Project Summary Project Name: Route 37 Corridor Safety Sweep Project Number:
|
|
- Russell Howard
- 5 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 Project Summary This project summary page details the benefit cost analysis (BCA) for the Route 37 Corridor Safety Sweep Project. A BCA provides estimates of the anticipated benefits that are expected to accrue from a project over a specified period and compares them to the anticipated costs of the project. The annual benefit, operation & maintenance costs and work zone costs are all explained in their respective tab. The annual construction cost was determined by taking the total construction cost over the service life of the project. Bridges have a longer service life, so 30 years was determined to be appropriate. The present value cost and benefit were calculated using the information in the U.S. Department of Transportation "Benefit Cost Analysis Guidance for TIGER and INFRA Applications". These figures were then used to determine the benefit cost ratio of the entire project. Project Benefits at Project Costs at 7% Net Project Benefits Year# Year Project Benefits Project Costs 7% Discount Rate Discount Rate at 7% Discount Rate Present Day Annual Benefit: Safety, Travel Time, Emissions: $ 10,035, Present Day Annual Operation & Maintenance Cost Savings: $ 610, $ $ $ 14,851, $ 13,880, $ (13,880,010.03) Present Day Annual Work Zone Impact Cost Savings: $ 643, $ $ $ 14,851, $ 12,971, $ (12,971,971.99) sub total: $ 11,289, $ $ $ 14,851, $ 12,123, $ (12,123,338.31) $ $ $ $ $ Present Day Total Construction Costs: $ 44,000, $ 11,289, $ 8,049, $ $ $ 8,049, Present Day Work Zone Impact Cost: $ 554, $ 11,289, $ 7,522, $ $ $ 7,522, $ 11,289, $ 7,030, $ $ $ 7,030, Service Life: $ 11,289, $ 6,570, $ $ $ 6,570, Discount: 7% $ 11,289, $ 6,140, $ $ $ 6,140, $ 11,289, $ 5,739, $ $ $ 5,739, Present Value Cost: $ 38,975, $ 11,289, $ 5,363, $ $ $ 5,363, Present Value Benefit: $ 101,853, $ 11,289, $ 5,012, $ $ $ 5,012, $ 11,289, $ 4,684, $ $ $ 4,684, Benefit Cost Ratio: $ 11,289, $ 4,378, $ $ $ 4,378, Net Present Value (NPV) $ 62,877, $ 11,289, $ 4,091, $ $ $ 4,091, Return on Investment (ROI) 10% $ 11,289, $ 3,824, $ $ $ 3,824, Average User Cost Savings Per Year (NPV) $ 3,917, $ 11,289, $ 3,574, $ $ $ 3,574, $ 11,289, $ 3,340, $ $ $ 3,340, $ 11,289, $ 3,121, $ $ $ 3,121, $ 11,289, $ 2,917, $ $ $ 2,917, $ 11,289, $ 2,726, $ $ $ 2,726, $ 11,289, $ 2,548, $ $ $ 2,548, $ 11,289, $ 2,381, $ $ $ 2,381, $ 11,289, $ 2,225, $ $ $ 2,225, $ 11,289, $ 2,080, $ $ $ 2,080, $ 11,289, $ 1,944, $ $ $ 1,944, $ 11,289, $ 1,816, $ $ $ 1,816, $ 11,289, $ 1,697, $ $ $ 1,697, $ 11,289, $ 1,586, $ $ $ 1,586, $ 11,289, $ 1,483, $ $ $ 1,483, Total Present Day Benefit Value $ 101,853, Total Present Day Cost Value $ 38,975, Summary
2 Safety Benefit Crash Severity is labeled by the KABCO injury scale, which can also be used for establishing crash costs. This scale was developed by the National Safety Council (NSC) and is frequently used by law enforcement for classifying injuries: K Fatal; A Incapacitating injury; B Nonincapacitating injury; C Possible injury; and O No injury. Two safety countermeasures were identified for this project that would improve the study area and potentially decrease overall crash severity. These two countermeasures are the weaving and queuing between Interstate 95 and Route 37. When evaluating countermeasures crash modification factors (CMF) clearinghouse are used to determine the percentage decrease in crashes with the proposed improvements. CMF descriptions can be reviewed at cmfclearinghouse.org. Crash data was collected for the study area between January 1, 2012 and December 31, From the U.S. Department of Transportation "Benefit Cost Analysis Guidance for TIGER and INFRA Applications", the monetized value for the value of injuries were obtained to determine a monetary benefit. Safety Issue: Weaving Issues from the interchange of Interstate 95 and Route 37 Predicted Number to affected by Annual Crash Value of Crash Severity Total per Year CMF factor Improvement Reduction Injuries Annual Savings B $ 125, $ 10, C $ 63, $ 32, O $ 4, $ 12, $ 55, Safety Issue: Queue on Interstate 95 due to Route 37 Number to affected by Predicted Annual Crash Value of Crash Severity Total per Year CMF factor Improvement Reduction Injuries Annual Savings B $ 125, $ 10, C $ 63, $ 29, O $ 4, $ 8, $ 48, Total Annual Savings (2016 Dollars) $ 103, Safety Benefit
3 Emissions Benefit Due to the proposed safety improvements, daily VHT in the traffic network is expected to decrease from 2,460 vehicle hours in the No Build Condition to 1,210 vehicle hours in the Build Condition, while the average speed is expected to increase from 16.5 mph to 40.0 mph. This results in a decrease of pollutants across the project area. CO2 is expected to decrease by 1,684 tons per year, NOX will decrease by 0.3 tons per year, VOC decrease by 0.3 tons per year, PM10 will decrease by 1.2 tons per year, and PM2.5 will decrease by 0.2 tons per year. Damage Costs were assessed based on the results of the pollutant inventory. The unit costs for NOX, VOC, and PM2.5 were obtained from the Benefit Cost Analysis Guidance for Tiger and Infra Applications document. This document has rescinded guidance on quantifying CO2 damage costs but allows applicants to use their own unit cost. CO2 damage costs were quantified in this assessment using the same methodology that it is applied for NOX, VOC, and PM2.5, where costs are sourced from the Corporate Average Fuel Economy for MY 2017 MY 2025 Passenger Cars and Light Trucks. Total Annual Savings (2016 Dollars) $ 95, Emissions Benefit
