TAXATION OF SHARES AND SECURITIES. Nihar Jambusaria

Size: px
Start display at page:

Download "TAXATION OF SHARES AND SECURITIES. Nihar Jambusaria"

Transcription

1 TAXATION OF SHARES AND SECURITIES Nihar Jambusaria

2 CONTENTS Provisions to Prevent Possible Tax Avoidance Treatment of Share Transactions Capital Gains Business Income including Speculation Income

3 MEASURES TO CHECK TAX AVOIDANCE/EVASION Dividend stripping S. 94(7) Where (a) any person buys or acquires any securities or unit within a period of three months prior to the record date; (b) such person sells or transfers such securities within a period of three months after such date; or such unit within a period of nine months after such date;

4 MEASURES TO CHECK TAX AVOIDANCE/EVASION (Contd) (c) the dividend income on such securities or unit received or receivable by such person is exempt, then, the loss, if any, arising to him on account of such purchase and sale of securities or unit, to the extent such loss does not exceed the amount of dividend or income received or receivable on such securities or unit, shall be ignored for the purposes of computing his income chargeable to tax. S. 94(7) cannot be applied from retrospective effect. Wallfort Shares & Stock Brokers Pvt. Ltd. v. ITO & Ors. 96 ITD 1 (Mum.) (TM).

5 MEASURES TO CHECK TAX AVOIDANCE/EVASION (Contd) Bonus / right stripping S. 94(8) Where (a) any person buys or acquires any units within a period of three months prior to the record date; (b) such person is allotted additional units without any payment on the basis of holding of such units on such date;

6 MEASURES TO CHECK TAX AVOIDANCE/EVASION (Contd) c) such person sells or transfers all or any of the units referred to in clause (a) within a period of nine months after such date, while continuing to hold all or any of the additional units referred to in clause (b), then, the loss, if any, arising to him on account of such purchase and sale of all or any of such units shall be ignored for the purposes of computing his income chargeable to tax and notwithstanding anything contained in any other provision of this Act, the amount of loss so ignored shall be deemed to be the cost of purchase or acquisition of such additional units referred to in clause (b) as are held by him on the date of such sale or transfer.

7 MEASURES TO CHECK TAX AVOIDANCE/EVASION (Contd) Whether dividend stripping is allowable - Whether a premeditated transaction by virtue of which an assessee earns tax free income and squares off profits with losses is permissible if it is within the four corners of law? EVEREADY INDUSTRIES INDIA LTD vs CIT (2011- TIOL-169-HC-KOL-IT)

8 TREATMENT OF SHARE TRANSACTIONS The following factors would be relevant in determining whether transactions for purchase & sale of shares & securities are in the nature of business or investment? (1) Motive (2) Number of transactions (3) Relation with other activities (4) Source of investment (5) Resources employed (6) Consistency

9 TREATMENT OF SHARE TRANSACTIONS Issues Where a large number of transactions of purchase and sales of shares and securities of different companies are entered into during P. Y., whether the gain can be declared as short term or long term capital gain or should it be declared under the head income from business or profession. Consider the decisions o Smt. Neerja Birla v. ACIT 66 ITD 148 (Mum.) and o Arjun Kapoor 70 ITD 161 (Del.) o Janak Rangwala vs. ACIT 11 SOT 627 (Mum.) o Circular No.4/2007 dt

10 TREATMENT OF SHARE TRANSACTIONS Assessee company having reflected its entire shareholding in various shares, including the shares in question, as stock-intrade all along in the past and the Revenue authorities having come to the finding of fact that the shares of the same company were purchased by the assessee by way of trading and not by way of investment, income derived by assessee from sale of such shares is to be treated as business income and not as capital gains. ANKITA DEPOSITS & ADVANCES (P) LTD. vs. CIT [(2010) 235 CTR (HP) 273]

11 TREATMENT OF SHARE TRANSACTIONS Where the assessee has shown investment in shares under the head Investment in the balance sheet for many years and the same is accepted by the AO in the past, there is no justification for treating the activity of the assessee of purchase and sale of shares as business merely on the reason of the volume of the transactions, particularly when no money has been borrowed for making investment in shares. BHARAT KUNVERJI KENIA vs. Addl. CIT [(2010) 130 TTJ 86] Assessee having shown the shares as investment in the books and there being no material on record to show that the same were converted into stock-in-trade, receipts from sale thereof are assessable as capital gains and not business income CIT vs. ESS JAY ENTERPRISES (P) LTD. [(2008) 173 TAXMAN 1 (Del)]

12 TREATMENT OF SHARE TRANSACTIONS Tribunal having entered a pure finding of fact that the assessee is engaged in two different types of transactions namely, investment in shares and dealing in shares for the purposes of business and held that the delivery based transactions are to be treated as investment transactions and that there ought to be uniformity in treatment and consistency in various years when the facts and circumstances are identical, no substantial question of law arises. CIT vs. GOPAL PUROHIT [(2010) 228 CTR (Bom) 582]

13 TREATMENT OF SHARE TRANSACTIONS Assessee transacting numerous transactions in large quantity of shares, profit from which was shown as short-term capital gain. Assessee was investor in shares having portfolio built-up over a period of 50 years. Shares and other securities have been shown under the head "Investment" in balance sheet consistently. Revenue having accepted the profit arising from the sale of shares as capital gain in previous assessment years, there is no need to give different treatment this year KUNVARJI NANJI KENIA vs. Addl. CIT [(2010) 131 TTJ (Mum)87]

14 TREATMENT OF SHARE TRANSACTIONS Where in the earlier year it had been held that the income from impugned shares are assessable as business income having regard to the shares held and nature of the business conducted by the assessee, in the absence of any material to despair the same, profit from sale of shares in the current year is assessable as business income and not as capital gains. MATHESON BOSANQUET ENTERPRISES LTD. vs. DCIT [(2009) 316 ITR 375 (Mad)] Where the assessee is doing both types of activity i.e. trading in shares and investment in shares and the stock transferred during the year is demonstrated by the assessee to be from the investment account, the profit was rightly offered by the assessee as short-term capital gain; AO was not justified in assessing the same as business income. PARESH D. SHAH vs. JCIT [(2010) 2 ITR (Trib) 311]

15 TREATMENT OF SHARE TRANSACTIONS Assessee s business being investment in shares and interest on capital borrowed for purposes of said investment having been claimed and allowed as deduction under s. 36(1)(iii), assessee cannot, at the same time, be allowed to return said profits as capital gains by taking benefit of indexation and the said profits have to be assessed as business income. PENINSULAR INVESTMENTS LTD. vs. DCIT [(2009) 120 TTJ (Hyd) 96] Where there was a long gap between the date of acquisition of shares and their sale and the shares having been shown as investment in wealth-tax returns right from the asst. yr , profits from sale of shares were chargeable as capital gains and not business income CIT vs. REWASHANKER A. KOTHARI [(2006) 283 ITR 338 (Guj)]

16 TREATMENT OF SHARE TRANSACTIONS Where on the basis of facts it was found that the investment is out of own fund and not borrowed; that the investment is not rotated frequently; that the total number of transactions are very few; that all the shares purchased are not sold and rather held for quite number of days, held that the transactions are to be treated as giving rise to the capital gain CIT vs. ROHIT ANAND [(2010) 327 ITR 445 (Del. HC)]

17 TREATMENT OF SHARE TRANSACTIONS The intention of the assessee is relevant to determine whether he is carrying on the business in shares or investments. Where it was found that the assessee has been holding shares for a long time and has been utilising the surplus funds only for the investments. Both CIT(A) and Tribunal have concurrently found that assessee was dealing as also investing in shares while maintaining separate books of account and receipts from sale of shares in question was assessable under the head capital gains. No substantial question of law arose CIT vs. S. RAMAAMIRTHAM [(2008) 306 ITR 239]

18 TREATMENT OF SHARE TRANSACTIONS In the matter of deciding whether the income of assessee derived from portfolio management investments is to be charged under business income or capital gains, where lower authorities had taken into consideration only the volume of transactions and not the other relevant factors, the issue was remanded to AO for fresh adjudication. SAR INVESTMENT (P) LTD. vs. DCIT [(2010) 40 SOT 566 (Ahd)] Assessee dealing in shares both as business as well as investment and, inter alia, keeping separate accounts in respect of the two portfolios, profits from sale of shares in investment portfolio after holding them for two to four years were taxable as capital gains and not as business income. SARNATH INFRASTRUCTURE (P) LTD. vs. ACIT [(2009) 120 TTJ (Lucknow) 216]

