Internet Appendix. Table A1: Determinants of VOIB
|
|
- Stephen Horn
- 5 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 Internet Appendix Table A1: Determinants of VOIB Each month, we regress VOIB on firm size and proxies for N, v δ, and v z. OIB_SHR is the monthly order imbalance defined as (B S)/(B+S), where B (S) is the number of shares traded initiated by buyers (sellers). VOIB_SHR is the standard deviation of daily order imbalance in a month. The order imbalance volatility calculated using number of trades is termed VOIB_NUM. The number of informed agents, N, is measured as the number of informed institutional investors. Following Abarbanell, Bushee and Raedy (2003), we break down institutional investors into informed and uninformed types, where the informed institutions are defined as investment companies and independent investment advisors because such institutions are more likely to be active investors. Other institutions, such as bank trusts, insurance companies, corporate/private pension funds, public pension funds, university and foundation endowments, have longer investment horizons and trade less actively. Following Chordia, Huh and Subrahmanyam (2009), we employ earnings volatility as a proxy for v δ, where earnings volatility is the standard deviation of earnings per share (EPS) from the most recent eight quarters. Finally, we employ the average of daily dollar volume (in million dollars) as a proxy for v z. All independent variables are standardized in the cross section. The time-series averages of coefficient estimates from monthly crosssectional regressions are presented along with the associated Newey-West (1987) t-statistics. The coefficients are multiplied by VOIB_SHR VOIB_NUM Intercept *** *** (71.76) (92.67) N 0.459** 0.526*** (2.46) (3.28) v δ 0.178*** 0.216*** (6.17) (8.05) v z 0.795*** 1.133*** (6.05) (16.55) SIZE *** *** (-36.58) (-68.78) 1
2 Table A2: Summary Statistics before and after January 2001 Panel A (Panel B) presents the time-series averages of the cross-sectional statistics for common stocks listed on NYSE, AMEX and NASDAQ before (after) January The stock-month observation must have valid information to calculate the return, market capitalization, book-to-market ratio, and order imbalance, and must have the month-end price above one dollar. OIB_SHR is the monthly order imbalance defined as (B S)/(B+S), where B (S) is the number of shares traded initiated by buyers (sellers). VOIB_SHR is the standard deviation of daily order imbalance in a month. SVOIB_SHR is the difference between VOIB_SHR in the current month and the six-month moving average of VOIB_SHR in the previous month. The variables calculated using the number of trades are termed as OIB_NUM, VOIB_NUM, and SVOIB_NUM. The Amihud illiquidity (ILLIQ) is calculated as the monthly average of the daily ratio of the absolute return to the dollar volume. TURN is the logarithm of the monthly average of the daily turnover ratio calculated as the number of shares traded divided by shares outstanding. SPRD is the spread measure using the cheap alternative solution by Holden and Jacobsen (2014). The shocks to the Amihud illiquidity (SILLIQ), turnover (STURN), spread (SSPRD), and return standard deviation (SRet_Std) are computed similarly to SVOIB. Panel A: Descriptive statistics pre-2001 Statistics N Mean St. dev. Median Minimum Maximum OIB_SHR 2, VOIB_SHR 2, SVOIB_SHR 2, OIB_NUM 2, VOIB_NUM 2, SVOIB_NUM 2, ILLIQ 2, SILLIQ 2, TURN 2, STURN 2, SPRD 2, SSPRD 2, Panel B: Descriptive statistics post-2001 Statistics N Mean St. dev. Median Minimum Maximum OIB_SHR 3, VOIB_SHR 3, SVOIB_SHR 3, OIB_NUM 3, VOIB_NUM 3, SVOIB_NUM 3, ILLIQ 3, SILLIQ 3, TURN 3, STURN 3, SPRD 3, SSPRD 3,
3 Table A3: Fama-MacBeth Regression Estimates Using an ARMA(1,1) Model for VOIB to Extract Shocks This table presents the time-series averages of individual stock cross-sectional OLS regression coefficient estimates between July 1983 and December The order imbalance is calculated using the number of shares traded in Column 1 and using the number of trades in Column 2. We use an ARMA(1,1) model for VOIB to extract shocks. The dependent variable is the risk-adjusted return calculated using the Fama-French (1993) factors as well as the momentum factor and the liquidity factor of Pastor and Stambaugh (2003) with loadings conditional on the size and book-to market ratio. All independent variables (except R1 and R212) are lagged one month. OIB is the monthly order imbalance defined as (B- S)/(B+S), where B (S) is the trades initiated by buyers (sellers). VOIB is the standard deviation of daily order imbalance in a month. POIB is the logistic transform of the ratio of number of days with positive order imbalance and total number of trading days in the month. SVOIB is the difference between VOIB in the current month and the six-month moving average of VOIB in the previous month. SIZE represents the logarithm of market capitalization. BM is the logarithm of the bookto-market ratio. R1 is the lagged one month return. R212 is the cumulative returns over the second through the twelfth months prior to the current month. TURN is the logarithm of the monthly average turnover ratio calculated as the trading volume divided by shares outstanding. StdTURN is the standard deviation of TURN in the past 36 months. ILLIQ represents the Amihud measure of illiquidity. SPRD is the spread measure using the cheap alternative solution by Holden and Jacobsen (2014). ACC represents accruals, measured as in Sloan (1996). AG is the asset growth computed in Cooper, Gulen and Shill (2008). ISSUE represents new issues as in Pontiff and Woodgate (2008). IVOL is the idiosyncratic volatility computed as in Ang, Hodrick, Xing, and Zhang (2006). PROFIT is the profitability variable as in Fama and French (2006). SUE is the standardized unexpected earnings, computed as the most recent quarterly earnings less the earnings four quarters ago, standardized by its standard deviation estimated over the prior eight quarters. MAX is the maximum daily return in the last month. DISP is the analyst dispersion in earnings forecasts and DISPD is a dummy that equals to one if the stock is covered by at least two analysts and zero otherwise. SSTT is the small size trade imbalance as in Hvidkjaer (2008). HiloSprd is the high-low spread estimate of Corwin and Schultz (2012). INSTV is the average of the eight most recent quarterly absolute institutional ownership percentage changes. ILLIQV is the idiosyncratic volatility of liquidity in Akbas, Armstrong and Petkova (2011). PIN is the probability of informed trade measured by Easley, Kiefer, O Hara, and Paperman (1996). Ret_Std is the standard deviation of daily returns in a month. SSPRD, SOIB, SPOIB, STURN, SStdTURN, SIVOL, SILLIQ, SDISP, and SRet_Std are defined similarly as SVOIB. All variables are winsorized at the 0.5% and 99.5% levels. N is the average number of stocks per month. Newey-West t-statistics are reported in parentheses. *,**, and *** denote statistical significance at the 10%, 5%, and 1% level, respectively. SHR NUM Model 1 2 Intercept 3.493*** 3.353*** (4.86) (4.73) VOIB 1.232** 1.391** (2.28) (2.48) SVOIB *** *** (-5.07) (-5.01) ILLIQ (1.14) (1.12) SILLIQ ** *** (-2.57) (-2.59) TURN (1.00) (1.36) STURN 0.839*** 0.798*** (8.53) (8.14) SPRD 0.341*** 0.331*** (5.71) (5.43) SSPRD *** *** (-5.05) (-4.97) OIB (-1.15) (-0.36) SOIB * (1.57) (1.68) 3
