APR Data: # of Clients: # of Households # of Adults # of Leavers: # of Adult Leavers:

Transcription

1 APR Data: # of Clients: # of Households # of Adults # of Leavers: # of Adult Leavers: # of Stayers: # of Adult Stayers: # of Adult Stayers not yet required to have annual assessment: 2018 Kentucky Balance of State CoC Renewal Scoresheet for TH, SSO (non-coordinated entry), RRH, and PSH (Approved by KY BoS CoC Advisory Board August 3, 2018) Note: Victim Service Providers (VSP) client-level data will be evaluated using the provider s HMIS comparable database. References to HMIS in this scoresheet include these comparable databases. Agency Name: Project Name: Project Type (Circle one): TH - PH-RRH - PH-PSH - SSO Victim Service Provider (Circle one): No Project Serves 100% Youth (24 years old and under): No Project Serves 100% Persons in recovery from addiction: No Priority Area Goal Points Possible Proj. Performance/ Response Project Type and Priority Populations 1. All Programs: Permanent Supportive Housing; Rapid Rehousing projects serving both individuals and families with children; Transitional Housing for youth, persons fleeing domestic violence, or persons in a recovery from addiction program. Project serves priority populations with housing resources -PSH = 5 -RRH serving at least 50% families with children = 4 -RRH = 3 -TH for 100%: unaccompanied and/or parenting youth, persons fleeing domestic violence, or persons in recovery from addiction = 3 Length of Stay/Homeless (Quickly Moves People into Permanent Housing) 2. All Programs: Applicant is = 5 committed to moving people quickly into PH. 3. RRH Programs: Percentage of participants (adults and children) spending 30 days or less from Project Entry to Housing Move-in 4. TH Programs: On average, participants (adults and children) exiting program have stayed in project 180 days or less (VSPs 270 or less). Quickly move to PH Move to PH in 6 months or less (VSPs 9 months or less) 70% or more 14 days or less = 5 80% or more 30 days or less = 3 90% or more 60 days or less = 1pt None of the above = days or less = 5 points 181 or more = 0 VSP: 270 days or less = 5 VSP: 271 days or more = 0 Score Data Source/ Calculation, if applicable / e-snaps (5A. Project Participants Households) e-snaps Project, Question 3B:3a HMIS Data/CoC APR/CAPER Q22c, Q22b: (Average Length for Leavers Only)

2 Housing Stability (Permanent Housing Destination at Exit and/or Maintaining Permanent Housing) 5. PSH Programs: Length of Stay 12 months (366 days) or longer (adults and children) 80% 80% or more = % = 3 59% or less = 0 PSH projects funded for the first time in 2016: Length of stay 3 months (91 days) or more. 6. SSO, TH and RRH Programs: Percentage of participants (adults and children) exiting to permanent housing destinations 7. PSH Programs: Percentage of participants (adults and children) remaining in PSH or exiting to permanent housing destinations 8. TH/RRH/PSH Programs (excluding VSPs): Returns to Homelessness-Percentage of participants who exited to permanent housing and returned to homelessness within 2 years of exit. 90% 90% or more = % = % = % = 3 59% or less = 0 90% 90% or more = % = % = % = 3 59% or less = 0 Less than the CoC Systemwide % for project component as submitted to HUD May 2018 Less than CoC % for component type = 10 Within 5 percentage of CoC % for type= 5 Within 10 percentage of CoC % for type =3 > 10 percentage than CoC % for type = 0 VSP (N/A) = 10, Q22a1 : Q23a + Q23b PH charts # of Connecting Participants to Mainstream Benefits/Community Resources and Increasing Participants Income 9. All Programs: Program s commitment to connecting participants with mainstream resources. Answers to ALL relevant questions on the 2018 proj. app. to all 4 = 10 to 3 = 8 to 2 = 3 to 1 or less = PSH Programs: Percentage of adult stayers entry to annual follow-up. 8% 8% or more = 5 5-7% = 3 2-4% =1 2 or less = 0 : Q23a + Q23b PH charts + stayers total # of clients. HMIS Data/ System-Wide Performance Measures Report, Metric 2.b.2 e-snaps Project, 4A. 2a, 2b, 3, and 3a. Q19a1. stayers minus stayers not yet required to have an annual assessment in APR Q18.

3 11. RRH/TH/SSO Programs Percentage of adult stayers entry to annual follow-up. 12. PSH Programs: Percentage of adult leavers entry to exit. 13. RRH/TH/SSO Programs: Percentage of adult leavers entry to exit. 14. All Programs: Percentage of adult participants who gained, maintained, or increased income from other sources (nonemployment, non-earned cash) from entry to exit or at follow-up. 15. SSO Programs: Percentage of adult leavers with at least 1 or more noncash benefit(s) at exit. Utilization Rate 16. PSH/RRH/TH Programs: Average unit utilization rate 12% 12% or more = % = 3 6-8% =1 5% or less = 0 16% 16% or more = % = % =1 5% or less = 0 20% 20% or more = % = % =1 9% or less = 0 36% 36% or more = % = % =1 14% and below = 0 70% 70% or more = % = 1 Less than 50% = 0 Pre-2016 projects (85%) Projects funded for first time in 2016 (60%) 85% or more =10 75 to 84% = 7 65 to 74% = 5 55 to 64% = 2 64% and below = 0 60% of more = % = % %% = 2 29% or less = 0 Q19a1. stayers minus stayers not yet required to have an annual assessment in APR Q18. Q19a2. Q19a2. Q19a3 s minus number of adult stayers not yet required to have an annual assessment in APR Q18. Q20b adult Q8b # of households served last Wed in Oct/Jan/Apr/ July total units in App x 4 Q8b number of households served last Wed in Apr and July total units in App x 2

