NOTICE OF REGULAR MEETING

Transcription

1 NOTICE OF REGULAR MEETING PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that there will be a regular meeting of the commission of the Madison Metropolitan Sewerage District at 8 a.m., on Thursday, Jan. 25, 2018, at the Maintenance Facility Training Room at 1610 Moorland Road, Madison, Wis The commission will consider, and may take action, on the matters set forth on the attached agenda. If any matter on the agenda is to be considered in closed session of the commission, please be advised that following the closed session the commission will reconvene into open session for purposes of taking any action based on the closed session and concluding its agenda. Date: Jan. 23, 2017 D. Michael Mucha, P.E. Chief Engineer and Director Any person who has a qualifying disability as defined by the Americans with Disabilities Act that requires the meeting or materials at the meeting to be in an accessible location or format must contact the chief engineer and director at , 1610 Moorland Road, Madison, Wis., at least 24 hours prior to the commencement of the meeting so that any necessary arrangements can be made to accommodate each request. 1. Opening A. Call to Order B. Welcome Guests C. Announcements: Introduction of new employees Kelly Sullivan, Project Engineer and Rodger Weaver, Relief Operator 2. Appearances by the Public 3. Consent Calendar A. Approval Meeting Minutes from B. Approval for Award of Annual Contracts for Maintenance and Support of the District s Oracle WAM System Dunn Commission Agenda Report Attachment 1: 2018 Mythics/Oracle Annual Contracts Item Summary Attachment 2: Resolution ( R1) 1

2 C. Review and Approval of Sewer Extension Plans - Gebert Commission Agenda Report Attachment 1: Sewer Vicinity Map Attachment 2: Sewer Extension Financial Summary New Construction Projects Verona Downtown Streets Reconstruction Phase II, City of Verona Attachment 3: Verona Downtown Streets Reconstruction Phase II Resolution & Map ( R2) Westmorland Boulevard Assessment District 2018, City of Madison Attachment 4: Westmoreland Boulevard Assessment District 2018 Resolution & Map ( R3) 4. Acceptance of Liquid Processing Facilities Plan for Planning Purposes Borelli Commission Agenda Report Attachment 1: Resolution ( R4) Attachment 2: DNR Approval Letter Attachment 3: CARPC Concurrence Letter 5. Approval of First Amendment to Memorandum of Understanding Regarding Allocation and Payment of Connection Fees for the Community of Bishops Bay Development - Gebert Commission Agenda Report Attachment 1: Resolution ( R5) Attachment 2: Exhibit A-1 - Map of MOU Area 6. PS-7 Review and Approval of Professional Services Agreement Lundey/Bembinster Commission Agenda Report Attachment 1: Summary of Pricing from Consultant Proposals Attachment 2: Resolution ( R6) 7. Study Session: Inclusion and Diversity Peters Commission Agenda Report 8. Chief Engineer and Director s Report A. CED Update-Mucha 2017 Plant Performance Review B. Operations Report Dundee December Plant Performance Data December Plant Flow Data C. Regulatory Review and Report-Kent Regulatory Report D. Future Meeting Schedule (as of 1/23/18) Future Meeting Schedule 9. Future Agenda Topics 2

3 10. Other Business by Law 11. Adjournment 3

4 Meeting of the Commissioners of the Madison Metropolitan Sewerage District Thursday, Jan. 11, a.m. District Maintenance Facility Training Room, 1610 Moorland Road, Madison, Wis Present: Commissioner Tom Hovel Commissioner Angela James Commissioner Ken Clark Commissioner Sara Eskrich Commissioner James Martin Commissioner Ezra Meyer Commissioner Brad Murphy Commissioner Brian Potts (excused absence) Commissioner Tom Wilson Commission Meeting 1. Opening A. Commissioner Hovel called the meeting to order at 8 a.m. B. Welcome guests: Jeffrey Svien and Rebecca Harring, Wells Fargo C. Announcements: None. 2. Appearances by the Public 3. Consent Calendar A. Approval of Meeting Minutes from B. Approval of Cash Statement-Operating Fund C. Approval of Cash Statement-Capital Projects Fund D. Approval of Expedited Annexation Dohm Attachment, City of Madison ( R1) E. Review and Approval of Sewer Extension Plan Hawks Valley-Phase 4, City of Madison ( R2) Discussion: The minutes; operating fund cash statement; capital projects fund cash statement; expedited annexation- Dohm attachment; and sewer extension plan were reviewed and placed on file. The operating cash fund account shows an available cash balance through operating fund check no in the amount of $395,316.51; plus adjustments of $514.76; subsequent receipts totaling $1,909, less disbursements of $2,247,410.48; with a resulting cash balance of $58, The capital projects fund cash statement shows an available cash balance through capital projects fund account check no in the 4

5 amount of $13,012.61; subsequent receipts totaling $2,616,114.07; less disbursements of $2,617, with a resulting cash balance of $11, Action: After discussion, Commissioner Martin moved, seconded by Commissioner Eskrich to approve items A-E of the consent calendar. Motion carried 6-0. Commissioner Meyer was absent for the previous meeting and abstained from the vote for the meeting minutes. Commissioner James was absent from the vote. 4. Approval of Fourth Quarter Sewer Service Bills Presenter: Todd Gebert, Collection System Engineer Description: Service charges for each of the district s customers are calculated and invoiced on a quarterly basis to fund the district s costs for conveying and treating wastewater and require approval by the commission before invoices are sent. Discussion: Mr. Gebert provided a quarterly information packet to the commission at the meeting ( R3). He then presented information on the financial impact, analysis and options and service charge summary for the fourth quarter of Action: After discussion, Commissioner Meyer moved second by Commissioner Clark to approve sewer service charges for the fourth quarter of 2017 as prepared. Motion carried 8-0. Commission James arrived at 8:05 a.m. 5. Chief Engineer and Director s Report A. Updates-Mucha Mr. Mucha, chief engineer and director, gave a brief district update and welcomed the commission back for Action: No action necessary-informational only. B. Regulatory Review-Yde Action: No action necessary-informational only. C. Review of Commission Calendar Action: No action necessary-informational only. 6. Future Agenda Topics Action: No other business was discussed, no action necessary. 7. Other Business Allowed by Law Action: No other business was discussed, no action necessary. 8. Adjournment Action: Commissioner Murphy moved, seconded by Commissioner Meyer that the meeting be adjourned. Motion carried

