Liquidity Risk of Corporate Bond Returns. Viral Acharya (NYU Stern), Yakov Amihud (NYU Stern) and Sreedhar Bharath (ASU) Forthcoming, JFE
|
|
- Harvey Elliott
- 5 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 Liquidity Risk of Corporate Bond Returns Viral Acharya (NYU Stern), Yakov Amihud (NYU Stern) and Sreedhar Bharath (ASU) Forthcoming, JFE Sponsored by Centre for Advanced Financial Research and Learning (CAFRAL) and Fixed Income Money Market and Derivatives Association of India (FIMMDA) A short introduction: The effect of market liquidity on asset pricing The prevailing theory of asset pricing: Positive risk-return relation. However, the empirical evidence for the stock market is that on average, RM - Rf > 0. Across stocks, empirical evidence is scarce or non-existent, or higher risk lower average return. Problems in estimating risk. Our formal model assumes that Assets are characterized by dividend stream and trading costs. Investors need to trade occurs randomly. In equilibrium, we prove that 1. Asset returns are increasing function of trading costs. (The function is concave.) Or Asset prices are decreasing and convex function of trading costs. The theory of Amihud & Mendelosn (1986): Positive illiquidity-return relation. 2. Net returns too are an increasing function of trading costs.
2 The expected excess monthly return (or yield) on a stock as a function of the stock s bid-ask spread, reflecting clienteles (Amihud-Mendelson 1986) R i = β i ln(s i ) + year dummies 0.80% 0.70% 0.60% P/E ratio and liquidity (Loderer & Roth, JEF 2003) The effect of illiquidity (relative bid-ask spread) on the P/E ratio, controlling for (1) beta, (2) dividend payout, (3) current EPS growth and (4) expected earnings growth (from analysts reports). Excess Monthly Return 0.50% 0.40% 0.30% 0.20% 0.10% 0.00% 0.0% 0.5% 1.0% 1.5% 2.0% 2.5% 3.0% 3.5% 4.0% 4.5% 5.0% Bid-Ask Spread (%) Result: discount of over 20% for a median-spread stock compared to zerospread stock ( ). Discount as a function of spread is observed for both Nasdaq and Swiss stocks. There is ample empirical support for this relation by independent studies. Restricted stock. Price discount of about 1/3. (Silber 1991). Why do small trading costs have a big price effect? Because they are incurred repeatedly, for ever. A quick calculation: Valuation of transaction cost of c PV = c / (r-g). It grows with the stock price, whose growth rate is r D/P. PV = c * P/D Assume that trading is once a year. Stock dividend yield, D/P, is now about 2%-2.5%. the price multiple of trading cost c is % trading cost leads to at least 4% discount in stock price. Liquidity is hard to observe, but we observe trading frequency, which by Amihud- Mendelson (1986) is affected by trading costs. Turnover = (volume /number of shares) proxies for trading frequency. More liquid stocks are traded more frequently. The effect of turnover on stock returns cross-section analysis Explanatory Variables: All months Excl. January Turnover: -.04 (8.58) -.04 (7.91) Book/Market:.14 (5.97).08 (3.29) log(size): -.05 (4.65).02 (1.60) β: -.37 (5.76) -.05 (6.84) Higher liquidity, or turnover lower expected returns.
3 Variable The effect of ILLIQ = avg( R /$Volume) on stock expected return (constant omitted), monthly, [From Amihud (2002)] All months Excl. January Liquidity changes over time: Evidence from the recent crisis U.S. trading costs as % of stock prices. Based on data from ITG. BETA ILLIQMA (0.64) (5.39) (0.79) (4.91) (0.59) (3.69) (0.30) (4.56) 1.8% 1.6% 1.4% Small Cap All Large Cap LnSIZE (3.50) (2.00) (3.51) (1.14) 1.2% 1.0% StdDev of Return (1.90) (2.89) (0.96) (1.77) 0.8% 0.6% DIVYLD (3.36) (4.28) (2.81) (2.11) 0.4% R (3.70) (6.19) (2.33) (2.92) 0.2% 0.0% Q3 Q1 Q3 Q1 Q3 Q1 Q3 Q1 Q3 Q1 Q3 Q1 RYR (3.40) (4.27) (2.04) (2.82) The effects of expected and unexpected illiquidity (illiquidity shocks) on excess monthly stock returns, Note: The (absolute) effect of liquidity declines in size. RM-Rf (EW) Constant (1.97) Excess returns on size-based portfolios RSZ 2 -Rf RSZ 4 -Rf RSZ 6 -Rf RSZ 8 -Rf RSZ 10 Rf (2.03) (2.12) (2.13) (2.05) (0.99) Current paper, Liquidity Risk of Corporate Bond Returns The yield spread on corporate bonds is considered a risk and default premium. Corporate bonds are usually less liquid than Treasury bonds, especially the high-yield ones. LnMILLIQ m (2.12) (2.11) (2.33) (2.36) (2.30) (1.18) Therefore, bond returns should respond to liquidity shocks (in addition to other LnMILLIQ U m (4.42) JANDUM m (4.20) (4.53) (5.03) (4.34) (4.08) (4.12) (3.45) (4.04) (2.64) (3.38) (1.47) R-squared D-W shocks that affect bond prices) because the required yield changes then. The yield spread reflects both risk\default premium and illiquidity premium. Chen, Lesmond & Wei (2007) pricing of the level of illiquidity. dejong & Driessen (2007), Lin, Wang & Wu (2011) pricing liquidity risk.
