CHAPTER - 5 ANALYSIS OF PROFITABILITY
|
|
- Harriet Little
- 5 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 CHAPTER - 5 ANALYSIS OF PROFITABILITY 5.1 INTRODUCTION 5.2. CONCEPT OF PROFITABILITY 5.3 MEARUREMENT OF PROFITABILITY 5.4 IMPORTANCE OF PROFITABILITY 5.5 ANALYSIS OF PROFITABILITY Gross Profit Ratio Operating Profit Ratio Return on Capital Employed Ratio 5.5.3(i) Return on Gross Capital Employed Ratio 5.5.3(ii) Return on Capital Employed Ratio Net Profit Ratio Return on Owner s Equity (Net Worth) Ratio Return on Equity Capital Ratio Dividend Pay-out Ratio Earnings Per Share (EPS) 5.6 REFERENCES An Appraisal of Financial Performance of Selected Car Manufacturing Companies in India 145
2 5 - ANALYSIS OF PROFITABILITY 5.1 Introduction: The main aim of a business enterprise is to earn profit which is necessary for the endurance and expansion of the business enterprise. It can be earned with the help of amount invested in business. It is necessary to identify how much profit has been earned by the amount invested in the business. It can be ascertained through profitability ratio. These ratios inspect the current operating performance and efficiency of the business concern. These ratios can be helpful to the management to take remedial measures if there is a negative trend. The business firms are usually established with a view of earning profit from the business operations. Therefore the main purpose of any business is to make profit. The profit is golden egg. It is not easy for a business to breathe well without profit. According to Prof. Diskey An economic activity, which is undertaken for profit is business. Profit is centre of the attraction and interest in the corporate unit, therefore, it is necessary to analyze and interpret the profitability in the corporate sector. According to Lord Keynes. Profit is the engine that drives the business enterprise. Profit is the heart of business, if an enterprise fails to make profit, capital invested is eroded and if this condition continues, the enterprise ultimately ceases to exist. The profit is the index to the economic progress. Profit improves national income and standard of living of the people related with the business. It is also viewed as a mirror of the operating performance of the business. But only profit is not the only objective in today s business environment. Profit is not sole but one among the most important objectives. Profit normally guides and directs business operations. No doubt, profit is main objective of business but it should not be over emphasized. The management should concentrate to maximize its profit with the welfare of society. Thus, profit is not just the reward of owners, but it is also related with the interest of other segments of society, such as shareholders, customers, creditor, government etc Concept of Profitability: In the period of economic development, the profit and the profitability are two different concepts. Profit is the absolute term and profitability is a relative concept. An Appraisal of Financial Performance of Selected Car Manufacturing Companies in India 146
3 The word Profitability is composition of two words profit and ability. Remarkably, profit indicates the income while profitability indicates the ability of making profit. Although both of them are controversial, though, both are inter-related and inter-dependent. In the vision of accounting the profit is the difference between total revenue and total expenses over a period of time. The term profitability is referred to earning capacity or operating performance. In the words of Haward and Upton profitability is the ability of a management in given investment to earn a return from its use. Sometimes the term profitability and profit are used synonymously but actually they are different. The very high profit does not always point out a sound organizational efficiency and low profit is not always a mark of organizational sickness. Thus, profitability is a composite concept relating to efficiency of an organization to earn profit Measurement of Profitability: Profitability of a firm can be measured by its profitability ratios. The operating efficiency of a firm can be measured by profitability. In the process of performance appraisal of a business enterprise, profitability ratios are calculated to measure the operating efficiency. Generally measurement of profitability relies on two variables i.e. sales to revenue and investment to revenue. In the words of James C. Van Horne, profitability ratios are of two types: those showing profitability in relation to sales, and those showing profitability in relation to investment. An organization should try to produce higher profit on each rupee of sale or revenue. If an organization fails to generate adequate profit it becomes difficult to cover its operation cost as well as interest burden. A study of financial analysis of any organization is incomplete unless it measures profitability in relation to the sale, assets, revenue, net worth and capital employed etc Importance of Profitability: Profit is a very good symbol of business performance, but the actual standard of performance of a business enterprise cannot be judged by absolute size of its periodic profit. Profitability is a good tool which represents the earning of a business firm. The analysis of profitability is useful for management, bankers, investors, shareholders, employees and government. The management can assess the effectiveness of its own plan and policies. It is also helpful for creditors for granting credit. Investors are also An Appraisal of Financial Performance of Selected Car Manufacturing Companies in India 147
4 interested to know profitability. By this, they can take decisions of buying, selling or holding shares in the company, employees of the organization can think over fringe benefits. The government uses it for the purpose of regulations and administration Analysis of Profitability of Selected Car Manufacturing Companies in India: A management of the Car Manufacturing in India is very interesting to locate and pinpoint the causes which are responsible for low or high profitability. Generally profitability of industry in India has been analyzed from the view point of financial management and share holders. The following ratios are calculated to measure Profitability of selected Car Manufacturing companies in India, 1) Gross profit ratio 2) Operating profit ratio 3) Return on capital employed ratio 4) Net profit ratio 5) Return on owner s equity (Net worth) ratio 6) Return on equity capital ratio 7) Dividend pay-out ratio 8) Earnings per Share (EPS) Gross Profit Ratio Generally excess of net sales over cost of goods sold is known as gross profit margin. The gross profit ratio indicates the efficiency of controlling the cost of goods as it shows the margin between the cost of goods sold and the sales revenue. It indicates the efficiency with which management produces each unit of product. This ratio is of vital importance for evaluating business results. Any fluctuation in the gross profit ratio is the result of a change in cost of goods sold or sales or both. It reflects pricing policies of a business. A low gross profit ratio will suggest a decline in business which may because of insufficient sales, higher cost of production with the existing or reduced selling price or all round inefficient management. The finance manager must detect the causes of falling gross profit margin. The high gross profit margin is a sign of good and efficient management. A high gross profit ratio is an indication of effectiveness of management. The gross profit ratio may increase due to any of the following factors. An Appraisal of Financial Performance of Selected Car Manufacturing Companies in India 148
5 Increase in sales prices where cost of goods sold remaining constant. Reduction in cost of goods sold where sales prices remaining constant. An increase in the proportionate volume of higher margin items A combination of variations in sales prices and costs. While, in the case of low profit ratio, it may reveal over investment in plant and machinery due to firm s inability to purchase at favourable terms, higher cost of goods sold etc. Further, this ratio will also be low because of a decrease in price in the market. This ratio is calculated by dividing gross profit by net sales and is generally expressed as a percentage. The formula of gross profit ratio is given as under: (Sales Cost of Goods Sold) Gross Profit Ratio = x 100 Sales TABLE GROSS PROFIT RATIO (%) YEAR MARUTI TATA MAHINDRA FORCE AVERAGE Maximum Minimum Average Sources: computed from the annual reports & accounts of the perspective companies. An Appraisal of Financial Performance of Selected Car Manufacturing Companies in India 149
6 CHART GROSS PROFIT RATIO (%) Maruti Tata Mahindra Force 0 CROSS-SECTIONAL RATIO ANALYSIS: Maruti Suzuki India Ltd.: It is clear from the table no. 5.1 that the Gross Profit Ratio of Maruti Suzuki India Ltd. shows fluctuation trend during study period. It is ranged between 23.89% in the year and 16.23% in the year with an average ratio of 19.49%. The average ratio of this company was 19.49%, which is higher than the average ratio (16.425%) of sampled companies. So company is doing better than average. So we can say that the company is doing better. Gross Profit Ratio company was 17.92% in and then after 21.38% in Then it was decreased constantly for next two years; 17.06% in and 16.23% in Then it was increased for two years; 16.57% in and 19.70% in Then it was decreased in next year; 17.37% in Then again for three year it was decreased 21.34% in , 23.44% in and 23.89% in So company has satisfactory average ratio compare to average ratio of the Car Manufacturing companies in India under study. Tata Motors Ltd.: The Gross Profit Ratio of Tata Motors Ltd. was found in the above table no It shows slight fluctuation trend during study period. It is ranged between 19.40% in the years and % in the years , with an average ratio of 16.28%. An Appraisal of Financial Performance of Selected Car Manufacturing Companies in India 150