19 TREATMENT OF SHARE TRANSACTIONS Where the assessee has maintained separate account of trading in shares and investment in shares and such investment is made from surplus funds which is accepted by the Department as investment in earlier years the profit on sale of such shares is taxable as long term capital gain and not as business income. SURESH KUMAR SEKSARIA vs. ACIT [(2010) 1 ITR (Trib) 783 (Mum)] Assessee company having been incorporated to engage in the business of investment in shares and securities, shares purchased could not be a business asset in the hands of assessee, hence the assessee rightly offered the same under the head "Capital gains". CIT vs. TRISHUL INVESTMENTS LTD. [(2008) 305 ITR 434]

20 TREATMENT OF SHARE TRANSACTIONS Whether the assessee whose substantial income from capital gain comprises long term capital gain and who has shown substantial dividend income, can be said to be a trader of shares and doing share trading business MANAGEMENT STRUCTURE & SYSTEMS PVT LTD vs. ITO [2010- TIOL-254-ITAT-MUM] Where the Assessee held certain shares as investment and also as stock in trade and claims deduction for trading loss. On disallowance by AO Tribunal remands. AO goes by entry treatment in books and again treats it as capital loss. Tribunal holds that the nomenclature of the entry will not decide the actual character of the transactions. Since the frequency of trading in shares is very high, it is clearly stock in trade. No substantial question of law involved CIT vs. SMC CREDIT LIMITED [2010-TIOL-50-HC-DEL]

21 TREATMENT OF SHARE TRANSACTIONS Considering the facts that most of the shares were purchased and sold immediately and there are no shares which are acquired prior to and held after , the intention of the assessee is to gain profits by dealing in short term profit only; further, considering the borrowing of funds, small amount of dividend when compared to the gain in shares and also the fact that assessee group companies are involved in share trading, the conclusion of the revenue authorities that the income from sale of shares declared by the assessee as short term capital gain is income from business was sustainable. Sadhana Nabera Vs. ACIT [41 DTR (Mum)(Trib.) 393]

22 TREATMENT OF SHARE TRANSACTIONS In respect of gain in shares held for more than 365 days when in the past the department has accepted sale of shares of holdings of more than a year as investment, the gain should be assessed as long term capital gain in the year under appeal; however, in respect of shares with the frequent transactions where shares are held for more than a month, they should be treated as investments and for those held for less than a month as profit from business. Sugamchand C Shah Vs. ACIT [36 DTR (Ahd)(Trib.) 345]

23 TREATMENT OF SHARE TRANSACTIONS Though the assessee had purchased/sold other shares and units of mutual funds, this solitary transaction had been disputed by the AO mainly because the assessee had purchased the shares in question from borrowed funds obtained on high rate of interest, which also forms the basis for the conclusion arrived at by the AO that the transaction in question is an "adventure in the nature of trade or business" rather than a normal investment. Held that: merely because the shares had been purchased from borrowed funds obtained on high rate of interest would not change the nature of the transaction from investment to one in the nature of an "adventure in the nature of trade particularly when the assessee is mainly engaged in jewellry business. CIT Versus NIRAJ AMIDHAR SURTI [(Appeal No. 836 of 2009), Guj HC]

24 TREATMENT OF SHARE TRANSACTIONS If share transactions are treated as business, the following expenses are allowable as deduction- (1) Interest on borrowed capital (2) Brokerage, service tax, stamp duty (3) Penalties, bad delivery charges, auction charges (4) Demat account charges (5) Portfolio Management & advisory fees

25 CAPITAL GAINS Conversion of capital assets into stock in trade Issues Any care is required to be taken before converting shares / securities into stock in trade? Whether an assessee can hold some shares and securities as stock in trade and some shares and securities as investment. o Century Builder 5694/Mum./2000/dt o Arjun Kapoor 70ITD161(Del) o Circular No. 4/2007 dt

26 CERTAIN JUDGEMENTS 1. Shares obtained in family settlement Family settlement is analogous to partition of H.U.F. Therefore, S. 49(1)(i) shall apply for determining the cost of acquisition of shares under family settlement. Shanti Chandran 241 ITR 371 (Mad.)

27 CERTAIN JUDGEMENTS (contd.) 2. Opening stock of a new firm constituted by some partners of dissolved firm should be valued at market price. V. S. Chandraprakasa Nadar & Co. v. CIT 244 ITR 298 (Mad.) 3. Bad investments written off would not give rise to capital loss. R.C. Mudliar 240 ITR 552 (Mad.)

28 CERTAIN JUDGEMENTS (contd.) 4. Where business loss arises due to valuation of closing stock at cost or market price whichever is less and there was no purchase and sale of shares during the P.Y., Explanation to S. 73 does not apply. Nirvan Holding Pvt. Ltd. BCA-399 JULY 2003, SMC, MUM Sun Dist. & Mining Co. 68 Taxman 223. Mumbai High Court held in Prasad Agents Pvt. Ltd. V. ITO [2009 TIOL-164-HC-MUM] that share valuation loss is covered by Explanation to S.73.

29 CERTAIN JUDGEMENTS (contd.) 5. Where shares / securities are acquired by any mode u/s. 49(1), indexation shall be allowed from the P. Y. of acquisition of the previous owner. o o o Pushpa Sophat v. ITO 81 ITD 1 (Chd.) Meera Khera February 2004 BCA Journal. Contrary- Kishor Kanoongo Mum. Trib. o DCIT v. Manjula J. Shah dt.16 th October, 2009.

30 CERTAIN JUDGEMENTS (contd.) 6. Indexation is allowable on L.T.C.G. on transfer of MEP 91 and MEP 92 refer S. 45(6). K. B. Shah 77 TTJ 30 (Mum.) 7. Transfer of investments is not hit by Explanation to S. 73. Mysore Rolling Mills Pvt. Ltd. 195 ITR 405 (Kar.)

31 SPECULATION BUSINESS A transaction which is not periodically or ultimately settled by delivery or transfer of the contracted goods is a speculative transaction as defined by S. 43(5) of the Income-tax Act. No exception is made in that section for shares and stocks in fact, s. 43(5) specifically includes stocks and shares, and hence the provisions of S. 43(5) equally apply to dealing in shares and stocks. Under normal understanding, a speculative transaction is one where there is no intention to take or give delivery. However, under the income-tax law, the intention of the purchaser or seller to take or give delivery of shares is immaterial for determining a speculative transaction. What is material is whether delivery or transfer has actually taken place or not.

32 SPECULATION BUSINESS (Contd) Explanation 2 to s.28 reads as under : Where speculative transactions carried on by an assessee are of such a nature as to constitute a business, the business (hereinafter referred to as speculation business ) shall be deemed to be distinct and separate from any other business.

33 SPECULATION BUSINESS (Contd) S. 43(5) provides for certain exceptions. The following transactions concerning shares and stocks are not construed as speculative transactions by virtue of the proviso to S. 43(5) : a contract in respect of stocks and shares entered by a dealer or investor to guard against loss in his holdings of stocks and shares through price fluctuations (commonly referred to as hedging transactions). a contract entered into by a member of a forward market or a stock exchange in the course of any transaction in the nature of jobbing or arbitrage to guard against loss which may arise in the ordinary course of his business as such member. An eligible transaction of dealing in derivatives, with effect from A.Y

34 SPECULATION BUSINESS (Contd) Whether rule 8D applies even to a period when it was not framed - Whether proviso inserted in clause (d) of Sec 43(5) is prospective and hence loss attributable to prior period of derivatives is speculative? ELEGANT MARBLES & GRANITE INDUSTRIES LTD vs. DCIT [(2011-TIOL-198-ITAT-MUM)] Whether clause (d) of proviso to section 43(5) is inserted prospectively w.e.f. A.Y Whether the expenses incurred on speculative transactions cannot be allowed to be set off against the profit / loss of non-speculative business? ITO Vs M/s TCFC FINANCE LIMITED (2011-TIOL-184- ITAT-MUM)

35 Issues relating to Expln. to S.73- (1) Applicability to shares held as investments- Mysore Rolling Mills Pvt. Ltd. 195ITR 404(kar) Trade Team Pvt. Ltd. 54 ITD 36(Bom) (2) Share broking-whether business of purchase & sale of shares? SRJ Securities Ltd. v ACIT 81 TTJ 484 (Del) DCIT v Frontline Capital Services Ltd. 96 TTJ 201 (Del)

36 (3) Applicability to securities other than shares Appollo Tyres Ltd. 255 ITR 273 (S.C.) (4) Loss due to stock valuation not regarded as speculation loss Nirvan Holding Pvt. Ltd. 35 BCAJ 399 (Mum) Contrary view-prudential Constn. Co. Pvt. Ltd. 75 ITD 338 (Hyd.) Associated Capital Markets Pvt. Ltd. ITA No & 3057 Mum.2001 dt Now resolved by Mum. H.C. decision in Prasad Agents- Contrary view upheld.