4 Liquidity and Treasury securities yields 1) Amihud-Mendelson (JF 1991): Treasury bills and Treasury notes with the same (short) maturity: Risk is the same. Bills are more liquid than bonds, bills have lower yield than notes. 2) On-the-run bonds are more liquid than off-the-run bonds, and have lower yield. Liquidity costs and corporate bond yields Yield spreads are known to exceed the expected cost of default, given data on default probability and recovery rate. The excess yield compensates for both risk and illiquidity. Lower rating lower liquidity (higher bid-ask spread and other measures of illiquidity) higher illiquidity premium. Chen, Lesmond & Wei (JF 2007) estimate the effect of the level of trading costs on the cross-section of bond yields, controlling for bond and firm characteristics, such as rating, leverage, risk. Results: Trading costs have a positive and highly significant effect on yield spread. Estimating the effect of Liquidity Risk on bond returns (current paper) R j,t = a j + β T,j TERM t + β D,j DEF t + β SI,j Silliq t + β BI,j Billiq t+ e j,t, R j, t = excess return on bond portfolio (over 30-day T-Bill rate) TERM t : Long-term govt (30yr) minus 30-day T-Bill return DEF t : Eq-wtd returns of all corporate bonds (maturity > 1 yr) average return on 1-yr and 30-yr govt bonds Silliq t, Billiq t : Innovations in stock and Treasury bond illiquidity (from AR(2) and AR(3) models). Research questions: Market liquidity changes over time. We study liquidity risk, the exposure of bond prices to liquidity shocks (the returns-liquidity shocks covariance). - Does the liquidity risk change over time? (risk in liquidity risk) - Is this change different for different rating classes of bonds? - Is the liquidity risk conditional? - If so is there an economic identification of changes in liquidity risk? A two-step approach: 1) Statistical analysis: Test for a pattern in changes over time in liquidity risk 2) If there is a pattern of such a change identify its economic determinants.
5 Related models and theories: Brunnermeier and Pedersen (2009): market liquidity can be adversely affected by funding liquidity. Because of margin constraints, a negative value shock causes a liquidity shock because of correlated liquidations. This lowers asset values and exacerbates the effect of the shock. He and Krishnamurthy (2010): Households invest through intermediaries. A negative wealth shock makes them allocate money away from risky to riskless assets, lowering intermediaries wealth and causing capital constraints and forced liquidation. Firm s policy-related model: Focus on incentives and endogenized constraint: Acharya and Viswanathan (2011): Adverse value shock affect financial firms\intermediaries greater firm s leverage incentive of firm s managers to risk-shift greater constraint on outside funding (rolling over debt) worsening funding liquidity need of firm to de-lever sale of assets worsening liquidity. This in turns affects asset prices. Sample period: , months. Bond data are from Lehman Fixed Income Database (Warga, 1998) for , and Merrill Lynch corporate bond index database (Schafer & Strebulaev, 2008) thereafter, incl Corporate bonds are largely held in institutional portfolios rather than in retail ones. Studying their return-liquidity relations is an appropriate setting to identify these liquidity effects. Returns are calculated from monthly prices and accrued interest. - We use actual prices, no matrix pricing. Bonds with no options (call, sinking funds). Excluded: bonds not in Lehman or Merrill indexes; with maturity < 1 year; not rated; non-identical S&P\Moody s rating; special features (call, sinking funds, floating rate). - Average # bonds in each month: 2,234 (between 245 and 9,286). - We construct indices of bond returns, VW, by rating class.
6 Illiquidity innovations Equity-market illiquidity: Amihud s (2002) ILLIQ, the equally-weighted monthly average of daily return /dollar volume, as modified by Acharya and Pedersen (2005). ILLIQ measures price impact, related to Kyle s (1985) λ. Stock illiq innovations Treasury bond market illiquidity: the monthly quoted % bid-ask spread of short maturity on-the-run treasuries (source: Goyenko (2006)). Was used by Longstaff, Mithal, Neis (2004), dejong and Driessen (2009). The innovations are residuals from an autoregressive model, AR(3) for stocks and AR(2) for bonds. The coefficients are adjusted for finite sample by Shaman and Stine s (1989) method. Bond illiq innovations Unconditional liquidity risk (red=significant) Coefficients Rating α ß T (all signif.) ß D (all signif.) ß SI ß BI Adj-Rsq AAA AA A BBB BB (Junk) B CCC & below TERM DEFAULT SILLIQ DEF Silliq Billiq
7 Time-varying betas Estimate a Markov regime-switching model in a two-equation model, for Investment Grade (IG) and Junk (Jnk) Regime-switching analysis, Hamilton (1994) Time-varying betas Estimate a Markov regime-switching model Regime-Dependent Variance-Covariance Matrix (s t = 1,2): R IG, t = a IG + β IG,T TERM t + β IG, D DEF t + β IG,SI Silliq t + β IG,BI Billiq t +e IG, t R JNk, t =a IG + β JNK,T TERM t +β JNK, D DEF t + β JNK,SI Silliq t + β JNK,BI Billiq t + e JNK, t Markov switching probability for state transition: P(s t = 1 s t 1 = 1) = p P(s t = 2 s t 1 = 2) = q Liquidity betas change substantially between regimes Regime 1 Investment G t-stat Junk Grade t-stat Parameters Constant P 0.96 TERM q 0.93 DEF Silliq ρ St = Billiq ρ St = σ i Regime 2 Investment G t-stat Junk Grade t-stat Constant TERM DEF Silliq Billiq σ i Wald tests for differences in coefficients Chi-sq tests Numbers are p-values Between regime 1 and 2 Between IG and Junk Investment G Junk Regime 1 Regime 2 TERM & DEF Liquidity TERM DEF Silliq Billiq