4 Table A3 (continued) POIB * (0.47) (-1.94) SPOIB * (-0.02) (1.70) SIZE *** *** (-4.54) (-4.23) BM (-0.49) (-0.52) R (-0.00) (0.06) R *** *** (-10.16) (-10.17) STDTURN *** *** (-3.05) (-3.23) SSTDTURN (-0.47) (-0.42) IVOL (0.77) (0.81) SIVOL (-0.76) (-0.71) ACC *** *** (-3.25) (-3.22) AG *** *** (-2.91) (-2.99) ISSUE *** *** (-3.36) (-3.39) PROFIT (0.21) (0.06) SUE 0.027** 0.027** (2.26) (2.22) Max 4.864*** 4.873*** (3.64) (3.75) DISP *** *** (-2.82) (-2.94) SDISP (0.64) (0.66) DISPD (-1.39) (-1.60) SSTT (1.03) (0.37) HiLoSprd (1.02) (1.09) INSTV (1.07) (0.91) ILLIQV ** ** (-2.25) (-2.01) PIN *** *** (-3.85) (-3.97) Ret_Std *** *** (-3.38) (-3.45) SRet_Std (1.22) (1.18) Adj. R-sq N
5 Table A4: Fama-MacBeth Regression Estimates with Other Control Variables This table presents the time-series averages of individual stock cross-sectional OLS regression coefficient estimates between July 1983 and December In this table, we add two more control variables: SHiloSprd and O/S. SHiloSprd is HiloSprd shock, where HiloSprd is the high-low spread estimate of Corwin and Schultz (2012). O/S is the ratio of option trading volume and stock trading volume, measured as in Roll, Schwartz and Subrahmanyam (2010). The order imbalance is calculated using the number of shares traded in Columns 1 to 3 and using the number of trades in Columns 4 to 6. The dependent variable is the risk-adjusted return calculated using the Fama-French (1993) factors as well as the momentum factor and the liquidity factor of Pastor and Stambaugh (2003) with loadings conditional on the size and book-to market ratio. All independent variables (except R1 and R212) are lagged one month. OIB is the monthly order imbalance defined as (B-S)/(B+S), where B (S) is the trades initiated by buyers (sellers). VOIB is the standard deviation of daily order imbalance in a month. POIB is the logistic transform of the ratio of number of days with positive order imbalance and total number of trading days in the month. SVOIB is the difference between VOIB in the current month and the six-month moving average of VOIB in the previous month. SIZE represents the logarithm of market capitalization. BM is the logarithm of the book-to-market ratio. R1 is the lagged one month return. R212 is the cumulative returns over the second through the twelfth months prior to the current month. TURN is the logarithm of the monthly average turnover ratio calculated as the trading volume divided by shares outstanding. StdTURN is the standard deviation of TURN in the past 36 months. ILLIQ represents the Amihud measure of illiquidity. SPRD is the spread measure using the cheap alternative solution by Holden and Jacobsen (2014). ACC represents accruals, measured as in Sloan (1996). AG is the asset growth computed in Cooper, Gulen and Shill (2008). ISSUE represents new issues as in Pontiff and Woodgate (2008). IVOL is the idiosyncratic volatility computed as in Ang, Hodrick, Xing, and Zhang (2006). PROFIT is the profitability variable as in Fama and French (2006). SUE is the standardized unexpected earnings, computed as the most recent quarterly earnings less the earnings four quarters ago, standardized by its standard deviation estimated over the prior eight quarters. MAX is the maximum daily return in the last month. DISP is the analyst dispersion in earnings forecasts and DISPD is a dummy that equals to one if the stock is covered by at least two analysts and zero otherwise. SSTT is the small size trade imbalance as in Hvidkjaer (2008). INSTV is the average of the eight most recent quarterly absolute institutional ownership percentage changes. ILLIQV is the idiosyncratic volatility of liquidity in Akbas, Armstrong and Petkova (2011). PIN is the probability of informed trade measured by Easley, Kiefer, O Hara, and Paperman (1996). Ret_Std is the standard deviation of daily returns in a month. SSPRD, SOIB, SPOIB, STURN, SStdTURN, SIVOL, SILLIQ, SDISP, SRet_Std and SHiloSprd are defined similarly as SVOIB. All variables are winsorized at the 0.5% and 99.5% levels. N is the average number of stocks per month. Newey-West t-statistics are reported in parentheses. *,**, and *** denote statistical significance at the 10%, 5%, and 1% level, respectively. SHR NUM Model Intercept 2.579*** *** (3.63) (1.61) (1.48) (3.08) (0.55) (0.49) VOIB 3.101*** 9.094*** 9.440*** 3.703*** *** *** (3.53) (3.70) (3.84) (4.50) (4.00) (4.11) SVOIB *** *** *** *** *** *** (-5.51) (-3.12) (-3.26) (-7.21) (-3.63) (-3.72) ILLIQ (1.35) (0.52) (0.66) (1.26) (0.30) (0.43) SILLIQ *** ** (-2.58) (-0.64) (-0.74) (-2.55) (-0.35) (-0.44) TURN 0.146* ** (1.75) (0.67) (0.79) (2.39) (1.30) (1.42) STURN 0.729*** 0.401** 0.388** 0.643*** 0.280* 0.269* (7.47) (2.57) (2.50) (6.79) (1.78) (1.72) SPRD 0.311*** *** (5.48) (1.25) (1.01) (5.13) (1.56) (1.38) SSPRD *** *** (-4.54) (-0.31) (-0.25) (-4.52) (-0.37) (-0.32) OIB * * * (-1.05) (-1.86) (-1.93) (-1.06) (-1.62) (-1.68) SOIB * 2.282* 1.008** 4.633*** 4.726*** (1.39) (1.86) (1.88) (2.25) (2.61) (2.65) POIB (0.14) (0.03) (0.15) (-1.10) (0.85) (0.99) 5
6 Table A4 (continued) SPOIB (0.18) (-0.48) (-0.57) (0.88) (-1.30) (-1.45) SIZE *** *** (-3.40) (-0.82) (-0.73) (-2.76) (0.14) (0.18) BM ** ** ** ** (-0.64) (-2.08) (-2.11) (-0.63) (-2.21) (-2.22) R * * (-0.20) (-1.57) (-1.55) (-0.20) (-1.68) (-1.67) R *** *** *** *** *** *** (-10.29) (-5.83) (-5.86) (-10.31) (-6.08) (-6.10) STDTURN *** *** (-2.93) (0.89) (0.86) (-3.13) (0.46) (0.41) SSTDTURN (-0.77) (0.90) (0.98) (-0.67) (1.30) (1.36) IVOL (0.58) (-0.38) (-0.33) (0.71) (-0.24) (-0.17) SIVOL (-0.55) (0.29) (0.26) (-0.57) (0.11) (0.05) ACC *** *** (-3.25) (-1.25) (-1.17) (-3.19) (-1.11) (-1.05) AG *** *** ** *** ** ** (-2.90) (-2.60) (-2.56) (-2.99) (-2.57) (-2.53) ISSUE *** ** ** *** *** *** (-3.39) (-2.52) (-2.54) (-3.47) (-2.82) (-2.84) PROFIT (0.31) (-0.59) (-0.65) (0.05) (-0.62) (-0.67) SUE 0.026** ** (2.18) (-0.93) (-0.91) (2.12) (-1.20) (-1.17) Max 5.104*** 6.184*** 6.357*** 5.167*** 6.679*** 6.855*** (3.89) (3.73) (3.84) (4.03) (3.92) (4.01) DISP *** *** (-2.80) (-0.95) (-0.92) (-2.98) (-0.99) (-0.96) SDISP (0.55) (1.24) (1.28) (0.64) (1.24) (1.29) DISPD * (-1.61) (-0.99) (-0.97) (-1.93) (-1.03) (-1.03) SSTT ** ** (1.09) (-1.24) (-1.13) (0.39) (-2.46) (-2.40) HiLoSprd (0.92) (0.29) (0.89) (1.17) (0.09) (0.65) INSTV (1.02) (-1.46) (-1.48) (0.79) (-1.45) (-1.46) ILLIQV ** ** (-2.32) (-0.07) (-0.07) (-2.10) (0.20) (0.22) PIN *** *** *** *** *** *** (-3.89) (-4.54) (-4.60) (-4.16) (-4.69) (-4.77) Ret_Std *** *** (-3.24) (-0.87) (-1.04) (-3.43) (-1.13) (-1.31) SRet_Std (1.00) (-0.12) (0.02) (1.10) (0.10) (0.26) SHiLoSprd (0.24) (-1.19) (0.05) (-1.12) O/S *** *** *** *** (-2.87) (-2.78) (-2.91) (-2.81) Adj. R-sq N
