok as he was Trader A s supervisor. 46. Horcsok provided the Client X ticket to Grossmith, who, with Horcsok s knowledge, altered the ticket by crossing out the symbol CCO and writing in PD for PD.N and by changing the client information from Client X to Client Y. This ticket will now be called the altered Client X Ticket and remained time stamped at 9:43 a.m.
13 Between 2:54:10 p.m. and 2:57:08 p.m., Grossmith sent a Chat to Webb containing fabricated information to support Webb s lie to the compliance department at UBS LLC that Webb s purchase of the 10,000 shares as principal was to fill a Canadian client order received by him earlier that day. 48. The Chat included a reference to Client Y as purchaser and stated that Grossmith had given the order to Webb at 9:43 a.m. that morning and that Grossmith was still waiting to be provided with the fill (9:43 a.m. being the time stamp on the original Client X ticket). 49. At 2:56:34 p.m., Horcsok spoke with Webb on Horcsok s taped telephone line. The following comments were made during the conversation: Webb: So we re all set, right? Horcsok: Yeah. Webb: Who is it, who is the customer? Horcsok: Check your Chat. Webb: I didn t check it. Who Chatted me? Horcsok: Grossmith Webb: I just closed it. I just need to know the name. Horcsok: Client Y Webb: Okay, perfect. Horcsok: Make a copy of this again, please. Webb: What s that? Horcsok: Keep a copy of this again.
14 9. Webb: Are you going to send me a copy of the ticket? Horcsok: Umm, I guess, I need to, huh. Webb: Hold on one second. (Webb talking to someone in the background) Do you want me to get a copy of the ticket? Do you want a copy of the ticket? (to Horcsok) No, bye 50. At 2:57:29 p.m., Grossmith prepared an OASIS trade ticket showing the following: Buy 10,000 PD.N for Client Y. Instructions: In line with volume, not held, unsolicited. The order, in fact, had been solicited. 51. The fill of information for the10,000 shares bought by Client Y was attached to the Oasis ticket in the Stamford Office. The fill matched the volumes and prices of shares bought by Webb as principal between 2:20:06 p.m. and 2:24:23 p.m. 52. In addition, Grossmith added a Trader Note on the OASIS ticket to correspond with the altered Client X ticket which stated that the paper trade ticket should have been for shares of PD not CCO. The Trader Note perpetuated the false story that Webb had been provided a Canadian client order to purchase 10,000 shares of PD.N earlier that morning. 53. At 3:00:31 p.m., Grossmith called Webb but reached another employee in the Stamford office of UBS LLC. In an effort to continue the charade, Grossmith told this employee that he had sent Webb a ticket earlier that morning for the purchase of PD.N. 54. At 3:06:11 p.m., Grossmith again contacted the Stamford office and spoke to the same employee. Grossmith made another statement to the effect that he had been waiting all day for Webb to fill out the ticket for the purchase of 10,000 of PD.N.
15 At 3:12:57 p.m., Client Y gave Grossmith an order to sell the 10,000 shares PD.N which it had agreed to purchase less than an hour prior. By then, the market price for PD.N had moved higher. 56. At 3:16.39 p.m., Grossmith prepared an OASIS ticket showing the following information: sell 10,000 PD for Client Y. Instructions: In line with volume, not held, unsolicited. 57. Grossmith inputted the OASIS trade ticket into the system and sent it to the Stamford office for execution. However, it was not filled because UBS LLC was concerned about placing any more orders for PD.N. This concern was not expressly relayed to Horcsok or Grossmith. 58. Eventually, Client Y had to give the sell order to another investment dealer who was able to sell the shares at a profit of approximately US$5, Sometime between 3:00 p.m. and 3:30 p.m., Horcsok, to Grossmith s knowledge, destroyed the altered Client X ticket. 60. At 3:31 p.m., Grossmith changed the Trader Note entry in the OASIS system from posit ticket PD instead of CCO to posit ticket PD.. By this time, the altered Client X ticket had been destroyed. This entry was intended to reflect that the altered Client X ticket was no longer going to be used to substantiate the PD.N trade. This change was made after an attempt to delete the entire Trader Note which Grossmith had entered earlier. However, the system would not delete the original note. 61. At 3:03:07 p.m., without Horcsok s knowledge a second paper ticket was prepared by Trader A for Client X s order to buy 35,000 CCO shares (the Replacement Client X ticket ). 62. The Replacement Client X ticket was time stamped at 15:03:07 p.m. by Trader A. A fill of 5,000 CCO was recorded. Trader A also placed the following notation on the ticket late time stamp, should be 9:41 as per client Chat.