8 Stress regime linked to recessions Probability of stress regime. Pairs of estimates: (1) OLS, with logit transformation of prob(regime 2) (2) Logit estimation, with dummy = 1 if prob(regime 2) > 0.70 Variables lagged (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) (6) (7) (8) Const *** -1.03*** -1.11*** -.70*** -2.69*** -1.40*** -1.92*** -1.06*** NBER Recession 5.88*** 2.62*** Stock-Watson Index -1.69*** -.76*** Prob (Recession) -Hamiliton 4.71*** 2.01*** Negative Market Return dummy Business Conditions Index 3.12*** 1.78*** -1.81*** -.93*** Paper-Bill Spread.01**.004** TED Spread.03***.01*** Obs. Adj R 2 / PsedoR 2 (%) Variables lagged (9) (10) (11) (12) (13) (14) Const *** -2.50*** -4.69*** -2.54*** -4.75*** -2.62*** NBER Recession 1.43* 1.20* Stock-Watson Index Prof(Recession)-Hamilton ** 1.32** 1.21** Negative Market Return * Business Conditions -0.99*** -0.47** -1.13*** -0.60** Index Paper-Bill Spread TED Spread.03*** 0.01*** 0.03*** 0.01*** EE measure year growth *** *** *** *** *** *** Equity Volatility 93.82*** 53.44*** 80.39*** 49.93*** 80.53*** 50.01*** Equity Volatility * EE measure year growth *** *** *** *** *** *** Obs. Adj / Pseudo R 2 (%) 28 Probability of Regime Out of sample predictions of the stress regime Dep. Var = 1 if the actual prob(regime 2) > 70%, from statistical model Predicted prob(regime 2) is rolling monthly estimate from the economic prediction model (14), we start with estimates from (1/2 the sample), and predict for Regime 2 (as per Regime Switching Model ) Constant -1.78*** (.24) Predicted prob(regime 2) 5.77*** (.94) Obs. 216 Pseudo R 2 (%) 27
9 Junk-IG Return Junk-IG Return DEF Return -(T-Bill Yld -Fed Funds) -(T-Bill Yld -Fed Funds) Short Junk-IG Medium Junk-IG Long (Junk-IG) (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) (6) (7) (8) Const *** 26.02*** ** 48.57*** 24.24*** 28.43*** 24.13** Prob(Regime2) *** TERM -.07*** -.08*** *** -.47*** DEF.84***.77*** -.07** -.11**.55***.61***.62*** Silliq * ** * * Billiq ** 21.37** Prob(Regime 2)* TERM Prob(Regime 2)*DEF -.66*** -.67*** ** -.71*** -.82*** Prob(Regime 2)* Silliq Prob(Regime 2)* Billiq Obs. Adj R 2 (%) * ** * ** *** * ** 18 Flight to Liquidity Out-of-sample prediction of conditional bond returns for the financial crisis years, In each month, we calculate Prob(Regime 2) using our logit prediction model (column (14)). We calculate portfolio returns using the coefficients of each of the two regimes, conditional on the realized factors TERM, DEF, BILLIQ, SILLIQ for that month. Then, denoting p2 = Prob(Regime 2), Predicted return = (1-p2)*(predicted return using regime 1 coefficients) + p2*(predicted return using regime 2 coefficients) Predicting investment grade bond returns in Predicting junk bond returns in Actual Bond returns (bps) Actual Bond Returns vs. Predicted Bond Returns Investment Grade, Year RMSE (45 degree line) = RMSE (regression) = Actual = 0.84 Predicted t-stat (8.58) (0.11) R-Squared = 77% Regime Switching Model Prediction (bps) Data source: Regime Switching Model, Table 3 11 Actual Bond returns (bps) Actual Bond Returns vs. Predicted Bond Returns Junk Grade, Year RMSE (45 degree line) = RMSE (regression) = Actual = 0.86 Predicted t-stat (8.44) (0.77) R-Squared = 76% Regime Switching Model Prediction (bps) Data source: Regime Switching Model, Table 3
10 Out-of-sample predictions during the financial crisis Predicted value use estimated prob(regime 2) from the logit model, using the economic time series, the estimated coefficients of each regime and the current values of TERM, DEF, BILLIQ, SILLIQ (SE in parentheses) Dependent variable: Actual IG Returns Actual Junk Returns Constant 4.65 (42.93) (66.82) Predicted cond. IG return (0.098) Predicted cond. Junk return (0.102) R-sqr (%) p-value of F-test if slope = Obs The effects on stocks, classified by Book/Market Fama and French (1995): Firms with high BE/ME tend to be persistently distressed. They have low ratios of earnings to book equity for at least 11 years around portfolio formation. Conversely, low BE/ME is associated with sustained strong profitability. Recent studies (e.g., Chen, Noe & Tice, 2009) confirm that. We replicate the analysis for the high and low BE/ME quintiles. High and low BE/ME are taking the role of junk bonds and IG bonds, respectively. Liquidity betas change substantially between regimes Regime 1 Low BM t-stat High BM t-stat Parameters Constant P 0.96 Rm- Rf q 0.90 TERM DEF ρ St = Silliq ρ St = Billiq σ i Regime 2 Low BM t-stat High BM t-stat Constant Rm - Rf TERM DEF Silliq Billiq σ i Wald tests for differences in coefficients Chi-sq tests Numbers are p-values Between regime 1 and 2 Between High & Low BM Low BM High BM Regime 1 Regime 2 Rm-Rf TERM DEF Silliq Billiq
11 Probability of stress regime obtained from stock return estimates as a function of macroeconomic variables (1) OLS, with logit transformation of prob(regime 2) (2) Logit estimation, with dummy=1 if prob(regime 2) > 0.7 Variables lagged (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) (6) (7) (8) NBER Recession 2.73***.84*** Stock-Watson Index -1.09*** -.59*** Prob (Recession) -Hamiliton 3.48*** 1.62*** Negative Market Return Business Conditions Index 1.50*** *** -.61*** Paper-Bill Spread TED Spread.009*.001 Obs. Adj R 2 / PsedoR 2 (%) Variables lagged (9) (10) (11) (12) (13) (14) NBER Recession * Stock-Watson Index ** * Prof(Recession)- 1.91*** 1.06** 1.84***.89* Hamilton Negative Market Return Business Conditions Index Paper-Bill Spread TED Spread.01*** ***.004 EE measure yr growth ** *** *** *** *** *** Equity Volatility 62.53*** 36.41*** 55.85*** 36.99*** 55.81*** 36.21*** Equity Volatility t-1 *EE measure year growth *** *** ** *** ** * *** Obs. Adj / Pseudo R 2 (%) Probability of Regime 2 obtained from stock return estimates HMLDEF, returns on high-low default risk Stocks are classified into high and low default risk portfolios using Altman s (1968) Z-score as modified by Hillegeist et al. (2004). Z = Const *wcta *reta -0.1*ebitta -0.22*mvliab *sata. wcta = working capital / total assets. reta = retained earning / total assets. ebitta = earnings before interest and taxes/ total assets. mvliab = market value of equity / total liabilities. sata = sales / total assets. Portfolio construction: Every months, stocks are classified into a 5x5 matrix: 5 quintiles by daily return volatility, then into 5 quintiles by the modified Z-score. Each portfolio return is value-weighted. The return on low (high) default risk portfolio is the average return on the five stock quintiles with the highest (lowest) Z score. This lowers the effect of volatility on the default risk-return relation. Campbell et al. (2008): Corr (default risk, return volatility) > 0, Ang et al. (2006): volatility has negative effect on stock expected return. (This methodology follows Fama and French (1993) in neutralizing the effect of book-to-market effect from the size effect in portfolio construction.)