7 Table A5: Fama-MacBeth Regressions for Robustness Checks Using VOIB_NUM This table presents the time-series averages of individual stock cross-sectional OLS regression coefficient estimates between July 1983 and December Model 1 (Model 2) uses raw return (mid quote return from open to close) as the dependent variable. In Models 3 (Model 4), all shock variables are calculated using the three-month (twelve-month) moving averages accordingly. Model 5 excludes the great financial crisis period of 2008 and Models 6 and 7 use data before and after January 2001 only. Model 8 uses the Weighted Least Squares regressions in cross-sectional estimation following Asparouhova, Bessembinder and Kalcheva (ABK, 2010). In Model 9, we form decile portfolios sorted by every day, replace each individual firm s with the average of the decile portfolio to which the firm belongs (OIB), and construct other order flow variables using OIB. All independent variables (except R1 and R212) are lagged one month. OIB is the monthly order imbalance defined as (B-S)/(B+S), where B (S) is the number of trades initiated by buyers (sellers). VOIB is the standard deviation of daily order imbalance in a month. POIB is the logistic transform of the ratio of number of days with positive order imbalance and total number of trading days in the month. SVOIB is the difference between VOIB in the current month and the six-month moving average of VOIB in the previous month. SIZE represents the logarithm of market capitalization. BM is the logarithm of the book-to-market ratio. R1 is the lagged one month return. R212 is the cumulative returns over the second through the twelfth months prior to the current month. TURN is the logarithm of the monthly average turnover ratio calculated as the trading volume divided by shares outstanding. StdTURN is the standard deviation of TURN in the past 36 months. ILLIQ represents the Amihud measure of illiquidity. SPRD is the spread measure using the cheap alternative solution by Holden and Jacobsen (2014). ACC represents accruals, measured as in Sloan (1996). AG is the asset growth computed in Cooper, Gulen and Shill (2008). ISSUE represents new issues as in Pontiff and Woodgate (2008). IVOL is the idiosyncratic volatility computed as in Ang, Hodrick, Xing, and Zhang (2006). PROFIT is the profitability variable as in Fama and French (2006). SUE is the standardized unexpected earnings, computed as the most recent quarterly earnings less the earnings four quarters ago, standardized by its standard deviation estimated over the prior eight quarters. MAX is the maximum daily return in the last month. DISP is the analyst dispersion in earnings forecasts and DISPD is a dummy that equals to one if the stock is covered by at least two analysts and zero otherwise. SSTT is the small size trade imbalance as in Hvidkjaer (2008). HiloSprd is the high-low spread estimate of Corwin and Schultz (2012). INSTV is the average of the eight most recent quarterly absolute institutional ownership percentage changes. ILLIQV is the idiosyncratic volatility of liquidity in Akbas, Armstrong and Petkova (2011). PIN is the probability of informed trade measured by Easley, Kiefer, O Hara, and Paperman (1996). Ret_Std is the standard deviation of daily returns in a month. SSPRD, SOIB, SPOIB, STURN, SStdTURN, SIVOL, SILLIQ, SDISP, and SRet_Std are defined similarly as SVOIB. All variables are winsorized at the 0.5% and 99.5% levels. N is the average number of stocks per month. Newey- West t-statistics are reported in parentheses. *,**, and *** denote statistical significance at the 10%, 5%, and 1% level, respectively. Model raw ret o-c ret MA=3 MA=12 ex-crisis post2001 pre2001 ABK OIB Intercept 3.631*** 4.384*** 2.694*** 2.160*** 2.315*** 5.665*** *** 2.831*** (3.67) (3.46) (4.04) (2.99) (3.03) (7.86) (0.07) (3.27) (4.06) VOIB 4.013*** 5.375*** 2.798*** 3.079*** 3.097*** 5.910*** 1.935*** 3.543*** 2.295*** (4.39) (4.14) (3.80) (4.08) (3.86) (3.27) (3.74) (4.29) (3.74) SVOIB *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** (-7.35) (-6.33) (-6.63) (-6.16) (-6.65) (-5.32) (-6.38) (-7.03) (-7.11) ILLIQ ** (0.11) (2.38) (1.44) (0.01) (1.21) (1.47) (1.02) (1.30) (1.28) SILLIQ * *** ** *** ** ** *** *** (-1.76) (-3.23) (-2.55) (-1.22) (-2.59) (-2.03) (-2.39) (-2.68) (-2.72) TURN 0.153* 0.228* 0.298*** ** 0.158* (1.79) (1.78) (3.87) (1.19) (1.63) (-0.29) (2.03) (1.65) (1.19) STURN 0.770*** 0.611*** 0.498*** 0.653*** 0.639*** 0.727*** 0.609*** 0.658*** 0.706*** (7.06) (5.18) (5.91) (5.90) (6.56) (6.86) (4.35) (7.02) (7.56) SPRD 0.312*** 0.442*** 0.303*** 0.274*** 0.306*** 0.577*** 0.115** 0.303*** 0.317*** (4.83) (4.86) (5.18) (4.67) (4.94) (5.52) (2.28) (5.17) (5.32) SSPRD *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** (-4.29) (-3.41) (-5.01) (-3.78) (-4.05) (-6.11) (-0.23) (-4.59) (-4.70) 7
8 Table A5 (Continued) OIB ** * ** (-0.87) (-2.04) (0.41) (-1.70) (-1.29) (-2.50) (1.60) (-0.99) (-0.12) SOIB 0.884** 2.053*** *** 0.997** 2.362*** ** 0.744* (2.01) (2.85) (1.21) (3.05) (2.33) (2.85) (0.05) (2.21) (1.93) POIB ** ** (-0.65) (1.38) (-2.03) (-0.89) (-0.85) (-0.24) (-1.42) (-1.17) (-2.20) SPOIB ** ** * (0.62) (-0.70) (2.02) (0.47) (0.82) (-0.76) (2.20) (1.01) (1.66) SIZE ** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** (-2.49) (-2.79) (-3.88) (-2.72) (-2.82) (-7.07) (-0.20) (-3.03) (-3.74) BM 0.117* (1.65) (0.80) (-0.79) (-0.33) (-0.69) (-0.19) (-0.53) (-0.55) (-0.54) R ** (0.64) (0.53) (0.42) (-0.96) (1.63) (-1.55) (2.12) (-0.22) (-0.19) R *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** (-9.11) (-3.84) (-10.16) (-9.97) (-9.91) (-5.80) (-9.28) (-10.48) (-10.46) STDTURN ** * *** * *** * *** *** *** (-2.02) (-1.68) (-5.04) (-1.68) (-3.49) (-1.94) (-2.71) (-3.31) (-3.16) SSTDTURN ** * * (-2.03) (-1.81) (1.05) (-1.76) (-0.72) (-0.51) (-0.87) (-1.00) (-1.02) IVOL (-0.16) (0.54) (-0.21) (-0.14) (0.28) (1.40) (-0.28) (0.51) (0.50) SIVOL * (0.12) (-0.98) (0.67) (-0.00) (-0.23) (-1.79) (0.65) (-0.42) (-0.49) ACC *** * *** *** *** *** *** *** (-2.77) (-1.90) (-3.19) (-3.14) (-2.94) (-1.57) (-2.72) (-3.10) (-3.12) AG *** *** *** ** *** ** *** *** (-2.70) (-2.74) (-2.72) (-2.29) (-2.75) (-1.54) (-2.50) (-2.90) (-2.90) ISSUE *** *** *** *** *** *** ** *** *** (-3.67) (-3.39) (-3.55) (-3.65) (-3.72) (-3.61) (-2.29) (-3.73) (-3.69) PROFIT (-0.02) (1.06) (0.12) (0.89) (0.40) (-1.21) (0.80) (0.11) (0.20) SUE 0.028** ** *** ** 0.026** (2.12) (1.21) (2.27) (1.50) (2.97) (1.57) (1.51) (2.18) (2.23) Max 4.681*** *** 6.153*** 5.255*** 3.713** 5.801*** 4.947*** 4.960*** (3.46) (1.64) (3.88) (4.58) (4.02) (2.25) (3.20) (3.88) (3.91) DISP ** *** *** *** * ** *** *** (-2.47) (-0.16) (-3.36) (-2.68) (-2.93) (-1.90) (-2.34) (-2.97) (-2.93) SDISP (0.12) (-0.25) (0.98) (0.40) (0.62) (1.42) (-0.20) (0.63) (0.61) DISPD *** * * * * (-2.97) (-1.91) (-1.61) (-1.52) (-1.57) (-1.79) (-1.05) (-1.89) (-1.80) SSTT * (-0.18) (-1.93) (0.40) (-0.19) (0.59) (-0.75) (0.70) (0.54) (0.57) HiLoSprd * * (1.36) (1.53) (1.44) (1.89) (1.32) (-0.25) (1.69) (1.24) (1.08) INSTV *** (1.07) (0.05) (-0.05) (0.80) (0.90) (-3.10) (1.52) (0.81) (0.92) ILLIQV * * *** * (-1.58) (-0.52) (-1.70) (-1.36) (-1.82) (0.38) (-2.88) (-1.93) (-1.51) PIN *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** (-4.17) (-4.67) (-3.81) (-4.08) (-3.51) (-6.60) (0.64) (-4.15) (-4.11) Ret_Std * *** ** * *** *** * *** *** (-1.74) (-3.22) (-2.08) (-1.74) (-2.84) (-2.75) (-1.80) (-2.97) (-2.98) SRet_Std ** (0.79) (0.32) (0.18) (0.79) (0.79) (2.17) (-0.30) (0.80) (0.85) Adj. R-sq N
9 Table A6: Fama-MacBeth Regressions Using Randomly Formed Portfolios We perform an alternative test that accounts for measurement error in OIB. In this test, we use 20 randomly formed portfolios as test assets every month, and use the portfolios average order flows to compute their VOIB and SVOIB. We then run Fama-MacBeth regressions for the 20 portfolios, using equally-weighted open-close quote midpoint returns to account for non-synchronous trading. We repeat this procedure 100 times. This table presents the time-series averages of individual stock cross-sectional OLS regression coefficient estimates between July 1983 and December SHR NUM Intercept (0.57) (1.05) VOIB 2.684*** 2.894*** (6.82) (7.30) SVOIB *** *** (-9.39) (-10.57) 9
10 Table A7: Bivariate Portfolio Sorts Controlling for Limits to Arbitrage Proxies (Contemporaneous Relationship) Each month between July 1983 and December 2012, stocks are first sorted into high and low groups based on one of the control variables, and then into SVOIB_SHR or SVOIB_NUM quintile portfolios within each control variable group. Then the quintile portfolio returns, the return differences between high and low quintile SVOIB portfolios, and the alphas using the Fama and French (1993) model along with the momentum factor and the Pastor and Stambaugh (2003) liquidity factor are reported with the Newey-West t-statistics in parentheses. VOIB is the standard deviation of daily order imbalance in a month, where order imbalance is defined as (B S)/(B+S) with B (S) being the trades initiated by buyers (sellers). SVOIB is the difference between VOIB in the current month and the six-month moving average of VOIB in the previous month. The order imbalance is calculated using the number of shares traded in Panel A and using the number of trades in Panel B. SIZE represents the logarithm of market capitalization. INST is the percentage of shares held by institutional investors. IVOL is the idiosyncratic stock return volatility. *,**, and *** denote statistical significance at the 10%, 5%, and 1% level, respectively. Panel A: SVOIB_SHR Controlling for SIZE Controlling for INST Controlling for IVOL Small- SVOIB Small Large Large Low High Low-High Low High Low-High Low High High-Low *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** 3.486*** (-8.24) (-6.75) (-8.02) (-8.12) (-9.25) (-6.41) (-6.31) (-8.70) (8.24) Alpha *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** 3.329*** (-8.45) (-7.38) (-7.23) (-8.25) (-9.69) (-6.01) (-6.55) (-9.11) (8.60) Panel B: SVOIB_NUM Controlling for SIZE Controlling for INST Controlling for IVOL Small- SVOIB Small Large Large Low High Low-High Low High Low-High Low High High-Low *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** 2.433*** (-5.83) (-5.62) (-4.93) (-6.08) (-5.55) (-4.91) (-5.35) (-6.36) (5.80) Alpha *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** 2.322*** (-5.89) (-6.00) (-4.58) (-6.20) (-5.38) (-4.67) (-5.11) (-6.51) (5.88) 10
11 Table A8: Dynamic Effects of Liquidity Shocks: Robustness Checks This table presents robustness checks for the effects of SVOIB on returns in the next 1, 2-4, 5-7, 8-10, 11-13, 14-16, 17-19, 20-22, 23-25, 26-28, months. We calculate OIB as the monthly order imbalance defined as (B-S)/(B+S). VOIB is the standard deviation of daily order imbalance in a month. SVOIB is the difference between VOIB in the current month and the six-month moving average of VOIB in the previous month. SILLIQ is the shock to the Amihud illiquidity measure defined similarly as SVOIB. Panel A reports the raw return differences and the alphas with respect to the Fama-French three-factor along with the momentum and liquidity factors of portfolios that buy stocks in the highest quintile of illiquidity shocks and sell stocks in the lowest quintile of illiquidity shocks, and the time-series averages of the coefficient estimates for the illiquidity shocks from cross-sectional regressions as in Table 5. In Panel B, we divide the sample into two groups based on the institutional holding (INST) or idiosyncratic volatility (IVOL), and report for each group the time-series averages of the coefficient estimates of SVOIB_SHR and SILLIQ from cross-sectional regressions. In Panel C, we divide the sample into two groups based on SIZE, the institutional holding or idiosyncratic volatility, and report the results for SVOIB_NUM. All cross-sectional regressions control for the same variables as those in Column 3 of Table 5. For brevity, coefficient estimates are reported only for the illiquidity shock variables. All variables are winsorized at the 0.5% and 99.5% levels. Newey-West t-statistics are reported in parentheses. *,**, and *** denote statistical significance at the 10%, 5%, and 1% level, respectively. Panel A: Price impact in the long run Return difference Alpha FM coefficient SVOIB_NUM SILLIQ SVOIB_NUM SILLIQ SVOIB_NUM SILLIQ Month *** *** *** *** ** (-7.49) (-8.94) (-7.84) (-9.08) (-0.41) (-2.51) Month *** *** ** (-0.20) (-4.56) (-0.32) (-3.73) (-1.42) (-2.50) Month ** * * (0.63) (-2.45) (0.71) (-1.95) (0.01) (-1.93) Month *** *** (2.79) (-1.18) (2.72) (-0.92) (0.44) (0.84) Month *** ** (2.71) (0.73) (2.34) (0.99) (1.07) (0.69) Month *** 0.961** 0.674*** 1.077*** 2.482* (2.71) (2.35) (2.94) (2.62) (1.82) (-1.34) Month ** 0.651** 0.320** 0.742*** 3.260** 8.684** (2.21) (2.55) (1.97) (2.79) (2.18) (2.01) Month *** ** ** (2.62) (1.38) (2.53) (1.21) (2.40) (0.84) Month ** * (2.04) (1.36) (1.78) (1.50) (1.62) (1.12) Month (0.14) (1.11) (0.33) (1.05) (0.69) (1.63) Month ** (-0.43) (1.56) (-0.51) (1.39) (-0.41) (-2.51) 11