7 The average ratio of this company was 16.28%, which is slight less than average ratio (16.425%) of sampled companies. So we can say that the company is not doing satisfactory. Gross Profit Ratio of Tata Motors shows up and down trends in every year. It was 16.48% in and 15.81% in Then it was increased in the next year; 17.73% in Then it was decreased in the next year; 16.12% in Then it was constantly increased for next two years; 18.43% in and 19.40% in Then constant decreased in next four years, 17.95% in , 16.20% in , 13.27% in and 11.03% in This way there was up and down in the Gross Profit Ratio of the company. Mahindra & Mahindra Ltd. It is clear from the table no. 5.1 that the Gross Profit Ratio of Mahindra & Mahindra Ltd. shows fluctuation trend during study period. It is ranged between 25.04% in the years and 17.95% in the year with an average ratio of 20.95%. The average ratio of this company was 20.95%, which is more than the average ratio (16.425%) of sampled companies. So company is doing better than average. Gross Profit Ratio of the company was 19.51% in and 22.01% in Then it was constantly two years decreased; 20.58% in and 20.44% in Then it was constantly decreased in next two years; 22.51% in and 17.95% in Then it was constantly increased in next three years; 19.02% in , 20.33% in and 22.07% in So company has satisfactory average ratio compare to average ratio of the Car Manufacturing companies in India under study. Force Motors India Ltd.: It is clear from the table no. 5.1 that the Gross Profit Ratio of Force Motors India Ltd. shows fluctuation trend during study period. It is ranged between 13.78% in the years and 2.53% in the year with an average ratio of 8.98%. The average ratio of this company was 8.98%, which is very much less than the average ratio (16.425%) of sampled companies. So we can say that the company is not doing satisfactory. An Appraisal of Financial Performance of Selected Car Manufacturing Companies in India 151
8 Gross Profit Ratio of the company was 6.08% in and 7.81% in Then in next two years it was constantly reduced; 3.54% in and 2.53% in Then ratio increased in next two years; 11.36% in and 13.60% in Then ratio decreased in next two years; 10.24% in and 8.12% in Then ratio increased in next two years; 12.77% in and 13.78% in So company has no satisfactory ratio compare to average ratio of the Car Manufacturing companies in India under study. TREND AND TIME-SERIES ANALYSIS: Financial Year : The above table no. 5.1 shows that in the financial year the Gross Profit Ratio of the sampled companies was ranged between 19.51% and 6.08%. The average ratio of the year was 15.09%, which was lower than the average ratio of the study period (16.424%) of the sampled companies. Ratios of the sampled companies in the year were; Maruti Suzuki 17.92%, Tata Motors 16.84%, Mahindra & Mahindra 19.51% (highest) and Force Motors 6.08% (lowest). Therefore Mahindra & Mahindra had done better in the year. Financial Year : The above table no. 5.1 shows that in the financial year the Gross Profit Ratio of the sampled companies was ranged between 22.01% and 7.81%. The average ratio of the year was 16.75%, which was higher than the average ratio of the study period (16.424%) of the sampled companies. Ratios of the sampled companies in the year were; Maruti Suzuki 21.38%, Tata Motors 15.81%, Mahindra & Mahindra 22.01% (highest) and Force Motors 7.81% (lowest). Therefore Mahindra & Mahindra had done better in the year. Financial Year : The above table no. 5.1 shows that in the financial year the Gross Profit Ratio of the sampled companies was ranged between 20.58% and 3.54%. The average ratio of the year was 14.73%, which was lower than the average ratio of the study period (16.424%) of the sampled companies. Ratios of the sampled companies in the year were; Maruti Suzuki 17.06%, Tata Motors 17.73%, Mahindra & Mahindra An Appraisal of Financial Performance of Selected Car Manufacturing Companies in India 152
9 20.58% (highest) and Force Motors 3.54% (lowest). Therefore Mahindra & Mahindra had done better in the year. Financial Year : The above table no. 5.1 shows that in the financial year the Gross Profit Ratio of the sampled companies was ranged between 20.44% and 2.53%. The average ratio of the year was 13.83%, which was lower than the average ratio of the study period (16.424%) of the sampled companies. Ratios of the sampled companies in the year were; Maruti Suzuki 16.23%, Tata Motors 16.12%, Mahindra & Mahindra 20.44% (highest) and Force Motors 2.53% (lowest). Therefore Mahindra & Mahindra had done better in the year. Financial Year : The above table no. 5.1 shows that in the financial year the Gross Profit Ratio of the sampled companies was ranged between 25.04% and 11.36%. The average ratio of the year was 17.85%, which was higher than the average ratio of the study period (16.424%) of the sampled companies. Ratios of the sampled companies in the year were; Maruti Suzuki 16.57%, Tata Motors 18.43%, Mahindra & Mahindra 25.04% (highest) and Force Motors 11.36% (lowest). Therefore Mahindra & Mahindra had done better in the year. Financial Year : The above table no. 5.1 shows that in the financial year the Gross Profit Ratio of the sampled companies was ranged between 22.51% and 13.60%. The average ratio of the year was 18.80%, which was higher than the average ratio of the study period (16.424%) of the sampled companies. Ratios of the sampled companies in the year were; Maruti Suzuki 19.70%, Tata Motors 19.40%, Mahindra & Mahindra 22.51% (highest) and Force Motors 13.60% (lowest). Therefore Mahindra & Mahindra had done better in the year. Financial Year : The above table no. 5.1 shows that in the financial year the Gross Profit Ratio of the sampled companies was ranged between 17.95% and 10.24%. The average ratio of the year was 15.88%, which was lower than the average ratio of the study period (16.424%) of the sampled companies. Ratios of the sampled companies in the year were; Maruti Suzuki 17.37%, Tata Motors 17.95% (highest), Mahindra & An Appraisal of Financial Performance of Selected Car Manufacturing Companies in India 153
10 Mahindra 17.95% (highest) and Force Motors 10.24% (lowest). Therefore Mahindra & Mahindra had done better in the year. Financial Year : The above table no. 5.1 shows that in the financial year the Gross Profit Ratio of the sampled companies was ranged between 21.34% and 8.12%. The average ratio of the year was 16.17%, which was lower than the average ratio of the study period (16.424%) of the sampled companies. Ratios of the sampled companies in the year were; Maruti Suzuki 21.34% (highest), Tata Motors 16.20%, Mahindra & Mahindra 19.02% and Force Motors 8.12% (lowest). Therefore Mahindra & Mahindra had done better in the year. Financial Year : The above table no. 5.1 shows that in the financial year the Gross Profit Ratio of the sampled companies was ranged between 23.44% and 12.77%. The average ratio of the year was 17.45%, which was higher than the average ratio of the study period (16.424%) of the sampled companies. Ratios of the sampled companies in the year were; Maruti Suzuki 23.44% (highest), Tata Motors 13.27%, Mahindra & Mahindra 20.33% and Force Motors 12.77% (lowest). Therefore Maruti Suzuki had done better in the year. Financial Year : The above table no. 5.1 shows that in the financial year the Gross Profit Ratio of the sampled companies was ranged between 23.89% and 11.03%. The average ratio of the year was 17.69%, which was higher than the average ratio of the study period (16.424%) of the sampled companies. Ratios of the sampled companies in the year were; Maruti Suzuki 23.89% (highest), Tata Motors 11.03% (lowest), Mahindra & Mahindra 22.07% and Force Motors 13.78%. Therefore Maruti Suzuki had done better in the year. TABLE GROSS PROFIT RATIO (ANOVA TEST) Source of Variation SS df MS F F crit Between Years Between Company Error Total An Appraisal of Financial Performance of Selected Car Manufacturing Companies in India 154
11 It is clear from the table No. 5.2 that the Gross Profit Ratio among the sampled car manufacturing companies was significant, because the calculated value of F ( ) was greater than that of the table value ( ) at 5% level of significance. Hence, the null hypothesis is rejected and alternative hypothesis is accepted. The difference between the years for same company was not significant, because the calculated value of F ( ) was less than that of the table value ( ) at 5% level of significance. Hence, the null hypothesis is accepted and alternative hypothesis is rejected. Therefore, it is concluded that there is significant difference in the Gross Profit Ratio among sampled car manufacturing companies under study. It is also concluded that there is no significant difference in the Gross Profit Ratio in between the years of sampled car manufacturing companies under study Operating Profit Ratio: This ratio indicates the relationship between operating profit and net sales in the form of percentage. The operating profit margin reflects the efficiency with which the business enterprise produces each unit of product. There is no standard rule for operating profit ratio and it may differ from one type of business to other business. A high operating profit ratio is the sign of managerial efficiency. A low ratio should be carefully investigated and compared with the ratios of similar business enterprises operating in the industry, to diagnoses as also to remedies the problem. Operating profit arrived by adjusting all non-operating expenses and income in net profit in the other words; we can say profits earlier than depreciation and taxes (EBDIT). A constent high ratio indicated effective and efficient operation of business. It is calculated as under: Operating Profit Operating Profit Ratio = x 100 Net Sales An Appraisal of Financial Performance of Selected Car Manufacturing Companies in India 155
12 TABLE OPERATING PROFIT RATIO (%) YEAR MARUTI TATA MAHINDRA FORCE AVERAGE Maximum Minimum Average Sources: computed from the annual reports & accounts of the perspective companies. 20 CHART OPERATING PROFIT MARGIN (%) Maruti Tata Mahindra Force CROSS-SECTIONAL RATIO ANALYSIS Maruti Suzuki India Ltd.: It is clear from the table no. 5.3 that the Operating Profit Ratio of Maruti Suzuki India Ltd. shows fluctuation trend during study period. It is ranged between 15.29% in the year and 7.06% in the year with an average ratio of %. The An Appraisal of Financial Performance of Selected Car Manufacturing Companies in India 156