37 (5) Whether the Expln. Applies to arbitrage, hedging,etc. excluded from the meaning of speculation u/s. 43(5)? Rohini Capital Services Ltd. v DCIT 92 ITD 317 (Del) (6) Settlement for breach of contract is not a speculative transaction. Bhandari Rajmal Kushalraj v ITO 96 ITR 401 (7) Applicability to units of UTI and loss suffered on account of wrong deals entered on behalf of clients? DCIT vs. M/s CSL SECURITIES (P) LTD [(2011-TIOL- 201-ITAT-DEL)]

38 (5) Whether loss on sale of shares is speculative loss in view of explanation to section 73 though the transaction is not speculative in nature as per Sec 43(5) because there is actual delivery of shares. M/s RPG INDUSTRIES LIMITED vs. CIT (2011-TIOL-171- HC-KOL-IT)

39 Conversion of Stock into Capital Asset Whether conversion of shares held as stock in trade into capital asset would attract any tax. What will be the cost of acquisition of such shares cost or market value?

40 CIRCULAR NO. 4/2007, DATED Distinction between shares held as stock-in-trade and shares held as investment - tests for such a distinction The Income Tax Act, 1961 makes a distinction between a capital asset and a trading asset. Capital asset is defined in Section 2(14) of the Act. Long-term capital assets and gains are dealt with under Section 2(29A) and Section 2(29B). Short-term capital assets and gains are dealt with under Section 2(42A) and Section 2(42B). Trading asset is dealt with under Section 28 of the Act.

41 CIRCULAR NO. 4/2007, DATED The Central Board of Direct Taxes (CBDT) through Instruction No.1827 dated August 31, 1989 had brought to the notice of the assessing officers that there is a distinction between shares held as investment (capital asset) and shares held as stock-in-trade (trading asset). In the light of a number of judicial decisions pronounced after the issue of the above instructions, it is proposed to update the above instructions for the information of assessees as well as for guidance of the assessing officers. 5. In the case of Commissioner of Income Tax (Central), Calcutta Vs Associated Industrial Development Company (P) Ltd (82 ITR 586), the Supreme Court observed that: Whether a particular holding of shares is by way of investment or forms part of the stock-in-trade is a matter which is within the knowledge of the assessee who holds the shares and it should, in normal circumstances, be in a position to produce evidence from its records as to whether it has maintained any distinction between those shares which are its stock-in-trade and those which are held by way of investment.

42 CIRCULAR NO. 4/2007, DATED In the case of Commissioner of Income Tax, Bombay Vs H. Holck Larsen (160 ITR 67), the Supreme Court observed: The High Court, in our opinion, made a mistake in observing whether transactions of sale and purchase of shares were trading transactions or whether these were in the nature of investment was a question of law. This was a mixed question of law and fact. 7. The principles laid down by the Supreme Court in the above two cases afford adequate guidance to the assessing officers. 8. The Authority for Advance Rulings (AAR) (288 ITR 641), referring to the decisions of the Supreme Court in several cases, has culled out the following principles :-

43 CIRCULAR NO. 4/2007, DATED (i) Where a company purchases and sells shares, it must be shown that they were held as stock-in-trade and that existence of the power to purchase and sell shares in the memorandum of association is not decisive of the nature of transaction; (ii) the substantial nature of transactions, the manner of maintaining books of accounts, the magnitude of purchases and sales and the ratio between purchases and sales and the holding would furnish a good guide to determine the nature of transactions; (iii)ordinarily the purchase and sale of shares with the motive of earning a profit, would result in the transaction being in the nature of trade/adventure in the nature of trade; but where the object of the investment in shares of a company is to derive income by way of dividend etc. then the profits accruing by change in such investment (by sale of shares) will yield capital gain and not revenue receipt.

44 CIRCULAR NO. 4/2007, DATED Dealing with the above three principles, the AAR has observed in the case of Fidelity group as under:- We shall revert to the aforementioned principles. The first principle requires us to ascertain whether the purchase of shares by a FII in exercise of the power in the memorandum of association/trust deed was as stock in-trade as the mere existence of the power to purchase and sell shares will not by itself be decisive of the nature of transaction. We have to verify as to how the shares were valued/held in the books of account i.e. whether they were valued as stock-in-trade at the end of the financial year for the purpose of arriving at business income or held as investment in capital assets. The second principle furnishes a guide for determining the nature of transaction by verifying whether there are substantial transactions, their magnitude, etc., maintenance of books of account and finding the ratio between purchases and sales.

45 CIRCULAR NO. 4/2007, DATED It will not be out of place to mention that regulation 18 of the SEBI Regulations enjoins upon every FII to keep and maintain books of account containing true and fair accounts relating to remittance of initial corpus of buying and selling and realizing capital gains on investments and accounts of remittance to India for investment in India and realizing capital gains on investment from such remittances. The third principle suggests that ordinarily purchases and sales of shares with the motive of realizing profit would lead to inference of trade/adventure in the nature of trade; where the object of the investment in shares of companies is to derive income by way of dividends etc., the transactions of purchases and sales of shares would yield capital gains and not business profits.

46 CIRCULAR NO. 4/2007, DATED CBDT also wishes to emphasise that it is possible for a tax payer to have two portfolios, i.e., an investment portfolio comprising of securities which are to be treated as capital assets and a trading portfolio comprising of stock-in-trade which are to be treated as trading assets. Where an assessee has two portfolios, the assessee may have income under both heads i.e., capital gains as well as business income. 11. Assessing officers are advised that the above principles should guide them in determining whether, in a given case, the shares are held by the assessee as investment (and therefore giving rise to capital gains) or as stock-in-trade (and therefore giving rise to business profits). The assessing officers are further advised that no single principle would be decisive and the total effect of all the principles should be considered to determine whether, in a given case, the shares are held by the assessee as investment or stock-in-trade. 12. These instructions shall supplement the earlier Instruction no dated August 31, 1989.

47

ACCOUNTING & TAXATION ISSUES RELATING TO CAPITAL MARKET TRANSACTIONS CAPITAL MARKET TRANSACTIONS

ACCOUNTING & TAXATION ISSUES RELATING TO CAPITAL MARKET TRANSACTIONS CAPITAL MARKET TRANSACTIONS ACCOUNTING & TAXATION ISSUES RELATING TO CAPITAL MARKET TRANSACTIONS CAPITAL MARKET TRANSACTIONS CASH MARKET DERIVATIVE MARKET DELIVERY DAILY JOBBING FUTURE OPTIONS BASED (NO DELIVERY) INDEX STOCKS INDEX

More information

Deemed Speculation loss. August 10, 2011 by kkchhaparia

Deemed Speculation loss. August 10, 2011 by kkchhaparia Deemed Speculation loss 1 Deemed Speculation loss.. [Explanation - Where any part of the business of a company [other than a company whose gross total income consists mainly of income which is chargeable

More information

ISSUES IN CAPITAL GAIN. NIHAR JAMBUSARIA 25 July, 2010

ISSUES IN CAPITAL GAIN. NIHAR JAMBUSARIA 25 July, 2010 ISSUES IN CAPITAL GAIN NIHAR JAMBUSARIA 25 July, 2010 BUSINESS INCOME VS. CAPITAL GAINS Whether the assessee whose substantial income comprises long term capital gain can be said to be a trader of shares

More information

SEMINAR ON SECTION 14A DISALLOWANCE AND DEEMED DIVIDEND

SEMINAR ON SECTION 14A DISALLOWANCE AND DEEMED DIVIDEND SEMINAR ON SECTION 14A DISALLOWANCE AND DEEMED DIVIDEND Deemed Dividend-Legislative Intent The insertion of section 14A in 2001 was mainly done to make the following Supreme Court judgments non functional:

More information

A Fresh look at disallowances u/s 14A of Income Tax Act - By CA. K.K.Chhaparia

A Fresh look at disallowances u/s 14A of Income Tax Act - By CA. K.K.Chhaparia A Fresh look at disallowances u/s 14A of Income Tax Act - By CA. K.K.Chhaparia Now a days, every assessee who is doing investment or trading in shares are getting hit hard by the impact of section 14A.

More information

CAPITAL GAINS BUSINESS PROFITS?

CAPITAL GAINS BUSINESS PROFITS? CAPITAL GAINS OR BUSINESS PROFITS? Compiled by: CA. Pankaj Ghanshyam Shah G.J. Shah & Company Indore Dear Readers FOREWORD There is no provision in the statute regarding the question as to when can a transaction

More information

Section 14A Expenditure incurred in relation to income not includible in Total Income. CA. Pramod Jain. B. Com (H), FCA, FCS, FCMA, LL.B.

