IMPLICATIONS UNDER TAX LAWS OF FAMILY ARRANGEMENT, NOMINATION AND WILL
|
|
- Sherilyn Harrell
- 6 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 December 15, 2010 IMPLICATIONS UNDER TAX LAWS OF FAMILY ARRANGEMENT, NOMINATION AND WILL Balkrishna V. Jhaveri Nishith Desai Associates For discussion purpose only Advocate, High Court
2 DEFINITION OF FAMILY ARRANGEMENT BY HALSBURY S LAW OF ENGLAND Halsbury s Law of England define a family arrangement as an agreement between members of the same family, intended to be generally and reasonably for the benefit of the family either by compromising doubtful or disputed rights or by preserving the family property or the peace and security of the family by avoiding litigation or by saving its honour. 2
3 THE ESSENTIALS OF A FAMILY ARRANGEMENT In the landmark decision of Kale vs. Deputy Director of Consolidation (AIR 1976 SC 807) the Supreme Court laid down the following essentials of a valid family arrangement: (i) The family arrangement should be for the benefit of the family in general. (ii) (iii) (iv) The family arrangement must be bonafide, honest, voluntary and it should not be induced by fraud, coercion or undue influence. The purpose of the family arrangement should be to resolve present or possible family disputes and rival claims not necessarily legal claims by a fair and equitable division of the property amongst various members. The parties to the family arrangement must have antecedent title, claim or interest. Even if a possible claim in the property which is acknowledged by the parties to the settlement will be sufficient. (v) The consideration for entering into family arrangement should be preservation of family property, preservation of peace and honour of the family and avoidance of litigation. 3
4 The Landmark decision of the Supreme Court in Kale vs. Deputy Director of Consolidation (AIR 1976 SC 807) Lachmandas was the tenant & tenure holder of the agricutural land of 38 acres who died in 1948 leaving behind him three daughters Tikia Har Pyari Ram Pyari Kale (son) Under the U. P. Tenancy Act, 1939, the unmarried daughter inherits the property. - U. P. Consolidation of Holdings Act, Their Lordships held: The principles which apply to the case of ordinary compromise between strangers, do not equally apply to the case of compromise in the nature of family arrangements. Family arrangements are governed by a special equity peculiar to themselves and will be enforced if honestly made. 4
5 Continued. The object of the arrangement is to protect the family from long drawn litigation or perpetual strifes which mar the unity and solidarity of the family and create hatred and bad blood between the various members of the family. To-day when we are striving to build up an egaritarian society and are trying for a complete reconstruction of the society, a family arrangement by which the property is equitably divided between the various contenders so as to achieve an equal distribution of wealth instead of concentrating the same in the hands of a few is undoubtedly a milestone in the administration of justice. That is why the term family has to be understood in a wider sense so as to include within its fold not only close relations or legal heirs but even those persons who may have some sort of antecedent title, a semblance of a claim or even if they have a spes successions so that future disputes are sealed for ever and the family instead of fighting claims inter se and wasting time, money and energy on such fruitless or futile litigation is able to devote its attention to more constructive work in the larger interest of the country. 5
6 FAMILY ARRANGEMENT IS NOT A TAX PLANNING TOOL TO AVOID TAXATION ON DISTRIBUTION OF PROPERTIES. 6
7 FAMILY DISPUTE IS A PRELUDE TO FAMILY ARRANGEMENT Sahu Madhav Das vs. Mukund Ram (AIR 1955 SC 481) Dispute may be present or future. The threat of eruption of dispute is a good cause for a family arrangement. The test is whether the arrangement really removes the cause of dispute and makes the family more secure and happier. The example: K Venugopal vs. CIT (248 ITR 251, Mad.) K. Venugopal, the assessee, gave a sum of Rs. 3,40,000/- to his minor son pursuant to the family settlement. Interest was earned by the minor on the said amount. The question arose whether the interest income is taxable in the hands of the assessee u/s. 64(1)(v) of the I.T.Act, 1961? 7
8 List of some of the decisions where the courts have held that the claim of a family arrangement is not tenable as the assessees have failed to prove that there was a dispute among the members of the family 1. Income Tax Officer vs. Narendra S. Kapadia (1996) 58 ITD 329 (Mum.) 2. Gift-tax Officer vs. Shamjibhai Khimjibhai Patel (1994) 51 ITD 484 (Ahd.) 3. Kusumben Kantilal Shah vs. Income-tax Officer (1996) 56 ITD 476 (Ahd.) 4. CIT vs. Mrs. Bibijan Begum (1996) 221 ITR 836 (Gau) 5. Ashok Soi vs. Deputy Commissioner of Income-tax 74 ITD 235 (Delhi) 8
9 FAMILY IN A FAMILY ARRANGEMENT HAS A WIDER MEANING The Supreme Court in Ram Charan Das vs. Girja Nandini Devi (AIR 1996 SC 323, 329) held that: Court give effect to a family settlement upon the broad and general ground that it s object is to settle existing or future disputes regarding property amongst members of a family. The word family in this context is not to be understood in the narrow sense of being a group of person who are recongnised in law as having a right of succession or having a claim to a share in the property in dispute. -- CIT vs. Sea Rock Investment Pvt. Ltd. (317 ITR 253, Kar.) -- Pannalal Silk Mills Pvt. Ltd. vs. DCIT (44 ITD 458,Bom.) -- Kusumben Kantilal Shah vs. ITO (56 ITD 476, Ahd.) 9
10 ANTECEDENT TITLE, CLAIM OR INTEREST EVEN A POSSIBLE CLAIM Kale vs. Deputy Director of Consolidation (AIR 1976 SC 807) CED vs. Chandra Kala Garg (148 ITR 737, All.) Chunni Lal died in 1962 S.D.Garg (son) Chandra Kala S1 S2 Garg (wife) CIT vs. R. Ponnammal (164 ITR 706, Mad.) 10
11 WHETHER THE FAMILY ARRANGEMENT AMOUNTS TO A TRANSFER Hiran Bibi vs. Sohan Bibi (AIR 1914 PC 44) Sahu Madho Das vs. Mukund Ram (AIR 1955 SC 481) Ram Charan Das vs. Giraj Nandini Devi (AIR 1966 SC 323 at 329) Roshan Singh vs. Zile Singh (AIR 1988 SC 881) Kay Arr Enterprises vs. JCIT (99 TTJ 411, Chennai). Approved by the Madras High Court in 299 ITR 348. The assessee firm and the members of the family of Shri K. Rajgopal transferred shares of M/s.Lakshmi Mils Ltd. and M/s. Lakshmi Card Clothing Mfg. Co. Ltd. in favour of Shri G.K. Sundaram and Shri Narayanaswamy and the members of their families. The members of the families of Shri G.K. Sundaram and Shri Narayanaswamy transferred shares of M/s. Vijayeshwari Textile Mills Ltd. in favour of Shri K. Rajgopal and the members of his family. 11