6 Meeting adjourned 8:08 a.m. Regular meeting of the commissioners Jan. 11, 2018 Angela James, Secretary Future Meetings: Thursday, Jan. 25 at 8 a.m. - regular commission meeting Thursday, Feb. 8 at 8 a.m. - regular commission meeting Thursday, Feb. 22 at 8 a.m. - regular commission meeting 6

7 7

8 8

9 9

10 10

11 11

12 Return to Agenda COMMISSION AGENDA REPORT Meeting of Jan. 25, 2018 Approval for Award of Annual Contracts for Maintenance and Support of the District s Oracle WAM System Lead Staff: Laurie Dunn, Information Systems Manager Requested Action: The commission is requested to award a $54,723 agreement for the maintenance and support of the district s Oracle WAM system to Mythics, and to authorize the chief engineer and director to execute an award with Mythics at a cost not to exceed $54,723. Attachments: Attachment 1: 2018 Mythics/Oracle Annual Contracts - Item Summary Attachment 2: Resolution ( R1) Financial Impact: The 2018 budget for Oracle WAM maintenance and support is $56,918. Our recommended vendor, Mythics, has proposed a total price for all 5 contracts of $54,723. This falls within the budget limit. Background: Oracle WAM is a centralized maintenance management system (CMMS) used by all staff at the district. This system provides applications, forms, reports and analysis tools for: asset management, purchasing, operations, receiving, timekeeping, inventory, specifications and warranties. Maintenance and support contracts are essential for making sure these types of enterprise systems are working correctly. The Oracle WAM system requires maintenance and support from Oracle. Oracle sets the prices for the support contacts and they require us to select a third party contract partner to manage those contracts. Oracle has contracted out this support function. The prices for the contracts will be the same no matter which partner is used. Mythics is an Oracle partner that manages the contract services to setup our maintenance and support. Oracle partners make sure the appropriate contracts are created and then they obtain pricing from Oracle. We have been using Mythics for the past four years. We have been pleased with their responsiveness to our questions, assistance in helping us understand increasing complex Oracle contract rules and in their proactive management of our account. While there is an option to not renew our support and maintenance contract, district staff does not have the time, expertise or resources to independently manage and support the Oracle WAM system. The system is highly complex and requires deep specialist knowledge of both the Oracle database and 12

13 the WAM applications. We know of no organization using Oracle WAM that opts for self-maintenance and support. Without this specialist support we would also risk system slow-down and crashes that could negatively impact some of our essential maintenance management and financial processes. The district s transaction policy requires commission approval to award these contracts because in total they are an operating fund expense that exceeds $50,000. Analysis and Options: Recommendation: Award contracts for Oracle WAM support and maintenance to Mythics for a cost of $54,723 and authorize the chief engineer and director to execute a purchase order for the contracts. Key considerations: The Oracle WAM system is integral to the district s business and operations. We need specialized maintenance and support services from Oracle to optimally support that system. Internal staff does not possess the skills needed to independently support the Oracle WAM system. Over the past four years Mythics has given the district excellent service and proactive account management. Other Oracle partners would not be able to provide us with cost savings on these contracts. We prefer to stay with a vendor that has this record of good customer support. Option 1: Award of a contract for Oracle WAM support and maintenance to another vendor. Key considerations: Oracle dictates support and maintenance pricing to partner vendors. So while other Oracle partners are available, they would not be able to provide us with notable cost savings on these contracts. We would prefer to stay with Mythics and their record of good customer support. Option 2: Provide Oracle WAM support and maintenance using district staff. Key considerations: District staff does not have the time, expertise or resources to independently manage and support the Oracle WAM system. This option presents risks of diminishing performance, data corruption and system shut-down. This risk is not acceptable for a system that is essential to the district s business and operations. Next Steps: Following completion of a contract agreement, Mythics will provide Oracle WAM support to the district for the next annual contract year. 13

14 Attachment Mythics/Oracle Annual Contracts - Item Summary Oracle WAM Component WAM/Synergen Enterprise System Product 28,694 Oracle Database, production system licensing 7,917 Oracle Database, test system licensing 2,173 Oracle WebLogic Suite for hosting WAM applications, production system 13,083 Oracle WebLogic Suite for hosting WAM applications, test system 1,626 Oracle Internet Developer Suite, 1 license for IT programmers 1,230 Total cost $54,723 Cost 14

15 Attachment 2 APPROVAL FOR AWARD OF ANNUAL CONTRACTS FOR MAINTENANCE AND SUPPORT OF THE DISTRICT S ORACLE WAM SYSTEM R1 WHEREAS, the Oracle WAM system is central to the functioning of the district, and WHEREAS, the Madison Metropolitan Sewerage District (the district ) has determined the need for specialized maintenance and support of the Oracle WAM system, and WHEREAS, district staff does not have the time, expertise or resources to provide that specialized maintenance and support, and WHEREAS, the district recognizes that Oracle specialists will best meet the needs for maintenance and support of the Oracle WAM system, and WHEREAS, Mythics has been recommended by Oracle as our partner to supply the maintenance and support contracts with Oracle, and WHEREAS, Oracle contracts partners will provide the Oracle WAM maintenance and support contracts for the same general costs, and WHEREAS, Mythics has provided the district with several years of excellent customer-focused management on our Oracle WAM support and maintenance contracts, and WHEREAS, the recommended contract is within budgetary limits. NOW, THEREFORE, and following consideration of the above recitals which are incorporated by reference, it is hereby resolved by the Madison Metropolitan Sewerage District Commission as follows: 1. The commission awards the contract for Oracle WAM maintenance and support to Mythics at the proposed contract price of $54, The commission authorizes the chief engineer and director to execute a purchase order for the contracts. 15

16 The above resolution was adopted by the commissioners of the Madison Metropolitan Sewerage District at their meeting held at the district on Jan. 25, MADISON METROPOLITAN SEWERAGE DISTRICT Attested by: Thomas Hovel, President Angela James, Secretary 16

