Summary Open Minutes California State Personnel Board Meeting September 5, 2013

Transcription

1 Summary Open Minutes California State Personnel Board Meeting September 5, 2013 I. Open Session - Call to Order and Roll Call Members Present: Patricia Clarey, President Kimiko Burton Richard Costigan II. Information and Discussion Items 1. Report of the Executive Officer Suzanne Ambrose - CalHR s second annual conference will be held on September 19, Suzy will provide opening remarks and a brief update on SPB. Staff will host a panel on the Compliance Review Division. - Little Hoover Commission will hold a post-implementation review on GRP1 on November 21, President Clarey and Suzy will testify at the hearing. - Member Costigan and Suzy attended the Basic Correctional Officer (CO) Academy graduation on August 30, It was the first CO graduation in several years. It is anticipated that there will be over 600 academy graduates next year. 2. Report of the Chief Counsel Alvin Gittisriboongul - The Legal staff, in conjunction with DGS and CalHR, are developing a training program regarding issues related to personnel matters, contracting out, and anticipated changes to the law. 3. Report on the California Public Employees Retirement System - Member Costigan (Report Attached) CalPERS Report 4. New Business - None 5. Public Comment on Matters Not on the Agenda - None III. Hearings 1. Department of Health Care Services CEA Request Attachment 5 Persons Participating: Toby Douglas, Director, DHCS Karen Johnson, Chief Deputy Director, DHCS ACTION: Approved Page 1 of 16

2 Summary Open Minutes California State Personnel Board Meeting September 5, Governor s Office of Emergency Services CEA Attachment 6 Request Persons Participating: Brendon Murphy, Deputy Director, OES ACTION: Approved 3. Office of System Integrations CEA Request Attachment 6 Persons Participating: Shell Culp, Chief Deputy Director, OSI ACTION: Approved IV. Oral Argument 1. Case No PA Persons Participating: Steven Bassoff, Esq. Kevin Geckeler, Labor Relations Counsel, CalHR Laura Freeman, Senior Staff Counsel, DCA ACTION: Submitted 2. Case No A Persons Participating: Suzanne Wyatt, Attorney III, CDCR Leanne Kent, Staff Counsel, CCPOA ACTION: Submitted V. Closed Session Attachment 1 VI. Reconvene into Open Session Action Items 1. Approval of Strategic Plan Strategic Plan ACTION: Approved 2. Draft Audit Reports for the following: Board of State and Community Corrections California Coastal Commission California Debt and Investment Advisory Committee California Department of Consumer Affairs Boards California Department of Consumer Affairs Bureaus California Department of Corporations California Department of Financial Institutions California Health Facilities Financing Authority California Pollution Control Financing Authority Page 2 of 16

3 Summary Open Minutes California State Personnel Board Meeting September 5, 2013 California Science Center California Tahoe Conservancy California Tax Credit Allocation Committee Commission on State Mandates Delta Stewardship Council Department of Insurance Health and Human Services Agency Managed Risk Medical Insurance Board Natural Resources Agency Office of Environmental Health Hazard Assessment Office of the Inspector General Office of Traffic Safety Scholarshare Investment Board Sierra Nevada Conservancy State Council on Developmental Disabilities State Treasurer s Office Wildlife Conservation Board ACTION: Approved 3. Approval of the Draft Summary Open Minutes from Attachment 2 the July 25 and August 8, 2013, Board Meetings ACTION: Approved 4. Approval of the Draft Closed Minutes from the July 25 and August 8, 2013, Board Meetings ACTION: Approved 5. Approval of the Resolution Extending Time Pursuant Attachment 3 to Government Code Section ACTION: Adopted 6. Non-Hearing Agenda Attachment 4 See Attachment 4 for Actions 7. Career Executive Assignments Attachment 5 See Attachment 5 for Actions 8. Submitted Items Attachment 6 See Attachment 6 for Actions 9. Evidentiary Cases and Non-Evidentiary Cases Attachment 7 See Attachment 7 for Actions Page 3 of 16

4 Summary Open Minutes California State Personnel Board Meeting September 5, 2013 VII. Adjournment MINUTES CERTIFICATION Page 4 of 16