12 WHETHER THE FAMILY ARRANGEMENT AMOUNTS TO A TRANSFER Continued Mrs. P. Sheela vs. Income-tax Officer (120 ITD 159, Bang.) Definition of the term transfer prior to its amendment by the Finance Act, 1987, w.e.f Insertion of the clauses (v) and (vi) to section 2(47) w.e.f Insertion of section 45(4) w.e.f CIT vs. A.N.Naik Associates (265 ITR 346, Bom.) Contrary decision of the Appellate Tribunal in the case of ACIT vs. Goyal Dresses (126 ITD 131, Chennai). After referring to the decision of the Bombay High Court in A.N.Naik Associates (supra), the Tribunal adopted the favourable view of the Kerala High Court in CIT vs. Kunnamkulam Mill Board (257 ITR 544) where the Court held that section 45(4) is not attracted in the case of retirement. The Tribunal also relied on the decision of the Madras Bench of the Tribunal in DCIT vs. G.K. Enterprises (131 Taxman 181) 12
13 CONCLUSION In a case of bone fide family arrangement which complies with the essentials of the family arrangement fully in letters and spirit, would not amount to transfer of a property as it amounts to mutual adjustment of rights among the members of the family. However as held by the Bombay High Court if a property of the firm is given to the retiring partner section 45(4) gets attracted as it deems transfer of a property to the retiring partner. A company is a legal entity and therefore, it cannot be a party to the family arrangement and hence the property of the company cannot be distributed pursuant to the family arrangement. 13
14 Cost of acquisition and the period of holding of the property in the hands of receiving member at the time of its sale CIT vs. Shanti Chandran (241 ITR 371, Mad.) The Madras High Court held that the family arrangement is analogous to partition and therefore, as provided in section 49 the cost of acquisition in the hands of the assessee is the cost incurred by the previous owner. Followed in ACIT vs. Baldev Raj Charla (121 TTJ 366, Delhi) Applicability of Clubbing provisions u/s. 64(1) Under the valid family arrangement there is no transfer as every one receives the property pursuant to antecedent title in the properties considered in the family arrangement and therefore, the clubbing provisions are not applicable. 14
15 Valid Family Arrangement does not give rise to gift u/s.2(xii) and 4(1) of the Gift-tax Act or taxable u/s. 4(1) of the Wealth-tax Act CGT vs. D. Nagrirathnam (266 ITR 342, Mad.) CWT vs. Santokh Singh (252 ITR 707, Del.) In the case of Banarasi Lal Aggarwal vs. CGT (230 ITR 114, P&H) the Court held the interest free loan given by the wife and sons to the assessee do not give them interest in the property and there was no antecedent title, claim or interest of the wife and sons in the property and hence the 3/4 th share given by the assessee to the wife and sons would amount to gift. 15
16 REGISTRATION OF THE FAMILY ARRANGEMENT AGREEMENT Section 17(1)(b) of the Registration Act,1908, lays down that a document for which registration is compulsory should by its own force, operate or purport to create, declare, assign, limit or extinguish either in present or in future any right, title or interest in an immovable property. Kale vs. Deputy Director of Consolidation (AIR 1976 SC 807) 16
17 NOMINATION Meaning Role of the nominee Appointment of minor as Nominee Nomination by Joint Account Holder Supreme Court decision in the case of Smt. Sarbati Devi & Anr. vs. Smt. Usha Devi (AIR 1984 SC 346) Latest decision of the Bombay High Court in the case of Harsha Nitin Kokate vs. The Saraswat Co-operative Bank Ltd. & Ors. [(2010) 5 Taxmann.com 43, Bom.] 17
18 Latest decision of the Supreme Court dated 15 th November, Nominee of bank account does not get succession rights The Supreme Court (SC) has clarified that the nominee of a depositor in a bank does not get ownership of the money in the account after death of the depositor. The nominee gets exclusive right to receive the money lying in the account. The money in the account will form part of the estate of the deceased depositor and devolve according to the rules of succession. In this case, Ram Chander vs Devender Kumar, one son was the nominee of his mother. After her death, he claimed he was the owner of the money in the account, to exclusion of his brother. The same rule will apply to government savings and other investments. 18
in NBFCs Presented by : Hitesh R. Shah Chartered Accountant 28 January
Typical Tax issues in NBFCs Presented by : Hitesh R. Shah Chartered Accountant 28 January 2013 1 It is a company registered under the Companies Act, 1956 and is engaged in the business of financing whether
More informationSEMINAR ON SECTION 14A DISALLOWANCE AND DEEMED DIVIDEND
SEMINAR ON SECTION 14A DISALLOWANCE AND DEEMED DIVIDEND Deemed Dividend-Legislative Intent The insertion of section 14A in 2001 was mainly done to make the following Supreme Court judgments non functional:
More informationTAX PLANNING THROUGH HUF AND FAMILY ARRANGEMENT
TAX PLANNING THROUGH HUF AND FAMILY ARRANGEMENT B Y C A M A N O J S K A R L E K A R HUF 2 Under Section 4 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 tax is payable by every person. The term Person as defined u/s 2(31)
More informationISSUES IN CAPITAL GAIN. NIHAR JAMBUSARIA 25 July, 2010
ISSUES IN CAPITAL GAIN NIHAR JAMBUSARIA 25 July, 2010 BUSINESS INCOME VS. CAPITAL GAINS Whether the assessee whose substantial income comprises long term capital gain can be said to be a trader of shares
More informationCIT vs. Manjula J. Shah - [2013] 355 ITR 474 (Bombay) 1
CIT vs. Manjula J. Shah - [2013] 355 ITR 474 (Bombay) 1 Where capital asset is acquired under a will or gift, indexed cost of acquisition is calculated with reference to year in which previous owner first
More informationA Fresh look at disallowances u/s 14A of Income Tax Act - By CA. K.K.Chhaparia
A Fresh look at disallowances u/s 14A of Income Tax Act - By CA. K.K.Chhaparia Now a days, every assessee who is doing investment or trading in shares are getting hit hard by the impact of section 14A.