17 COMMISSION AGENDA REPORT Meeting of Jan. 25, 2018 Review and Approval of Sanitary Sewer Extensions Lead Staff: Curt Sauser, Engineering Technician Requested Action: Adopt resolutions approving sanitary sewer extension plans. Attachments: Attachment 1: Sewer Extension Vicinity Map Attachment 2: Sewer Extension Financial Summary Attachment 3: Verona Downtown Streets Reconstruction Phase II Resolution & Map ( R2) Attachment 4: Westmorland Boulevard Assessment District Resolution & Map ( R3) Financial Impact: A plan review fee of $1,425 will be due for the new construction projects for external customers which propose to install new publicly owned sewers. Conveyance facility and treatment plant connection charges will also be due for the lands which can be served from the sewers being installed, as identified above. A plan review fee is not charged for reconstruction projects. Background: The district is directed under Section 66.24(3) of the Wisconsin Statutes and NR108.04(4) of the Wisconsin Administrative Code to review and approve any proposed sanitary sewerage system construction or installation projects within the Madison Metropolitan area for which Wisconsin Department of Natural Resources approval is required. The commission is requested to adopt resolutions for the sanitary sewer extension plans listed below that were reviewed by staff and placed on file with the district. 17

18 Reconstruction Projects: Verona Downtown Streets Reconstruction Phase II, City of Verona The proposed extension will reconstruct 896 LF of 8-inch sanitary sewer on S. Schuman Street and West Park Lane. The project is in the vicinity of the Miller & Sons supermarket in the City of Verona. The sewers are being replaced in conjunction with the street reconstruction project. No additional sanitary sewer service will be provided with this project. Westmorland Boulevard Assessment District , City of Madison The proposed extension will reconstruct 1,414 LF of 8-inch sanitary sewer on Westmorland Boulevard and Hammersley Avenue in the City of Madison. The existing sewers have been determined to be in poor condition and are being replaced with the street reconstruction project. No additional sanitary sewer service will be provided with this project. Analysis and Options: Recommendation: Adopt resolutions approving the sewer extension plans. Key considerations: Plans have been reviewed by the planning department and are acceptable. Option 1: Approve sewer extensions, with modifications determined by the commission. Key considerations: The commission may choose to place conditions on the approval, as necessary. Option 2: Other options brought forward by the commission. Next Steps: Upon commission approval, plans will be forwarded to the Wisconsin DNR for final approval, prior to construction. 18

19 Attachment 1 Return to Agenda Westmorland Blvd Assessment District 2018 City of Madison Downtown Streets Reconstruction Phase II City of Verona Vicinity Map Sewer Extensions 19 Prepared by: CAS Date: 01/22/2018

20 Attachment 2 Sewer Extension - Resolution Approvals - Year 2018 Sewer Plan Agenda Item Sewer Extension Community Proposed Use Meeting Apvl Date 1/25/2018 a. Downtown Streets Reconstruction - Phase II Length and Size Plan Review Fee CFCC (Conveyance Facility Charges) TPCC (Treatment Plant Charges) Sewer Plan Total City of Verona Street Reconstruction 896' - 8" /25/2018 b Westmorland Boulevard Assessment District City of Madison Street Reconstruction 1,414' - 8" Charges Approved: Current Meeting $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 Previous Total Approved (by Resolution) $1, $42, $5, $48, Current Total Approved (by Resolution) $1, $42, $5, $48, Actual vs. Budget comparison Plan Review 2018 Income: Actual Collected $1, Income: Budgeted $99, Percent of Budget 1% ICCAS_apvls.xlsx Day of the year 22 % Yr passed by 6% Interceptor & Treatment Plant $0.00 $1,575, % 20

21 Attachment R2 WHEREAS, plans for sanitary sewer extensions were submitted to the Madison Metropolitan Sewerage District ("the district") for Downtown Streets Reconstruction - Phase II, in the City of Verona, on Jan. 9, 2018, by Jeff Montpas of AECOM, and WHEREAS, the project will replace 896 LF of sanitary sewer on South Shuman Street and West Park Lane, and are being replaced in conjunction with the street reconstruction project, and WHEREAS, no new sanitary sewer service is immediately being provided as a result of this project, and WHEREAS, the proposed sanitary sewer extension will connect to the City of Verona s sewerage facilities and is within the district s Nine Springs Valley Interceptor/Pumping Station 17 basin, and WHEREAS, plan review fees are waived for reconstruction projects, and WHEREAS, connection charges for the areas being served have been paid, and WHEREAS, the district has received a sewer extension review letter # from the Capital Area Regional Planning Commission (CARPC) dated Jan. 19, 2018 stating the CARPC staff has reviewed the proposed extension and determined that it is consistent with the urban service area provisions of the "Dane County Water Quality Plan" and the "Dane County Land Use and Transportation Plan", and WHEREAS, the chief engineer and director of the district has recommended the approval of said plans, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the plans for sanitary sewer extensions for Downtown Streets Reconstruction - Phase II, in the City of Verona, submitted on Jan. 9, 2018, by Jeff Montpas of AECOM, be approved subject to the following conditions: 1. That the City of Verona shall require the presence of an engineer or an inspector on the construction of said sewer extensions who shall make a record showing in detail the construction as built and shall furnish the district with as-built plans in the case of any significant deviations from the original design. 2. That the construction, operation, maintenance and use of said sewer extensions shall be in accordance with the lawful rules and regulations of the district and with the applicable State of Wisconsin plumbing and sewerage codes. 21

22 3. That if construction of the sewer extensions covered by said plans has not commenced within four years following the approval date of this resolution, this approval shall become void and new plans shall be submitted. If construction has commenced but has not been completed within the four-year approval period, the unbuilt portion must be submitted for reapproval if it is a significant portion of the project and would require DNR approval. The above resolution was adopted by the commissioners of the Madison Metropolitan Sewerage District at their meeting held at the district on Jan. 25, MADISON METROPOLITAN SEWERAGE DISTRICT Attested by: Thomas Hovel, President Angela James, Secretary 22

23 Return to Agenda Walgreens Sugar Creek Senior Apartments Miller & Sons Supermarket *2017 Aerial Photography Legend Map Scale Proposed Sewers 0 Existing Sewers Feet Downtown Streets Reconstruction Phase II Prepared by: CAS City of Verona Date: 01/19/2018 MMSD Plan No