16 11. Trader A printed out the Chat and attached it to the Replacement Client X ticket to record the execution time and verify the client instructions. 63. Trader A created the Replacement Client X ticket so there would be an audit trail for Client X s purchase of the 5,000 CCO. The Evening of February 4, Prior to leaving work on the afternoon of February 4 th, Horcsok tried to contact Webb in Stamford on more than one occasion, but was unable to reach him. Horcsok was unaware that Webb had lied to UBC LLC compliance until later that evening when Webb returned his call to Horcsok s mobile phone, by which time Horcsok was on his way home. 65. On the evening of February 4, 2005, Horcsok was contacted by the President of UBS Securities Canada who was in Florida. 66. Horcsok advised the President that Client Y had bought the 10,000 shares in question but that he and Grossmith did not know what was going on at the time. 67. Horcsok did not advise the President that some of the conversations with Webb were deliberately on untaped telephone lines, that he and Grossmith altered the Client X ticket and then subsequently destroyed it, or that Grossmith fabricated Chats and made untrue statements to an UBS LLC employee to back-up Webb s lies to UBS LLC compliance. Events Subsequent to February 4, As stated in paragraph 14 above, Grossmith and Horcsok were questioned further about these events on February 7 and 8, 2005 by UBS LLC and UBS Securities Canada compliance. However, in those interviews, Horcsok and Grossmith were not forthcoming about all of the circumstances of February 4, Finally at a meeting on February 9, 2005 which was convened at Horcsok s request after UBS LLC compliance had sought to interview
17 12. Grossmith again, Horcsok provided UBS Securities Canada and UBS LLC with the complete details concerning the events of February 4, 2005 and his and Grossmith s and Trader A s involvement on that day. 69. On February 22, 2005, after an internal investigation by UBS LLC and UBS Securities Canada, both Horcsok and Grossmith were terminated by UBS Securities Canada on the basis of the circumstances set out above. 70. To date, neither Grossmith nor Horcsok have been paid their 2004 bonuses by UBS Securities Canada. 71. No Canadian client was harmed and Horcsok has received no financial benefit. III. CONCLUSION 72. In summary, Horcsok s conduct described in paragraphs 46 and 59 resulted in UBS Securities Canada contravening UMIR 10.11(1) and 10.12(1) related to its audit trail requirements, for which Horcsok is liable pursuant to UMIR 10.3(4). 73. Horscok s conduct described in paragraphs 37, 38, 39, 40, 41, 43, 45, 46, 47, 48, 49, 52, 53, 54, 61, 62 and contravened UMIR 7.1(4) relating to his supervisory obligations. July 5th, 2005 Market Regulation Services Inc. Suite 900, Box King Street West Toronto, Ontario M5H 1J8 Investigations and Enforcement Telephone: Facsimile: TO: Zoltan Horcsok c/o Robert L. Colson Teplitsky, Colson Barristers Suite Bond Street Toronto, Ontario M5B 1X3 Telephone: (416) Facsimile: (416)
18 SCHEDULE A Page 1 of 2 Excerpts from the Universal Market Integrity Rules 7.1 Trading Supervision Obligations (4) The head of trading together with each person who has authority or supervision over or responsibility to the Participant for an employee of the Participant shall fully and properly supervise such employee as necessary to ensure the compliance of the employee with these Rules and each Policy Extension of Responsibility (4) Any officer or employee of a Participant or Access Person or any individual holding a similar position with a Participant or Access Person who engages in conduct that results in the Participant or Access Person contravening a Requirement may be found liable by the Market Regulator for the conduct and be subject to any penalty or remedy as if such person was the Participant or Access Person Audit Trail Requirements (1) Order and Trade Record - In addition to any information required to be recorded by a Participant in accordance with Part 11 of the Trading Rules, a Participant shall: (a) immediately following the receipt or origination of an order, record: (i) (ii) (iii) all order designations required by clause (b) of subsection (1) of Rule 6.2, the identifier of any investment adviser or registered representative receiving the order, and any information respecting the special terms attaching to the order required by subsection (2) of Rule 6.2, if applicable; (b) immediately following the entry of an order to trade on a marketplace, add to the record : (i) (ii) the identifier of the Participant through which any trade would be cleared and settled, the identifier assigned to the marketplace on which the order is entered; and (c) immediately following the variation or correction of an order, add to the record any information required by clause (a) which has been changed.
19 SCHEDULE A Page 2 of Retention and Inspection of Records and Instructions (1) A Participant shall retain: (a) (b) the record of each order as required by Rule 10.11; and sufficient information to identify the beneficial owner of each account for which a record of an order is retained, for a period of not less than seven years from the creation of the record of the order, and for the first two years, such record and information shall be kept in a readily accessible location...
IN THE MATTER OF THE UNIVERSAL MARKET INTEGRITY RULES AND IN THE MATTER OF GLEN GROSSMITH OFFER OF SETTLEMENT
Settlement Agreement July 18, 2005 2005-004 IN THE MATTER OF THE UNIVERSAL MARKET INTEGRITY RULES AND IN THE MATTER OF GLEN GROSSMITH OFFER OF SETTLEMENT A. INTRODUCTION Market Regulation Services Inc.
More informationJuly 28, IN THE MATTER OF THE UNIVERSAL MARKET INTEGRITY RULES AND IN THE MATTER OF
Settlement Agreement July 28, 2005 2005-006 IN THE MATTER OF THE UNIVERSAL MARKET INTEGRITY RULES AND IN THE MATTER OF IAN MACDONALD, EDWARD BOYD, PETER DENNIS AND DAVID SINGH OFFER OF SETTLEMENT A. INTRODUCTION
More informationINVESTMENT INDUSTRY REGULATORY ORGANIZATION OF CANADA IN THE MATTER OF: THE RULES OF THE INVESTMENT INDUSTRY REGULATORY ORGANIZATION OF CANADA
INVESTMENT INDUSTRY REGULATORY ORGANIZATION OF CANADA IN THE MATTER OF: THE RULES OF THE INVESTMENT INDUSTRY REGULATORY ORGANIZATION OF CANADA AND THE UNIVERSAL MARKET INTEGRITY RULES AND INTERACTIVE BROKERS
More informationMarch 11, IN THE MATTER OF THE UNIVERSAL MARKET INTEGRITY RULES AND IN THE MATTER OF RHONDA HYMERS OFFER OF SETTLEMENT
Settlement Agreement March 11, 2004 2004-004 IN THE MATTER OF THE UNIVERSAL MARKET INTEGRITY RULES AND IN THE MATTER OF RHONDA HYMERS OFFER OF SETTLEMENT A. INTRODUCTION 1. Market Regulation Services Inc.