Section 14A Expenditure incurred in relation to income not includible in Total Income. CA. Pramod Jain. B. Com (H), FCA, FCS, FCMA, LL.B. Section 14A Expenditure incurred in relation to income not includible in Total Income CA. Pramod Jain B. Com (H), FCA, FCS, FCMA, LL.B. DISA, MIMA This document would help in better understanding of critical

More information

A legitimate expenditure or relief not claimed in the return of income can be claimed ONLY by revising the return of income under section

A legitimate expenditure or relief not claimed in the return of income can be claimed ONLY by revising the return of income under section Fresh Claim Outside The Return of Income BY:- CA. (Dr.) Gurmeet S. Grewal B. Com (Hons.), FCA, PhD., CLA (IIAM) Grewal & Singh Chartered Accountants New Delhi, Chandigarh, Yamuna Nagar, Jammu Phones: 09811242856

More information

in NBFCs Presented by : Hitesh R. Shah Chartered Accountant 28 January

in NBFCs Presented by : Hitesh R. Shah Chartered Accountant 28 January Typical Tax issues in NBFCs Presented by : Hitesh R. Shah Chartered Accountant 28 January 2013 1 It is a company registered under the Companies Act, 1956 and is engaged in the business of financing whether

More information

CIT vs. Manjula J. Shah - [2013] 355 ITR 474 (Bombay) 1

CIT vs. Manjula J. Shah - [2013] 355 ITR 474 (Bombay) 1 CIT vs. Manjula J. Shah - [2013] 355 ITR 474 (Bombay) 1 Where capital asset is acquired under a will or gift, indexed cost of acquisition is calculated with reference to year in which previous owner first

More information

Tax Issues -NBFC. Presented by CA Mahazaver Patel for

Tax Issues -NBFC. Presented by CA Mahazaver Patel for Tax Issues -NBFC Presented by CA Mahazaver Patel for 1 KEY REVENUE ISSUES PROFITON SALE OF SECURITIES DIVIDEND PREMIUM RECEIVED INTEREST ON LOANS & DEPOSITS UPFRONT FEES / UNDERWRITING COMMISSION 2 KEY

More information

In order to answer the aforesaid queries, the following issues will have to be examined :

In order to answer the aforesaid queries, the following issues will have to be examined : 1 Tax-treatment of the share of a company in the income of an AOP [Published in 351 ITR (Jour) 16] - By S.K.Tyagi Recently, an Opinion was sought by a company relating to the tax-treatment of its share

More information

A Fresh look at disallowance under section 14A of the Income-Tax Act, 1961

A Fresh look at disallowance under section 14A of the Income-Tax Act, 1961 A Fresh look at disallowance under section 14A of the Income-Tax Act, 1961 [Published in 332 ITR (Jour) 49] 1 - By S.K.Tyagi Section 14A, the heading of which is Expenditure incurred in relation to income

More information

Important Judgment s on TDS CA. MAHENDRA SANGHVI

Important Judgment s on TDS CA. MAHENDRA SANGHVI Important Judgment s on TDS CA. MAHENDRA SANGHVI 1 Section 192 : Salary Commission to Managing Director Commission to Managing Director as fixed percentage of profit. Accrual of commission in the year

More information

IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL PANAJI BENCH, PANAJI

IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL PANAJI BENCH, PANAJI IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL PANAJI BENCH, PANAJI BEFORE SHRI N.S. SAINI, HON BLE ACCOUNTANT MEMBER AND SHRI GEORGE MATHAN, HON BLE JUDICIAL MEMBER (Asst. Year : 2009-10) DCIT, Circle-1(1), Panaji.

More information

REASSESSMENTS WITH SPECIAL REFERENCE TO RECENT DEVELOPMENTS AND PRACTICLE ASPECTS THERETO

REASSESSMENTS WITH SPECIAL REFERENCE TO RECENT DEVELOPMENTS AND PRACTICLE ASPECTS THERETO REASSESSMENTS WITH SPECIAL REFERENCE TO RECENT DEVELOPMENTS AND PRACTICLE ASPECTS THERETO By H. N. Motiwalla Chartered Accountant HNM 1 Income Escaping Assessment (S. 147) Income Escaping Assessment (S.

More information

Controversies surrounding Section 14A of the Income Tax Act

Controversies surrounding Section 14A of the Income Tax Act Controversies surrounding Section 14A of the Income Tax Act CA Vivek Newatia vnewatia@sjaykishan.com CA Puja Borar pujaborar@sjaykishan.com Background and Rationale for introduction Section 14A introduced

More information

Concealment Penalties- Post Assessment Issues- WIRC ) The penalty proceedings being separate & independent, the assessee is entitled to

Concealment Penalties- Post Assessment Issues- WIRC ) The penalty proceedings being separate & independent, the assessee is entitled to Prepared by: Advocate Mandar Vaidya, Concealment Penalties- Post Assessment Issues- WIRC- 22.3.14. Advocate, High Court. 1) The penalty proceedings being separate & independent, the assessee is entitled

More information

Futures, Options and other Derivatives

Futures, Options and other Derivatives Overview of Accounting, Reporting and Taxation of Futures, Options and other Derivatives By: Sanjay Agarwal Founder of Voice of CA, NGO Email: agarwal.s.ca@gmail.com Accounting aspects Accounting Aspects

More information

Issues Under Income-tax Act, CA Nihar Jambusaria

Issues Under Income-tax Act, CA Nihar Jambusaria Real Estate Transactions Issues Under Income-tax Act, 1961 CA Nihar Jambusaria The Focus Tax issues relating to Real Estate Transactions under Income-tax Act, 1961 Accounting For Revenue from Real Estate

More information

Section 14A and Rule 8D

Section 14A and Rule 8D Special Story recent Controversies in income tax assessments Sameer G. Dalal, Advocate Section 14A and Rule 8D When the case of an assessee is selected for scrutiny, it is always the endeavour of the Assessing

More information

IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL DELHI E BENCH, NEW DELHI. [Coram: Pramod Kumar AM and A. T. Varkey JM]

IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL DELHI E BENCH, NEW DELHI. [Coram: Pramod Kumar AM and A. T. Varkey JM] IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL DELHI E BENCH, NEW DELHI [Coram: Pramod Kumar AM and A. T. Varkey JM] Page 1 of 11 Minda Sai Limited C/o R N Saraf & Co 2659/2, Gurudwara Road, Karol Bagh New Delhi

More information

IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL MUMBAI D BENCH MUMBAI BENCHES, MUMBAI BEFORE SHRI VIJAY PAL RAO, JM & SHRI RAJENDRA, AM

IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL MUMBAI D BENCH MUMBAI BENCHES, MUMBAI BEFORE SHRI VIJAY PAL RAO, JM & SHRI RAJENDRA, AM IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL MUMBAI D BENCH MUMBAI BENCHES, MUMBAI BEFORE SHRI VIJAY PAL RAO, JM & SHRI RAJENDRA, AM Reliance Industrial Infrastructure Ltd 5 th Floor, NKM International House 178

More information

Reassessment B y C A M a h e n d r a S a n g h v i

Reassessment B y C A M a h e n d r a S a n g h v i Reassessment B y C A M a h e n d r a S a n g h v i R e a s s e s s m e n t & 2 RELEVANT SECTIONS: Sec. 147 Income escaping assessment. Sec. 148 Issue of notice where income has escaped assessment. Sec.

More information

IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL HYDERABAD BENCH B, HYDERABAD

IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL HYDERABAD BENCH B, HYDERABAD IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL HYDERABAD BENCH B, HYDERABAD BEFORE SHRI P.MADHAVI DEVI, JUDICIAL MEMBER AND SHRI S. RIFAUR RAHMAN, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER ITA No. 503/Hyd/2012 Assessment Year: 2008-09,

More information

[Published in 406 ITR (Journ.) p.73 (Part-3)]

[Published in 406 ITR (Journ.) p.73 (Part-3)] 1 Valuation of residential accommodation as a perquisite [Valuation of perquisite in respect of residential accommodation provided by the employer to the employee] [Published in 406 ITR (Journ.) p.73 (Part-3)]

More information

INTENSIVE STUDY GROUP 08/08/2013 CA SANJAY CHOKSHI

INTENSIVE STUDY GROUP 08/08/2013 CA SANJAY CHOKSHI CHAMBER OF TAX CONSULTANTS INTENSIVE STUDY GROUP 08/08/2013 CA SANJAY CHOKSHI CIT V. TEXTOOL CO. LTD. SUPREME COURT QUESTION REFERRED: Whether on the facts and in the circumstances of the case, the Appellate

More information

No disallowance under section 14A, where the assessee has got no income from a composite and indivisible business