5 CalPERS Update August 2013 The CalPERS Board of administration approved the following Board Investment Consultant Contract items: Extension of Wilshire Associates contract to act as the Board s Primary Pension Consultant Extension of Pension Consulting Alliance s contract to act as the Board s Back-up to the Primary Pension Consultant Extension of the Inflation-Linked Asset Class Spring-Fed Pool and Meketa Investment Group s contract to act as the Board s Investment Consultant for the Infrastructure Program CalPERS staff presented a CalPERS for California Report to the Investment Committee, which outlined the results of the CalPERS initiative to invest in portfolio companies in traditionally underserved markets primarily located in California. The CalPERS Board adopted an Oppose Unless Amended position on Assembly Bill (AB) 912 because provisions of this bill would restrict the California Public Employees Retirement System (CalPERS) Board s authority to establish benefit plan designs that are negotiated on behalf of our members. The CalPERS Board adopted a Neutral position on AB 1144, because the bill provides the City of Carson with the flexibility to address its post-retirement health benefits, which are the result of collective bargaining, and does not have an impact on the administration of the Public Employee Medical and Hospital Care Act (PEMHCA). The CalPERS Board adopted a Neutral position on AB 1346, because the bill provides the Sacramento Metropolitan Fire District with the flexibility to address its post-retirement health benefits, which are the result of collective bargaining and do not have a direct impact on the administration of PEMHCA. The CalPERS Board adopted a Neutral position on Senate Bill (SB) 277 because the bill proposes policy changes that if signed into law would reflect agreement between labor, as the bill s sponsor, and management, assuming the Legislature passes the bill and the Governor signs the bill. The CalPERS Board adopted an Oppose, Unless Amended position on SB 598. The bill should be amended to remove the language requiring physician notification. The CalPERS Board adopted a Support position on SB 746. CalPERS staff presented a customer service and support report to the Pension & Health Benefits Committee that highlighted CalPERS customer service improvements in Fiscal Year

6 CalPERS Update August 2013 The CalPERS Dependent Eligibility Verification (DEV) Project is currently in the verification stage, which will be performed in cycles for State, Public Agency and School employers with an additional cycle for new hires at the end of the process.

7 Summary Open Minutes California State Personnel Board Meeting September 5, 2013 Closed Session Attachment 1 Employee Appointments, Disciplinary Matters, and Other Appeals Deliberations to consider matters submitted at prior hearing. [Government Code Sections 11126(c)(3), 18653(3)] Deliberation on Non-Evidentiary Cases and Adverse Actions, Discrimination Complaints and other Proposed Decisions Submitted by Administrative Law Judges Deliberations on proposed, rejected, remanded, and submitted decisions, petitions for rehearing, and other matters related to cases heard by Administrative Law Judges of the SPB or by the Board itself. [Government Code sections 11126(c)(3), 18653] Pending Litigation Conference with legal counsel to confer with and receive advice regarding pending litigation when discussion in open session would be prejudicial. Counsel will submit a list of SPB litigations and writ litigations for the Board to review and confer. [Government Code sections 11126(e), 18653] Recommendations to the Legislature Deliberations on recommendations to the Legislature. [Government Code section 18653] Recommendations to the Governor Deliberations on recommendations to the Governor. [Government Code section 18653] Page 5 of 16

8 Summary Open Minutes California State Personnel Board Meeting September 5, 2013 On September 5, 2013, the Board took the following action on the Resolution listed as presented by Suzanne Ambrose, Executive Officer, California State Personnel Board. VOTE: Clarey, Burton, Costigan Aye Notice of Government Code Section Resolution Attachment 3 Government Code Section requires that cases pending before SPB Administrative Law Judges (ALJ's) be completed within six months or no later than 90 days after submission of a case, whichever is first, absent the publication of substantial reasons for needing an additional 45 days. The Board hereby publishes its substantial reasons for the need for the 45-day extension for some of the cases now pending before it for decision. An additional 45 days may be required in cases that require multiple days of hearings, that have been delayed by unusual circumstances, or that involve any delay generated by either party (including, but not limited to, submission of written briefs, requests for settlement conferences, continuances, discovery disputes, pre-hearing motions). In such cases, six months may be inadequate for the ALJ to hear the entire case, prepare a proposed decision containing the detailed factual and legal analysis required by law, and for the SPB to review the decision and adopt, modify or reject the proposed decision within the time limitations of the statute. Therefore, at its next meeting, the Board will issue the attached resolution extending the time limitation by 45 days for all cases that meet the above criteria, and that have been before the Board for less than six months as of the date of the Board meeting. Government Code Section Resolution WHEREAS, Section provides that, absent waiver by the appellant, the time period in which the Board must render its decision on a petition pending before it shall not exceed six months from the date the petition was filed or 90 days from the date of submission; and WHEREAS, Section also provides for an extension of the time limitations by 45 additional days if the Board publishes substantial reasons for the need for the extension in its calendar prior to the conclusion of the six-month period; and WHEREAS, the Agenda for the Board meeting included an item titled "Notice of Government Code Section Resolution" which sets forth substantial reasons for utilizing that 45-day extension to extend the time to decide particular cases pending before the Board; Page 6 of 16