More informationRe Credit Suisse Securities (Canada) Inc
Re Credit Suisse Securities (Canada) Inc IN THE MATTER OF: The Market Integrity Rules of the Investment Industry Regulatory Organization of Canada and The Universal Market Integrity Rules and Credit Suisse
More informationRe Savard. The Rules of the Investment Industry Regulatory Organization of Canada. The By-Laws of the Investment Dealers Association of Canada
Unofficial English Translation Re Savard IN THE MATTER OF: The Rules of the Investment Industry Regulatory Organization of Canada and The By-Laws of the Investment Dealers Association of Canada and Michel
More informationINVESTMENT INDUSTRY REGULATORY ORGANIZATION OF CANADA
INVESTMENT INDUSTRY REGULATORY ORGANIZATION OF CANADA IN THE MATTER OF: THE DEALER MEMBER RULES OF THE INVESTMENT INDUSTRY REGULATORY ORGANIZATION OF CANADA AND PORTFOLIO STRATEGIES SECURITIES INC. SETTLEMENT
More informationTHE RULES OF THE INVESTMENT INDUSTRY REGULATORY ORGANIZATION OF CANADA SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT PART I INTRODUCTION
IN THE MATTER OF: THE RULES OF THE INVESTMENT INDUSTRY REGULATORY ORGANIZATION OF CANADA AND HAMPTON SECURITIES LTD. SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT PART I INTRODUCTION 1. The Investment Industry Regulatory Organization
More informationINVESTMENT INDUSTRY REGULATORY ORGANIZATION OF CANADA
INVESTMENT INDUSTRY REGULATORY ORGANIZATION OF CANADA IN THE MATTER OF: THE RULES OF THE INVESTMENT INDUSTRY REGULATORY ORGANIZATION OF CANADA (IIROC) AND JOHN SHANE MACEACHERN SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT I.
More information2. The Enforcement Department of IIROC has conducted an investigation ( the Investigation ) in the conduct of Gerald Stefaniuk.
INVESTMENT INDUSTRY REGULATORY ORGANIZATION OF CANADA IN THE MATTER OF: THE RULES OF THE INVESTMENT INDUSTRY REGULATORY ORGANIZATION OF CANADA (IIROC) AND GERALD STEFANIUK AKA JERRY STEFANIUK SETTLEMENT
More informationRe Interactive Brokers Canada
Unofficial English Translation IN THE MATTER OF: Re Interactive Brokers Canada The Dealer Member Rules of the Investment Industry Regulatory Organization of Canada (IIROC) and The Universal Market Integrity
More informationMarch 7,
March 7, 2002 2002-061 UNIVERSAL MARKET INTEGRITY RULES Background On December 1, 2001, National Instrument 21-101 Marketplace Operation (the Marketplace Operation Instrument ) and National Instrument
More informationNotice to Public. Contested Hearing. MICHAEL BOND and SESTO DELUCA. December 20, 2006 No Suggested Routing Trading Legal and Compliance
Notice to Public Contested Hearing December 20, 2006 No. 2006-010 Suggested Routing Trading Legal and Compliance MICHAEL BOND and SESTO DELUCA Relevant UMIR Provisions 2.2 Manipulative and Deceptive Method
More informationIN THE MATTER OF THE BY-LAWS OF THE INVESTMENT DEALERS ASSOCIATION OF CANADA. Re: KELLY JOHN CAMPBELL HUSKY
IN THE MATTER OF THE BY-LAWS OF THE INVESTMENT DEALERS ASSOCIATION OF CANADA Re: KELLY JOHN CAMPBELL HUSKY Heard: May 1, 2006 Decision: May 10, 2006 Hearing Panel: Eric Spink, Chair Kathleen Jost William
More informationTHE RULES OF THE INVESTMENT INDUSTRY REGULATORY ORGANIZATION OF CANADA SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT PART I INTRODUCTION
IN THE MATTER OF: THE RULES OF THE INVESTMENT INDUSTRY REGULATORY ORGANIZATION OF CANADA AND DUNCAN ROY SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT PART I INTRODUCTION 1. The Investment Industry Regulatory Organization of Canada
More informationAugust 18, IN THE MATTER OF THE TSX VENTURE EXCHANGE INC. AND ROGER BRIAN ASHTON SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT
Offer of Settlement August 18, 2003 2003-006 IN THE MATTER OF THE TSX VENTURE EXCHANGE INC. AND ROGER BRIAN ASHTON SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT 1.0 INTRODUCTION 1.1 Staff of the TSX Venture Exchange Inc. (the
More informationIN THE MATTER OF THE UNIVERSAL MARKET INTEGRITY RULES AND IN THE MATTER OF DESJARDINS SECURITIES INC., JEAN-PIERRE DE MONTIGNY AND JEAN-LUC BRUNET
Settlement Agreement March 16, 2005 2005-002 IN THE MATTER OF THE UNIVERSAL MARKET INTEGRITY RULES AND IN THE MATTER OF DESJARDINS SECURITIES INC., JEAN-PIERRE DE MONTIGNY AND JEAN-LUC BRUNET OFFER OF
More informationIN THE MATTER OF DISCIPLINE PURSUANT TO BY-LAW 20 OF THE INVESTMENT DEALERS ASSOCIATION OF CANADA RE: STEVEN RODNEY JESKE SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT
IN THE MATTER OF DISCIPLINE PURSUANT TO BY-LAW 20 OF THE INVESTMENT DEALERS ASSOCIATION OF CANADA RE: STEVEN RODNEY JESKE SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT I. INTRODUCTION 1. The staff ( Staff ) of the Investment Dealers
More informationRe IPC Securities REASONS FOR DECISION
Re IPC Securities IN THE MATTER OF: The Rules of the Investment Industry Regulatory Organization of Canada and IPC Securities Corporation 2016 IIROC 32 Investment Industry Regulatory Organization of Canada
More information2. The Enforcement Department of IIROC has conducted an investigation ( the Investigation ) in the Respondent s conduct.
INVESTMENT INDUSTRY REGULATORY ORGANIZATION OF CANADA IN THE MATTER OF: THE RULES OF THE INVESTMENT INDUSTRY REGULATORY ORGANIZATION OF CANADA (IIROC) AND RICHARD STANFORD SMITH SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT I.
More informationNotice to Public. Contested Hearing. April 7, 2008 No Suggested Routing Trading Legal and Compliance STEVE HORROCKS
Notice to Public Contested Hearing April 7, 2008 No. 2008-004 Suggested Routing Trading Legal and Compliance STEVE HORROCKS Relevant UMIR Provisions 8.1 [Client-Principal Trading] Summary Commencing on
More informationIN THE MATTER OF THE SECURITIES ACT R.S.O. 1990, c. S.5, AS AMENDED -AND- IN THE MATTER OF MARK STEVEN ROTSTEIN AND EQUILIBRIUM PARTNERS INC.
