Mandatory Combined Reporting for State Income Taxes Improving Tax Compliance to Manage Conflicting State Rules
|
|
- Shawn Wright
- 6 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 Presenting a live 110-minute teleconference with interactive Q&A Mandatory Combined Reporting for State Income Taxes Improving Tax Compliance to Manage Conflicting State Rules WEDNESDAY, MAY 22, pm Eastern 12pm Central 11am Mountain 10am Pacific Today s faculty features: Robert Rosato, Manager of State Income-Franchise Tax, Ryan, Pittsburgh Jeffrey Reed, Attorney, Mayer Brown, New York Mike Shaikh, Reed Smith, Los Angeles Robert Porcelli, Partner, State and Local Tax Group, PricewaterhouseCoopers, Tyson s Corner, Va. For this program, attendees must listen to the audio over the telephone. Please refer to the instructions ed to the registrant for the dial-in information. Attendees can still view the presentation slides online. If you have any questions, please contact Customer Service at ext. 10.
2 Tips for Optimal Quality Sound Quality Call in on the telephone by dialing and enter your PIN when prompted. If you have any difficulties during the call, press *0 for assistance. You may also send us a chat or sound@straffordpub.com immediately so we can address the problem. Viewing Quality To maximize your screen, press the F11 key on your keyboard. To exit full screen, press the F11 key again.
3 Continuing Education Credits FOR LIVE EVENT ONLY Attendees must stay on the line throughout the program, including the Q & A session, in order to qualify for full continuing education credits. Strafford is required to monitor attendance. Record verification codes presented throughout the seminar. If you have not printed out the Official Record of Attendance, please print it now (see Handouts tab in Conference Materials box on left-hand side of your computer screen). To earn Continuing Education credits, you must write down the verification codes in the corresponding spaces found on the Official Record of Attendance form. Please refer to the instructions ed to the registrant for additional information. If you have any questions, please contact Customer Service at ext. 10.
4 Program Materials If you have not printed the conference materials for this program, please complete the following steps: Click on the + sign next to Conference Materials in the middle of the lefthand column on your screen. Click on the tab labeled Handouts that appears, and there you will see a PDF of the slides and the Official Record of Attendance for today's program. Double-click on the PDF and a separate page will open. Print the slides by clicking on the printer icon.
5 Mandatory Combined Reporting for State Income Taxes Seminar May 22, 2013 Robert Rosato, Ryan Mike Shaikh, Reed Smith Jeffrey Reed, Mayer Brown Robert Porcelli, PricewaterhouseCoopers
6 Today s Program Overview Of Background Concepts And Trends [Robert Rosato] Mandatory Unitary Combined Reporting States [Mike Shaikh, Jeffrey Reed and Robert Porcelli] Slide 8 Slide 25 Slide 26 Slide 45 Discretionary Combined Reporting States [Jeffrey Reed and Mike Shaikh] Slide 46 Slide 52 Next States Likely To Act [Robert Porcelli] Slide 53 Slide 65
7 Notice ANY TAX ADVICE IN THIS COMMUNICATION IS NOT INTENDED OR WRITTEN BY THE SPEAKERS FIRMS TO BE USED, AND CANNOT BE USED, BY A CLIENT OR ANY OTHER PERSON OR ENTITY FOR THE PURPOSE OF (i) AVOIDING PENALTIES THAT MAY BE IMPOSED ON ANY TAXPAYER OR (ii) PROMOTING, MARKETING OR RECOMMENDING TO ANOTHER PARTY ANY MATTERS ADDRESSED HEREIN. You (and your employees, representatives, or agents) may disclose to any and all persons, without limitation, the tax treatment or tax structure, or both, of any transaction described in the associated materials we provide to you, including, but not limited to, any tax opinions, memoranda, or other tax analyses contained in those materials. The information contained herein is of a general nature and based on authorities that are subject to change. Applicability of the information to specific situations should be determined through consultation with your tax adviser. 7
8 Robert Rosato, Ryan OVERVIEW OF BACKGROUND CONCEPTS AND TRENDS
9 State Filing Methodologies Separate company reporting Individual entity basis, with income of affiliates excluded Consolidated reporting Common ownership, usually 80% or more Some states require that a federal consolidated return be filed as a prerequisite to filing a state consolidated return. Single return filed for the affiliated group Combined reporting Common ownership, usually 50% or more Usually same trade or business Evidenced by functional integration, centralized management and economies of scale 9
10 Separate Company Reporting Filing separately The parent company and its affiliates are treated separately when determining taxable income. Nexus is analyzed with regard to each company's contacts with the state. LLCs are treated as taxable entities by some states. Separate company reporting is not common among the states. Some remaining separate reporting states have proposals to shift away from this methodology. 10
11 Consolidated Vs. Combined Reporting Consolidated reporting Similar basis of composition to federal filing group Generally, the affiliated group is treated as a single taxpayer. Focuses on ownership relationship between entities Usually, 80% common ownership requirement Business income often determined by post-apportionment Combined reporting Affiliates that are unitary are included in the group. Usually, 50% common ownership requirement 11
12 12 Combined Reporting Types of combined filing Mandatory combined reporting Roughly 20 jurisdictions require a unitary business to file a combined report. Unitary members are forced by statute to file a combined report. Elective/discretionary combined reporting Generally, these states also allow separate company returns. State requires or permits taxpayer to elect to file a combined report, if certain conditions are met. Combined report is used to accurately reflect group s income earned in the state. Nexus combination reporting All members with nexus in the state are included in return. States vary regarding pre- and post-apportionment of income.
13 Combined Reporting (Cont.) Pre-apportionment Members of the group combine income and losses before apportioning income. The combined business income of the entire group is multiplied using the entire group s aggregate apportionment percentage. Post-apportionment The income and losses of each member of the group are apportioned using each member s individual apportionment percentage. Each entity s apportioned income is aggregated afterward to determine the taxable income of the group. 13
14 Combined Reporting (Cont.) Unitary business States are limited by the U.S. Constitution when determining which entities are unitary. Fact-dependent analysis, often evidenced by factors including centralized management, functional integration and economies of Scale Determining which entities are unitary MTC regulations Three unities test Contribution and dependency test Flow of value test Factors of profitability test 14
15 Who Is The Taxpayer? Questions to consider: Who is ultimately included in the combined group? Whose apportionment factors are included in the combined group? Who can utilize the net operating losses generated within the combined group? Who can utilize credits generated within the combined group? 15
16 Who Is The Taxpayer? (Cont.) Worldwide reporting Combined return includes income from all foreign and domestic entities in the unitary group. Upheld by the U.S. Supreme Court in Container Corporation of America v. Franchise Tax Board, 103 S. Ct (1983) Water s edge election Taxpayer may exclude foreign members of the combined group that are not organized in the U.S. 16
17 Who Is The Taxpayer? (Cont.) 17 Joyce v. Finnigan Appeal of Joyce, Inc., No. 66 SBE 069 (Cal. SBE Nov. 11, 1966) A shoe company was unitary with a subsidiary in California but had no nexus in California. A unitary member without nexus to the taxing jurisdiction must remove its sales from the sales numerator, for apportionment purposes. A unitary member with nexus must throw back sales to jurisdictions where the member has no nexus. Appeal of Finnigan Corp., Cal. St. Bd. of Equal., August 25, 1988 Two taxpayers with nexus to California had sales outside California to a taxing jurisdiction where only one entity had nexus, All members of the unitary group include in-state sales in the apportionment numerator of a Finnigan state, Nexus based on the entire group: Sales by a member without individual nexus are not thrown back, because nexus was established by the entire group.