24 Attachment R3 WHEREAS, plans for sanitary sewer extensions were submitted to the Madison Metropolitan Sewerage District ("the district") for Westmorland Boulevard Assessment District 2018, in the City of Madison, on Jan. 16, 2018, by Kyle Frank, City Engineering Division, and WHEREAS, the project will replace 1,414 LF of sanitary sewer on Westmorland Boulevard and Hammersley Avenue, within the City s Sunset Village neighborhood. The existing sewers are in poor condition, undersized and are being replaced in conjunction with the street reconstruction project, and WHEREAS, no new sanitary sewer service is being provided as a result of this project, and WHEREAS, the proposed sanitary sewer extension will connect to the City of Madison s sewerage facilities and is within the district s West Interceptor basin, and WHEREAS, plan review fees are waived for reconstruction projects, and WHEREAS, connection charges for the areas being served have been paid, and WHEREAS, the district has received a sewer extension review letter # from the Capital Area Regional Planning Commission (CARPC) dated Jan. 18, 2018 stating the CARPC staff has reviewed the proposed extension and determined that it is consistent with the urban service area provisions of the "Dane County Water Quality Plan" and the "Dane County Land Use and Transportation Plan", and WHEREAS, the chief engineer and director of the district has recommended the approval of said plans, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the plans for sanitary sewer extensions for Westmorland Boulevard Assessment District 2018, in the City of Madison, submitted on Jan. 16, 2018, by Kyle Frank, City Engineering Division, be approved subject to the following conditions: 1. That the City of Madison shall require the presence of an engineer or an inspector on the construction of said sewer extensions who shall make a record showing in detail the construction as built and shall furnish the district with as-built plans in the case of any significant deviations from the original design. 24

25 2. That the construction, operation, maintenance and use of said sewer extensions shall be in accordance with the lawful rules and regulations of the district and with the applicable State of Wisconsin plumbing and sewerage codes. 3. That if construction of the sewer extensions covered by said plans has not commenced within four years following the approval date of this resolution, this approval shall become void and new plans shall be submitted. If construction has commenced but has not been completed within the four-year approval period, the unbuilt portion must be submitted for reapproval if it is a significant portion of the project and would require DNR approval. The above resolution was adopted by the commissioners of the Madison Metropolitan Sewerage District at their meeting held at the district on Jan. 25, MADISON METROPOLITAN SEWERAGE DISTRICT Attested by: Thomas Hovel, President Angela James, Secretary 25

26 Return to Agenda Hoyt Park Reservoir Park Madison Police Mid Town Station Bethany United Methodist Church Our Lady Queen of Peace Parish & School *2017 Aerial Photography Legend Map Scale 0 Proposed Sewers Feet Existing Sewers 26 Westmorland Boulevard Assessment District 2018 City of Madison MMSD Plan No Prepared by: CAS Date: 01/18/2018

27 Return to Agenda COMMISSION AGENDA REPORT Meeting of Jan. 25, 2018 Acceptance of Liquid Processing Facilities Plan for Planning Purposes Lead Staff: Bruce Borelli-Director of Engineering Jeff Klawes-Project Engineer Requested Action: The commission is requested to approve resolution R4 accepting the liquid processing facility plan for future planning purposes. Attachments: Attachment 1: Resolution R4 Attachment 2: DNR Approval Letter Attachment 3: CARPC Concurrence Letter Financial Impact: A total of $977,000 was included in the capital improvements plan (CIP) and capital budget for the liquid processing facilities plan. This includes external services and internal staff time. Staff expects the final total amount to be within this limit, at approximately $960,000. The 2016 liquid processing facilities plan does not directly authorize future expenditures. However, recommendations from the facilities plan will have a significant impact on future district finances. Phase I of the plan is included in current CIP and capital budget. Phases II & III will be addressed in future capital improvement plans and future capital budgets. Total liquid processing improvement costs are summarized as follows: Phase I Phase II Phase III Total Cost (in 2017 dollars) $15.6 million $17.5 million $24.0 million $57.1 million Approximate Timeframe Please note that these are high-level planning estimates in current (2017) dollars and will likely change as the details for each phase become clearer. Background: In 2016, the district s asset management program identified a number of treatment plant liquid-processing needs. It had been over twenty years since the district completed a study of the treatment plant liquid processing system and staff believed that a single facility planning 27

28 effort would best address the needs in a holistic way. The basic purpose of a facility planning effort is to assess the condition of a sewerage system, establish a need for improvements, evaluate options to address system needs and to identify the cost effective alternatives. Specific drivers for this project included: Evaluate future loading conditions and regulatory constraints. Conduct condition assessments for structures, equipment, controls and instrumentation associated with the project. Evaluate current and future peak flow conditions, as well as potential schemes for managing peak wet weather flows, to ensure the plant s hydraulic capacity is capable of handling incoming peak flows. Evaluate aeration systems for treatment performance, energy efficiency, facility impacts and costs to meet future process and nutrient removal requirements. Develop an overall plan to meet the future hydraulic requirements of the influent screening, grit removal and screenings/grit management systems. Develop an overall plan to meet the future hydraulic requirements of the ultraviolet disinfection system. Assess the electrical systems and power reliability for the liquid processing facilities and identify required electrical upgrades. Other miscellaneous plant improvements. Strand Associates were chosen to perform the facilities planning work and the plan was developed over the course of approximately 18 months. The 2016 liquid processing facilities plan (and recommendations from the plan) was presented to the commission on Aug. 31 st, The recommendations included future improvements to the Nine Springs Treatment Plant liquid processing system totaling approximately $57.1 million (in 2017 dollars) over a period of 10+ years. Design for the first set of projects from the plan, called the Liquid Processing Improvements-Phase 1, is scheduled to begin in early 2018, with subsequent phases occurring in later years. At the Aug. 31, 2017 meeting, the commission adopted resolution R4, which directed the following: 1) Submittal of the 2016 liquid processing facilities plan to the Wisconsin Department of Natural Resources (WDNR) and Capitol Area Regional Plan Commission (CARPC) for approval. 2) That a public hearing be conducted. Next steps at that time included staff returning to the commission for consideration of acceptance of the liquid processing facilities plan for planning purposes after the necessary approvals were received and the public hearing was conducted. The public hearing was noticed as required by s. NR (4) and was conducted on Oct. 5, There were no public attendees at the meeting and no written comments from the public were received. A CARPC letter of concurrence (see attachment 3) with the plan was received on 28