13 average ratio of this company was %, which is more than the average ratio (7.717%) of sampled companies. So company is doing better than average. Gross Profit Ratio company was 15.29% in the year Then it was decreased constantly for next three years; 14.88% in , 14.12% in and 9.18% in Then it was increased in next year; 12.74% in Then it was decreased constantly for next two years; 9.93% in and 7.06% in Then again for three year it was constantly increased; 9.70% in , 11.66% in and 13.43% in So company has satisfactory average ratio compare to average ratio of the Car Manufacturing companies in India under study. Tata Motors Ltd.: The Operating Profit Ratio of Tata Motors Ltd. was found in the above table no It shows slight fluctuation trend during study period. It is ranged between 11.40% in the years and -3.4% in the years , with an average ratio of 6.437%. The average ratio of this company was 6.437%, which is less than average ratio (7.717%) of sampled companies. Operating Profit Ratio of Tata Motors shows up and down trends in every year. It was 10.68% in and 9.70% in Then it was increased in the next year; 10.53% in Then it was decreased in the next year; 6.71% in Then it was increased in next year; 11.4% in Then for next five years the ratio was constantly decreased; 9.90% in , 7.69% in , 3.81% in , % in and -3.4% in This way there was up and down in the Gross Profit Ratio of the company. Mahindra & Mahindra Ltd. It is clear from the table no. 5.3 that the Operating Profit Ratio of Mahindra & Mahindra Ltd. shows fluctuation trend during study period. It is ranged between 25.04% in the years and 17.95% in the year with an average ratio of 20.95%. The average ratio of this company was 20.95%, which is more than the average ratio (16.425%) of sampled companies. So company is doing better than average. Operating Profit Ratio of the company was 19.51% in and 22.01% in Then it was constantly two years decreased; 20.58% in and 20.44% in Then it was constantly decreased in next two years; 22.51% in and An Appraisal of Financial Performance of Selected Car Manufacturing Companies in India 157
14 17.95% in Then it was constantly increased in next three years; 19.02% in , 20.33% in and 22.07% in So company has satisfactory average ratio compare to average ratio of the Car Manufacturing companies in India under study. Force Motors India Ltd.: It is clear from the table no. 5.3 that the Operating Profit Ratio of Force Motors India Ltd. shows fluctuation trend during study period. It is ranged between 13.78% in the years and 2.53% in the year with an average ratio of 8.98%. The average ratio of this company was 8.98%, which is very much less than the average ratio (16.425%) of sampled companies. So company is not doing better than average. Operating Profit Ratio of the company was 6.08% in and 7.81% in Then in next two years it was constantly reduced; 3.54% in and 2.53% in Then ratio increased in next two years; 11.36% in and 13.60% in Then ratio decreased in next two years; 10.24% in and 8.12% in Then ratio increased in next two years; 12.77% in and 13.78% in So company has no satisfactory ratio compare to average ratio of the Car Manufacturing companies in India under study. TREND AND TIME-SERIES ANALYSIS: Financial Year : The above table no. 5.3 shows that in the financial year the Operating Profit Ratio of the sampled companies was ranged between 15.29% and -4.49%. The average ratio of the year was 8.05%, which was higher than the average ratio of the study period (7.717%) of the sampled companies. Ratios of the sampled companies in the year were; Maruti Suzuki 15.29% (highest), Tata Motors 10.68%, Mahindra & Mahindra 10.71% and Force Motors -4.49% (lowest). Therefore Maruti Suzuki had done better in the year. Financial Year : The above table no. 5.3 shows that in the financial year the Operating Profit Ratio of the sampled companies was ranged between 14.88% and -6.10%. The average ratio of the year was 7.48%, which was lower than the average ratio of the study period (7.717%) of the sampled companies. Ratios of the sampled companies in An Appraisal of Financial Performance of Selected Car Manufacturing Companies in India 158
15 the year were; Maruti Suzuki 14.88% (highest), Tata Motors 9.70%, Mahindra & Mahindra 11.45% and Force Motors -6.10% (lowest). Therefore Maruti Suzuki had done better in the year. Financial Year : The above table no. 5.3 shows that in the financial year the Operating Profit Ratio of the sampled companies was ranged between 14.12% and -5.04%. The average ratio of the year was 7.46%, which was lower than the average ratio of the study period (7.717%) of the sampled companies. Ratios of the sampled companies in the year were; Maruti Suzuki 14.12% (highest), Tata Motors 10.53%, Mahindra & Mahindra 10.23% and Force Motors -5.04% (lowest). Therefore Maruti Suzuki had done better in the year. Financial Year : The above table no. 5.3 shows that in the financial year the Operating Profit Ratio of the sampled companies was ranged between 9.81% and -9.07%. The average ratio of the year was 4.00%, which was lower than the average ratio of the study period (7.717%) of the sampled companies. Ratios of the sampled companies in the year were; Maruti Suzuki 9.18%, Tata Motors 6.71%, Mahindra & Mahindra 9.81% (highest) and Force Motors -9.07% (lowest). Therefore Mahindra & Mahindra had done better in the year. Financial Year : The above table no. 5.3 shows that in the financial year the Operating Profit Ratio of the sampled companies was ranged between 16.29% and 3.84%. The average ratio of the year was 11.07%, which was higher than the average ratio of the study period (7.717%) of the sampled companies. Ratios of the sampled companies in the year were; Maruti Suzuki 12.74%, Tata Motors 11.40%, Mahindra & Mahindra 16.29% (highest) and Force Motors 3.84% (lowest). Therefore Mahindra & Mahindra had done better in the year. Financial Year : The above table no. 5.3 shows that in the financial year the Operating Profit Ratio of the sampled companies was ranged between 14.72% and 9.22%. The average ratio of the year was 10.94%, which was higher than the average ratio of the An Appraisal of Financial Performance of Selected Car Manufacturing Companies in India 159
16 study period (7.717%) of the sampled companies. Ratios of the sampled companies in the year were; Maruti Suzuki 9.93%, Tata Motors 9.90%, Mahindra & Mahindra 14.72% (highest) and Force Motors 9.22% (lowest). Therefore Mahindra & Mahindra had done better in the year. Financial Year : The above table no. 5.3 shows that in the financial year the Operating Profit Ratio of the sampled companies was ranged between 11.83% and 5.82%. The average ratio of the year was 8.10%, which was higher than the average ratio of the study period (7.717%) of the sampled companies. Ratios of the sampled companies in the year were; Maruti Suzuki 7.06%, Tata Motors 7.69%, Mahindra & Mahindra 11.83% (highest) and Force Motors 5.82% (lowest). Therefore Mahindra & Mahindra had done better in the year. Financial Year : The above table no. 5.3 shows that in the financial year the Operating Profit Ratio of the sampled companies was ranged between 11.64% and 2.73%. The average ratio of the year was 6.97%, which was lower than the average ratio of the study period (7.717%) of the sampled companies. Ratios of the sampled companies in the year were; Maruti Suzuki 9.70%, Tata Motors 3.81%, Mahindra & Mahindra 11.64% (highest) and Force Motors 2.73% (lowest). Therefore Mahindra & Mahindra had done better in the year. Financial Year : The above table no. 5.3 shows that in the financial year the Operating Profit Ratio of the sampled companies was ranged between 11.66% and -2.65%. The average ratio of the year was 6.36%, which was lower than the average ratio of the study period (7.717%) of the sampled companies. Ratios of the sampled companies in the year were; Maruti Suzuki 11.66% (highest), Tata Motors -2.65%, Mahindra & Mahindra 11.65% and Force Motors 4.78% (lowest). Therefore Maruti Suzuki had done better in the year. Financial Year : The above table no. 5.3 shows that in the financial year the Operating Profit Ratio of the sampled companies was ranged between 13.43% and -3.40%. The An Appraisal of Financial Performance of Selected Car Manufacturing Companies in India 160
17 average ratio of the year was 6.74%, which was lower than the average ratio of the study period (7.717%) of the sampled companies. Ratios of the sampled companies in the year were; Maruti Suzuki 13.43% (highest), Tata Motors -3.40%, Mahindra & Mahindra 10.71% and Force Motors 6.21% (lowest). Therefore Maruti Suzuki had done better in the year. TABLE OPERATING PROFIT RATIO (ANOVA TEST) Source of Variation SS df MS F F crit Between Years Between Company Error Total It is clear from the table No. 5.4 that the Operating Profit Ratio among the sampled car manufacturing companies was significant, because the calculated value of F ( ) was greater than that of the table value ( ) at 5% level of significance. Hence, the null hypothesis is rejected and alternative hypothesis is accepted. The difference between the years for same company was not significant, because the calculated value of F ( ) was less than that of the table value ( ) at 5% level of significance. Hence, the null hypothesis is accepted and alternative hypothesis is rejected. Therefore, it is concluded that there is significant difference in the Operating Profit Ratio among sampled car manufacturing companies under study. It is also concluded that there is no significant difference in the Operating Profit Ratio in between the years of sampled car manufacturing companies under study Return on Capital Employed Ratio: Return on Capital Employed Ratio is one of the most important profitability ratios and the most important measure of performance. Return on capital employed is a proper tool to measure the overall performance and earning power of the capital invested. ROI is the basic profitability ratio. This ratio establishes relationship between net profit (before interest, tax and dividend) and capital employed. It is expressed as a percentage on investment. The term investment here refers to long-term funds invested in business. This investment is called capital employed. It shows how the management has used the funds provided by owners and creditors. The comparison of this ratio with the ratio of other organization in similar business will An Appraisal of Financial Performance of Selected Car Manufacturing Companies in India 161
