|
|
|
- Milo Perkins
- 5 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30 FAVOR - OPPOSE 18/19.WEST VIRGINIA FUTURE FUND: COMBINED A18.WEST VIRGINIA FUTURE FUND: INFRASTRUCTURE PROJECTS B19.WEST VIRGINIA FUTURE FUND: EDUCATION, PUBLIC SAFETY & LAND CONSERVATION 20.COAL TAX INITIAL BALLOT 21.COAL TAX INFORMED BALLOT 61.POST POSITIVE BALLOT 66.FINAL BALLOT GENDER TOTAL Men Women AGE All under & over AGE COLLAPSE Under & over Men <50 GENDER /AGE Women <50 Men 50+ Women 50+ Page 1
31 PARTY ID STRENGTH PARTY ID PARTY ID /GENDER FAVOR - OPPOSE 18/19.WEST VIRGINIA FUTURE FUND: COMBINED A18.WEST VIRGINIA FUTURE FUND: INFRASTRUCTURE PROJECTS B19.WEST VIRGINIA FUTURE FUND: EDUCATION, PUBLIC SAFETY & LAND CONSERVATION 20.COAL TAX INITIAL BALLOT 21.COAL TAX INFORMED BALLOT 61.POST POSITIVE BALLOT 66.FINAL BALLOT TOTAL Strong Democ rat Weak Republ ican Strong Republ ican Democ rat Indep/ DK Indep/ DK w/weak Republ ican Democ ratic men Democ ratic women Indep/ DK men Indep/ DK men w/weak Indep/ DK women w/weak Republ ican men Republ ican women Page 2
32 PARTY ID /AGE EDUCATION EDUCATION /GENDER FAVOR - OPPOSE 18/19.WEST VIRGINIA FUTURE FUND: COMBINED A18.WEST VIRGINIA FUTURE FUND: INFRASTRUCTURE PROJECTS B19.WEST VIRGINIA FUTURE FUND: EDUCATION, PUBLIC SAFETY & LAND CONSERVATION 20.COAL TAX INITIAL BALLOT 21.COAL TAX INFORMED BALLOT 61.POST POSITIVE BALLOT 66.FINAL BALLOT TOTAL Democ rat <50 Democ rat 50+ Republi can 50+ H.S. /Less Post H. S. Non-co llege grad College gradua te or post-gr ad 4-year College grad Non college men Non college women College men College women Page 3
33 EDUCATION /AGE REGION REGION / GENDER FAVOR - OPPOSE 18/19.WEST VIRGINIA FUTURE FUND: COMBINED A18.WEST VIRGINIA FUTURE FUND: INFRASTRUCTURE PROJECTS B19.WEST VIRGINIA FUTURE FUND: EDUCATION, PUBLIC SAFETY & LAND CONSERVATION 20.COAL TAX INITIAL BALLOT 21.COAL TAX INFORMED BALLOT 61.POST POSITIVE BALLOT 66.FINAL BALLOT TOTAL Non-co llege <50 College <50 Non-co llege 50+ College 50+ Charles / Huntin gton South North Central /East Charles / Huntin gton Men Charles / Huntin gton Women North Men North Women Central /East Men Central /East Women Page 4
34 REGION / AGE COLLAPSE CONGRESSIONAL DISTRICT CONGRESSIONAL DISTRICT / GENDER FAVOR - OPPOSE 18/19.WEST VIRGINIA FUTURE FUND: COMBINED A18.WEST VIRGINIA FUTURE FUND: INFRASTRUCTURE PROJECTS B19.WEST VIRGINIA FUTURE FUND: EDUCATION, PUBLIC SAFETY & LAND CONSERVATION 20.COAL TAX INITIAL BALLOT 21.COAL TAX INFORMED BALLOT 61.POST POSITIVE BALLOT 66.FINAL BALLOT TOTAL Charle s / Huntin gton 50 & over South 50 & over North 50 & over Central /East 50 & over CD-01 CD-02 CD CD-01 Men CD-01 Women CD-02 Men CD-02 Women CD-03 Men CD-03 Women Page 5
35 FAVOR - OPPOSE 18/19.WEST VIRGINIA FUTURE FUND: COMBINED A18.WEST VIRGINIA FUTURE FUND: INFRASTRUCTURE PROJECTS B19.WEST VIRGINIA FUTURE FUND: EDUCATION, PUBLIC SAFETY & LAND CONSERVATION 20.COAL TAX INITIAL BALLOT 21.COAL TAX INFORMED BALLOT 61.POST POSITIVE BALLOT 66.FINAL BALLOT TOTAL CONGRESSIONAL DISTRICT / AGE COLLAPSE CD-01 Under 50 CD & over CD-02 Under 50 CD & over CD & over Yes, fishing HUNTING OR FISHING Yes, both All yes No COAL INDUSTRY HOUSEHOLD Yes - former All yes No 1.VOTE LIKELIHOOD almost certain probab ly Page 6
36 FAVOR - OPPOSE 18/19.WEST VIRGINIA FUTURE FUND: COMBINED A18.WEST VIRGINIA FUTURE FUND: INFRASTRUCTURE PROJECTS B19.WEST VIRGINIA FUTURE FUND: EDUCATION, PUBLIC SAFETY & LAND CONSERVATION 20.COAL TAX INITIAL BALLOT 21.COAL TAX INFORMED BALLOT 61.POST POSITIVE BALLOT 66.FINAL BALLOT TOTAL 2.BARACK OBAMA a ble Unfavo rable 10/11.COAL COMPANIES: COMBINED a ble Unfavo rable 12/13. RENEWABLE /CLEAN ENERGY: COMBINED a ble Unfavo rable 14/15.THE EPA: COMBINED a ble Unfavo rable 22/24.ECONOMY: COMBINED Excelle nt /good Just fair /poor 23/25.QUALITY OF THE ENVIRONMENT: COMBINED Gotten better Stayed about the same Gotten worse Page 7
37 FAVOR - OPPOSE 18/19.WEST VIRGINIA FUTURE FUND: COMBINED A18.WEST VIRGINIA FUTURE FUND: INFRASTRUCTURE PROJECTS B19.WEST VIRGINIA FUTURE FUND: EDUCATION, PUBLIC SAFETY & LAND CONSERVATION 20.COAL TAX INITIAL BALLOT 21.COAL TAX INFORMED BALLOT 61.POST POSITIVE BALLOT 66.FINAL BALLOT TOTAL 29.ENVIRO PROTECTIONS VS. ECON Enviro nmenta l protect ions are often good for the econo my Enviro nmenta l protect ions are often bad for the econo my Enviro nmenta l protect ions often have little or no impact on the econo my 18/19.WEST VIRGINIA FUTURE FUND: COMBINED w/lean ers COAL TAX INITIAL BALLOT Oppos e w/lean ers 20.COAL TAX INITIAL BALLOT - strong Page 8
38 FAVOR - OPPOSE 18/19.WEST VIRGINIA FUTURE FUND: COMBINED A18.WEST VIRGINIA FUTURE FUND: INFRASTRUCTURE PROJECTS B19.WEST VIRGINIA FUTURE FUND: EDUCATION, PUBLIC SAFETY & LAND CONSERVATION 20.COAL TAX INITIAL BALLOT 21.COAL TAX INFORMED BALLOT 61.POST POSITIVE BALLOT 66.FINAL BALLOT TOTAL 21.COAL TAX INFORMED BALLOT Oppos e w/lean ers INITIAL TO INFORMED BALLOT SHIFT Solid Solid Oppos e Persua dable 61.POST POSITIVE BALLOT Oppos e w/lean ers INITIAL TO POST POSITIVE BALLOT SHIFT Solid Persua dable Toward Toward Oppos e Page 9
39 FAVOR - OPPOSE 18/19.WEST VIRGINIA FUTURE FUND: COMBINED A18.WEST VIRGINIA FUTURE FUND: INFRASTRUCTURE PROJECTS B19.WEST VIRGINIA FUTURE FUND: EDUCATION, PUBLIC SAFETY & LAND CONSERVATION 20.COAL TAX INITIAL BALLOT 21.COAL TAX INFORMED BALLOT 61.POST POSITIVE BALLOT 66.FINAL BALLOT TOTAL 66.FINAL BALLOT Oppos e w/lean ers INITIAL TO FINAL BALLOT SHIFT Solid Solid Oppos e Persua dable Toward Oppos e Democ rat DO NOT FAVOR TARGETS Non-co al HHD Renew able /clean favorab le Suppor t Future Fund Page 10
40 FAVOR - OPPOSE 18/19.WEST VIRGINIA FUTURE FUND: COMBINED A18.WEST VIRGINIA FUTURE FUND: INFRASTRUCTURE PROJECTS B19.WEST VIRGINIA FUTURE FUND: EDUCATION, PUBLIC SAFETY & LAND CONSERVATION 20.COAL TAX INITIAL BALLOT 21.COAL TAX INFORMED BALLOT 61.POST POSITIVE BALLOT 66.FINAL BALLOT SPLIT SPLIT TOTAL A B C D AC AD BC BD Page 11
41 DEM. MINUS REPUB. ID FAVOR - OPPOSE 18/19.WEST VIRGINIA FUTURE FUND: COMBINED 18/19.WEST VIRGINIA FUTURE FUND: COMBINED - strong - not strong - lean favor Oppose - strong Oppose - not strong - lean oppose (don't know / refused) Oppose w/leaners (Refused) GENDER AGE AGE COLLAPSE GENDER /AGE All under 65 & Under 50 & Men Women Men Women TOTAL Men Women over 50 over <50 < % 45% 41% 47% 39% 42% 43% 44% 42% 45% 42% 45% 40% 16% 16% 16% 17% 23% 13% 14% 19% 13% 21% 17% 11% 15% 11% 10% 12% 11% 6% 14% 12% 9% 13% 4% 13% 16% 11% 7% 8% 6% 8% 7% 7% 5% 7% 6% 9% 6% 6% 7% 3% 1% 5% 1% 2% 3% 6% 1% 4% 3% 2% 6% 2% 2% 2% 3% 3% 3% 2% 3% 2% 1% 1% 4% 17% 17% 17% 12% 23% 18% 16% 17% 17% 15% 18% 18% 16% 1% 2% 0% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 3% 1% 1% 70% 71% 69% 75% 67% 68% 69% 72% 69% 71% 73% 71% 66% 12% 10% 13% 11% 9% 13% 14% 10% 13% 11% 9% 9% 16% 17% 17% 17% 12% 23% 18% 16% 17% 17% 15% 18% 18% 16% 30% 29% 32% 26% 29% 35% 30% 27% 33% 22% 32% 35% 31% 1% 2% 0% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 3% 1% 1% Page 12
42 PARTY ID STRENGTH PARTY ID PARTY ID /GENDER DEM. MINUS REPUB. ID FAVOR - OPPOSE 18/19.WEST VIRGINIA FUTURE FUND: COMBINED 18/19.WEST VIRGINIA FUTURE FUND: COMBINED - strong - not strong - lean favor Oppose - strong Oppose - not strong - lean oppose (don't know / refused) Oppose w/leaners (Refused) Strong Weak Strong Indep/ Democ Democ Indep/ Republ Republ Democ Republ Republ Democ Indep/ DK Republ ratic ratic DK ican ican TOTAL rat ican ican rat DK w/weak ican men women men w/weak w/weak men women % 51% 39% 53% 47% 35% 38% 47% 48% 46% 37% 39% 38% 52% 43% 16% 15% 14% 17% 16% 16% 14% 16% 19% 14% 18% 15% 14% 12% 18% 11% 12% 9% 7% 15% 9% 8% 8% 9% 19% 12% 10% 5% 8% 8% 7% 6% 4% 4% 6% 10% 9% 4% 9% 4% 6% 6% 12% 1% 6% 3% 2% 7% 2% 2% 2% 4% 4% 2% 2% 2% 6% 1% 7% 2% 2% 4% 2% 2% 3% 3% 3% 3% 1% 1% 4% 2% 3% 17% 11% 22% 15% 11% 23% 22% 18% 8% 14% 25% 24% 20% 21% 15% 1% 1% 3% 1% 1% 2% 1% 2% 1% 2% 3% 1% 2% 70% 78% 61% 77% 78% 60% 61% 71% 76% 79% 67% 64% 57% 72% 69% 12% 10% 14% 8% 10% 16% 15% 10% 14% 6% 6% 9% 22% 4% 16% 17% 11% 22% 15% 11% 23% 22% 18% 8% 14% 25% 24% 20% 21% 15% 30% 25% 35% 24% 28% 36% 33% 28% 20% 34% 37% 35% 30% 32% 26% 1% 1% 3% 1% 1% 2% 1% 2% 1% 2% 3% 1% 2% Indep/ DK men Indep/ DK women Page 13