29 Sept. 14, 2017, and included no comments. WDNR approval (see Attachment 2) of the plan was received on Jan. 9, In their approval, the WDNR requested that the following proposed project elements be further addressed and documented via future amendment(s) of the facilities plan or preliminary design report(s) and submitted for review and formal approval: Projected effluent quality associated with implementation of the proposed biological contact stabilization/ high-rate activated sludge treatment process capability in particular with regard to ability to meet the applicable effluent ammonia-nitrogen and phosphorus limits. Possible initiation of an aggressive clearwater infiltration/ inflow pilot study. Assessment/documentation of the proposed secondary clarifier stress testing and subsequent computational fluid dynamics modeling results. Assessment/documentation of the proposed bench-scale and full-scale pilot testing and results of the nitrite shunt process operation/ performance to confirm capabilities of the tentatively recommended full-plant implementation of the nitrite shunt process alternative for future nitrogen reduction. Further inspection of the existing 54-inch diameter primary influent pipeline from the east primary junction chamber to the east primary clarifiers to confirm whether rehabilitation or replacement of the pipeline is ultimately recommended. The facilities plan report recommended further evaluation and refinement of these items, so staff concurs with these conditions and will comply with the WDNR request. Analysis and Options: Recommendation: District staff recommends the commission approve resolution R4 accepting the 2016 liquid processing facilities plan for planning purposes. Key considerations: The 2016 plan addresses the needs identified, and when fully implemented, will improve the overall performance, reliability and condition of the treatment plant. A public hearing has been held in accordance with state statutes, CARPC has concurred with the plan, and the WDNR has approved the plan. Therefore, staff believes the plan can be accepted for future planning purposes and will begin implementing the first phase of recommendations in the plan. Professional service agreements and construction contracts for future phases will be presented to the commission for approval as the work proceeds. Option 1: Defer adoption of resolution R4 until staff can return with answers to any questions or concerns the commission may have. 29

30 Key considerations: This will allow time for staff to address any questions or concerns raised by the commission and make the appropriate changes to the facilities plan. Next Steps: If accepted, staff will begin implementing the plan. Initial work includes design of the first phase of improvements recommended by the plan, called the Liquid Processing Improvements-Phase 1. Consideration of design services associated with this work is anticipated at the Feb. 8, 2018, commission meeting. 30

31 Attachment 1 Acceptance of 2016 Liquid Processing Facilities Plan for Planning Purposes R4 WHEREAS, Madison Metropolitan Sewerage District (the district ) determined the need to evaluate improvements required for the liquid processing system at the Nine Springs Waste Water Treatment Plant (the NSWWTP ), and WHEREAS, evaluation of the liquid processing needs at the NSWWTP was accomplished through a facilities planning process, and WHEREAS, facility planning studies are required by Chapter NR 110 Wisconsin Administrative Code for all projects involving new or modified sewerage systems owned by municipal or other nonindustrial entities, and WHEREAS, the basic purpose of facility planning is to assess the condition of a sewerage system, establish a need for improvement, evaluate options to address system needs and to identify the costeffective alternative, and WHEREAS, the cost effective alternative is that which results in the expenditure of the minimum total resources costs over the planning period, and WHEREAS, total resources costs include monetary costs, environmental and social considerations, and other non-monetary factors, and WHEREAS, improvements that are identified to be necessary and cost-effective in the facilities plan may then be eligible to receive financial assistance from the state Clean Water Fund loan program, and WHEREAS, a primary purpose of this facilities plan was to ensure that the treatment plant s hydraulic capacity is capable of managing peak flow events and to address critical liquid stream assets that are nearing the end of their useful life, and WHEREAS, the planning period for the 2016 liquid processing facilities plan was 2040, and WHEREAS, elements of the 2016 liquid processing facilities plan included: Evaluation of future loading conditions and regulatory constraints. Condition assessments for structures, equipment, controls and instrumentation associated with the project. 31

32 Evaluation of current and future peak flow conditions, as well as potential schemes for managing peak wet weather flows. Evaluation of aeration systems for treatment performance, energy efficiency, facility impacts and costs to meet future process and nutrient removal requirements. Development of an overall plan to meet the future hydraulic requirements of the influent screening, grit removal and screenings/grit management systems. Development of an overall plan to meet the future hydraulic requirements of the ultraviolet disinfection system. Assessment of the electrical systems and power reliability for the liquid processing facilities, and WHEREAS, the 2016 liquid processing facilities plan was developed over the course of approximately 16 months and included numerous workshops and review meetings, and a series of technical memoranda, each devoted to a specific topic and/or area of the planning study, and WHEREAS, the 2016 liquid processing facilities plan was prepared by Strand Associates in conjunction with district staff, and WHEREAS, a public hearing concerning the 2016 facilities plan was conducted in accordance with s. NR (4); and, WHEREAS, a letter of concurrence with the 2016 liquid processing facilities plan was received from the Capital Area Regional Planning Commission on Sep. 14, 2017, and WHEREAS, a letter of approval (with conditions) for the 2016 liquid processing facilities plan was received from the Wisconsin Department of Natural Resources on Jan. 9, NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Madison Metropolitan Sewerage District Commission, and following consideration of the above recitals which are incorporated by reference, as follows: 1. The commission accepts the 2016 liquid processing facilities plan as a planning document and the plan will be used to guide future capital improvements to the liquid processing system at the Nine Springs Wastewater Treatment Plant. 32

33 The above resolution was adopted by the commissioners of the Madison Metropolitan Sewerage District at their meeting held in the district office on Jan. 25, MADISON METROPOLITAN SEWERAGE DISTRICT Attested by: Thomas Hovel, President Angela James, Secretary 33

34 Attachment 2 34 Return to Agenda

35 Return to Agenda 35

36 36

37 Attachment 3 Sent via September 14, 2017 Mr. Jeffrey Klawes, PE Madison Metropolitan Sewerage District 1610 Moorland Road Madison, WI RE: Madison Metropolitan Sewerage District 2016 Liquid Processing Facilities Plan Dear Mr. Klawes: Pursuant to Section NR (4) of the Wisconsin Administrative Code, the Capital Area Regional Planning Commission has reviewed the 2016 Liquid Processing Facilities Plan for the Madison Metropolitan Sewerage District, prepared by Strand Associates in association with Brown and Caldwell, dated August The flow and loading estimates used as the basis for this facilities plan are consistent with the range of the 2040 population forecasts for the MMSD service area. These forecasts were based on official population projections for the MMSD service area, and are consistent with the Dane County Water Quality Management Plan as revised and updated through July You should include a copy of this letter in your submittal to the Wisconsin Department of Natural Resources. Please contact us if you have any questions or if we can be of any further assistance. Sincerely, Mike Rupiper, PE, ENV SP Director of Environmental Resources Planning 37