4 Travel Time Savings Figure PM Queues with and without TIGER A Vissim modal was completed to depict multi modal traffic flow simulation throughout the network. This model determined how many vehicles were traveling within the network (14,546), and the approximate delay with and without the TIGER Grant funding (0.07 and 0.01 hour delays respectively). See Table 1 below. It was determined that mainly workdays would be effected due to the delay and there are 260 workdays per year. From the U.S. Department of Transportation "Benefit Cost Analysis Guidance for TIGER and INFRA Applications", the average vehicle occupancy for cars is 1.39 and for trucks is Approximately 5% of all the average daily traffic is trucks. In addition to the vehicle operating costs, there will be a slight monetized value for travel time added to this diversionary cost. From the U.S. Department of Transportation "Benefit Cost Analysis Guidance for TIGER and INFRA Applications", All Purpose private vehicle travel monetized value is $14.10 and for Commercial Vehicle operators (an average of truck drivers and bus drivers) is $ Cost of Additional Travel Time (cars): 14.1 dollars Cost of Additional Travel Time (commercial): dollars Weekdays during the year: 260 days Percentage of daily trucks: 5% Percentage of daily cars: 95% Average Vehicle Occupancy (cars): 1.39 persons per vehicle Average Vehicle Occupancy (trucks): 1 persons per vehicle Total Vehicles Traveling within the Network: 14,546 vehicles per day Hour Delay per vehicle for 2040 No TIGER: 0.07 hour Hour Delay per vehicle for 2040 TIGER: 0.01 hour Hours of Delay (include AM and PM Peak) 2 hours Total Annual Savings (2016 Dollars) $ 9,836, Travel Time Saving
5 Work Zone Closure Impact (with TIGER) Figure 1: Existing and Diversionary Routes RIDOT is requesting to replace/or rehabilitate a series of 15 bridges and culverts, built in the 1960s, located along the eastern portion of Route 37. Only 5 bridges will be completely replace with the other 10 bridges being rehabilitation only. Each replaced bridge would take one full weekend. The 10 rehabilitated bridges would need to be completed regardless of receipt of the TIGER grant so the cost and benefits are negated for those 10 bridges. From RIDOT's permanent count station data, dated 2017, the daily weekend traffic is 75,000 vehicles. Figure 1 depicts the three diversionary routes possible with the bridge closures. An average of 3.1 additional mileage would be incurred with the diversionary routes. From the U.S. Department of Transportation "Benefit Cost Analysis Guidance for TIGER and INFRA Applications", the monetized value for vehicle operating costs for cars is $0.40 and for trucks is $0.96. Approximately 5% of all the average daily traffic is trucks. In addition to the vehicle operating costs, there will be a slight monetized value for travel time added to this diversionary cost. From the U.S. Department of Transportation "Benefit Cost Analysis Guidance for TIGER and INFRA Applications", All Purpose private vehicle travel monetized value is $14.10 and for Commercial Vehicle operators (an average of truck drivers and bus drivers) is $ Timeframe: 5 weekends Daily Weekend Traffic: 75,000 vehicles Average Additional Mileage: 3.1 miles Vehicle Operating Cost (Cars): 0.4 dollars Vehicle Operating Cost (Trucks): 0.96 dollars Percentage of daily trucks: 5% Percentage of daily cars: 95% Cost of Additional Travel Time (cars): 14.1 dollars Additional Travel Time (commercial): dollars Speed Limit: 60 mph Total Work zone Diversion Cost (one time cost) (2016 Dollars) $ 554, Work Zone Closure Impact
6 Bridge Rehabilitation Work Zone Impact (No TIGER) RIDOT is requesting to replace/or rehabilitate a series of 16 bridges and culverts, built in the 1960s, located along the eastern portion of Route 37. Only 4 bridges will be completely replace with the other 12 bridges being rehabilitated or preseved only. The rehabilitated bridges would need to be completed regardless of receipt of the TIGER grant so the cost and benefits are negated for those bridges. However, without the TIGER funding the 4 bridges that need complete replacement would need to undergo maintenance over the next 30 years and would cause delay and detouring during maintenance. It is assumed due to the overall daily volume that the three lane roadways would have to maintain at least 2 lanes during maintenance. This maintenance work would also mainly be performed during the off peak hours and weekends, however there may be a chance of maintenance overlapping with peak hour commutes, therefore a peak hour impact was calculated. It was assumed that only one bridge would be rehabilitated a year. It is estimated that approximately 35,689 vehicles will be impacted in the network due to the maintenance. It is also assumed that due to these delays due to maintenance that some people would detour creating a longer commute then normal, due to slower speeds on local roadways and additional