No disallowance under section 14A, where the assessee has got no income from a composite and indivisible business 1 No disallowance under section 14A, where the assessee has got no income from a composite and indivisible business [Published in 384 ITR (Jour) 1 (Part-1)] By S.K.Tyagi Recently in the case of one of

More information

IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL MUMBAI H BENCH MUMBAI BENCHES, MUMBAI. ITA No. 6497/Mum/ ) & ITA No.6603/Mum/2009 (Asst Year )

IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL MUMBAI H BENCH MUMBAI BENCHES, MUMBAI. ITA No. 6497/Mum/ ) & ITA No.6603/Mum/2009 (Asst Year ) 1 IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL MUMBAI H BENCH MUMBAI BENCHES, MUMBAI BEFORE SHRI J SUDHAKAR REDDY, AM & SHRI VIJAY PAL RAO, JM Mr Hitesh Satishchandra Doshi Etemia A/1602 Hiranandani Garden Main

More information

Payment of Export commission to Non-Resident Agent :-

Payment of Export commission to Non-Resident Agent :- Common Disputes:- Payment of Export commission to Non-Resident Agent :- Relevant Bare Act, Rules & Circulars:- Other Sums 195. [(1) Any person responsible for paying to a non-resident, not being a company,

More information

Dilution of Section 14A

Dilution of Section 14A Dilution of Section 14A A ready reckoner - R.Dhiraj, Advocate, SAPR Advocates INTRODUCTION Section 14A has been introduced by the Finance Act 2001 with retrospective effect from 1962. The provision was

More information

TDS under section 195 of the Income-tax Act. CA Vishal Palwe 16 December 2017 Seminar on International Taxation at WIRC

TDS under section 195 of the Income-tax Act. CA Vishal Palwe 16 December 2017 Seminar on International Taxation at WIRC TDS under section 195 of the Income-tax Act CA Vishal Palwe 16 December 2017 Seminar on International Taxation at WIRC Overview of section 195 Overview of section 195 195(1) Any person paying to non-resident

More information

$~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI ITA 607/2015. versus AND ITA 608/2015. versus

$~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI ITA 607/2015. versus AND ITA 608/2015. versus $~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI 12. + ITA 607/2015 PR. COMMISSIONER OFINCOME TAX... Appellant Through: Mr. Kamal Sawhney, Senior Standing counsel with Mr. Raghvendra Singh and Mr.Shikhar Garg,

More information

IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL A BENCH : BANGALORE. BEFORE SHRI VIJAY PAL RAO, JUDICIAL MEMBER and SHRI JASON P BOAZ, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER

IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL A BENCH : BANGALORE. BEFORE SHRI VIJAY PAL RAO, JUDICIAL MEMBER and SHRI JASON P BOAZ, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL A BENCH : BANGALORE BEFORE SHRI VIJAY PAL RAO, JUDICIAL MEMBER and SHRI JASON P BOAZ, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER ITA No.726/Bang/2014 (Assessment year: 2005-06) M/s.B & B Infotech

More information

IN THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH. ITR No.192/1997 COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, JABALPUR. M/s VINDHYA TELELINKS LTD JUDGEMENT

IN THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH. ITR No.192/1997 COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, JABALPUR. M/s VINDHYA TELELINKS LTD JUDGEMENT IN THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH ITR No.192/1997 COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, JABALPUR Vs M/s VINDHYA TELELINKS LTD Krishn Kumar Lahoti and Smt Sushma Shrivastava JUDGEMENT Dated: February 22, 2011 The

More information

PBGP Disallowances An insight of the Indian Tax Laws

PBGP Disallowances An insight of the Indian Tax Laws PBGP Disallowances An insight of the Indian Tax Laws Contents Slide 2 Introduction Slide 3 Introduction on primarily include different types of expenditure which are not permissible to be reduced while

More information

2 O R D E R PER SAKTIJIT DEY, J.M. Instant appeals by the assessee are directed against separate orders passed by the learned Commissioner (Appeals) 4

2 O R D E R PER SAKTIJIT DEY, J.M. Instant appeals by the assessee are directed against separate orders passed by the learned Commissioner (Appeals) 4 IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL D BENCH, MUMBAI BEFORE SHRI SAKTIJIT DEY, JUDICIAL MEMBER AND SHRI RAJESH KUMAR, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER ITA no.5271/mum./2013 (Assessment Year : 2010 11) Plot no.612, Junction

More information

TAXATION OF REAL ESTATE TRANSACTIONS & RIGHTS. Nihar N. Jambusaria. 16 th April, 2011

TAXATION OF REAL ESTATE TRANSACTIONS & RIGHTS. Nihar N. Jambusaria. 16 th April, 2011 TAXATION OF REAL ESTATE TRANSACTIONS & DEVELOPMENT RIGHTS Nihar N. Jambusaria 16 th April, 2011 ROAD MAP OF THE CONTENTS Accounting Aspects of Real Estate development & Revenue Recognition Forms of Development

More information

ITA No.129 & 329/Kol/2016 M/s Bhoruka Investment Ltd. A.Y [Before Hon ble Sri N.V.Vasudevan, JM & Dr.Arjun Lal Saini, AM]

ITA No.129 & 329/Kol/2016 M/s Bhoruka Investment Ltd. A.Y [Before Hon ble Sri N.V.Vasudevan, JM & Dr.Arjun Lal Saini, AM] ITA No.129 & 329/Kol/2016 M/s Bhoruka Investment Ltd. A.Y.2012-13 1 IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL D BENCH : KOLKATA [Before Hon ble Sri N.V.Vasudevan, JM & Dr.Arjun Lal Saini, AM] I.T.A No.129/Kol/2016

More information

IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL MUMBAI BENCH G, MUMBAI

IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL MUMBAI BENCH G, MUMBAI IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL MUMBAI BENCH G, MUMBAI BEFORE SHRI C.N. PRASAD, HON'BLE JUDICIAL MEMBER AND SHRI MANOJ KUMAR AGGARWAL, HON'BLE ACCOUNTANT MEMBER O/o. Income Tax Officer 2(1)(1) Room

More information

Taxation and Redevelopment of Property. CA Nihar Jambusaria

Taxation and Redevelopment of Property. CA Nihar Jambusaria Taxation and Redevelopment of Property CA Nihar Jambusaria TDR Background Cracking Nuts Taxability Definitions TDR is not defined in Income Tax Act, 1961 Regulation 2(d) of Foreign Exchange Management

More information

$~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI 14 + ITA 557/2015. versus CORAM: DR. JUSTICE S.MURALIDHAR MR. JUSTICE VIBHU BAKHRU O R D E R %

$~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI 14 + ITA 557/2015. versus CORAM: DR. JUSTICE S.MURALIDHAR MR. JUSTICE VIBHU BAKHRU O R D E R % $~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI 14 + ITA 557/2015 COPERION IDEAL PRIVATE LIMITED... Appellant Through: Mr. Salil Kapoor and Mr. Sumit Lalchandani, Advocates. versus COMMISSIONER OF INCOME

More information

IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL B BENCH, MUMBAI BEFORE SHRI R.C. SHARMA, AM AND SHRI MAHAVIR SINGH, JM

IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL B BENCH, MUMBAI BEFORE SHRI R.C. SHARMA, AM AND SHRI MAHAVIR SINGH, JM IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL B BENCH, MUMBAI BEFORE SHRI R.C. SHARMA, AM AND SHRI MAHAVIR SINGH, JM (Assessment Year: 2009-10) Deputy Commissioner of Income-tax- 10(1), Mumbai.455, Aayakar Bhavan,

More information

ITA No.681 & 824/Kol/2015-M/s. Kalyani Barter (P)Ltd. A.Y

ITA No.681 & 824/Kol/2015-M/s. Kalyani Barter (P)Ltd. A.Y ITA No.681 & 824/Kol/2015-M/s. Kalyani Barter (P)Ltd. A.Y.2010-11 1 IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL KOLKATA BENCH D KOLKATA Before Hon ble Shri Waseem Ahmed, Accountant Member and Shri S.S.Viswanethra

More information

Section 50C: An in-depth analysis

Section 50C: An in-depth analysis Section 50C: An in-depth analysis By: P. Kanthi Visalakshi, Associate, SAPR Advocates Why was 50C inserted: Prior to 50C being enacted, understating the consideration for transfer of capital assets (land

More information

DEEMED DIVIDEND. By Siddhartha Berlia, ACA

DEEMED DIVIDEND. By Siddhartha Berlia, ACA DEEMED DIVIDEND By Siddhartha Berlia, ACA Siddhartha@chhapariaassociates.com The concept of Deemed Dividend under the Income-tax Act, 1961(the Act) is not new. However, time and again many closely held