12 Relating HML to HMLDEF Regime 1 Regime 2 Coefficient t-stat Coefficiet t-stat Parameters Constant P HMLDEF q Silliq Billiq σ i Wald tests for differences in coefficients Chi-Sq p-value Constant HMLDEF Silliq Billiq Conclusion: Our paper -Focused on conditional liquidity risk of corporate bonds, which can be explained by economic factors associated with economic stress. -Shows evidence for time-varying liquidity betas for both Investment Grade and Junk bonds. -Shows that in times of stress, the effect of liquidity shocks on IG and Junk bonds takes opposite directions, consistent with flight to liquidity. The effects are similar for stocks classified by their BE/ME, related to likelihood of default.
Liquidity Risk of Corporate Bond Returns (Do not circulate without permission)
Liquidity Risk of Corporate Bond Returns (Do not circulate without permission) Viral V Acharya London Business School, NYU-Stern and Centre for Economic Policy Research (CEPR) (joint with Yakov Amihud,
More informationLiquidity Risk of Corporate Bond Returns (Preliminary and Incomplete)
Liquidity Risk of Corporate Bond Returns (Preliminary and Incomplete) Viral V Acharya London Business School and Centre for Economic Policy Research (CEPR) (joint with Yakov Amihud and Sreedhar Bharath)
More informationCorporate bond liquidity before and after the onset of the subprime crisis. Jens Dick-Nielsen Peter Feldhütter David Lando. Copenhagen Business School
Corporate bond liquidity before and after the onset of the subprime crisis Jens Dick-Nielsen Peter Feldhütter David Lando Copenhagen Business School Swissquote Conference, Lausanne October 28-29, 2010
More informationCommon Risk Factors in the Cross-Section of Corporate Bond Returns
Common Risk Factors in the Cross-Section of Corporate Bond Returns Online Appendix Section A.1 discusses the results from orthogonalized risk characteristics. Section A.2 reports the results for the downside
More informationCorporate bond liquidity before and after the onset of the subprime crisis. Jens Dick-Nielsen Peter Feldhütter David Lando. Copenhagen Business School
Corporate bond liquidity before and after the onset of the subprime crisis Jens Dick-Nielsen Peter Feldhütter David Lando Copenhagen Business School Risk Management Conference Firenze, June 3-5, 2010 The
More informationTHE EFFECT OF LIQUIDITY COSTS ON SECURITIES PRICES AND RETURNS
PART I THE EFFECT OF LIQUIDITY COSTS ON SECURITIES PRICES AND RETURNS Introduction and Overview We begin by considering the direct effects of trading costs on the values of financial assets. Investors
More informationFurther Test on Stock Liquidity Risk With a Relative Measure
International Journal of Education and Research Vol. 1 No. 3 March 2013 Further Test on Stock Liquidity Risk With a Relative Measure David Oima* David Sande** Benjamin Ombok*** Abstract Negative relationship
More informationLiquidity (Risk) Premia in Corporate Bond Markets
Liquidity (Risk) Premia in Corporate Bond Markets Dion Bongaert(RSM) Joost Driessen(UvT) Frank de Jong(UvT) January 18th 2010 Agenda Corporate bond markets Credit spread puzzle Credit spreads much higher
More informationDiscussion of Dick Nelsen, Feldhütter and Lando s Corporate bond liquidity before and after the onset of the subprime crisis
Discussion of Dick Nelsen, Feldhütter and Lando s Corporate bond liquidity before and after the onset of the subprime crisis Dr. Jeffrey R. Bohn May, 2011 Results summary Discussion Applications Questions
More informationStructural Models IV
Structural Models IV Implementation and Empirical Performance Stephen M Schaefer London Business School Credit Risk Elective Summer 2012 Outline Implementing structural models firm assets: estimating value
More informationAsset-Specific and Systematic Liquidity on the Swedish Stock Market
Master Essay Asset-Specific and Systematic Liquidity on the Swedish Stock Market Supervisor: Hossein Asgharian Authors: Veronika Lunina Tetiana Dzhumurat 2010-06-04 Abstract This essay studies the effect
More informationIlliquidity and Stock Returns: Cross-Section and Time-Series Effects: A Replication. Larry Harris * Andrea Amato ** January 21, 2018.
Illiquidity and Stock Returns: Cross-Section and Time-Series Effects: A Replication Larry Harris * Andrea Amato ** January 21, 2018 Abstract This paper replicates and extends the Amihud (2002) study that
More informationAnomalies and Liquidity
Anomalies and Liquidity Anomalies (relative to the CAPM): Small cap firms have higher average returns than predicted by the CAPM High E/P (low P/E) stocks have higher average returns than predicted by
More informationLiquidity Risk Management for Portfolios
Liquidity Risk Management for Portfolios IPARM China Summit 2011 Shanghai, China November 30, 2011 Joseph Cherian Professor of Finance (Practice) Director, Centre for Asset Management Research & Investments
More informationLiquidity Creation as Volatility Risk
Liquidity Creation as Volatility Risk Itamar Drechsler Alan Moreira Alexi Savov Wharton Rochester NYU Chicago November 2018 1 Liquidity and Volatility 1. Liquidity creation - makes it cheaper to pledge
More informationIlliquidity or Credit Deterioration: A Study of Liquidity in the US Corporate Bond Market during Financial Crisis.