traffic. The difference in commute time during the peak hour was calculated assuming the difference between a detouring vehicle and one that remained on Route 37. This difference in commute time takes into account a vehicle traveling the entire corridor and the delays it would experience. In addition to the vehicle operating costs, there will be a slight monetized value for travel time added to this diversionary cost. From the U.S. Department of Transportation "Benefit Cost Analysis Guidance for TIGER and INFRA Applications", All Purpose private vehicle travel monetized value is $14.10 and for Commercial Vehicle operators (an average of truck drivers and bus drivers) is $ Daily Weekend Traffic: 35,689 vehicles Percentage of daily trucks: 5% Percentage of daily cars: 95% Cost of Additional Travel Time (cars): 14.1 dollars Cost of Additional Travel Time (commercial): dollars Additional commuting time: 1.22 hours Total Bridge Rehab Work Zone Impact (2016 Dollars) $ 643, Bridge Rehab Work Zone Impact
7 Operations and Costs Operating and Maintenance costs were projected for both the no build baseline and with proposed improvement project. Without the proposed project the bridges called to be reconstructed/replaced would just be rehabilitated to maintain minimum maintenance. The bridges slated for preservation would still experience this under both no build and build scenarios. This minor rehabilitation over the long run would require these bridges to be completely reconstructed, which would cost a lot more then just replacing the bridges that currently need replacement. Therefore the existing rehabilitation costs would just be additional costs and therefore a loss of money. This is why the operating and maintenance expenditures creates a net positive for the project. For the no build baseline, general bridge rehabilitation and preservation would be necessary to maintain the bridges as shown in Table 1. Table 2 shows the annual maintenance cost with the bridge reconstruction and preservation. Table 1. Existing Rehabilitation Costs (2016) Bridge Rehabilitation Cost Contract Number Deck Area (sf) Cost/SF Bridge # $1,300, CB $ Bridge # $2,095,133 N/A $ Bridge # $2,064,810 N/A $ Bridge # $1,688,884 N/A $ Number of Major Rehabilitation in 30 year Period 1.5 Subtotal Rehabilitation Cost $10,724,000 Engineering (10%) $1,072,400 Total Rehabilitation Cost for Next 30 years $11,796,400 Total Preservation Costs $13,050,832 Total No Build Cost for Next 30 years $24,847,232 Table 2. Annual Maintenance Costs for Reconstructed Bridges (with the Proposed Improvement Project) Description / Task Cost # of times task performed in 30 years 30 year Maintenance Cost Bridge Inspection $15, $225, High Pressure Water Cleaning on Bridge Structure $25, $375, Concrete Surface Treatment (Protective Coating) $18,000 3 $54,000 Joint Replacement 1 $40,000 3 $120,000 Deck Repairs 2 $280,000 1 $280, Painting Existing Structural Steel 3 $200,000 1 $200,000 Number of Bridges in Question 4 Subtotal 30 year Maintenance Cost $5,016,000 Misc Items/Contingencies (10%) $501,600 Mobilization (10%) $501,600 Engineering (10%) $501,600 Total 30 year Build Maintenance Cost $6,520,800 1 Cost is dependent on Joint type. For estimating purposes and new construction assume Asphaltic Expansion Joint System. Note that Joint replacement occurs every 6 years after the initial 20 year replacement. 2 Assume 20% of the bridge deck needs partial depth repairs ( ) 3 Zone/Over coat Painting (includes cleaning/surface preparation) Total Operations and Costs per year for 30 years (2016 Dollars) $ 610, Operations and Costs
I-75 at Overpass Road Interchange
Benefit-Cost Analysis Supplementary Documentation TIGER Grant Program I-75 at Overpass Road Interchange Pasco County, FL October 16, 2017 0 Benefit-Cost Analysis Supplementary Documentation 1. Introduction
More informationHot Springs Bypass Extension TIGER 2017 Application. Benefit-Cost Analysis Methodology Summary
TIGER 2017 Application Overview This project proposes to extend the Hot Springs Bypass (US 70/US 270) from US 70 to State Highway 7 in Garland County, Arkansas. The 5.5 mile facility will initially consist
More informationI-44/US-75 Interchange and Related Improvements on I-44 in Tulsa County
I-44/US-75 Interchange and Related Improvements on I-44 in Tulsa County Cost-Effectiveness Analysis Supplementary Documentation FASTLANE Discretionary Grant Program I-44/US-75 Interchange and Related Improvements
More informationFY 2011 Continuing Appropriations Act. TIGER Discretionary Grant Program
FY 2011 Continuing Appropriations Act TIGER Discretionary Grant Program Highway 167 Improvement Project Appendices A Benefit Cost Analysis B Federal Wage Rate Certifications Submitted by Arkansas State
More informationTIGER III Grant Application Benefit Cost Analysis Technical Memo October 31, 2011
Improved US 70 with Railroad Grade Separation (Highway Overpass) Valliant, Oklahoma TIGER III Grant Application Benefit Cost Analysis Technical Memo October 31, 2011 The formal benefit-cost analysis (BCA)
More information32 nd Street Corridor Improvements
Benefit-Cost Analysis Supplementary Documentation TIGER Discretionary Grant Program 32 nd Corridor Improvements USDOT TIGER BCA Results City of Joplin, MO April 29, 2016 32nd Corridor Improvements Contents...