More informationIN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL HYDERABAD BENCH B, HYDERABAD
IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL HYDERABAD BENCH B, HYDERABAD BEFORE SHRI P.MADHAVI DEVI, JUDICIAL MEMBER AND SHRI S. RIFAUR RAHMAN, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER ITA No. 503/Hyd/2012 Assessment Year: 2008-09,
More informationThe Law On Taxability Of Non Compete Fees Explained By Darryl Paul Barretto
By Darryl Paul Barretto Overview Payment received as non compete fee was treated as a capital receipt till the assessment year 2003 04. Through the Finance Act, 2002, the said receipt were made taxable
More informationIN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, BANGALORE BENCH B BEFORE SHRI JASON P BOAZ, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER AND SHRI N V VASUDEVAN, JUDICIAL MEMBER
Page 1 of 13 1 IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, BANGALORE BENCH B BEFORE SHRI JASON P BOAZ, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER AND SHRI N V VASUDEVAN, JUDICIAL MEMBER (Asst. year 2005-06) M/s Synopsys International
More informationINTENSIVE STUDY GROUP 08/08/2013 CA SANJAY CHOKSHI
CHAMBER OF TAX CONSULTANTS INTENSIVE STUDY GROUP 08/08/2013 CA SANJAY CHOKSHI CIT V. TEXTOOL CO. LTD. SUPREME COURT QUESTION REFERRED: Whether on the facts and in the circumstances of the case, the Appellate
More informationIN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SUBJECT : MOTOR ACCIDENT CLAIMS TRIBUNAL Decided on: 13th February, 2015 MAC.APP. 84/2014
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SUBJECT : MOTOR ACCIDENT CLAIMS TRIBUNAL Decided on: 13th February, 2015 MAC.APP. 84/2014 BHARTI AXA GENERAL INS. CO. LTD... Appellant Through Mr. Navneet Kumar,
More informationTax Issues Relating to Succession Planning & Family Arrangements
Western India Regional Council Pune Branch Tax Issues Relating to Succession Planning & Family Arrangements Presentation by: Yogesh A. Thar May 27, 2017 INDEX Wills Nomination Returns of Deceased and Executors
More informationSection 14A Expenditure incurred in relation to income not includible in Total Income. CA. Pramod Jain. B. Com (H), FCA, FCS, FCMA, LL.B.
Section 14A Expenditure incurred in relation to income not includible in Total Income CA. Pramod Jain B. Com (H), FCA, FCS, FCMA, LL.B. DISA, MIMA This document would help in better understanding of critical
More informationO/TAXAP/561/2013 IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD. TAX APPEAL NO. 561 of 2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD TAX APPEAL NO. 561 of 2013 ================================================================ COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX VI...Appellant(s) Versus MADHAV ENTERPRISE
More informationIN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL MUMBAI BENCH D MUMBAI BEFORE SHRI SAKTIJIT DEY (JUDICIAL MEMBER) AND SHRI N.K. PRADHAN (ACCOUNTANT MEMBER)
IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL MUMBAI BENCH D MUMBAI BEFORE SHRI SAKTIJIT DEY (JUDICIAL MEMBER) AND SHRI N.K. PRADHAN (ACCOUNTANT MEMBER) ITA No. 3481/MUM/2014 Assessment Year: 2009-10 Ranjeet D
More informationAll about Section 269SS & 269T of Income Tax Act,1961
All about Section 269SS & 269T of Income Tax Act,1961 Section 269SS No Person shall, take or accept from any other person (herein after called depositor)any loans or deposits otherwise than by an account
More informationIssues Under Income-tax Act, CA Nihar Jambusaria
Real Estate Transactions Issues Under Income-tax Act, 1961 CA Nihar Jambusaria The Focus Tax issues relating to Real Estate Transactions under Income-tax Act, 1961 Accounting For Revenue from Real Estate
More informationA Fresh look at disallowance under section 14A of the Income-Tax Act, 1961
A Fresh look at disallowance under section 14A of the Income-Tax Act, 1961 [Published in 332 ITR (Jour) 49] 1 - By S.K.Tyagi Section 14A, the heading of which is Expenditure incurred in relation to income
More informationVs. Date of hearing : Date of Pronouncement : O R D E R
IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, MUMBAI BENCH F, MUMBAI BEFORE SHRI RAJENDRA SINGH, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER AND SHRI AMIT SHUKLA, JUDICIAL MEMBER ITA No. 5720/Mum/2011 Assessment Year : 2004-05 M/s. Forever
More information$~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI ITA 239/2015 & CM No. 6678/2015 COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX-VI Through Mr Rohit Madan, Advocate.