18 Who Is The Taxpayer? (Cont.) Throwback of sales Requires taxpayers that are not taxable in the destination state to source sales back to the state of origin Sales are thrown back into the numerator of the jurisdiction from which the goods were shipped. Reasoning behind throwback is to ensure that all sales are assigned to the numerator of a jurisdiction. Double-throwback Illinois throws back sales to its sales numerator when the taxpayer s activities in Illinois go beyond P.L , and the taxpayer s receipts are taxable in neither the destination state nor the origin state. 18
19 Who Is The Taxpayer? (Cont.) Credits Multiple approaches exist regarding application of credits to a unitary group. Some states only allow application of the credit to the entity that earned the credit, despite the unitary nature of the group. Other states allow application of the credit to any entity in the unitary group, though another entity in the group actually earned the credit. 19
20 Who Is The Taxpayer? (Cont.) Net operating losses NOLs can be treated as pre-apportioned losses carried forward for use by the entire group. Some states treat NOLs as a post-apportioned loss in the aggregate, for use by the entire group. Some states treat NOLs as a post-apportioned losses for each separate entity. Application of NOLs is limited in application to the entity that incurred the loss, not to other unitary entities. How are net operating losses allocated when members join or leave the group? What happens if a member converts to an LLC? 20
21 California Combined Reporting Update Recent changes in California California converts to Finnigan. All sales of the combined reporting group are included in the California sales numerator for apportionment purposes, regardless of a unitary member s nexus with the state. Single-sales factor apportionment For 2011 and 2012, taxpayers can elect to use single-sales factor apportionment or a double-weighted sales factor.» Election for 2011 and 2012 must be on a timely filed return and made by all entities in the combined group. In 2013, most taxpayers are required to use single-sales factor apportionment, including corporations in a combined group. 21
22 California Combined Reporting Update (Cont.) California law changes Economic nexus Cal. Rev. & Tax. Code 3101» A taxpayer is doing business in California if California sales exceed the lesser of $500,000 or 25% of its total sales. California Chief Counsel Ruling (Aug. 28, 2012) A taxpayer should not throw back sales to a jurisdiction where the taxpayer has greater than $500,000 of sales.» Having $500,000 of receipts in California creates economic nexus with California.» Despite another jurisdiction's statutes, $500,000 of sales into that jurisdiction creates economic nexus, for California throwback purposes. 22
23 State Throwback Updates Recent rulings and proposed laws Indiana sales to foreign countries subject to throwback A taxpayer s sales are thrown back when its business activities do not rise to the level of doing business in other states or foreign jurisdictions. Kentucky House Bill 142 Proposed bill would adopt a throwback rule, in addition to mandatory combined reporting, beginning on or after Jan. 1, Minnesota H.F. 37 Proposed bill would adopt throwback rule to sales of tangible personal property and services, beginning in
24 Slide Intentionally Left Blank
25 Net Operating Loss Update Wisconsin NOL application Wis. Stat (6)(a) allows a post-apportioned NOL not used by a member of the combined group to be applied to other members of the combined group that can use the NOL. For taxable years after 2012, members of the combined group cannot share NOLs generated in tax years before Jan. 1, Beginning in tax year 2011 and for 19 years thereafter, an entity with a pre-2009 NOL may use that NOL against its own income, then use up to 5% of the pre-2009 NOL to offset income of other entities. 25
26 Mike Shaikh, Reed Smith Jeffrey Reed, Mayer Brown Robert Porcelli, PricewaterhouseCoopers MANDATORY UNITARY COMBINED REPORTING STATES
27 Massachusetts Regulations Unity presumptions/indicia Who s in the group Water s edge/worldwide election Domestic corporations plus certain foreign corporations REITs/RICs/captive insurance companies Computation of income Inter-company transactions ( ) Deferral regime Apportionment California method Finnigan Special rules Tax attributes 27
28 West Virginia MTC method Unity presumptions Who s in the group Water s edge/worldwide election Newly formed entities Insurance companies (out) Computation of income Inter-company transactions (conformity to Treasury Reg ) Deferred inter-company stock accounts Apportionment On a group basis Joyce Throw-out Tax attributes 28
29 District Of Columbia: Combined Reporting Mandatory unitary combined reporting was enacted effective Jan. 1, The final combined reporting regulations were finalized on Sept. 14, A corporation subject to tax must file a combined return if it is engaged in a unitary business with entities related by common ownership. Entities are commonly owned or controlled when more than 50% of the voting control of each member is directly or indirectly owned by a common owner or owners. 29
30 District Of Columbia: Combined Reporting (Cont.) Passive holding companies are deemed to be engaged in a unitary business if they (1) hold intangible assets used by the business, or (2) are parent companies that directly or indirectly control operating company subsidiaries. Unincorporated business entities are included in the combined return as members if they are more than 50% owned. 30
31 Slide Intentionally Left Blank
32 Harley Davidson: Securitization Vehicles And Combined Returns Harley-Davidson, Inc. & Subs. v. California Franchise Tax Board Harley-Davidson offered a financing program to its dealers and to retail customers. The loans were packaged and were deposited into special purpose entity trusts (SPEs). The SPEs were established to be bankruptcy remote vehicles. The San Diego Superior Court ruled that the SPEs had nexus with California on the basis that they depended on Harley-Davidson entities for their existence, since their only business was to purchase loans for securitization. Accordingly, their factors were required to be included in the California combined return. Additionally, the court ruled that the SPEs were financial corporations, because they competed with national banks in selling pools of loans. 32
33 Chief Counsel Ruling Rulings: California Taxpayer does not have to throw back tangible personal property sales when it has more than $500,000 of sales in a foreign jurisdiction. Throwback of domestic tangible personal property sales is not required when a member of its California unitary group has more than $500,000 of sales, including sales of other than tangible personal property, in the destination state; and member is not otherwise protected from taxation in that state under P.L PwC Slide 33
34 Rulings: California (Cont.) Chief Counsel Ruling Certain corporations included in federal consolidated return converted to limited liability companies, as a result of filing under Chap. 11. Members of consolidated group were disallowed a worthless stock deduction on conversion of insolvent corporations under Treas. Reg. Sec (d)-2(a)(1). FTB held that because California does not permit a consolidated return, Treas. Reg. Sect (d)-2(a)(1) will not operate to disallow any worthless stock deduction pertaining to insolvent converted entities, otherwise applicable under federal consolidated rules. PwC Slide 34