Ontario Commission des 22 nd Floor 22e étage Securities valeurs mobilières 20 Queen Street West 20, rue queen ouest Commission de l Ontario Toronto ON M5H 3S8 Toronto ON M5H 3S8 IN THE MATTER OF THE SECURITIES
More informationORGANIZATION OF CANADA
INVESTMENT INDUSTRY REGULATORY ORGANIZATION OF CANADA IN THE MATTER OF: THE RULES OF THE INVESTMENT INDUSTRY REGULATORY ORGANIZATION OF CANADA AND THE BY-LAWS OF THE INVESTMENT DEALERS ASSOCIATION OF CANADA
More informationIN THE MATTER OF THE UNIVERSAL MARKET INTEGRITY RULES AND IN THE MATTER OF CIBC WORLD MARKETS INC. SCOTT MORTIMER AND CARL IRIZAWA
Settlement Agreement December 21, 2004 2004-008 Certain sections of this Settlement Agreement are redacted for privacy purposes. All redactions were approved by the RS Hearing Panel that approved this
More informationON BEHALF OF. TAKE FURTHER NOTICE that pursuant to Rule 6.2 of IIROC s Rules of Practice and Procedure, that the hearing shall be designated on the:
INVESTMENT INDUSTRY REGULATORY ORGANIZATION OF CANADA ON BEHALF OF INVESTMENT DEALERS ASSOCIATION OF CANADA IN THE MATTER OF: THE DEALER MEMBER RULES OF THE INVESTMENT INDUSTRY REGULATORY ORGANIZATION
More information2. The Enforcement Department of IIROC has conducted an investigation (the Investigation ) into the conduct of the Respondent.
INVESTMENT INDUSTRY REGULATORY ORGANIZATION OF CANADA IN THE MATTER OF: THE RULES OF THE INVESTMENT INDUSTRY REGULATORY ORGANIZATION OF CANADA (IIROC) AND XAVIER CHENG KUO LI SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT I. INTRODUCTION
More informationRe Richardson. The By-Laws of the Investment Dealers Association of Canada
Re Richardson IN THE MATTER OF: The By-Laws of the Investment Dealers Association of Canada and The Dealer Member Rules of the Investment Industry Regulatory Organization of Canada (IIROC) and Paul Frederick
More informationSETTLEMENT AGREEMENT
INVESTMENT INDUSTRY REGULATORY ORGANIZATION OF CANADA IN THE MATTER OF: THE RULES OF THE INVESTMENT INDUSTRY REGULATORY ORGANIZATION OF CANADA (IIROC) AND BENJAMIN HUW DAVIES SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT I. INTRODUCTION
More informationON BEHALF OF. TAKE FURTHER NOTICE that pursuant to Rule 6.2 of IIROC s Rules of Practice and Procedure, that the hearing shall be designated on the:
INVESTMENT INDUSTRY REGULATORY ORGANIZATION OF CANADA ON BEHALF OF INVESTMENT DEALERS ASSOCIATION OF CANADA IN THE MATTER OF: THE DEALER MEMBER RULES OF THE INVESTMENT INDUSTRY REGULATORY ORGANIZATION
More informationINVESTMENT INDUSTRY REGULATORY ORGANIZATION OF CANADA MARKET REGULATION SERVICES INC. IN THE MATTER OF: THE MARKET INTEGRITY RULES OF THE
INVESTMENT INDUSTRY REGULATORY ORGANIZATION OF CANADA ON BEHALF OF MARKET REGULATION SERVICES INC. IN THE MATTER OF: THE MARKET INTEGRITY RULES OF THE INVESTMENT INDUSTRY REGULATORY ORGANIZATION OF CANADA
More informationTHE PURPOSE OF THE HEARING
INVESTMENT INDUSTRY REGULATORY ORGANIZATION OF CANADA IN THE MATTER OF: THE RULES OF THE INVESTMENT INDUSTRY REGULATORY ORGANIZATION OF CANADA AND EARL MAREK NOTICE OF HEARING TAKE NOTICE that pursuant
More informationSETTLEMENT AGREEMENT
INVESTMENT INDUSTRY REGULATORY ORGANIZATION OF CANADA IN THE MATTER OF: THE RULES OF THE INVESTMENT INDUSTRY REGULATORY ORGANIZATION OF CANADA (IIROC) AND THE BY-LAWS OF THE INVESTMENT DEALERS ASSOCIATION
More informationSETTLEMENT AGREEMENT
IN THE MATTER OF: THE RULES OF THE INVESTMENT INDUSTRY REGULATORY ORGANIZATION OF CANADA AND CHRISTOPHER RUTLEDGE SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT PART I INTRODUCTION 1. The Investment Industry Regulatory Organization
More information2. IIROC s Enforcement Department has conducted an investigation into Mackie s conduct (the Investigation ).
INVESTMENT INDUSTRY REGULATORY ORGANIZATION OF CANADA IN THE MATTER OF: THE RULES OF THE INVESTMENT INDUSTRY REGULATORY ORGANIZATION OF CANADA AND MACKIE RESEARCH CAPITAL CORPORATION SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT
More informationTHE RULES OF THE INVESTMENT INDUSTRY REGULATORY ORGANIZATION OF CANADA SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT PART I INTRODUCTION
IN THE MATTER OF: THE RULES OF THE INVESTMENT INDUSTRY REGULATORY ORGANIZATION OF CANADA AND NICHOLAS KARAKOLIS SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT PART I INTRODUCTION 1. The Investment Industry Regulatory Organization
More informationNOTICE OF HEARING INVESTMENT INDUSTRY REGULATORY ORGANIZATION OF CANADA THE RULES OF THE INVESTMENT INDUSTRY REGULATORY ORGANIZATION OF CANADA
INVESTMENT INDUSTRY REGULATORY ORGANIZATION OF CANADA IN THE MATTER OF: THE RULES OF THE INVESTMENT INDUSTRY REGULATORY ORGANIZATION OF CANADA AND ROLAND PAPP NOTICE OF HEARING TAKE NOTICE that pursuant
More informationSETTLEMENT AGREEMENT
Unofficial English Translation INVESTMENT INDUSTRY REGULATORY ORGANIZATION OF CANADA IN THE MATTER OF: THE RULES OF THE INVESTMENT INDUSTRY REGULATORY ORGANIZATION OF CANADA (IIROC) AND THE BY-LAWS OF
More informationMANIPULATIVE AND DECEPTIVE ACTIVITIES
January 30, 2004 No. 2004-003 Suggested Routing: Trading, Legal & Compliance REQUEST FOR COMMENTS MANIPULATIVE AND DECEPTIVE ACTIVITIES Summary The Board of Directors of Market Regulation Services Inc.