$~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI 10. + ITA 239/2015 & CM No. 6678/2015 COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX-VI Through Mr Rohit Madan, Advocate. versus... Appellant M/S UNITECH LTD.... Respondent Through
More informationIN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD. TAX APPEAL NO. 93 of 2000
IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD TAX APPEAL NO. 93 of 2000 FOR APPROVAL AND SIGNATURE: HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE KS JHAVERI and HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE K.J.THAKER ================================================================
More informationIN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SUBJECT : DELHI RENT CONTROL ACT Date of Judgment: RC.REV. 169/2012 & CM Nos.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SUBJECT : DELHI RENT CONTROL ACT Date of Judgment:23.04.2012. RC.REV. 169/2012 & CM Nos.7155-56/2012 SANT LAL Through RAJINDER KUMAR Through None. Mr. Amit Khemka,
More informationIN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL MUMBAI D BENCH MUMBAI BENCHES, MUMBAI BEFORE SHRI VIJAY PAL RAO, JM & SHRI RAJENDRA, AM
IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL MUMBAI D BENCH MUMBAI BENCHES, MUMBAI BEFORE SHRI VIJAY PAL RAO, JM & SHRI RAJENDRA, AM Reliance Industrial Infrastructure Ltd 5 th Floor, NKM International House 178
More informationWorkshop on Practical Problems of Tax Treaty Interpretation and Application
Workshop on Practical Problems of Tax Treaty Interpretation and Application TERMINATION PAYMENTS FOR NON-COMPETE CLAUSE BIJAL AJINKYA Partner, Khaitan & Co Facts Mr A, resident of R, works as a lawyer
More informationAggregation of Income. CA Venkatesan Murali
Aggregation of Income CA Venkatesan Murali Overview of Act Section Number Particulars 68 Unexplained Cash Credits 69 Unexplained Investments 69A 69C 69B 69D Unexplained Money, Jewellery, etc., Unexplained
More informationControversies surrounding Section 14A of the Income Tax Act
Controversies surrounding Section 14A of the Income Tax Act CA Vivek Newatia vnewatia@sjaykishan.com CA Puja Borar pujaborar@sjaykishan.com Background and Rationale for introduction Section 14A introduced
More informationThis is an appeal by the department against the order dated of ld. CIT(A)-XXII, New Delhi.
IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL DELHI BENCH G, NEW DELHI Before Sh. D. Manmohan, Vice President And Sh. N. K. Saini, AM ITA No. 519/Del/2013 : Asstt. Year : 2003-04 Income Tax Officer, Ward 20(3),
More information2 O R D E R PER SAKTIJIT DEY, J.M. Instant appeals by the assessee are directed against separate orders passed by the learned Commissioner (Appeals) 4
IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL D BENCH, MUMBAI BEFORE SHRI SAKTIJIT DEY, JUDICIAL MEMBER AND SHRI RAJESH KUMAR, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER ITA no.5271/mum./2013 (Assessment Year : 2010 11) Plot no.612, Junction
More informationImportant Judgment s on TDS CA. MAHENDRA SANGHVI
Important Judgment s on TDS CA. MAHENDRA SANGHVI 1 Section 192 : Salary Commission to Managing Director Commission to Managing Director as fixed percentage of profit. Accrual of commission in the year
More informationIN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD. TAX APPEAL NO. 749 of 2012
IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD TAX APPEAL NO. 749 of 2012 FOR APPROVAL AND SIGNATURE: HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE AKIL KURESHI With HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE J.B.PARDIWALA and HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE A.J.
More informationIN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL MUMBAI BENCH G, MUMBAI
IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL MUMBAI BENCH G, MUMBAI BEFORE SHRI C.N. PRASAD, HON'BLE JUDICIAL MEMBER AND SHRI MANOJ KUMAR AGGARWAL, HON'BLE ACCOUNTANT MEMBER O/o. Income Tax Officer 2(1)(1) Room
More informationIN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SUBJECT : INCOME TAX ACT. INCOME TAX APPEAL No. 171/2001. Date of decision: 18th July, 2014
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SUBJECT : INCOME TAX ACT INCOME TAX APPEAL No. 171/2001 Date of decision: 18th July, 2014 COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX... Petitioner Through Mr. Balbir Singh, Sr.