More information2012 TIGER Grant Application Benefit Cost Analysis Technical Memo March 19, 2012
Improved US 70 with Railroad Grade Separation (Highway Overpass) Valliant, Oklahoma 2012 TIGER Grant Application Benefit Cost Analysis Technical Memo March 19, 2012 Project Summary The Improved US 70 with
More informationFreight Rail Improvements Oklahoma City to Shawnee TIGER Grant Application Benefit Cost Analysis Technical Memo October 2009
Freight Rail Improvements Oklahoma City to Shawnee TIGER Grant Application Benefit Cost Analysis Technical Memo October 2009 Introduction The formal benefit cost analysis has been conducted using best
More informationLife-Cycle Cost Analysis: A Practitioner s Approach
Life-Cycle Cost Analysis: A Practitioner s Approach FHWA Office of Performance Management 1 Topics Fundamentals of Economic Analysis Tools and resources What to do now 2 Learning Objectives By the end
More informationFY 2011 Continuing Appropriations Act. TIGER Discretionary Grant Program
FY 2011 Continuing Appropriations Act TIGER Discretionary Grant Program Highway 150 Resurfacing Project Appendices A Benefit Cost Analysis B Federal Wage Rate Certifications Submitted by Arkansas State
More informationFY 2011 Continuing Appropriations Act. TIGER Discretionary Grant Program
FY 2011 Continuing Appropriations Act TIGER Discretionary Grant Program Highway 92 Bridge Improvement Project Appendices A Benefit Cost Analysis B Federal Wage Rate Certification Submitted by Arkansas
More informationBenefit-Cost Analysis Guidance for Discretionary Grant Programs
Benefit-Cost Analysis Guidance for Discretionary Grant Programs Office of the Secretary U.S. Department of Transportation June 2018 Benefit-Cost Analysis Guidance Table of Contents Acronym List...4 1.
More informationAPPENDIX E: ATM MODEL TECH MEMORANDUM. Metropolitan Council Parsons Brinckerhoff
APPENDIX E: ATM MODEL TECH MEMORANDUM Metropolitan Council Parsons Brinckerhoff Metropolitan Highway System Investment Study Evaluation of Active Traffic Management Strategies Prepared by: Parsons Brinckerhoff
More informationTampa Bay Express Planning Level Traffic and Revenue (T&R) Study
Tampa Bay Express Planning Level Traffic and Revenue (T&R) Study Project Report FPN: 437289-1-22-01 Prepared for: FDOT District 7 February 2017 Table of Contents Executive Summary... E-1 E.1 Project Description...
More informationECONOMIC ANALYSIS. Table 1: Total Cost Estimate (Economic Costs) (CNY million)
Jiangxi Ji an Sustainable Urban Transport Project (RRP PRC 45022) ECONOMIC ANALYSIS A. Project Costs 1. This chapter outlines the methodology and results of the economic analysis for the project, comprising
More informationReview and Update of Year 2035 Regional Transportation Plan
Review and Update of Year 2035 Regional Transportation Plan #217752 1 Background Every four years, the Year 2035 Plan is reviewed Elements of review Validity of Plan Year 2035 forecasts Transportation
More informationBenefit Cost Analysis for the San Juan Multi-Modal Transportation System: Infrastructure and Safety Improvements
Benefit Cost Analysis for the San Juan Multi-Modal Transportation System: Infrastructure and Safety Improvements Final Submitted to: April 24, 2014 TABLE OF CONTENTS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY...3 INTRODUCTION...5
More informationMEMORANDUM. For the purpose of this analysis, a No Build Alternative and a Build Alternative were under consideration.
SRF No. 0158856 MEMORANDUM TO: FROM: Libby Ogard, President, Prime Focus Ryan Loos, PE, Senior Engineer Nick Semeja, EIT, Engineer DATE: May 26, 2015 SUBJECT: NORTHWOODS RAIL TRANSIT COMMISSION GREAT LAKES
More informationTIGER IV. Benefit Cost Analysis. Minot International Airport Access Road. Minot, ND
Appendix A TIGER IV Benefit Cost Analysis Minot International Airport Access Road Minot, ND Table of Contents Summary and Findings... 3 Net Economic Impacts to North Dakota... 4 Project Matrix... Error!