More information

THE CHAMBER OF TAX CONSULTANTS. STUDY GROUP MEETING ON 22/04/2013 SPEAKER : KESHAV B. BHUJLE, Advocate

THE CHAMBER OF TAX CONSULTANTS. STUDY GROUP MEETING ON 22/04/2013 SPEAKER : KESHAV B. BHUJLE, Advocate THE CHAMBER OF TAX CONSULTANTS STUDY GROUP MEETING ON 22/04/2013 SPEAKER : KESHAV B. BHUJLE, Advocate 1. AAR: 1.1 AAR: S. 245R of I. T. Act, 1961: Application for ruling: No requirement of recording reasons

More information

IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, BANGALORE BENCH B BEFORE SHRI JASON P BOAZ, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER AND SHRI N V VASUDEVAN, JUDICIAL MEMBER

IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, BANGALORE BENCH B BEFORE SHRI JASON P BOAZ, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER AND SHRI N V VASUDEVAN, JUDICIAL MEMBER Page 1 of 13 1 IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, BANGALORE BENCH B BEFORE SHRI JASON P BOAZ, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER AND SHRI N V VASUDEVAN, JUDICIAL MEMBER (Asst. year 2005-06) M/s Synopsys International

More information

All about Section 269SS & 269T of Income Tax Act,1961

All about Section 269SS & 269T of Income Tax Act,1961 All about Section 269SS & 269T of Income Tax Act,1961 Section 269SS No Person shall, take or accept from any other person (herein after called depositor)any loans or deposits otherwise than by an account

More information

Slump Sale, MAT and AMT

Slump Sale, MAT and AMT Special Story CA Haresh Kenia Slump Sale, MAT and AMT Introduction The Income-tax Act provides for the requirement of audit report and certification from Accountants under various provisions of the Act

More information

SUMMARY OF JUDGEMENTS

SUMMARY OF JUDGEMENTS JUNE, 2015 DIRECT TAX UPDATE SUMMARY OF JUDGEMENTS KNAV is a firm of International Accountants, Tax and Business Advisors. Presence in INDIA USA UK FRANCE NETHERLANDS SWITZERLAND CANADA E: admin@knavcpa.com

More information

DEDUCTION OF TAX AT SOURCE SECTION 195 H PADAMCHAND KHINCHA CHARTERED ACCOUNTANTS

DEDUCTION OF TAX AT SOURCE SECTION 195 H PADAMCHAND KHINCHA CHARTERED ACCOUNTANTS DEDUCTION OF TAX AT SOURCE SECTION 195 H PADAMCHAND KHINCHA CHARTERED ACCOUNTANTS 1 Nature of TDS obligation Section 4(1) Charge of income tax Section 4(2) Income tax shall be deducted at source or paid

More information

ITA NO.3352/MUM/2010(A.Y )

ITA NO.3352/MUM/2010(A.Y ) IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, MUMBAI BENCH H, MUMBAI BEFORE SHRI N.V.VASUDEVAN(J.M) & SHRI R.K.PANDA (A.M) Hindustan Platinum Pvt. Ltd., C-122, TTC Indusrial Area, Pawane Village, Rabale, Navi

More information

IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, MUMBAI BENCH I, MUMBAI BEFORE SHRI SANJAY GARG, JUDICIAL MEMBER AND SHRI ASHWANI TANEJA, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER

IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, MUMBAI BENCH I, MUMBAI BEFORE SHRI SANJAY GARG, JUDICIAL MEMBER AND SHRI ASHWANI TANEJA, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, MUMBAI BENCH I, MUMBAI BEFORE SHRI SANJAY GARG, JUDICIAL MEMBER AND SHRI ASHWANI TANEJA, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER Assessment Year: 2005-06 DCIT, Cir. 6(1), R.No.506, 5 th

More information

Reporting under Revised Tax Audit Forms (Clause 26 to 41 of Form 3CD)

Reporting under Revised Tax Audit Forms (Clause 26 to 41 of Form 3CD) Reporting under Revised Tax Audit Forms (Clause 26 to 41 of Form 3CD) Date :- 9 th August 2014 CA. Sanjay C. Shah 1 Clause 26 Reporting in pursuant to Section 43B of the Act. (Corresponding to old clause

More information

IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL DELHI BENCH `F : NEW DELHI BEFORE SHRI G.E. VEERABHADRAPPA, VICE PRESIDENT AND SHRI C.L.SETHI, JUDICIAL MEMBER.

IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL DELHI BENCH `F : NEW DELHI BEFORE SHRI G.E. VEERABHADRAPPA, VICE PRESIDENT AND SHRI C.L.SETHI, JUDICIAL MEMBER. IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL DELHI BENCH `F : NEW DELHI BEFORE SHRI G.E. VEERABHADRAPPA, VICE PRESIDENT AND SHRI C.L.SETHI, JUDICIAL MEMBER. I.T. A. No.4931/Del/2010 Assessment Year: 2007-08 Quippo

More information

IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, BANGALORE BENCH B BEFORE SMT. ASHA VIJAYARAGHAVAN, JUDICIAL MEMBER AND SHRI INTURI RAMA RAO, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER

IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, BANGALORE BENCH B BEFORE SMT. ASHA VIJAYARAGHAVAN, JUDICIAL MEMBER AND SHRI INTURI RAMA RAO, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, BANGALORE BENCH B BEFORE SMT. ASHA VIJAYARAGHAVAN, JUDICIAL MEMBER AND SHRI INTURI RAMA RAO, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER ITA No.971/Bang/2015 (Asst. Year 2011-12 ) M/s Sevasadan

More information

IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL HYDERABAD BENCH A, HYDERABAD

IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL HYDERABAD BENCH A, HYDERABAD IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL HYDERABAD BENCH A, HYDERABAD BEFORE SHRI CHANDRA POOJARI, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER AND SMT. ASHA VIJAYARAGHAVAN, JUDICIAL MEMBER ITA No. 842/HYD/2012 Assessment Year: 2007-08,

More information

DIRECT TAX REFRESHER COURSE. Current Controversial Issues under Capital Gains and Section 56. Compiled by Milin Mehta Chartered Accountant

DIRECT TAX REFRESHER COURSE. Current Controversial Issues under Capital Gains and Section 56. Compiled by Milin Mehta Chartered Accountant DIRECT TAX REFRESHER COURSE Current Controversial Issues under Capital Gains and Section 56 Compiled by Milin Mehta Chartered Accountant Statutory Warning Anything said in this paper could be valid only

More information

IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL MUMBAI BENCHES D, MUMBAI. Before Shri B R Baskaran, AM & Shri Amit Shukla, JM

IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL MUMBAI BENCHES D, MUMBAI. Before Shri B R Baskaran, AM & Shri Amit Shukla, JM IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL MUMBAI BENCHES D, MUMBAI Before Shri B R Baskaran, AM & Shri Amit Shukla, JM ITA No.1284/Mum/2013 Assessment Year : 2009-10 Dharmayug Investments Ltd. The Times of

More information

PUNE BRANCH OF WIRC OF ICAI. DIRECT TAX PROVISIONS OF FINANCE (No. 2) BILL 2014 CA Ketan L. Vajani 16 th July, 2014

PUNE BRANCH OF WIRC OF ICAI. DIRECT TAX PROVISIONS OF FINANCE (No. 2) BILL 2014 CA Ketan L. Vajani 16 th July, 2014 PUNE BRANCH OF WIRC OF ICAI DIRECT TAX PROVISIONS OF FINANCE (No. 2) BILL 2014 CA Ketan L. Vajani caketanvajani@gmail.com 16 th July, 2014 Rates of Taxes No change in Tax Rates Basic Limit for Individual

More information

A COMPLETE ANALYSIS OF THE FINANCE ACT, 2013 PART - VI (Chapter XIII & XIV of the IT Act)

A COMPLETE ANALYSIS OF THE FINANCE ACT, 2013 PART - VI (Chapter XIII & XIV of the IT Act) A COMPLETE ANALYSIS OF THE FINANCE ACT, 2013 PART - VI (Chapter XIII & XIV of the IT Act) Prepared by Advocates of M/s Subbaraya Aiyar, Padmanabhan & Ramamani (SAPR) Advocates 13. CHAPTER XIII Income Tax

More information

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SUBJECT : INCOME TAX ACT, 1961 Date of decision: ITA 232/2012

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SUBJECT : INCOME TAX ACT, 1961 Date of decision: ITA 232/2012 IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SUBJECT : INCOME TAX ACT, 1961 Date of decision: 22.11.2012 ITA 232/2012 COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX IV Through Mr. Kamal Sawhney, Sr. Standing Counsel... Appellant