43 PARTY ID /AGE EDUCATION EDUCATION /GENDER DEM. MINUS REPUB. ID FAVOR - OPPOSE 18/19.WEST VIRGINIA FUTURE FUND: COMBINED 18/19.WEST VIRGINIA FUTURE FUND: COMBINED - strong - not strong - lean favor Oppose - strong Oppose - not strong - lean oppose (don't know / refused) Oppose w/leaners (Refused) College gradua Republ Non-co te or 4-year Non Non Democ Democ ican H.S. Post H. llege post-gr College college college College College TOTAL rat <50 rat /Less S. grad ad grad men women men women % 42% 50% 43% 47% 33% 42% 46% 43% 45% 38% 47% 45% 16% 23% 11% 17% 11% 28% 18% 13% 8% 18% 17% 10% 16% 11% 15% 15% 11% 14% 10% 12% 9% 14% 11% 14% 8% 10% 7% 5% 7% 2% 8% 9% 8% 5% 6% 9% 7% 4% 5% 3% 4% 5% 2% 2% 2% 5% 4% 3% 3% 6% 2% 3% 1% 5% 2% 3% 3% 1% 2% 2% 3% 1% 2% 17% 11% 12% 17% 16% 13% 15% 20% 22% 12% 17% 25% 16% 1% 1% 1% 1% 2% 1% 1% 2% 2% 1% 3% 70% 80% 76% 71% 72% 71% 72% 69% 65% 75% 68% 65% 71% 12% 8% 11% 11% 11% 14% 12% 11% 12% 11% 14% 8% 12% 17% 11% 12% 17% 16% 13% 15% 20% 22% 12% 17% 25% 16% 30% 28% 27% 33% 32% 26% 30% 30% 38% 26% 34% 33% 28% 1% 1% 1% 1% 2% 1% 1% 2% 2% 1% 3% Page 14
44 EDUCATION /AGE REGION REGION / GENDER DEM. MINUS REPUB. ID FAVOR - OPPOSE 18/19.WEST VIRGINIA FUTURE FUND: COMBINED 18/19.WEST VIRGINIA FUTURE FUND: COMBINED - strong - not strong - lean favor Oppose - strong Oppose - not strong - lean oppose (don't know / refused) Oppose w/leaners (Refused) Charles / Huntin Charles / Huntin gton Charles / Huntin gton Non-co Non-co Central Central llege College llege College Central North North /East /East TOTAL <50 < gton South North /East Men Women Men Women Men Women % 42% 48% 41% 44% 46% 38% 45% 41% 47% 45% 45% 46% 40% 41% 16% 20% 18% 15% 10% 16% 17% 14% 17% 17% 14% 8% 18% 20% 14% 11% 8% 10% 16% 9% 12% 12% 5% 16% 8% 16% 7% 4% 14% 18% 7% 8% 6% 8% 4% 6% 11% 5% 6% 10% 2% 6% 5% 3% 9% 3% 0% 2% 3% 7% 1% 4% 5% 1% 1% 2% 3% 8% 2% 2% 2% 3% 3% 3% 2% 1% 2% 1% 5% 2% 1% 4% 17% 18% 14% 12% 25% 15% 15% 21% 17% 14% 16% 26% 18% 19% 15% 1% 1% 2% 2% 1% 1% 2% 0% 2% 3% 1% 1% 70% 70% 76% 73% 63% 74% 67% 64% 74% 72% 76% 60% 68% 75% 73% 12% 11% 8% 13% 13% 10% 17% 12% 9% 12% 8% 11% 13% 7% 11% 17% 18% 14% 12% 25% 15% 15% 21% 17% 14% 16% 26% 18% 19% 15% 30% 28% 24% 31% 36% 30% 29% 28% 35% 23% 37% 35% 23% 37% 32% 1% 1% 2% 2% 1% 1% 2% 0% 2% 3% 1% 1% Page 15
45 REGION / AGE COLLAPSE CONGRESSIONAL DISTRICT CONGRESSIONAL DISTRICT / GENDER DEM. MINUS REPUB. ID FAVOR - OPPOSE 18/19.WEST VIRGINIA FUTURE FUND: COMBINED 18/19.WEST VIRGINIA FUTURE FUND: COMBINED - strong - not strong - lean favor Oppose - strong Oppose - not strong - lean oppose (don't know / refused) Oppose w/leaners (Refused) Charle s / Central Huntin South North /East CD-01 CD-02 CD-03 gton & 50 & 50 & CD-01 Wome CD-02 Wome CD-03 Wome TOTAL & over over over over CD-01 CD-02 CD-03 Men n Men n Men n % 48% 35% 47% 37% 44% 43% 41% 44% 44% 46% 41% 46% 37% 16% 13% 8% 13% 18% 15% 15% 18% 14% 15% 13% 18% 20% 16% 11% 13% 19% 5% 17% 8% 15% 11% 7% 9% 11% 18% 12% 9% 7% 3% 17% 5% 3% 5% 6% 10% 4% 6% 7% 4% 11% 9% 3% 2% 3% 9% 2% 4% 1% 3% 2% 6% 3% 1% 5% 2% 5% 3% 3% 2% 1% 3% 5% 1% 1% 2% 5% 17% 15% 16% 17% 22% 20% 17% 13% 22% 19% 20% 14% 8% 18% 1% 2% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 2% 1% 2% 1% 2% 70% 73% 62% 65% 73% 67% 73% 70% 65% 68% 70% 76% 78% 62% 12% 10% 23% 17% 5% 12% 9% 16% 11% 12% 8% 9% 12% 20% 17% 15% 16% 17% 22% 20% 17% 13% 22% 19% 20% 14% 8% 18% 30% 32% 37% 25% 39% 31% 34% 26% 33% 29% 33% 34% 21% 32% 1% 2% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 2% 1% 2% 1% 2% Page 16
46 DEM. MINUS REPUB. ID FAVOR - OPPOSE 18/19.WEST VIRGINIA FUTURE FUND: COMBINED 18/19.WEST VIRGINIA FUTURE FUND: COMBINED - strong - not strong - lean favor Oppose - strong Oppose - not strong - lean oppose (don't know / refused) Oppose w/leaners (Refused) CONGRESSIONAL DISTRICT / AGE COLLAPSE HUNTING OR FISHING COAL INDUSTRY HOUSEHOLD CD-01 CD-01 CD-02 CD-02 CD-03 Under 50 & Under 50 & 50 & Yes, Yes, Yes - almost probab TOTAL 50 over 50 over over fishing both All yes No former All yes No certain ly % 44% 43% 46% 40% 43% 34% 47% 43% 45% 45% 47% 41% 44% 35% 16% 13% 16% 16% 15% 8% 17% 13% 16% 17% 12% 13% 17% 16% 17% 11% 7% 9% 16% 14% 16% 11% 9% 11% 11% 12% 9% 12% 11% 14% 7% 7% 4% 10% 3% 13% 10% 6% 7% 6% 9% 7% 7% 7% 8% 3% 1% 7% 3% 3% 2% 3% 3% 3% 3% 5% 2% 3% 5% 2% 3% 2% 2% 4% 3% 1% 5% 2% 1% 3% 2% 3% 17% 23% 18% 13% 21% 13% 23% 20% 19% 11% 15% 16% 17% 17% 18% 1% 2% 1% 2% 2% 1% 2% 1% 2% 1% 1% 70% 64% 69% 78% 69% 68% 62% 69% 69% 73% 70% 69% 70% 71% 66% 12% 10% 13% 10% 8% 20% 15% 9% 11% 14% 14% 13% 11% 11% 16% 17% 23% 18% 13% 21% 13% 23% 20% 19% 11% 15% 16% 17% 17% 18% 30% 33% 29% 28% 38% 33% 36% 30% 31% 28% 30% 26% 32% 30% 35% 1% 2% 1% 2% 2% 1% 2% 1% 2% 1% 1% 1.VOTE LIKELIHOOD Page 17
47 DEM. MINUS REPUB. ID FAVOR - OPPOSE 18/19.WEST VIRGINIA FUTURE FUND: COMBINED 18/19.WEST VIRGINIA FUTURE FUND: COMBINED - strong - not strong - lean favor Oppose - strong Oppose - not strong - lean oppose (don't know / refused) Oppose w/leaners (Refused) 2.BARACK OBAMA 10/11.COAL COMPANIES: COMBINED 12/13. RENEWABLE /CLEAN ENERGY: COMBINED 14/15.THE EPA: COMBINED 22/24.ECONOMY: COMBINED Excelle nt /good a Unfavo a Unfavo a Unfavo a Unfavo Gotten Gotten TOTAL ble rable ble rable ble rable ble rable better worse % 49% 39% 45% 44% 45% 37% 47% 40% 47% 41% 47% 41% 46% 16% 12% 19% 16% 15% 14% 26% 16% 17% 22% 14% 15% 17% 12% 11% 13% 9% 11% 10% 12% 4% 10% 12% 12% 11% 11% 11% 13% 7% 6% 7% 6% 11% 6% 12% 4% 11% 2% 9% 6% 7% 9% 3% 2% 3% 3% 3% 2% 5% 3% 3% 0% 4% 2% 4% 3% 2% 3% 2% 1% 5% 2% 1% 2% 2% 2% 2% 1% 3% 17% 13% 20% 17% 11% 18% 15% 17% 15% 14% 18% 18% 18% 13% 1% 2% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 0% 1% 1% 4% 70% 74% 67% 72% 69% 71% 67% 73% 69% 81% 65% 73% 68% 71% 12% 11% 12% 10% 18% 10% 18% 9% 16% 5% 15% 9% 13% 12% 17% 13% 20% 17% 11% 18% 15% 17% 15% 14% 18% 18% 18% 13% 30% 28% 31% 29% 26% 32% 20% 29% 29% 28% 31% 30% 32% 27% 1% 2% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 0% 1% 1% 4% Just fair /poor 23/25.QUALITY OF THE ENVIRONMENT: COMBINED Stayed about the same Page 18
48 DEM. MINUS REPUB. ID FAVOR - OPPOSE 18/19.WEST VIRGINIA FUTURE FUND: COMBINED 18/19.WEST VIRGINIA FUTURE FUND: COMBINED - strong - not strong - lean favor Oppose - strong Oppose - not strong - lean oppose (don't know / refused) Oppose w/leaners (Refused) 29.ENVIRO PROTECTIONS VS. ECON 18/19.WEST VIRGINIA FUTURE FUND: COMBINED 20.COAL TAX INITIAL BALLOT Enviro nmenta Enviro Enviro l nmenta nmenta protect l l ions protect protect often ions ions have are are little or often often no good bad for impact for the the on the econo econo econo w/leane Oppos w/leane - TOTAL my my my rs e rs strong % 50% 42% 47% 61% 52% 29% 9% 9% 65% 9% 16% 12% 22% 11% 23% 16% 19% 9% 12% 9% 9% 11% 8% 8% 20% 16% 37% 10% 9% 22% 30% 5% 22% 7% 2% 9% 7% 4% 21% 4% 2% 5% 4% 3% 3% 2% 6% 2% 9% 2% 1% 2% 2% 2% 2% 7% 1% 5% 4% 5% 1% 4% 17% 19% 15% 6% 100% 56% 13% 9% 51% 41% 12% 51% 1% 3% 1% 2% 2% 70% 71% 72% 78% 100% 37% 79% 56% 40% 51% 79% 40% 12% 7% 13% 15% 7% 6% 35% 8% 9% 7% 8% 17% 19% 15% 6% 100% 56% 13% 9% 51% 41% 12% 51% 30% 29% 25% 28% 16% 100% 100% 24% 23% 78% 75% 18% 78% 1% 3% 1% 2% 2% 20.COAL TAX INITIAL BALLOT Page 19