4 Severity of Need and Commitment to HUD Policy Priorities 17. SSO/TH programs: Project uses the VI-SPDAT common assessment tool for client referrals to Coordinated Entry System to ensure equal access to PH in community. 18. PSH and RRH programs: enrolled in project since March 1, 2018 that came through the Coordinated Entry Prioritization Process. 19. PSH programs: enrolled since March 1, 2018 with VI-SPDAT (or Full SPDAT) acuity score recommending PSH. 20. RRH programs: since March 1, 2018 with VI- SPDAT (or Full SPDAT) acuity score recommending at least RRH. 21. PSH programs: that were chronically homeless at program entry since January 1, SSO and RRH: Percentage of participants with at least one condition (i.e., disability) at program entry. 23. SSO programs: Percentage of adult participants with no income at program entry. 24. SSO programs: Percentage of adult participants entries from streets/emergency shelters 25. All programs: Project utilizes a Housing First model = % 100% = % = % = 1 pt Less than 50% = 0 100% 100% = % = 1 pt Less than 80% = 0 100% 100% = % = 1 pt Less than 80% = 0 40% 40% or more = % = 1 pt Less than 30% = 0 40% 40% or more = % = 1 Less than 25% = 0 50% 50% or more = to 49% = 7 30 to 39% = 5 Less than 30% = 0 60% 60% or more = to 59% = 7 40 to 49% = 5 /HMIS KHC /HMIS KHC /HMIS KHC /HMIS HMIS Data/KHC custom report Q13a2 Q18. Q15. Less than 40% = 0 = 10 e-snaps App Q 3B (3a-d) and KHC application for SSO

5 Program Management, Capacity, HMIS (or comparable database for VSPs) Data Quality, and CoC Participation 26. All programs: Project sponsor meets minimum threshold and selfcertification criteria on KHC Capacity Scorecard If sponsor agency does not meet minimum criteria, application will not be accepted. Pass/Fail Projects that fail to reach the minimum established criteria or establish a plan to correct deficiencies that is acceptable to KHC will not be eligible for ranking. KHC Capacity Scorecard 27. All programs: If your 2016 grant (or most recent S+C grant) has closed, did project have any unspent funds exceeding 5%? No No = 3 = 0 Project still open = 3 N/A (not more than 5% unspent)= All programs: If you had unspent funds exceeding 5% for your closed 2016 grant (or most recent S+C grant), are you voluntarily requesting less funding for this renewal grant? 29. All programs: If your 2016 grant (or most recent S+C grant) is still open, is your project on track to spend down 100% of the funds? 30. All programs: If your 2016 grant (or most recent S+C grant) is still open and you are not on track to spend down 100% of the funds, are you voluntarily requesting less funding for your 2018 renewal grant? 31. All programs: For this project, has there been a HUD and/or KHC monitoring with findings since 7/1/ All programs: For HMIS or VSP comparable database, missing data for client destination at exit: Data Quality as compared to the CoC Data Quality Report submitted to HUD in May 18 No findings or findings corrected and accepted No missing data = 2 Project still open = 2 N/A (not more than 5% unspent) = 2 ; within 20% variance = 3 No; more than 20% underspent = 0 Project closed = 3 = 2 Project closed = 2 No findings or no review completed = 5 Findings, but corrected and accepted = 3 No missing data = 5 Some missing, but is less than the CoC percent missing for the component type = 3 Greater than the CoC percent missing for the component type= 0 Verified by eloccs Balance as of August 17, /HUD/ KHC verified Q23a and Q23b and CoC Data Quality Report

6 33. All Programs: Number of Adults Stayers without required Annual Assessment 34. ALL programs: All HIC/PIT data submitted on time, or for SSO, agency helped with PIT 35. All programs: Agency representative attended 2017 Annual CoC meeting, and 2018 Regional CoC mtg 36. All programs (BONUS): Agency representative attending Point-in-Time Count (K-Count) Training 100% completed/no Adults Stayers without their Annual Assessment completed. 0 without required assessment = % without = % without= 1 pt More than 25% without= 0 = 5 100% Attended both= 5 Attended 1 = 2 Did not attend = 0 = 3 Score Q18 Universe: Adult Stayers minus Adult stayers not yet required to have an annual assessment. HIC/PIT Data Records COC Planning and Coordination Records COC Planning and Coordination Records All Project Types: 125 Total Possible Points Earned Score (%)