More informationREASONS FOR DECISION
Reasons for Decision File No. 201519 IN THE MATTER OF A DISCIPLINARY HEARING PURSUANT TO SECTIONS 20 AND 24OF BY-LAW NO. 1 OF THE MUTUAL FUND DEALERS ASSOCIATION OF CANADA Re: Terry William Sukman Heard:
More informationNOTICE OF HEARING. Unofficial English Translation INVESTMENT INDUSTRY REGULATORY ORGANIZATION OF CANADA IN THE MATTER OF: THE RULES OF THE
Unofficial English Translation INVESTMENT INDUSTRY REGULATORY ORGANIZATION OF CANADA IN THE MATTER OF: THE RULES OF THE INVESTMENT INDUSTRY REGULATORY ORGANIZATION OF CANADA AND THE UNIVERSAL MARKET INTEGRITY
More informationRe Trudeau UNANIMOUS DECISION ON THE MERITS
Unofficial English Translation Re Trudeau IN THE MATTER OF: The Rules of the Investment Industry Regulatory Organization of Canada (IIROC) and Jean-Louis Trudeau 2017 IIROC 51 Hearing Panel of the Investment
More informationTHE RULES OF THE INVESTMENT INDUSTRY REGULATORY ORGANIZATION OF CANADA SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT PART I INTRODUCTION
IN THE MATTER OF: THE RULES OF THE INVESTMENT INDUSTRY REGULATORY ORGANIZATION OF CANADA AND ULA HARTNER SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT PART I INTRODUCTION 1. The Investment Industry Regulatory Organization of Canada
More informationNotice to Public. Contested Hearing. Northern Securities Inc., Victor Alboini, and Christopher Shaule. October 20, 2005 No.
Notice to Public Contested Hearing October 20, 2005 No. 2005-012 Suggested Routing Trading Legal and Compliance Northern Securities Inc., Victor Alboini, and Christopher Shaule Relevant UMIR Provisions
More informationIN THE MATTER OF THE SECURITIES ACT, R.S.O. 1990, c. S.5, AS AMENDED - AND - IN THE MATTER OF ZHEN (STEVEN) PANG and OASIS WORLD TRADING INC.
Ontario Commission des 22 nd Floor 22e étage Securities valeurs mobilières 20 Queen Street West 20, rue queen ouest Commission de l Ontario Toronto ON M5H 3S8 Toronto ON M5H 3S8 IN THE MATTER OF THE SECURITIES
More informationNOTICE OF HEARING INVESTMENT INDUSTRY REGULATORY ORGANIZATION OF CANADA IN THE MATTER OF: THE DEALER MEMBER RULES OF THE
INVESTMENT INDUSTRY REGULATORY ORGANIZATION OF CANADA IN THE MATTER OF: THE DEALER MEMBER RULES OF THE INVESTMENT INDUSTRY REGULATORY ORGANIZATION OF CANADA AND THE BY-LAWS OF THE INVESTMENT DEALERS ASSOCIATION
More informationRe Assante Capital Management REASONS FOR DECISION
IN THE MATTER OF: Re Assante Capital Management The Rules of the Investment Industry Regulatory Organization of Canada (IIROC) and Assante Capital Management Ltd. 2015 IIROC 44 Investment Industry Regulatory
More informationINVESTMENT INDUSTRY REGULATORY ORGANIZATION OF CANADA
INVESTMENT INDUSTRY REGULATORY ORGANIZATION OF CANADA IN THE MATTER OF: THE RULES OF THE INVESTMENT INDUSTRY REGULATORY ORGANIZATION OF CANADA (IIROC) AND SCOTIA CAPITAL INC. SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT I. INTRODUCTION
More informationTHE PURPOSE OF THE HEARING
INVESTMENT INDUSTRY REGULATORY ORGANIZATION OF CANADA IN THE MATTER OF: THE RULES OF THE INVESTMENT INDUSTRY REGULATORY ORGANIZATION OF CANADA AND JULIAN ROBERT RICCI NOTICE OF HEARING TAKE NOTICE that
More informationRe Elue. The Dealer Member Rules of the Investment Industry Regulatory Organization of Canada ( IIROC ) 2014 IIROC 39
Re Elue IN THE MATTER OF: The Dealer Member Rules of the Investment Industry Regulatory Organization of Canada ( IIROC ) and Afam Elue 2014 IIROC 39 Investment Industry Regulatory Organization of Canada
More informationMarket Integrity Notice Guidance
Market Integrity Notice Guidance August 10, 2007 No. 2007-015 Suggested Routing Trading Legal and Compliance Key Topics Artificial Price Best Execution Best Price Obligation Designated Offshore Securities
More informationJAMES ALEXANDER MOON, MICHAEL EDWARD COMEAU AND MITCHELL TORCH
IN THE MATTER OF: THE RULES OF THE INVESTMENT INDUSTRY REGULATORY ORGANIZATION OF CANADA AND JAMES ALEXANDER MOON, MICHAEL EDWARD COMEAU AND MITCHELL TORCH SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT PART I INTRODUCTION 1. The
More informationRe Industrial Alliance Securities
IN THE MATTER OF: Re Industrial Alliance Securities The Rules of the Investment Industry Regulatory Organization of Canada and Industrial Alliance Securities Inc. 2014 IIROC 57 Investment Industry Regulatory
More informationTHE RULES OF THE INVESTMENT INDUSTRY REGULATORY ORGANIZATION OF CANADA SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT PART I INTRODUCTION
IN THE MATTER OF: THE RULES OF THE INVESTMENT INDUSTRY REGULATORY ORGANIZATION OF CANADA AND KEVIN FREDERICK PRICE SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT PART I INTRODUCTION 1. The Investment Industry Regulatory Organization