38 COMMISSION AGENDA REPORT Meeting of Jan. 25, 2018 Approval of First Amendment to memorandum of understanding Regarding Allocation and Payment of Connection Fees for the Community of Bishops Bay Development Lead Staff: Todd Gebert, Capital Planning Engineer Requested Action: The commission is requested to adopt resolution R5 approving the first amendment to the memorandum of understanding regarding allocation and payment of connection fees for The Community of Bishops Bay development. Attachment 1: Resolution R5 Attachment 2: Exhibit A-1 - Map of MOU Area Financial Impact: The proposed amendment may change the amount of conveyance facility connection charges revenue from The Community of Bishops Bay development by up to plus or minus approximately $41,000 over the life of the development. That is about 2.5 percent of anticipated revenue of $1.7 million. (All dollars in this report are given as present-day values. Actual rates will be escalated over time per existing policy in district connection charges regulation.) Background: In June 2015, the City of Middleton, the Town of Westport and the district entered into a memorandum of understanding (MOU) for the collection of district connection charges associated with the Bishops Bay golf course and future development in The Community of Bishops Bay. As part of this agreement connection charges for the golf course were considered paid, but the amount due was transferred to other developable lands in The Community of Bishops of Bay for the purposes of computing a new connection charge rate. As outlined in the MOU, the district seeks to recover approximately $1.7 million in connection charges from lands within the MOU area (exclusive of the golf course), to cover the cost of conveyance system capacity. A special connection charge rate was set assuming a net chargeable area of acres. In March of 2016, the district received sewer extension plans for The Community of Bishops Bay, The Back Nine Phase 4. The Phase 4 development proposed the improvement of approximately 4.5 acres of lands within the Bishops Bay golf course. These lands were not 38

39 included in the net chargeable area that was identified in the original MOU. The sewer extension plans were conditionally approved by the commission at the April 28, 2016 meeting with the understanding that an amendment to the MOU would be executed by all parties prior to the approval of any subsequent phases. The purpose of the amendment was to clarify how much actual net chargeable area would be allowed to change from the assumed amount before the terms of the MOU would need to be revisited. The other parties to the MOU have agreed to the amendment. The proposed resolution would add the district's approval and complete the amendment. Analysis and Options: The amendment specifies that a cumulative increase or decrease of up to ten (10) acres of net chargeable area within the MOU area shall not result in a change to the conveyance facility connection charge rate or the application of said rate to any net chargeable areas. The parties agree to review and adjust the MOU if the cumulative net increase or decrease in net chargeable area exceeds that amount for all developed lands in the MOU area. Ten acres is approximately 2.5 percent of the original estimated chargeable area. Recommendation: The commission is requested to adopt resolution R5 approving the first amendment to the memorandum of understanding regarding allocation and payment of connection fees for The Community of Bishops Bay development. Key considerations: The amendment allows flexibility for future development while also protecting each party from overpayment or underpayment of connection charges. The City of Middleton and Town of Westport have approved the amendment. Option 1: The commission may specify an alternate limit for the cumulative increase or decrease in net chargeable area. Key considerations: Adjustments to the net chargeable area limit may not be acceptable to the other parties. Next Steps: None needed. 39

40 Attachment 1 FIRST AMENDMENT TO MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING REGARDING ALLOCATION AND PAYMENT OF CONNECTION CHARGES FOR THE COMMUNITY OF BISHOPS BAY DEVELOPMENT R5 WHEREAS, effective June 18, 2015, the City of Middleton, Town of Westport and the district (collectively the parties ) entered into a memorandum of understanding (MOU) regarding the conveyance facility connection charge (CFCC) rate to be applied to lands within the Bishops Bay golf course and The Community of Bishops Bay development, otherwise known as the MOU area, and WHEREAS, the MOU established a methodology for calculating the CFCC rate and applying it to the net chargeable areas within the MOU area, and WHEREAS, the parties wish to amend the MOU to provide additional clarity regarding the conditions under which the connection charge rate shall be revisited as development proceeds within the MOU area. NOW, THEREFORE, and following consideration of the above recitals which are incorporated by reference, it is hereby resolved by the Madison Metropolitan Sewerage District Commission as follows: 1. The commission president and district chief engineer and director shall execute the first amendment to the memorandum of understanding regarding allocation and payment of connection charges for The Community of Bishops Bay development. The above resolution was adopted by the commissioners of the Madison Metropolitan Sewerage District at their meeting held at the district on Jan. 25, MADISON METROPOLITAN SEWERAGE DISTRICT Attested by: Thomas Hovel, President Angela James, Secretary 40

41 Attachment 2 Return to Agenda Acres CT H Legend "M " *2014 Aerial Photography CTH "M" CTH "Q" Oncken Rd Lake Mendota M.O.U. Area City of Middleton Exhibit A 1 The Community of Bishops Bay Connection Charge Rate M.O.U. 41 Prepared by: CAS Date: 06/17/2015

42 Return to Agenda Central USA Boundary Oncken Rd This Parcel NOT included in M.O.U Acres TOTAL Acres CTH "M" CTH "Q" This Parcel NOT included in M.O.U. Phase Acres Acres Phase Acres Fox Bluff Limited SA Boundary (Middleton) (Westport) (Golf Course) TOTAL ACRES *2014 Aerial Photography CT H Middleton Service Area "M " Legend Westport Service Area Lake Mendota Bishops Bay Golf Course (The Back Nine) Exhibit A 2 The Community of Bishops Bay Connection Charge Rate M.O.U. 42 Prepared by: CAS Date: 06/17/2015

43 COMMISSION AGENDA REPORT Meeting of Jan. 25, 2018 Pumping Station 7 Improvements: Review and Approval of Design Phase Engineering Services Lead Staff: Dave Lundey, Electrical Construction Manager John Bembinster, Electrical Engineer Requested Action: The commission is requested to approve resolution R6 awarding design phase engineering services for the Pumping Station 7 improvements to Strand Associates at a cost not to exceed $258,700. Attachments: Attachment 1: Summary of Pricing from Consultant Proposals Attachment 2: Resolution ( R6) Financial Impact: The proposed design services cost of $258,700 is included in the 2018 Capital Improvements Plan and 2018 Capital Budget and is within the $300,000 budgeted amount. The total estimated project cost is $3.83 million and is broken-down as follows: Item Estimated Cost District Staff (entire project) $ 317,000 Consultant Services-Design $ 300,000 Consultant Services-Construction $ 136,000 Construction $ 3,080,000 Total $3,833,000 Background: Pumping Station 7, one of the most critical assets in the district s collection system, was originally built in 1950 and pumped roughly 40 percent (or 16 million gallons) of wastewater to the treatment plant each day. The station now works in tandem with Pumping Station 18, and the two stations continue to provide critical redundancy and resiliency to the district s conveyance system. Pumping Station 7 is nearly 70 years old and was last rehabilitated 25 years ago (i.e., in 1992). Given the age of the station, the time that has elapsed since the last rehabilitation and the complexities of operating Pumping Station 7 in tandem with Pumping Station 18, district staff have recommended a number of potential improvements at Pumping Station 7 that are needed 43