More information

IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL "F" Bench, Mumbai. Before Shri B.R. Baskaran, Accountant Member and Shri Pawan Singh, Judicial Member

IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL F Bench, Mumbai. Before Shri B.R. Baskaran, Accountant Member and Shri Pawan Singh, Judicial Member IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL "F" Bench, Mumbai Before Shri B.R. Baskaran, Accountant Member and Shri Pawan Singh, Judicial Member (Assessment Year: 2014-15) 801/806, 8th Floor, Elite Square 274,

More information

G.A no.1150 of 2015 ITAT no.52 of 2015 IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA Special Jurisdiction (Income Tax) ORIGINAL SIDE

G.A no.1150 of 2015 ITAT no.52 of 2015 IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA Special Jurisdiction (Income Tax) ORIGINAL SIDE G.A no.1150 of 2015 ITAT no.52 of 2015 IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA Special Jurisdiction (Income Tax) ORIGINAL SIDE Commissioner of Income Tax, Kolkata-2 Versus M/s. G K K Capital Markets (P) Limited

More information

IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL HYDERABAD BENCH B, HYDERABAD BEFORE SHRI B. RAMAKOTAIAH, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER AND SHRI SAKTIJIT DEY, JUDICIAL MEMBER

IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL HYDERABAD BENCH B, HYDERABAD BEFORE SHRI B. RAMAKOTAIAH, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER AND SHRI SAKTIJIT DEY, JUDICIAL MEMBER IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL HYDERABAD BENCH B, HYDERABAD BEFORE SHRI B. RAMAKOTAIAH, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER AND SHRI SAKTIJIT DEY, JUDICIAL MEMBER ITA No. 1743/Hyd/2013 Assessment Year : 2009-10 Bellwether

More information

IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL DELHI BENCH "F : NEW DELHI. Before Shri. G. E. Veerabhadrappa, VP and Shri. George Mathan, JM

IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL DELHI BENCH F : NEW DELHI. Before Shri. G. E. Veerabhadrappa, VP and Shri. George Mathan, JM IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL DELHI BENCH "F : NEW DELHI Before Shri. G. E. Veerabhadrappa, VP and Shri. George Mathan, JM ITA No. 3198/D/2004 Asst Year: 1999-2000 GE Capital Services India, AIFACS

More information

Part - I. Law relating to taxation of Partnership Firms

Part - I. Law relating to taxation of Partnership Firms 1. Introduction: Part - I Law relating to taxation of Partnership Firms Under the income tax law, the total income of the firm will be determined as a separate entity and it will be computed under various

More information

The Law On Taxability Of Non Compete Fees Explained By Darryl Paul Barretto

The Law On Taxability Of Non Compete Fees Explained By Darryl Paul Barretto By Darryl Paul Barretto Overview Payment received as non compete fee was treated as a capital receipt till the assessment year 2003 04. Through the Finance Act, 2002, the said receipt were made taxable

More information

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION. WRIT PETITION No OF 2004

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION. WRIT PETITION No OF 2004 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION No. 3314 OF 2004 wp-3314-2004.sxw M/s. Eskay K'n' IT (India) Ltd... Petitioner. V/s. Dy. Commissioner of Income

More information

RECOVERY PROCEEDINGS UNDER INCOME TAX ACT, 1961

RECOVERY PROCEEDINGS UNDER INCOME TAX ACT, 1961 RECOVERY PROCEEDINGS UNDER INCOME TAX ACT, 1961 By Shri Jitendra Singh, Advocate M-3, Mezzanine Floor, Court Chambers, 35, New Marine Lines, Mumbai 400020 Telephone No: (022) 49737379 Mobile No.: +91 9975750130

More information

vk;dj vihyh; vf/kdj.k **bz^^ U;k;ihB eqacbz esaa

vk;dj vihyh; vf/kdj.k **bz^^ U;k;ihB eqacbz esaa vk;dj vihyh; vf/kdj.k **bz^^ U;k;ihB eqacbz esaa IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL E BENCH, MUMBAI Jh th +,l + iuuw] ys[kk lnl;,oa Jh vfer kqdyk] U;kf;d lnl; ds le{ka BEFORE SHRI G.S. PANNU, ACCOUNTANT

More information

IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL MUMBAI BENCH D MUMBAI BEFORE SHRI SAKTIJIT DEY (JUDICIAL MEMBER) AND SHRI N.K. PRADHAN (ACCOUNTANT MEMBER)

IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL MUMBAI BENCH D MUMBAI BEFORE SHRI SAKTIJIT DEY (JUDICIAL MEMBER) AND SHRI N.K. PRADHAN (ACCOUNTANT MEMBER) IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL MUMBAI BENCH D MUMBAI BEFORE SHRI SAKTIJIT DEY (JUDICIAL MEMBER) AND SHRI N.K. PRADHAN (ACCOUNTANT MEMBER) ITA No. 3481/MUM/2014 Assessment Year: 2009-10 Ranjeet D

More information

WIPRO LTD. vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX*

WIPRO LTD. vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX* /feedback.html /library.html WIPRO LTD. vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX* ITAT, BANGALORE A BENCH P. Mohanarajan, J.M. & N.L. Kalra, A.M. ITA Nos. 426 & 427/Bang/2006; Asst. yrs. 2001-02 & 2002-03

More information

SECTION 195 OF THE INCOME TAX ACT,1961 PROVISIONS, AMENDMENTS AND CONTROVERSIES

SECTION 195 OF THE INCOME TAX ACT,1961 PROVISIONS, AMENDMENTS AND CONTROVERSIES 1 WIRC Pune Camp CPE Study Circle January 19, 2013 SECTION 195 OF THE INCOME TAX ACT,1961 PROVISIONS, AMENDMENTS AND CONTROVERSIES CA JIGER SAIYA jigersaiya@mzsk.in Contents Introduction Recent Amendments

More information

The relevant extract of Calcutta High Court order in the case of Balmer Lawrie & Co Ltd (1995) 215 ITR 249 (Cal) is reproduced below:

The relevant extract of Calcutta High Court order in the case of Balmer Lawrie & Co Ltd (1995) 215 ITR 249 (Cal) is reproduced below: Caselaws Analysis: The relevant extract of Calcutta High Court order in the case of Balmer Lawrie & Co Ltd (1995) 215 ITR 249 (Cal) is reproduced below: The relief under sec 80-I of the Act has to be calculated

More information

IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL MUMBAI BENCH C : MUMBAI : O R D E R :

IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL MUMBAI BENCH C : MUMBAI : O R D E R : IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL MUMBAI BENCH C : MUMBAI BEFORE SHRI P.M. JAGTAP (AM) AND SHRI R.S. PADVEKAR (JM) (Asstt. Year : 2005-06) M/s Pik Pen Private Limited Appellant 7, Parsian Building,

More information

DIRECT TAXES Tribunal

DIRECT TAXES Tribunal Jitendra singh & sameer dalal Advocates DIRECT TAXES Tribunal REPORTED 1. TDS under section 194I provision for rent vis-à-vis actual payment assessee making provisions for disputed rent payable to landlord

More information

IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL AMRITSAR BENCH; AMRITSAR. BEFORE SH. A.D. JAIN, JUDICIAL MEMBER AND SH. B.P. JAIN, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER

IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL AMRITSAR BENCH; AMRITSAR. BEFORE SH. A.D. JAIN, JUDICIAL MEMBER AND SH. B.P. JAIN, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL AMRITSAR BENCH; AMRITSAR. BEFORE SH. A.D. JAIN, JUDICIAL MEMBER AND SH. B.P. JAIN, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER I.T.A. No. 437(Asr)/2012 Assessment Year: 2009-10 PAN: AAACN6345A

More information

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL NOs OF 2010 (Arising out of SLP(C) No of 2009)

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL NOs OF 2010 (Arising out of SLP(C) No of 2009) IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL NOs.7541-7542 OF 2010 (Arising out of SLP(C) No. 34306-34307 of 2009) GE India Technology Centre Private Ltd.. Appellant(s) Versus

More information

IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL MUMBAI BENCH I, MUMBAI BEFORE SHRI I.P. BANSAL, JUDICIAL MEMBER AND SHRI D. KARUNAKARA RAO, ACCOUNTAT MEMBER

IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL MUMBAI BENCH I, MUMBAI BEFORE SHRI I.P. BANSAL, JUDICIAL MEMBER AND SHRI D. KARUNAKARA RAO, ACCOUNTAT MEMBER IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL MUMBAI BENCH I, MUMBAI BEFORE SHRI I.P. BANSAL, JUDICIAL MEMBER AND SHRI D. KARUNAKARA RAO, ACCOUNTAT MEMBER Shri Irfan Abdul Kader Fazlani, 21 A Nirmal, Nariman Point,

More information

$~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI ITA 239/2015 & CM No. 6678/2015 COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX-VI Through Mr Rohit Madan, Advocate.