35 Cases: California Apple, Inc. v. Franchise tax Board, Cal. Circuit Ct., Dkt. Nos. A128091, A129090, 9/12/2011; Cal. S. Ct., Dkt. No. S197381, petition for review denied 01/04/2012 Dividends from the accumulated earnings of a partially included CFC of a water s edge filer are governed by the last-in/first-out ordering provisions and must be treated as coming from current-year earnings until exhausted, and then from the most recent years earnings without regard to whether the earnings represent included or excluded income. Interest expense attributable to funds proven to have some economic connection to the generation of taxable income qualify for deduction. PwC Slide 35
36 Cases: Illinois Clarcor, Inc. v. Hamer, Ill Ct. App., No. 09-L-51291, 5/11/12 The court rejected taxpayer s attempt to exclude its packaging subsidiaries from its unitary group, while not attempting to exclude its filtration subsidiaries. Court found that horizontal integration existed between the subsidiaries, as evidenced by the sharing of cash, which is strongly indicative of a unitary business; and common pension, 401(k) and health insurance plans. Further, the taxpayer offered no explanation of why it lacked vertical control over the subsidiaries it sought to exclude. PwC Slide 36
37 Cases: Minnesota Express Scripts, Inc. v. Commissioner of Revenue, Minnesota Tax Court, Ramsey County, Docket No. 8272R, 8/20/12 A taxpayer s corporate acquisition triggered an IRC Sect. 382 limitation of the acquired company s net operating loss carryovers equal to approximately $30 million. The Minnesota Department of Revenue apportioned that limitation using the apportionment ratio of the income years, which reduced the amount of available loss to approximately $120,000. Despite department guidance to the contrary, there was no statutory authority for the department s position to apportion the Sect. 382 limitation. Additionally, the Tax Court found that the taxpayer was not unitary with one of its LLC subsidiaries, because the facts did not support a flow of value and there was not sufficient control over the subsidiary. PwC Slide 37
38 Cases: Texas In re: Nestle USA, Inc., 387 S.W.3d 610 (Tex. Oct. 19, 2012), rehearing denied Dec. 14, 2012 Challenge involving constitutionality of Texas franchise tax under Texas Equal and Uniform Clause and the Equal Protection, Due Process and Commerce Clauses Texas Supreme Court dismissed without merit all constitutional challenges made to the Texas franchise tax, finding that the Legislature has discretion in structuring tax laws and the structure of the franchise tax is reasonably related to the value of the privilege of doing business in Texas. Reinforced Texas position that a combined group is subject to a single classification, for deduction purposes, regardless of separateentity benefit. PwC Slide 38
39 Costco Wholesale Corp. v. Oregon Department of Revenue Bermuda insurance company not independently subject to tax or required to file in Oregon. Held insurance company income required to be in included in group income Compare with Stancorp Oregon Tax Court, TC
40 Coca-Cola Enterprises, Inc. v. Alabama Department of Revenue Consolidated group filing Issue of whether the group can carry forward NOLs incurred before an election to file consolidated return Application of SRLY rules Held: Group may carry forward NOLs before election but may not deduct losses incurred before consolidated filing was an option. Docket No. Corp
41 Inclusion Of Foreign Entities In Combined Returns Most states provide for water s edge combined reporting or worldwide combined reporting as a default, and water s edge combined reporting may be elected. In some states, all foreign corporations (i.e., corporations incorporated in foreign countries) are excluded from the combined return. In other states, at least some foreign corporations are included in the combined return. 41
42 Inclusion Of Foreign Entities In Combined Returns (Cont.) If 20% or more of a foreign corporation s activity is in the U.S., then some states will require that it be included in the unitary combined return. Some states will look to the average property and payroll. Other states look to the average property, payroll and sales. Wisconsin looks to whether 80% active foreign business income. Some states will include foreign corporations, to the extent of ECI or FDAP. 42
43 Inclusion Of Foreign Entities In Combined Returns (Cont.) Recently, a few states have started including foreign corporations if more than 20% of the income of the foreign corporation is from intangible property or service-related activities, the costs of which are deductible against the business income of other members of the unitary group (DC, MA and WV). A few states include foreign corporations in the combined return if they are doing business in a tax haven jurisdiction (AK, DC, MT and WV). 43
44 Slide Intentionally Left Blank
45 What s In the Group? Insurance companies REITs/RICs/REMICs 45
46 Jeffrey Reed, Mayer Brown Mike Shaikh, Reed Smith DISCRETIONARY COMBINED REPORTING STATES
47 Discretionary Combined Separate-entity state Reporting: New York Old law: Combined if distortion Presumption of distortion if substantial intercorporate transactions between the companies If no substantial inter-corporate transactions, may be required or permitted to file combined if separate-entity reporting would not fairly reflect the income of the corporations 47
48 New law: Discretionary Combined Reporting: New York (Cont.) Must file combined if there are substantial inter-corporate transactions TSB-M-08(2)C details how to determine if there are substantial intercorporate transactions. Receipts test Expenditures test Asset transfer test Loans included but not dividends Recent trend toward decombination audits IT USA, Inc. 48
49 North Carolina History of forced combination Wal-Mart East v. Hinton (2009) Delhaize America, Inc. v. Lay (2012) North Carolina Directive CD Codification of forced combination 49
50 Discretionary Combined Reporting: Indiana In Indiana, combined reporting is viewed as an alternative to three-factor apportionment. So, combined reporting may be invoked by the Indiana DOR or by taxpayers as a type of alternative apportionment. Combined reporting is warranted to fairly reflect a taxpayer s Indiana income. Indiana Code Penalties Burden of proof issues 50
51 South Carolina Combination Media General Communications, Inc. v. S.C. Department of Revenue, (S.C. Supreme Court 2010) Burden of proof CarMax Auto Superstores West Coast, Inc. v. South Carolina Department of Revenue (S.C. Court of Appeals 2012) 51
52 Slide Intentionally Left Blank
53 Robert Porcelli, PricewaterhouseCoopers NEXT STATES LIKELY TO ACT
54 Combined Reporting: 2001 WA OR ID MT WY ND SD MN WI MI NY VT NH MA CT ME RI CA NV UT CO NE KS IA MO IL IN OH KY WV PA VA NJ DE MD DC AZ NM OK AR TN NC SC AK MS AL GA TX LA HI FL Combined reporting proposals Unitary/combined states Remaining separate entity or elective consolidated reporting/other PwC Slide 54
55 Combined Reporting: 2013 WA OR ID MT WY ND SD MN WI MI NY* VT NH MA CT ME RI CA NV UT CO NE KS IA MO IL IN OH KY WV PA VA NJ DE MD DC AZ NM* OK AR TN NC SC AK MS AL GA TX LA HI FL Combined reporting proposals considered recently and/or currently proposed Unitary/combined states (now including the Ohio CAT, Texas margin tax and Michigan business tax) Remaining separate entity or elective consolidated reporting/other * New Mexico requires certain unitary large retailers to file combined returns (2014). PwC * New York requires related corporations to file a combined report upon the existence of substantial intercorporate transactions Slide 55