49 DEM. MINUS REPUB. ID FAVOR - OPPOSE 18/19.WEST VIRGINIA FUTURE FUND: COMBINED 18/19.WEST VIRGINIA FUTURE FUND: COMBINED - strong - not strong - lean favor Oppose - strong Oppose - not strong - lean oppose (don't know / refused) Oppose w/leaners (Refused) 21.COAL TAX INFORMED BALLOT w/lean ers INITIAL TO INFORMED BALLOT SHIFT Solid Oppos e 61.POST POSITIVE BALLOT w/lean ers INITIAL TO POST POSITIVE BALLOT SHIFT Oppos Solid Persua Oppos Solid Persua TOTAL e dable e dable % 52% 28% 13% 55% 26% 18% 51% 28% 17% 54% 22% 32% 40% 16% 15% 17% 15% 15% 19% 10% 17% 16% 8% 18% 9% 10% 10% 11% 13% 10% 22% 11% 10% 17% 11% 7% 27% 10% 20% 22% 11% 7% 3% 24% 6% 3% 27% 4% 21% 3% 6% 9% 5% 3% 1% 9% 3% 1% 11% 1% 7% 4% 1% 3% 4% 7% 2% 1% 2% 6% 0% 1% 9% 1% 5% 5% 1% 4% 3% 2% 17% 14% 9% 35% 13% 6% 44% 13% 17% 36% 12% 34% 20% 22% 1% 2% 1% 2% 1% 1% 2% 1% 1% 4% 70% 80% 56% 50% 81% 55% 46% 79% 51% 52% 82% 51% 64% 60% 12% 4% 35% 15% 4% 39% 9% 6% 33% 10% 4% 14% 16% 14% 17% 14% 9% 35% 13% 6% 44% 13% 17% 36% 12% 34% 20% 22% 30% 28% 21% 63% 24% 17% 71% 26% 28% 69% 23% 59% 45% 35% 1% 2% 1% 2% 1% 1% 2% 1% 1% 4% Towar d Towar d Oppos e Page 20
50 DEM. MINUS REPUB. ID FAVOR - OPPOSE 18/19.WEST VIRGINIA FUTURE FUND: COMBINED 18/19.WEST VIRGINIA FUTURE FUND: COMBINED - strong - not strong - lean favor Oppose - strong Oppose - not strong - lean oppose (don't know / refused) Oppose w/leaners (Refused) 66.FINAL BALLOT INITIAL TO FINAL BALLOT SHIFT Renew able Suppor Solid Toward /clean t Oppos w/lean Solid Oppos Persua Oppos Democ Non-co favorab Future TOTAL e ers e dable e rat al HHD le Fund % 52% 23% 20% 55% 23% 20% 34% 30% 22% 22% 42% 16% 17% 16% 8% 18% 18% 11% 10% 13% 17% 9% 30% 11% 10% 14% 22% 9% 8% 17% 22% 17% 13% 15% 28% 7% 3% 23% 2% 3% 29% 3% 7% 11% 15% 14% 3% 1% 11% 3% 1% 12% 8% 5% 4% 4% 2% 1% 3% 5% 1% 1% 7% 4% 6% 5% 6% 17% 15% 10% 38% 13% 8% 41% 15% 18% 24% 29% 1% 1% 2% 2% 1% 1% 1% 1% 70% 79% 53% 51% 81% 50% 48% 66% 60% 52% 47% 100% 12% 5% 37% 10% 4% 43% 10% 19% 21% 23% 24% 17% 15% 10% 38% 13% 8% 41% 15% 18% 24% 29% 30% 25% 27% 65% 23% 17% 65% 40% 40% 42% 51% 28% 1% 1% 2% 2% 1% 1% 1% 1% DO NOT FAVOR TARGETS Page 21
51 DEM. MINUS REPUB. ID FAVOR - OPPOSE 18/19.WEST VIRGINIA FUTURE FUND: COMBINED 18/19.WEST VIRGINIA FUTURE FUND: COMBINED - strong - not strong - lean favor Oppose - strong Oppose - not strong - lean oppose (don't know / refused) Oppose w/leaners (Refused) SPLIT SPLIT TOTAL A B C D AC AD BC BD % 41% 45% 44% 42% 43% 38% 44% 46% 16% 15% 16% 16% 16% 17% 14% 15% 17% 11% 13% 10% 11% 11% 13% 13% 10% 9% 7% 8% 6% 7% 6% 7% 9% 8% 4% 3% 3% 3% 3% 3% 2% 4% 4% 2% 2% 2% 3% 0% 4% 3% 1% 5% 17% 18% 16% 17% 17% 17% 19% 18% 15% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 2% 0% 1% 2% 70% 69% 71% 71% 69% 73% 65% 69% 73% 12% 12% 11% 10% 13% 8% 16% 12% 11% 17% 18% 16% 17% 17% 17% 19% 18% 15% 30% 32% 29% 29% 32% 30% 35% 29% 29% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 2% 0% 1% 2% Page 22
52 DEM. MINUS REPUB. ID FAVOR - OPPOSE A18.WEST VIRGINIA FUTURE FUND: INFRASTRUCTURE PROJECTS A18.WEST VIRGINIA FUTURE FUND: INFRASTRUCTURE PROJECTS FAVOR - OPPOSE B19.WEST VIRGINIA FUTURE FUND: EDUCATION, PUBLIC SAFETY & LAND CONSERVATION B19.WEST VIRGINIA FUTURE FUND: EDUCATION, PUBLIC SAFETY & LAND CONSERVATION - strong - not strong - lean favor Oppose - strong Oppose - not strong - lean oppose (don't know / refused) Oppose w/leaners (Refused) - strong - not strong - lean favor Oppose - strong Oppose - not strong - lean oppose (don't know / refused) Oppose w/leaners (Refused) GENDER AGE AGE COLLAPSE GENDER /AGE All under 65 & Under 50 & Men Women Men Women TOTAL Men Women over 50 over <50 < % 42% 40% 46% 34% 40% 41% 41% 40% 42% 39% 41% 40% 15% 15% 16% 15% 22% 12% 17% 18% 14% 19% 17% 11% 16% 13% 13% 13% 9% 10% 18% 12% 9% 16% 6% 13% 20% 12% 8% 8% 7% 11% 9% 6% 5% 10% 6% 14% 6% 3% 8% 3% 1% 5% 2% 1% 11% 1% 4% 2% 3% 6% 2% 1% 2% 1% 4% 1% 2% 2% 2% 3% 18% 18% 17% 16% 23% 18% 14% 19% 17% 17% 21% 20% 14% 1% 2% 0% 3% 1% 1% 1% 1% 2% 1% 1% 69% 70% 68% 70% 65% 70% 69% 68% 70% 67% 69% 72% 68% 12% 10% 14% 14% 9% 11% 15% 12% 13% 14% 10% 7% 17% 18% 18% 17% 16% 23% 18% 14% 19% 17% 17% 21% 20% 14% 32% 33% 32% 26% 32% 40% 26% 29% 35% 23% 36% 42% 29% 1% 2% 0% 3% 1% 1% 1% 1% 2% 1% 1% % 48% 42% 49% 43% 43% 45% 46% 44% 48% 45% 48% 40% 16% 17% 16% 19% 24% 13% 12% 21% 13% 24% 18% 11% 15% 10% 7% 11% 12% 2% 10% 12% 8% 11% 3% 13% 11% 10% 6% 7% 5% 5% 4% 8% 5% 5% 7% 4% 6% 10% 5% 3% 1% 5% 4% 4% 2% 1% 4% 3% 1% 6% 3% 3% 3% 4% 2% 5% 2% 3% 4% 1% 5% 16% 16% 17% 9% 23% 18% 17% 15% 18% 14% 15% 17% 19% 1% 2% 0% 3% 1% 1% 2% 1% 4% 1% 1% 71% 72% 70% 80% 69% 66% 69% 75% 67% 74% 76% 70% 65% 11% 10% 13% 9% 8% 14% 13% 8% 14% 8% 9% 12% 16% 16% 16% 17% 9% 23% 18% 17% 15% 18% 14% 15% 17% 19% 29% 25% 31% 25% 25% 30% 34% 25% 31% 21% 29% 29% 33% 1% 2% 0% 3% 1% 1% 2% 1% 4% 1% 1% Page 23
53 PARTY ID STRENGTH PARTY ID PARTY ID /GENDER DEM. MINUS REPUB. ID FAVOR - OPPOSE A18.WEST VIRGINIA FUTURE FUND: INFRASTRUCTURE PROJECTS A18.WEST VIRGINIA FUTURE FUND: INFRASTRUCTURE PROJECTS FAVOR - OPPOSE B19.WEST VIRGINIA FUTURE FUND: EDUCATION, PUBLIC SAFETY & LAND CONSERVATION B19.WEST VIRGINIA FUTURE FUND: EDUCATION, PUBLIC SAFETY & LAND CONSERVATION - strong - not strong - lean favor Oppose - strong Oppose - not strong - lean oppose (don't know / refused) Oppose w/leaners (Refused) - strong - not strong - lean favor Oppose - strong Oppose - not strong - lean oppose (don't know / refused) Oppose w/leaners (Refused) Strong Weak Strong Indep/ Democ Democ Indep/ Republ Republ Democ Republ Republ Democ Indep/ DK Republ ratic ratic DK ican ican TOTAL rat ican ican rat DK w/weak ican men women men w/weak w/weak men women % 43% 43% 46% 42% 39% 46% 44% 50% 35% 35% 42% 51% 45% 44% 15% 12% 22% 13% 17% 12% 14% 17% 14% 20% 16% 15% 12% 17% 18% 13% 19% 10% 8% 16% 9% 7% 9% 8% 23% 15% 12% 1% 13% 6% 8% 9% 8% 7% 12% 7% 4% 8% 5% 12% 6% 7% 8% 3% 2% 2% 4% 3% 2% 3% 3% 4% 2% 4% 2% 6% 2% 3% 6% 5% 1% 3% 7% 3% 18% 13% 19% 21% 13% 20% 18% 20% 11% 15% 23% 18% 18% 22% 19% 1% 3% 2% 4% 69% 74% 76% 67% 76% 60% 67% 71% 73% 78% 65% 70% 65% 75% 67% 12% 10% 5% 12% 9% 20% 14% 9% 12% 7% 12% 13% 16% 3% 14% 18% 13% 19% 21% 13% 20% 18% 20% 11% 15% 23% 18% 18% 22% 19% 32% 32% 33% 29% 29% 35% 30% 31% 20% 38% 38% 33% 27% 38% 25% 1% 3% 2% 4% % 60% 33% 59% 51% 31% 31% 50% 45% 56% 39% 36% 26% 58% 42% 16% 17% 4% 20% 16% 19% 15% 14% 25% 9% 19% 15% 15% 8% 19% 10% 5% 6% 7% 13% 10% 8% 7% 10% 16% 10% 8% 9% 3% 9% 6% 4% 8% 6% 9% 11% 3% 10% 2% 2% 6% 16% 2% 4% 3% 2% 12% 1% 1% 2% 5% 5% 2% 9% 2% 8% 3% 4% 4% 4% 3% 1% 4% 6% 1% 2% 2% 6% 16% 8% 26% 9% 9% 27% 26% 16% 5% 13% 27% 30% 22% 21% 11% 1% 6% 1% 2% 4% 2% 1% 3% 6% 1% 5% 71% 83% 43% 86% 80% 60% 54% 70% 79% 80% 68% 58% 50% 70% 71% 11% 9% 24% 5% 10% 11% 16% 12% 16% 6% 2% 6% 27% 5% 18% 16% 8% 26% 9% 9% 27% 26% 16% 5% 13% 27% 30% 22% 21% 11% 29% 17% 37% 20% 26% 37% 35% 26% 20% 30% 37% 38% 32% 26% 26% 1% 6% 1% 2% 4% 2% 1% 3% 6% 1% 5% Indep/ DK men Indep/ DK women Page 24
54 PARTY ID /AGE EDUCATION EDUCATION /GENDER DEM. MINUS REPUB. ID FAVOR - OPPOSE A18.WEST VIRGINIA FUTURE FUND: INFRASTRUCTURE PROJECTS A18.WEST VIRGINIA FUTURE FUND: INFRASTRUCTURE PROJECTS FAVOR - OPPOSE B19.WEST VIRGINIA FUTURE FUND: EDUCATION, PUBLIC SAFETY & LAND CONSERVATION B19.WEST VIRGINIA FUTURE FUND: EDUCATION, PUBLIC SAFETY & LAND CONSERVATION - strong - not strong - lean favor Oppose - strong Oppose - not strong - lean oppose (don't know / refused) Oppose w/leaners (Refused) - strong - not strong - lean favor Oppose - strong Oppose - not strong - lean oppose (don't know / refused) Oppose w/leaners (Refused) College gradua Republ Non-co te or 4-year Non Non Democ Democ ican H.S. Post H. llege post-gr College college college College College TOTAL rat <50 rat /Less S. grad ad grad men women men women % 32% 52% 35% 38% 36% 37% 49% 46% 42% 32% 46% 51% 15% 25% 10% 21% 14% 27% 19% 10% 4% 19% 19% 4% 13% 13% 19% 14% 16% 18% 9% 14% 11% 16% 13% 15% 13% 9% 8% 6% 7% 3% 5% 11% 7% 8% 12% 9% 6% 5% 9% 3% 5% 4% 3% 2% 4% 2% 4% 5% 4% 2% 3% 1% 3% 2% 1% 2% 1% 3% 2% 18% 15% 11% 18% 18% 14% 16% 17% 18% 13% 21% 27% 12% 1% 3% 1% 2% 1% 2% 2% 1% 69% 76% 76% 72% 70% 71% 71% 69% 66% 75% 66% 63% 73% 12% 6% 12% 10% 9% 14% 11% 13% 16% 10% 12% 10% 15% 18% 15% 11% 18% 18% 14% 16% 17% 18% 13% 21% 27% 12% 32% 34% 25% 36% 37% 26% 33% 29% 36% 28% 39% 40% 23% 1% 3% 1% 2% 1% 2% 2% 1% % 54% 49% 51% 56% 31% 46% 43% 40% 48% 44% 48% 39% 16% 21% 11% 13% 7% 30% 16% 17% 12% 18% 14% 15% 19% 10% 11% 15% 6% 11% 10% 11% 8% 12% 9% 12% 4% 11% 6% 4% 7% 1% 10% 7% 9% 1% 9% 8% 3% 3% 2% 5% 4% 2% 5% 5% 3% 2% 7% 3% 5% 1% 6% 3% 3% 3% 2% 2% 3% 3% 2% 2% 16% 5% 12% 17% 13% 13% 13% 22% 26% 12% 14% 23% 22% 1% 1% 2% 1% 2% 3% 1% 1% 5% 71% 85% 76% 71% 74% 71% 72% 68% 63% 75% 70% 67% 69% 11% 10% 11% 13% 13% 14% 13% 8% 7% 12% 15% 6% 9% 16% 5% 12% 17% 13% 13% 13% 22% 26% 12% 14% 23% 22% 29% 21% 29% 29% 27% 27% 27% 32% 40% 24% 30% 28% 34% 1% 1% 2% 1% 2% 3% 1% 1% 5% Page 25