44 to keep this critical facility operating in an efficient and effective manner. The most pressing needs are replacement of the control system and the HVAC system to mitigate the corrosion of electrical gear and control systems. The following is a list of potential improvements and key objectives associated with the project: Replacement of existing controllers and control system. Replacement of electrical switchgear (including outdoor transformers and utility equipment). Installation of an odor control system. Replacement or modifications to the HVAC system. Separation of control room space from garage and screen room. Installation of variable speed drive(s) to optimize pumping operations. Replacement of manual valves with electrically actuated valves. Other improvement identified during the design process. A scope of work concerning these potential improvements was developed and requests for proposals were sent directly to 11 consulting firms. The work was also advertised on a regional project communication/solicitation website and in the local newspaper. Proposals were received from four firms. A team of five district employees from various workgroups reviewed the proposals. The district selection committee evaluated each consultant s proposal on the following criteria: project approach, key technical issues, strength of the project team, qualifications, pricing and schedule. Analysis and Options Recommendation: The commission is requested to approve resolution R6 awarding the Pumping Station 7 improvements design services to Strand Associates. Key considerations: The selection followed the district s professional services process, which is qualificationbased, and considers all the criteria noted above. Strand has the necessary staff and resources to complete this project, and its not-toexceed budget of $258,700 is reasonable when compared to past pumping station rehabilitation design costs. Strand s proposed amount of $258,700 was the lowest-cost proposal and is well within the budgeted amount of $300,000. Strand has a complete grasp of the issues required for the project design and their approach to the work was detailed and concise. Strand has extensive past experience with the district pumping station projects and is very familiar with district requirements and preferences. Strand is very familiar with external stakeholders, including the City of Monona and the nearby Yahara waterfront redevelopment team. Strand is a local firm, with the services being provided from their Madison office. 44

45 Strand s proposal included extensive discussion and time devoted to sustainable issues. Option 1: Request additional information as-needed and have staff return at a later date to address the questions. Key considerations: This would allow time to address any questions or concerns the commission may have with the award. This would delay the project slightly. This would not impact the overall project schedule or budget. Option 2: Direct staff to modify the scope or schedule of the project. Key considerations: The commission could direct staff to modify the scope of the project and delete certain aspects or add other items they deem necessary. Depending on the nature of the changes, this could have an impact on the overall project budget. The commission could delay the project. This could impact the overall project budget, as construction costs are likely to rise in the future. Next Steps: District staff recommends award of design engineering services to Strand Associates. Following completion of an agreement, Strand will begin the design work, with completion scheduled for late

46 Attachment 1 Summary of Pricing from Consultant Proposals Pumping Station 7 Improvements Company Amount Strand $ 258,700 MSA $ 330,850 Applied Technologies $ 349,707 AECOM $ 490, ,000 46

47 Attachment 2 AWARD OF DESIGN PHASE ENGINEERING SERVICES FOR THE PUMPING STATION 7 IMPROVEMENTS RESOLUTION R6 WHEREAS, the Madison Metropolitan Sewerage District (the district ) has determined that improvements to Pumping Station 7 are needed to ensure that the station continues to operate effectively and reliably, and WHEREAS, potential improvements include replacement of existing control system, replacement of electrical switchgear (including outdoor transformers and utility equipment), installation of an odor control system, replacement or modifications to the HVAC system, separation of control room space from garage and screen room, installation of variable speed drive(s) to optimize pumping operations, and replacement of manual valves with electrically actuated, and WHEREAS, district staff does not have the expertise or resources to perform the work, and WHEREAS, costs for the design phase engineering services were included in the district s Capital Improvements Plan and Capital Budget, and WHEREAS, district staff prepared a request for proposals (the RFP ) for this work and distributed the RFP to consultants, and WHEREAS, district staff advertised the work as required the district s procurement policies, and WHEREAS, the district received proposals from several interested consultants, and WHEREAS, the recommended proposal is within budgetary limits. NOW, THEREFORE, and following consideration of the above recitals which are incorporated by reference, it is hereby resolved by the Madison Metropolitan Sewerage District Commission, as follows: 1. The commission awards the design engineering services contract for the Pumping Station 7 improvements to Strand Associates at the proposed contract price of $258, As set forth in the commission transaction approval authority policy, any amendments to the work that exceed 10 percent of the proposed price will require commission approval. 47

48 3. The commission authorizes the chief engineer and director to execute a design phase engineering services agreement for this work on behalf of the district. The above and foregoing resolution R6 was duly adopted at a meeting of the Madison Metropolitan Sewerage District commission on Jan. 25, MADISON METROPOLITAN SEWERAGE DISTRICT COMMISSION Attested by: Thomas D. Hovel, President Angela James, Secretary Incorporated by Reference: Request for Proposal (RFP) for Pumping Station 7 Improvements Design Services Proposal from Strand Associates 48

49 Return to Agenda COMMISSION AGENDA REPORT Meeting of Jan. 25, 2018 Study Session on Inclusion and Diversity Lead Staff: Jenni Peters, Human Resources Manager Requested Action: The commission is requested to provide guidance that will assist staff with bringing forward a recommendation for an inclusion and diversity scorecard. Attachments: None. Financial Impact: There is no financial impact at this time. The district budgeted $25,000 for inclusion and diversity efforts in Background: The district officially began an inclusion and diversity initiative in The goals are to create a culture of inclusion, have a workforce representative of our community and increase the cultural competence of the organization as measured by the Intercultural Development Inventory (IDI). The organization has completed a baseline IDI assessment of cultural competence, foundational training and respectful workplace training. An inclusion and diversity strategic plan has been developed and is being implemented. In 2018, we are embarking on a three year partnership with the Young Womens Christian Association to further support our efforts with continued training, equity impact assessment with a focus on the hiring process and an evaluation of our policies and procedures. Analysis and Options The study session will focus on sharing information on the district inclusion and diversity initiative and obtaining commission interests for the development of an inclusion and diversity scorecard. Next Steps: Staff to return to the commission in 2018 with an inclusion and diversity scorecard recommendation. 49