More informationDraft Environmental Impact Statement. Appendix G Economic Analysis Report
Draft Environmental Impact Statement Appendix G Economic Analysis Report Appendix G Economic Analysis Report Economic Analyses in Support of Environmental Impact Statement Carolina Crossroads I-20/26/126
More informationSOLUTIONS FOR SAVING LIVES ON TEXAS ROADS
SOLUTIONS FOR SAVING LIVES ON TEXAS ROADS Darren McDaniel Texas Department of Transportation December 2016 Texas Traffic Safety Task Force Texas Traffic Safety Task Force was created in August 2015 with
More informationTable of Contents. Study Overview. Corridor Needs Analysis. Financial Strategies. Legislative Review
Table of Contents Study Overview Corridor Needs Analysis Climbing Lanes Additional Lane I-25/I-80 Cost Estimate ITS Truck Parking Financial Strategies Legislative Review 02 Study Overview The overall goal
More information10-Year Capital Highway Investment Plan DRAFT
10-Year Capital Highway Investment Plan DRAFT 2018-2027 DRAFT AUGUST 2017 1 Table of Contents PURPOSE OF 10-YEAR CAPITAL HIGHWAY INVESTMENT PLAN... 1 This page intentionally left blank. SUMMARY OF INVESTMENT
More informationALL Counties. ALL Districts
TEXAS TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION ALL Counties rhnute ORDER Page of ALL Districts The Texas Transportation Commission (commission) finds it necessary to propose amendments to. and., relating to Transportation
More informationFY Statewide Capital Investment Strategy... asset management, performance-based strategic direction
FY 2009-2018 Statewide Capital Investment Strategy.. asset management, performance-based strategic direction March 31, 2008 Governor Jon S. Corzine Commissioner Kris Kolluri Table of Contents I. EXECUTIVE
More informationNet Impacts of Detailed Travel Efficiencies I-49 South Economic Impact Analysis Eric McClellan, CDM Smith
Net Impacts of Detailed Travel Efficiencies I-49 South Economic Impact Analysis Eric McClellan, CDM Smith October 25, 2017 REMI Users Conference 2017 Evaluating Infrastructure Investment Project team Regional
More informationTools & Methods for Monitoring Performance Results
Tools & Methods for Monitoring Performance Results Craig B. Newell Bureau of Transportation Planning Manager Michigan Department of Transportation Overview of MDOT s Tools & Methods for Monitoring Performance
More informationREPORT TO THE CAPITAL REGIONAL DISTRICT BOARD MEETING OF WEDNESDAY, SEPTEMBER 8, 2010
REPORT TO THE CAPITAL REGIONAL DISTRICT BOARD MEETING OF WEDNESDAY, SEPTEMBER 8, 2010 SUBJECT City of Victoria Request for General Strategic Priorities Funding Application Support Johnson Street Bridge
More informationA Benefit Cost Analysis of the 45th Street at Calumet Avenue Grade Separation Project. Presented to the Town of Munster
A Benefit Cost Analysis of the 45th Street at Calumet Avenue Grade Separation Project Presented to the Town of Munster June 3, 2015 Table of Contents Executive Summary... 3 Project Description and Cost...
More informationSR 520 BRIDGE. Investment Grade Traffic and Revenue Study Update. SR 520 Bridge and the Eastside plus West Approach Bridge Project
SR 520 BRIDGE Investment Grade Traffic and Revenue Study Update SR 520 Bridge and the Eastside plus West Approach Bridge Project February 16, 2017 Photographs Courtesy of WSDOT Table of Contents Executive
More information10-Year Capital Highway Investment Plan DRAFT
This document is made available electronically by the Minnesota Legislative Reference Library as part of an ongoing digital archiving project. http://www.leg.state.mn.us/lrl/lrl.asp 10-Year Capital Highway
More informationI-81 Corridor Improvement Plan. October 2018 Public Meetings
I-81 Corridor Improvement Plan October 2018 Public Meetings I-81 Corridor Improvement Plan Overview of I-81 Corridor Improvement Plan purpose Summary of public feedback Prioritization of potential improvements
More informationNCHRP Consequences of Delayed Maintenance
NCHRP 14-20 Consequences of Delayed Maintenance Recommended Process for Bridges and Pavements prepared for NCHRP prepared by Cambridge Systematics, Inc. with Applied Research Associates, Inc. Spy Pond
More informationEconomic Appraisal Objectives
Network Screening HSM Vol. 1 (Part B) Chapters 7 & 8 MODULE 10. ECONOMIC APPRAISAL AND PRIORITIZATION Roadway Safety Management Process Diagnosis and Countermeasure Selection Economic Appraisal and Prioritization
More informationIncreased Transportation Infrastructure Investment Critical to State s Continued Economic Development
Increased Transportation Infrastructure Investment Critical to State s Continued Economic Development Overview In 2017 the Legislature passed and Governor Edmund G. Brown Jr. signed SB 1 (Beall; D-San
More informationFINANCIAL INFORMATION NOTE. Preliminary estimates of cost and revenue projections for the REM project (Réseau électrique métropolitain)
FINANCIAL INFORMATION NOTE Preliminary estimates of cost and revenue projections for the REM project (Réseau électrique métropolitain) January 2017 This document presents estimates of cost and revenue
More informationSafety Target Meeting Summary 10/3/2017
Safety Target Meeting Summary 10/3/2017 Recommendation: It was the recommendation of the committee that OTO support the statewide safety targets. Discussion: Natasha Longpine presented background information
More informationAnalysis of the Alameda County Transportation Expenditure Plan Prepared by Alameda County Transportation Commission
Analysis of the Alameda County Transportation Expenditure Plan Prepared by Alameda County Transportation Commission Discussion: In 1986, voters approved Measure B, a 1/2 cent sales tax, to fund transportation
More informationINVESTMENT STRATEGIES
3 INVESTMENT STRATEGIES 70 INVESTMENT STRATEGIES 71 A key role of Mobilizing Tomorrow is to outline a strategy for how the region will invest in transportation infrastructure over the next 35 years. This
More information10-Year Capital Highway Investment Plan
10-Year Capital Highway Investment Plan 2017-2026 OCTOBER 2016 1 Table of Contents PURPOSE OF 10-YEAR CAPITAL HIGHWAY INVESTMENT PLAN...1 This page intentionally left blank. SUMMARY OF INVESTMENT PLANS...6
More informationProjected Funding & Highway Conditions
Projected Funding & Highway Conditions Area Commission on Transportation Gary Farnsworth ODOT Interim Region 4 Manager March, 2011 Overview ODOT is facing funding reductions that will require new strategies
More informationStrategic Plan Performance Metrics & Targets
San Francisco Municipal Transportation Agency Strategic Plan Performance Metrics & Targets Fiscal Year 2019 Fiscal Year 2020 March 2018 SAFETY Goal 1: Create a safer transportation experience for everyone.