55 EDUCATION /AGE REGION REGION / GENDER DEM. MINUS REPUB. ID FAVOR - OPPOSE A18.WEST VIRGINIA FUTURE FUND: INFRASTRUCTURE PROJECTS A18.WEST VIRGINIA FUTURE FUND: INFRASTRUCTURE PROJECTS FAVOR - OPPOSE B19.WEST VIRGINIA FUTURE FUND: EDUCATION, PUBLIC SAFETY & LAND CONSERVATION B19.WEST VIRGINIA FUTURE FUND: EDUCATION, PUBLIC SAFETY & LAND CONSERVATION - strong - not strong - lean favor Oppose - strong Oppose - not strong - lean oppose (don't know / refused) Oppose w/leaners (Refused) - strong - not strong - lean favor Oppose - strong Oppose - not strong - lean oppose (don't know / refused) Oppose w/leaners (Refused) Charles / Huntin Charles / Huntin gton Charles / Huntin gton Non-co Non-co Central Central llege College llege College Central North North /East /East TOTAL <50 < gton South North /East Men Women Men Women Men Women % 34% 55% 40% 44% 47% 39% 47% 29% 48% 45% 48% 46% 21% 34% 15% 22% 13% 17% 7% 19% 11% 11% 20% 21% 16% 6% 16% 19% 21% 13% 8% 11% 19% 10% 16% 8% 6% 21% 10% 24% 6% 6% 30% 16% 8% 9% 11% 7% 5% 5% 14% 5% 8% 8% 11% 4% 10% 3% 1% 3% 9% 4% 6% 2% 5% 7% 3% 2% 1% 2% 2% 2% 3% 2% 4% 4% 18% 24% 10% 11% 24% 12% 18% 23% 19% 12% 11% 20% 26% 26% 14% 1% 2% 1% 1% 2% 1% 1% 2% 69% 63% 79% 76% 61% 81% 58% 64% 71% 79% 85% 60% 68% 70% 71% 12% 11% 11% 11% 16% 6% 22% 13% 10% 8% 4% 20% 7% 4% 13% 18% 24% 10% 11% 24% 12% 18% 23% 19% 12% 11% 20% 26% 26% 14% 32% 33% 21% 33% 36% 29% 29% 31% 40% 22% 39% 30% 31% 56% 31% 1% 2% 1% 1% 2% 1% 1% 2% % 49% 41% 43% 45% 45% 37% 44% 52% 46% 45% 40% 46% 52% 53% 16% 19% 23% 13% 12% 12% 24% 16% 14% 11% 14% 11% 19% 21% 4% 10% 8% 8% 12% 7% 9% 15% 5% 11% 5% 11% 9% 2% 5% 19% 6% 7% 10% 3% 7% 8% 6% 4% 12% 3% 10% 2% 8% 3% 4% 3% 5% 3% 3% 5% 2% 3% 8% 3% 3% 3% 3% 4% 1% 1% 4% 2% 5% 2% 7% 16% 12% 19% 14% 25% 18% 12% 20% 15% 17% 19% 33% 11% 14% 15% 1% 5% 2% 1% 4% 3% 7% 2% 71% 77% 72% 69% 64% 66% 76% 65% 77% 62% 69% 60% 68% 78% 77% 11% 11% 4% 16% 11% 14% 12% 11% 8% 17% 11% 20% 8% 8% 16% 12% 19% 14% 25% 18% 12% 20% 15% 17% 19% 33% 11% 14% 15% 29% 24% 27% 29% 35% 31% 28% 26% 29% 25% 36% 42% 15% 25% 35% 1% 5% 2% 1% 4% 3% 7% 2% Page 26
56 REGION / AGE COLLAPSE CONGRESSIONAL DISTRICT CONGRESSIONAL DISTRICT / GENDER DEM. MINUS REPUB. ID FAVOR - OPPOSE A18.WEST VIRGINIA FUTURE FUND: INFRASTRUCTURE PROJECTS A18.WEST VIRGINIA FUTURE FUND: INFRASTRUCTURE PROJECTS FAVOR - OPPOSE B19.WEST VIRGINIA FUTURE FUND: EDUCATION, PUBLIC SAFETY & LAND CONSERVATION B19.WEST VIRGINIA FUTURE FUND: EDUCATION, PUBLIC SAFETY & LAND CONSERVATION - strong - not strong - lean favor Oppose - strong Oppose - not strong - lean oppose (don't know / refused) Oppose w/leaners (Refused) - strong - not strong - lean favor Oppose - strong Oppose - not strong - lean oppose (don't know / refused) Oppose w/leaners (Refused) Charle s / Central Huntin South North /East CD-01 CD-02 CD-03 gton & 50 & 50 & CD-01 Wome CD-02 Wome CD-03 Wome TOTAL & over over over over CD-01 CD-02 CD-03 Men n Men n Men n % 53% 32% 57% 11% 47% 34% 41% 49% 46% 39% 30% 40% 42% 15% 14% 11% 27% 12% 16% 18% 9% 14% 12% 21% 22% 14% 13% 13% 18% 7% 27% 7% 21% 10% 5% 9% 18% 25% 16% 4% 8% 2% 21% 5% 7% 6% 10% 10% 5% 9% 4% 6% 15% 3% 6% 9% 4% 4% 1% 3% 4% 4% 3% 6% 2% 2% 4% 3% 1% 1% 2% 3% 3% 5% 18% 14% 19% 12% 24% 21% 18% 14% 20% 22% 22% 14% 13% 14% 1% 1% 2% 1% 2% 1% 1% 4% 69% 81% 49% 76% 65% 67% 72% 69% 63% 69% 69% 76% 78% 59% 12% 4% 31% 13% 9% 13% 9% 16% 18% 9% 9% 9% 6% 26% 18% 14% 19% 12% 24% 21% 18% 14% 20% 22% 22% 14% 13% 14% 32% 30% 40% 22% 51% 30% 40% 26% 28% 31% 39% 41% 29% 23% 1% 1% 2% 1% 2% 1% 1% 4% % 41% 38% 36% 60% 41% 52% 42% 39% 42% 54% 50% 52% 32% 16% 11% 15% 15% 11% 17% 14% 18% 19% 15% 13% 14% 18% 19% 10% 12% 19% 3% 9% 9% 8% 11% 9% 8% 4% 12% 9% 14% 6% 4% 13% 10% 2% 4% 5% 10% 8% 6% 4% 16% 3% 3% 5% 9% 3% 2% 3% 7% 3% 2% 4% 3% 8% 2% 2% 3% 2% 3% 5% 1% 2% 1% 6% 16% 16% 13% 23% 19% 20% 16% 12% 23% 17% 19% 14% 4% 21% 1% 3% 2% 3% 1% 4% 1% 2% 71% 64% 72% 54% 79% 67% 74% 72% 67% 66% 71% 77% 78% 66% 11% 17% 16% 21% 2% 11% 8% 16% 5% 16% 7% 9% 18% 14% 16% 16% 13% 23% 19% 20% 16% 12% 23% 17% 19% 14% 4% 21% 29% 36% 34% 28% 28% 32% 26% 27% 38% 27% 24% 28% 13% 41% 1% 3% 2% 3% 1% 4% 1% 2% Page 27
57 DEM. MINUS REPUB. ID FAVOR - OPPOSE A18.WEST VIRGINIA FUTURE FUND: INFRASTRUCTURE PROJECTS A18.WEST VIRGINIA FUTURE FUND: INFRASTRUCTURE PROJECTS FAVOR - OPPOSE B19.WEST VIRGINIA FUTURE FUND: EDUCATION, PUBLIC SAFETY & LAND CONSERVATION B19.WEST VIRGINIA FUTURE FUND: EDUCATION, PUBLIC SAFETY & LAND CONSERVATION - strong - not strong - lean favor Oppose - strong Oppose - not strong - lean oppose (don't know / refused) Oppose w/leaners (Refused) - strong - not strong - lean favor Oppose - strong Oppose - not strong - lean oppose (don't know / refused) Oppose w/leaners (Refused) CONGRESSIONAL DISTRICT / AGE COLLAPSE HUNTING OR FISHING COAL INDUSTRY HOUSEHOLD CD-01 CD-01 CD-02 CD-02 CD-03 Under 50 & Under 50 & 50 & Yes, Yes, Yes - almost probab TOTAL 50 over 50 over over fishing both All yes No former All yes No certain ly % 45% 49% 38% 32% 43% 36% 45% 39% 47% 47% 47% 39% 43% 28% 15% 8% 17% 15% 17% 5% 11% 14% 15% 18% 10% 6% 18% 15% 18% 13% 3% 12% 28% 17% 18% 14% 7% 12% 16% 18% 11% 14% 13% 11% 8% 13% 9% 4% 14% 8% 7% 8% 6% 3% 5% 8% 7% 9% 3% 1% 8% 2% 4% 2% 3% 3% 3% 8% 8% 1% 3% 2% 2% 3% 2% 2% 5% 2% 1% 2% 1% 5% 18% 30% 12% 10% 23% 14% 24% 22% 21% 8% 15% 20% 17% 16% 26% 1% 2% 1% 1% 2% 3% 1% 1% 69% 56% 78% 81% 66% 66% 61% 66% 66% 80% 75% 64% 71% 71% 58% 12% 14% 10% 9% 9% 20% 15% 11% 13% 10% 11% 13% 12% 12% 17% 18% 30% 12% 10% 23% 14% 24% 22% 21% 8% 15% 20% 17% 16% 26% 32% 32% 27% 38% 41% 34% 43% 29% 35% 25% 33% 31% 33% 31% 42% 1% 2% 1% 1% 2% 3% 1% 1% % 44% 39% 53% 51% 43% 32% 50% 47% 43% 44% 46% 44% 45% 43% 16% 18% 16% 16% 11% 11% 23% 11% 17% 16% 14% 18% 16% 16% 15% 10% 12% 6% 6% 11% 15% 7% 12% 10% 8% 9% 9% 10% 8% 16% 6% 7% 10% 13% 12% 5% 6% 6% 12% 8% 5% 6% 8% 3% 6% 3% 1% 3% 2% 2% 3% 3% 2% 2% 7% 3% 6% 1% 3% 5% 7% 3% 2% 3% 3% 16% 15% 23% 15% 18% 12% 23% 18% 17% 14% 15% 13% 18% 17% 11% 1% 5% 1% 2% 2% 1% 2% 2% 1% 2% 2% 71% 74% 61% 75% 74% 69% 62% 73% 74% 68% 67% 73% 70% 70% 74% 11% 6% 14% 10% 6% 19% 15% 7% 9% 17% 15% 13% 11% 11% 15% 16% 15% 23% 15% 18% 12% 23% 18% 17% 14% 15% 13% 18% 17% 11% 29% 33% 31% 21% 32% 31% 30% 30% 27% 30% 28% 23% 31% 29% 27% 1% 5% 1% 2% 2% 1% 2% 2% 1% 2% 2% 1.VOTE LIKELIHOOD Page 28