18 reveal the relative operating efficiency of the business enterprise. The main goal of making investment in any business is to obtain satisfactory return on the capital invested. Hence, the return on capital employed is used to measure success of a business. In day to day use the term capital employed is used to indicate the total investment in the firm whether owners or borrowed. The capital employed in a firm may be defined in a number of ways and the two most widely accepted definitions are Gross Capital Employed and Net Capital Employed. Gross Capital Employed usually comprises the total assets used in the business while net capital employed consists of the total assets of the business less its current liabilities (i) Return on gross capital employed: As defined earlier gross capital employed is the total of assets (except fictitious assets). Alternatively, it is the quantum of liabilities plus shareholders equity. The numerator, i.e. net profit before interest and taxes (EBIT) has been taken for computing this ratio. Net Profit before Interest and Taxes Return on Gross Capital Employed = x 100 Gross Capital Employed TABLE RETURN ON GROSS CAPITAL EMPLOYED (%) YEAR MARUTI TATA MAHINDRA FORCE AVERAGE / Maximum Minimum Average Sources: computed from the annual reports & accounts of the perspective companies. An Appraisal of Financial Performance of Selected Car Manufacturing Companies in India 162
19 CHART RETURN ON NET CAPITAL EMPLOYED Maruti Tata Mahindra Force 0-20 CROSS-SECTIONAL RATIO ANALYSIS: Maruti Suzuki India Ltd.: It is clear from the table no. 5.5 that the Return on Gross Capital Employed of Maruti Suzuki India Ltd. shows fluctuation trend during study period. It is ranged between 32.52% in the year and 13.53% in the year with an average ratio of 22.74%. The average ratio of this company was 22.74%, which is more than the average ratio (18.89%) of sampled companies. So company is doing better than average. The return on Gross Capital Employed of the company was 32.52% in the year Then it was decreased constantly for next three years; 31.03% in , 27.42% in and 17.42% in Then it was increased in next year; 28.93% in Then it was decreased constantly for next two years; 22.32% in and 13.53% in Then again for three year it was constantly increased; 15.93% in , 16.92% in and 21.24% in So company has satisfactory average ratio compare to average ratio of the Car Manufacturing companies in India under study. An Appraisal of Financial Performance of Selected Car Manufacturing Companies in India 163
20 Tata Motors Ltd.: The Return on Gross Capital Employed of Tata Motors Ltd. was found in the above table no It shows slight fluctuation trend during study period. It is ranged between 28.46% in the years and -6.77% in the years , with an average ratio of 11.52%. The average ratio of this company was 11.52%, which is less than average ratio (18.89%) of sampled companies. So we can say that the company is not doing satisfactory. The Return on Gross Capital Employed of Tata Motors shows up and down trends in every year. It was 28.46% in Then it was decreased constantly for next three years; 27.91% in , 21.63% in and 6.73% in Then it was increased in the next year; 12.98% in Then it was decreased constantly for next five years; 10.34% in and 8.36% in , 4.68% in , 0.93% in and -6.77% in This way there was up and down in the Gross Profit Ratio of the company. Mahindra & Mahindra Ltd. It is clear from the table no. 5.5 that the Return on Gross Capital Employed Operating Profit Ratio of Mahindra & Mahindra Ltd. shows fluctuation trend during study period. It is ranged between 29.81% in the years and 12.12% in the year with an average ratio of 24.15%. The average ratio of this company was 24.15%, which is more than the average ratio (18.89%) of sampled companies. So company is doing better than average. The Return on Gross Capital Employed of the company was 29.81% in Then it was constantly decreased in next three years; 28.16% in , 21.58% in and 12.12% in Then it was increased constantly in next two years; 27.40% in and 29.02% in Then it was decreased in the next year; 24.91% in Then it was increased in the next year; 25.95% in Then it was constantly decreased in next two years; 22.55% in and 20.05% in An Appraisal of Financial Performance of Selected Car Manufacturing Companies in India 164
21 So company has satisfactory average ratio compare to average ratio of the Car Manufacturing companies in India under study. Force Motors India Ltd.: It is clear from the table no. 5.5 that the Return on Gross Capital Employed of Force Motors India Ltd. shows fluctuation trend during study period. It is ranged between 86.99% in the years and -9.89% in the year with an average ratio of 17.15%. The average ratio of this company was 17.15%, which is less than the average ratio (18.89%) of sampled companies. So company is not doing better than average. The Return on Gross Capital Employed of the company was -9.54% in and % in Then in next year it was reduced; -9.89% in Then in next year it was increased very highly; 57.68% in Then in next year it was reduced; 13.26% in Then ratio increased constantly in next two years; 18.81% in and 86.99% in Then in next year it was highly reduced; 2.29% in Then ratio increased in next two years; 5.76% in and 9.91% in So company has no satisfactory ratio compare to average ratio of the Car Manufacturing companies in India under study. TREND AND TIME-SERIES ANALYSIS: Financial Year : The above table no. 5.5 shows that in the financial year the Return on Gross Capital Employed of the sampled companies was ranged between 32.52% and %. The average ratio of the year was 20.31%, which was higher than the average ratio of the study period (18.893%) of the sampled companies. Ratios of the sampled companies in the year were; Maruti Suzuki 32.52% (highest), Tata Motors 28.45%, Mahindra & Mahindra 29.81% and Force Motors -9.54% (lowest). Therefore Maruti Suzuki had done better in the year. Financial Year : The above table no. 5.5 shows that in the financial year the Return on Gross Capital Employed of the sampled companies was ranged between 31.03% and %. The average ratio of the year was 20.85%, which was higher than the average An Appraisal of Financial Performance of Selected Car Manufacturing Companies in India 165
22 ratio of the study period (18.893%) of the sampled companies. Ratios of the sampled companies in the year were; Maruti Suzuki 31.03% (highest), Tata Motors 27.91%, Mahindra & Mahindra 28.16% and Force Motors -3.72% (lowest). Therefore Maruti Suzuki had done better in the year. Financial Year : The above table no. 5.5 shows that in the financial year the Return on Gross Capital Employed of the sampled companies was ranged between 27.42% and %. The average ratio of the year was 15.19%, which was lower than the average ratio of the study period (18.893%) of the sampled companies. Ratios of the sampled companies in the year were; Maruti Suzuki 27.42% (highest), Tata Motors 21.63%, Mahindra & Mahindra 21.58% and Force Motors -9.89% (lowest). Therefore Maruti Suzuki had done better in the year. Financial Year : The above table no. 5.5 shows that in the financial year the Return on Gross Capital Employed of the sampled companies was ranged between 57.68% and 6.73%. The average ratio of the year was 23.52%, which was higher than the average ratio of the study period (18.893%) of the sampled companies. Ratios of the sampled companies in the year were; Maruti Suzuki 17.54%, Tata Motors 6.73% (lowest), Mahindra & Mahindra 12.12% and Force Motors 57.68% (highest). Therefore Force Motors had done better in the year. Financial Year : The above table no. 5.5 shows that in the financial year the Return on Gross Capital Employed of the sampled companies was ranged between 28.93% and 12.98%. The average ratio of the year was 20.64%, which was higher than the average ratio of the study period (18.893%) of the sampled companies. Ratios of the sampled companies in the year were; Maruti Suzuki 28.93% (highest), Tata Motors (lowest)%, Mahindra & Mahindra 27.40% and Force Motors 13.26%. Therefore Maruti Suzuki had done better in the year. Financial Year : The above table no. 5.5 shows that in the financial year the Return on Gross Capital Employed of the sampled companies was ranged between 29.02% and 10.34%. The average ratio of the year was 20.12%, which was higher than the average An Appraisal of Financial Performance of Selected Car Manufacturing Companies in India 166
23 ratio of the study period (18.893%) of the sampled companies. Ratios of the sampled companies in the year were; Maruti Suzuki 22.32%, Tata Motors 10.34% (lowest), Mahindra & Mahindra 29.02% (highest) and Force Motors 18.81%. Therefore Mahindra & Mahindra had done better in the year. Financial Year : The above table no. 5.5 shows that in the financial year the Return on Gross Capital Employed of the sampled companies was ranged between 86.99% and 8.36%. The average ratio of the year was 33.45%, which was higher than the average ratio of the study period (18.893%) of the sampled companies. Ratios of the sampled companies in the year were; Maruti Suzuki 13.53%, Tata Motors 8.36% (lowest), Mahindra & Mahindra 24.91% (highest) and Force Motors 86.99%. Therefore Mahindra & Mahindra had done better in the year. Financial Year : The above table no. 5.5 shows that in the financial year the Return on Gross Capital Employed of the sampled companies was ranged between 25.95% and 2.29%. The average ratio of the year was 12.21%, which was lower than the average ratio of the study period (18.893%) of the sampled companies. Ratios of the sampled companies in the year were; Maruti Suzuki 15.93%, Tata Motors 4.68%, Mahindra & Mahindra 25.95% (highest) and Force Motors 2.29 (lowest)%. Therefore Mahindra & Mahindra had done better in the year. Financial Year : The above table no. 5.5 shows that in the financial year the Return on Gross Capital Employed of the sampled companies was ranged between 22.55% and 0.93%. The average ratio of the year was 11.54%, which was lower than the average ratio of the study period (18.893%) of the sampled companies. Ratios of the sampled companies in the year were; Maruti Suzuki 16.92%, Tata Motors 0.93% (lowest), Mahindra & Mahindra 22.55% (highest) and Force Motors 5.76%. Therefore Mahindra & Mahindra had done better in the year. Financial Year : The above table no. 5.5 shows that in the financial year the Return on Gross Capital Employed of the sampled companies was ranged between 21.24% and %. The average ratio of the year was 11.11%, which was lower than the average An Appraisal of Financial Performance of Selected Car Manufacturing Companies in India 167