56 Combined Reporting Vermont applies to tax years beginning on or after January 1, 2006 West Virginia any taxpayer engaged in a unitary business with one or more other corporations must file a combined report, effective Jan. 1, 2009 Ohio CAT consolidated or combined reporting required Texas margin tax taxable entities that are part of an affiliated group engaged in a unitary business must file a combined report Michigan taxpayers are required to file based on a unitary combined reporting system, effective Jan. 1, 2008 (MBT) and effective Jan. 1, 2012 (corporate income tax) Massachusetts adopted combined reporting, effective Jan. 1, Wisconsin adopted combined reporting, effective for tax years beginning on or after Jan. 1, District of Columbia applies to tax years beginning after Dec. 31, 2010 PwC Slide 56
57 Combined Reporting Legislation: 2012 Activity Alabama S.B. 333, indefinitely postponed 4/26/12 Florida S.B. 1590, died in committee 3/9/12 Kentucky H.B. 162, introduced 1/3/12 (repeal mandatory nexus consolidation enacted in 2005 no activity since introduced) Maryland H.B. 941, 2/10/12 (no action) New Mexico S.B. 9, vetoed 3/6/12 Pennsylvania H.B. 2383, introduced 5/16/12 Virginia H.B (postponed until 2013) PwC Slide 57
58 Combined Reporting Legislation: 2013 Activity (Cont.) Alabama H.B. 203, pending committee action 2/7/13 Maryland H.B. 1246, failed Montana S.B. 208, introduced 1/28/13 (repeal water sedge election), died in standing committee 4/24/13 New Mexico S.B. 13, introduced 1/15/13 PwC Slide 58
59 Proposal: California On July 25, 2013, the California Franchise Tax Board will hold a public hearing regarding proposed modifications to California Code of Regulations Sect , specifically pertaining to the treatment of deferred inter-company stock accounts (DISAs). Proposed changes include: Reduction of a DISA through merger with a brother/sister corporation with basis Reduction of a DISA through subsequent capital contribution Treatment of a distribution through various tiers of stock ownership Does not currently address certain issues with respect to triggering a DISA, including a liquidation in a combined group PwC Slide 59
60 Proposal: Illinois On March 6, 2013, Illinois Gov. Pat Quinn proposed three corporate income tax changes: Suspending the foreign dividend deduction Decoupling from the federal domestic production activities deduction Suspending the non-combination rule for unitary members with different apportionment formulae That same day, Senate Bill 159 was amended to incorporate these three proposed changes, including repeal of the non-combination rule, which would be effective for tax years ending on or after Dec. 31, PwC Slide 60
61 Proposal: Massachusetts Gov. Patrick proposed budget, 1/23/13 Switch to market-based sourcing for sales of other than tangible personal property (also in HB 3382) Adopt throw-out rule for sale of other than tangible personal property (also in HB 3382) Repeal of security and utility classifications (utility classification provision also in HB 3382) Repeal of FAS 109 deduction: o The 2008 tax package established a deduction for any combined group that experienced an increase in the group s net deferred tax liability as a result of the combined reporting requirements of unitary businesses. The deduction, which will be claimed over a seven-year period, was to take effect for tax years beginning in o H.B delayed the implementation of the deduction for one year, by allowing deductions to first be claimed in PwC Slide 61
62 PwC Proposal: Minnesota S.B. 552 and FY budget proposal Legislation provides that foreign operating corporations (FOCs) would no longer be excluded from filing a Minnesota return or from filing as members of a unitary group. Provisions regarding FOCs would be repealed, including the deemed dividend provision and the 80% royalty deduction (presumably because FOCs would file as members of a unitary group). Legislation would repeal the royalty deduction from any other foreign corporation (currently at 80%). The legislation would provide that income and apportionment factors of a foreign entity would flow to its unitary domestic owner, for purposes of calculating net income and apportionment factors of a unitary business, to the extent the income is included in federal taxable income. Adopts Finnigan for purposes of sourcing sales of the unitary group Slide 62
63 Proposal: Montana Montana S.B. 208 Died April 24, 2013 in standing committee Would have (1) removed the taxpayer election to report as a water s edge group, and (2) required worldwide combined reporting for a unitary group of taxpayers Water s edge elections made prior to the bill s effective date would have remained in effect until its three-year term expired. PwC Slide 63
64 Proposal: Pennsylvania S.B. 882, regular session Imposes mandatory combined reporting requirement Water s edge treated as default classification; worldwide allowed upon election No guidance on Joyce/Finnigan contained within legislation Combined reporting effective for years beginning after Dec. 31, 2018 PwC Slide 64
65 Proposal: Oregon S.B. 310, referred to Finance and Revenue Committee 1/16/13 Adopt Finnigan approach for apportionment Governor s executive budget and A.B. 3009, S.B. 2609, introduced 1/22/13 S.B. 311, referred to Finance and Revenue Committee 1/16/13 Adopt market-based sourcing for sales not involving tangible personal property PwC Slide 65
Presenting a live 110-minute teleconference with interactive Q&A. Today s faculty features:
Presenting a live 110-minute teleconference with interactive Q&A State Corporate Income Apportionment Key Fundamentals Understanding Trends and State Approaches to Factor Weighting, Service Revenue, Joyce
More informationSingle Sales Apportionment:
Presenting a live 110 minute teleconference with interactive Q&A Single Sales Apportionment: Crafting a Multi State Strategy Meeting Tax Compliance and Planning Demands Amid Significant Changes in Sales
More informationState Sales Tax on Drop Shipments: Navigating Various States' Rules on Registrations and Exemptions
Navigating Various States' Rules on Registrations and Exemptions THURSDAY, JUNE 25, 2015, 1:00-2:50 pm Eastern IMPORTANT INFORMATION This program is approved for 2 CPE credit hours. To earn credit you
More informationAdd-Back Statutes: Where Do We Go From Here?
2005 SEATA Conference July 12, 2005 Add-Back Statutes: Where Do We Go From Here? Presented By: Joe Garrett, Esq. Alabama Department of Revenue & Kelly W. Smith, CPA, Esq. PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP 0 Related
More informationBad Debts: How Contractual Terms and Sales Tax Intersect IPT Annual Conference Charlotte, North Carolina
Bad Debts: How Contractual Terms and Sales Tax Intersect Thomas Zessman Senior Tax Manager U.S. Bank Minneapolis, Minnesota thomas.zessman@usbank.com Kyle Brehm State and Local Tax Director PricewaterhouseCoopers
More informationFederal Tax Reform Impact on 2019 Legislative Sessions: GILTI
Federal Tax Reform Impact on 2019 Legislative Sessions: GILTI Executive Committee Task Force on State and Local Taxation Scottsdale, Arizona November 17, 2018 Karl Frieden, COST Deborah Bierbaum, AT&T
More informationWhirlwind Review of New State Tax Laws
Todd Lard, Partner Sutherland Asbill & Brennan LLP Carley Roberts, Partner Sutherland Asbill & Brennan LLP FTA Annual Conference June 10, 2014 Whirlwind Review of New State Tax Laws Agenda Factor Weighting
More informationThe 2019 National Multistate Tax Symposium State tax reboot The age of Multistate. February 6-8, 2019
The 2019 National Multistate Tax Symposium State tax reboot The age of Multistate February 6-8, 2019 Sales factor deep dive Defining today s Market Sheelagh Beaulieu, CVS Caremark Corporation Craig B.