58 DEM. MINUS REPUB. ID FAVOR - OPPOSE A18.WEST VIRGINIA FUTURE FUND: INFRASTRUCTURE PROJECTS A18.WEST VIRGINIA FUTURE FUND: INFRASTRUCTURE PROJECTS FAVOR - OPPOSE B19.WEST VIRGINIA FUTURE FUND: EDUCATION, PUBLIC SAFETY & LAND CONSERVATION B19.WEST VIRGINIA FUTURE FUND: EDUCATION, PUBLIC SAFETY & LAND CONSERVATION - strong - not strong - lean favor Oppose - strong Oppose - not strong - lean oppose (don't know / refused) Oppose w/leaners (Refused) - strong - not strong - lean favor Oppose - strong Oppose - not strong - lean oppose (don't know / refused) Oppose w/leaners (Refused) 2.BARACK OBAMA 10/11.COAL COMPANIES: COMBINED 12/13. RENEWABLE /CLEAN ENERGY: COMBINED 14/15.THE EPA: COMBINED 22/24.ECONOMY: COMBINED Excelle nt /good a Unfavo a Unfavo a Unfavo a Unfavo Gotten Gotten TOTAL ble rable ble rable ble rable ble rable better worse % 46% 38% 42% 45% 44% 31% 46% 39% 38% 42% 47% 38% 44% 15% 11% 19% 15% 18% 11% 40% 15% 18% 23% 11% 17% 16% 14% 13% 15% 10% 12% 11% 13% 5% 10% 15% 16% 11% 11% 14% 10% 8% 7% 7% 7% 11% 8% 10% 5% 10% 4% 10% 11% 4% 15% 3% 3% 3% 2% 5% 2% 4% 3% 3% 1% 4% 3% 5% 2% 2% 2% 1% 2% 1% 2% 1% 2% 1% 2% 18% 15% 20% 19% 8% 20% 10% 18% 12% 15% 19% 14% 21% 11% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 0% 1% 1% 1% 1% 69% 73% 68% 70% 73% 68% 76% 72% 73% 77% 65% 75% 68% 68% 12% 12% 12% 11% 17% 11% 14% 10% 14% 7% 15% 11% 9% 21% 18% 15% 20% 19% 8% 20% 10% 18% 12% 15% 19% 14% 21% 11% 32% 33% 31% 32% 21% 34% 15% 30% 28% 33% 32% 25% 37% 22% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 0% 1% 1% 1% 1% % 52% 39% 47% 43% 45% 43% 48% 40% 61% 40% 47% 43% 47% 16% 14% 19% 18% 12% 17% 13% 16% 16% 19% 15% 13% 18% 11% 10% 10% 8% 10% 9% 11% 2% 9% 9% 6% 10% 10% 7% 17% 6% 5% 7% 5% 11% 4% 14% 2% 11% 8% 3% 10% 2% 3% 2% 3% 3% 2% 6% 3% 3% 4% 3% 4% 3% 3% 2% 1% 9% 3% 2% 2% 3% 1% 3% 2% 4% 16% 11% 21% 15% 14% 16% 21% 16% 17% 13% 17% 21% 14% 15% 1% 3% 0% 2% 2% 2% 2% 7% 71% 76% 66% 75% 64% 73% 57% 74% 66% 86% 66% 70% 68% 75% 11% 10% 13% 10% 20% 9% 22% 8% 17% 1% 15% 8% 18% 2% 16% 11% 21% 15% 14% 16% 21% 16% 17% 13% 17% 21% 14% 15% 29% 25% 31% 26% 32% 29% 24% 28% 29% 20% 31% 34% 26% 32% 1% 3% 0% 2% 2% 2% 2% 7% Just fair /poor 23/25.QUALITY OF THE ENVIRONMENT: COMBINED Stayed about the same Page 29
59 DEM. MINUS REPUB. ID FAVOR - OPPOSE A18.WEST VIRGINIA FUTURE FUND: INFRASTRUCTURE PROJECTS A18.WEST VIRGINIA FUTURE FUND: INFRASTRUCTURE PROJECTS FAVOR - OPPOSE B19.WEST VIRGINIA FUTURE FUND: EDUCATION, PUBLIC SAFETY & LAND CONSERVATION B19.WEST VIRGINIA FUTURE FUND: EDUCATION, PUBLIC SAFETY & LAND CONSERVATION - strong - not strong - lean favor Oppose - strong Oppose - not strong - lean oppose (don't know / refused) Oppose w/leaners (Refused) - strong - not strong - lean favor Oppose - strong Oppose - not strong - lean oppose (don't know / refused) Oppose w/leaners (Refused) 29.ENVIRO PROTECTIONS VS. ECON 18/19.WEST VIRGINIA FUTURE FUND: COMBINED 20.COAL TAX INITIAL BALLOT Enviro nmenta Enviro Enviro l nmenta nmenta protect l l ions protect protect often ions ions have are are little or often often no good bad for impact for the the on the econo econo econo w/leane Oppos w/leane - TOTAL my my my rs e rs strong % 50% 36% 44% 59% 50% 32% 2% 1% 60% 2% 15% 14% 24% 3% 22% 14% 22% 12% 17% 10% 12% 13% 11% 6% 26% 19% 40% 12% 10% 24% 32% 6% 24% 8% 3% 10% 7% 4% 20% 8% 5% 6% 8% 3% 3% 1% 10% 2% 9% 1% 2% 2% 3% 5% 1% 2% 4% 4% 2% 4% 18% 17% 21% 7% 100% 55% 16% 5% 50% 41% 15% 50% 1% 2% 2% 1% 1% 69% 75% 66% 73% 100% 40% 76% 64% 38% 50% 76% 38% 12% 6% 12% 19% 5% 7% 31% 12% 9% 9% 12% 18% 17% 21% 7% 100% 55% 16% 5% 50% 41% 15% 50% 32% 28% 30% 35% 19% 100% 100% 29% 17% 78% 77% 22% 78% 1% 2% 2% 1% 1% % 51% 47% 50% 63% 55% 25% 16% 16% 71% 16% 16% 10% 19% 19% 23% 18% 15% 6% 7% 8% 6% 10% 4% 10% 14% 13% 33% 8% 8% 21% 28% 4% 21% 6% 9% 7% 3% 22% 4% 3% 4% 3% 3% 2% 8% 3% 1% 3% 5% 1% 2% 9% 1% 8% 5% 5% 1% 5% 16% 21% 10% 5% 100% 57% 11% 14% 52% 41% 9% 52% 1% 4% 2% 2% 71% 66% 77% 83% 100% 33% 82% 48% 43% 51% 83% 43% 11% 9% 13% 12% 9% 5% 38% 5% 8% 6% 5% 16% 21% 10% 5% 100% 57% 11% 14% 52% 41% 9% 52% 29% 30% 21% 21% 13% 100% 100% 20% 29% 78% 74% 14% 78% 1% 4% 2% 2% 20.COAL TAX INITIAL BALLOT Page 30
60 DEM. MINUS REPUB. ID FAVOR - OPPOSE A18.WEST VIRGINIA FUTURE FUND: INFRASTRUCTURE PROJECTS A18.WEST VIRGINIA FUTURE FUND: INFRASTRUCTURE PROJECTS FAVOR - OPPOSE B19.WEST VIRGINIA FUTURE FUND: EDUCATION, PUBLIC SAFETY & LAND CONSERVATION B19.WEST VIRGINIA FUTURE FUND: EDUCATION, PUBLIC SAFETY & LAND CONSERVATION - strong - not strong - lean favor Oppose - strong Oppose - not strong - lean oppose (don't know / refused) Oppose w/leaners (Refused) - strong - not strong - lean favor Oppose - strong Oppose - not strong - lean oppose (don't know / refused) Oppose w/leaners (Refused) 21.COAL TAX INFORMED BALLOT w/lean ers INITIAL TO INFORMED BALLOT SHIFT Solid Oppos e 61.POST POSITIVE BALLOT w/lean ers % 47% 31% 14% 51% 26% 17% 45% 34% 25% 48% 17% 22% 50% 15% 13% 19% 17% 13% 21% 13% 15% 21% 11% 15% 11% 14% 14% 13% 16% 8% 25% 14% 10% 21% 14% 5% 24% 13% 20% 24% 10% 8% 3% 24% 5% 3% 25% 5% 21% 4% 9% 11% 6% 3% 1% 10% 3% 1% 11% 1% 7% 5% 0% 6% 8% 7% 2% 4% 5% 2% 3% 1% 4% 4% 1% 2% 3% 18% 19% 4% 30% 17% 4% 44% 18% 7% 32% 18% 34% 21% 9% 1% 1% 1% 1% 2% 1% 1% 1% 69% 77% 58% 55% 78% 57% 51% 74% 61% 60% 76% 48% 60% 74% 12% 4% 37% 14% 4% 39% 3% 7% 32% 9% 5% 17% 19% 17% 18% 19% 4% 30% 17% 4% 44% 18% 7% 32% 18% 34% 21% 9% 32% 35% 16% 60% 31% 16% 68% 33% 17% 59% 31% 56% 45% 22% 1% 1% 1% 1% 2% 1% 1% 1% INITIAL TO POST POSITIVE BALLOT SHIFT Oppos Solid Persua Oppos Solid Persua TOTAL e dable e dable % 58% 25% 13% 58% 26% 20% 58% 22% 6% 60% 27% 44% 25% 16% 17% 15% 12% 18% 18% 6% 19% 12% 5% 21% 7% 5% 3% 10% 9% 14% 19% 8% 10% 14% 9% 8% 31% 7% 21% 20% 12% 6% 2% 23% 7% 2% 28% 3% 20% 3% 3% 5% 4% 3% 1% 9% 3% 1% 11% 1% 8% 4% 1% 6% 3% 1% 7% 1% 15% 2% 5% 7% 1% 7% 8% 16% 10% 14% 40% 10% 8% 45% 9% 26% 41% 7% 35% 18% 40% 1% 2% 2% 1% 4% 1% 10% 71% 84% 53% 44% 84% 53% 41% 85% 41% 43% 88% 56% 69% 40% 11% 4% 32% 16% 4% 39% 15% 6% 33% 11% 4% 10% 13% 11% 16% 10% 14% 40% 10% 8% 45% 9% 26% 41% 7% 35% 18% 40% 29% 21% 28% 66% 18% 18% 74% 20% 39% 80% 15% 62% 46% 52% 1% 2% 2% 1% 4% 1% 10% Towar d Towar d Oppos e Page 31
61 DEM. MINUS REPUB. ID FAVOR - OPPOSE A18.WEST VIRGINIA FUTURE FUND: INFRASTRUCTURE PROJECTS A18.WEST VIRGINIA FUTURE FUND: INFRASTRUCTURE PROJECTS FAVOR - OPPOSE B19.WEST VIRGINIA FUTURE FUND: EDUCATION, PUBLIC SAFETY & LAND CONSERVATION B19.WEST VIRGINIA FUTURE FUND: EDUCATION, PUBLIC SAFETY & LAND CONSERVATION - strong - not strong - lean favor Oppose - strong Oppose - not strong - lean oppose (don't know / refused) Oppose w/leaners (Refused) - strong - not strong - lean favor Oppose - strong Oppose - not strong - lean oppose (don't know / refused) Oppose w/leaners (Refused) 66.FINAL BALLOT INITIAL TO FINAL BALLOT SHIFT Renew able Suppor Solid Toward /clean t Oppos w/lean Solid Oppos Persua Oppos Democ Non-co favorab Future TOTAL e ers e dable e rat al HHD le Fund % 46% 26% 32% 49% 25% 16% 50% 27% 20% 27% 38% 15% 17% 21% 8% 16% 20% 13% 11% 19% 22% 3% 34% 13% 14% 8% 23% 13% 11% 19% 11% 12% 17% 16% 28% 8% 4% 22% 1% 3% 26% 6% 9% 10% 17% 18% 3% 0% 11% 3% 0% 12% 8% 9% 3% 3% 2% 1% 4% 4% 1% 3% 3% 4% 3% 4% 18% 17% 8% 28% 17% 4% 42% 8% 21% 17% 28% 1% 1% 1% 2% 2% 1% 69% 77% 55% 64% 77% 56% 47% 72% 58% 59% 47% 100% 12% 5% 37% 8% 4% 40% 9% 20% 19% 23% 25% 18% 17% 8% 28% 17% 4% 42% 8% 21% 17% 28% 32% 32% 20% 55% 30% 17% 64% 22% 33% 38% 48% 28% 1% 1% 1% 2% 2% 1% % 58% 19% 6% 60% 22% 24% 9% 33% 24% 17% 48% 16% 18% 11% 9% 19% 16% 9% 9% 8% 12% 15% 25% 10% 5% 21% 22% 5% 4% 16% 38% 22% 9% 15% 27% 6% 2% 24% 2% 2% 33% 5% 12% 12% 10% 3% 1% 12% 3% 1% 12% 7% 5% 5% 3% 2% 2% 6% 1% 11% 3% 12% 7% 9% 16% 12% 13% 47% 10% 12% 40% 25% 14% 31% 30% 1% 2% 4% 2% 3% 71% 81% 50% 37% 84% 42% 49% 56% 62% 45% 46% 100% 11% 5% 37% 12% 4% 45% 11% 16% 24% 24% 24% 16% 12% 13% 47% 10% 12% 40% 25% 14% 31% 30% 29% 19% 35% 75% 16% 17% 67% 66% 47% 47% 53% 27% 1% 2% 4% 2% 3% DO NOT FAVOR TARGETS Page 32
62 DEM. MINUS REPUB. ID FAVOR - OPPOSE A18.WEST VIRGINIA FUTURE FUND: INFRASTRUCTURE PROJECTS A18.WEST VIRGINIA FUTURE FUND: INFRASTRUCTURE PROJECTS FAVOR - OPPOSE B19.WEST VIRGINIA FUTURE FUND: EDUCATION, PUBLIC SAFETY & LAND CONSERVATION B19.WEST VIRGINIA FUTURE FUND: EDUCATION, PUBLIC SAFETY & LAND CONSERVATION - strong - not strong - lean favor Oppose - strong Oppose - not strong - lean oppose (don't know / refused) Oppose w/leaners (Refused) - strong - not strong - lean favor Oppose - strong Oppose - not strong - lean oppose (don't know / refused) Oppose w/leaners (Refused) SPLIT SPLIT TOTAL A B C D AC AD BC BD % 41% 43% 38% 43% 38% 15% 15% 17% 14% 17% 14% 13% 13% 13% 13% 13% 13% 8% 8% 7% 9% 7% 9% 3% 3% 2% 4% 2% 4% 2% 2% 3% 3% 18% 18% 17% 19% 17% 19% 1% 1% 2% 0% 2% 0% 69% 69% 73% 65% 73% 65% 12% 12% 8% 16% 8% 16% 18% 18% 17% 19% 17% 19% 32% 32% 30% 35% 30% 35% 1% 1% 2% 0% 2% 0% % 45% 44% 46% 44% 46% 16% 16% 15% 17% 15% 17% 10% 10% 10% 9% 10% 9% 6% 6% 8% 4% 8% 4% 3% 3% 4% 2% 4% 2% 3% 3% 1% 5% 1% 5% 16% 16% 18% 15% 18% 15% 1% 1% 1% 2% 1% 2% 71% 71% 69% 73% 69% 73% 11% 11% 12% 11% 12% 11% 16% 16% 18% 15% 18% 15% 29% 29% 29% 29% 29% 29% 1% 1% 1% 2% 1% 2% Page 33