12 A8 (continued) Panel B: Fama-MacBeth regression coefficient estimates conditioning on INST and IVOL INST IVOL Low High Low High SVOIB_SHR SILLIQ SVOIB_SHR SILLIQ SVOIB_SHR SILLIQ SVOIB_SHR SILLIQ Month *** ** *** *** (-4.14) (-1.13) (-2.35) (-1.60) (-6.23) (-0.48) (-8.45) (-1.26) Month *** ** *** *** ** (-2.99) (-2.57) (0.56) (-2.65) (-0.95) (0.04) (-2.90) (-2.23) Month * (1.87) (-1.43) (-0.33) (-0.39) (1.14) (-0.46) (0.74) (-1.20) Month ** * ** (1.97) (-0.89) (1.94) (-0.74) (0.80) (0.33) (0.79) (-2.02) Month ** * * 2.973* (1.99) (1.26) (1.14) (-0.97) (1.81) (0.13) (1.83) (1.68) Month *** *** (3.12) (0.71) (-0.12) (-0.08) (1.46) (-1.01) (3.21) (1.18) Month *** ** ** * (3.02) (-1.44) (2.41) (-0.50) (0.06) (0.01) (2.54) (-1.82) Month *** * ** 3.963* (2.68) (1.27) (-0.80) (0.27) (1.79) (-1.44) (2.52) (1.70) Month ** 7.209* ** 2.443** * 6.074** (2.50) (1.94) (0.93) (-2.13) (1.99) (-1.86) (2.49) (1.37) Month ** ** 4.816* (2.09) (1.57) (1.09) (-0.74) (1.18) (-0.80) (2.25) (1.68) Month (1.50) (1.16) (0.81) (-1.58) (0.25) (-0.71) (1.35) (1.47) Panel C: Fama-MacBeth regression coefficient estimates for SVOIB_NUM conditioning on SIZE, INST and IVOL SIZE INST IVOL Small Large Low High Low High Month *** *** *** *** *** *** (-5.73) (-2.73) (-5.93) (-3.25) (-3.91) (-10.31) Month *** ** ** (-2.63) (-1.17) (-2.10) (0.54) (-1.38) (-2.31) Month (1.04) (-0.79) (0.95) (-1.54) (0.33) (-0.75) Month (1.11) (-0.53) (0.83) (-0.43) (0.41) (0.18) Month (1.26) (-0.70) (1.16) (0.53) (0.45) (0.72) Month ** 4.633** 4.931*** (2.08) (2.04) (2.78) (-0.63) (1.08) (1.21) Month ** 9.532** 4.714*** ** (2.23) (2.37) (2.88) (-1.38) (0.49) (2.02) Month ** 6.676** 6.060*** 6.610* ** (2.48) (2.25) (2.86) (1.87) (0.33) (2.41) Month ** ** 3.703** ** (2.06) (-0.79) (2.47) (2.21) (1.59) (2.12) Month * (1.57) (-1.30) (1.75) (-0.14) (0.46) (1.42) Month (1.01) (-1.42) (1.44) (-0.09) (-1.04) (0.84) 12
Internet Appendix to Is Information Risk Priced? Evidence from Abnormal Idiosyncratic Volatility
Internet Appendix to Is Information Risk Priced? Evidence from Abnormal Idiosyncratic Volatility Table IA.1 Further Summary Statistics This table presents the summary statistics of further variables used
More informationVariation in Liquidity, Costly Arbitrage, and the Cross-Section of Stock Returns
Variation in Liquidity, Costly Arbitrage, and the Cross-Section of Stock Returns Badrinath Kottimukkalur * January 2018 Abstract This paper provides an arbitrage based explanation for the puzzling negative
More informationHigh Idiosyncratic Volatility and Low Returns. Andrew Ang Columbia University and NBER. Q Group October 2007, Scottsdale AZ
High Idiosyncratic Volatility and Low Returns Andrew Ang Columbia University and NBER Q Group October 2007, Scottsdale AZ Monday October 15, 2007 References The Cross-Section of Volatility and Expected
More informationLiquidity skewness premium
Liquidity skewness premium Giho Jeong, Jangkoo Kang, and Kyung Yoon Kwon * Abstract Risk-averse investors may dislike decrease of liquidity rather than increase of liquidity, and thus there can be asymmetric
More informationThe Volatility of Liquidity and Expected Stock Returns
The Volatility of Liquidity and Expected Stock Returns Ferhat Akbas, Will J. Armstrong, Ralitsa Petkova January, 2011 ABSTRACT We document a positive relation between the volatility of liquidity and expected
More informationWhat Does Risk-Neutral Skewness Tell Us About Future Stock Returns? Supplementary Online Appendix
What Does Risk-Neutral Skewness Tell Us About Future Stock Returns? Supplementary Online Appendix 1 Tercile Portfolios The main body of the paper presents results from quintile RNS-sorted portfolios. Here,
More informationMarket Frictions, Price Delay, and the Cross-Section of Expected Returns
Market Frictions, Price Delay, and the Cross-Section of Expected Returns forthcoming The Review of Financial Studies Kewei Hou Fisher College of Business Ohio State University and Tobias J. Moskowitz Graduate
More informationThis paper investigates whether realized and implied volatilities of individual stocks can predict the crosssectional
MANAGEMENT SCIENCE Vol. 55, No. 11, November 2009, pp. 1797 1812 issn 0025-1909 eissn 1526-5501 09 5511 1797 informs doi 10.1287/mnsc.1090.1063 2009 INFORMS Volatility Spreads and Expected Stock Returns
More informationOnline Appendix for Overpriced Winners
Online Appendix for Overpriced Winners A Model: Who Gains and Who Loses When Divergence-of-Opinion is Resolved? In the baseline model, the pessimist s gain or loss is equal to her shorting demand times
More informationA Comparison of the Results in Barber, Odean, and Zhu (2006) and Hvidkjaer (2006)
A Comparison of the Results in Barber, Odean, and Zhu (2006) and Hvidkjaer (2006) Brad M. Barber University of California, Davis Soeren Hvidkjaer University of Maryland Terrance Odean University of California,
More informationAsubstantial portion of the academic
The Decline of Informed Trading in the Equity and Options Markets Charles Cao, David Gempesaw, and Timothy Simin Charles Cao is the Smeal Chair Professor of Finance in the Smeal College of Business at
More informationAn Online Appendix of Technical Trading: A Trend Factor
An Online Appendix of Technical Trading: A Trend Factor In this online appendix, we provide a comparative static analysis of the theoretical model as well as further robustness checks on the trend factor.
More informationAppendix Tables for: A Flow-Based Explanation for Return Predictability. Dong Lou London School of Economics
Appendix Tables for: A Flow-Based Explanation for Return Predictability Dong Lou London School of Economics Table A1: A Horse Race between Two Definitions of This table reports Fama-MacBeth stocks regressions.
More informationVolatility Appendix. B.1 Firm-Specific Uncertainty and Aggregate Volatility
B Volatility Appendix The aggregate volatility risk explanation of the turnover effect relies on three empirical facts. First, the explanation assumes that firm-specific uncertainty comoves with aggregate
More informationIs Information Risk Priced for NASDAQ-listed Stocks?