More information(2013) 145 ITD 150 (Visakhapatnam) : (2014) 97 DTR (Visakha)(Trib) 423 : (2014) 160 TTJ (Visakha) 236 TAXPUNDIT.ORG
GANTA VIJAYA LAKSHMI vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER ITAT VISAKHAPATNAM BENCH D. MANMOHAN, VP & B. R. BASKARAN, AM. ITA No. 253/VIZ/2012 22nd July, 2013 (2013) 145 ITD 150 (Visakhapatnam) : (2014) 97 DTR (Visakha)(Trib)
More informationvk;dj vihyh; vf/kdj.k **bz^^ U;k;ihB eqacbz esaa
vk;dj vihyh; vf/kdj.k **bz^^ U;k;ihB eqacbz esaa IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL E BENCH, MUMBAI Jh th +,l + iuuw] ys[kk lnl;,oa Jh vfer kqdyk] U;kf;d lnl; ds le{ka BEFORE SHRI G.S. PANNU, ACCOUNTANT
More informationCommissioner of Income Tax 24
vikrant 1/16 6 ITXA 1709 2014+.odt IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION INCOME TAX APPEAL NO. 1709 OF 2014 Commissioner of Income Tax 20 Shri. Deepak Kumar Agarwal
More informationDefinition of Trust What is Trust? Meaning-No definition in Income Tax Act Common Parlance-Confidence reposed in Definition of Trust-Section 3 of
Definition of Trust What is Trust? Meaning-No definition in Income Tax Act Common Parlance-Confidence reposed in Definition of Trust-Section 3 of Indian Trusts Act,1882- Obligation annexed to the ownership
More informationSection 14A and Rule 8D
Special Story recent Controversies in income tax assessments Sameer G. Dalal, Advocate Section 14A and Rule 8D When the case of an assessee is selected for scrutiny, it is always the endeavour of the Assessing
More informationIN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SUBJECT : INCOME TAX ACT, Date of Decision: 23rd February, ITA 1222/2011
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SUBJECT : INCOME TAX ACT, 1961 Date of Decision: 23rd February, 2012. ITA 1222/2011 CIT... Appellant Through: Ms. Suruchi Aggarwal, Sr. Standing Counsel. versus
More informationAppellant :- Commissioner Of Income Tax, Meerut And Another
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD Court No. - 33 Case:- INCOME TAX APPEAL No. - 73 of 2001 Appellant :- Commissioner Of Income Tax, Meerut And Another Respondent :- M/S Jindal Polyester & Steel Ltd.
More informationmore than the capital gains and the new residential asset was purchased within 2 years from the date of sale of residential property. 3. The Learned C
IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL Hyderabad B Bench, Hyderabad Before Smt. P. Madhavi Devi, Judicial Member AND Shri S.Rifaur Rahman, Accountant Member ITA No.1707/Hyd/2016 (Assessment Year: 2013-14)
More informationIN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL DELHI BENCH: F NEW DELHI BEFORE SH. G.C. GUPTA, VICE PRESIDENT AND SH. INTURI RAMA RAO, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER.
IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL DELHI BENCH: F NEW DELHI BEFORE SH. G.C. GUPTA, VICE PRESIDENT AND SH. INTURI RAMA RAO, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER. I.T.A Nos. 1766 to 1768/Del/2015 Assessment Years-2011-12
More informationSection 50C: An in-depth analysis
Section 50C: An in-depth analysis By: P. Kanthi Visalakshi, Associate, SAPR Advocates Why was 50C inserted: Prior to 50C being enacted, understating the consideration for transfer of capital assets (land
More informationIN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, BANGALORE BENCH B BEFORE SMT. ASHA VIJAYARAGHAVAN, JUDICIAL MEMBER AND SHRI INTURI RAMA RAO, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER
IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, BANGALORE BENCH B BEFORE SMT. ASHA VIJAYARAGHAVAN, JUDICIAL MEMBER AND SHRI INTURI RAMA RAO, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER ITA No.971/Bang/2015 (Asst. Year 2011-12 ) M/s Sevasadan
More informationIn order to answer the aforesaid queries, the following issues will have to be examined :
1 Tax-treatment of the share of a company in the income of an AOP [Published in 351 ITR (Jour) 16] - By S.K.Tyagi Recently, an Opinion was sought by a company relating to the tax-treatment of its share
More informationSection 44AD of The Income Tax Act,1961
Section 44AD of The Income Tax Act,1961 Special provision for computing profits and gains of business on presumptive basis By: CA Sanjay Kumar Agarwal CA Sidharth Jain Assisted By : CA Neha khurana Applicability
More informationIN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL DELHI E BENCH, NEW DELHI. [Coram: Pramod Kumar AM and A. T. Varkey JM]
IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL DELHI E BENCH, NEW DELHI [Coram: Pramod Kumar AM and A. T. Varkey JM] Page 1 of 11 Minda Sai Limited C/o R N Saraf & Co 2659/2, Gurudwara Road, Karol Bagh New Delhi
More informationof the CIT(A)- 16, New Delhi relating to assessment year
IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL DELHI BENCH E, NEW DELHI BEFORE SHRI R. K. PANDA, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER AND SMT. BEENA A. PILLAI, JUDICIAL MEMBER Assessment Year : 2011-12 Smt. Prem Jain, 2683/85, Gali
More informationReassessment B y C A M a h e n d r a S a n g h v i
Reassessment B y C A M a h e n d r a S a n g h v i R e a s s e s s m e n t & 2 RELEVANT SECTIONS: Sec. 147 Income escaping assessment. Sec. 148 Issue of notice where income has escaped assessment. Sec.
More informationIN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL B BENCH, MUMBAI BEFORE SHRI R.C. SHARMA, AM AND SHRI MAHAVIR SINGH, JM
IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL B BENCH, MUMBAI BEFORE SHRI R.C. SHARMA, AM AND SHRI MAHAVIR SINGH, JM (Assessment Year: 2009-10) Deputy Commissioner of Income-tax- 10(1), Mumbai.455, Aayakar Bhavan,
More informationTax Planning through HUF & Family Arrangements
Seminar on "Tax Planning through HUF & Family Arrangements" on 23rd August 2014 organised by : Western India Regional Council of The Institute of Chartered Accountants of India at BKC, Mumbai Tax Planning
More information* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI. + FAO 276/2010 Reserved on: Decided on: versus
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + FAO 276/2010 RAJ KUMAR & ANR Through Reserved on: 20.10.2010 Decided on: 01.11.2010... Appellant Mr. Rajeshwar Tyagi, Adv. versus STATE & ORS. Through Nemo...