63 DEM. MINUS REPUB. ID FAVOR - OPPOSE 20.COAL TAX INITIAL BALLOT 20.COAL TAX INITIAL BALLOT FAVOR - OPPOSE 21.COAL TAX INFORMED BALLOT 21.COAL TAX INFORMED BALLOT - strong - not strong - lean favor Oppose - strong Oppose - not strong - lean oppose (don't know / refused) Oppose w/leaners (Refused) - strong - not strong - lean favor Oppose - strong Oppose - not strong - lean oppose (don't know / refused) Oppose w/leaners (Refused) GENDER AGE AGE COLLAPSE GENDER /AGE All under 65 & Under 50 & Men Women Men Women TOTAL Men Women over 50 over <50 < % 50% 50% 52% 62% 48% 43% 56% 46% 52% 60% 49% 43% 11% 10% 12% 10% 10% 8% 19% 10% 12% 11% 9% 8% 15% 8% 7% 9% 11% 9% 5% 9% 10% 6% 6% 14% 8% 5% 11% 13% 10% 11% 8% 16% 7% 10% 13% 13% 7% 13% 13% 6% 6% 6% 4% 2% 8% 10% 3% 8% 5% 1% 7% 9% 1% 1% 1% 2% 1% 1% 2% 1% 2% 2% 1% 1% 11% 12% 11% 11% 8% 13% 13% 9% 13% 12% 7% 12% 14% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 2% 69% 67% 72% 73% 81% 61% 70% 76% 64% 69% 84% 66% 63% 19% 20% 17% 17% 12% 25% 17% 14% 22% 19% 10% 21% 23% 11% 12% 11% 11% 8% 13% 13% 9% 13% 12% 7% 12% 14% 21% 20% 21% 24% 18% 20% 22% 21% 20% 19% 23% 21% 20% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 2% % 52% 48% 51% 59% 46% 46% 54% 46% 51% 58% 52% 40% 11% 9% 12% 14% 9% 8% 13% 12% 10% 13% 10% 5% 13% 8% 8% 8% 7% 4% 9% 11% 6% 10% 6% 6% 10% 9% 12% 14% 10% 11% 7% 17% 9% 10% 14% 14% 5% 14% 14% 4% 2% 6% 0% 5% 5% 8% 2% 6% 2% 2% 3% 9% 3% 3% 4% 7% 2% 1% 5% 5% 2% 3% 6% 2% 3% 11% 11% 10% 9% 14% 13% 6% 11% 10% 11% 12% 12% 9% 1% 1% 2% 1% 3% 2% 1% 3% 68% 69% 68% 72% 72% 63% 70% 72% 65% 70% 74% 68% 63% 20% 19% 21% 18% 14% 23% 21% 16% 23% 19% 14% 19% 26% 11% 11% 10% 9% 14% 13% 6% 11% 10% 11% 12% 12% 9% 22% 22% 22% 24% 20% 23% 21% 22% 22% 20% 24% 24% 21% 1% 1% 2% 1% 3% 2% 1% 3% Page 34
64 PARTY ID STRENGTH PARTY ID PARTY ID /GENDER DEM. MINUS REPUB. ID FAVOR - OPPOSE 20.COAL TAX INITIAL BALLOT 20.COAL TAX INITIAL BALLOT FAVOR - OPPOSE 21.COAL TAX INFORMED BALLOT 21.COAL TAX INFORMED BALLOT - strong - not strong - lean favor Oppose - strong Oppose - not strong - lean oppose (don't know / refused) Oppose w/leaners (Refused) - strong - not strong - lean favor Oppose - strong Oppose - not strong - lean oppose (don't know / refused) Oppose w/leaners (Refused) Strong Weak Strong Indep/ Democ Democ Indep/ Republ Republ Democ Republ Republ Democ Indep/ DK Republ ratic ratic DK ican ican TOTAL rat ican ican rat DK w/weak ican men women men w/weak w/weak men women % 57% 44% 63% 53% 39% 43% 55% 46% 58% 45% 47% 39% 59% 52% 11% 13% 13% 11% 11% 10% 9% 12% 11% 11% 12% 8% 11% 8% 15% 8% 8% 15% 2% 7% 9% 9% 7% 5% 10% 12% 13% 5% 7% 7% 11% 10% 13% 11% 11% 10% 14% 12% 18% 6% 6% 13% 14% 12% 12% 6% 4% 8% 1% 6% 11% 9% 4% 8% 4% 6% 5% 14% 5% 3% 1% 1% 2% 0% 3% 2% 1% 1% 2% 1% 3% 1% 2% 11% 8% 7% 9% 10% 16% 13% 8% 10% 10% 16% 12% 15% 7% 10% 1% 0% 1% 0% 1% 1% 0% 1% 2% 1% 1% 69% 78% 71% 77% 72% 58% 62% 74% 62% 79% 69% 68% 55% 75% 74% 19% 14% 21% 14% 18% 24% 24% 17% 27% 10% 13% 19% 30% 18% 16% 11% 8% 7% 9% 10% 16% 13% 8% 10% 10% 16% 12% 15% 7% 10% 21% 16% 22% 13% 18% 28% 24% 17% 16% 20% 29% 26% 22% 15% 18% 1% 0% 1% 0% 1% 1% 0% 1% 2% 1% 1% % 64% 42% 55% 57% 39% 40% 50% 55% 59% 44% 44% 37% 56% 45% 11% 10% 12% 12% 9% 12% 9% 12% 10% 8% 10% 6% 13% 8% 16% 8% 7% 13% 4% 8% 5% 6% 8% 7% 8% 8% 10% 2% 9% 7% 12% 8% 11% 15% 9% 14% 14% 13% 15% 5% 10% 14% 14% 16% 11% 4% 2% 11% 3% 6% 8% 4% 2% 4% 1% 4% 12% 4% 5% 3% 1% 1% 6% 3% 4% 5% 4% 2% 3% 3% 3% 6% 3% 5% 11% 8% 7% 7% 11% 18% 17% 7% 9% 11% 24% 19% 14% 4% 9% 1% 0% 4% 1% 1% 1% 1% 2% 1% 1% 3% 1% 3% 68% 81% 66% 71% 73% 56% 56% 69% 71% 75% 62% 60% 51% 72% 67% 20% 11% 23% 21% 15% 25% 26% 22% 19% 13% 14% 21% 32% 23% 22% 11% 8% 7% 7% 11% 18% 17% 7% 9% 11% 24% 19% 14% 4% 9% 22% 17% 20% 17% 21% 28% 27% 18% 18% 23% 34% 32% 21% 16% 21% 1% 0% 4% 1% 1% 1% 1% 2% 1% 1% 3% 1% 3% Indep/ DK men Indep/ DK women Page 35
65 PARTY ID /AGE EDUCATION EDUCATION /GENDER DEM. MINUS REPUB. ID FAVOR - OPPOSE 20.COAL TAX INITIAL BALLOT 20.COAL TAX INITIAL BALLOT FAVOR - OPPOSE 21.COAL TAX INFORMED BALLOT 21.COAL TAX INFORMED BALLOT - strong - not strong - lean favor Oppose - strong Oppose - not strong - lean oppose (don't know / refused) Oppose w/leaners (Refused) - strong - not strong - lean favor Oppose - strong Oppose - not strong - lean oppose (don't know / refused) Oppose w/leaners (Refused) College gradua Republ Non-co te or 4-year Non Non Democ Democ ican H.S. Post H. llege post-gr College college college College College TOTAL rat <50 rat /Less S. grad ad grad men women men women % 55% 51% 46% 51% 44% 48% 55% 53% 50% 46% 53% 57% 11% 12% 10% 16% 9% 14% 11% 12% 11% 10% 12% 9% 14% 8% 11% 4% 5% 11% 7% 10% 5% 7% 7% 13% 8% 3% 11% 9% 14% 15% 12% 12% 12% 11% 13% 12% 12% 15% 8% 6% 5% 7% 6% 5% 9% 7% 5% 1% 6% 8% 7% 3% 1% 1% 1% 0% 3% 1% 1% 2% 1% 2% 1% 1% 11% 7% 13% 9% 11% 10% 11% 12% 14% 13% 9% 8% 14% 1% 1% 1% 0% 1% 1% 2% 69% 78% 65% 68% 71% 65% 68% 72% 70% 67% 70% 69% 74% 19% 14% 21% 22% 18% 23% 20% 16% 16% 19% 21% 23% 12% 11% 7% 13% 9% 11% 10% 11% 12% 14% 13% 9% 8% 14% 21% 19% 17% 16% 23% 20% 22% 18% 22% 20% 23% 17% 18% 1% 1% 1% 0% 1% 1% 2% % 59% 55% 45% 47% 42% 45% 58% 56% 47% 43% 62% 56% 11% 10% 8% 10% 10% 11% 10% 12% 11% 10% 10% 7% 16% 8% 7% 8% 9% 13% 8% 11% 3% 5% 9% 12% 7% 1% 12% 9% 10% 19% 11% 18% 14% 10% 11% 15% 12% 12% 8% 4% 6% 3% 5% 6% 5% 2% 1% 3% 8% 3% 3% 2% 3% 2% 2% 4% 3% 4% 4% 2% 3% 2% 5% 11% 13% 9% 8% 12% 11% 12% 9% 10% 12% 11% 10% 8% 1% 1% 3% 0% 1% 1% 2% 3% 1% 1% 3% 68% 76% 71% 64% 69% 61% 66% 74% 72% 67% 65% 76% 73% 20% 11% 19% 25% 18% 28% 22% 15% 16% 21% 24% 14% 16% 11% 13% 9% 8% 12% 11% 12% 9% 10% 12% 11% 10% 8% 22% 22% 19% 19% 27% 23% 25% 16% 18% 24% 27% 19% 15% 1% 1% 3% 0% 1% 1% 2% 3% 1% 1% 3% Page 36
Rock the Vote Robert G. Meadow, Ph.D. Partner
Celinda Lake President Alysia Snell Partner Michael Perry Partner David Mermin Partner Rock the Vote Robert G. Meadow, Ph.D. Partner Daniel R. Gotoff Partner Joshua E. Ulibarri Partner Rick A. Johnson
YG Network: National Survey Results. Presented by: John McLaughlin and Rob Schmidt January 22 nd, 2014
f YG Network: National Survey Results Presented by: John McLaughlin and Rob Schmidt January 22 nd, 14 Methodology This national survey of 1, likely 14 general election voters was conducted from January
FOR RELEASE: TUESDAY, SEPTEMBER 30 AT 6 AM
Interviews with 1,055 adult Americans conducted by telephone by ORC International on September 25-28, 2014. The margin of sampling error for results based on the total sample is plus or minus 3 percentage
FOR RELEASE: FRIDAY, OCTOBER 8 AT 1 PM
Interviews with 1,008 adult Americans conducted by telephone by Opinion Research Corporation on October 5-7, 2010. The margin of sampling error for results based on the total sample is plus or minus 3
Morning Consult National Tracking Poll # September 14-17, Crosstabulation Results
Morning Consult National Tracking Poll #170911 September 14-17, 2017 Crosstabulation Results Methodology: This poll was conducted from September 14-17, 2017, among a national sample of 1994 registered
EMBARGOED FOR RELEASE: Thursday, August 4 at 6:00 a.m.
Interviews with 1,003 adult Americans conducted by telephone by ORC International on July 29-31, 2016. The margin of sampling error for results based on the total sample is plus or minus 3 percentage points.