9 Summary Open Minutes California State Personnel Board Meeting September 5, 2013 WHEREAS, there are currently pending before the Board cases that have required multiple days of hearing and/or that have been delayed by unusual circumstances or by acts or omissions of the parties themselves; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED AND ORDERED that the time limitations set forth in Government Code Section are hereby extended an additional 45 days for all cases that have required multiple days of hearing or that have been delayed by acts or omissions of the parties or by unusual circumstances and that have been pending before the Board for less than six months as of the date this resolution is adopted. ACTION: Adopted Page 7 of 16

10 Summary Open Minutes California State Personnel Board Meeting September 5, 2013 On September 5, 2013, the Board took the following action on the Non-Hearing Agenda as presented by Suzanne Ambrose, Executive Officer, California State Personnel Board. VOTE: Clarey, Burton, Costigan Aye Non-Hearing Agenda Attachment 4 A. Requests to Establish, Revise or Abolish Classifications, Alternate Range Criteria, etc. 1. DRIVER SAFETY HEARING OFFICER The California Department of Human Resources, on behalf of the California Department of Motor Vehicles, proposes to retitle the Driver Safety Officer classification to Driver Safety Hearing Officer, revise the classification specification and make minor revisions to Alternate Range Criteria 133. ACTION: Approved 2. MOTOR VEHICLE REPRESENTATIVE The California Department of Human Resources, on behalf of the California Department of Motor Vehicles, proposes to consolidate the Motor Vehicle Field Representative (MVFR) and the Motor Vehicle Technician (MVT) classifications. The MVFR classification will be retitled to Motor Vehicle Representative. The MVT classification and Alternate Range Criteria 245 will be abolished. Minor revisions will be made to Alternate Range Criteria 243. ACTION: Approved 3. DIRECTOR, DIVISION OF LAW ENFORCEMENT The California Department of Human Resources, on behalf of the California Department of Justice, proposes minor specification revisions to the Director, Division of Law Enforcement, Department of Justice, CEA classification. ACTION: Approved 4. DISABILITY INSURANCE PROGRAM REPRESENTATIVE AND EMPLOYMENT PROGRAM REPRESENTATIVE The California Department of Human Resources, on behalf of the Employment Development Department, proposes minimum qualifications corrections to the Disability Insurance Program Representative and Employment Program Representative specifications. ACTION: Approved Page 8 of 16

11 Summary Open Minutes California State Personnel Board Meeting September 5, 2013 B. Requests to Abolish Classes that have had No Incumbents for More than Two Years NONE C. Request for Backdate of Appointments 1. CASE NO BD Classification: Associate Governmental Program Analyst Department: California s Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation ACTION: Approved Page 9 of 16

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

32

33

34

35

36

37

38

39

40

41

42

43

44

45

46

47

48

49

50

51

52

53

54

55

56

57

58

59

60

61

62

63

64

65

66

67

68

69

70

71 STATE OF CALIFORNIA Governor Edmund G. Brown Jr. DEPARTMENT PERSONNEL MANAGEMENT DIVISION 1515 "S" STREET, NORTH BUILDING, SUITE 400 SACRAMENTO, CA OF HUMAN RESOURCES September 5, 2013 TO: Five-Member Board FROM: Nicole Holtzman, Staff Personnel Program Analyst ~ Personnel Management Division SUBJECT: Revisions to Disability Insurance Program Representative and Employment Program Representative Classifications SUMMARY OF ISSUES: The Department of Human Resources (CaiHR) on behalf of the Employment Development Department (EDD) proposes to correct the Disability Insurance Program Representative (DIPR) and the Employment Program Representative (EPR) classifications' minimum qualifications. On March 22, 2011, the Employment Program Assistant (EPA) classification was abolished. The EPA classification was part of the minimum qualifications for the DIPR and EPR classifications. When the EPA classification was abolished, the second minimum qualfications pattern for the DIPR and the EPR was revised to Office Assistant (Typing), Range B for the second pattern, which was in error. CONSULTED WITH: Fariba Shahmirzadi, EDD Chief, Classifications and Pay and Payroll Services Sections Nanci Loftin, EDD Exam Manager Lisa Torres, EDD Labor Relations Manager In accordance with the terms of the CalHR and Bargaining Unit 1 contract, the Service Employees International Union has been notified of this proposal. CLASSIFICATION See Part B. CONSIDERATIONS: RECOMMENDATIONS: That the proposed revised specifications for the following classifications as shown in this calendar be adopted: Disability Insurance Program Representative Employment Program Representative