More informationTHE RULES OF THE INVESTMENT INDUSTRY REGULATORY ORGANIZATION OF CANADA SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT PART I INTRODUCTION
IN THE MATTER OF: THE RULES OF THE INVESTMENT INDUSTRY REGULATORY ORGANIZATION OF CANADA AND DARYL MICHAEL REBECK SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT PART I INTRODUCTION 1. The Investment Industry Regulatory Organization
More informationRe Suleiman DECISION AND REASONS
Re Suleiman IN THE MATTER OF: The Dealer Member Rules of the Investment Industry Regulatory Organization of Canada ( IIROC ) and Rizwan Suleiman ( Respondent ) 2016 IIROC 27 Investment Industry Regulatory
More informationRe: ROBERT SCOTT RITCHIE SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT DECISION
IN THE MATTER OF A SETTLEMENT HEARING PURSUANT TO BY-LAW 20 OF THE INVESTMENT DEALERS ASSOCIATION OF CANADA PACIFIC DISTRICT COUNCIL Re: ROBERT SCOTT RITCHIE SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT Panel: Appearances: Leon
More informationRE: MAURICE GUY BRAZEAU
IN THE MATTER OF A DISCIPLINE HEARING PURSUANT TO BY-LAW 20 OF THE INVESTMENT DEALERS ASSOCIATION OF CANADA RE: MAURICE GUY BRAZEAU NOTICE OF HEARING NOTICE is hereby given that a hearing will be held
More informationRS Market Integrity Notice Notice of Amendment Approval Provisions Respecting Manipulative and Deceptive Activities
13.1.3 RS Market Integrity Notice Notice of Amendment Approval Provisions Respecting Manipulative and Deceptive Activities April 1, 2005 Summary NOTICE OF AMENDMENT APPROVAL PROVISIONS RESPECTING MANIPULATIVE
More informationIN THE MATTER OF A DISCIPLINARY HEARING PURSUANT TO SECTIONS 20 AND 24 OF BY-LAW NO. 1 OF THE MUTUAL FUND DEALERS ASSOCIATION OF CANADA
Notice of Hearing File No. 201425 IN THE MATTER OF A DISCIPLINARY HEARING PURSUANT TO SECTIONS 20 AND 24 OF BY-LAW NO. 1 OF THE MUTUAL FUND DEALERS ASSOCIATION OF CANADA Re: Bemelekot Woldeyes Tewahade
More informationJEREMY NICHOLAS DREW AUSTIN
INVESTMENT INDUSTRY REGULATORY ORGANIZATION OF CANADA IN THE MATTER OF: THE RULES OF THE INVESTMENT INDUSTRY REGULATORY ORGANIZATION OF CANADA AND JEREMY NICHOLAS DREW AUSTIN NOTICE OF HEARING TAKE NOTICE
More informationINVESTMENT INDUSTRY REGULATORY ORGANIZATION OF CANADA
INVESTMENT INDUSTRY REGULATORY ORGANIZATION OF CANADA IN THE MATTER OF: THE DEALER MEMBER RULES OF THE INVESTMENT INDUSTRY REGULATORY ORGANIZATION OF CANADA AND THE BY-LAWS OF THE INVESTMENT DEALERS ASSOCIATION
More informationIN THE MATTER OF THE UNIVERSAL MARKET INEGRITY RULES AND IN THE MATTER OF JASON FEDIUK DECISION. Jean P. Whittow, Q.C. Chilwin C.
IN THE MATTER OF THE UNIVERSAL MARKET INEGRITY RULES AND IN THE MATTER OF JASON FEDIUK DECISION Hearing Panel: Chair Industry Member Industry Member Counsel For Market Regulation Services: Counsel For
More informationINVESTMENT DEALERS ASSOCIATION SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT
INVESTMENT DEALERS ASSOCIATION IN THE MATTER OF: THE BY-LAWS OF THE INVESTMENT DEALERS ASSOCIATION OF CANADA AND WILLIAM RICHARD BOOTH BELL WRIGHT SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT I. INTRODUCTION 1. The Enforcement
More informationRe Lewis. The Dealer Member Rules of the Investment Industry Regulatory Organization of Canada (IIROC) 2016 IIROC 01
Re Lewis IN THE MATTER OF: The Dealer Member Rules of the Investment Industry Regulatory Organization of Canada (IIROC) and Robert Lewis 2016 IIROC 01 Investment Industry Regulatory Organization of Canada
More informationIN THE MATTER OF THE SECURITIES ACT, R.S.O. 1990, c. S.5, AS AMENDED (the Act ) - AND -
Ontario Commission des P.O. Box 55, 19 th Floor CP 55, 19e étage Securities valeurs mobilières 20 Queen Street West 20, rue queen ouest Commission de l Ontario Toronto ON M5H 3S8 Toronto ON M5H 3S8 IN
More informationRE: ROCHE SECURITIES LIMITED and FRANCIS ROCHE
BULLETIN 3216 IN THE MATTER OF DISCIPLINE PURSUANT TO BY-LAW 20 OF THE INVESTMENT DEALERS ASSOCIATION OF CANADA RE: ROCHE SECURITIES LIMITED and FRANCIS ROCHE AMENDED SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT I. INTRODUCTION
More informationTHE RULES OF THE INVESTMENT INDUSTRY REGULATORY ORGANIZATION OF CANADA
IN THE MATTER OF: THE RULES OF THE INVESTMENT INDUSTRY REGULATORY ORGANIZATION OF CANADA AND MARTIN WENDALL MATTHEWS AND ARNOLD WARD FRANCIS SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT PART I INTRODUCTION 1. The Investment Industry
More information5. Staff and the Respondent jointly recommend that the District Council accept this Settlement Agreement.