More informationPARTNERSHIP AUDIT REGULATIONS The Great Unknown
2018 FTA Annual Meeting June 3 6, 2018 Nashville, TN PARTNERSHIP AUDIT REGULATIONS The Great Unknown Nikki Dobay, Senior Tax Counsel, Council On State Taxation Helen Hecht, General Counsel, Multistate
More informationAge of Insured Discount
A discount may apply based on the age of the insured. The age of each insured shall be calculated as the policyholder s age as of the last day of the calendar year. The age of the named insured in the
More informationSTATE AND LOCAL TAX IPT ANNUAL CONFERENCE. Eran Liron. Arthur J. Parham
STATE AND LOCAL IPT ANNUAL CONFERENCE TAX Eran Liron State and Local Tax Partner PricewaterhouseCoopers, LLP San Jose, CA Eran.J.Liron@us.pwc.com Arthur J. Parham General Tax Advisor Entergy Services,
More informationSTATE MOTOR FUEL TAX INCREASES:
Since 2013, 26 states have increased or adjusted taxes on motor fuel to support needed transportation investments. Twenty-three of those states increased their state gas tax, while three states Kentucky,
More informationNCSL Midwest States Fiscal Leaders Forum. March 10, 2017
NCSL Midwest States Fiscal Leaders Forum March 10, 2017 Public Pensions: 50-State Overview David Draine, Senior Officer Public Sector Retirement Systems Project The Pew Charitable Trusts More than 40 active,
More informationPRODUCER ANNUITY SUITABILITY TRAINING REQUIREMENTS BY STATE As of September 11, 2017
PRODUCER ANNUITY SUITABILITY TRAINING REQUIREMENTS BY STATE As of September 11, 2017 This document provides a summary of the annuity training requirements that agents are required to complete for each
More informationACORD Forms Updated in AMS R1
ACORD Forms Updated in AMS360 2017 R1 The following forms will use the ACORD form viewer, also new in this release. Forms with an indicate they were added because of requests in the Product Enhancement
More informationSTATE MOTOR FUEL TAX INCREASES:
STATE MOTOR FUEL TAX INCREASES: 2013-2018 Since 2013, 27 states have increased or adjusted taxes on motor fuel to support needed transportation investments. Twenty-four of those states increased their
More informationThe 2019 National Multistate Tax Symposium State tax reboot The age of Multistate. February 6-8, 2019
The 2019 National Multistate Tax Symposium State tax reboot The age of Multistate February 6-8, 2019 State treatment of federal Tax Cuts and Jobs Act s foreign income and GILTI Susan Courson-Smith, Pfizer
More informationSales Factors Based on the Benefit Received
Sales Factors Based on the Benefit Received ABA Tax Section Meeting San Diego, CA February 17, 2012 Giles Sutton, Partner Grant Thornton Robert Mahon, Partner Perkins Coie LLP 704.632.6885 206.359.6260
More informationComparative Revenues and Revenue Forecasts Prepared By: Bureau of Legislative Research Fiscal Services Division State of Arkansas
Comparative Revenues and Revenue Forecasts 2010-2014 Prepared By: Bureau of Legislative Research Fiscal Services Division State of Arkansas Comparative Revenues and Revenue Forecasts This data shows tax
More informationMandatory Unitary Combined Reporting: Navigating Conflicting and Evolving State Rules
FOR LIVE PROGRAM ONLY Mandatory Unitary Combined Reporting: Navigating Conflicting and Evolving State Rules THURSDAY, SEPTEMBER 29, 2016, 1:00-2:50 pm Eastern IMPORTANT INFORMATION FOR THE LIVE PROGRAM
More informationAmerican Memorial Contract
American Memorial Contract Please complete all pages of the contract and send it back to Stephens- Matthews with a copy of each state license you choose to appoint in. You are required to submit with the
More informationSTATE TAX WITHHOLDING GUIDELINES
STATE TAX WITHHOLDING GUIDELINES ( Guardian Insurance & Annuity Company, Inc. and Guardian Life Insurance Company of America (hereafter collectively referred to as Company )) (Last Updated 11/2/215) state
More informationACORD Forms in ebixasp (03/2004)
ACORD Forms in ebixasp (03/2004) Form number Form Name Edition Date 1 Property Loss Notice 2002/1 2 Automobile Loss Notice 2002/1 3 General Liability Notice of Occurrence/Claim 2002/1 4 Workers Compensation
More informationNotice for Occurrence and Claims-Made Policies: Navigating Notice of Claim vs. Circumstance, Pre-Tender Costs and More
Presenting a live 90-minute webinar with interactive Q&A Notice for Occurrence and Claims-Made Policies: Navigating Notice of Claim vs. Circumstance, Pre-Tender Costs and More Resolving Disputes Over Multifaceted
More informationNon-Financial Change Form
Non-Financial Change Form Please Print All Information Below Section 1. Contract Owner s Information Administrative Offices: PO BOX 19097 Greenville, SC 29602-9097 Phone number (800) 449-0523 Overnight
More informationThe 2018 National Multistate Tax Symposium Take the lead Tax reform and fortifying state positions. February 7-9, 2018
The 2018 National Multistate Tax Symposium Take the lead Tax reform and fortifying state positions February 7-9, 2018 Planning for future-state taxation regimes And the future state Scott Schiefelbein,
More informationState Tax Chart Results
State Tax Chart Results Tax Type: Sales/Use Legend: N/A - Not Applicable Software as a Service (SaaS) This chart shows whether or not the state imposes a tax on the sales of Software as a Service (SaaS).
More information2018 NAFC ANNUAL CONFERENCE. THE CHANGING FINANCIAL LANDSCAPE IN TRUCKING: addressing opportunities and challenges
2018 NAFC ANNUAL CONFERENCE THE CHANGING FINANCIAL LANDSCAPE IN TRUCKING: addressing opportunities and challenges State Income Tax Update Agenda State Impacts of Federal Reform State Nexus Apportionment
More informationmedicaid a n d t h e How will the Medicaid Expansion for Adults Impact Eligibility and Coverage? Key Findings in Brief
on medicaid a n d t h e uninsured July 2012 How will the Medicaid Expansion for Adults Impact Eligibility and Coverage? Key Findings in Brief Effective January 2014, the ACA establishes a new minimum Medicaid
More informationRequired Minimum Distribution Election Form for IRA s, 403(b)/TSA and other Qualified Plans
Required Minimum Distribution Election Form for IRA s, 403(b)/TSA and other Qualified Plans For Policyholders who have not annuitized their deferred annuity contracts Zurich American Life Insurance Company
More informationIMPORTANT TAX INFORMATION
IMPORTANT TAX INFORMATION To set up and maintain your account with WestconGroup, we require you to provide us valid Resale Certificates for all states that you are located in, as well as for any other
More informationFinal Paycheck Laws by State
ALABAMA AL No Provision No Provision ALASKA AK 23.05.140(b) ARIZONA AZ Ariz. Rev. Stat. 23-350, 23-353 ARKANSAS AR Ark. Code Ann. 11-4-405 CALIFORNIA CA Cal. Lab. Code 201 to 202, 227.3 COLORADO CO Colo.