72 Classification Proposal Package, Part B CLASSIFICATION CONSIDERATIONS Background 1. Provide some historical perspective about the organizational setting of the subject class and the needs that this request addresses. On March 22, 2011 the Employment Program Assistant (EPA) classification was abolished. The EPA classification was part of the minimum qualifications for the Disability Insurance Program Representative (DIPR) and the Employment Program Representative (EPR) classifications, therefore the classification specifications for the DIPR and the EPR were revised. CalHR had mistakenly revised the minimum qualifications from EPA to any class equivalent to the Office Assistant (Typing), Range B. Classification Considerations 2. What class does the subject classifications report to? DIPR report to Disability Insurance Program Manager I and EPR reports to an Employment Program Manager I. 3. Will the subject classifications supervise? If so, what classifications? DIPR and EPR classifications do not have supervisory or managerial responsibilities. 4. What are the specific duties of the subject classifications? The EPR in Unemployment Insurance (Ul) is filing Ul benefit claims, authorizes payment or provides information on claim status. The EPR independently reviews, investigates and determines if an individual is eligible or ineligible to receive Ul benefits in accordance with Ul laws, rules, regulations, and procedures. An EPR informs customers and employers of their rights and responsibilities under the Ul program. These services are provided by telephone in a non-public, call-center environment that includes the use of automated data systems. The EPR in Workforce Services (WS) typically performs the following duties: Provides employment services to job seekers and employers following prescribed WS policies and procedures; provides customer service to job seekers ánd employers, and, if necessary, assists customers who are unable to use self-service equipment/programs; expands the degree of employment services available in a particular community by providing services at special sites such as schools of vocational education, community colleges, and parks and recreation facilities; solicits and enters employer job listings into California Job Openings Browse System (CaijOBS) and/or other local operating system; and enters information into Employer Management Contact System (ECMS). The DIPR works in either a Claims Management Office, managing a caseload or in a Customer Service Center, receiving calls. The DIPR independently reviews claims, analyzes data, and determines eligibility in accordance with Disability Insurance laws, rules, regulations, policies, and procedures. The DIPR discusses claim information and program requirements with customers and the public in an automated phone environment and/or in person, while simultaneously inputting and accessing automated data systems. 5. What is the decision making responsibility of the subject classifications? The EPR independently reviews, investigates and determines if an individual is eligible or ineligible to receive Ul benefits in accordance with Ullaws, rules, regulations, and procedures. DIPR determines eligibility in accordance with Disability Insurance laws, rules, regulations, policies, and procedures

73 Classification Proposal Package, Part B 6. What would be the consequence of error if incumbents in the subject classifications did not perform their jobs? The consequence of error is if Ul or DI benefits are approved or denied in error, the State is impacted and may lose funds. 7. What are the analytical requirements expected of incumbents in the subject classifications? The analytical requirements expected of both DIPR and EPR incumbents are varied depending on the unit's functions and where positions are placed, however for most of them the analytical expectation is minimal. 8. What are the purpose, type, and level of contacts incumbents in the subject classifications make? The level of contacts of incumbents is with public either in person or on the phone. Need for New Class (if necessary) 9. For new classes only: what existing classes were considered and why were they not appropriate? NIA Minimum Qualifications 10. What are the proposed or current minimum qualifications of the subject classes and why are they appropriate? DIPR: Either I Four years of experience with the Employment Development Department. (Candidates who are within six months of completing the required experience will be admitted to the examination; however, they must meet the required experience before being considered eligible for appointment.) Or II Completion of 60 semester units or 90 quarter units of college course work. and Two years of public contact experience providing services or information. Or III Equivalent to graduation from college. (Must provide evidence of registration as a senior in a recognized educational institution to be admitted in the examination, and must secure evidence of graduation or its equivalent before being considered eligible for appointment.) EPR: Either I Four years of experience with the Employment Development Department. (Candidates who are within six months of completing the required experience will be admitted to the examination; however, they must meet the required experience before being considered eligible for appointment.) Or II Completion of 60 semester units or 90 quarter units of college course work. and Two years of public contact experience providing services or information. Or III Equivalent to graduation from college. (Must provide evidence of registration as a senior in a recognized institution to be admitted in the examination, and must secure evidence of graduation or its equivalent before being considered for appointment.) - 2 -

74 Classification Proposal Package, Part B Probationary Period D The probationary period is six months 11. If a probationary period other than six months is proposed, what is the rationale? N/A Status Considerations 12. What is the impact on current incumbents? None 13. Will current employees move by examination, transfer, reallocation, split-off, etc.? Explain rationale. N/A Consulted With 14. In addition to the departmental contacts listed on the cover sheet, list the names and affiliations of persons who were consulted during the development of this proposal. Nanci Loftin, Exam Manager Lisa Torres, Labor Relations Manager - 3 -