BULLETIN NO. IN THE MATTER OF DISCIPLINE PURSUANT TO BY-LAW 20 OF THE INVESTMENT DEALERS ASSOCIATION OF CANADA RE: JORY CAPITAL INC. SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT I. INTRODUCTION 1. The staff ( Staff ) of the Investment
More informationORDER ENTRY DURING A REGULATORY HALT
April 16, 2004 No. 2004-010 Suggested Routing: Trading, Legal & Compliance REQUEST FOR COMMENTS ORDER ENTRY DURING A REGULATORY HALT Summary The Board of Directors of Market Regulation Services Inc. (
More informationPROVISIONS RESPECTING MANIPULATIVE AND DECEPTIVE ACTIVITIES
August 13, 2004 No. 2004-017 Suggested Routing: Trading, Legal & Compliance REQUEST FOR COMMENTS PROVISIONS RESPECTING MANIPULATIVE AND DECEPTIVE ACTIVITIES Summary The Board of Directors of Market Regulation
More information11 ROC OCRCVM nov o2 2017
ISSUED IIROC Nation^Weafing Coordinator 11 ROC OCRCVM nov o2 2017 Investment Industry Regulatory Organization ot Canada Organisme canadien de reglementalion du commerce des v.ileurs mobilieres IN THE MATTER
More informationIN THE MATTER OF the Toronto Stock Exchange Act, R.S.O. 1990, c. T.15, as amended, and Part XVII of the General By-law of The Toronto Stock Exchange
Decision June 12, 2003 2003-002 IN THE MATTER OF the Toronto Stock Exchange Act, R.S.O. 1990, c. T.15, as amended, and Part XVII of the General By-law of The Toronto Stock Exchange AND IN THE MATTER OF
More informationNOTICE OF AMENDMENT APPROVAL DEFINITION OF REGULATED PERSON
February 6, 2004 No. 2004-006 Suggested Routing: Trading, Legal & Compliance NOTICE OF AMENDMENT APPROVAL DEFINITION OF REGULATED PERSON Summary Effective February 6, 2004, the Alberta Securities Commission,
More informationRe National Bank Direct Brokerage Inc. Decision
Unofficial English Translation Re National Bank Direct Brokerage Inc. In the matter of: The Rules of the Investment Industry Regulatory Organization of Canada and The By-Laws of the Investment Dealers
More informationRULE 1 INTERPRETATION AND GENERAL PROVISIONS
RULE 1 INTERPRETATION AND GENERAL PROVISIONS 1-101 Definitions (1) Unless otherwise defined or interpreted or the subject matter or context otherwise requires, every term used in these Rules that is: (d)
More informationTHE PURPOSE OF THE HEARING
INVESTMENT INDUSTRY REGULATORY ORGANIZATION OF CANADA IN THE MATTER OF: THE RULES OF THE INVESTMENT INDUSTRY REGULATORY ORGANIZATION OF CANADA AND WASSEEM DIRANI NOTICE OF HEARING TAKE NOTICE that pursuant
More informationDecision on Settlement Agreement
Unofficial English Translation Re Béland In the matter of: The By-Laws of the Investment Dealers Association of Canada and The Rules of the Investment Industry Regulatory Organization of Canada and Alain
More informationINVESTMENT DEALERS ASSOCIATION OF CANADA
INVESTMENT DEALERS ASSOCIATION OF CANADA IN THE MATTER OF: THE BY-LAWS OF THE INVESTMENT DEALERS ASSOCIATION OF CANADA AND ANDY HYON CHUL KIM NOTICE OF HEARING TAKE NOTICE that pursuant to Part 10 of By-law
More informationNOTICE OF HEARING INVESTMENT INDUSTRY REGULATORY ORGANIZATION OF CANADA IN THE MATTER OF: THE DEALER MEMBER RULES OF THE HENRY COLE
INVESTMENT INDUSTRY REGULATORY ORGANIZATION OF CANADA IN THE MATTER OF: THE DEALER MEMBER RULES OF THE INVESTMENT INDUSTRY REGULATORY ORGANIZATION OF CANADA AND HENRY COLE NOTICE OF HEARING TAKE NOTICE
More information2012 BCSECCOM 59. David Charles Greenway and Kjeld Werbes. Securities Act, RSBC 1996, c Hearing
David Charles Greenway and Kjeld Werbes Securities Act, RSBC 1996, c. 418 Hearing Panel Brent W. Aitken Vice Chair Kenneth G. Hanna Commissioner David J. Smith Commissioner Hearing date January 23, 2012
More informationRe Laurentian Bank Securities
Unofficial English Translation IN THE MATTER OF: Re Laurentian Bank Securities The Dealer Member Rules of the Investment Industry Regulatory Organization of Canada (IIROC) and The By-Laws of the Investment
More informationIN THE MATTER OF THE SECURITIES ACT, R.S.O. 1990, c. S.5, AS AMENDED - AND -
Ontario Commission des 22 nd Floor 22e étage Securities valeurs mobilières 20 Queen Street West 20, rue queen ouest Commission de l Ontario Toronto ON M5H 3S8 Toronto ON M5H 3S8 IN THE MATTER OF THE SECURITIES
More informationNOTICE OF HEARING INVESTMENT INDUSTRY REGULATORY ORGANIZATION OF CANADA THE RULES OF THE INVESTMENT INDUSTRY REGULATORY ORGANIZATION OF CANADA
INVESTMENT INDUSTRY REGULATORY ORGANIZATION OF CANADA IN THE MATTER OF: THE RULES OF THE INVESTMENT INDUSTRY REGULATORY ORGANIZATION OF CANADA AND DAVID EDWARD SLOAN NOTICE OF HEARING TAKE NOTICE that
More information2. IIROC s Enforcement Department has conducted an investigation (the Investigation ) into the Respondents conduct.