Is Information Risk Priced for NASDAQ-listed Stocks? Kathleen P. Fuller School of Business Administration University of Mississippi kfuller@bus.olemiss.edu Bonnie F. Van Ness School of Business Administration
More informationInternet Appendix to The Booms and Busts of Beta Arbitrage
Internet Appendix to The Booms and Busts of Beta Arbitrage Table A1: Event Time CoBAR This table reports some basic statistics of CoBAR, the excess comovement among low beta stocks over the period 1970
More informationBetting against Beta or Demand for Lottery
Turan G. Bali 1 Stephen J. Brown 2 Scott Murray 3 Yi Tang 4 1 McDonough School of Business, Georgetown University 2 Stern School of Business, New York University 3 College of Business Administration, University
More informationLiquidity Variation and the Cross-Section of Stock Returns *
Liquidity Variation and the Cross-Section of Stock Returns * Fangjian Fu Singapore Management University Wenjin Kang National University of Singapore Yuping Shao National University of Singapore Abstract
More informationInternet Appendix for The Joint Cross Section of Stocks and Options *
Internet Appendix for The Joint Cross Section of Stocks and Options * To save space in the paper, additional results are reported and discussed in this Internet Appendix. Section I investigates whether
More informationVariation in Liquidity and Costly Arbitrage
and Costly Arbitrage Badrinath Kottimukkalur * December 2018 Abstract This paper explores the relationship between the variation in liquidity and arbitrage activity. A model shows that arbitrageurs will
More informationUniversity of California Berkeley
University of California Berkeley A Comment on The Cross-Section of Volatility and Expected Returns : The Statistical Significance of FVIX is Driven by a Single Outlier Robert M. Anderson Stephen W. Bianchi
More informationCommon Risk Factors in the Cross-Section of Corporate Bond Returns
Common Risk Factors in the Cross-Section of Corporate Bond Returns Online Appendix Section A.1 discusses the results from orthogonalized risk characteristics. Section A.2 reports the results for the downside
More informationDo Retail Trades Move Markets? Brad Barber Terrance Odean Ning Zhu
Do Retail Trades Move Markets? Brad Barber Terrance Odean Ning Zhu Do Noise Traders Move Markets? 1. Small trades are proxy for individual investors trades. 2. Individual investors trading is correlated:
More informationThe High Idiosyncratic Volatility Low Return Puzzle
The High Idiosyncratic Volatility Low Return Puzzle Hai Lu, Kevin Wang, and Xiaolu Wang Joseph L. Rotman School of Management University of Toronto NTU International Conference, December, 2008 What is
More informationCross Sectional Asset Pricing Tests: Ex Ante versus Ex Post Approaches
Cross Sectional Asset Pricing Tests: Ex Ante versus Ex Post Approaches Mahmoud Botshekan Smurfit School of Business, University College Dublin, Ireland mahmoud.botshekan@ucd.ie, +353-1-716-8976 John Cotter
More informationIs Stock Return Predictability of Option-implied Skewness Affected by the Market State?
Is Stock Return Predictability of Option-implied Skewness Affected by the Market State? Heewoo Park and Tongsuk Kim * Korea Advanced Institute of Science and Technology 2016 ABSTRACT We use Bakshi, Kapadia,
More informationAppendix. A. Firm-Specific DeterminantsofPIN, PIN_G, and PIN_B
Appendix A. Firm-Specific DeterminantsofPIN, PIN_G, and PIN_B We consider how PIN and its good and bad information components depend on the following firm-specific characteristics, several of which have
More informationA Lottery Demand-Based Explanation of the Beta Anomaly. Online Appendix
A Lottery Demand-Based Explanation of the Beta Anomaly Online Appendix Section I provides details of the calculation of the variables used in the paper. Section II examines the robustness of the beta anomaly.
More informationWhen Low Beats High: Riding the Sales Seasonality Premium
When Low Beats High: Riding the Sales Seasonality Premium Gustavo Grullon Rice University grullon@rice.edu Yamil Kaba Rice University yamil.kaba@rice.edu Alexander Núñez Lehman College alexander.nuneztorres@lehman.cuny.edu
More informationPrice Impact or Trading Volume: Why is the Amihud (2002) Illiquidity Measure Priced? XIAOXIA LOU TAO SHU * August 2016
Price Impact or Trading Volume: Why is the Amihud (2002) Illiquidity Measure Priced? XIAOXIA LOU TAO SHU * August 2016 * Lou is at the Alfred Lerner College of Business, University of Delaware. Email:
More informationMargin Trading and Stock Idiosyncratic Volatility: Evidence from. the Chinese Stock Market
Margin Trading and Stock Idiosyncratic Volatility: Evidence from the Chinese Stock Market Abstract We find that the idiosyncratic volatility (IV) effect is significantly exist and cannot be explained by
More informationManagement Science Online Appendix Tables: Hiring Cheerleaders: Board Appointments of "Independent" Directors
Management Science Online Appendix Tables: Hiring Cheerleaders: Board Appointments of "Independent" Directors Table A1: Summary Statistics This table shows summary statistics for the sample of sell side
More informationInvestor Clienteles and Asset Pricing Anomalies *
Investor Clienteles and Asset Pricing Anomalies * David Lesmond Mihail Velikov November 6, 2015 PRELIMINARY DRAFT: DO NOT CITE OR CIRCULATE Abstract This paper shows that the profitability of anomaly trading
More informationCaught on Tape: Institutional Trading, Stock Returns, and Earnings Announcements
Caught on Tape: Institutional Trading, Stock Returns, and Earnings Announcements The Harvard community has made this article openly available. Please share how this access benefits you. Your story matters.
More informationTrends in the Cross-Section of Expected Stock Returns
Trends in the Cross-Section of Expected Stock Returns Tarun Chordia, Avanidhar Subrahmanyam, and Qing Tong April 12, 2013 Contacts Chordia Subrahmanyam Tong Voice: +1-404-727-1620 +1-310-825-5355 +65-6828-0158
More informationVariation in Liquidity and Costly Arbitrage
Variation in Liquidity and Costly Arbitrage Badrinath Kottimukkalur George Washington University Discussed by Fang Qiao PBCSF, TSinghua University EMF, 15 December 2018 Puzzle The level of liquidity affects
More informationDisagreement in Economic Forecasts and Expected Stock Returns
Disagreement in Economic Forecasts and Expected Stock Returns Turan G. Bali Georgetown University Stephen J. Brown Monash University Yi Tang Fordham University Abstract We estimate individual stock exposure
More informationThe Value of True Liquidity
The Value of True Liquidity Working Paper This version: December 2016 Abstract This study uncovers the ability of liquid stocks to generate significant higher riskadjusted portfolio returns than their
More informationEconomic Valuation of Liquidity Timing
Economic Valuation of Liquidity Timing Dennis Karstanje 1,2 Elvira Sojli 1,3 Wing Wah Tham 1 Michel van der Wel 1,2,4 1 Erasmus University Rotterdam 2 Tinbergen Institute 3 Duisenberg School of Finance
More informationLectures on Market Microstructure Illiquidity and Asset Pricing
Lectures on Market Microstructure Illiquidity and Asset Pricing Ingrid M. Werner Martin and Andrew Murrer Professor of Finance Fisher College of Business, The Ohio State University 1 Liquidity and Asset
More informationMaxing Out: Stocks as Lotteries and the Cross-Section of Expected Returns
Maxing Out: Stocks as Lotteries and the Cross-Section of Expected Returns Turan G. Bali, a Nusret Cakici, b and Robert F. Whitelaw c* February 2010 ABSTRACT Motivated by existing evidence of a preference
More informationInformation Risk and Momentum Anomalies
Information Risk and Momentum Anomalies Chuan-Yang Hwang cyhwang@ntu.edu.sg Nanyang Business School Nanyang Technological University Singapore and Xiaolin Qian xiaolinqian@umac.mo Faculty of Business Administration
More informationLIQUIDITY SHOCKS AND STOCK MARKET REACTIONS
KOÇ UNIVERSITY-TÜSİAD ECONOMIC RESEARCH FORUM WORKING PAPER SERIES LIQUIDITY SHOCKS AND STOCK MARKET REACTIONS Turan G. Bali Lin Peng Yannan Shen Yi Tang Working Paper 1304 February 2013 KOÇ UNIVERSITY-TÜSİAD
More informationInternet Appendix Arbitrage Trading: the Long and the Short of It
Internet Appendix Arbitrage Trading: the Long and the Short of It Yong Chen Texas A&M University Zhi Da University of Notre Dame Dayong Huang University of North Carolina at Greensboro May 3, 2018 This
More informationInternet Appendix to Leverage Constraints and Asset Prices: Insights from Mutual Fund Risk Taking
Internet Appendix to Leverage Constraints and Asset Prices: Insights from Mutual Fund Risk Taking In this Internet Appendix, we provide further discussion and additional empirical results to evaluate robustness
More informationFurther Test on Stock Liquidity Risk With a Relative Measure
International Journal of Education and Research Vol. 1 No. 3 March 2013 Further Test on Stock Liquidity Risk With a Relative Measure David Oima* David Sande** Benjamin Ombok*** Abstract Negative relationship
More informationVariation of Implied Volatility and Return Predictability
Variation of Implied Volatility and Return Predictability Paul Borochin School of Business University of Connecticut Yanhui Zhao School of Business University of Connecticut This version: January, 2017
More informationThe Idiosyncratic Volatility Puzzle: A Behavioral Explanation
Utah State University DigitalCommons@USU All Graduate Plan B and other Reports Graduate Studies 5-2015 The Idiosyncratic Volatility Puzzle: A Behavioral Explanation Brad Cannon Utah State University Follow
More informationIdiosyncratic volatility and stock returns: evidence from Colombia. Introduction and literature review
Idiosyncratic volatility and stock returns: evidence from Colombia Abstract. The purpose of this paper is to examine the association between idiosyncratic volatility and stock returns in Colombia from
More informationDoes market liquidity explain the idiosyncratic volatility puzzle in the Chinese stock market?