50 Madison Metropolitan Sewerage District Nine Springs Wastewater Treatment Plant Flow Data (Data from Flows&Performance&AerationQuery) Hauled Wastes, gallons per day Lagoon Flows Final Effluent (MGD) Biosolids (MGD) Raw Waste to POTW Waste to To From W4 Badfish Badger Mill Class A Class B Month (MGD) Headworks Sludge Digesters Total (MGD) (MGD) Recycle Creek Creek Created to Storage to Land Jan ,519 1,935 2,592 57, Feb ,514-2,231 57, Mar ,640 1,290 9,239 90, Apr ,945 2,883 4,875 93, May ,162-3,484 81, Jun ,139 1,667 2,300 82, Jul , , Aug ,999 2, , Sep ,881 1, , Oct ,558 1, , Nov ,769 2, , Dec ,990 4, , Avg ,748 1,669 2,157 81, Jan ,318 2, , Feb ,791 1, , Mar ,515 1, , Apr ,173 1, , May , , Jun ,650 1, , Jul ,387 1, , Aug ,621 1, , Sep , , Oct ,979 1, , Nov ,170 1, , Dec ,606 1, , Avg ,126 1, , Jan ,299 1, , Feb ,386 1, , Mar , , Apr ,571 2, , May , , Jun ,296 2, , Jul , , Aug ,222 1, , Sep , , Oct , ,898 89, Nov ,732 1, , Dec ,363 1, , Avg ,536 1, ,

51 Madison Metropolitan Sewerage District Nine Springs Wastewater Treatment Plant Performance Data (Data from Flows&Performance&AerationQuery) Raw Wastewater (mg/l) Final Effluent (mg/l) Digester/Methane Gas Data (kcf/day) Process Air Usage (cubic feet) per per Pound per Pound Month BOD TSS TKN TP BOD TSS NH4 TP Cl Produced Purchased Used Flared Gallon BOD Removed TOD Removed Jan Feb Mar Apr , May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Avg Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Avg Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Avg

52 Madison Metropolitan Sewerage Commission Regulatory Review January 2018 Paul G. Kent and Vanessa D. Wishart Legislation: AB 770. This is an omnibus bill designed to address a variety of municipal issues that have been raised by the development community. An earlier version imposed a substantial imitation on municipal stormwater management. That has now been scaled back. There is also language on impact fees, eminent domain and municipal contracts, none of which have major impacts on the District. AB 774. This is a bill directed at Milwaukee Metropolitan Sewerage District. It basically provides that if there is a complaint to the PSC, the PSC will no longer give deference to MMSD s rates or practices. The bill arises out of a dispute between Milwaukee and one of its outlying communities and was not intended to affect Chapter 200 entities. Proposed Rules NR 149 Laboratory Certification Standards. DNR has released responses to comments on changes to the lab certification rules in NR 149 that would apply to municipal as well as commercial labs. We are in the process of reviewing these comments. Designated Use and Site Specific Limits. DNR reconvened the advisory committee on these rules on September 28, 2017, after having made a number of adjustments to the rule package since our last advisory committee meeting in the spring. The committee met again on December 14, 2017, to review changes to proposed rule language. It will be meeting in March or April to discuss additional revisions to rule language regarding site specific criteria. Bacteria Standards. There has been discussion about a proposed rule to change the bacteria standard from fecal coliform to E. Coli. DNR is now anticipating that the draft economic impact analysis will be released in fall of [No change] WPDES Process Improvements Study Group. DNR is convening a study group on process improvements for WPDES wastewater permitting. DNR held a second meeting on December 1, DNR plans to convene three subgroups to address the following topics: (1) Permit Applications; (2) Consistency/Certainty; and (3) Emerging Technology/Policy Implementation. This latter subgroup would consider variance issues and other policy matters. The next meeting will likely be held in the spring. [No change] Rules in Scoping Stage Anti-degradation Standards. The scope statement for authorization to revise the anti-degradation standards in NR 207 was approved by the Natural Resources Board in October. Anti-degradation is a set of requirements that applies to new or increased discharges to surface waters. These changes could impact the District in future permits. The current rule has been largely unchanged since 1989 and the revisions are designed in part to bring the rule in line with new EPA regulations issued in August The scope statement estimates that it will take 3 years to develop the rule. [No change] Other Issues Chloride Variances. Many municipal permittees are in ongoing discussions with DNR regarding implementation of chloride variances. Triennial Standards Review. DNR is in the process of accepting public input as part of the process for the Triennial Standards Review on water quality. The deadline to suggest topics is January 25,

53 Note: All dates are tentative and subject to change Meeting Date Type of Meeting 01/25/18 Commission Meeting 02/8/18 Commission Meeting Agenda Topics Introduction of new employees Kelly Sullivan, Project Engineer and Rodger Weaver, Relief Operator Consent Review and Approval of Sewer Extension Plans Sauser Approval for Award of Annual Contracts for Maintenance and Support of the District s Oracle WAM System-Dunn Acceptance of Liquid Processing Facilities Plan for Planning Purposes Borelli Approval of First Amendment to Memorandum of Understanding Regarding Allocation and Payment of Connection Fees for the Community of Bishops Bay Development - Gebert Pumping Station 7 Improvements: Review and Approval of Professional Services Agreement Lundey/Bembinster Study Session: Inclusion and Diversity Peters Chief Engineer and Director s Report Mucha 2017 Plant Performance Review - Mucha Operations Report Dundee Regulatory Review Kent Excused Absence: Ken Clark Excused Absence: Brad Murphy Excused Absence: Ezra Meyer via GoToMeeting Consent Cash Statements Review and Approval of Sewer Extension Plans Sauser Liquid Processing Improvements Phase 1: Review and Approval of Design Phase Engineering Klawes Review of Bids and Award of Contract: Southeast Interceptor Rehab Upstream of Pumping Station 9 Hjellen Acceptance of Work: Pumping Station 15 Rehabilitation - Hurlebaus Struvite Update-Seib Chief Engineer and Director s Report Mucha Regulatory Review Kent