La Plata County Voters Views of DRO Ballot Issue
Poll Results La Plata County Voters Views of DRO Ballot Issue Presented June 9, 2015 Sample Size: n=400 Eligibility: Likely November 2016 Voters Interview Method: Telephone. Landline 67; Cell 33 Margin
FOR RELEASE: FRIDAY, SEPTEMBER 30 AT 6 AM
Interviews with 1,010 adult Americans conducted by telephone by ORC International on September 23-25, 2011. The margin of sampling error for results based on the total sample is plus or minus 3 percentage
Results of SurveyUSA Election Poll # Page 1
In North Carolina, Tillis-Hagan U.S. Senate Race Ends Where it Started, Exactly Even: One week till votes are counted in the high-profile, spare-no-expense contest for United States Senator from North
Obama Job Approval Slips as Economic Pessimism Rises
MARCH 21, 2013 Positive Signs on Stocks, Housing Have Little Impact Obama Job Approval Slips as Economic Pessimism Rises FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT THE PEW RESEARCH CENTER FOR THE PEOPLE & THE PRESS
OR 2 YR 4 YR POST LESS COLL COLL GRAD (U) (V) (W) (X)
10-1 QUESTION 11: Of the following fiscal policy issues, which do you feel North Carolina state lawmakers should address FIRST? BANNER 1 EDUCATION ======================= OR 2 YR 4 YR POST LESS COLL COLL
National Tracking Poll
National Tracking Poll Project: 180102 N Size: 1988 Registered Voters Margin of Error: ± 2% Topline Report January 04-05, 2018 POL6 Question Response Frequency Percentage As you may know, later this month
The sample also includes 950 interviews among registered voters (plus or minus 3 percentage points)
Interviews with 1,035 adult Americans conducted by telephone by ORC International on December 16-19, 2013. The margin of sampling error for results based on the total sample is plus or minus 3 percentage
How the Survey was Conducted Nature of the Sample: McClatchy-Marist Poll of 1,249 National Adults
How the Survey was Conducted Nature of the Sample: McClatchy-Marist Poll of 1,249 This survey of 1,249 adults was conducted July 5 th through July 9 th, 2016 by The Marist Poll sponsored and funded in
Morning Consult National Tracking Poll # April 05-07, Crosstabulation Results
Morning Consult National Tracking Poll #180408 April 05-07, 2018 Crosstabulation Results Methodology: This poll was conducted from April 05-07, 2018, among a national sample of 1994 Registered Voters.
How the Survey was Conducted Nature of the Sample: NPR/PBS NewsHour/Marist Poll of 1,075 National Adults
How the Survey was Conducted Nature of the Sample: NPR/PBS NewsHour/Marist Poll of 1,075 This survey of 1,075 adults was conducted November 28 th through December 4 th, 2018 by The Marist Poll sponsored
National Tracking Poll # March 01-03, Crosstabulation Results
National Tracking Poll #190301 March 01-03, 2019 Crosstabulation Results Methodology: This poll was conducted between March 1-March 3, 2019 among a national sample of 1993 Registered Voters. The interviews
National Tracking Poll # March 01-03, Crosstabulation Results
National Tracking Poll #190301 March 01-03, 2019 Crosstabulation Results Methodology: This poll was conducted from March 01-03, 2019, among a national sample of 1993 Registered Voters. The interviews were
National Tracking Poll # July 06-10, Crosstabulation Results
National Tracking Poll #180708 July 06-10, 2018 Crosstabulation Results Methodology: This poll was conducted from July 06-10, 2018, among a national sample of 1999 Registered Voters. The interviews were
National Tracking Poll
National Tracking Poll Project: 170409 N Size: 2194 Registered Voters Margin of Error: ± 2% Topline Report April 20-24, 2017 Question Response Frequency Percentage NCT1 Generally, how involved do you believe
National Tracking Poll # July 13-14, Crosstabulation Results
National Tracking Poll #180724 July 13-14, 2018 Crosstabulation Results Methodology: This poll was conducted from July 13-14, 2018, among a national sample of 1991 registered voters. The interviews were
National Tracking Poll # December 04-04, Crosstabulation Results
National Tracking Poll #181159 December 04-04, 2018 Crosstabulation Results Methodology: This poll was conducted from December 04-04, 2018, among a national sample of 1975 Registered Voters. The interviews
Marist College Institute for Public Opinion Poughkeepsie, NY Phone Fax
Marist College Institute for Public Opinion Poughkeepsie, NY 12601 Phone 845.575.5050 Fax 845.575.5111 www.maristpoll.marist.edu POLL MUST BE SOURCED: McClatchy-Marist Poll* Majority Considers Ukraine
National Tracking Poll # February 15-19, Crosstabulation Results
National Tracking Poll #190232 February 15-19, 2019 Crosstabulation Results Methodology: This poll was conducted from February 15-19, 2019, among a national sample of 1914 Registered Voters. The interviews
Morning Consult National Tracking Poll # January 18-20, Crosstabulation Results
Morning Consult National Tracking Poll #180111 January 18-20, 2018 Crosstabulation Results Methodology: This poll was conducted from January 18-20, 2018, among a national sample of 1994 Registered Voters.
What America Is Thinking On Energy Issues. Production & Infrastructure: New Jersey
Nielsen What America Is Thinking On Energy Issues Production & Infrastructure: New Jersey August 2014 Methodology Audience: 602 Registered Voters Methodology: Telephone interviews Interview Dates: July
What America Is Thinking On Energy Issues. Production & Infrastructure: Missouri
Nielsen What America Is Thinking On Energy Issues Production & Infrastructure: Missouri August 2014 Methodology Audience: 614 Registered Voters Methodology: Telephone interviews Interview Dates: July 29
THE TARRANCE GROUP, INC. Battleground 55 #14396: Weighted Tables Aguust 23-28, 2014
RG1 GEOGRAPHIC AREAS ONE RG2 GEOGRAPHIC AREAS TWO SENEL U.S. SENATE ELECTION STATUS BY STATE COMPSEN COMPETITIVE SENATE RACES GOVEL GUBERNATORIAL ELECTION STATUS BY STATE GENDER GENDER RSEXEMP SEX / EMPLOYMENT/C
Taos County Survey. Survey of 300 Active Registered Voters. Performed for the Wilderness Society. Prepared by Stephen Clermont/Third Eye Strategies
Taos County Survey Survey of 300 Active Registered Voters Performed for the Wilderness Society Prepared by Stephen Clermont/Third Eye Strategies August 22 nd 25 th, 2016 Third Eye Strategies Burke Virginia
The sample includes 648 interviews among landline respondents and 275 interviews among cell phone respondents.
Interviews with 93 adult Americans conducted by telephone by ORC International on May 17-18, 013. The margin of sampling error for results based on the total sample is plus or minus 3 percentage points.
National Tracking Poll # May 18-22, Crosstabulation Results
National Tracking Poll #180538 May 18-22, 2018 Crosstabulation Results Methodology: This poll was conducted from May 18-22, 2018, among a national sample of 1993 Registered Voters. The interviews were
FOR RELEASE: Wednesday, February 19 at 6:00 a.m. ET
Interviews with 1,027 adult Americans conducted by telephone by ORC International on February 12-15, 2015. The margin of sampling error for results based on the total sample is plus or minus 3 percentage
Morning Consult National Tracking Poll # January 26-28, Crosstabulation Results
Morning Consult National Tracking Poll #170104 January 26-28, 2017 Crosstabulation Results Methodology: This poll was conducted from January 26-28, 2017, among a national sample of 1991 registered voters.
Hello, my name is from HAI, a national research firm.
Copyright 2014 September 26 - October 2, 2014 400 Interviews Alaska HAI3272 Margin of Error: +/- 4.9% Hello, my name is from HAI, a national research firm. [IF LANDLINE] We're conducting a survey in Alaska
Tax Reform National Survey
Tax Reform National Survey Key findings of a survey of 1,000 likely voters nationally, conducted October 19-22, 2017. Glen Bolger glen@pos.org Project #17420 Public Opinion Strategies is pleased to present
The sample also includes 710 interviews among registered voters (plus or minus 3.5 percentage points)
Interviews with 801 adult Americans conducted by telephone by ORC International on March 7-9, 014. The margin of sampling error for results based on the total sample is plus or minus 3.5 percentage points.
A Survey of Voter Attitudes in Wisconsin
A Survey of Voter Attitudes in Wisconsin December 14-16, 2015 #14907 Survey was conducted December 14-16 Statewide sample of 503 registered voters Margin of error: +/- 4.5% Partisan affiliation: 47% Dem,
National Tracking Poll
National Tracking Poll Project: 180115 N Size: 20429 Registered Voters Margin of Error: ± 1% Topline Report January 16-29, 2018 P1 Question Response Frequency Percentage Now, generally speaking, would
National Tracking Poll
National Tracking Poll Project: 160703 N Size: 2803 Registered Voters Margin of Error: ± 2% Topline Report July 22-24, 2016 P1 Question Response Frequency Percentage Now, generally speaking, would you
EMBARGOED FOR RELEASE: Sunday, January 21 at 8:00 a.m.
CNN January 2018 The study was conducted for CNN via telephone by SSRS, an independent research company. Interviews were conducted from January 14, 2017 January 18, 2018 among a sample of 1,005 respondents,
June 12-16, 2009 N= 895. All trends are from New York Times/CBS News polls unless otherwise noted. An asterisk indicates registered respondents only.
z POLL June 12-16, 2009 N= 895 All trends are from New York Times/CBS News polls unless otherwise noted. An asterisk indicates registered respondents only. 6. Do you approve or disapprove of the way Barack
FOR RELEASE: WEDNESDAY, MARCH 30 AT 6 AM
Interviews with 1,023 adult Americans conducted by telephone by Opinion Research Corporation on March 11-13, 2011. The margin of sampling error for results based on the total sample is plus or minus 3
Morning Consult National Tracking Poll # January 11-16, Crosstabulation Results
Morning Consult National Tracking Poll #180108 January 11-16, 2018 Crosstabulation Results Methodology: This poll was conducted from January 11-16, 2018, among a national sample of 1993 registered voters.
Morning Consult National Tracking Poll # September 22-24, Crosstabulation Results
Morning Consult National Tracking Poll #170916 September 22-24, 2017 Crosstabulation Results Methodology: This poll was conducted from September 22-24, 2017, among a national sample of 2200 Adults. The
National Tracking Poll
National Tracking Poll Project: 170205 N Size: 1971 Registered Voters Margin of Error: ± 2% Topline Report February 16-19, 2017 Question Response Frequency Percentage FB1_1 industries or sectors... Agriculture
2017 WESTERN STATES SURVEY Interview Schedule Utah
2017 WESTERN STATES SURVEY Public Opinion Strategies/FM3 December 2016 January 2017 N = 400 voters in Utah Margin of Error: + 4.9% per state In this document: C C C C An asterisk (*) in a response category
National Tracking Poll
National Tracking Poll Project: 180326 N Size: 1992 Registered Voters Margin of Error: ± 2% Topline Report March 20-21, 2018 P1 Question Response Frequency Percentage Now, generally speaking, would you
PENSION POLL 2015 TOPLINE RESULTS
PENSION POLL 2015 TOPLINE RESULTS RELEASED: FEBRUARY 6, 2015 The Reason-Rupe Pension Poll interviewed 1,003 adults on both mobile (501) and landline (502) phones, including 290 respondents without landlines,
National Tracking Poll # January 18-22, Crosstabulation Results
National Tracking Poll #190140 January 18-22, 2019 Crosstabulation Results Methodology: This poll was conducted from January 18-22, 2019, among a national sample of 1996 Registered Voters. The interviews
Base: All respondents Unweighted Base Weighted Base
2. Overall, do you think the election of Barack Obama to President is a good thing or a bad thing? Good thing 770 645 125 77 249 259 185 179 223 368 76% 76% 76% 67% 70% 78% 86% 72% 73% 80% CD CD GH Bad
Tax System Seen as Unfair, in Need of Overhaul
TUESDAY, DECEMBER 20, 2011 Wealthy Not Paying Fair Share Top Complaint Tax System Seen as Unfair, in Need of Overhaul FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Andrew Kohut President, Pew Research Center Carroll
Chartpack. Kaiser Health Tracking Poll: 2010
Chartpack Kaiser Health Tracking Poll: 2010 2010 CHART 1 Awareness of Law s Passage As far as you know, has a health care reform bill been passed by Congress and signed into law by President Obama, or
Morning Consult National Tracking Poll # November 09-11, Crosstabulation Results
Morning Consult National Tracking Poll #171104 November 09-11, 2017 Crosstabulation Results Methodology: This poll was conducted from November 09-11, 2017, among a national sample of 1993 registered voters.
Morning Consult National Tracking Poll # December 08-11, Crosstabulation Results
Morning Consult National Tracking Poll #171203 December 08-11, 2017 Crosstabulation Results Methodology: This poll was conducted from December 08-11, 2017, among a national sample of 1955 registered voters.