More informationWashington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority Metro Budget Overview
Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority Metro Budget Overview February 2011 Metro 10,877 Employees (10,974 budgeted) 1,491 Buses 588 Escalators and 237 Elevators 106 Miles of Track 92 Traction Power
More informationUNIFIED TRANSPORTATION PROGRAM
2002 UNIFIED TRANSPORTATION PROGRAM Blank Page SUMMARY OF CATEGORIES CATEGORIES NUMBER, NAME AND YEAR ESTABLISHED PROGRAMMING AUTHORITY FUNDING BANK BALANCE (Yes/) RESPONSIBLE ENTITY RANKING INDEX OR ALLOCATION
More informationTraffic Impact Analysis Guidelines Methodology
York County Government Traffic Impact Analysis Guidelines Methodology Implementation Guide for Section 154.037 Traffic Impact Analysis of the York County Code of Ordinances 11/1/2017 TABLE OF CONTENTS
More informationGLOSSARY. At-Grade Crossing: Intersection of two roadways or a highway and a railroad at the same grade.
Glossary GLOSSARY Advanced Construction (AC): Authorization of Advanced Construction (AC) is a procedure that allows the State to designate a project as eligible for future federal funds while proceeding
More information2017 UNIFIED TRANSPORTATION PROGRAM AND HB 20 IMPLEMENTATION
2017 UNIFIED TRANSPORTATION PROGRAM AND HB 20 IMPLEMENTATION HGAC Transportation Policy Council Meeting Current Initiatives On-going efforts to address performance-based planning and programming processes
More informationHighway Engineering-II
Highway Engineering-II Chapter 7 Pavement Management System (PMS) Contents What is Pavement Management System (PMS)? Use of PMS Components of a PMS Economic Analysis of Pavement Project Alternative 2 Learning
More informationImplementing the MTO s Priority Economic Analysis Tool
Implementing the MTO s Priority Economic Analysis Tool presented at 6th National Conference on Transportation Asset Management presented by Alison Bradbury Ontario Ministry of Transportation November 2,
More informationState of Ohio. Department of Transportation ~ Innovative Contracting Manual
State of Ohio Department of Transportation ~ Innovative Contracting Manual 5/1/2010 Copies of this manual and reference materials may be obtained at: Ohio Department of Transportation Division of Construction
More informationECONOMIC ANALYSIS. A. Introduction
Bridge Replacement for Improved Rural Access Sector Project (RRP PNG 43200) ECONOMIC ANALYSIS A. Introduction 1. The economic analysis of the proposed project has been carried out in accordance with ADB
More informationTulsa Arkansas River Crossing TIGER Grant Application Benefit Cost Analysis Technical Memo September 10, 2009
Tulsa 1-244 Arkansas River Crossing TIGER Grant Application Benefit Cost Analysis Technical Memo September 10, 2009 Introduction The formal benefit cost analysis has been conducted using best practices
More information1 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY. Figure 1-1: SR 156 Study Area & Monterey Expressway Alignment
1 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY The Transportation Agency for Monterey County (TAMC) Board commissioned a Level 2 Traffic and Revenue study on the feasibility of collecting tolls to fund the proposed new SR156 connector
More informationINVESTING STRATEGICALLY
11 INVESTING STRATEGICALLY Federal transportation legislation (Fixing America s Surface Transportation Act FAST Act) requires that the 2040 RTP be based on a financial plan that demonstrates how the program
More informationfinal report Benefit/Cost Analysis for U.S. 41 Corridor ITS New Start - Winnebago, Outagamie, and Brown Counties
Benefit/Cost Analysis for U.S. 41 Corridor ITS New Start - Winnebago, Outagamie, and Brown Counties final report prepared for Wisconsin Department of Transportation prepared by Cambridge Systematics, Inc.
More information0.- NEW JERSEY. and as of
0.- NEW JERSEY TURNPIKE AUTHORITY and Unaudited Financial Statements as of and 2016 (A Component Unit of the State of New Jersey) (Dollars shown in thousands) 1 Table of Contents Highlights... 2 Condensed
More informationTTFAC Hearing Regarding Chesapeake Transportation System June 18, 2012
TTFAC Hearing Regarding Chesapeake Transportation System June 18, 2012 1 Chesapeake Transportation System The Chesapeake Transportation System (CTS) consists of the existing Chesapeake Expressway and the
More informationTransfer of Federal Gas Tax Revenues Under the New Deal for Cities and Communities. Municipal Funding Agreement Guide.