INVESTMENT INDUSTRY REGULATORY ORGANIZATION OF CANADA IN THE MATTER OF: THE DEALER MEMBER RULES OF THE INVESTMENT INDUSTRY REGULATORY ORGANIZATION OF CANADA AND BARRET CAPITAL MANAGEMENT INC., JAMIE COHEN
More informationREASONS FOR DECISION
Reasons for Decision File No. 201618 IN THE MATTER OF A SETTLEMENT HEARING PURSUANT TO SECTION 24.4 OF BY-LAW NO. 1 OF THE MUTUAL FUND DEALERS ASSOCIATION OF CANADA Re: John Alojz Kodric Heard: December
More informationRE: JOHN CRAIG DUNN NOTICE OF HEARING IN THE MATTER OF A DISCIPLINE HEARING PURSUANT TO BY-LAW 20
IN THE MATTER OF A DISCIPLINE HEARING PURSUANT TO BY-LAW 20 OF THE INVESTMENT DEALERS ASSOCIATION OF CANADA RE: JOHN CRAIG DUNN NOTICE OF HEARING NOTICE is hereby given that a hearing will be held before
More informationACCEPTANCE AND CONSENT
THE NEW YORK STOCK EXCHANGE LLC LETTER OF ACCEPTANCE, WAIVER AND CONSENT NO. 2012031480718 TO: RE: The New York Stock Exchange LLC do Department of Enforcement Financial Industry Regulatory Authority ("FINRA")
More informationRe Watts DECISION AND REASONS
Re Watts IN THE MATTER OF: The Dealer Member Rules of the Investment Industry Regulatory Organization of Canada and John Phillip Watts 2016 IIROC 28 Investment Industry Regulatory Organization of Canada
More informationMUTUAL FUND DEALERS ASSOCIATION OF CANADA RE: SHAWN SANDINK DISCIPLINARY HEARING. Hearing: June 22, 2006 Decision: July 19, DECISION and REASONS
Decision and Reasons File No. 200602 MUTUAL FUND DEALERS ASSOCIATION OF CANADA IN THE MATTER OF A DISCIPLINARY HEARING PURSUANT TO SECTIONS 20 and 24 OF BY-LAW NO. 1 OF THE MUTUAL FUND DEALERS ASSOCIATION
More informationThe Dealer Member Rules of the Investment Industry Regulatory Organization of Canada
INVESTMENT INDUSTRY REGULATORY ORGANIZATION OF CANADA In the matter of: The Dealer Member Rules of the Investment Industry Regulatory Organization of Canada and Paul Christopher Darrigo NOTICE OF HEARING
More informationRe Toh. The Dealer Member Rules of the Investment Industry Regulatory Organization of Canada (IIROC)
Re Toh IN THE MATTER OF: The Dealer Member Rules of the Investment Industry Regulatory Organization of Canada (IIROC) and The By-Laws of the Investment Dealers Association of Canada (IDA) and Weng Lok
More informationRe Gebert REASONS AND DECISION
Re Gebert IN THE MATTER OF: The Dealer Member Rules of the Investment Industry Regulatory Organization of Canada and Jeffrey Edward Gebert 2016 IIROC 44 Investment Industry Regulatory Organization of Canada
More informationAGREED STATEMENT OF FACTS
Agreed Statement of Facts File No. 201434 IN THE MATTER OF A DISCIPLINARY HEARING PURSUANT TO SECTIONS 20 AND 24 OF BY-LAW NO. 1 OF THE MUTUAL FUND DEALERS ASSOCIATION OF CANADA Re: Yan Feng Li (also known
More informationMarket Integrity Notice
Market Integrity Notice Request for Comments March 14, 2008 No. 2008-004 Suggested Routing Trading Legal and Compliance Key Topics Audit Trail Identifier Trading Symbol PROVISIONS RESPECTING THE ASSIGNMENT
More informationNYSE AMERICAN LLC LETTER OF ACCEPTANCE, WAIVER, AND CONSENT NO
NYSE AMERICAN LLC LETTER OF ACCEPTANCE, WAIVER, AND CONSENT NO. 2016-07-01304 TO: RE: NYSE AMERICAN LLC Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith Incorporated, Respondent CRD No. 7691 Merrill Lynch, Pierce,
More informationRe Mendelman REASONS FOR ACCEPTANCE OF SETTLEMENT
Re Mendelman IN THE MATTER OF: The Rules of the Investment Industry Regulatory Organization of Canada (IIROC) and Allen Samuel Mendelman 2016 IIROC 14 Investment Industry Regulatory Organization of Canada
More informationNYSE ARCA, INC. NYSE REGULATION, Complainant, Proceeding No January 8, 2019 WEDBUSH SECURITIES, INC. and EDWARD W.
NYSE ARCA, INC. NYSE REGULATION, Complainant, Proceeding No. 2016-07-01264 1 v. January 8, 2019 WEDBUSH SECURITIES, INC. and EDWARD W. WEDBUSH, Respondents. Edward W. Wedbush violated: (i) NYSE Arca Rules
More informationAmendments Respecting Trading Supervision Obligations
Rules Notice Notice of Approval/Implementation UMIR Please distribute internally to: Institutional Legal and Compliance Senior Management Trading Desk Retail Contact: Sanka Kasturiarachchi Policy Counsel,
More informationAMENDED NOTICE OF HEARING
INVESTMENT DEALERS ASSOCIATION OF CANADA IN THE MATTER OF: THE BY-LAWS OF THE INVESTMENT DEALERS ASSOCIATION OF CANADA AND ARGOSY SECURITIES INC. AND DAX SUKHRAJ AMENDED NOTICE OF HEARING TAKE NOTICE that
More informationIN THE MATTER OF THE SECURITIES ACT, R.S.O. 1990, c. S.5, AS AMENDED. - and -
Ontario Commission des P.O. Box 55, 22 nd Floor CP 55, 22e étage Securities valeurs mobilières 20 Queen Street West 20, rue queen ouest Commission de l Ontario Toronto ON M5H 3S8 Toronto ON M5H 3S8 IN
More information