24 ratio of the study period (18.893%) of the sampled companies. Ratios of the sampled companies in the year were; Maruti Suzuki 21.24% (highest), Tata Motors -6.77% (lowest), Mahindra & Mahindra 20.05% and Force Motors 9.91%. Therefore Maruti Suzuki had done better in the year. TABLE RETURN ON GROSS CAPITAL EMPLOYED (ANOVA TEST) Source of Variation SS df MS F F crit Between Years Between Company Error Total It is clear from the table No.5.6 that the Return on Gross Capital Employed among the sampled car manufacturing companies was significant, because the calculated value of F ( ) was greater than that of the table value ( ) at 5% level of significance. Hence, the null hypothesis is accepted and alternative hypothesis is rejected. The difference between the years for same company was not significant, because the calculated value of F ( ) was less than that of the table value ( ) at 5% level of significance. Hence, the null hypothesis is accepted and alternative hypothesis is rejected. Therefore, it is concluded that there is no significant difference in the Return on Gross Capital Employed among sampled car manufacturing companies under study. It is also concluded that there is no significant difference in the Return on Gross Capital Employed in between the years of sampled car manufacturing companies under study (ii) Return on Net Capital Employed: Net Capital Employed is the total of assets (except fictitious assets) minus current liabilities. Alternatively, it is the quantum of permanent capital e.g. Non-current liabilities plus shareholder s equity, the numerator, e.g. Net profit before interest and taxes (EBIT). Net Profit before Interest and Taxes Return on Net Capital Employed = x 100 Net Capital Employed An Appraisal of Financial Performance of Selected Car Manufacturing Companies in India 168
25 TABLE RETURN ON NET CAPITAL EMPLOYED YEAR MARUTI TATA MAHINDRA FORCE AVERAGE Maximum Minimum Average Sources: computed from the annual reports & accounts of the perspective companies CHART RETURN ON NET CAPITAL EMPLOYED Maruti Tata Mahindra Force -100 CROSS-SECTIONAL RATIO ANALYSIS Maruti Suzuki India Ltd.: It is clear from the table no. 5.7 that the Return on Net Capital Employed of Maruti Suzuki India Ltd. shows fluctuation trend during study period. It is ranged between 47.04% in the year and 20.15% in the year with an average ratio of %. The average ratio of this company was %, which is less than the An Appraisal of Financial Performance of Selected Car Manufacturing Companies in India 169
26 average ratio (45.144%) of sampled companies. So company is not doing better than average. The return Net Capital Employed of the company was 47.04% in the year Then it was decreased constantly for next three years; 44.70% in , 38.72% in and 25.94% in Then it was increased in next year; 38.56% in Then it was decreased constantly for next two years; 30.80% in and 20.15% in Then again for three year it was constantly increased; 22.60% in , 24.48% in and 31.97% in So company has satisfactory average ratio compare to average ratio of the Car Manufacturing companies in India under study. Tata Motors Ltd.: The Return on Net Capital Employed of Tata Motors Ltd. was found in the above table no It shows fluctuation trend during study period. It is ranged between % in the years and % in the years , with an average ratio of %. The average ratio of this company was %, which is less than average ratio (45.144%) of sampled companies. So we can say that the company is not doing satisfactory. The Return on Net Capital Employed of Tata Motors shows up and down trends in every year. It was % in Then it was decreased constantly for next three years; 77.76% in , 75.18% in and 11.80% in Then it was increased in the next year; 28.12% in Then it was decreased in next year; 19.50% in Then it was increase in next year 24.77% in Then it was decreased constantly for next three years; 9.30% in , 1.53% in and % in This way there was up and down in the Return on Net Capital Employed Ratio of the company. Mahindra & Mahindra Ltd. It is clear from the table no. 5.7 that the Return on Net Capital Employed Operating Profit Ratio of Mahindra & Mahindra Ltd. shows fluctuation trend during study period. It is ranged between 54.48% in the years and 19.52% in the year with an average ratio of %. The average ratio of this company was An Appraisal of Financial Performance of Selected Car Manufacturing Companies in India 170
CHAPTER-4 ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL EFFICIENCY. The word efficiency as defined by the Oxford dictionary states that:
CHAPTER-4 ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL EFFICIENCY 4.1 Concept of Efficiency and Performance The word efficiency as defined by the Oxford dictionary states that: "Efficiency is the accomplishment of or the ability
More informationCHAPTER-8 SUMMARY, FINDINGS & SUGGESTIONS
CHAPTER-8 SUMMARY, FINDINGS & SUGGESTIONS SR. NO. PARTICULAR P. NO 8.1 INTRODUCTION 166 8.2 METHODOLOGY 166 8.3 ANALYSIS OF LIQUIDITY 167 8.4 ANALYSIS OF PROFITABILITY 168 8.5 ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL STRUCTURE
More informationCHAPTER-4 ANALYSIS OF LIQUIDITY
CHAPTER-4 ANALYSIS OF LIQUIDITY SR. NO. PARTICULAR P. NO 4.1 INTRODUCTION OF LIQUIDITY 81 4.2 CONCEPT OF LIQUIDITY 81 4.3 SIGNIFICANCE OF THE LIQUIDITY ANALYSIS 82 4.4 LIQUIDITY ANALYSIS OF SELECTEDAUTOMOBILE
More informationLiquidity and Profitability Analysis Chapter is divided into four parts. comprising of part I dealing with Liquidity Analysis divided into short-term
163 5.1 INTRODUCTION Liquidity and Profitability Analysis Chapter is divided into four parts comprising of part I dealing with Liquidity Analysis divided into short-term and long-term. Part II deals with
More informationCHAPTER-5 ANALYSIS AND EVALUATION OF WORKING CAPITAL
CHAPTER-5 ANALYSIS AND EVALUATION OF WORKING CAPITAL 5.1 INTRODUCTION 5.2 CONCEPT OF WORKING CAPITAL MANAGEMENT 5.3 SIGNIFICANCE OF WORKING CAPITAL 5.4 OBJECTIVES OF WORKING CAPITAL 5.5 STRUCTURE OF WORKING
More informationCHAPTER 4. ANALYSIS AND INTERPRETATION OF DATA Ratio Analysis - Meaning of Ratio (A) Return on Investment Ratios
CHAPTER 4 ANALYSIS AND INTERPRETATION OF DATA Ratio Analysis - Meaning of Ratio (A) Return on Investment Ratios - Concept of Return on Investment - Advantages of ROI - Limitations of ROI - Evaluation of
More informationChapter-III PROFITABILITY IN PHARMACEUTICAL INDUSTRY
Chapter-III PROFITABILITY IN PHARMACEUTICAL INDUSTRY The main objective of this chapter is to study the profitability of the Pharmaceuticals and Public limited companies and identify the reasons for the
More informationChapter 4 Financial Strength Analysis
Chapter 4 Financial Strength Analysis 4.1 Meaning of Financial Strength Finance is an essential requirement for every business enterprise. Various type of finance was needed by the concern for their activity
More informationANALYSIS OF VALUE ADDED RATIOs
ANALYSIS OF VALUE ADDED RATIOs 4.1 INTRODUCTION. 4.2 MEANING & DEFINITION OF VALUE ADDED RATIO. 4.3 OBJECTIVE & UTILITY OF RATIO ANALYSIS. 4.4 LIMITATION OF RATIO ANALYSIS. 4.5 CLASSIFICATION OF RATIO.
More informationCHAPTER V: DATA ANALYSIS AND INTERPRETATION OF DATA
CHAPTER V: DATA ANALYSIS AND INTERPRETATION OF DATA 5.1. VARIOUS PARAMETERS USED FOR THE DATA ANALYSIS AND TESTING OF HYPOTHESIS Following are the various parameters re used for the analysis & interpretation
More informationCHAPTER - 4 ANALYSIS OF PERFORMANCE OF SELECTED FMCG COMPANIES
CHAPTER - 4 ANALYSIS OF PERFORMANCE OF SELECTED FMCG COMPANIES The performance of the FMCG Companies can be evaluated in three ways, they are: (1) Solvency: This is the measure of the firm s ability to
More information6.1 Introduction. 6.2 Meaning of Ratio
6.1 Introduction Ratio analysis has emerged as the principal technique of analysis of financial statements. The system of analysis of financial statements by means of ratio was first made in 1919 be Alexander
More informationChapter-4. Data Analysis and Interpretation
Chapter-4 Data Analysis and Interpretation Chapter-4 Data Analysis and Interpretation 4.1 Introduction. 4.2 Meaning of Finance. 4.3 Definition of Financial Efficiency. 4.4 Concept of Financial Efficiency.
More informationChapter 6. Data Analysis and Interpretation
Chapter 6 Data Analysis and Interpretation 6.1 Introduction. 6.2 Current Ratio. 6.3 Quick Ratio. 6.4 Debt Equity Ratio. 6.5 Interest Coverage Ratio. 6.6 Operating Profit Margin Ratio. 6.7 Net Profit Margin
More informationCHAPTER: 6 FINDINGS, SUGGESTIONS AND CONCLUSION
CHAPTER: 6 FINDINGS, SUGGESTIONS AND CONCLUSION 6.1 Introduction This chapter is the heart of the whole It provides its emerging conclusion based on the analysis carried out during the contemplative The
More informationA COMPARATIVE STUDY ON LIQUIDITY ANALYSIS IN AUTOMOBILE COMPANIES
A COMPARATIVE STUDY ON LIQUIDITY ANALYSIS IN AUTOMOBILE COMPANIES Mukti. R. Barot Assistant professor, President commerce college Kalol, Muktibarot49@gmail.com Abstract Liquidity is a significant concept
More informationCHAPTER IV COST STRUCTURE ANALYSIS. Please purchase PDF Split-Merge on to remove this watermark.
CHAPTER IV COST STRUCTURE ANALYSIS CHAPTER IV COST STRUCTURE ANALYSIS INTRODUCTION This is an age of mass production as a result of which competition in every industry is cut-throat. Therefore, it is utmost
More informationDr. Urvashiba N. Jhala 2 Associate Professor V. M. Mehta Muni. Arts & Commerce College, Jamnagar India
ISSN: 2321-7782 (Online) Impact Factor: 6.047 Volume 4, Issue 8, August 2016 International Journal of Advance Research in Computer Science and Management Studies Research Article / Survey Paper / Case
More informationMeasuring Firms Financial Health -A Study on Select Indian Automobile Companies
Measuring Firms Financial Health -A Study on Select Indian Automobile Companies G.Santhiyavalli Professor of Commerce Avinashilingam Institute for Home Science and Higher Education for Women, Coimbatore-
More informationChapter-5. Data Analysis & Interpretation
Chapter-5 Data Analysis & Interpretation CHAPTER 5 DATA ANALYSIS AND INTERPRETATION Ratio Analysis - Meaning of Ratio (A) Return on Investment Ratios 5.1 Return on Capital Employed Ratio 5.2 Return on
More informationIJRESS Volume 5, Issue 8 (August, 2015) (ISSN ) International Journal of Research in Economics and Social Sciences (IMPACT FACTOR 5.