More informationU.S. Tax Seminar Updates & Developments November 2013
Updates & Developments Ron Mazurik, Senior Tax Manager Alon Sherer, Senior Tax Manager Agenda Recent Legislation Recent Cases Proposed Legislation Points for Attention State Tax Developments 2 Recent Tax
More informationImpact of Federal Reform on State Corporate Income Tax Base & the Best and Worst of Sales Tax Administration Focus on New Mexico
Council On State Taxation 1 2018 15 th Annual NMTRI Tax Policy Conference Impact of Federal Reform on State Corporate Income Tax Base & the Best and Worst of Sales Tax Administration Focus on New Mexico
More informationCorporate Income Tax and Policy Considerations
Corporate Income Tax and Policy Considerations Presentation by Richard Anklam, Executive Director, New Mexico Tax Research Institute To The Interim Revenue Stabilization and Tax Policy Committee September
More informationInstallment Loans CHARTS. No cap other than unconscionability:
NCLC NATIONAL CONSUMER LAW CENTER Installment Loans WILL STATES PROTECT BORROWERS FROM A NEW WAVE OF PREDATORY LENDING? Copyright 2015, National Consumer Law Center, Inc. CHARTS CHART 1 Full APRs Allowed
More informationTWIST-Q Summary of developments
TWIST-Q Summary of developments Rate changes Impact The corporate income tax rate is increased to 7.0 percent effective July 1, 2017. Senate Bill 9 (veto overridden July 6, 2017). IL Because the state
More informationConformity Issues in SALT
Carley Roberts, Partner Zachary Atkins, Associate TEI Nashville 2014 Spring Seminar Franklin, TN May 14, 2014 Conformity Issues in SALT Agenda Conformity and the State Income Tax Base Capital Gains Conformity
More informationUNIFORM SALES & USE TAX CERTIFICATE
UNIFORM SALES & USE TAX CERTIFICATE The issuer and the recipient have the responsibility of determining the proper use of this certificate under applicable laws in each state, as these may change from
More information36 Million Without Health Insurance in 2014; Decreases in Uninsurance Between 2013 and 2014 Varied by State
36 Million Without Health Insurance in 2014; Decreases in Uninsurance Between 2013 and 2014 Varied by State An estimated 36 million people in the United States had no health insurance in 2014, approximately
More informationAgenda. Overview. Digital Age SALT Issues Applying Old Rules to New Technology
COST NORTHWEST REGIONAL TAX SEMINAR Digital Age SALT Issues Applying Old Rules to New Technology June 17, 2010 Presented By: Carolynn S. Iafrate Stephen P. Kranz 1 Agenda Overview Sourcing of Digital Products
More informationLong-Term Care Partnership Overview & Training Requirements Guide
Long-Term Care Partnership Overview & Training Requirements Guide Version Sept. 12, 2012 M28108 Contents LONG-TERM CARE PARTNERSHIP OVERVIEW & TRAINING REQUIREMENTS GUIDE Long-Term Care Partnership Overview...4
More information2016 Workers compensation premium index rates
2016 Workers compensation premium index rates NH WA OR NV CA AK ID AZ UT MT WY CO NM MI VT ND MN SD WI NY NE IA PA IL IN OH WV VA KS MO KY NC TN OK AR SC MS AL GA TX LA FL ME MA RI CT NJ DE MD DC = Under
More informationExemption Certificate Management in Sales Tax Compliance Sharpening Your Company's Approach to Verifying, Storing and Retrieving Certificates
Presenting a live 110 minute teleconference with interactive Q&A Exemption Certificate Management in Sales Tax Compliance Sharpening Your Company's Approach to Verifying, Storing and Retrieving Certificates
More informationCOMPARISON OF ABA MODEL RULE FOR REGISTRATION OF IN-HOUSE COUNSEL WITH STATE VERSIONS
As of September 7, 2016 2016 American Bar Association COMPARISON OF ABA MODEL RULE FOR REGISTRATION OF IN-HOUSE COUNSEL WITH STATE VERSIONS AMERICAN BAR ASSOCIATION CENTER FOR PROFESSIONAL RESPONSIBILITY
More informationOlder consumers and student loan debt by state
August 2017 Older consumers and student loan debt by state New data on the burden of student loan debt on older consumers In January, the Bureau published a snapshot of older consumers and student loan
More informationFundamentals and Best Practices for Handling Multistate Taxation Presented Thursday, April 16, 2015
1 Fundamentals and Best Practices for Handling Multistate Taxation Presented Thursday, April 16, 2015 2 Housekeeping 3 Credit Questions Today s topic Speaker To earn RCH credit you must 4 Stay on the webinar,
More informationLong-Term Care Partnership Overview & Training Requirements Guide
Long-Term Care Insurance Mutual of Omaha Insurance Company SM Long-Term Care Partnership Overview & Training Requirements Guide 75014 Version November 16, 2015 For producer use only. Not for use with the
More informationSystematic Distribution Form
Systematic Distribution Form (To be used for all Qualified Plans, IRA s and Non-Qualified Plans) (This form is not applicable to a Required Minimum Distribution ( RMD ). If you are older than 70 ½, refer
More informationProperty Tax Relief in New England
Property Tax Relief in New England January 23, 2015 Adam H. Langley Senior Research Analyst Lincoln Institute of Land Policy www.lincolninst.edu Property Tax as a % of Personal Income OK AL IN UT SD MS
More informationFinal Section 385 Regs: Navigating State and Local Tax Impact of New Debt-to-Equity Reclassification Rules
FOR LIVE PROGRAM ONLY Final Section 385 Regs: Navigating State and Local Tax Impact of New Debt-to-Equity Reclassification Rules THURSDAY, JANUARY 12, 2017, 1:00-2:50 pm Eastern IMPORTANT INFORMATION FOR
More informationComposite Returns and Nonresident Withholding for Pass-Through Entities: Navigating the Multistate Complexities
Composite Returns and Nonresident Withholding for Pass-Through Entities: Navigating the Multistate Complexities Determining Whether to File Composite Returns, Dealing With Withholding Requirements FOR
More informationTomorrow s World Conference December 2013
www.pwc.com Tomorrow s World Asia Pacific Real Estate Conference 2013 6 December 2013 www.pwc.com Breakout Session 2: Real Estates Investments in U.S. Byron Carlock Adam Handler Miranda Tse Agenda Market
More informationØ Sales Tax alone accounts for 34% of state revenue. Average of the 50 State Revenue Sources. Ø Online commerce continues to grow.