Illiquidity or Credit Deterioration: A Study of Liquidity in the US Corporate Bond Market during Financial Crisis Nils Friewald WU Vienna Rainer Jankowitsch WU Vienna Marti Subrahmanyam New York University
More informationMicroéconomie de la finance
Microéconomie de la finance 7 e édition Christophe Boucher christophe.boucher@univ-lorraine.fr 1 Chapitre 6 7 e édition Les modèles d évaluation d actifs 2 Introduction The Single-Index Model - Simplifying
More informationApplied Macro Finance
Master in Money and Finance Goethe University Frankfurt Week 2: Factor models and the cross-section of stock returns Fall 2012/2013 Please note the disclaimer on the last page Announcements Next week (30
More informationLiquidity Risk Premia in Corporate Bond Markets
Liquidity Risk Premia in Corporate Bond Markets Frank de Jong Joost Driessen Tilburg University University of Amsterdam Moody s / Salomon Center NYU May 2006 1 Two important puzzles in corporate bond markets
More informationSize Matters, if You Control Your Junk
Discussion of: Size Matters, if You Control Your Junk by: Cliff Asness, Andrea Frazzini, Ronen Israel, Tobias Moskowitz, and Lasse H. Pedersen Kent Daniel Columbia Business School & NBER AFA Meetings 7
More informationLiquidity Creation as Volatility Risk
Liquidity Creation as Volatility Risk Itamar Drechsler, NYU and NBER Alan Moreira, Rochester Alexi Savov, NYU and NBER JHU Carey Finance Conference June, 2018 1 Liquidity and Volatility 1. Liquidity creation
More informationAnalyst Disagreement and Aggregate Volatility Risk
Analyst Disagreement and Aggregate Volatility Risk Alexander Barinov Terry College of Business University of Georgia April 15, 2010 Alexander Barinov (Terry College) Disagreement and Volatility Risk April
More informationLiquidity Creation as Volatility Risk
Liquidity Creation as Volatility Risk Itamar Drechsler Alan Moreira Alexi Savov New York University and NBER University of Rochester March, 2018 Motivation 1. A key function of the financial sector is
More informationAn Online Appendix of Technical Trading: A Trend Factor
An Online Appendix of Technical Trading: A Trend Factor In this online appendix, we provide a comparative static analysis of the theoretical model as well as further robustness checks on the trend factor.
More informationDispersion in Analysts Earnings Forecasts and Credit Rating
Dispersion in Analysts Earnings Forecasts and Credit Rating Doron Avramov Department of Finance Robert H. Smith School of Business University of Maryland Tarun Chordia Department of Finance Goizueta Business
More informationLiquidity skewness premium
Liquidity skewness premium Giho Jeong, Jangkoo Kang, and Kyung Yoon Kwon * Abstract Risk-averse investors may dislike decrease of liquidity rather than increase of liquidity, and thus there can be asymmetric
More informationInternet Appendix. Table A1: Determinants of VOIB
Internet Appendix Table A1: Determinants of VOIB Each month, we regress VOIB on firm size and proxies for N, v δ, and v z. OIB_SHR is the monthly order imbalance defined as (B S)/(B+S), where B (S) is
More informationA Lottery Demand-Based Explanation of the Beta Anomaly. Online Appendix
A Lottery Demand-Based Explanation of the Beta Anomaly Online Appendix Section I provides details of the calculation of the variables used in the paper. Section II examines the robustness of the beta anomaly.
More informationFinancial Intermediaries and the Cross-Section of Asset Returns. Discussion
Financial Intermediaries and the Cross-Section of Asset Returns by Adrian, Etula, Muir Discussion Pietro Veronesi The University of Chicago Booth School of Business 1 What does this paper do? 1. From Broker-Dealer
More informationStocks with Extreme Past Returns: Lotteries or Insurance?
Stocks with Extreme Past Returns: Lotteries or Insurance? Alexander Barinov Terry College of Business University of Georgia June 14, 2013 Alexander Barinov (UGA) Stocks with Extreme Past Returns June 14,
More informationLiquidity Risk Premia in Corporate Bond Markets
Liquidity Risk Premia in Corporate Bond Markets Frank de Jong Tilburg University and University of Amsterdam Joost Driessen University of Amsterdam September 21, 2006 Abstract This paper explores the role
More informationTreasury Illiquidity and Funding Liquidity Risk
Treasury Illiquidity and Funding Liquidity Risk Ruslan Goyenko* McGill University September 23, 2011 Abstract This paper introduces the illiquidity of US Treasuries as a proxy for Brunnermeier and Pedersen
More informationLecture 5. Predictability. Traditional Views of Market Efficiency ( )
Lecture 5 Predictability Traditional Views of Market Efficiency (1960-1970) CAPM is a good measure of risk Returns are close to unpredictable (a) Stock, bond and foreign exchange changes are not predictable
More informationFinancial Econometrics Notes. Kevin Sheppard University of Oxford
Financial Econometrics Notes Kevin Sheppard University of Oxford Monday 15 th January, 2018 2 This version: 22:52, Monday 15 th January, 2018 2018 Kevin Sheppard ii Contents 1 Probability, Random Variables
More informationLiquidity Risk Premia in Corporate Bond Markets
Liquidity Risk Premia in Corporate Bond Markets Frank de Jong Tilburg University and University of Amsterdam Joost Driessen University of Amsterdam November 14, 2005 Abstract This paper explores the role
More informationIs Economic Uncertainty Priced in the Cross-Section of Stock Returns?
Is Economic Uncertainty Priced in the Cross-Section of Stock Returns? Turan Bali, Georgetown University Stephen Brown, NYU Stern, University Yi Tang, Fordham University 2018 CARE Conference, Washington
More informationVolatility Appendix. B.1 Firm-Specific Uncertainty and Aggregate Volatility
B Volatility Appendix The aggregate volatility risk explanation of the turnover effect relies on three empirical facts. First, the explanation assumes that firm-specific uncertainty comoves with aggregate
More informationMarket Frictions, Price Delay, and the Cross-Section of Expected Returns
Market Frictions, Price Delay, and the Cross-Section of Expected Returns forthcoming The Review of Financial Studies Kewei Hou Fisher College of Business Ohio State University and Tobias J. Moskowitz Graduate
More informationA Review of the Return-Illiquidity Relationship
A Review of the Return-Illiquidity Relationship Jozef Drienko a, Tom Smith b, Anna von Reibnitz a, * a Research School of Finance, Actuarial Studies and Statistics, College of Business and Economics, Australian
More informationExploiting Factor Autocorrelation to Improve Risk Adjusted Returns
Exploiting Factor Autocorrelation to Improve Risk Adjusted Returns Kevin Oversby 22 February 2014 ABSTRACT The Fama-French three factor model is ubiquitous in modern finance. Returns are modeled as a linear
More informationTHE TERM STRUCTURE OF BOND MARKET LIQUIDITY
THE TERM STRUCTURE OF BOND MARKET LIQUIDITY Ruslan Goyenko, University Avanidhar Subrahmanyam, Andrey Ukhov, ON-the-Run vs OFF-the-Run Treasury market illiquidity literature focus: on-the-run ( Fleming
More informationDiscussion of Corporate Bond Liquidity Before and After the Onset of the Subprime Crisis by J. Dick-Nielsen, P. Feldhütter, D.