More informationCommissioner of Income-Tax Vs. Punjab Chemical & Crop Protection Ltd
Commissioner of Income-Tax Vs. Punjab Chemical & Crop Protection Ltd Judgement: 1. Ajay Kumar Mittal, J. - This appeal has been preferred by the Revenue under section 260A of the Income-tax Act, 1961 (in
More informationDownloaded from :
Downloaded from : http://abcaus.in PETITIONER: BHARAT COMMERCE & INDUSTRIES LTD. Vs. RESPONDENT: THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CENTRAL II DATE OF JUDGMENT: 05/03/1998 BENCH: SUJATA V.MANOHAR, D.P. WADHWA
More information[Published in 389 ITR (Journ.) p.1 (Part-1)]
A charitable and / or religious trust is entitled to carry forward and adjust the excess expenditure in earlier years against the income of subsequent years 1 [Published in 389 ITR (Journ.) p.1 (Part-1)]
More informationG.A no.1150 of 2015 ITAT no.52 of 2015 IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA Special Jurisdiction (Income Tax) ORIGINAL SIDE
G.A no.1150 of 2015 ITAT no.52 of 2015 IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA Special Jurisdiction (Income Tax) ORIGINAL SIDE Commissioner of Income Tax, Kolkata-2 Versus M/s. G K K Capital Markets (P) Limited
More informationSlump Sale, MAT and AMT
Special Story CA Haresh Kenia Slump Sale, MAT and AMT Introduction The Income-tax Act provides for the requirement of audit report and certification from Accountants under various provisions of the Act
More informationConcealment Penalties- Post Assessment Issues- WIRC ) The penalty proceedings being separate & independent, the assessee is entitled to
Prepared by: Advocate Mandar Vaidya, Concealment Penalties- Post Assessment Issues- WIRC- 22.3.14. Advocate, High Court. 1) The penalty proceedings being separate & independent, the assessee is entitled
More informationDilution of Section 14A
Dilution of Section 14A A ready reckoner - R.Dhiraj, Advocate, SAPR Advocates INTRODUCTION Section 14A has been introduced by the Finance Act 2001 with retrospective effect from 1962. The provision was
More informationIN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SUBJECT : INCOME TAX ACT RESERVED ON: DECIDED ON: ITA 776/2011
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SUBJECT : INCOME TAX ACT RESERVED ON: 08.10.2012 DECIDED ON: 05.11.2012 ITA 776/2011 THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX DELHI-II... Appellant Through: Sh. Sanjeev Sabharwal,
More informationAnd ITA 161/2015. ANSAL LAND MARK TOWNSHIP (P) LTD... Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE DR. JUSTICE S.MURALIDHAR HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIBHU BAKHRU
$~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI 6&7 + ITA 160/2015 COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX-1... Appellant Through: Mr. Kamal Sawhney,Senior Standing counsel with Mr. Raghvendra Singh, Junior Standing counsel
More informationSTUDY GROUP MEETING. Thursday, 14 th December, 2017 SNDT, Committee Room, Churchgate, Mumbai. RECENT JUDGMENTS ON DIRECT TAX
THE CHAMBER OF TAX CONSULTANTS 3, Rewa Chambers, Ground Floor, 31, New Marine Lines, Mumbai - 400 020 Tel.: 2200 1787 / 2209 0423 / 2200 2455 E-mail: office@ctconline.org Website: www.ctconline.org STUDY
More informationITA No.681 & 824/Kol/2015-M/s. Kalyani Barter (P)Ltd. A.Y
ITA No.681 & 824/Kol/2015-M/s. Kalyani Barter (P)Ltd. A.Y.2010-11 1 IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL KOLKATA BENCH D KOLKATA Before Hon ble Shri Waseem Ahmed, Accountant Member and Shri S.S.Viswanethra
More informationVs. Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax Circle 2, Agra Respondent
IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, AGRA BENCH, AGRA [Coram : Pramod Kumar AM and Joginder Singh JM] I.T.A. No.: 176/Agra/2013 Assessment year:2008-09 Raj Kumari Agarwal (Deceased; through legal heir
More informationIN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION INCOME TAX APPEAL NO OF 2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION INCOME TAX APPEAL NO. 2356 OF 2013 Itxa-2356-2013 The Commissioner of Income Tax 11.. Appellant. v/s. M/s. Goodwill Theatres
More informationFutures, Options and other Derivatives
Overview of Accounting, Reporting and Taxation of Futures, Options and other Derivatives By: Sanjay Agarwal Founder of Voice of CA, NGO Email: agarwal.s.ca@gmail.com Accounting aspects Accounting Aspects
More informationIN THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH. ITR No.192/1997 COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, JABALPUR. M/s VINDHYA TELELINKS LTD JUDGEMENT
IN THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH ITR No.192/1997 COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, JABALPUR Vs M/s VINDHYA TELELINKS LTD Krishn Kumar Lahoti and Smt Sushma Shrivastava JUDGEMENT Dated: February 22, 2011 The
More informationDeemed Speculation loss. August 10, 2011 by kkchhaparia
Deemed Speculation loss 1 Deemed Speculation loss.. [Explanation - Where any part of the business of a company [other than a company whose gross total income consists mainly of income which is chargeable
More informationExplanation to Sec.73: A Deeming Provision By Subash Agarwal, Advocate
Explanation to Sec.73: A Deeming Provision By Subash Agarwal, Advocate 1. Introduction: The Taxation Laws (Amendment) Act, 1975 inserted an explanation to sec.73 w.e.f.1.4.77 and created a legal fiction
More information$~R * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % DECIDED ON: ITA /2000 COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX... Appellant