Fundamental Analysis of the Financial Institutions in India (With Special Reference to Selected Banks) Sri. Megharaja.B Assistant Professor and Research Scholar Department of Studies and Research in Commerce
More informationUNIT 6 FINANCIAL STATEMENTS: ANALYSIS AND INTERPRETATION MODULE - 2
UNIT 6 FINANCIAL STATEMENTS: ANALYSIS AND INTERPRETATION MODULE - 2 UNIT 6 FINANCIAL STATEMENTS: ANALYSIS AND INTERPRETATION Financial Statements: Structure 6.0 Introduction 6.1 Unit Objectives 6.2 Relationship
More informationProfitability Analysis: An Empirical Study of BSE Oil and Gas Index Companies
ISSN 2278 0211 (Online) Profitability Analysis: An Empirical Study of BSE Oil and Gas Index Companies Sonia Sharma Assistant Professor in Commerce Guru Gobind Singh College for Women, Chandigarh, India
More informationInternational Journal of Business and Administration Research Review, Vol. 3, Issue.12, Oct - Dec, Page 59
PERFORMANCE EVALUATION, COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS AND FACTORS INFLUENCING THE EFFICIENCY OF DISTRICT CENTRAL CO-OPERATIVE BANKS A STUDY WITH REFERENCE TO SOUTHERN STATES OF INDIA Mr.F.Franco authers * Dr.R.Karpagavalli**
More informationTrends in Dividend Behaviour of Selected Old Private Sector Banks in India
7 Trends in Dividend Behaviour of Selected Old Private Sector Banks in India Dr. V. Mohanraj, Associate Professor in Commerce, Sri Vasavi College, Erode Dr. S. Sounthiri, Assistant Professor in Commerce
More informationEffEct of DEtErminants of capital structure on financial leverage: a study of selected indian automobile companies
Article can be accessed online at http://www.publishingindia.com EffEct of DEtErminants of capital structure on financial leverage: a study of selected indian automobile companies Sangeeta Mittal*, Lavina
More informationUNIT IV CAPITAL BUDGETING
UNIT IV CAPITAL BUDGETING Capital Budgeting: Capital budgeting is the process of making investment decision in long-term assets or courses of action. Capital expenditure incurred today is expected to bring
More informationC h a p te r: 7. M e a s u re m e n t a n d analysis o f p r o fita b ility o f N T P C L td.
C h a p te r: 7 M e a s u re m e n t a n d analysis o f p r o fita b ility o f N T P C L td. 7.1 P ro fit a n d p r o fita b ility Profit is the main and ultimate aim of every business. In accounting,
More informationUNIT 5 COST OF CAPITAL
UNIT 5 COST OF CAPITAL UNIT 5 COST OF CAPITAL Cost of Capital Structure 5.0 Introduction 5.1 Unit Objectives 5.2 Concept of Cost of Capital 5.3 Importance of Cost of Capital 5.4 Classification of Cost
More informationA study on capital structure analysis of Tata motors limited
International Journal of Commerce and Management Research ISSN: 2455-1627, Impact Factor: RJIF 5.22 www.managejournal.com Volume 3; Issue 3; March 2017; Page No. 48-52 A study on capital structure analysis
More informationFINANCIAL MANAGEMENT (PART-19) DIVIDEND POLICY I. Dear students, Welcome to the lecture series on Financial Management.
FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT (PART-19) DIVIDEND POLICY I 1. INTRODUCTION Dear students, Welcome to the lecture series on Financial Management. Learning Objectives Introduction Types of Dividend Policy Major issues
More informationStudy of one-way ANOVA with a fixed-effect factor
Study of one-way ANOVA with a fixed-effect factor In the last blog on Introduction to ANOVA, we mentioned that in the oneway ANOVA study, the factor contributing to a possible source of variation that
More informationCHAPTER - VI RATIO ANALYSIS 6.3 UTILITY OF RATIO ANALYSIS 6.4 LIMITATIONS OF RATIO ANALYSIS 6.5 RATIO TABLES, CHARTS, ANALYSIS AND
CHAPTER - VI RATIO ANALYSIS 6.1 INTRODUCTION 6.2 NATURE OF RATIO 6.3 UTILITY OF RATIO ANALYSIS 6.4 LIMITATIONS OF RATIO ANALYSIS 6.5 RATIO TABLES, CHARTS, ANALYSIS AND INTERPRETATION OF DIFFERENT RATIOS
More informationCHAPTER-5 DATA ANALYSIS PART-3 LIQUIDITY AND SOLVENCY
CHAPTER-5 DATA ANALYSIS PART-3 LIQUIDITY AND SOLVENCY 190 CHAPTER 5 DATA ANALYSIS PART-3 LIQUIDITY & SOLVENCY 5.1 INTRODUCTION:... 192 5.2 LIQUIDITY & SOLVENCY RATIOS:... 194 5.2.1 CURRENT RATIO:... 194
More informationImportant Determinants of Capital Structure Decisions of Indian Automobile Industry
Important Determinants of Capital Structure Decisions of Indian Automobile Industry Dr. Rashmi Soni 1, Monik Shah 2, Sumit Chawla 3 Abstract: The Capital Structure of a firm describes how it has sourced
More informationVolume-4, Issue-5, October-2017 ISSN No:
A PROFITABILITY ANALYSIS FROM THE VIEW POINT OF SHAREHOLDERS OF SELECTED INDIAN CEMENT COMPANY Pravin T Patel Ass. Prof. Aroma College of College, Research scholar of Babasaheb Ambedkar, Open University,
More informationCHAPTER 5 DATA ANALYSIS & INTERPRETATION
CHAPTER 5 DATA ANALYSIS & INTERPRETATION 180 5.1 CAPITAL RISK ADEQUACY RATIO: CRAR is a ratio of Capital Fund to Risk Weighted Assets. Reserve Bank of India prescribes banks to maintain a minimum Capital
More informationAN EXPLORATORY STUDY ON PROFITABILITY ANALYSIS OF ASHOK LEYLAND. Tamilnadu, India.
AN EXPLORATORY STUDY ON PROFITABILITY ANALYSIS OF ASHOK LEYLAND RAMYA.K 1 MATHANKUMAR.R 2 1 Assistant professor, Department of Commerce, Dr.N.G.P. Arts and Science College, Coimbatore, Tamilnadu, India.
More informationPERFORMANCE APPRAISAL OF HPCL THROUGH FREE CASH FLOW
Indian Journal of Accounting (IJA) 18 ISSN : 0972-1479 (Print) 2395-6127 (Online) Vol. XLVIII (2), December, 2016, pp. 18-24 PERFORMANCE APPRAISAL OF HPCL THROUGH FREE CASH FLOW Dr. S. K. Khatik Dr. Amit
More informationOnline Open Access publishing platform for Management Research. Copyright 2010 All rights reserved Integrated Publishing association
ASIAN JOURNAL OF MANAGEMENT RESEARCH Online Open Access publishing platform for Management Research Copyright 2010 All rights reserved Integrated Publishing association Review Article ISSN 2229 3795 A
More informationANALYSIS OFFINANCIAL STATEMENTS WITH SPECIAL REFERENCE TO BMTC, BANGALORE
ANALYSIS OFFINANCIAL STATEMENTS WITH SPECIAL REFERENCE TO BMTC, Sridhara G* N. Sathyanarayana** BANGALORE Abstract: Transportation industry contributes a major role in the development of a company. Transportation
More informationTRENDS OF NON PERFORMING ASSETS IN REGIONAL RURAL BANKS IN INDIA
www.eprawisdom.com e-issn : 2347-9671, p- ISSN : 2349-0187 EPRA International Journal of Economic and Business Review Vol - 4, Issue- 7, July 2016 Inno Space (SJIF) Impact Factor : 5.509(Morocco) ISI Impact
More informationComparative Study of Ratio Analysis of selected Textile Companies of India
Comparative Study of Ratio Analysis of selected Textile Companies of India MANOJKUMAR VISHNUBHAI PATEL Assistant Professor, Shree Krishna Commerce College, Shankhalpur, Bechraji Gujarat (India) Abstract:
More informationResearch Guru Volume-10 Issue-2(September,2016) (ISSN: X)
Analysis of Profitability of Indian Banks: A Comparative Study of Abstract: Selected Public and Private Banks. Amit K Parmar Asst. Professor Govt. Comm. College Sec.15, Gandhinagar amitbhatera66@gmail.com
More informationFinance. A Comparative Study on Wealth Maximization in Selected Automobile Industries ABSTRACT
A Comparative Study on Wealth Maximization in Selected Automobile Industries Finance KEYWORDS : Wealth Maximization, Market price, Automobile Industry, Profit maximization R. Muruga Ganesh Assistant Professor,
More informationINDEX 4.1 INTRODUCTION MEANING OF ACCONTING PROFIT GROSS PROFIT AND NET PROFIT NORMAL PROFIT, SUPERNORMAL PROFIT 93
INDEX SR.NO. TITLE PAGE NO. 4.1 INTRODUCTION 93 4.2 MEANING OF ACCONTING PROFIT 93 2.1 GROSS PROFIT AND NET PROFIT 93 2.2 NORMAL PROFIT, SUPERNORMAL PROFIT 93 2.3 ACCOUNTING PROFIT V/S ECONOMIC PROFIT
More informationCHAPTER-6 FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS AND SUGGESTIONS
CHAPTER-6 FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS AND SUGGESTIONS 219 CHAPTER -6 FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS AND SUGGESTIONS 6.1 FINDINGS:... 221 6.1.1 CAPITAL STRUCTURE POSITION:... 221 6.1.2 PROFITABILITY POSITION:... 222 6.1.3
More informationAnalysis of Productivity of Indian Banks: A Comparative Study of Selected Public and Private Banks
Analysis of Productivity of Indian Banks: A Comparative Study of Selected Public and Private Banks Amit K Parmar Asst. Professor Govt. Comm. College Sec.15, Gandhinagar Abstract:- Dr. A. R. Kulkarni Co-Guide
More informationCHAPTER :- 4 CONCEPTUAL FRAMEWORK OF FINANCIAL PERFORMANCE.