Discussion of Corporate Bond Liquidity Before and After the Onset of the Subprime Crisis by J. Dick-Nielsen, P. Feldhütter, D. Lando Discussant: Loriano Mancini Swiss Finance Institute at EPFL Swissquote
More informationThe Role of Preferences in Corporate Asset Pricing
The Role of Preferences in Corporate Asset Pricing Adelphe Ekponon May 4, 2017 Introduction HEC Montréal, Department of Finance, 3000 Côte-Sainte-Catherine, Montréal, Canada H3T 2A7. Phone: (514) 473 2711.
More informationOPTIMAL RISKY PORTFOLIOS- ASSET ALLOCATIONS. BKM Ch 7
OPTIMAL RISKY PORTFOLIOS- ASSET ALLOCATIONS BKM Ch 7 ASSET ALLOCATION Idea from bank account to diversified portfolio Discussion principles are the same for any number of stocks A. bonds and stocks B.
More informationA Sensitivity Analysis between Common Risk Factors and Exchange Traded Funds
A Sensitivity Analysis between Common Risk Factors and Exchange Traded Funds Tahura Pervin Dept. of Humanities and Social Sciences, Dhaka University of Engineering & Technology (DUET), Gazipur, Bangladesh
More informationLIQUIDITY, THE VALUE OF THE FIRM, AND CORPORATE FINANCE * by Yakov Amihud, New York University, and Haim Mendelson, Stanford University
LIQUIDITY, THE VALUE OF THE FIRM, AND CORPORATE FINANCE * by Yakov Amihud, New York University, and Haim Mendelson, Stanford University Until fairly recently, the theory of corporate finance has been based
More informationLiquidity and Asset Pricing. Evidence on the role of Investor Holding Period.
Liquidity and Asset Pricing. Evidence on the role of Investor Holding Period. Randi Næs Norges Bank Bernt Arne Ødegaard Norges Bank and Norwegian School of Management BI Third workshop on Market Microstructure
More informationidentifying search frictions and selling pressures
selling pressures Copenhagen Business School Nykredit Symposium October 26, 2009 Motivation Amount outstanding end 2008: US Treasury bonds $6,082bn, US corporate bonds $6,205bn. Average daily trading volume
More informationA forward-looking model. for time-varying capital requirements. and the New Basel Capital Accord. Chiara Pederzoli Costanza Torricelli
A forward-looking model for time-varying capital requirements and the New Basel Capital Accord Chiara Pederzoli Costanza Torricelli Università di Modena e Reggio Emilia Plan of the presentation: 1) Overview
More informationCommon Risk Factors in Explaining Canadian Equity Returns
Common Risk Factors in Explaining Canadian Equity Returns Michael K. Berkowitz University of Toronto, Department of Economics and Rotman School of Management Jiaping Qiu University of Toronto, Department
More informationAggregate Risk and the Choice Between Cash and Lines of Credit
Aggregate Risk and the Choice Between Cash and Lines of Credit Viral V Acharya NYU-Stern, NBER, CEPR and ECGI with Heitor Almeida Murillo Campello University of Illinois at Urbana Champaign, NBER Introduction
More informationLiquidity Risk and Correlation Risk: A Clinical Study of the General Motors and Ford Downgrade of May 2005
Liquidity Risk and Correlation Risk: A Clinical Study of the General Motors and Ford Downgrade of May 2005 Viral Acharya, Stephen Schaefer, and Yili Zhang NYU-Stern, LBS and LBS Link between liquidity
More informationWhat is the Expected Return on a Stock?
What is the Expected Return on a Stock? Ian Martin Christian Wagner November, 2017 Martin & Wagner (LSE & CBS) What is the Expected Return on a Stock? November, 2017 1 / 38 What is the expected return
More informationSeptember 12, 2006, version 1. 1 Data
September 12, 2006, version 1 1 Data The dependent variable is always the equity premium, i.e., the total rate of return on the stock market minus the prevailing short-term interest rate. Stock Prices:
More informationBetting against Beta or Demand for Lottery
Turan G. Bali 1 Stephen J. Brown 2 Scott Murray 3 Yi Tang 4 1 McDonough School of Business, Georgetown University 2 Stern School of Business, New York University 3 College of Business Administration, University
More informationJohn H. Cochrane. April University of Chicago Booth School of Business
Comments on "Volatility, the Macroeconomy and Asset Prices, by Ravi Bansal, Dana Kiku, Ivan Shaliastovich, and Amir Yaron, and An Intertemporal CAPM with Stochastic Volatility John Y. Campbell, Stefano
More informationInternet Appendix to Is Information Risk Priced? Evidence from Abnormal Idiosyncratic Volatility
Internet Appendix to Is Information Risk Priced? Evidence from Abnormal Idiosyncratic Volatility Table IA.1 Further Summary Statistics This table presents the summary statistics of further variables used
More informationA Macroeconomic Framework for Quantifying Systemic Risk. June 2012
A Macroeconomic Framework for Quantifying Systemic Risk Zhiguo He Arvind Krishnamurthy University of Chicago & NBER Northwestern University & NBER June 212 Systemic Risk Systemic risk: risk (probability)
More informationEconomic Valuation of Liquidity Timing
Economic Valuation of Liquidity Timing Dennis Karstanje 1,2 Elvira Sojli 1,3 Wing Wah Tham 1 Michel van der Wel 1,2,4 1 Erasmus University Rotterdam 2 Tinbergen Institute 3 Duisenberg School of Finance
More informationAssessing the probability of financial distress of UK firms
Assessing the probability of financial distress of UK firms Evangelos C. Charalambakis Susanne K. Espenlaub Ian Garrett First version: June 12 2008 This version: January 15 2009 Manchester Business School,
More informationReturn Decomposition over the Business Cycle