75 CALIFORNIA STATE PERSONNEL BOARD SPECIFICATION Schematic Code: Class Code: Established: Revised: Title Changed: WB /1/83 3/22/11 EMPLOYMENT PROGRAM REPRESENTATIVE DEFINITION Under supervision in the Employment Development Department to perform a variety of professional work that is necessary to administer a number of departmental programs including employability,. placement, and related services; and unemployment insurance benefit payments. JOB CHARACTERISTICS The class of Employment Program Representative is the recruiting, training, and journey level class for persons to perform the full range of professional Job Service or Unemployment Insurance work. Under close supervision, incumbents receive classroom and on-the-job training in the fundamentals required to successfully perform in either area. As proficiency increases, incumbents are assigned increasingly complex and difficult work. Some of the positions in this class require fluency in both English and a second language to facilitate communication with claimants. Persons interested in qualifying for special language positions must pass both the proficiency test for a specified non-english language and the general examination administered to all candidates for positions in the class. TYPICAL TASKS Job Service Program: Gathering and disseminating labor market information to employers and applicants; assisting employers in their labor needs; interviewing, testing, and referring applicants for work; making job development contacts; negotiating on behalf of applicants for salary, benefit, and experience requirements; providing employment and placement services to special applicant groups such as exoffenders, the disabled, veterans, and minorities; complying with all Federal and State legislation, departmental policies, and procedures with respect to special services and considerations for these groups; promoting self-service employment services for employers and job seekers; assisting in providing employment-related services; contacting employers to identify and list available jobs; promoting

76 Employment Program Representative -3- KNOWLEDGE AND ABILITIES Knowledge of: General economic conditions and trends; California industrial, labor, business and agricultural conditions, trends, employment practices, and employment and training requirements; factors affecting labor supply and demand; labor, management, employer, and governmental organizations concerned with the Department's programs; provisions of State and Federal laws and services available to veterans; problems of economically disadvantaged individuals, groups, and communities; scope and availability of programs and services designed to alleviate social problems through employment and training processes; automated data systems; principles of unemployment insurance; and interviewing techniques utilized in claims determination work including adjudication. Ability to: Interpret and apply provisions of the California Unemployment Insurance Code laws, rules, regulations, policies, and procedures; interpret and apply regulations, policies, and procedures of the Department and the U.S. Department of Labor relating to unemployment insurance benefits, employability, placement, and training programs; gather and analyze data and reason logically; comprehend written material and interpret and apply rules and instructions; communicate effectively; utilize automated data; analyze situations and take effective action; accurately secure, evaluate, analyze, and record facts; establish and maintain cooperative relations with those contacted in the work; gain the confidence of all customers-employers, the public, and community organizations; market the Department's services; and relate to members of all ethnic and racial groups and be sensitive to customer and community group needs. pmd/sks

77 CALIFORNIA STATE PERSONNEL BOARD SPECIFICATION Schematic Code: Class Code: Established: Revised: Title Changed: WE /1/83 3/22/11 DISABILITY INSURANCE PROGRAM REPRESENTATIVE DEFINITION Under supervision in the Employment Development Department to perform a variety of professional disability claims examination work necessary to administer the Department's Disability Insurance Program. JOB CHARACTERISTICS The class of Disability Insurance Program Representative is the recruiting, training, and journey level class for persons to perform disability claims examination work. Under close supervision, incumbents receive classroom and on-the-job training in the fundamentals of disability claims examination and eligibility determination. Experienced incumbents in this class may act in a "lead" capacity over lower-level staff. As incumbents progress, they perform a full range of disability claims examination work including the investigation of the most difficult and complex cases with minimal supervision and a considerable degree of independence. Some of the positions in this class require fluency in both English and a second language to facilitate communication with claimants. Persons interested in qualifying for special language positions must pass both the proficiency test for a specified non-english language and the general examination administered to all candidates for positions in the class. TYPICAL TASKS Examining and investigating all types of Disability Insurance claims; scheduling independent medical examinations when appropriate, and analyzing all employment data in order to determine claimant's eligibility and claim duration; making eligibility determinations and informing claimants; filing workers' compensation liens when injury is work related; documenting all actions and decisions; following up on claimant's status through duration of claim; identifying and reporting any suspected fraudulent claims or activities; and responding to inquiries from claimants and the public.