Transfer of Federal Gas Tax Revenues Under the New Deal for Cities and Communities Municipal Funding Agreement Guide January 2010 Administered by: Association of Municipalities of Ontario 200 University
More information2018 Annual Report. Highway Department Accomplishments
2018 Annual Report Highway Department The vision of the Eau Claire County Highway Department is to provide services to the taxpayer that, to the best of our ability, provides safe and efficient travel
More informationCountywide Dialogue on Transportation
Countywide Dialogue on Transportation Fairfax Federation November 15, 2012 Fairfax County Background Fairfax County s economic health depends on an efficient transportation system. The County strives to
More informationInstructions for Completing the Annual Road and Street Finance Report
Instructions for Completing the Annual Road and Street Finance Report Additional information you wish to submit may be attached to the report on 8.5" by 11" paper. Please round all amounts up or down to
More information2017 UNIFIED TRANSPORTATION PROGRAM AND HB 20 IMPLEMENTATION
2017 UNIFIED TRANSPORTATION PROGRAM AND HB 20 IMPLEMENTATION TEMPO Meeting July 21, 2016 Current Initiatives On-going efforts to address performance-based planning and programming processes as required
More informationDeck Preservation Strategies with a Bridge Management System. Paul Jensen Montana Department of Transportation
Deck Preservation Strategies with a Bridge Management System Paul Jensen Montana Department of Transportation Email : pjensen@mt.gov Development Of A Roadmap Definitions Outcomes Culture Models Performance
More informationA New Cost-Benefit Methodology for Highway-Railway Grade Crossing Safety Programs
August 6 th, 2014 Ali Rezvani, Ricardo Cruz, Andrew Thomas GLX-2014 A New Cost-Benefit Methodology for Highway-Railway Grade Crossing Safety Programs Motivation Competition for increasingly scarce resources
More informationTOLLED MANAGED LANE POLICIES
Proposed Modifications to Managed Lane Policy 1. A fixed-fee schedule will be applied during the first six months of operation; dynamic pricing will be applied thereafter. 2. The toll rate will be set
More informationProject 06-06, Phase 2 June 2011
ASSESSING AND INTERPRETING THE BENEFITS DERIVED FROM IMPLEMENTING AND USING ASSET MANAGEMENT SYSTEMS Project 06-06, Phase 2 June 2011 Midwest Regional University Transportation Center College of Engineering
More information2008 Citizens Guide to Sound Transit, Phase 2
Page 1 Key Findings ST2 would spend about $22.8 billion, yet serve only 0.4 percent of all trips in 2030. ST2 would shift only 0.84 percent of passenger vehicles from the road to transit by 2030. ST2 would
More informationRIDOA STATEWIDE PLANNING PROGRAM Transportation Planning
RIDOA STATEWIDE PLANNING PROGRAM Transportation Planning Land & Water Conservation Summit March 10, 2012 Statewide Planning Framework Department of Administration Statewide Planning Program State Planning
More informationQUALITY TRANSPORTATION SUMMARY
SUMMARY Transportation systems influence virtually every aspect of community life. They are the means for moving people, goods, and services throughout the community, and they play a significant role in
More informationPublic Transportation and the Nation s Economy
Public Transportation and the Nation s Economy A Quantitative Analysis of Public Transportation s Economic Impact Prepared by Cambridge Systematics, Inc. with Economic Development Research Group This study
More informationFY2017 Budget Discussion
Finance & Administration Committee Information Item IV-B November 5, 2015 FY2017 Budget Discussion Page 70 of 116 Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority Board Action/Information Summary Action
More informationOklahoma Transportation Authority Report to Bondholders Second Quarter Phil Tomlinson, Director and Secretary of Transportation
Governor Brad Henry, Member Ex-Officio Douglas F. Riebel, Chairman Mike Leonard, Vice-Chairman Greg Massey, Secretary & Treasurer Clark Brewster, Member Hal Ellis, Member C. Kendric Fergeson, Member Phil
More informationKeep Wisconsin Moving Smart Investments Measurable Results
Keep Wisconsin Moving Smart Investments Measurable Results Wisconsin Transportation Finance and Policy Commission January 2013 Investment in transportation Investment in our economy Investment in our quality
More informationGladys Porter Early College High School. Alberto Velez. Brownsville, Texas
Gladys Porter Early College High School Alberto Velez Brownsville, Texas Chapter 14 Transportation Section 14.1 TRANSPORTATION CHOICES Objectives Identify various types of transportation. Explain how to
More informationMeasure I Strategic Plan, April 1, 2009 Glossary Administrative Committee Advance Expenditure Agreement (AEA) Advance Expenditure Process
Glossary Administrative Committee This committee makes recommendations to the Board of Directors and provides general policy oversight that spans the multiple program responsibilities of the organization
More informationImproving Bridge Risk and Deterioration Modeling
11 th National Conference on Transportation Asset Management Improving Bridge Risk and Deterioration Modeling Mohammad Dehghani, Caitlin McKinley, Zach Rubin, and Wayne Francisco, GHD Minneapolis, MN July
More informationParking Services and Transportation Planning
Prepared for the Board of Governors April 10, 2014 Table of Contents PARKING SERVICES AND TRANSPORTATION PLANNING... 1 Background:... 2 Transportation Demand Management (TDM)... 2 Safety Initiatives:...