Region Vote Choice Tea Party Party Gender Age Religion. Dutchess Westchester. Ind/
Q1. Is the United States on the right track, or is it headed in the wrong direction? Right track 26% 23% 27% 29% 52% 5% 5% 52% 53% 9% 17% 20% 33% 26% 27% 20% 27% 43% Wrong direction 63% 70% 59% 61% 34%
Marist College Institute for Public Opinion Poughkeepsie, NY Phone Fax
Marist College Institute for Public Opinion Poughkeepsie, NY 12601 Phone 845.575.5050 Fax 845.575.5111 www.maristpoll.marist.edu Four in Ten with High Expectations For Obama s Second Term Approval Rating
June 2007 Pennsylvania Keystone Poll
For immediate release Thursday, June 7, 2007 June 2007 Pennsylvania Keystone Poll SUMMARY OF FINDINGS Prepared by: Center for Opinion Research Floyd Institute for Public Policy Franklin & Marshall College
Morning Consult National Tracking Poll # August 24-28, Crosstabulation Results
Morning Consult National Tracking Poll #170814 August 24-28, 2017 Crosstabulation Results Methodology: This poll was conducted from August 24-28, 2017, among a national sample of 1999 registered voters.
How the Survey was Conducted Nature of the Sample: McClatchy-Marist National Poll of 1,197 Adults
How the Survey was Conducted Nature of the Sample: McClatchy-Marist National Poll of 1,197 Adults This survey of 1,197 adults was conducted February 4 th through February 9 th, 2014 by The Marist Poll
Morning Consult National Tracking Poll # May 12-14, Crosstabulation Results
Morning Consult National Tracking Poll #170507 May 12-14, 2017 Crosstabulation Results Methodology: This poll was conducted from May 12-14, 2017, among a national sample of 2001 registered voters. The
Nottingham Parking Levy Survey
Page 1 Nottingham Parking Levy Survey PAGE TABLE TITLE TOTAL 1 1 Q1 - As you may know, Nottingham City Council has announced plans to introduce a workplace parking levy. This would mean a charge of 253
2017 WESTERN STATES SURVEY Interview Schedule Colorado
2017 WESTERN STATES SURVEY Public Opinion Strategies/FM3 December 2016 January 2017 N = 400 voters in Colorado Margin of Error: + 4.9% per state In this document: C C C C An asterisk (*) in a response
Morning Consult National Tracking Poll # March 08-12, Crosstabulation Results
Morning Consult National Tracking Poll #180312 March 08-12, 2018 Crosstabulation Results Methodology: This poll was conducted from March 08-12, 2018, among a national sample of 1997 registered voters.
How the Survey was Conducted Nature of the Sample: NPR/PBS NewsHour/Marist Poll of 1,075 National Adults
How the Survey was Conducted Nature of the Sample: NPR/PBS NewsHour/Marist Poll of 1,075 This survey of 1,075 adults was conducted November 28 th through December 4 th, 2018 by The Marist Poll sponsored
Morning Consult National Tracking Poll # April 06-09, Crosstabulation Results
Morning Consult National Tracking Poll #170404 April 06-09, 2017 Crosstabulation Results Methodology: This poll was conducted from April 06-09, 2017, among a national sample of 1988 registered voters.
National Tracking Poll # January 25-27, Crosstabulation Results
National Tracking Poll #190156 January 25-27, 2019 Crosstabulation Results Methodology: This poll was conducted from January 25-27, 2019, among a national sample of 1997 Registered Voters. The interviews
Facts & Findings March 2018
NEW JERSEY HEALTH & WELL- BEING POLL Facts & Findings March 2018 In the Shadow of ACA Repeal and Replace : Public Views on How New Jersey Policymakers Should Respond O ver the past year, the U.S. Congress
North Carolina Statewide April 2017
North Carolina Statewide April 2017 Interview Schedule N = 600 Registered Voters (30% Cell Phones) Margin of Error: +/- 4.00% Field Dates: April 20, 22-23, 2017 (ASK ALL) 1. First, are you registered to
National Tracking Poll # August 02-06, Crosstabulation Results
National Tracking Poll #180805 August 02-06, 2018 Crosstabulation Results Methodology: This poll was conducted from August 02-06, 2018, among a national sample of 1994 Registered Voters. The interviews
Results of SurveyUSA Election Poll # Page 1
1 Month to NC Presidential Primary, Trump Atop Rubio and Cruz; Clinton Well Ahead of Sanders; General Election Head-To-Head Matchups Favor Republicans if Clinton is the Democratic Nominee: 2 weeks till
Not One Penny National Online Survey
Not One Penny National Online Survey February 9-16, 2018 2000 Respondents Q.2 Are you currently registered to vote in (STATE FROM SAMPLE)? Yes... 100 No... - (Don't know/refused)... - (ref:screen1) Q.3
National Tracking Poll # July 19-23, Crosstabulation Results
National Tracking Poll #180736 July 19-23, 2018 Crosstabulation Results Methodology: This poll was conducted between July 19-July 23, 2018 among a national sample of 2203 Adults. The interviews were conducted
Key findings from a statewide survey of 500 likely voters in Georgia, conducted February 23-25, Project #10118
Key findings from a statewide survey of 500 likely voters in Georgia, conducted February 23-25, 2010. Project #10118 METHODOLOGY Public Opinion Strategies is pleased to present the key findings of a telephone
THE TARRANCE GROUP, INC. / LAKE RESEARCH PARTNERS GWU Battleground 29 #10420: Weighted Tables February 12-15, 2006
QB LIKELIHOOD OF VOTING IN UPCOMING ELECTION Extremely likely Very likely Somewhat likely 62% 28% 10% 1020 49% 29% 23% 81 62% 28% 10% 1020 Q1 Republican GENERIC CONGRESSIONAL BALLOT Lean Republican Undecided
Access and Infrastructure National April 2014
Access and Infrastructure National April 2014 Created for: American Petroleum Institute Presented by: Nielsen Interviewing: April 3-9, 2014 Respondents: 1,003 Registered Voters Method: Telephone Sample:
National Tracking Poll
National Tracking Poll Project: 170102 N Size: 1991 Registered Voters Margin of Error: ± 2% Topline Report January 12-13, 2017 IFA2 Question Response Frequency Percentage Which of the following should
Marist College Institute for Public Opinion Poughkeepsie, NY Phone Fax
Marist College Institute for Public Opinion Poughkeepsie, NY 12601 Phone 845.575.5050 Fax 845.575.5111 www.maristpoll.marist.edu Despite Increased Economic Optimism, Americans Still Feel Pinch Gas Prices
National Tracking Poll
National Tracking Poll Project: 160614 N Size: 1960 Registered Voters Margin of Error: ± 2% Topline Report June 23 - July 01, 2016 P3 Question Response Frequency Percentage Now, thinking about your vote,
10th Annual Transamerica Retirement Survey Full-Time & Part-Time Workers
10th Annual Transamerica Retirement Survey Full-Time & Part-Time Workers Transamerica Center for Retirement Studies Table of Contents PAGE Objectives 4 Methodology 5 Terminology 6 Profile of Respondents
Men Women Phoenix Rest of Maricopa Pima South North...
Arizona Education Association Special Election Eve/Day Survey May 16-17, 2016 500 special election voters Gender Men... 48 40 59 Women... 52 60 41 Region Phoenix... 19 21 19 Rest of Maricopa... 40 38 41
National Tracking Poll
National Tracking Poll Project: 170406 N Size: 10833 Adults Margin of Error: ± 1% Topline Report April 06-12, 2017 Question Response Frequency Percentage NCT1_1 How exciting do you nd each of the following
National Tracking Poll
National Tracking Poll Project: 150803 N Size: 2013 Registered Voters Margin of Error: ± 2% Topline Report August 14-16, 2015 P1 Question Response Frequency Percentage Now, generally speaking, would you
Key Findings From a National Survey of 800 Likely Voters March &14, 2009
Key Findings From a National Survey of 800 Likely Voters March 10-12 &14, 2009 Project #09065 1 Public Opinion Strategies and Greenberg Quinlan Rosner Research are pleased to present National Public Radio
National Tracking Poll
National Tracking Poll Project: 160812 N Size: 2001 Registered Voters Margin of Error: ± 2% Topline Report September 01-02, 2016 P1 Question Response Frequency Percentage Now, generally speaking, would
For release after 10:00AM/ET Monday, November 6, VIRGINIA
For release after 10:00AM/ET Monday, November 6, 2017. VIRGINIA The Fox News Poll is conducted under the joint direction of Anderson Robbins Research (D) and Shaw & Company Research (R). The poll was conducted
Tax Reform National Survey
Tax Reform National Survey Key findings of a survey of 1,000 likely voters nationally, conducted October 19-22, 2017. Glen Bolger glen@pos.org Project #17420 Public Opinion Strategies is pleased to present
Morning Consult National Tracking Poll # November 16-19, Crosstabulation Results
Morning Consult National Tracking Poll #171109 November 16-19, 2017 Crosstabulation Results Methodology: This poll was conducted from November 16-19, 2017, among a national sample of 2586 registered voters.
Time Warner Cable News/Siena College Poll September 4, 7-9, Likely Voters Congressional District 19 MOE +/- 4.0%
Q1. Is the United States on the right track, or is it headed in the wrong direction? Right track 23% 40% 14% 17% 27% 19% 41% 13% 28% 20% 19% 22% 24% 21% 17% 34% 45% 25% 6% Wrong direction 64% 45% 77% 68%
Marist College Institute for Public Opinion Poughkeepsie, NY Phone Fax
Marist College Institute for Public Opinion Poughkeepsie, NY 12601 Phone 845.575.5050 Fax 845.575.5111 www.maristpoll.marist.edu POLL MUST BE SOURCED: NBC News/Marist Poll* Colorado: Udall Ahead of Gardner
EMBARGOED FOR RELEASE:
The study was conducted for CNN via telephone by SSRS, an independent research company. Interviews were conducted from June 14, 2018 to June 17, 2018 among a sample of 1,012 respondents. The landline total
S2 Gender N % Male % Female %
Marquette Law School Poll Toplines January 19-22, 2012 (Reported total sample size may differ from 701 due to rounding of weighted data.) S2 Gender Male 356 51% Female 345 49% S4 Region Milwaukee City
Marist College Institute for Public Opinion Poughkeepsie, NY Phone Fax
Marist College Institute for Public Opinion Poughkeepsie, NY 12601 Phone 845.575.5050 Fax 845.575.5111 www.maristpoll.marist.edu POLL MUST BE SOURCED: NBC News/Marist Poll* Kentucky: McConnell and Grimes
Random digit dial Results are weighted to be representative of Maryland registered voters.
Access and Infrastructure Maryland April 2014 Created for: American Petroleum Institute Presented by: Nielsen Interviewing: April 9 16, 2014 Respondents: 602 registered voters Method: Telephone Sample:
MEMORANDUM. Key Findings. Atlantic Coast Pipeline support Support Oppose Net Support Total 56%
H ai TO: Interested parties FROM: Hickman Analytics, Inc. RE: Virginia Survey Results DATE: June 8, 2015 Hickman Analytics, Inc. Honest Accurate Insight MEMORANDUM Summary. A wide majority of Virginia
NASD Investor Education Foundation
Applied Research & Consulting LLC 320 West 13th Street Seventh Floor NYC, NY 10014 Tel. 212.226.1007 Fax. 212.226.0240 E-mail. arc@arcllc.com NASD Investor Education Foundation Military Personnel and Spouses
Marist College Institute for Public Opinion Poughkeepsie, NY Phone Fax
Marist College Institute for Public Opinion Poughkeepsie, NY 12601 Phone 845.575.5050 Fax 845.575.5111 www.maristpoll.marist.edu POLL MUST BE SOURCED: NBC News/Marist Poll* Tossup for U.S. Senate in Iowa,
City of East Lansing Survey on an Income Tax versus Property Tax Increase Proposal
EPIC MRA 4710 W. Saginaw Highway Suite 2C Lansing, MI 48917 P: 517-886-0860 P: 800-545-8249 F: 517-886-9176 E: info@epicmra.com W: www.epicmra.com City of East Lansing Survey on an Income Tax versus Property
Survey on Nebraska s Minimum Wage
Survey on Nebraska s Minimum Wage The information on the following pages comes from an IVR survey conducted on February 26 th and February 27 th on a random sample of voters in Nebraska. Contents Methodology...
Texas Tracking Poll. Page 1
Texas Tracking Poll Project: 170920 N Size: 801 Adults In Texas Margin of Error: ± 3% Topline Report September 26-29, 2017 Question Response Frequency Percentage GE1_4 Do you agree or disagree with the
Morning Consult National Tracking Poll # January 04-05, Crosstabulation Results
Morning Consult National Tracking Poll #180102 January 04-05, 2018 Crosstabulation Results Methodology: This poll was conducted from January 04-05, 2018, among a national sample of 1988 registered voters.