Does market liquidity explain the idiosyncratic volatility puzzle in the Chinese stock market? Xiaoxing Liu Guangping Shi Southeast University, China Bin Shi Acadian-Asset Management Disclosure The views
More informationAN ALTERNATIVE THREE-FACTOR MODEL FOR INTERNATIONAL MARKETS: EVIDENCE FROM THE EUROPEAN MONETARY UNION
AN ALTERNATIVE THREE-FACTOR MODEL FOR INTERNATIONAL MARKETS: EVIDENCE FROM THE EUROPEAN MONETARY UNION MANUEL AMMANN SANDRO ODONI DAVID OESCH WORKING PAPERS ON FINANCE NO. 2012/2 SWISS INSTITUTE OF BANKING
More informationOnline Appendix. Arbitrage Asymmetry and the Idiosyncratic Volatility Puzzle
Online Appendix to accompany Arbitrage Asymmetry and the Idiosyncratic Volatility Puzzle by Robert F. Stambaugh, Jianfeng Yu, and Yu Yuan November 4, 2014 Contents Table AI: Idiosyncratic Volatility Effects
More informationLeft-Tail Momentum: Limited Attention of Individual Investors and Expected Equity Returns *
Left-Tail Momentum: Limited Attention of Individual Investors and Expected Equity Returns * Yigit Atilgan a, Turan G. Bali b, K. Ozgur Demirtas c, and A. Doruk Gunaydin d ABSTRACT This paper documents
More informationRealization Utility: Explaining Volatility and Skewness Preferences
Realization Utility: Explaining Volatility and Skewness Preferences Min Kyeong Kwon * and Tong Suk Kim March 16, 2014 ABSTRACT Using the realization utility model with a jump process, we find three implications
More informationAppendix. In this Appendix, we present the construction of variables, data source, and some empirical procedures.
Appendix In this Appendix, we present the construction of variables, data source, and some empirical procedures. A.1. Variable Definition and Data Source Variable B/M CAPX/A Cash/A Cash flow volatility
More informationRevisiting Idiosyncratic Volatility and Stock Returns. Fatma Sonmez 1
Revisiting Idiosyncratic Volatility and Stock Returns Fatma Sonmez 1 Abstract This paper s aim is to revisit the relation between idiosyncratic volatility and future stock returns. There are three key
More informationLong Run Stock Returns after Corporate Events Revisited. Hendrik Bessembinder. W.P. Carey School of Business. Arizona State University.
Long Run Stock Returns after Corporate Events Revisited Hendrik Bessembinder W.P. Carey School of Business Arizona State University Feng Zhang David Eccles School of Business University of Utah May 2017
More informationJournal of Empirical Finance
Journal of Empirical Finance 16 (2009) 409 429 Contents lists available at ScienceDirect Journal of Empirical Finance journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/jempfin The cross section of cashflow volatility
More informationDispersion in Analysts Earnings Forecasts and Credit Rating
Dispersion in Analysts Earnings Forecasts and Credit Rating Doron Avramov Department of Finance Robert H. Smith School of Business University of Maryland davramov@rhsmith.umd.edu Tarun Chordia Department
More informationAsset-Specific and Systematic Liquidity on the Swedish Stock Market
Master Essay Asset-Specific and Systematic Liquidity on the Swedish Stock Market Supervisor: Hossein Asgharian Authors: Veronika Lunina Tetiana Dzhumurat 2010-06-04 Abstract This essay studies the effect
More informationThe Trend in Firm Profitability and the Cross Section of Stock Returns
The Trend in Firm Profitability and the Cross Section of Stock Returns Ferhat Akbas School of Business University of Kansas 785-864-1851 Lawrence, KS 66045 akbas@ku.edu Chao Jiang School of Business University
More informationValue at Risk and Expected Stock Returns
Value at isk and Expected Stock eturns August 2003 Turan G. Bali Associate Professor of Finance Department of Economics & Finance Baruch College, Zicklin School of Business City University of New York
More informationTurnover: Liquidity or Uncertainty?
Turnover: Liquidity or Uncertainty? Alexander Barinov Terry College of Business University of Georgia E-mail: abarinov@terry.uga.edu http://abarinov.myweb.uga.edu/ This version: July 2009 Abstract The
More informationHigh Idiosyncratic Volatility and Low Returns: International and Further U.S. Evidence
High Idiosyncratic Volatility and Low Returns: International and Further U.S. Evidence Andrew Ang Columbia University and NBER Robert J. Hodrick Columbia University and NBER Yuhang Xing Rice University
More informationSupplementary Results For Greenwood and Hanson 2009, Catering to Characteristics Last revision: June 2009
Supplementary Results For Greenwood and Hanson 2009, Catering to Characteristics Last revision: June 2009 Appendix Table I Robustness to Forecasting Regressions Robustness of regressions of monthly long-short
More informationArbitrage Asymmetry and the Idiosyncratic Volatility Puzzle
Arbitrage Asymmetry and the Idiosyncratic Volatility Puzzle Robert F. Stambaugh The Wharton School University of Pennsylvania and NBER Jianfeng Yu Carlson School of Management University of Minnesota Yu
More informationAsset Pricing and Excess Returns over the Market Return
Supplemental material for Asset Pricing and Excess Returns over the Market Return Seung C. Ahn Arizona State University Alex R. Horenstein University of Miami This documents contains an additional figure
More informationAn Alternative Four-Factor Model
Master Thesis in Finance Stockholm School of Economics Spring 2011 An Alternative Four-Factor Model Abstract In this paper, we add a liquidity factor to the Chen, Novy-Marx & Zhang (2010) three-factor
More informationSupplementary Appendix for Outsourcing Mutual Fund Management: Firm Boundaries, Incentives and Performance
Supplementary Appendix for Outsourcing Mutual Fund Management: Firm Boundaries, Incentives and Performance JOSEPH CHEN, HARRISON HONG, WENXI JIANG, and JEFFREY D. KUBIK * This appendix provides details
More informationApril 13, Abstract
R 2 and Momentum Kewei Hou, Lin Peng, and Wei Xiong April 13, 2005 Abstract This paper examines the relationship between price momentum and investors private information, using R 2 -based information measures.
More informationHigh Idiosyncratic Volatility and Low Returns: International and Further U.S. Evidence
High Idiosyncratic Volatility and Low Returns: International and Further U.S. Evidence Andrew Ang Columbia University and NBER Robert J. Hodrick Columbia University and NBER Yuhang Xing Rice University
More informationThe Information Content of Idiosyncratic Volatility
JOURNAL OF FINANCIAL AND QUANTITATIVE ANALYSIS Vol. 44, No. 1, Feb. 2009, pp. 1 28 COPYRIGHT 2009, MICHAEL G. FOSTER SCHOOL OF BUSINESS, UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON, SEATTLE, WA 98195 doi:10.1017/s0022109009090073
More informationOption Return Predictability
Singapore Management University Institutional Knowledge at Singapore Management University Research Collection Lee Kong Chian School Of Business Lee Kong Chian School of Business 2-2016 Option Return Predictability
More informationDispersion in Analysts Earnings Forecasts and Credit Rating
Dispersion in Analysts Earnings Forecasts and Credit Rating Doron Avramov Department of Finance Robert H. Smith School of Business University of Maryland Tarun Chordia Department of Finance Goizueta Business
More informationDoes Idiosyncratic Volatility Proxy for Risk Exposure?