78 MINIMUM QUALIFICATIONS Disability Insurance Program Representative -2- Either I Four years of experience with the Employment Development Department. (Candidates who are within six months of completing the required experience will be admitted to the examination; however, they must meet the required experience before being considered eligible for appointment. ) Or II One year of 02cperience in the Employment Development Department performing the duties of a class at a level of responsibility comparable to that of an O:f(ficeAssistant (Typing), Range B. Or II-±- Completion of 60 semester units or 90 quarter units of college course work. and Two years of public contact experience providing services or information. Or ±- III Equivalent to graduation from college. (Must provide evidence of registration as a senior in a recognized educational institution to be admitted in the examination, and must secure evidence of graduation or its equivalent before being considered eligible for appointment.) KNOWLEDGE AND ABILITIES Knowledge of: General labor, economic, and business trends; labor market conditions; interviewing techniques; principles of insurance payments programs; medical terminology and common medical references used in interpreting medical findings; employment practices and conditions and physical demands of occupations in industrial, domestic, professional, commercial, and agricultural employment in California; workers' compensation and employer liability laws affecting California workers; and provisions of State and Federal laws affecting disability insurance programs. Ability to: Interpret and apply provisions of the California Unemployment Insurance Code, rules, regulations, policies, and procedures of the Employment Development Department, and precedent decisions of the California Unemployment Insurance Appeals Board and Workers' Compensation Appeals Board relating to the Disability Insurance program laws, rules, regulations, policies, and procedures; gather and analyze data and reason logically; comprehend written material and interpret and apply rules and instructions; communicate effectively; analyze situations accurately and take effective action; utilize automated data systems; interpret medical facts and determine the probable duration of disability; secure and evaluate facts and evidence by interview or correspondence, make sound decisions, and

79 Disability Insurance Program Representative -3- present testimony at hearings; establish and maintain cooperative relations with others; and relate to members of all ethnic, racial, and disability groups and be sensitive to community group needs. pmd/sks

80 CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF HUMAN RESOURCES CLASSIFICATION ITEM TRANSMITTAL Board Meeting Date: Location: ROUTING: September 5, 2013 Sacramento ANALYST Calendar: Hearing items will be scheduled for 30 minutes unless otherwise specified: Nicole Holtzman ~./ [2SJ Non-Hearing D Staff MANAGER _.._K ",,..\"/ D Hearing Barbara Hudson V'o.{ SUBJECT ISECRETARIAT Minor specification revisions to the Disability Insurance Program Representative and the Employment Program Representative classes DPA OR DEPT REVIEW 1. Certificate of Conformance (Form 137): 2. Specifications: 3. Allocation Standards: 4. Class Data Sheet: 5. Salary Analysis: 6. Salary Comp Resolution (Deep Class Only): 7. Draft Item Sent to Employee Union(s): NOTIFY AND SEND COPIES TO: Yvonne Walker, President Service Employees' International Union (SElU) th Street Sacramento, CA 6811 D Attached [2SJ Not Required ~ Attached D Submitted [2SJ Spec Only ~ Submitted D Submitted [2SJ Not Required D Included ~ Not Applicable Date: 9/10/12 Bargaining Unit 1, SEIU 1BARGAINING UNIT, AS INDICATED ON ATTACHMENT SPB REVIEW 1. Nontesting Class: 2. Entry-Level Class: 3. Type of Certification: 4. Status/Exam Resolution Approved: 6. Prob Periods (other than 6 mos): 6. Job Category/Categories: D Examination Processing Unit Notified D Health Questionnaire D Medical Exam D 3 Ranks D 3 Names D Date D Policy Analyst D Reviewed D Not applicable D Submitted D Reviewed SECRETARIAT REVIEW Before Letters Mailed on D After Letters Mailed on (Date) (Date)

81 BARGAINING UNITS EXCLUDED REPRESENTATIVES CONTACT LIST SEIU Units [8J 1. n 3. D 4. D D 15. D 17. n 20, D 21 Yvonne Walker, Chief of Staff Service Employees International Union PO Box Sacramento, CA (916) ; Fax (916) (866) D CASE Unit 2 Antonette Young, Director of Operations California Attorneys, Admin. Law Judges & Hearing Officers in State Employment 1231 "I" Street, Suite 300 Sacramento, CA (916) ; FAX (916) D CAHP Unit5 Rob Nelson, President California Association of Highway Patrolmen 2030 "V" Street Sacramento, CA (916) ; FAX (916) D CCPOA Unit 6 Steve Weiss, Chief of Labor California Correctional Peace Officers Association 755 Riverpoint Drive, Suite 200 West Sacramento, CA (916) ; FAX (916) D CSLEA Unit 7 Kasey Christopher Clark, General Mgr/Chief Counsel California Statewide Law Enforcement Association 2029 "H" Street Sacramento, CA (916) ; FAX (916) D CDF Firefighters Unit 8 Bob Wolf, President CDF Firefighters 1731 "J" Street, Suite 100 Sacramento, CA (916) ; FAX (916) D CAPS Unit 10 Kristen Haynie, Labor Relations Consultant California Association of Professional Scientists 455 Capitol Mall, Suite 500 Sacramento, CA (916) ; FAX (916) D IUOE Unit 12 Tim Neep, Director IUOE Division Central Office Locals 3, 12,39, and 501, AFL-CIO 1121 "L" Street, Suite 401 Sacramento, CA (916) ; FAX (916) Toll-free (800) D IUOE Unit 13 Jerry Kalmar, Business Manager Stationary Engineers Division Locals 39 and North Market Blvd. Sacramento, CA (415) ; FAX (415) D UAPD Unit 16 Al Grah, Executive Director Union of American Physicians & Dentists 180 Grand Avenue, Suite 1380 Oakland, CA (510) ; FAX (510) D CAPT Unit 18 Kenneth Murch, Consultant California Association of Psychiatric Techs 1220 "S" Street, Suite 100 Sacramento, CA (916) ; FAX (916) Toll- free (800) O AFSCME Unit 19 Cliff Tillman, Senior Business Agent American Federation of State, County and Municipal Employees 2150 River Plaza Drive, Suite 275 Sacramento, CA (916) ; FAX (916) D PECG Unit 9 Bruce Blanning, Executive Assistant Professional Engineers in CA Government 455 Capitol Mall, Suite 501 Sacramento, CA (916) ; FAX (916) Rev. 03/09/11