Ø Sales Tax alone accounts for 34% of state revenue. Average of the 50 State Revenue Sources Ø Online commerce continues to grow. Ø This past Black Friday, for the second consecutive year, more people
More informationNASRA Issue Brief: Employee Contributions to Public Pension Plans
NASRA Issue Brief: Employee Contributions to Public Pension Plans September 2017 Unlike in the private sector, nearly all employees of state and local government are required to share in the cost of their
More informationMINIMUM WAGE INCREASE GUIDE
2017-2018 MINIMUM WAGE INCREASE GUIDE The Federal minimum wage has been $7.25 since 2009, but many states and localities have passed their own minimum wage laws. Employers must pay non-exempt employees
More informationDrop Shipments and Sales Tax Navigating Varying State Policies on Registrations and Exemptions
Presenting a live 110 minute teleconference with interactive Q&A Drop Shipments and Sales Tax Navigating Varying State Policies on Registrations and Exemptions THURSDAY, JUNE 9, 2011 1pm Eastern 12pm Central
More informationState Treatment of Social Security Treatment of Pension Income Other Income Tax Breaks Property Tax Breaks
State-By-State Tax Breaks for Seniors, 2016 State Treatment of Social Security Treatment of Pension Income Other Income Tax Breaks Property Tax Breaks AL Payments from defined benefit private plans are
More informationState Trust Fund Solvency
Unemployment Insurance State Trust Fund Solvency National Employment Law Project Conference - Washington DC December 7, 2009 Robert Pavosevich pavosevich.robert@dol.gov Unemployment Insurance Program
More informationkaiser medicaid and the uninsured commission on The Cost and Coverage Implications of the ACA Medicaid Expansion: National and State-by-State Analysis
kaiser commission on medicaid and the uninsured The Cost and Coverage Implications of the ACA Expansion: National and State-by-State Analysis Executive Summary John Holahan, Matthew Buettgens, Caitlin
More informationMINIMUM WAGE INCREASE GUIDE
2017-2018 MINIMUM WAGE INCREASE GUIDE The Federal minimum wage has been $7.25 since 2009, but many states and localities have passed their own minimum wage laws. Employers must pay non-exempt employees
More information2017 WORKBOOK. Mandatory LTC Training
2017 WORKBOOK Mandatory LTC Training ABOUT THE AUTHOR EDUCATION CREDIT AND YOUR CERTIFICATE OF COMPLETION LTC Connection specializes exclusively in LTC insurance training and education and has been working
More informationHousehold Income for States: 2010 and 2011
Household Income for States: 2010 and 2011 American Community Survey Briefs By Amanda Noss Issued September 2012 ACSBR/11-02 INTRODUCTION Estimates from the 2010 American Community Survey (ACS) and the
More informationThe State Tax Implications of Federal Tax Reform Legislation
The State Tax Implications of Federal Tax Reform Legislation Executive Committee Task Force on State and Local Taxation Phoenix, Arizona January 14, 2017 Joe Crosby, Multistate Associates Karl Frieden,
More informationFISCAL YEAR 2016 AT A GLANCE Number of Authorized Firms
FISCAL YEAR 2016 AT A GLANCE Number of Authorized Firms 300,000 275,000 250,000 225,000 200,000 175,000 150,000 125,000 100,000 246,565 252,962 261,150 258,632 260,115 FY 2012 FY 2013 FY 2014 FY 2015 FY
More informationCharts with Analysis: Tax Tax Type: Sales and Use Tax Topic: Cash for Clunkers Payments
Effective July 1, 2009, until November 1, 2009, the federal government has enacted the Consumer Assistance to Recycle and Save (CARS) Program, Title XIII of PL 111-32 (2009), 123 Stat. 1859. The program,
More informationFinancial Transaction Form for IRA and Non-Qualified Contracts Only
Financial Transaction Form for IRA and Non-Qualified Contracts Only (Note: See Form ZA-8642 dealing with Financial Transactions for 403(b)/TSA s) Please Print All Information Below Zurich American Life
More informationSBA s Disaster Assistance Program
SBA s Disaster Assistance Program Frank Skaggs, Center Director Field Operations Center East Atlanta, GA Florida Governor s Hurricane Conference Orlando, FL May 11-16, 2014 1 Mission To help people recover
More informationHighlights. Percent of States with a Decrease in MH Expenditures from Prior Year: FY2001 to 2010
FY 2010 State Mental Health Revenues and Expenditures Information from the National Association of State Mental Health Program Directors Research Institute, Inc (NRI) Sept 2012 Highlights SMHA Funding
More informationExecutive Summary. Introduction
Date: Regarding: 2014-2017 United States Animal Loss Claims (External Dissemination) Prepared by: David Fennig, Strategic Analyst Executive Summary The purpose of this ForeCAST SM is to analyze claims
More informationHealth Insurance Price Index for October-December February 2014
Health Insurance Price Index for October-December 2013 February 2014 ehealth 2.2014 Table of Contents Introduction... 3 Executive Summary and Highlights... 4 Nationwide Health Insurance Costs National
More informationState, Local and Net Tuition Revenue Supporting General Operating Expenses of Higher Education, U.S., Fiscal Year 2010, Current (unadjusted) Dollars
State, Local and Net Tuition Revenue Supporting General Operating Expenses of Higher Education, U.S., Fiscal Year 2010, Current (unadjusted) Dollars Net Tuition $51.3 Billion 37% All State Support $73.7
More informationTax Breaks for Elderly Taxpayers in the States in 2016
AL Payments from defined benefit private plans are exempt; most public systems are exempt; military and US Civil service are exempt Special Homestead ion for 65+ +25.2% +2.4% AK No PIT Homestead ion for
More informationPresenting a live 110-minute teleconference with interactive Q&A. Today s faculty features:
Presenting a live 110-minute teleconference with interactive Q&A Advanced Apportionment Issues Confronting Multi-State Companies Reporting Accurately and Strategically, Preparing for Problematic States,
More informationSIGNIFICANT PROVISIONS OF STATE UNEMPLOYMENT INSURANCE LAWS JANUARY 2008
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF LABOR EMPLOYMENT AND TRAINING ADMINISTRATION Office Workforce Security SIGNIFICANT PROVISIONS OF STATE UNEMPLOYMENT INSURANCE LAWS JANUARY 2008 AL AK AZ AR CA CO CT DE DC FL GA HI /
More informationFinancing Unemployment Benefits in Today s Tough Economic Times
Financing Unemployment Benefits in Today s Tough Economic Times Maurice Emsellem 7 th Annual Workers Voice State Legislative Issues Conference July 19, 2003. Today s Funding Situation The Good, the Bad
More informationMultistate Tax Considerations of the Federal Tax Reform International Tax Provisions
External Multistate Tax Alert January 22, 2018 Multistate Tax Considerations of the Federal Tax Reform International Tax Provisions Overview On December 22, 2017, President Trump signed legislation (P.L.