Does Idiosyncratic Volatility Proxy for Risk Exposure? Zhanhui Chen Nanyang Technological University Ralitsa Petkova Purdue University We decompose aggregate market variance into an average correlation
More informationHave we solved the idiosyncratic volatility puzzle?
Have we solved the idiosyncratic volatility puzzle? Roger Loh 1 Kewei Hou 2 1 Singapore Management University 2 Ohio State University Presented by Roger Loh Proseminar SMU Finance Ph.D class Hou and Loh
More informationMutual Fund Performance in the Era of High-Frequency Trading
Mutual Fund Performance in the Era of High-Frequency Trading Nan Qin 1 First draft: March 15, 2016 This version: August 27, 2016 Abstract This paper shows that intensity of high-frequency trading (HFT)
More informationThe beta anomaly? Stock s quality matters!
The beta anomaly? Stock s quality matters! John M. Geppert a (corresponding author) a University of Nebraska Lincoln College of Business 425P Lincoln, NE, USA, 8588-0490 402-472-3370 jgeppert1@unl.edu
More informationOnline Appendix to. The Value of Crowdsourced Earnings Forecasts
Online Appendix to The Value of Crowdsourced Earnings Forecasts This online appendix tabulates and discusses the results of robustness checks and supplementary analyses mentioned in the paper. A1. Estimating
More informationLiquidity, Liquidity Risk, and the Cross Section of Mutual Fund Returns. Andrew A. Lynch and Xuemin (Sterling) Yan * Abstract
Liquidity, Liquidity Risk, and the Cross Section of Mutual Fund Returns Andrew A. Lynch and Xuemin (Sterling) Yan * Abstract This paper examines the impact of liquidity and liquidity risk on the cross-section
More informationDeviations from Optimal Corporate Cash Holdings and the Valuation from a Shareholder s Perspective
Deviations from Optimal Corporate Cash Holdings and the Valuation from a Shareholder s Perspective Zhenxu Tong * University of Exeter Abstract The tradeoff theory of corporate cash holdings predicts that
More informationThe V-shaped Disposition Effect
The V-shaped Disposition Effect Li An December 9, 2013 Abstract This study investigates the asset pricing implications of the V-shaped disposition effect, a newly-documented behavior pattern characterized
More informationInternet Appendix for Arbitrage Asymmetry and the Idiosyncratic Volatility Puzzle *
Internet Appendix for Arbitrage Asymmetry and the Idiosyncratic Volatility Puzzle * ROBERT F. STAMBAUGH, JIANFENG YU, and YU YUAN * This appendix contains additional results not reported in the published
More informationWhich shorts are informed? Ekkehart Boehmer Charles M. Jones Xiaoyan Zhang
Which shorts are informed? Ekkehart Boehmer Charles M. Jones Xiaoyan Zhang April 2007 Enron 250 4,000,000 Share price 200 150 100 50 3,500,000 3,000,000 2,500,000 2,000,000 1,500,000 1,000,000 500,000
More informationLiquidity and IPO performance in the last decade
Liquidity and IPO performance in the last decade Saurav Roychoudhury Associate Professor School of Management and Leadership Capital University Abstract It is well documented by that if long run IPO underperformance
More informationMaxing Out: Stocks as Lotteries and the Cross-Section of Expected Returns
Maxing Out: Stocks as Lotteries and the Cross-Section of Expected Returns Turan G. Bali, a Nusret Cakici, b and Robert F. Whitelaw c* August 2008 ABSTRACT Motivated by existing evidence of a preference
More informationPervasive Liquidity Risk And Asset Pricing
Pervasive Liquidity Risk And Asset Pricing Jing Chen Job Market Paper This Draft: Nov 15 2005 Abstract This paper constructs a measure of pervasive liquidity risk and its associated risk premium. I examine
More informationJournal of Financial Economics
Journal of Financial Economics 108 (2013) 139 159 Contents lists available at SciVerse ScienceDirect Journal of Financial Economics journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/jfec Anomalies and financial
More informationEconomic Policy Uncertainty and Momentum
Economic Policy Uncertainty and Momentum Ming Gu School of Economics and WISE Xiamen University guming@xmu.edu.cn Minxing Sun Department of Finance University of Memphis msun@memphis.edu Yangru Wu Rutgers
More informationHidden in Plain Sight: Equity Price Discovery with Informed Private Debt
Hidden in Plain Sight: Equity Price Discovery with Informed Private Debt Jawad M. Addoum 1 Justin R. Murfin 2 1 Cornell University 2 Yale University Chicago Financial Institutions Conference 2018 April
More informationDo Mutual Funds Trade on Earnings News? The Information Content of Large Trades
Do Mutual Funds Trade on Earnings News? The Information Content of Large Trades Linda H. Chen, Wei Huang, and George J. Jiang December 2017 Linda H. Chen is from the Department of Accounting, College of
More informationEstimating Order Imbalance Using Low Frequency. Data
Estimating Order Imbalance Using Low Frequency Data JinGi Ha and Jianfeng Hu November 19, 2016 ABSTRACT We estimate net order flow based on the Kyle (1985) model, in which price impact is the product of
More informationTime-Varying Liquidity and Momentum Profits*
Time-Varying Liquidity and Momentum Profits* Doron Avramov Si Cheng Allaudeen Hameed Abstract A basic intuition is that arbitrage is easier when markets are most liquid. Surprisingly, we find that momentum
More informationInternet Appendix for. Fund Tradeoffs. ĽUBOŠ PÁSTOR, ROBERT F. STAMBAUGH, and LUCIAN A. TAYLOR
Internet Appendix for Fund Tradeoffs ĽUBOŠ PÁSTOR, ROBERT F. STAMBAUGH, and LUCIAN A. TAYLOR This Internet Appendix presents additional empirical results, mostly robustness results, complementing the results
More informationImplied Funding Liquidity
Implied Funding Liquidity Minh Nguyen Yuanyu Yang Newcastle University Business School 3 April 2017 1 / 17 Outline 1 Background 2 Summary 3 Implied Funding Liquidity Measure 4 Data 5 Empirical Results
More informationArbitrage Asymmetry and the Idiosyncratic Volatility Puzzle
Arbitrage Asymmetry and the Idiosyncratic Volatility Puzzle Robert F. Stambaugh, The Wharton School, University of Pennsylvania and NBER Jianfeng Yu, Carlson School of Management, University of Minnesota
More informationLiquidity and the Post-Earnings-Announcement Drift
Liquidity and the Post-Earnings-Announcement Drift Tarun Chordia, Amit Goyal, Gil Sadka, Ronnie Sadka, and Lakshmanan Shivakumar First draft: July 31, 2005 This Revision: May 8, 2006 Abstract The post-earnings-announcement
More informationInstitutional Skewness Preferences and the Idiosyncratic Skewness Premium
Institutional Skewness Preferences and the Idiosyncratic Skewness Premium Alok Kumar University of Notre Dame Mendoza College of Business August 15, 2005 Alok Kumar is at the Mendoza College of Business,
More informationA Review of the Return-Illiquidity Relationship
A Review of the Return-Illiquidity Relationship Jozef Drienko a, Tom Smith b, Anna von Reibnitz a, * a Research School of Finance, Actuarial Studies and Statistics, College of Business and Economics, Australian
More informationInternet Appendix. Do Hedge Funds Reduce Idiosyncratic Risk? Namho Kang, Péter Kondor, and Ronnie Sadka
Internet Appendix Do Hedge Funds Reduce Idiosyncratic Risk? Namho Kang, Péter Kondor, and Ronnie Sadka Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, Vol. 49, No. 4 (4) Appendix A: Robustness of the Trend
More information