$~R-11-16 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % DECIDED ON: 19.02.2015 + ITA 120-125/2000 COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX... Appellant in all cases versus NISHI MEHRA... Respondent in ITA 120/2000 ARUN
More informationRECOVERY PROCEEDINGS UNDER INCOME TAX ACT, 1961
RECOVERY PROCEEDINGS UNDER INCOME TAX ACT, 1961 By Shri Jitendra Singh, Advocate M-3, Mezzanine Floor, Court Chambers, 35, New Marine Lines, Mumbai 400020 Telephone No: (022) 49737379 Mobile No.: +91 9975750130
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
1 REPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL NO.19400 OF 2017 [Arising out of SLP (C) No. 8858 of 2017] RAJ KUMAR BHATIA...APPELLANT Versus SUBHASH CHANDER BHATIA...RESPONDENT
More informationA legitimate expenditure or relief not claimed in the return of income can be claimed ONLY by revising the return of income under section
Fresh Claim Outside The Return of Income BY:- CA. (Dr.) Gurmeet S. Grewal B. Com (Hons.), FCA, PhD., CLA (IIAM) Grewal & Singh Chartered Accountants New Delhi, Chandigarh, Yamuna Nagar, Jammu Phones: 09811242856
More informationIN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL MUMBAI BENCH I, MUMBAI BEFORE SHRI I.P. BANSAL, JUDICIAL MEMBER AND SHRI D. KARUNAKARA RAO, ACCOUNTAT MEMBER
IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL MUMBAI BENCH I, MUMBAI BEFORE SHRI I.P. BANSAL, JUDICIAL MEMBER AND SHRI D. KARUNAKARA RAO, ACCOUNTAT MEMBER Shri Irfan Abdul Kader Fazlani, 21 A Nirmal, Nariman Point,
More informationIN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL (DELHI BENCH SMC : NEW DELHI) BEFORE SHRI H.S. SIDHU, JUDICIAL MEMBER
IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL (DELHI BENCH SMC : NEW DELHI) BEFORE SHRI H.S. SIDHU, JUDICIAL MEMBER ITA No. 1228/Del/2016 Assessment Year: 2011-12 SH. ADARSH KUMAR SWARUP, POST BAG NO. 221, RAMBAGH,
More information$~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI 14 + ITA 557/2015. versus CORAM: DR. JUSTICE S.MURALIDHAR MR. JUSTICE VIBHU BAKHRU O R D E R %
$~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI 14 + ITA 557/2015 COPERION IDEAL PRIVATE LIMITED... Appellant Through: Mr. Salil Kapoor and Mr. Sumit Lalchandani, Advocates. versus COMMISSIONER OF INCOME
More informationTax Issues -NBFC. Presented by CA Mahazaver Patel for
Tax Issues -NBFC Presented by CA Mahazaver Patel for 1 KEY REVENUE ISSUES PROFITON SALE OF SECURITIES DIVIDEND PREMIUM RECEIVED INTEREST ON LOANS & DEPOSITS UPFRONT FEES / UNDERWRITING COMMISSION 2 KEY
More informationIN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SUBJECT : INCOME TAX ACT DECIDED ON: ITA 176/2014
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SUBJECT : INCOME TAX ACT DECIDED ON: 25.04.2014 ITA 176/2014 COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX DELHI I... Appellant Through: Mr. Rohit Madan, Sr. Standing Counsel with
More informationTHE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX DELHI IV... Appellant Through: Mr. Sanjeev Sabharwal, Advocate VERSUS
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SUBJECT : INCOME TAX ACT ITA NO.1192/2011 Reserved on : 8th November, 2011. Date of Decision : 21st November, 2011. THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX DELHI IV... Appellant
More informationCommissioner of Income Tax 18 } Appellant versus Sambhaji Nagar Co op. Hsg. Society Ltd. } Respondent
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION INCOME TAX APPEAL NO. 1356 OF 2012 Commissioner of Income Tax 18 } Appellant versus Sambhaji Nagar Co op. Hsg. Society Ltd.
More informationTAXATION OF SHARES AND SECURITIES. Nihar Jambusaria
TAXATION OF SHARES AND SECURITIES Nihar Jambusaria nihar.jambusaria@ril.com jnihar@rediffmail.com CONTENTS Provisions to Prevent Possible Tax Avoidance Treatment of Share Transactions Capital Gains Business
More informationTaxability of Real Estate transactions
Taxability of Real Estate transactions Sunil Arora M.Com,, F.C.A. saa@airtelmail.in Understatement of consideration What is the recourse available with the AO? Can AO refer to the Valuation Officer for
More informationIN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL BANGALORE A BENCH, BANGALORE
IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL BANGALORE A BENCH, BANGALORE BEFORE SMT P.MADHAVI DEVI, JUDICIAL MEMBER AND SHRI ABRAHAM P GEORGE, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER ITA Nos.220 & 1043(BNG.)/2013 (Assessment year
More informationIN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA Special Jurisdiction (Income-tax) (Original Side) I.T.A. No.219 of 2003
1 IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA Special Jurisdiction (Income-tax) (Original Side) Present: The Hon ble Mr. Justice Bhaskar Bhattacharya And The Hon ble Mr. Justice Sambuddha Chakrabarti I.T.A. No.219 of
More information$~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI ITA 607/2015. versus AND ITA 608/2015. versus
$~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI 12. + ITA 607/2015 PR. COMMISSIONER OFINCOME TAX... Appellant Through: Mr. Kamal Sawhney, Senior Standing counsel with Mr. Raghvendra Singh and Mr.Shikhar Garg,
More informationIN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SUBJECT : CODE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE. Ex F.A 7/2011. Reserved on : Date of Decision :
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SUBJECT : CODE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE Ex F.A 7/2011 Reserved on : 11.02.2011 Date of Decision : 17.02.2011 SATNAM ANAND & ANR. Through: Mr. S.K. Duggal, Advocate....