CHAPTER :- 4 CONCEPTUAL FRAMEWORK OF FINANCIAL PERFORMANCE. 4.1 INTRODUCTION. 4.2 FINANCIAL PERFORMANCE. 4.3 FINANCIAL STATEMENT. 4.4 FINANCIAL STATEMENT ANALYSIS. 4.5 METHODS OF ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL
More informationSHORT TERM SOLVENCY ANALYSIS OF LEAD AUTOMOBILE PLAYERS IN INDIA
International Journal of Advanced Research in Management (IJARM) Volume 6, Issue 3, Sep-Dec (2015), pp. 11-17, Article ID: 10220150603002 Available online at http:// http://www.iaeme.com/currentissue.asp?jtype=ijarm&vtype=6&itype=3
More informationA Comparative Analysis of Nonperforming Assets Management in Nationalised Banks of India (For the period to )
Volume-7, Issue-1, January-February 2017 International Journal of Engineering and Management Research Page Number: 176-183 A Comparative Analysis of Nonperforming Assets Management in Nationalised Banks
More informationManagement of Non-Performing Assets in Virudhunagar District Central Co-Operative Bank-An Overview
Middle-East Journal of Scientific Research 20 (7): 851-855, 2014 ISSN 1990-9233 IDOSI Publications, 2014 DOI: 10.5829/idosi.mejsr.2014.20.07.114016 Management of Non-Performing Assets in Virudhunagar District
More informationNPAs of Nationalised Banks of India: A Critical Review
ISSN: 2347-3215 Volume 1 Number 4 (2013) pp. 17-26 www.ijcrar.com NPAs of Nationalised Banks of India: A Critical Review Sakshi Jhamb 1 and H.V.Jhamb 2* 1 JJT University, Jhunjhunu, Rajasthan, India 2
More informationNEW ECONOMIC REFORMS AND INDIAN CAPITAL MARKET: AN ANALYTICAL STUDY
Indian Journal of Accounting (IJA) 117 ISSN : 0972-1479 (Print) 2395-6127 (Online) Vol. XLVIII (2), December, 2016, pp. 117-125 NEW ECONOMIC REFORMS AND INDIAN CAPITAL MARKET: AN ANALYTICAL STUDY Dr. Anshuja
More informationFINANCIAL PERFORMANCE ANALYSIS OF SELECT CEMENT COMPANIES
FINANCIAL PERFORMANCE ANALYSIS OF SELECT CEMENT COMPANIES DR. A.Y. KETTIRAMALINGAM 1 K.SOWMIYA 2 P.SANGEETHA 3 1 Associate Professor, School of Commerce PG, Rathnavel Subramaniam College of Arts & Science
More informationIntroduction. The industry has seen tremendous growth over last 5 years
Introduction Why automotive industry? The industry has seen tremendous growth over last 5 years Highly sensitive to demand and can be affected by external factors Capital intensive industry What are we
More informationCHAPTER 5: FINDINGS, SUGGETIONS, HYPOTHESIS TESTING AND CONCLUSION
Evaluation of working and performance of Regional Rural Banks of Gujarat State has been made at length with different angles in foregoing chapters. Contribution and overall progress made and key areas
More informationEFFICACY OF ALTMAN S Z-SCORE TO PREDICT FINANCIAL UNASSAILABILITY: A MULTIPLE DISCRIMINANT ANALYSIS (MDA) OF SELECT AUTOMOBILE COMPANIES IN INDIA
EFFICACY OF ALTMAN S Z-SCORE TO PREDICT FINANCIAL UNASSAILABILITY: A MULTIPLE DISCRIMINANT ANALYSIS (MDA) OF SELECT AUTOMOBILE COMPANIES IN INDIA Momina Bushra Research Scholar School for Management Studies
More informationfinancial Analysis Annual Report
financial Analysis Annual Report 217 87 DuPont Analysis Increase in sales volume by 16% coupled with increasing price trend during the year resulted in higher sales and profits due to which EBIT margin
More informationUNIT 13 LEVERAGES Structure
UNIT 13 LEVERAGES Structure 13.0 Objectives 13.1 Introduction 13.2 Concept and Types of Leverage 13.3 Operating Leverage 13.3.1 Meaning 13.3.2 Computation of OL 13.3.3 Behaviour of Operating Leverage 13.3.4
More informationJournal of Advance Management Research, ISSN: Vol.05 Issue-03, (August 2017), Impact Factor: 4.598
LEVERAGE ANALYSIS AND ITS IMPACT ON PROFITABILITY OF SELECT STEEL COMPANIES OF INDIA TRADED IN BOMBAY STOCK EXCHANGE (BSE) Dr.J.Michael Sammanasu PhD Associate Professor St. Joseph s Institute of Management
More informationPERFORMANCE OF IDBI BANK WITH REFERENCE TO NON PERFORMING ASSETS
PERFORMANCE OF IDBI BANK WITH REFERENCE TO NON PERFORMING ASSETS R.Navaneethakrishnasamy & M.Sharmila devi Ph.D. Research Scholar (Part-time), P.G and Research Department of Commerce, Sri S.R.N.M. College,
More informationKeywords: NBFC, Solvency, Current ratio, Liquid ratio, Debt equity ratio and Proprietary ratio
Solvency Analysis of Non Banking Financial Companies in Tamilnadu Dr. D. VENKADESH, M.Com., M.B.A., M.Phil., PGDCA., Ph.D., Assistant Professor & Research Advisor PG & Research Department of Commerce A.V.V.M.
More informationAnalysis Of Value Of Firm Select Automobile Companies Under Net Income Approach And Analyzed Financial Leverage
Analysis Of Value Of Firm Select Automobile Companies Under Net Income Approach And Analyzed Financial Leverage Dr. M. Maheswaran M.Com., M.Phil., Ph.D. Lecturer in Accounting & Finance, Blue Hora University,
More informationM.V.S.R Engineering College. Department of Business Managment
M.V.S.R Engineering College Department of Business Managment CONCEPTS IN FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT 1. Finance. a.finance is a simple task of providing the necessary funds (money) required by the business of
More informationA STUDY OF FINANCIAL PERFORMANCE: A COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF CO- OPERATIVE BANKS IN BIJAPUR DISTRICT (KARNATAKA STATE)
A STUDY OF FINANCIAL PERFORMANCE: A COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF CO- OPERATIVE BANKS IN BIJAPUR DISTRICT (KARNATAKA STATE) Ms. Bharati R. Hiremath Research Scholar Research and Development Centre, Bharathiar
More informationnot to be republished NCERT You have learnt about the financial statements Analysis of Financial Statements 4
Analysis of Financial Statements 4 LEARNING OBJECTIVES After studying this chapter, you will be able to : explain the nature and significance of financial analysis; identify the objectives of financial
More informationA Comparison of Financial Performance Based On Ratio Analysis (With Special Reference to ITC Limited and HUL Limited)
IOSR Journal Of Humanities And Social Science (IOSR-JHSS) Volume 23, Issue 4, Ver. 3 (April. 2018) PP 59-63 e-issn: 2279-0837, p-issn: 2279-0845. www.iosrjournals.org A Comparison of Financial Performance
More informationINTRODUCTION Meaning of Capital Structure Definition of Capital Structure Gerestenbeg, James C. Van Horne, Presana Chandra,
INTRODUCTION Capital is the major part of all kinds of business activities, which are decided by the size, and nature of the business concern. Capital may be raised with the help of various sources. If
More informationCHAPTER V ANALYSIS AND INTERPRETATION
CHAPTER V ANALYSIS AND INTERPRETATION 1 CHAPTER-V: ANALYSIS AND INTERPRETATION OF DATA 5.1. DESCRIPTIVE ANALYSIS OF DATA: Research consists of a systematic observation and description of the properties
More informationA Study on Working Capital Management and Profitability Analysis of Select Steel Companies in India. *T. Venkatesan **Dr.S.K.