More informationMcGuireWoods State Death Tax Chart. Revised January 3, 2012
McGuireWoods Chart Revised January 3, 2012 This chart is maintained for the McGuireWoods LLP Website and is updated regularly. Any comments on the chart or new developments that should be reflected on
More informationSandra Hernandez, Managing Director, WTAS, Los Angeles Jeanne Sullivan, Director, National Pass-Throughs Group, KPMG, Washington, D.C.
Presenting a live 110 minute teleconference with interactive Q&A Passive Activity Loss Rules: Strategies for Pass Throughs to Maximize Deductions Leveraging Latest Federal Guidance and Rulings to Establish
More informationAdvanced Income Tax Apportionment Issues Confronting Multi-State Companies
FOR LIVE PROGRAM ONLY Advanced Income Tax Apportionment Issues Confronting Multi-State Companies THURSDAY, JULY 20, 2017, 1:00-2:50 pm Eastern IMPORTANT INFORMATION FOR THE LIVE PROGRAM This program is
More informationMarilyn Tavenner, CMS Administrator Don Moulds, Acting Assistant Secretary for Planning and Evaluation
TO: The Secretary Through: DS COS ES FROM: Marilyn Tavenner, CMS Administrator Don Moulds, Acting Assistant Secretary for Planning and Evaluation DATE: September 5, 2013 SUBJECT: Projected Monthly Targets
More informationTax Allocation in Pass-Through Entities
Presenting a live 110-minute teleconference with interactive Q&A Tax Allocation in Pass-Through Entities Minimizing Tax Impact Through Strategic Allocation of Income, Gains, Losses and Liabilities THURSDAY,
More informationState Tax Implications of International Tax Reform
State Tax Implications of International Tax Reform NCSL Executive Task Force on State & Local Taxation Presenters: March 23, 2018 Scott Roberti, Ernst & Young, LLP (Moderator) Karl Frieden, COST Michael
More informationThe Acquisition of Regions Insurance Group. April 6, 2018
The Acquisition of Regions Insurance Group April 6, 2018 Forward-Looking Statements This presentation contains "forward-looking statements" within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform
More informationE-Verify Legislation: A State-by-State Perspective
www.gtlaw.com E-Verify Legislation: A State-by-State Perspective WA OR NV CA ID AZ UT MT WY CO NM ND SD NE KS OK TX MN WI IA IL MO AR MS LA NY MI PA IN OH WV VA KY NC TN SC AL GA ME VT NH MA RI CT NJ DE
More informationNational Employment Law Project UNEMPLOYMENT INSURANCE FINANCING: STATE TRUST FUNDS IN RECESSION AS OF SEPTEMBER 30, 2008
National Employment Law Project UNEMPLOYMENT INSURANCE FINANCING: STATE TRUST FUNDS IN RECESSION AS OF SEPTEMBER 30, 2008 Introduction In May 2008, NELP issued a briefing paper (Unemployment Insurance
More informationInsufficient and Negative Equity
Insufficient and Negative Equity Lack Of Equity Impedes The Real Estate Market Mark Fleming Chief Economist December, 2011 70% 60% 50% 40% 30% Negative Equity Highly Concentrated Negative Equity Share,
More informationUniform Consent to Service of Process
Applicant Company Name: NAIC No. FEIN: Uniform Consent to Service of Process Original Designation Amended Designation (must be submitted directly to states) Applicant Company Name: Previous Name (if applicable):
More informationAviva Announcing Changes to Products and Annuity Rates
September 9, 2011 Aviva Announcing Changes to Products and Annuity Rates This field update contains information on product and rate changes effective September 16, 2011. We want to thank you for all of
More informationTaxing Investment Income in the States New Hampshire Fiscal Policy Institute 2 nd Annual Budget and Policy Conference Concord, NH January 23, 2015
Taxing Investment Income in the States New Hampshire Fiscal Policy Institute 2 nd Annual Budget and Policy Conference Concord, NH January 23, 2015 Norton Francis State and Local Finance Initiative Urban-Brookings
More informationFlorida 1/1/2016 Workers Compensation Rate Filing
Florida 1/1/2016 Workers Compensation Rate Filing Kirt Dooley, FCAS, MAAA October 21, 2015 1 $ Billions 4.0 3.5 3.0 2.5 2.0 1.5 1.0 0.5 0.0 Florida s Workers Compensation Premium Volume 2.368 0.765 0.034
More informationConsumer-Driven Health Plans, HSAs & Tax-related Strategies to Control Health Costs
Richard Cauchi Program Director National Conference of State Legislatures Consumer-Driven Health Plans, HSAs & Tax-related Strategies to Control Health Costs Rev 9/4/06 NCSL FISCAL ANALYSTS SEMINAR September
More informationApplication Trade Credit Insurance Multi Buyer
Chubb Global Markets Political Risk & Credit 1133 Avenue of the Americas New York, NY 10036 (212) 835-3138 (NY) (312) 612-8827 (Chicago) (213) 612-5512 (Los Angeles) Application Trade Credit Insurance
More informationUNIFORM SALES & USE TAX EXEMPTION/RESALE CERTIFICATE MULTIJURISDICTION
UNIFORM SALES & USE TAX EXEMPTION/RESALE CERTIFICATE MULTIJURISDICTION The below-listed states have indicated that this certificate is acceptable as a resale/exemption certificate for sales and use tax,
More informationHandling Unclaimed or Abandoned Wages Presented on Wednesday, November 1, 2017
Handling Unclaimed or Abandoned Wages Presented on Wednesday, November 1, 2017 1 2016 The Payroll Advisor 2 Housekeeping 3 Credit Questions Today s topic Speaker 2016 The Payroll Advisor To earn RCH credit
More informationMcGuireWoods LLP State Death Tax Chart. Revised March 26, 2012
McGuireWoods LLP Chart Revised March 26, 2012 This chart is maintained for the McGuireWoods LLP Website and is updated regularly. Any comments on the chart or new developments that should be reflected
More informationState and local business tax. a year of dramatic state and local tax reform? 1 May 2013
State and local business tax policy trends: will 2013 be a year of dramatic state and local tax reform? 1 May 2013 Disclaimer Ernst & Young refers to the global organization of member firms of Ernst &
More informationOregon: Where Taxes Are Low, Fees Are High and Revenue Is Slightly Below Average
Issue Brief March 6, 2012 Oregon: Where Taxes Are Low, Fees Are High and Revenue Is Slightly Below Average The money we pay in fees and taxes helps create jobs, build a strong economy, and preserve Oregon
More informationData Note: What if Per Enrollee Medicaid Spending Growth Had Been Limited to CPI-M from ?
Data Note: What if Per Enrollee Medicaid Spending Growth Had Been Limited to CPI-M from 2001-2011? Rachel Garfield, Robin Rudowitz, and Katherine Young Congress is currently debating the American Health
More informationNexus Assistant Results
Nexus Assistant Results Tax Type: Corporate Income Legend: N/A - Not Applicable Alabama --Company Business income includes income from intangible personal property, the acquisition, management, and disposition
More information