More informationAllowability of expenditure on employees welfare
Allowability of expenditure on employees welfare 1 [Expenditure on employees welfare activities, including education of children of the employees, is allowable as a deduction] [Published in 405 ITR (Journ.)
More informationIN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL DELHI BENCH : F : NEW DELHI BEFORE SHRI A.D. JAIN, JUDICIAL MEMBER AND SHRI T.S. KAPOOR, ACCOUNTAN
IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL DELHI BENCH : F : NEW DELHI BEFORE SHRI A.D. JAIN, JUDICIAL MEMBER AND SHRI T.S. KAPOOR, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER Assessment Year : 2004-05 ACIT, Circle 47 (1), New Delhi.
More informationIN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU PRESENT THE HON BLE MR.JUSTICE JAYANT PATEL AND THE HON BLE MRS.JUSTICE S SUJATHA ITA NO.
1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 16 TH DAY OF FEBRUARY 2016 BETWEEN: PRESENT THE HON BLE MR.JUSTICE JAYANT PATEL AND THE HON BLE MRS.JUSTICE S SUJATHA ITA NO.205 OF 2015 1.
More informationIN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL "F" Bench, Mumbai. Before Shri B.R. Baskaran, Accountant Member and Shri Pawan Singh, Judicial Member
IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL "F" Bench, Mumbai Before Shri B.R. Baskaran, Accountant Member and Shri Pawan Singh, Judicial Member (Assessment Year: 2014-15) 801/806, 8th Floor, Elite Square 274,
More informationIN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL PANAJI BENCH, PANAJI
IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL PANAJI BENCH, PANAJI BEFORE SHRI N.S. SAINI, HON BLE ACCOUNTANT MEMBER AND SHRI GEORGE MATHAN, HON BLE JUDICIAL MEMBER (Asst. Year : 2009-10) DCIT, Circle-1(1), Panaji.
More informationIN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH. (O&M) Date of decision: 4.8.2010 M/s V.K. Timber Pvt. Ltd. -----Appellant. Vs. Commissioner Income Tax (Appeals) & another. -----Respondents CORAM:-
More informationDOUBLE DEDUCTION OF DEPRECIATION FOR TRUSTS
fmsf Resource support on NGO Governance, Accounting and Regulations Standards & NORMS An initiative of FMSF & VANI VANI Legal Series Vol. IV, Issue 6, September 2011 For private circulation only DOUBLE
More informationIN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL DELHI BENCH: C NEW DELHI BEFORE SHRI H. S. SIDHU, JUDICIAL MEMBER AND SHRI L.P. SAHU, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER ORDER
IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL DELHI BENCH: C NEW DELHI BEFORE SHRI H. S. SIDHU, JUDICIAL MEMBER AND SHRI L.P. SAHU, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER I.T.A. No. 100/Del/2015 Assessment Year: 2010-11 HARISH NARINDER
More informationIN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL DELHI BENCH: E : NEW DELHI BEFORE SMT. DIVA SINGH, JUDICIAL MEMBER AND SH. O.P. KANT, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER
IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL DELHI BENCH: E : NEW DELHI BEFORE SMT. DIVA SINGH, JUDICIAL MEMBER AND SH. O.P. KANT, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER Assessment Year: 2006-07 M/s. Ujagar Holdings Pvt. Ltd., 8-D,
More informationIN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SUBJECT : INCOME TAX ACT, 1961 Date of decision: ITA 232/2012
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SUBJECT : INCOME TAX ACT, 1961 Date of decision: 22.11.2012 ITA 232/2012 COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX IV Through Mr. Kamal Sawhney, Sr. Standing Counsel... Appellant
More informationIN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, BANGALORE A BENCH, BANGALORE. [Coram: Pramod Kumar AM and P Madhavi Devi JM]
IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, BANGALORE A BENCH, BANGALORE [Coram: Pramod Kumar AM and P Madhavi Devi JM] I.T.A. No.: 1709/Bang/2013 I.T.A. No.: 1709/Bang/2013 Page 1 of 11 Dheeraj Amin J V Builders,
More informationIN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL DELHI BENCH "F : NEW DELHI. Before Shri. G. E. Veerabhadrappa, VP and Shri. George Mathan, JM
IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL DELHI BENCH "F : NEW DELHI Before Shri. G. E. Veerabhadrappa, VP and Shri. George Mathan, JM ITA No. 3198/D/2004 Asst Year: 1999-2000 GE Capital Services India, AIFACS
More informationDEEMED DIVIDEND. By Siddhartha Berlia, ACA
DEEMED DIVIDEND By Siddhartha Berlia, ACA Siddhartha@chhapariaassociates.com The concept of Deemed Dividend under the Income-tax Act, 1961(the Act) is not new. However, time and again many closely held
More informationIN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL PUNE BENCH B, PUNE BEFORE SHRI G.S. PANNU, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER AND MS. SUSHMA CHOWLA, JUDICIAL MEMBER ITA Nos.2220
IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL PUNE BENCH B, PUNE BEFORE SHRI G.S. PANNU, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER AND MS. SUSHMA CHOWLA, JUDICIAL MEMBER (Assessment Years : 2009-10 & 2010-11) Asstt. Commissioner of Income
More informationC.R. Building, I.P. Estate
IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL DELHI BENCH: D NEW DELHI BEFORE SHRI R. P. TOLANI, JUDICIAL MEMBER AND SHRI J. S. REDDY, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER I.T.A. No. 364/Del/2012 Assessment Years: 2008-09 ACIT Vs.
More information