A Study on Working Capital Management and Profitability Analysis of Select Steel Companies in India *T. Venkatesan **Dr.S.K.Nagarajan *Research Scholar, Bharathiar University, Coimbatore, Tamilnadu, India
More informationWorking Capital Management of Larsen & Turbo
Volume-8, Issue-5, October 2018 International Journal of Engineering and Management Research Page Number: 56-63 DOI: doi.org/10.31033/ijemr.8.5.02 Working Capital Management of Larsen & Turbo K. Pavithra
More informationAustralian Journal of Basic and Applied Sciences
ISSN:1991-8178 Australian Journal of Basic and Applied Sciences Journal home page: www.ajbasweb.com The Role of Capital Structure Analysis on Indian Commercial Banks Comparative Study between Punjab National
More informationA Comparative Analysis of the Impact of Current Assets and Fixed Assets on Working Capital of Textile Companies in India
Volume 117 No. 7 2017, 263-271 ISSN: 1311-8080 (printed version); ISSN: 1314-3395 (on-line version) url: http://www.ijpam.eu ijpam.eu A Comparative Analysis of the Impact of Current Assets and Fixed Assets
More informationInternational Journal of Innovative Research in Management Studies (IJIRMS) ISSN (Online): Volume 1 Issue 4 May 2016
A STUDY ON STOCK SELECTION WITH SPECIAL REFERENCE TO BOOK VALUE, EARNING PER SHARE AND MARKET PRICE S.Mahalakshmi* *II Year MBA Student, School of Management, SASTRA University, Thanjavur, South India
More informationA STUDY OF PROFITABILITY AND EFFICIENCY OF PRIVATE SECTOR BANKS IN A DEVELOPING ECONOMY: THE CASE OF INDIA Dr RATNA SINHA Head of Department, T.John Institute of Management & Science, Bangalore ABSTRACT
More informationFindings, Suggestions and Conclusion
CHAPTER VI Findings, Suggestions and Conclusion The corporate sector is the backbone of the Indian economy, so for as it provides a vital, effective and organized system for the growth of industrial as
More informationAnswer to MTP_Final_ Syllabus 2012_December 2016_Set 2. Paper 20: Financial Analysis and Business Valuation
Paper 20: Financial Analysis and Business Valuation Page 1 of 21 Paper 20- Financial Analysis and Business Valuation Full Marks: 100 Time allowed: 3 Hours Question No. 1 which is compulsory and carries
More informationInterrelationship between Profitability, Financial Leverage and Capital Structure of Textile Industry in India Dr. Ruchi Malhotra
Interrelationship between Profitability, Financial Leverage and Capital Structure of Textile Industry in India Dr. Ruchi Malhotra Assistant Professor, Department of Commerce, Sri Guru Granth Sahib World
More informationWORKING CAPITAL MANAGEMENT AND PROFITABILITY ANALYSIS OF SELECTED PAPER COMPANIES IN INDIA
Primax International Journal of Commerce and Management Research Online ISSN: 221-612 WORKING CAPITAL MANAGEMENT AND PROFITABILITY ANALYSIS OF SELECTED PAPER COMPANIES IN INDIA J. Jeyanthi 1 Abstract Efficient
More informationCHAPTER IV BID ASK SPREAD FOR FUTURES MARKETS
CHAPTER IV BID ASK SPREAD FOR FUTURES MARKETS 4.1 INTRODUCTION Futures and Options (commonly denoted as F&O) was introduced in the National Stock Exchange during 2000s. Since its introduction, there has
More informationCHAPTER - 6. PA NPA ANALYSIS AND INTERPRETATION OF DATA OF SELECTED UCBS TEKAN TOGETHER 6.1 Introduction 131
CHAPTER - 6 PA NPA ANALYSIS AND INTERPRETATION OF DATA OF SELECTED UCBS TEKAN TOGETHER 6.1 Introduction 131 6.2 Concept Of NPA And Its Importance In Banking Sector 131 6.3 Common - Size Analysis Of The
More informationFactors affecting the share price of FMCG Companies
Factors affecting the share price of FMCG Companies Authors: Dharia Dilasha, Kakadia Sachita ABSTRACT To review the factors affecting the share prices of various FMCG companies like revenues, operating
More informationJOURNAL OF INTERNATIONAL ACADEMIC RESEARCH FOR MULTIDISCIPLINARY Impact Factor 2.417, ISSN: , Volume 4, Issue 4, May 2016
A STUDY ON EFFICIENT MARKET HYPOTHESIS IN SELECTED AUTOMOBILE STOCKS IN INDIA DR. RAKESH KUMAR* MISS. SHALINI SAGAR** *Assistant Professor, Accountancy & Law, Dayalbagh Educational Institute, Deemed University,
More informationIMPACT OF ACQUISITIONS THROUGH VALUE ADDITION - A CASE STUDY OF TATA STEEL AND TATA POWER COMPANIES IN INDIA
Tactful Management Research Journal ISSN :2319-7943 Impact Factor : 2.1632 (UIF) Vol. 3 Issue. 4 Jan 2015 Available online at www.lsrj.in IMPACT OF ACQUISITIONS THROUGH VALUE ADDITION - A CASE STUDY OF
More informationThe Internal Rate of Return Model for Life Insurance Policies
The Internal Rate of Return Model for Life Insurance Policies Prof. Mihir Dash Department of Quantitative Methods School of Business, Alliance University Chikkahagade Cross, Anekal, Bangalore, India-562106
More informationMeasuring Financial Distress of Public Sector Enterprises Using Z-Score Model
Measuring Financial Distress of Public Sector Enterprises Using Z-Score Model Ms. Jyoti Pandit Research Scholar, P.G. Department of Business Studies,Sardar Patel University, Vallabh Vidyanagar 388120.
More informationDr.M.Manjurani Asst.Professor Dept. of Commerce, T.S.A.Arts Science and Tamil College Perur-10.
A STUDY ON SOLVENCY AND PROFITABILITY ANALYSIS OF MAHINDRA AND MAHINDRA LIMITED IN POLLACHI INTRODUCTION AND DESIGN OF STUDY Dr.M.Manjurani Asst.Professor Dept. of Commerce, T.S.A.Arts Science and Tamil
More informationA Comparative Financial Analysis of TATA Steel Ltd. and SAIL
IOSR Journal of Economics and Finance (IOSR-JEF) e-issn: 2321-5933, p-issn: 2321-5925.Volume 7, Issue 6 Ver. IV (Nov. - Dec. 2016), PP 01-05 www.iosrjournals.org A Comparative Financial Analysis of TATA
More informationUNIT 1 FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT: BASICS
UNIT 1 FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT: BASICS UNIT 1 FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT: BASICS Financial Management: Structure 1.0 Introduction 1.1 Unit Objectives 1.2 Importance of Finance 1.3 Meaning of Business Finance 1.4
More informationIJRFM Volume 4, Issue 6(June 2014) (ISSN ) IMPACT FACTOR 4.088
Capital Structure Analysis of Oil Industry An Empirical Study of HPCL, LOCL & BPCL (INDIA) Astt. Prof. Harvinder Singh S.D. College (Lahore), Ambala Cantt Astt. Prof. Parveen Kumar S.D. College (Lahore),
More informationACTIVITY RATIO OF THE CEMENT COMPANIES
ACTIVITY RATIO OF THE CEMENT COMPANIES CHAPTER V ACTIVITY PARAMETERS OF THE CEMENT COMPANIES 5.1. Introduction Having studied the short term and long term solvency of select units in earlier chapters,
More informationAssessing the Probability of Failure by Using Altman s Model and Exploring its Relationship with Company Size: An Evidence from Indian Steel Sector
DOI: 10.15415/jtmge.2017.82003 Assessing the Probability of Failure by Using Altman s Model and Exploring its Relationship with Company Size: An Evidence from Indian Steel Sector Abstract Corporate failure
More informationCHAPTER VII FINDINGS AND CONCLUSIONS
CHAPTER VII FINDINGS AND CONCLUSIONS The study in general aims at studying the impact of dividend policy on shareholders wealth of selected pharma units in India. This study covers eleven companies viz.,
More informationAvailable online at ScienceDirect. Procedia Economics and Finance 11 ( 2014 )
Available online at www.sciencedirect.com ScienceDirect Procedia Economics and Finance 11 ( 2014 ) 445 458 Symbiosis Institute of Management Studies Annual Research Conference (SIMSARC13) A Study on Capital
More informationFinancial Evaluation of Arasu Rubber Corporation Limited in Kanyakumari District of Tamilnadu-An Empirical study
Financial Evaluation of Arasu Rubber Corpon Limited in Kanyakumari District of Tamilnadu-An Empirical study D.H.Thavamalar & M.Julius prasad Assistant Professor, Department of Commerce, Directorate of
More informationA COMPARATIVE STUDY OF GROWTH ANALYSIS OF PUNJAB NATIONAL BANK OF INDIA AND HDFC BANK LIMITED
A COMPARATIVE STUDY OF GROWTH ANALYSIS OF PUNJAB NATIONAL BANK OF INDIA AND HDFC BANK LIMITED Dr. R. Gupta 1, Dr.N.S. Sikarwar 2 1 Sr.Assistant Professor, Department of Management, Haryana College of Technology
More informationJournal of Radix International Educational and Research Consortium 1 P a g e
A Journal of Radix International Educational and Research Consortium RIJEB RADIX INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ECONOMICS & BUSINESS MANAGEMENT NSE- TRADING OF CURRENCY FUTURES POONAM ABSTRACT The introduction
More informationCHAPTER-5 DATA ANALYSIS AND INTERPRETATION
CHAPTER-5 DATA ANALYSIS AND INTERPRETATION INDEX Serial No. Name of Topic Page No. 5.1. Introduction 209 5.2. Bombay Stock Exchange 214 5.3. BSE SENSEX and Their Weight in INDEX 214 5.4. Basis for Calculating
More informationUNIT 16 BREAK EVEN ANALYSIS
UNIT 16 BREAK EVEN ANALYSIS Structure 16.0 Objectives 16.1 Introduction 16.2 Break Even Analysis 16.3 Break Even Point 16.4 Impact of Changes in Sales Price, Volume, Variable Costs and on Profits 16.5
More information