Return Decomposition over the Business Cycle Tolga Cenesizoglu March 1, 2016 Cenesizoglu Return Decomposition & the Business Cycle March 1, 2016 1 / 54 Introduction Stock prices depend on investors expectations
More informationDion Bongaerts, Frank de Jong and Joost Driessen An Asset Pricing Approach to Liquidity Effects in Corporate Bond Markets
Dion Bongaerts, Frank de Jong and Joost Driessen An Asset Pricing Approach to Liquidity Effects in Corporate Bond Markets DP 03/2012-017 An asset pricing approach to liquidity effects in corporate bond
More informationSize and Value in China. Jianan Liu, Robert F. Stambaugh, and Yu Yuan
Size and Value in China by Jianan Liu, Robert F. Stambaugh, and Yu Yuan Introduction China world s second largest stock market unique political and economic environments market and investors separated
More informationLiquidity, Taxes and Yield Spreads between Tax-exempt and Taxable Bonds
Liquidity, Taxes and Yield Spreads between Tax-exempt and Taxable Bonds Chunchi Wu Woongsun Yoo Abstract This paper proposes a dynamic pricing model for municipal bonds with the liquidity factor and time-varying
More informationFINANCE RESEARCH SEMINAR SUPPORTED BY UNIGESTION
FINANCE RESEARCH SEMINAR SUPPORTED BY UNIGESTION The Pricing of the Illiquidity Factor s Systematic Risk Prof. Yakov AMIHUD New York University, Stern School of Business Abstract This paper presents a
More informationCHAPTER 5 Bonds and Their Valuation
5-1 5-2 CHAPTER 5 Bonds and Their Valuation Key features of bonds Bond valuation Measuring yield Assessing risk Key Features of a Bond 1 Par value: Face amount; paid at maturity Assume $1,000 2 Coupon
More informationLiquidity as risk factor
Liquidity as risk factor A research at the influence of liquidity on stock returns Bachelor Thesis Finance R.H.T. Verschuren 134477 Supervisor: M. Nie Liquidity as risk factor A research at the influence
More informationAppendix. In this Appendix, we present the construction of variables, data source, and some empirical procedures.
Appendix In this Appendix, we present the construction of variables, data source, and some empirical procedures. A.1. Variable Definition and Data Source Variable B/M CAPX/A Cash/A Cash flow volatility
More informationTHE TERM STRUCTURE OF BOND MARKET LIQUIDITY. Avanidhar Subrahmanyam University of California at Los Angeles. August 10, 2007.
THE TERM STRUCTURE OF BOND MARKET LIQUIDITY Ruslan Goyenko McGill University Avanidhar Subrahmanyam University of California at Los Angeles Andrey Ukhov Indiana University August 1, 27 Abstract Previous
More informationStock Liquidity and Default Risk *
Stock Liquidity and Default Risk * Jonathan Brogaard Dan Li Ying Xia Internet Appendix A1. Cox Proportional Hazard Model As a robustness test, we examine actual bankruptcies instead of the risk of default.
More informationLabor-Technology Substitution: Implications for Asset Pricing. Miao Ben Zhang University of Southern California
Labor-Technology Substitution: Implications for Asset Pricing Miao Ben Zhang University of Southern California Background Routine-task labor: workers performing procedural and rule-based tasks. Tax preparers
More informationRisk-Adjusted Futures and Intermeeting Moves
issn 1936-5330 Risk-Adjusted Futures and Intermeeting Moves Brent Bundick Federal Reserve Bank of Kansas City First Version: October 2007 This Version: June 2008 RWP 07-08 Abstract Piazzesi and Swanson
More informationSurvival of Hedge Funds : Frailty vs Contagion
Survival of Hedge Funds : Frailty vs Contagion February, 2015 1. Economic motivation Financial entities exposed to liquidity risk(s)... on the asset component of the balance sheet (market liquidity) on
More informationLiquidity Risk in Credit Default Swap Markets
Liquidity Risk in Credit Default Swap Markets Anders B. Trolle (joint work with Benjamin Junge) Ecole Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne and Swiss Finance Institute Paris, March 25, 2013 1 / 14 Contribution
More informationAddendum. Multifactor models and their consistency with the ICAPM
Addendum Multifactor models and their consistency with the ICAPM Paulo Maio 1 Pedro Santa-Clara This version: February 01 1 Hanken School of Economics. E-mail: paulofmaio@gmail.com. Nova School of Business
More informationFinal Exam Suggested Solutions
University of Washington Fall 003 Department of Economics Eric Zivot Economics 483 Final Exam Suggested Solutions This is a closed book and closed note exam. However, you are allowed one page of handwritten
More informationDoes market liquidity explain the idiosyncratic volatility puzzle in the Chinese stock market?
Does market liquidity explain the idiosyncratic volatility puzzle in the Chinese stock market? Xiaoxing Liu Guangping Shi Southeast University, China Bin Shi Acadian-Asset Management Disclosure The views
More informationMacroeconomic Uncertainty and Credit Default Swap Spreads
Macroeconomic Uncertainty and Credit Default Swap Spreads Christopher F Baum Boston College and DIW Berlin Chi Wan Carleton University November 3, 2009 Abstract This paper empirically investigates the
More informationGrowth Opportunities, Investment-Specific Technology Shocks and the Cross-Section of Stock Returns
Growth Opportunities, Investment-Specific Technology Shocks and the Cross-Section of Stock Returns Leonid Kogan 1 Dimitris Papanikolaou 2 1 MIT and NBER 2 Northwestern University Boston, June 5, 2009 Kogan,
More informationCredit Markets: Is It a Bubble?