More informationFinancial Management. Adoption: CEO Date: May 2017 (Adoption/most recent revision) Review period: Executive Manager Business Performance
Category: Financial Management Adoption: CEO Date: May 2017 (Adoption/most recent revision) Review period: Three years Responsible Manager: Executive Manager Business Performance CEO Signature Date 20
More informationThe Oregon Department of Transportation Budget
19 20 The Oregon Department of Transportation Budget The Oregon Department of Transportation was established in 1969 to provide a safe, efficient transportation system that supports economic opportunity
More informationChapter 3: Regional Transportation Finance
Chapter 3: Regional Transportation Finance This chapter examines the sources of funding for transportation investments in the coming years. It describes recent legislative actions that have changed the
More informationPurpose. 2 Third Crossing Business Plan
Business Plan April 18, 2017 Purpose This is the third of three information sheets on critical pieces of work related to the preliminary design and business plan development for the Third Crossing. This
More information10-Year Capital Highway Investment Plan
10-Year Capital Highway Investment Plan 2016-2025 DECEMBER 2015 1 This page intentionally left blank. TABLE OF CONTENTS Purpose of 10-Year Capital Highway Investment Plan...1 Summary of 10 Year Plan Investments...5
More informationEconomic Implications of Selection of Long-Life versus Conventional Caltrans Rehabilitation Strategies for High-Volume Highways
Economic Implications of Selection of Long-Life versus Conventional Caltrans Rehabilitation Strategies for High-Volume Highways Draft report prepared for the CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION Division
More informationTABLE OF CONTENTS PAGE NUMBER
TABLE OF CONTENTS PAGE NUMBER Chapter 1 Introduction 1-1 Corridor Description 1-2 DRPA Bridges 1-2 Competing Bridges 1-6 Study Objective and Scope of Work 1-8 Chapter 2 Traffic and Toll Revenue Trends
More information1.0 CITY OF HOLLYWOOD, FL
1.0 CITY OF HOLLYWOOD, FL PAVEMENT MANAGEMENT SYSTEM REPORT 1.1 PROJECT INTRODUCTION The nation's highways represent an investment of billions of dollars by local, state and federal governments. For the
More informationECONOMIC AND FINANCIAL ANALYSES FOR TRANCHE 2
Appendix 6 ECONOMIC AND FINANCIAL ANALYSES FOR TRANCHE 2 1. Background. The Second Rural Connectivity Investment Program will support the Government of India in improving rural connectivity through the
More informationABILENE MPO TRANSPORTATION POLICY BOARD MEETING
ABILENE MPO TRANSPORTATION POLICY BOARD MEETING Tuesday, October 16, 2018 at 1:30 pm City Council Chambers Abilene City Hall 555 Walnut Street, Abilene, Texas 1. Call to Order. Public comment may be taken
More informationTravel Forecasting for Corridor Alternatives Analysis
Travel Forecasting for Corridor Alternatives Analysis Purple Line Functional Master Plan Advisory Group January 22, 2008 1 Purpose of Travel Forecasting Problem Definition Market Analysis Current Future
More informationIntercity Transit Community Update
Intercity Transit Community Update Mission and Vision Mission: Our mission is to provide and promote transportation choices that support an accessible, sustainable, livable, healthy, prosperous community.
More informationTransit Asset Management Initial Performance Targets
Item #7 TPB Technical Committee January 6, 2017 Transit Asset Management Initial Performance Targets January 6, 2017 Background Federal TAM Law MAP-21 required that every transit operator receiving federal
More informationFindings & Recommendations Discussion
Findings & Recommendations Discussion 1 Discussion Topics Funding and Scenarios T WORKS project letting timeframes Viable funding and finance options Calculator Local participation funds for new projects
More informationResidential Street Improvement Plan
Residential Street Improvement Plan Introduction Aging infrastructure, including streets, is a nationwide problem and it is one of the biggest challenges facing many cities and counties throughout the
More informationADEPT NATIONAL BRIDGES GROUP COMMUTED SUMS FOR THE RELIEF OF MAINTENANCE AND RECONSTRUCTION OF BRIDGES
ADEPT NATIONAL BRIDGES GROUP COMMUTED SUMS FOR THE RELIEF OF MAINTENANCE AND RECONSTRUCTION OF BRIDGES GUIDANCE NOTES Rev 3 August 2017 INDEX Section Page 1 Introduction to Commuted Sums 3 2 When are Commuted
More informationREVISED ENGINEER'S REPORT ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO OF THE CITY OF SAN JACINTO
REVISED ENGINEER'S REPORT ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. 2003-1 OF THE CITY OF SAN JACINTO December 11, 2003 REVISED ENGINEER'S REPORT ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. 2003-1 CITY OF SAN JACINTO Prepared for CITY OF SAN
More informationPrioritising bridge replacements
Prioritising bridge replacements Andrew Sonnenberg, National Bridge Engineering Manager, Pitt&Sherry ABSTRACT Road and Rail managers own a variety of assets which are aging and will need replacement. There
More informationMETRO. Metro Funding. Associated Master Plan: Comprehensive Master Transportation Plan (MTP) for Arlington. Neighborhood(s):
METRO METRO METRO 2017 2026 CIP Metro Funding Project Description The Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority (WMATA/Metro) is a unique federal-state-local partnership formed to provide mass transit
More informationFinancial Snapshot October 2014
Financial Snapshot October 2014 Financial Snapshot About the Financial Snapshot The Financial Snapshot provides answers to frequently asked questions regarding MoDOT s finances. This document provides
More informationEnvironmental Planning Statement
Operational Programmes for Malta Cohesion Policy 2007 2013 Investing in Our Future This Project is being considered for European Union part-financing Operational Programme I Cohesion Policy 2007-2013 Investing
More informationADEPT NATIONAL BRIDGES GROUP COMMUTED SUMS FOR THE RELIEF OF MAINTENANCE AND RECONSTRUCTION OF BRIDGES
ADEPT NATIONAL BRIDGES GROUP COMMUTED SUMS FOR THE RELIEF OF MAINTENANCE AND RECONSTRUCTION OF BRIDGES GUIDANCE NOTES Rev 1 January 2016 INDEX Section Page 1 Introduction to Commuted Sums 3 2 When are
More information