82 Summary Open Minutes California State Personnel Board Meeting September 5, 2013 On September 5, 2013, the Board took the following action on the Career Executive Assignment Category as presented by Suzanne Ambrose, Executive Officer, California State Personnel Board. VOTE: Clarey, Burton, Costigan Aye Career Executive Assignments Attachment 5 A. Requests to Establish New or Revise Existing CEA Positions 1. CHIEF, RESEARCH AND ANALYTIC STUDIES BRANCH The California Department of Health Care Services is requesting approval to allocate the above position to the CEA category. This position will direct and oversee the development of sensitive and complex policy initiatives that have the potential to influence the expenditure of hundreds of millions of dollars in State and federal funds that impact the lives of the State s Medical Assistance Program (Medi-Cal) beneficiaries and their families. This position will provide direction to executive management and the national Medicaid and Medi-Cal program policies ACTION: Approved B. SPB Board Decisions Regarding Requests to Establish New or Revised Existing CEA Positions 1. ASSISTANT SECRETARY, OFFICE OF PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMENT The California Department of Technology s request to allocate the above position to the CEA category was rejected on July 25, ACTION: Noted 2. INDUSTRY ADMINISTRATOR The California Department of Motor Vehicles request to allocate the above position to the CEA category was approved on August 8, ACTION: Noted 3. DEPUTY SECRETARY, INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY The Transportation Agency s request to allocate the above position to the CEA category was approved on August 8, ACTION: Noted Page 10 of 16

83 Summary Open Minutes California State Personnel Board Meeting September 5, 2013 On September 5, 2013, the Board took the following action on the Submitted Items as presented by Suzanne Ambrose, Executive Officer, California State Personnel Board. VOTE: Clarey, Burton, Costigan Aye Submitted Items Attachment 6 A. Items Scheduled for Action 1. DIRECTOR, AUDITS PERFORMANCE EVALUATION The California Governor s Office of Emergency Services is requesting approval to allocate the above position to the CEA category. This position provides objective audit services in accordance with auditing standards for the Office. This position is a member of the Executive Management Team and is a primary policy advisor to maintain financial and program integrity in compliance with applicable laws and regulations Taken under submission at the July 25, 2013, Board meeting. Hearing held on August 8, Taken under submission at the August 8, 2013, Board meeting. ACTION: Approved 2. DEPUTY DIRECTOR FOR THE CALIFORNIA HEALTHCARE ELIGIBILITY, ENROLLMENT, AND RETENTION SYSTEM PROGRAM MANAGEMENT The Office of System Integrations is requesting approval to allocate the above position to the CEA category. This position is mission critical and will ensure that all programs and operations areas affected by the implementation of California s Healthcare Eligibility, Enrollment, and Retention Automated Systems are ready to go-live on January 1, This position directs, advises and participates in the planning of policy development that impacts stakeholders and the public Taken under submission at the August 8, 2013, Board meeting. ACTION: Approved B. Items to be Scheduled for Action at a Later Date NONE Page 11 of 16

84 Summary Open Minutes California State Personnel Board Meeting September 5, 2013 On September 5, 2013, the Board took the following action on the Evidentiary and Non- Evidentiary Cases as presented by Alvin Gittisriboongul, Chief Counsel, California State Personnel Board. VOTE: Clarey, Burton, Costigan Aye Evidentiary Cases Attachment 7 A. Administrative Law Judges Proposed Decision after Hearing 1. CASE NO Classification: Hospital Police Officer Department: California Department of State Hospitals ACTION: The Board adopted the ALJ s Proposed Decision. 2. CASE NO Classification: Psychiatric Technician Department: California Department of Developmental Services ACTION: The Board adopted the ALJ s Proposed Decision. 3. CASE NO Classification: Legal Secretary Department: California Department of Justice ACTION: The Board adopted the ALJ s Proposed Decision. 4. CASE NO Classification: Police Officer Department: California State University San Marcos ACTION: The Board adopted the ALJ s Proposed Decision. 5. CASE NO Classification: Correctional Sergeant Department: California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation ACTION: The Board adopted the ALJ s Proposed Decision. 6. CASE NOS and Classification: Correctional Officers Department: California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation ACTION: The Board adopted the ALJ s Proposed Decision. Page 12 of 16