Credit Markets: Is It a Bubble? Dr. Edward Altman NYU Stern School of Business 2015 Luncheon Conference TMA, NY Chapter New York January 21, 2015 1 1 Is It a Bubble? Focus on Default Rates in Credit Markets
More informationDiscussion of Relationship and Transaction Lending in a Crisis
Discussion of Relationship and Transaction Lending in a Crisis Philipp Schnabl NYU Stern, CEPR, and NBER USC Conference December 14, 2013 Summary 1 Research Question How does relationship lending vary
More informationLiquidity, Liquidity Risk, and the Cross Section of Mutual Fund Returns. Andrew A. Lynch and Xuemin (Sterling) Yan * Abstract
Liquidity, Liquidity Risk, and the Cross Section of Mutual Fund Returns Andrew A. Lynch and Xuemin (Sterling) Yan * Abstract This paper examines the impact of liquidity and liquidity risk on the cross-section
More informationOnline Appendix for Demand for Crash Insurance, Intermediary Constraints, and Risk Premia in Financial Markets
Online Appendix for Demand for Crash Insurance, Intermediary Constraints, and Risk Premia in Financial Markets Hui Chen Scott Joslin Sophie Ni January 19, 2016 1 An Extension of the Dynamic Model Our model
More informationStock Market Cross-Sectional Skewness and Business Cycle Fluctuations 1
Stock Market Cross-Sectional Skewness and Business Cycle Fluctuations 1 Ninth BIS CCA Research Conference Rio de Janeiro June 2018 1 Previously presented as Cross-Section Skewness, Business Cycle Fluctuations
More informationLiquidity Patterns in the U.S. Corporate Bond Market
Liquidity Patterns in the U.S. Corporate Bond Market Stephanie Heck 1, Dimitris Margaritis 2 and Aline Muller 1 1 HEC-ULg, Management School University of Liège 2 Business School, University of Auckland
More informationCREDIT RATINGS. Rating Agencies: Moody s and S&P Creditworthiness of corporate bonds
CREDIT RISK CREDIT RATINGS Rating Agencies: Moody s and S&P Creditworthiness of corporate bonds In the S&P rating system, AAA is the best rating. After that comes AA, A, BBB, BB, B, and CCC The corresponding
More informationLiquidity and Asset Pricing. Evidence on the role of Investor Holding Period.
Liquidity and Asset Pricing. Evidence on the role of Investor Holding Period. Randi Næs Norges Bank Bernt Arne Ødegaard Norwegian School of Management BI and Norges Bank UiS, Sep 2007 Holding period This
More informationAppendix. Table A.1 (Part A) The Author(s) 2015 G. Chakrabarti and C. Sen, Green Investing, SpringerBriefs in Finance, DOI /
Appendix Table A.1 (Part A) Dependent variable: probability of crisis (own) Method: ML binary probit (quadratic hill climbing) Included observations: 47 after adjustments Convergence achieved after 6 iterations
More informationWho Borrows from the Lender of Last Resort? 1
Who Borrows from the Lender of Last Resort? 1 Itamar Drechsler, Thomas Drechsel, David Marques-Ibanez and Philipp Schnabl NYU Stern and NBER ECB NYU Stern, CEPR, and NBER November 2012 1 The views expressed
More informationIlliquidity or Credit Deterioration: A Study of Liquidity in the US Corporate Bond Market during Financial Crises
Illiquidity or Credit Deterioration: A Study of Liquidity in the US Corporate Bond Market during Financial Crises Nils Friewald, Rainer Jankowitsch, Marti G. Subrahmanyam First Version: April 30, 2009
More informationDispersion in Analysts Earnings Forecasts and Credit Rating
Dispersion in Analysts Earnings Forecasts and Credit Rating Doron Avramov Department of Finance Robert H. Smith School of Business University of Maryland davramov@rhsmith.umd.edu Tarun Chordia Department
More informationApplying Fama and French Three Factors Model and Capital Asset Pricing Model in the Stock Exchange of Vietnam
International Research Journal of Finance and Economics ISSN 1450-2887 Issue 95 (2012) EuroJournals Publishing, Inc. 2012 http://www.internationalresearchjournaloffinanceandeconomics.com Applying Fama
More informationPremium Timing with Valuation Ratios
RESEARCH Premium Timing with Valuation Ratios March 2016 Wei Dai, PhD Research The predictability of expected stock returns is an old topic and an important one. While investors may increase expected returns
More informationDo the LCAPM Predictions Hold? Replication and Extension Evidence
Do the LCAPM Predictions Hold? Replication and Extension Evidence Craig W. Holden 1 and Jayoung Nam 2 1 Kelley School of Business, Indiana University, Bloomington, Indiana 47405, cholden@indiana.edu 2
More informationCombining State-Dependent Forecasts of Equity Risk Premium
Combining State-Dependent Forecasts of Equity Risk Premium Daniel de Almeida, Ana-Maria Fuertes and Luiz Koodi Hotta Universidad Carlos III de Madrid September 15, 216 Almeida, Fuertes and Hotta (UC3M)
More information1. Logit and Linear Probability Models
INTERNET APPENDIX 1. Logit and Linear Probability Models Table 1 Leverage and the Likelihood of a Union Strike (Logit Models) This table presents estimation results of logit models of union strikes during
More informationDiscount Rates. John H. Cochrane. January 8, University of Chicago Booth School of Business
Discount Rates John H. Cochrane University of Chicago Booth School of Business January 8, 2011 Discount rates 1. Facts: How risk discount rates vary over time and across assets. 2. Theory: Why discount
More informationQuantifying credit risk in a corporate bond
Quantifying credit risk in a corporate bond Srichander Ramaswamy Head of Investment Analysis Beatenberg, September 003 Summary of presentation What is credit risk? Probability of default Recovery rate
More informationLong and Short Run Correlation Risk in Stock Returns
Long and Short Run Correlation Risk in Stock Returns Discussion by Ric Colacito Econometric Society Winter Meetings, Denver, 1/2011 1 / 10 Contribution 1 Background: market variance risk premium predicts
More information10th Symposium on Finance, Banking, and Insurance Universität Karlsruhe (TH), December 14 16, 2005
10th Symposium on Finance, Banking, and Insurance Universität Karlsruhe (TH), December 14 16, 2005 Opening Lecture Prof. Richard Roll University of California Recent Research about Liquidity Universität
More information