$~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI ITA 239/2015 & CM No. 6678/2015 COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX-VI Through Mr Rohit Madan, Advocate. $~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI 10. + ITA 239/2015 & CM No. 6678/2015 COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX-VI Through Mr Rohit Madan, Advocate. versus... Appellant M/S UNITECH LTD.... Respondent Through

More information

ITA no. 3279/Mum./2008 (Assessment Year : ) Revenue by : Mr. Ajit Kumar Jain Assessee by : Mr. Firoze B. Andhyarujina

ITA no. 3279/Mum./2008 (Assessment Year : ) Revenue by : Mr. Ajit Kumar Jain Assessee by : Mr. Firoze B. Andhyarujina IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL L BENCH, MUMBAI BEFORE SHRI B.R. MITTAL, JUDICIAL MEMBER AND SHRI J. SUDHAKAR REDDY, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER ITA no. 3279/Mum./2008 (Assessment Year : 2003-04) Dy. Commissioner

More information

IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL MUMBAI BENCHES, B, MUMBAI BEFORE SHRI P.M.JAGTAP, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER AND SHRI VIJAY PAL RAO, JUDICIAL MEMBER ITA

IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL MUMBAI BENCHES, B, MUMBAI BEFORE SHRI P.M.JAGTAP, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER AND SHRI VIJAY PAL RAO, JUDICIAL MEMBER ITA Default u/s 194C does not result in s. 40(a)(ia) disallowance if TDS paid before due date of filing ROI Bapushaeb Nanasaheb Dhumal vs. ACIT (ITAT Mumbai) The assessee made payments to sub-contractors during

More information

Section 44AD of The Income Tax Act,1961

Section 44AD of The Income Tax Act,1961 Section 44AD of The Income Tax Act,1961 Special provision for computing profits and gains of business on presumptive basis By: CA Sanjay Kumar Agarwal CA Sidharth Jain Assisted By : CA Neha khurana Applicability

More information

2 the order passed by the AO dated for AY , on the following grounds:- 1 : Re.: Treating the reimbursement of the expenses as income

2 the order passed by the AO dated for AY , on the following grounds:- 1 : Re.: Treating the reimbursement of the expenses as income IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL "L" Bench, Mumbai Shri C.N. Prasad (Judicial Member) & Before Shri Ashwani Taneja (Accountant Member) ITA No.4659/Mum/2014-2009-10 ITA No.385/Mum/2016-2011-12 Dy.CIT

More information

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SUBJECT : INCOME TAX ACT. Judgment delivered on : ITA Nos. 697/2007, 698/2007 & 699/2007.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SUBJECT : INCOME TAX ACT. Judgment delivered on : ITA Nos. 697/2007, 698/2007 & 699/2007. IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SUBJECT : INCOME TAX ACT Judgment delivered on : 06.03.2009 ITA Nos. 697/2007, 698/2007 & 699/2007 ESTER INDUSTRIES LIMITED... Appellant versus COMMISSIONER OF INCOME

More information

C.R. Building, I.P. Estate

C.R. Building, I.P. Estate IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL DELHI BENCH: D NEW DELHI BEFORE SHRI R. P. TOLANI, JUDICIAL MEMBER AND SHRI J. S. REDDY, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER I.T.A. No. 364/Del/2012 Assessment Years: 2008-09 ACIT Vs.

More information

INTERNATIONAL TAXATION Case Law Update

INTERNATIONAL TAXATION Case Law Update CA Tarunkumar Singhal & Sunil Moti Lala, Advocate INTERNATIONAL TAXATION A. SUPREME COURT RULINGS 1. Where the transfer pricing addition made in the final assessment order pursuant to original assessment

More information

[Published in 358 ITR (Journ.) p. 30 (Part-3) ] - By S.K.Tyagi

[Published in 358 ITR (Journ.) p. 30 (Part-3) ] - By S.K.Tyagi 1 Disallowance under section 14A The AO cannot straight away apply rule 8D, without consideration of claim of assessee under section 14A( 2 ) of the Act. [Published in 358 ITR (Journ.) p. 30 (Part-3) ]

More information

Aggregation of Income. CA Venkatesan Murali

Aggregation of Income. CA Venkatesan Murali Aggregation of Income CA Venkatesan Murali Overview of Act Section Number Particulars 68 Unexplained Cash Credits 69 Unexplained Investments 69A 69C 69B 69D Unexplained Money, Jewellery, etc., Unexplained

More information

IMPORTANT DECISIONS INCOME TAX

IMPORTANT DECISIONS INCOME TAX IMPORTANT DECISIONS INCOME TAX S. Sathiyanarayanan Partner 18 Feb 2017 ICAI SIRO Scheme of Morning Talk Recent Decisions (Dec 2016 to Feb 2017) Section 14A Section 50B CIT vs. Vinzas Solutions India Private

More information

Insurance Key Indirect Tax Issues

Insurance Key Indirect Tax Issues CA. S.S. Gupta & CA. Nidhi Mapuskar Insurance Key Indirect Tax Issues The insurance sector is divided into two parts namely Life and General. The Government of India had introduced Service Tax on General

More information

TDS on Payments to Non-residents under section 195 Law and Procedures

TDS on Payments to Non-residents under section 195 Law and Procedures Study Course on International Taxation for Beginners Organised by - Western India Regional Council of the Institute Chartered Accountants of India TDS on Payments to Non-residents under section 195 Law

More information

IN THE INCME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, C BENCH, KOLKATA. Before : Shri M. Balaganesh, Accountant Member, and Shri S.S. Viswanethra Ravi, Judicial Member

IN THE INCME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, C BENCH, KOLKATA. Before : Shri M. Balaganesh, Accountant Member, and Shri S.S. Viswanethra Ravi, Judicial Member IN THE INCME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, C BENCH, KOLKATA Before : Shri M. Balaganesh, Accountant Member, and Shri S.S. Viswanethra Ravi, Judicial Member I.T.A No. 1185/Kol/2012 A.Y. 2008-09 I.T.O Ward 1(1),

More information

LUNAWAT & CO. Chartered Accountants 13 th February2016, Faridabad CA. PRAMOD JAIN FCA, FCS, FCMA, LL.B, MIMA, DISA

LUNAWAT & CO. Chartered Accountants 13 th February2016, Faridabad CA. PRAMOD JAIN FCA, FCS, FCMA, LL.B, MIMA, DISA Chartered Accountants 13 th February2016, Faridabad CA. PRAMOD JAIN FCA, FCS, FCMA, LL.B, MIMA, DISA An Intro. LUNAWAT & CO. What is Limited Liability Partnership? A body corporate formed & incorporated

More information

IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL MUMBAI BENCHES, H, MUMBAI BEFORE SHRI R V EASWAR, PRESIDENT AND SHRI PRAMOD KUMAR, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER

IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL MUMBAI BENCHES, H, MUMBAI BEFORE SHRI R V EASWAR, PRESIDENT AND SHRI PRAMOD KUMAR, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL MUMBAI BENCHES, H, MUMBAI BEFORE SHRI R V EASWAR, PRESIDENT AND SHRI PRAMOD KUMAR, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER I T A No: 6289/Mum/2008 (Assessment Year: 2005-06) Shri Mahendra

More information

Dividend General Meaning Dividend, in its ordinary connotation, means the sum paid to or received by a shareholder proportionate to his shareholding

Dividend General Meaning Dividend, in its ordinary connotation, means the sum paid to or received by a shareholder proportionate to his shareholding Deemed Dividend Presentation By : - CA Agarwal Sanjay Voice of CA CA Sidharth Jain Team Voice of CA www.taxguru.in Dividend General Meaning Dividend, in its ordinary connotation, means the sum paid to

More information

PUNE. CA. Pramod Jain LUNAWAT & CO. FCA, FCS, FCMA, LL.B, MIMA, DISA. 6 th December 2014

PUNE. CA. Pramod Jain LUNAWAT & CO. FCA, FCS, FCMA, LL.B, MIMA, DISA. 6 th December 2014 PUNE CA. Pramod Jain FCA, FCS, FCMA, LL.B, MIMA, DISA 6 th December 2014 LUNAWAT & CO. Close Merge Options Run Convert An Intro. LUNAWAT & CO. What is Limited Liability Partnership? A body corporate formed

More information

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.4117 OF 2010

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.4117 OF 2010 1 31 itxa 4117.10.doc K IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.4117 OF 2010 The Commissioner of Income Tax 4 Vs. M/s. The Stock and Bond Trading

More information