85 Summary Open Minutes California State Personnel Board Meeting September 5, CASE NO Classification: Psychiatric Technician Department: California Department of State Hospitals ACTION: The Board adopted the ALJ s Proposed Decision. 8. CASE NO E Classification: Correctional Lieutenant Department: California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation ACTION: The Board adopted the ALJ s Proposed Decision. 9. CASE NO Classification: Custodian Department: California Department of General Services ACTION: The Board adopted the ALJ s Proposed Decision. 10. CASE NO Classification: Associate Governmental Program Analyst Department: California Department of Transportation ACTION: The Board adopted the ALJ s Proposed Decision. 11. CASE NO Classification: Staff Counsel Department: California State Compensation Insurance Fund ACTION: The Board adopted the ALJ s Proposed Decision. 12. CASE NO Classification: Correctional Officer Department: California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation ACTION: The Board adopted the ALJ s Proposed Decision. 13. CASE NO Classification: Equipment Operator II Department: California Department of Transportation ACTION: The Board rejected the ALJ s Proposed Decision and will set the matter for hearing. B. Petitions for Rehearing 1. CASE NO P Classification: Officer Department: California Highway Patrol ACTION: Denied Page 13 of 16

86 Summary Open Minutes California State Personnel Board Meeting September 5, CASE NO P Classification: Correctional Sergeant Department: California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation ACTION: Denied 3. CASE NO P Classification: Program Representative Department: California Department of Consumer Affairs ACTION: Denied C. Pending Board Review 1. CASE NOS A, A, A, and A Classifications: Correctional Officers, Sergeant, and Lieutenant Department: California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation 2. CASE NOS A and A Classifications: Correctional Counselor and Administrator Department: California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation 3. CASE NO A Classification: Parole Agent I Department: California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation 4. CASE NO PA Classification: Supervising Investigator II Department: California Department of Developmental Services D. Oral Arguments 1. CASE NO PA Classification: Inspector Department: California Department of Consumer Affairs ACTION: Taken under submission. 2. CASE NO A Classification: Correctional Officer Department: California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation ACTION: Taken under submission. Page 14 of 16

87 Summary Open Minutes California State Personnel Board Meeting September 5, 2013 E. Chief Counsel Resolutions 1. CASE NOS and B Classification: Correctional Officer Department: California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation ACTION: The Board issued its Resolution. F. Pending Board Decisions 1. CASE NO A Classification: Administrative Support Coordinator Department: California State University, San Diego 2. CASE NO A Classification: Plumber II Department: 22 nd District Agricultural Association 3. CASE NO A Classification: Dental Hygienist Department: California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation 4. CASE NO A Classification: Correctional Lieutenant Department: California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation 5. PERSONAL SERVICES CONTRACT, PSC NO SPB File No (b) Classification: Attorney Department: California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation 6. CASE NO A Classification: Medical Technical Assistant Department: Department of State Hospitals Page 15 of 16

88 Summary Open Minutes California State Personnel Board Meeting September 5, 2013 Non-Evidentiary Cases G. Withhold from Certification Appeals 1. CASE NO N Classification: Associate Governmental program Analyst Department: California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation and California Department of Human Resources ACTION: Denied 2. CASE NO N Classification: Associate Information Systems Analyst Department: California Department of Health Care Services ACTION: Denied 3. CASE NO N Classification: Cadet Department: California Highway Patrol ACTION: Taken under submission. H. Medical and Psychological Screening Appeals NONE I. Proposed Recommendations after Board Remand NONE J. Request to File Charges Cases NONE K. Examination Appeals, Minimum Qualifications, Merit Issue Complaints NONE L. Rule 211 Appeals, Rule 212 Out of Class Appeals, Voided Appointment Appeals NONE Page 16 of 16

89 Summary Open Minutes California State Personnel Board Meeting September 5, 2013 I hereby certify that the State Personnel Board made and adopted the preceding resolution at its meeting held on October 24, VOTE: Clarey, Burton, Costigan, Shanahan, Tom Aye /s/ SUZANNE M. AMBROSE Suzanne M. Ambrose Executive Officer California State Personnel Board